Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Hi Students,
We are pleased to publish in this column the doubts raised by our Sriram students
on ENGLISH Grammar and the clarification provided by our professors to the
same. It will be beneficial for you to go through this section and understand the
concepts better.
Best wishes,
Team Sriram
Pages after pages (A) / of (B) / the Mahabarat (C) / were read (D)." The answer key describes the
correct answer as "A", saying that the correct answer should be "page after page". However, if that is
the case, then the sentence would become "Page after page of the Mahabarat were read." Here, "page"
doesn't agree with "were read". Is there another explanation?
The expression is “Page after page” – you read one page at a time, right? But if you choose the rather
dubious expression “pages after pages”, which a writer is free to, then this sentence is grammatically
correct. If it is “page after page”, the verb should definitely be “was”.
Question 28: The question states "If John works hard,(A) /he would get distinction(B) /in the exam(C)/
No error (D)", and the answer key describes the answer as A, saying the right answer is "If John worked
hard, he would get distinction in the exam." While this answer sounds right, is it also correct to say the
answer is B, to make it "If John works hard, he will get distinction in the exam"?
This is a conditional sentence starting with “If”. If a condition is met, there will be a consequence.
This particular sentence comes under Conditional Sentence Type 1 - It is possible and also very likely
that the condition will be fulfilled.
As I have told the students repeatedly, you do not meddle with the subject. Choosing the subject “John
– works hard” - is the writer's privilege. You keep it that way and check if the rest of the sentence
agrees with this.
1
SRIRAM LAW ACADEMY Doubts
Training Organisation for CLAT & IIT HSEE Corner
www.sriramlawacademy.com ENGLISH
I also had one question regarding prepositions, though not part of any test per se. Do we say "Ramesh
sat under the shade of the tree" or "Ramesh sat in the shade of the tree"?
You cannot sit “under” the shade of a tree. You need to be a jinn/ghost/elf to do that. You
also have to dig the ground beneath the tree. You can only sit “in” the shade of a tree.
There is a good British library in the city/and anyone interested in books/can avail of the facility"
However, I feel that it should be "avail themselves of" and not "avail of". Please do clarify.
Avail has three meanings: (1) to make use of; (2) to be of use; and (3) benefit or advantage.
In the first sense, avail is always a reflexive verb, followed by a reflexive pronoun such
as myself, oneself, or herself, with the pronoun referring to the person or thing performing the action—
for example:
Residents visiting the library could avail themselves of the park district’s facilities and programs.
Cooper’s is not technically a defamation suit, although it does avail itself of some of the language used
in such suits.
Think of avail as a synonym of help. In the first example above, residents help themselves. In the
second, it helps itself. However, unlike help, the reflexive avail always takes the preposition of.
In Q-1, "themselves" is missing
Question 10 of the test - "In case of his dying without an issue his nephew would inherit all the
property".
Answer given is- "In case he dies without an issue his nephew would inherit all the property".
["In case of" is a preposition and needs an object to complete its sense. All prepositions need an
object. "his dying" is not considered a correct phrase because "dying" cannot be used as an object ["I
want his death" not "I want his dying"]. "him dying" is equally awkward. "his death" would be better.
We use "in case" to talk about things we should do in order to be prepared for possible future situations.
So, "In case he dies" is correct.
2
SRIRAM LAW ACADEMY Doubts
Training Organisation for CLAT & IIT HSEE Corner
www.sriramlawacademy.com ENGLISH
This is the crux of the entire problem;(a) /everything centers on(b) /it being resolved(c) /No error(d).
this classic sentence gives you the answer. Yes, "c" should be "its being resolved".
What makes a screwdriver a screwdriver is no feature of the screwdriver itself. Its being a
screwdriver depends on its being used as such by an agent.
Another one: Your ability to handle conflict, however, depends on your being [not you being]
connected to these feelings.
"Being resolved" is taken as a noun (and an object), so the pronoun "it" changes to its adjective form
"its", as in "its mood".
What would you say? "Everything depends on "he being promoted" or everything depends on "his being
promoted"?
He felt _ happiness that he had never felt before " What should be in the missing place?
Before superlative we always use "the"? Please help me in solving this question
3. The is not used when the subject refers to a whole group and not to a particular section of the
group.
Consultants specialise in giving advice. She works in banking. Microchips are used to make computers.
You could say "He felt the happiness" but the article "the" is really not needed. You may say
it refers to a past happiness and is therefore specific, but that is not true since it is "happiness never
felt". We don't know which happiness, don't know the quantity or quality or the context of that
happiness.
So it is unspecified happiness, and does not need an article before it. Remember, as a general rule we
do not place an article before non-countable nouns.
3
SRIRAM LAW ACADEMY Doubts
Training Organisation for CLAT & IIT HSEE Corner
www.sriramlawacademy.com ENGLISH
Conditionals- 1] If you are looking for Sita, you would find her with Ram . provided explanation under
this ques. is -- If you are looking for Sita ,you will find her with Ram The above mentioned explanation
is according to which Rule ? Why it can't be -- If you look for Sita , you would find her with Ram . [Acc.
Rule - If +Simple Past + Modal + verb 1 form ] 2] If you boil water it..........to vapours (turns / will turn
) answer given - turns Why not " will turn
Conditionals- 1] If you are looking for Sita, you would find her with Ram . provided explanation under
this ques. is –
The rule here is simple. It is consistency of tense. Also, it talks of a possible future action.
It is not a conditional in the sense of cause and effect. ("if you waste your time, you will
be chucked out of your job." This is a condition.)
Why it can't be -- If you look for Sita ,you would find her with Ram . [Acc. Rule - If +Simple Past +
Modal + verb 1 form ]
The meaning of the clause "If you look for Sita" does not convey the same sense as "If you are looking
for Sita" at all. "If you look for Sita" has an implied threat. Why would you change the tense and
because of that, the intent?
And why is the "would" here taken as a modal? It is plain past tense of the helping verb "will". So there
is a clash of tenses here. Let's separate the past tense from a modal.
2] If you boil water it..........to vapours (turns / will turn ) answer given - turns Why not " will turn " ?
The simple present tense is used mostly for habitual happenings. In other words, we must
use the simple present tense to denote habitual happenings - things that happen regularly.
{My mother combs her hair twice a day.}
He asked me (a) / if I am ill and (b) / I answered that I was not (c) / No error. (d)
The answer is given as 'If I was ill". Shouldn't it be 'If i were ill"? or are both the usages correct?
Here the question is not whether it is "if I was ill" or "if I were ill". The "am" is not consistent with the
introductory verb "asked". So the error lies in segment [b].
4
SRIRAM LAW ACADEMY Doubts
Training Organisation for CLAT & IIT HSEE Corner
www.sriramlawacademy.com ENGLISH
The closure of the car factory (a) / has a knock-out effect (b) / on the tyre manufacturers. (c) / No
error. (d)
shouldn't part b actually be 'had a knock- out effect' instead of 'has a knock out effect'?
His strong voice cut over (a) / the hum of conversation (b) / like a knife through butter (c) / No error.
(d)
The answer is given as “cut into” instead " is it okay to use "cut through"?
Now that my children are all grown up and gone out into the world, (a) / I would like to spend my old
age (b) / in the village I was born (c) / No error. (d)
Is there any error in the question given above?
Yes, in segment [c]. It should be "in the village in which I was born" OR "in the village I was born in."
You need a word or a phrase to connect the village and "I was born". The "in" in the "in the village"
answers the question "Where would I like to spend my old age?"
One of our subscriber (a) / reads four or five detective stories every week (b) / besides others which
he gets from another library (c) / No error. (d)
The error is in segment [a]. You always pick one from a group. Otherwise why would you say "one of"?
It is to state that "we have many subscribers, and one of them...." One of what? A group, right?
5
SRIRAM LAW ACADEMY Doubts
Training Organisation for CLAT & IIT HSEE Corner
www.sriramlawacademy.com ENGLISH
The mother, in spite of the protests from the child, (a) / made it to drink the medicine (b) / three times
a day (c) / No error. (d)
Isn't simply 'made it drink' correct?
Yes. The verb "made" is so comprehensive in its meaning that you don't need to add "to" to the
following basic verb "to drink". By the way, these basic verbs are used as nouns. They stand as subjects
and objects.
I am playing football for my school (a) / for the last three years (b) / without ever being dropped for
any important match (c) / No error. (d)
part c - Isn't it 'dropped from' instead of 'dropped for'?
They informed him that (a) / he will have to pay the bill (b) / when the goods arrived (c) / No error.
(d)
Please give a hint to support the answer.
The error lies in segment [b]. "will" is not consistent with the tense of the introductory verb "informed".
It should be "would".
6
SRIRAM LAW ACADEMY Doubts
Training Organisation for CLAT & IIT HSEE Corner
www.sriramlawacademy.com ENGLISH
2. Negotiable : Cheque ::
a) Frozen: Asset
b) Inventory: Merchandise
c) Bank: Money
d) Trade: tariff
"c" - "their" does not agree with its antecedent "the running party".
2. If I were he (a) / I should not (b) / accept the offer (c) / No error (d)
"b" - There is a condition "If I were he" and it is accepted. What follows should be a
statement of certainty "would", not a vague "should". All such (hypothetical) conditional
sentences are followed by "would".
For the following questions, select pair of words which mean the nearest to the original.
1. Frayed: Fabric
a) Watered: Garden b) Dilapidated: Building c) Frozen: Ice d) Crumpled: Paper
Ma'am, I come to an understanding that frayed refers to the wearing out of a cloth or a fabric. So, I
thought that the right answer would be crumpled: paper because the situations are similar ie when a
paper is considered to be damaged when it has been crumpled. But the solution says that the perfect
answer is option (b) Dilapidated: Building. I also understand that dilapidated means absolute ruin
which might also make option (b) right. But, why isn't (d) right?
A fabric is frayed because of long use or because it has not been used for a long time.
Similarly, a building gets dilapidated because of long use or neglect over a long period of
time.
7
SRIRAM LAW ACADEMY Doubts
Training Organisation for CLAT & IIT HSEE Corner
www.sriramlawacademy.com ENGLISH
2. Levitate: Magician
a) Cook: Mother b) Argue: Lawyer c) Float: Astronaut d) Sky jump: Parachutists
I come to an understanding that levitate means raising something to the air, purely by magical tricks.
I presumed that the answer would be (d) But the solution says that the answer is (c). But, I would
like to know why (c) is right and why not (d) because I find both options to be viable answers.
[2] The word "float" here is used in the same sense as "Levitate" - staying in air defying
gravitational pull. "Jump" is coming down because of that pull. So (c) is right.
8
SRIRAM LAW ACADEMY Doubts
Training Organisation for CLAT & IIT HSEE Corner
www.sriramlawacademy.com ENGLISH
I.
The bad news finally --------- the country to the danger of nuclear warfare. A. awoke B. awakened C.
woke D. waked up I would like to know the correct answer for this and explanation of usage of these
words. Thank you.
The answer is "awakened". The word "awaken" is used in both the direct and metaphorical
senses.
In its applied sense, it means "rouse", as in "rouse a feeling".
"Different images can awaken new emotions in us."
"Expel" is "throw out". Not a pleasant thing at all. It is used in a negative sense and only for
people. You cannot expel an idea or a smell. Also you cannot "expel" a dog.
"Dispel" is primarily used for inanimate or abstract things. It means "chase away" or "scatter"
and both these meanings can be used in a positive sense.
Dispel the notion that you are not capable of doing this job. Dispel the great man's teachings
among your friends.