NBA Accreditation

Accreditation – Road to Transformation
National Board of Accreditation - NBA
• Pre-qualifiers for accreditation

• Outcome based education
• Reports and documentation
• Criteria for evaluation
• Solution to ease accreditation process
• About Creatrix Accreditation
15-04-2019 1
Speakers Introduction
Siva (Host) Dr. Manpreet Manna Prof. S.K.Soni

CEO – Creatrix Campus Ex- Director AICTE Ex - Dean of Quality Assurance
Thought Leader – Education & IT Faculty, SLIET University NBA Accreditation Consultant
15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 2

Presenting Creatrix Campus Suite
Administrators/Management
Administration software can
improve quality & efficiency and
accelerate decision-making
Instructor/faculty
Communicate and collaborate with
students, staff. Manage grades,
assignments, and timetable efficiently.
Learner/student
Students can now learn at their own
pace and through their own devices.
State of the art LMS to facilitate
learning, auto-notification & alerts.

Creatrix Campus – Accreditation Support
Areas of Coverage
❖ Criteria for evaluation
❖ Outcome based education
❖ Pre-qualifiers for accreditation
❖ Reports and documentation
❖ Solution to ease accreditation process
❖ About Creatrix Accreditation

Dr. Manpreet Manna
Introduction
Evaluation Criteria & Parameters
Outcome Based Education

NBA Accreditation
What, Why, When and How?
What is accreditation ?
❖ It assures Program Quality
What it is not ….
❖ Not an award system (Gold Silver 1 2 3 )
❖ Not an Investigation of a complaint
❖ Not a Regulatory Process
❖ Not an Audit
❖ Accreditation is not even a ranking system

What is the NBA’s Quality Grading ?
Accredited Program for 6 Years

[when cumulative score is above 750 out of1000]
signifies that program meets and in most cases exceeds the
criteria.
Accredited Program for 3 Years

[when cumulative score is between 650 and 749 out of1000]
Signifies that program meets the minimum criteria with marginal
deficiencies which can be rectified in a short time.

Areas to be covered in SAR (Self Appraisal Reports)
❖ Program Criteria
❖ Program Educational Objectives, PEO
❖ Graduate Profile
❖ Program Outcomes, PO
❖ Accreditation Criteria
❖ Course Outcomes, CO
❖ Assessment
❖ Evaluation

Parameters for team to evaluate
❖ Infrastructure, Buildings and Facilities

❖ Faculty; Teaching Learning
❖ Industry Interaction; Brand
❖ Employability; Placement record
❖ What students can do after graduating??
❖ Whether institute provides all that is necessary for a confident engineer of
tomorrow; Prepare a 21st Century engineer

Case study
❖ The institute must showcase one case study of social impact with students
involvement with any one abhiyaan like
❖ Swacchta Abhiyan
❖ Vittiya Saksharta Abhiyan
❖ Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojna
❖ PMKVY unit with success rate
❖ Energy conservation project
❖ Waste disposal management etc.

Criteria for evaluation
❖ Stakeholder feedback (students, faculty, management)
❖ Preparedness, unbiased results orientation
❖ Peer team visit

❖ Documentation – recruitment, placement, financial
❖ Management – vision for next 5 , 10 years
❖ Orientation of supporting staff
❖ lab technicians/staff – promotion criteria
❖ Librarian, Asst. Librarian , hostel staff - from admin point of view
❖ Internship, placements, association with industry, MoU

❖ Faculty exchange, student exchange, expert visit
❖ Rural connect , social welfare
Outcome based education
Broadly in three parts

CURRICULUM
CONDUCTION
EVALUATION

CURRICULUM
When you are given autonomy for design or revise your institute curriculum (existing
accredited Institutions looking for 6 years) what measures you have taken while doing:
❖ Industry’s need based and student’s Industry readiness
❖ Local area need for entrepreneurial approach
❖ Learner’s aptitude, as for every region of country the learner’s taste and capacity
varies
❖ How similar to Model Curriculum of AICTE
❖ How balanced is BOS of an Institution

CONDUCTION
❖ Most of the time faculty conducting their classes in routine way, without sensing
the need of retrospective approach with
❖ Practical Based Learning(lecture in lab/plant)
❖ Effective use of Blended Learning

❖ Case studies
❖ Online teaching through e-content (Need MOOCs development approach)
❖ Student’s growth chart preparation with evaluation/monitoring their
communication skills, computational skills (which can be possible with some IT
tool)
EVALUATION
❖ The Examination Centre with complete secrecy and safety
❖ The Bloom's taxonomy approach for Examination reformation.
❖ The continuous feedback mechanism with statistical and graphical analytics of
students.
❖ The remedial action plan to be drawn for slow learners with appropriate
evaluation system.
❖ The question paper setting through external experts.
❖ The answer sheets evaluation at centralised point with table marking
❖ Sample question papers, answer sheets, keys and evaluation pattern be ready for
discussion.
❖ The CO and PO should be mapped in question paper.
Don’ts
❖ Never give wrong data related to Faculty, Lab Equipment's, Research Publications,
Placement, especially budget which always creates a negative impression.
❖ HOD himself/herself should give Department presentation and shouldn’t allow junior
faculty to present before the committee.
❖ Don’t keep any expired medicines in Health Centre, salts/chemicals in lab and Fire
extinguisher cylinder.
❖ The lift AMC certificate should not be expired.
❖ Never give false statements regarding students participation or recognitions in
International/National platform as these can be verified in fraction of minutes.

Don’ts
❖ Never do any tempering in Lab health register, faculty leave register, security and
sweeper’s roaster and salary registers.
❖ Never do arguments on such cases where supporting document is not available.
❖ Avoid any new recruitment of supporting staff or safai karamchari or bus driver during
visit period.
❖ Avoid unrealistic and lengthy Mission statements of each department.
❖ Never highlight any photos in any management/director office that reflects to any
political affiliation, cast/religious influenced (unless its Minority Institute)

Prof. S. K. Soni
Outcome Based Education
Pre - qualifiers for Accreditation
Reports & Documentation

Philosophy of OBE
Outcome Based Education means clearly focusing and organizing every-thing in an

educational system around what is essential for all students to be able to do
successfully at the end of their learning experiences (WILLIAM G SPADY 1994)
❖ VISION >>> WHERE TO = DESTINATION
❖ MISSION >>> HOW TO = WAYS & MEANS
❖ PROGRAM EDUCATION OBJECTIVES- PEOs >> WHAT FOR DEPT IS QUALITY
ASSURING:: EMPLOYMENT, CORE & MULTI-DISCIPLINARY ABILITIES, LIFE-LONG
LEARNING PROFESSIONAL
❖ PROGRAM OUTCOMES- POs >> ABILITY @ END OF PROGRAM
❖ COURSE OUTCOMES- COs >> ABILITY @ END OF A COURSE

Process
WORLD OF
WORK
कमाई
THE CONCEPT DIAGRAM OBE?

FOR B TECH P=4 YRS
OUTPUT
PROCESS
WORLD OF
INPUT LEARNING
पढाई

PARADIGM & PURPOSE OF OBE -1
❖ Paradigm: WHAT and WHETHER students learn successfully is more important

than WHEN and HOW they learn something.
❖ Purpose-1: Ensuring that all students are equipped with the knowledge,
competence, and qualities needed to be successful after they exit the
educational system.
❖ Purpose-2: Structuring and operating institutes so that the intended outcomes
can be achieved and maximized for all students. It is highly desirable that faculty
set higher success criteria or passing % marks or grade.

3 KEY PRINCIPLES OF OBE
❖ All students can learn and succeed, but not on the same day & in the same way.
❖ Successful learning promotes even more successful learning.
❖ Institutions control the conditions that directly affect successful learning in

institution. So the management of the institutes must feel & execute their
responsibilities a more honestly and be more fair with students and economy.

Evolving Outcome Statements
❖ Discuss with Selected honest & ACTIVE stakeholders
❖ Perform SWOT analyses of Departments & Institute
❖ Evolve outcomes iterating in forward & reverse direction from Vision to COs &
back
❖ USE OUTCOMES IN PRE-QUALIFIERS AND SAR
❖ IMPLEMENT OUTCOMES IN FIRST CYCLE AND REVIEW IF DESIRED

SWOT Analysis
❖ Strength: What makes you feel proud of ❖ Opportunities What can be used to
and a little superior to competitors.. transform your loss-making enterprise into a
profit center.
❖ Weakness: What you shall like to hide
❖ Threats: What can uproot your business or
from competitors and get filled in reduce your profits.
inferiority complex.
❖ SWOT analyses Opportunity plus strengths
❖ Weakness is the most difficult part to can change and or improve your total
perform honestly without fear of business plan.
management. Engage some external ❖ Weakness plus threats compel you to stop
expert to do SWOT for your institute. some verticals of your enterprise.

INTER-CONNECTED OUTCOMES OF A PROFESSIONAL
PROGRAM
VISION
AFTER 2XP YRS GAs
PEOs
MISSION
AFTER 2XP YRS
@ END OF COURSE
COs
First do POs,
PSOs
SWOT
@ END OF PROGRAM(P)
Analyses
of Inst & FOR B TECH, P=4 YEARS
Dept

SAMPLE OUTCOMES-VISION & MISSION
VISION OF CIVIL ENGG DEPT: MISSION OF CIVIL ENGG DEPT :

❖ To be a premier technical ❖ To provide quality education for successful careers:
department with teaching, Jobs, Business and higher studies in Civil Engineering
research and consultancy that emphasizes academic and technical excellence
that serves the economy in profession and research, life-long learning, effective
and strives continuously for communication, multi-discipline team work and
excellence in education and leadership to meet the challenges of the business &
research society

SAMPLE OUTCOMES: PEOs & POs
❖ EC-PEO-1: Develop ability to apply concepts of ❖ EC-PO-10. Communication: Communicate effectively
mathematics, science and computing to on complex engineering activities with the
Electronics and Communication Engineering engineering community and with society at large,
such as, being able to comprehend and write effective
❖ EC-PEO-2: Develop ability design and develop
reports and design documentation, make effective
interdisciplinary and innovative systems
presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
❖ EC-PEO-3: Develop ability to apply skills of
❖ EC-PSO1. Able to clearly understand the concepts and
communication, team work, ethics, leadership
applications in the field of Communication/
for a successful career in ICT industry and R&D
networking, signal processing, embedded systems
organizations
and semiconductor technology.

SAMPLE OUTCOMES: COs
Course V-Sem : INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP
❖ Explain the applicable source, scope and ❖ Describe to the various Legal issues
limitations of Intellectual Property within pertaining to Intellectual Property Rights
the purview of engineering domain. with the utility in engineering perspectives
❖ Apply the latest methodology, frameworks ❖ Undertake a micro-project of venture

and tools that entrepreneurs use to
creation in a facilitated learning
succeed in real life
environment

FOUR DOMAINS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
COGNITIVE: PSYCHOMOTOR OR MANUAL SKILLS:

KNOWLEDGE- RELATED TO ACTIVITIES RELATED TO PERFORMANCE OF
MENTAL ACTIVITIES- (Use PROFESSIONAL TASKS USING MIND &
Action Verbs at 3 levels MUSCLES OF BODY (Use action verbs at 3 levels )
AFFECTIVE: INTERACTIVE:
ATTITUDES AND VALUES- RELATED ACTIVITIES RELATED TO MOUTH & BODY
TO FEELINGS IN HEART (Use action TO COMMUNICATE WITH OTHERS (Use
verbs at 3 levels ) action verbs at 3 levels )

SAMPLE ACTION VERBS OF FOUR EARNING DOMAINS
COGNITIVE DOMAIN (BLOOM) PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN: (DAVE)

L-1: DRAW, IDENTIFY, DESCRIBE L-1 & ABOVE: LOOSEN, SELECT, GRIND, SKETCH,
L-2: COMPUTE, COMPARE, EXPLAIN REPAIR, REPLACE, TUNE, REMOVE,
L-3 & ABOVE: ANALYZE, DEFEND, CREATE FABRICATE, ASSEMBLE,
AFFECTIVE DOMAIN; (KRATHWOL) INTERACTIVE DOMAIN : (SONI)

L-1: FOLLOW, PRACTICE, INITIATE L-1: INFORM, ORIENT, TELL,
L-2: CONFORM, PERFORM, INITIATE L-2: CLARIFY, EXPLAIN, FACE QUESTIONS,
L-3 & ABOVE: CLASSIFY, INTEGRATE, QUALIFY L-3 & ABOVE: LEAD A MEETING, CONVINCE TEAM
MEMBERS, MOTIVATE STUDENTS TO ATTEND
CLASSES.

General meaning of Pre-qualification
❖ Institute’s present human & physical resources > resources of approval phase.
❖ Reference norms are AICTE’s program approval norms.
❖ Pre-qualifier comprises of two parts

❖ PART A- Profile of the Institute
❖ PART B- Program information
APRIL19 OBE & NBA: PQ, REPORTS & DOCUMENTS 32

Part-B: Essential Qualifiers-1
❖ Vision, Mission & PEOs.
❖ Are the Vision & Mission of the Department stated in the Prospectus /
Website?
❖ Are the PEOs of the Program listed in the Prospectus / Website?
❖ AICTE’s approval: for all the years including current year
❖ Overall Admission average for last 3 years > 50% of intake
❖ Program admission average for last 3 years> 50%

Part-B: Essential Qualifiers-2
❖ Faculty: Student intake > 1:25 (average over previous 3 academic years including
current academic year)
❖ Whether at least one Professor or one Associate Professor on regular basis with Ph.D.
degree is available in the respective Department during previous two academic years
including current academic year.
❖ Whether number of available Ph.Ds. in the department is greater than or equal to 10%
of the required number of faculty averaged for previous two academic years including
current academic year.
❖ Whether two batches have passed out in the programs under consideration

Part-B: Desirable parameters -1
❖ Whether department has program assessment and quality improvement committee. If

so, its constitution and mandate.
❖ Whether the departments under consideration receives separately earmarked funds for
❖ Maintenance of Laboratory/computational facilities (recurring funds)
❖ Up-gradation of laboratory/computation facilities (non-recurring funds)
❖ HODs should possess PhD degree.
❖ Available PhDs in the department exceeds 15% of the required number of faculty for
previous two academic years
❖ Overall admissions in the undergraduate programs under consideration has been more
than 60% (average of the previous three academic years)

NBA Reports & Documentation
Self-assessment Report Annexures & opinion Annual Compliance

or SAR survey reports. Report
❖ Self assessment report is ❖ SAR is a crisp and to ❖ Compliance report
prepared in consultation the point document elaborates with
with the stakeholders evidences that to what
❖ Annexures kept in
extent the SAR has been
❖ It states how the dept is classified hard & soft
practiced
going to implement OBE files, folders and pen-
drives.

NBA’s Self-Assessment Report or SAR-1
❖ SAR is a written commitment of the department which relates to the ways &
means of implementing the best possible practices OBE after getting NBA
Accreditation.
❖ The most critical and complex parts of SAR are the following;
❖ Conducting SWOT analysis,
❖ Evolving Outcome statements such as Mission, PEOs, POs and COs in the context of Graduate
attributes of Washington accord. Use of action verbs in different learning domains levels must
be selected carefully.

NBA’s Self-Assessment Report or SAR-2
Contd .. critical and complex parts of SAR;

❖ Enriching Curriculum after gap analyses, with hints for delivering content to
accomplish outcomes and
❖ Methodology and planning of assessment of students or evaluation of the
performance of departments and the institute
❖ Help of some external consultant & ERP agency is recommended

DELIVERY, ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION
Delivery Assessment
❖ Content of a professional program is ❖ COs are assessed using traditional
methods &
delivered through course outcomes-
COs. ❖ Use rubrics to minimize subjectivity,
❖ Learner centred delivery methods is Evaluation

preferred over lectures only. ❖ POs are attained indirectly from
assessment of COs and results of opinion
❖ Faculty becomes mentor/ facilitator of surveys of stake holders, at the end of
learning by students. program.
❖ PEOs & Mission after 2*P years

Uploading SAR and inspection of institute
❖ Uploading of SAR and related documents on e-NBA website shall require a team of
persons well conversant with both computing and word processing.
❖ Improve every aspects of buildings, roads and campus so that expert team visiting
the department and Institute’s campus should feel happy.
❖ Seek suggestions from different allied stakeholders to create an impressive
academic environment with a sharp focus on facilitating learning by students within
and without classrooms.

Accreditation
Creatix Campus Team

Accreditation Process flow – Creatrix campus
• Template selection • Evaluate • Progress monitoring
• Assign responsibilities • Generate grades • Version control
• Setting targets • Fact Check • Address gaps
Plan Assess Improve

Sustain
Accreditation
ready • Continuous monitoring
• Compliance reports
• Sustain for re-
Collate Analyse accreditation
• Load data(Program, Faculty,

Student, Outcomes, etc.,) • Identify gaps
• Map data • Auto assign task
• Collect evidences • Approval
• Generate report

Streamlined designing and mapping
❖ Create program / courses
❖ Create program / course outcomes
❖ Map courses to POs
❖ Map of COs to POs
❖ Map of assessments to COs
❖ Map of topics to COs
❖ Setup targets for each outcomes

Outcome based education in Creatrix
❖ Aligning mission, objectives with
outcomes
❖ Streamlined course design and
mapping
❖ Flexible assessment planning &
management
❖ Comprehensive learning outcomes
measurement
❖ Rigorous Continuous Quality
Improvement
❖ Easy report generation for
Accreditation
Faculty Management, Information & Contribution
❖ Faculty Recruitment, Faculty Information,
Faculty Workload, Faculty Performance,
Faculty Portal, Faculty Mentoring
❖ Faculty Evaluation & Development
❖ Support for quality & council accreditation
❖ Track up research activities
❖ Instant Email notifications

Courses Scheduling
Student Information System
Attendance
Self Management
Registration
Fees LMS
Outcomes
Assessment
Attainment
Course/
Internship /
Faculty
Placement
Evaluation

Measuring Outcomes for Continuous Improvement
❖ Monitor & track student success performance across

outcomes for progression
❖ Identifying poor outcome attainments and dissect
weaker areas
❖ Personalized assessment based on performance
❖ Better assessment of learning outcomes

❖ Disaggregation of learning outcomes
❖ Use of analytical and holistic rubrics

Report Generation for Accreditation
❖ Single click report generation
❖ Any time report generation
❖ Configurable SER/SAR templates
❖ Faculty contribution reports
❖ Course/Faculty evaluation reports

Q&A
Contact :
R. Rupesh
+91 – 9940436619
Business Development Manager
Creatrix – Campus
www.creatrixcampus.com

NBA Accreditation

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

NBA Accreditation

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Accreditation – Road to Transformation

National Board of Accreditation - NBA

• Pre-qualifiers for accreditation

Siva (Host) Dr. Manpreet Manna Prof. S.K.Soni

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 2

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 3

❖ Criteria for evaluation

❖ Outcome based education

❖ Pre-qualifiers for accreditation

❖ Reports and documentation

❖ Solution to ease accreditation process

❖ About Creatrix Accreditation

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 5

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 6

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 7

Accredited Program for 6 Years

Accredited Program for 3 Years

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 8

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 9

❖ Infrastructure, Buildings and Facilities

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 10

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 11

❖ Peer team visit

❖ Internship, placements, association with industry, MoU

Broadly in three parts

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 13

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 14

❖ Effective use of Blended Learning

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 17

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 18

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 19

Outcome Based Education means clearly focusing and organizing every-thing in an

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 20

THE CONCEPT DIAGRAM OBE?

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 21

❖ Paradigm: WHAT and WHETHER students learn successfully is more important

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 22

❖ Successful learning promotes even more successful learning.

❖ Institutions control the conditions that directly affect successful learning in

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 23

❖ Discuss with Selected honest & ACTIVE stakeholders

❖ Perform SWOT analyses of Departments & Institute

❖ USE OUTCOMES IN PRE-QUALIFIERS AND SAR

❖ IMPLEMENT OUTCOMES IN FIRST CYCLE AND REVIEW IF DESIRED

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 24

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 25

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 26

VISION OF CIVIL ENGG DEPT: MISSION OF CIVIL ENGG DEPT :

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 27

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 28

❖ Apply the latest methodology, frameworks ❖ Undertake a micro-project of venture

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 29

COGNITIVE: PSYCHOMOTOR OR MANUAL SKILLS:

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 30

COGNITIVE DOMAIN (BLOOM) PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN: (DAVE)

AFFECTIVE DOMAIN; (KRATHWOL) INTERACTIVE DOMAIN : (SONI)

15-04-2019 Copyright Anubavam Technologies Pvt Ltd 2019 31

❖ Reference norms are AICTE’s program approval norms.

❖ Pre-qualifier comprises of two parts

❖ PART B- Program information

APRIL19 OBE & NBA: PQ, REPORTS & DOCUMENTS 32

❖ Vision, Mission & PEOs.

❖ Are the PEOs of the Program listed in the Prospectus / Website?