Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
MOTIVATION
CONCEPTS
Presented by: Group 4
Learning Objectives:
DESCRIBE DEMONSTRATE
the differences among self-efficacy
the three key elements of motivation
COMPARE
theory, and expectancy theory.
individual’s intensity,
goal.
INTENSITY
DEFINING MOTIVATION -describes how hard a person tries
OF MOTIVATION an organization
PERSISTENCE
-measures how long a
COMPARE
theory, and expectancy theory.
THEORY
Includes hunger, thirst, shelter, sex,
SAFETY SOCIAL
Security and protection from Affection, belongingness,
ESTEEM SELF-ACTUALIZATION
Internal factors such as self-respect,
Drive to become what we are
autonomy, and achievement,
capable of becoming;
and extern l factors such as status,
includes growth, achieving our
recognition, and attention.
potential, and self-fulfillment
HIGHER ORDER NEEDS
Source: A. H. Maslow, Motivation and Personality, 3rd ed., R. D. Frager and J. Fadiman (eds.). © 1997. Adapted by permission of
Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
THEORY X
BASICALLY NEGATIVE
THEORY Y
BASICALLY POSITIVE
perform. direction.
HERZBERG'S TWO
FACTOR THEORY
VENESSE ABELLANOSA
TWO FACTOR
THEORY
WORKING EFFICIENTLY
A theory that relates intrinsic factors to
FREDERICK HERZBERG
"The oppposite of
satisfaction is no
INTRINSIC FACTORS
Advancement, recognition, responsibility, and
satisfaction."
achievement seem related to job satisfaction
"The oppposite of
EXTRINSIC FACTORS
dissatisfaction is no
dissatisfaction."
Supervision, pay, company policies, and work
HYGIENE FACTORS
Factors - such as company policies and
Theory?
McClelland's Theory
of Needs
McClelland's Theory
of Needs
WORKING EFFICIENTLY
A theory that states achievement,
motivation
DAVID McCLELLAND
THREE IMPORTANT
NEEDS NEED FOR
ACHIEVEMENT (nAch)
The drive to excel, to achieve in
behaved otherwise
interpersonal relationships
McClelland's Theory of needs is a theory
motivation
Learning Objectives:
DESCRIBE DEMONSTRATE
the differences among self-efficacy
the three key elements of motivation
COMPARE
theory, and expectancy theory.
EDWARD DECI
and
RICHARD RYAN
COGNITIVE
EVALUATION THEORY
A complementary theory which is a version of self-
VALUES
2 PICS 2 WORDS
____ _____________
theory
GOAL SETTING
THEORY
MECA CENABRE
GOAL - SETTING
THEORY
a theory proposed by Edwin Locke
performance.
EDWIN LOCKE
THREE PERSONAL FACTORS
THAT INFLUENCE THE
GOAL-PERFORMANCE
RELATIONSHIP
GOAL COMMITMENT
TASK an individual is committed to the
or abandon it
affect task performance strongly
different cultures
WAYS TO REGULATE THOUGHTS AND BEHAVIOR
DURING GOAL PURSUIT
striving for goals through advancements striving for goals by fulfilling duties and
specific goals,
feedback on goalprogress.
FOUR
INGREDIENTS
Goal Specificity Participation in
COMMON TO
setting of goals)
MBO PROGRAMS
Explicit time period Performance
Feedback
Source: http://bba12.weebly.com/uploads/9/4/2/8/9428277/organizational_behavior_15e_-
_stephen_p_robbins__timothy_a_judge_pdf_qwerty.pdf
GOAL-SETTING and ETHICS
When money is tied to goal attainment, we may
COMPARE
theory, and expectancy theory.
increase performance
VERBAL PERSUASION
ENACTIVE MYSTERY
convincing us that we have the
gaining experience with the task or
necessary skills necessary to be
job
successful
OTHERS
PYGMALION EFFECT
- form of self-fulfilling prophecy in
consequences
conditions
behavior
- Ignores the inner state of the individual
SKINNER
Operant
Conditioning Theory
- People learn to behave to get something they
consequences
STIMULI IN A RELATIVELY
UNTHINKING MANNER
Social-Learning
Theory and Reinforcement
-The view that we can learn through both
recognize and pay attention to its critical the individual remembers the model’s action
features. We tend to be most influenced by after the model is no longer readily available
our estimation)
After a person has seen a new behavior by modeled behavior if positive incentives or
observing the model, watching must be rewards are provided. Positively reinforced
converted to doing. This process behaviors are given more attention, learned
demonstrates that the individual can perform better, and performed more often
inequities
J. STACEY ADAMS
BASED ON EQUITY THEORY, EMPLOYEES WHO
PERCEIVE INEQUITY WILL MAKE ONE OF SIX CHOICES:
CHANGE INPUTS CHANGE OUTCOMES
(exert less effort if underpaid or more if (individuals paid on a piece-rate basis can
DISTORT PERCEPTIONS OF
SELF
(“I used to think I worked at a moderate
DISTORT PERCEPTIONS OF
pace, but now I realize I work a lot harder
OTHERS
than everyone else”). (“Mike’s job isn’t as desirable as I thought”).
informational, and
interpersonal justice
individuals
process
rewards
allocated
2 TYPES OF INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE
INFORMATIONAL JUSTICE INTERPERSONAL JUSTICE
- The degree to which employees are
- The degree to which employees are
treated
provided truthful explanations for
treated
employees with explanations for key
and employees
JUSTICE OUTCOMES
ENSURING JUSTICE
CULTURE AND JUSTICE
What are the 2 types of interactional justice?
VROOM'S
EXPECTANCY
THEORY
ANNIKA CAÑETE
EXPECTANCY
THEORY
A theory that says that the strength of a
VICTOR VROOM
Source: http://bba12.weebly.com/uploads/9/4/2/8/9428277/organizational_behavior_1
5e_-_stephen_p_robbins__timothy_a_judge_pdf_qwerty.pdf
EFFORT-PERFORMANCE
RELATIONSHIP
THE PROBABILITY PERCEIVED BY THE
5e_-_stephen_p_robbins__timothy_a_judge_pdf_qwerty.pdf
PERFORMANCE-REWARD
RELATIONSHIP
THE DEGREE TO WHICH THE INDIVIDUAL
DESIRED OUTCOME.
5e_-_stephen_p_robbins__timothy_a_judge_pdf_qwerty.pdf
REWARDS-PERSONAL
GOALS RELATIONSHIP
THE DEGREE TO WHICH ORGANIZATIONAL
5e_-_stephen_p_robbins__timothy_a_judge_pdf_qwerty.pdf
Learning Objectives:
DESCRIBE DEMONSTRATE
the differences among self-efficacy
the three key elements of motivation
COMPARE
theory, and expectancy theory.
JOB PERFORMANCE.
WHAT MAKES PEOPLE MORE LIKELY TO
BE ENGAGED IN THEIR JOBS?
COMPARE
theory, and expectancy theory.
5e_-_stephen_p_robbins__timothy_a_judge_pdf_qwerty.pdf
Learning Objectives:
DESCRIBE DEMONSTRATE
the differences among self-efficacy
the three key elements of motivation
COMPARE
theory, and expectancy theory.
Cherry Co?
fin.