European Journal of Business and Management www.iiste.

org
ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online)
Vol.5, No.20, 2013

Risk Management Practices among Commercial Banks in Ghana

Seyram Pearl Kumah1* Yakubu Awudu Sare2
1.Department of Banking and Finance, Ghana Baptist University College, PMB, Kumasi, Ghana.
2.Department of Banking and Finance, School of Business and Law, University for Development Studies, P. O.
Box UPR 36, Wa-Ghana.
* E-mail of the corresponding author: awudusare@yahoo.com

Abstract
The study compares the risk management practices among commercial banks in Ghana. Using the multiple
regression model the paper examines the determinants of risk management practices among the selected
commercial banks. Cross-sectional research design was used. A standard modified questionnaire from (Hussien
and Faris, 2007), were administered to risk analysts and senior risk managers of the sampled banks at the
headquarters offices and branch head offices in Accra and Kumasi. The results show that the sampled banks are
somewhat efficient in managing risk, and risk monitoring and control is the most influencing variable in risk
management practices. The results again show a significant difference among commercial banks in the practice
of risk identification, understanding risk and in risk monitoring and control except risk assessment and analysis.
Keywords: risk, management, commercial banks, Ghana.

1. Introduction
The banking industry as a whole (at a global and national level) has been profitable in every single year at least
since 1970. The industry has become more competitive due to deregulation. Today banks have much flexibility
on the services they offer, the location where they operate and the rate they pay depositors for their deposits.
Although generally viewed as favourable, this flexibility is creating intense competition among banks and even
between banks and other financial institutions that now offer banking services. Ghana has a well-developed
banking system that was used extensively by previous governments to finance attempts to develop the local
economy. By the late 1980s, the banks had suffered substantial losses from a number of bad loans in their
portfolios. In addition, cedi depreciation had raised the banks' external liabilities. In order to strengthen the
banking sector, the government in 1988 initiated comprehensive reforms. In particular, the amended banking law
of August 1989 required banks to maintain a minimum capital base equivalent to 6 percent of net assets adjusted
for risk and to establish uniform accounting and auditing standards. The law also introduced limits on risk
exposure to single borrowers and sectors. These measures strengthened central bank supervision, improved the
regulatory framework, and gradually improved resource mobilization and credit allocation.
In several parts of the world, financial institutions have faced challenging times in the recent past. The most
affected have been banks which have suffered losses and even closures. A major cause of the problem has been
traced to low quality assets in their portfolios that turned toxic which eroded their capital and weakened their
ability to perform their intermediation function. The unpalatable outcome has been loss of confidence in the
banking system with dire consequences for economic management. Without doubt, there has been a failure of
corporate governance (Brown and Caylor, 2004). Risk management is the cornerstone of prudent banking
practice. Undoubtedly all banks in the present-day volatile environment are facing a large number of risks such
as credit risk, liquidity risk, foreign exchange risk, market risk and interest rate risk, among other risks which
may threaten a bank’s survival and success. In other words, banking is a business of risk. For this reason,
efficient risk management is absolutely required. Carey and Mark (2001) indicate in this regard that risk
management is more important in the financial sector than in other parts of the economy.
In recent years, risk management in banks has come under increasing scrutiny. This is because of the incidence
of bank failures in the mid 1990s, coupled with the fraudulent operations of quasi banks such as Pyram that
resulted in losses of investor’s funds and eroded confidence in the banking industry (Besis and Wileyand, 2000).
There is therefore increasing attention to risk management and efficient regulatory regimes to instill sanity in the
banking industry. Additionally, due to the failure of many banks/financial institutions in the recent past, it has
attracted the attention of regulators as well as all stakeholders. Risk management has therefore, become a key
area of focus and hence warrants a study to examine and compare the risk management practices among
commercial banks in Ghana.

2. Hypothesis
• Hypothesis one: There is a positive relationship between risk management practices and understanding
risk, risk identification, risk assessment and analysis and risk monitoring across the selected banks in
Ghana.

185
European Journal of Business and Management www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online)
Vol.5, No.20, 2013

• Hypothesis two: There is difference in risk management practices, understanding risk, risk
identification, risk assessment and analysis, and risk monitoring across the selected banks in Ghana.

3. Theoretical Literature
Risk Management has been described as all the things you need to do to make the future sufficiently certain
(Bessis et al., 2004). It is regarded as the rational process that will allow risk to be managed well. For the
purpose of this study, a more appropriate definition of risk is “the potential for loss either directly through loss of
earnings or capital or indirectly through the imposition of constraints on an organization’s ability to meet its
business objectives. Critical definitions that appear in the risk management literature review summarize it to
mean a focus encompassing unexpected consequences, both favorable and unfavorable. In each case the goal is
to rid the firm of risks that are not essential to the financial service provided, or to absorb only optimal quantity
of a particular kind of risk. This is otherwise termed the potential for future returns to vary from the expected
returns. If returns could be guaranteed under all circumstances, there would be no risk, and risk management
would be irrelevant. However, such a guarantee is not possible in the real world; hence, the need for risk
management.
The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (2004), p. 6 of the Treadway Commission in the USA defines risk
management as “enterprise risk management is a process, affected by an entities board of directors, management
and other personnel, applied in strategy setting and across the enterprise, designed to identify potential events
that may affect the entity, and manage risk to be within its risk appetite, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the achievement of entity objectives.” The European Foundation for Quality Management (2005) is
somewhat less verbose. They define it as: “the systematic use of organization-wide processes to identify, assess,
manage, and monitor risks-such that aggregated information can be used to protect, release and create value.”
Managing risks is of course is not new; typically, risks have been managed mainly by intuition and experience.
What is new in the aforementioned definitions is the systematic approach.
3.1 How to manage risk – The models
In their attempts to manage risks, most organizations will differentiate between three main types. First, there are
risks which must be managed; that is to say regulatory bodies and/or government demand this of operators in a
particular field, and most often the quality of management is also externally assessed. Many environmental risks
come into this category. Second, there are the classic risks of internal and external fraud and theft inherent in any
business dealing with money. These risks are different because in general they are not so well externally policed.
However, they are inherent in financial institutions and so departments such as internal audit have had time to
develop and form systems to manage them. The third type of risks is those where there is no clear self-
preservation reason for the organization to try and manage them. These are optional risks. An organization can
choose whether to manage them or not and to what degree, along with their risk profile. It is these kinds of risk
that the risk management models target.
There are many popular models for managing risk but most are based on the original pioneering work
undertaken in Australia and New Zealand and are to be found in the AUNZ standard number 4360 first
published in 1999, updated in 2004. Between this and other models such as the Enterprise Risk Management
(ERM) framework prepared by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway
Commission, strong similarities can be found. The AUNZ standard framework is taken as the primary model in
this paper (Standards Australia and Standard New Zealand, 2004a, b). There is a wide range of possibilities
ranging from “do nothing at all” in attempting to nullify the effect of each and every identified risk. This
decision, like so many management problems, will be a trade-off based on comparing the cost/likelihood of
insurance with the cost/likelihood of risk. In order to manage these optional risks, the models suggest that three
steps are necessary: risk recognition, risk prioritization and risk management.
With respect to the first risk, the assessment task is to understand what is at risk and what events could
potentially cause harm or benefits. The risk recognition phase has two parts:
• Context establishment, which defines what is risk; and
• Risk identification, which covers the identification within the established context of uncertain events
that could cause harm or benefits, their associated causes and their potential consequences.
Once the risks have been identified, the next stage is to understand the nature and level of the risks, so that they
can be managed in an appropriate manner. This risk prioritization phase has two parts. The first is risk analysis,
which is based on likelihood and consequence. Likelihood depends on the probability of occurrence and the
frequency of activity. The consequence can be measured in many ways, such as effects on results or on the
enablers of results. The second is risk evaluation. After an analysis has been undertaken, risks are evaluated
against an appropriate risk-acceptance criterion to give a ranking, for example “low” (tolerable), “medium”
(which should be as low as reasonably practicable), and “high” (intolerable). Risk assessment is then made and
can take place either quantitatively or qualitatively. Once a risk assessment has been completed, the risk profile

186
European Journal of Business and Management www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online)
Vol.5, No.20, 2013

of an organization can be determined. This shows the scale and complexity of risks faced and depicts the number
of risks for each level. It is a representation of risk exposure of the organization, which ideally equates to the risk
capacity (the maximum resource that the organization is willing to put at risk) and risk appetite (the amount of
risk the organization is willing to take).
The next stage in the process of risk management is the management of the risks which have been identified and
prioritized. The way risks are managed can again be categorized in different ways. Perhaps the simplest of these
is the “four Ts” (European Foundation for Quality Management, 2005). The “four Ts” model sets out four ways
of dealing with unacceptable risks.
• Terminate – cease activities related to the risk (e.g. giving up smoking avoids associated health risks);
• Treat – add control measures or contingency plans to manage the likelihood and consequence of events
(e.g. wearing a hard hat reduces the consequences of being hit by a falling object): additional control
measures or contingency plans become part of the management system.
• Tolerate – accept the risk; and
• Transfer – move the impact of risks to another entity (e.g. insurance)
A fifth approach to managing risk (i.e. a fifth “T”, we might call “trade-off”), which is often used by the
financial sector, is risk neutralization. This is the offsetting of risks against each other, so they cancel each other
out (e.g. pooling and hedging are both risk neutralization methods).
3.2 Risk exposure functions
All organizations deal with risks, though the nature and magnitude may differ for each type of organization. This
is especially true for banks/financial institutions, as they deal with money. They act as financial intermediaries in
any economic system. They help in mobilizing household/corporate savings and making them available to deficit
units. Since they help in credit creation by means of loans and advances, they face many risks; in fact, taking risk
is the core of most of the products and services offered by banks/financial institutions.
In their role as financial intermediaries, banks and/or financial institutions are involved in the following activities,
which result in various types of risks:
• Funds mobilization: Funds are mobilized by accepting term deposits as well as by allowing customers
to operate their checking accounts by leaving balances in them.
• Funds deployment: The funds that are mobilized are first subject to regulatory investment requirements
- i.e. banks have to invest a specific proportion of their funds in certain instruments, often government
securities. The surplus funds are available as loans for various segments of corporate and retail
borrowers.
• Funds transfer: Banks and financial institutions are key vehicles for moving funds on behalf of their
customers. The core competence of banks is to act as agents of corporations in supporting their liquidity
needs across various geographical locations.
Banks also act as settlement agents for their corporate clients in the realization and payment of their
funds.
• Risk transfer: Manufacturing and other companies (the banks’ clients) are exposed to a number of risks.
Some of the risks are central to their business. They relate to product obsolescence, business model, and
distribution channels. The bulk of these have to be handled by the companies themselves. However, for
risks that arise from financial markets, they look to their banks to take them over, since it is the latter’s
core competence to handle them. Banks are thus saddled with risks passed on by their customers, in
addition to the risks that are an integral part of their existence.
• Transaction services: Banks assist their customers in carrying out various trade transactions’, both
domestic and international. International transactions involve dealing with multiple currencies. The
global network of the banking system and its relationships constitute the backbone of such trade.
• Credit enhancement services: In the course of trade, it is quite possible that the concerned parties may
not be familiar with each other. Therefore, suppliers of goods often expect the bank’s help in evaluating
or enhancing the creditworthiness of a customer. The entire gamut of letters of credit or guarantees
would fall under this category of services.
All these roles involve dealing with risks of some type. Inadequate risk management may adversely affect the
earnings of the bank/financial institution in the short run and its survival in the long run. This is also true for
organizations other than banks and financial institutions. The financial performance of most firms is affected by
price changes. These prices relate to commodities, exchange rates, interest rates and equities. Fluctuations in
financial prices are a source of significant risk, collectively called financial risk or price risk. Financial risk may
be defined as the potential for cash flows or asset values to vary from expectations due to changes in prices. This
definition also gives an indicator of the measurement of risk: the more volatile the price, the greater the risk.
Risks arise from a variety of sources, and affect the value of the assets held by the banks. As defined earlier, risk
arises due to the possibility that the actual outcome could be different from the expected outcome. The

187
European Journal of Business and Management www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online)
Vol.5, No.20, 2013

probability of an outcome is governed by the availability of certain information. Due to information asymmetry,
the most up-to-date information is available with only certain economic players. Further, the outcome is
dependent on several other drivers. These interrelationships are not necessarily known or determinable.
Governments play a very important role; their policies may not always be in accordance with expectations. This
adds more uncertainty to the possibilities. In spite of our best effort to model an outcome, it may not be possible,
therefore, to ascertain the exact result. Some of the factors that can expose any economic entity (more
particularly banks or financial institutions) to various risks are discussed below:
• Economic policies of governments and resultant budget deficits or surpluses: changes in money supply,
levels of inflation and interest rates as well as capital formation that takes place concomitantly in the
economy. All these in turn influence the movement of capital in and out of the country; have an impact
on the relative value of currencies and also the values of various debt instruments.
• Compensation and savings propensities and the preferences of individual consumers, which result in
certain patterns of international trade. In the process, they create trade surpluses in some economies and
deficits in others.
• Political, social, racial, and ethnic issues that impact the availability of or demand for a particular
commodity and thus result in upheavals in various commodity markets.
• Technological factors that bring in new products (making other products redundant in the process) and
thus having an effect on the fortunes of the corporations manufacturing and marketing them.
• Governance of corporations and their financial performance (which is a result of competitive factors in
various markets), as well as the financial structures opted for by the individual organization.

4. Empirical Literature
There have been a large number of studies published about risk management in general. However, the number of
the empirical studies on risk management practices in financial institutions was found to be relatively small. The
following summaries the main conclusions of some selected studies.
Linbo (2004) examined efficiency versus risk in large domestic USA banks. He found that profit efficiency is
sensitive to credit risk and insolvency risk but not to liquidity risk or to the mix of loan products. Hahm (2004)
conducted an empirical study on interest rate and exchange rate exposures of banking institutions in pre-crisis
Korea. The results indicated that Korean commercial banks and merchant banking corporations had been
significantly exposed to both interest rate and exchange rate risks, and that the subsequent profitability of
commercial banks was significantly associated with the degree of pre-crises exposure. The results also indicated
that the Korean case highlights the importance of upgrading financial supervision and risk management practices
as a precondition for successful financial liberalization. Niinimaki (2004) found that the magnitude of risk taking
depends on the structure and size of banks’ risk Management in the market competition. Banks in this situation
tend to take risks, although extreme risk taking is avoided. In contrast, introducing deposit insurance increases
risk taking if banks are competing for deposits. In this case, deposit rates become excessively high, thereby
forcing banks to take extreme risks. Wetmore (2004) examined the relationship between liquidity risk and loans-
to-core deposit ratio. This he observed, was an increased over the period studied, which reflects a change in the
asset/liability management practices of banks. He also concluded that there is a positive relationship occurring
between market risk and the change in loan-to-core deposits ratio after 1994.
Wang and Sheng (2004) studied foreign exchange risk, diversification and Taiwanese America depository
receipt (ADRs). In this study, they tried to answer the following question: Should USA investors purchase
American depository receipts issued by Taiwanese multinationals? Their empirical results indicated that
Taiwanse ADRs were shown to help USA investors diversify their portfolios globally. These findings suggest
that Taiwanese ADRs are valid investment tools for USA investors who seek international diversifications.
Khambata and Bagdi (2003) examined off-balance –sheet (OBS) credit risk across the top 20 Japanese banks.
The main results of this study indicated that financial derivatives are heavily used by the four banks and that loan
commitments are the largest source of credit risk among traditional OBS instruments.
The main techniques used in risk management according to Al-Tamimi (2002) were establishing standards,
credit score, credit worthiness analysis, risk rating and collateral. He also highlighted the willingness of the UAE
commercial banks to use the most sophisticated risk management techniques in the study, and recommended the
adoption of a conservative credit policy. The GDP growth rate, firms, family indebtedness, rapid past credit or
branch expansion, inefficiency, portfolio composition, size, net interest margin, capital ratio and market power
are variables that explain credit risk. Their findings raise important bank supervisory policy issues: the use of
bank-level variables as early warning indicators, the advantages of mergers of banks from different regions, and
the role of banking competition and ownership in determining credit risk. Oldfield and Santomero (1997)
investigated risk management in financial institutions and suggested four steps for active risk management
techniques:

188
European Journal of Business and Management www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online)
Vol.5, No.20, 2013

• The establishment of standards and reports;

• The imposition of position limits and rules (i.e. contemporary exposures, credit limits and position
concentration);
• The creation of self investment guidelines and strategies; and
• The alignment of incentive contracts and compensation (performance-based compensation contracts).

5. Data and Methodology

The study was descriptive in nature and employed the cross-sectional research design. This type of research
design examines a single point in time or takes a one time snapshot approach of an issue being studied and is
appropriate for large sample size (Nueman, 2007).
5.1 Sampling and Data Collection
Empirical analysis is based on a sample of six banks, drawn from a list of 27 banks in Ghana. The targeted
sampled banks are the six biggest commercial banks in Ghana and these banks are involved in risk management
(Price Waterhouse Coopers, 2009). The sample includes four foreign banks operating in Ghana: Barclays Bank,
SG-SSB Bank, Standard Chartered Bank and Ecobank and two local banks: Agricultural Development Bank
(ADB) and Ghana Commercial Bank (GCB). A modified standard questionnaire from (Hussien and Faris, 2007),
were administered at the headquarters offices and branch head offices of the selected banks in Accra and Kumasi.
They were given to the risk analysts and senior risk managers of those banks. The sampling technique used is the
purposive sampling since it allowed qualified respondents to be specifically contacted or approached to
participate in the survey.
5.2 Data Analysis
A multiple linear regression model was estimated to identify the degree of association between risk management
practices and the determinants (understanding risk, risk identification, risk assessment and analysis and risk
monitoring and control) to test hypothesis one. A non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis Test was used to test if there
were differences in risk management practices and the determinants (understanding risk, risk identification, risk
assessment and analysis and risk monitoring and control) across the selected banks considered for this study as
stated in hypothesis two. The nonparametric tests for multiple independent samples are useful for determining
whether or not the values of a particular variable differ between two or more groups. This is especially true when
the `assumptions of ANOVA are not met. The Kruskal-Wallis test is a one-way analysis of variance by ranks. It
tests the null hypothesis that multiple independent samples come from the same population. Unlike standard
ANOVA, it does not assume normality, and it can be used to test ordinal variables
5.3 Empirical Model
The major purpose of this research is to explore the dependence of one variable on the other and so the
regression model below was used:
RMPi = β₀ + β₁(UR)ᵢ + β₂ ( RI )ᵢ + β₃( RAA )ᵢ + β₄( RMC )ᵢ + εᵢ
i=1 . . . n
where RMPi is risk management practices, URᵢ is understanding risk, RIi is risk identification, RAAi is risk
assessment and analysis and RMCi is risk monitoring and controlling system, subscript i denote the cross-
sectional dimension and n represents the number of respondents.

6. Results and Discussions

The multiple linear regression model results reported in Table 1 were obtained using the SPSS (version 17)
statistical software package to test hypothesis one using the stepwise entry. The results indicated that, risk
monitoring and control was the only predictor variable identified in this study to be statistically significant and
have positive impact on risk management practices and it explained about 45% of the variation in risk
management practices. Since (F = 8.984, p = 0.003) for the model showed a p-value less than 0.05 (p < 0.05),
this shows that the model is significant for any future predictions. Hypothesis one is not confirmed because not
all the predictor variables have positive relationship with risk management practices since the correlation
coefficient for understanding risk and risk identification are negative (-0.096) and (-0.035) respectively and the
relationship is not also significant.
INSERT TABLE 6.1
INSERT TABLE 6.2
The second hypothesis of the study is stipulated as “there is difference in risk management practices and the
determinants (understanding risk, risk identification, risk assessment and analysis, and risk monitoring and
control) across the selected banks”. Kruskal- Wallis Test was used to test for differences between the
determinants of risk management. The result of the mean ranks is displayed in Table 6.3 for the various aspects
of risk management practices

189
European Journal of Business and Management www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online)
Vol.5, No.20, 2013

The Kruskal-Wallis statistics measures how much the group ranks differ from the average rank of all the groups.
The results of the test statistics as shown in Table 6.3 tells us the ratings of the various risk management
practices such as understanding risk, risk identification, risk monitoring and control and risk management
practices did differ by the type of bank respondent. From table 3 the differences observed in the mean ranks
across the various banks were highly significant except for risk assessment and analysis which did not differ by
the type of bank of respondents even though there was slight difference observed between the rank means.
Hence, hypothesis two is supported by the findings of the study that difference exist in the risk management
practices across the banks.
INSERT TABLE 6.3

7. Conclusion
This study examined the risk management practices among selected banks in Ghana. The analysis unraveled the
major risk management determinants to include: understanding of risk, risk identification, risk assessment and
analysis, risk monitoring and controlling system. Risk monitoring and control was noted to be the most
influencing variable in risk management practice among the banks. There is also a negative relationship between
risk management practices and the determinants which includes understanding risk and risk identification, whiles
risk assessment and analysis and risk monitoring and control are positively related with risk management
practices in this study. The secondary objective is to compare the determinants of risk management among the
sampled banks, and it revealed that, there is a significant difference in risk management practices, understanding
risk, risk identification and risk monitoring and control, except risk assessment and analysis which did not differ
across the selected banks.

References
Al-Tamimi, H. (2002), “Risk management practices and empirical analysis of the UAE commercial banks”,
Journal of Finance India 16 (3), 45-57.
Basis, J. And Wileyand, J. (2000), “Risk management in banking”. 2nd ed. Singapore.
Bassis, J. (2004), “Risk management in banking”, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley: 792.
Brown, L. D. and Caylor, M. L. (2004), “Corporate governance and firm performance”, working paper.
Carey, M. and Mark, H. (2001), “Parameterising credit risk models with rating data”, Journal of Banking and
Finance, 25, 197-270.
European Foundation for Quality Management (2005), “Framework for risk management, European foundation
for quality management”, Brussels.
Hahm, J. H. (2004), “Interest rate and exchange rate exposures of banking institutions in pre-crisis Korea”,
Applied Economics, 36 (13), 1409-19.
Hussein, A. H. A., and Faris, M. A. (2007), “Banks' risk management: a comparison study of UAE national and
foreign banks”, Journal of Risk Finance 8(4), 394-409.
Khambata, D. and Bagdi, R. R. (2003), “Off-balance-sheet credit risk of the top 20 Japanese banks”, Journal of
International Banking Regulation, 5(1) 57-71.
Linbo Fan, L. (2004), “Efficiency versus risk in large domestic US”, Managerial Finance, 30(9), 1-19.
Neuman, W.L. (2007), “Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches”, (Third ed.),
Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Niinimaki, J. P. (2004), “The effects of competition of banks risk taking”, Journal of Economics, 81 (3), 199-222.
Oldfield, G. S. and Santomero, A. M. (1997), “Risk management in financial institutions”, Sloan Management
Review, 39 (1),33-46.
Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC) and the Ghana Association of Bankers (GAB) (2010), “Risk management in
well capitalised banks”, Journal of Ghana Banking Survey, (2010).
Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand (2004a), AS/NZS 4360: Australia and New Zealand Standard
on Risk Management, Standards Australia, Sydney/Standards New Zealand, Auckland.
Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand (2004b), Australia New Zealand Handbook: Risk Management
Guidelines Companion to AS/NZS 4360, Standards Australia, Sydney/Standards New Zealand, Auckland.
Wang, J. and Sheng-Yung (2004), “Return and volatility intra-day transmitting of dually-traded stocks: The case
of Taiwan, Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore”, Journal of Economics and Management, 1(2), 119-141.
Wetmore, J. L. (2004), “Panel data, liquidity risk, and increasing loans-to-cor deposits ratio of large commercial
bank holding companies”, American Business Review, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 99-107.

190
European Journal of Business and Management www.iiste.org
ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online)
Vol.5, No.20, 2013

Table 6.1: Regression model results

Variable Unstandardized Standard Beta t-Values t-Probability
Coefficients Error
Constant 3.530 .278 12.703 .000
Risk Monitoring .190 .063 .219 2.997 .003
&Control System
R .219
R2 .48
Adjusted R2 .45
Std. Error of the .39664
Estimate
F-statistics 8.984
Probability (F-statistics) .003

Table 6.2: Excluded Variablesb

Collinearity Statistics
Partial Minimum
Model Beta In T Sig. Correlation Tolerance VIF Tolerance
1 Understanding Risk -.096a -1.256 .211 -.094 .913 1.096 .913
and Risk
Management
Risk Identification -.035a -.476 .634 -.036 .976 1.025 .976
a
Risk Assessment and .068 .918 .360 .069 .986 1.014 .986
Analysis
a. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), Risk Monitoring and Control
b. Dependent Variable: Risk Management Practices

Table 6.3: Kruskal-Wallis Test

Test Statisticsa,b
Understanding Risk Risk Assessment Risk Monitoring Risk Management
Risk Identification and Analysis and Control Practices
Chi-Square 26.500 47.157 2.798 44.886 22.460
Df 5 5 5 5 5
Asymp. Sig. .000 .000 .731 .000 .000
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable

191
This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science,
Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access
Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is
Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.

More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage:
http://www.iiste.org

CALL FOR JOURNAL PAPERS

The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and
collaborating with academic institutions around the world. There’s no deadline for
submission. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission
instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/journals/ The IISTE
editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified submissions in a
fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the readers all over the
world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from
gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the journals is also available
upon request of readers and authors.

MORE RESOURCES

Book publication information: http://www.iiste.org/book/

Recent conferences: http://www.iiste.org/conference/

IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners

EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open

Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar