Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Price 90/-
Printed by
Kalyani Corporation
Pune
RIVER TRAINING AND
PROTECTION WORKS
FOR RAILWAY BRIDGES
November 2016
INDIAN RAILWAYS INSTITUTE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
PUNE 411 001
(ii)
FOREWORD TO FOURTH EDITION
(iii)
(iv)
PREFACE TO FOURTH EDITION
(v)
PREFACE TO THE THIRD REVISED EDITION
Shiv Kumar
Director
IRICEN
(vi)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO THE
THIRD REVISED EDITION
(vii)
PREFACE TO THE SECOND REVISED EDITION
(viii)
PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION
(ix)
hydraulic modeling and measurement of river water levels
and discharges. The entire subject matter is thus grouped
under the above seven chapters.
Principal
Indian Railways Institute of
Advanced Track Technology, Pune
(x)
CONTENTS
1. TYPE OF RIVERS 1
1.1 Upper reaches 1
1.2 Submontane reaches 4
1.3 Flood plain reaches 5
1.3.1 Stable type 5
1.3.2 Aggrading type 6
1.3.3 Degrading type 6
1.4 Tidal reaches 6
1.5 Other types 7
1.5.1 Flashy Rivers 7
1.5.2 Virgin Rivers 8
1.5.3 Himalayan Rivers 9
1.5.4 South Indian Rivers 9
2. BEHAVIOR OF RIVERS 10
2.1 Meandering Pattern 11
2.1.1 Meander Characteristics and
causative factors 12
2.1.2 Cut offs and movement of meanders 13
2.1.3 Meander relationships 16
2.1.4 Engineering implications of meanders 20
2.2 Braiding Pattern 22
2.3 Bed Forms 24
2.4 River Formulae 30
(xi)
3.4 Acquisition and processing of data 44
3.5 Study of river morphology 45
3.5.1 Interpretation and analysis using
remote sensing 45
3.6 Procurement of data 47
3.6.1 Steps for the procurement 47
3.6.2 Details for the requisition 48
3.7 Concluding Remarks 50
(xii)
5.3.6 Provisions as contained in IRBM 95
para 810 with regards to guide bunds
5.3.6.1 Necessity 95
5.3.6.2 Shape and design features 96
5.3.6.3 Apron protection for guide 98
bunds
5.3.6.4 Maintenance 99
5.3.6.5 Failure and remedial measures 99
5.4 Spurs on Groynes 100
5.4.1 Functions 100
5.4.2 Types 100
5.4.3 Location 104
5.4.4 Length, Spacing, Inclination and
Height 105
5.4.5 Materials of construction 106
5.4.6 Provisions as contained in IRBM 107
para 811 with regards to spurs/groynes
5.4.6.1 Necessity 107
5.4.6.2 Types of spurs/groynes 107
5.4.6.3 Location and salient features 108
of a spur/groynes
5.4.6.4 Maintenance of spurs/groynes 109
5.4.6.5 Permeable structures 109
5.5 Approach banks and Marginal embankments 112
5.5.1 Approach Banks 112
5.5.1.1 Provisions as contained in 113
IRBM para 817 with regards to
protection of approach banks
5.5.2 Marginal embankments 114
5.5.3 Provisions as contained in IRBM
para 812 with regards to marginal
bunds 115
5.6 Bank revetment 115
5.7 Closure bunds 117
(xiii)
5.7.1 Provisions as contained in IRBM 117
para 813 with regards to closure
bunds
5.8 Artificial cut offs 117
5.8.1 Provisions as contained in IRBM 118
para 814 with regards to assisted/
artificial cut-offs
5.9 Protection for shallow piers 119
(xiv)
(i) Size of stone 133
(ii) Thickness 133
(iii) Slope of launched face 133
(iv) Quantity of apron stone 134
(v) Laying of apron 135
6.4 Spurs or Groynes 135
6.4.1 Types of spurs 135
6.4.2 Location 135
6.4.3 Length, inclination, height and
spacing for impermeable spurs 137
6.4.4 Cross section and Protection of
impermeable spurs 137
6.4.5 Permeable spurs 141
6.5 Approach Bank and Marginal Embankments 141
6.5.1 Approach banks 141
6.5.2 Marginal embankments 144
6.6 Bank Revetments 145
6.6.1 Side slope 145
6.6.2 Velocity in the eroding bend along
concave bank 145
6.6.3 Side slope and apron protection 146
6.7 Artificial cut offs 146
6.8 Bridge pier Protection 147
6.8.1 Deep piers 147
(i) Scour depth and grip length 147
(ii) Flood scour 153
(iii) Scour due to constriction 154
(iv) Effect of bed forms 154
(v) Pier scour in clayey strata 154
6.8.2 Shallow piers 156
6.9 Design for protection works: instructions as 157
contained in IRBM para 818
6.10 Data Requirement 158
6.10.1Survey data 158
(xv)
6.10.2Hydraulic data 159
6.10.3Sediment data 159
(xvi)
9. HYDRAULIC MODELLING 182
9.1 Modeling Technique 182
9.2 Similitude Requirement 182
9.3 Model Scale Design 183
9.3.1 Rigid Bed Models 183
9.3.2 Mobile Bed Models 184
9.4 Model Limitations 185
9.5 Dimensional Analysis 185
9.6 Requirement of field data 186
9.6.1 General 186
9.6.2 Survey Data 186
9.6.3 Hydrographic data 187
9.6.4 Sediment Data 187
(xvii)
e. Model limitations 220
11.4 Closing remarks 220
(xviii)
Chapter 1
TYPES OF RIVERS
In Bridge Engineering, intimate knowledge of the
environmental medium is as important as that of the
structure since their interaction governs safety of the bridges
and final regime of the river.
In the hilly upland reach, the river course and its plan
form are mostly governed by hill contours. Rocky banks
impose side constraint in lateral movement of the river. The
riverbed comprises boulders, shingle, gravel and material of
1
Photo 1.1 : River Ravi (left) and River Pubbar (right) in
the hilly region of Himachal Pradesh. Note : Banks of
the river are fully governed by the hills. The bed
material is comprised of boulders of various sizes.
2
Photo 1.2 : Remnants of a suspension bridge lost during
the catastrophe
3
1.2 SUBMONTANE REACHES
4
systems are illustrative of braiding pattern. Photo 1.3 shows
a tributary of River Sutlej in Himachal Pradesh. Peak floods
can more often be flashy. Intensity of suspended and bed
load transport is intermediate between upland and flood plain
reaches.
5
to year over long periods. Changes in the river bed do occur
from season to season, but on an annual basis, bed level
changes are nominal. Ganga River is a notable example of
such type of rivers.
6
sea tides is felt and predominates over the tidal reach. The
tidal effect depends on tidal range, which is the difference
between high water and low water and varies from one tidal
waterway to another. The effect also changes from day to
day due to changing position of the earth with respect to sun
and the moon. On full moon and new moon days, lunar effect
and so the tidal ranges are the highest. These tides are
called spring tides. On the other hand, at quarters lunar
effect is the least and so also the tidal range. These are
called neap tides. When moon is the nearest, the tide is
called perigee tide and when the farthest it is called apogee
tide. As the flood tide progresses from the sea into the
estuary and tidal creeks, shallow water effect is felt and wave
form gets distorted, the rising limb of the tidal wave
becoming steeper. Accordingly, the wave velocity becomes
faster and in an extreme case, the flood tide moves up like a
wall when it is called a bore tide.
7
sediment load can be brought down by the river, which can
be deposited on the way. Flashy floods cannot scour the
riverbed sufficiently at constrictions within guide bunds
thereby causing high afflux. In case of Luni River in
Rajasthan, a flashy flood in 1944 resulted in rapid rise of
water level of 24m in 2 days. In case of the Bandy, its
tributary, flood level rose even faster by 48 m in the same
period. The resulting afflux upstream of the bridge was about
1.83 m, which caused breaches in left approach and damage
to three end piers on the left flank.
8
and 11862 cum/s respectively), most of the discharge is
known to vanish by the time they reach to the Rann of
Kutchh. In fact, the rivers are nearly non-existent within a
short distance of 20-25 km from the Canal Crossings.
9
Chapter 2
BEHAVIOUR OF RIVERS
A bridge engineer needs to be well conversant with the
river behaviour, which is largely influenced by the form or shape
of the river alignment in plan. Plan form of a river is designated by
the term “Channel pattern” which can be either meandering,
braided or straight.
10
Straight courses of rivers are not met with very frequently.
Leopold and Walman (2.1) have observed that they are more of an
exception, the straight lengths not obtaining for more than ten
times their widths.
11
Photo 2.1 (C) : Examples of complex type of river channel
12
Some meanders are very flat while others very sharp or
acute. These and all possible shapes in between can be depicted
schematically using arc of a circle as shown in Fig. 2.2. River
meanders are rarely so regular and uniform in shape. The
conceptual model using circular arc, however help in quantitative
assessment of the behaviour of meanders. Definition sketch giving
symbols is presented in Fig. 2.3.
13
14
Photo 2.4 : Showing development of cut-off observed in
Gango River, Assam and formation of Oxbow lakes
15
formation of more cutoffs in its wake. On the other hand, in the
case of wide and shallow rivers, the meander shape does not
change but the whole meander train moves downstream. This
downstream travel of meanders results in cyclic changes of the
meander position within Khadir at any fixed location. In the case
of Ganga river at Mokamah and Mansi the meander was known
to occupy the same position either at the south or at north edge
of Khadir after a period of about 70 years as shown in Fig. 2.5.
16
A
RS
SA F
HA
M RO
AS M
SA
TI
PU
TO
R
FR
OM A
RI SI
SA A AN
MA AG M
ST
IP KH
UR
NI
BARAU
90
19
19
TO
00
1969 KA
TI
HA
1969 R
17
1936
E
19
IDG RA
J
19
36
BR END
RA
19 9
69
REFERENCES :
1. COURSE OF R GANGA IN 1969 SHOWN THUS
2. COURSE OF R GANGA IN 1936 SHOWN THUS
3. COURSE OF R GANGA IN 1990 SHOWN THUS
Fig.2.5 :Cycle changes in Ganga river at Mansi
Table 2.1
3. Inglis 1939 ML = 49.63Q½ Shaw’s data of Orissa rivers in For 16 rivers in Flood Plain
India
MB = 14.0 W Bates data of American rivers For rivers in Flood plains
18
R = 37.385 Q½ Jefferson data For Incised Rivers
ML = 4.59 R0.98
ML/MB=1.80 Q-0.038
19
8. Chitale 1970 LR/LV=1.429(m/D)-0.077
S*-0.052 (W/D)-0.065 S* = S x 104
MB/W = 48.299(m/D)-0.050 Data of 42 rivers
S*-0.453 (W/D)-0.471 m = size of bed material
LR/LV=1.145(MB/W)-0.134
20
These changes are not local but are governed by
changes occurring in upstream meanders. Nodal points occur in
rivers where natural constraints in the form of non-erosive strata
restrict downstream movement of meanders. In Ganga River, the
Kasmar bluff on the north bank has thus developed a nodal point
at Patna as seen in Fig. 2.7.
21
2.2 BRAIDING PATTERN
22
Interlaced type braided channel – Brahmaputra River, Assam
23
Photo 2.9 : Progressive development of channels,
shifting of islands and consequent bank erosion in river
Brahmaputra, Assam
24
25
26
Fig.2.5 : Training of Danube river in Hungary
(a) TYPICAL RIPPLE (e) PLANE BED
PATTERN, F << 1. & d < 0.4 mm.
DECELERATION ACCELERATION
ACCELERATION WEAK BOIL
BOIL BOIL
F = FROUDE NUMBER
(c) DUNES
27
height less than 3 cm. For ripple formation the size of bed material
needs to be less than 0.4 to 0.6 mm. Dunes have wave length
and wave height greater than ripples and these are dependent on
flow characteristics. They also move downstream and are
associated with sub critical flow regime (with Froude no. less
than 1). As the flow approaches critical condition, when Froude
Number (V/ gD ) approaches 1 (where V is velocity in m/sec, D
depth in m), dunes start getting washed out due to high velocity.
This is the transition bed form, which is some times called flat
bed. With Froude Number equal to or greater than I, antidunes
are formed whose wavelength is roughly equal to 2p V2/g where
V is the velocity in m/s and g is the gravitational acceleration.
Their height depends on flow characteristics. Antidunes are sand
waves of sinuous shape in phase with gravity water surface waves
and may move upstream, downstream or remain stationary
depending on flow characteristics.
28
Table 2.2 : Characteristics of Bed Forms in the lower
Reach of Brahmaputra River
Maximum
amount of
movement in 24 — 246 m 159 m 640 m
hours period
Average amount
of movement in 3m 122 m 67 m 204 m
24 hours period
29
40
30
20
UPPER REGIME
F>1
10.0
TRANSITION
8.0
6.0
F = FROUDE NUMBER
4.0
3.0
2.0
DUNES
F>1
1.0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
MEDIAN GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETRES
is less than 1 x 103, that the upper regime of bed forms will occur
when the ratio is greater than 4 x 103 and that the bed will be in
transition if ratio is in between these values. In the above ratio, V
is the mean velocity in m/sec, D is the mean depth in m and d50
is the median grain size in mm.
30
ML, ratio of channel length to valley length P etc. all interact and
change, results in changes in the remaining parameters. Using
a plus exponent for increase and minus for decrease, Schumm
indicated the nature of change brought about in channel
morphology by change in water discharge and sediment load.
The associated changes were qualitatively expressed by him in
the following form.
+ + + - - -
+ W D ML _ W D ML
Q ≅ _ Q ≅
S S+
+ + + _ - - -
+ W ML S W ML S
Q ≅ _ _ Qs ≅
s D P D+ P+
Qs . d50 ≅ Q.S
W α Q0.5
D α Q0.33
S α Q-0.17
V α Q0.17
Empirical formulae for primary variables such as width,
depth and slope were evolved by Lacey, Blench and several other
authors. More important of the formulae are listed in Table 2.3(2.9).
31
Table 2.3 : River Formulae
32
Notes: (i) All formulae are in M. K. S. units except that
of Blench
(ii) In Blench formulae Fs was assumed as 0.1
and Fb = 1.9 mO.5 for size of bed material in
between 0.2 and 2.00 mm.
(iii) Blench formulae were evolved on basis of canal
and river data vide Reference 2.12. Lacey
formulae were evolved on basis of canal data
vide References 2.13 and 2.14. Nixon formulae
were based on data of U.K. rivers vide Reference
2.15. Pettis formulae were obtained using data
of U.S.A. rivers vide Reference 2.16. Statistical
relations were worked out using data of Indian
rivers vide Reference 2.17.
33
Dr = Wr-0.8
Sr = Wr0.24
Mr = Wr-0.25
Vr = Wr-0.19
Wr = Qr1.66
Dr = Qr -0.57
Vr = Qr -0.03
Similarly effect of Constructing flood embankments on
depth and velocity can be evaluated. The most general case is
the one where all parameters are free to change without
constraint. In this case the relations obtained were the following.
Wr = Qr0.50 (Assumed)
Dr = Qr 0.36
Sr = Qr-0.27
Vr = Qr 0.14
Mr = Qr 0.10
Thus the changes in river parameters are interdependent
and when the ratio of variation in anyone of the parameters is
known, the corresponding ratios for the other parameters can be
derived.
34
REFERENCES
35
2.12 Blench, T., ‘Regime behaviour of Canals and Rivers’
Butterworths Scientific Publications, London U.K. 1957.
2.13 Lacey, G., ‘Stable channels in alluvium’ Paper No. 4736,
Minutes of Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers
London U.K. Vol. 29, 1930, pp 259-384.
2.14 Lacey, Q and Pamberton, W, ‘A general formula for
uniform flow in self formed alluvial channels’ Proceedings
of the Institution of Civil Engineers, London, Part 2,
September 1972.
2.15 Nixon ,M., ‘A study of bankful discharges of rivers in
England and Wales’, the Institution of Civil Engineers,
Proceedings, February, 1959, Vol. 12, Session 1958-
59, Paper No. 6322.
2.16 Pettis, C. R., ‘Discussion published in American Society
of Civil Engineers Transactions 1937’, pp 149 to 152 on
Paper No. 1957, ‘Stable Channels in erodible material’
by E.W. Lane.
2.17 Chitale, S.V. ‘Sympathetic changes in river regime
Proceedings, Institution of Civil Engineers, London U.
K. Part 2, 1977’13, September, pp. 613-623
36
Chapter 3
37
3.1 REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUE
3.1.1 Satellites
38
needs to be understood first. A photograph covers a specific area
within its view and a picture is taken covering the full area at a
time. Everybody is familiar with this process. A satellite observes
and records the data line by line, which is made up of many
points. The point-by-point observations of the intensity of light
are taken in digital form. Fig 3.2 shows the movement of satellite
and the process of observation in schematic way. The process
can be compared to a scanner where the source of light travels
over the document, collects, and stores the data in digital form.
Therefore, a satellite takes certain time to capture the data
covering the specific area of interest.
39
3.2 ADVANTAGES
40
Therefore, comparisons of a dynamic phenomenon, like river
channel changes, can be studied easily. Photo 3.4 shows an
example of river channel alignment observed at an interval of four
years. Analysis of river channel changes during the period can
help to assess the changes and estimate the likely changes in
future.
41
by the use of satellite data.
42
Photo 3.6 : Showing imageries of low and higher resolution
covering the same area. Clarity of finer details is evident
43
Photo 3.7 : Showing the river reach observed by different
bands
44
These also monitor the exact path, height, location, etc of the
satellite when the data is received.
45
studying its planforms, their changes over periods, etc. Many of
these aspects are important for a bridge engineer. River layout
and planforms, like, meandering, braided, straight, etc can be
seen in a synoptic view of the imagery. Further sub-division of
the rivers like (a) sharp and flat, irregular and irregular, intense,
type of meandering rivers (b) island type and interlaced type braid-
ing rivers (c) straight but stable / unstable, etc can be easily
identified by the use of synoptic view of the imageries.
46
eters qualitatively. However, for reliable quantification is required,
computer analysis is recommended, wherein suitable softwares
and expertise in the digital analysis is necessary.
47
lites, dates of pass showing cloud free data, and cost of each
photo print. More than one date of pass might be suggested
within each of the period interest. In such case, the bridge engi-
neer should make selection of suitable date of pass.
i. Period of Data
48
ii. Area of interest
49
sis indicate necessity of protection / training measures in the
upstream, then the length of study reach can be accordingly
extended in the upstream direction.
50
REFERENCES
51
Chapter 4
52
4.1 VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION AND FLOW FORMULAE
fLV 2
(iii) h= Darey Weisbach Formula
8 Rg
V R
(iv) = 6.25 + 5.75log Logarithmic formula
V* Ks
53
37
1.0
H 1000
0.8 K 100
10
0.6
D
H
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
V
V mean
D = TOTAL DEPTH OF HEIGHT.
K = BOTTOM ROUGHNESS.
H = HEIGHT FROM BOTTOM ON A VERTICAL II
V = VELOCITY AT HEIGHT H.
V mean = MEAN VELOCITY OVER A VERTICAL
H. F. L.
P1 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 P
7
P3 P6
A1 A2
R1 = ; R2 = ; P2
P1 2 1 P2 2 1 P5
3 2 3 2 P4
R1 S R2 S
V1 = n1 ; V2 = n2
Q1 = A1 V1 ... Q2 = A2 V2
Q = SQn
Fig. 3.2 : Discharge computation for a river with
composite cross section
54
1/ 2
V R 1/ 6 C ⎡8⎤
= = 1/ 2 = ⎢ ⎥
V* n g ⎣f ⎦
wherein n, C and f are measures of boundary roughness in
Manning, Chezy and Darey Weisbach formulae.
55
head D and velocity head V2/2g also in m. Thus Ef equals
summation of D and V2/2g. When bridge waterway is constricted
by making the bridge narrower than the channel width, discharge
intensity q increases at the bridge section. Change in q brings
about corresponding changes in D and V but not in Ef. The
interrelationship amongst these parameters is depicted
graphically in Fig. 4.3 reproduced from Reference 4.1.
56
15.240 50
ENERGY
OF
FLOW CURVES
13.716 45
12.192 40
TH
10.668 35
EP
LD
ICA
RIT
2g
FC
2
Energy of flow Ef = D + V
9.144 30
SO
CU
40 LO
0
37
7.620 25 35
5
0
32
5
30
0
28
0
6.096 20 26
0
24
0
22
E
0
LIN
20
0
H
18
PT
0
DE
4.572 15 16
0
14
0
12
0
10
0
90
3.048 10 80
70 Cusecs/Cemecs Cusecs/Cemecs Cusecs/Cemecs
60
50 400 = 11.319 200 = 5.660 60 = 1.698
40 375 = 10.612 180 = 5.094 50 = 1.415
30 350 = 9.904 160 = 4.528 40 = 1.132
1.524 5 20 325 = 9.197 140 = 3.962 30 = 0.849
300 = 8.489 120 = 3.396 20 = 0.566
10 280 = 7.923 100 = 2.830 10 = 0.283
260 = 7.358 90 = 2.547 5 = 0.141
FT.
5
240 = 6.792 80 = 2.264 1 = 0.028
M.
1
220 = 6.225 70 = 1.981
0
0 FT. 5 10 15 20 25 30
Depth (D)
M. 1.524 3.048 4.572 6.096 7.620 9.144
Fig. 4.3 : Relationship between specific energy,
depth of flow and discharge intensity
57
4.2.2 Afflux on account of obstruction to flow
58
When the river carries a flashy flood, time may be
inadequate to develop full scour, even if the river is alluvial and
bed is scourable. Substantial afflux can then occur. Scour depth
and afflux for a flashy flood can be estimated by making
computations for progressive rise in flood discharge starting with
the lowest stage. Flood hydrograph is converted to a step
diagram, each step pertaining to a small rise in discharge obtained
for a specific duration. Smaller this specific duration, higher will
be the accuracy. For the first rise in discharge, afflux is initially
computed for no scour condition. Scour depth for increased
velocity is then estimated using any of the appropriate sediment
transport functions. Numerous such functions have been given
in Reference 4.7. Time available for scour is the time during
which, that particular discharge stage is experienced. This time
is woven in the method of estimation of the scour depth. With
this scour depth, the afflux is recomputed. By iteration process
the afflux and scour for the first rise in flood discharge is finalised.
Next rise in discharge is then considered. Entire flood hydrograph
is thus covered up to the peak point. Afflux and scour values
associated with the peak stage of a given design hydrograph
provide necessary design data. More detailed procedure is
explained in Reference 4.8.
59
wherein h is wave height in m, F is fetch in km and V is wind
velocity in km per hour.
4.5 CLEARANCE
Table 4.1
60
In case of arch bridges, minimum clearances measured
to the crow of the arch are indicated in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2
P = 4.836 Q1/2
R = 0.473 ()
Q
f
1/3
61
Bridge waterway is normally designed using Lacey
relationship P = 1.811 CQ1/2 allowing some deviation in the value
of C from 2.5 to 3.5 according to local conditions. The depth of
relationship D = 0.473 (Q/f)1/3 is employed for calculation of scour
depth at bridge piers or along guide bunds adopting multiplying
scour factors given in I.R. Substructure Code as given in Table
4.3.
Table 4.3
62
Table 4.4
63
D = 1.34 (q2/f)1/3
‘f’ being the Lacey silt factor. This formula can be reduced to
where ‘W’ is water surface width in m and ‘m’ the size of bed
material in mm. The semi-theoretical formula derived by Laursen
and Latishenkov curves in vogue in the U.S.S.R. have the same
form of equation as the Lacey D,q, f formula.
Important Conversions
In F.P.S. In Mks
K1S/ 6 K1S/ 6
n= (KS in ft) n= (KS in mm)
29.3 76.5
⎡ V2 ⎤ ⎡⎛ A ⎞2 ⎤ ⎡ V2 ⎤ ⎡⎛ A ⎞2 ⎤
h =⎢ + 0.05⎥X⎢⎜ ⎟ − 1⎥ h = ⎢ + 0.01524 ⎥X⎢⎜ ⎟ − 1⎥
⎣ 58.6 ⎦ ⎣⎝ a ⎠ ⎦ ⎣17.88 ⎦ ⎣⎝ a ⎠ ⎦
1/2 1/4
h = 0.17 (V . F) + 2.5 - (F) h = 0.0322 (V . F)1/2 + 0.76 – 89(F)1/4
1/2
P = 2.67 Q P = 4.836 Q1/2
1/3
R = 0.473 (Q/f) R = 0.473 (Q/f)1/3
2 1/3
D = 0.9(q /f) D = 1.34(q2/f)1/3
64
REFERENCES
65
Chapter 5
66
5.2 BRIDGE WATERWAY
W = 4.836 Q1/2
67
CHENAB RIVER
AT SHER SHAH
RAILWAY
CA
NA
L
AD
RO
68
5.3 GUIDE BUNDS
69
RIVER CURRENT
HIGH BANK
SHOAL
WORST POSSIBLE
EMBAYMENT
AXIS
RIVER CURRENT
HIGH BANK
WORST POSSIBLE
EMBAYMENT
SHOAL
AXIS
RIVER CURRENT
HIGH BANK
WORST POSSIBLE
EMBAYMENT
AXIS
(C) PARALLEL
70
in case of wide and shallow rivers to induce the flow to hug the
guide bunds better without separation all along their lengths as
shown in Fig. 5.1. Considering all the above shapes, in case of
alluvial rivers with sandy bed and meandering pattern, elliptical
shape appears preferable to minimise obliquity and separation
of flow. Straight parallel guide bunds with composite curve for
upstream heads have also been found to give optimum design
as in case of Mokameh bridge on Ganga river. In case of rivers in
submontane region, in rivers with bed material coarser than sand
size and in rivers with braided channel pattern, experience is
that nonsymmetrical guide bunds with different length· and shape
on left and right banks may be warranted on account of local
conditions and may be found to result in superior hydraulic
performance.
71
Fig. 5.3 : Velocity distribution in channelsof different
curvatures
Down Stream 1
/10 L to 1/5 L ¼ L for discharge 1
/5 to ¼ L for (ii) ‘L’ is length of
Length of 7086 to 21254 rivers in flood bridge between
m 3 /s plains and abutments.
longer as
3/8 L for equired for
discharge of rivers in
42507 to 70847 submontane
m 3 /s region.
72
Procedure advocated by Spring, Gales and U.P.I.R.I. for
determining length of guide bund to keep away the worst bend
forming in the river was to first ascertain dimensions of such a
bend obtaining in the river when a cut off occurs. Ratio of bend to
chord at this stage in lower Ganga river was found by Gales to
be 1.75. When such acute bends are not found in available
surveys, radius of worst loop can be estimated on basis of average
radius of existing bends. For each bend, the meander length ML
along valley and meander width MB across valley is measured.
Radius of curvature R can then be roughly worked out assuming
the meander shape to have formed of circular arc and using the
relationship.
120
0 885 m.
R
885 m.
AXIS OF
STRUCTURE
60 m.
1250 m.
73
Length of guide bund determined on basis of the above
two considerations of axial flow through the bridge and keeping
the worst bend away at a safe distance may still be found to be
inadequate to protect the long approaches in rivers having wide
khadirs. Such a situation may be met with more frequently in
case of braided rivers. Instead of elongating the guide bunds
further, it would be advisable in such rivers to provide additional
training works such as spurs, revetments etc. for protection of
approach banks.
Rc = 0.45 Pw
74
Table 5.2
75
Fig. 5.5 : Composite curve for guide bund head of
mokame bridge on Ganga river
76
Table 5.3
77
Radius of curvature arrived at using these relationships
for various discharges are given in Table 5.4.
Radius of Curvature Rc in
Discharge Q
Metres according to
m3/s
Spring Gales Garg
78
5.3.4 Protection for side slopes
Table 5.5
79
Table 5.6
Thickness of Stone and Soiling for Slope for Guide
Bunds According to Gales
Thickness of Ballast to be
soiling ballast 17.5 17.5 20.0 20.0 22.5 22.5 broken to
(cm) pass 6.25
cm ring
T = 0.06 Q1/3
()
1/3
Q
T=K F
80
81
Fig. 5.6 : Thickness of pitching recommended by Sethi
Table 5.7 : Thickness of stone pitching for shank according to Sethi
82
head.
4 14159 15 97.5 112.5
Use of 45 to 60 cm thick cement concrete slabs
on slopes supported by a suitable toe may be
5 28317 15 105 120
considered in place of pitching stone where
costs of the two arrangements compare
6 42475 22.5 105 127.5 favourably.
Thickness of stone pitching for U/S head above
7 56634 22.5 112.5 135 low water level should be same as that of shank.
For underwater slope, the thickness for U/S
8 70790 22.5 120 142.5 head should be 1.5 T.
Thickness for underwater slope was stipulated to be’
1.5 T for head and 1.33 T for the body and tail.
83
that of the stone and C1 and C2 are coefficients. Some such
relationships are presented in Table 5.8.
84
Table 5.8 : Relationships for Size and Weight of Stone
S.No. Relationship Relationship for Sponsoring Source Remarks
(1) for Size weight Agency (5) (6)
(2) (3) (4)
1. Vb = 5.95D1/2 W = 0.031 Vb6 U.S. Bureau of Adopted from the report of Sub- Relationship is for 2:1 side slope. T.V.A. adopted
(Vb is velocity Public Roads Committee on slope protection similar procedure vide reference 5.11. Depend-
in A.S.C.E., proceedings, ing on the severity of attack Vb is increased up
against stone) June, 1948 to 100 percent
W = 0.254 Vm6 U.S. Army Corps Relationship originally given in Relationship is for 2:1 side slope and derived
2. Vm = 4.2 D1/2 Ref. 5.12 is T=0.04 (rs-r) D50. from relationship in terms of T given for horizon-
of Engineers This was converted by author tal bottom.
85
(Vm is local
average velocity) as Vm= 4.9 D1/2 and then side
slope effect allowed for as sug-
gested in Reference 5.12 which
gave Vm= 4.2 D1/2 for 2:1 side
slope
The curve is given in Hydrau- Meant for protection of channel bottom and side
3. Vm = 5.65 D1/2 W = 0.043 Vm6 United States lic Design Criteria of U.S. wa- slopes down-stream of stilling basins and for
Bureau of ter-ways experiment station, in rock sizes for river closures. Vm in preference
Ref. 5.14, sheet 712-1.It ap- to Vb is recommended to be adopted to account
Reclamation proximates Isbash Curve with for indeterminate flow factors like obliquity of
curve. E = 0.86 attack, eddy action, etc. It nearly corres-ponds
to curve of Bureau of Public Roads with 1:1
side slope.
S.No. Relationship Relationship for Sponsoring Source Remarks
(1) for Size weight Agency (5) (6)
(2) (3) (4)
4. For SS 1:1 For SS 1:1 California Public IS : 8408-1976 and Draft of ‘Cri- The plots in figure 6 of IS 8408-1976 are based
Vm = 5.00 D1/2 W = 0.089 Vm6 Works Department. teria for Design of Guide Banks on the relationship
0.1136V6SS.Z
for Alluvial Streams’ prepared W=
For SS 2:1 For SS 2:1 by BDC.68 of I.S.I. (SS --1)3
Vm = 6.37 D1/2 W = 0.021 Vm6 wherein Z is Cosec3 (70O-a), Ss is specific
gravity of stone, a is angle in degrees of side
For SS 3:1 For SS 3:1 slope. This relationship was adopted from Cali-
fornia Public Works Department and shown
Vm = 6.81 D1/2 W = 0.014 Vm6 plotted in Fig.6 without giving relationship. They
are recommended by I.S.I for slope protection.
86
CPW Department recommends Vm to be in-
creased by 33% for very violent attack and
reduced by 33% for practically no attack.
S.No. Relationship Relationship for Sponsoring Source Remarks
(1) for Size weight Agency (5) (6)
(2) (3) (4)
5. Vm = 6.65 D1/2 for W = 0.0161 Vm6 ISI IS 8408-1976 and Draft of ‘Cri- ISI has recommended these relationships for
surrounded stone. for surrounded teria for design of Guide Banks apron protection. These two relationships are
Vm = 4.9 D1/2 for stone, for Alluvial Streams’ prepared shown plotted in Fig. 7 without giving relations.
isolated stone W = 0.1003 Vm6 by BDC 68 of ISI. They are supported by following relationships.
for isolated stone. V = 6.5 D1/2 - Garde, V = 6.8 D1/2 - Isbash for
For 40 kg stone For 40 kg stone surrounded stone and
6. and 3.5 m/s and V = 4.9 D1/2 - Isbash, V = 4.9 D1/2 - Berry,
velocity 3.5 m/s velocity
Vm = 6.32 D1/2 V = 4.8 D1/2 - Mavis Laushy for isolated
W = 0.0218 V6 stone.
87
For 70 kg stone
and 3.5 m/s For 70 kg stones
velocity 3.5 m/s velocity 40 to 70 kg stone of 0.3 to 0.4 m diameter is
Vm = 5.76 D1/2 Indian Practice IS 8408-1976
said to withstand velocities upto 3.5 m/s
Vm = 4.9 D1/2 W = 0.0381 V6
(SS = 2.65)
3:1
0.2 10
0.1
1.0
0.08
0.06
-1
0.04 10
0.03
0.7 1 2 4 6 8 10
VELOCITY m/s
1
0.8 103
S
0.6
NE
TO
0.4 102
NE
STONE DIAMETER m.
TO
TE
DS
LA
(SS = 2.65)
0.2
TE
SO
10
LA
RI
SO
FO
RI
0.1
1.0
FO
0.08
-0.06
-1
-0.04 10
-0.03
0.7 1 2 4 6 8 10
VELOCITY m/s
88
The weight of stone when isolated is thus nearly six
times the weight of surrounded stone. Instead of this extreme
factor of 6, if factor of 3 is used, the relationship of apron stone
worked out from relationship of slope stone would be
W = 3 X 0.04 V6 = 0.12 V6
or nearly W = 0.1 V6
or V = 4.9 D1/2
or D = 0.042 V2
89
5.3.5 Apron protection
D = 0.473 (Q/f)1/2
90
Table 5.9 : Estimation of Depth of Scour according to
Gales
91
D is Depth below H.F.L. and proposed to be estimated
using Lacey formula
D = 0.473 (Q/f)1/3
W = 4.836 QI/2
D = 1.34 (q2/f)1/3
D = 2.75 DLacey
92
"Bridge Sub-Structure Code" of Railways(5.10) specified
that depth of scour be estimated using the Lacey formula.
D = 0.473 (Q/f)1/3
93
Table 5.13 : Thickness of Launched Apron according to Gales
94
4 Addition at 11 and 22% for high 11 11 23 23
silt content
5 Addition at 22% for head 23 23 23
6 Total thickness of pitching 163 140 185 163 209 186
stone
7 Apron thickness = 1.5 times 245 210 278 245 315 278
thickness of pitching stone
over 2 horizontal : 1 Vertical
launched face
8 Berm thickness Same as apron Thickness
At curved heads, the apron launches on a conical surface.
Apron quantity is accordingly required to be increased suitably
as in Fig. 5.9.
2 3(
π r2 -- r2
2 )
5.3.5.4 Apron as laid
5.3.6.1 Necessity
Guide bunds are meant to confine and guide the river flow
through the structure without causing damage to it and its
95
approaches. They also prevent the out flanking of the structure.
96
For smaller rivers, one single radius is good enough. Forimportant
rivers, multi radii may beselected generally after model
studies for smoother flows
.
f) Top width of the shank of the guide bund should be wide
enough to permit plying of trucks and keeping reserve
boulders for maintenance. From this consideration top width
may be taken between 6m to 9m, and side slopes may be
taken as 2:1.
97
khadir of the river must be constructed in one go in one season.
In case this is not possible, at least, a wedge size equal to
angle of internal friction of the old construction should be
removed and the next construction should be done with
proper benching. For slope protection and apron, an overlap may
be provided.
i) Thickness of apron
98
kept as 1.5 times the differen ce between the deepest known
scour level and low water level.
5.3.6.4 Maintenance:
99
c) If slips and blow -outs in the bund occur due to a steep sub
soil water gradient resulting from a rapidly falling flood in the
river, the bank should be widened to reduce the hydraulic
gradient. This equally applies to marginal bunds.
5.4.1 Functions
5.4.2 Types
100
APRON
SLOPE
TOP
PLAN
F
HFL
R LWL
r1
AT BED LEVEL
r2 D
r3 SCOUREDBED
r4
SECTION
101
1.5 D
H.F.L.
T
F a 2.76 T R L.F.L.
GUIDE BANK
SECTION
D
PROBABLE SECTION OF
WORST ATTACK
ACCORDING TO SPRING
F = Free board.
R = Rise of flood.
D = Deepest known scour.
T = Thickness of slope stone.
Area of slope stone = 2.25 T (R+F) ie. T (R+F) Cosec a
Area of apron stone = 2.82 DT ie. TD Cosec a
Width of apron = 1.5 D.
Mean thickness of apron = 1.88 T.
Inside thickness of apron = T.
Outside thickness of apron = 2.76 T.
Inclination of slope stone = 2 to 1.
Desired inclination of apron stone = 2 to 1.
102
DESIGNED THICKNESS
OF DEVELOPED APRON
PERMANENT SLOPE BERM APRON 1.5 D
E H.F.L.
P
LO R R1
C KS 1.5T1
BA T2 INCLINA- D3
T S C
GUIDE BANK TION
1 D1
SECTION T1 1 IN D D2
2
PROSPECTIVE SLOPE 1 IN 2
LENGTH OF SLOPE 2.24 D
DEEPEST KNOWN SCOUR + ALLOWANCE
ACCORDING TO GALES
F = Free board.
R = Rise of flood above bottom of apron.
D = Depth of scour for calculation of apron stone.
T = Thickness of permanent slope stone.
S = Thickness of soling.
T2 = Thickness of covering T + S.
C = Thickness of clay covering.
T1 = Thickness of stone on prospective slope
bottom of apron.
W = Width of berm = 15 for class A Rivers.
= 20 for class B Rivers and
= 25 for class C Rivers.
Area of permanent stone = 2.24 (R+F)
Area of prospective slope stone = 2.24 D x T1
Area of berm stone = W x 1.5 T1
Width of apron = 1.5 D.
Thickness of apron = 1.5 T1.
Area of apron stone = 1.5 D x 1.5 T1
In construction abrupt changes in the width of the
apron should be avoided.
Back slope to be suitably protected by stone
pitching or grass.
REFERENCES :
Class A Rivers - Q between 2.5 and 7.5 lakh Cs.
Class B Rivers - Q between 7.5 and 15 lakh Cs.
Class C Rivers - Q between 15 and 25 lakh Cs.
103
Impermeable spurs are made of solid core with exposed faces
protected by pitching. Such spurs can withstand severe river
attack better than permeable spurs. Deposition occurs on the
downstream side of the spur due to material scoured from the
nose and the high velocity current gets deflected away. Solid
spurs are accordingly provided where attack of flood flow is to be
diverted. According to height, the spurs are classified as full height
spurs when their top level is designed to remain above the highest
flood level. On the other band, when top level is lower than the
high flood level, spurs get occasionally submerged. Such spurs
are called part height spurs. Short submerged spurs with height
not exceeding 3 m or so when suitably aligned with respect to
flow direction are effective in protecting the bank and are termed
as bed bars. Another scheme of classification is according to
orientation of the spur. Spurs may be aligned with respect to the
flow direction, facing either upstream, normal or downstream.
Spurs facing upstream are termed deflecting or repelling whereas
spurs facing downstream are called attracting spurs. The term
attracting is used in a restrictive sense. Attracting action of the
spur can only be limited and that too under favourable conditions.
Spurs aligned normal to direction of flow are called normal spurs.
According to the shape of the spur head, the spur is termed a
T-headed spur, a hockey stick spur, a curved headed spur or a
round nosed spur. Material of construction is still another criterion
used in differentiation of spurs. Spurs may be either stone spurs,
brick spurs, bally pile spurs, spurs constructed of stone crate,
concrete blocks or trees.
5.4.3 Location
104
5.4.4 Length, spacing, inclination and height
105
form. The length of bank protected on upstream is shorter but on
the downstream, protected length measured from the point of
the junction of the spur with the bank is increased. When a battery
of spurs is provided, the first spur has to take brunt of the attack
and this spur is often oriented facing downstream. Rest of the
spurs are made either normal or facing a little upstream. The
angle of spurs to the flow direction in case of upstream or
downstream facing spurs is ordinarily limited to 20 degrees with
respect to normal, upstream inclination being favoured especially
in curved reaches.
Spurs are normally made full height with top level above
design high flood level providing· an adequate freeboard. When
high ground to tie the spur is not available within a reasonable
distance, the top level of the spur can be same as the bank level,
special care being taken in this case to prevent outflanking by
breach near the bank. Downstream face of the spur and the
riverbank in the vicinity of the spur need adequate protection.
Partial height spurs have been used with success in some
countries. Normally, however, full height spurs are preferred.
106
5.4.6 Provisions as contained in IRBM para 811 with
regards to Spurs/Groynes
iii) Spurs are also classified as full height spurs and part
height spurs. Where top level is higher than HFL, it is called a
full height spur.
107
armoured to hold the river at a distance. A series of such spurs/
groynes correctly positioned can hold the river at a position away
from the point intended to be protected. The edge of the "T”
head should be curved somewhat in the manner of a guide bund
to avoid swirls.
108
Guidelines) and IRC:89-1997 (Guidelines for Design and
Construction of River Training and Control Works for Road
Bridges).
109
structures.
iii) According to the conditions encountered, namely,
submerged and non-submerged.
iv) According to the type of structure provided, namely,
spur type, screen type or dampeners (revetment)
type.
110
15cm to 25cm are used for the bally structures. Normally, the
larger girth of 20cm to 25cm is used for the main members,
whereas, the smaller girth of 15cm to 20cm is used for
bracings. Generally, 4 to 5 strands of 4mm GI wire are used for
interconnecting porcupines, cribs, and anchor them to the ground.
Ballies driven into the ground upto a depth of 2m are
treated as anchor. Concrete anchors have an anchor rod of
size 32-36mm, well embedded in concrete cube. Wire crate
anchors are of size 1.5m x 1.5m x1.5m, made up of thick
wires and filled with stones or bricks. A concrete block is
casted with bolt and is included in the wire crate anchor. In
case of emergencies, tie wires are joined directly to the wires
of the crates.
111
of cribs are normally used in a permeable screen.
One screen is normally provided at the entrance
of the bypass or secondary channel. The second
screen is provided at a distance of 1 to 1.5 times
width of the screen and is extended on both the
banks for a length one third of the channel width.
112
by the high flood level, which is further raised by the approach
velocity. On the downstream side, the water level may be very
low. Under these conditions, the approach bank has to withstand
high differential head. Rapid draw-down during falling flood can
create further, instability in the approach bank. Nature of
foundation, material used in forming the approach bank, cross
section and protection on side and at toe are important aspects
governing stability of an approach bank. Cross section of the
bank and surface protection are accordingly designed considering
foundation strata, engineering properties of the soil forming the
bank and the hydraulic conditions which the bank has to
withstand. Necessary precautions are required to be taken, in
consonance with prevailing conditions. For instance, in order to
discourage formation of rat holes, inverted filter and suitable other
means may have to be resorted to.
113
iii) In the case of bridges with insufficient water way.
iv) The wave action on the approach bank of bridges
situated in a lake/large tank bed may have a detrimental
effect.
In all the above cases the pitching of the approach bank up to
HFL with sufficient free board is an effective solution. Provision
of toe wall and narrow apron in some cases will also be useful.
2. If deep borrow pits are dug near the toe of approach banks,
the water flows through these pits and forms a gradually
deepening water course which may eventually threaten the
safety of the approach bank. In this case it will be useful to put
rubble “T” spurs across the flow to reduce the velocity and
expedite silting of the course.
114
Effect of marginal or flood embankments is to restrict
the spill discharge and divert it to the main channel. Discharge
intensity in the river channel is accordingly increased which
improves its sediment transporting capacity. The riverbed is,
therefore, normally lowered. Such a lowering is however not
reflected in flood levels since confinement for spill flow results in
boosting up of water level as is exemplified in case of the
Mississippi river. If the river is initially of aggrading type
construction of flood embankments may not be effective in
neutralising this tendency and the river may continue to aggrade
though at a slower rate.
115
thus tends to pin down the channel position which may not be
desirable under certain conditions. Secondly the eroding current
brushes past the pavement and is not diverted away from the
bank as in case of spurs.
116
assessed. Stability of pitching depends on provision of well-
designed filter below it. All these aspects have been previously
dealt with under slope and apron protection for guide bunds.
117
Artificial cut offs across hairpin bends are quite useful
as a flood control measure. Consequent upon making a cut off,
the river slope on the upstream steepens, velocities increase,
bed scours and flood levels are lowered. In the Mississippi lowering
of flood levels by 1 to 2 m is achieved by means of cut offs.
Increase in velocity, however, results in accelerated bank erosion
and consequent change in shape and position of other existing
meanders on the upstream and bank protective measures are,
therefore, simultaneously warranted.
118
5.9 PROTECTION FOR SHALLOW PIERS
119
Landslips are common and hence precautionary
measures for efficient drainage and stability of bank slopes are
warranted.
REFERENCES
5.1 Spring, F.J.E. 'River training and control on guide bank
system', Technical Paper No. 153, Government. of India,
1903.
5.2 Gales, R., 'The principles of river training for the railway
bridges and their application to the case of Hardinge
bridge over the lower Ganges at Sara', Journal of the
Institution of Civil Engineers, December 1938, Paper
No. 5167.
5.3 Lacey, G., Stable channels in alluvium', Paper No. 4736,
minutes of proceedings of the Institution of Civil
Engineers, Volume.229, January 1930.
5.4 Sethi, H. K. L, ''River training and control for bridges"
Technical Paper, Research Designs and Standards
Organisation, Lucknow - 1960.
5.5 'Report of the Committee of Engineers, Government of
India, Ministry of Railways, October 1959.
5.6 Sharma, H. D., Goel, P. K., Singh, V. K., 'Elliptical guide
bunds', Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India)
120
March, 1976. Vol. 56, part C 15.
5.7 Garg, S. P., Asthana, B. N., Jain, S. K., 'River training
at bridges and barrages,' Journal of the Institution of
Engineers (India), Volume 51, May 1971.
5.8 Chitale, S. V., 'Radius of curved heads of banks', Irrigation
and power, Journal Central Board of Irrigation Power,
India, Vol. 37, No.4, October 1980.
5.9 Inglis, C. C., 'The behaviour and control of rivers and
canals', Research publication No. 13, Central water,
Irrigation and Navigation Research Station, Poona, India,
1949.
5.10 'Indian Railway Standard Code of practice for the design
of Sub-structures of bridges (Bridge Sub-structure Code)'
Ministry of Railway, Railway Board, Government of India,
New Delhi, Revised 1985.
5.11 "Use of rip rap for bank protection", Hydraulic
Engineering Circular No. 11, June 1967, U.S. Dept. of
Transportation, Bureau of Public Roads, Federal
Highway Administration.
5.12 "Hydraulic Design of flood control channel", Engineer
Manual, 1st July, 1970, Department of the Army, U. S.
Army Corps of Engineers.
5.13 "Hydraulic Designs of Spillways", Engineer Manual, 31st
March, 1965, Department of the Army, U. S. Army Corps
of Engineers.
5.14 "Hydraulic Design Criteria", Sheets 712-1, U.S. Water-
ways Experiment Station Vicksberg, Mississippi, U.S.A.
5.15 Koerner, R. M. and Welsh, J. P., "Construction and
geotechnical engineering using synthetic fabrics", A
volume in the Wiley Series of Practical Construction
Guides, Editor Morris M. D., Wiley Inter Science
Publication, New York, U.S.A., 1980.
121
Chapter 6
Where such Stream flow records exist for less than the desired
recurrence interval but sufficient for the statistical analysis, design
discharge may be: Computed statistically for the desired
recurrence interval
123
iii) For locations, where existing bridges are less than 50 years
old and there is no past history of incidents of over flow/washout/
excessive scour etc.: The water way may be judiciously decided
after calculation of design discharge and keeping in view the
waterway of existing bridges on adjacent locations on the same
river (Para 4.5.7of SSC)
124
Table 6.1 : Foundation Design Discharge (Q f )with
Percentage Increase to Waterway Design Discharge (Q50)
When the river flows between high banks and the whole
width is actively functioning during high floods, the bridge waterway
should practically be equal to the spread between stable banks
at the design flood level. This practice may be followed even if
such a river slightly overtops the banks during extraordinary
floods. These conditions may normally be met with in incised
rivers and in upland reaches in river gorges.
P = W = 4.836 Q1/2
125
effective waterway for bridges on alluvial rivers should normally
be equal to width given by the Lacey formula.
P = 1.811 CQ1/2
126
affect the prevailing tidal pattern and cause deterioration by silting.
The possibility of constriction of a tidal waterway should, therefore,
be viewed from all angles including tidal regime, navigation
requirements, effect of salinity, etc.
127
Fig. 6.1 : Elliptical shape of guide bunds
W (CM/SEC.)
0.01 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 2 4 68 10 20 40 60
10 10
8 8
6 6
4 4
0 0
2 2
1 1
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
D
0.4 0.4
(MM) T = 320 F 0
60 F
0.2 0.2
0.1 1000 F 0.1
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.01 0.02 0.04 0.060.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 2 4 6 8 10 20 40 60
D = DIAMETER OF SEDIMENT GRAIN (MM.)
W = SETTLING VELOCITY (CM./SEC.)
Fig. 6.2 : Settling velocity of sediment grains of
different sizes
128
On the other hand if constriction is small on one or both
sides and exposed length of approach is accordingly short, guide
bund of length smaller than the length of the bridge may be found
adequate to ensure safety of the approach from worst loop and
also to guide flow smoothly without separation, obliquity and
with optimum uniform discharge distribution across the bridge.
Shorter length than bridge length for the guide bund is considered
permissible under these conditions.
129
(iii) Side Slopes
(iv) Material
0.71 Vaverage
Vbottom = ———————————
0.68 Log y/D50 + 0.71
130
wherein y is the flow depth in m and D50 is also in m. Adoption of
average velocity in place of bottom velocity introduces a certain
factor of safety.
K = 102.5 K
w
0.672 w _ 62.5
wherein Kw is the size in m with weight of stone of w
(kg/m3) and K is the stone size in m with weight of 2645 kg/m3.
131
(vi) Thickness of pitching
3k 100
2k 80
1k 50
0.1 k not to exceed 10
132
Thickness of such graded stone protection should be
2D50 max or 1.5D100 max whichever results in greater thickness.
Thickness should not be less than 1.5 D50 and not less than 31
cm.
W = 0.10 V6
(ii) Thickness
133
(iv) Quantity of apron stone
D = c x 1.34 ( )
q
f
[ ][ ]
2/3
Width of unconstricted Discharge of
Depth within channel excluding spill channel plus
guide bunds portion spills
————— = —————————— X ———————
Depth of Width within guide bunds Discharge of
unconstricted channel
discharge
wherein
134
bed material in still water, which can be estimated from curves in
Fig. 6.2.
6.4.2 Location
135
Fig. 6.3 : Apron design features
136
if available, should be superimposed to demarcate the eroding
reach. In bend flow, more vulnerable portion of bank to erosion is
generally at the downstream end of the bend.
137
Table 6.2
Length of spur to
Thickness of be provided with
Location pitching T metres pitching of thick-
or fraction of T ness in Col.2
1 2 3
Nose T Whole
2/3 T Next 31 to 46 m
2/3 T First 31 to 61 m
Downstream side
of shank Nominal or Nil Rest depending on
action of return flow
Graded filter 20 to 30 cm thick satisfying standard design
criteria should be provided at the nose, and over the shank. When
thickness of pitching is kept nominal, thickness of filter can be
reduced to 15 cm or it can be omitted considering likelihood of
parallel flow and its action.
Apron of standard design as in case of guide bunds
should be provided for protection of scoured face down the entire
depth of scour hole.
138
Table 6.3 : Scour Factors for Apron Design in case of Spurs
(A) According to Indian Standard Specifications
Sr.No. Location Scour Factor
(i) Nose 2.0 to 2.5
(ii) Transition from nose to 1.5
shank and first 30 m to 61 m
on upstream
(iii) Next 31 m to 61 m on upstream 1.0
(iv) Transition from nose to shank 1.0
and first 15 m to 30 m
on downstream
(i) Nose
For spur facing D/S at 30o to bank line 1.5
For spur facing D/S at 60 to bank line
o
2.0
For spur at 90 to bank line
o
2.5
For spur facing U/S at 30 to bank line
o
3.0
(ii) Shank
For spur facing D/S at 30o to bank line
On U/S face over length 0.85 L 1.0
On D/S face over length 0.30 L 1.0
For spur facing D/S at 60o to bank line
On U/S face over length 0.80 L 1.0
On D/S face over length 0.40 L 1.0
For spur at 90o to bank line
On U/S face over length 0.70 L 1.0
On D/S face over length 0.50 L 1.0
For spur facing U/S at 30o to bank line
On U/S face over length 0.60 L 1.0
On D/S face over length 0.72 L 1.0
139
Note :-
(a) Scour factor is defined as scoured depth below
H.F.L. divided by Lacey depth below H.F.L.
(b) L is the projected length of an inclined spur given
by actual length x sine of angle with respect to
bank line.
(c) Out of the apron designs worked out according
to A and B above, heavier of the two may be
adopted.
1. Laursen(6.9) L d ⎡⎛ 1 d s 1.7 ⎞ ⎤
= 2.75 s ⎢⎜ . + 1 ⎟ − 1⎥
D D ⎣⎝11.5 D ⎠ ⎦
0.4
2. Liu(6.14) ds ⎡L⎤
= 1.1⎢ ⎥ Fr 0.33
D ⎣D⎦
Recommended by Richardson(6.15)
L
< 25
D
3. For spurs in ds
the Missis- = 4.0Fr 0.33
D
sippi river with
Recommended by Richardson(6.15)
large L/D ratio
L
for > 25
D
For arriving at scour depth with spurs making different
angles with flow direction, multiplying factors are used.
Note :- In the above formulae :
dS is equilibrium scour depth below mean bed level, D is upstream
depth flow, Fr is upstream Froude Number ⎛⎜ V ⎞⎟ and L is
⎜ ⎟
effective or projected spur length. ⎝ gD ⎠
140
Thickness of apron should be 25 to 50 percent more
than thickness of pitching on slope.
141
Fig. 6.4 : Design of impermeable spur
142
adequate cover. As an approximation it may be assumed as a
straight line with slopes of 1: 1 in impervious clay varying to 1: 12
in sandy soil. For ordinary clay the gradient is about 1 in 4. The
cover over hydraulic gradient line should be 0.9 to 1.2 m along
slope and about 0.6 m along ground.
143
When bridge approaches obstruct spill discharge and
guide bunds are not provided, deep scour holes can be formed at
abutments. Estimation of scour depth and protection at the
abutments for slope and for toe in the form of apron may be
similar to that in case of spurs.
[ ]
estimated also on basis of flow depths using the expression
2/3
V at eroding bank Flow depth at eroding bank
—————————— = —————————————
V of cross section Average flow depth of the cross
mean
section
145
Pattern of channel Increase in flow
depth below
High Flood Level
i) Straight reach …1.25 x normal flood depth
ii) Moderate Bend … 1.50 x normal flood depth
iii) Severe bend … 1.75 x normal flood depth
iv) Right angled bend … 2.0 x normal flood depth
146
the original. Thus in effect river attains a somewhat steeper slope
and generates higher velocities. Bank protection is, therefore,
usually needed at and in the vicinity of a cut off to prevent side
erosion. Otherwise new bends may form in the wake of a cut off
as was experienced in the Mississippi River(6.7). Superimposition
of the expected longitudinal section with cut off over the existing
section permits a rough assessment of possible degradation and
aggradation. Such an attempt should be made to estimate the
final bed and water levels and lengths likely to be affected by the
cut off.
D = 0.473 (Q/f)1/3
147
123 M
{
0 DE A 0
EP 3.05 GREATEST DEPTH OF
ES 6.09 PIER IN WATER AS
TA 9.14
SC 12.19 MEASURED BELOW
OA REPRESENTS HIGHEST ER 15.24 HIGHEST FLOOD.
DE
KNOWN FLOOD LEVEL TA
INA 18.29
PT
BL 21.34
HO
OB REPRESENTS HIGHEST ES 24.38
CO 27.43
FB
{
KNOWN FLOOD LEVEL UR 30.48
OT
33.53 LEAST DEPTH OF
TO
OB REPRESENTS DEPTH 36.58 PIER IN THE SOIL
M
39.62
TO WHICH FOUNDATIONS OR BELOW GREATEST
OF
B 42.67
SHOULD BE SUNK. PROBABLE SCOUR.
FO
45.72
UN
48.77
TI
DA
51.82
ON 54.86
S 57.91
C 60.96
NOTE :
148
The pier scour in IRC code is assumed to be double the
normal depth of flow given by Lacey formula
D = 1.34 (q2/f)1/3
Design Data
Alternative (B) –
D = 0.473 (Q/f)1/3
150
Table 'A' : Scour level computations for bed material sizes given in Alternative (A)
S. Elevation Value Value of 'f' D Lacey Scour Level Whether Remarks Estimated
No. of 'm' f = 1.76m½ D=0.473 Q 1/3 HFL-2D Lacey estimated scour scour level
( )
f level is higher to be finally
than, equal to or adopted
lower than level
corresponding to
'm'
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1. From 100 to 98 m 0.32 mm 1.00 5.45 m 107.00 - 10.90 Lower Scour level
151
= 96.10 m will be below
RL 98 m
2. From 98 m to 97.2 m 0.50 mm 1.25 5.00 m 107.00 - 10.00 Nearly equal Scour will Scoured
= 97.00 m continue to level
RL 97.2 m will be
RL 97.2 m
3. From 97.2 m to 90 m 0.70 mm 1.47 4.77 m 107.00 - 9.54 Higher Scour will
= 97.46 m not proceed
below
RL 97.2 m
Table 'B' : Scour level computations for bed material sizes given in Alternative (B)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1. From 100 to 98 m 0.50 mm 1.25 5.00 m 107.00 - 10.00 Lower Scour level
= 97.00 m will be lower
than
RL 98.00 m
2. From 98 m to 96.2 m 0.32 mm 1.00 5.45 m 107.00 - 10.90 Nearly equal Scour will Scoured
= 96.10 m continue to level
RL 96.10 m will be
RL 96.00 m
152
3. From 96.2 m to 90 m 0.20 mm 0.835 5.5 m 107.00 - 11.00 Higher Scour will
= 96.00 m cease at
RL 96.0 m
d s ⎡⎛ 1 d s ⎞ ⎤
1.7
b
= 5.5 ⎢⎜ + 1⎟ − 1⎥
D D ⎣⎝11.5 D ⎠ ⎦
River bed surveys are usually made when river flows are
low. During floods river bed may be lowered due to scour. For
estimation of flood scour, riverbed is required to be gauged on
the bridge section line at various flood stages and flood scour
estimated by extrapolation of this data of intermediate floods to
design flood stage.
153
(iii) Scour due to constriction
155
Laursen opined that some of the assumptions made in
evolving the above relationship were rather bold. In the absence
of any better approach, the Laursen relationship is, however,
considered to provide at least some indication of the extent of
scour in cohesive materials. Considerable judgement and caution
are accordingly required to be exercised while extending the
concept of clear water scour to scour in clayey bed as observed
in Reference 6.19.
156
account of pitching round the piers. Sufficient quantity of stone
needs to be provided under such conditions to cater for full
estimated scour depth on downstream side.
Minor Bridges:
157
Major/Important Bridges:
(i) For bridge design and training works, river plan extending
at least one meander length both on upstream and downstream
showing low water channel, high flood channel boundaries and
extent of overbank flooding with corresponding discharges and
water levels.
158
form, cut offs or to develop nodal points. Stability of the river in
plan can be examined with the help of such plan.
159
REFERENCES
160
6.11 Preusers, H.N.C.’Scour around drilling platforms,’
Bulletin, Hydraulic Research 1964 and 1965, International
Association for Hydraulic Research, Volume 19.
6.16 Shen, H.W., Schneider V.R., and Koraki S., ‘Local scour
arourid bridge piers’, Joumal of Hydraulics Division
A.S.C.E., Nov. 1969. oages 1919-1940.
161
Chapter 7
162
7.1 FUNCTION
7.2 CLASSIFICATION
163
The permeable structures are made up of different types
of smaller units called as elements. Many elements, made up of
bamboos, ballies, RCC poles, etc are arranged in specific pattern
and linked together to form a permeable structure.
7.3.1 ELEMENTS
164
Photo 7.1 (A) : Typical Bamboo Porcupine
165
Photo 7.2 (A) Bamboo crib constructed at site
166
c. Bally frames - Permeable bally structures are made up
of main skeleton of large bamboos or ballies. Cross ballies are
used for stability of the structure. Photo 7.3 shows bally frame
structure constructed at site, projecting from the bank into the
river.
167
7.3.2 Construction material
168
for impermeable stone spurs are followed for permeable spurs
also.
The material like trees, bushes and willows are used for
construction of spurs and dampeners, particularly during flood
emergencies.
169
length. Projection of the spurs into the river channel is normally
11 % to 15 %. Three spurs are provided for a specific reach to be
protected. A single permeable spur is generally not found effective.
Alignment of spurs is kept pointing towards upstream with
reference to the flow.
170
For depth of flow up to 3 m, two rows of porcupines are
laid along the bank on either side of the toe as dampners. For
more depth, numbers of rows are increased.
171
The elements are tied to each other by wire ropes. The
tie ropes are duly anchored to the bank and at the nose with the
help of suitable anchor or anchor blocks. Intermediate anchors
are also provided at an interval of 15 m to 20 m along the length
of the structure on the upstream side.
7.7 MISCELLANEOUS
172
and sedimentation device. The RCC porcupines are able to
withstand higher velocities. They also have longer life than the
bamboo structure. Fig 7.7(A) shows a sketch of typical RCC
porcupine. Photo 7.7(B) shows photograph of RCC porcupine
laid at site. Photo 7.7(C) shows the porcupines laid across a
large channel to induce sedimentation.
173
Chapter 8
174
material is normally very uniform in size.
There are two types of filters in use. (a) Graded filter and
(b) geotextile filter
175
etc. Bridge engineers are suggested to use the IS code No 9429
for the design of graded filters. Due to high flexibility available in
the design, each case is normally tackled separately.
D50 (filter)
------------------- < 40
D50 (sub-soil)
D15 (filter)
5 < ------------------- < 40
D15 (sub-soil)
D15 (filter)
------------------- < 5
D85 (sub-soil)
176
Geotextiles are textile fabrics, made up of polymers,
and are permeable to water. The fine holes or pores in the
geotextile allow the fluids to flow. Due to tensile and warp strength
of the geotextile, geofabric filter has an advantage In case of
uneven settlement of small magnitude. However, in case of
significant settlements, damage to the filter is certain. Any type
of damage to the filter is difficult to repair.
When the soil particle size is very fine, the pore size,
worked out by designs, can be less than that provided by the
weaving system. In such cases, non-woven geotextile is used.
The non-woven textile is made up of fine and long filaments or
fibers of different lengths. The material is laid in specific thickness
and are "needle punched" to mix them thoroughly and form a
177
fully interlaced layer and pressed to form a textile of uniform
thickness. A strong bond between the fibers is formed in the
process.
8.4.1 Properties
178
8.4.2 Design criteria
(b) For bed material containing at least 50% but not more
than 85% fines by weight, the equivalent opening size of filter
should not be smaller than sieve No.100 (0.149 mm) and should
not be larger than sieve no.70 (0.211 mm).
179
Photo 8.2 (A) : Showing geo-fabric being laid below the
slope pitching
Photo 8.2 (B) Geofabric filter being laid below the stone
pitching. Cushion of sand is laid before spreading the
geofabric filter.
180
REFERENCES
181
Chapter 9
HYDRAULIC MODELLING
182
With turbulent flow in channels, gravity force
predominates. Ignoring other forces and applying the above
conditions, it is then found that the Froude Number (Fr) equal
to V/(gL)1/2 should be the same in model and prototype
wherein V is the mean velocity, g is the gravitational
acceleration and the L the length parameter. In laminar flow
phenomenon, the viscous flow predominates and the
conditions obtained is that Reynolds Number R equal to VL/
v wherein v is the kinematic viscosity should be the same.
Surface tension achieves importance in certain situations
such as weir flow with smalI depths. The condition that then
emerges is equality of Weber Number (W) given by
V2 (σ l δL). In this σ is the surface tension and δ the density.
In water hammer problems elastic compression is an
important force. Couchy Number C equal to V/(K / δ)l/2 should
then be same in model and prototype in which K is the bulk
modulus of elasticity. Each of the variables in above
quantities should have same basic fundamental dimensions
of length, time and mass / force so that the number (Froude,
Reynolds, etc.) is dimensionless.
183
model. The scale of boundary friction in this case works out
to be such that model is required to be made smoother than
the prototype.
184
local scour, channel pattern(9.4) etc. Vertical exaggeration in
river models normally found suitable on basis of above
conditions is about 3 to 5.
185
phenomenon is conceived, model experiments can be
programmed and conducted to determine the coefficients and
indices entering into this relationship.
9.6.1 General
186
Positions of sections and their zero chainages
should be shown on the plan. The levels should be close
enough to enable demarcating deep and shallow portions of
the channels but can be wide apart where variations in levels
are gradual.
187
should be observed near bed level, at mid depth and
near H.F.L. on bridge line.
REFERENCES
188
Pune’. Annual Report (Technical), 1945, pp 88-116.
189
Chapter 10
190
there is some overlap of the successive gauges. In order to obtain
more accuracy, gauges can also be fixed sloping if site conditions
permit.
191
10.1.3 Crest gauges
192
Fig. 10.1 : Staff - in - pipe type crest - stage gauge
193
Fig. 10.1 A : Crest gauge
194
normally made at the same time and on the same verticals used
for depth measurements. It is considered safe to normally use
25 equidistant verticals for depth and velocity observations. In
the case of a river, the following values of relative errors at 68%
confidence limit are given for progressively reduced number of
verticals.
195
196
Fig. 10.2 : Pivot point layout
deflection on the suspension line from true vertical in bigger depths
and higher velocities. The conventional air and wet line corrections
are then applied.
197
A
L1
L1
SOUNDING LINE
C
K L = AIR LINE CORRECTION
B a
D
L2 CURRENT L2
KL
W WET LINE CORRECTION
RIVER BED E
G
K La = (Seca - 1) L1
198
o
Significant errors may result if the vertical angle is more
than 30 .
199
and 75 seconds with spring contact is ensured. Under ideal
conditions the cup type meter is expected to give accuracy up
to 98 percent.
200
While measuring discharge from the bridge, according
to Research, Designs and Standards Organisation, the number
of verticals should be as indicated below:
201
estimated on basis of depth of scour assuming angle of repose
of sand as 2 horizontal to 1 vertical.
202
Table 10.2 : Values of Rugosity Coefficient n for open
channels with Relatively Coarse Bed Material
not characterized by Bed Form
203
(2) Cultivated area
(i) No crop 0.020 to 0.040
(ii) Mature raw crops 0.025 to 0.045
(iii) Mature field crops 0.030 to 0.050
(3) Brush
(i) Scattered brush, 0.035 to 0.070
heavy weeds
(ii) Light brush and trees 0.035 to 0.060
(without foliage)
(iii) Light brush and trees 0.040 to 0.080
(with foliage)
(iv) Medium to dense brush 0.045 to 0.110
(without foliage)
(b) Medium to dense brush 0.070 to 0.160
(with foliage)
(4) Trees
(i) Cleared land with 0.030 to 0.050
tree stumps, no sprouts
(ii) Same as above but with 0.050 to 0.080
heavy growth of sprouts
(iii) Heavy stand of timber, 0.080 to 0.120
a few down trees, little
under growth flood stage
below branches
(iv) Same as above but with 0.100 to 0.160
flood stage reaching
branches
(v) Dense willows, straight 0.100 to 0.200
204
Besides the site requirements mentioned in connection
with Velocity Area method, the following additional requirements
are required to be satisfied in adopting the method of Stage
Discharge relationship.
205
The value of Go is determined by using the relation
G1G3 − G22
GO =
G1 + G3 − 2G 2
Wherein G1, G2 and G3 are the three gauge heights
corresponding to three discharges Q1, Q2 and Q3 which are
selected in geometric progression. Alternatively the standard
graphical method can be used.
206
1
⎛ 1 dh ⎞ 2
Q = Q O ⎜1 + . ⎟
⎝ SO VW dt ⎠
207
sudden injection method and the latter constant injection method.
The apparatus and chemical to be used, specifications of
techniques of injection, sampling and also the methods of
analysis are covered in reference number 10.25.
208
specially for metering the water supplies. Rigid specifications
about their shapes and approach and exit conditions, locations
and method of measuring water levels, formulae and coefficients
to be used are then required to be followed. Reference numbers,
10.2, 10.8, 10.18, 10.19, 10.20 and 10.21 deal exhaustively with
standard notches, weirs, flumes, falls, drops, orifices, nozzles,
ventury etc.
REFERENCES
209
10.11 IS: 3910 - 1992, Indian Standard - Requirements for water
flow current meters. Measurements in open channels
rotati'lJ elements.
10.12 IS: 3911 - 1994, Indian Standard - Surface, floats,
functional requirements.
10.13 IS : 3912 - 1993, Indian Standard - Sounding rods
functional requirements.
10.14 IS: 4073 - 1967, Indian Standard - Specification for fish
weights, June 1967.
10.15. IS: 4080 - 1994, Indian Standard - Specification for vertical
staff gauges - functional requirements.
10.16 IS: 4858 - 1968, Indian Standard - Specification for velocity
rods.
10.17 IS : 6064 - 1971, Indian Standard - Specification for
sounding and suspension equipment, December 1971.
10.18 IS: 6063 - 1971, Indian Standard - Method of
measurement of flow ·of water in open channels using
standing wave flume, November 1971.
10.19 IS: 6062 - 1971, Indian Standard - Method of
measurement of flow of water in open channels using
standing wave flume fall, November 1971.
10.20 IS: 6059 - 1971, Indian Standard - Recommendations
for liquid flow measurement in open channels by weirs
and flumes - weirs of finite crest width for free discharge,
September 1971.
10.21 IS: 6330-1971, Indian Standard - Recommendation for.
liquid flow measurement in open channels by weirs and
flumes - End depth method for estimation of flow in
rectangular channels with a free overfall (Approximate
method), December 1971.
10.22 IS: 9117-1979, Indian Standard - Recommendation for
liquid flow measurement in open channels by weirs and
f1umesEnd depth method for estimation of flow in non
rectangular channels with free overfall (Approximate
method).
10.23 IS: 9108-1979, Indian Standard-Liquid flow
measurements in open channels using thin plate weirs.
210
10.24 IS : 9116-1979, Indian Standard -Water Stage recorder
(Float type)
10.25 IS: 9163 (Part I) - 1979, Indian Standard - Dilution
methods for measurement of steady flow; Part I -
Constant rate injection method.
10.26 Hiranandani: M. G. and Chitale, S. V. 'Stream Gauging',
Second edition, Central Water and Power Research
Station, Pune, 1964.
10.27 World Meteorological Organisation, 'Manual of Stream
Gauging', Volume I 'Field Work'; Volume 1I,'Computation
of Discharge', Operational Hydrology Report No. 13,
WMO-No. 519, 1980.
211
Chapter 11
MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
Rapid development is taking place in recent years in the
field of Mathematical modeling in the advanced hydraulics
laboratories in the world. The development is aimed at the
simulation of water and sediment flows; transport and dispersion
of pollutants in open channels and in wide shallow water bodies
using the digital computers.
212
While adopting the mathematical modeling technique,
the original system of mathematical equations is simplified
keeping in view the desired objectives. The terms playing
insignificant contribution to the flow phenomena are neglected
and a satisfactory numerical formulation is made. The modified
formulation is made suitable for solution of a particular desired
flow phenomena. Such modifications are then cost effective and
are suitable for the speed and capacity of the computers.
However, the application would also get restricted to the desired
objectives kept in view by the designer.
213
(i) One dimensional model
(ii) Two dimensional model
(iii) Three dimensional model
214
dams, barrages, bridges, embankments affect the natural regime
of rivers. Changes in the river regime affect river plan form,
hydraulic relations at a particular location etc. Modeling of
morphological processes in rivers is covered in this type. Using
quasi-steady flow conditions and sediment transport relations,
time dependent changes in the bed levels can be computed in 1
dimensional model. Fig 11.2 shows bed level changes computed
for an under-nourished canal for a period of about 30 years.
Progressive reduction in the overall bed levels and changes in
the bed profiles are apparent from the figure.
216
Fig 11.5 : Bed levels computed at the nose of a spur in
sediment transport module of 2 D mathematical model.
The scours computed in the model have been reversed
for better understanding of the scours.
218
a. Scale effects
d. Establishment cost
219
model which increase the preliminary cost before taking up the
construction of a physical model.
e. Model limitations
220
REFERENCES
221
LIST OF FIGURES & PHOTOS
222
Fig. 3.1 : Two types of orbits followed by Indian
satellites
Fig. 3.2 : Method of observation by satellite
Photo 3.3 : The synoptic coverage. The right side
photographs are the satellite imageries
covering about 150 km (upper) and about 10
km (lower) of river length. Index maps are
on the left.
Photo 3.4 : The repetitive coverage. Imageries taken at
an interval of four years show the river
channel changes.
Photo 3.5 : Showing inaccessible river reach and
corresponding satellite image.
Photo 3.6 : Showing imageries of low and higher
resolution covering the same area.
Photo 3.7 : Showing the river reach observed by different
bands
Fig. 4.1 : Vertical velocity distribution with different
bottom roughnesses
Fig. 4.2 : Discharge computation for a river with
composite cross section
Fig. 4.3 : Relationship between specific energy, Depth
of Flow and Discharge Intensity
Fig. 5.1 : Railway Bridge on Chenab River at Sher
Shah
Fig. 5.2 : Guide Bunds of different shapes
Fig. 5.3 : Velocity distribution in channels of different
curvatures
Fig. 5.4 : Fitting at worst bend at curved head of a
guide bund
Fig. 5.5 : Composite curve for guide bund head of
Mokama Bridge on Ganga River
Fig. 5.6 : Thickness of pitching recommended by
Sethi
Fig. 5.7 : Size of Pitching Stone Vs Velocity
Fig. 5.8 : Size of Apron Stone Vs Velocity
223
Fig. 5.9 : Apron for Curved Head of a Guide Bund
with allowance for fanning out
Fig. 5.10 (A) : Apron as laid according to spring
Fig. 5.10 (B) : Apron as laid according to gales
Fig. 6.1 : Elliptical shape of guide bunds
Fig. 6.2 : Settling velocity of sediment grains of
different sizes
Fig. 6.3 : Apron design features
Fig. 6.4 : Design of Impermeable Spur
Fig. 6.5 : Depth of Bridge Piers according to Spring
Fig. 6.6 : Relation between Pier size and Scour Depth
given by Laursen
Fig. 7.1 : Elevation of Typical Porcupine
Photo 7.1 (A) : Typical Bamboo Porcupine
Fig. 7.2 : Sketch of Typical Crib
Photo 7.2 (A) : Bamboo crib constructed at site
Photo 7.3 : Bamboo structure projecting from the bank
into the river
Fig. 7.4 : Sketch of a typical permeable tree structure
Fig. 7.5 : Sketch of typical layout of Porcupine Spur
Fig 7.6 : Porcupine screens for inducing
sedimentation
Fig 7.7 (A) : Sketch of typical RCC porcupine
Photo 7.7(B) : RCC Porcupine laid at site
Photo 7.7(C) : Porcupine screen laid across a channel
Photo 8.1 : Internal structure of typical non-woven and
woven type geo-fabric
Photo 8.2 (A) : Showing geo-fabric being laid below the
slope pitching
Photo 8.2 (B) : Geo-fabric filter being laid below the stone
pitching. Cushion of sand is laid before
spreading the geo-fabric filter.
Photo 8.2 (C) : Geo-fabric filter being laid below the stone
pitching. Cushion of sand is laid on the top
of filter.
224
Fig. 10.1 : Staff-in-Pipe type Crest-Stage Gauge
Fig. 10.1 (A) : Crest Gauge
Fig. 10.2 : Pivot Point Layout
Fig. 10.3 : Air Line and Wet Line Corrections
Fig 11.1 : Typical network of river channels reproduced
in 1 D mathematical model
Fig 11.2 : Computed bed level profile using 1 D
morphological model
Fig 11.3 : Bed levels (topography) reproduced in a
2 D mathematical model.
Fig 11.4 : Velocities computed in 2 D model for a
specific discharge stage
Fig 11.5 : Bed levels computed at the nose of a spur
in sediment transport module of 2 D
mathematical model.
225
LIST OF TABLES
Page No.
Table 2.1 : Meander relationships 18
Table 2.2 : Characteristics of Bed Forms in the 29
lower Reach of Brahmaputra River
Table 2.3 : River Formulae 32
Table 4.1 : Minimum clearances for bridges with 60
rectangular openings
Table 4.2 : Clearances for arch bridges 61
Table 4.3 : Calculation of scour depth 62
Table 4.4 : Comparison of actual widths of rivers 63
with those given by the Lacey Formula
Table 5.1 : Length of Guide Bund 72
Table 5.2 : Radius of Curved Head 75
According to Spring
Table 5.3 : Radius of Curvature and Angle of Sweep 77
According to Spring, Gales and Sethi
Table 5.4 : Radius of Upstream Curved Head of Guide 78
Bund According to Various Investigators
Table 5.5 : Thickness of Stone Protection 79
recommended by Spring
Table 5.6 : Thickness of Stone and Soiling for Slope 80
for Guide Bunds According to Gales
Table 5.7 : Thickness of stone pitching for shank 82
according to Sethi
Table 5.8 : Relationships for Size and Weight of Stone 85
Table 5.9 : Estimation of Depth of Scour 91
according to Gales
Table 5.10 : Estimation of Depth of Scour according to 91
committee headed by Khosla
Table 5.11 : Estimation of Depth of Scour according to 92
Sethi
Table 5.12 : Thickness of Launched Apron according to 93
Spring
226
Table 5.13 : Thickness of Launched Apron according to 94
Gales
Table 6.1 : Foundation Design Discharge with 125
Percentage Addition to Waterway
Design Discharge
Table 6.2 : Thickness of Pitching 138
Table 6.3 : Scour Factors for Apron Design in case 139
of Spurs
(A) According to Indian Standard Specifications
(B) On Basis of Experiments conducted by
Mushtaq Ahmed
Table 6.4 : Formulae in Vogue in the U.S.A. for 140
Prediction of Scour at the Noses of Spurs
Table 'A' : Scour level computations for bed material 151
sizes given in Alternative (A)
Table 6.5 : Etcheverry’s Maximum Allowable 155
Tractive Forces Given by Lane
Table 6.6 : USBR Limiting Tractive Forces in kg/cm2 155
Table 10.1 : Air Line Correction and Wet Line Correction 197
Table 10.2 : Values of Rugosity Coefficient n for 203
open channels with Relatively Coarse
Bed Material not characterized by Bed Form
Table 10.3 : Values of Rugosity Coefficient n for 203
open channels with other than Coarse
Bed Material
227
INDEX
Page No.
Afflux
In Alluvial rivers 58
In rivers with non-scourable bed 55
Due to obstruction 58
Bridges
Alignment 66
Lacey Formulae 61
Location 66
Waterway 67, 112
Clearance 60
Filters
Graded 175
Geotextile 175, 178
Construction method 179
Free Board 59
Modelling
Couchy Number 183
Data requirement 158
Dimensional analysis 185
Dynamic similarity 182, 183
228
Froude Number 28, 30, 140, 183
Geometric similarity 182
Kinetic similarity 182
Hydraulic modeling 182
Mathematic modeling 212
Mobile bed geometrically similar models 184
Mobile bed vertically exaggerated models 184
Model Limitations 185
Model scale designs 183
Modelling technique 182
Pie (p) theorem 185
Reynolds Number 183
Rigid bed geometrically similar models 184
Rigid bed vertically exaggerated models 184
Similitude requirements 182
Weber Number 183
229
Cross-section 101, 102, 129
Construction material 130
Curved head 74, 129
Length 71, 127
Scour along guide bund 84, 125
Shape in plan 69, 70, 127
Side slope and its protection 79, 129
Size of pitching stone 130
Thickness of pitching stone 132
Top level 129
Top width 129
Scour in Rivers
Effect of bed forms 154
Flood scour 153
Lacey Formulae 61
Measurement of
Air line correction 197
Echo sounders 199
Various methods 200
230
Wet line correction 197
Scour in alluvial rivers 58
Scour due to constriction 154
Scour at piers in clayey strata 154
Scour depth with different bed material at various
depths 147
Remote Sensing
Process 38
Characteristics 42
Data acquisition 44, 47
Rivers
Bed forms 24
Antidunes 27
Bed forms in Brahmaputra 29
Bed forms in Mississippi 28
Dunes 27
Flat beds 28
Implications of bed forms 28
Ripples 27
Transitions in bed forms 30
Behaviour of Rivers 2
Braiding pattern 22
Cut offs 13
Meanders 11
Meander movements 13
Meander implications 20
Meander relationships 18
River Formuale 30
River Reaches 1
Flood plains 5
Submontane 4
Tidal 6
Upper 1
River Types 1
Aggrading 6
231
Braided 22
Degrading 6
Flashy 7
Himalayan 9
Meandering 11
South Indian 9
Stable 5
Virgin 8
Velocity Measurements
Current meters 199
Distribution over a vertical 53
Formulae 30, 53
Mean velocity 200
Reduction coefficient 200
Rugosity coefficient in Manning formula 203
232
For suggestions, please write to:
mail@iricen.gov.in
Published by :
INDIAN RAILWAYS INSTITUTE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
11-A, South Main Road, Koregaon Park, Pune - 411001.
90/-