Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
HERONGATE:
THE CASE
FOR
RENTSAFE
OTTAWA
HERONGATE CHAPTER OF
OTTAWA ACORN
ACORN strongly believes the City's "Rental Accommodations Review" did not
adequately capture the extent of the problem of bad housing in Ottawa, which
continues to be a widespread and urgent issue. The claim that substandard
housing is not widespread in Ottawa was based on 3-1-1 data,
which is not a representative database as it is entirely complaint based,
meaning that it does not capture issues that tenants do not call the City
about. On the contrary, during ACORN's recent repairs canvas in Herongate,
80% of the tenants ACORN spoke with had no idea 3-1-1 existed, or what it
could be used for, yet all of them reported significant problems in their
buildings or units.
In 2016 and again in 2018, Timbercreek Asset Management was able to justify
demolishing sections of the neighbourhood's affordable family row houses
with the intent of replacing them with luxury rentals arguing they were beyond
repair. Many ACORN members, who were previously evicted
in this neighbourhood, argue that RentSafe is also a revenue neutral
this was demolition by neglect and program so it wouldn't impact the
the City should have tools in place City's budget. Landlords pay a per
to prevent rentals from purposefully unit/annual registration fee as well
deteriorating. Owing to these mass as additional inspection costs if
evictions, many Herongate tenants needed. In Toronto, the cost of
live in fear of being evicted any registration is significantly less than
1% of what landlords make in rent
day. If landlord registry was in
each year; they pay $10.80/year
place, repairs could not have been
per unit that they rent out.
neglected to the point of demolition
and tenant displacement.
Critics and landlords have wrongly
argued that the cost of a landlord
ACORN members argue that a registry would be downloaded onto
landlord registry would promote tenants. The Province caps the
good landlords, and target the bad. amount of rent landlords can
For instance, Toronto’s RentSafe charge each year and they always
program did mass inspections of charge the maximum. If a landlord
the properties it decided to register wanted to increase the rent by
and assigned them a grade. more than what the Province
Buildings that did well were only allows, they'd have to apply for an
inspected every three years; Above the Guideline Rent Increase
however, buildings that did poorly (AGI) at the Landlord Tenant Board
were subject to a full audit, and (LTB)which would be highly unlikely
were inspected annually. Therefore, given the nominal cost of
bad buildings were targeted in registration. Even if landlords did go
order to bring them up to standard. to the LTB to apply for an AGI and it
This model allows the City to was passed down to tenants, it
would be less than a dollar extra a
efficiently identify the bad buildings
month in rent, which tenants would
without letting any fall through the
gladly pay to have a guarantee of
cracks and focus its resources on
safe and healthy housing. Tenants
the worst offenders. In addition,
are paying significantly more as a
RentSafe publishes property
consequence of mold, losing
standards reports online and we'd furniture to pests, and paying for
also like to see them posted in cleaning or repairs themselves.
common areas of buildings.
Therefore, good landlords receive Presently, the onus of getting
recognition for their practices and repairs done or reporting issues in a
tenants would know what they're home is completely on the tenant.
getting into before signing a lease. In Herongate, for example,
countless residents stated that Timbercreek
had been unresponsive to their calls, and that
no action was taken to fix any of their issues.
Repairs can take years to occur, and even
when they are finally done, they are seldom
done well. A landlord registry would ensure
landlords actually follow through on repairs and
that problems are addressed through the
administration of proactive inspections by the
City.