Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
STRUCTURAL REPORT
OF
RESIDENTIAL CUM COMMERCIAL BUILDING
OF
KIRITPUR-08, KATHMANDU
SUBMITTED TO:
KIRTIPUR MINICIPALITY
KATHMANDU
Table of Contents
1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4
1.3 Access......................................................................................................................................4
7 Annex ........................................................................................................................................... 29
1.3 Access
The site is connected via 6’ wide road in East direction.
Foundation
Column
Beam
Slab
Staircase
Wall
4
1.6 Description of the Building
Building Type Residential Building
Location Panga, Kirtipur-08, Kathmandu, Nepal
Total Land Area 470.4 sq. ft.
Plinth Area 424.846 sq. ft.
Structural system Special Moment Resisting Frame structure
Soil type Medium Soil
Seismic zone Zone V
Bearing Capacity 120 kN/m2
Foundation Isolated Foundation
Number of storey 4
Top storey height 8’1”
Floor to floor height 8’4”
Width of wall 9” and 5”
i. Dead Load
Type of loads ii. Live Load as per IS 875 part II
iii. Earthquake induced load as per IS 1893
Analysis Tools ETABS v16.2.1, SAFE v16.0.1
Size of Beam 9”x14”
Size of Column 12|”x12”
Depth of Slab 5”
Type of Staircase Wooden Staircase
M20 – Beam
Grade of Concrete
M25 - Column
Grade of Steel Fe500
5
1.7 Scope and Limitation
The report is based in the architectural drawing provided.
2 Load Cases
2.1 Codes of Practices
Following codes of practices developed by Bureau of Indian Standards and Nepal National Building
Codes were followed in the analysis and design of building:
2. Indian Standard
c. IS 13920: 1993 (Code of practice for ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures
subjected to seismic forces)
6
2.2 Load Pattern
TABLE: Load Patterns
Name Type Self Weight Multiplier Auto Load
Dead Dead 1
Live Load Live 0
Floor Finish Dead 0
9inch wall load Dead 0
5inchwall load Dead 0
Parapet Load Dead 0
EQx Seismic 0 IS1893 2002
Stair load Dead 0
EQy Seismic 0 IS1893 2002
`
7
3 Design Parameters
3.1 Structural System
Since, the building has number of plane frames along both directions; 3D frame analysis has been
done. The frames are analyzed as Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF).
3.2 Construction Materials:
Brick : 1st class Local bricks of compressive strength of 100 kg/cm2
Sand : Specification as per IS Code
Aggregate : Specification as per IS Code
Grade of Concrete : Column – M30, Beam – M25
Grade of Steel : Fe500 TMT Steel
3.3 Construction Materials Properties:
AAC Block Masonry = 7.36 kN/m3, IS : 875 (Part 1) - 1987
Brick Masonry density = 19.2 kN/m3, IS : 875 (Part 1) - 1987
4 Load Calculation
4.1 Dead Load Intensities
8” AAC Block Masonry = 5.37 KN/m
6” AAC Block Masonry = 4.35 KN/m
Partition Load intensities = 1.00 KN/m2
Floor Finish = 1.50 KN/m2
Parapet wall = 2.40 kN/m
Stair load = 9.50 kN/m and 8.5KN/m
8
Seismic Zone Factor Z Cl 6.4.2, Table 2 0.36
Importance Factor I Cl 6.4.2, Table 6 1
Response Reduction Factor R Cl 6.4.2, Table 7 5
Height of the building h Refer Drawing 9.75 m
Time Period of the building Along X Tx Cl 7.6.1 0.414 Sec
Time Period of the building Along Y Ty Cl 7.6.1 0.414 Sec
Soil Type Type II
Spectral Acceleration Coefficient Sa/g Cl 6.4.5, Fig 2 2.5
Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Ah Cl 6.4.2 0.09
Seismic Weight of Building W From ETABS 1856.10 kN
Base Shear VB Cl 7.5.3 167.05 kN
9
5 Structural Analysis
5.1 Finite Element Modeling of the Building
The space frame is modeled using Integrated Building Design Software ETABS v16.2.0 and the
foundation system is modeled using SAFE v16.0.1. The loads are taken as per above
calculations and design data considered.
Figure 5.4.4 shows the finite element model of the building, modelled with ETABs v16
software:
10
5.2 Load Assignments in ETABS
11
Figure 5.2-ii: Typical Floor Live Load
12
Figure 5.2-ii: Floor Finish Load
13
Figure 5.2-iii: Wall Load
14
Figure 5.3-i: Joint Reaction for 1.5(LL+DL)
15
Figure 5.3-ii: AFD for 1.5(DL+LL)
16
Figure 5.3-iv: Inplane moment diagram for 1.5(DL+LL)
17
Figure 5.3-v: Longitudinal Reinforcement Demand Frame 1
18
Figure 5.3-vii: Longitudinal Reinforcement Demand Frame B
19
Figure 5.4-ii: Soil Pressure Diagram under Service Load
20
Figure 5.4-iv: Top Reinforcement
21
TABLE: Base Reactions
Load Case/Combo FX FY FZ MX MY MZ X Y Z
kN kN kN kN-m kN-m kN-m m m m
EQX 1 -358.8495 0 0 0 -2692.7943 1630.2624 0 0 0
EQX 2 -358.8495 0 0 0 -2692.7943 1762.9389 0 0 0
EQX 3 -358.8495 0 0 0 -2692.7943 1497.586 0 0 0
EQY 1 0 -358.8495 0 2692.7943 0 -3039.6741 0 0 0
EQY 2 0 -358.8495 0 2692.7943 0 -3311.807 0 0 0
EQY 3 0 -358.8495 0 2692.7943 0 -2767.5412 0 0 0
22
6 Sample Design Calculation
6.1 Column Design
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
304.8 304.8 65.2 28.1
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 415 415
Slenderness Effects (IS 39.7.1) and Minimum Biaxial Moments (IS 39.2, 25.4)
End Moment End Moment Initial k*Ma Minimum Minimum
Mu1 (kN-m) Mu2 (kN-m) Moment (kN-m) Moment (kN-m) Moment (kN-m) Eccentricity (mm)
Major Bending (M3 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0
23
K K Framing P-Delta Q K
Sway Non-Sway Type Done? Factor Used
Major Bend(M3 ) 0 0 Sway Special No 0 0
Minor Bend(M2 ) 0 0 Sway Special No 0 0
Column Section
Column
COLUMN FLOOR ETABs Area, 12 16 20 25 28 Group
Size 2
mm
A1 1 2085 12"x12" 4 4 2060.88
2 1457 8 1608.50
C1
3 814 4 4 1256.64
4 743 8 904.78
A2 1 2052 12"x12" 4 4 2060.88
2 1561 8 1608.50
C1
3 1022 4 4 1256.64
4 743 8 904.78
A3 1 1892 12"x12" 4 4 2060.88
2 1603 8 1608.50
C1
3 1129 4 4 1256.64
4 743 8 904.78
A4 1 1694 12"x12" 4 4 2060.88
2 1452 8 1608.50
C1
3 884 4 4 1256.64
4 753 8 904.78
B1 1 1825 12"x12" 4 4 2060.88
2 1458 8 1608.50
C1
3 870 4 4 1256.64
4 749 8 904.78
B2 1 1953 12"x12" 4 4 2060.88
2 1571 8 1608.50
C1
3 1096 4 4 1256.64
4 743 8 904.78
B3 1 1875 12"x12" 4 4 2060.88
2 1581 8 1608.50
C1
3 1102 4 4 1256.64
4 743 8 904.78
B4 1 1656 12"x12" 4 4 2060.88
C1
2 1390 8 1608.50
24
3 828 4 4 1256.64
4 743 8 904.78
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
228.6 355.6 228.6 0 63.5 63.5
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 415 415
25
Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -41.6797 445 0 445 235
Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 223 0 0 223
26
6.4 SLAB DESIGN
fy 500 N/mm2
fck 20 N/mm2
d' 20 mm
DESIGN OF TWO WAY SLAB
Check
Slab of Weight Load Coefficient require provided
No. Pane kN/m
(m) (m) (mm) (mm) kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 Value (kNM) (mm) d+d' (mm2) (mm) ( ") ( ")
l 2
Column Details
Size: 12”x12”
Concrete Grade: M25
Reinforcement Grade: Fe500
Clear Cover: 40 mm
**Refer Structural Drawing**
Beam Details
Primary beam size: 9”x14”
Secondary beam size: 9”x12”
Concrete Grade: M20
Reinforcement Grade: Fe500
Clear Cover: 25 mm
**Refer Structural Drawing**
Slab Details
Thickness: 5”
Concrete Grade: M20
Reinforcement Grade: Fe500
Clear Cover: 15 mm
**Refer Structural Drawing**
Staircase Details
Waist slab thickness: 5”
Concrete Grade: M20
Reinforcement Grade: Fe500
Clear Cover: 15 mm
**Refer Structural Drawing**
28
7 Annex
7.1 Story Drift
As per Clause no. 7.11.1 of IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016, the storey drift in any storey due to specified
design lateral force with partial load factor of 1.0, shall not exceed 0.004 times the storey height.
From the frame analysis the displacements of the mass centres of various floors are obtained and are
shown in Table 4 along with storey drift. Since the building configuration is same in both the
directions, the displacement values are same in either direction.
29
7.3 Torsion Irregularity Check
The Story Max/Avg Displacement is less more 1.200 for some diaphragms under lateral forces
acting with design eccentricity. So, according to IS 1893 (Part1):2002 Clause 7.1, the building is
considered as torsionally irregular. But, the ratio is under 1.4000 hence extreme torsion irregularity
doesn’t exist.
30
8 Structural Design Check List
AS PER SUBMITTED
BUILDING ELEMENTS REMARKS
DESIGN
GENERAL
☐Yes
Provision for further extension
☒No
☐Structural Aluminium
☐Brick Masonry
Materials to be used in structure(tick the listed materials ☐Timber
that will be used in structure element) ☐Structural Steel
☒RCC (Reinforcement Bar)
☐Stone Masonry
Specify the design unit weight of materials: Steel (in KN/m3) 78.5
31
Balcony
☐Type I (Hard)
Subsoil category ☒Type II (Medium)
☐Type III (Soft)
32
NBC 106-1994 SNOW LOAD
☐Perennial
Snowfall type or condition ☐Occasional
☒No snowfall
☒Yes
Have you considered fire safety requirement?
☐No
☐Yes
Availability of soil test report
☒No
Are you sure that all safety measures will be fulfilled in the ☒Yes
construction site as per this code? ☐No
☒M20
☐M25
Concrete grade in structure
☐M30
☐M35
☐Fe-415
Reinforcement Steel Grade ☒Fe-500
☐Fe-550
SLAB DESIGN
33
☐4 side continuous
☐1 short side discontinuous
☐1 long side discontinuous
☒2 adjacent side continuous
Boundary condition of slab ☐2 long side continuous
☐2 short side continuous
☐1 long side continuous
☐1 short side continuous
☐4 side discontinuous
☐Cantilever
Support condition ☐Simply supported
☐One side continuous
☒Both side continuous
☒Yes
Short column effect considered or not
☐No
34
Minimum area of longitudinal reinforcement provided (%) 1.35
LOAD COMBINATIONS
1: DL 1.5
1: LL 1.5
2: DL 1.2
2: LL 1.2
2: EQ 1.2
3: DL 1.5
3: EQ 1.5
4: DL 0.9
4: EQ 1.5
☐PILE
☒Strap
Type of Foundations ☒Isolated
☐Combined
☐Raft
35