Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Gaya
A.B.P.no.-............................/2017
Vs.
Subject –ABP
INDEX
1|Page
In,
Gaya
A.B.P.no.-............................/2017
(Arising out of Guraru P.S. case no. -78/15 state versus shyam
goswami and others U/S 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 324, 353,
333, 337,427,307, 188, 504, 109, 115 and 506/34 of IPC & 27
Arms act pending in the court of A.C.J.M. Vth, Gaya.)
Vs.
2|Page
Most respectfully showeth -:
1. That the petitioner are innocent and has been falsely implicated in this
case.
3. That the prosecution story in brief is that informant of this case Ranjan
Kumar S.H.O of Guraru P.s. recorded his self statement at 12:10 on
29/09/15 at sugar mill Guraru alleging their in that he received and
information that a dead body of person was lying on Guraru railway
station track.
4. That on this information he along with his police force proceeded towards
place of occurance regarding verification of the information. At last he
reached there and found that deceased was Subham Kumar alies Uttam
S/o- Binod Rajak , R/o vill- Akunpur, P.S.- Guraru. He seized the dead
body at A.N.M.M.C.H. Gaya for post-mortum.
5. That then accused petitioner and other 22 person were blocked the road
and used to slogan against the police. It is further relate that all the
accused person began to shut up the shops of the Guraru market. It is
further that they were in 200 in number and someone of them were
identified by Chokidar . it is further alleged that they were scuffing with
the police person and broken peace and destroyed the publice property.it
is further related that all the turbulent person were petting stones over the
police party.
(certified copy of FIR is annexed
herewith & marked as Annexture 1)
6. That petitioner was student of B.Sc. part (2) and he was not present at
place of occurenc on the alleged time of occurance because he was
3|Page
present in his Anugrah Narayan Memorial College, Gaya and he has paid
his fee.
(photo copy of fee receipt is annexed
herewith this petition and mark as
annexture 2)
8. That the petitioner had written a letter regarding his innocence to the
S.S.P. Gaya in Janta Darbar but nothing has enquired about occurance by
the police.
9. That the petitioner shall not misuse the privilege of the bail and shall
abide by any terms which your honour would like to lay down.
10.That the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly situated
co-accused Shyam Kumar Goswami in Cr. Misc. No. 11554 of 2016 on
01.04.2016, Jitendra Rajak in Cr. Misc. No.57384 of 2015 on 14.01.2016,
Shatrughan Prasad @ Shatrughna Prasad in Cr. Misc. No. 412 of 2016 on
07.01.2016 have already been granted anticipatory bail by different
Benches of this Court.
It is therefore prayed
that your honour may
4|Page
be pleased to enlarge
the petitioner on bail.
Place .............
Date...............
5|Page