Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
e. Roads
f. Mobilization
g. Envelopment
h. Inner Lines.
15. These wars were rapidly decided in 7 weeks only due to
a. Limited nature of both wars.
b. Superiority of Prussian General Staff.
c. Speed of Prussian mobilization.
d. Superior Prussian tactics.
PART III - IMPACT OF INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION ON CONDUCT OF WAR
(SCHLIEFFEN AND STRATEGIC ENVELOPMENT)
16. American Civil War (1861-1865)
17. Austro-Prussian War (1866
18. Franco-Prussian War (1870-1871)
19. Von Schlieffen
a. Parallelism.
b. Implications.
(i) Location of Switzerland and Belgium
(ii) Terrain
(iii) Intervention of Britain
20. Schlieffen Plan
a. Considerations
(i) Russian mobilization will be slow initially so France is to be taken on first.
(ii) France would have strong fortresses along their frontiers, which may result
in loss of valuable time.
(iii) Wide manoeuvres through Belgium was possible.
(iv) Military advantage, out weighed violation of Belgium’s neutrality and
dangers of British hostility was imminent.
b. Plan
(i) Eastern Front (Russia)
(ii) Southern Front (Serbia)
(iii) Western Front
(iv) Execution
c. Criticism on the Plan
(i) General von Bulow and General Bernhardi preferred frontal attacks instead of
flanking ones.
(ii) General von Schlicting advocated smaller groups instead of huge armies.
(iii) Schlieffen was blamed for doing nothing for the training of senior
commanders.
d. Modification in Plan
e. Reasons of Failure
(i) Moltke (the younger) only copied the ideas of Moltke (the elder) slavishly and
could not visualize the situation correctly at Verdun.
(ii) Plan was to advance west of Paris but actually it was conducted east of Paris,
leaving French capital and railways hub uninvested.
(iii) Weak and incompetent generalship.
(iv) Incorrect passage of information to Moltke’s Headquarters.
(v) Exposed flank of General Kluck.
21. Impact on Conduct of War
a. Adoption of Strategy of Annihilation
RESTRICTED