ANPQP Revision

Version 2.1

July/2008
TCS-SQA

1
Contents
Basic Concept of the Revision
Summary of the Revision
Contents of the Revision

2
Basic Concept of the Revision
Ver 2.1 is planned to be minor because the
previous revision (Ver 2.0) was drastic and
it is not so long after Ver 2.0 application.
(Scheduled to be implemented from Sep. 2008)
- Items previously decided to discuss in Ver 2.1
development
- Amendment of errors found in Ver 2.0
- Reinforcement of Design Review activity
Add the item of “Quick Design Review” into
Nissan company specific.
3
Contents
Basic Concept of the Revision
Summary of the Revision
Contents of the Revision

4
Summary of the Revision
1) Reinforcement of requirements

2) Clarify the requirement

3) Improvement for Using ANPQP/Other

5
Contents
Basic Concept of the Revision
Summary of the Revision
Contents of the Revision

6
Reinforcement of requirements
Nissan–supplier Joint Design Review (Nissan Unique)
-Product and Process Design Review
Added to participate in Renault / Nissan - Supplier joint design review.
Note;
In addition to the suppliers' product and process design review activities,
Renault / Nissan will identify suppliers to participate in joint product and process design reviews.
For Nissan, these joint reviews will be either "Full Process Design Review" or "Quick Design
Review".

- Confirm with Renault / Nissan if participation in a joint product and process

design review is required.
7
Reinforcement of requirements
Nissan–supplier Joint Design Review (Nissan Unique)
-Full Process DR
Added the explanation of Full Process DR
Activity Purpose ：
Full process DR is implemented for part/system which is first application for Nissan.
Nissan and supplier take preventive actions to implement Full Process DR.
( Nissan’s expert leader ,who is expert of each technical area, select the part/ system for
Full Process DR by risk assessment)
Nissan Full Process DR reviewer review following items with his knowledge and skill in
Full Process Design Review；
-Design quality improvement using Design FMEA, FTA, Process FMEA etc. by design/
production engineers of Nissan and Supplier
-Clarification of characteristics for control in manufacturing process
-Quality assurance way in manufacturing process using Process FMEA, QA table B of QFD,
etc.

8
Reinforcement of requirements
Nissan–supplier Joint Design Review (Nissan Unique)
-Quick DR
Added the explanation of Quick DR
Activity Purpose ：
Nissan and supplier take preventive actions in short time and effectively by gathering
technical knowledge from both Nissan and supplier. Through the discussion of design,
testing, production engineers of Nissan and supplier, clarify the potential concerns and
complaints and these causes by any changes, then identify countermeasure proposal from
Design, Evaluation, Process view point on DRBFM worksheet. Reviewer ,who is an expert
of each technical area, checks this result for including his wisdom.
-Design Change Management
Added the requirement to Participate in Joint Design Review when
required by Renault/Nissan.

-If requested, participate in Joint Design Review with Renault / Nissan.

9
Reinforcement of requirements
Improvement of 8D Concern and Countermeasure Report
Summary format (Nissan Unique)
Improved "Final analysis" including 5-Why step for final root cause
("Why was the defect made?" and "Why was the defect not detected?“) analysis

Added confirmation of Horizontal Deployment to “Follow-up Actions”

10
Reinforcement of requirements
Improvenment of Environmental requirements
-Environmental Requirements (Nissan Specific)

Added the market to apply Environmental requirement

It is required that motor vehicles developed for the European Union,
Japanese, Korean, Taiwanese, Chinese and US markets:

Added the requirement regarding marking and recycling

Comply with regulations relating to the use of recycled & recyclable
materials, including marking of specific material types.

-DCI for Material Investigation Report and Declaration Letter

Minimum Content Requirements
The supplier shall comply with the latest issue of Nissan Engineering Standard
NES M0301 (Substance Use Restrictions) and NES D0031 (Marking of Polymeric
Parts) on all products under development and in current production, including raw
materials.
11
 Reinforcement of requirements
Submission requirements
SpecialCharacteristics & Key FeatureDigram (Nissan Submission Rquirement)

Part Status Report(Renault unique)

12
Clarify the requirement
Clarified the Renault’s milestone and the definition of light blue cell

Renault Vehicle and Powertrain Project

Milestones are more detailed than in Version 2.0

Changed the definition of light blue cell

Ver.2.0: ‘‘Activity Timing’’
Ver.2.1: ‘‘Activity Timing and Submit again if up-dated’’
13
Clarify the requirement
Clarified the scope of Sub-supplier change management
-Sub-Supplier Management

Ver2.1:Apply the change management activity before any change

to a sub-supplier or within a sub-supplier.

-Process /Facilitysite Change Management

Added the sentence that the scope of Process / Facilitysite Change Management
activity covers all changes made by the tier 1 supplier or their supply chain.
14
Clarify the requirement
Clarified the documents to ensure consistency of operation
step number and characteristics identification.
The supplier must ensure consistency throughout all documentation
(e.g.: Control plan, Process Flow Chart,Special Characteristic and Key Features
Diagram, Inspection Report, FMEA) for;
- operation step numbering
- product characteristics identification
Control Plan
Process Flow Chart

SC & KF Diagram

15
Clarify the requirement
Added the measurement data for all suites / cavities of any
multi-part tooling to Minimum Content Requirements of
Inspection Report.

DCI for Inspection Report;

Minimum Content Requirements

Measurement data for all features identified on the drawing and in the Special Characteristics and
Key Features Diagram. This shall include measurement data from all suites / cavities of any
multi-part tooling.

The conformity status of each measurement (OK / Not OK)

The unit for each measurement will be identified
Supplier approval signature and date
A unique report number

16
Clarify the requirement
Clarified the minimum content of the Full Volume Confirmation
Audit Result from a quality and production control perspective.
DCI for Full Volume Confirmation Audit Result;
"The document content shall provide evidence that:

-All personnel associated with the manufacture of the product

(production staff, material handling & warehouse staff, inspection staff etc.)
are fully trained to the required skill level
-All production and inspection facilities and equipment are maintained and calibrated
-All process documentation is in place and reflects the correct product design level.
-The manufacturing output (straight through ratio, OK ratio etc.) matches the
required manufacturing output detailed in the Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring Plan
etc...

Commonised the output document to Renault / Nissan.

Version 2.0

Version 2.1 17
Clarify the requirement
Improvment of Worked Example
Added the worked example of following documents.
-Ramp up activity plan
-MQA(Renault Unique)
-Quality Plan
Improved the content of following worked example to be more detail
-Supplier Master Schedule
Updated to 2 types of examples which contain the same data but show all the data on
1 page or all the data split between the front page and details sheets.

-Control Plan
Improved the content of the "Reaction Plan", "Maintenance" and "Poka Yoke" columns.
Updated to 2 types of examples.

-Inspection Report & Special Characteristics & Key Feature Diagram

Improved the contents to ensure consistency Inspection Report and
Special Characteristics & Key Feature Diagram.
18
Improvement for Using ANPQP
Changed the order of each activities in chronologic order.
And added chapter number
Version 2.0 Version 2.1

19
Improvement for Using ANPQP
Linked each DCI and format/example

20
Improvement for Using ANPQP
Words which are included in the glossary are linked to the
text in each page where the word is used.

21
Improvement for Using ANPQP
Modified and commonised the content of Header portion of
each document

Additional item from Ver.2.0:

-Author
-Tel No.

Deleted item from Ver.2.0:

-Supplier Personnel Responsible for the Activity

22
Improvement for Using ANPQP
Unified “Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring Plan” and
“Supplier Production Preparation Status Report” into one document
Version 2.0 Version 2.1

Modified the format to be able to monitor the plan and status in one document
Plan

Achievement 23
 Other Changes
ƒ Supplier Contact Directory :
-Format in 3 separate Excel sheets.
ƒ Gauge Specification :
-Removed the list of the items to be validated fromthe Gauge Specification Sheet.
ƒ Document Format “Part Number Details”
-Applied to both Renault and Nissan
ƒ Document Format “Capacity Submission Warrant” :
-Format was revised to make it compatible with a new Information System under
development
ƒ Document Format “Supplier Master Schedule” :
-Minimum Content Requirements have been reinforced minimum content requirement to
clarify all ANPQP Activities shall be clearly planed in the document.

ƒ Document Formats “Supplier EDI Agreement & EDI

Submission Warrant” :
-Level Submission was « 1 », corrected « (1) » as these activities are made only if
necessary (for Supplier Manufacturing Site working for the first time with Renault Plant)

24
25