Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
Alcantara, Katrine Ann E.
Dones, Miguel Antonio M.
Lopez, Robynne Kyle N.
Sy, Jason L.
Block 3D
A.Y. 2018-2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Overview of Special Proceedings ................................................................................... 3
Form 1: Extrajudicial Settlement of Estate................................................................ 26
Form 2: Extrajudicial Settlement Among Heirs (with Deed of Absolute Sale) ........... 28
Form 3: Petition for Partition ..................................................................................... 30
Form 4: Affidavit of Self-Adjudication........................................................................ 32
Form 5: Petition for Letters of Administration in Cases of Intestacy ......................... 33
Form 6: Petition for Summary Settlement of Estate of Small Value ......................... 34
Form 7: Petition for Probate of Holographic Will....................................................... 35
Form 8: Notarial Will ................................................................................................. 36
Form 9: Petition for Probate of Notarial Will ............................................................. 38
Form 10: Petition for Escheat ................................................................................. 40
Form 11: Petition for Guardianship ......................................................................... 41
Form 12: Petition for Guardianship of Minors ......................................................... 43
Form 13: Affidavit of Intent and Consent for Adoption of Child ............................... 44
Form 14: Deed of Voluntary Commitment............................................................... 45
Form 15: Petition for Domestic Adoption of a Minor ............................................... 46
Form 16: Petition for Nullity of Marriage.................................................................. 47
Form 17: Petition for Legal Separation ................................................................... 50
Form 18: Petition for Annulment of Voidable Marriage ........................................... 52
Form 19: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus .......................................................... 54
Form 20: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus For Custody of a Minor Child ............ 56
Form 21: Petition for Writ of Amparo....................................................................... 57
Form 22: Petition for Writ of Habeas Data .............................................................. 59
Form 23: Petition for Writ of Kalikasan.................................................................... 62
Form 24: Petition for Change of Name ................................................................... 66
Form 25: Petition for Correction of Entry................................................................. 69
Form 26: Petition for Correction of Entry (Change of Sex)...................................... 71
Form 27: Petition for Correction of Entry (Change of Name) .................................. 73
Form 28: Appeal in Special Proceedings ................................................................ 75
ORDER FOR PARTITION - If after the trial the Contents of the Petition
court finds that the plaintiff has the right thereto,
it shall order the partition of the real estate among 1. The jurisdictional facts – death of the
all the parties in interest. testator and his residence at the time
of death or the province where estate
PARTITION BY AGREEMENT - Thereupon the was left by the decedent who is a
parties may, if they are able to agree, make the non-resident;
partition among themselves by proper 2. The names, ages, and residences of
instruments of conveyance, and the court shall the heirs, legatees, devisees of the
confirm the partition so agreed upon by all the testator or decedent;
parties, and such partition, together with the order 3. The probable value and character of
of the court confirming the same, shall be the property of the estate;
recorded in the registry of deeds of the place in 4. The name of the person for whom the
which the property is situated. letters are prayed;
5. The name of the person having
Probate of Wills custody of the will if has not been
delivered to the court.
Notice Jurisdiction
1. If the ward in a resident of the Philippines, Family Court
notice must be served to persons mentioned
in the petition residing in the province; Venue
including the minor if he is above 14 years
old. 1. Family Court of the province or city of the
ward’s residence if he or she is a resident
2. If the ward is not a resident of the Philippines,
of the Philippines
publication is sufficient.
2. Family Court of the province or city where
the ward’s property is located if he or she
Opposition to Petition
is not a resident of the Philippines
1. Any interested person may file
2. Grounds
Who May File a Petition for Appointment of
a. Competency of the incompetent Guardian for a Minor (or Guardianship of
b. Unsuitability of the person for whom Minors)?
letters are prayed
3. The opposition may pray that the petition: 1. Any relative
a. Be dismissed; or 2. Other person on behalf of the minor
b. That letters of guardianship issue to 3. The Secretary of Social Welfare and
himself; or Development
c. To any suitable person 4. The Secretary of Health in case of an
insane minor who needs to be
Parents as Guardians hospitalized
All defenses not raised in the return shall be Petitioner shall be exempted from the
deemed waived. payment of the docket and other lawful fees
Return Contents
a. A certified true machine copy of the All petitions for the clerical or
certificate or of the page of the typographical errors and/or change of
registry book containing the entries first names or nicknames may be availed
sought to be corrected or changed; of ONLY ONCE.
b. At least two (2) public or private
documents showing the correct Hence, if a person has availed of a
entries upon which correction or petition for correction of clerical or
change shall be based; typographical error under RA 9408 and
c. Other documents which the wants to correct another clerical or
petitioner or the city or municipal civil typographical error should file a petition
registrar or the consul general may with the RTC UNDER RULE 108.
consider relevant and necessary for
the approval of the petition; However, if a person has filed a petition
d. For correction of erroneous entry of for correction of clerical or typographical
date of birth or sex of a person: errors, he can still avail of a petition for
earliest school record of earliest change of first name of nickname, and
school documents such as, but not vice versa.
limited to, medical records, baptismal
certificate and other documents
issued by religious authorities;
e. For change of gender corrected:
certification issued by an accredited
government physician attesting to
the fact that the petitioner has not
undergone sex change or sex
transplant; and
f. Certification from appropriate law
enforcement agencies that the
petitioner has no pending case or no
criminal record
This AGREEMENT made and entered into this [ ]nd day of [Address] 201_ by and among:
[HEIR], of legal age, Filipino, [status], and with residence and postal address at _________________;
[HEIR], of legal age, Filipino, [status], and with residence and postal address at ______________;
[HEIR], of legal age, Filipino, [status], and with residence and postal address at ______________;
WITNESSETH:
THAT we are the legitimate children and sole heirs of [name of deceased] who died on [date] in
[place of death]; copy of his death certificate is hereto attached as Annex “A”;
THAT said deceased died without any will or testament and without any outstanding debts on favor of
any person or entity;
THAT said deceased, at the time of his death, left certain property, situated in [address] and more
particularly described as follows, to wit:
[Technical description of property; specific metes and bounds of the property with approximate
area thereof, as indicated on the face of the title]
THAT pursuant to Section 1 of Rule 74 of the Revised Rules of Court of the Philippines, and we being
all of age and with full capacity to contract, we do hereby adjudicate unto ourselves the properties
described above, in equal shares.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereinto signed this AGREEMENT, this _nd day of [Month] 201_
in the ________, Philippines.
HEIR HEIR
_________________ ____________________________
HEIR
____________________
_______________________________
____________________________
Witness Witness
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
BEFORE ME, a Notary Public for and in the City of Makati, this 2nd day of October 2013
personally appeared:
All known to me to be the same persons who executed the foregoing instrument and hereby
acknowledged to me that the same is their free and voluntary act and deed.
This instrument consisting of two (2) pages, including this page on which this acknowledgement
is written refers to an EXTRAJUDICIAL SETTLEMENT OF ESTATE and has been signed by the parties
and their witnesses and sealed with my notarial seal.
Doc. No.
Page No.
Book No.
Series of 2018.
This Extrajudicial Settlement of Estate, made and executed in [Place] on [Date] by and among:
WITNESSETH, that:
WHEREAS, We are the sole heirs of [Name of Decedent] who passed away on [Date] , and at the time
of his death, was residing at [Place], copy of his death certificate is hereto attached as Annex A;
WHEREAS, the decedent, died intestate, without Will or Testament, and without any outstanding debts
in favor of any person or entity;
WHEREAS, the decedent is the absolute and registered owner of two parcels of land located at [Place]
covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. [TCT No.] and [TCT No.] respectively, of the Registry of
Deeds of [Place] and more particularly described as follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1 of Rule 74 of the Revised Rules of Court of the Philippines, and
being with full capacity to contract, we do hereby adjudicate unto ourselves the parcel of land described
above, in EQUAL PRO-INDIVISO SHARE EACH;
That for and in consideration of the sum of [amount in words] (P_____________) , Philippine
Currency, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by us, the Heirs of _______ , we do hereby SELL,
CEDE, CONVEY, and TRANSFER by way of ABSOLUTE SALE unto [name of buyer] , (his/her) heirs,
assigns and successors-in-interests, all our rights, interests and participation over the above-described
parcel of land; and we hereby warrant the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the VENDEE, his heirs
and assigns and warrant to defend his rights and interests against any claim from third persons
whomsoever, that possession to be transferred upon the execution of this instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands this _____ day of [Month,
Year] at Place] .
____________________ ____________________
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
BEFORE ME , a Notary Public for and in the City of [Place] , Philippines this [Date] personally
appeared the following:
known to me and to me known to be the same persons who executed the foregoing Extrajudicial
Settlement Among Heirs consisting of Two (2) pages including this page, and they acknowledged to me
that the same is their free and voluntary act and deed.
WITNESS MY HAND AND NOTARIAL SEAL at the place and on the date first herein above written.
Notary Public
Doc. No.
Page No.
Book No.
Series of
versus
NEIL FALGUI,
Defendant,
x ------------------------------------ x
PETITION
Plaintiff, by undersigned counsel, and to this Honorable Court, respectfully alleges that:
1. The plaintiff, of legal age, Filipino, married, and resident of No. 12 Blackwater St., Quezon City.
The defendant is of legal age, Filipino, married, and resident of No. 11 Blackwater St., Quezon
City.
2. Plaintiff and defendant are co-owners of one parcel of land (residential lot) situated at Espana
Street, Manila, Philippines, and covered by Transfer Certificate Title No. 13576 of the Office of
Registered Deeds of the City of Manila.
3. The aforementioned parcel of land has a 30 meter frontage at Espana Street, and is easily
divisible into two parcels both of which can conveniently serve as either residential or commercial
premises.
4. Plaintiff had notified defendant of former’s desire and intention to partition said property, and for
that purpose, had presented and submitted to defendant a project plan of partition.
5. Notwithstanding repeated demands by plaintiff, defendant refused and still refuses without
justifiable cause or reason, to accede to the partition of the property.
I, [petitioner], of legal age, [citizenship], [status], and a resident [address], after being sworn in
accordance with law, hereby depose and say: That I am the Petitioner in the above-entitled case; That I
have caused the preparation of the above Petition and I have read the same and knows the contents
thereof; That the allegations contained therein are true and correct of my own personal knowledge.
That I further certify that: (a) I have not theretofore commenced any other action or proceeding or filed
any claim involving the same issues or matter in any court, tribunal, or quasi-judicial agency and, to the
best of my knowledge, no such action or proceeding is pending therein; (c) if I should thereafter learn
that the same or similar action or proceeding has been filed or is pending before the Supreme Court, the
Court of Appeals, or any other tribunal or quasi-judicial agency, I undertake to report such fact within five
(5) days there from to the court or agency wherein the original pleading and sworn certification
contemplated
herein have been filed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hands this 24th day of February 2015, at Quezon
City,
Philippines.
JURAT
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, this 24th day of February 2015, by [affiant] who exhibited
to
me her Community Tax Certificate No. 123456 issued at Makati City, Philippines on March 8, 2014.
Doc. No.
Page No.
Book No.
Series of
x-----------------------------x
AFFIDAVIT OF SELF-ADJUDICATION
I, NAME , of legal age, Filipino, single and a resident of [address] , after having been duly sworn to
in accordance with law, depose and state:
1. That I am the only heir of [name of deceased] who died wihout any last will and testament on
[date] in [place] as evidenced by his Death Certificate issued by the City of Makati hereto
attached as Annex “A” and made an integral part of this affidavit;
2. That at the time of his death, my father had no debts, liabilities or obligations to any persons,
agency or institution;
3. That the only property he left is a [description] hereto attached as “Annex B” and made an
integral part of this affidavit;
4. That pursuant to Rule 74, Sec 1 of the Rules of Court, I hereby adjudicate unto myself the
above—described real estate by means of this Affidavit and hereby files the same with the
Register of Deeds of [place] City with the request that the said adjudication be made effective
without judicial proceeding as prescribed by the aforementioned provision of the Rules of
Court.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereinto set my hand this _nd day of [month] 201_ in [place] ,
Philippines.
________________
Affiant
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this __________ 2013 in ______ City, Metro Manila,
Philippines, affiant exhibiting to me her ____________________ issued in ________ on _________ and
valid until ____________.
Doc. No.
Page No.
Book No.
Series of 2018.
THEODORE ROOSEVELT,
Petitioner,
x ------------------------------------ x
PETITION
2. On May 2, 2016, Roose Bolton died without leaving any will in the city of Makati, Philippines,
which was his residence at the time of death.
3. The deceased’s only heir is herein petitioner, Ramsay Bolton, residing at No. 12 Winterfell St.
Makati City
4. The deceased left a house and lot located at No. 152, Onyx Road, Grain Subdivision, Quezon City
and cash amounting to Fifty Thousand Pesos (P50,000); he had no debts.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that after due notice and hearing, letters of administration of the
estate of the deceased, Roose Bolton, be issued in favor of petitioner.
x ------------------------------------ x
1. That the petitioner, of legal age, Filipino,married, and resident of [address], is the mother of
recently deceased [name of deceased], who died intestate in [place of death] on __ MONTH
20__;
2. That the decedent is an inhabitant of [address], and a resident of [address] , at the time of her
death;
3. That the heirs of the decedent consist only of her parents, to wit:
4. That the property left by the decedent consists of personal property, the gross value of [amount]
(Pxxxxx.00).
5. Personal property above mentioned is a [ description of property]
6. That the decedent has left no debts.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that upon proper notice and hearing the estate of the decedent
be summarily settled and distributed to the abovementioned heirs.
_______________,
Petitioner,
x ------------------------------------ x
PETITION
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that after due notice and publication this Honorable Court fix the
date for the probate of the holographic will and that letters of administration be issued in favor of the
herein petitioner and thereafter adjudicate the properties of the deceased in accordance with the said
holographic will.
(Sgd.) ________________
Counsel for the Petitioner
[Address]
IBP No.
PTR No
Roll No.
MCLE Compliance No.
I, [ Testator] , of legal age, married to [Spouse] , a native of [Address] , now actually residing at
[address] , being of sound and disposing mind and memory, and not acting under influence, violence,
fraud or intimidation of whatever kind, declare this to be my Last Will and Testament which I have caused
to be written in English, the language which is known to me. And I hereby declare that:
II. I give and bequeath to my children __________, __________, and __________, in equal
shares, the following properties, real and personal, whatsoever and wheresoever located:
[Description of property]
III. I designate _______________ as the sole executor of this Last Will and Testament.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand this ___day of July 2007 in __________.
(Sgd.) _________________
ATTESTATION CLAUSE
WE, the undersigned witnesses, whose residences are stated opposite our respective names, do hereby
certify that: the [ testator] has published unto us the foregoing will consisting of ___ pages numbered
correlatively in letters on the upper part of each page, as his/her last will and testament and has signed
the same and every page thereof, on the left margin, in our joint presence and we, in turn, at his/her
request have witnessed and signed the same and every page thereof, on the left margin, in the presence
of the testator and in the presence of each other.
[WITNESS 1] [Residence]
[WITNESS 2] [Residence]
[WITNESS 3] [Residence]
JOINT ACKNOWLEDGMENT
BEFORE ME, Notary Public for and I the _______________, this ___day of __, 20__, personally
appeared:
all known to me to be the same persons who signed the foregoing Will, the first as testator and the last
three as instrumental witnesses, and they respectively acknowledged to me that they signed the same
as their own free act and deed.
This Will consists of ___ pages, including the page in which this acknowledgment is written, and has
been signed on the left margin of each and every page thereof by the testator and his witnesses and has
been sealed with my Notarial seal.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand the day, year and place written.
(Sgd.) _____________
Notary Public
Until ________________
IBP No.______________
PTR No._____________
Roll No.______________
MCLE No.____________
Doc. No.
Page No.
Book No.
Series of 2018.
Petitioner,
SP PROC. No. 0023
For: Probate of Will
x ------------------------------------ x
1. That the petitioner, of legal age, and resident of [address], is the executor named in the last will
and testament of [name of deceased], deceased, who died intestate in [place of death] on __
MONTH 20__;
2. That a photostatic copy of the last said will and testament is hereto attached as Annex “A” and
made an integrral part of this petition, the original thereof to be presented to this Honorable Court
at the time of probabte;
3. That the subscribing witnesses to said will are: [name of witness], [name of witness], and
[name of witness], all of whom are residents of __________ City;
4. That the decedent is an inhabitant of the Philippines and a resident of [address] at the time of
her death;
5. That the Petitioner, named in the will as executor thereof, is legally qualified to act as such and
hereby consents and agrees to accept said trust;
6. That the following persons, all of age, have been named in the said will as devisees of the
deceased, to wit:
7. That the property left by the decedent consists of real and personal property, the gross value of
which is [value in words] (value in numbers).
PRAYER
X--------------------------------------------X
PETITION
Senior State Solicitor Draco Malfoy, as authorized by Solicitor General Ron D. Weasley, in behalf
of the Republic of the Philippines, unto this Honorable Court. Respectfully avers that:
1. Harry Potter, an American citizen, and resident of 32 Grimmauld Place, Hogwarts St.,
Mandaluyong City died intestate in the said city on October 1, 2018;
2. At the time of his death, he left personal and real property in the city, to wit:
a. Condominium Unit (Unit No. 234 located at the 2nd floor, Hogwarts Building, Pioneer
St., Mandaluyong City
b. One (1) Nimbus Two Thousand Fountain Pen
c. One (1) Firebolt sedan with plate number b33pb33p
3. He left no heir or persons who by law are entitled to inherit his personal and real property.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that upon due notice and hearing, and after payment of
his just debt and charges, the estate of the deceased Harry Potter be declared in favor of the
Government, in accordance with law.
Draco Malfoy
Senior State Solicitor
Petitioner.
x ------------------------------------------------------- x
1. That the petitioner who is of age, single, and resident of Unit 1F, Building 2, Tuscany
Private Estate, Mckinley Hill, Taguig is the friend of Juan Dela Cruz (hereinafter referred to as the
“WARD”)
2. That the said WARD, by reason of her age, is unable to take care of herself and manage her
property without outside aid
3. That the said WARD is 103 years of age, is a resident of 36 Xavier Street Greenhills West
Subdivision, San Juan City.
4. That the said WARD is the owner of a parcel of land located in the City of Makati, with a
probable value of FIFTY MILLION PESOS (‘P50,000,000);
5. That due to the said WARD being incompetent, it is necessary and convenient that a guardian of
his person and property be appointed;
7. That, as above stated, the Petitioner is the person having the said WARD in his care, and that he
possesses all qualifications to whom letters of guardianship should issue.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that, upon due notice and hearing, and upon the
giving of such bond as this Honorable Court may direct, that the said Petitioner be appointed
guardian of the person and estate of the WARD
(sgd.)
Moses Roses
Counsel for Petitioner
2 Rockwell Drive, Makati City
PTR NO. 124272
IBP No. 183383
Roll No. 123432
MCLE No: 454674
1. That the Petitioner who is of age, single, and resident of Dr A. Santos Ave, Parañaque, Metro
Manila is the actual of custodian of the minor AYO CO, (hereinafter referred to as the “MINOR”)
2. That the said MINOR, who at the time of the filing of this petition is only eight (8) years of age, and
is a resident of Dr A. Santos Ave, Parañaque, Metro Manila.
3. That the said MINOR is the owner or real property, located in Makati City, of the probable value of
ONE HUNDRED MILLION PESOS (P100,000,000.00)
4. That due to the continued absence of the parents of said MINOR, it is necessary and convenient
that a guardian of his person and property be appointed;
6. That, as above stated, the Petitioner is the person having the said MINOR in his care, and that he
possesses all qualifications to whom letters of guardianship should issue.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that, upon due notice and hearing, and upon the
giving of such bond as this Honorable Court may direct, that the said Petitioner be appointed
guardian of the person and estate of the MINOR.
3. That we are unable to support said child and that believing that it would be for (his/her)own interest
and benefit, we, hereby signify our written intent, freely and voluntarily to have our(son/daughter)
____________be adopted.
4. That we also signify our written consent, freely, willingly and voluntarily to have our
son/daughter)____________be legally adopted by the
spouses_________and___________of___________, Philippines in accordance with law.
5. That we are ready and willing, freely and voluntarily to abdicate our parental authority over said child
in favor of the spouses____________and_____________, who are ____and _____years of age,
respectively, and who are both possessed of the necessary civil and legal rights as well as the financial
capacity to raise, rear and support said child, after the adoption proceeding had been instituted and an
order of adoption be issued.
6. That we execute this affidavit to declare our intention and consent to the adoption of our
(son/daughter)_________as well as to the truth of the foregoing facts.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this____________at"_____________,
Philippines.
Affiant Affiant
(JURAT)
I, MAMA BEAR, of legal age, Filipino, widow, temperate at all times and in full possession of my
mental powers, hereby declare:
That I am the legitimate mother of the minor, BABY BEAR, five (5) years old, whose father is now
deceased.
That due to my inability to support the said child, and believing it would be for her own interest and
benefit, I hereby give my written consent, freely and voluntarily, that said child be committed to the
Department of Social Welfare and Development for adoption, in accordance with law.
MAMA BEAR
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ____ day of ______ 2018 in _________,
Philippines, affiant exhibiting to me her competent evidence of identity by way of _______________
issued at ___________ on ________________.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that upon due notice and hearing, judgment be rendered
adjudging that the minor child, [NAME OF ADOPTEE], be freed from all legal obligations of obedience
and maintenance with respect to her natural parents and that she be declared to all legal intents and
purposes, the child of the herein petitioners, [NAME OF SPOUSES] and that her surname be changed
to that of petitioners.
City of Makati, October 15, 2018.
Atty. Counsel McCounsel
Counsel for Petitioner
Address of Counsel
Roll of Attorneys No.
PTR No.
IBP Lifetime Membership/Receipt No.
MCLE Compliance No.
[Verification with Certification of Non-Forum Shopping]
Leticia Manalo,
Petitioner
Civil Case No. CV0101
For: DECLARATION OF NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
-versus-
Gregorio Manalo,
Respondent
X-----------------------X
PETITION
1. Petitioner, Leticia Manalo, is of legal age, Filipino citizen, and a resident of NY Street,
Mandaluyong City, where he may be served with summons and other court processes;
2. Respondent, Gregorio Manalo, is likewise of legal age, Filipino citizen, and a resident of Pioneer
Street, Mandaluyong City, where he may be served with summons and other court processes;
3. Petitioner and Respondent (referred herein as Parties) entered into a contract of marriage on
October 1, 2015 at the Office of the City Mayor of Mandaluyong. Solemnized by Hon. Benjamin
Abalos. A copy of their marriage certificate is hereto attached as Annex “a”;
4. The parties begot two children. Copies of their children’s Certificates of Live Birth are hereto
attached as Annex “B” and “C”, respectively;
5. Petitioner and Respondent were childhood friends, growing up in the same area and were
schoolmates during elementary. They went their separate ways from high school to college and
only met again upon their batch reunion in a restaurant in Mandaluyong City;
6. Petitioner and respondent became romantically involved immediately after the reunion;
8. When Respondent’s parents came to know that herein Petitioner got pregnant, they pressured
the Respondent to marry Petitioner. Likewise, the relatives of Petitioner put pressure on her by
warning her not to put their family in a humiliating situation;
9. Even before their marriage, the Petitioner had observed that the Respondent displayed
irresponsibility to the extent that he oftentimes would not care for her emotions and feelings.
However, she hoped that the Respondent would change once they get married. Petitioner then
gave in to the pressure and married Respondent even though she did not know him too well;
11. Petitioner tried convincing Respondent to change for the better for the sake of the family and
their growing children and to return to them as a husband and a father to fulfill their marital
obligations but such pleas fell on deaf ears as Respondent was not willing to be a husband and
a father and does not want to live in a peaceful union with Petitioner;
12. Petitioner sought the help of a clinical psychologist, Dr. Manuel Villacorta, who conducted a
psychological evaluation on the ability of Respondent to discharge and cope with the essential
obligations of marriage. Dr. Villacorta found that Respondent was psychologically incapacitated
to perform the essential marital obligations resulting from his immaturity, which affected his
sense of rational judgment and responsibility;
13. As found by Dr. Villacorta, Respondent’s behavioral patterns were affected during his early
developmental years where he was raised and exposed in an unfavorable environment;
14. The psychiatric illness of the Respondent is serious and incurable since it is deeply rooted in his
personality and that such illness originated from parental overindulgence or overprotection
especially coming from the mother, the parent of the opposite sex. The fact that his father was
an Overseas Filipino Worker (OFW) in Saudi Arabia, and hence the lack of a father figure, helped
the illness develop. The absence of a father figure during his growing years deprived him of the
guidance on how to be a proper husband and father which was apparent in his marriage;
15. These traits reveal that he has psychological incapacity under Art. 36 of the Family Code of the
Philippines and is medically labeled as having “Histrionic Personality Disorder with Dependent
16. The psychological makeup of the parties are explained in greater detail in the Clinical
Assessment Report (“Report”) dated 25 July 2018, a copy of which is attached as Annex “D”;
17. That the psychological incapacity on the part of the defendant was already existing and manifest
even before the celebration of the marriage, but Petitioner thought it will disappear during the
marriage; however, it subsisted and even got worse;
18. That said psychological defect or illness is grave, serious and incurable;
19. Petitioner is filing this petition to declare her marriage a nullity. Respondent showed no concern
for his obligation towards his family in violation of Art. 68 of the Family Code which provides that
husband and wife are obliged to live together, observe mutual love, respect and fidelity, and
render mutual help and support. Petitioner is also filing this case under Art. 36 of the same Code
as the Respondent manifested apparent personality disorder and psychological dysfunction, i.e.
his lack of effective sense of rational judgment and responsibility by being psychologically
immature and failing to perform his responsibilities as a husband;
20. That the parties did not acquire any property and there are no known creditors who will be
prejudiced by the declaration of nullity of their marriage should the Honorable Court grant this
petition, hereto attached as Certificate of Non-Property, Annex “E”.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that judgment be rendered declaring the nullity of
the marriage of Petitioner with Respondent pursuant to Article 36, and the annulment of the same
marriage based on Article 45(5) of the Family Code of the Philippines.
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are also prayed for.
Copy Furnished:
Office of the City Prosecutor (Personal Service)
Justice Hall, Mandaluyong City
EXPLANATION
A copy of the foregoing PETITION was sent through registered mail to the Office of the Solicitor
General due to distance, and manpower constraints.
1. Petitioner Gregorio del Pilar and Respondent Remedios Nable Jose met each other sometime
in January, 2012. The acquaintance led to courtship and romantic relations, culminating in the
exchange of marital vows in a church wedding on April 1, 2014. A copy of the marriage certificate
is hereto attached as ANNEX “A” and made an integral part of this petition;
2. After their marriage, the couple decided to settle at Dagupan Village, Mandaluyong City, where
they built their family home;
3. The union produced a single child, namely, Joven, born on December 2, 2015. A copy of the
Certificate of Live Birth is attached hereto as Annex “B”;
4. The couple’s marriage started of good which manifested through their display of intimacy and
giving of trust and respect to each other. They were able to easily address minor issues in their
relationship. Remedios was a good wife and mother as she placed the concerns and welfare of
Gregorio and Joven as her priority above anything else;
5. In the middle stages of their marriage, Remedios showed signs of thoughtlessness in the
discharge of her marital obligations as she became addicted to gambling (poker, mahjong) and
seldom went home. Remedios became an irresponsible wife and mother. Gregorio tried to
rekindle their marriage and to reverse the adverse situation;
6. However, sometime in April 2017, Remedios succumbed into habitual alcoholism and when
confronted about it, she would turn violent and physically hurt Gregorio, causing trauma to both
Gregori and Joven;
7. In the latter part of July 2017. Remedios left her family and the conjugal home and has not
returned since. She has totally become unmindful of her obligations to the family since all her
resources were spent in gambling and alcohol. There was a complete cessation of marital
relations between Remedios and Gregorio - both personal and property related - as well as
parental relations with their children since Remedios no longer provided support, may it be
financial or emotional;
8. In the early part of December 2017, the situation turned worse when Gregorio discovered that
Remedios was pregnant with another man’s child. Due to this circumstance, Gregorio and Joven
9. Gregorio can no longer tolerate Remedios’ shortcomings of being a mother and wife due to her
irresponsibility and unwarranted acts as well as sexual infidelity resulting to a failure on her part
to perform her duties to live with Gregorio, observe mutual love, respect, and render mutual help
and support;
10. Hence, this Petition for Legal Separation on the following grounds: (a) repeated physical violence
or grossly abusive conduct directed against Gregorio, (b) habitual alcoholism of Remedios, (c)
sexual infidelity or perversion of Remedios, and (d) abandonment by Remedios without
justifiable cause for more than one year;
11. The couple did not enter into any property relations and Gregorio has no known creditors;
12. In filing this petition, Gregorio was constrained to engage the services of counsel for an
acceptance fee of Ten Thousand Pesos (Php 10000) and per appearance fee of Two Thousand
Pesos (Php 2000), and will incur litigation expenses in the sum of Twenty Thousand Pesos (Php
20000).
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is respectfully prayed for this Honorable Court to decide in favor
of the petitioner and specifically to decree the following:
1. The Legal Separation between Gregorio and Remedios;
2. The dissolution of their conjugal property relations and the division of the net conjugal assets;
3. The designation of Gregorio as the administrator of the absolute community during the pendency
of the action and eventual dissolution of such property;
4. The custody of their common child to be awarded to Gregorio;
5. The forfeiture of Remedios’ one-half share in the net conjugal assets in favour of the common
child;
6. The disqualification of Remedios from inheriting from Gregorio by intestate succession as well
as the revocation of the provisions in the will of Gregorio (if any) in favor of Gregorio;
7. Remedios to provide support to Gregorio and Joven;
8. The payment to Gregorio’s counsel of Php 10000 as attorney’s fees to be taken from Remedios’
share in the net assets or if none from Gregorio’s share therein; and
9. Such other relief or reliefs as may be deemed just and equitable by the Honorable Court.
Emilio Aguinaldo
Counsel for Petitioner
1 Heneral St., Kawit, Cavite
Roll of Attorneys No. 999
PTR No. 23498
IBP Receipt No. 56723
MCLE Compliance No. EA-232323
1. Petitioner Gregorio del Pilar and Respondent Remedios Nable Jose met each other sometime
in January, 2012. The acquaintance led to courtship and romantic relations, culminating in the
exchange of marital vows in a church wedding on April 1, 2015. A copy of the marriage certificate
is hereto attached as ANNEX “A” and made an integral part of this petition;
2. After their marriage, the couple decided to settle at Dagupan Village, Mandaluyong City, where
they built their family home;
4. That during February 15, 2015, Gregorio had the opportunity to have a good paying job in Saudi
Arabia, the same was made known to Remedios. However, the news was not taken lightly by
Remedios; she became violent and began throwing things inside the house. Remedios took a
knife and aimed it at the neck of Gregorio uttering words like “Goyong, kung iiwanan mo ako
dito, papatayin kita at ang mga kamag-anak mo”;
5. Fearing for his safety and that of his family’s, Gregorio followed Remedios’ orders and did not
leave for Saudi Arabia;
6. However, sometime in March 2015, Remedios once again threatened Gregorio’s life. While
Gregorio was sleeping, Remedios held a knife, once again on his neck and stated that she would
kill him and his family if they did not get married immediately. Fearing for his life, he said yes;
7. At the end of March 2015, another instance of violence occurred. While Gregorio was shining
his leather shoes, Remedios barged in the backdoor and pointed a pistol at Gregorio. Remedios
then threatened that she would kill Gregorio and his family if they did not get married
immediately;
9. That frequently, Remedious would take out a knife or pistol and just point it at Gregorio uttering
threatening words such as “subukan mong umalis, papatayin kita at ang pamilya mo.” This
scenario has occurred at least once a week until Gregorio could no longer tolerate the shame,
humiliation, and embarrassment brought about by said marriage which was entered into by force
and intimidation;
11. The couple did not enter into any property relations and Gregorio has no known creditors;
12. In filing this petition, Gregorio was constrained to engage the services of counsel for an
acceptance fee of Ten Thousand Pesos (Php 10000) and per appearance fee of Two Thousand
Pesos (Php 2000), and will incur litigation expenses in the sum of Twenty Thousand Pesos (Php
20000).
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is respectfully prayed for this Honorable Court to decide in favor
of the petitioner and specifically to decree the following:
2. The dissolution of their conjugal property relations and the division of the net conjugal assets;
3. The designation of Gregorio as the administrator of the absolute community during the pendency
of the action and eventual dissolution of such property;
4. The forfeiture of Remedios’ one-half share in the net conjugal assets in favour of the common
child;
5. The disqualification of Remedios from inheriting from Gregorio by intestate succession as well
as the revocation of the provisions in the will of Gregorio (if any) in favor of Gregorio;
7. The payment to Gregorio’s counsel of Php 10000 as attorney’s fees to be taken from Remedios’
share in the net assets or if none from Gregorio’s share therein; and
8. Such other relief or reliefs as may be deemed just and equitable by the Honorable Court.
Emilio Aguinaldo
Counsel for Petitioner
1 Heneral St., Kawit, Cavite
Roll of Attorneys No. 999
PTR No. 23498
IBP Receipt No. 56723
MCLE Compliance No. EA-232323
DIOSDADO MACAPAGAL,
Respondent.
x ------------------------------------------ x
PETITION
2. That the petitioner, _____________, in whose behalf this application is being made, is actually
restrained of his liberty by the respondent _____________ who is the Chief of Police of _____________
at the _____________ Police Station;
3. That sometime in the morning of _____________, petitioner was taken into custody by the said
respondent without a warrant of arrest and detained at the _____________ Police Station without any
criminal charges being filed against him before the proper judicial authorities despite the lapse of
________ (______). Moreover, petitioner was taken by the respondent not under any of the
circumstances where a warrantless arrest is allowed by the law or the Rules of Court;
4. That such restraint of liberty of the petitioner by the respondent is therefore without any legal
authority;
5. That the petitioner through counsel has exhausted all efforts available at law but to no avail, and
that he has no other plain, speedy, and adequate remedy to protect his personal rights and secure his
personal liberty except by his application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, petitioner most respectfully prays that a Writ of Habeas Corpus be issued by this
Honorable Court, directed to the respondent _____________ commanding the latter to produce the
body of _____________ before this Court at the time and place therein specified, and to summon the
respondent _____________ then and there to appear and to show cause of the detention of said
_____________; and that after due proceedings, the said _____________ be restored of his liberty
and forthwith discharged from confinement .
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise prayed for.
ANAQUIN SKYWATER,
Respondent.
x ------------------------------------------ x
PETITION
1. Petitioner is the mother of the minors Luke Skywater, who were born out of the valid marriage
between petitioner and respondent Anaquin Skywater.
2. The marriage failed and petitioner has been living separately from respondent since 2015.
Sometime in March 2018, respondent, unknown to petitioner, abducted the minor children and has kept
them incommunicado and out of petitioner’s reach.
3. Being below seven (7) years of age, custody of the minors is naturally presumed to belong to
petitioner, as their mother. Consequently, respondent’s refusal to allow petitioner to regain custody over
the minors is unlawful and unjustified.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of habeas corpus issue directing
respondent to make a return showing his legal authority to detain the minor children, subject of this
petition, and thereafter, present the minor children personally before the Court on a date and time it
chooses.
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise prayed for.
JARJAR BLINKS
Counsel for Petitioner
Address of Counsel
Roll of Attorneys No.
PTR No.
IBP Lifetime Membership/Receipt No.
MCLE Compliance No.
-versus-
EMILIO AGUINALDO,
Respondent.
x ------------------------------------------ x
PETITION
1. That petitioner is a Filipino citizen, of legal age, with address at ________ and the respondent is a
Filipino citizen , of legal age , with address at _________;
2. That the petitioner, ______, in whose behalf this application is being made, is actually restrained of
his liberty by the respondent, _____ at the latter’s residence at _________;
3. (State facts pertaining to the right to life, liberty and security of the aggrieved party violated or
threatened with violation by the unlawful act or omission of the respondent, and how such threat or
violation is committed with the attendant circumstance detained in supporting affidavits);
4. (The investigation conducted, if any, specifying the names, personal circumstances and addresses
of the investigating authority or individuals, as well as the manner and conduct of the investigation
together with any report);
5. (The actions and recourses taken by the petitioner to determine the fate and whereabouts of the
aggrieved party and the identity of the person responsible for the threat, act or omission).
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, petitioner respectfully prays that a WRIT OF AMPARO be issued by this Honorable
Court, ordering respondents ________ to immediately release from their custody the person of
_________ to petitioners if still alive, or if already dead, to show the place where his remains is placed
or buried and to pay the petitioner _____________.
(may also include prayer for:
1. Order enjoining respondent from doing harm or harassment.
2. Order allowing inspection by the court of the premises
3. Order respondents to produce documents to or in their custody related to the detention.)
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise prayed for.
versus
DART VEEDER,
Respondent.
I.
NATURE OF THE PETITION
1. This is a petition for the writ of habeas data filed under A.M. No. 08-1-16-SC, also known as the Rule
on the Writ of Habeas Data to require the respondent/s to produce and, if necessary update and rectify,
or, in the alternative, suppress or destroy information within its control and/or contained in its database,
which relates to petitioner, his/her family, his/her home and his/her correspondence.
2. Petitioner respectfully submits that respondent obtained the information through an unlawful act, has
unjustifiably failed to disclose the information to petitioner, and/or has unjustifiably refused to update,
rectify, suppress or destroy the information.
3. This act or omission of respondent to comply with petitioner's demand is a violation of, or poses a
threat of violation to, petitioner's right to privacy in life, liberty and security.
4. In view of the foregoing, petitioner brings this petition before this Honorable Court praying that the
respondent be required to cause the immediate production of the information requested so that the same
may be revealed to petitioner for proper updating, rectification or, in the alternative, for its suppression
or destruction, whatever may be necessary to protect petitioner's privacy.
5. Finally, petitioner respectfully submits that he/she is an indigent person and prays that this Honorable
Court exempt him/her from docket and other legal fees in this case, subject to the submission of proof of
his/her indigency within fifteen days from the filing of this petition.
II
6. Petitioner is a Filipino, of legal age, and residing at [state address]. She may be served with notices
from this Honorable Court through her undersigned counsel.
7. Respondent is being impleaded in his capacity as a public officer or employee, in charge of the
information or database of [state office], which office is engaged in the gathering, collecting, and storing
of data. He/She may be served summons and other processes of this Honorable Court at the [state
office address]. Respondent is of legal age, residing at [state address] and is engaged in the gathering,
collecting, and storing of data. He/She may be served summons and other processes of this Honorable
Court at the [state office address].
III
MATERIAL ALLEGATIONS
9. Petitioner is a citizen of the Republic of the Philippines whose right to privacy is protected by the Bill
of Rights found in Article III of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, which provides:
Section 3. (1) The privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon
lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise as prescribed by law.
Any evidence obtained in violation of this or the preceding section shall be inadmissible for any
purpose in any proceeding.
Section 7. The right of the people to information of matters of public concern shall be recognized.
Access to official records and documents, and papers pertaining to official acts, transactions, or
decisions as well as to government research data used as basis for policy development, shall be afforded
the citizen, subject to such limitations as may be provided by law.
10. Also, in Lourdes T. Marquez vs. Hon. Aniano A. Desierto, et al., this Honorable Court had occasion
to rule:
Zones of privacy are recognized and protected in our laws. The Civil Code provides that "[e]very
person shall respect the dignity, personality, privacy, and peace of mind of his neighbors and
other persons" and punishes as actionable torts several acts for meddling and prying into the
privacy of another. It also holds a public officer or employee or any private individual liable for
damages for any violation of the rights and liberties of another person, and recognizes the
privacy of letters and other private communications. The Revised Penal Code makes a crime of
the violation of secrets by an officer, the revelation of trade and industrial secrets, and trespass
to dwelling. Invasion of privacy is an offense in special laws like the Anti-Wiretapping Law, the
Secrecy of Bank Deposits Act, and the Intellectual Property Code. (G.R. No. 135882, June 27,
2001.)
11. Finally, Republic Act 6713, known as the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials
and Employees, makes it a duty of every public officer and employee to allow the inspection of all public
documents, and to respond to requests within fifteen days. Viz:
Section 5. Duties of Public Officials and Employees. — In the performance of their duties, all
public officials and employees are under obligation to:
(a) Act promptly on letters and requests. — All public officials and employees shall, within fifteen
(15) working days from receipt thereof, respond to letters, telegrams or other means of
communications sent by the public. The reply must contain the action taken on the request.
xxx xxx xxx
(e) Make documents accessible to the public. — All public documents must be made accessible
to, and readily available for inspection by, the public within reasonable working hours.
12. On [date], petitioner requested access to all information held about him/her by the respondent, within
fifteen days from respondent's receipt. A copy of the written request is attached as Annex "A".
13. The period given to respondent to allow petitioner access to its database has already lapsed.
15. The use and possible dissemination of the information held by respondent is an unlawful intrusion
into petitioner's privacy, which intrusion threatens to ultimately violate petitioner's right to life, liberty and
security.
16. The information which remains hidden from petitioner is in the database of respondent located in the
following offices: [state the offices or known location of the information].
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, petitioner prays that this Honorable Court give due course to this petition and issue the
writ of habeas data and rule, as follows:
1. Upon the filing of the petition, ENJOIN respondent from disseminating the information;
2. Upon notice and hearing, ORDER respondent to:
a. Produce the information in its possession regarding petitioner's person, his/her family, home
and correspondence;
b. Correct, suppress or destroy the information in its database, whatever may be applicable as
determined by this Honorable Court; and
c. Rectify the damage caused to petitioner's reputation by making a public apology to petitioner,
which shall be circulated in the manner and to such persons as the petitioner may deem
appropriate.
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise prayed for.
YOODA MAESTER
Counsel for Petitioner
Address of Counsel
Roll of Attorneys No.
PTR No.
IBP Lifetime Membership/Receipt No.
MCLE Compliance No.
vs.
[Names of Respondents],
Respondents
x————————————————–x
PETITION FOR WRIT OF KALIKASAN
WITH PRAYER FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ORDER (TEPO)
Petitioners, through the undersigned counsel, and to this Honorable Court, respectfully state that:
PREFATORY STATEMENT
1. What use will modernization serve if it proves to be a scourge on an individual’s fundamental right,
not just to health and safety, but, ostensibly, to life preservation itself, in all of its desired quality?
PARTIES
3. Petitioners are residents and inhabitants of Barangay 183-Villamor, Zone 20, Pasay City and
Magallanes Village, Makati City, all of legal age, Filipinos, with capacity to sue, and residents of the
following addresses: [insert names and addresses here].
Petitioners may be served with the orders, resolutions, notices and processes of this Honorable Court
through their counsel of record, Atty. H. Harry L. Roque, Jr., at Roque and Butuyan Law Offices, 1904
Antel Corporate Centre, 121 Valero Street, Salcedo Village, 1227 Makati City, Philippines.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
8. Barangay 183 Zone 20, Villamor, Pasay City (hereinafter referred to as “Barangay 183”, for brevity)
used to be part of the Villamor Air Base. It was thereafter converted into a private residential land
pursuant to Republic Act No. 7227, otherwise known as “An Act Accelerating the Conversion of Military
Reservations Into Other Productive Uses, Creating the Bases Conversion And Development Authority
For This Purpose, Providing Funds Therefor And For Other Purposes”. As such, the said parcel of land
was subdivided and afterwards sold and awarded to its inhabitants, including herein Petitioners.
9. Magallanes Village (hereinafter referred to as “Magallanes Village”, for brevity) is a residential area
located in Makati City adjacent to Barangay 183.
10. The Petitioners are existing residents and inhabitants of Barangay 183 and Magallanes Village.
Some
of them have likewise established their respective businesses and livelihood therein.
11. On 13 July 2009, without the prior authority from and approval by Respondent Barangay Council of
Barangay 183, Zone 20, Villamor Air Base, Pasay City (hereinafter referred to as “Respondent
Barangay Council”) and without the prior consultation with the constituents of the barangay,
Respondent Barangay Chairman Cesar S. Toledanes (hereinafter referred to as “Respondent
Toledanes”) issued a Barangay Working Permit Clearance “for the installation of 115 KV sub-
transmission lines and poles at the10th and 12th Streets of Barangay 183.”
13. Also, despite the close proximity of the installation of the high tension wires and poles to the nearby
Magallanes Village in Makati City, the residents and inhabitants of the same were not notified or
consulted with respect to such plans.
14. Thus, sometime in August 2010, Respondent MERALCO began erecting towering posts along the
10th, 12th and 27th streets of Barangay 183 and lining the perimeter wall between Barangay 183 and
Magallanes Village. The thirty (30) foot-high poles will hold the transmission lines that will supply more
or less one hundred fifteen (115) Kilovolts (KV) of electricity to the Ninoy Aquino International Airport III
(NAIA 3).
16. The high tension transmission lines shall traverse the entire 10th and 12th streets of Bgy. 183, and
shall pass along the concrete wall separating Barangay 183 of Pasay City and Magallanes Village of
Makati City.
17. On 18 October 2010, Petitioner Gemma dela Cruz, on behalf of the other Petitioners, sent a letter
to Respondents Toledanes, Cortez, Dimaano, Abad, Castillo and Cacacho, appealing for the recall of
the Barangay Working Permit and Resolution No. 40-S-2009 earlier issued by them. This, however,
proved futile.
18. The alarming presence of the towering posts being erected in close proximity to–that is, as near as
one (1) meter from–the respective properties of Petitioners-Residents of Bgy. 183 and less than ten
(10) meters from the respective properties of Petitioners-Residents of Magallanes Village, and the
hazardous effects of the high tension wires to their health and safety, bring Petitioners to seek the
intervention of this Honorable Court.
19. Due to the urgency of the situation, as the installation and energizing of the high tension wires will
be completed by December 2010, there is a need to protect the Petitioners from the hazardous and ill
effects of the same.
DISCUSSION
[For each ground, there should be a discussion of the facts and
circumstances supported by legal and evidentiary bases]
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed of the Honorable Court that:
1. Immediately upon the filing of this petition, a Temporary Environmental Protection Order (TEPO) and
or a Writ of Kalikasan be issued, ordering Respondents and any person acting on their behalf, to cease
and desist from conducting excavation works, installing poles and transmission lines along the entire
2. After a summary hearing, issue a Resolution, extending the effectivity of the TEPO until the
termination of this case; and
Petitioners pray for such other reliefs as are just and equitable under the premises.
SQUIRE MCSQUIRMY,
Petitioner
X----------------------------------------------------------X
Petitioner, through the undersigned counsel and unto this Honorable Court, most respectfully
avers that:
1. Petitioner is of legal age, single, Filipino, and a resident of No. 34 Tertipor St., Fairview, Quezon
City, Philippines where notices and other court processes may be served;
2. Petitioner seeks the change of his name in his Certificate of Live Birth (Copy of which is hereto
attached as Annex “A”, to make an integral part hereof);
3. Petitioner was born in Quezon City, Philippines on December 15, 1994 to husband and wife
Peter McSquirmy and Ashley David;
4. Petitioner’s Certificate of Live Birth bears Registry No. 22-1994, and duly registered on
December 28, 1994;
6. The ground for filing this petition is to remove confusion as to her scholastic records and other
legal effects and her first name appearing of her Certificate of Live Birth;
7. Petitioner has used the name Wormy McSquirmy since childhood up to the present as evidenced
by his scholastic records and several public documents;
9. Petitioner has no pending administrative, criminal, or civil case in any court of law or quasi-
judicial body; and,
10. Petitioner is filing this petition in accordance with Rule 103 of the Rules of Court.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is respectfully prayed of the Honorable Court that upon
due hearing, an order be issued:
1. Declaring that SQUIRE MCSQUIRMY be changed to WORMY MCSQUIRMY;
2. Ordering the Civil Registry Office of Fairview, Quezon City to make the necessary changes in
their records in the Certificate of Live Birth of SQUIRE MCSQUIRMY.
Such other reliefs as are just and equitable are likewise prayed for.
Emilio Aguinaldo
Counsel for Petitioner
1 Heneral St., Kawit, Cavite
Roll of Attorneys No. 999
PTR No. 23498
IBP Receipt No. 56723
MCLE Compliance No. EA-232323
I, SQUIRE MCSQUIRMY, of legal age, Filipino, and a resident of No. 34 Tertipor St., Fairview,
Quezon City, Philippines, after having been sworn to in accordance with law, do hereto depose and say:
1. That I am the petitioner in the above-entitled case;
2. That I have caused the preparation and filing of this petition for change of name;
3. That I have read the material and relevant allegations therein contained and the same are true
and correct based on my personal knowledge and authentic records;
4. That I have not heretofore commenced any action or filed any claim involving the same issues
before any other court, tribunal or quasi-judicial agency; that to the best of my knowledge, there
is no such pending action or claim and that if I should hereafter learn that the same or similar
action or claim has been filed or is pending, I shall report such fact within five (5) days therefrom
to the Honorable Court.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature this 15th day of October 2018,
in Quezon City, Philippines.
SQUIRE MCSQUIRMY
Affiant
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me in Quezon City, on the 15th day of October 2018 by
SQUIRE MCSQUIRMY, personally known to me, to be the same person who personally signed before
me the foregoing and acknowledged that she executed the same.
KANGA ROO,
Petitioner
versus
X----------------------------------------------------------X
PETITION
COMES NOW, the petitioner by the undersigned counsel and unto this Honorable Court
respectfully aver:
1. That the petitioner is of legal age, single and a bona fide resident Kanga's House, Hundred
Acre Wood, Quezon City;
2. That petitioner is the mother of Roo who was born in Hundred Acre Wood on October 5,
2010. The facts and circumstances related to her birth was registered with the Local Civil
Registrar’s Office of San Juan City under Registry No. 999. A copy of which is hereto
attached as Annex “A”;
3. That petitioner is not legally married to the father of Roo, and no longer has contact with
such person.
4. In the Birth Certificate of Roo, item no. 23 was inadvertently entered as legitimated instead
of not legitimated which the latter is her true and correct status.
5. To support the correction of the erroneous entry of legitimated to not legitimated. the
petitioner herein submits a copy of the Certificate of Live Birth, dated ________________
hereto attached as Annex “B”.
6. To avoid further inconsistency, and also to set all the records straight, herein petitioner
requests that the status as appearing in the Birth Certificate of the Roo be corrected from
legitimated to not legitimated.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that, after due notice and publication, in accordance with
the Rules of Court and hearing, this Honorable Court directs the Hundred Acre Wood Quezon City Local
Civil Registrar’s Office that the status of Roo be corrected from legitimated to not legitimated.
SIGNED on this _____ day of April, 2018 at Hundred Acre Wood, Quezon City.
MANDY DY,
Petitioner
versus
PETITION
COMES NOW, the petitioner by the undersigned counsel and unto this Honorable Court
respectfully aver:
1. That the petitioner is of legal age, single and a bona-fide resident of 36 Xavier Street,
Greenhills West Subdivision, San Juan City;
2. The facts and circumstances related to her birth was registered with the Local Civil
Registrar’s Office of San Juan City under Registry No. 893. A copy of which is hereto
attached as Annex “A”;
3. In her Certificate of Live Birth her sex was inadvertently entered as Male instead of
Female, which is her true and correct sex.
4. To support the correction of the erroneous entry of sex from Male to Female, the petitioner
herein submits a copy of the Medical Certificate, dated ________________ hereto
attached as Annex “B” and a copy of Ultra Sound, _________________ stating that
she is a Female which is hereto attached as Annex “C to C-1”’;
5. Hereto attached as Annex "D" is the Certification from Dr. Parungo of the Philippine
General Hospital, to state that petitioner has not undergone any sex change or sex
transplant.
6. To support the petition, the herein petitioner submits documents hereto attached as
Annexes “ _____” to “____”;
7. To avoid further inconsistency, and also to set all the records straight, herein petitioner
requests that the sex as appearing in the Certificate of Live Birth of the petitioner be
corrected from Male to Female.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that, after due notice and publication, in accordance with
the Rules of Court and hearing, this Honorable Court directs the San Juan City Local Civil Registrar’s
Office that the gender of the petitioner be corrected from M (Male) to F (Female).
versus
PETITION
COMES NOW, the petitioner, by the undersigned counsel unto this Honorable Court respectfully
aver:
1. The petitioner is of legal age, single, Filipino and a resident of Unit 1F, Building 2, Tuscany
Private Estate, Upper Mckinley Road, Mckinley Hill, Taguig City;
2. Petitioner was born on March 10, 1995 at St. Luke's Medical Center, Taguig City and
the registration of his birth was duly registered with the Local Civil Registrar’s Office of
Taguig City ;
3. In the Birth Certificate issued by the Local Civil Registrar’s Office of Taguig City, his name
appears as TERENCE JOHN ARDOLPH and the date of birth of the petitioner appears
as March 10, 1990. A copy of the Birth Certificate is hereto attached as Annex “A”;
4. That the true and correct date of birth of petitioner is March 10, 1995;
5. Additionally, he has been using the first name TERENCE JOHN RUDOLPH and that all
his records ever since he was of school age has carried the name TERENCE JOHN
RUDOLPH ;
6. In support the correction of the erroneous entry of the date of birth from date of birth from
March 10, 1990 to March 10, 1995, the herein petitioner submits his Philippine passport
and Certificate of Live Birth hereto attached as Annexes “B” to “C” ;
7. Hereto attached as Annex "D" is the earliest school record of petitioner from Santa's
Kindergarten School;
8. To support the petition, the herein petitioner submits documents hereto attached as
Annexes “ _____” to “____”;
9. To avoid further inconsistency, and also to set all the records straight, herein petitioner
requests that his name TERENCE JOHN ARDOLPH LUA ANG be changed to
TERENCE JOHN RUDOLPH LUA ANG and that the date of birth as appearing in the
Certificate of Live Birth of the petitioner be corrected from March 10, 1990 to March
10, 1995.
___________________
Defendant,
x-------------------------------------------------------------------------x
RECORD ON APPEAL
2. That on ______, the defendant-appellant filed his Answer to said complaint, as follows:
[Copy Answer]
3. That after due hearing, the court, on ______ rendered the following decision:
[Copy Decision]
4. That on ______, defendant-appellant filed a motion for reconsideration of the following tenor:
[Copy Motion for Reconsideration]
5. That on ______, the court issued an order denying said motion for reconsideration, to wit:
6. That on ______, defendant-appellant received notice of said order denying his motion for
reconsideration, and on ______ filed his Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeals as follows:
[Copy Notice of Appeal]
WHEREFORE, the defendant-appellant prays the approval of this Record on Appeal and
that the same be transmitted to the Court of Appeals, together with all the oral and documentary
evidence given and presented at the trial of the above-entitled case.