Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.

com>

YOUR URGENT ATTENTION IS REQUESTED RE: Systemic Judicial

Failures in the First Circuit
Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com> Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 1:54 PM
To: dan_jackson@ao.uscourts.gov
Cc: Susan Goldberg <susan_goldberg@ca1.uscourts.gov>, Trey Gowdy
<trey.gowdy@nelsonmullins.com>, "Constituent.services@state.ma.us"
<constituent.services@massmail.state.ma.us>, elizabeth warren
<elizabeth_warren@warren.senate.gov>, lori trahan <lori.trahan@mail.house.gov>, ayanna pressley
<ayanna.pressley@mail.house.gov>, NewYorkComplaints Dojoig
<dojoig.newyorkcomplaints@usdoj.gov>, theresa watson3 <theresa.watson3@usdoj.gov>, andrew lelling
<andrew.lelling@usdoj.gov>, mary murrane <mary.murrane@usdoj.gov>, christina sterling
<christina.sterling@usdoj.gov>, sydney levin-epstein <sydney_levin-epstein@markey.senate.gov>, Jim
Lehman <jim.lehman@nelsonmullins.com>, Kevin Polansky <kevin.polansky@nelsonmullins.com>, Nora
Keefe <Nora_Keefe@warren.senate.gov>, Nairoby Gabriel <Nairoby_Gabriel@warren.senate.gov>,
david fialkow <david.fialkow@klgates.com>, "Jeffrey B. Loeb" <JLoeb@richmaylaw.com>,
maura.healey@state.ma.us, jesse.boodoo@state.ma.us, "Murphy, Matthew T."
<mmurphy@casneredwards.com>, mharmon@harmonlaw.com, kmchugh@harmonlaw.com, ma-igo-
general-mail@state.ma.us, igo-fightfraud@state.ma.us

Dear Deputy Chief Jackson,

As you know, I have been regularly updating the Administrative Office of US Courts (including
Director James C. Duff) over the past several years on systemic judicial failures in the First
Circuit, including the Office of the First Circuit Executive and a broken process for addressing
evidenced judicial misconduct. The most recent update was an email communication that included a
follow-up letter to US District Court Chief Judge - Hon. Patti B. Saris. You were copied on the
email (See attached below for reference). The letter to the Chief Judge requests the Court's
assistance with re-establishing jurisdiction over three (3) civil complaints:

1. HARIHAR v US BANK, et al, (Docket No. 15-cv-11880);

2. HARIHAR v THE UNITED STATES (Docket No. 17-cv-11109); and
3. HARIHAR v CHIEF JUDGE JEFFREY R. HOWARD, et al (Docket No. 18-cv-11134)

You are aware that the PRIMARY legal issue right now involves two (2) DISQUALIFIED Judicial
Officers who continue to issue orders - when as a matter of record, it is evidenced that they no longer
have jurisdiction over the above-referenced dockets:

1. US District Court Judge - Hon. Allison Dale Burroughs (RECUSED, 6/19/17);

2. US District Court Judge - Hon. Denise J. Casper

It is my understanding that these evidenced actions constitute Judicial Treason under ARTICLE III
and 18 U.S. CODE § 2381 On Sunday, October 6, 2019, I filed an EMERGENCY NOTICE/MOTION
(HARIHAR v US BANK), informing the Court of the follow-up communication to Chief Judge Saris;
and the request for her assistance with re-stablishing jurisdiction in the referenced civil complaints
(Ref. ECF No. 161). The Emergency status was necessary, as the referenced judicial failures are
causing increased (and certainly unnecessary) hardships to the Plaintiff. However, as of today -
Saturday, October 12, 2019, the Court has made no effort to even address these emergency legal
issues. Therefore, I am respectfully requesting that the Administrative Office of US Courts now
intervene in addressing this systemic judicial breakdown in the First Circuit. Please be advised, since
the severity of legal issues involving judicial officers includes evidenced criminal violations including
(but not limited to) TREASON against The United States, multiple government offices/agencies will
necessarily be copied on this email, including: (1) Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA); (2) The
Department of Justice (DOJ); and (3) Members of Congress. The White House will be copied
separately via www.whitehouse.gov.

Finally, it's important to note that the Plaintiff has in Good Faith, extended an offer(s) to reach a
mutual agreement(s) with ALL Defendant parties (including the Defendants – COMMONWEALTH
OF MASSACHUSETTS and THE UNITED STATES) in the referenced civil complaints. Based on the
Plaintiff’s interpretation of the law – IF a Defendant party(s) were to successfully reach a mutual
agreement with the Plaintiff, there would no longer be a need to proceed further with the CIVIL
portions of the complaint against them, as they would likely be perceived as moot. The Plaintiff
remains hopeful that mutual agreements will be made with ALL parties that are: (1) mutually
beneficial; (2) constructive; and (3) which contribute to the overall benefit of our great Nation. Thank
you for your attention to this very serious and sensitive legal matter.

Respectfully submitted this 12th Day of October, 2019

Mohan A. Harihar
Plaintiff – Pro Se
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: A LETTER TO US DISTRICT COURT CHIEF JUDGE – THE HON. PATTI B. SARIS
To: <marie_losco@mad.uscourts.gov>, <maryellen_molloy@mad.uscourts.gov>,
<miguel_lara@mad.uscourts.gov>
Cc: <dan_jackson@ao.uscourts.gov>, Constituent.services@state.ma.us
<constituent.services@massmail.state.ma.us>, elizabeth warren
<elizabeth_warren@warren.senate.gov>, sydney levin-epstein <sydney_levin-
epstein@markey.senate.gov>, lori trahan <lori.trahan@mail.house.gov>, ayanna pressley
<ayanna.pressley@mail.house.gov>, NewYorkComplaints Dojoig
<dojoig.newyorkcomplaints@usdoj.gov>, theresa watson3 <theresa.watson3@usdoj.gov>, andrew
lelling <andrew.lelling@usdoj.gov>, mary murrane <mary.murrane@usdoj.gov>, christina sterling
<christina.sterling@usdoj.gov>, <maura.healey@state.ma.us>, <chairmanoffice@sec.gov>,
<CommissionerStein@sec.gov>, <CommissionerJackson@sec.gov>,
<CommissionerPeirce@sec.gov>, <jesse.boodoo@state.ma.us>, david fialkow
<david.fialkow@klgates.com>, Jeffrey B. Loeb <JLoeb@richmaylaw.com>, Kevin Polansky
<kevin.polansky@nelsonmullins.com>, <kmchugh@harmonlaw.com>, Murphy, Matthew T.
<mmurphy@casneredwards.com>, Nora Keefe <Nora_Keefe@warren.senate.gov>, Nairoby Gabriel
<Nairoby_Gabriel@warren.senate.gov>
 FOLLOW-UP LETTER TO US DISTRICT COURT CHIEF JUDGE –

THE HONORABLE PATTI B. SARIS

October 4, 2019

The Honorable Patti B. Saris

Chief Judge – District of Massachusetts
John Joseph Moakley U.S. Courthouse
1 Courthouse Way
Boston, MA 02210
Phone: (617) 748-9175

RE: HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880

Dear Chief Judge Saris:

This follow-up communication to the Plaintiff’s September 25, 2019 letter [Ref. ECF No. 160] is
respectfully delivered to your Honor’s direct attention to update the Court on recent developments in
the above-referenced civil complaint. Please be advised of the following:

I. The Defendant’s Timeline for Reaching a Mutual Agreement has Expired – as stated in
the 9/25/19 letter to your Honor, the Plaintiff had in Good Faith, extended an opportunity to
reach a mutual agreement with ALL FOURTEEN (14) Defendants associated with the
referenced Docket:
1. WELLS FARGO NA;
2. US BANK NA;
3. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS;
4. FORMER MASSACHUSETTS AG - MARTHA COAKLEY;
5. HARMON LAW OFFICES, PC;
6. NELSON MULLINS, LLP;
7. PETER HALEY, Esq. (Nelson Mullins, LLP);
8. DAVID E. FIALKOW, Esq. (K&L Gates, LLP);
9. JEFFREY S. PATTERSON, Esq. (K&L Gates, LLP);
10. KURT R. MCHUGH, Esq. (Harmon Law Offices, PC);
11. KEN DAHER (Real Estate Broker, Weichert Realters/Daher
Companies);
 12. MARY DAHER (Real Estate Broker, Weichert Realters/Daher
Companies);
13. JEFFREY PERKINS; and
14. ISABELLE PERKINS

Previously, it was reported to your Honor that Bank Defendants – WELLS FARGO and US
BANK had expressed an interest in having a mutual agreement discussion. Despite the
Defendants statement of record, they have failed to timely provide the Plaintiff with a settlement
proposal. Therefore, the offer has expired and is off the table. Similarly, Defendants – Jeffrey
and Isabelle Perkins had expressed an interest in having a mutual agreement discussion and
have also failed to timely provide the Plaintiff with a settlement proposal.

The remaining Defendants have failed to respond all together. That includes the Defendant –
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, where the Plaintiff’s numerous efforts to communicate
with: (1) representing counsel – Assistant AG Jesse M. Boodoo; (2) MA Attorney General
Maura Healey; (3) Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA); and (4) Massachusetts Congressional
Leaders including US Senator (and 2020 Presidential Candidate) Elizabeth Warren have
been blatantly ignored. Rather than work together to resolve these serious legal issues,
leaders of this Commonwealth (and all Defendants) appear intent on aligning with disqualified
judicial offers who have (as a matter of record) exemplified patterns of corrupt conduct –
including (but not limited to) evidenced acts of TREASON against The United States of
America. The most recent judicial failures evidenced on this docket - by RECUSED US District
Court Judge – the Hon. Allison Dale Burroughs, were previously brought to your Honor’s
attention in the referenced letter, delivered September 25, 2019.[1] Therefore, the Plaintiff
respectfully requests that your Honor first assist with restoring jurisdiction over this docket.
II. The Plaintiff will Next Seek to Amend his Original Complaint – Once jurisdiction has
been restored (and after this Court has VOIDED all judgements issued by disqualified judicial
officers), the Plaintiff intends to amend his original complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b)(2) & (3). It should appear clear to this Court (and to any objective observer) that ALL
Defendants – including: (1) the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; (2) ALL representing counsel
of record; and (3) their respective law firms appear intent on aligning with the VOID decisions of
DISQUALIFIED judicial officers who have (as a matter of record) evidenced acts of Treason
against The United States.

Additional amendments will include adding the following Defendants:

1. K&L Gates, LLP;
 2. Rich May, PC;
3. Casner & Edwards, LLP;
4. Jesse M. Boodoo, Esq. (Commonwealth of Massachusetts)
5. Kevin Patrick Polansky, Esq. (Nelson Mullins, LLP);
6. Jeffrey B. Loeb, Esq. (Rich May, PC); and
7. Matthew Murphy, Esq. (Casner & Edwards, LLP)

It also should appear clear to ANY objective observer who has thoroughly researched the historical
record – that collectively, these parties are clearly in “LOCK-STEP” to successfully commit Fraud
Upon this Court. The overall INTENT to consciously commit this Fraud is (at minimum) believed to
be twofold:

A. To Prevent Legal Precedent from being Set – as it pertains to the illegal securitization
of mortgages and other crimes identified with the 2008 US Foreclosure Crisis; and
B. To Irreparably Damage the Plaintiff’s Intellectual Property/Trade Secret – known
as “THE HARIHAR FCS MODEL©” which was designed to assist The United States with
Economic growth and recovery from damages resulting from the 2008 Foreclosure/
Financial Crisis - and is ultimately protected under the Economic Espionage Act.

The Plaintiff respectfully re-states that Sovereign/Judicial Immunity, as well as Litigation Privilege
is considered WAIVED, when Fraud Upon the Court has been evidenced.

III. Upholding Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) – Once jurisdiction has been restored, if the named
Defendants (including parties still to be added as Defendants) do not wish to enter into a mutual
agreement with the Plaintiff – and instead insist on maintaining their current position, this Court
must ultimately uphold the Plaintiff’s evidenced (and UNOPPOSED) Fraud on the Court
claims(s); bringing a Default judgement in favor of the Plaintiff with prejudice. The related
Criminal and Professional complaints of record – against all parties will also need to be
addressed by: (1) this Court; (2) the Department of Justice (DOJ); (3) the Board of BAR
Overseers/BAR Council; and (4) the National Association of Realtors (NAR).
IV. Assistance with the Appointment of Counsel, 28 U.S.C § 1915- The Plaintiff respectfully
reminds your Honor that he is a Pro Se litigant with NO LEGAL EXPERIENCE. While the
historical record shows a TEXTBOOK reason for this Court to exercise its discretion and assist
the Plaintiff with the appointment of counsel, it MAY be considered moot once Federal Rule 60
is upheld.
Please be advised, the referenced litigation is related to a new complaint now being prepared

for filing in The United States Court of Federal Claims; and includes matters perceived to

impact National Security. Therefore, the following government offices/agencies/committees will

necessarily receive copies of this formal letter (via email, US Mail and/or social media):

1. President Donald J. Trump (via www.whitehouse.gov);

2. US Secret Service;
3. The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS);
4. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC);
5. Office of the US Inspector General (OIG) - specifically, IG Michael Horowitz;
6. Department of Justice (DOJ) - specifically, US Attorney General, William
Barr;
7. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI);
8. Administrative Office of US Courts - specifically, Director James C. Duff;
9. House/Senate Judiciary Committees;
10. Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA);
11. US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA);
12. US Senator Ed Markey (D-MA);
13. US Congresswoman Lori Trahan (D-MA);
14. US Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (D-MA);

Copies of this Letter will separately: (1) be included in a NOTICE filed with the Court; (2) be delivered

via email communication to the Court Clerk(s); and (3) will also be made available to the Public and to

media outlets nationwide for documentation purposes and out of continued concerns for the

Plaintiff’s personal safety and security. If your Honor has ANY questions regarding any portion of

this letter, or requires additional information, the Plaintiff is happy to provide upon request. The

Plaintiff is grateful for your Honor’s consideration of this very serious, and sensitive matter.

Respectfully submitted this 4th Day of October, 2019

Mohan A. Harihar
Plaintiff – Pro Se
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com
[1] Following her sua sponte recusal on June 19, 2017, US District Court Judge – Hon. Allison Dale
Burroughs issued an order on July 29, 2019 WITHOUT JURISDICTION, denying the Plaintiff’s
Motion [Ref. ECF No. 157]. On August 5, 2019, a second VOID order was issued without
jurisdiction [Ref. ECF No. 158]. Both of these actions are interpreted as clear (and incremental)
violations to ARTICLE III and 18 U.S. CODE § 2381 - JUDICIAL TREASON.