Federal Waterway Engeneering and Research

Institute
(Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau - BAW)

Code of Practice
Use of Geotextile Filters on Waterways
(MAG)

Edition 1993
 Code of Practice
Use of Geotextile Filters on Waterways
(MAG)

Publisher (self publishing house ) :

Kußmaulstraße 17, 76187 Karlsruhe, Telefon (0721) 9726-0, Telefax (0721) 9726-454
Reprint, translation or other reproductions even extracts permitted only by editor approval
(C) BAW 1993
Contents Page

Symbols used ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 4

1 Preliminary remarks............................................................................................................................................................... 5
2 Terms ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Geotextile........................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Nonwoven.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.3 Woven................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
2.4 Composite material ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5
2.5 Filter layer.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.6 Separation layer ................................................................................................................................................................................. 5
2.7 Drainage layer.................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.8 Erosion............................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.9 Suffosion............................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
2.10 Colmatation...................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.11 Dynamic hydraulic loading.............................................................................................................................................................. 5
2.12 Static hydraulic loading ................................................................................................................................................................... 5
3 Principles for the use of a geotextile as a filter layer or separation layer........................................................................... 5
3.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
3.2 Necessity for a geotextile................................................................................................................................................................... 5
3.2.1 Filter layer....................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
3.2.2 Separation layer .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6
3.3 Basis for design.................................................................................................................................................................................. 6
3.3.1 Subsoil ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
3.3.1.1 Items of subsoil report................................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.3.1.2 Non-cohesive soils ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.3.1.3 Cohesive soils .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6
3.3.1.4 Inhomogeneous subgrade............................................................................................................................................................. 6
3.3.1.5 Suffosive soils.............................................................................................................................................................................. 6
3.3.2 Hydraulic loading ........................................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.3.3 Mechanical loads ............................................................................................................................................................................ 7
3.3.3.1 General......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.3.3.2 Construction works ...................................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.3.3.3 Waterway operations ................................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.3.4 Quality of water in the filter zone ................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.3.4.1 pH-value....................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.3.4.2 Chemical and biological factors................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.3.5 UV-resistance.................................................................................................................................................................................. 7
3.3.6 Penetrability by roots ...................................................................................................................................................................... 7
4 Types of filter and armour-layer construction .................................................................................................................... 8
4.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
4.2 Geotextile directly on the subgrade (standard application)................................................................................................................ 8
4.3 Geotextile on a granular levelling sublayer ....................................................................................................................................... 8
4.4 Geotextile combined with an unbound granular filter........................................................................................................................ 8
4.5 Granular interlayer between geotextile and top layer ........................................................................................................................ 8
4.6 Geotextile with a structural addition .................................................................................................................................................. 8
4.6.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................ 8
4.6.2 Geotextile with an additional layer ................................................................................................................................................. 8
4.6.3 Geotextile with attached fascine-grid (sink mattress) ..................................................................................................................... 9
4.6.4 Geotextile with mineral filler.......................................................................................................................................................... 9
4.7 Edges of a slope protection ................................................................................................................................................................ 9
4.8 Connections with structures ............................................................................................................................................................... 9
4.9 Overlaps and seams............................................................................................................................................................................ 9
4.10 Armour layers .................................................................................................................................................................................. 9
5 Requirements........................................................................................................................................................................... 10
5.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................... 10
5.2 Filtration stability............................................................................................................................................................................... 10
5.2.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................ 10
5.2.2 Soil-type design procedure of the BAW ......................................................................................................................................... 10
5.2.2.1 Basis............................................................................................................................................................................................. 10
5.2.2.2 Application principle for permeable top layers............................................................................................................................ 10
5.2.2.3 Application principle for impermeable top layers........................................................................................................................ 11
5.2.3 Filter rules ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 11
5.2.3.1 General......................................................................................................................................................................................... 11
5.2.3.2 Design of a filter layer ................................................................................................................................................................. 11
5.2.3.3 Design of a separation layer......................................................................................................................................................... 12
5.3 Material properties .............................................................................................................................................................................. 12
3
Contents Page

5.3.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................ 12
5.3.2 Permeability .................................................................................................................................................................................... 12
5.3.3 Opening size ................................................................................................................................................................................... 12
5.3.4 Layer thickness ............................................................................................................................................................................... 12
5.3.4.1 Related to the filtration function .................................................................................................................................................. 12
5.3.4.2 Related to the separation function................................................................................................................................................ 13
5.3.5 Tensile strength and strain .............................................................................................................................................................. 13
5.3.6 Resistance to dynamic perforation loads......................................................................................................................................... 13
5.3.7 Resistance to abrasion loads ........................................................................................................................................................... 13
5.3.8 Resistance to static puncture loads.................................................................................................................................................. 14
5.3.9 Resistance to high temperatures...................................................................................................................................................... 14
5.3.10 Friction coefficient........................................................................................................................................................................ 14
5.3.11 Mass per unit area ......................................................................................................................................................................... 14
6 Tests.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 14
6.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................... 14
6.2 Basic test............................................................................................................................................................................................ 14
6.3 Suitability test .................................................................................................................................................................................... 14
6.4 Quality control during manufacture ................................................................................................................................................... 14
6.5 Control tests by the Principal............................................................................................................................................................. 14
7 Instructions for inviting tenders and for construction works.............................................................................................. 15
7.1 Tender documents.............................................................................................................................................................................. 15
7.2 Construction works ............................................................................................................................................................................ 15
7.2.1 Preparation of the filter subgrade.................................................................................................................................................... 15
7.2.2 Installation in the dry ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15
7.2.3 Installation under water.................................................................................................................................................................. 15
7.3 Inventory documents.......................................................................................................................................................................... 15
8 References................................................................................................................................................................................ 16
9 Index of keywords ................................................................................................................................................................... 17
10 Index of annexes ...................................................................................................................................................................... 18

Symbols used
cu = apparent cohesion of soil
Cu = uniformity coefficient ( defined as d60 / d10 )
di = particle diameter of soil corresponding to i % by weight of finer particles
Di = particle diameter of granular filter corresponding to i % by weight of finer particles
Dw = filtration opening size of a geotextile or its individual layers ( in future intended O90 )
DX = type of top layer construction
h = hydraulic head
∆h = change in hydraulic head
i = hydraulic gradient ( h / T )
IP = plasticity index
k = coefficient of permeability
kn = coefficient of normal permeability of a geotextile
Mt = total mass of soil passing
Ml = mass of soil passing during the last test phase
q = flow rate
T = layer thickness
∆t = time difference
v = flow velocity
Vh = velocity of change in hydraulic head
Vs = ship velocity
wL = liquid limit
wP = plastic limit
β = angle of slope to horizontal
µ = mass per unit area
ϕ' = effective angle of internal friction
σ = normal stress

4
1 Preliminary remarks
This Code of Practice applies to geotextiles used as a filter layer
or separation layer in bank and bottom revetment systems of
waterways and the associated structures such as e.g. dams or
lateral trenches.
A prerequisite for the use of geotextiles is the fulfilment of certain
application-related technical requirements in accordance with the
Technical Supply Conditions for Geotextile Filters (TLG) /1/.
2 Terms
2.1 Geotextile
A geotextile is a manufactured sheet-like permeable textile con-
struction material. It may be fabricated as a nonwoven, woven or
composite material.
2.2 Nonwoven
A nonwoven is a single-layer geotextile fabricated by bonding of
fibre fleeces. Fibre fleeces consist of staple fibres (3-15 cm) or
filaments (endless fibres) randomly orientated /15/. Bonding can be
mechanical (by needle-punching), by adhesion or by cohesion
(melting).
2.3 Woven
A woven is a single-layer geotextile consisting of interlacing thread
systems. Threads in longitudinal direction are called warp threads, in
cross direction weft threads /15/.
2.4 Composite material
A composite material is a multilayer geotextile of which the indivi-
dual layers differ clearly in their structure.
2.5 Filter layer
A filter layer must restrain subsoil under all the possible hydraulic
conditions (mechanical filtration stability), while allowing the
passage of soil pore water without detrimental rising of seepage
line (hydraulic filtration stability).
2.6 Separation layer
A separation layer must prevent intermixing or interpenetration
of adjacent dissimilar granular layers or must prevent erosion
while its permeability - opposed to a filter layer - is of subordinate
importance. At the same time it can be used to promote colmata-
tion, if desired.
2.7 Drainage layer
A drainage layer must collect and transport water in its plane.
2.8 Erosion
Erosion is the removal and thus the particle loss of nearly all soil
fractions by currents of pore water or surface water.
2.9 Suffosion
Suffosion is the displacement or washing-out of fine-soil fractions
by pore water flow without change of the soil skeleton in the
structure.
2.10 Colmatation
Colmatation is the reduction in permeability of a soil or a filter layer
by solid-matter incorporation (clogging, blocking) or by accumu-
lation
2.11 Dynamic hydraulic loading
Hydraulic loads are dynamic in the sense of this code if the change
in hydraulic head ∆h within time ∆t occurs with a velocity
Vh = ∆h/∆t > ksoil
(e.g. quick drawdown of water level, waves, turbulent currents).
They cause relatively high hydraulic gradients in the interface zone
between soil and filter layer and, as a result of this, turbulent flow
through the filter /26/.
2.12 Static hydraulic loading
Hydraulic loads are static in the sense of this code if the change
in hydraulic head ∆h within time ∆t occurs with a velocity
Vh = ∆h/∆t ≤ ksoil
(e.g. slow fluctuations of water level, small wave-heights and flow
velocities). They cause relatively small hydraulic gradients in the
interface zone between soil and filter layer and, as a result of this,
laminar flow through the filter /26/.
3 Principles for the use of a geotextile as a filter
layer or separation layer
3.1 General
The necessary single steps from designing to tendering a geotex-
tile filter are shown in Annex 10. They apply likewise to a sepa-
ration layer.
3.2 Necessity for a geotextile
3.2.1 Filter layer
A filter is necessary between two layers of differing granular ma-
terials if a significant fraction of the finer-grained layer cannot be
restrained by the coarser layer under the expected pore water flow.
The necessity for a geotextile filter can be checked according to
Annex 1.
A geotextile filter layer must be dimensioned with regard to
grain sizes and permeability of the adjacent subsoil, con-
sidering the type of pore water flow (turbulent, laminar, see
2.11, 2.12),
mechanical stresses caused during construction works and by
waterway operations,
chemical properties of water in the filter zone,
possible short-term ultra-violet light (UV) weathering during
construction works and
if need be, penetrability by roots in the zone of fluctuating water
levels and above this, depending on the revetment system
chosen.
5
3.2.2 Separation layer
A separation layer can be needed if
a) intermixing of widely differing granulations is to be preven-
ted with regard to long-term settlements (e.g. sand or topsoil on
coarse gravel or stones, rip-rap groyns on mud, coarse bed
course on fine subsoil),
b) interpenetration of two layers of widely differing grain sizes
shall be prevented with regard to long-term function of one of
the two layers (e.g. rip-rap on clay lining, clay lining on very
coarse subsoil),
c) erosion of subsoil beneath a hard lining (e.g. asphaltic) shall be
prevented in the case of cracks and at the same time self-sealing
of the lining system due to colmatation is to be promoted,
d) a changing compact rock (e.g. sandstone, claystone) is erodible
by weathering, hydraulic impacts or mechanical influences (e.g.
moving of armourstone).
A geotextile separation layer must be designed concerning
safe restraining of subsoil,
mechanical stresses caused during construction works and by
later operations,
chemical properties of water,
possible short-term UV-weathering during construction works
and
penetrability by roots (if desired).
In cases of dynamic impacts caused e.g. by turbulent currents, waves
or vibratory compaction, the need for a separation layer can be
assessed according to Annex 1.
3.3 Basis for design
3.3.1 Subsoil
3.3.1.1 Items of subsoil report
The subsoil report must include the following details and be
representative of the construction section in which the geotextile
filter or separation layer is to be installed:
a) grain-size distribution: this is needed
to check whether a filter (see 3.2.1) or separation layer (see
3.2.2) is necessary;
to check the stability to suffosion (see 3.3.1.5);
for geotextile design (see 5.2);
for assessment of subsoil with regard to non-cohesive or
cohesive nature (see 3.3.1.2, 3.3.1.3);
to assess k-value of subsoil (Annex 4).
b) effective angle of internal friction (ϕ'): this is needed
to assess local stability of slopes exposed to seepage flow
(see 3.3.1.2);
to assess geotextile's friction coefficient (see 5.3.10).
c) coefficient of permeability (k-value): this is needed
to assess the type of hydraulic loading (see 2.11, 2.12);
to assess needed permeability of the geotextile (see 5.3.2).
Determination by laboratory tests is only necessary in cases
where its exact knowledge is required for safety reasons.
Otherwise assessment according to Annex 4 is sufficient.
d) apparent cohesion of subsoil (cu) and plasticity index (Ip):
These are needed for the determination of filtration properties
of a geotextile filter (see 5.2.2.2, 5.2.3).
6
e) sequence and inclination of strata: The advice given in
subclause 3.3.1.4 concerning stratified soils lying in the slope
area must be heeded.
f) quality of water in the filter zone:
The chemical quality of water must be known with regard to
detrimental influences on a geotextile (see 3.3.4).
3.3.1.2 Non-cohesive soils
Sloped non-cohesive soils or soils of low cohesion are susceptible to
sliding or to formation of erosion channels under the impact of pore
water or surface water currents, if the angle of slope is
β ≥ ϕ'/2.
Under the impact of shipping (waves, quick drawdown of water
level) slope instability will occur earlier. This must be considered
when choosing the type of filter construction (see 4).
For filter design, soils with grain fractions d20 ≥ 0,006 mm must be
regarded as non-cohesive (see 5.2), if no more accurate investiga-
tions with respect to the apparent cohesion and plasticity index are
available.
3.3.1.3 Cohesive soils
Cohesive soils have a very low mobility of particles and a very low
permeability. This may be taken into account when designing a filter
(see 5.2). Possible concentrated water veins must be considered
when choosing the type of filter construction (see 4).
3.3.1.4 Inhomogeneous subgrade
A subgrade is inhomogeneous in the sense of this code if there exist
alternating layers of non-cohesive fine-grained or mixed-grained
soils and coarse-grained soils according to DIN 18 196 /16/,
inhomogeneous soils (lenses),
remains of former structures, which are to remain in the subsoil
(e.g. parts of a former armour layer).
This must be taken into account when choosing the type of filter
construction (see 4), if inhomogeneous subgrade is situated below
the highest water level. In the case of e.g. continuous influx of
groundwater, transport of fine-soil particles beneath the geotextile to
a deeper situated and more permeable layer must be prevented.
3.3.1.5 Suffosive soils
Stability of subsoil to suffosion must be proved for non-cohesive
soils with gap gradation or for non-cohesive, non-uniform soils
(Cu ≥ 8). In the case of doubt laboratory tests are recommended.
Since the effective local gradient is generally not known or may
even be enhanced by later measures, geometric stability to suffo-
sion must be checked especially for silty subsoils (Annex 2)/12/13/.
In the case of silty suffosive subsoils the seepage line can be raised
by colmatation of the geotextile caused by leached fine particles
(possible consequences: decrease in stability of slope or of slope
revetment, waterlogging due to a rise in groundwater level).
If the occurence of suffosion is possible, a suitable type of filter
construction must be chosen (see 4) or the geotextile must be
designed according to subclause 5.2.1.
3.3.2 Hydraulic loading
When ascertaining the filtration requirements of a geotextile (see
5.2), the following types of hydraulic loads have to be distin-
guished:
a) dynamic hydraulic loading
b) static hydraulic loading.
Whether dynamic or static hydraulic loading is relevant in the
particular application can be determined using the criteria of
subclauses 2.11 and 2.12.
The hydraulic influence of shipping or comparable hydraulic
impacts always cause dynamic hydraulic filter loading which may
lead to pumping movements of a geotextile in cases where the cover
layer surcharge does not act on the entire geotextile surface
(see 4.10).
3.3.3 Mechanical loads
3.3.3.1 General
During installation or construction works, or even during waterway
operation, a geotextile can be subjected to considerable mechani-
cal loads. For that reason, it must be adequately dimensioned as
regards strength properties, or appropriate precautionary measures
must be taken.
3.3.3.2 Construction works
During construction works a geotextile can be subjected to the
following mechanical stresses:
a) installation of the geotextile
tensile stresses: are unimportant if the geotextile is installed
by rolling it out. When placed under water using a pontoon
tensile forces depend on the flow pressure of currents acting
on the geotextile area /21/ (see 5.3.5).
b) placement of aggregate on the geotextile
tensile stresses: will occur due to spanning of the geotextile
across irregularities in the subgrade under the weight of the
material placed (see 7.2.2).
dynamic perforation stresses: are caused only when very
coarse aggregate (armourstone) is dropped. When placing
under water by dropping from the water surface, drop energy
of stones will be only max. 15% of that registrated in the dry
from a drop height of 2 m (see 5.3.6) /25/20/.
puncture stresses: will occur during compaction works if
any angular material is in contact with the geotextile (see
5.3.8).
c) driving on the layer overlying the geotextile:
puncture stresses: the magnitude of these loads depends
on thickness, grain size, grain shape of overlying layer, on
weight of construction equipment and on strength of subsoil
(see 5.3.8).
3.3.3.3 Waterway operations
The following mechanical loads on a geotextile can be caused
during waterway operations (currents, waves, quick drawdown of
water level):
tensile stresses: can occur in connection with subgrade defor-
mations or uplift pressure in case of quick water level fluctu-
ations, if big cavities with corresponding water volume exist
beneath a geotextile and the cover-layer surcharge does not act
on the entire geotextile surface (see 4.10).
abrasion loads: can be caused by chafing movements of rock
material or movements of a geotextile on sharp-edged structural
elements (see 5.3.7).
3.3.4 Quality of water in the filter zone
3.3.4.1 pH-value
The long-term durability of geotextiles manufactured of the
following fibre raw materials /1/
- Polyacrylic (PAC)
}
- Polyamide (PA)
3 < pH < 12
- Polyethylene (PE)
- Polypropylene (PP)
- Polyester (PES) 3 < pH < 10
is not problematical as regards acidic or basic soils and water if the
pH-value is in the above-mentioned range (Annex 5).
3.3.4.2 Chemical and biological factors
By precipitation or flocculation from the water of e.g.
a) sintering products or
b) ochreous products
the permeability of a geotextile can be considerably reduced .
Sintering can occur due to groundwater containing dissolved lime in
the case of
drop of water pressure (change in flow conditions) or increase of
water temperature together with
oxygen contact.
Groundwater with a fairly high degree of hardness, i.e. a German
degree of hardness ≥ 12° DH, is liable to cause sintering if CO2 is
present at the same time /10/.
Chemical ochre formation must be taken into account if the
groundwater contains dissolved divalent iron or manganese. If water
pressure falls or temperature increases a trivalent insoluble chemical
combination will arise through oxidation (hydroxide), in the
presence of dissolved O2 in the water. This will than flocculate
/10/11/29/.
Ochre formation can also occur on a biological basis due to meta-
bolic activity of iron and manganese microbes /11/.
Sintering and ochre formation are generally only important in the
zone of fluctuating water levels. Thus danger of sintering or ochre
formation must be checked only if the zone of fluctuating water
levels occupies more than 50% of the percolated filter area (e.g. tidal
zone, undammed rivers).
If a possible sintering or ochre formation has to be considered, the
use of a highly permeable granular filter according to MAK /6/ is
recommended.
3.3.5 UV-resistance
The long-term resistance to ultra-violet light (UV) weathering of
geotextiles manufactured of the usual fibre raw materials (see
3.3.4.1) is highly variable (Annex 5). Resistance of UV-sensitive
raw materials can be considerably improved by stabilizers. How-
ever permanent UV- weathering must be prevented by the layer(s)
overlying the geotextile.
3.3.6 Penetrability by roots
Experiences to date show that geotextiles used in waterways are
in principle penetrable by grasses, bushes and trees. Penetrability
will be improved with increasing
- pore size (opening size) and
- mobility of fibres (nonwovens) or yarns (wovens).
7
4 Types of filter and armour-layer construction
4.1 General
When using a permeable armour layer the following types of filter
construction have to be taken into consideration depending on
subsoil, slope inclination, hydraulic loadings and installation
conditions of the geotextile:
a) geotextile directly on the subgrade (standard application),
b) geotextile on a granular levelling sublayer,
c) geotextile combined with an unbound granular filter,
d) granular interlayer between geotextile and armour layer.
The type of filter and armour-layer construction must guarantee,
especially on slopes, a stable interface between geotextile and
subsoil for all possible hydraulic loadings (see 3.3.2), to prevent
the removal of subsoil. Erosion channels beneath the geotextile can
be the initial point of destruction of a bank protection. For this
reason it is necessary that the geotextile is in complete contact with
the subgrade. Beyond this, cavities beneath the geotextile with a
correspondingly large water volume impair local mechanical
stability of a bank revetment in the case of quick water-level
decrease due to uplift pressure.
For the edges of a filter area and their connections to structures a
special type of construction must generally be chosen.
Under an impermeable cover layer a geotextile fulfils only a
separation function (see 3.2.2 and 5.2.2.3).
4.2 Geotextile directly on the subgrade (standard application)
Placing a geotextile directly on the subgrade (if necessary with a
structural addition, see 4.6) is the standard construction method
(Annex 3, sheet 1). This is used in the following cases:
a) subsoil is homogeneous and existing vegetation and remains
of former structures will be completely removed (see 3.3.1.4);
b) because of subsoil properties an even subgrade can be con-
structed and will remain stable during construction (see
3.3.1.2);
c) when subsoil is susceptible to erosion: the cover layer effects
a full-area contact of the geotextile with the subgrade (see
4.10);
d) when subsoil is susceptible to suffosion: no structural addition
may be used which could lead to colmatation of the geotextile
(see 4.6.2);
e) there is no concentrated groundwater flow (e.g. cleavage wa-
ter), exceeding the hydraulic capacity of the geotextile filter
layer (see 4.6.2). . the application :
4.3 Geotextile on a granular levelling sublayer
On slopes a granular levelling sublayer beneath the geotextile
(Annex 3, sheet 1) is recommended in the following cases:
a) because of subsoil properties an even subgrade cannot be con-
structed or it will not remain stable during construction
(see 3.3.1.2);
b) inhomogeneous subgrade (see 3.3.1.4);
c) suffosive subsoil (see 3.3.1.5);
d) existing vegetation will, as an exception, not be removed.
The granular levelling sublayer effects a homogeneous and smooth
formation for the geotextile. Grading curves of levelling sublayer
and subsoil must be compatible to avoid settlements which may
occur if the levelling sublayer is too coarse or to avoid rising of the
seepage line if it is too fine (MAK /6/).
8
Recommended grain-sizes of the levelling sublayer, valid for
subsoils with d15 < 0,7 mm, are given in Annex 4.
The quantity of material must be chosen so that existing cavities or
irregularities will be fully filled up and a calculated cover thickness
of at least 5 cm is guaranteed (when placing under water 10 cm).
On slopes steeper than 1:3 crushed granular material should be used
when installation takes place under water.
The geotextile must be designed with respect to the properties of the
levelling sublayer (see 5.2 and 5.3).
4.4 Geotextile combined with an unbound granular filter
Under certain boundary conditions a geotextile can be applied too as
an upper filter layer on an unbound granular filter according to
MAK /6/ (Annex 3, sheet 1), e.g.:
a) when widely differing soil-types are present in the subgrade re-
quiring, as a result of filter design, different geotextile structures;
b) when using excavation material suitable for filter purposes;
c) for decompression in the case of heavy local ingress of ground-
water (e.g. cleavage water);
d) in drainage applications.
Requirements on the geotextile can generally be reduced (see
5.3.4.1).
4.5 Granular interlayer between geotextile and top layer
Experience from tidal zone have proved that it is advantageous in
the case of erosive subsoils to place on slopes between the geo-
textile filter and a permeable top layer, consisting of large armour-
stone of class II or larger, a smaller grained interlayer (Annex 3,
sheet 1 ) of which the grain size must be tuned to the top layer as
regards mechanical filtration stability (MAK /6/). This type of con-
struction effects a full-area contact of the geotextile with the sub-
grade, even during heavy hydrodynamic impacts (see 4.10).
4.6 Geotextile with a structural addition
4.6.1 General
In the case of difficult circumstances as regards installation under
water the following structural additions to a geotextile are to be
taken into consideration depending on the boundary conditions of
a) additional layer on the underside of the geotextile;
b) fascine-grid attached to the geotextile;
c) factory-made incorporation of mineral material between two
geotextile layers.
4.6.2 Geotextile with an additional layer
An additional layer on the underside of a geotextile (Annex 3,
sheet 2)
- reduces forming of folds during installation and thus improves
the contact with the subgrade already before installation of
the top layer (important on erosive subsoils, see 3.3.1.2);
- enhances the resistance to dynamic perforation (see 5.3.6) or to
puncture loads (see 5.3.8);
- can enhance friction coefficient (see 5.3.10) and thus improve
positional stability of the geotextile on steep slopes.
The opening size of the additional layer must be tuned to the grading
of the subsoil.
Additional layers can be subdivided into those with a relatively
small-pore structure , i.e.opening sizes, which must be accom-
modated to grain-sizes of subsoil if they are to stabilize the inter-
face between geotextile and subgrade (stabilization layer) and those
with a relatively large-pore structure (anchorage layer). After a short
time of hydraulic impact the latter effect the anchorage of the
geotextile in the subgrade.
An additional layer must be clearly visible with the naked eye in
order to ensure the correct installation position.
For the structure of an additional layer the parameters given in
Table 1 are recommended.
Table 1: recommendations for the structure of an additional layer
soil type of type of opening size thickness
subsoil additional Dw (O90) T covered at any point even if the connection deforms (rise of joints).
(subgrade) layer (mm) (mm)
soil type small-pore 0.3 - 2.0 5 - 15
2-4 large-pore 8.0 - 20 15 - 25
An additional layer must not be applied
beneath a lining, because it will operate like a drainage layer
in the case of leakage (see 5.2.2.3);
on slopes if the subsoil is extremely susceptible to erosion (see
3.3.1.2) and contains stones. Stones can lead to undesired
"tenting" of the additional layer and thus form large voids or
promote formation of erosion channels beneath the geotextile;
on slopes directly on suffosive subsoil (see 3.3.1.5), because the
additional layer can become nearly impervious as a result of col-
matation due to incorporation of fine-soil particles;
in the case of heavy ingress of groundwater or cleavage water,
because an overpressure acting on a large area can arise behind
the geotextile as a result of filter layer permeability being much
lower compared with the permeability of the additional layer.
4.6.3 Geotextile with attached fascine-grid (sink mattress)
A full-area and nearly unwrinkled installation of geotextiles is possi-
ble when a fascine-grid is attached to the upper side of the geotextile
(Annex 3, sheet 2). When installing under water (sink mattress) the
structure must be sunk by placing the cover material on it or by
using a beam.The fascine-grid also improves the stability of aggre-
gate overlying the geotextile.
This type of filter construction may be taken into account especial-
ly for bottom protection works which are executed in great water
depths, or for slope protections without toe support (e.g. very long
slopes under water).
4.6.4 Geotextile with mineral filler
The mass per unit area of a geotextile can be considerably increased
by factory-made incorporation of aggregate (e.g. sand, fine gravel)
between two geotextile layers. When installed under water, this
enhances the positional stability of the geotextile during the stage of
construction without surcharge (no change of position by floating
and no rise of folds).
4.7 Edges of a slope protection
When installed on a slope, the upper edge of a geotextile must be
protected against subsurface erosion caused by surface water or
wave run-up overtopping even during the construction period
(Annex 3, sheet 3). This applies especially to geotextiles with an
additional layer (see 4.6.2).
The lateral edges at the beginning and the end of the filter area
must also be protected against subsurface erosion in the case of
wave impact or of turbulent currents (e.g. by embedding in the
subsoil).
Toe forms appropriate as a lower fastening of a slope revetment
are shown in Annex 3, sheet 4 /7/.
4.8 Connections with structures
The connection of a geotextile filter with a structure has to be per-
formed in such a way that the subsoil to be protected is not un-
The connection must maintain a long-term filter stability.
Connections with a smooth building surface being executed in the
dry can be performed e.g. with an overlapping separate geotextile
fitting piece tightly attached to the building. The fitting must be
formed in such a way that it will not be exposed to detrimental
strains in the case of movement of the building (Annex 3, sheet 5).
Connections with a smooth or non-planar building surface (e.g.
sheet-pile wall) can be performed in the dry as well as under water
with an overlapping granular filter or with a concrete seal
(Annex 3, sheet 5).
4.9 Overlaps and seams
The overlap of two geotextile units must be (ZTV-W /2/):
in the dry ≥ 0,50 m,
under water ≥ 1,0 m .
Overlap strips shall run on slopes in the direction of inclination.
If it is not possible to avoid horizontal overlaps on a slope, the
lower sheet must always pass over the upper one (Annex 3, sheet 5).
Additional layers must not overlap.
Seams must be manufactured with a distance to the geotextile
selvedge of at least 3 cm. Prayer seams are to be placed with the
edges to the top, to prevent rising of the geotextile (Annex 3,
sheet 5).
4.10 Armour layers
The armour layer (top layer) must be designed or structured in such
a way that the geotextile obtains a long-term protection from
damage due to shipping traffic and UV-weathering (see 3.3.5). On
slopes at the same time a full-area contact of the geotextile with the
subgrade must be effected under the expected hydraulic impacts (see
4.1). The smaller the particle size of the overlying aggregate, the
more homogeneous is the contact of the geotextile with the subgrade
(see 4.5).
Types of armour-layer constructions appropriate for slope or bottom
protection (standard top layers /7/) are shown in Annex 3, sheet 6.
9
An adequate protection of the geotextile from UV-weathering and
damage e.g. by anchor cast, anchor furrowing or collision by ships
has been proved through field experiments and empirical observa-
tion, when layer thickness is as follows:
unsorted coarse fill material: T ≥ 0,70 m,
loose armourstone size class II or III: T ≥ 0,60 m,
armourstone size class II, partially grouted: T ≥ 0,40 m,
armourstone size class II, fully grouted: T ≥ 0,30 m,
asphaltic concrete: T ≥ 0,15 m.
The TLW /3/ apply to size classification of armourstone. The
corresponding ranges of particle-size distribution are given in
Annex 5.
5 Requirements
5.1 General
A geotextile and its seams must be designed with respect to both to
filtration stability and to strength properties. The requirements can
be established on the basis of
- performance tests,
- design rules or
- confident empirical knowledge.
When a geotextile is used as a filter layer in a slope or bottom pro-
tection in waterways according to Annex 3, sheet 6, the adoption of
the standard requirements according to the classification procedure
of the BAW is recommended, which has been set up mainly on per-
formance tests connected with empirical values. Using this, all re-
quirements on the geotextile are established when assigning the
subsoil to a soil type or soil-type range (soil-type design procedure)
and choosing the type of top-layer construction (Table 2 and 3).
As regards different geotextile applications, top-layer constructions
or hydraulic boundary conditions, the individual values to be
required must be separately determined or evaluated for the type of
application concerned.
5.2 Filtration stability
5.2.1 General
Requirements on filtration stability of a geotextile can be esta-
blished in the case of permeable top layers according to the
following filter criteria:
a) dynamic hydraulic loadings
soil-type procedure of the BAW (see 5.2.2),
filter rules ( see 5.2.3);
b) static hydraulic loadings
filter rules (see 5.2.3).
For applications, in which dynamic hydraulic loadings are relevant
(see 3.3.2), the mechanical filtration stability takes preference.
When a grading band exists containing soils in the boundary zone
between non-cohesive and cohesive, mechanical filtration stability
must be always designed with regard to the finest non-cohesive
grading curve of the band. It is sufficient if the permeability of the
geotextile will not be lower than the most permeable granulation of
the band even considering possible entrapment of soil particles.
On the other hand, when static hydraulic loadings exist, hydraulic
filtration stability takes preference.The geotextile must be designed
to be as permeable as possible with regard to the most permeable
granulation of the grading band, so that the finest non-cohesive
granulation will just be restrained.
10
When using a geotextile on a suffosive subsoil, the following
possibilities are given, but paying attention to subclause 4.6.2.:
dimensioning of the geotextile pore sizes so large that the mobile
grain fractions are allowed to pass, or
dimensioning of the geotextile pore sizes so small that the mo-
bile grain fractions will be restrained. Stability and service-
ability of the structure must not be endangered by the possible
resulting rise of seepage line.
When using a geotextile beneath an impermeable top layer (lining)
special criteria apply (see 5.2.2.3)
5.2.2 Soil-type design procedure of the BAW
5.2.2.1 Basis
The soil-type design procedure has been developed by the BAW to
evaluate the suitability of a geotextile as a filter layer in slope or
bottom protection on shipping canals. It has been established with
respect to dynamic hydraulic filter loads as these occur in water-
ways /24/. Thus it shall be applied to dynamic hydraulic filter
loadings only.
For utilization of the soil-type design procedure the range of non-
cohesive and low cohesive soils from medium silt to medium gravel
has been classified into four soil types (Annex 6) based on the
grain-size limits of DIN 18 196 /16/.
In the course of the basic test being prescribed to each new geo-
textile product /1/2/, the external dynamic hydraulic filter loadings
acting in waterways are simulated in a performance test as follows:
a) quick drawdown and rerise cycles of water level by the flow-
through method /5/.
b) turbulent flow parallel to the filter surface of return currents,
waves, screw-race by the reversing turbulent flow method /5/.
The soil mass passing through the gotextile and the permeability of
the geotextile considering entrapped soil particles are determined.
The test is performed with a granulation close to the fine-grained
border of the individual soil-type ranges (Annex 6), which often are
present in the German Waterways. The test can also be done with
the in-situ soil in the course of a suitability test (see 6.3) in the case
of need.
For permeable soils (soil types 1-3) the flow-through method yields
the more unfavourable values of soil loss, whereas for low perme-
able soils (soil type 4) the reversing turbulent flow method does.
5.2.2.2 Application principle for permeable top layers
The grading-curve of the subsoil forming the subgrade is needed
(see 3.2.1). If the subsoil is cohesive cu and Ip should also be known.
If cu and Ip are unknown or if cu < 10 kN/m2 and Ip < 0,15 the
geotextile must always be designed - to be on the safe side - for soil
type 4.
If the subsoil has been classified to be of non-cohesive nature in the
sense of subclause 3.3.1.2, it must be assigned with its finest-
grained, non-cohesive grading curve to the validity range of one of
the soil types 1 - 4 (Annex 6, sheet 1 and 2). The soil type which
encloses the grain fractions d5 - d60 of the subsoil in its validity
range is decisive for filtration specification.
The filtration properties of a geotextile are sufficient for all granu-
lations of a certain validity range if the limit values given in Table 2
concerning layer thickness (see 5.3.4.1), mass of soil passing and kn
(at h = 0,25 m) are met in the basic test with the assigned soil type
(see 5.2.2.1). The limit value for soil mass passing in the last test
phase (Ml) is an indication of adequate stabilization of soil loss
during the test period.
Table 2 : standard requirements on filtration properties of a geotextile according to TLG /1/

beneath a permeable top layer

1 2 3 4 5 6

Nr. soil type of subsoil filter layer thickness permissible soil loss kn-value of the soil-
(subgrade) (T) total mass (Mt ) mass (Ml) of soil filled geotextile 5)
of soil passing passing in the last test
(mm) (g/184 cm2) 1) phase (g/184 cm2) 1) (m/s)

1 soil type 1 T ≥ 4,5 2) kn ≥ 8 ⋅10−4

2 soil type 2 T ≥ 4,5 2) Mt ≤ 300 3) Ml ≤ 30 kn ≥ 6 ⋅10−4

3 soil type 3 T ≥ 4,5 kn ≥ 1 ⋅10−4

4 soil type 4 T ≥ 6,0 kn ≥ 1 ⋅10−7

cohesive soils with

requirements related to soil types 1-4 requirement related
5 cu ≥ 10 kN/m2 no requirement
(free selection) apply to soil type 4 applies
and Ip ≥ 0,15 4)

cohesive soils with

6 cu < 10 kN/m2 no requirement requirements related to soil type 4 apply
or Ip< 0,15 4)

beneath an impermeable top layer (lining)

7 independent of soil
type of subsoil T < 5,0 requirements related to soil type 4 apply kn < 1 ⋅10−5

1) grams, related to the exposed test area /5/

2) valid only for gradings which may lead to reduction of permeability due to clogging or blocking (see 5.3.2)
3) 300 g / 184 cm2 = 16,3 kg/m2

4) where c and I are unknown, requirements of soil type 4 apply

u p
5) h = 0,25 m

If the subsoil includes a band of grading curves exceeding the limits
of the validity range of one soil type, the geotextile filter must be
designed for all those soil types of which the validity range is cut by
the grading band grain fractions d5 - d60 , i.e. all related require-
ments apply (see example Annex 7).
Note
The admissible soil loss of the flow-through method (see 5.2.2.1)
has been established to date for safety reasons at 25 (2,5) g due
to the small number of test cycles compared with the reversing
turbulent flow method (TLG 1987). Since studies with multiple
loading times did not significantly enhance the mass of soil loss,
limit values have been equalized with those of soil type 4 (TLG
1993).
The kn -value of the soil-filled geotextile must in principle be at least
twice of the subsoil's (considerable silty soils at least tenfold).
Reduced filtration requirements apply to cohesive subsoils (e.g.
sealing clay) dependent on apparent cohesion and plasticity index.
In cases where cu ≥ 10 kN/m2 and IP ≥ 0,15 (Table 2, line 5), based
on results of filtration tests /19/, any geotextile which meets the
requirements on admissible loss of soil mass of one of the soil types
1-4 is appropriate as a filter.
In cases where cu < 10 kN/m2 or IP < 0,15 any geotextile which
complies with admissible loss of soil mass valid for soil type 4 is
appropriate as a filter.
5.2.2.3 Application principle for impermeable top layers
When a geotextile is provided as a separation layer beneath an
impermeable top layer (hard lining), it shall be able to promote at
the same time self-sealing of the lining in the case of cracks /7/. For
this purpose it is sufficient to dimension the mechanical filtration
stability, independent of soil type of subsoil, for the silt fraction (soil
type 4, Table 2, line 7). In this case permeability and layer thickness
should be as small as possible. In the case of leakage nonwovens are
acting due to permeability in their plane like a drainage layer
(seepage loss, see too 4.6.2).
5.2.3 Filter rules
5.2.3.1 General
For geotextiles provided as a filter layer beneath permeable armour
layers the filter rules of AK 14/ AA 6.14 apply. They are based on
the determination of the largest opening size of a geotextile (see
5.3.3) which is just still admissible for the grading of the subsoil to
be protected considering the type of hydraulic loading. They have
been derived from distinct existing filter rules being valid only for a
certain range of gradings, with the objective of a generally valid
dimensioning rule. Thus they represent a compromise for some soils,
and as such, deviations from the given filter rules can be necessary,
depending on boundary conditions of a construction task.
5.2.3.2 Design of a filter layer
When designing a geotextile filter layer according to the filter rules
/8/14/, it must be distinguished between the grain-size ranges
11
A, B, C and at the same time between static and dynamic hydraulic
loadings of the filter area. The design rules and an example of
application are given in Annex 8
Concerning soils in the grain-size range A, a geotextile used as a
filter beneath a structure sensitive to settlement must be designed for
dynamic hydraulic loads according to the soil-type design procedure
(see 5.2.2).
5.2.3.3 Design of a separation layer
A separation layer has to be designed merely to provide safe soil
restraint (see 2.6 and 3.2.2). For this purpose it is sufficient to
establish an upper limit of admissible opening size (see 5.3.3)
related to the boundary conditions of construction works.
5.3 Material properties
5.3.1 General
The general material requirements of the TLG /1/ and ZTV-W /2/
apply.
Geotextiles must be so flexible or extensible that they will ensure
under the weight of the cover layer a full-area contact with a sub-
grade showing normal irregularities, without forfeiting filtration
stability. Needle-punched nonwovens are much more flexible and
extensible than products bonded by adhesion or melting or than
wovens. A structural addition reduces the flexibility of a geotextile.
A geotextile and its seams must be dimensioned or designed in such
a way that the expected mechanical loads will not affect the
filtration properties or even cause damages. Normally, only loads
caused during construction works are relevant to the material
properties to be specified (see 3.3.3.2).
The most important physical and chemical properties of the usual
fibre raw materials (see 3.3.4.1) can be gathered from Annex 5.
Based on current experience these fibre raw materials are ecologi-
cally compatible.
5.3.2 Permeability
The permeability of a geotextile is influenced by porosity (non-
wovens about 80-95%), pore size, pore-size distribution and layer
thickness. Permeability is given as
- flow velocity v (m/s),
- flow rate q (l/m2/s) or
- coefficient of normal permeability kn (m/s).
v (q) increases with increasing hydraulic head h (fig.). kn decreases
with increasing hydraulic gradient i and is constant in the laminar
range (i ≤ 2) only. Thus it makes sense, when comparing permea-
bilities, to compare index values at a certain h (h = 0,25m or
h = 0,05 m /5/), considering that v (q, kn) increases too with increa-
sing water temperature and is given for geotextiles at 20° C (k of
soils at 10° C according to DIN 18 130 /17/).
12
Permeability of a brand-new (unused) geotextile can be reduced in
the service state by the following effects:
a) soil-particle entrapment (clogging, blocking):
clogging (nonwovens) may occur when Dw > 0,5 x d2 , blocking
(woven) when U < 3. Reduction of v (q, kn) can generally be
judged by performance tests only (see 5.2.2.1), but can be con-
sidered too, based on practical experience on thick non-wovens
(T > 2 mm), when using a safety factor as follows:
- silty soils : kn ≥ 50 x ksoil
- low silty soils : k ≥ 10 x ksoil . } at h ≥ 0,05 m
b) accumulation of fines: is mainly relevant on suffosive subsoils
(see 3.3.1.5).
c) sintering, ochre formation (see 3.3.4.2).
d) uniform surcharge: under a pressure of σ ≤ 2 kPa the reduction
in v (q, kn) is negligible even for thick nonwovens (T > 2 mm)
with minimum strength according to subclause 5.3.5 (unpub-
lished investigations of the BAW).
e) reduction of percolated filter area by large armour-layer ele-
ments (see 5.3.4.1).
5.3.3 Opening size
The range of pore sizes of a geotextile or of its single layers is
described as a substitute with the parameter Dw (effective opening
size, soon probably indicated as O90 ). Dw is determined by sieving,
the geotextile being used as a sieve. Dw (O90) = X means that 90 %
of the pores are equal to or smaller than the grain diameter X.
Dw (O90) is used in geotextile design according to filter rules as a
characteristic parameter for soil restraint (see 5.2.3.2). Its magni-
tude is not unchangable. It can be reduced due to surcharge or
even be enlarged due to geotextile deformations or due to fibre
shifting caused by dynamic impacts, dependent on type or on
strength of a geotextile. That must be assessed in the case of a high
safety level, if necessary, in a suitability test (see 6.3); concerning
nonwovens with strengths according to subclause 5.3.5 and
wovens with fixed crossing points this is generally not relevant.
Dw says nothing about the hydraulic filtration stability of a geo-
textile which is influenced too by porosity, pore-size distribution and
layer thickness (see 5.3.2 and 5.3.4.1).
Dw of an additional layer: see subclause 4.6.2.
5.3.4 Layer thickness
5.3.4.1 Related to the filtration function
The filtration stability of a geotextile can be influenced by layer
thickness. With increasing layer thickness
- consequences of possible variations of mass per unit area on
variations of opening size are reduced (safety to erosion).
- sensitivity of a geotextile to large variations of grading curves of
subsoil is reduced (safety to erosion).
- hydrodynamic impacts (waves, turbulent currents) acting through
the geotextile on the subsoil are damped, i.e. geotextile pore sizes
can be larger without impairing soil restraint (safety to colma-
tation).
- ability to drain off soil water even from those filter areas which
are covered e.g. with very large elements of an armour layer, will
be improved (mechanical stability).
In the normal case the minimum values given in Table 2 apply to
layer thickness.
Layer thickness is dispensable as a filter requirement
a) in the case of a low safety level;
b) when the subsoil is exactly known and of homogeneous nature
(very small grading band);
c) on coarse subsoils if no significant reduction of permeability
due to clogging or blocking can occur (see 5.3.2);
d) in the case of subordinate importance of geotextile permeability
in the plane (relatively small particle sizes of the overlying
layer).
The geotextile's ability to resist to these loads without damage must
be proved. The values for drop energy given in Table 3 correspond
to perforation loads caused by an armourstone of size class II of
30 kg (60 kg, size class III) dropped in the dry from a height of 2 m
/3/5/.

Table 3 applies too to placing under water (see 3.3.3.2) on account

5.3.4.2 Related to the separation function of the many imponderables when dumping armourstone.

When a geotextile fulfils a separation function (see 3.2.2) there is no
need to require a minimum layer thickness. Layer thickness depends
only on the required strength properties.
5.3.5 Tensile strength and strain
The required minimum values of tensile strength at failure of a
geotextile are given in Table 3, valid when used under armour
layers inclined 1:2 or less. According to current practical experience
they are sufficient to cover the normal tensile stresses which are
unavoidable (see 3.3.3) and consider even tensile forces arising from
the flow pressure of currents (v ≤ 1,50 m/s) when installed under
water /20/21/23/. As regards geotextiles being exposed to wear,
sufficient residual tensile strengths must additionally be proved after
execution of abrasion test (see 5.3.7).
On slopes steeper than 1:2 or in the case of current loadings being
substantially higher when the geotextile is placed, the necessary
tensile strengths at failure must be proved separately.
Strains of nonwovens due to uniaxial tensile sresses at failure may
be up to 150 %. Those of wovens are generally much below 20 %.
As regards geotextiles connected to a fascine-grid (sink mattress)
the tensile srengths at failure to be required depend on size of the
sink and the placing method (see 4.6.3).
5.3.6 Resistance to dynamic perforation loads
When placing a cover layer consisting of armourstone the geo-
textile is subjected to dynamic perforation loads influenced by
- shape and weight of stones,
- drop height of stones,
- strength of subsoil and
- placing in the dry or under water.
Drop energy can be established similarly for requirements on
resistance to dynamic perforation loads of lighter or heavier stones.
Practical experience has shown that geotextiles with a mass per unit
area of µ ≥ 500 g/m2 and maximum strength according to Table 3
are sufficiently resistant to perforation by stones of size class II
when placed on sand or finer-grained subsoils (soil types 2 - 4). In
the case of coarser subsoil or heavier stones a sufficient resistance to
dynamic perforation loads must be proved, if need be in a suita-
bility test (see 6.3).
5.3.7 Resistance to abrasion loads
Abrasion loads can lead long-term to damages of a geotextile (see
3.3.3.3). According to practical experience these loads occur in the
zone of fluctuating water levels with an important magnitude only in
connection with unbound protective layers with large voids (armour-
stone of size class II or larger) or with permeable concrete block-
systems caused by chafing movements of single stones under
frequent heavy wave impacts.
A geotextile is considered resistant to abrasion loads if 75 % of the
required layer thickness (otherwise original layer thickness) and of
the required maximum tensile strengths are still left after execution
of abrasion test /5/ (Table 3).
If abrasion impacts due to bed load transport must be taken into
account in bottom protection (e.g. protective measures against scour
in the tail water of barrages), in the case of armour layers with large
voids the geotextile must be solidly protected against abrasion loads
by an overlying smaller-grained interlayer (e.g. crushed rock) which
is compatible with the overlying cover layer. Synthetic materials are
not sufficiently long-term resistant to abrasion loads of this kind.

Table 3: Standard requirements on strength properties of a geotextile according to TLG /1/

Nr. material properties Type of top-layer construction according to Annex 3, sheet 6

D1 D2/D3 D4,
armourstone armourstone coverings
µ< µ ≥
class II class III class II + grout
3kN/m² 3kN/m²

1 tensile strength at failure according to DIN 53 857

kN/m ≥ 12,0 ≥ 12,0 ≥ 12,0 ≥ 9,0 1) ≥ 12,0
longitudinal and transverse

2 resistance to dynamic perforation (drop energy) Nm ≥ 600 ≥1200 ≥ 600 -

3 resistance to residual thickness (T) of the filter layer soil type 1-3:T≥3,5
mm - -2)
abrasion after abrasion test soil type 4 :T≥4,5

tensile strength at failure after abrasion

kN/m ≥ 9,0 - -2)
test (residual tensile strength)

1) when installed under water ≥ 12,0 kN/m

2) precast stones like D1

13
5.3.8 Resistance to static puncture loads
In cases where static puncture impacts on a geotextile cannot be
avoided (see 3.3.3.2) a suitability test (see 6.3) of resistance to
static puncture loads is recommended on a test area under condi-
tions of construction site if damage to the geotextile cannot be
excluded from practical experience.
Geotextiles which are resistant to dynamic perforation loads accor-
ding to Table 3 are resistant to static puncture loads too if a protec-
tive layer with a thickness according to subclause 4.10 is used, since
dynamic perforation loads cause a greater dynamic impact on the
geotextile surface.
When using geotextiles in a service way or in roads of a construc-
tion site the "Recommendations for the Use of Geotextiles in Earth-
works " /9/, should be referred to.
5.3.9 Resistance to high temperatures
When an armour layer is constructed directly on a geotextile using
hot bituminous matters, proof of resistance to high temperatures
(adequate residual tensile strength, see 5.3.5) is not necessary for the
usual fibre raw materials (with exception of PE, see Annex 5). For
these, the BAW has proved by a great number of tests that geotex-
tiles which are placed under material heated up to 200°C /5/ are
sufficiently heat resistant.
5.3.10 Friction coefficient
In slope protection a minimum value of the friction coefficient of a
geotextile related to the subsoil generally must not be required.
Because of irregularities of interface between geotextile and the
subsoil resulting from armour-layer installation (e.g. top layer
according to Annex 3, sheet 6) the friction coefficient of the
geotextile can be assumed equal to the effective angle of internal
friction of the subsoil /22/, if interlocking between the geotextile and
the subsoil is possible due to relation of geotextile opening size and
grain sizes of the subsoil (see 5.3.3). Otherwise it has to be reduced
by the factor 0.8. On slopes steeper than 1:2 the friction coefficient
of the geotextile or of the geotextile type must be known. If need be,
it is to be determined in the course of a suitability test (see 6.3).
The friction behaviour of a geotextile on cohesive soils with
softened surface can be significantly improved by an additional
layer with the largest possible pore sizes (see 4.6.2), because the
cohesion of subsoil takes effect when the additional-layer fibres
penetrate into the subsoil.
5.3.11 Mass per unit area
The mass per unit area of a geotextile results from the specified
material and filtration properties. This is used as a characteristic
relative value in quality controls and therefore must be determined
in each test (see 6).
Based on practical experience this may be used as a standard value
for achieving specific material properties.
6 Tests
6.1 General
Tests for quality assurance can be subdivided into
- the basic test,
- suitability test(s),
- quality control during manufacture and
- control tests by the Principal.
14
They must be performed for geotextiles according to the TLG /1/
(Annex 9) and ZTV-W /2/ by an approved testing authority
following the RPG /5/.
6.2 Basic test
The basic test is a test by the Contractor to demonstrate the funda-
mental suitability of untried construction materials, construction-
material mixtures and construction-material systems for the inten-
ded purpose.
6.3 Suitability test
The suitability test is a test by the Contractor to demonstrate the
suitability of the construction materials, construction-material
mixtures and the construction-material system for the intended pur-
pose taking into consideration the installation method in accordance
with the specifications of the building contract. This must be per-
formed in good time before construction commences.
A suitability test is necessary
a) to prove the fulfilment of those requirements which are justified
by specific conditions relating to the construction works and thus
are not covered by the certificate of the basic test;
b) in the case of a high required safety level and a subsoil which is
critical with respect to the geotextile filtration properties (perfor-
mance tests by using the subsoil granulation as a test soil);
c) in the case of an untried installation method, or if no experience
exists in geotextile installation under water;
d) if the foreseen base materials deviate as regards source or type
from those of the basic test, i.e. if a significant change of their
properties can be assumed.
6.4 Quality control during manufacture
Quality control must be guaranteed by factory production control
tests of the manufacturer and of an approved body (TLG /1/).
Factory production control tests are tests by the Contractor to check
whether the quality of construction materials, construction-material
mixtures and the construction-material system comply with the
contractual specifications.
6.5 Control tests by the Principal
Control tests are tests by the Principal to check if the quality pro-
perties of the construction materials, construction-material mixtures
and the construction-material system fulfil the contractual require-
ments.
Samples for control tests must be taken on the directive of the
Principal by the Contractor and be sent to the testing laboratory by
the Principal. The following must be stated for the samples :
- contractual requirements,
- product name,
- roll number,
- name of the construction project,
- range for which the sample is representative,
- geotextile upper side for placing purposes,
- date of sampling,
- name of the authorized person.
If seams are manufactured on the construction site a trial seam
should be tested before commencement of placing (ZTV-W /2/).
The samples taken from one delivery must be sent to the testing
laboratory by the Principal in good time so that the test results are
available before commencement of placing (TLG /1/).
7 Instructions for inviting tenders and for
construction works
7.1 Tender documents
The inviting of tenders for supply of geotextiles must always be
based on the Technical Supply Conditions for Geotextile Filters
(TLG /1/).
When setting up the tender documents for geotextiles used in a
standard top layer by means of the catalogue of standard-specifi-
cation texts (STLK) /4/ all relevant particular requirements accor-
ding to the TLG are unambiguously established by assigning the
subsoil to be protected, following the soil-type design procedure of
the BAW (see 5.2.2) and by indicating the type of top-layer con-
struction if the symbols of the standard top layer and of the soil type
or soil-type range are indicated in the bill of quantities. In the case
of deviating or additional requirements all decisive requirements
must be included in the construction-works description (Annex 10).
If special connections are to be performed (see 4.7 and 4.8) they
must be detailed in the tender documents and drawn if need be.
If a construction contract is concluded the technical contract condi-
tions ZTV-W (LB 210) must be established as part of the contract.
Admissible tolerances as regards preparation of the subgrade must
be indicated in the tender documents.
When the geotextile is to be placed under water, it must be pro-
vided in the tender documents that the supplier indicates the in-
stallation method as regards
- preparation of the filter subgrade,
- description of the placement equipment or of the installation
method
- extent of intended diver operations (see 7.2.3).
7.2 Construction works
7.2.1 Preparation of the filter subgrade
The filter subgrade must be evenly levelled. Cavities, which may
often occur when constructing the subgrade on a cohesive subsoil,
and also erosion channels, must be filled up with soil of filter qua-
lity (see 4.3). Any vegetation, exposed stones or foreign bodies must
be removed. Otherwise a larger quantity of geotextiles may be
required, and this may amount to 30% of the filter area /20/, resul-
ting from the larger surface of an irregular subgrade compared with
a regular one. This may have consequences for the execution of
overlaps or connections with structures as insufficient fabric may be
available to ensure complete coverage. On slopes the local mecha-
nical stability of the armour layer can be reduced due to large ca-
vities beneath the geotextile (see 4.1).
7.2.2 Installation in the dry
Installation of geotextiles in the dry is generally not problematical
(see 3.3.3.2). Nevertheless it must be ensured that measures to
secure the geotextile against displacements caused by wind, waves
(tidal zone) etc. do not lead to perforation of the later percolated
filter area /2/ and that they do not result in uncontrollable tensile
strengths when placing the protective layer. The geotextile must be
allowed to slide on the subgrade.
Driving on geotextiles without a sufficient protective layer must be
avoided (see 3.3.3.2).
7.2.3 Installation under water
Placing a geotextile unit under water in the the planned position is
only possible with technical assistance or by using a structural
addition (see 4.6), since geotextiles do not sink to the subgrade
without surcharge because of their low unit weight (Annex 5) and
entrapped air bubbles.
The following demands are to be made on the installation method
(does not apply to sink mattresses, see 4.6.3):
a) The geotextile should be in contact with the subgrade if at all
possible when cover layer aggregate is placed on it, or it should
be held only in a small distance above it (< 0,50 m), while pre-
stressing it moderately. Sinking a floating geoextile unit in the
planned position and without folds is not possible simply by
placing aggregate on it. In addition coarse aggregate (stones)
may get beneath the geotextile (risk of perforation ; reduction
of mechanical stability of the top layer on slopes, see 4.1; in-
creased risk of abrasion damages).
The satisfactory position of the geotextile must be checked by a
diver in each case before placing the protective layer if this is
not guaranteed by the installation method or by the structural
addition used (see 4.6).
b) The area of overlaps must be checked by a diver immediately
before installing the adjacent geotextile unit to ensure full-area
coverage and freedom from stones if this is not guaranteed by
the structural addition used and by the placing method. A geo-
textile protruding from an impermeable top layer (lining) may
lead to uncontrollable water losses in a sealing section depen-
ding on the geotextile transmissivity /20/ (see too 5.2.2.3).
c) Fixings of a geotextile which may cause damage of the filter
area (e.g. pinning) are inadmissible.
d) All edges over which the geotextile is turned must be rounded
off to minimize chafing loads due to movements of the instal-
lation equipment or of the geotextile itself.
In the section of the construction site the authorized maximum speed
of navigation should be limited to Vs = 6 km/h, to exclude as far as
possible slippage or erosion of the filter subgrade, damage of the
geotextile unit caused by the flow pressure and displacement of
overlaps caused by return currents or waves. If necessary the navi-
gational span must be reduced by traffic signs to a width much less
than already effected by the floating equipment of the construction
site.
When placing a granular levelling sublayer the recommendations
given in subclause 4.3 must be heeded.
7.3 Inventory documents
With respect to the later maintenance works or repairs inventory
documents must be established from the actual revetment structure
giving all the essential details such as:
- nature of subsoil according to DIN 4022 /28/ and to DIN 18 196
/16/
- product name of the geotextile and test report of the basic test
and/or of suitability test(s),
- type of geotextile joints (seams or overlaps), indication of roll
width,
- revetment structure,
- type of toe support,
- indication of geographical location of construction section,
- abnormalities during construction execution (e.g. defects re-
gistered by control tests or reservations resulting from the final
inspection) and
- diver reports.
15
8 References /20/ Abromeit, H.-U.: "Installation of geotextile filters under water
by technical means"; Mitteilungen des Franzius-Instituts für
Wasserbau und Küsteningenieurwesen der Universität Han-
/1/ Technical Supply Conditions for Geotextile Filters (TLG);
nover, Nr. 62/1986
obtainable at Drucksachenstelle bei der WSD Mitte, Am
Waterlooplatz 9, 30169 Hannover
/21/ Abromeit, H.-U.: "Tensile stresses on a geotextile due to the
influences of shipping when installation is performed from the
/2/ Supplementary Technical Contract Conditions - Hydraulic
water surface", BAW-Brief Nr. 5/1989
Engineering (ZTV-W) for Embankment and Bottom Revet-
ments, service area 210; obtainable at Drucksachenstelle bei
/22/ Grett, H.-D.: "Friction behaviour of geotextiles being in con-
der WSD Mitte, Am Waterlooplatz 9, 30169 Hannover
tact with cohesive or non-cohesive soils"; Mitteilungen des
Franzius-Instituts für Wasserbau und Küsteningenieurwesen
/3/ Technical Supply Conditions for Armourstone (TLW), ob-
der Universität Hannover, Nr. 59/1984
tainable at Drucksachenstelle bei der WSD Mitte, Am Water-
looplatz 9, 30169 Hannover
/23/ Knieß, H.G./ List, H.-J.: "Long-term durability of geotextile
filters"; unpublished research report of the BAW, Karlsruhe
/4/ Catalogue of Standard Specification Texts - Hydraulic Engi-
1982
neering (STLK) for Embankment and Bottom Revetments,
service area 210; obtainable at Drucksachenstelle bei der
/24/ Knieß, H.G.: "Criteria and attempt for technical and economi-
WSD Mitte, Am Waterlooplatz 9, 30169 Hannover
cal design of inland-waterway revetments", Mitteilungsblatt
der Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau, Karlsruhe, Nr. 53, August
/5/ Guidelines for Testing Geotextile Filters in Navigable Water-
1983
ways (RPG), BAW Karlsruhe
/25/ Knieß, H.G.: "Dumping of stones under water", Mitteilungs-
/6/ Code of Practice Use of Granular Filters on Waterways
blatt der Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau, Karlsruhe, Nr. 50,
(MAK), BAW Karlsruhe
1981
/7/ Code of Practice Use of Standard Construction Types for
/26/ Schnitter , G./ Zeller, J.: "Seapage flow in earth dams due to
Embankment and Bottom Revetments on Waterways (MAR),
fluctuation of a dammed up water level"; Schweizerische Bau-
BAW Karlsruhe
zeitung, 75. Jahrgang, Nr. 52/1957
/8/ Guideline Nr. 306: "Use of geotextiles in hydraulic enginee-
/27/ "Denkendorfer Fasertafel 1986", Institut für Textil- und Ver-
ring"; editor: Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und
fahrenstechnik, Körschtalstraße 26, 73770 Denkendorf
Kulturbau e V. (DVWK), edition 1991
/28/ DIN 4022, part 1; Subsoil and groundwater; designation and
/9/ "Directions for Use of Geotextiles in Earthworks", Forschungs-
description of soil and rock
gesellschaft für Sraßen- und Verkehrswesen / Köln
/29/ Kuntze, H.: "Verockerungen; Diagnose und Therapie"; Schrif-
/10/ "Das Geotextilhandbuch", Schweizerischer Verband der Geo-
tenreihe des Kuratoriums für Wasser- und Kulturwesen,
textilfachleute (SVG), secretariat c/o EMPA, Postfach, 9001
Nr. 32 (1978)
St. Gallen / Switzerland

/11/ Nold "Brunnenfilterbuch", J. F. Nold & Co., 63811 Stock-

stadt

/12/ Kezdi, A.: "Handbuch der Bodenmechanik", VEB Verlag für

Bauwesen Berlin

/13/ Busch / Luckner : "Geohydraulik für Studium und Praxis",

Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart

/14/ DVWK-Schriften Nr. 76; "Use and testing of plastics in

earthworks and water engineering"; recommendations of
Working Group 14 of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Erd- und
Grundbau e.V., Hamburg, Berlin; Parey 1986

/15/ DIN 60 000; Textiles; basic terms and definitions

/16/ DIN 18 196; Earthworks and foundations; soil classification

system for civil engineering purposes

/17/ DIN 18 130, part 1; Soil, testing procedures and testing

equipment; determination of the coefficient of water permea-
bility; laboratory tests

/18/ DIN 53 857, part 1 and 2;Testing of textiles; simple tensile

test on strips of textile fabrics

/19/ Abromeit, H.-U.: "Reqirements on filtration properties of a

geotextile used on clay linings", BAW-Brief Nr. 3/91

16
 mechanical filter loads, see 3.3.3
9 Index of keywords - execution of construction works, see 3.3.3.2
- waterway operations, see 3.3.3.3
A abrasion loads, see 3.3.3.3, 5.3.7 mechanical filtration stability, see 2.5, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.3.3
abrasion resistance, see 5.3.5, 5.3.7 mechanical stability, see 3.3.1.2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.5, 4.6.2, 5.3.4.1, 7.2.1, 7.2.3
additional layer, see 4.6.2, 4.9, 5.3.3, 5.3.10
N non-cohesive soil, see 3.3.1.2, 5.2.2.2, 5.2.3
angle of internal friction, see 3.3.1.1, 3.3.1.2
nonwoven, see 2.2, 5.2.2.3, 5.3.1, 5.3.2
armour layers, see 4.10
armourstone, see 4.10 O ochre formation, see 3.3.4.2, 5.3.2
authorized maximum speed of navigation, see 7.2.3 opening size, see 4.6.2, 5.2.3, 5.3.2, 5.3.3
overlaps, see 4.9, 7.2.1, 7.2.3
B basic test, see 5.2.2.1, 5.2.2.2, 6.2
bill of quantities, see 7.1 P penetrability by roots, see 3.3.6
biological ochre formation, see 3.3.4.2 perforation loads, see 3.3.3.2
blocking, see 2.10, 5.2.2.2, 5.3.2 performance test, see 5.2.2.1, 5.3.2, 6.3
bottom protection pH-value, see 3.3.4.1
- connections with structures, see 4.8 plasticity index Ip, see 3.3.1.1, 3.3.1.2, 5.2.2.2, 5.2.3.2
- standard type of construction, see 4.10 production control by an approved body, see 6.4
puncture loads, see 3.3.3.2
C catalogue of standard-specification texts, see 7.1
chemical ochre formation, see 3.3.4.2 Q quality control, see 6.4
classification procedure of the BAW, see 5.1, 7.1 R requirements
cleavage water, see 4.2, 4.3, 4.6.2 - filtration stability, see 5.2
clogging, see 2.10, 5.2.2.2, 5.3.2 - material properties, see 5.3
cohesive soil, see 3.3.1.3, 5.2.2.2 residual tensile strength, see 5.3.5, 5.3.7, 5.3.9
colmatation, see 2.10, 3.3.1.4, 3.3.1.5, 4.6.2, 5.3.2, 5.3.4.1 resistance
connections with structures, see 4.8, 7.1, 7.2.1 - abrasion, see 5.3.5, 5.3.7
construction works, see 7.2 - dynamic perforation, see 5.3.6
- description, see 7.1 - high temperatures, see 5.3.9
- in the dry, see 7.2.2 - long term, see 3.3.4.1
- under water, see 7.2.3 - static puncture, see 5.3.8
construction-site roads, see 5.3.8 - UV weathering, see 3.3.5, 4.10, 5.3.1
construction types, see 4 ff. reversing turbulent flow method, see 5.2.2.1
control tests, see 6.5
S sealing clay, see 5.2.2.2
D drainage layer, see 2.7, 5.2.2.3 seams, see 4.9, 5.1, 5.3.1
durability, see 3.3.4.1, 3.3.5 seepage loss, see 5.2.2.3, 7.2.3 ?
dynamic hydraulic loading, see 2.11, 3.3.2, 5.2.1, 5.2.2.1, 5.2.3.2, 5.3.4.1 separation layer, see 2.6, 3.2.2, 5.2.3.3, 5.3.4.2
E erosion, see 2.8, 3.3.1.2, 4.1, 4.5, 4.6.2, 5.3.4.1 sink mattress, see 4.6.3, 5.3.5, 7.2.3
sintering, see 3.3.4.2, 5.3.2
F fascine-grid, see 4.6.3
site traffic, see 3.3.3.2
fibre raw materials, see 3.3.4.1, 5.3.1
slope protection, see 4.10
filter, see 2.5
- edges, see 4.7
- hydraulic loadings, see 3.3.2
- toe forms, see 4.6.3, 4.7
- mechanical impacts, see 3.3.3
soil, see subsoil
- necessity, see 3.2
soil types, see 5.1, 5.2.2.1
- rules, see 5.2.1, 5.2.3
soil-type design procedure, see 5.2.2
- subgrade, see 4.2, 4.3, 7.1, 7.2
standard top layers, see 4.10
- types of construction, see 4.1 ff.
static hydraulic loadings, see 2.12, 3.3.2, 5.2.1, 5.2.3.2
filtration stability, see 5.2, 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.3.4.1
strain, see 5.3.1, 5.3.5
flexibility, see 5.3.1
structural addition, see 4.6 ff
flow pressure of currents, see 3.3.3.2, 5.3.5, 7.2.3
subgrade, see 4.2, 4.3, 4.6.2, 7.2.1, 7.2.2, 7.2.3
flow-through method, see 5.2.2.1
subsoil, see 3.3.1
friction coefficient, see 4.6.2, 5.3.10
- description, see 3.3.1.1
G grading band, see 5.2.1, 5.2.2.2, 5.3.4.1 - cohesive, see 3.3.1.3, 5.2.2.2
grain-size distribution, see 3.3.1.1, 5.2.2.2 - susceptible to erosion, see 3.3.1.2
granular filter, see 3.3.4.2, 4.4, 4.8 - inhomogeneous, see 3.3.1.4
granular interlayer, see 4.5 - non-cohesive, see 3.3.1.2, 5.2.2.2
granular levelling layer, see 4.3 - susceptible to suffosion, see 3.3.1.5
H hydraulic filter loadings suffosion, see 2.9, 3.3.1.5, 4.3, 4.6.2, 5.2.1, 5.3.2
- dynamic, see 2.11, 3.3.2, 5.2.1, 5.2.2.1, 5.2.3.2, 5.3.4.1 suitability test, see 5.2.2.1, 5.3.3, 5.3.8, 5.3.10, 6.3
- static, see 2.12, 3.3.2, 5.2.1, 5.2.3.2 surface water, see 4.7
hydraulic filtration stability, see 2.5, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.3.4.1 T tender documents, see 7.1
hydraulic gradient, see 2.11, 2.12, 5.3.2 tensile strength, see material properties
I inhomogeneous subgrade, see 3.3.1.4, 4.3 tensile stresses, see 3.3.3.2, 3.3.3.3
installation tests, see 6 ff
- in the dry, see 7.2.2 - basic test, see 6.2
- loads, see 3.3.3.2 - control tests by the Principal, see 6.5
- under water, see 7.2.3 - production control by an approved body, see 6.4
interlayer, granular, see 4.5 - production control by the manufacturer, see 6.4
inventory documents, see 7.3 - suitability tests, see 6.3
thickness
K k-value - additional layer, see 4.6.2
- geotextile, see 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.3.2 - armour layer, see 4.10
- soil, see 3.3.1.1, 5.3.2 - geotextile, see 5.2.2.2, 5.2.2.3, 5.3.3, 5.3.4, 5.3.7
L levelling sublayer, granular, see 4.3 - levelling sublayer, see 4.3
lining, see 4.6.2, 5.2.2.3, 7.2.3 toe forms, see 4.6.3, 4.7
loads, mechanical, see 3.3.3 top layers, see 4.10
long-term durability, see 3.3.4.1, 3.3.5 U uplift pressure, see 3.3.3.3, 4.1
M manufacturer production controls, see 6.4 UV-weathering, see 3.3.5, 4.10
mass per unit area, see 5.3.6, 5.3.11 V vegetation, see 3.3.6, 4.2, 4.3, 7.2.1
material properties, see 5.3
- additional layer, see 4.6.2 W water in the filter zone, see 3.3.4
- resistance to abrasion loads, see 5.3.7 water permeability, 3.3.4.2, 5.3.2
- resistance to perforation loads, see 4.6.2, 5.3.6 waterway operations, see 3.3.3.3
- resistance to static puncture loads, 5.3.8 woven, see 2.3, 5.3.1, 5.3.2
- tensile strengths, see 5.3.5, 5.3.7 Z zone of fluctuating water levels, see 3.3.4.2
- thickness, 5.3.4 ZTV-W, service area 210, see 5.3.1, 6.5, 7.1

17
10 Index of Annexes Page

Annex 1 Check of the necessity for a filter layer (separation layer) ................................................................................................ 19
Annex 2
sheet 1-2: Check of suffosion stability of a soil using its grading curve (geometric suffosion stability) .......................................... 20
Annex 3
sheet 1: Types of filter construction................................................................................................................................................... 22
sheet 2 : Geotextile with a structural addition ................................................................................................................................... 23
sheet 3: Examples of the upper edge construction of a slope protection (see 4.7) .......................................................................... 24
sheet 4: Toe forms of a slope protection (example of an armourstone layer partially grouted) ................................................... 25
sheet 5: Connections with a structure (see 4.8) ................................................................................................................................. 26
sheet 6: Standard top layers for a slope and bottom protection according to the MAR /7/ (see 4.10).......................................... 27
Annex 4 Grain-size range recommended for a granular levelling sublayer (see 4.3) and assessment of
soil permeability; diagram of BEYER, relation of HAZEN .............................................................................................. 28
Annex 5 Grading bands of the armourstone size classes 0 - V according to the Technical Supply
Conditions for Armourstone (TLW) /3/ and fibre raw materials used for geotextiles and their
properties /27/ ........................................................................................................................................................................ 29
Annex 6
sheet 1: Validity range of the soil types 1 and 2 (see 5.2.2) .............................................................................................................. 30
sheet 2: Validity range of the soil types 3 and 4 (see 5.2.2) .............................................................................................................. 31
Annex 7
sheet 1-4: Examples of a filter application in a permeable slope protection of a ship-canal using the
soil-type design procedure of the BAW ............................................................................................................................... 32
Annex 8
sheet 1-3: Filter rules of the AK 14 / AA 6.14....................................................................................................................................... 36
Annex 9 Table on standard tests according to the Technical Supply Conditions for
Geotextile Filters (TLG)........................................................................................................................................................ 39
Annex 10 Process of design and tender-document specification......................................................................................................... 40

18
 Annex 1

Check of the necessity for a filter layer (separation layer)

A filter is necessary between the soil to be protected and the intended cover layer if the admissible ratio value A50 according to the diagram of
CISTIN / ZIEMS is exceeded (see fig.).

fig.: diagram of CISTIN / ZIEMS

A50 = ratio of the mean grain diameter D50 of the cover layer and d50 of the subsoil to be protected
CUI = uniformity coefficient of the subsoil
CUII= uniformity coefficient of the cover-layer material

Note
The validity of the CISTIN / ZIEMS diagram /13/ has been proved for soils in the range of 0.1 < d < 30 mm and for filter granulations in the
range of 4 <D < 100 mm. Since being determined on the basis of geometric size ratios this may be used too for the assessment of the necessity
for a filter as regards coarser granulations. It can be used likewise to assess the necessity for a separation layer in the case of dynamic
impacts (see 3.2.2).

Examples of application

a) A cover layer consisting of armourstone size class II on subsoil consisting of coarse very gravelly sand
subsoil: d60 = 2.0 mm
d50 = 1.5 mm
d10 = 0.4 mm
CUI = 5
cover layer: D50 = 170 mm (Annex 5)
CUII = 1.7
from the diagram of CISTIN / ZIEMS : admissible A50 = 11
existing A50 = D50 / d50 = 170 / 1.5 = 113 > admissible A50
A filter is necessary.

b) A cover layer consisting of armourstone size class II on subsoil consisting of gravel

subsoil: d60 = 20 mm
d50 = 16 mm
d10 = 4 mm
CUI = 5
cover layer: D50 = 170 mm (Annex 5)
CUII = 1.7
from the diagram of CISTIN / ZIEMS : admissible A50 = 11
existing A50 = D50 / d50 = 170 / 16 = 10.6 < admissible A50
A filter is not necessary.

19
 Annex 2, sheet 1

Check of suffosion stability of a soil using its grading curve

(geometric suffosion stability)

Principle

1. Cut the grading curve of the soil (see fig.1) at an arbitrary grain diameter. The finer grain diameters are regarded as the base fraction (db),
the coarser grain diameters as the filter fraction (df). Read at the cut diameter (dc) the weight percentage (wsc).

fig.1 : soil grading curve and grading curves of the base and of the filter fraction for one chosen cut diameter dc

2. Determine a separate grading curve of the base fraction and of the filter fraction (see fig. 1) according to equations 1 and 2. For this, at
least 5 evenly graded grain diameters should be used in each case.
a) determination of the base-fraction grading curve:
for a chosen grain diameter db(i) applies

wb(i) = ws / wsc × 100 % (equation 1)

b) determination of the filter-fraction grading curve:

for a chosen grain diameter df(i) applies

wb - wsc
wf(i) = 100% - w × 100% (equation 2)
sc

with
wb(i) = percentage by weight of the base-fraction grading curve at the chosen grain diameter db(i)
wf(i) = percentage by weight of the filter-fraction grading curve at the chosen grain diameter df(i)
ws = percentage by weight of the soil at the chosen grain diameter db(i) or df(i) of its grading curve
wsc = percentage by weight of the soil at the chosen cut diameter dc of its grading curve.

3. Check the mechanical filtration stability of the grading curves of the filter and of the base fraction according to CISTIN / ZIEMS (Annex
1). If the admissible ratio A50 is kept, the filtration stability between the two chosen grain fractions is given.

4. Repeat the steps 1. to 3. using further cut diameters (see fig. 2). A soil is stable to suffosion if the mechanical (geometric) filtration
stability between the grading curves of the filter and of the base fraction exists for any cut diameter.

20
 Annex 2, sheet 2

fig. 2: investigated cut diameters

Example of calculation

1. Cut the soil grading curve (see fig. 1) at the chosen grain diameter dc = 1 mm into the base and the filter fraction.
At the cut diameter dc read
wsc = 48 %.

2. In order to determine the grading curve of the base and of the filter fraction the following , nearly evenly graded grain diameters are to be
used:
db(i) = 0.1; 0.15; 0.2; 0.35; 0.6 mm
df(i) = 2.0; 4.0; 6.0; 10; 16; 20 mm.

For e.g. db3 = 0.2 mm, ws = 19 % (see fig. 1)

from equation 1 :
wb3 = 19 % / 48 % x 100 % = 39 %.

For e.g. df3 = 6 mm, ws = 59 % (see fig. 1)

from equation 2 :
59% - 48%
wf3 = 100% - 48% × 100% = 21 %

Accordingly calculate the percentage by weight of the base and of the filter-fraction grading curves using the remaining established grain
diameters. The two grading curves are constructed by straight-line connection of the points deter-
mined in this way.

3. In order to check the filtration stability between the base and the filter fraction the following characteristic grain diameters of their grading
curves are needed:

base fraction filter fraction

d60 = 0.3 mm D60 = 22 mm
d50 = 0.25 mm D50 = 19 mm
d10 = 0.09 mm D10 = 2.75 mm
CUI = d60 / d10 = 3.3 CUII = D60 / D10 = 8.

From Annex 1 with CUI = 3.3 and CUII = 8:

admissible A50 = 22
existing A50 = D50 / d50 = 19 / 0.25 = 76 > admissible A50 .

There is no mechanical filtration stability between the grading curves of the base and of the filter fraction, i.e. the soil is not stable to suffosion
as regards the investigated cut diameter.

21
 Annex 3, sheet 1

Types of filter construction

Geotextile directly on the subgrade (standard application, see 4.2)

permeable granular armour layer

geotextile
subsoil

Geotextile on a granular levelling sublayer (see 4.3)

permeable granular armour layer

geotextile
granular levelling sublayer
subsoil

Geotextile combined with an unbound granular filter (see 4.4)

permeable granular armour layer

geotextile
unbound granular filter
subsoil

Granular interlayer between geotextile and top layer (see 4.5)

top layer consisting of large armourstone

granular interlayer (filter stable to the top layer)

geotextile
subsoil

22
 Annex 3, sheet 2

Geotextile with a structural addition

Geotextile with an additional layer (see 4.6.2)

a) with relatively small pores

cm

b) with relatively large pores

cm

c) fascine-grid (sink mattress), see 4.6.3

23
 Annex 3, sheet 3
Examples of the upper edge construction
of a slope protection (see 4.7)

Upper edge of the filter

a) in the case of low surface-water discharge

b) in the case of high surface-water discharge

c) in the case of a long slope

24
 Annex 3, sheet 4

Toe forms of a slope protection

(example of an armourstone layer partially grouted)

a) toe carpet: on soils only slightly susceptible to erosion (d50 > 2 mm and Cu > 3)

b) embedded toe: design for a scour depth of

d ≥ 1.5 m in the case of non-cohesive fine-grained soil
d ≥ 0.75 m in the case of gravelly soil

c) toe sheet-pile wall: design for a scour depth of

d ≥ 1.5 m in the case of non-cohesive fine-grained soil
d ≥ 0.75 m in the case of gravelly soil

25
 Annex 3, sheet 5
Connections with a structure (see 4.8)
a) smooth surface

b) non-planar surface (e.g. sheet-pile wall)

variant 1

variant 2

overlap on slopes, seams (see 4.9)

26
 Annex 3, sheet 6

Standard top layers for a slope and bottom protection

according to the MAR /7/ (see 4.10)

armourstone size class II or III according to the TLW /3/

D1 geotextile filter

subsoil or lining susceptible to erosion or non-resistant to

dynamic perforation loads

armourstone size class II according to the TLW /3/ partially

grouted with impermeable mortar

D2 geotextile filter

subsoil or lining susceptible to erosion or non-resistant to

dynamic perforation loads

armourstone size class II according to the TLW /3/ fully

grouted with permeable mortar
D 3a geotextile filter

subsoil or lining susceptible to erosion or non-resistant to

dynamic perforation loads

armourstone size class II according to the TLW /3/ fully

grouted with impermeable mortar
D 3b
geotextile separation layer
subsoil

impermeable covering, e.g.asphaltic concrete

D 4a geotextile separation layer

subsoil

permeable covering, e.g. concrete blocks, gabions

(applicable only in the zone of fluctuating water levels)

D 4b geotextile filter
subsoil or lining susceptible to erosion or non-resistant to
dynamic perforation loads

27
 Annex 4

Grain-size range recommended for a granular

levelling sublayer (see 4.3)

assessment of soil permeability

1. Diagram of BEYER

2. Relation according to HAZEN valid for non-cohesive soils

a) uniform soils (Cu ≤ 5):

ksoil = (1.0 to 1.5) × d102 ; (d10 given in cm , k given in m / s)

b) non-uniform soils (Cu > 5):

(1.0 to 1.5)
ksoil = CU × d102 ; (d10 given in cm, k given in m / s).

28
 Annex 5

Grading bands of the armourstone size classes 0 - V

according to the Technical Supply Conditions for Armourstone (TLW) /3/

Fibre raw materials used for geotextiles and their properties /27/

type of fibre density biological resistance to acid resistance to basic resistance to ultra- softening point
raw material (g/cm3) resistance water water violet radiation 1) (°C) /
(pH ≥ 3) (pH ≤ 12) melting point
(°C)
Polyacrylic ++
1.14 - 1.18 +++ ++ ++ 200 / -
(PAC) (50 - 60)
PA 6
180 - 200 /
Polyamide + 215 - 220
1.14 + + ++
(PA) (5 - 15) 2) PA 6.6
220 - 235 /
255 - 260
Polyester + 230 - 240 /
1.36 - 1.38 ++ ++ +
(PES) (5 - 15) 2) 250 - 260
high density +++ 105 - 120 /
Polyethylene (PE) 0.95 - 0.96 ++ ++ ++ (no values 125 - 135
available)
Polypropylene + 150 - 160 /
0.90 - 0.92 ++ ++ ++
(PP) (0 - 10) 3) 160 - 175
+ + + exellent stability, + + good stability, + sufficient stability

1) residual strength in % of initial strength (tested on yarns) after direct weathering for 12 months, location Florida
2) improved as regards stabilized types
3) essential improvement possible with stabilizers

29
 Annex 6, sheet 1

Validity range of the soil types 1 and 2 (see 5.2.2)

test soil ST 1: k = 4 × 10-4 m / s (mean value)

test soil ST 2: k = 3 × 10-4 m / s (mean value)

30
 Annex 6, sheet 2

Validity range of the soil types 3 and 4 (see 5.2.2)

test soil ST 3: k = 6 x 10-5 m / s (mean value)

test soil ST 4: k = 1 x 10-9 m / s (mean value)

31
 Annex 7, sheet 1

Examples of a filter application in a permeable slope protection of a ship-canal using the soil-type
design procedure of the BAW

1. Example of soils lying in the range of the soil types 1 to 4

1.1 Local boundary conditions

Given:
- a subsoil including the grading band SU to SE according to fig. 1 (no critical alternating layers, see 3.3.1.4) with the
following soil mechanical values:
• SU : ϕ' = 30°
cu, Ip unknown
• SE : ϕ' = 35°
- execution of the construction works mainly under water;
- wave and current impacts caused by shipping even during construction works;
- top layer consisting of armourstone (D1), size class III;
- slope inclination 1:3 (β = 18,4°).

fig.1: grading band of the subsoil

1.2 Assessment of the subsoil

For the assessment of subsoil properties the
- grading curves (grading band) and
- effective angle of internal friction
of the present soils SU to SE are available.

These soils are classified to be of non-cohesive nature (d20 ≥ 0.006 mm), but to be susceptible to erosion during the con-struction stage (β
≥ ϕ' / 2). They are not suffosive (Cu < 8). Special effects of the water in the sense of subclause 3.3.4 are not relevant.

1.3 Assessment of the hydraulic loadings

According to subclause 3.3.2 dynamic hyraulic loadings must be considered in filter design.

1.4 Choice of the type of filter construction

In connection with the design top layer D1 (size class III) a filter is necessary according to Annex 1. Because the subsoil is susceptible to
erosion the geotextile shall be provided with an additional layer (see 4.6.2).

32
 Annex 7, sheet 2

1.5 Design of the geotextile filter

1.5.1 Assignment of the subsoil to the soil types 1 to 4

As regards the grain fractions d5 to d60 the grading band SU to SE (fig.1) must be compared with the validity range of the soil types 1 to 4
and assigned to them (Annex 6). The result is
• SU = soil type 4 (fig. 2a)
• SE = soil type 2 (fig. 2b).
SU is relevant to the mechanical filtration stability of the geotextile, SE to the hydraulic one (see 5.2.1).

fig. 2a: position of SU fig. 2b: position of SE

1.5.2 Material properties

Because of the provided type of top-layer construction, geotextile requirements are needed concerning
- tensile strengths
- resistance to dynamic perforation and
- resistance to abrasion.
For the design slope inclination the material requirements according to Table 3, top layer D1 (III), can be utilized.

1.6 Specifications in the tender documents

To tender a geotextile with an additional layer meeting the filtration requirements related to the soil types 2 to 4 and the material
properties required for a top-layer construction D1 (size class III). Wording of the geotextile specification text in the tender documents:
"geotextile with additional layer for a standard top layer D1, soil types 2 to 4, according to the TLG, Annex 2" (see 7.1). Herewith
the following specified limit values are relevant to a geotextile filter related to the subsoils present SU to SE (see Tables 2 and 3):
admissible mass of soil passing (related to the finest-grained non-cohesive soil type)
- soil type 4 : ≤ 300 (30) g;
k-value of the soil-filled geotextile (related to the most permeable soil type)
- soil type 2 : kn > 6 ⋅10-4 m/s;
thickness of the filter layer : T ≥ 6 mm (soil type 4 is relevant, see too 5.3.4.1);
tensile strength at failure : ≥ 1200 N/10 cm = 12 kN/m;
resistance to dynamic perforation loads related to armourstone size class III on soil types 2 - 4: > 1200 Nm;
resistance to abrasion loads
- residual thickness of the filter layer after abrasion test: T ≥ 4.5 mm (soil type 4 is relevant)
- residual tensile strength after abrasion test: ≥ 900 N/10 cm = 9 kN/m;
additional layer on soil types 2 - 4
small-pore structure : Dw = 0.3 - 2.0 mm; T = 5 - 15 mm
large-pore structure : Dw = 8 - 20 mm; T = 15 - 25 mm.

1.7 Choice of the geotextile

Any geotextile is appropriate for the revetment construction forseen which can be shown to meet the requirements of the above subclause
1.6 (see too 6.2)

33
 Annex 7, sheet 3

2. Example of soils lying only partly in the validity range of the soil types 1 to 4

2.1 Local boundary conditions

Given:
- a subsoil in alternating layers including the grading band TM to SU according to fig.3 with the following soil
mechanical values:
• TM : cu = 15 kN/m2
Ip = 0.18
• SU : ϕ' = 37 °;
- wave and current impacts caused by shipping;
- top layer consisting of armourstone, size class II partially grouted (D2);
- slope inclination 1:3 (β = 18.4°);
- remains of former revetment structures are present;
- execution of the construction works in the dry;
- seepage efflux from the slope during construction;

fig. 3: grading band of the subsoil

2.2 Assessment of the suboil

For the assessment of subsoil properties the
- grading curves (grading band) and
- characteristic soil mechanical parameters
of the present soils TM to SU are available.
TM is of cohesive, SU of non-cohesive nature. Both soil groups are not susceptible to erosion (see 3.3.1.2, 3.3.1.3). Non-cohesive
granulations lying between TM and SU can be instable during construction and erodible if β ≥ ϕ' / 2. The subsoil is not inhomogeneous in
the sense of subclause 3.3.1.4 if the former revetment remains are to be removed. Having checked the stability to suffosion (Annex 2) the
soils are assessed to be of non-suffosive nature. Special effects of the water in the sense of subclause 3.3.4 are not relevant.

2.3 Assessment of the hydraulic loadings

According to subclause 3.3.2 dynamic hydraulic loadings must be considered in filter design.

2.4 Choice of the type of filter construction

In connection with the design top layer D2 (size class II) a filter is necessary according to Annex 1. The following types of construction
can be considered alternatively:
a) geotextile without additional layer directly on the subgrade if the former revetment remains are to be removed;
b) geotextile on a granular levelling sublayer if the former revetment remains are not to be removed or if the slope is not
stable during construction (see above 2.2).

2.5 Design of the geotextile filter

2.5.1 Assignment of the subsoil to the soil types 1 to 4
2.5.1.1 Geotextile without additional layer directly on the subgrade
As regards the grain fractions d5 to d60 the grading band TM to SU (see fig. 3) must be compared with the validity range of the soil types 1
to 4 (Annex 6) and assigned to them as far as possible. The result is
• SU = soil type 3 (fig 4a);
• TM includes the range in which the filtration requirements may be reduced if cu and Ip are known. If grading curves exist between SU
and TM (here supposed) these lie in the range of soil type 4, which in each case is relevant to the mechanical filtration stability design.
For the hydraulic filtration stability design SU is relevant.

34
 Annex 7, sheet 4

fig. 4a: position of SU fig. 4b : position of TM

2.5.1.2 Geotextile on a granular levelling sublayer

The granulation of the granular levelling sublayer must comply with the cinditions in subclause 4.3. Gradings of the levelling sublayer
lying in the recommended range (see Annex 4) must be assigned to the soil type 1.

2.5.2 Material properties

Because of the provided type of top-layer construction, geotextile requirements are needed concerning
- tensile strengths and
- resistance to dynamic perforation .
For the design slope inclination the material requirements according to Table 3, top layer D2, are sufficient in the case of expected usual
installation stresses.

2.6 Specifications in the tender documents

2.6.1 Geotextile without additional layer directly on the subgrade
To tender a geotextile without additional layer meeting the filtration requirements related to the soil types 3 and 4 and the material
properties required for the top-layer construction D2. Wording of the geotextile specification text in the tender documents: "geotextile
without additional layer for a standard top layer D2, soil types 3 to 4, according to the TLG, Annex 2" (see 7.1). Herewith the
following specified limit values are relevantt to a geotextile filter related to the present soil groups TM to SU (see Tables 2 and 3):
admissible mass of soil passing (related to the finest-grained non-cohesive soil type)
- soil type 4 : ≤ 300 (30) g;
k-value of the soil-filled geotextile (related to the most permeable soil type)
- soil type 3 : kn > 1.2 ⋅ 10-4 m/s;
thickness of the filter layer : T ≥ 6 mm (soil type 4 is relevant);
tensile strength at failure : ≥ 1 200 Nm/ 10 cm = 12 kN/m;
resistance to dynamic perforation loads related to armourstone size class II on soil type 3-4: > 600 Nm.

2.6.2 Geotexttile on a granular levelling sublayer

To tender a geotextile without an additional layer meeting the filtration requirements related to soil type 1 (if the levelling-sublayer
grading curve lies in the range of the grading band according to Annex 4) and the material properties required for a top-layer construction
D2. Wording of the geotextile specification text in the tender documents:"geotextile without additional layer for a standard top layer
D2, soil type 1, according to the TLG, Annex 2". Herewith the following specified limit values are relevant to a geotextile filter applied
on a granular levelling sublayer (see Tables 2 and 3):
admissible mass of soil passing
- soil type 1 : ≤ 300 (30) g;
k-value of the soil-filled geotextile
-soil type 1 : kn > 8 ⋅ 10-4 m/s;
thickness of the filter layer : T ≥ 4.5 mm; required only if reduction of permeability due to clogging or blocking is possible, i.e. Dw >
0.5⋅ d2 (see 5.3.2);
tensile strength at failure: > 600 Nm.

2.7 Choice of the geotextile

Any geotextile is appropriate for the revetment construction forseen which can be shown to meet (see 6.2) the requirements of the above
subclause 2.6.1 or 2.6.2 (depending on the type of filter construction chosen).

35
 Annex 8, sheet 1

Filter rules of the AK 14 / AA 6.14

Table 1: Filter rules of the AK 14 / AA 6.14 /8/ for design of the mechanical filtration stability of a geotextile

36
 Annex 8, sheet 2

When designing the mechanical filtration stability of a geotextile on the basis of the largest admissible opening size Dw (O90 ) according to the
filter rules of the AK 14 the following grain-size ranges are to be distinguished.
- grain-size range A: d40 ≤ 0.06 mm
- grain-size range B: d15 ≥ 0.06 mm
- grain-size range C: d15 < 0.06 mm and d40 > 0.06 mm
The relevant filter rules are given in Table 1. The largest admissible opening size resulting from them should be used to ensure the
permeability as high as possible. With respect to safety to colmatation the lower limit value of the admissible opening size should be: Dw (O90)
≥ 0.8 ⋅ max. O90 /8/.
The grading curve of the subsoil must not cut the specially featured ranges given in the individual grain-size distribution diagrams.
Concerning the hatched area of the grain-size range A a relatively open filter design is admissible due to the effective cohesion /8/ (see too
3.3.1.3).
The hydraulic filtration stability is guaranteed for mechanically bonded nonwovens in contact with silt or sand if the kn-value of the brand-
new product measured under a normal stress of 2 kPa meets the following condition /8/:
kn ≥ 50 ⋅ ksoil.

Examples of application

In the following examples of application only the principal method for the design of the geotextile filtration properties according to the filter
rules is shown. Further requirements must be established following subclause 5.3 (see example Annex 7).
The grading bands of Annex 7, fig. 1 and 3, are used as examples of application.

Example 1 (see Annex 7, fig. 1): grading band SU - SE

Table 2: characteristic grain diameters of the limiting grading curves SU and SE

soil group d10 d15 d40 d50 d60 CU d90 grain-size range
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (-) (mm)

SU 0.014 0.018 0.055 0.075 0.10 7.1 0.2 A (d40 ≤ 0.06 mm)

SE 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.17 0.20 2.0 0.4 B (d15 > 0.06 mm)

According to subclause 5.2.1 , in the case of hydrodynamic loadings, the mechanical filtration stability is to be designed for SU and the
hydraulic filtration stability for SE.

mechanical filtration stability to SU (Table 2)

- Check of the criteria relevant to a soil with a high grain mobility:
1.Cu = 7.1 < 15 (criterion is met)
the further criteria must not be checked. The result is: SU is a subsoil with a high grain mobility.
- Determination of the limit values of the admissible opening sizes Dw (O90):
hydrostatic loadings hydrodynamic loadings
Dw < d90 = 0.2 mm Dw < d90 = 0.2 mm < 0.3 mm
upper limit value: Dw < 0.2 mm (valid for hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loadings)
lower limit value: Dw ≥ 0.8 ⋅ max. Dw = 0.8 ⋅ 0.2 = 0.16 mm.

hydraulic filtration stability to SE (Table 2)

- Assessment of the k-value of the subsoil according to Annex 4 (diagram of BEYER):
kSE = 1 ⋅ 10-4 m/s
- Permeability of the brand-new geotextile (kn):
kn ≥ 50⋅ kSE ≥ 5 ⋅ 10-3 m/s.
geotextile requirements in the tender documents
1. filtration stability: 0.16 ≤ DW < 0.2 mm; kn ≥ 5 ⋅ 10-3 m/s
2. layer thickness and other requirements see example 1 in Annex 7.

37
 Annex 8, sheet 3

Example 2 (Annex 7, fig. 3): grading band TM-SU

Table 3: characteristic grain diameters of the limiting grading curves TM and SU

soil group d10 d15 d40 d50 d60 CU d90 Ip grain-size range
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (-) (mm) (-)

TM - - 0.007 0.02 0.05 - 0.4 0.18 hatched area

SU 0.06 0.09 0.30 0.40 0.50 8.3 2.0 - B (d15 > 0.06 mm)
When dynamic hydraulic loads are relevant, according to sublause 5.2.1 the mechanical filtration stability is to be designed for the finest-
grained non-cohesive grading curve, the hydraulic filtration stability for the coarsest-grained (most permeable) grading curve of the grading
band (here SU).

As regards the finest non-cohesive grading curve the grain fractions given in Table 3a apply (here supposed, but in practice to be determined
by laboratory tests).

Table 3a: characteristic grain diameters of SU (supposed finest-grained non-cohesive grading curve)

finest-grained d10 d15 d40 d50 d60 CU d90 grain-size range

non-cohesive soil (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (-) (mm)
group

SU 0.006 0.012 0.08 0.12 0.15 25 1.0 C (d15 < 0.06 mm

d40 > 0.06 mm)

mechanical filtration stability to SU (Table 3a)

- Check of the criteria relevant to a subsoil with a high grain mobility
1. Cu = 25 > 15 (criterion is not met)
2. 0.02 < d < 0.1 mm = 20 - 30% (graphically assessed)
3. Ip = 0.08 < 0.15 (criterion is met).
The result is: SU is a subsoil with high grain mobility.
- Determination of the limit values of the admissible opening sizes Dw (O90):
hydrostatic loadings hydrodynamic loadings
Dw < d90 = 1.0 mm Dw< 1.5 × d10 √ Cu = 0.045 mm ( relevant upper limit value)
Dw ≥ 0.8 mm (lower limit) Dw < d50 = 0.12 mm
Dw ≥ 0.045 ⋅ 0.8 = 0.036 mm (lower limit value)

hydraulic filtration stability to SU (Table 3)

- Assessment of the k-value of the subsoil according to Annex 4 (HAZEN):
kSU = 3.6 ⋅ 10-5 m/s - 5.4 ⋅ 10-5 m/s
- Permeability of the brand-new geotextile (kn):
kn ≥ 50 ⋅ kSU ≥ 2.7 ⋅ 10-3 m/s.

geotextile requirements in the tender documents

1. filtration sttability: hydrostatic loads hydrodynamic loads
0.8 ≤ Dw < 1.0 mm 0.036 ≤ Dw < 0.045 mm
kn ≥ 2.7 ⋅ 10-3 m/s kn ≥ 2.7 ⋅ 10-3 m/s
2. layer thickness and other requirements see example 1 in Annex 7.

Note
(1) In the case of a suffosive subsoil attention should be paid to subclause 3.3.1.5.
(2) As regards geotextile permeability the tender documents must state at which water head h or gradient i
the minimum value kn shall apply (see too subclause 5.3.2).

38
 Annex 9

Table on standard tests according to the Technical Supply Conditions

for Geotextile Filters (TLG)

tests to be carried out basic test suitability test quality control tests control tests carried out
(proof of funda-mental (prior to construction) (during production) by the Principal
suitability)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

basic raw materials x (x) - -

general material properties x - - -

according to paragraph
(4) - (7)

mass per unit area

• filter layer x x x x
• additional layer x x x x

thickness
• filter layer x x x x
• additional layer x x x x

tensile strength at failure

• longitudinal direction x x x x
• transverse direction x x x x
x (x) x x
• seams

water permeability 1)
x - - -
• v/h- or kn /i-curve
x (x) x x
• index value for v or kn at
h = 0.05 or 0.25 m

opening size
x (x) x (x)
• filter layer x - x x
• additional layer

filtration stability according to x (x) - -

the BAW test method

resistance to dynamic x (x) - -

perforation loads

resistance to abrasion loads x (x) - -

resistance to temperatures
of up to 200 °C 2) x (x) - -

(x) depending on conditions of the construction works

1) v = flow velocity
h = hydraulic head
kn = coefficient of normal permeability
i = hydraulic gradient

2) only relevant to fibre raw materials known not to be resistant to high temperatures

39