Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Mysugar also has a distillery unit with distillation capacity Consistent revisions in state announced prices - SAP
of 32-kilo litres per day for production of rectified spirit (which is higher than State Minimum Price- SMP) for
used for the production of ‘arrack’. Mysugar is one of cane has led to higher input costs for Mysugar. The
the two entities licensed to produce arrack in Karnataka. government policy of allowing free import of sugar and
Mysugar had a liquor-manufacturing unit and an acetic a bumper crop in the previous year has meant lower
acid plant, which closed down due to difficult business realizations. These factors have resulted in Mysugar
conditions. incurring continuous losses from FY2001 to FY2003
Working Results The sectoral mix of NSDP over the past eight years has
Total Income 1788.5 1677.6 1502.4 witnessed a marked change with services at 51%
PBILDT 92.9 116.1 -52.5 accounting for the maximum portion of NSDP. The share
Depreciation 11.1 13.8 14
of primary sector, which accounted for 38% in 1993-94,
PBIT 81.8 102.3 -66.5
Interest 97.8 106.5 100 has fallen to 26% in 2001-02. The share of industrial
PAT -16.1 -4.3 -166.5 sector has remained stagnant at 23%.
Dividend (%) nil Nil nil
Net Cash Accruals -5 9.5 -152.5 Government’s Finances
Financial Position
Equity Capital 67.3 67.3 87.3
GOK has been witnessing increased revenue deficits
Tangible Net worth 148.5 143.3 -3.1 during the period 1998-99 & 2002-03, which is a pointer
Total Capital Employed 237.9 309.3 141.7 to its deteriorating fiscal health. RD as a percentage of
Key Ratios RR has almost doubled from 10.8% in 1998-99 to 20.1%
Profitability (%) for 2002-03RE. The unprecedented rise in RD has
Increase in Net Sales 28.3 -4.1 12.9 fuelled higher fiscal deficits. RD as a percentage of GFD
Increase in PBILDT 10.3 25 -145.2
PBILDT/Inc. from Operations 5.2 6.9 -3.5
has witnessed erratic movements over the years and
PAT/Income from Operations -0.9 -0.3 -11.1 currently stands at 59. GFD as percentage of NSDP
ROI 10.6 11.4 -8.7 had grown to 5.3 for FY’02 now stands reduced to
RONW -10.2 -2.9 N.M. 4.4 for FY’03(RE).
Solvency
Overall Gearing 4.7 5.8 N.M. Revenue expenditure has grown at a CARG of 13%.
Interest coverage (times) 0.8 1.0 -0.7 Developmental Expenditure however, grew at a slower
Current ratio (times) 1.0 1.0 0.8
Ave. collection period (days) 4.7 3.9 1.7 rate of 11% vis-à-vis 16% growth in Non Developmental
Turnover Ratios Expenditure. Growth in developmental expenditure is
Capital Turnover Ratio 2.1 1.9 1.9 attributable to increased subsidies doled out to the
Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio 7.4 6.0 4.9 power sector, chief beneficiary being KPTCL in 2000-01
Working Capital Turnover Ratio 3.0 2.7 3.3 & 2002-03. Key drivers to growth in Non Developmental
Revenue Receipts have grown at a CARG of 11% during Capital receipts of GOK have risen at a high CARG of
the period 1998-99 & 2002-03, due to a healthy growth 34% during the period 1998-99 & 2002-03RE mainly
of 12% in own tax revenues. Chief contributor to own driven by the huge growth in internal debts. A major
tax revenue remains sales tax, which accounts for 34% portion of this was due to the unprecedented growth in
of revenue receipts. Non-tax revenues have stagnated WMA availed in 2002-03 RE to the tune of 60% of total
at 21% of Revenue receipts. However, grants from internal debt. GOK has not achieved much success in
centre for various plans have grown at a high CARG of recovery of loans and advances which has forced the
24%. States own non-tax revenues have shown a state to resort to higher borrowings. GOK has however
negative CARG of 4% during the same period. managed to substitute a major portion of the high cost
debt by refinancing them through market borrowings.
Consistent increase in Revenue Deficits has led to
reduction in quantum of resources available for capital Debt & Liquidity
expenditure. Capital expenditure towards development
as a percentage of total capital expenditure has declined Increasing Fiscal Deficit has lead to an increase in the
from 71 in 1998-99 to a low 33 in 2002-03 RE. For 2002- indebtedness of GOK. The outstanding debt has
03 RE, Irrigation accounts for the highest chunk of doubled from a level of Rs. 186 bn. in 1998-99 to Rs.
expenditure at around 60% of total expenditure on 381 bn. for 2002-03 RE. Outstanding Debt as a
economic services. Though total capital expenditure has percentage of NSDP at 25% is lower than most states
grown at a CARG of 36%, a huge portion of it is due to in India. Accounting for guarantees issued by the state,
growth in non-developmental capital expenditure mainly the total liability to NSDP ratio is higher at around 29%.
towards repayment of internal debt and central loans, GOK has faced liquidity problems in FY’02 & FY’03 and
which includes ways and means advances. GOK has a to tide over the same, it has availed ways and means
Revenue Account
Revenue Receipts 112 129 148 153 170 198
Rev. Expenditure 124 152 167 186 204 220
Revenue Deficit (12) (23) (19) (33) (34) (21)
Capital Account
Capital Receipts 36 50 48 74 115 85
Capital Expenditure 24 27 30 41 83 64
Capital Surplus 11 23 18 33 32 22
Agg. Receipts (AR) 148 179 196 227 285 284
Agg. Expenditure (AE) 149 179 197 226 286 284
Primary Deficit (13) (23) (18) (32) (24) (24)
Gross Fiscal Deficit (31) (43) (42) (59) (58) (60)
Overall Surplus / (Deficit) (1) (0) (1) 1 (2) 1
RD/GFD (%) 39.1 54.4 44.1 56 59.1 35.4
RD/NSDP (%) 1.9 2.7 2.0 3.0 2.6 1.4
GFD/NSDP (%) 4.8 5.0 4.5 5.3 4.4 3.9
Interest Expenditure 18 20 24 27 33 36
Interest/RR (%) 14.4 15.6 16.1 17.5 19.6 18.3
Debt 186 223 266 326 381 447
August 2003
Disclaimer
CARE’s ratings are opinions on credit quality and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold any security.
CARE has based its ratings on information obtained from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable.
CARE does not, however, guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any information and is not
responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. Most issuers
of securities rated by CARE have paid a credit rating fee, based on the amount and type of securities issued.