A.

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING

Communicative language teaching (CLT) is an accepted paradigm with many

interpretations and manisfetations. In the previous chapter you were introduced to a
progression of methods that defined a century or more of language-teaching history.
Beneath those methods lay some important theoretical assumption. In the 1940s and
1950s, the profession was to some extent convinced that teachers could behaviorally
program a scientifically ordered set of linguistics structures into the minds of learners
through conditioning. In the 1960s we were worried about how Chomsky’s generative
grammar was going to fit into our language classrooms and how to inject the cognitive
code of a language into the process of absorption. The innovativeness of the 1970s
bought affective factors to the forefront of some experimental language teaching
methods. This period saw a focus on emotional and sociocultural factor operating within
learners. The late 1970s and early 1980s saw the beginnings of what we now recognize as
a Communicative Approach as web better and better understood the function that must be
incorporated into a classroom. The late 1980s and 1990s saw the development of
approaches that highlighted the fundamentally communicative properties of language,
and classroom were increasingly characterized by authenticity, real-word simulation, and
meaningful task.

Today we continue our professional march through history. Beyond grammatical

and discourse elements in communication, we continue to probe the nature of social,
cultural, and pragmatic features of language. We are exploring pedagogical for ‘real-life”
communication in the classroom. We are trying to get our learners to develop linguistic
fluency, and not just the accuracy that once consumed our predecessors. We are
equipping our students with tools for generating unrehearsed language performance “out
there” when they leave the womb of our classroom. We are concerned with how to
facilitate lifelong language learning among our students, and not just with the immediate
classroom task. We are looking at learners as partner in a cooperative venture, and our
classroom practices seek to draw on whatever intrinsically sparks learners to reach their
fullest potential.
 All of these theoretical interest underlie what we can best describe CLT. It is
difficult to offer a definition of CLT. It is unified but broadly based, theoretically well-
informed set of tenets about the nature of language and of language learning and
teaching.

1. Characteristics Of A CLT Approach

a. Overall goals. CLT suggests a focus on all of the components
(grammatical. Discourse, functional, sociolinguistic, and strategic) of
communicative competence. Goals therefore must intertwine the
organizational (grammatical, discourse) aspect of language with the
pragmatic (functional, sociolinguistics, strategic) aspect.
b. Relationship of form and function
Language techniques are designed to engage learners in the pragmatic,
authentic, functional, use of language for meaningful purposes.
Organizational language forms are not the central focus, but remain as
important components of language that enable the learner to accomplish
those purposes.
c. fluency and accuracy
a focus on students “flow” of comprehension and production and a
focus on the formal accuracy of production are seen as complementary
principles underlying communicative techniques. At time fluency may
have to tae on more importance than accuracy on order to keep learners
meaningfully engaged in language use. At other times the students will
be encouraged to attend to correctness. Part of the teacher’s
responsibility is to offer appropriate corrective feedback on learners
errors.
d. Focus on real-world contexts
Students in a communicative class ultimately have to use the language,
productively and receptively, in unrehearsed context outside the
classroom. Classroom tasks must therefore equip students with the
skills necessary for communicative in those context.

e. Autonomy and strategic involvement

 Students are given opportunities to focus on their own learning process
through raising their awareness of their on styles of learning (strengths,
weakness, preferences) and through the development of appropriate
strategies for production and comprehension. Such awareness and
action will help to develop autonomous learners capable of continuing
to learn the language beyond the classroom and the course.
f. Teacher roles
The role of the teacher is that of facilitator and guide, not an all-
knowing font of knowledge. The teacher is an empathetic “coach” who
values the students linguistics development. Students are encouraged to
construct meaning through genuine linguistics interaction with other
students and with the teacher.
g. Student role
Student in a CLT class are active participants in their own learning
process. Learner-centered, cooperative, collaborative learning is
emphasized, but not at the expense of appropriate teacher-centered
activity.

These seen characteristics underscore some major departures from earlier

methods and approaches. In some ways those departures were a gradual product of
outgrowing the numerous methods that characterized a long stretch of history. In other
ways those departures were radical. Structurally (grammatically) sequence curricula were
a mainstay of language teaching for centuries. CLT suggests that grammatical structure
might better be subsumed under various pragmatics categories. In CLT we pay
considerably less attention to the overt presentation and discussion of grammatical rules
than we traditionally did. Using a great deal of authentic language is implied in CLT, as
we attempt to build fluency. It is important to note, however, that fluency should never be
encouraged at the expense of clear, unambiguous, direct communication. Much more
spontaneity is present in communicative classroom: students are encouraged to deal with
unrehearsed situation under the guidance, but not control, of the teacher. The importance
of learners developing of strategic approach of acquisition is a total turnabout from
earlier methods that never broached the topic of strategies-based instruction. And finally,
the teacher facilitative role in CLT and students collaborative role are the product of two
decades or more of slowly recognizing the importance of learner initiative in the
classroom.

Some of the characteristics of CLT make it difficult for a nonnative-speaking

teacher who might not be very proficient in the second language to teach effectively.
Dialogues, drills, rehearsed exercise, and discussion (in the firs language) of the
grammatical rules are much simpler for some nonnative-speaking teacher to contend
with. This drawback should not deter one, however from pursuing communicative goals
in the classroom. Technology (such as video, television, audio cds, the internet, the web,
and computer software) can aid such teacher. Moreover, in the last decade or so, we have
seen a marked increase in English teachers proficiency level around the world. As
educational and political institutions in various countries become more sensitive to the
importance of teaching foreign language of “passing a test” we may be better able,
worldwide, to accomplish the goals of communicative language teaching.

CLT is not by any means a brand-new approach. One of the most comprehensive
lists of CLT features came a quarter of a century ago from Finocchiaro and Brumfit in a
comparison of audiolingual methodology what with they then called the communicative
approach. Because of particality, their list is reprinted in table 3.1

A comparison of the audilingual methods and communicative language teaching

(Finocchio&Bumfit, 1983)

No Audiolingual methods Communicative approach

1. Attends to structure and form more Meaning is paramount.
than meaning
2. Demands memorization of structure- Dialogs, if used, center around
based dialogs. communicative functions and afe not
normally memorized.
3. Language items are not necessarily Contextualization is a basic premise.
contextualized.
4. Language learning is learning Language learning is learning to
structures, sounds, or words. communicate.
5. Mastery, or "over-learning" is sought Effective communication is sought.
6. Drilling is a central technique. Drilling may occur, but peripherally.
7. Native-speaker-like pronunciation is Comprehensible pronunciation is sought.
 sought.
8. Grammatical explanation is avoided.
9. Communicative activities only come
after a long process of figid drills and
exercises.
10. The use of the student's native
language is forbidden.
11. Translation is forbidden at early levels. Translation may be used where students
12. Reading and writing are deferred till
speech is mastered.
13. The target linguistic system will be
learned through the overt tcaching of
the patterns of the system.
14. Linguistic competence is the desired
goal.
15. Varicties of language are rccognized
but not emphasized.
16. The sequence of units is determined
solely by principles of linguistic
complexity
17. The teacher controls the learners and
prevents them from doing anything
that conflicts with the theory
18. "Language is habit" so errors must be
prevented at all costs.
19. Accuracy, in terms of formal
correctness, is a primary goal.
20. Students are expected to interact with
the language system, embodied in
machines or controlled materials
21. The teacher is expected to specify the
Any device which helps the learners is
accepted - varying according to their age,
interest, etc.
Attempts to communicate may be
encouraged from the very beginning.
Judicious use of native hmguage is
accepted where feasible
need or benefit from it.
Reading and writing can start from the
first day, if desired.
The target linguistic system will be learned
best through the process of struggling to
communicate.
Communicative competence is the desired
goal (i.e. the ability to use the linguistic
system effectively and appropriately).
Linguistic variation is a central concept in
materials and methodology.
Sequencing is determined by any
consideration of content, functions, or
meaning that maintains interest.
Teachers help learners in any way that
motivates them to work with the language
Language is created by the individual
often through trial and error.
Fluency and acceptable language is the
primary goal: accuracy is judged not in the
abstract but in context.
Students are expected to interact with
other people, either in the flesh, through
pair and group work, or in their writings.
The teacher cannot know exactly what
 language that students are to use. language the students will use.
22. Intrinsic motivation will spring from intrinsic motivation will spring from an
an interest in the structure of the interest in what is being communicated by
language. the language.

A. TASK-BASED LANGUAGE TEACHING

One of the most prominent perspecttives within the CLT framework is task-based
language teaching (TBLT). While some researcher (kumaravadivelu, 2006) argue that
TBLT is a significantly different approach, other proponents would claim thatTBLT is at
the very heat of CLT. This approach puts the use of tasj at the core of language teaching.
While there is a good deal of variation among experts on how to describe or define task,
peter skehan (1998) concept of task still captures the essentials. He defines task as an
activity in which.

1. Meaning is primary
2. There are some communication problem to solve
3. There is some sort of relationship to comparable real-worl activities
4. Task completion has some priority, and
5. The assessment of the task is in terms of outcome

Perhaps more simply put “a task is an activity which requires learner to use
language, with emphasis on meaning, to attain an objective” (bygtate, skeehan&swain).
In some cases, a task may be comprised of several technique may be synonymous. But in
other cases, a task may be comprised of several techniques. Task based teaching makes
an important distinction between target task which student must accompolish beyond the
classroom, and pedagogical task which form the nucleus of the classroom activity.

Pedagogical task are distinguished by their specific goals that point beyond the
language classroom to the target task. A pedagogical task designed to teach student to
give personal imformation in a job interview might, for examples :

1. Doing exercise in comprehension of wb-question with do-insertion

2. Doing drills in the use of frequency adverbs
3. Listening to extract of job interviews
4. Analyzing the grammar and discourse of the interviews
5. Modeling an interview : teacher and one student
 6. Role playing a simulated interview

A task-based curriculum, then, specifics what a learners need to do with English

language in terms of arget task ad organizes a series of pedagogical intended to reach
those goals. Task-based instruction is not a new method. Rather, it puts task at the center
of ones methodological focus.

Task-based instruction is perspective within a CLT framework that forces you to

carefully consider all the techniques that you use in the classroom in terms of a number of
important pedagogical purposes.

1. Characteristics of TBLT
a. Task ultimately point learners beyond the forms of language alone to
real-world context.
b. Task spesifically contribute to communicative goals
c. Their elements are carefully designed and not simply haphazardly or
idiosyncratically thrown together
d. Their objectives as well specified so that you can at some later point
accurately determine the success of one task over another.
e. Task engage learners, at some level, in genuine prosblem-solving
activity.