CURSO

Ingeniería Sismo Resistente II

Análisis Sísmico por

Superposición Modal Espectral

Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Introducción

 25 0 0 0 0 
0 25 0 0 0

 
M =  0 0 20 0 0 
0 0 0 20 0 
 
0 0 0 0 15 

k1 = 50000 k2 = 40000 k3 = 40000 k4 = 30000 k5 = 20000

 k1 + k2 −k2 0 0 0   90000.00 −40000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

 −k2 k2 + k3 −k3   −40000.00 80000.00 −40000.00 0.00 0.00


0 0
  
K =  0 −k3 k3 + k4 −k4 0  K =  0.00 −40000.00 70000.00 −30000.00 0.00 
 0 0 −k4 k4 + k5 −k5   0.00 0.00 −30000.00 50000.00 −20000.00 
   
 0 0 0 −k5 k5   0.00 0.00 0.00 −20000.00 20000.00 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Calculo de Frecuencias Angulares y
Periodos de vibración
 3600.00 −1600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 
 
−1600.00 3200.00 −1600.00 0.00 0.00
−1
 
K1 = M K K1 =  0.00 −2000.00 3500.00 −1500.00 0.00 
 0.00 0.00 −1500.00 2500.00 −1000.00 
 
 0.00 0.00 0.00 −1333.33 1333.33 

evp = eigenvals ( K1)

 6016.82  5to
 175.66  1ro
 4227.54  4to  1093.43  2do
   
evp =  175.66  1ro Freq = sort ( evp ) Freq =  2619.89  3ro
 1093.43  2do  4227.54  4to
   
 2619.89  3ro  6016.82  5to

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Calculo de Frecuencias Angulares y
Periodos de vibración

i = 1  5
2 
i = Freq T =
i i i

1 = 13.25 T = 0.47
1

2 = 33.07 T = 0.19
2

3 = 51.18 T = 0.12
3

4 = 65.02 T = 0.10
4
5 = 77.57 T = 0.08
5

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Calculo de modos de vibración

v = eigenvecs ( K1)

5to 4to 1ro 2do 3ro

 0.387 0.613 0.141 −0.328 0.433 

 
 −0.585 −0.240 0.302 −0.514 0.265

v =  0.642 −0.458 0.430 −0.349 −0.337 
 −0.298 0.543 0.550 0.126 −0.551 
 
 0.085 −0.250 0.634 0.700 0.571 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Normalizando los modos de vibración

 1.000   1.000   1.000 

 2.140   1.567   0.613 
 3    4    5  
v v v
V = V =  3.045  V = V =  1.063  V = V =  −0.778 
1 1 2 2 3 3
v
1 3  3.896  v
1 4  −0.384  v
1 5  −1.273 
     
 4.487   −2.134   1.319 

 1.000   1.000 
 −0.392   −1.511 
 2    1  
v v
V = V =  −0.748  V = V =  1.659 
4 4 5 5
v
1 2  0.886  v
1 1  −0.770 
   
 −0.408   0.219 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Matriz de modos de vibración
Normalizados
 ( V1) (V2)1  1 (V3)1  1 (V4)1  1 (V5)1  1 
 1 1

 ( 1) 2  1 (V2)2  1 (V3)2  1 (V4)2  1 (V5)2  1 

 V

 =  ( V1)
3 1
(V2)3  1 (V3)3  1 (V4)3  1 (V5)3  1 
 
 ( V1) (V2)4  1 (V3)4  1 (V4)4  1 (V5)4  1 
4 1
 
 ( V1) (V2)5  1 (V3)5  1 (V4)5  1 ( 5)5  1 
V
 5 1

 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 

 2.140 1.567 0.613 −0.392 −1.511

 
 =  3.045 1.063 −0.778 −0.748 1.659 
 3.896 −0.384 −1.273 0.886 −0.770 
 
 4.487 −2.134 1.319 −0.408 0.219 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Calculo de Me y Ke

 930.53 −0.00 0.00 −0.00 0.00 

 −0.00 180.20 0.00 0.00 0.00

T  
Me =   M  Me =  0.00 0.00 105.02 0.00 −0.00 
 −0.00 0.00 0.00 58.23 0.00 
 
 0.00 0.00 −0.00 0.00 149.69 

 163461.99 −0.00 0.00 −0.00 0.00 

 −0.00 197033.12 0.00 0.00 0.00

T  
Ke =   K  Ke =  0.00 0.00 275138.89 0.00 −0.00 
 −0.00 0.00 0.00 246170.59 0.00 
 
 0.00 0.00 − 0.00 0.00 900633.61 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Calculo de Vector de masas
participantes L =  T
.M .I

1  284.63 
1  45.73 
  T
L =   M  I  
I =  1  L =  19.08 
1  11.83 
   
1  8.31 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Li 2
Calculo de Masas Efectivas Lei =
Mi

2
L( 1  1)
Le = Le = 87.06
1 1 Me 1 1
( 1  1)

n
Li 2

2
L
 ( 2  1)
 Masa efectiva total
Le = Le = 11.6
2 1 2 1
Me
( 2  2) i =1 M i

2
L( 3  1)
= = 3.47
 5 
Le Le
3 1 Me 3 1

 Le 
( 3  3)
Mtotal =
 i 1 
L( 4  1)
2
i = 1 
Le = Le = 2.4
4 1 Me 4 1
( 4  4)

2
Mtotal = 105.00
L( 5  1)
Le = Le = 0.46
5 1 Me 5 1
( 5  5)

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

Factor de
 T .M .I Li
Participación FPM i = i = T =
 .M . M i
Modal (FPMi)
L
( 1  1)
 1 =  1 = 0.31
Me
( 1  1)

L
( 2  1) Sumatoria de participacion de modos
 2 =  2 = 0.25
Me
( 2  2)
5

 3 =
L
( 3  1)
 3 = 0.18
  i = 1.00

Me
i=1
( 3  3)

L
( 4  1)
 4 =  4 = 0.2
Me
( 4  4)

L
( 5  1)
 5 =  5 = 0.06
Me
( 5  5)

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Factor de
 Li 2 
Participación M 
Pi =  i 
de Masas Mtotal

P =
( Le
1  1)
 100
P = 82.92
1 Mtotal 1

> 90 %
P =
(Le2  1) 100 P = 11.05
2 Mtotal 2

=
( Le
3  1)
 100
P = 3.30
P
3 3
Sumatoria de participacion efectiva
Mtotal

( Le
4  1)
 100  5 
P
4
=
Mtotal
P = 2.29
4
Suma = 
 P
i
Suma = 100.00
i = 1 

P =
( Le
5  1)
 100
P = 0.44
5 Mtotal 5

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 ANALISIS MODAL ESPECTRAL
Sa
T C = 2.5( Tp/T) C ZUS.g.C
R
0.1 15.00 2.50 254.8
0.2 7.50 2.50 254.8
0.3 5.00 2.50 254.8
0.4 3.75 2.50 254.8
Espectro NTE-030 0.5 3.00 2.50 254.8
0.6 2.50 2.50 254.8
0.7 2.14 2.14 218.4
0.8 1.88 1.88 191.1
Z = 0.4 Lima 0.9 1.67 1.67 169.9
U = 1.3 Centro Comercial g = 980 1.0 1.50 1.50 152.9 NTE-030
Espectro
S = 1.2 S2 Tp = 0.6 1.1 1.36 1.36 139.0
R = 6.0 Muro estruct. 1.2 1.25 1.25 127.4
ZUS.g = 101.92
1.3 300.0 1.15 1.15 117.6
1.4 1.07 1.07 109.2
R
1.5
250.0 1.00 1.00 101.9
1.6 0.94 0.94 95.6
1.7 0.88 0.88 89.9
Sa

Sa (m/seg2)
1.8 200.0 0.83 0.83 84.9
T C = 2.5( Tp/T) C ZUS.g.C 1.9 0.79 0.79 80.5
R 2.0
0.1 15.00 2.50
150.0 0.75 0.75 76.4
0.08 18.75 2.5 254.8 2.1 0.71 0.71 72.8
0.2
0.10 7.50
15.00 2.50
2.5 254.8 2.2 0.68 0.68 69.5
0.3
0.12 5.00
12.50 2.50
2.5 254.8 2.3 100.0 0.65 0.65 66.5
0.4
0.19 3.75
7.89 2.50
2.5 254.8 2.4 0.63 0.63 63.7
0.5
0.47 3.00
3.19 2.50
2.5 254.8 2.5 50.0 0.60 0.60 61.2
0.6 2.50 2.50 254.8 2.6 0.58 0.58 58.8
0.7 2.14 2.14 218.4 2.7
0.8 1.88 1.88 191.1 0.0 0.56 0.56 56.6
2.8 0.54 0.54 54.6
0.9 1.67 1.67 169.9 2.9 0.52 0.52 52.7
1.0 1.50 1.50 152.9 3.0 0.50 0.50 51.0
1.1 1.36 1.36 139.0
Ing.
1.2 Sismo 1.25
Resistente1.25
II 127.4 Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida
1.3 1.15 1.15 117.6
1.4 1.07 1.07 109.2
 ANALISIS MODAL ESPECTRAL
Sa

Espectro NTE-030
T C = 2.5( Tp/T) C ZUS.g.C
R
0.1 15.00 2.50 254.8
0.2 7.50 2.50 254.8
0.3 5.00 2.50 254.8
Z = 0.4 Lima 0.4 3.75 2.50 254.8
U = 1.3 Centro Comercial g = 980 0.5 3.00 2.50 Espectro
254.8NTE-030
S = 1.2 S2 Tp = 0.6 0.6 2.50 2.50 254.8
R = 6.0 Muro estruct. 0.7
ZUS.g = 101.92
300.0 2.14 2.14 218.4
0.8 1.88 1.88 191.1
R 0.9 1.67 1.67 169.9
1.0 250.0 1.50 1.50 152.9
1.1 1.36 1.36 139.0
Espectro NTE-030 1.2 200.0 1.25 1.25 127.4

Sa (m/seg2)
1.3 1.15 1.15 117.6
300.0 1.4 1.07 1.07 109.2
1.5 150.0 1.00 1.00 101.9
250.0 1.6 0.94 0.94 95.6
1.7 100.0 0.88 0.88 89.9
Sa (m/seg2)

200.0 1.8 0.83 0.83 84.9

1.9 0.79 0.79 80.5
150.0 Sa
2.0
50.0 0.75 0.75 76.4
2.1 0.71 0.71 72.8
Sa
100.0
2.2
T 0.0 0.68Tp/T)
C = 2.5( 0.68
C 69.5
ZUS.g.C
50.0 2.3 0.65 0.65 66.5
R
2.4
0.1 0.63
15.00 0.63
2.50 63.7
254.8
0.08 18.75 2.5
0.0 2.5
0.2 0.60
7.50 0.60
2.50 61.2
254.8
0.10 15.00 2.5
2.6
0.3 0.58
5.00 0.58
2.50 58.8
254.8
T (seg) 0.12 12.50 2.5
2.7
0.4 0.56
3.75 0.56
2.50 56.6
254.8
0.19 7.89 2.5
2.8
0.5 0.54
3.00 0.54
2.50 54.6
0.47 3.19 2.5 254.8
2.9
0.6 0.52
2.50 0.52
2.50 52.7
254.8
3.0
0.7 0.50
2.14 0.50
2.14 51.0
218.4
Ing. Sismo Resistente II 0.8
Ing.
1.88
Omart1.88
Tello Malpartida
191.1
0.9 1.67 1.67 169.9
1.0 1.50 1.50 152.9
1.1 1.36 1.36 139.0
 ANALISIS MODAL ESPECTRAL
Sv Sa
Calculo de Desplazamientos Máximos Sd = =
 2
1er Modo:
1 = 13.25 T = 0.47  1 = 0.31
1

Sa1
Del espectro : Sa1 = 254.8 Sd1 = Sd1 = 1.45
(  1) 2

 1.00   0.444 
   
 1  2.14   0.950 
1 =  1 =  3.05  Umax1 = 1 Sd1  1 Umax1 =  1.351 
 3.90   1.728 
   
 4.49   1.991 
2do Modo: 2 = 33.07 T = 0.19  2 = 0.25
2

Sa2
Del espectro : Sa2 = 254.8 Sd2 = Sd2 = 0.23
(  2) 2

 1.00   0.059 
 1.57   0.093 
 2    
2 =  2 =  1.06  Umax2 = 2 Sd2  2 Umax2 =  0.063 
 −0.38   −0.023 
   
 −2.13   −0.126 
Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida
 ANALISIS MODAL ESPECTRAL
Calculo de Desplazamientos Máximos

3er Modo: 3 = 51.18 T = 0.12  3 = 0.18

3

Sa3
Del espectro : Sa3 = 254.8 Sd3 = Sd3 = 0.10
( 3) 2

 1.00   0.018 
 0.61   0.011 
 3    
3 =  3 =  −0.78  Umax3 = 3 Sd3  3 Umax3 =  −0.014 
 −1.27   −0.023 
   
 1.32   0.023 

4to Modo:
4 = 65.02 T = 0.10  4 = 0.20
4

Sa4
Del espectro : Sa4 = 254.8 Sd4 = Sd4 = 0.06
( 4) 2

 1.00   0.012 
 −0.39   −0.005 
 4    
4 =  4 =  −0.75  Umax4 = 4 Sd4  4 Umax4 =  −0.009 
 0.89   0.011 
   
 −0.41   −0.005 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 ANALISIS MODAL ESPECTRAL
Calculo de Desplazamientos Máximos

5to Modo: 5 = 77.57 T = 0.08  5 = 0.06

5

Sa5
Del espectro : Sa5 = 254.8 Sd5 = Sd5 = 0.04
( 5) 2

 1.00   0.002 
 −1.51   −0.004 
 5    
5 =  5 =  1.66  Umax5 = 5 Sd5  5 Umax5 =  0.004 
 −0.77   −0.002 
   
 0.22   0.001 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 COMBINACION POR
SUPERPOSICION MODAL
U1 = Sumatoria de Valores Absolutos (A BS)

 Umax1
1 1
+ Umax2
1 1
+ Umax3
1 1
+ Umax4
1 1
+ Umax5
1 1 
 
 Umax1
2 1
+ Umax2
2 1
+ Umax3
2 1
+ Umax4
2 1
+ Umax5
2 1 
 
U1 =  Umax1 + Umax2 + Umax3 + Umax4 + Umax5 
3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1
 
Umax1 + Umax2 + Umax3 + Umax4 + Umax5
 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 
 Umax1 + Umax2 + Umax3 + Umax4 + Umax5 
 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 
 0.54 
 
1.06
 
U1 =  1.44 
 1.79 
 
 2.15 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 COMBINACION POR
SUPERPOSICION MODAL
U2= Raiz Cuadrada de la Suma de los Cuadrados ( RCSC)


 (Umax11  1)2 + (Umax21  1)2 + (Umax31  1)2 + (Umax41  1)2 + (Umax51  1)2 
 


(Umax12  1) + (Umax22  1) + (Umax32  1) + (Umax43  1)
2 2 2 2
+ (Umax54  1) 
2

U2 =  (Umax13  1)2 + (Umax23  1)2 + (Umax33  1)2 + (Umax43  1)2 + (Umax53  1)2 

 
 (Umax14  1)2 + (Umax24  1)2 + (Umax34  1)2 + (Umax44  1)2 + (Umax54  1) 
2

 
 2
 (Umax15  1)2 + (Umax25  1)2 + (Umax35  1)2 + (Umax45  1)2 + (Umax55  1) 

 0.45 
 0.95 
 
U2 =  1.35 
 1.73 
 
Ing. Sismo Resistente II  1.99  Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida
 COMBINACION POR
SUPERPOSICION MODAL

Umax
Norma NTE-030: 0.25ABS+0.75SRSS 1 1
 1 =  1 = 0.0047
100
 0.25 U11  1 + 0.75 U2
1 1  Umax
   0.47  2 1
   2 =  2 = 0.0098
 0.25 U12  1 + 0.75 U2
2 1  0.98 100
   
Umax =  0.25 U13  1 + 0.75 U2 Umax =  1.37 
3 1  Umax
3 1
 0.25 U1 +   1.74   3 =  3 = 0.0137
0.75 U2
 4 1 4 1    100
 0.25 U1 + 0.75 U2   2.03  Umax
 5 1 5 1  4 1
 4 =  4 = 0.0174
100
Umax
5 1
 5 =  5 = 0.0203
100

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Distorsión de Entrepiso

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Calculo de Cortantes de Entrepiso

V = k1  1 V = 234.93
1 1

(
V = k2  2 −  1
2 ) V = 204.45
2

(
V = k3  3 −  2
3 ) V = 157.52
3

4 (
V = k4  4 −  3 ) V = 110.52
4
(
V = k5  5 −  4
5 ) V = 57.88
5

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Fuerzas Sísmicas del Análisis Dinámico

F = 30.48
F = V − V 1
1 1 2

F = V − V
F = 46.93
2 2 3
2

F = V − V F = 47.00
3 3 4 3
F = V − V
4 4 5 F = 52.64
4
F = V F = 57.88
5 5
5

5
V =  F
i V = 234.93
i=1

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

 Fuerzas Sísmicas del Análisis Dinámico
(Método Alternativo)

 30.48 
Umax  46.93 
Fd = K  
100 Fd =  47.00 
 52.64 
 
 57.88 
5
V =  F
i V = 234.93
i=1

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida

¿ Preguntas ….?