Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

10 Wave Optics

10.2 Huygens Principle 10.5 Interference of Light Waves and Young’s


10.3 Refraction and Reflection of Plane Waves Experiment
using Huygens Principle 10.6 Diffraction
10.4 Coherent and Incoherent Addition of Waves 10.7 Polarisation

Topicwise Analysis of Last 10 Years’ CBSE Board Questions (2016-2007)

VSA SA I SA II VBQ LA

14

12

10
Number of questions

0
10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7
Topic

8 Maximum weightage is of Diffraction. 8 No VBQ type questions were asked till now.
8 Maximum VSA, SA and SA II type questions were
asked from Polarisation.

KEY POINTS

8 Wavefront : The locus of all particles of the X Spherical wavefront : When the source of light
medium vibrating in the same phase at a given is a point source, the wavefront is spherical.
instant is known as wavefront. X Cylindrical wavefront : When the source of
Depending on the shape of sources of light, light is linear, the wavefront is cylindrical.
wavefront can be of three types X Plane wavefront : When the point source or
linear source of light is at very large distance,
a small portion of spherical or cylindrical
wavefront appears to be plane. Such a wavefront
is known as plane wavefront.
8 Huygens principle : According to Huygens
principle, vt
– Every point on given wavefront (primary
wavefront) acts as a fresh source of new
disturbance, called secondary wavelets.
From DABB′ and DA′B′B, Snell’s law can be
– The secondary wavelets spread out in all
proved.
the directions with the speed of light in the
sin i ct / BB′ c a
medium. = = = mg
– A surface touching these secondary wavelets sin r vt / BB′ v
tangentially in the forward direction at any So, first law of refraction can be proved.
instant gives the new (secondary) wavefront X Also, the incident ray, refracted rays and normal
at that instant. to the rays, all lie in the same plane. This gives
the second law of refraction.
8 Laws of reflection by Huygens’ principle
– Effect on frequency, wavelength and speed
X Let us consider a plane wavefront AB
during refraction. When a wave passes
incident on the plane reflecting surface xy.
from one medium to another then change
The tangent B′A′ represent reflected wavefront
in speed v take place, wavelength l also
after time t.
changes, whereas its frequency u remains
the same.
X Coherent and incoherent sources : The
sources of light, which emit continuous light
waves of the same wavelength, same frequency
x
and in same phase or having a constant phase
For every point on wavefront AB, a corresponding difference are known as coherent sources. Two
point lies on the reflected wavefront A′B′. sources of light which do not emit light waves
So, comparing two triangle DBAB′ and DB′A′B with a constant phase difference are called
We find that incoherent sources.
AB′ = A′B = ct, BB′ = common 8 Interference of light : It is the phenomenon
A = A′ = 90° of redistribution of energy on account of
Thus two triangles are congruent, hence superposition of light waves from two coherent
i= r sources. Interference pattern produce points of
This proves first law of reflection. maximum and minimum intensity. Points where
X Also incident rays, reflected rays and normal to resultant intensity is maximum, interference
them all lie in the same plane. This gives second is said to be constructive and at the points of
law of reflection. destructive interference, resultant intensity is
minimum.
8 Laws of refraction by Huygens principle
X Intensity distribution : If a, b are the amplitudes
X Let us consider a plane wavefront AB incident
of interfering waves due to two coherent sources
on the plane refracting surface xy. The tangent
and f is constant phase difference between the
B′A′ represent refracted wavefront after time
two waves at any point P, then the resultant
‘t’. For every point on primary wavefront AB,
amplitude at P will be
a corresponding point lies on the refracted
wavefront A′B′. =
R a2 + b2 + 2ab cos f
Resultant intensity where
=
I I1 +I2 + 2 I1I2 cosf n = 1 for first dark fringe,
n = 2 for 2nd dark fringe and so on.
( )
2
– When cos f =1; I=
max I1 + I2 xn = distance of nth dark fringe from the centre
lD
( )
2
– When cos f =− 1, I min =I1 − I2 \ xn =− (2n 1)
2d
( )
2 X Fringe width : The distance between any two
I max I1 + I2
= consecutive bright or dark fringes is known as
( I2 )
I min 2
I1 − fringe width.
lD
X Conditions for sustained interference of light Fringe width, b =
d
: The two sources should continously emit b l
waves of the same wavelength or frequency. X Angular fringe width : = q =
D d
– The amplitudes of waves from two sources
If W1, W2 are widths of two slits, I1, I2 are
should preferably be equal.
intensities of light coming from two slits;
– The waves emitted by the two sources should
a, b are the amplitudes of light from these slits,
either be in phase or should have a constant
then
phase difference.
– The two sources must lie very close to each W1 I1 a2
= =
other. W2 I2 b2
– The two sources should be very narrow. 2
I max (a + b)
8 Young’s double slit experiment : Young’s double =
slit experiment was the first to demonstrate the I min (a − b)2
phenomenon of interference of light. Using – When entire apparatus of Young’s double
two slits illuminated by monochromatic light slit experiment is immersed in a medium
source, he obtained bright and dark bands of of refractive index m, then fringe width
equal width placed alternately. These were becomes
called interference fringes.
l ′D lD b
X For constructive interference (i.e. formation of b′ = = =
d md m
bright fringes)
For nth bright fringe, – When a thin transparent plate of thickness t
d and refractive index m is placed in the path
Path difference
= x= n nl of one of the interfering waves, fringe width
D
where n = 0 for central bright fringe remains unaffected but the entire pattern
n = 1 for first bright fringe, shifts by
n = 2 for second bright fringe and so on D b
Dx
= (m − 1) t = (m − 1) t
d = distance between two slits d l
D = distance of slits from the screen This shifting is towards the side in which
xn = distance of nth bright fringe from the transparent plate is introduced.
centre. X Colour of thin films : A soap film or a thin
D film of oil spread over water surface, when
\ xn = nl
d seen in white light appears coloured. This effect
X For destructive interference (i.e. formation of can be explained in terms of phenomenon of
dark fringes). interference.
For nth dark fringe, 8 Diffraction of light : It is the phenomenon of
d l bending of light around corners of an obstacle
path difference
= x= n (2n − 1)
D 2 or aperture in the path of light.
X Diffraction due to a single slit : The diffraction first secondary minimum of the other and vice
pattern produced by a single slit of width a versa.
consists of a central maximum bright band X Resolving power of a microscope : It is defined
with alternating bright and dark bands of as the reciprocal of the minimum distance d
decreasing intensity on both sides of the central between two point objects, which can just be
maximum. seen through the microscope as separate.
– Condition for nth secondary maximum is 1 2m sin q
l Resolving power= =
Path difference
= a= sin qn (2n + 1) d l
2 where m is refractive index of the medium
where n = 1, 2, 3,.......
– Condition for nth secondary minimum is between object and objective lens, q is half the
Path difference = asinqn = nl angle of cone of light from the point object, d
where n = 1, 2, 3,....... represents limit of resolution of microscope
– Width of secondary maxima or minima and msinq is known as the numerical aperture.
X Resolving power of a telescope : It is defined
lD
b= as reciprocal of the smallest angular separation
a
(dq) between two distant objects, whose images
where a = width of slit
are just seen in the telescope as separate.
D = distance of screen from the slit
1 D
2lD Resolving power = =
– Width of central maximum = dq 1.22 l
a
where D is diameter or aperture of the objective
– Angular fringe width of central maximum
lens of the telescope, dq represents limit of
2l resolution of telescope.
=
a
– Angular fringe width of secondary maxima 8 Polarisation of light : The phenomenon of
restricting the vibrations of light (electric
l
or minima = vector) in a particular direction, perpendicular
a
to direction of wave motion is known as
X Fresnel distance : It is the minimum distance a
polarisation of light.
beam of light has to travel before its deviation
X Angle of polarisation : The angle of incidence
from straight line path becomes significant.
for which an ordinary light is completely
a2 polarised in the plane of incidence when it gets
Fresnel distance, Z F =
l reflected from a transparent medium.
8 Resolving power : It is the ability of an optical X Laws of Malus : According to law of Malus,
instrument to produce distinctly separate when a beam of completely plane polarised light
images of two close objects i.e. it is the ability of is incident on an analyser, the resultant intensity
the instrument to resolve or to see as separate, of light (I) transmitted from the analyser varies
the images of two close objects. directly as the square of the cosine of the angle
X Limit of resolution : The minimum distance (q) between plane of transmission of analyser
between two objects which can just be seen as and polariser
separate by the optical instrument is known i.e. I ∝ cos2q
as the limit of resolution of the instrument. X Brewster’s law : According to Brewster’s law,
Smaller the limit of resolution of the optical when unpolarised light is incident at polarising
instrument, greater is its resolving power and angle (ip) on an interface separating a rarer
vice-versa. medium from a denser medium of refractive
X Rayleigh’s criterion of limiting resolution : index m, such that m = tan ip
According to Rayleigh, two nearby images then light is reflected in the rarer medium
are said to be resolved if the position of the is completely polarised. The reflected and
central maximum of one coincides with the refracted rays are perpendicular to each other.

Вам также может понравиться