Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 11

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/328794885

The Influence of Food & Beverage Quality, Service Quality, Place, and
Perceived Price to Customer Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention

Article · March 2018


DOI: 10.32424/jorim.v1i1.18

CITATIONS READS

0 259

2 authors, including:

Agus Suroso
Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
9 PUBLICATIONS   3 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Agus Suroso on 16 May 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Journal of Research in Management
Vol. 1, No. 1, 2018, pp. 28 - 37
Published by Indonesian Research Society
Published online 5th March, 2018 at http://irs-managementstudies.com/index.php/irs

The Influence of Food & Beverage Quality, Service


Quality, Place, and Perceived Price to Customer
Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention
REZHA ARLANDA, AGUS SUROSO2

1,2
Management Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia

This type of the research is case study with survey method by using questionnaire as a tool
Abstract of data collection. The study was conducted in Purwokerto area. There are many various
type of culinary business, such as cafe, restaurant, foodstreet, foodcourt, etc. But one of the
most popular in the society now is cafe and restaurant. One of the new cafe and resto that
had been just found in Purwokerto is Level Up. As a new arrival, Level Up have a unique
concept, place, foods and beverages, and also the services that can attract young adult in
Purwokerto to visit Level Up. But, there was a decrease in the customers who visited Level
Up after a year of standing and the problem that faced by Level Up become a business
phenomenon. Based on the problems above, this research was conducted to analyze the
food and beverage quality, service quality, place, and perceived price to customer
satisfaction and repurchase intention. Respondents of this research are 165 respondents
came from consumers in Purwokerto who have been visited Level Up Purwokerto. This
research uses SEM (Structural Equation Model) as analysis tools technique. Statistical
software SPSS is used to analyze the data. The result of hypothesis testing using T-test is in
the following: (1) Food and beverage quality has positive effect on customer satisfaction. (2)
Service quality has positive effect on customer satisfaction. (3) Place has a positive but no
significant effect on customer satisfaction. (4) Perceived price has a positive effect on
customer satisfaction. (5) Customer satisfaction has a positive effect on repurchase
intention.

Keywords Food and Beverage Quality, Service Quality, Perceived Price, Customer Satisfaction,
Repurchase Intention

INTRODUCTION The data from badan keuangan daerah


People eat in the first time just to fulfill the Banyumas 2018 explained that there is the
needs of daily intake, but the more modern growth of cafe and restaurant in Purwokerto
times the activity of consuming food is also from 2013 until 2017. Many cafes and
accompanied by a satisfaction or orientation restaurants are popping up. So, it makes
pleasure in the activity of consumption itself. competition in cafe and restaurant become
Business in food field is one of promising very competitive in Purwokerto. Various
business, because food is one of the primary brand of cafes and restaurants and the
needs for all people. In big cities, it makes a variety of foods and beverages can be
new opportunity for businessman to utilize offered from traditional until modern, and this
people lifestyle today, because people tend thing that happened in the era cafe
to be more consumptive now. generation now.
There is many various type of culinary Level Up sell various food, like western
business, such as cafe, restaurant, food and Indonesian food with standarized
foodstreet, foodcourt, etc. But one of the quality. For the service itself Level Up have a
most popular in the society now is cafe and fast and right service that make customer
restaurant. Cafe and restaurant business is doesn’t need to waiting too long for their
getting better in its development, because the order. With the unique concept of the place,
opportunity for success in this business is like a garden and swimming pool also make
very big. Cafe and restaurant business will customer comfortable to spend many time to
have a long heyday if its managed well and it hang out in there. Level Up also have a
can fulfill customer needs and wants. strategic location where can easily reached

Correspondence to : arlanda.rezha@gmail.com Received: January, 30, 2018


Revised:February, 12, 2018
Accepted:February, 28, 2018
Journal of Research in Management , Vol.1, No.1 2018, pp.28 - 37

by customer. as well as the location of Level


Up that is strategic enough, their sales do not Customer of Level Up
reach the target. The problems faced by
2000
Level Up caused a decrease in sales after
the first year, because incoming customers 1500
are not as high as the first year. So, there 1000
was a decrease in the customers who visited 500
Level Up after a year of standing. And the 0
problem that faced by Level Up become a

Jul-17
Nov-16

May-17

Nov-17
Sep-16

Mar-17

Sep-17
Jan-17

Jan-18
business phenomenon that wanted to be
examined by the author.
To win the competitive competition, Figure 1. The Growth of Customer in Level
businessman is required to create excellence Up Purwokerto
competing for its products and services in an Based on the background that already
effort to satisfy the customers. It’s very explained, author wants trying to do more
important because the concept of marketing analysis of how foods and beverages quality,
said that customer satisfaction are the service quality, place, and perceived price
economic and social requirements for that provided by Level Up to their customers,
company to keep survive (Dharmmesta and and how it can influence customer
Irawan, 2005). For companies that run in satisfaction and repurchase intention
culinary business, service quality becomes
an important thing. The quality of service is a
level of ability (ability) of the company in LITERATURE REVIEW AND
providing everything which is the customer's
HYPOTHESES (TAHOMA 10 BOLD,
expectation to fulfill their needs. But, to fulfil
UPPERCASE)
customer needs and wants location is being
Quality
important for customer. The location selection
Quality is a dynamic condition associated
is one of aspect that have to considered by
with products, services, people, processes
businessman before open their business.
and environments that meet or exceed
Consumer will more satisfied if the company
expectations. From some opinions above can
location has strategic location to reach.
be concluded that quality is a measure to
Beside the location, other thing that can
measure a value for goods or services.
affect customer satisfaction is price. The
(Goeth and Davis in Tjiptono, 2005)
perceived price on the product and includes
Product Quality
services not in accordance with the
According Kotler (2009) is everything that can
expectations and benefits of the product, it
be offered to the market to get attention,
will cause dissatisfaction.
bought, used, or consumed that can satisfy
Maintaining customer satisfaction is very
the desires or needs. The product in
important to do, because satisfaction is the
marketing terms is the physical form of goods
key to building a profitable relationship with
offered with a set of images and services
customers, retaining and growing new
used to satisfy the needs. Products are
customers, and collecting customer lifetime
purchased by consumers because they can
value. A satisfied customer will make
meet certain needs or provide certain
repurchases, inform the good things about
benefits.
the product to others and will not pay too
1. Place (Location) : According to Losch,
much attention to the offer similar products
sales location is very influential on the
from other companies (Kotler and Armstrong,
number of consumers obtained. The
2008).
farther away from the sellers, the more
consumers lazy to buy because the cost
of transportation to visit the seller more
expensive. Losch tends to suggest that
the production site is in market or close
to the market.
2. Perceived Price : Kotler & Armstrong
(2008) states that, Price is the sums
charged for a product or service. More
broadly, the price is the sum of all value
Journal of Research in Management , Vol.1, No.1 2018, pp.28 - 37

provided by the customer to profit from satisfaction, and concluded that service
owning or using a product or service. quality influenced customer satisfaction.
3. Customer Satisfaction : Customer Based on these researches it can be
satisfaction is a central concept in proposed the second hypothesis, as follow:
marketing because it is crucial to H2 : Service quality (X2) has a positive
meeting the needs and wants of influence on customer satisfaction (Y1)
customers (Spreng, Mackenzie, &
Olshavsky, 2000; Yi, 2009). Firms 1. The effect of place on customer
deliver a product as well as satisfaction satisfaction
to customers, and obtain profits in return In order to increase the customer satisfaction,
(Yi, 2009). While customer satisfaction restaurant location is an important feature of
has been defined in many ways, the restaurant that affects customer
researchers generally agree that an satisfaction (Hyun, 2010, in Yenny. E. Br. C.
evaluation process is an essential And Herry. H., 2017). Which is why, in the
element underlying customer satisfaction modern times the location of a restaurant
(Yi, 2009). offer a more crucial value for the customers,
4. Repurchase Intention : According to specifically in terms of the cost to visit and
Hume et al., (2006) repurchase intention the environment, as well as how the
is the consumers’ decisions to involve in restaurant is capable to fulfill the customer’s
activities with a service provider and the demands (Brocato, 2007, in Yenny. E. Br. C.
shape of such activity in the future. And Herry. H., 2017). Suhud, U. and Wibowo,
Repurchase intention is an act of post A., 2016 (in Yenny. E. Br. C. And Herry. H.,
consumer purchase. 2017) state that for some restaurant, location
can be one of most crucial aspect to
Hypothesis Development increasing customer satisfaction. Based on
The effect of food & beverage quality on these researches, it can be proposed the
customer satisfaction third hypothesis as follows:
In particular, food quality, atmosphere, menu H3: Place (X3) has a positive influence on
variety, service from staff, cleanliness, customer satisfaction (Y1)
styling, price, interior design and décor, The effect of perceived price on customer
professional appearance of staff, and store satisfaction
location have been identified as components Perceived Price is closely associated with the
of store image in the restaurant industry customer satisfaction, as proven by the study
(Prendergast & Man, 2002, in Kisang, R. and which examining the direct impacts of price
Heesup, H., 2010). According to Mattila, 2001 on the business’ profits and market share
(in Kisang, R. and Heesup, H., 2010), food (Zeithaml, 2003). According to (Štefko,
quality was the most important attribute of Gburova, & Jurkova, 2011), customer
overall restaurant elements and its expected perceived price has the ability to directly
to have a positive relationship with customer influencing the customer satisfaction.
satisfaction and loyalty. Based on these According to Kotler and Lane (2008), there is
researches, it can be proposed the first a positive relationship between perceived
hypothesis as follow: price and satisfaction which ultimately
H1: Food & beverage quality (X1) have a affecting the customer’s overall satisfaction.
positive influence on customer satisfaction Based on these researches can be proposed
(Y1) the fourth hypothesis as follows:
The effect of service quality on customer H4 : Perceived price (X4) has a positive
satisfaction influence on customer satisfaction (Y1)
There have been mixed findings about the The effect of customer satisfaction on
causal direction between service quality and repurchase intention
customer satisfaction. The most common Satisfaction is considered as an excellent
explanation for the difference is that factor in influence the customer’s intention to
perceived service quality is described as a revisit the restaurant (Choi & Chu, 2011)
form of attitude, a long-run overall evaluation since the higher the satisfaction, the higher
of a product or service, whereas satisfaction the chance of the customer to perform a
is a transaction-specific evaluation (Cronin & revisit (Oh, 2000 and Han et al., 2009). There
Taylor, 2002). Ladhari et al., 2008 (in are many researches which support
Yinghua, L. and SooCheong, J., 2009), relationship between satisfaction and
investigated determinants of dining repurchase intentions (Choia & Chub, 2001,
Journal of Research in Management , Vol.1, No.1 2018, pp.28 - 37

Gill, Byslma, & Ouschan, 2007, Paul & to anticipate a return rate of feasible
Geoffrey N., 2009, in Raza. M. A., Siddiquei. questionnaire (researcher determined the
A. N., Awan. H. M., And Bukhari. K., 2012). return rate with 90%) so the sample size
Based on these research it can be proposed used in this study is 165 respondents.
the fifth hypothesis, as follow: Primary data in this research were obtained
H5: Customer satisfaction (Y1) has a positive directly in the field of the respondents who
inluence on repurchase intention (Y2) have visited Level Up Purwokerto in order to
explain the influence of food and beverage
quality, service quality, location and
perceived price toward customer satisfaction
and repurchase intentions.
b. Secondary Data
Secondary data in this research is data that is
written sourced from literature references,
scientific articles, scientific journals and other
sources such as growth of restaurant data
which obtained from BKD Banyumas, growth
of customer data which obtained from Level
Up Purwokerto, and data which obtained via
internet related to this research.
Data Analysis Technique
Variable measurement
To measure the variables required
Figure 2. Research Model measurement scale. The scale of
measurement is used as a reference
METHODS standard to determine the length of the
The subjects of this research are consumers interval that will produce quantitative data.
who have visited Level Up Purwokerto. The With the scale of this measurement, the value
objects of this research are food and of the variable measured by a particular
beverage quality, service quality, location, instrument can be expressed in the form of
perceived price to customer satisfaction and numbers, so it would be more accurate,
repurchase intention. The population in this efficient and communicative (Sugiyono, 2003:
research are consumers who have come and 127).
make purchase in Level Up Purwokerto. Analysis technique
Because number of target population is This study used Structural Equation Model for
unknown, the Slovin formula was used to the data analysis technique. It is statistical
determine the amount of minimum sample is technique that allow to testing a series of
as follows: relative complex connections simultaneously.
A complex relationship can be built between
n=
one or several dependent variables with one
From the formula can be calculated sample or more independent variables. Perhaps
size as follows: there is also a variable that has double role
as independent variable in a connection, but
being dependent variable on another
Based on Slovin method, minimum sample connection given the existence of tiered
should be take 83.333 respondents. This causality connection. Each of the dependent
study uses SEM as analysis tools technique. variable and independent variable can be
Hair et al., (in Ferdinand, 2005) suggest that shaped to factor or construct built from some
by using the Structural Equation Model variable indicators. Similarly among the
(SEM) analysis, the minimum sample size is variables that can be a form of a single
100 until 200 samples, and then use a variable that is directly observed or directly
comparison with five observations for each of measured in research process.
the estimated parameters. Number of
indicator within study is 25 and there are 5
hypotheses, so the minimum sample should RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
be taken is 150 sample [(25 + 5) x 5]. To Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is
qualify the minimum sample size by Slovin used to estimate the adequacy of the
methods and SEM analysis techniques, and measurement model for each construct.
Journal of Research in Management , Vol.1, No.1 2018, pp.28 - 37

Based on the output of confirmatory factor greater than 2.0. It shows that each indicator
analysis model, it can be seen the regression is significant as dimension of the latent
weights as follows: factors formed. Thus, it can be stated that
Table 1. Regression Weight of CFA each indicator or dimension forming the latent
variables of research model have shown
Causal Relationship Est. SE CR
unidimensionality.
Food_Beverage_ After analyzing the measurement model
x1 1.000
Quality through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)
Food_Beverage_ where each variable indicator can be used to
x2 1.058 .154 6.858
Quality prove define latent constructs, then the next
Food_Beverage_ step is to conduct a full model SEM analysis
x3 1.312 .216 6.065
Quality with the model result is as follows:
x11 Place 1.000

x12 Place 1.441 .223 6.467


Food_Beverage_
x4 1.121 .171 6.554
Quality
x6 Service_Quality 1.000

x7 Service_Quality 1.339 .224 5.986

x9 Service_Quality 1.476 .228 6.472

x13 Place 1.101 .184 5.977

x16 Perceived_Price 1.000

x18 Perceived_Price .752 .130 5.786

x17 Perceived_Price .838 .127 6.616

x8 Service_Quality 1.634 .254 6.437


Customer_Satisf
x20 1.035 .117 8.859
action HYPOTHESES TESTING
x21
Customer_Satisf
.853 .111 7.702 Hypotheses testing of this research based on
action
the null hypothesis that the regression
Customer_Satisf coefficient between the relationships is equal
x22 1.000
action
to zero by the usual t-test in regression
Repurchase_Inte
x25
ntion
1.478 .183 8.070 models (Ferdinand, 2005). The summary
Repurchase_Inte
results of the critical ratio (CR) values and its
x24
ntion
1.389 .173 8.031 value of ttable can be seen in Table 2.
Repurchase_Inte
x23 1.000 Table 2. StandardizedRegression Weight to
ntion
Hypotheses Testing
Customer_Satisf
x19 1.016 .111 9.122
action
t table
Food_Beverage_ Causal Relationship C.R.
x5 1.271 .184 6.892 (one tiled)
Quality Customer_S Food_Beverage 2.03
<- 1.660
x10 Service_Quality 1.151 .205 5.610 atisfaction _Quality 2
Customer_S <- 2.73
Service_Quality 1.660
atisfaction 4
x14 Place 1.212 .188 6.434
Customer_S <- 0.94
Place 1.660
x15 Place 1.088 .188 5.793 atisfaction 9
Based on Table 11, it can be seen that the Customer_S <- 3.50
Perceived_Price 1.660
atisfaction 1
critical ratio values of each indicator in
Repurchase <- Customer_Satisf 5.54
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) model is 1.660
_Intention action 1
Journal of Research in Management , Vol.1, No.1 2018, pp.28 - 37

First Hypothesis Testing: Based on the hypothesis which states that customer
confidence level of 95% (α = 0.05) and satisfaction has a positive influence on
degree of freedom (n - k) with one tiled test, repurchase intention is accepted.
the t table value of this causal relationship is
1.660. From the result of Structural Equation CONCLUSION
Modeling (SEM) analysis, it is obtianed the CR As an effort to increase the customer
value of food & beverages quality on satisfaction, management of Level Up
customer satisfaction of 2.032 is greater than Purwokerto needs to make priority on food &
the value of ttable. Thus, Ho is rejected and Ha beverages quality, service quality and
is accepted, it means that food & beverages perceived price. Furthermore, as an effort to
quality has a positive and significant effect on increase the consumers’ repurchase
customer satisfaction. Therefore, first intention, management of Level Up
Purwokerto needs to make priority on
hypothesis which states that food &
customer satisfaction. The ways can be done
beverages quality has a positive influence on
by offering and selling the foods & beverages
customer satisfaction is accepted.
with high quality based on the customers’
Second Hypothesis Testing: SEM analysis preference, improve the consumers’
result shows that the CR value of service experience with foods & beverages of Level
quality on customer satisfaction of 2.734 is Up Purwokerto, always increase the service
greater than value of ttable. Thus, Ho is quality based on customers’ needs and
rejected and Ha is accepted, it means that wants, always follow up the consumer
service quality has a positive and significant complaints quickly and accurately, and set
effect on customer satisfaction. Therefore, the price of foods & beverages that the
second hypothesis which states that service affordable, suitability and favorable price.
quality has a positive influence on customer Refers to the limitations of this study, further
satisfaction is accepted. research need to choose and add the other
Third Hypothesis Testing: Refers to the independent variables (for example perceived
result of Structural Equation Modeling value and store atmosphere variables). If
analysis, it is obtianed the CR value of place possible in theory and practice, further
on customer satisfaction of 0.949 is greater research may develop the research model by
than ttable value. Thus, the Ho is accepted and using the moderator variable (for example
Ha is rejected, it means that place has a promotion, brand image and word of mouth).
positive but no significant effect on customer Further research also need to choose and
add the number of respondents that in
satisfaction. Therefore, third hypothesis
practically can be implemented the probability
which states that place has a positive
sampling method and using the other
influence on customer satisfaction is
methods of data collection, such as interview
rejected. and observation.
Fourth Hypothesis Testing: Furthermore,
based on the SEM result, it is obtianed the CR REFERENCES
value of perceived price on customer
satisfaction of 3.501 is greater than value of Akbar, M., & Parvez, N. (2009). Impact Of Service
ttable. Thus, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, Quality, Trust, And Customer Satisfaction
it means that perceived price has a positive On Customer Loyalty. ABAC Journal,
and significant effect on customer 29(1), 24-38.
satisfaction. Therefore, fourth hypothesis Arnett, D.B., Laverie, D.A., & McLane, C. (2002).
Using Job Satisfaction and Pride As
which states that perceived price has a Internal-Marketing Tools. Cornell Hotel And
positive influence on customer satisfaction is Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43(2),
accepted. 87–96.
Fifth Hypothesis Testing: Furthermore, Assael, H. (2004). Consumer Behavior: A
SEM analysis result shows that the CR value Strategic Approach, 6th ed. Boston. MA:
of customer satisfaction on repurchase Houghton Mifflin Company
Blackwell, R.D., Miniard, P.W., & Engel, J.F.
intention of 5.541 is also greater than value (2001). Consumer Behavior: International
of ttable. Thus, Ho is rejected and Ha is Student Edition. Thomson/South-Western:
accepted, it means that customer satisfaction University of Winconsin, Madison.
has a positive and significant effect on Boulding, W., Staelin, R., Ehret, M., & Johnston,
repurchase intention. Therefore, fifth W.J. (2005). A Customer Relationship
Management Roadmap: What Is Known,
Journal of Research in Management , Vol.1, No.1 2018, pp.28 - 37

Potential Pitfalls, and Where to Go. Journal Repurchase Intentions in Service


of Marketing, 69, 155–166. Recovery. Journal of Retailing, 84, 424-
434.
Bolton, R.N., & Lemon, K.N. (2004) The
Theoretical Underpinnings of Customer Gunawan, A. (2010). Manajemen Pemasaran
Asset Management: A Framework And (Analisis Untuk Perancangan Strategi
Propositions For Future Research. Journal Pemasaran). Skripsi. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu
of the Academy of Marketing Science, Manajemen YKPN: Yogyakarta.
32(3), 271-292.
Hair, J.F.J., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., &
Cardello, A.V. (1995). Food Quallty: Relativity, Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data
Context and Consumer Expectations. Food Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-
Quality and Provenance, 6, 163-170. Hall.
Hasniaty. (2015). Customer Perception On
Changsu, K., Robert, D.G., Namchul, S., Joo-Han, Products, Pricing, Service Quality, Towards
R., & Jongheon, K. (2012). Factors Customer’s Quality Relationships And
influencing Internet shopping value and Loyalty Of Domestic Airlines, Indonesia.
customer repurchase intention. Electronic International Journal Of Scientific &
Commerce Research and Application, 11, Technology Research, 4.
374–387.
Hawkins, D.I., & Mothersbaugh, D.L. (2010).
Cronin, J.J & Taylor, S.A. (2002). Measuring Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing
Service Quality: A Reexaminataion and Strategy (Eleven Edition). New York:
Extension. Journal of Marketing, 56, 55-68. McGraw-Hill.
Heesup, H., Ki-Joon, B., & Betsy, B. (2009).
Dharmesta & Irawan. (2005). Manajemen Influencing Factors On Restaurant
Pemasaran Modern (Edisi Kedua). Customers’ Revisit Intention: The Roles Of
Yogyakarta : Liberty Emotions And Switching Barriers.
International Journal Of Hospitality
Dudi, A., & Suprihadi, H. (2005). Riset Pemasaran Management , 28, 563–572.
Prospektif & Terapan. Malang: Bayumedia
Publishing. Hellier., Phillip, K., Geursen., Gus, M., Carr,,
Eliasaph, I., Farida, B., & Balarabe, J. (2016). Rodney, A., & Rickard, J.A. (2003).
Consumer Satisfaction And Repurchase Customer Repurchase Intention: A General
Intentions. Developing Country Studies , Structural Equation Model. European
6(2). journal of marketing, 37(11), 1762-1800.

Elifni, M. (2014). Analisis Faktor–Faktor Yang Hendri, M. (2006). Pemasaran Ritel. Jakarta:
Mempengaruhi Kepuasan Pelanggan Di Pt Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Jne Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu & Riset
Manajemen , 3(9). Hume., Margee., Mort, G.S., & Winzar, H. (2006).
Exploring Repurchase Intention In A
Farisya. (2012). Pengaruh Experential Marketing Performing Art Context : Who Comes? And
Terhadap Repurchase Intention Melalui Why Do They Come Back ?. International
Customer Satisfaction Sebagai Intervening Joural of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector
Variabel. Skripsi. Universitas Indonesia: Marketing 12(2), 135-148.
Depok.
Hume, M., & Sullivan, M. (2010). The
Ferdinand, A. (2005). Structural Equation Consequence Of Appraisal Emotion,
Modeling Dalam Penelitian Manajemen. Service Quality, Perceived Value And
Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Customer Satisfaction On Repurchase
Diponegoro: Semarang. Intent In The Performing Arts. Journal of
Ferdinand, A. (2006). Metode Penelitian Services Marketing, 24(2), 170 – 182.
Manajemen. Badan Penerbit Universitas
Diponegoro, Semarang. Hutton, J.D., & Richardson, L.D. (1995).
Fitzsimmons., James, A., Fitzsimmons., & Mona, Healthscapes: The Role Of The Facility
J. (2006). Service Management: And Physical Environment On Consumers’
operations, strategy, and information Attitudes, Satisfaction, Quality
technology. McGraw Hill. Assessments, And Behaviors. Health Care
Gaspersz, V. (2005). Total Quality Management. Management Review, 20(2), 48-61.
PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Ida, A.I.S., & I Made, J. (2015). Pengaruh Kualitas
Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A.L., & Tsiros, M. (2008). Layanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan
The Effect of Compensation on
Journal of Research in Management , Vol.1, No.1 2018, pp.28 - 37

Restoran Baruna Sanur. E-Jurnal Journal Service Marketing 2000, 14(3),


Manajemen Unud, 4(7). 217-231.

Imam, H. & Dadang, I. (2014). Pengaruh Kualitas Lin., & Long Yi. (2009). The Influence of Corporate
Produk Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Tehadap Image, Relationship Marketing,and Trust
Proses Keputusan Pembelian (Studi Pada on Purchase Intention: The Moderating
Konsumen Bober Cafe Bandung Periode Effects of Word-of-Mouth. Journal of
Bulan Juni 2013). Skripsi. Bandung: Management and Information, 10, 51-85.
Universitas Telkom. Lovelock, C., & Wright, L.K. (2007). Manajemen
Pemasaran Jasa. Indonesia: PT. Indeks,
Jill,G. (2005). Customer Loyalty: Menumbuhkan Lupiyoadi., & Hamdani, A. (2009). Pemasaran
dan Mempertahankan Kesetiaan Jasa. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Pelanggan. Jakarta: Erlangga. Margareta, F. S., & Edwin, J. (2012). Analisa
Pengaruh Food Quality and Brand Image
Johnson., Michael, D., Herrman, A., & Huber, F terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Roti Kecik
(2006). The Evolutionof Loyalty Intentions. Toko Roti Ganep’sdiota Solo. Jurnal
Journal of marketing, 7(2), 122-132. Manajemen Pemasarann, 1 (1).

Junggun, H. (2000). Inflation Targeting : New Margee, H., Gillian, S.M., & Hume, W. (2007).
monetary Policy Framework in Korea. Exploring repurchase intention in a
Seoul Korea: The Bank of Korea. performing arts context: who comes? and
why do they come back?. International
Kandampully, J., & Suhartanto, D. (2003). The Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector
Role Of Customer Satisfaction And Image Marketing , 12, 135–148.
In Gaining Customer Loyalty In The Hotel
Industry. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marsum. (2010). Restoran dan Segala
Marketing, 10(1), 3-25. Permasalahannya. Yogyakarta: Andi
Kisang, R., & Heesup, H. (2010). Influence of the Publisher.
Quality of Food, Service, and Physical
Environment on Customer Satisfaction and Matilla, A. S., et al. (2003). The effects of
Behavioral Intention in Quick-Casual consumer expertise on evoked set size and
Restaurants: Moderating Role of Perceived service loyalty. Journal of Services
Price. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Marketing.
Research, 34, 310.
Mochlas, A. (2012). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas
Kotler, P., Bowen, J., & Makens, J. (2006), Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen
Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism, 4th Menggunakan Jasa Balai Latihan Kerja
ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Industri. Skripsi. Universitas Dipenogoro:
Kotler, P., & Gertner, D. (2002). Country As Brand, Semarang.
Product And Beyond: A Place Marketing Mohammad, H., Ali, D., Afshin. R., & Ali. H.
And Brand Management Perspective. (2012). Evaluation of factors affecting
Journal of Brand Management, 9(4), 249- customer loyalty in the restaurant industry.
261. African Journal of Business Management ,
Kotler, P. (2005). Manajemen Pemasaran, Jilid I 6(14), 5039-5046.
dan II. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.
Morgan, R.M., & Hunt, S.D. (2002). The
Kotler, P., & Gary, A. (2008). Prinsip – Prinsip Commitment-Trust Theory Of Relationship
Pemasaran. Edisi 12 Jilid 1. Jakarta: Marketing. Journal Of Marketing, 58( 3),
Erlangga. 20-38.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K.L. (2009). Manajemen Mowen, C., & Minor, J.M. (2002). Perilaku
Pemasaran, Jilid 1,Edisi ke 13. Jakarta: Konsumen. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Erlangga.
Muhammad. A. R., Ahmad. N. S., Hayat. M. A., &
Kotler, P., & Keller, K.L. (2012). Marketing Khurram. B. (2012). Relationship Between
th
Management (14 ed). New Jersey: Service Quality, Perceived Value,
Prentice Hall. Satisfaction And Revisit Intention In Hotel
Industry. Interdisciplinary Journal Of
Lamb, C., et.al. (2001). Pemasaran Edisi Pertama. Contemporary Research In Business , 4(8).
Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Lee, H., Lee, Y., & Yoo, D. (2000). The Nova, A.C. (2012). Pengaruh Service Quality,
Determinants Of Perceived Service Quality Food Quality, Dan Perceived Value Pada
And Its Relationship With Satisfaction. Behavioral Intention Yang Dimediasi Oleh
Customer Satisfaction (Studi pada
Journal of Research in Management , Vol.1, No.1 2018, pp.28 - 37

Restoran “Ayam-Ayam Resto” Klodran). Spreng, R., MacKenzie., & Olshavsky. (1996), A
Skripsi. Surakarta: Universita Sebelas Re-examination of the determinants of
Maret. consumer satisfaction. Journal of
marketing, 60(3), 15-32.
Parasuraman, A. (2001). The Behavioural
Consequences of Service Quality. Journal Štefko, R., Gburova. J., & Jurkova, J.(2011).
of Marketing, 60. Marketing Pricing Strategies Used By The
Peri, G. (2006). The economic value of cultural Branches Of Chain Stores. Journal of
diversity: evidence from US cities. Journal Advanced Studies in Finance, 2(2) .
of Economic Geography, 6, 1, 9–44.
Sugiyono. (2003). Metode Penelitian Bisnis Edisi I.
Peter, J.P., & Olson, J.C. (2002). Perilaku Bandung: Alfabeta .
Konsumen Dan Strategi Pemasarann. Suliyanto. (2005). Analisis Data dalam Aplikasi
Terjemahan. Jakarta: Erlangga Pemasaran. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
________. (2006). Metode Riset dan Bisnis.
Peter, Paul J., Jerry C. Olson. (2010).Consumer Yogyakarta: ANDI.
Behavior & Marketing Strategy. 9th Edition. Suliyanto. (2011). Ekonometrika Terapan: Teori
McGraw Hill. dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta:
Penerbit ANDI.
Pingjun. J. and Bert. R.(2004). Customer intention
to return online: price perception, attribute- Sumarwan., Ujang., Prihartono, A.G., Sumarlin,
level performance, and satisfaction A.W., Mamahit, D.A., Hadi, E.P., Hasan, J.,
unfolding over time. European Journal of Ahmady, M., Wulandari, R., & Haryono, T.
Marketing , Vol. 39 No. 1/2, 2005 pp. 150- (2012). Riset Pemasaran dan Konsumen,
174. Seri 2. Bogor: PT Penerbit IPB Press
Swastha,B. (2010). Manajemen Penjualan:
Rani, O. (2016). Pengaruh Kualitas Produk, Pelaksanaan Penjualan. Yogyakarta:
Kepercayaan Merek, Dan Kepuasan BPFE-.
Konsumen Terhadap Loyalitas Merek Swastha, B., & Irawan. (2003). Manajemen
(Studi pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Pemasaran Modern. Yogyakarta: Penerbit
Keolahragaan Universitas Negeri Liberty Yogyakarta.
Yogyakarta Pengguna Minuman Isotonik
Merek Mizone). Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S (2001). Using
Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta. Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
Rashid. S., Irfan. R., And Muhammad Z. (2011). Tjiptono, F., & Gregorious, C. (2012). Pemasaran
Analysis Of The Factors Affecting Strategik. Yogyakarta: ANDI.
Customers’ Purchase Intention: The
Mediating Role Of Perceived Value. African Tjiptono, F. (2002). Strategi Pemasaran.
Journal Of Business Management, 5(20), Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
8041-8049.
Tjiptono, F. (2005). Pemasaran Jasa, Edisi I.
Render, B., & Heizer, J. (2001). Prinsip-Prinsip Yogyakarta; Penerbit Bayumedia
Manajemen Operasi:Operations Publishing.
Management. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Tjiptono, F. (2006). Manajemen Jasa. Edisi I.
Yogyakarta: Andi.
Sangadji, E.M., & Sopiah. (2013). Prilaku Tjiptono, F. (2014). Pemasaran Jasa. Edisi I,
Konsumen: Pendekatan Prakti Disertai: Yogyakarta: Andi.
Himpunan Jurnal Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Kennedy, T.M. (2003). Services cape to
Penerbit Andi. emphasize the impact of the physical
environment Cronin. Social-Servicescape.
Schiffman., & Kanuk. (2007). Perilaku Konsumen Utami, S. (2014). Pengaruh Kualitas Produk Dan
Edisi ke Tujuh. Jakarta: PT. Indeks. Layanan Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen
Di Restoran Koki Tappanyaki Express.
Selim, A., & Habibur, R. (2015). The Effects Of Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri
Marketing Mix On Consumer Satisfaction: Yogyakarta.
A Literature Review From Islamic
Perspectives. Turkish Journal Of Islamic Valarie, A., & Zeithaml. (2014). Consumer
Economics, 2(1). Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A
Means-End Model and Synthesis of
Sofjan, A. (2007). Manajemen Pemasaran. Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3),2-22.
Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Varki, V., & Colgate, M. (2001). The Role Of Price
Perceptions In An Integrated Model Of
Journal of Research in Management , Vol.1, No.1 2018, pp.28 - 37

Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Service Yinghua, L., & Soo Cheong, J. (2009). Perceptions
Research. of Chinese restaurants in the U.S.: What
affects customer satisfaction and
Viavianli, L., (2016). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas behavioral intentions?. International Journal
Pelayanan, Harga, Dan Suasana Cafe of Hospitality Management, 28, 338 – 348.
Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen. Skripsi,
Universitas Sanata Dharma. Yogyakarta. Young, N. S., & Cheong, J. (2007). Does Food
Quality Really Matter In Restaurants? Its
Vincent, G. (2005). Total Quality Management. Impact On Customer Satisfaction And
Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Behavioural Intentions. Journal of
Hospitality & Tourism Research, 31(3),
Voss, G.B., Parasuraman, A., & Grewal, D. (2004). 387-410.
The Roles of Price, Performance, and
Expectationn in Determining Satisfaction in Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., & Parasuraman, A.
Service Exchanges. Journal of Marketing, (2003), Communication and control
62, 46 – 61. processes in the delivery of service quality.
The Journal of Marketing, 52 (2), 35-48.
Yamit, Z. (2010). Manajemen Kualitas Produk &
Jasa. Yogyakarta: Ekonesia. Zeithaml, V.A., Bitner, M.J., & Gremler, D.D.
(2006), Services Marketing: Integrating
Yang, C.Y. (2009). The Study Of Repurchase Customer Focus across the Firm. New
Intentions In Experiential Marketing - An York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Empirical Study Of The Franchise
Restaurant. The International Journal of Zeithaml, V.A., Bitner, M.J., & Gremler, D.D.
Organizational Innovation, 2(2). (2009), Services Marketing: Integrating
Customer Focus across the Firm. Boston,
Yenny, E.Br.C., & Herry. H. (2017). Factors That MA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Influence Customer’s Intentions To Revisit
Cafe: Case Study Of Siete Café In Zineldin, M. (2006). The Royalty Of Loyalty: CRM,
Bandung. Journal Of Business Quality And Retention. Journal of
AndManagement , 6, (2), 284-300. Consumer Marketing. 23, 7, 430-437.

View publication stats

Вам также может понравиться