10th and Yampa Hotel Planning Commission

AGENDA ITEM #1.
Staff Report
Department of Planning & Community Development
Project Overview
Project Name Lots 11,12, E2 Lot 10, BLK 32, Original Town of SS
(TBD Yampa Street)
Project Code PUD-18-01
Project Type Planned Unit Development - PUD
Project Description A PUD for a hotel which includes custom height, setbacks,
floor area ratio, lot coverage, site and design standards that
differ from the current zoning.
Applicant Marr – Yampa Limited
Zoning CY-2 (Current), PUD (proposed)
Report Prepared By Bob Keenan, AICP
Principal Planner
Through Rebecca Bessey, AICP
Director of Planning & Community Development
Planning Commission September 26, 2019
City Council First Reading: October 8, 2019; Second Reading: November
12, 2019 (to be tabled to November 19, 2019)
Project Location
Page 1 of 7 1.1
Lots 11,12, E2 Lot 10, BLK 32, Original Town of SS (TBD Yampa Street); PUD-18-01
Report Date: September 19, 2019
Background
The subject parcel is zoned CY-2 and is situated on the corner of 10th and Yampa Streets and
across the street from the Yampa River. The parcel is 0.41 acre in size and slopes downwards
from the alley to Yampa Street. The site is currently used as a surface parking lot for general
parking and is not part of any required business or residential parking. It was previously used
for parking for the Yampa Valley Electric Association when their headquarters was located across
10th Street. Since that property was redeveloped in 2016, the parking lot was made available to
the public by the private property owner.
Project Description
The applicant is proposing a 55-room boutique hotel at the corner of Yampa and 10th Streets.
The proposed hotel consists of four stories along the Yampa Street side and transitions to three
above ground stories towards the alley. The applicant is proposing to park the hotel at a rate of
1 parking space per hotel room, which meets City requirements. Parking is structured, with a
portion of the parking under the hotel and accessed from Yampa Street, and a smaller
unenclosed parking lot accessed from the alley.
The PUD is proposed due to the limitations of the current zoning standards which makes
construction of a hotel infeasible without a significant number of variations to the Community
Development Code. Further analysis on the request for PUD is provided below.
Due to the specific nature of the proposed PUD, a hotel use will be the only allowable use on this
property, and it must be configured and constructed as depicted in the attached plans. The next
steps in the application process for this project, if approved, are: a lot consolidation,
Development Plan, and construction drawings.
Please see attachment D and E for a comprehensive list of all aspects of the proposed
custom zoning for this project and a comparison to the current zoning standards.
Project Analysis
The following section provides staff analysis of the application as it relates to sections of the CDC.
It is intended to highlight those areas that may be of interest or concern to Planning Commission,
City Council, Staff or the public. For standards and requirements applicable to this proposal
please refer to the CDC or contact the staff planner.
Principal Discussion Items

Principal discussion includes but is not limited to the use of the property as a hotel and the
associated dimensional and design standards that make up the proposed custom zoning.
Criteria for Approval: PUD

CONSISTENT?
Approval Criteria Summary
YES NO NA
Proposed Development Cannot be Accommodated with

Current or other City Zoning
PUD Shall Meet at Least One of the Following: 
 Addresses a Community Need
 Special Physical Characteristics
 Preserve Valued Features
 To Protect and Preserve the Character of a Historic
Structure or District
Page 2 of 7 1.2
 Proposed Scale or Timing Demands More

Customized Approach
 Allows for Creativity to Produce a Superior
Outcome
 Necessary to Respond to a Changed Condition
Proposal is Compatible with Surroundings 
Shall Substantially Further Adopted Plans 
Shall Minimize Adverse Impacts on the Natural

Environment
Provides Significant Community Enhancement 
Provides Outcome Superior in Terms of Community
Enhancement – Not Solely to Enhance Developer’s 
Economic Feasibility
CDC Section 721.C – Planned Unit Developments shall be approved upon findings that
the following criteria are met:
1. The proposed development cannot be accommodated with the current zoning of the property
or any other City zone district.
CONSISTENT
Staff agrees with the applicant’s narrative that the hotel project cannot be
accommodated in the current or any other City zone district due to the limitations of the
current zone district which appears to not fully accommodate the more unique needs of a
hotel versus other allowed uses. A hotel use requires a minimum number of rooms and
associated parking to be feasible. The applicant is proposing to fully park the proposed
hotel use as required by code. However, the square-footage needed for parking the site
greatly reduces the remaining square-footage to accommodate the hotel rooms, lobby,
and amenities. Furthermore, the CY-2 zoning allows for additional height on the
uppermost floor (38’ maximum instead of 28’) for buildings with residential units on the
uppermost floor. Allowing hotel rooms on the uppermost floor is not that dissimilar to
allowing residential units on the upper-most floor that can be rented as a vacation unit,
which is allowed under current code. It is for this reasons staff believes this criterion is
met.
2. The Planned Unit Development shall meet at least one of the following:
a. The PUD addresses a community need as described in the Community Plan; or
b. The development site has special physical characteristics including but not limited to an
irregular or oddly-shaped lot, or a lot with significant topographical barriers to standard
development construction practices; or
c. The PUD will preserve valued environmental, cultural, or scenic resource lands or view
corridors, minimize the disturbance of natural hazard areas, increase the amount of
functional open space within the development, or create functional public spaces; or
d. The PUD is necessary to protect and preserve the character of a historic structure or
historic district; or
Page 3 of 7 1.3
e. The proposed scale or timing of a development project demands a more customized

zoning approach to achieve a successful phased development; or
f. The PUD allows for creativity in the development process, use of land, or use of related
physical facilities to produce a superior outcome as described in Section 721.C.6; or
g. The PUD is necessary to respond to a changed condition where the current zone map
or standard zone district does not meet the needs of the lot owner or community for
this particular site.
CONSISTENT
Staff agrees with the applicant’s narrative that the PUD meets criterion a, above. The
PUD addresses the following community needs as provided in adopted plans:
1. 2004 Steamboat Springs Area Community Plan

a. Policy LU-2.1: Infill and redevelopment will occur in appropriate locations, as
designated by the city.
b. Table LU: Land Use Summary Table
Old Town Commercial - classification emphasizes commercial uses, including
retail, office restaurant, hotel/motel and other commercial uses involving active
or frequent interaction with the public. Strong pedestrian relationships and a
walking environment are required.
2. 2019 Downtown Plan
a. LUZ 6: Increase lodging opportunities.
b. LUZ 6.1: Increase opportunities for lodging uses by modifying the CDC to allow
hotels as a by-right or limited use instead of a conditional use in Commercial Old
Town, Commercial Yampa One and Two, and Commercial Oak Two.
c. LUZ 6.2: Encourage hotels by providing discounted development fees for land
use applications for hotels.
d. LUZ 6.3: Modify the CDC to allow the same building height for lodging uses as
residential on the uppermost floor
3. The type, height, massing, appearance, and intensity of development permitted by a PUD is
compatible with surrounding zone districts, land uses, and neighborhood context and
character, and the PUD will result in a logical and orderly development pattern within the
community.
CONSISTENT
The proposed hotel PUD will be consistent with the size and scale of development
permitted in surrounding zone districts. As noted above, the height of the proposed
building, 38’, will be similar to buildings built to the maximum height in adjacent zone
districts, with residential units above.
As for the floor area ratio (FAR) and lot coverage, these too will appear to be similar to
other developments built to the maximum standards of the zone district. The CDC allows
for basements to be excluded from FAR. While the lowest level parking garage does not
qualify for this exemption due to the grade change from the alley to Yampa Street, the
mass of this additional square-footage is built into the ground which will lessen its impact
and appear similar to other developments that provide structured parking. FAR is
proposed to be increased over the current zoning from 200% to 275%.
Page 4 of 7 1.4
Lot Coverage is proposed to be increased from 85% to 100% to accommodate the lobby
and underbuilding parking garage. However, as viewed from the alley or from the west,
the building will appear as an L shaped building and will not appear to be 100% lot
coverage. This is partly due to the change in grade; dropping from the alley to Yampa
Street.
Massing will be similar to adjacent zone districts with the 4th story of the proposed
building stepping back 10’ (CY-2 has a 15’ stepback) so that the street presence appears
to be 3 stories as viewed from the Yampa Street sidewalk adjacent to the building.
However, the current zoning requires building massing to be expressed in 25’ increments
vs. the 50’ increments proposed by this PUD.
The proposed setbacks of 0’ on Yampa and 10th Street differ from the current zone
district of 10’. However, a variety of building setbacks exist on Yampa Street with some
recent project built to 0’ front. The building on the corner of 10th and Lincoln has a 0’
setback on 10th Street.
The buildings appearance, as a result of this PUD, will be similar to those allowed in the
vicinity that provides underbuilding parking. Glazing and transparency may differ from
other developments built to the zoning requirements (ground floor wall area minimum
60% required) as the applicant is proposing to not provide glazing along the first level
where the underbuilding parking is. The applicant is proposing to mitigate the lack of
fenestration on these facades via a textured brick veneer, signage, and a transparent
garage door. The applicant is proposing 60% glazing along the lobby area, non parking
garage façades.
Staff finds that the proposed building will be in context and character with surrounding
developments built to the maximum standards of the CY-2 zone district and will result in
logical and orderly development.
4. The PUD shall substantially further the preferred direction and policies outlined in the
Community Plan and other applicable adopted plans.
CONSISTENT
The proposed PUD addresses several community needs noted in both the Downtown
Plan and the Community Plan. Please refer to criterion #2, above. Staff finds that the
proposed PUD generally furthers the direction and policies of the City’s adopted plans.
Other policies of note are as follows:
Community Plan -
 Land Use - Old Town Commercial

Development shall be keeping with the historic flavor of the Old Town area. The
business uses are generally intended to be small-scale and not dependent on direct
vehicular access or parking.
 CD-1.5 – Infill and redevelopment projects shall be compatible with the context of
existing neighborhoods and development.
 Policy ED-1.1 – Continue to support tourism-related land uses, businesses, and
marketing.
 SPA-1.2: Promote infill, redevelopment, and affordable housing in Old Town, but
new development should preserve Old Town’s historic character.
Page 5 of 7 1.5
5. The PUD shall minimize any adverse impacts on the natural environment, including water
quality, air quality, wildlife habitat, vegetation, wetlands, and natural landforms.
CONSISTENT
The proposed PUD should not have any unexpected negative impacts on the natural
environment. The current use of the land is a surface parking lot and it does not meet
current standards for water quality. The proposed development will meet all necessary
water quality and environmental standards.
6. In return for flexibility in zoning, development permitted by the PUD shall provide significant
community enhancement not achievable through application of a standard zone district. A
community enhancement may include but is not limited to:
a. Diversification of land use to provide opportunities for commercial, recreational, and

educational facilities to be conveniently located near a mix of housing types; or
b. A variety of housing types; or
c. Innovation in development, site design, or architectural quality; or
d. More efficient use of land and energy; or
e. Exemplary pedestrian connections and amenities; or
f. Expanded opportunities for public transportation; or
g. Safe, compact, and efficient street or utility networks; or
h. Any other feature or features that furthers the direction of the Community Plan as a
whole and not just a specific individual goal or policy.
CONSISTENT
Staff agrees with the applicant’s narrative that the PUD meets criteria a and h, above.
The proposed hotel PUD provides for diversification of land uses that may not be
achieved through the CY-2 zoning. As previously noted, the current zoning does not
allow densities to support viable hotel development while still providing required parking.
Regarding criterion h, as noted above, the PUD generally furthers the direction of both
the Community Plan and the Downtown Plan.
7. The Planned Unit Development shall provide an outcome superior in terms of community
enhancement than would be achievable with the current zoning of the property or any other
City zone district and is not being used solely as a means to enhance a development’s
economic feasibility.
CONSISTENT
Staff agrees with the applicant’s narrative that the PUD provides a superior community
enhancement than what otherwise would be achievable with the current zoning of the
property. The proposal is to provide a boutique hotel that Downtown currently lacks.
The need for the PUD is not to enhance the economic feasibility of the project but to
make it feasible at all. As noted throughout this staff report, the current zoning
Page 6 of 7 1.6
limitations, Conditional Use, FAR, setbacks, etc. allowed under current zoning restrict the
feasibility of hotel development which is recognized by the Downtown Plan.
Staff Findings
Staff finds that the Yampa Street Hotel PUD, PUD-18-01, is CONSISTENT with the Criteria for
Approval for a Planned Unit Development.
Recommended Motion
Staff recommends approval of the PUD as presented.
Attachments
A. Project Timeline
B. Project Narrative
C. Plan Set
D. PUD Comparison
E. PUD Zoning Exhibit
F. Engineering Variance
Page 7 of 7 1.7
A. Project Timeline
Project Timeline
Project Code: PUD-18-01
Project Name: Yampa Street Hotel PUD
DATES NOTES
Pre-Submittal Meeting 12/20/2018
Application Submitted 02/20/2019
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW
TAC Letter 03/21/2019
Resubmittal 05/10/2019
TAC Letter 06/07/2019
Resubmittal 07/19/2019
TAC Letter
Resubmittal
TAC Letter
PUBLIC NOTICE
Newspaper Notice 09/15/2019
Mailed Notice 09/10/2019
Property Posting 09/10/2019
Mineral Notice n/a
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Planning Commission 09/26/2019
City Council 10/08/2019 &
11/19/2019
NOTES
1.8
Attachment B
Project Narrative
This project is a boutique hotel proposed to be built on an existing infill lot in downtown Steamboat. This boutique
hotel will bring a vital component to Steamboat in that it will provide a location, downtown, where visitors to the
area can lodge and utilize non-motorized forms of transit to access local businesses (including shopping and food
service). The project will add to the character of the downtown and its streetscape and promote exploration of
Steamboat via public transportation and existing walking / hiking paths. This project could not be developed within
all of the confines of the existing zoning code which is why we are proposing this PUD.
The restrictions of the CY-2 Zoning lot size prevents hotel use as being a viable development option in this zone
district even though the hotel use is an emphasized commercial use in this area per the Community Plan. This is
why a PUD is being proposed for this site and use. The current lot size limitations do not lend themselves to any
reasonable dimension for providing both ground floor parking (parking spaces including an aisle for access) as well
as a public access point at the ground floor level (Lobby). Trying to push the parking lower into the water table (to
hypothetically provide more area in the building) would require extensive de-watering and garage access ramps
that essentially would be for a minimal parking allotment increase: The deeper the underbuilding garage goes,
the more ramps are required to reach the bottom of it. The more ramp space that is required, the less parking can
be provided. The less parking that can be provided, the less guest rooms that can be provide (1 parking space is
required per guest room).
Our goal for this PUD is to add an important use in the downtown area (on an infill Old Town parcel that is
currently an asphalt parking lot) consistent with community vision and goals. This proposed project is keeping
with the larger community goal of improving the compact, urban center of downtown Steamboat Springs. This
boutique hotel is oriented to Yampa and 10th Street and includes underbuilding parking.
The PUD establishes that a hotel use would be the only proposed use for the project site and PUD requirements.
We are asking to be granted revisions as it applies to Setbacks, Lot Size, Uppermost Story Use, Floor Area Ratio,
and Lot Coverage in order to allow this use to fit on the tight urban site. This project will meet the intent of the
zoning requirements, visually consistent with surrounding projects in the downtown area, and furthering the goals
of the 2004 Steamboat Springs Area Community Plan and the soon to be adopted City of Steamboat Springs
Downtown Plan.
2 1.9
Challenges
To justify the hotel use and the required service support system for it, a minimal critical mass of inventory is
required. This is a reciprocal relationship between the full-time services (including 24-hour guest support, the
lobby, operational, engineering and housekeeping staff) and the guest rooms to support the service functions,
and vise-versa. To make this site developable within minimum standards for a hotel use we have a number of
challenges to overcome through the PUD process.
1. Setbacks - The proposed site has a current front setback requirement of 10 ft min for the Principal Building
up to 28 ft. In order to allow for increased density for the hotel use (including on-site parking), we are
requesting as part of the PUD that the Principal Building revise the setback height to be 30 ft. (in lieu of
28’) and the setback up to that level for this site be set to zero ft. (in lieu of 10 ft). The revised setback
allows the surface parking to be added behind the building, accessed from the Alley and screened from
both Yampa and 10th Streets, a requirement of the zone district. This also has to do with continuing to
meet the overhead height requirement of 38’ while still allowing the hotel rooms adequate height to
accommodate structure and HVAC in the floor/ceiling system.
An additional reason we are proposing to reduce the front setbacks is that this project is proposed to be
placed on the corner of two main streets; Yampa and 10th Streets. Yampa Street from 5th down to 8th
Street has multiple retail and restaurants including several stand-alone restaurants on the south side of
the road. After 9th Street heading west, the buildings along the south side of the street (river side)
disappear and the area becomes public parking and walking paths. The north side of the street becomes
smaller buildings with interjecting parking lots between 8th and 11th Streets. If someone is not familiar
with the area, there is no visual draw to continue down past 8th / 9th Street to other businesses. This
project proposes that the building at the corner of Yampa & 10th should sit closer to the front property
lines. It should be a visual landmark for people on Yampa Street. The main lobby space on the corner will
be all glass and become a visual draw and anchor to encourage more people to explore the west end of
Yampa on foot.
The reduction of this setback is in line with other developments on this street.
Waterside Village (corner of 11th and Yampa) has the front setback at zero.
The Olympian (corner of 5th and Yampa) has a front setback of zero to 8 ft at grade.
The other setback revision we would like to request is that the Principal Building above 30’ (in lieu of 28’)
be set at 10’ min (in lieu of 25’ min). This allows the uppermost level of this building to be more useable
(at a depth more conducive to a hotel room/suite) and makes that floor level more proportionally
connected to the base of the building.
2. Uppermost Floor Use - The existing CY-2 zoning requires that the uppermost floor to be residential. As
part of the PUD we would like to request that the uppermost floor of this project be used for the main
building function of a hotel. This is based on the critical mass of inventory necessary to justify the support
services provided at a boutique hotel (24-hour front desk service, common lobby space, housekeeping
and operational spaces). The proposed hotel use functions most efficiently when the entire building is
dedicated to the main use, a hotel, in lieu of providing spaces on the upper most floor that are separate
and not associated with the hotel function.
3. Lot Coverage – The current zoning requirement for Lot Coverage for this lot is 85% max. To allow for the
3 1.10
required parking for the hotel use, the majority of the Lowest Level of this project is proposed to be an
underbuilding Parking Garage. We would like to propose as part of this PUD that the Lot Coverage for this
site be 100%. Due to the grade change from the alley to Yampa Street (Yampa is +/- 6’ below the alley),
much of the lowest level of the building is actually pushed into the grade so the fact that the building on
that level is the size of the parcel is not visual apparent. This also allows for the necessary parking required
for the hotel use.
4. Floor Area Ratio – The current zoning code for this property allows a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of
200% max with 3rd Floor Residential. This means that this site at 17,860 SF, is allowed to build 35,720 SF
of constructed floor space. Basements are excluded from the FAR calculation.
To allow for the required parking for the hotel use and to keep as much of that parking out of sight as
possible, the majority of the Lowest Level of this project is proposed to be a Parking Garage below the
building. As part of the PUD we would like to request that the FAR for this site be 275% (including the
underbuilding parking). This allows for the boutique hotel to have as much parking as possible (+/- 55
space). This parking will allow the hotel to be a size that can support the full service, on-site functions
required by a boutique hotel including 24-hour front desk service, common lobby space, housekeeping
and operational spaces.
5. Lot Size – the existing requirement for lot width in the CY-2 Zone District is 100 ft max. This project’s
existing parcel is made up of 2 ½ lots (East ½ of lot 10 and all lots 11 and 12 of Block 32). At the time of
development, the interior lot lines of these lots will be vacated. As part of the PUD it is proposed that the
lot width be revised to be 125 ft max to match this parcel size.
4 1.11
Additional PUD Revision Criteria
Chapter 26, Article 4, Development and Design Standards
Section 402 Landscape
There is no longer a request to change the Frontage Landscaping as part of this PUD. This is because the
Frontage Landscape Table 402-1 notes the following:
Zone District CY
Depth 10’ (4)
Category A
NOTE (4) – Frontage landscaping is only required for undeveloped portions of a lot.
This project proposes to develop the entire lot, so there are no undeveloped portion that would require
frontage landscaping. The requirement is being met without asking for any variation to the code.
The requirements for Interior Landscape are proposed to be removed for this project site. This has to do
with the fact that there is no interior of this lot. The building occupies most of the proposed lot with the
alley accessible parking occupying the rest of the space. The proposed site does not have room to install
traditional interior landscape. As noted above, alternate landscaping will be provided including planters,
potted plants and street trees in the right of way.
Interior Parking Lot Landscape is proposed to be removed from requirements for this site. The parking
that is accessible at grade level is actually built on top of the Lower Level Parking Garage. This means the
surface parking does not have any grade for landscape planting available to it. The alley parking lot is also
not visually accessible from 10th or Yampa Streets. The locations where alternative landscape is to be
provided are in location where it will enhance the public realm and community appearance.
Section 407 Off-Street Loading
As this is proposed to be a boutique hotel with limited deliveries, the requirement for an off-street loading
space is proposed to be removed as part of the PUD. This is requested due to this facility being a hotel
with limited deliveries as compared to a commercial retail establishment. Deliveries, when they occur, are
expected to occur at the drop-off and check-in parallel spaces located in front of the hotel.
Section 409 Snow Storage
As part of this PUD the Snow Storage requirement is proposed to be removed due to this project utilizing
snowmelt.
Section 415 Clear Vision Setback
The intent of the Clear Vision Setback, as described in CDC Section 415 is to “maintain a clear line of sight
at intersections to maintain vehicle and pedestrian safety”. The CDC standard defaults to a 30-ft minimum
setback from property lines for corner lots.
5 1.12
As part of this PUD the Clear Vision Setback requirement is requested to be revised. In lieu of the 30’ clear
vision setback at corner lots, it is proposed that this project will use “A Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets 1990” by American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
(AASHTO) to show how the vision standards are being met at the streets and alleys associated with this
project. The intersection sight distance developed by AASHTO is a nationally accepted and applied
standard. Per Section 1.1 of the City’s Engineering Standards, “the standards generally follow the criteria
set forth by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and
CDOT.” It is the Applicant’s intent to develop a project that conforms to applicable standards and the
AASHTO sight distance guidelines afford the designers and reviewers standards that may be applied. We
would like to propose to use this standard for determining that the Clear Vision requirements are being
met in lieu of CDC Section 415.
Section 426 Access
This boutique hotel proposes to have two access points. The slope of the existing site (+/-6’-0” of grade
change from alley to Yampa Streets) lends itself to an access both on Yampa Street (south) and from the
alley (north). The Yampa Street access will be for the interior parking garage. Yampa Street is the lowest
accessible street surrounding this property, which is why the south access is proposed to be from this
street. The side street (10th Street) is sloped and does not allow for access to an underground garage
except on the prominent corner of 10th and Yampa where it is required that the building engage the public
and establish a visual presence with its entry. An access on 10th Street would require the building to be
pushed higher, which is one of the existing requirements that this PUD is trying not to alter, the height
requirement. There is proposed to be a second access for this site from the alley for the surface parking
located on that side. The alley lot is fully screened from the streets by the building.
Division 2, Community Design Standards
Section 443.E Building Massing
The building massing for this hotel is proposed to be expressed in 50’ increments for the residential
portion of the building in lieu of the 25’ requirement in this section. A hotel has limited flexibility of room
design and layout and stepping the façade at 50’ increments allows for variety in the elevation of the
building without compromising the usefulness of the room layouts.
The lowest level of building is the Lobby and Parking access. It is proposed that there be minimal step
backs on this level of the building. This has to do with the efficiency of a parking garage. The proposed
expressed massing is to be 75’ increments on the Lowest Level of the building to accommodate the
parking.
As noted in the section called PUD Criterial, Item number 3, the proposed materials for the building will
be designed and a variety of materials chosen for the façades. These will be used in conjunction with the
massing to create pedestrian level interest and massing compatible with Old Town. The building will also
use offsets, projections, and recesses in the façade to mitigate its visual impact.
The ground level of the proposed hotel is to be 11 ft high in lieu of the 12 to 15 ft requirement in this
section. This has to do with the use of this level. A portion of the lowest level is Lobby space and the
majority of it is a parking garage. A height of 11 ft meets the requirements for the Lobby use. Any increase
6 1.13
in the height at the lowest level would continue to raise the ceiling of the garage and the guest units
above. A greater height at the garage is not useful or required. Keeping the height of the Lowest Level at
11 ft allows the proposed project to meet the overall height requirement as well. That way there is no
request to adjust the overall building height.
See PUD-17 and PUD-18 for exhibits showing the proposed building massing standards.
Section 443.H Building Scale, Variation and Fenestration
Glazing and Transparency Standards

Currently the CY-2 Zone District requires the following Transparent Glazing Requirements:
• 30% minimum of the wall area at ground floor building facades facing public circulation
• 60% minimum of the wall area at ground floor building facades facing Yampa Street
• 25% minimum of the wall area of all upper floor building facades.
This PUD is requesting that these requirements be revised as follows:

Transparent glazing, including glazed doors, shall be provided as follows:
• 60% minimum of the wall area of the Lobby (finished interior area) at the ground floor
building facades facing both Yampa Street and 10th Street.
• The underbuilding parking area at the ground floor building facades are to be excluded
from the glazing requirement.
• 25% minimum of the wall area of all upper floor building facades.
Changes to the glazing requirements stem from the ground floor of the building being partially a public
lobby façade and partially a parking garage. These proposed glazing requirements were reviewed
between Eric Smith and Bob Keenan.
See PUD-17 and PUD-18 for exhibits showing the proposed glazing and transparency standards.
7 1.14
Criteria for PUD Approvals
Steamboat Community Development Code

Steamboat Springs Municipal Code Chapter 6
721 Planned Unit Development
1. The proposed development cannot be accommodated with the current zoning of the property or any other
City zone district.
In order to fit required parking on this site (both in the garage and on the surface) we have designed a
narrower, L shaped building that sits on top of a larger Lobby/Parking Garage level. This results in a
narrower hotel building above that can screen the surface parking (a district zoning requirement). A 10’
setback, as currently required by code, would further limit the number of standard sized hotel rooms that
will be able to fit on the site while still allowing for adequate parking for those hotel rooms.
The current CY-2 zoning does allow additional height with Residential on Uppermost Floor (38’ max with
Residential on Uppermost Floor). However, Residential use is not compatible with a boutique hotel where
guests expect a private and unique experience (all hotel use VS mixed-use). Many of the owned
Residential units in town are ultimately rented out, similar to a hotel, with nightly and weekly rentals. We
would argue that allowing the uppermost floor of this project to be a hotel use, to match the full building
use, is not that dissimilar from the uppermost floor being residential except that it allows the entire
proposed building to function as one business/entity.
As such, we are proposing a use (hotel) and height (with the uppermost floor being hotel) that is consistent
with how the zoning code is currently regulating this area. Although additional height would allow for
more units, we are not asking for additional total height. We are asking for a reduction in setbacks and
the ability to have hotel guestroom units at the uppermost floor.
The goal of this project is to provide a boutique hotel experience in the downtown Steamboat area, a use
that currently does not exist. This is consistent with the community goals outlined in the 2004 Steamboat
Springs Area Community Plan as well as the forthcoming City of Steamboat Springs Downtown Plan.
2. The Planned Unit Development shall meet at least one of the following:
a. The PUD addresses a community need as described in the Community Plan
The 2004 Steamboat Springs Area Community Plan as well as the forthcoming City of Steamboat Springs
Downtown Plan continually reference the need for urban infill projects, transit-oriented development,
and the need to bring more visitors to the downtown area to strengthen downtown businesses during the
day as well as during evening hours.
Policy LU-2.1: Infill and redevelopment will occur in appropriate location, as designated by the city.
This project is an infill of an existing parking lot that is part of the Old Town commercial district; an area
noted as being appropriate for infill and redevelopment by the city in the Community Plan. It brings
density to the currently underutilized parcel, avoids sprawl and provides an efficient use of a small urban
8 1.15
site. Although this boutique hotel project is not mixed-use, it will provide a use that is complementary to
the downtown area and bring pedestrian traffic to other downtown businesses.
Table LU-4: Land Use Summary Table

Old Town Commercial - classification emphasizes commercial uses, including retail, office restaurant,
hotel/motel and other commercial uses involving active or frequent interaction with the public. Strong
pedestrian relationships and a walking environment are required.
This project is to be a hotel, an emphasized commercial use by the Community Plan. It proposes to meet
the community goal of providing this currently not available business entity (boutique hotel) in Old Town
where guests can more easily interact with the public storefronts and businesses.
Policy T-1.4: New development shall incorporate transit-friendly design.

Transit-friendly design, (walkable, mixed-use, and not dominated by activities with significant automobile
use) is much more effective in promoting transit use than traditional development patterns.
The hotel use, especially in this downtown location, encourages transit use instead of single occupant
vehicles due to its location. The proposed boutique hotel is close to existing public transit stops (1/10 of
a mile from the nearest bus stop). We believe the easy access will promote the use by guests of the public
transit system throughout downtown and to the mountain. A typical hotel guest can also very easily walk
to downtown retail and restaurants during day and evening hours.
g. The PUD is necessary to respond to a changed condition where the current zone map or standard
zone district do not meet the needs of the lot owner or community for this particular site.
The PUD is requesting revisions to the setbacks, lot size, uppermost floor use, lot coverage and FAR. The
requested changes are to achieve the critical mass required to support the full service, on-site functions
required by a boutique hotel including 24-hour front desk service, common lobby space, housekeeping
and operational spaces. We believe these PUD revisions are appropriate for a boutique hotel use in a small
city urban core but do not meet the current standard zone district requirements. The PUD is necessary to
provide this use in Old Town which will in turn support other businesses downtown by providing visitors
who are staying in the direct vicinity.
One of the strategies in the Community Plan Goals 2004 (GM-1.3(b)) is about planning and evaluating
regulations that affect infill and redevelopment. It says “Building code and zoning regulations can
constrain infill and redevelopment through regulations (e.g., excessive parking requirements, setbacks,
lot coverage, “one-size-fits-all” level of service standards).” We believe that this infill and redevelopment
project fits the reason for this Community Plan strategy.
3. The type, height, massing, appearance, and intensity of development permitted by a PUD is compatible with
surrounding zone districts, land uses, and neighborhood context and character, and the PUD will result in a
logical and orderly development pattern within the community.
Type: We request at a hotel use be approved for this site as it is specifically encouraged in the 2004
Steamboat Springs Area Community Plan, as well as the soon to be adopted City of Steamboat Springs
Downtown Plan.
9 1.16
Height: The current maximum height limit on this site is 42’ for Public Facilities, 38’ for Commercial uses
with Residential on uppermost floors, and 28’ without Residential on uppermost floors. Table LU-4
encourages uses including hotels as a primary use in Old Town, and Residential as a secondary use. We
are not asking for additional height above code. We are asking for hotel units to be allowed within the
current 38’ height limit. This PUD is also requesting that the proposed step back for the uppermost floor
happen at 30’ above existing grade, in lieu of 28’ above existing grade. This has to do with meeting the
overhead height requirement of 38’ while still allowing the hotel rooms adequate height to accommodate
structure and HVAC in the floor/ceiling system.
Massing: This building proposes to step the building back on the uppermost floor consistent with
surrounding approved projects. We are also varying and stepping the façade to articulate the material
changes along both Yampa and 10th Street. This is to create pedestrian level interest and massing
compatible with Old Town and the surrounding urban fabric.
Appearance: The building will be designed and materials chosen for the façades, to complement the
nearby historic and more recently developed buildings in downtown Steamboat. Elements of masonry,
steel, siding and stucco will drive an appearance that acknowledges the history of Steamboat but also
present as high-quality and contemporary. They will be chosen to be complementary to the context of
the existing area. The fenestrations will vary in size and pattern to provide visual interest as well. The
Lobby of the building will be storefront glass to provide a visual anchor at the corner of Yampa and 10th
Streets.
Intensity: In order to achieve the critical mass required to support the on-site functions required by a
boutique hotel including 24-hour, full service front desk, common lobby space, housekeeping and
operational spaces, a certain density is required. This building density is tied to the amount of parking that
can be provided and screened properly per zoning requirements. In order to reduce surface parking in the
city for this hotel use, we are locating the majority of parking below the building. Rather than a density-
limiting FAR that incentivizes above ground parking, keeping parking underground in this PUD we believe
serves the goals of the city better. We are requesting in the PUD that the FAR be increased to 275% to
accommodate the underbuilding parking.
Development Pattern: The development on Yampa Street consists of shorter, 1 and 2 story building that
house mainly restaurants and retail functions on the south side of the street. Current buildings on the
north side of the street increase in height and density to 2, 3 and 4 stories. As the side streets (ie. 9th, 10th,
11th, etc.) head from Yampa north to Lincoln, the streets slope up. This means the developments on the
north side of Yampa either have to step up as they go north or they need to go underground. This project
proposes to go underground, which will help mitigate the height of the building.
This project also proposes to be a visual draw for patrons on Yampa Street. Currently the majority of the
retail and restaurant functions are between 5th Street and 8th Street. The street scape from 9th to 11th
streets consists of shorter buildings with parking lots disrupting the pattern on the north side of the street
and a municipal parking lot and building before the development stops and becomes a walking path on
the south side. This project will provide a visual anchor with a full glass lobby at the corner of Yampa and
10th Street to draw more people west down Yampa Street.
10 1.17
4. The PUD shall substantially further the preferred direction and policies outlined in the Community Plan and
other applicable adopted plans.
The 2004 Steamboat Springs Area Community Plan as well as the forthcoming City of Steamboat Springs
Downtown Plan continually reference the need for infill projects, transit-oriented development, and the
need to direct more guests to the downtown area to strengthen downtown businesses during the day as
well as evening hours.
This project is an infill of an existing parking lot that is part of the Old Town commercial district; an area
noted as being appropriate for infill and redevelopment by the city in the Community Plan. It brings
density to the currently underutilized parcel, avoids sprawl and proposes to provide a visual draw for
Steamboat visitors on Yampa Street. The hotel use is complementary to all of the downtown businesses,
provide sales tax revenue to the city and supports pedestrian traffic.
This project is to be a hotel, an emphasized commercial use by the Community Plan. The hotel use,
especially in this downtown location, encourages public transit use instead of single occupant vehicles
due to its location. The proposed boutique hotel is close to existing public transit stops (1/10 of a mile).
We believe the easy access will promote the use by guests of the public transit system throughout
downtown and to the mountain.
5. The PUD shall minimize any adverse impacts on the natural environment, including water quality, air quality,
wildlife habitat, vegetation, wetlands, and natural landforms.
This project is an infill project on an existing site, meaning that it will not use a previously un-developed
lot and put a building on it. Being infill, this project will utilize as much existing infrastructure including
water, sewer, roads, etc. that it can. In utilizing this infill site, the project preserves non-developed sites
in the community.
The hotel use, especially in this downtown location, encourages transit use instead of single occupant
vehicles due to its location. The proposed boutique hotel is close to existing public transit stops (1/10 of
a mile from the nearest stop). We believe the easy access will promote the use by guests of the public
transit system and walking throughout downtown area, reducing car emissions.
This hotel project is proposed to be a new building. Being a new structure facilitates meeting energy code
requirements more efficiently (in lieu of trying to retrofit systems that might not be compatible with
today’s energy conservation needs).
Currently this site is a surface parking lot. Pollutants and chemicals from cars drain into existing city storm
water culverts. The underground parking garage included in this project will collect parking lot water and
chemicals and run them through a sand/oil separator before releasing them into the sanitary water
system.
11 1.18
6. In return for flexibility in zoning, development permitted by the PUD shall provide significant community
enhancement not achievable through application of a standard zone district. A community enhancement may
include but is not limited to:
6a. Diversification of land use to provide opportunities for commercial, recreational, and educational
facilities to be conveniently located near a mix of housing types
Currently there is not a boutique hotel option in downtown. This project diversifies the fabric of the
downtown businesses. It also allows related opportunities for the existing downtown retail, restaurant
and other commercial establishments to have an additional group of potential guests that are staying in
their vicinity and within walking distance.
6h. Any other feature or features that furthers the direction of the Community Plan as a whole and not
just a specific individual goal or policy.
In essence the 2004 Steamboat Springs Area Community Plan and the soon to be adopted City of
Steamboat Springs Downtown Plan emphasize the need for concentrated infill development rather than
sprawl in the downtown area. This stems from the realization that an urban, walkable core with a mix of
uses and variety of commercial options is ideal for both visitors and residents. While one project cannot
meet all the needs outlined in the plans, this project does fit well into the overall goal for a diverse urban
core bringing in a use that not currently provided, a boutique hotel.
7. The Planned Unit Development shall provide an outcome superior in terms of community enhancement than
would be achievable with the current zoning of the property or any other City zone district and is not being
used solely as a means to enhance a development’s economic feasibility.
Currently there are no boutique lodging options in downtown Steamboat Springs. A hotel of this type
would add approximately 50-100 guests to the downtown area that will use existing retail, restaurant,
and commercial businesses during the day as well as evenings, all year long. Because of current zoning,
development of this type is more likely to occur outside of downtown where more density is allowed. As
mentioned in the Challenges section above, in order for boutique hotels to work, they need to mass to
justify the support functions that are necessary to keep them running smoothly. This PUD proposes slight
modifications to current zoning to allow this use to be inserted onto an existing infill lot, yet consistent
with surrounding massing and character, and furthering the goals of the Community and Downtown Plans.
12 1.19
Summary
This project will improve downtown Steamboat Springs, and meet the goals of the 2004 Steamboat Springs Area
Community Plan and the soon to be adopted City of Steamboat Springs Downtown Plan. The minor adjustments
from code we are asking for do not conflict with the intent of the current code for this site, and the resultant
building will be consistent with surrounding historic buildings and newer development. Consistently the city has
stated that one of its major goals is to attract development to the downtown urban core through higher density
infill versus development sprawl outside of downtown. This planning strategy will bring a critical pedestrian
mass to maintain and accentuate the downtown core. Hand in hand with that strategy is also the need for future
development to not overload the downtown core with vehicular traffic, and rather create a well utilized transit
network. Creating an environment where both the pedestrian mass and high transit utilization happens
throughout the day as well as evening hours is critical to creating a vibrant urban core. This project will be an
important part of the downtown Steamboat Springs vision.
13 1.20
Attachment C
ERIC SMITH ASSOCIATES, P.C.

ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS

YAMPA STREET HOTEL PUD
FOR: 10TH AND YAMPA

STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO 80487
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 11, 12 E2 LOT 10 BLK 32 ORIGINAL TOWN OF SS TOTAL: 1.41 AC
ALSO KNOWN AS:
YAMPA STREET HOTEL
PROJECT INFO SHEET INDEX PROJECT TEAM

ZONING: PUD-01 COVER SHEET
EXISTING CY-2 PUD-02 VICINITY MAP OWNER:
PROPOSED SEE PUD PUD-03 VICINITY MAP 2 MARR-YAMPA LIMITED
PUD-04 AREA TRANSIT DIAGRAM 3190 SOUTH LINCOLN AVENUE
PUD-05 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO 80487
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION:
PUD-06 MASSING DIAGRAMS PHONE: (970) 879-2250
R1 - RESIDENTIAL (HOTEL) PUD-07 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS CONTACT: SCOTT MARR
PUD-08 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS EMAIL: scottamarr@gmail.com
CLIMATE ZONE: PUD-09 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
7 PUD-10 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
PUD-11 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS
SITE INFORMATION:
PUD-12 AREA PLANS ARCHITECT:
TOTAL ACRES: 0.41 AC PUD-13 SITE SECTIONS ERIC SMITH ASSOCIATES, P.C.
PUD-14 ARCH SITE PLAN 1919 7th STREET
PUD-14A ENTRY DRIVE EXHIBIT BOULDER, CO 80302
PUD-15 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (COLOR) (303) 442-5458
PUD-16 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (COLOR) CONTACT: KATE LEGGETT
PUD-17 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (B&W) EMAIL: kate@esapc.com
PUD-18 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (B&W)
1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
1-4 SIGHT DISTANCE EXHIBITS
CIVIL:
LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC.
141 9th STREET
PO BOX 774943
(970) 871-9494
CONTACT: ERIK GRIEPENTROG
EMAIL: erikg@landmark-co.com
YAMPA RIVER
LINCOLN AVENUE
TRAFFIC ENGINEER:
McDOWELL ENGINEERING
1099 CAPITOL STREET, SUITE 208
PO BOX 4259
YAMPA STREET EAGLE, CO 81631
(970) 623-0788
CONTACT: KARI McDOWELL SCHROEDER
EMAIL: kari@mcdowelleng.com
UPDATED PER TAC COMMENTS DATED 6/7/19
PROJECT SITE
10th STREET
COVER SHEET
PUD-01
ESA Job Number: 18046
Date: 7/11/19 1.21
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
As YAMPA STREET HOTEL PUD
pe
n
10TH AND YAMPA
Pi
ne
th
12
ht
11
Oa
k
Ya
m
pa Site
Ri
th
ve
10
r
Lin
co
ln
h
9t
Ya
m
pa
h
8t
h
7t
h
6t
h
5t
N
No Scale
© 2018 Google
Vicinity Map
PUD-02
Date: 2018-12-21 1.22
Little
Toots
Park
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
Lin 10TH AND YAMPA

co STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO 80487
ln
Av
e.
.
St
th
11 Ya Site
.
St
m
pa
th
Av
10
e.
Ya
m
pa
Ri
ve
r
No Scale
© 2018 Google
Vicinity Map
PUD-03
Date: 2018-12-21 1.23
1/4
Mi
le
W
a
lk
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
in
g
To
pe
n
10TH AND YAMPA
ler
an
ce
Site
Bus/Shuttle Stop
Pi Multi-Use Route
ne
th
12
On-Street Bike Route
Transit Route
Stops within 1/4 Mile: 16
ht
11
Distance to Closest Stop: 454’ or
Oa .09 Miles
k
Distance to Multi-Use Route: 60’
Ya
m
pa Site Distance to Bike Route: 0’
Ri
th
ve
10
r
Lin
co
ln
h
9t
Ya
m
pa
h
8t
h
7t
h
6t
h
5t
N
No Scale
© 2018 Google
Area Transit Diagram

PUD-04
Date: 2018-12-21 1.24
1/4
Mi
le
W
a
lk
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
in
g
To
pe
n
10TH AND YAMPA
ler
an
Western Lodge
ce
Commercial / Retail /
Restaurant Concentrations
Nordic Lodge Pi Current Hotel
ne
th
Downtown Locations
12
Restaurants: 43
ht
11
Shopping/Retail: 39
Oa
k Hotels: 3
Ya (Per Steamboat Chamber Listings,
m
pa Site Downtown Area)
Ri
th
ve
10
r
Lin
co
ln
h
9t
Ya
m
pa
h
8t
h
7t
h
6t
h
5t
N
No Scale
© 2018 Google Rabbit Ears
Locations and number of establishments shown are approximate.
Pedestrian Access
PUD-05
Date: 2018-12-21 1.25
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
10TH AND YAMPA

Yampa 10th Ave. Yampa 10th Ave.
Yampa Top Level Step-Back

Facade Variation
Av e .
10th
Av e .
10th
Alley
e .
Ya
Av
m
t h
pa
10
Consistent Building Coverage
No Scale
Massing Diagrams
PUD-06
Date: 2018-12-21 1.26
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
11th St.
10TH AND YAMPA
Lincoln
Alley
10th St.
Site
1. View South on 10th Toward Yampa Street- Existing
Yampa 2
5 3
4
Yampa River
Building Examples
Following the PUD
Requirements
© 2018 Google
N
Key
No Scale
1. View South on 10th Toward Yampa Street- New Perspective Views

PUD-07
Date: 2018-12-21 1.27
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
10TH AND YAMPA

Lincoln
Alley
10th St.
11th St.
Site
Yampa 2
5 3
4
Yampa River
Building Examples
Following the PUD
Requirements
© 2018 Google
N
Key
No Scale

PUD-08
Date: 2018-12-21 1.28
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
10TH AND YAMPA

Lincoln
Alley
10th St.
11th St.
Site
Yampa 2
5 3
4
Yampa River
Building Examples
Following the PUD
Requirements
© 2018 Google
N
Key
No Scale

PUD-09
Date: 2018-12-21 1.29

 
  1.30

!
 
  1.31
1 2 1 2
0' - 5"
2 1 2 1
0' - 5"
PUD-13 PUD-13 PUD-13 PUD-13
A A
10' - 0"
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
10TH AND YAMPA

0' - 9"
0' - 5" 2' - 10"

THIRD LEVEL
0' - 5" 4
SECOND
1' - 6" 9335 SF
1' - 6"
LEVEL
3
0' - 5"
11680 SF 10' - 0"
0' - 5" 0' - 5"
B B
2' - 11"
0' - 11"
0' - 9"
10' - 0"
SECOND LEVEL THIRD LEVEL
1/16" = 1'-0" 1/16" = 1'-0"
1 2
1 2
125' - 0"
0' - 5"
2 1 2 1
0' - 6"
PUD-13 PUD-13 PUD-13 PUD-13
A A
2 PARKING PROPOSED USE:
SPACES
HOTEL (ONLY PROPOSED USE)
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA:

LOWER LEVEL 16,878 SF
0' - 8" FIRST LEVEL 10,688 SF
35 PARKING SPACES SECOND LEVEL 11,680 SF
THIRD LEVEL 9,335 SF
0' - 5"
SURFACE TOTAL 48,581 SF
PARKING PARKING EXISTING LOT:

5 .41 ACRES = 17,860 SF
GROSS 5642 SF
1 18 PARKING SPACES LOT COVERAGE:
12393 SF
LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED BY ZONE DISTRICT:
0' - 9" 85% MAX
PUD:
140' - 0"
PROPOSE TO USE THE FIRST FLOOR FOR THE LOT COVERAGE.
LOT COVERAGE PROVIDED (USING FIRST LEVEL):

10,688 / 17,860 = 60%
2' - 3"
FLOOR AREA RATIO:

LOBBY 0' - 5"
FIRST LEVEL
2' - 10"
FLOOR AREA RATIO ALLOWED BY ZONE DISTRICT:
6 2
200% MAX WITH 3RD FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
4485 SF 1' - 6"

10688 SF PUD:
PROPOSE TO INCREASE FAR TO 275%
FAR:
(GROSS FLOOR AREA - BASEMENT) / GROSS LOT AREA x 100
0' - 5"
FAR PROVIDED: UPDATED PER TAC COMMENTS DATED 6/7/19
0' - 5" 48,581 SF - 0 / 17,860 X 100 = 272%
0' - 11"
PARKING:
B B
55 PARKING SPACES (35 IN GARAGE, 20 SURFACE)
AREA PLANS
2' - 11"
0' - 11"
0' - 9"
3' - 0"
ADDITIONAL PUD CRITERIA ARE LISTED IN THE PROJECT NARRATIVE.
PARKING LEVEL
1/16" = 1'-0"
FIRST LEVEL
1/16" = 1'-0"
PUD-12
Date: 7/11/19 1.32
A B
10' - 0"
38' Height Offset from Existing Grade
ROOF LEVEL
6743' - 0"
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
10' - 0"
THIRD LEVEL
6733' - 0"
10TH AND YAMPA
10' - 0"
36' - 11"
35' - 4"
41' - 0"
SECOND LEVEL
6723' - 0"
38' - 0"
30' - 0"
10' - 0"
Alley FIRST LEVEL
6713' - 0"
ALLEY 2
Existing Grade
11' - 0"
6708' - 9"
Yampa Street
02 PARKING LEVEL
6702' - 0"
NORTH-SOUTH SECTION 1
1/8" = 1'-0"
A B
10' - 0"
38' Height Offset from Existing Grade
ROOF LEVEL
6743' - 0"
THIRD LEVEL
6733' - 0"
SECOND LEVEL
6723' - 0"
38' - 0"
30' - 0"
Alley
FIRST LEVEL
6713' - 0"
2.1%
ALLEY 2
6708' - 9"
Existing Grade Yampa Street
02 PARKING LEVEL
3.9% 6702' - 0"
1.0% 1.0%
0' 4' 8' 16' 32'
UPDATED 8/21/19
NORTH-SOUTH SECTION 2
1/8" = 1'-0"
SITE SECTION
PUD-13
Date: 7/11/19 1.33
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
1 2
10TH AND YAMPA
SURFACE
PARKING
ACCESS
5' ALLEY SNOW 2 1
STORAGE PUD-13 ALLEY PUD-13
EASEMENT
5' - 0"
EXISTING
TRANSFORMERS
PROPOSED BOUTIQUE HOTEL
B
1
HOTEL PUD-14A
ENTRY
(2) DESIGNATED PARKING

SPACES FOR HOTEL DROP
OFF AND CHECK IN
LOWER
LEVEL
GARAGE
ENTRY
ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - PROPOSED

1/16" = 1'-0"
UPDATED PER TAC COMMENTS DATED 6/7/19
SITE PLAN
PUD-14
Date: 7/11/19 1.34
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
10TH AND YAMPA

EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 3 EXHIBIT 4
SIGNAGE HANGING FROM THE

CEILING INDICATING TO EXITING
VEHICLES TO WATCH FOR
PEDESTRIANS. FLASHES LIGHTS
WHEN GARAGE DOOR OPENS.
SEE EXHIBIT 3.
PARKING GARAGE LOBBY
STOREFRONT
DOOR
GLASS
PLANTER WITH 6" STOREFRONT GARAGE
CURB (TYP OF 2) WINDOW DOOR
1' - 0"
B
SIGNAGE INDICATING FOR
PROPERTY LINE
6' - 6"
PEDESTRIANS TO LOOK FOR
12' - 0"
VEHICLES EXITING GARAGE.
FLASHES LIGHTS WHEN
GARAGE DOOR OPENS.
(TYPICAL BOTH SIDES OF
DRIVE) SEE EXHIBIT 1
6' - 0"
12' - 0"
DETECTABLE WARNING
SURFACE TACTILES (TYPICAL
BOTH SIDES OF DRIVE)
7' - 0"
SEE EXHIBIT 2
FLASHING LIGHTS IN THE

SIDEWALK THAT TURN ON
WHEN GARAGE DOOR OPENS DRIVE CROSSING AREA TO (2) DROP OFF AND PICK-UP
(TYPICAL BOTH SIDES OF 1 HAVE DIFFERENT PARALLEL PARKING SPACES 2
DRIVE) SEE EXHIBIT 4 CONCRETE PATTERN /
COLOR THEN DRIVE TO
GUIDE PEDESTRIANS.
ADDED PER TAC COMMENTS DATED 6/7/19
DRIVE ENTRY
1 YAMPA STREET HOTEL - PROPOSED YAMPA STREET DRIVE ENTRY
PUD-14A 1/8" = 1'-0"
7/16/19 FOR SK
PUD-14A
Date: 7/11/19 1.35
METAL PANELS ERIC SMITH ASSOCIATES, P.C.
METAL FASCIA
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
10TH AND YAMPA

STUCCO FINISH STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO 80487
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT,
TRANSPARENT GLAZING
GUESTROOM MECHANICAL UNIT VENT
METAL GUARDRAIL
BRICK HEADER COURSE
BRICK VENEER
BRICK HEADER COURSE
GARAGE VENT
ALUMINUM GLAZED GARAGE DOOR CANOPY ROOF TEXTURED BRICK VENEER CANOPY ROOF ALUMINUM STOREFRONT, TRANSPARENT GLAZING
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT, TRANSPARENT GLAZING
2 SOUTH ELEVATION COLOR- YAMPA STREET

PUD-15 1/8" = 1'-0"
BRICK HEADER COURSE
METAL FASCIA
METAL GUARDRAIL
STUCCO FINISH
METAL PANELS
CANOPY ROOF
BRICK VENEER
BRICK HEADER COURSE
TEXTURED BRICK VENEER

1 EAST ELEVATION COLOR- 10TH STREET
PUD-15 1/8" = 1'-0"
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (COLOR)

PUD-15
Date: 7/11/19 1.36
METAL FASCIA
STUCCO FINISH STUCCO FINISH ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING
METAL PANELS
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
10TH AND YAMPA

CANOPY ROOF
2 NORTH ELEVATION COLOR - ALLEY

PUD-16 1/8" = 1'-0"
METAL PANELS
METAL FASCIA
STUCCO FINISH
STUCCO FINISH
BRICK VENEER
BRICK HEADER COURSE
TEXTURED BRICK VENEER
CANOPY ROOF

1 WEST ELEVATION COLOR
PUD-16 1/8" = 1'-0"
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (COLOR)

PUD-16
Date: 7/11/19 1.37
UPPER FLOORS
SECTION 443.H BUILDING SCALE, VARIATION AND FENESTRATION
GLAZING AND TRANSPARENCY STANDARDS TRANSPARENT GLAZING AT 25% MIN. WALL AREA OF ALL
UPPER FLOOR BUILDING FACADES
49' - 11" 24' - 6" 49' - 10"

SECTION 443.E BUILDING MASSING
PROPOSED TO BE EXPRESSED IN 50' INCREMENTS (MAX) AT
RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE BUILDING IN LIEU OF 25'
INCREMENTS
SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
10TH AND YAMPA
UPPER FLOORS
PARKING GARAGE
LOBBY
PROPOSED TO BE EXPRESSED IN 75' INCREMENTS (MAX) AT 74' - 6" 49' - 9"
LOBBY/PARKING GARAGE LEVEL IN LIEU OF 25' INCREMENTS
PARKING GARAGE LOBBY

GLAZING AND TRANSPARENCY STANDARDS UNDER-BUILDING PARKING AREA AT THE GROUND FLOOR TRANSPARENT GLAZING AT 60% MIN. OF THE WALL AREA
BUILDING FACADE EXCLUDED FROM GLAZING REQUIREMENT OF THE LOBBY AT GROUND FLOOR BUILDING FACADE
2 SOUTH ELEVATION B&W - YAMPA STREET

PUD-17 1/8" = 1'-0"
UPPER FLOORS
GLAZING AND TRANSPARENCY STANDARDS TRANSPARENT GLAZING AT 25% MIN. WALL AREA OF ALL
33' - 4" 30' - 7" 37' - 8" 37' - 0"
PROPOSED TO BE EXPRESSED IN 50' INCREMENTS (MAX) AT
RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE BUILDING IN LIEU OF 25'
INCREMENTS
UPPER FLOORS
PARKING GARAGE
LOBBY

PROPOSED TO BE EXPRESSED IN 75' INCREMENTS (MAX) AT 33' - 4" 5' - 7" 25' - 0"
LOBBY/PARKING GARAGE LEVEL IN LIEU OF 25' INCREMENTS
LOBBY PARKING GARAGE
GLAZING AND TRANSPARENCY STANDARDS TRANSPARENT GLAZING AT 60% MIN. OF THE WALL AREA UNDER-BUILDING PARKING AREA AT THE GROUND FLOOR
OF THE LOBBY AT GROUND FLOOR BUILDING FACADE BUILDING FACADE EXCLUDED FROM GLAZING REQUIREMENT
1 EAST ELEVATION B&W - 10TH STREET

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (B&W)
PUD-17 1/8" = 1'-0"
PUD-17
Date: 7/11/19 1.38
UPPER FLOORS
TRANSPARENT GLAZING AT 25% MIN. WALL AREA OF ALL

SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS
10TH AND YAMPA

UPPER FLOORS
2 NORTH ELEVATION B&W - ALLEY

PUD-18 1/8" = 1'-0"
UPPER FLOORS
TRANSPARENT GLAZING AT 25% MIN. WALL AREA OF ALL

UPPER FLOORS
1 WEST ELEVATION B&W ADDED PER TAC COMMENTS DATED 6/7/19

PUD-18 1/8" = 1'-0"
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (B&W)

PUD-18
Date: 7/11/19 1.39
SURVEYORS
Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80477

141 9th Street ~ P.O. Box 774943
EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
www.LANDMARK-CO.com
(970) 871-9494
OF A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SW1/4 SECTION 8
|
CIVIL ENGINEERS
AND IN THE NW1/4 SECTION 17, T6N, R84W, 6TH P.M.,
CITY OF STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, COUNTY OF ROUTT, STATE OF COLORADO
CONSULTANTS, INC.
L NDMARK
ET
RE
ET
ST
RE
TH
ST
OA
11
TH
ET
K
ST
12
RE
RE
ST
E T
TH
OLD TOWN
10
STEAMBOAT
ET
LI
NC SPRINGS
RE
OL
ST
N
SITE AV
H
9T
EN
ET
UE
RE
/U
S
ST
YA HW
M
H
PA Y
8T
40
ST
RE
YA ET
M
PA
671
X RI
VE
0
R
67 M SAN MH
06 XT XE
RIM= 6709.56'
(SE) INV. IN = 6704.23'
ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN 10
THREE YEARS AFTER THE PERSON BRINGING THE ACTION EITHER DISCOVERED OR
(NW) INV. OUT = 6704.15'
COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN
THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY
LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS AGAINST LAND SURVEYORS: ALL ACTIONS AGAINST ANY
DISCOVERED THE NEGLIGENCE OR DEFECT WHICH GAVE RISE TO SUCH ACTION,

ALLEGED NEGLIGENT OR DEFECTIVE LAND SURVEY SHALL BE BROUGHT WITHIN
MORE THAN TEN YEARS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE SURVEY UPON WHICH
RECOVERED
AND NOT THEREAFTER, BUT IN NO CASE SHALL SUCH AN ACTION BE BROUGHT

RECOVERED
SUCH ACTION IS BASED. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST

XS
XS XS XS XS XS XS XS
IN THE EXERCISE OF REASONABLE DILIGENCE AND CONCERN SHOULD HAVE

XS XS XS
NAIL W/BRASS TAG XS XS XS XS XS XS
LAND SURVEYOR BROUGHT TO RECOVER DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ANY

XS XS XS
NAIL W/BRASS TAG
XS
6708
STAMP ILLEGIBLE
07
STAMP ILLEGIBLE
67
O
XF
XT XTV O V
S51°22'50"E 124.88' XF XT
YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.

XE BORE HOLE
670
XE XE
9
GREASE TRAP LID MONITOR MONITOR
RIM = 6705.55' WELL WELL
XS
XM
W
XM
W VICINITY MAP
GREASE TRAP LID
RIM = 6705.54'
XT NORTH SCALE = 1" : 500'
XS
67
08
GREASE TRAP LID
RIM = 6705.66' TITLE COMMITMENT NOTES PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
XS
THIS LAND SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC. TO DETERMINE EAST 1/2 OF LOT 10 AND ALL LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 32, TOWN OF STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, COUNTY OF ROUTT, STATE OF
670
8 OWNERSHIP OF THIS TRACT, VERIFY THE DESCRIPTION SHOWN, VERIFY THE COMPATIBILITY OF THIS DESCRIPTION WITH COLORADO.
THAT OF ADJACENT TRACTS, OR VERIFY EASEMENTS OF RECORD. FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS,
RIGHT-OF-WAY OR TITLE OF RECORD, LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO.
140.00'
GENERAL NOTES
598-H0541193-328-LP5, AMENDMENT NO. 1, PREPARED BY HERITAGE TITLE COMPANY, EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 23, 2018 AT
7:00 A.M. 1. ALL REFERENCES HEREON TO BOOKS, PAGES, FILES, RECEPTION NUMBERS AND FILE NUMBERS ARE TO PUBLIC
MONITOR
670
DOCUMENTS FILED IN THE RECORDS OF ROUTT COUNTY, COLORADO.
N38°36'12"E
7 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY PER THE ABOVE-REFERENCED TITLE COMMITMENT. THE
140.00'
WELL
XM
W
BORE HOLE NUMBERS USED CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBERING SYSTEM USED IN THE TITLE COMMITMENT. LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, 2. EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC DOCUMENTS SHOWN OR NOTED HEREON WERE EXAMINED AS TO LOCATION AND PURPOSE
INC. COMMENTS FOLLOW THE TITLE COMMITMENT ITEMS IN PARENTHESIS. AND WERE NOT EXAMINED AS TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, CONDITIONS, OBLIGATIONS, TERMS, OR AS TO THE
RIGHT TO GRANT THE SAME.
S38°36'12"W
SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 (EXCEPTIONS)

3. UTILITIES ARE SHOWN PER VISIBLE AND APPARENT SURFACE EVIDENCE TOGETHER WITH PREVIOUS SURVEYING
DESCRIPTION:
6706 ITEM COMMENT LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC. HAS COMPLETED IN THE AREA. IF MORE ACCURATE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES ARE REQUIRED, THE UTILITY WILL HAVE TO BE VERIFIED BY FIELD POTHOLING. LANDMARK CONSULTANTS,
1. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS OR CLAIMS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT WHICH COULD INC. AND THE SURVEYOR OF RECORD SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR THE LOCATION OF OR THE FAILURE TO NOTE THE
6707
BE ASCERTAINED BY AN INSPECTION OF THE LAND OR THAT MAY BE ASSERTED BY PERSONS IN POSSESSION LOCATION OF NON-VISIBLE UTILITIES.
6705 OF THE LAND. (VISIBLE AND APPARENT EVIDENCE OF RIGHTS OR CLAIMS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION ARE
CURB INLET
6705 FL = 6703.45' SHOWN HEREON TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.) 4. BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, BEING MONUMENTED AS SHOWN
6706
18" INV. OUT = 6699.79' HEREON AND BEING ASSUMED TO BEAR N51°22'50"W.
2. EASEMENTS, LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES, OR CLAIMS THEREOF, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
BORE HOLE
(VISIBLE AND APPARENT EVIDENCE OF EASEMENTS, OR CLAIMS OF EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN HEREON TO THE BEST 5. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND
6704
OF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.) MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY, COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE 18-4-508, C.R.S.
BASIS OF BEARINGS T
MONITOR XS
67 WELL 3. ANY ENCROACHMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES, VIOLATION, VARIATION, OR ADVERSE CIRCUMSTANCE AFFECTING THE 6. THIS SITE CONTAINS A CALCULATED AREA OF 17,483 SQUARE FEET OR 0.40 ACRES.
04
TITLE THAT WOULD BE DISCLOSED BY AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE LAND SURVEY OF THE LAND AND NOT SHOWN
BY:
W
XM
6703
BY PUBLIC RECORDS. (VISIBLE AND APPARENT ENCROACHMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES, VIOLATIONS, VARIATIONS OR 7. THE LAST FIELD INSPECTION OF THIS SITE WAS ON AUGUST 31, 2018.
ADVERSE CIRCUMSTANCES AFFECTING THE TITLE ARE SHOWN HEREON TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND
6703
BELIEF.) 8. A PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE X, AREAS OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD; AREAS OF 1%
DATE:
6702 ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1
N51°22'50"W 124.88' 6702 4. ANY LIEN OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL HERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, SQUARE MILE; AND AREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES FROM 1% CHANCE ANNUAL FLOOD, AS DETERMINED BY THE F.E.MA.
6701 CURB INLET
FL = 6703.15' IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC. DID NOT EXAMINE OR FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 08107C0877D, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 4, 2005. FLOOD ZONE IS
NO.
18" INV. OUT = 6699.75' ADDRESS THIS ITEM.) SHOWN HEREON BASED IN CITY OF STEAMBOAT SPRINGS GIS MAPPING.
J
XE
5. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS OR OTHER MATTERS, IF ANY, CREATED, FIRST APPEARING IN 9. THE MEASURED DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE IN U.S. SURVEY FEET.
RECOVERED NO.5 REBAR THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR ATTACHING SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF BUT PRIOR TO THE DATE
W/ ORANGE PLASTIC CAP
2066-003
09-06-18
STAMPED "WLS LS 38277" THE PROPOSED INSURED ACQUIRES OF RECORD FOR THE VALUE THE ESTATE OR INTEREST OR MORTGAGE
JAG
AJS
STORM MH 10. SITE BENCHMARK: RECOVERED NO.5 REBAR WITH ORANGE PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "WLS LS 38277", HAVING A NAVD88
FLUSH W/ GROUND THEREON COVERED BY THIS COMMITMENT. (LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC. DID NOT EXAMINE OR ADDRESS THIS
RIM= 6703.42'
ELEVATION OF 6701.90' AS SHOWN HEREON.
XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS
ITEM.)
XS XS
XS
XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS XS
18" (NE) INV. IN = 6699.14'
SITE BENCHMARK 6701 18" (NW) INV. IN = 6699.05'
CITY OF STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, COUNTY OF ROUTT, CHECKED BY:

RECOVERED NO.5 REBAR SAN MH
18" (SE) INV. IN = 6699.15' 6. WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OF TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT THESE MATTERS ARE SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC
DRAWN BY:
W/ ORANGE PLASTIC CAP RIM= 6701.54'
PROJECT:
18" (SW) INV. OUT = 6699.04'
STAMPED "WLS LS 38277" (SE) INV. IN = 6692.69' RECORDS. (LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC. DID NOT EXAMINE OR ADDRESS THIS ITEM.)
6701 (NW) INV. OUT = 6692.69'
DATE:
FLUSH W/ GROUND
ELEV. = 6701.90'
7. ALL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS, NOW OR HERETOFORE ASSESSED, DUE OR PAYABLE.
LOCATED IN THE SW1/4 SECTION 8 & NW1/4 SECTION 17,

THIS TAX EXCEPTION WILL BE AMENDED AT POLICY UPON SATISFACTION AND EVIDENCE OF PAYMENT OF TAXES.
(LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC. DID NOT EXAMINE OR ADDRESS THIS ITEM.)
TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 84 WEST, 6TH P.M.;

8. ANY RIGHTS, INTERESTS, OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING MATTERS
DISCLOSED BY ALTA SURVEY,
NORTH JOB NO.: 2277-001
DATED: 04-19-14
DRAWING FILENAME: P:\2277-001\Survey\2277-001-ALTA-2018.dwg LAYOUT NAME: Cover DATE: Dec 21, 2018 - 8:41am CAD OPERATOR: Erik
EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN

PREPARED BY: LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC
MATTERS SHOWN: CONCRETE BARRIERS, UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINES AND UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINES
STATE OF COLORADO
WHICH ENCROACH ONTO SUBJECT PROPERTY AND BOUNDARY PROPERTY. (THE LOCATION OF VISIBLE
PARCEL OF LAND
IMPROVEMENTS IS SHOWN HEREON TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.)
LIST OF XREFS: [xSURVEYBORDER-24x36] [2277-001-xExist] [2277-001-alta] [xVICMAP] [FEMA 2016 STEAMBOAT]
LEGEND:
FO
PROPERTY BOUNDARY FIBER OPTIC LINE MARKER, VAULT & PEDESTAL XFO XFO XFO XFO
T
ADJACENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY
TELEPHONE LINE MARKER, VAULT, XT XT XT XT XT XT
RECOVERED PROPERTY CORNER MONUMENT PEDESTAL AND MANHOLE
E
AS NOTED
ELECTRIC LINE MARKER, TRANSFORMER, XE XE XE XEM XE XE
BUILDING METER AND SECONDARY PEDESTAL

MAJOR CONTOUR ELECTRIC MANHOLE, OUTLET, XE XGEN XEJ
GENERATOR AND JUNCTION BOX
MINOR CONTOUR
LIGHT POLE, STREET LIGHT, TRAFFIC SIGNAL XTR XTR
ASPHALT TRAFFIC CONTROL VAULT AND CABINET
CONCRETE OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE XOH XOH XOH XOH
GRAVEL UTILITY POLE, GUY POLE & GUY WIRE

SIGN CULVERT W/ END SECTIONS
S
SANITARY SEWER LINE MARKER XS XS XS XS XC XS STORM MANHOLE, MANHOLE INLET,
MANHOLE AND CLEANOUT GRATE INLET AND CURB INLET
XST
W
WATER LINE MAKER, FIRE HYDRANT C SHEET
AIR CONDITIONER, MAILBOX, NEWSTAND,
X
S
XW XW XW XW XWM
GATE VALVE, CURB STOP & BLOWOFF AC MB N XMH
G TRASH CAN, MISC. MANHOLE

GAS LINE MARKER, VALVE, MANHOLE/VAULT,
METER AND SHUTOFF
CABLE LINE MARKER, VAULT AND PEDESTAL
C
XG
XTV
GAS
XG XG
XTV
XG XGM
XTV
XG
XGS
XTV
BOLLARD, BOLLARD W/LIGHT
FLAG POLE AND DELINEATOR
L
1
Of 1 Sheets
1.40
SURVEYORS

www.LANDMARK-CO.com
EX
EX
(970) 871-9494
EX
|
EXEX
CIVIL ENGINEERS
EX
DESIGN SPEED 20MPH

DESIGN SPEED 20MPH
115' REQUIRED SITE DISTANCE
115' PROVIDED SITE DISTANCE
(PROVIDED BUILDING MOVES 5' SOUTH)
CONSULTANTS, INC.
L NDMARK
(PROVIDED BUILDING MOVES 5' SOUTH)
LEGEND:
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
EASEMENT
SECTION LINE
CENTERLINE
FOUND MONUMENT
FOUND SECTION CORNER
BUILDING
SURFACE
PARKING ROOF LINE/OVERHANG
ACCESS
DECK
XG
ALLEY WALL
FENCE
XG
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 6805
EX
GM PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
construction or contracting
instruments of service
Professional Engineer in the
Consultants, Inc.
These drawings are
employ of Landmark
unless signed and sealed by a
provided by Landmark
Consultants, Inc. and are not
to be used f or any type of
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR 6805
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR

ASPHALT
CONCRETE
GRAVEL
SIGN
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER W/ MH SS
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER W/ MH XS
PROPOSED WATER
T
PROPOSED GV, FH & CS
RT FOR CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING WATER
E
GAS
GAS METER AND MANHOLE/VAULT
S
CABLE
DESCRIPTION:
CABLE PEDESTAL
EX EX
FIBER OPTIC
W
EX
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL AND MANHOLE/VAULT
ELECTRIC
E
SITE DISTANCE - NORTH ALLEY ENTRANCE ELECTRIC PED, JUNCTION BOX AND METER
SCALE: 1"=20' NORTH
LIGHT POLE AND LIGHT POLE W/ MAST
I
PROPOSED DITCH / SWALE
V
UTILITY POLE AND GUY WIRE
DITCH/SWALE
E
EXISTING STORM SEWER W/ FES
BY:
PROPOSED STORM SEWER W/ FES
NO
INLET AND STORM MANHOLE ST
EX
DATE:
OVERLAND AND CHANNEL FLOW ARROWS
EX
EX CONIFEROUS AND DECIDUOUS TREE EX EX
EXEX
NO.
EX
DESIGN SPEED 20MPH

NOTES:
04/16/2019
2066-003
1. ALL REFERENCES HEREON TO BOOKS, PAGES, FILES, RECEPTION NUMBERS AND
EG
JR
48.81' PROVIDED SITE DISTANCE
FILE NUMBERS ARE TO PUBLIC DOCUMENTS FILED IN THE RECORDS OF ROUTT
(PROVIDED BUILDING
COUNTY, COLORADO.
REMAINS AS IS)
CHECKED BY:
2. EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC DOCUMENTS SHOWN OR NOTED HEREON WERE EXAMINED
DRAWN BY:
AS TO LOCATION AND PURPOSE AND WERE NOT EXAMINED AS TO RESERVATIONS,
PROJECT:
RESTRICTIONS, CONDITIONS, OBLIGATIONS, TERMS, OR AS TO THE RIGHT TO
DATE:
GRANT THE SAME.
3. UTILITIES ARE SHOWN PER APPARENT SURFACE EVIDENCE TOGETHER WITH

RECORD INFORMATION. IF MORE ACCURATE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES ARE REQUIRED, THE UTILITY WILL HAVE TO BE VERIFIED BY FIELD
DESIGN SPEED 20MPH POTHOLING. LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC. AND THE SURVEYOR OF RECORD
115' REQUIRED SITE DISTANCE SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR THE LOCATION OF OR THE FAILURE TO NOTE THE
60.21' PROVIDED SITE DISTANCE LOCATION OF NON-VISIBLE UTILITIES.
(PROVIDED BUILDING
REMAINS AS IS) 4. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND
SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY, COMMITS A CLASS TWO
Sight Distance Exhibit

(2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE 18-4-508, C.R.S.
10th and Yampa Hotel

DRAWING FILENAME: P:\2066-003\DWGs\Production Drawings\2066-003-Site Distance Exhibit.dwg LAYOUT NAME: 1 DATE: Jul 11, 2019 - 8:32am CAD OPERATOR: Josh
SURFACE
PARKING
ACCESS
XG
ALLEY
LIST OF XREFS: [xBORDER] [2066-003-xSite] [2315-002-xSite] [2315-002-xExist -D] [2034-001-EX] [1340-074-xExist] [xSD_Leg] [1340-074-xAdjacent]
XG
EX
GM
EX EX
EX
SHEET
SITE DISTANCE - NORTH ALLEY ENTRANCE

SCALE: 1"=20' NORTH
1
Of # Sheets
1.41
SURVEYORS

www.LANDMARK-CO.com
GARAGE ENTRANCE
EX
(970) 871-9494
ALLEY
GARAGE ENTRANCE
|
BUSH
93.09' PROVIDED SITE DISTANCE

CIVIL ENGINEERS
DESIGN SPEED 2MPH
EX
EX
CONSULTANTS, INC.
L NDMARK
LEGEND:
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
EASEMENT
SECTION LINE
EXEX
EX
EX
EX
EX
EX
CENTERLINE
EX
FOUND MONUMENT
BUILDING
ROOF LINE/OVERHANG
BUSH
DECK
WALL
FENCE
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 6805
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
Consultants, Inc.
These drawings are
employ of Landmark

ASPHALT
DESIGN SPEED 20MPH DESIGN SPEED 20MPH
9% UPSLOPE 104' REQUIRED SITE DISTANCE 6% DOWNSLOPE 120' REQUIRED SITE DISTANCE CONCRETE
150.04' PROVIDED SITE DISTANCE 166.08' PROVIDED SITE DISTANCE
GRAVEL
SIGN
PROPOSED WATER
T
RT FOR CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING WATER
E
B
GAS
S
CABLE
DESCRIPTION:
CABLE PEDESTAL
FIBER OPTIC
W
TELEPHONE
SITE DISTANCE - NORTHEAST ALLEY TO STREET TELEPHONE PEDESTAL AND MANHOLE/VAULT
SCALE: 1"=20' NORTH ELECTRIC
E
ELECTRIC PED, JUNCTION BOX AND METER
I
V
DITCH/SWALE
E
BY:
NO
DATE:
GARAGE ENTRANCE
CONIFEROUS AND DECIDUOUS TREE EX EX
NO.
EX
ALLEY
NOTES:
GARAGE ENTRANCE
04/16/2019
2066-003
EG
JR
EX
DESIGN SPEED 2MPH COUNTY, COLORADO.
CHECKED BY:
25' PROVIDED SITE DISTANCE 2. EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC DOCUMENTS SHOWN OR NOTED HEREON WERE EXAMINED
DRAWN BY:
EX
PROJECT:
EX
DATE:
GRANT THE SAME.

DESIGN SPEED 2MPH UTILITIES ARE REQUIRED, THE UTILITY WILL HAVE TO BE VERIFIED BY FIELD
5' REQUIRED SITE DISTANCE POTHOLING. LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC. AND THE SURVEYOR OF RECORD
22.19' PROVIDED SITE DISTANCE SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR THE LOCATION OF OR THE FAILURE TO NOTE THE
LOCATION OF NON-VISIBLE UTILITIES.
4. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND

EXEX
EX
EX

EX
EX
EX
EX
M
B
SHEET
SITE DISTANCE - NORTHEAST ALLEY TO STREET

SCALE: 1"=20' NORTH
2
Of # Sheets
1.42
SURVEYORS

www.LANDMARK-CO.com
(970) 871-9494
EX
|
CIVIL ENGINEERS
EX EX
EX
EX
EX
CONSULTANTS, INC.
L NDMARK
EX
XW
XW
EX
EX
LEGEND:
XS
EX
EX
XW
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
XS
EX
EX
XW
EX
EX EASEMENT
XS
EX EX EX
EX EX EX EX BUSH
SECTION LINE
XW
CENTERLINE
XS
FOUND MONUMENT
XW
LOWER FOUND SECTION CORNER
LEVEL
GARAGE
BUILDING
XW
ENTRY
ROOF LINE/OVERHANG
DECK
DESIGN SPEED 15 MPH
80' REQUIRED SITE DISTANCE WALL
192.87' PROVIDED
FENCE
DESIGN SPEED 15 MPH PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 6805
Consultants, Inc.
These drawings are
employ of Landmark
340.97' PROVIDED

ASPHALT
BUSH
CONCRETE
BUSH
GRAVEL
BUSH
EX
SIGN
EX
PROPOSED WATER
T
RT FOR CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING WATER
E
GAS
S
SITE DISTANCE - SOUTH ENTRANCE CABLE
SCALE: 1"=30' NORTH
DESCRIPTION:
CABLE PEDESTAL
FIBER OPTIC
W
TELEPHONE
ELECTRIC
E
ELECTRIC PED, JUNCTION BOX AND METER

I
V
DITCH/SWALE
E
BY:
NO
DATE:
EX OVERLAND AND CHANNEL FLOW ARROWS
NO.
EX
NOTES:
04/16/2019
2066-003
EX 1. ALL REFERENCES HEREON TO BOOKS, PAGES, FILES, RECEPTION NUMBERS AND
EG
JR
PROPOSED BOUTIQUE HOTEL COUNTY, COLORADO.
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
PROJECT:
DATE:
GRANT THE SAME.
EX 3. UTILITIES ARE SHOWN PER APPARENT SURFACE EVIDENCE TOGETHER WITH
EX DESIGN SPEED 2MPH
5' REQUIRED SITE DISTANCE RECORD INFORMATION. IF MORE ACCURATE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND
DESIGN SPEED 2MPH 93.09' PROVIDED SITE DISTANCE UTILITIES ARE REQUIRED, THE UTILITY WILL HAVE TO BE VERIFIED BY FIELD
EX POTHOLING. LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC. AND THE SURVEYOR OF RECORD
76.04' PROVIDED SITE PROVIDED SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR THE LOCATION OF OR THE FAILURE TO NOTE THE
EX LOCATION OF NON-VISIBLE UTILITIES.
EX
EX SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY, COMMITS A CLASS TWO
EX

EX EX EX
BUSH

LOWER
LEVEL
GARAGE
ENTRY
BUSH
BUSH
BUSH
EX EX
SHEET
SITE DISTANCE - SOUTH ENTRANCE

SCALE: 1"=20' NORTH 3
Of # Sheets
1.43
SURVEYORS

www.LANDMARK-CO.com
(970) 871-9494
|
CIVIL ENGINEERS
XW
XW
CONSULTANTS, INC.
XS
L NDMARK
XG
XG
XW
XW
XS
XW
XS
EX
XS
LEGEND:
XW
XS
XS
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
EX XS
XW
XS
EASEMENT
SECTION LINE
XW
XS
CENTERLINE
FOUND MONUMENT
XW
XS
LOWER
BUILDING
XW
LEVEL
GARAGE ROOF LINE/OVERHANG
ENTRY
DECK
XW
WALL
DESIGN SPEED 15 MPH DESIGN SPEED 15 MPH XW
80' REQUIRED SITE DISTANCE FENCE
115' PROVIDED 114.91' PROVIDED PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 6805
Consultants, Inc.
These drawings are
employ of Landmark

ASPHALT
CONCRETE
GRAVEL
EX
EX SIGN
PROPOSED WATER
T
BUSH
BUSH
RT FOR CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING WATER
E
GAS
BUSH
S
EX EX
CABLE
DESCRIPTION:
CABLE PEDESTAL
FIBER OPTIC
W
TELEPHONE
ELECTRIC
E
SITE DISTANCE - 10TH TO YAMPA ELECTRIC PED, JUNCTION BOX AND METER
SCALE: 1"=20' NORTH
I
V
DITCH/SWALE
E
BY:
NO
DATE:
NO.
NOTES:
04/16/2019
2066-003
EG
JR
COUNTY, COLORADO.
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
PROJECT:
DATE:
GRANT THE SAME.

UTILITIES ARE REQUIRED, THE UTILITY WILL HAVE TO BE VERIFIED BY FIELD
POTHOLING. LANDMARK CONSULTANTS, INC. AND THE SURVEYOR OF RECORD
SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR THE LOCATION OF OR THE FAILURE TO NOTE THE
LOCATION OF NON-VISIBLE UTILITIES.


SHEET
4
Of # Sheets
1.44
Attachment D
Yampa Street Hotel (PUD-18-01)

Zoning Exhibit Comparison
Revised 8/29/19
CY-2 Commercial Yampa Two

Building Placement Current Code PUD
Lot Line Setbacks
Front
Principal Building up to 28’ 10’ min.
Principal Building above 28’ 25’ min.

Side
Principal Building 0’ min. 0’ min.
Rear
Principal Building 0’ min. 0’ min.
Lot Size
Width 25’ min. 25’ min.
100’ max. 125’ max.
Depth No min. No min.
Area 3,000 sf. min. 3,000 sf min.
22,000 sf max. 22,000 sf max.
Building Form
Building Height
Buildings with Residential on Uppermost Floor
Overall Height 38’ max. 38’ max.
Average Plate Height 38’ max. 38’ max.
Other Standards
Building Intensity
Lot Coverage 85% max. 100% max.
Floor Area Ratio
With 3rd Floor Residential 200% max. 275% max.
Density
Dwelling Units per Lot No max. No max.
Other Code Notes

Required Parking 1 parking space 1 parking space
Per guest room per guest room
Use: Hotel Conditional Use Use by Right
1.45
Eric Smith Associates, P.C. • 1919 7th Street • Boulder, CO 80302 • (303) 442-5458 • 442-4745 (fax) • www.esapc.com
404.2 Interior Landscape (REQUIRED)

CY requires Category B Landscape in any areas no satisfying minimum frontage landscaping, parking lot
setback landscaping, or internal parking lot landscaping.
Table 402-3 Landscape Categories

Category B
Number of Plantings 1 per 500 SF MIN
Mix of Plantings
Evergreen trees (>10’) 10%
Evergreen trees (8-9’) 15%
Evergreen trees (6-7’) 10%
Deciduous Trees (2.5”) 20%
Ornamental Trees 15%
Shrubs (5 gallon) 15%
Ground Cover
Grass Seed, Turn or Sod 60% min
404.2 Interior Landscape (PROPOSED)

Category NA
There is no “interior” of this lot for interior landscape to be installed in. See also Project Narrative.
402.6 Interior Parking Lot Landscaping (REQUIRED)

Amount and Form
Minimum Area 200 sf per 9 parking spaces
Allowed Forms Interior Islands
End Islands
Corner Projections
Interior Strips
Type
Required Plantings
Deciduous Trees (2.5”) 1 per 200 sf min.
Shrubs (5 gallon) 4 per 200 sf min.
Perennials or Grasses added for seasonal color
Prohibited Materials
Evergreen trees
Rock Mulch
Dyed Mulch
1.46
Eric Smith Associates, P.C. • 1919 7th Street • Boulder, CO 80302 • (303) 442-5458 • 442-4745 (fax) www.esapc.com
402.6 Interior Parking Lot Landscaping (PROPOSED)
NA
The parking lot for the proposed site sits on top of covered parking garage. There is limited ability to
provide landscaping materials or soil capable of supporting landscaping with the occupiable parking
garage space below the lot. The lot is also located on the alley and not visible from 10th or Yampa Streets.
See also Project Narrative for further explanation.
Table 407.1 Off-Street Loading (REQUIRED)

Loading Space 12’ wide x 25’ long x 14’ high
407 Off-Street Loading (PROPOSED)

Loading Space NA
The limited deliveries to the site are proposed to be made at the drop-off and check-in parallel parking
spaces located on Yampa Street. See also Project Narrative for further explanation.
Table 409.1 Snow Storage (REQUIRED)

Minimum Area 1 sf per 2 sf of paved area
Table 409.1 Snow Storage (PROPOSED)

Minimum Area NA
All pavement areas on the property are proposed to be snow melted. See also Project Narrative for
further explanation.
415.C Clear Vision Setback Standards (REQUIRED)

On corner lots, clear vision setbacks shall be a minimum of 30’.
415.C Clear Vision Setback Standards (PROPOSED)

See Sight Distance Exhibits for AASHTO standards being used to meet clear vision standards.
setback for corner lots.
As part of this PUD the Clear Vision Setback requirement is requested to be revised. In lieu of the 30’ clear
vision setback at corner lots, it is proposed that this project will use “A Policy on Geometric Design of
1.47
Section 426 Access
426.C Standards (REQUIRED)

1. Driveways shall comply with City Engineering Standards
6. In the CY-2 zone district:
a. Vehicular access shall occur from an alley or side street unless topographic constraints
prohibit such access.
b. No more than one driveway shall access any adjacent street from aggregated lots.
426.C Standards (PROPOSED)

1. Driveways shall comply with City Engineering Standards (no change proposed)
a. Vehicular access shall occur from an alley and/or street.
b. No more than one driveway shall access any adjacent street from aggregated lots. (no
change proposed)
The project team is working with City Engineering on coming up with an acceptable design for the Yampa
Street entry drive.
The project proposes to change the CY-2 zone district requirement to allow for the vehicular access to
come from both the Alley and Yampa Street. See Project Narrative for further explanation.
443.E.1 Standards (REQUIRED)

a. Building massing shall reflect the traditional patters of lot width Downtown through the
expression of 25-foot increments in building massing, structural bay, and fenestration
patterns.
b. Building shall fill the full width of lots.
c. Building facades greater than two stories shall be differentiated through architectural
variation such a prominent belt course, change of materials, or change of fenestration
patterns.
d. Ground floor height shall be between 12 and 15 feet, and display windows at the street level
shall appear similar in height to those seen traditionally.
1.48
443.E.1 Standards (PROPOSED)
patterns.
b. Building shall fill the full width of lots. (no change proposed)
patterns. (no change proposed)
See Project Narrative for further explanation.
Section 443.H Building Scale, Variation and Fenestration
443.H.3 Glazing and Transparency Standards (REQUIRED)

a. Transparent glazing, including glazed doors, shall be provided as follows:
i. A minimum of 30 percent of the wall area of all ground floor building facades facing
public circulation or gathering areas.
ii. A minimum of 60 percent of the wall area of all ground floor building facades facing
Yampa Street.
iii. A minimum of 25 percent of the wall area of all upper floor building facades.
b. Transparent glazing shall be rated at a minimum 60 percent light transmittance factor.
c. Highly reflective or darkly tinted glass shall not be used on any area of the building.
443.H.3 Glazing and Transparency Standards (PROPOSED)

i. 60% minimum of the wall area of the Lobby (finished interior area) at the ground floor
ii. The underbuilding parking area at the ground floor building facades are to be
excluded from the glazing requirement.
(no changed proposed)
(no change proposed)
Changes to the glazing requirements stem from the ground floor of the building being partially a public
lobby façade and partially a parking garage. These proposed glazing requirements were reviewed
between Eric Smith and Bob Keenan.
See Project Narrative for further explanation.
1.49
Attachment E
Yampa Street Hotel (PUD-18-01)

Zoning Exhibit
Revised 8/29/19
Building Placement PUD

Lot Line Setbacks
Front
Side
Principal Building 0’ min.
Rear
Principal Building 0’ min.
Lot Size
Width 25’ min.
125’ max.
Depth No min.
Area 3,000 sf min.
22,000 sf max.
Building Form
Building Height
Overall Height 38’ max.
Average Plate Height 38’ max.
Other Standards
Building Intensity
Lot Coverage 100%
Floor Area Ratio 275% max.
Density
Dwelling Units per Lot No max.
Other Code Notes

Required Parking 1 parking space
Per guest room
Use: Hotel Use by Right
1.50
Eric Smith Associates, P.C. • 1919 7th Street • Boulder, CO 80302 • (303) 442-5458 • 442-4745 (fax) • www.esapc.com
404.2 Interior Landscape (PROPOSED)

Category NA
There is no “interior” of this lot for interior landscape to be installed in. See also Project Narrative for
402.6 Interior Parking Lot Landscaping (PROPOSED)

NA
The parking lot for the proposed site sits on top of covered parking garage. There is limited ability to
provide landscaping materials or soil capable of supporting landscaping with the occupiable parking
garage space below the lot. The lot is also located on the alley and not visible from 10th or Yampa Streets.
407 Off-Street Loading (PROPOSED)

Loading Space NA
The limited deliveries to the site are proposed to be made at the drop-off and check-in parallel parking
spaces located on Yampa Street. See also Project Narrative for further explanation.
Table 409.1 Snow Storage (PROPOSED)

Minimum Area NA
All pavement areas on the property are proposed to be snow melted. See also Project Narrative for
415.C Clear Vision Setback Standards (PROPOSED)

NA
setback for corner lots.
1.51
As part of this PUD the Clear Vision Setback requirement is requested to be removed. In lieu of the 30’
clear vision setback at corner lots, it is proposed that this project will use “A Policy on Geometric Design of
Section 426 Access
426.C Standards (PROPOSED)

1. Driveways shall comply with City Engineering Standards (no change proposed)
a. Vehicular access shall occur from an alley and/or street.
b. No more than one driveway shall access any adjacent street from aggregated lots. (no
change proposed)
The project team is working with City Engineering on coming up with an acceptable design for the Yampa
Street entry drive.
The project proposes to change the CY-2 zone district requirement to allow for the vehicular access to
come from both the Alley and Yampa Street. See Project Narrative for further explanation.
443.E.1 Standards (PROPOSED)

patterns.
b. Building shall fill the full width of lots. (no change proposed)
patterns. (no change proposed)
1.52
443.H.3 Glazing and Transparency Standards (PROPOSED)
i. 60% minimum of the wall area of the Lobby (finished interior area) at the ground floor
ii. The underbuilding parking area at the ground floor building facades are to be
excluded from the glazing requirement.
(no changed proposed)

1.53
August 14, 2019
Re: PUD-18-01, Yampa Street Hotel, Original Town Blk 32 Lots 10-12
Engineering Variance Approval
Review Based on:

PUD drawings by ESA dated 7/11/2019
Site Distance Exhibit Sheets 1-4 by Landmark dated 4/16/2019
Drive Entry sheet PUD-14A by ESA dated 7/11/2019
Transportation Impact Study by McDowell dated 2/15/2019
TAC Response dated July 18, 2019
Public Works Engineering Division has reviewed the development proposal for PUD-18-01
known as the Yampa Street Hotel. Engineering Standards indicate that each lot will have one
access point from the lowest classification of street. Additionally, the Steamboat Springs
Downtown Design Guidelines indicate that no new driveways should access Yampa Street.
The developer has made a case that due to the site size, the required parking cannot feasibly
be accessed solely from the alley. This is due to the inefficiencies of internal ramps required
for multi-level parking. The developer proposes the hotel parking be accommodated via two
parking decks, one accessed off of the alley and one accessed off of Yampa Street. The
developers engineering team has proposed pedestrian enhancements to mitigate the second
driveway.
Public Works has approved the below variances to engineering standards and downtown
design guidelines.
1. More than one access point for a single lot.
2. A new access point onto Yampa Street.
The variances have been approved with the following conditions:

1. The pedestrian enhancements shown on sheets PUD-14 and PUD-14A will be
shown on future Development Plans and Civil Construction Plans.
2. The sidewalk grades will take precedence over the driveway grade. The sidewalk
will not ramp down to the driveway grade.
3. All pedestrian enhancements will be privately maintained.
Copy: File
Ben Beall, City Engineer
Stuart King, Community Development Engineer
Planning Department
1.54

10th and Yampa Hotel Planning Commission

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

10th and Yampa Hotel Planning Commission

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

AGENDA ITEM #1.

Principal Discussion Items

Criteria for Approval: PUD

 Proposed Scale or Timing Demands More

a. The PUD addresses a community need as described in the Community Plan; or

e. The proposed scale or timing of a development project demands a more customized

1. 2004 Steamboat Springs Area Community Plan

Other policies of note are as follows:

 Land Use - Old Town Commercial

a. Diversification of land use to provide opportunities for commercial, recreational, and

b. A variety of housing types; or

c. Innovation in development, site design, or architectural quality; or

d. More efficient use of land and energy; or

e. Exemplary pedestrian connections and amenities; or

f. Expanded opportunities for public transportation; or

g. Safe, compact, and efficient street or utility networks; or

Chapter 26, Article 4, Development and Design Standards

Section 402 Landscape

Section 407 Off-Street Loading

Section 409 Snow Storage

Section 415 Clear Vision Setback

Section 426 Access

Division 2, Community Design Standards

Section 443.E Building Massing

Section 443.H Building Scale, Variation and Fenestration

Glazing and Transparency Standards

This PUD is requesting that these requirements be revised as follows:

Steamboat Community Development Code

Table LU-4: Land Use Summary Table

Policy T-1.4: New development shall incorporate transit-friendly design.

ERIC SMITH ASSOCIATES, P.C.

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL EXHIBITS

FOR: 10TH AND YAMPA

ALSO KNOWN AS:

YAMPA STREET HOTEL

PROJECT INFO SHEET INDEX PROJECT TEAM

Lin 10TH AND YAMPA

Stops within 1/4 Mile: 16

Area Transit Diagram

10TH AND YAMPA

Yampa 10th Ave. Yampa 10th Ave.

Yampa Top Level Step-Back

Consistent Building Coverage

1. View South on 10th Toward Yampa Street- New Perspective Views

10TH AND YAMPA

2. View South on 10th Toward Yampa Street- New Perspective Views

10TH AND YAMPA

3. View South on 10th Toward Yampa Street- New Perspective Views

10TH AND YAMPA

0' - 5" 2' - 10"

0' - 5" 0' - 5"

PUD-13 PUD-13 PUD-13 PUD-13

PROPOSED FLOOR AREA:

PARKING PARKING EXISTING LOT:

PROPOSE TO USE THE FIRST FLOOR FOR THE LOT COVERAGE.

LOT COVERAGE PROVIDED (USING FIRST LEVEL):

FLOOR AREA RATIO:

4485 SF 1' - 6"

ADDITIONAL PUD CRITERIA ARE LISTED IN THE PROJECT NARRATIVE.

Existing Grade Yampa Street

0' 4' 8' 16' 32'

PROPOSED BOUTIQUE HOTEL

(2) DESIGNATED PARKING

ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - PROPOSED