CASE STUDY GUIDELINES (INDIVIDUAL)

Make a study of two families in relation to their vulnerability to disasters:

 Select two families you know that have opposite socio-economic statuses (one is rich,
and the other one is poor). Set separate appointments in each family for an interview.
 Before the interview, observe the family’s living conditions. Answer the questions on
physical setting on p. 20.With the family’s condition , take pictures of the house, family
members and its surrounding.
 Using BOX 1 on pages 20-21 to interview the parents
 After the interview, write a report using the outline on p. 22
 Compile the case study of all members in the group and have it soft-bound(the case
study presented will served as 2nd Quarter Exam)

HAZARD ANALYSIS GUIDELINES (GROUP)

With your respective groupmates, do a hazard analysis of Davao Doctors College Inc., Cad
Bldg. using FACTOR ANALYSIS only(you may refer on Table 1.3 p. 27 and Table 1.4 p. 28-29
for sample analysis). Then, each group is also task to create an EVACUATION PLAN in your
assigned floor. (you may refer some samples on the internet)
Prepare a written report and a visual material of the output. Attach the written report and
the evacuation plan on the compiled case study, while the visual material(for FACTOR
ANALYSIS) will be presented before the end of the 2nd Quarter.

RUBRICS: CASE STUDY-90 POINTS

AcceptableNot
Competent
Excellent
Your written work will be evaluated by the criteria below in
order to give you specific feedback to help guide your
development as a writer. Your writing will not be graded point
by point by these items; it will be graded for its overall quality.
6 5 4 3 2
Presentation
1. The purpose and focus are clear and consistent.
2. The main claim is clear, significant, and challenging.
3. Organization is purposeful, effective, and appropriate.
4. Sentence form and word choice are varied and appropriate.
5. Punctuation, grammar, spelling, and mechanics are
appropriate.
Content
6. Information and evidence are accurate, appropriate, and
integrated effectively.
7. Claims and ideas are supported and elaborated.
8. Alternative perspectives are carefully considered and
represented.
Thinking
9. Connections between and among ideas are made.
10. Analysis/synthesis/evaluation/interpretation are effective
and consistent.
11. Independent thinking is evident/Coordination with the
groupmates are visible.
12. Creativity/originality is evident.
 Assignment Specific Criteria
13. Responds to all aspects of the assignment.
14. Documents evidence appropriately.
15. Follows the correct format and guidelines.

RUBRIC HAZARD ANALYSIS-100 points

Criteria 20 – Exemplary 15– Accomplished 10 – Developing 5 – Beginning

 Does a full share
of work or more
 Assigns a clearly
defined role; group
Cooperation
 Does an equal share of work  Does almost as much  Does less work than
 Assigns roles, but roles are work as others other group members
not clearly defined or  Assigns roles, but roles  No effort made to
consistently adhered to are not adhered to assign roles to group

members perform  Usually considers all views  Often sides with friends members
roles effectively and helps team to reach fair instead of considering all  Acts as cliques or
 Always decision views individuals rather than
considers all views  Rarely argues  Sometimes argues group
and helps team to  Group seldom solves its  Group settles problems  Arguments within
reach fair decision problems as a team and asks and gives up easily group
 Never argues classmates or teacher for  Little attempt to solve
with teammates help problems; gives up
 Group tries to easily
solve its problems by
  Works agreeably with  Can be coaxed into  Did not meet
ationOrganiz

Takes initiative in
helping the group get partner(s) concerning meeting with other partner(s) at agreed
organized and setting organization and times and partner(s) times or places
times and places to places to meet  Somewhat organized  Lack of organization;
meet  Product is organized with an ideas; not presented in choppy and confusing;
  Collects and contributes  
ResponsiMember Research

Collects and Collects and contributes Collects and

contributes accurate mostly accurate content somewhat accurate content contributes inaccurate
content  At times, takes initiative to  Uses only materials content
 Goes above and find extra information provided  Does not utilize
beyond to research  Shares information with the  Shares some information resources effectively
 Provides many ideas  Participates in discussions  Listens to others; on some  Seems bored with
for the assignment about the assignment occasions, makes conversations about the
 Clearly communicates  Usually shares opinions and suggestions assignment
desires, ideas, thoughts with other  Rarely expresses feelings  Never/almost never
personal needs and partner(s) or preferences spoke up
  Presentation is thoughtful  
onPresentati

Presentation is clever Presentation is at times Little creativity used;

and original  Presentation is well done; clearly presented bland
 Engaging; captures interesting to audience  Presentation is at times  Presentation is hard to
interest of audience  Some use of visual aids interesting to audience follow; poorly
 Appropriate variety of  Visual aids somewhat add to  Limited use of visual aids organized