ARELLANO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II OUTLINE FIRST SEM 2019

ATTY ROBERTO A. DEMIGILLO

ARTICLE III, 1987 CONSTITUTION

V. DUE PROCESS

Art. III, Sec. I, 1987 Constitution

Art. III. Sec. 14 (1)
Definition, Nature and Scope
CORONA V. UNITED HARBOR PILOTS ASSN, OF THE PHIL, 283 SCRA 31 ALCAZAR
Purpose of the guaranty
Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884) ALCAZAR
Meaning of Life, Liberty, and Property
Substantive Due Process
Villegas vs. Hu Chong Tsai Pao Ho, 86 SCRA 275 (1978) ALCAZAR
Rubi vs. Prov. Board of Mindoro, 39 Phil. 660 (1919) ANDAL
Ynot v Intermediate Appellate Court 148 SCRA 659 ANDAL
Churchill v Raffarty 32 Phil 580
Acebedo Optical v Court of Appeals GR 100152 March 31, 2000
M. Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health No. 88-1503 June
25, 1990 BADRON
Beltran v Secretary of Health G.R. No. 133640, November 25, 2005 BADRON
Manalo v PNP Chief GR 178920 October 15, 2007
Lucena Grand Central Terminal Inc. v JAC Liner, Inc. GR 148339 Feb.
23, 2005 BAGUINON
GMA V MTRCB 514 SCRA 191 BAGUINON
KNIGHTS OF RIZAL V. DMCIA HOMES, GR 213948 APR 25, 2017 BAGUINON
EVASCO V. MONTANEZ, GR 199172, FEB 21, 2018 ANDAL

Void for Vagueness/Overbreadth

Ople v. Torres, 292 SCRA 141. (1998) CATAHAY
Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, November 19, 2001
David v. Arroyo, G.R. No. 171390, May 3, 2006 CATAHAY
Ong v. Sandiganbayayn, G.R. No. 126858, September 16, 2005
SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE ENGAGEMENT NETWORK V ANTI TERRORISM
COUNCIL, 632 SCRA 146 CATAHAY

Procedural Due Process

NESTLE PHILS. V PUEDAN, GR 220617 JAN 30, 2017 DANIPOG

TURKS SHAWARMA CO. V PAJATON, GR 207156 JAN 16, 2017 DANIPOG
ESTATE OF F.E. MARCOS V REPUBLIC, GR 213227, JAN 18, 2017 DELACRUZ
LAGON V VELASCO, GR 208424 FEB 14, 2018 DELA CRUZ
REPUBLIC V SERENO, GR 237428 RESO FOR M.R. JUN 19, 2018 LUBO
ALLOWANCE FOR THE FAMILY FOUNDATION PHIL INC. V GARIN, RESO ON
PARTIAL M.R. GR 217872, APR. 26, 2017 LUBO
Publication Requirement
Tanada v. Tuvera, 146 SCRA 446 (1986) MAZO
PITC v. Angeles, 263 SCRA 421 (1996)
Republic v. Extelcom, G.R. 147096, January 15, 2002
Impartial Court or Tribunal
Tanada vs. PAEC, 141 SCRA 307 (1986)
Anzaldo vs. Clave , 119 SCRA 353 (1982) MAZO
Tejano v. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 159190, June 30, 2005
People v. Court of Appeals, 262 SCRA 452 (1996)
Tabuena v. Sandiganbayan, 268 SCRA 332 (1997) MAZO
Prejudicial Publicity
Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966)
Webb v. De Leon, 247 SCRA 652 (1995)
People v. Sanchez, G.R. No. 121039, October 18, 2001 MURING
Notice and Hearing:
 2

Summary Dismissal Board v. Torcita, 330 SCRA 153 (2000) MURING

Secretary of Justice v. Lantion, G.R. No. 139466, October 17, 2000 MURING
People vs. Estrada G.R. No. 130487 June 19, 2000
Lim v. Court of Appeals, G.R. 111397, August 12, 2002
AQUINO V MUNICIPALITY OF MALAY AKLAN, GR 211356 PACSON
Opportunity to be Heard
Budiongan v. De la Cruz, G.R. No. 170288, September 22, 2006
Roxas v. Vasquez, G.R. 114944, June 21, 2001
Marohombsar v. Judge Adiong, A.M. RTJ-02-1674, January 22, 2004
PAGC V MONTEMAYOR, GR 170146 PACSON
OMBUDSMAN V REYES, GR 170512 PACSON
Exceptions to notice and hearing requirements
Philcomsat vs. Alcuaz, 180 SCRA 218 (1989) PALMOS
Suntay vs. People, 101 Phil. 833 (1957)
Var Orient Shipping Co., Inc. vs. Achacoso, 161 SCRA 232 (1988)
SECRETARY OF JUSTICE V LANTION, 322 SCRA 160
SECREATRY OF JUSTICE V HONORABLE RALPH LANTION, OCT 17, 2000,
RESO ON M.R. PALMOS
Administrative Due Process
Ang Tibay vs. CIR, 69 Phil. 635 (1940) REYES
Montemayor vs. Araneta University Foundation, 77 SCRA 321 (1977) GARNER
Meralco vs. PSC, 11 SCRA 317 (1964) GARNER
Ateneo vs. CA, 145 SCRA 100 (1986) GARNER
Alcuaz vs. PSBA, 161 SCRA 7 (1988) REYES
Non vs. Hon. Dames, G.R. No. 89317, May 30, 1990
Fabella v Court of Appeals GR 110379 November 28, 1997
Lao Gi Alias chia v Court of Appeals 180 SCRA 756
People v Nazario 165 SCRA 186 REYES
Army Navy Club v Court of Appeals GR 110223 April 8, 1997 RIGOS
J. Gonzales v NLRC and Ateneo de Davao. GR 125735 August 26, 1999 RIGOS

______________________________________________________________________________
_

VI. EQUAL PROTECTION

Political, Economic and Social Equality

Art. XIII, Sec. 1 and 2 (social justice)
Id., Sec. 3 (protection to labor)
Art. XII, Sec. 10 (nationalization of business)
Id., Sec. 2, par. 2 (reservation of marine resources)
Art. II, Sec. 11 (free access to the courts)
Art. VIII, Sec. 5(5) (legal aid to poor)
Art. IX-C, Sec. 10 (protection of candidates)
Art. II, Sec. 26 (public service)
Art. II, Sec. 14 (equality of women and men)

BIRAOGO V. PHIL TRUTH COMMISSION, GR 192935 SAPLA

BELTRAN V SEC. OF HEALTH, GR 133640 SAPLA

Sexual Discrimination
Phil. Association of Service Exporters vs. Drilon, 163 SCRA 386 (1988) TAN

Administration of Justice
People vs. Hernandez, 99 Phil. 515 (1956) ABITRIA
People vs. Isinain, 85 Phil. 648 (1950)
Chavez v. PCGG, G.R. 130716, December 9, 1998
Nunez vs. Sandiganbayan, 111 SCRA 433 (1982)
Gallardo v. People, G.R. 142030, April 21, 2005
ABUBAKAR V PEOPLE GR 202408 ; 202409 JUN 27, 2018 ABITRIA
TELEBAP AND GMA V COMELEC, 289 SCRA 339 ABITRIA
SERRANO V GALLANT MARITIME SERVICE, 582 SCRA 254
GARCIA V. DRILON, 699 SCRA 352 ALCANTARA
 3

Public Policy
Central Bank Employees Assoc. v. BSP, G.R. No. 148208, Dec. 15, 2004 ALCANTARA
PNB v. Palma, G.R. 157279, August 9, 2005 ALCANTARA
Unido vs. COMELEC, 104 SCRA 17 (1981)
PJA vs. Prado, 227 SCRA 703 (1993)
Olivarez v. Sandiganbayan, 248 SCRA 700 (1995) ARANETA
Tiu v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 127410, January 20, 1999
Coconut Oil Refiners v. Torres, G.R. 132527, July 29, 2005
ISAE v. Quisumbing, G.R. No. 128845, June 1, 2000 ARANETA
PHILRECA vs. DILG, G.R. No. 143076. June 10, 2003
People v Cayat 68 Phil 12, 18 ARANETA
Ormoc Sugar Central v Ormoc City L-23794 Feb. 17, 1968
Sison v Ancheta 130 SCRA 654
Himagan v People GR 113811 October 7, 1994 CHUA
Phil Judges Assn. v Prado GR 105371 November 11, 1993 CHUA
De Guzman Jr. v Comelec GR 129118 July 19, 2000
Phil Telegraph and Telephone v NLRC GR 118978 May 23, 1997
Parreno v CA GR 162224 June 7, 2007 CHUA
British American Tobacco v CamachoGR 163583 April 15, 2009 CORTES
Quinto and Tolentino v Comelec GR 189698 Feb. 22, 2010
______________________________________________________________

VII. THE NON-IMPAIRMENT CLAUSE

Art. III, Sec. 10

Purpose
When impairment occurs
When allowed
Emergency Powers
Rutter vs. Esteban, 93 Phil. 68 (1953) CORTES
Zoning and Regulatory Ordinances
Villanueva vs. Castaneda, 154 SCRA 142 (1987) CORTES
Sangalang vs. IAC, 168 SCRA 634 (1988)
Ortigas & Co. v. A, G.R. No. 126102, December 4, 2000 FANDINOLA
Home Building and Loan assn. v Blaisdell 290 U.S. 398
Juarez v Court of Appeals GR 93474 October 9, 1992
Administrative Regulations
Tiro vs. Hontanosas, 125 SCRA 697 (1983) FANDINOLA
Rental Laws
Caleon vs. Agus Development Corp., 207 SCRA 748 (1992) FANDINOLA
Tax Exemptions
Meralco v. Province of Laguna, 306 SCRA 750 (1999) FEDERIZO

_____________________________________________________________