Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A simple rectangular microstrip patch antenna is a light miniaturization of the microstrip antenna in terms of the size
weight, low cost, conformal antenna. But, while designing a [3]. Various researchers are working on the use of
microstrip patch, as the operating frequency decreases, size of metamaterials to design electrically small antenna [4]. Thus,
the patch antenna increases which is a major dis-advantage. there are various methods of using metamaterial structures. A
Hence, miniaturization techniques can be employed to reduce detailed analysis on the design, fabrication and testing of
the size of the antenna while simultaneously reducing the double negative metamaterials can be obtained in reference [5]
An efficient way to reduce the resonant frequency is to use being carried out on designing antennas based on mu-negative
Defected Ground Structure (DGS). The various advantages of loading [6], [7].
DGS include Bandwidth improvement, surface wave The explanation related to this paper is carried out in four
suppression, cross polarization reduction, reduction in mutual different parts. The first part gives the basic introduction about
coupling and most importantly size reduction. the paper and its contents, the second part gives details about
Now-a-days, wireless applications require antennas that have all the dimensions related to the structure, the third part shows
large bandwidth, appreciable gain, proper impedance matching all the results obtained and part four concludes the paper.
1002
This full-text paper was peer-reviewed and accepted to be presented at the IEEE ICCSP 2015 conference.
is 9 .5 rum. The gap (g), width (w) and spacing (s) between the III. RESULTS
SSRR is 0.5 rum.
Fig. 1 shows the proposed antenna structure.
The DGS related dimensions are as follows: V= 10 rum,
V'= 1.5 rum and H= 4 rum. W
��
.l�
Lp Slot u
L
E
I
r = Dielectric constant of substrate
Feed_L
Step 2: Calculation of Effective dielectric constant
[ -If?
The effective dielectric constant as a result of fringing = 3.875 r--
J
E +1 E -1 h - w
1. E =_r_+_r_ 1+ 12-
eff
2 2 Iv
w
= c
eff 2fO �E
L
L
eff
Step 4: Calculation for extension in length
(wh + 0.2641)
( EejJ +0.3)
M=0.412h
b) Bottom ,iew
( EejJ -0.258) (: + 0.8) Fig. 1. Proposed Antenna Structure a) top view b) bottom view
antenna.
1003
This full-text paper was peer-reviewed and accepted to be presented at the IEEE ICCSP 2015 conference.
t
Fig. 5. Total Gain ofthe antenna
�1500 TABLE I
�
COMPARISTON TABLE FOR UNLOADED VERSUS METAMATERrAL
LOADED MICROSTRIP PATCH ANTENNA
-20.00 + + - - + + - +- +- + + + -
Antenna
Antenna parameter with
Sr. no. Parameters parameter
SSRR
without SSRR
Reflection
I. Coefficient at -25.01 dB -28.6775 dB
,�
2.44 Ghz
Freq[GHz]
2. Gain 1.423 dB 1.5268 dB
3. Impedance 54.36 ohm 52.45 ohm
Fig. 3. Reflection Coefficient of the unloaded microstrip patch antenna with Radiation
DGS. 4. 84.29 83.75
Efficiency
Front to back
To increase the gain, reflection coefficient and to match the 5. I.I48 2.3953
ratio
port impedance a SSRR is loaded between the square slot.
Fig. 4 shows the reflection coefficient of the SSRR loaded IV. CONCLUSION
microstrip patch antenna. Fig. 5 gives the gain associated with
A rectangular microstrip patch antenna is designed at the
the complete structure. Table 1 shows the effect of adding
working frequency of 5.2 GHz which is then miniaturized to
square split ring resonators, comparison of the various antenna
the operating frequency of 2.44 GHz using a square slot and an
parameters obtained with and without the square split ring
I-shaped DGS. A size reduction of 21.38 % is achieved. The
resonators.
metamaterial structure gives increased reflection coefficient,
XY Plott gain and a impedance of 52.45 ohms at 2.44 GHz. The
Bandwidth obtained is 103.6 MHz which covers the complete
2.4 Ghz band.
-5.00
REFERENCES
·10,00
[I] V. G. Veselago, 'The electrodynamics of substances with
"
0
�15,OO simultaneously negative values of t: and Jl, Soviet Physics Uspekhi, vol.
� 10, pp. 509-514,1968.
·20,00 [2] B.-I. Wu, W. Wang, 1. Pacheco, X. Chen, T. Grzegorczyk and 1. A.
Kong, "A study of using Metamaterials as Antenna Substrate to enhance
gain", in Progress in Electromagnetics Research, PJER 51, 295-328,
·25.00
2005
[3] N. Ripin, W. M. A. W. Saidy, A. A. Sulaiman, N. E. A. Rashid, M. F.
·30,00 Hussin, "Miniaturization of Microstrip Patch Antenna Through
1.00 1.50 2.00 2 3.00 3.50 4.00
FreqGHz] Metamaterial Approach", in
2013 iEEE Student Conjerence on
Research and Development (SCOReD), 16 -17 December 2013,
Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Fig. 4. Reflection Coefficient ofthe SSRR loaded microstrip patch antenna [4] R. W. Ziolkowski, "Design, fabrication, and testing of double negative
metamaterials," iEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation," vol.
It was observed that by inserting the square split ring 51, No.7, pp. 1516-1529,2003.
[5] 1.G. Joshi, Shyam S. Pattnaik, S. Devi and M. R. Lohokare, "Electrically
resonators in the center of the patch, the reflection coefficient
Small Patch Antenna Loaded with Metamaterial," JETE Journal oj
was changed from -25.01 dB to -28 .6775 dB. An increment in Research (20I0 Accepted).
the gain from 1.423 dB to1.5268 dB is observed. The key [6] Filiberto Bilotti, Andrea Alu, and Lucio Vegni, "Design of miniaturized
advantage of using the SSRR is that by properly selecting the metamaterial patch antenna with ,u-negative loading, " iEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 56 , No. 6 , June 2008,
dimensions of the SSRR, it does not change the operating
pp. 1640-1647.
frequency of the unloaded patch. [7] J. G. Joshi, Shyam S. Pattnaik, S. Devi and M. R. Lohokare,
It is observed that by simply varying 'V' and 'H' in the "Metamaterial Embedded Wearable Rectangular Microstrip Patch
DGS structure, various resonant frequencies can be obtained Antenna" in international Journal oj Antennas and Propagation,
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 974315,9 pages.
as well as the antenna can be further miniaturized, which was
[8] Balanis, Constantine, "Antenna theory - Analysis and Design", John
observed while carrying out the parametric analysis.
Wiley & Sons Ltd, Reprinted 1997.
1004