Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
In the government budget cycle, accountability is laid down by the need for government
agencies and departments submit to submit quarterly and monthly income statements;
statements of allotment, obligations and balances along with other financial reports and
documents for audit - a formal process whereby the authenticity, accuracy and reliability of
financial accounts or transactions are checked and approved.
There are several kinds of audit: One is Financial Auditing wherein financial transactions and
accounts are checked to ensure the submitting government agency has complied with the rules
and regulations, specifically the pre-agreed and government accounting system. Another type is
Performance Auditing whereby
one is looking at the systems of the agency to assess it has delivered on its institutional purpose
and mandate by linking the budgets with results or results-based budgets. An
1 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
internal audit,
as the name suggests, an internal check on agency systems and processes.
External Auditing
involves an outside audit body being brought in to look at the agency.
Pre-auditing
refers to auditing by agencies before approval of transactions while
post-auditing
is auditing by an independent body after.
The Philippine government has agencies mandated to ensure accountability and transparency
on its overall operations. These agencies are: The Office of the Ombudsman, Sandiganbayan,
Presidential Anti-Graft Commission, the Civil Service Commission and primarily, for the
purpose of this paper, the Commission on Audit.
2 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
Significantly, Section 13 of Republic Act 6770 or the Ombudsman Act of 1989 states it shall
give priority to “high-profile complaints to high-ranking and supervisory officials involved with
grave offenses and large sums of money and/or properties.”
The Ombudsman does not only cover officials and employees of the government, but also
private individuals who have participated or “in conspiracy” with them in the filed complaints.
Sandiganbayan
The Sandiganbayan, or the government’s anti-graft court, is mandated by the 1973 and 1987
Constitutions. It covers criminal and civil cases against graft and corrupt practices and other
offenses committed by public officers and employees with Salary Grade 27 and above,
including those in local government units and government-owned or controlled corporations,
which are related to their official duties as determined by law.
Crimes and civil cases filed against public officers below Salary Grade 27 are covered by the
Regional Trial Court but Sandiganbayan is vested with Appellate Jurisdiction over its final
judgments, resolutions or orders. Private individuals can also be sued before this special court
if they are alleged to be in conspiracy with public officers. The Sandiganbayan is also entrusted
to have original exclusive jurisdiction over special laws such as RA 3019 (Anti-graft and Corrupt
Practices Law), RA 1379 (Forfeiture of Illegally Acquired Wealth), Revised Penal Code spec.
Batasang Pambansa 871.
3 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
PAGC’s jurisdiction includes the following laws: RA 3019, RA 1379, 6713, Revised Penal
Code, and E.O. 292.
The Civil Service Commission (CSC) is the central personnel agency of the government and is
tasked in the recruitment, building, maintenance and retention of a highly-competent and
professional workforce. It is also one of the three independent commissions established by the
Constitution with adjudicative powers to render final disputes and personnel actions on Civil
Service. It covers all national government agencies, local government units and
government-owned and -controlled corporations.
4 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
Commission on Audit
The Commission on Audit (COA) is the constitutional commission mandated to be the supreme
audit institution of the government. It has jurisdiction over national government agencies, local
government units, government-owned and controlled corporations and non-government
organizations receiving benefits and subsidies from the government.
1. Examine, audit and settle all accounts pertaining to the revenue and receipts of, and
expenditures or uses of funds and property owned or held in trust by, or pertaining to, the
government;
2. Promulgate accounting and auditing rules and regulations including those for the
prevention and disallowance of irregular, unnecessary, excessive, extravagant or
unconscionable expenditures, or uses of government funds and properties;
3. Submit annual reports to the President and the Congress on the financial condition and
operation of the government;
4. Recommend measures to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government
operations;
5. Keep the general accounts of government and preserve the vouchers and supporting
papers pertaining thereto;
6. Decide any case brought before it within 60 days;
7. Perform such other duties and functions as may be provided by law. COA, as the other
constitutional commissions are mandated, is headed by a Chairman and two Commissioners
appointed by the President and the Commission on Appointments of Congress. It also enjoys
5 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
fiscal autonomy which means its appropriations must be released regularly and automatically.
The Commission also deploys resident auditors in all national government agencies, local
government units and government-owned and controlled corporations pursuant to its mandate
to review each agency’s financial operations in a risk-based audit approach.
COA reports
In order to perform its audit functions, COA produces different kinds of reports. A study by the
Philippine National Budget Monitoring Project 1 identified and explained each of these:
The Annual Audit Reports contain the results of the audit conducted on the financial statements
submitted by agencies, local government units and government-owned and controlled
corporations to COA auditors. The results are shown in the form of audit opinions indicating
how the agencies faired with their financial statements at the end of each fiscal year. The
types of audit opinions are:
Unqualified (U), Qualified (Q), Adverse (A) and Disclaimer (D).
6 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
An Unqualified Opinion refers to the “clean opinion” or the agency reflected the results of the
financial statements fairly, which means its operations and the financial condition in a period of
time based on existing government accounting standards, and in compliance with government
laws, rules and regulations. A Qualified Opinion means that an agency reflected fairly except
for some specific transactions and/or accounts that have been found to be problematic, either
improper, questionable or needs further explanations. Adverse opinion means that the
financial statements did not fairly present its results of operations and financial condition of the
agency, and are not in compliance with prescribed laws and applicable guidelines. Lastly, the
Disclaimer opinion means that “there is no sufficient basis to form any opinion” for an agency
does not keep or submit its records of financial accounts and transactions.
An audit report has the following parts: Audit Certificate, which shows the audit opinion, the
Financial Statements, Major Findings and Observations
which explains if there are defects in the compliance of accounting and auditing rules and
policies, and
Recommendations
to the entities. In turn, COA checks if these measures were conformed by the entity on the next
year’s annual audit report.
The Consolidated Annual Financial Reports on the other hand show the financial performance
of the public sector in general. Each level has a volume of the consolidated financial report, one
each for NGAs, LGUs and GOCCs. These are based on the audit reports of each entity. These
reports contain the financial condition and highlights of agencies, local government units and
government corporations. These reports also reflect the financial resources of the government,
even the off-budget accounts or funds that are not subject to annual appropriations.
Interestingly, these reports are the only source where one can be informed about funds that are
not sourced out from appropriations.
7 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
Special Audit Reports are purposely for investigation, in response to a request by interested
parties or by a directive from Congress. The Commission has already undergone special audit
reports on the country’s outstanding debt and special purpose funds such as the Agriculture
and Fisheries Modernization Act and procurement of the Department of Public Works and
Highways.
GAFMIS
The GAFMIS is also essential because it assists government agencies with the Electronic New
Government Accounting System (e-NGAS).
It is a computerized program of the New Government Accounting System wherein budget
transactions, allotments and obligations are recorded and monitored electronically. It also helps
in streamlining the New Government Accounting System which provides the new accounting
policies in the government. Some of the basic features of the new system are the
Accrual accounting and One-fund concept.
Accrual accounting recognizes the income when earned and expenses when incurred as
oppose to recognizing income when cash is earned and expenses when paid.
8 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
internal control. It maintains efficiency and effectiveness in operations. It looks at the reliability
of financial transactions in reports by making sure that they are in accordance with rules and
regulations.
Several provisions in the Philippines have signified the internal control in the government such
as Section 123 of the amended Presidential Decree 1445, the Administrative Code 1987 and
Government Accounting and Auditing Manual guided by worldwide standards thru the
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and International Organization for
Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). The INTOSAI also formulated standards for the internal
control systems in the public sector. It has emphasized that internal control systems shall be in
line with the characteristics, values and context of the public organizations.
In line with these provisions, the Government has formulated the National Government Internal
Control System (NGICS)
through the efforts of the DBM and resource and reference panels from various government
agencies. It serves as a guide to government agencies in putting up internal control systems. It
aims to strengthen accountability, safeguard assets, promote efficiency, economy and
effectiveness in the operations and adhere with the policies of the organization.
9 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
The audit and accountability system in the Philippines have issues and limitations that affect
the status of checks and balances in the country’s financial resources.
As of September 2009, the Ombudsman has 1,007 employees, 30 percent of whom are
lawyers and 70 percent are investigators, technical and administration staff. The agency
experiences difficulty in hiring good lawyers due to uncompetitive salaries against the private
sector. Likewise, Sandiganbayan lacks human resources while CSC lacks sufficient budget for
salaries and programs. In PAGC, it is reported that employees have no security of tenure.
Akbayan Representative Risa Hontiveros-Baraquel also reported that the COA had its budget
cut by government in 2009 4 even though this is technically illegal since it has fiscal autonomy
from the administration under the Constitution.
10 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
Other organizational problems that were reported to exist were the unclear organizational
goals, lack of prioritization among concerns and values that are not service-oriented.
The Office of the Ombudsman has been continuously involved in controversy. Ombudsman
Merceditas Gutierrez has been accused of being unduly influenced by Malacanang Palace
–something she denies. PAGC is also seen as being very political – but then again it is a
presidential and not a constitutional body.
11 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
4. Backlog of cases
In her public budgeting and accounting class 6 , the late Professor Emilia Boncodin stressed
some issues on COA’s mandate and the accounting and auditing system of the government.
These are the following:
12 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
The audit system looks only at the agency’s compliance with the accounting standards and
laws in the financial reports instead of finding if the agencies have properly allocated their
appropriated budgets.
What is reported in the government budget documents regarding the GOCCs are the budgetary
support to government corporations or subsidies only. Yet, COA audits the corporate operating
expenses or the entire budget of government corporations.
13 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
example is DPWH’s audit report where it has been given an adverse opinion for the past 16
years.
Each type of audit has its own problems. Post-audit is disadvantageous because it involves
final evaluation of financial transactions –that is after the funds have already been disbursed.
Pre-audit however, ironically defeats the overall essential purpose of auditing because
financial transactions are assessed beforehand. In the past, COA had been operating on
post-audit basis since 1995 until 2009 when COA Circular 2009-002 reinstituted the selective
pre-auditing due to the rising incidents of anomalous disbursements. However, Circular
2009-003 in June 16, 2009 suspended some of the provisions in the earlier circular to ensure
uniformity and consistency in its implementation.
On COA reports
The Philippine National Budget Monitoring Project 7 has identified the following limitations that
affect the importance of COA reports in ensuring accountability:
1. Timeliness
14 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
COA’s deadline on the submission of reports is not parallel to the schedule of budget
preparation. Audit and financial reports must be submitted by end of September while budget
preparation time ends in July when the Congress’ session opens. The timings would thus work
best if reversed since the reports should serve as aids in reviewing the agencies’ budgets in
time for budget legislation. Given the reality, the value of COA’s reports being used as tools to
determine the status of government entities in terms of financial performance and compliance
with rules are nullified.
2. Completeness
Audit reports of agencies are not completed on time due to inability of personnel and time
constraints. In effect, this puts problems in reviewing the budget and in making the annual
financial reports.
3. Availability
15 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
Although COA’s website is useful in terms of the reports posted, many reports from agencies
including those from LGUs and GOCCs are currently missing.
4. Contestability of findings
There are issues on COA’s findings on its reports. First is that the some of the past findings
have not been resolved yet or the so-called “hereditary balance sheets.” An example is the
disallowances that must be deducted by agencies to employees. However, these have not
been resolved even if some personnel have already left the service or died. Secondly, there is
the inconsistency of audit rules by resident auditors. In some agencies, the rules of past
auditors and new auditors differ like deductions that were not present in the past have already
been installed at the time the new auditor comes to office. The third issue is the unreasonable
application of rules and regulations in auditing. Some expenses are disallowed even if it yields
good results. The last issue is the inability of auditors to understand the situation of agencies’
operations. The operations have complexities that emergencies become inevitable and it is
hard for them to look at the reasons for the issues in operations.
5. Feasibility of recommendations
The COA’s recommendations on reports are not always being followed by agencies and these
are already beyond the control of the institution.
16 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
6. Conflict of interest
COA auditors are still considered as “mere mortals” that may experience biases, influences and
errors in judgment. There are often claims that some auditors are complicit in bribery and graft.
17 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
The Open budget Index is an advocacy of the International Budget Partnership’s (IBP) Open
Budget Initiative promoting public access to budget information and adopting accountable
budget systems.
The open budget index survey is being demonstrated in 85 countries around the world, one of
which is the Philippines, to determine if information is publicly available and to monitor the
practice of budget execution. The survey is formulated to measure the following aspects of the
budget system:
18 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
In the report of the 2008 Open Budget Survey, findings show that 80 percent of the world’s
governments do not provide adequate budget information to citizens. Most countries have weak
formal oversight institutions. They have recommended some immediate measures to the
governments to improve budget transparency and accountability:
1. Disseminate budget information in forms and through methods and media that are
understandable and useful to the wider population. This should include disseminating
information through radio or other broadcast media, and in languages spoken by the majority of
the population.
2. Institutionalize mechanisms for public involvement in the budget process, including public
hearings during formulation and discussion of the Executive’s budget proposal, and at regular
intervals throughout the budget cycle.
3. Expand opportunities for media coverage of the budget process, for example, by opening
budget hearings to journalists or broadcasting these hearings on radio, television, and the
19 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
Internet.
4. Support relevant reforms to improve the independence and capacity of the legislature and
supreme audit institution to play their formal oversight role. Reforms should address the political
and financial independence of these institutions, as well as their analytical capacity, access to
the executive, and other legal powers required to fulfill their mandate.
5. Build effective public finance information systems that enhance the quality and timeliness
of available budget information, for example, through the use of clear, standardized
classification systems and appropriate Information Technology (IT).
The Framework was developed to assess and develop essential public financial management
systems. The following are the critical dimensions that serve as indicators in the performance of
an open and orderly public financial management system.
20 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
5. Donor Practices
The Fiscal ROSC is a project of the International Monetary Fund which takes a look at how the
countries observe the international standards and codes. It focuses on twelve areas, one of
which is fiscal transparency.
The Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency is based on the following principles
(The author is a research assistant of the International Center for Innovation, Transformation
and Excellence in Governance under the Philippine National Budget Monitoring Project.)
21 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
Sources:
- Briones, Leonor M. Chapter 10 Public Financial Accountability for Integrity and Results:
The Case of the Philippine Bureau of the Treasury. Governance, Corruption and Public
Financial Management. Asian Development Bank < Link > Date Accessed: February
8, 2010
- Cariño, Ledivina V. Administrative Accountability: A Review of the Evolution, Meaning and
Operationalization of a Key Concept in Public Administration, Philippine Journal of Public
Administration, April 1983.
- Center for People Empowerment in Governance and Transparency International
Philippines. Is the Philippine Judicial System Effective in Fighting Corruption?:
- A Preliminary Report. Dec. 8, 2006, < Link >
- Civil Service Commission. About Us.< Link > Date Accessed: February 8, 2010
- Commission on Audit < Link >
- Department of Budget and Management. National Government Internal Control System.
DBM Publication. < Link > Date Accessed: February 7, 2010.
- Ethics and Accountability in Public Service (Public Administration 161) class WFV, First
Semester 2009-2010 headed by Prof. Minerva Baylon, Ph.D. Comparative Table of
Effectiveness of Agencies Mandated to Ensure Accountability in Government. UP-NCPAG,
October 2009.
- International Monetary Fund. Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency (2007). < Li
nk
>
- Natad, Johny Sauro. Internal Control and the IC System in the Philippines. Bukidnon State
University Graduate Extension Studies, Surigao City Study Center, September 2008.
- Office of the Ombudsman. About Us.< Link > Date Accessed: February 8, 2010.
- Official Website of the Government Accountancy and Financial Management Information
System < Link >
- Open Budget Initiative. Open Budgets. Transform Lives. The Open Budget Survey 2008.
International Budget Partnership < Link > Feb. 15, 2010
- Philippine National Budget Monitoring Project. Using Reports of the Commission on Audit.
United States Agency for International Development, July 2009.
22 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
- Presidential Anti-Graft Commission. About Us < Link > Date Accessed: February 8, 2010.
1Philippine National Budget Monitoring Project. Using Reports of the Commission on Audit.
United States Agency for International Development, July 2009.
2 Natad, Johny Sauro. Internal Control and the IC System in the Philippines. Bukidnon State
University Graduate Extension Studies, Surigao City Study Center, September 2008
3 Ethics and Accountability in Public Service (Public Administration 161) class WFV, First
6 Boncodin, Emilia. Public Administration 132: Public Budgeting and Accounting, First Semester
2009-2010, Auditing and Accountability. UP-NCPAG, October 2009.
7 Philippine National Budget Monitoring Project. Using Reports of the Commission on Audit.
23 / 24
Checks and Balances: Audit and Accountability in Philippine Public Finances
24 / 24