Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
This essay is based on the analysis of the lesson plan “Bin Liner” that is evaluated on
the framework of the Quality Teaching Model. It will highlight and include four areas
of improvements in the modified lesson, and justify the reforms with the help of
scholarly articles.
1 Intellectual quality
1.1 Deep knowledge
Comments:
4 The majority of the students show deep understanding when they critically
analysed, explained, and provided reasoned arguments on true and false
questions, causes and the effects of plastic bags. They also expressed their
knowledge of the improved design of the paper bag by telling its pros and
cons. Their knowledge was continuously assessed through discussion with
the teacher.
Similarly, one student asked another student about the power that is required
to break down the plastic bags.
1.5 Metalanguage
Comments:
1 There was no precise talk on the language used in the class except defining
the meaning of biodegradable and high-density polyethylene. Different
symbols and language could be discussed in the class, or students could
develop their word bank while learning.
4 Students worked in pairs and were reporting back to the class on their
discussed knowledge. The teacher also picked one of the reasons told by
students such at the lightweight feature of the plastic bag, and encouraged
him to state the effect of it to develop communication.
4 Detailed criteria regarding the quality of work have been made where
students were involved in reflecting on the improved design of the bin liner
through the MAS sheet and modified the design. At the beginning of the
lesson, a clear overview of the expectations from students have been
described and restated throughout the lesson, and also mentioned in the
written form of the lesson plan.
2.2 Engagement
Comments:
Students seemed deeply engaged, interested, and on-task while taking part in
5
different activities. They were sharing their ideas and showing their group
contribution during discussing true-false questions, constructing paper bin
liner, filling the MAS sheet, or asking questions to their peers.
4 Expectations in this lesson were high even though it was not vocalised by the
teacher that was not necessary. The expectations were expressed clearly in
the lesson plan for the student’s stage. Plus, prior learning of student
identified through true-false questions, and the majority of students took part
in challenging work of modifying paper bin liner.
4 The majority of tasks were conducted in groups, and the teacher provided
positive feedback on student’s activities and encouraged them to share their
ideas on plastic bags and paper bin liner. Students collaborated via think-pair-
share activity, and provided them with a sense of ownership by letting them
create their paper bin liner.
5 All students were able to do the task and clear about the task was given.
Students were discussing and expressing their ideas without interrupting the
class. Student’s self-regulation was also enhanced through purposeful
activities, collaboration with their group members, and decision-making
authority to bring modification in the paper bin liner.
relation to some significant aspects of the lesson. For instance, modifying the
bin liner according to them, and presenting the modifications in front of the
class in their style. Moreover, students took responsibility for their work in
various activities; however, the teacher controlled the choice and timing of
activities that can be improved by providing them flexibility in completing
their activity.
3 Significance
3.1 Background knowledge
Comments:
3.4 Inclusivity
Comments:
3.5 Connectedness
Comments:
5 High Connected is marked when students tried to make the paper bin liner for
everyday use, and make it bigger for commercial bins to relate their
knowledge outside of the class. Also, students told the causes and effects of
plastic bags, and the pros and cons of paper bin liners, based on their
everyday experiences.
3.6 Narrative
Comments:
1 The teacher did not use any story to connect and support the fundamental
concepts of the lesson. The teacher could ask for any story such as what
happened to a plastic bag when bought to home.
Identify the four NSW QT model elements you are targeting for improvement.
QT model
Note: Not all activities may be captured by the video. Assume they were covered by the teacher.
Key ideas for this lesson are cause and effect with questions being “why do we
use so many plastic bags in Australia?” and “what is the effect on the
environment?”
Another key idea is solutions with questions being “what have governments
done to solve problems caused by plastic bags?” and “what can citizens do to
solve problems caused by plastic bags?”
Give overview of activity:
Designing renewable alternatives to plastic bags using newspapers.
Teacher will show students a design and they will improve that design.
Give overview of thinking tools to be used:
Think-pair-share
Teacher introduces pre-designed Google slides with the help of a smart board
and already added all students to it. Students will use I-pads in groups to write
any problematic words related to the subject at one of the slides during the
lesson. The teacher will discuss these words after finishing every activity.
There will be some questions from other countries such as “Africa has
completely banned the plastic bag.” Or “New Zealand becomes the latest
country to ban plastic bags.”
On a different Google slide, students have 2 minutes to think and write as many
reasons for why people use so many plastic bags across different cultures and
nationalities. Everyone can see and share their ideas altogether on the screen.
Students will be asked to narrate the story of a plastic bag. What happens to a
plastic bag after entering the supermarket? Students express their response.
Students can select a bin of varying size, out of various bins of different sizes
and shapes, to make the paper bin liner.
Students to identify ways to improve the bin liners for selected bin using the
MAS sheet.
Students to work in pairs to refine the newspaper bin liner. Circulate around the
room to assist students.
Students demonstrate their improved designs to the teacher, using the teacher’s
waste paper basket as a test.
Teacher to encourage peer support during demonstrations.
Summarise and close the lesson.
Academic justification
In the modifications, the element of metalanguage has been strengthened with the
help of the interactive whiteboard and Google slides. The curriculum framework of
Western Australian school stresses that schools should use, select, adapt technical
devices, and make students capable of using it (Dawson, 2008). Moreover, the
reactions among peers and teacher that assist reflection (Berry, 2005). This reflection
contributes in creating more inquiries about the topic; therefore, provide a deeper
involve children in higher-order thinking (Harrison, 2013). The children will be able
to explain, generalise, or conclude gained information if they are clear about the
meaning of different concepts used in the lesson. Further, the learners should take
time out to pay attention to the language features, their specific meaning, and words
that are problematic and influence the flow of the lesson (Basturkmen , Loewen &
Ellis, 2002).
Students direction has also been improved by introducing Google slides to provide
students authority to work according to their pace. Since the emphasis in a lesson
should be laid upon students apply knowledge instead of a teacher directs their actions
(Ayres, Sawyer & Dinham, 2004), the modified lesson makes students think of
various solutions to replace plastic bin liner, and the students can select the bin for
making the paper bin liner. Similarly, the narration of a story on a plastic bag helps to
learning more exciting (Jones, 2007). It also improves the student’s engagement, and
10 Name: Alka Rani
Student ID: 17596741
Assignment 2 (102086 Designing Teaching & Learning)
students become more devoted to the studies that help them to learn efficiently
(Gibson, 2011; Jones, 2007). Further, the teaching of science can be made more
authentic, relevant, and exciting with the help of ICT, and increase the chances of
(Livingstone, 2012). However, the need for a teacher is still required to supervise the
Another amendment in the lesson is the introduction of narratives to narrate the story
of the life of a plastic bag. The justifications for the changes are that science
education can be deepened by the utilization of auditory, visuals, and real experiences
(Ekici & Pekmezci, 2015). The narrative component, while planning and organising
lessons help children to understand the content (Lyle, 2000). Teaching is considered
valuable tool to their learning (Ayres, Sawyer & Dinham, 2004) that helps students to
education facilitates to make the knowledge permanent in the student’s mind (Ekici &
knowledge as everyday life, and thinking manners are affected by listening and telling
Finally, attempts have been made to improve the element of cultural knowledge with
the help of questions based on different cultural locations in the lesson. Cultural
understanding is essential, as culture is a lens that helps people to understand and see
schooling is to socialize children with the help of cultural norms (Sarah, & Patricia,
2014). The pedagogy that is based on cultural knowledge should help to find a
connection between culture and learning (Tyrone, 2003). Similarly, educators can
educated to close the academic gaps that lasted between various students (Salmona,
Partlo, Kaczynski & Leonard, 2015). Moreover, it is vital to break the deficit thinking
about different students, especially low social-economic backgrounds, that they are
ill-behaved and unintelligent (Sarah, & Patricia, 2014). Therefore, the presence of
school and have a major impact on the student’s academic achievements (Ayres,
Sawyer & Dinham, 2004). Cultural knowledge integration is critical to make all
learners from low income and culturally diverse background capable of learning and
“Differentiating teaching to meet specific needs across the full range of abilities”.
Reference list
Ayres, P., Sawyer, W., & Dinham, S. (2004). Effective teaching in the context of a
10.1080/01411920310001630008
Beihammer, H., & Kaisa, E. (2011). Narratives in teaching practice: Matti Raekallio
10.1177/1053825917690870
https://app.education.nsw.gov.au/quality-teaching-
rounds/Assets/Classroom_Practice_Guide_ogogVUqQeB.pdf
10.1080/87567555.2010.550957
10.1080/0022027910230301
Helen, B., Shawn, L., & Rod, E. (2002). Metalanguage in Focus on Form in the
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELLmGo9H4zw
Press.
051x(02)00092-6
Salmona, M., Partlo, M., Kaczynski, D., & Leonard, S. (2015). Developing Culturally
10.14221/ajte.2015v40n4.3
Sarah, N., & Patricia, G. (2014). Educator Beliefs and Cultural Knowledge: