Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
7 REFERENCES/SOURCES _______________________________________________________ 51
Data is a buzz word in many industries, and indeed advanced data analytics — combining data
sources in creative ways, automatic decision making through machine learning, etc. — is at the
pinnacle of this applied scientiic development that is currently transforming many industries.
Big data will underpin new To extract meaningful value Make the data work:
waves of productivity, growth from big data, you need Leveraging data in the core
and consumer surplus optimal processing power, process to create new services,
analytics capabilities and gain efficiency, reduce costs
skills and improve performance.
McKinsey 2011 IBM 2014
Integrate analytics in
Secure data access! Develop smart tools! core processes!
Figure 1 - Big data and data analytics aim to create value. Many applications are generic.
Application of data analytics to the core processes requires more specific effort but has a higher potential.
The difference between structured data and Many tools and applications of Big Data and data
unstructured data is disappearing. For example, in asset analytics for the analysis of both structured and
management, structured and metadata will not only unstructured data are generic and are applied in
improve knowledge, but will also ‘institutionalize’ different business sectors. They concern generic aims
practical knowledge6, often considered as the most like marketing and sales, procurement or process
unstructured knowledge there is and something management that have similar goals for all industries.
traditional tools like expert systems have struggled with. The challenge that many companies are now facing is
This will result in more reined asset management how to apply data analytics to their business speciic and
strategies that will take more practical aspects into technical processes, products and services in order to
consideration. The use of real time sensor data in stay competitive.
maintenance allows for increasingly ‘leaner and meaner’
maintenance strategies without sacriicing on quality. Companies start to implement data analytics to optimize
their core processes, increase service levels and/or
develop revolutionary new ways of working, new
products and new services. This step is challenging
because it requires a combination of ICT knowledge,
data analytics skills as well as domain knowledge to know
where data analytics brings most value and to interpret
the results, as illustrated in igure 1.
While data analysis always was an important part of econometrics and logistics, the availability
of huge amounts of data through the Internet and social media, data analytics - and related
associated aspects like machine-learning - is becoming a force that is transforming industries.
In unbundled energy markets, there is a strict distinction between commercial stakeholders and
market facilitating and ‘shared infrastructure’ management parties, such as distribution network
operators (DSOs49) and transmission system operators (TSOs). Commercial stakeholders are ‘governed’
by a competing market: competition should ensure their cost eficiency and their customer focus.
Grid operators have a natural monopoly. To ensure their cost eficiency and proper execution of their
tasks, they are governed by regulation and monitored by external (governmental) agencies, referred
to as the ‘Regulators’.
Transmission and distribution system/network operators (TSOs and DSOs) have the task to facilitate
the market by transporting and distributing the electricity through their grids and by maintaining the
integrity of the system through several technical and administrative functions. These include
maintenance and grid expansion to provide suficient capacity; the procurement of ancillary services
to keep the system stable; and facilitate market processes that are necessary for the market to function.
Examples of these facilitating services include providing metering services and facilitating the allocation
and reconciliation of energy use and generation.
However, regulating TSOs and DSOs by strictly deining their tasks, services and price levels does have
drawbacks. DSOs and TSO are by regulation not allowed to beneit speciic market parties—including
end—users, they cannot differentiate their offering to speciic individual wishes of end-users. All market
parties—including end users—should be treated equally. For relative simple needs, that all end-users
share, like a grid connection with a ixed capacity for a ixed price, this works well. However sometimes
more complex situations arise, like a congestion in the grid that affects only a limited number of users.
This strict approach leads to major ineficiencies as the TSO/DSO are not allowed to make use of the dif-
ferent needs and wishes of individual customers and therefore have to fall back to the ‘one size its’
all approach.
By redeining this ‘one size its all’ service level as the best ‘collective service’ possible to which
end-users are entitled but can negotiate about, this paradox can be broken. TSO/DSOs still have an
obligation to offer this ‘best collective service’ if end users if requested. However, it becomes
negotiable. In case of network capacity problems, a TSO/DSO can offer to compensate end-users in the
problem area to reduce (or increase) their load/production through an auction mechanism. End-users
that accept, will offer the lexibility while being compensated, while end-users that do not or cannot
accept, will not be affected by the capacity problems. This mechanism ensures an optimal allocation of
scarce lexibility, not only for the DSO, but also for the TSO and market parties.
Within the USEF framework (4) this concept has been extensively developed, including fail safe
mechanisms for DSOs; the deinition of stakeholders like aggregators that facilitate the interaction with
end-users; and deinitions of processes and protocols in a reference implementation that has been and
is continued to be tested in several demonstration projects among Europe.
The power system knows many stakeholders and demand and supply and seeks the most
the most important ones are described below. economical solution for the energy to be supplied.
The BRP can source the requested energy on
The role of the Transmission System Operator behalf of the Supplier in two ways: directly,
(TSO) is to transport energy from centralized by dispatching power plants with which it has a
producers to dispersed industrial prosumers and contractual agreement, or indirectly, by trading on
Distribution System Operators over its high-voltage the energy markets.
grid. The TSO also operates interconnectors that
link to other high-voltage grids in neighbouring The role of the Supplier is to source, supply, and
regions and countries. The TSO is responsible invoice energy to its customers. The Supplier and
for keeping the system in balance by deploying its customers agree on commercial terms for the
regulating capacity, reserve capacity, and incidental supply and procurement of energy. In this paper
emergency capacity (In some countries this task is often utility is used to describe a supplier that also
performed by an Independent System Operator, owns generation.
the ISO).
The role of the Aggregator is to accumulate
The role of the distribution network operator lexibility (controlled changes in power demand or
(DNO) or Distribution System Operator (DSO) is generation) from Prosumers sell it to the BRP, the
to cost-effective transfer and distribute energy in a TSO and/or the DSO. The Aggregator’s goal is to
given region over the distribution grid to and from maximize the value of that lexibility, taking into
end users and for the connections to and from the account customer needs, economic optimization,
transmission grid. The difference between a DSO and grid capacity.
and a DNO is that the DSO is able to perform
grid capacity management (i.e. activate demand An Energy Service Company (ESCo) offers auxiliary
response and local generation to support the energy-related services to Prosumers but is not
distribution grid). directly active in the electricity value chain.
An ESCo may provide for example data related
A Balance Responsible Party (BRP) is responsible services like insight services and energy
for actively balancing supply and demand for its management services, but may also offer
portfolio of producers, aggregators, and installation services (like condensing boilers,
prosumers. The BRP forecasts its portfolio’s energy
ENERGY SYSTEM
Regulated:
OPERATION FORECASTING AND
Network and SETTLEMENT PLANNING
system operators (dispatch, control,
(data allocation, support, maintenance, (loads, asset status,
Non-regulated: contracts & billing) workforce management) contracting, investment
Generator, retailer, decisions)
aggregator
CUSTOMER VALUE
CUSTOMER CUSTOMER
PERCEPTION
CUSTOMER EXPECTATION
(residential, industrial, SATISFACTION AND
producer) RETENTION (products, services) (information, marketing)
THIRD PARTY
(energy service
company, independent DATA ANALYSIS, COMBINING DATA SOURCES
service provider)
Figure 2 - Overview of the purpose of the use of data in the power system set in a timeframe: is data used for past actions (settlement);
is data used for future actions (forecasting and planning). The 'effect' on other stakeholders (customers and third parties) is
taken into account. Customer satisfaction is in the end a result of his expectation and what he/she perceives they're receiving.
Mapping the same approach of future’, now and past value chain: utilities, retailers, aggregators and grid and
regarding services to the customer gives an indication of system operators. It is however important to notice
how these speciic processes might help in creating value that there are more companies connected to the
to the customer (the end users of the electricity system). electricity value chain, like independent service providers
Carefully managing customer expectations, as well as and energy service companies.
meeting them when the moment is due, will ultimately
will lead to satisfaction and customer retention11 (see The next section will address the basic processes as
igure 2). mentioned in igure 2:
forecasting and planning
This paper is about data analytics in the electricity sector operation and
and it mostly considers stakeholders in the electricity settlement
One of the main applications of data analytics is forecasting. In the electricity sector the
application of forecasting ranges from predicting power lows minutes ahead, to economic
developments in the energy market spanning decades; and, from lifetime predictions of large
assets, to predictions of behaviors and preferences of consumers.
Network operators, as well as other asset managers, must Early experiences are helping to prioritize the
deal with increasing uncertainties related to regulations, deployment of the next sensors. Unfortunately, from
developments in the energy market and the use of a data point of view—assets have a technical lifetime
electricity. Examples include the changes of grid codes of multiple decades and most of the healthy asset
and market design, the emergence of local energy population is still not being monitored. So, in practice
markets, integration of renewables (solar and wind power most information about assets and asset lifetime comes
generation) and storage, and the increase of electric from investigations of incidental failures.
transportation.
Maintenance
Resource planning
Dispatch planning
Execution
Balancing
minutes
MINUTES hours
HOURS days
DAYS months
MONTHS years
YEARS decades
DECADES
Figure 3 - Typical timing scope for important processes in the power system related to forecasting
This data is supporting the execution of asset New developments and opportunities
maintenance, for which there are many philosophies. Within the power industry, especially the network
Most of these philosophies can be categorized into three operators, there are some hurdles for asset
basic types, each having their own merits and drawbacks. management to become more data driven. One major
This is dependent on the assets age and use, the hurdle is that grid assets have a very long (technical)
probability and consequence of failure, the availability lifetime, some ranging over 60 years. Most failures are
of data, costs, etc.: incidents with external causes, e.g. by storms, loods,
building and digging activities, although aging and wear
Corrective maintenance (for example ‘run to failure’) caused by increasing loads are beginning to have a
Preventive maintenance (for example periodic larger impact. There is extensive knowledge and
maintenance) information about failure mechanisms and core failure
Predictive maintenance (for example maintenance; causes available, gained by power failure investigations.
reliability-centered maintenance) However, there is surprisingly little ‘raw’ data about asset
failures. The cause of this is the long lifetime of assets and
The available data and data analytics basically play a the fact that most of them are not monitored. Especially
role on two levels. First, they allow for selecting the little data is available of the ‘large healthy population’,
right approach for each individual asset and/or which makes the application of many analytical
group/cluster of assets. Second, they play a major role algorithms like ‘rare event’ statistics dificult.
in the maintenance methodologies themselves.
With the more advanced methodologies, aspects that
have predictive qualities about future possible failures
are monitored and help decide about preventive
maintenance and when (plannable) corrective
maintenance measures are required.
AT IONS
LIMIT
LIM
ITAT
ION
S
A
DAT
HEALTH
Figure 4 - A risk-based asset management decision process (5) and the application of (historical) failure data by factorizing
this into core probabilities and risks
The second challenge can only be addressed by Although data analytics promises to ind predictive
recognizing that the availability of (failure) data will structures in the data itself, combining it with
remain an issue and thus a different approach is required fundamental knowledge about the system has huge
than with normal big data applications, that presume an beneits. This “knowledge analytics” can be represented
‘abundance’ of data. The required methodologies need by a Bayesian network, which is essentially a complete
to make optimal use of the relative small amount that is representation of the interconnections between different
available. For example, as assets will be more and more features of a system that lead to performance failures.
monitored, new tools, such as ‘rare event’ statistics, can The interconnections in a Bayesian network are
be applied, giving better predictions of the asset lifetime. represented by conditional probabilities (e.g., the
probability of an interconnect failure given the
Increased monitoring also means that failure data and probabilities of encapsulation, metal frame, and glass
data about the circumstances and environment before failures), which are derived from data, experience, and
and during the failure, will become available. However, models. Using Bayesian networks in this way offers
for this to become truly valuable, this needs to be several advantages: they can be used to perform
generalized to be applicable to the whole asset sensitivity analyses, thus providing leading indicators
population, i.e. assets operating under different of failures; they can be used to conduct dynamic risk
circumstances (see igure 5 for an example). management using sensor inputs.
Humidity Temperature
Vapor phase
salt
Manufacturing
Material infant defect
susceptibility Impact in
transportation
Atmospheric
corrosion
Galvanic Impact in
coupling to Mechanical installation
steel force
UV
Metal frame
failure
Interconnect
failure
Figure 5 - Example of a Bayesian network for the failure mechanisms of solar panels, able to combine data with fundamental
knowledge of the system15. 'Backpropagation' techniques might be used to reverse experience data to 'root causes'.
These kinds of 'empirical' models can also be used to establish links between data of assets operating in completely
different circumstances.
Introduction and current situation These methods take a ‘top down’ approach (see igure 6),
As with renewable generation, electricity demand is using (well-known) patterns in overall loads as a basis for
highly inluenced by the weather, especially, heating and forecast. These methods prove to be powerful.
cooling. Variations in demand used to be the main source The demand of even a few hundreds of households
of uncertainty in the electricity system, thus forecasting follows a regular pattern, and on a scale of millions of
load always has been an important topic in electricity households, industry and commercial buildings, the
systems. Both short term forecasting, necessary for demand is regular and shows a well-known pattern that
contracting and planning of dispatch of generation; is easy to forecast using the prementioned methods.
as well as long term demand, inluencing investment Size (i.e. the number of customers) is an important tool to
decisions in power generation and transmission and manage risks for balance responsible parties, and thus a
distribution networks. source of competitive advantage.
Long term forecasting in general relies on scenario However, demand is becoming more correlated due to
planning, based on general and local economic the ongoing electriication of heat (heat pumps,
developments, correlated with data from industry, air-conditioning) and transport (electric vehicles).
commercial and residential demand and possible Local (solar) generation is also increasingly occurring in
technological developments like for example energy distribution grids, so the statistical averaging out will
savings, the use of electric vehicles and solar energy. become less in the future. More relevant, because
expanding the network capacity to cope with this
Short term load forecasting depends on statistical synchronization of demand and generation in the
learning algorithms, regression models, neural networks capillaries of the network is very expensive, these
and other pattern recognition methods18. capacity limitations will lead to the necessity for local
Because aggregated demand has a very periodical ‘balancing’ (i.e. congestion management), and thus
(i.e. day/ week/season) and stable behavior, even relative for local demand forecasts consisting of much smaller
simple methods that exploit this behavior, like the ‘similar numbers of end users.
Consumers Consumers
Figure 6 - Traditional demand forecasting in power systems relies on known patterns overall (i.e. aggregated) loads.
'Big data' - as applied in for example marketing - is trying to create insights in unknown patterns by aggregating
data from users. As local forecasting becomes more important because of infrastructure constraints, this will lead
to an increased application of 'Big data' techniques in demand forecasting.
The area that probably will be inluenced most by data analytics is 'Operations'. Historically
analytics of operational processes was manual work and thus labour intensive and expensive.
This meant that it was predominantly a tool for analysts in staff departments to underpin
strategic decisions or to design more eficient operational processes.
Process improvements,
tweaks to reduce disturbances Continuous analytics, adaptive control, situational
awareness to continuously optimize the process or system
PROCESS PROCESS
Figure 7 - A significant part of the 'manual' process analytics will be automated and become part of the process itself.
At the same time component/step control will become more aware of its environment and other components
in the system (situational awareness).
The traditional solution to cope with such uncertainty is The power system can therefore beneit greatly from
to increase the network capacity and/or the generation the integration of data analytics supported optimization
capacity. However, this solution is becoming increasingly into operational processes, as described in the
expensive for the described uncertainty, because of two introduction of this chapter. However, it can only do so if
reasons: certain conditions are met. The most important condition
is that there should be enough (near) real-time data from
Variable renewable generation (i.e. wind and solar) sensors in the system to assess the situation and status.
is highly correlated. New electric demand Second, there should be enough possibilities or ‘buttons
(electric vehicle charging as well as heat pumps) to press’ to adapt the system to cope with the changing
is also potentially highly correlated. To accommodate environment, i.e. ‘actors. Finally, the right models and
peaks caused by this correlated demand and this ‘meta-models’ should be available to respectively give
(local) generation would require an enormous the gathered sensor data a context and relevance; issue
increase in grid transmission and distribution capacity, the right command to the ‘actors’; and adapt the models
which would have a low degree of utilization. themselves to learn and keep the system optimal under
As the future becomes less predictable, the risks that changing circumstances. All these conditions are
traditional large and long term investments in both beginning to be satisied.
generation as transmission capacity become ‘stranded
assets’ are increasing drastically, leading to a relative The number of sensors in the grid is rapidly increasing.
higher attractiveness of more lexible and short term Today, smart meters for example can act as the receptors
solutions.19 on the outer edges of power systems, and an increasing
number of smart devices will do the same. Within the
grid, Phasor Measuring Units (PMUs) are installed at
strategic locations, measuring all aspects of the power
low.
NETWORK RISKS
Activities to reduce risks
GRID OPERATIONS
(DMS, switching, DATA ACQUISITION STRATEGIC THREATS
MODEL
disturbances, events, (measurements) AND SCENARIOS
workforce development)
OTHER PROCESSES
Activities to optimize operations
NETWORK STATUS (strategy, asset
management
investments)
Figure 8 - Risk-based grid operations: a schematic of how faster than real time simulations, continuously calibrated with
measurements and data from the grid can be used to continuously assess and minimize risk and optimize the
grid configuration, work force deployment, etc.
Dispatchable demand response, sometimes called However, this division between dispatchable and
explicit demand response, focuses on the control system, non-dispatchable DR is disappearing. Dispatchable and
often simplifying the value allocation system to a ixed non-dispatchable DR, where respectively a control signal
fee to the participating customers. It is dificult to adjust or a price signal is communicated are essentially
dispatchable DR programs to changing desires and 'one-way communication' concepts. Two-way
circumstances of customers without involving a more communications in combination with data analytics and
advanced value allocation system. A customer that does local intelligence is changing this rapidly.
not mind the air-conditioning to be switched off one day,
might ind it uncomfortable the next.
ADVANTAGES
Power (kW)
DISADVANTAGES
Dificult to evaluate the value for the power system and the individual customer
Time
Dificult to apply to more than one use of lexibility
ADVANTAGES
(Value to suupplier)
Relatively straightforward
Price (€)
DISADVANTAGES
No direct control of loads (uncertainty of the response and ability to 'ine tune')
Possible instability problems if automation is applied on a large scale
Time
ADVANTAGES
Value (€)
Price
DISADVANTAGES
Demand Timing: anticipation to (global) changes in the system should be
implemented locally (through bids), making local intelligence more
Power (kW) crucial
Figure 9 - Examples of demand response concepts: each of them communicates on two of three possible axes: power, value and time.
Each concept is missing one of these axes, which is the root of its disadvantages. Dispatchable demand response misses value;
non-dispatchable demand response misses power and a market approach misses time, resulting in planning challenges.
Because the wishes and requirements of individual For network operations, this will result in a much deeper
consumers can be implemented in the demand response control at the edges of the network, incorporating
scheme, retailers or aggregators will be able to offer demand response and control of decentral generation.
much more tailored energy contracts to their customers. Inluencing demand and local generation means that not
They can offer services that optimize the electricity use only the grid itself is considered, but also the speciic
of a customer to make greatest use of the solar energy circumstances of end-users’ processes and energy
from his neighbourhood, while offering his neighbour markets (either directly or through intermediaries like
a service that minimizes his bill (see also chapter 5). aggregators). This requires very fast models utilizing for
At the same time the remaining lexibility can be used to example precompiled simulations of more complicated
offer services to the grid operator to avoid congestions aspects of the system system, such as using certiied
and to optimize the aggregator’s position on the markets. ‘digital twins’.
An example of a pilot project where these propositions
were implemented is discussed on page 42 Data analytics in wholesale operations also will utilize
(PowerMatchingCity). sensors such as smart meters (and many other sensors),
but then to create and utilize this data to formulate and
optimize opportunities to trade eventually leading to
new tradable products and new markets; for example by
4.6 Summary for operations activating demand response and small scale residential
storage to optimize intraday and balancing positions.
In general, the impact of data analytics on operations can
be characterized by leaving behind the old ‘paradigm’ These products coming from wholesale optimization,
that a choice needs to be made between eficiency and are materializing in new retail products. Already energy
lexibility, or at least bring this paradigm to a next level. suppliers are diverging their product range (e.g. offering
Periodic analyses made by staff departments to optimize hourly wholesale prices to their clients). Data analytics
processes are replaced by machine learning algorithms, will tweak retail propositions to redistribute costs and
using online data that continuously will tweak and risks between the energy supplier/aggregator, wholesale
optimize the processes. traders/generators and end-users. It will incorporate
demand response, possibly automatically dispatched
For the power system, which used to handle variations in through ‘smart contracts’, making sure to incorporate the
demand and disturbances with capacity and redundancy, speciic wishes of the consumer, for ex- ample using real
this change comes just in time. As the variations in the time renewable energy from a speciic wind turbine.
system will become dominated by renewable
generation as well as demand with very synchronous
behavior, this traditional response of increasing capacity
becomes increasingly more expensive, both in regard
to variable loads caused by variable renewables and
synchronous demand as with regard to the risk of
stranded assets, that turn out to be obsolete before
their anticipated end of life, due to the fast changing
(economic or regulatory) environment.
Energy settlement is the process by which the difference between electricity generated and
electricity sold is reconciled. The process consists mainly of allocating metering data to the
responsible market parties and associated contracts and, afterwards, the associated payments.
As mentioned in paragraph 4.5, dispatchable demand response and non-dispatchable demand response
can be integrated through a market mechanism in such a way that demand can be operated as a virtual
power plant, while still enabling the participating clients the freedom not to participate when they are not
lexible enough or if the price is too low.
One of the advantages of such a system is that all devices will make a bid to use or produce electricity just
a few minutes in advance. This means that the system is basically a ‘feed forward control system’, with all
the beneits for stability. The bid curves can easily be aggregated to form bid curves on higher levels, like
households, aggregated to district level, to aggregator or retailer portfolio level etc. Control or dispatch
can then be done by communicating the price associated with the required power demand or generation.
For traders, this system acts as if dispatching through a virtual power plant. Access to the bid curve of the
whole portfolio provides a relation between power change and price change. By changing the electricity
price of the consumers (the retail price through the aggregator) traders unlock this lexibility. It can be used
to optimize the trader’s portfolio or it can be sold to the intraday or balancing markets.
For the aggregator or retailer, this demand response opens a new dimension for the development of
energy products and contracts based on the preferences their customers, up to the point to facilitate their
consumers to organize their own energy (sub)community.
The ‘default’ option is that devices are optimized on the retail price set by the aggregator. This price is
the effect of the aggregator’s effort to optimize the load and local generation on behalf of its customers.
Consumers and local generators that are the aggregator’s customers which (automatically) react on this
price will receive a lower energy bill.
In addition, the aggregator’s customers can react on other information as well. Consumers that would like
to maximize the fraction of a certain kind of energy (for example solar) or certain sources such as locally-
generated energy can do so. If this energy is available they can change their bids accordingly, by using
real time certiicates, or just measuring data.
The project PowerMatchingCity has already demonstrated that smart grids are technically feasible.
Flexibility has an economic value for the economy
Energy services can be created that meet the needs of consumers
Market barriers that impede the monetization of lexibility can be eliminated relatively cheaply
MARKET OPTIMIZATION
HOME OPTIMIZATION
NETWORK OPTIMIZATION
As in other sectors, blockchain is receiving a lot of Blockchain (or alternatively tangle45) is considered as
attention in the power and utility sector as well. It can an important piece of the puzzle in the how the power
be used in many applications, from cryptocurrencies to sector might develop. Just as the shift from fossil to
facilitate energy trade among citizens to digital models renewable electricity generation is breaking the business
of power electronic equipment for use in stability logic of ever-increasing scale in central (thermal) power
assessments by grid operators as discussed in paragraph generation, blockchain based transactions might break
4.2 ‘The impact of analytics on grid operations’. Although the business logic in energy supply and billing46,
the main application is seen in energy or power making blockchain a potential game changer, especially
transactions between end-users (or their equipment in energy retail, which allows the emergence of new
when talking about the internet of things) and/or players in the market, among which (cooperatives of)
stakeholders in the electricity system such as retailers of their own clients—active consumers—themselves.
the TSOs.
Consumers are actively organizing themselves into
Blockchain basically is a shared, distributed ledger of cooperatives, installing solar panels on their roofs or
blocks of transactions, or other entries to the ledger, collectively build wind farms to generate and supply
that are chained to each other. Each block has a hash themselves with renewable energy. Blockchain (and
(basically a digital ingerprint that depends on the tangle) technologies have many characteristics that seem
content of the block) and contains the hash of the like a natural it with this development. Organizing a
previous block. So, once an entry is recorded in a block, cooperative requires a high degree of organization and
it cannot be altered anymore. Most blockchains are dedication. Not only in initiating such initiatives, but
permissioned blockchains, meaning that all participants especially in maintenance and administration.
are known and trusted. There are some applications—like Blockchain might facilitate a major part of this
Bitcoin or Ethereum—that are permissionless (open) administration, such as the automatic registration (and
and everyone can make transactions as well as add new remuneration) of energy transactions. Many applications
blocks to the chain, as long as you can ‘prove that you using blockchain already have been developed that are,
have an interest in upkeeping the integrity of the chain’, or can be used for energy applications; ranging from
by showing a proof of effort44 (or e.g. a proof of stake) trusted peer to peer energy transactions and billing
and the newly added block has been veriied by others. applications47 to certiication.
This process of adding new blocks to the chain is called
‘mining’ and successful adding a new block to the chain
is rewarded, for example by gaining bitcoins.
There are more hurdles to overcome before blockchain However, it is only a matter of time before blockchain
can break ‘the business logic in energy supply and applications appear that might be able to create
energy billing’. For example; exchanging electricity portfolios and incorporate data analytics to calculate
between ‘peers’ uses the electricity network. The network and share this risk among all participants, thus creating
requires a continuously balance of the power in and a virtual balance responsible party. It might even
output. So, if the two ‘peers’ are not exactly matching incorporate instructions for controlled demand response
their power generation and use, others that use the and local generation providing the lexibility and control
network are affected. to offset the imbalance risks of both demand, for
example, to incorporate the variable supply of local
In most countries, it is obligatory to be ‘insured’ against renewable energy supply. Blockchain used in such a
this risk of not complying with your agreed demand and fashion has the potential to put the power system
supply contracts (thus creating an administrative completely on a new footing.
imbalance). Short imbalances are collectively taken care
of by the TSO, longer imbalances are taken care of by the
energy supplier (and corresponding balance responsible
party)48.
Settlement consists mainly of allocating meter data Data analytics will enhance this trend and will allow
and their corresponding energy exchange to the suppliers or aggregators to enter a business niche that is
responsible market parties and associated contracts and, focussing on energy of ‘higher value’ to their customers,
afterwards, the associated payments. While data analytics for example by operating demand response or (local)
can achieve beneits in optimizing these processes, it is in storage tweaked to the wishes of these customers, using
these contracts and agreements between electricity data from many sources, among which data from smart
traders, energy suppliers and end-users where the major meters.
developments will be.
So, the development of new business models, away from
The main application of data analytics will be driven by the economies of scale of traditional energy suppliers,
the changes at the edges of the settlement processes, focussing on ‘premium’ lexible energy and the
caused by the development of smart metering and the application of data analytics go hand in hand and it is
rise of new business models focusing on alternative value dificult to see which one enables the other. Applications
models rather than the economies of scale of traditional like blockchain, tangle and the internet of things likely
energy suppliers. There are already some energy will play a role in this, likely to make existing settlement
suppliers who have started to make use of smart meter processes much more eficient and secure, but there is
data to build their retail products on, like charging their a small chance that blockchain technology will disrupt
customers wholesale prices. the existing business models of energy suppliers by
automating their tasks and enabling end-users to trade
among themselves, skipping the middle man.
The Internet of Things is about devices communicating with each other. Of course, for the IoT to create
value, this communication has to have sensible content, that has meaning to the ‘receiver’. In other words,
the IoT devices need to have something in common to talk over. While this value can be derived from the
end user (e.g. streaming media, remotely controlled thermostats or an IoT coffee machine connected to the
alarm clock), it becomes interesting if this communication becomes more autonomous, such as optimizing
logistic chains in the industrial IoT, or indeed exchanging energy and optimizing the power system.
Energy use, and especially lexibility in energy use, is something all devices share, and provided it is a
scarce resource is an ‘interesting’ topic between devices to communicate. While the relative increase in
value of this energy IoT will diminish as more appliances offer lexibility, it still might offer a kick-start to a
much wider IoT.
Added
Addedvalue of of
value
smart
smart energy
energy to
to the
valueofofthe
the internet
Internet of things
of Things
Scaling up networks. As energy is a 'topic' all devices share,
its initial value is relatively high. However, as networks grow,
Totalvalue
all devices offer the same thing: lexibility in energy use that
Energy optimization: can be used to optimize the power system.
Value proportunal
Energy opimization: to
nnxx valuelog(n)
proportional to log(n)
Data analytics has, and will continue to have, an enormous impact on the electricity system
and its stakeholders. To beneit from it, companies will strive to connect data sources, sources
within their company, external public sources and also sources from other companies, including
sharing data with competitors.
(1) Rus, Daniela. Study: Carpooling apps could reduce trafic 75%. www.csail.mit.edu. [Online] 3 January 2017
https://www.csail.mit.edu/ridesharing_reduces_trafic_300_percent
(2) Aalst, prof. dr. WMP van der. http://www.processmining.org/. Process Mining. [Online] 2014
http://www.processmining.org/
(3) DNV GL. 10 Technology Trends Creating a New Power Realy. www.dnvgl.com. [Online] 2016
https://www.dnvgl.com/energy/publications/download/technology-outlook-2025-energy.html
(4) USEF. www.USEF.info. http://www.usef.info/Downloads.aspx. [Online] 2016.
(5) The application of health and risk indices as a decision-support tool for utilities.
Vermeer, M.E., Schuddebeurs, J.D. and Wetzer, J.M. London : IET Digital Library, 2016
Asset Management Conference (AM 2016), 2016 page 31
(6) World business council for sustainable development. Corporate Renewable Power Purchase Agreements
www.wbcsd.org. [Online] 26 October 2016
http://www.wbcsd.org/Clusters/Climate-Energy/Resources/Corporate_Renewable_PPAs_Scaling_up_globally
(7) USEF. USEF: Workstream on aggregator implementation models
https://www.usef.energy. [Online] September 2017. https://www.usef.energy/news-events/publications/
(8) Kamphuis, R., et al. Real-time trade dispatch of a commercial VPP with residential customers in the
PowerMatchingCity SmartGrid living lab. [Online] 2013
IET Conference Publications. 2013. 1-4. 10.1049/cp.2013.0666
(9) Bliek, F., et al. PowerMatchingCity, a living lab smart grid demonstration. Innovative Smart Grid Technologies
Conference Europe (ISGT Europe), 2010 IEEE PES. 1 - 8. 10.1109/ISGTEUROPE.2010.5638863, 2010
(10) Anderson, Chris. The end of theory: the data deluge makes scientiic method obsolete. Wired. June 2008
(11) DNV GL. https://www.dnvgl.com/publications/smart-cable-guard-2-0-17603
www.dnvgl.com [Online] DNV GL, 2018
(12) Kadurek, Petr. Data Applications for Advanced Distribution Networks Operation (PhD thesis)
Enschede: Ipskamp drukkers, 2013
(13) DNV GL. https://www.dnvgl.com/publications/making-renewables-smarter-104362
https://www.dnvgl.com/publications/. [Online] 11 2017
(14) Sridhar, Narasi. 2017 Frank Newman Speller Award: Knowledge-Based Predictive Analytics
in Corrosion. 2017, Vol. 74, 2
(15) Qian, Y., et al. Risk on failure, based on PD measurements in actual MV PILC and XLPE power cables
Jicable'15. Versailles, France, June 2015
1
This comes of course at the expense of the taxi drivers. Whether this is completely ethical is another issue.
Around Uber, but also around Airbnb there are many controversies. They are transforming their industries to such
an extent that many think that new regulation is required.
2
‘Big Data’ is usually characterized by Volume, Velocity, Variety and sometimes Veracity. In other words, the data is
too much, too fast, too divers and with a too low ‘integrity’ to be handled with ‘traditional’ ICT technology.
3
Note: A fundamental difference between these markets and electricity is that besides better service and more choice
Uber and Airbnb main breakthrough is a much more eficient matching between demand and supply that includes
new participants that did previously not participate. The electricity system is characterized by a per deinition (near)
perfect match of demand and supply, that includes all grid connected generation and demand. So, while the Uber
and Airbnb business models can and likely will be transposed to the energy sector, their impact will be different.
Data analytics does enable other business models that might have a similar impact on the electricity markets as
Uber did on the taxi market.
4
Management of the shared data might also be an issue, as this can lead to distrust and if one of the participating
partners would take this role. Most likely this would be done by an independent third party (e.g. a joint venture of
the participants, or an independent service provider).
5
For example, DNV GL has set up its Veracity data analytics platform for external clients to store, analyse and share
data among each other, even across industries and beneit from the data analytics capabilities it offers.
6
In 2008 Chris Anderson published an article in ‘Wired’ predicting the End of Theory. “With enough data, the numbers
speak for themselves.” For practical experience this would be even truer.
7
More information about the challenges the electricity sector is facing can be found in other DNV GL white and
position papers, among which the Energy Transition Outlook: https://eto.dnvgl.com.
8
DER (distributed energy resources) can be generation, like CHP units, solar and wind generation. It includes also
potential lexible loads, like charging of electric vehicles and demand response (both industrial as residential).
9
The main message is that policies are often changing every few years. Still successful examples are the feed in tariffs
boosting solar in Germany and the current tenders for off-shore wind projects in the North Sea, driving down costs.
On the other side there is the ETS scheme that still does not really take off.
10
Another dimension in the transformation of the energy supply is formed by the effects of the unbundling of
distribution and production/supply function of utilities and the liberalization of the latter since 2000.
This has contributed to an overinvestment and consequent crisis in the traditional fossil fuelled power generation.
11
Customers’ expectations as well as the perceived value of the services they received are inluenced by many factors,
like past experiences, information from competitors, reactions from friends and family, the media, etc.
The reversed mechanism: a dissatisied customer ‘running away’, because the service/product did not live up to their
expectation, is even stronger.
12
DSO stands for Distribution System Operator. In this document the term DSO is chosen over DNO
(Distribution Network Operator), because Distribution Network Management will require more and more active
control of assets and services, for example for capacity management, voltage control and other power quality issues.
13
For example the use of drones for automatic inspections of wind turbine blades, see (13).
14
See www.oreda.com
15
See (14). The graph is based on internal analysis by Narasi Sridhar.
16
A (simpliied) example could be: P(failure near sea shore) = P(failure because of salt) + P(failure because of
humidity) – P(failure salt - failure humidity). By factorizing these probabilities in elements and recombining the
elements, data from different failures can be reused to anticipate failures in other situations and possible other
kinds of assets.
DNV GL
DNV GL is a global quality assurance and risk management company. Driven by our purpose of safeguarding life, property
and the environment, we enable our customers to advance the safety and sustainability of their business. We provide
classiication, technical assurance, software and independent expert advisory services to the maritime, oil & gas, power and
renewables industries. We also provide certiication and supply chain services to customers across a wide range of industries.
Operating in more than 100 countries, our experts are dedicated to helping customers make the world safer, smarter and
greener.
The trademarks DNV GL and the Horizon Graphic are the property of DNV GL AS. All rights reserved.
This publication or parts thereof may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying
or recording, without the prior written consent of DNV GL.
©DNV GL 10 /2018