Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1.! GENERAL
AFTER ANY UPDATING PHASE, THE HOSPITAL COMPLEX SHOULD FORM AN EFFECTIVELY FUNCTIONING WHOLE
TURKU
HELSINKI
TAMPERE
MIKKELI
VAASA
HAINAN
COLOMBO
VANUATU
Construction of the
Finnish hospital network
1900 1935 1970
TURKU
ANALYSIS
Positive Problems
•! Original site sufficiently large for •! The need for growth unforeseen
ca. 100 years
•! The need for new types of facilities
•! The hospital had acquired the unforeseen
adjoining site
•! The typology of the A-hospital in 1937
and the U-hospital in 1966 did not allow
for flexibility
HELSINKI
ANALYSIS
Positive Problems
•! The size of the site has allowed for •! Lack of Master Plan
new construction for app. 100 years
•! The need for growth unforeseen
TAMPERE
ANALYSIS
Positive Problems
•! The size of the site allows for future •! Lack of a Master Plan
enlargements
•! The need for growth unforeseen
MIKKELI
PÄÄTILARYHMÄT:
ANALYSIS
Positive Problems
•! The hospital was able to acquire the •! The original site was too small
adjoining site for its enlargement
•! The need for growth unforeseen
VAASA
PÄÄTILARYHMÄT:
ANALYSIS
Positive Problems
•! The hospitals have grown in a haphazard way without a proper Master Plan
–! This has led to inefficient functionality and increased operating costs
COLOMBO
VANUATU
•! The hospital has grown in phases •! The overall functional concept of the
hospital was reorganised
•! Some of the buildings were financed by
donated funds •! Key medical examination and treatment
functions were located in the new central
•! The need for beds have exeeded the examination and treatment building
hospital’s capacity
•! Existing ward buildings were renovated
•! The size of the site limited to the growth of
the hospital •! The implementations of the project was
done in phases
•! The hospital complex did not form an
optionally functioning whole
•! There was a great need to increase the •! The key medical examination and
examination, treatment and bed capacity of treatment departments were located in the
the hospital new central building for ”hot-functions”
•! The existing buildings were technically in a •! A high-rise in-patient tower for 1000
poor shape patients adjoins this examination and
treatment building
•! The size of the site did allow for new
construction •! The existing buildings were renovated for
out-patient departments and service
purposes
siteplan
LUGANVILLE, VANUATU
development plan for 2000 - 2005
BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
•! The hospital has grown in phases •! The role and tasks of the hospital in the
northern Vanuatu health service network
•! Some of the buildings were financed by were redefined
donated funds
•! The overall functional concept of the
•! The services for examination and hospital was reorganized
treatment were very limited
•! A new examination and treatment building
was designed
siteplan