Figure 2.

L B

s
Se q B IsI f
Es

Is F F
 F A A

n
F A

m m n
A m
m m n

m m n
A
m m n

m
A
n m n

Df L
If f s
B B
Df

Table 2.3
 S e rigid Se Flexible footing

Table 2.4
 Es i z
Es
z

Table 2.5

Table 2.6
Empirical Equation Reference Note:

Figure 2.2
 q Be I G I F I E
Se s
E
BL
Be

Be B

IF
Ef t
Be Be
E k

IE
Be
s
Df
Es E kz

IG f B H Be E KBe

Figure 2.3
Figure 2.4

Figure 2.5 D f Be

Ez

Ez q z Es
qz
Es

s E zi h zi s q z i E si h z i
i i
s
hzi i
qz q BL B z L z

qz qB B z

s q Bic Es
Figure 2.6
2.3 METHODS UTILIZING IN-SITU STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT)

s q N C wC d

s q N B B CwCd

s q N C wCd

s q N B B C wCd

Nc N
qult

qa N

qa N B

qa N

Nc N

s q N

s q N B B
s q N
 s s B B mC w

D B

s qB

Nc N N
Figure 2.7

Figure 2.8
 Table 2.7

Rectangle with L/B

Circle

D’Appolonia et al (1968)
S PBM v v I

s qBI M

M N
M N
Figure 2.9
 Figure 2.10

N60.

N60)
N60

N a N

N60
N a N

N60(a) N60

Case I. N60 N60(a)

z B
BR BR
 BR

Case II. N60 N60(a)

Case III. N60 N60(a) z B

z z B
z z

Se
Se

L
Se B B q
BR L BR pa
B

pa
L

N or N a

N60 N60(a) N60 N60(a)

z z
z z
q q

q c c
 N or N a

q q

overconsolidated q c

q q c

z
v v
s z
C v

e
Cc

a. vo

b. C’
’
N
c.

d.
e. v

f. z

v v
H z
C v

g.
 v B L
q B Z L Z
v

Figure 2.11
Figure 2.12
Figure 2.13
2.4 METHODS UTILIZING IN-SITU CONE PENETRATION TEST (CPT)

s qB qc

n
I zi
Se CC q q zi
i E si

C q q q

C
q
q
E si

Esi
 Figure 2.14 z z
z

Table 2.8
Iz (Schmertmann
z Iz (Schmertmann, 1970) Iz (Schmertmann, 1978)
(Das, 2004))

0 0 0.1 0.1
square or circular q vp
foundations
z=z1=0.5B 0.6 0.5
z=z2=2B 0 0 0
0 0 0.2 0.2
z=z1=0.5B 0.6 --- ---
foundations with q vp
L/B 10
z=z1=B --- 0.5
z=z2=2B 0 --- ---
z=z2=4B --- 0 0
q
vp
 Iz
A
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
0

0.5

B
1

1.5
q vp
D/B

2.5

L/B=1 (1978)
3 L/B>=10 (1978)
1<L/B<10 (1978)

C (1970) Proposal
B
3.5

4.5

Figure 2.15

Se
qc

qc
qc
 qc qc

qc/N

Table 2.9

Empirical Equation Reference Note:

Es=2qc (Es in tsf) N: stand penetration
Es=2.5qc (for axisymmetric cases, Es in tsf)) resistance
Es:modulus of
Es=3.5qc
(for plain strain cases, Es in tsf)) elasticity
Empirical Value qc:cone resistance
2
Soil Type qc/N (kg/cm )
Silts, sandy silts, slightly cohesion silt-sand
mixtures 2
Clean, fine to medium, sand & slightly silty sands 3.5
Coarse sands & sands with little gravel 5
Sandy gravels with gravel 8

2.5 METHODS UTILIZING PLATE LOAD TEST RESULTS

sB s B B

sB s B B
Dr
Dr
 Figure 2.16

Figure 2.17

E E Kz
 E K

E K

Figure 2.18

qu F qu P
qu F

qu P

BF
qu F qu P
BP
BF
BP

q
BF
SF SP
BP
BF
SF SP
BF BP

s s B B mC w

D B