Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

Macke V.

Camps

FACTS:

Macke and Chandler are business partners under the firm name of Macke, Chandler & Company. They sold various goods for the
Washington Café to Ricardo Flores, who represented himself as the agent of Jose Camps. Flores paid a P174 leaving a balance and
informed them that he does not have the necessary funds on hand and that he would have to wait for the return of Jose Camps. However,
Jose Camps failed to pay the said balance denying the authority of Flores. A written contract was introduced as evidence. The written
contract shows that Galmes (owner of the building) had subrented the building where the business was conducted which Jose Camps
signed as “sublessee” and Ricardo Flores’ signed as “managing agent.”

ISSUE: Whether or not Ricardo Flores is an agent of Jose Camps.

DECISION: YES. The contract introduced in evidence sufficiently establishes the fact that the defendant was the owner of business and of
the bar, and the title of "managing agent" attached to the signature of Flores which appears on that contract, together with the fact that, at
the time the purchases in question were made, Flores was apparently in charge of the business, performing the duties usually entrusted to
managing agent, leave little room for doubt that he was there as authorized agent of the defendant. One who clothes another with apparent
authority as his agent and holds him out to the public as such, can not be permitted to deny the authority of such person to act as his agent
to the prejudice of innocent third parties dealing with such agent in good faith and in the honest belief that he is what he appears to be.

Вам также может понравиться