Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
IN HIGHER PLANTS
Michael F. Thomashow
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences and
Department of Microbiology and Public Health,
Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
I. Introduction............................................................ 99
11. Biochemistry of Cold Acclimation ....................................... 101
111. Genetics of Cold Acclimation ........................................... 105
A. Inheritance of Frost Hardiness ...................................... 105
B. Gene Expression during Cold Acclimation ............................ 108
C. Characterization of Cold-RegulatedGenes and Polypeptides. ........... 116
IV. Concluding Remarks. .................................................. 123
References ............................................................ 125
1. Introduction
99
C-opMght0 1990 by Academic Ress, In?
100 MICHAEL F. THOMASHOW
Much of the research on cold acclima ion has been directed toward
understanding the mechanism(s) respc!i sible for the increased frost
tolerance of acclimated plants. Toward this end, many of the initial
studies focused on determining the critical forms of injury that occur in
plants during a freeze-thaw cycle. In 1912, Maximov suggested that
disruption of cellular membranes, particularly the plasma membrane,
was the primary cause of freezing injury in plants. Subsequent studies
have supported this view (see Levitt, 1980; Steponkus, 1984). Further,
they have indicated that membrane damage results primarily from the
severe dehydration that occurs during a freeze-thaw cycle. Thus, toler-
ance to freezing must include a tolerance to dehydration stress. What
then are the forms of membrane damage that occur during freeze-
induced dehydration and what mechanisms are responsible for tol-
erance?
“Expansion-induced lysis,” one form of cell and membrane injury,
occurs in response to relatively high freezing temperatures, about -3 to
-7°C (see Steponkus, 1984).As temperatures drop below O”C,the extra-
cellular water of the plant begins to freeze, resulting in a lowered water
activity and an increased solute concentration in the extracellular
spaces. In response to these changes in chemical and osmotic potentials,
water moves out of the cells, causing severe dehydration and cell
shrinkage. When the extracellular ice melts, the cells rehydrate and
expand. If the cells are to survive, their plasma membranes must be
able to withstand the efflux and influx of water. This occurs in cells that
can frost harden, but nonacclimated cells lyse.
A critical difference between the membranes from cold-acclimated
and nonacclimated plant cells appears to be that membrane material is
“conserved during a freeze-thaw cycle in hardened cells. In an elegant
series of experiments, Steponkus and colleagues (Gordon-Kamm and
Steponkus, 1984a,b; Dowgert and Steponkus, 1984; Dowgert et al.,
1987) showed that protoplasts prepared from acclimated rye seedlings
had a much greater potential to reexpand after a freeze-thaw cycle
than did protoplasts isolated from nonacclimated plants. This differ-
ence resulted from a change in the cryobehavior of the membranes in
the acclimated cells. Upon freezing to about -5”C, the nonacclimated
protoplasts dehydrated and the plasma membranes formed endocytotic
102 MICHAEL F.THOMASHOW
vesicles. When the protoplasts were thawed, the vesicular material was
not reincorpoiated into the plasma membranes and, consequently, re-
hydration resulted in an intolerable osmotic pressure and the pro-
toplasts burst. When the cold-acclimated protoplasts were frozen, they,
too, dehydrated, but instead of forming endocytotic vesicles, the plasma
membranes formed exocytotic extrusions. The important difference
was that these membrane extrusions remained in association with
plasma membrane and were reincorporated during rehydration. Thus,
the protoplasts could swell to their original size.
Whether the plasma membranes from whole plant cells behave in
precisely the same way as those from protoplasts is open to question
(see, e.g., Pearce and Willison, 1985; Johnson-Flanagan and Singh,
1986; Singh et al., 1987). For example, instead of extracellular extru-
sions, hardened whole cells of B. napus, alfalfa, and rye produced many
more osmotically active plasmalemma strands during plasmolysis than
did nonhardened cells (see, e.g., Johnson-Flanagan and Singh, 1986;
Singh et al.,1987). These strands appeared to tether the protoplast to
the cell wall in the plasmolyzed cells. The critical point, however, was
that the plasmalemma strands, like extracellular extrusions, were
reincorporated back into the expanding protoplasts during deplasmoly-
sis. Thus, whereas the nonacclimated cells suffered expansion-induced
lysis, the acclimated cells did not.
Other forms of damage have also been shown to occur in the plasma
membranes of nonacclimated cells as they are frozen to subzero temper-
atures of - 10°C and below. At these temperatures, the dehydration
experienced by the cells is, of course, more severe than freezing to -5"C,
and injury is generally manifested as a loss of osmotic responsiveness
(see Steponkus, 1984; Steponkus and Lynch, 1989). Examination of the
membranes from such cells has revealed the formation of lateral phase
separations, aparticulate lamellae, lamellar-to-hexagonal-I1 phase
transitions, and multilamellar vesicles (see, e.g., Gordon-Kamm and
Steponkus, 1984a,b; Pearce and Willison, 1985;Johnson-Flanagan and
Singh, 1986; Singh et al., 1987). Similar membrane damage is suffered
by nonacclimated cells subjected to equivalent degrees of dehydration
induced by suspension in hypertonic solutions at O"C, indicating that
the injury is due to dehydration rather than low temperature per se. In
cold-acclimated cells, these forms of injury are greatly reduced. For
example, whereas osmotic nonresponsiveness occurs when protoplasts
from nonacclimated rye leaves are frozen to - 1O"C, protoplasts isolated
from acclimated leaves can be frozen to - 10°C without injury (Gordon-
Kamm and Steponkus 1984b). Protoplasts from acclimated rye leaves
GENETICS OF COLD ACCLIMATION IN PLANTS 103
A. INHERITANCE
OF FROST
HARDINESS
The inheritance of the ability to frost harden has been examined in a
wide range of plants, with the most detailed body of knowledge existing
for wheat. The first studies were those of Nilsson-Ehle (1912), who
reported the results of a cross between two varieties of winter wheat
that were intermediate in their abilities to frost harden. The results
indicated transgressive segregation for the frost hardiness character
and it was concluded that frost hardiness was a quantitative trait
controlled by several genes. Subsequent studies with wheat conducted
by Hayes and Aamodt (19271,Worzella (19351, and Quisenberry (1931)
have confirmed this notion.
Additional, more detailed genetic analyses have indicated that the
gene interactions responsible for frost hardiness in wheat are quite
complex. Gullord (1975) and Gullord et al. (1975) examined the mate-
rial from two complete diallels of winter wheat (Triticum aestiuum L.),
one having six parental genotypes and the other four genotypes. They
assessed the freezing tolerance of cold-acclimated plants using two
different protocols, a “low-intensity” freeze (the crowns of the plants
were kept dry and frozen to - 15 to -22°C) and a “high-intensity” freeze
(the crowns of the plants were submerged in water and frozen to - 11 to
-15°C). From the analysis of the data, the investigators concluded that
frost tolerance involved the action of several partially dominant genes
that were mostly additive in their effects. In addition, the data sug-
gested that the genes controlling frost tolerance under high-intensity
freezing were different from the genes controlling freezing hardiness
under low-intensity freezing. This latter conclusion is intriguing in
light of the work of Steponkus et al. (1988) discussed previously, indi-
cating that frost tolerance in acclimated rye protoplasts involves at
least two different mechanisms.
In studies analogous to those by Gullord and colleagues, Sutka (1981,
1984) analyzed two complete diallels of winter wheat, one having 6
parental genotypes and the other 10 genotypes. Again, the analyses
indicated that the inheritance of frost hardiness involved multiple
genes that were mostly additive in their effect. However, the variance-
covariance graphical analysis indicated that frost sensitivity was par-
tially dominant. Similar conclusions regarding the direction of domi-
nance were reached by Puchkov and Zhirov (1978) and Schafer (1923).
Other studies (for a review, see Orlyuk, 1985), for example, those by
106 MICHAEL F. THOMASHOW
Chromosome Reference(s)
that frost tolerance was largely determined by recessive genes and, like
others (Coffman, 1962;Finkner, 19661,observed transgressive segrega-
tion of the frost-hardiness character (F3 progenies that were more frost
tolerant than the original parents were obtained in many crosses). As
for barley, winter survival (freezing tolerance being the major factor)
was found to be controlled primarily by genes with additive effects
(Eunus et al., 1962; Rhode and Pulham, 1960). Both dominant and
recessive genes contributed to winter hardiness, and the direction of
dominance (toward frost tolerance or frost sensitivity) appeared to de-
pend on the severity of the freezing conditions.
108 MICHAEL F. THOMASHOW
B. GENEEXPRESSION
DURING COLDACCLIMATION
1. Isozyme Composition
Temperature can have a variety of effects on the structures and
functions of enzymes (Brandts, 1967; Somero, 1975; Tappel, 1966). Of
course, it affects the rate at which covalent bonds are made or broken
during enzyme catalysis; generally, the rate of catalysis under condi-
tions of saturating substrate concentration (Vmax)approximately dou-
bles for each 10°C increase in temperature. In addition, temperature
affects the “weak” chemical bonds-hydrogen bonds, electrostatic in-
teractions, and hydrophobic interactions-that stabilize the higher or-
ders of protein structure (secondary, tertiary, and quaternary struc-
ture) and enzyme-ligand interactions. For example, hydrogen bonds
and electrostatic interactions, because they form exothermically, are
stabilized by reductions in temperature. Hydrophobic interactions,
which form endothermically, are favored by increases in temperature.
Thus, small changes in temperature commonly affect the K , values
and activation energies for enzymes, whereas temperature extremes,
both high and low, can result in enzyme denaturation.
Given the effects of temperature on protein structure and function,
one might expect that certain enzymes would be modified, or that
different forms might be synthesized, in cold-acclimatedplants. That is,
different isozymes, better suited to low-temperature environments,
might be produced during cold acclimation. There is evidence to indi-
cate that this is the case. Huner and Macdowall (1976a,b, 1979a,b)
isolated and characterized the ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/
oxygenase (Rubisco)from acclimated and nonacclimated rye plants and
found that there were different isozymes in the two types of tissues.
Moreover, they presented evidence indicating that the “acclimated en-
zyme” had twice the specific activity of the “nonacclimated enzyme”
(measured at 25”C), and that the apparent K , for COZ of the two
GENETICS OF COLD ACCLIMATION IN PLANTS 109
which it was found that soluble protein levels in acclimated plants were
about 50 and 300% greater, respectively, than in nonacclimated plants.
Moreover, it has been shown that changes in polypeptide composition
occur during the cold acclimation process. The polypeptide profiles of
tissues from a variety of cold-acclimated and nonacclimated plants
have been examined by SDS-PAGE and in uivo radiolabeling (Table 2).
The results indicate that cold acclimation is associated with both the
appearance of new polypeptides and increases and/or decreases in oth-
ers. The in uiuo radiolabeling experiments suggest that many, if not
most, of these changes involve modifications in polypeptide synthesis.
However, because the radiolabeling periods used in most of the studies
were relatively long (usually 6-24 hours), it is possible that posttrans-
lational processes such as polypeptide turnover also have roles.
Although it is clear that a number of changes in polypeptide composi-
tion occur during cold acclimation, it is significant to note that, unlike
the heat-shock and anaerobic stress responses, wherein extensive
changes in protein synthesis occur (see Kimpel and Key, 1985; Sachs
and Ho, 1986),the changes in protein synthesis during cold acclimation
appear to be relatively modest. That is, although a number of changes
occur, the overall patterns of protein synthesis in cold-acclimated and
nonacclimated plants appear to be quite similar. For example, Guy and
Haskell (1987) examined the synthesis of polypeptides during cold
acclimation in spinach (Spinucia oleracea L.) by radiolabeling plant
leaves in uiuo with [35S]methionineand analyzing the polypeptides by
two-dimensional SDS-PAGE. Using this procedure, the investigators
could resolve about 500 different polypeptides. They found that most of
the polypeptides synthesized by the control and cold-acclimated leaves
were the same. There were, however, certain reproducible differences.
Exposure of the plants to 5°C resulted in the appearance of three new
high-molecular-weight cold-regulated (COR) polypeptides (the poly-
peptides were referred to by the investigators as “CAPS,” cold-
acclimation proteins) having molecular weights of 160K, 117K, and
85K. A dramatic increase in a fourth high-molecular-weight COR poly-
peptide, molecular weight 79K, was also consistently observed. An
additional 18 polypeptides, ranging in molecular weight from 19K to
48K, were detected in acclimated leaves in some experiments, but not
in others. Nine polypeptides, in the range of 22-55 kDa, were present in
nonacclimated plants but were absent in acclimated plants.
Results similar to those of Guy and Haskell (1987) have been ob-
tained by other investigators working with other plants (Table 2).
Kurkela et al. (1988) used in uiuo radiolabeling and one-dimensional
SDS-PAGE to compare the polypeptide profiles of nonacclimated and
acclimated Arabidopsis thuliana and found that seven polypeptides
GENETICS OF COLD ACCLIMATION IN PLANTS 111
TABLE 3
cDNA and Genomic Clones of Cold-Regulated Genes
cDNA and genomic copies of cor genes have also been isolated from
Arubidopsis. We (Hajela et al., 1990)isolated cDNA clones by construct-
ing a cDNA library of poly(A)+ RNA isolated from cold-acclimated
plants and screening it by differential hybridization to cDNA probes
prepared against RNA isolated from acclimated and nonacclimated
plants. Initially 25 “cold-regulated clones” were identified that, upon
further analysis, were found to fall into one of four groups. Each group,
represented by either pHH7.2, pHH28, pHH29, or pHH67, contained
cDNA inserts of different cor genes (Table 3). Northern blot analysis of
total RNA isolated from acclimated and nonacclimated plants indicated
that pHH7.2, pHH28, pHH29, and pHH67 hybridized to transcripts of
1.4, 2.5, 0.6, and 0.7 kb, respectively. The levels of these transcripts
increased dramatically (10-fold or greater) in cold-acclimated plants
and returned to low levels in deacclimated plants. Time-course studies
indicated that the levels of all four cor transcripts increased markedly
within 4 hours, continued to increase up to about 12 hours, and then
remained at elevated levels for as long as the plants were kept at low
temperatures (the longest period tested was 14 days). Returning the
plants to warm temperatures resulted in rapid decreases in the levels of
all four transcripts; within 4-8 hours, they fell to very low or undetect-
able levels. Nuclear run-on transcription assays indicated that the
temperature-regulated accumulation of the cor transcript represented
by pHH7.2, pHH28, and pHH29 was controlled primarily at the
posttranscriptional level, while accumulation of the cor transcript
represented by pHH67 was regulated largely at the transcriptional
level.
M. Franck and S. Kurkela (personal communication) have isolated a
genomic clone of an Arubidopsis cor gene. The gene codes for a 0.45-kb
transcript that increases greater than 10-foldin acclimated plants. The
level of the transcript remains high for as long as the plants are kept in
the cold and falls to low or undetectable levels within 14 hours of
returning the plants to control temperatures.
C. CHARACTERIZATION
OF COLD-REGULATED
GENES
AND POLYPEPTIDES
distinct from the heat-shock response. Where studied, COT genes have
been found not to be responsive to heat stress and, unlike heat shock,
the changes in gene expression that accompany cold acclimation are not
transient and are relatively modest (of course, a change in expression of
only 1%of the genes in a higher plant would still be more than 100
genes). Major issues that now need to be addressed include detailing the
transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms in-
volved in controlling cor gene expression, determining how plants
“sense” cold temperatures and relay this information into altered gene
expression, and establishing the link between low-temperature- and
ABA-regulated expression of cor genes. The isolation of cDNA and
genomic clones of cor genes is an important step toward these goals.
As for the functions of cor genes and the roles that they have in cold
acclimation, virtually nothing is known. There is, in fact, no direct
evidence for or against the hypothesis that COR polypeptides have
significant roles in cold hardening. This hypothesis, as first proposed by
Weiser (19701, however, is reasonable, especially in light of what is
known about the changes in gene expression that occur in response to
other environmental stresses such as heat shock and anaerobic stress.
Further, as discussed above, a number of observations have been made
that are consistent with the hypothesis: there is the finding in alfalfa
that a high positive correlation exists between the levels of expression
of three cor genes and the frost hardiness of four different cultivars;
where it has been examined in detail, COT gene expression has been
found to closely parallel plant acclimation and deacclimation; it has
been concluded in studies with wheat, B . nupus, and S . commersonii
that inhibitors of protein synthesis hinder cold acclimation; and it has
been shown that certain cor genes are responsive to both ABA applica-
tion and drought stress, two treatments that can increase the freezing
tolerance of plants in the absence of low temperatures. There is also the
intriguing observation that certain COR polypeptides of Arubidopsis
share the unusual biochemical property of not being precipitated by
boiling. It would seem unlikely that the sharing of this property, along
with cold regulation, would be mere happenstance. More likely, it is
reflective of some common underlying biochemical property, perhaps
even shared function. Determining the functions of these and other cor
genes and determining whether the COR polypeptides have important
roles in cold acclimation are major issues to be addressed. Again, the
isolation of cDNA and genomic clones of cor genes should help in such
endeavors. I would anticipate that significant progress will be made
regarding these issues over the coming few years.
GENETICS OF COLD ACCLIMATION IN PLANTS 125
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I wish to thank Andrew Hanson, Peter Steponkus, Charlie Guy, and Jas Singh
for insightful, informative discussions regarding cold acclimation and plant stress;
Marianne Franck, Peter Chandler, Tim Close, and 0. Veisz for sharing unpublished
results and preprints of articles; and Peter Steponkus, Suzanne Hugly, Sarah Gilmour,
Ravindra Hajela, and David Horvath for critical comments on the manuscript. Research
conducted in the author’s laboratory waa supported by grants from the USDA Competi-
tive Grants Program, the Michigan Research Excellence Fund, and the Michigan State
Agricultural Experiment Station.
REFERENCES
Amirshashi, M. C., and Patterson, F. L. (1956). Cold resistance of parent varieties, Fz
populations and F3 lines of 20 oat crosses. Agron. J. 48,184-188.
Baker, J., Steele, C., and Dure, L., 111 (1988). Sequence and characterization of 6 Lea
proteins and their genes from cotton. Plant Mol. Biol. 11,277-291.
Bondar’, G. P. (1981). Results of a study of winter hardiness in the wheat variety Odessa
16 by means of monosomic analysis. Ekol. Genet. Rust. Zhivotn. Tezisy Dokl. Vses.
Konf., 2, Kishinev, Moldaviun, SSR,70-71.
Brandts, J. F. (1967). Heat effects on proteins and enzymes. In “Thermobiology” (A. Rose,
ed.), pp. 25-72. Academic Press, New York.
Burke, M. J., Gusta, L. V., Quamme, H. A., Weiser, C. J., and Li, P. H. (1976). Freezing
and injury in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 27,507-528.
Caffrey, M., Fonseca, V., and Leopold, A. C. (1988). Lipid-sugar interactions. Relevance
to anhydrous biology. Plant Physiol. 86,754-758.
Cahalan, C., and Law, C. N. (1979). The genetical control of cold resistance and vernaliza-
tion requirement in wheat. Heredity 42,125-132.
Carpenter, J. F., and Crowe, J. H. (1988). Modes of stabilization of protein by organic
solutes during desiccation. Cryobiology 25,459-470.
Chen, P. M., and Gusta, L. V. (1982). Cold acclimation of wheat and smooth brome-grass
cell suspensions. Can. J.Bot. 60,1207-1211.
Chen, T. H. H., and Gusta, L. V. (1983). Abscisic acid-induced freezing resistance in
cultured plant cells. Plant Physiol. 73, 71-75.
Chen, H. H., Gavinlertvatana, P., and Li, P. H. (1979). Cold acclimation of stem-cultured
plants and leaf callus of Solanum species. Bot. Gaz. (Chicago) 140,142-147.
Chen, H. H., Li, P. H., and Brenner, M. L. (1983). Involvement of abscisic acid in potato
cold acclimation. Plant Physiol. 71,362-365.
Close, T., Kortt, A. A., and Chandler, P. (1989).A cDNA based comparison of dehydration
induced proteins (dehydrins) in barley and corn. Plant Mol. Biol. 13,95-108.
Cloutier, Y . ,and Siminovitch, D. (1982). Correlation between cold- and drought-induced
frost hardiness in winter wheat and rye varieties. Plant Physiol. 69,256-258.
Coffman, F. A. (1962). Increased winter hardiness in oats now available. Agron. J. 54,
489-491.
Cox, W., and Levitt, J. (1976). Interrelations between environmental factors and freezing
resistance of cabbage leaves. Plant Physiol. 57,553-555.
Crowe, J. H., and Crowe, L. M. (1986). Stabilization of membranes in anhydrobiotic
organisms. In “Membranes, Metabolism, and Dry Organisms” (A. C. Leopold, ed.),
pp. 188-209. Cornell Univ. Press (Comstock), Ithaca, New York.
126 MICHAEL F.THOMASHOW
Olien, C. R. (1965). Interference of cereal polymers and related compounds with freezing.
Cryobiology 2.47-54.
Olien, C. R. (1973). Thermodynamic components of freezing stress. J. Theor. Biol. 39,
201-210.
Olien, C. R. (1974). Energies of freezing and frost desiccation. PlantPhyswl. 53,764-767.
Olien, C. R., and Smith, M. V. (1977). Ice adhesions in relation to freeze stress. Plant
Physiol. 60,499-503.
Orlyuk, A. P. (1985). The problems of frost- and winter-hardiness in genetic studies of
winter wheat. Genetika (Moscow)21,15-22.
OR, W., Keller, W. A., and Singh, J. (1986). Induction of freezing tolerance in a n embryo-
genic cell suspension culture ofBrassicanapus by abscisic acid at room temperature.
J.Plant Physwl. 126,23-32.
Pearce, R. S., and Willison, J. H. M. (1985). Wheat tissues freeze-etched during exposure
to extracellular freezing: Distribution of ice. Plantu 163,295-303.
Perras, M., and Sarhan, F. (1989). Synthesis of freezing tolerance proteins in leaves,
crown, and roots during cold acclimation of wheat. Plant Physiol. 89,577-585.
Pfahler, P. L. (1966). Small grain improvement by breeding and selection. Rep. Fla.
Agric. Exp. Stn. p. 52.
Poysa, V. W. (1984). The genetic control oflow temperature, ice-encasement, and flooding
tolerances by chromosomes 5A, 5B, and 5D in wheat. Cereal Res. Commun. 12,
135-141.
Puchkov, Y. M., and Zhirov, E. G. (1978). Breeding of common wheat varieties with high
frost resistance and genetic aspects of it. World Sci. News 15,17-22.
Quisenberry, K. S. (1931). Inheritance of winter hardiness, growth habit, and stem-rust
reaction in crosses between Minhardi and H-44 spring wheats. U.S., Dep. Agric.,
Tech. Bull. 218,45 pp.
Reaney, M. J. T., and Gusta, L. V. (1987). Factors influencing the induction of freezing
tolerance by abscisic acid in cell suspension cultures of Bromus inermis Leyss and
Medicago sativa L. Plant Physwl. 83,423-427.
Rhode, D. R., and Pulham, C. F. (1960). Heritability estimates of winter hardiness in
winter barley determined by the standard unit method of regression analysis. Agron.
J . 52,584-586.
Rikin, A., Waldman, M., Richmond, A. E., and Dovart, A. (1975).Hormonal regulation of
morphogenesis and cold-resistance. I. Modifications by abscisic acid and gibberellic
acid in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) seedlings. J . Exp. Bot. 26, 175-183.
Roberts, D. W. A. (1967). The temperature coefficient of invertase from the leaves of
cold-hardened and cold-susceptible wheat plants. Can. J.Bot. 45,1347-1357.
Roberts, D. W. A. (1975). The invertase complement of cold-hardening and cold-sensitive
wheat leaves. Can. J.Bot. 53,1333-1337.
Roberts, D. W. A. (1979). Changes in the proportions of two forms of invertase associated
with the cold acclimation of wheat. Can. J. Bot. 57,413-419.
Roberts, D. W. A. (1982). Changes in the forms of invertase during the development of
wheat leaves growing under cold-hardening and non-hardening conditions. Can. J.
Bot. 60,1-6.
Roberts, D. W. A. (1986). Chromosomes in ‘Cadet’ and ‘Rescue’ wheats carrying loci for
cold hardiness and vernalization response. Can. J.Genet. Cytol. 28,991-997.
Robertson, A. J., Gusta, L. V., Reaney, M. J. T., and Ishikawa, M. (1987). Protein
synthesis in bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss) cultured cells during the induction
of frost tolerance by abscisic acid or low temperature. Plant Physiol. 84,1331-1336.
Robertson, A. J., Gusta, L. V., Reaney, M. J. T., and Ishikawa, M. (1988). Identification of
130 MICHAEL F. THOMASHOW