ANPQP REVISION

Version 2.0

1
Current Problems and Revision Points

ANPQP Revision

Detailed Contents of Revision

2
Current Problems and Revision Points

ANPQP Revision

Detailed Contents of Revision

3
Problems of Current Situation
Main VOCs about Current ANPQP
1．Time-consuming
・Take much time to reach information one demands.
・It takes much time to prepare and submit document because there are many kind of
documents.

2．Difficult to understand
・Because the number of documents required to submit differs depending on parts
assessment level, it is hard to know which document is applied to which parts.
・We don’t know what and how to write “List of sub-supplier” because there are no
example and format of it.
・Difficult to understand ANPQP because there is no description about the relationship
between each phase of ANPQP and Nissan project process.

3. Requirement regarding ISO/TS16949

・What will it be in the future about the necessity to obtain ISO/TS16949 certificate?
・Linkage between ISO/TS16949 and ANPQP is unclear because there is no correlation
table.

4
Problems of current situation

(1) Too much volume (the number of pages and

required documents) and difficult to understand
(VOC)

(2) There are some ineffective requirements

5
Revision Point of ANPQP
Basic Revision Concept Revision Point
(1) To contain fundamental •Delete activity requirements of
activities for product management related
realization to make it e.g. Senior Management Support
practical and realistic • Reinforce activity requirements
e.g. Sub Supplier Management
(2) To optimize document - Change document submission
requirements frequency according to the
according to the risk to risk
make it efficient - Reduce the number of documents
(3) To make it easy to „Change ANPQP structure
understand „Change structure of activity
requirement page
„Add “FAQ” page

6
Current Problems and Revision Points

ANPQP Revision

Detailed Contents of Revision

7
Format of ANPQP Revised Version
Activity Specified / Recommended Form
Completion Instruction
Requirement of each document and Completion example

Submission Level of
Output Documents Each Document

8
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
Main Changes
ANPQP Before change After change
requirements
Sub Supplier There is no format for Add format named Component Supply
Management Sub-Supplier List Chain Chart (CSCC)
Sub-Supplier list Extend scope of submission to M/H of
submission is requested assessment level.
only for Module parts
Supplier Insufficient explanation Add “Describe the preparation schedule for
Master of production the completion of the design, manufacture,
Schedule tool/die/gauge inspection & buy off of all tooling. The
schedule on Supplier schedule shall also include the date of
Master Schedule tooling design reviews and trials. Specify
the production place of tool/ die and trial
place.” on Supplier Master Schedule
DCI(Document Completion Instruction)
Design FMEA/ Action at design change Add “Review and update the DFMEA /
Product is not specified Product AMDEC whenever the design is
AMDEC changed or modified”
Special Regular tests on Add “Nissan require suppliers to make
Characteristics regulatory parts except regular tests on Important A/B, OBD and
Control Important A/B is not regulatory parts”
(Nissan only) specified

9
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
Main Changes
ANPQP Before change After change
requirements
Design Review Minimum contents Clarify minimum contents
Record requirement of Design requirement of Design Review Record
Review Record is not on DCI
clarified
Design -Joint check activity -Add “When requested, the supplier
Verification and between Renault/Nissan shall attend the Renault/ Nissan trial
Product / Process and supplier is not assembly activities to review the
Validation specified assembled part condition and confirm
-Continuous conformance Renault/ Nissan assembly
testing after SOP is not requirements”.
specified -Add “Carry out Continuous
Conformance Testing for functional
and performance requirements” in
Phase5 activity
Supplier Test Plan Concerning sample size of Add “This sample size must be
& Report test is not specified statistically valid or otherwise agreed
with Renault/ Nissan “

10
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
Main Changes
ANPQP Before change
requirements
Control Plan Insufficient explanation of
“Process characteristics”
Work Instruction Operator training is not
specified.
Gauge There is no detail
Specification / explanation of “Gauge
Approval Sheet approval activity & Reports”.
Process Requirement of that if
Capabilities Study process capability
and Improvement requirements are not
achieved is “all product shall
be subjected to additional
confirmation activities” only.
11
After change
Add detail explanation of
“Process characteristics” on DCI
Add “Train all operators based on
the work instructions”
Add detail explanation of the
item in Document Description of
DCI.
Add “ the supplier shall establish
root cause(s) and implement
effective countermeasure(s) to
meet the requirements by the
time of SOP”.
1. Reinforcement of Requirements
Main Changes
ANPQP Before change After change
requirements
Analysis of Process Action of process change for Add “Review and update the
Potential Failures Process FMEA is not specified PFMEA whenever the process
and Effects design is changed or modified”.
Activities during Detail requirement of Ramp-up Clarify definition and
Ramp-up activity is not specified. requirement of Ramp-up
activity.
Detail content requirement of Add minimum content
Ramp-up activity plan is not requirement of this plan in DCI.
specified.
Non Conforming Requirement of Add “Apply the
Product countermeasure to other countermeasure to other
Management similar parts/ processes similar parts/ processes
(horizontal deployment) is not (horizontal deployment)
clear.
Supplier Contact There is no document format Add document format of
Directory as a project contact directory as a project

12
3-1) Structure Improvement for Easy Understanding

(1) Specify requirement of complying ISO/TS16949 as

ANPQP Alliance Policy.

(2) Change structure so that requirements can be

recognized at one view.

(3) Make clear the purpose, requirement, its contents,

and output document of each activity requirement.

(4) Change structure of Document Completion

Instruction

13
(1) ANPQP Alliance Policy
Outline
1. The supplier is expected to provide products that meet
or exceed Renault / Nissan Quality, Cost and Delivery
targets.
2. Suppliers are required to comply with all ISO/TS 16949
requirements. This is a minimum requirement for the
application of ANPQP.
3. Renault / Nissan conduct an audit by using the Alliance
evaluation audit tools (ASES/ASAS-P).
4. The supplier is required to rigorously apply ANPQP.
Clarify compliance with ISO/TS16949 as a minimum
requirement in applying ANPQP.
(However, Nissan would not request the certification of
ISO/TS16949. In case a supplier delivers parts to Renault,
the supplier is required to get certification of ISO/TS16949.)
14
(2) Make Possible to Recognize
Requirements at One View
ANPQP Current ANPQP

1. Organization 2. Design Completion 3. Off-tool 4. Off-process 5. Post SOP

& Planning

Activities required at each phase were listed

indivisually 2.4 Design Review 4.2 Process
Capability Study

ÆNo consistency through

2.5 Prototype Control
Plan
phases,
3.6 Pre-Production
Control Plan and hard to
understand 4.6 Production
ÆHard and demanding to3.8find requirements
Final Process
Control Plan
of
each phase Capability Study Plan

4.9 Production Preparation

Monitoring
3.11 Production
Preparation Monitoring
2.18 Initial Process 4.10 Design Review
Capability Study Plan
3.12 Design Review

2.19 Production
Preparation Monitoring

15
(2) Make Possible to Recognize
Requirements at One View
Activity Completion Instruction ANPQP V2.0
Requirement of each document Specified / Recommended Form
and Completion example
Submission Level of
Output Documents Each Document

List the requirements through all phases at 1 page

ÆMake overall format simple
ÆEasy to understand the contents of required activity
through all phases
ÆPossible to recognize requirements at one view

Requirement items;
54 items to 23 activities

16
(2) Make Possible to Recognize
Requirements at One View
Integrate submission level from 6 to 4 patterns
Current ANPQP ANPQP V2.0
Submission Level Symbol Submission Level Sym Example of
bol Document
Approve A Document Engineering
1
Submit completed by Drawings,
S supplier and Control Plan,
Submit (Review by Renault / submitted to PSW, etc.
R Renault/Nissan for
Nissan and supplier) signature.
Retain (Submit if required) r Document 2 Supplier Test
completed by Report, Process
Prepare and Submit only when a supplier and Flow Chart, etc.
required by Renault and Nissan submitted to
Renault/ Nissan.
Based on experience, Renault /
Nissan have identified these as the Document 3 Work Instructions,
main documents subject to change completed by DR Record, etc.
supplier. Submitted
through the development and to Renault/ Nissan
production phases of any project. only by request.
Therefore these documents should be
submitted when they are initially Document ( ) Design Change
completed by Request, Process
produced and subsequently, only
supplier if neccesary. Change Request,
when the content has changed. 8D CCR, etc.

17
(3) Make Clear the Purpose of Each Requirement,
its Contents, and Output Document
1.3 Sub Supplier Management Current ANPQP
Description
Renault and / or Nissan requests that the first tier supplier identifies all the potential sub supplier
being considered for new projects.
In certain cases, Renault and / or Nissan will specify the sub-supplier to be used by the first tier
supplier.
・The purpose of activities was not clear
The supplier must deploy a product development system to ensure that its sub-suppliers shall
⇒Users may conduct activities without
design, manufacture and deliver a product in accordance with Renault and / or Nissan QCD
targets. This procedure shall be included in the Supplier Quality Plan.
understanding the purpose of activities.
Note:
・Hard to understand the consistency of requirements
It is the responsibility of the first tier supplier to manage all their sub suppliers in order that all
from the planning
ANPQP requirements are met in stage tofirst-tier
full by the SOPsupplier. For further guidance on the
management of suppliers which are specified by Renault and / or Nissan, refer to the
appropriate RFQ file(s).
Within all phase activities the first tier supplier shall ensure, through the use of project reviews, that
they are compliant with ANPQP requirements at phase 2,3 & 4 and that all ongoing design,
process and facility changes are managed during phase 5.
The updated 'List of Sub Suppliers' shall be included in the Supplier Quality Plan and / or the
Process Flow Chart.

Required Result
For module parts, the completed 'List of Sub Suppliers' with their respective evaluation levels (in
・・・・・

18
(3) Make Clear the Purpose of Each Requirement,
its Contents, and Output Document
Sub-Supplier Management ANPQP2.0
Activity purpose:
To manage all sub-suppliers to ensure products delivered to Renault / Nissan
achieve QCD targets.
・Clarify
Tier the
1 suppliers important
shall requirements,
be responsible for the management “why this is
and approval of
parts quality and associated documentation for all sub-supplier's (including
required”,
those and
specified by “what
Renault to do”
/ Nissan) unlessinotherwise
referring toineach
agreed content
the RFQ.
ofsub-supplier
No requirement.changes are allowed in phase 4, unless otherwise agreed by
Renault/ Nissan.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity -Identify all the sub-suppliers for the production phase, complete CSCC (Component Supply Chain
Content Chart), to understand the complete supply chain.
-Select and evaluate sub-suppliers based on their ability to supply products which satisfy Renault/
Nissan QCD target .
-Criteria for selection, evaluation, and re-evaluation shall be established including quality history and/or
・Possible to find activities of each phase
second or third party audit results.
-Deploy a product development system to ensure that sub-suppliers design, manufacture and deliver a
at 1 page.
product in accordance with Renault / Nissan QCD targets.
Select potential sub- -Finalise the CSCC Update the CSCC -No sub- -Apply the change
suppliers and make document. whenever there are supplier management
the draft of CSCC any changes to the changes activity before
document. sub-suppliers. any CSCC
change.
Output Component Supply Chain Chart(CSCC）
Document

19
(4) Change Structure of
Document Completion Instruction
SUPPLIER DOCUMENT COMPLETION REQUIREMENTS
Current ANPQP
List of Sub Suppliers

The following items are expected as a minimum content of this document:

-Product to be supplied (cross reference to completed part drawing)
・There
Supplier namewas
and no description except for document
location
-Confirm whether this
completion is an existing supplier
method.
If so, state length of supplier relationship and relevant experience of this
⇒Why document needed to be completed was not
type of product
brought
-Clarify to suppliers,
which parts andDesignated"
are "Customer this might make
parts the
and / or supplied
parts from Renault
document / Nissan or
completion others
itself the purpose.
-State relevant internationally recognised standard(s), with which the
product will be in conformance (ISO, DIN, JIS etc.)
-Key dimensions / weight of product as supplied
-Surface treatment or protective method to be used for transit / storage
-Component part numbers in the case of modular assemblies
The supplier shall comply with the Control of Documents and Control of
Records requirements of ISO/TS16949.

20
(4) Change Structure of
Document Completion Instruction
Document Completion Instruction ANPQP2.0
Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC)

Key Points
The Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC) is a chart which visualises the structure
of the component supply chain.
・Clarify the key points and minimum requirements of the
The CSCC shall be used to reinforce sub supplier management.
document.
Minimum ⇒Easy to understand
Content the purpose of document
Requirements
The CSCCcompletion
shall cover all and
tiers function of chain
of the supply the document.
down to raw material level
(including grease, sealant, solder, etc.).
・・・
Document Description
Item Completion Instructions
Part name and Part number delivered Describe Part name and Part number delivered to
to Renault /Nissan Renault/Nissan.
Supply Chain Structure and their Describe Supply Chain Structure with component parts' name.
component parts' name

21
3-2) Add FAQ
Example
Question
Where is the Data Retention
requirement of documents?
Does the scope of “Sub supplier” Yes.
include both raw material
supplier and parts supplier?
Shall the Supplier Contact
Directory be submitted for each
project? Is it included also any
miner change project or KD
project?
22
Answer
There is in the “Ground Rule of
Document Submission”.
We added the format for project
in this revision, so please
submit it for all projects
including miner changes
projects. In addition, for the
contact of head office function
and manufacturing
4. Other Changes; Document revision

Following items were revised according to

VOC (Voice of Customer) from suppliers and
Renault/ Nissan internal.
Document integrated Document name changed

Document eliminated Document added

Others
Improvement document format (easy to input)
Improvement of each document header

23
4. Other Changes; Document revision

Document integrated
Current document name Revision document name
Process Change Summary Process/ Facility Site Change
Facility Site Transfer Request
Summary

Document eliminated
„ Installation Plan
„ Internal Concern Management Procedures
„ Action Plan to achieve customers QCD targets

24
4. Other Changes; Document revision
Document name and format changed
Document name (V2.0) Format Name Document name(V1.4）
changed
Component Supply Chain Chart Add Y Sub-supplier List
（CSCC）
Supplier Production Preparation - Y Supplier Plan
Monitoring Plan
Supplier Proeduction - Y Supplier Status
Preparation Monitoring Status Report
Report
Supplier Test Plan & Report - Y Supplier Test
Report
Supplier Contact Directory Small - -
change
Work Instruction - Y Process Instruction

25
4. Other Changes; Renault included documents

Renault existing documents have been included in

ANPQP Version 2.0 :
„MQA

„Supplier Recommendations

„Logistics and Packaging Data Sheet

„Supplier EDI agreement

„EDI Submission Warrant

„Part Status Report

26
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
Changed phase name (Phase 1 & 5) however keep phase
concept.
Requirements Requirements
Review and Review and
Planning Planning

Ramp-up
and Mass Production

27
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
Requirements review
Part
and Planning Submission
Warrant
Requirements
Organisationreview
Phase 1 (PSW)
Design Completion and
et Planning
Planning

Phase 2 Off Tool

RFQ Feed Back
Phase 3 Analysis
Off Process
Sourcing
Ramp-up and
confirmation Phase 4 Mass Production
Tooling
release
Phase 5

Off Tool
confirmation
Supplier
Manufacturing
Approval
(AFF)

28
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed
Vehicle Project Milestones
ENVU/EVIP

Pre contrat Contrat ROP/TGA AMSLOT AMPS/ABTO AF/SOP

Supplier 100% suppliers Investment 100% IOD 100% PSW 100%

nomination nominations authorisations Suppliers
100% AFF
facilities
Phase 1 in place
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4

Phase 5
For all products
Suppliers Tooling Go
nominations Ahead
Supplier
RFQ PSW Manufacturing
I.O.D
Approval (AFF)

29
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed

Powertrain Project Milestones

Pre contrat Contrat AMIOD AMEI AMPS AF

IOD
machined
100% nominations IOD ass.

100% Tooling Go Ahead

100% IOD

100% APF (AEI)

100% AFF

30
4. Other Changes; Phase name changed

(Phase 1)
Phase 1
Requirements Requirements
Review and Planning
Review and Planning Phase 2
Design Completion Phase 3
Off tool Phase 4
Off process Ramp-up and
立上り後
Mass production
Phase 5
Tooling Release
Slot Supplier
Slot ET PT1 PT2 SOP
Process selection
DF DFC
V-3P DDlot VClot PTlot
lot lot
Process Tooling
Sourcing Parts
Confirmation Release Approval

31
32