Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
AFFIDAVIT
2. That the cause of the collision between the car I was riding was the
sudden/momentary stopping of the car in front of us (Honda City
bearing plate no. NFI774);
3. That during the collision incident, there was a heavy downpour which
rendered the road very slippery and our driver was driving at a very
calculated slow speed of 40 kph and maintained our lane all throughout
until the collision incident;
4. That the car I was riding then driven by the accused is about 2 vehicles
distance from the front car (Honda City) involved in the collision
incident;
Affidavit of Witness for the Accused Page 1 of 3
in Damage to Property
5. That at the time the car in front of us suddenly stopped, the driver of the
car I was driving applied his brake properly (in a calculated manner)
and promptly to slow down and prevent colliding with the car in front of
us;
6. That the suddenness of the stop by the front car gave our car very little
time to react with the brakes applied and considering that the road was
very slippery caused by the heavy downpour at the time;
7. That the car in front of us stopped so suddenly and without any signal
light engaged to warn/advise driver of the vehicle behind it as to its
driver’s intended next action (e.g. if it will make a turn to the left or
right); and that during the investigation at the police station in Caba, La
Union, the driver of Honda City car, Peter Soriano told the investigator
that the engine of the Honda City went off that caused it to
suddenly/momentarily stop, and as a consequence, the car I was riding
that was behind the Honda City car collided with the Honda City in
front, hitting its rear bumper and caused damage (dent) on its trunk.
8. That the two (2) vehicles distance between the car I was riding was a
safe distance under the circumstances presenting at the time but because
of the suddenness of the stop made by the car in front of us, our driver
could not make the immediate stop for fear of skidding to prevent the
collision considering the slippery road condition that day;
9. That the driver of the car I was riding then made efforts to prevent the
collision by applying the brakes in calculated manner to prevent the car
from skidding if he applies a sudden brake, which case would probably
result to greater damage to both our car and the car in front of us or
even would result to injuries to passengers of both cars;
10. The resulting damage to both cars will support the prudent and diligent
effort made by our driver under the circumstances presenting at the time
in trying to control the car and to prevent the collision; that the front car
only sustained minor damage to its car’s rear bumper and baggage
compartment (trunk), as with our car which also suffered from minor
dents on its front bumper and parts;
in Damage to Property
I am executing this Affidavit to attest to the truthfulness and veracity of the
foregoing and for all legal intents and purposes it may serve.
]
___________________________
Affiant
___________________________
Notary Public
in Damage to Property