IPCRF Teacher 1 3 2018

INDIVIDUAL PE
Name of Employee: ANDREA S. DELA TORRE Name of Rater:

Position: TEACHER I Position:
Review Period: JUNE,2018-APRIL,2019 Date of Review Period:
Division: AKLAN
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge of content within and

EducationS Knowledge and across curriculum teaching areas.
ervices Pedagogy
DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

INDIVIDUAL PE
Division: AKLAN

Basic 1. Content 2. Used a range of teaching strategies that
EducationS Knowledge and enhance learner achievement in literacy and
ervices Pedagogy numeracy skills.
INDIVIDUAL PE
Division: AKLAN

Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a range of teaching strategies to

EducationS Knowledge and develop critical and creative thinking, as well
ervices Pedagogy as other higher order thinking skills.

INDIVIDUAL PE
Division: AKLAN
4. Managed classroom structure to engage

Basic 2. Learning learners, individually or in groups, in
EducationS Environment and meaningful exploration, discovery and
ervices Diversity Learners hands-on activities within a range og
physical learning

4. Managed classroom structure to engage
Basic 2. Learning learners, individually or in groups, in
EducationS Environment and meaningful exploration, discovery and
ervices Diversity Learners hands-on activities within a range og
physical learning
INDIVIDUAL PE
Division: AKLAN

2. Learning 5. Managed learner behavior constructively
Basic Environment and by applying positive and non-violent
EducationS Diversity of discipline to ensure learning-focused
ervices Learners environment

INDIVIDUAL PE
Division: AKLAN
2. Learning 6. Used differentiated, developmentally

Basic Environment and appropriate learning experiences to address
EducationS Diversity of learners' gender, needs, strengths, interest
ervices Learners and experiences.

2. Learning 6. Used differentiated, developmentally
Basic Environment and appropriate learning experiences to address
EducationS Diversity of learners' gender, needs, strengths, interest
ervices Learners and experiences.
INDIVIDUAL PE
Division: AKLAN

7. Planned, managed and implemented
Basic 3. Curriculum and developmentally sequenced teaching and
EducationS Planning learning processes to meet curriculum
ervices requirements and varied teaching contexts.

INDIVIDUAL PE
Division: AKLAN
Basic 8. Participated in collegial discussions that

EducationS 3. Curriculum and use teacher and learner feedback to enrich
Planning
ervices teaching practice

INDIVIDUAL PE
Division: AKLAN

Basic 9. Selected, develop, organized and used
EducationS 3. Curriculum and appropriate teaching and learning resources,
Planning
ervices including ICT, to address learning goals.
INDIVIDUAL PE
Division: AKLAN

10. Designed, selected, organized and used

Basic 4. Assessment and diagnostic, formative and summative
EducationS Reporting assessment strategies consistent with
ervices curriculum requirements.

INDIVIDUAL PE
Division: AKLAN
Basic 11. Monitored and evaluated learner

EducationS 3. Curriculum and progress andRegion
DepEd achievement
VI-IPCRF using learner
Template
Planning
ervices attainment data
Basic 11. Monitored and evaluated learner
EducationS 3. Curriculum and progress and achievement using learner
Planning
ervices attainment data
INDIVIDUAL PE
Division: AKLAN

12. Communicated promptly and clearly the
Basic
4. Assessment and learners' needs, progress and achievement
EducationS Reporting to key stakeholders, including
ervices parents/guardians.

INDIVIDUAL PE
Division: AKLAN
Basic 13. Performed various related

EducationS 5. Plus Factor works/activities that contribute to the
ervices teacher-learning process

ADJECTIVAL RATING
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING ANDREA S. DELA TORRE
4.500-5.000 Outstanding Rater
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
OXIDA R. FLORES
HEAD TEACHER III
w Period: April 5, 2019
IN DURING PLANNING
Weight per
Performance Indicators(Quality/Effectiveness, Efficiency, Timeliness)
KRA (%)
Quality Efficiency Timeliness
5-Outstanding
Showed knowledge of Submitted at least 4
content and its integration lessons using MOV 1 and
within and across subject supported by any 1 of
areas as shown in MOV 1 the other given MOV
with a rating of 7

4-Very Satisfactory
Showed knowledge of Submitted 3 lessons
content and its integration using MOV 1 and
with a rating of 6

3-Satisfactory
7.5% Showed knowledge of Submitted 2 lessons
content and its integration using MOV 1 and
with a rating of 5

2-Unsatisfactory

Showed knowledge of Submitted any 1 of the
content and its integration given MOV
within and across subject
areas as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

1-Poor
No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence
shown was shown

OXIDA R. FLORES
HEAD TEACHER III
IN DURING PLANNING
Weight per Performance Indicators(Quality/Effectiveness, Efficiency, Timeliness)

KRA (%)

5-Outstanding
Facilitated using different Submitted at least 4
teaching strategies that learner-centered lessons
promote reading writing as evidently shown in
and/or numeracy skills as MOV 1 and supported by
shown in MOV 1 with a any 1 of the other MOV
rating of 7 given

4-Very Satisfactory

Facilitated using different Submitted 3 learner-
teaching strategies that centered lessons as
promote reading writing evidently shown in MOV
and/or numeracy skills as 1 and supported by any
shown in MOV 1 with a 1 of the other MOV
rating of 6 given

3-Satisfactory
7.5% Facilitated using different Submitted 2 learner-
promote reading writing evidently shown in MOV
and/or numeracy skills as 1 and supported by any
shown in MOV 1 with a 1 of the other MOV
rating of 5 given

2-Unsatisfactory
Facilitated using different Submitted 1 learner-
promote reading writing evidently shown in any
and/or numeracy skills as of the other given MOV
shown in MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

1-Poor
shown was shown

OXIDA R. FLORES
HEAD TEACHER III

IN DURING PLANNING

KRA (%)

5-Outstanding
Used different teaching Submitted at least 4
strategies that develop lessons using MOV 1 and
critical and creative thinking supported by any 1 of
skills and/or other HOTS as the other given MOV
rating of 7

4-Very Satisfactory
Used different teaching Submitted 3 lessons as
strategies that develop evidenced by MOV 1 and
rating of 6

3-Satisfactory
7.5% Used different teaching Submitted 2 lessons as
strategies that develop evidenced by MOV 1 and
rating of 5

2-Unsatisfactory
Used different teaching Submitted 1 lesson as
strategies that develop evidenced by any of the
critical and creative thinking given MOV
skills and/or other HOTS as
rating of 4

1-Poor
shown was shown

OXIDA R. FLORES
HEAD TEACHER III
IN DURING PLANNING

KRA (%)

5-Outstanding
Used classroom Submitted at least 4
management strategies that lessons supported by
engage learners in MOV 1 and any 1 of the
activities/task as shown in other acceptable MOV
MOV 1 with a rating of 7

4-Very Satisfactory
Used classroom Submitted 3 lessons
management strategies that supported by MOV 1 and
engage learners in any 1 of the other
activities/task as shown in acceptable MOV

3-Satisfactory
7.5%

Used classroom Submitted 2 lessons
7.5% management strategies that supported by MOV 1 and
engage learners in any 1 of the other
activities/task as shown in acceptable MOV

2-Unsatisfactory
Used classroom Submitted 1 lesson
management strategies that supported by any of the
engage learners in acceptable MOV
activities/task as shown in

1-Poor
shown was shown

OXIDA R. FLORES
HEAD TEACHER III
IN DURING PLANNING

KRA (%)

5-Outstanding

Applied teacher Submitted at least 4 of
management strategies of the given strategies as
learner behavior that observed in at least 4
promote positive and non- lessons
violent discipline as shown in
MOV submitted with a rating
of 7

4-Very Satisfactory
Applied teacher Submitted at least 4 of
learner behavior that observed in 3 lessons
promote positive and non-
of 6

3-Satisfactory
7.5% Applied teacher Submitted at least 4 of
learner behavior that observed in 2 lessons
promote positive and non-
of 5

2-Unsatisfactory
Applied teacher Submitted any 1 of the
management strategies of given strategies as
learner behavior that observed in only 1
promote positive and non- lesson
of 4

1-Poor
shown was shown

OXIDA R. FLORES
HEAD TEACHER III
IN DURING PLANNING
Weight per
Performance Indicators(Quality/Effectiveness, Efficiency, Timeliness)
KRA (%)

5-Outstanding
Applied differentiated Submitted at least 4
teaching strategies to differentiated teaching
address learner diversity as strategies in at least 2
shown in MOV 1 with a lessons as evidenced by
rating of 7 MOV 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other
acceptable MOV

4-Very Satisfactory
Applied differentiated Submitted 3
address learner diversity as strategies in at least 2
shown in MOV 1 with a lessons as evidenced by
rating of 6 MOV 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other
acceptable MOV

7.5% 3-Satisfactory

7.5%
Applied differentiated Submitted 2
address learner diversity as strategies in 2 lessons as
shown in MOV 1 with a evidenced by MOV 1 and
rating of 5 supported by any 1 of
the other acceptable
MOV

2-Unsatisfactory
Applied differentiated Submitted any 1
address learner diversity as strategies in only 1
shown in MOV 1 with a lesson as evidently
rating of 4 shown in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV

1-Poor
shown was shown

OXIDA R. FLORES
HEAD TEACHER III
IN DURING PLANNING

KRA (%)

5-Outstanding

Planned and implemented Submitted at least 4
developmentally sequenced developmentally
teaching and learning sequenced teaching and
process as shown in MOV 1 learning process as
with a rating of 7 evidently shown in MOV
1 and supported by any
1 of the other given
MOV

4-Very Satisfactory
Planned and implemented Submitted 3
MOV

7.5% 3-Satisfactory
MOV

2-Unsatisfactory
with a rating of 4 evidently shown in any 1
of the given MOV

1-Poor
shown was shown

OXIDA R. FLORES
HEAD TEACHER III
IN DURING PLANNING

KRA (%)

5-Outstanding
Consistently participated in Participated in at least 4
LACs/FGDs/meetings to LACs/FGDs/meetings as
discuss teacher/learner evidently shown in any 1
feedback to enrich of the given MOV
instruction as shown in the
MOV submitted

4-Very Satisfactory
Frequently participated in Participated in 3
MOV submitted

3-Satisfactory
7.5% Occasionally participated in Participated in 2
MOV submitted

2-Unsatisfactory

Reraly participated in Participated in 1
LACs/FGDs/meeting to LAC/FGD/meeting as
MOV submitted

1-Poor
shown was shown

OXIDA R. FLORES
HEAD TEACHER III
IN DURING PLANNING

KRA (%)

5-Outstanding
Developed and used varied Submitted at least 4
teaching and learning varied teaching and
resources, including ICT, to learning resources,
address learning goals as including ICT, as
shown in MOV 1 with a evidently shown in MOV
rating of 7 1 and supported by any
1 of the acceptable MOV

4-Very Satisfactory

Developed and used varied Submitted 3 varied
teaching and learning teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT,
address learning goals as as evidently shown in
shown in MOV 1 with a MOV 1 and supported by
rating of 6 any 1 of the acceptable
MOV

7.5% 3-Satisfactory
Developed and used varied Submitted 2 varied
teaching and learning teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT,
address learning goals as as evidently shown in
shown in MOV 1 with a MOV 1 and supported by
rating of 5 any 1 of the acceptable
MOV

2-Unsatisfactory
Developed and used varied Submitted any teaching
teaching and learning and learning resource,
resources, including ICT, to including ICT, as
address learning goals as evidently shown in any
shown in MOV 1 with a of the acceptable MOV
rating of 4

1-Poor
shown was shown

OXIDA R. FLORES
HEAD TEACHER III
IN DURING PLANNING

KRA (%)

5-Outstanding
Designed, selected, Submitted at least 4
organized and used varied assessment tools
diagnostic, formative and as evidnetly shown in
summative assessment any 1 of the acceptable
strategies consistent with MOV
curriculum requirements as
rating of 7

4-Very Satisfactory
Designed, selected, Submitted 3 varied
organized and used assessment tools as
diagnostic, formative and evidently shown in any 1
summative assessment of the acceptable MOV
strategies consistent with
rating of 6

3-Satisfactory
7.5% Designed, selected, Submitted 2 varied
organized and used assessment tools as
diagnostic, formative and evidently shown in any 1
summative assessment of the acceptable MOV
rating of 5

2-Unsatisfactory

Designed, selected, Submitted 1 assessment
organized and used tool as evidently shown
diagnostic, formative and in any of the acceptable
summative assessment MOV
rating of 4

1-Poor
shown was shown

OXIDA R. FLORES
HEAD TEACHER III
IN DURING PLANNING

KRA (%)

5-Outstanding
Consistently monitored and Submitted a combination Submitted MOV were
evaluated learner progress of at least 4 of the distributed across 4
and achievement using acceptable MOV quarters
learner attainment data as
shown in the MOV submitted

4-Very Satisfactory
Frequently monitored and Submitted a combination Submitted MOV were
evaluated learner progress of 3 of the acceptable distributed across 3
and achievement using MOV quarters
7.5% DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

3-Satisfactory
7.5%
Occationally monitored and Submitted a combination Submitted MOV were
evaluated learner progress of 2 of the acceptable distributed across 2
and achievement using MOV quarters

2-Unsatisfactory
Rarely monitored and Submitted 1 acceptable Submitted MOV was
evaluated learner progress MOV completed in only 1
and achievement using quarter

1-Poor
No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence No acceptable evidence
shown was shown was shown

OXIDA R. FLORES
HEAD TEACHER III
IN DURING PLANNING

KRA (%)

5-Outstanding

Consistently showed prompt Submitted a combination Submitted MOV were
and clear communication of of at least 4 of the distributed across 4
the learners' needs, progress acceptable MOV quarters
and achievement to key
stakeholders, including
parents/guardians as shown
in the MOV submitted

4-Very Satisfactory
Frequently showed prompt Submitted a combination Submitted MOV were
and clear communication of of 3 of the acceptable distributed across 3
the learners' needs, progress MOV quarters

3-Satisfactory
7.5%
Occasionally showed prompt Submitted a combination Submitted MOV were
and clear communication of of 2 of the acceptable distributed across 2
the learners' needs, progress MOV quarters

2-Unsatisfactory
Rarely showed prompt and Submitted any 1 of the Submitted MOV was
clear communication of the given MOV comlpeted in only 1
learners' needs, progress and quarter
achievement to key

1-Poor
shown was shown

OXIDA R. FLORES
HEAD TEACHER III
IN DURING PLANNING

KRA (%)

5-Outstanding
Consistently performed Submitted at least 4
various related different kinds of
works/activities that acceptable MOV
contribute to the teaching
learning process as shown in
the MOV submittted

4-Very Satisfactory
Frequently performed Submitted 3 different
various related kinds of acceptable MOV
works/activities that
the MOV submittted

3-Satisfactory
10% Occationally performed Submitted 2 different
various related kinds of acceptable MOV
works/activities that
the MOV submittted

2-Unsatisfactory

Rarely performed various Submitted any 1 of the
related works/activities that acceptable MOV
the MOV submittted

1-Poor
shown was shown
Over-All Rating for Accomplishments
S. DELA TORRE OXIDA R. FLORES

Rater Ratee

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RATING
Actual Results SCORE
Q E T A
5 5 5 0.375

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A

5 5 5 0.375

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
5 5 5 0.375

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
5 5 5 0.375

5 5 5 0.375

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A

5 5 5 0.375

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
5 5 5 0.375

5 5 5 0.375

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A

5 5 5 0.375

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
5 5 5 0.375

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A

5 5 5 0.375

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
5 5 5 0.375

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
5 5
DepEd 5Region VI-IPCRF 5
Template 0.375
5 5 5 5 0.375

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A

5 5 5 5 0.375

ACTUAL RATING
Q E T A
5 5 5 5 0.500

Accomplishments Outstanding 5.000
KENNETH B. REVESTIR
Public Schools District Supervisor

IPCRF Teacher 1 3 2018

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

IPCRF Teacher 1 3 2018

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

INDIVIDUAL PE

Name of Employee: ANDREA S. DELA TORRE Name of Rater:

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge of content within and

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a range of teaching strategies to

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

4. Managed classroom structure to engage

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

2. Learning 6. Used differentiated, developmentally

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

Basic 8. Participated in collegial discussions that

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

10. Designed, selected, organized and used

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

Basic 11. Monitored and evaluated learner

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE

Basic 13. Performed various related

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Weight per Performance Indicators(Quality/Effectiveness, Efficiency, Timeliness)

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

Weight per Performance Indicators(Quality/Effectiveness, Efficiency, Timeliness)

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

Quality Efficiency Timeliness

DepEd Region VI-IPCRF Template

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)