Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Saiteja Venkatapuram
Aderito Campos
Strategic Vision
● Bring best quality footwear to consumers
● Sustainable prices
● Social responsible where People, Profit and Planet and are in balance
Initial Objectives
Strategy Objectives Results – Year 20
● Provide shoes at low cost at high S/Q rating ● 8 S/Q rating/50 models
● Reliable celebrity appeal ● 255 – Industry leader (25 more than the
● Invest in styling and six sigma next team)
Customer/Employee
● Increase % of superior material ● Maximum styling (50K)
Financial ● Decrease shares outstanding ● 49.2% cost of pairs sold (industry leader)
● Reduce defects ● 7,590 shares outstanding (industry
leader)
● Factory upgrades (Average rate of
rejects - 1.2%)
Performance Targets
Indicators Year 11 Year 20 % Change Year 21 Year 22 ● EPS always above the
investor expectation
EPS $3.01 $14.04 366.45% $15 $18 ● ROE was average
compared to IE during the
ROE 18% 29.8% 65.56% 32% 36% years 14 & 15 and
increased continuously
Credit A- A+ A+ A+ since then
Rating ● Image rating took a big hit
during the first 4 years and
Image 68 83 22.06% 86 90
was below IE the first 1
year. Steadily improved
Rating
from Year 14
● Stock price was stable for
Global 14.3% 18.1% 26.57% 20% 23%
first 5 years and increased
Market
drastically from year 15
Share
● Global market share
increased steadily
Stock Price $41.93 $192.17 358.31% $250 $350 throughout the stimulation
1. Not buying large amounts of company stock early on in the game (i.e. years 11-15)
2. Not trying strategy of high volume lowest price/cost provider position
3. Not buying more Celebrity Endorsements early on in the game
Why?
1. Buying company stock early - We found out later in the game that it helps the metrics of the game
2. Low price cost provider - we think that this was an unexplored area by the teams
3. Celebrity Endorsements - we think buying them early is cheaper and can lead to higher celebrity
appeal numbers
Three Best Decisions
1. Started out with Strategy of High Quality/High Price position - ~200 models (Y 10-14) then switched to
~50 models (Y 15-20)
Why? - We were No 1
3. Buying additional plant capacity even though BSG Financial reports said capacity was not needed
Why? - Individual teams extra capacity can be used up with right strategy
One thing to change
● Try Strategy of High Volume Low Price provider. If executed well could of led to much higher
sales as no other team members chose that strategy.
Why?
Do Not
● Implement similar strategies to many others in class
● Run operations in-efficiently: “It’s not how much you earn but how much you keep…”
● Buy more plant capacity than your strategy calls at a time
● Presume that others won’t figure out your winning strategy
● Produce in regions with lower profit margins
Thank You - Danke - Obrigado - 谢谢
Merci - Ευχαριστώ - Gracias - Tack -
Grazie