Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
UrbanWS_1.0 OpenWASH
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted
or utilised in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,
without written permission from the publisher.
Contents
Introduction
Learning Outcomes for Study Session 8
8.1 What is a Water Safety Plan?
8.2 The components of a Water Safety Plan
8.2.1 Assemble a team of experts
8.2.2 Describe the water supply system
8.2.3 Identify the hazards and hazardous events
8.2.4 Carry out a risk assessment and prioritise the
risks
8.2.5 Identify the control measures needed for
each risk
8.2.6 Define the monitoring system for each
control measure
8.2.7 Prepare management procedures
8.2.8 Prepare verification programme
8.2.9 Develop supporting programmes
8.2.10 Document all of the above
Summary of Study Session 8
Self-Assessment Questions (SAQs) for Study Session 8
Introduction
By this stage in your study of the Module you should have a good understanding of
the reasons why safe water is important, and of the main components of a water
supply system. You have also learned about some of the ways in which the safety of a
water supply can be compromised. Water safety is the focus of this study session.
The World Health Organization (WHO) promotes the use of Water Safety Plans as a
method by which the risks in supplying safe water are assessed and controlled. In this
study session you will learn about Water Safety Plans and the steps involved in
drawing up such a plan for an urban water supply system. The study session
concludes with details of a Water Safety Plan formulated in Ethiopia.
8.1 Define and use correctly all of the key words printed in bold. (SAQ 8.1)
8.3 Describe the different steps in a Water Safety Plan and understand how they are
applied. (SAQ 8.3)
8.4 Give an example of the successful use of a Water Safety Plan in Ethiopia.
(SAQ 8.4)
From Study Session 4 you know that the catchment is the area of land
surrounding and sloping towards a river.
If the water quality assessed at the tap where people collect it or use it is found to be
poor, it has the disadvantage that unsafe water may already have been consumed by
the people served by the distribution system. The WHO has published recommended
steps for drawing up a Water Safety Plan (Bartram et al., 2009) on which the
following description is based. By using Water Safety Plans, the quality of the water
is proactively managed so that poor-quality water does not reach consumers. Water
Safety Plans also help to eliminate the causes of incidents that might disrupt the
delivery of safe water to consumers. Incidents, in the context of water supply,
means emergencies such as a burst pipe.
A Water Safety Plan considers all the stages in the supply of water, and therefore it
involves:
Water Safety Plans put the emphasis on controlling risks where they are likely to
arise, rather than having a treatment plant deal with cases of contamination after they
have occurred. Preventing a problem from occurring is much better than having it
occur and then trying to minimise its impact.
While the primary focus in a Water Safety Plan is on the direct dangers facing safe
water quality (such as the possibility of chemical or microbial contamination), the
Plan has to be more wide-reaching, considering aspects such as potential for flood
damage; the sufficiency of the source water and alternative supplies; availability and
reliability of power supplies; the quality of treatment chemicals; the availability of
trained staff; security; and the reliability of communication systems.
Although the stages depicted in Figure 8.1 are sequential (i.e. you do them one after
another in a sequence), they can be undertaken by teams of people working in
parallel, looking at different aspects of water supply. For instance, there could be
teams looking separately at the catchment, treatment plant and distribution system.
We will now look at each of the steps in turn.
The support of senior management is crucial for the formulation and implementation
of a Water Safety Plan, because changes in working practices may be needed, as well
as new systems (costing money) for the control of risks. The finance and time
requirements for preparing the Water Safety Plan will need to be approved by senior
management who are the supervisors and decision makers responsible for
implementing any actions that may be required. Depending on the context, senior
management could be the Town Water Board or the Woreda WASH Team, for
example.
Figure 8.2 The team of experts should have a range of knowledge and skills.
In the case of springs and wells, it is important to know where the rainfall is
percolating into the ground to replenish the groundwater. This will highlight the area
where protective measures (such as restrictions on, say, fertiliser or pesticide use) are
needed so that contaminants are not carried by the rainwater into the groundwater.
H As Co
a soc mp
z iat on
ar ed ent
d ha of
o zar wa
u d ter
s su
e ppl
v y
e sys
nt te
(s m
o af
u ect
rc ed
e
of
h
Site visits are an effective way of ensuring all possibilities are covered (Figure 8.4). It
is important to speak to the people who work at the locations concerned as they will
have local knowledge that may not necessarily be in the paperwork related to the
facility.
To illustrate this application of a risk matrix, suppose you wanted to carry out a risk
assessment for the case where a treatment plant runs out of chlorine disinfectant
(Figure 8.6). In a properly managed plant, with a system of stock control in place,
such an occurrence may be rare (with a rating of 1). The public health impact of it,
however, will be catastrophic (with a rating of 5). Using the matrix in Figure 8.5, you
can calculate a risk score, which will be the product of 1 and 5. This risk score of 5
can then be given a risk rating. From the scale in Figure 8.5, this would be ‘low’
(being less than 6).
By repeating the exercise for other hazards and risks and comparing the risk scores, a
prioritised list can be drawn up that ranks the risks in order of importance.
Unfortunately, budgets are often limited and because of this many of the smaller risks
are disregarded.
Figure 8.6 Drums of chlorine – essential stocks for a water treatment plant.
Do you remember the usual name for the routine instructions for
operating a water treatment plant?
compliance monitoring
internal and external auditing of operational activities
assessment of customer satisfaction.
In addition to regular review and updating, it is important that the Plan is reviewed
and possibly modified following an incident or crisis. A post-incident review, where
the incident is discussed in detail, is likely to identify areas for improvement in the
operating procedures, training or communications, and these should be incorporated
in a revised Water Safety Plan.
The three Water Safety Planning Teams were given training that focused on the
impact of unsafe water, assessing environmental contaminants, operating a hygienic
water point and the physical treatment of water at household level. They then applied
Water Safety Plans to three water points at Lemlem Queiha, May Weyni and May
Yordanos.
At May Weyni, the fence at the water point had been damaged by flood and had not
been repaired, and there was no gate. Nearly all the residents had latrines at their
homes.
At May Yordanos, the water point was found to be clean and well fenced. Water
handling was hygienic both at the water point and in the residents’ homes. The houses
had latrines, which meant that open defecation was eliminated. The community had a
good awareness of hygiene and sanitation.
Over the one-year period of the project, with the aid of the Water Safety Planning
Teams most of the residents installed latrines, and gained a good knowledge of
hygiene and sanitation. The water points were kept clean, and good water-handling
practice was adopted at water points and in homes. Open defecation was almost
totally eliminated. Gates were installed at the water points at Lemlem Queiha and
May Weyni, and the broken fence at May Weyni was repaired, to prevent
contamination by animals.
In what ways does Case Study 8.1 correspond to the ten steps of Water
Safety Plans described in this study session?
The actions taken in the case study correspond to the first few steps in
a Water Safely Plan:
Assembling a team of experts: twelve people were
trained so that they had the expertise to undertake a
Water Safety Plan.
Description of the water supply system: details of the
three water points were recorded.
Identification of hazards: the various hazards at two of
the water points (lack of gates, lack of a fence,
unclean areas around water points, the susceptibility
to flooding, open defecation, poor awareness of good
hygiene and sanitation, unclean jerrycans) were
noted.
The above was an example of the application of a Water Safety Plan but in a rural
context. Hence not all the ten steps necessary in an urban situation were applicable to
achieve the positive outcome.
a plan that proactively seeks to identify and control risks to safe and continuous water
supply
the process by which the likelihood of harm from a potential hazard is assessed
an emergency
supporting programmes
risk assessment
risk
incident
hazardous event
hazard
compliance monitoring
Hazard assessment
Risk assessment
Identification of the control measures needed for each risk
Definition of the monitoring system for each control measure.
Back
Back
Hazard assessment: The well is open and presents several hazards. There is no
wall around it, so people or animals can contaminate the water easily, either by
entering the water, or by people using contaminated utensils or containers when
collecting water. There is a possibility of surface water running into it, and also wind-
blown debris entering the water.
Risk assessment: The risk of contamination is high, especially since it is the sole
source of water for the village, so the risk assessment score will also be high.
Back
Back