Handbook of urban statistics 2019

HANDBOOK HANDBOOK
OF OF
URBAN STATISTICS URBAN STATISTICS
2019 2019

Government of India Government of India

Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs
 Contents Contents
Chapter/Table Chapter/Table
Definitions 1-5 Definitions 1-5

Abbreviations 6 Abbreviations 6

Chapter 1. Urban Demography 7-40 Chapter 1. Urban Demography 7-40

Table 1.1: Demographic Profile of India 12-13 Table 1.1: Demographic Profile of India 12-13

Table 1.2: Level of Urbanization 14 Table 1.2: Level of Urbanization 14

Table 1.3: Number of Urban Agglomerations (UAs) in India 17 Table 1.3: Number of Urban Agglomerations (UAs) in India 17

Table 1.4: State-wise Birth and Death Rates (per 1000 population) 18 Table 1.4: State-wise Birth and Death Rates (per 1000 population) 18

Table 1.5: Slum Population and Basic Amenities Available to Urban population 21 Table 1.5: Slum Population and Basic Amenities Available to Urban population 21

Table 1.6: Number of Statutory and slum reported towns with type wise slum population 22 Table 1.6: Number of Statutory and slum reported towns with type wise slum population 22

Table 1.7: Growth Indicator for Slum Households 23 Table 1.7: Growth Indicator for Slum Households 23

Table 1.8: Slum and Urban Population (Slum reported towns) 24 Table 1.8: Slum and Urban Population (Slum reported towns) 24

Table 1.9: Slum and Urban Population (all towns) 25 Table 1.9: Slum and Urban Population (all towns) 25

Table 1.10: State Share of Slum Population to Total Slum Population of India 26 Table 1.10: State Share of Slum Population to Total Slum Population of India 26

Table 1.11: Urban Population, Urbanization Level and Urban Growth Rate 29 Table 1.11: Urban Population, Urbanization Level and Urban Growth Rate 29

Table 1.12: Selected Demographic Indicators in India and across Continents 31-33 Table 1.12: Selected Demographic Indicators in India and across Continents 31-33

Table 1.13: Selected Demographic Indicators in BRICS countries 34 Table 1.13: Selected Demographic Indicators in BRICS countries 34

Table 1.14: Selected Demographic Indicators in SAARC countries 36-37 Table 1.14: Selected Demographic Indicators in SAARC countries 36-37

Table 1.15: The 30 Largest Urban Agglomerations Ranked by Population Size (2015) 39 Table 1.15: The 30 Largest Urban Agglomerations Ranked by Population Size (2015) 39

Chapter 2. Socio-economic indicators of Urban India 41-56 Chapter 2. Socio-economic indicators of Urban India 41-56

Table 2.1: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India 45 Table 2.1: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India 45

Table 2.2: Literacy Rate in Urban India 49 Table 2.2: Literacy Rate in Urban India 49
 Table 2.3: Percentage of Population Below Poverty Line in India 51 Table 2.3: Percentage of Population Below Poverty Line in India 51

Table 2.4: Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) in Urban India 53 Table 2.4: Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) in Urban India 53

Table 2.5: Total Surplus/Shortfall after transfer under Central Assistance to States (CAS) but preserv- Table 2.5: Total Surplus/Shortfall after transfer under Central Assistance to States (CAS) but preserv-
55 55
ing the fiscal space (in 2015-16 over 2014-15). ing the fiscal space (in 2015-16 over 2014-15).

Chapter 3. Urban Employment 57-94 Chapter 3. Urban Employment 57-94

Table 3.1: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 61 Table 3.1: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 61

Table 3.2: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Male, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 63 Table 3.2: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Male, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 63

Table 3.3: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Female, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 64 Table 3.3: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Female, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 64

Table 3.4: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 65 Table 3.4: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 65

Table 3.5: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Male, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 67 Table 3.5: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Male, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 67

Table 3.6: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Female, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 68 Table 3.6: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Female, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 68

Table 3.7: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 69 Table 3.7: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 69

Table 3.8: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Males, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 71 Table 3.8: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Males, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 71

Table 3.9: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Females,1999-2000 and 2011-2012 72 Table 3.9: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Females,1999-2000 and 2011-2012 72

Table 3.10: Unemployment Rate of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 73 Table 3.10: Unemployment Rate of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 73

Table 3.11: Unemployment Rate of Urban Males, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 75 Table 3.11: Unemployment Rate of Urban Males, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 75

Table 3.12: Unemployment Rate of Urban Females, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 77 Table 3.12: Unemployment Rate of Urban Females, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 77

Table 3.13: National Industrial Classification of Urban Workers (principal and subsidiary) 2011-2012 79-80 Table 3.13: National Industrial Classification of Urban Workers (principal and subsidiary) 2011-2012 79-80

Table 3.14: National Industrial Classification of Urban Male Workers (Principal and Subsidiary) 2011- Table 3.14: National Industrial Classification of Urban Male Workers (Principal and Subsidiary) 2011-
82-83 82-83
2012 2012
Table 3.15: National Industrial Classification of Urban Female Workers (principal and subsidiary) Table 3.15: National Industrial Classification of Urban Female Workers (principal and subsidiary)
84-85 84-85
2011-2012 2011-2012
Table 3.16: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs./day) received by Regular Wage/Salaried employee in Table 3.16: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs./day) received by Regular Wage/Salaried employee in
86 86
Urban India Urban India
Table 3.17: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs./day) received by Casual Labours engaged in Works Table 3.17: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs./day) received by Casual Labours engaged in Works
88 88
other than Public works in Urban India other than Public works in Urban India

Table 3.18: Work Participation Rate-2001 90-91 Table 3.18: Work Participation Rate-2001 90-91

Table 3.19: Work Participation Rate-2011 92-93 Table 3.19: Work Participation Rate-2011 92-93
Chapter 4. Public Expenditure on Urban Development 95-110 Chapter 4. Public Expenditure on Urban Development 95-110

Table 4.1: Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (Base Year 2011-12) 99 Table 4.1: Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (Base Year 2011-12) 99

Table 4.2: Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (Base Year 2011-12) 100 Table 4.2: Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (Base Year 2011-12) 100

Table 4.3: Growth of Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (Percentage change over previ- Table 4.3: Growth of Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (Percentage change over previ-
102 102
ous year) ous year)
Table 4.4: Growth of Per Capita Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (percentage change Table 4.4: Growth of Per Capita Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (percentage change
103 103
over previous year) over previous year)

Table 4.5: Revenue expenditure of States and Union Territories (Urban Development) 104 Table 4.5: Revenue expenditure of States and Union Territories (Urban Development) 104

Table 4.6: Capital Expenditure of States and Union Territories (Urban Development) 105 Table 4.6: Capital Expenditure of States and Union Territories (Urban Development) 105

Table 4.7: Additional FFC Transfers (in 2015-16 over 2014-15) 106 Table 4.7: Additional FFC Transfers (in 2015-16 over 2014-15) 106

Table 4.8: Decomposition of FFC Transfers to States 109 Table 4.8: Decomposition of FFC Transfers to States 109

Table 4.9: Per Capita Municipal Income-Expenditure 110 Table 4.9: Per Capita Municipal Income-Expenditure 110

Chapter 5. Urban Transportation 111-136 Chapter 5. Urban Transportation 111-136

Table 5.1: Mode Share in Various Cities (%) 116 Table 5.1: Mode Share in Various Cities (%) 116

Table 5.2: Pattern of Public Transport in Selected Indian Cities 118 Table 5.2: Pattern of Public Transport in Selected Indian Cities 118

Table 5.3: Public Transport Share Comparison, 1994 and 2007 119 Table 5.3: Public Transport Share Comparison, 1994 and 2007 119

Table 5.4: Desirable Modal Shares for Different City sizes 120 Table 5.4: Desirable Modal Shares for Different City sizes 120

Table 5.5: Vehicular Penetration in Select Developed and Developing Countries 122 Table 5.5: Vehicular Penetration in Select Developed and Developing Countries 122

Table 5.6: Registered Motor Vehicles per 1,000 Population in Million-Plus Indian Cities 124 Table 5.6: Registered Motor Vehicles per 1,000 Population in Million-Plus Indian Cities 124

Table 5.7: Comparison of Investment estimate for Urban transport by various Committees (2012-30) Table 5.7: Comparison of Investment estimate for Urban transport by various Committees (2012-30)
126 126
(Rs.Trillion) (Rs.Trillion)

Table 5.8: Comparison of Parking Charges in Various Cities, 2011 127 Table 5.8: Comparison of Parking Charges in Various Cities, 2011 127

Table 5.9: Vehicle Population in India (in ’000) 128 Table 5.9: Vehicle Population in India (in ’000) 128

Table 5.10: Vehicular Composition in India (Per Cent) 130 Table 5.10: Vehicular Composition in India (Per Cent) 130

Table 5.11: Metro Rail Projects in the Country 132 Table 5.11: Metro Rail Projects in the Country 132

Table 5.12: Funds released for various Metro Rail Projects 135 Table 5.12: Funds released for various Metro Rail Projects 135
Chapter 6. Urban Sanitation 137-152 Chapter 6. Urban Sanitation 137-152

Table 6.1 Bathing and Drainage Facilities (2001-2011) 141 Table 6.1 Bathing and Drainage Facilities (2001-2011) 141

Table 6.2 Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per 2001 Census (%) 144 Table 6.2 Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per 2001 Census (%) 144

Table 6.3 Urban Household Latrine Availability Data s per 2011 Census (%) 145 Table 6.3 Urban Household Latrine Availability Data s per 2011 Census (%) 145

Table-6.4 Percentage distribution of households with toilet facilities, 2015-16 147 Table-6.4 Percentage distribution of households with toilet facilities, 2015-16 147

Table 6.5 Percentage distribution of households by main source of drinking water, 2015-16 148-149 Table 6.5 Percentage distribution of households by main source of drinking water, 2015-16 148-149

Table 6.6 Percentage distribution of households by main source of drinking water, 2011 150-151 Table 6.6 Percentage distribution of households by main source of drinking water, 2011 150-151

Table 6.7 Hand-washing facility in urban India, 2015-16 (%) 152 Table 6.7 Hand-washing facility in urban India, 2015-16 (%) 152

Chapter 7. Urban Housing 153-186 Chapter 7. Urban Housing 153-186

Table 7.1: State wise Households having number of Dwelling Rooms-2001 (%) 157-158 Table 7.1: State wise Households having number of Dwelling Rooms-2001 (%) 157-158

Table 7.2: State wise Households having number of Dwelling Rooms -2011 (%) 159 Table 7.2: State wise Households having number of Dwelling Rooms -2011 (%) 159

Table 7.3: State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of owned dwellings -2001 161 Table 7.3: State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of owned dwellings -2001 161

Table 7.4: State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of owned dwellings - 2011 162 Table 7.4: State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of owned dwellings - 2011 162

Table 7.5: State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of rented dwellings -2001 164 Table 7.5: State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of rented dwellings -2001 164

Table 7.6: State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of rented dwellings-2011 166-167 Table 7.6: State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of rented dwellings-2011 166-167

Table7.7: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by Ownership/Tenure Status of Dwelling Table7.7: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by Ownership/Tenure Status of Dwelling
169-70 169-70
Units - 2001 Units - 2001

Table 7.8: State-wise Urban Households living by Ownership/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units - 2011 172-73 Table 7.8: State-wise Urban Households living by Ownership/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units - 2011 172-73

Table 7.9 Households with condition of House-2001-11 175-176 Table 7.9 Households with condition of House-2001-11 175-176

Table 7.10: Housing Price Index for 50 Cities (Assessment Price) 179-180 Table 7.10: Housing Price Index for 50 Cities (Assessment Price) 179-180

Table 7.11: State-wise Distribution of Urban Housing Shortage 182-183 Table 7.11: State-wise Distribution of Urban Housing Shortage 182-183

Table 7.12: Occupied Census Houses with Usage 184 Table 7.12: Occupied Census Houses with Usage 184

Table 7.13: Total Number of Vacant Census Houses 185 Table 7.13: Total Number of Vacant Census Houses 185
Chapter 8. Smart Cities Mission 187-206 Chapter 8. Smart Cities Mission 187-206

Table 8.1: List of selected Cities (state wise) and their progress details 195-198 Table 8.1: List of selected Cities (state wise) and their progress details 195-198

Table 8.2: Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission 199 Table 8.2: Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission 199

Table 8.2.1: Smart Command and Control Centres 199 Table 8.2.1: Smart Command and Control Centres 199

Table 8.2.2: Smart Road Projects 200-201 Table 8.2.2: Smart Road Projects 200-201

Table 8.2.3: Smart Solar Projects 201-202 Table 8.2.3: Smart Solar Projects 201-202

Table 8.2.4: Smart Water Projects 202-203 Table 8.2.4: Smart Water Projects 202-203

Table 8.2.5: Public Private Partnership (PPP) Projects 204 Table 8.2.5: Public Private Partnership (PPP) Projects 204

Table 8.2.6: Vibrant Public Places 205-206 Table 8.2.6: Vibrant Public Places 205-206

Chapter 9. Swachh Bharat Mission 207-224 Chapter 9. Swachh Bharat Mission 207-224

Table 9.1: Open Defecation Free Status (ODF) – State-wise 216 Table 9.1: Open Defecation Free Status (ODF) – State-wise 216

Table 9.2: IHHL Constructed (State-wise) 217 Table 9.2: IHHL Constructed (State-wise) 217

Table 9.3: Community Toilets and Public Toilets 218 Table 9.3: Community Toilets and Public Toilets 218

Table 9.4: Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission – Urban (Solid-Waste Management Status) 219-220 Table 9.4: Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission – Urban (Solid-Waste Management Status) 219-220

Table 9.5: Progress of Mission Allocation (State-wise, Component-wise) 221-222 Table 9.5: Progress of Mission Allocation (State-wise, Component-wise) 221-222

Table 9.6: Progress of Mission Release (State-wise, Component-wise) 223-226 Table 9.6: Progress of Mission Release (State-wise, Component-wise) 223-226

Chapter 10. Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) 225-250 Chapter 10. Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) 225-250

Table 10.1: Progress of Project Implementation 234-236 Table 10.1: Progress of Project Implementation 234-236

Table 10.2: Progress on release of funds and Utilization Certificates 237-238 Table 10.2: Progress on release of funds and Utilization Certificates 237-238

Table 10.3: Progress of Reforms at a Glance 239-240 Table 10.3: Progress of Reforms at a Glance 239-240

Table 10.4: Ease of Living Index – 2018 – Full Rank List 241-247 Table 10.4: Ease of Living Index – 2018 – Full Rank List 241-247

Table 10.5: Status of Municipal Bonds 248-249 Table 10.5: Status of Municipal Bonds 248-249
Chapter 11. Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana-Urban (PMAY-U) 251-272 Chapter 11. Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana-Urban (PMAY-U) 251-272

Table 11.1: Houses Sanctioned under PMAY(U) 257 Table 11.1: Houses Sanctioned under PMAY(U) 257

Table 11.2: Houses sanctioned under EWS/LIG and MIG in CLSS 258 Table 11.2: Houses sanctioned under EWS/LIG and MIG in CLSS 258

Table 11.3: Investment in Housing Construction through PMAY (U) (States/UTs wise) 259 Table 11.3: Investment in Housing Construction through PMAY (U) (States/UTs wise) 259

Table 11.4: Commitment of Central Assistance under PMAY-U 260 Table 11.4: Commitment of Central Assistance under PMAY-U 260

Table 11.5: Expenditure of Central Assistance under PMAY-U 261 Table 11.5: Expenditure of Central Assistance under PMAY-U 261

Table 11.6: Grounded Houses under PMAY (U) 262 Table 11.6: Grounded Houses under PMAY (U) 262

Table 11.7: Completed Houses under PMAY(U) 263 Table 11.7: Completed Houses under PMAY(U) 263

Table 11.8: Houses occupied under PMAY(U) 264-265 Table 11.8: Houses occupied under PMAY(U) 264-265

Table 11.9: Number of beneficiaries residing in slums availed benefits under various components of Table 11.9: Number of beneficiaries residing in slums availed benefits under various components of
266 266
PMAY (U) PMAY (U)

Chapter 12. National Urban Livelihood Mission (NULM) 273-294 Chapter 12. National Urban Livelihood Mission (NULM) 273-294

Table 12.1: No. Of SHGs formed and given Revolving Fund 281 Table 12.1: No. Of SHGs formed and given Revolving Fund 281

Table 12.2: No of candidates trained and placed up to January 2019 284 Table 12.2: No of candidates trained and placed up to January 2019 284

Table 12.3: No. Of Individual Groups and SHGs provided Loan 286 Table 12.3: No. Of Individual Groups and SHGs provided Loan 286

Table 12.4: Total Credit Linkage (In Cr.) and Interest Subventions 287 Table 12.4: Total Credit Linkage (In Cr.) and Interest Subventions 287
Table 12.5: Status of No. Of Cities Street Vendors survey completed, Vendor Identified and TVC Table 12.5: Status of No. Of Cities Street Vendors survey completed, Vendor Identified and TVC
formed. 289 formed. 289

Table 12.6: State-wise details of NULM and Non-NULM Shelters 291 Table 12.6: State-wise details of NULM and Non-NULM Shelters 291

Chapter 13. National Heritage City Development and Augmentation Yojana (HRIDAY) 295-310 Chapter 13. National Heritage City Development and Augmentation Yojana (HRIDAY) 295-310

Table 13.1: Snapshots of Projects and Expenditure 303 Table 13.1: Snapshots of Projects and Expenditure 303

Table 13.2: Year-wise Break-up of Expenditure 303 Table 13.2: Year-wise Break-up of Expenditure 303

Table 13.3: City-wise details of Projects in the 12 HRIDAY Cities 304 Table 13.3: City-wise details of Projects in the 12 HRIDAY Cities 304

Chapter 14. NER Schemes 311-318 Chapter 14. NER Schemes 311-318

Table 14.1: Projects/Packages Undertaken in NERUDP (%) 314 Table 14.1: Projects/Packages Undertaken in NERUDP (%) 314
Table 14.2: Tranche-wise Physical Progress 314 Table 14.2: Tranche-wise Physical Progress 314

Table 14.3: Financial Progress 315 Table 14.3: Financial Progress 315

Table 14.4: Physical Progress 317 Table 14.4: Physical Progress 317

Table 14.5: Financial Progress of the On-going Projects (In Lakhs) 317 Table 14.5: Financial Progress of the On-going Projects (In Lakhs) 317

Chapter 15. Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 319-324 Chapter 15. Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 319-324

Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016

Table 15.1 : Progress of Implementation of RERA 2016 323-324 Table 15.1 : Progress of Implementation of RERA 2016 323-324
 Graphs Page Nos. Graphs Page Nos.

Chapter 1. Urban Demography 7-40 Chapter 1. Urban Demography 7-40

Graph 1.1: Level of Urbanization (1991, 2001, 2011) 15 Graph 1.1: Level of Urbanization (1991, 2001, 2011) 15

Graph 1.2: Level of Urbanization – AEGR 1991-2011 16 Graph 1.2: Level of Urbanization – AEGR 1991-2011 16

Graph 1.3: State-wise Birth Rates (2001, 2011, 2016) 19 Graph 1.3: State-wise Birth Rates (2001, 2011, 2016) 19

Graph 1.4: State-wise Death Rates (2001, 2011, 2016) 20 Graph 1.4: State-wise Death Rates (2001, 2011, 2016) 20

Graph 1.5: State Share of Slum Population to Total Slum Population of Graph 1.5: State Share of Slum Population to Total Slum Population of
27 27
India (2001) India (2001)
Graph 1.6: State Share of Slum Population to Total Slum Population of Graph 1.6: State Share of Slum Population to Total Slum Population of
27 27
India (2011) India (2011)

Graph 1.7: Percentage of Slum Population (2001-2011) 28 Graph 1.7: Percentage of Slum Population (2001-2011) 28

Graph 1.8: Urbanization – International Comparison 30 Graph 1.8: Urbanization – International Comparison 30

Graph 1.9: Demographic Indicators in BRICS countries – Urban Popula- Graph 1.9: Demographic Indicators in BRICS countries – Urban Popula-
35 35
tion (%) tion (%)
Graph 1.10: Demographic Indicators in BRICS countries – Average Annual Graph 1.10: Demographic Indicators in BRICS countries – Average Annual
35 35
Rate of Change of Urban Population Rate of Change of Urban Population
Graph 1.11: Demographic Indicators in SAARC Countries – Population of Graph 1.11: Demographic Indicators in SAARC Countries – Population of
37 37
Urban Areas at Mid-Year 2014 (%) Urban Areas at Mid-Year 2014 (%)
Graph 1.12: Demographic Indicators in SAARC Countries – Average Annu- Graph 1.12: Demographic Indicators in SAARC Countries – Average Annu-
38 38
al Rate of Change of Urban Population al Rate of Change of Urban Population
Graph 1.13: The 30 Largest Urban Agglomerations Ranked by Population Graph 1.13: The 30 Largest Urban Agglomerations Ranked by Population
40 40
Size (2015) Size (2015)

Chapter 2. Socio-economic indicators of Urban India 41-56 Chapter 2. Socio-economic indicators of Urban India 41-56

Graph 2.1: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India – Households with Graph 2.1: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India – Households with
46 46
Source of Drinking Water (2001-2011) Source of Drinking Water (2001-2011)
 Graph 2.2: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India – Households with Graph 2.2: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India – Households with
47 47
Electricity (2002, 2008-09, 2012) Electricity (2002, 2008-09, 2012)
Graph 2.3: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India – Households with Graph 2.3: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India – Households with
48 48
No Latrine (2002, 2008-09, 2012) No Latrine (2002, 2008-09, 2012)

Graph 2.4: Literacy Rate in Urban India (1991, 2001, 2011) 50 Graph 2.4: Literacy Rate in Urban India (1991, 2001, 2011) 50

Graph 2.5: Population below Poverty Line in Urban India (%) 52 Graph 2.5: Population below Poverty Line in Urban India (%) 52

Graph 2.6: Infant Mortality Rate. 54 Graph 2.6: Infant Mortality Rate. 54

Chapter 3. Urban Employment 57-94 Chapter 3. Urban Employment 57-94

Graph 3.1: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons (Principal Graph 3.1: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons (Principal
62 62
and Subsidiary Status-%) and Subsidiary Status-%)
Graph 3.2: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons (Principal and Graph 3.2: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons (Principal and
66 66
Subsidiary Status-%) Subsidiary Status-%)

Graph 3.3: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Persons (%) 70 Graph 3.3: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Persons (%) 70

Graph 3.4: Unemployment Rate of Urban Persons (Usual Status-%) 74 Graph 3.4: Unemployment Rate of Urban Persons (Usual Status-%) 74

Graph 3.5: Unemployment Rate of Urban Males (Usual Status-%) 76 Graph 3.5: Unemployment Rate of Urban Males (Usual Status-%) 76

Graph 3.6: Unemployment Rate of Urban Females (Usual Status-%) 78 Graph 3.6: Unemployment Rate of Urban Females (Usual Status-%) 78

Graph 3.7: National Industrial Classification of Urban Workers (principal Graph 3.7: National Industrial Classification of Urban Workers (principal
81 81
and subsidiary), 2011-2012 (%) and subsidiary), 2011-2012 (%)
Graph 3.8: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs./day) received by Regular Graph 3.8: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs./day) received by Regular
87 87
Wage/salaried employee in Urban India Wage/salaried employee in Urban India
Graph 3.9: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs./day) received by Casual Graph 3.9: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs./day) received by Casual
89 89
Labours engaged in works other than Public works in Urban India Labours engaged in works other than Public works in Urban India

Chapter 4. Public Expenditure on Urban Development 95-110 Chapter 4. Public Expenditure on Urban Development 95-110

Graph 4.1: Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices ( Rs. Per Capita) 101 Graph 4.1: Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices ( Rs. Per Capita) 101
 Graph 4.2: Additional FFC Transfers (in 2015-16 over 2014-15) – Benefits Graph 4.2: Additional FFC Transfers (in 2015-16 over 2014-15) – Benefits
107 107
from FFC from FFC
Graph 4.3: Additional FFC Transfers (in 2015-16 over 2014-15) – FFC Graph 4.3: Additional FFC Transfers (in 2015-16 over 2014-15) – FFC
108 108
transfer benefits as % of NSDP transfer benefits as % of NSDP

Chapter 5. Urban Transportation 111-136 Chapter 5. Urban Transportation 111-136

Graph 5.1: Mode Share in Various Cities (%) 117 Graph 5.1: Mode Share in Various Cities (%) 117

Graph 5.2: Desirable Modal Shares for Different City sizes 121 Graph 5.2: Desirable Modal Shares for Different City sizes 121

Graph 5.3: Vehicular –Comparison with BRICS Nations 123 Graph 5.3: Vehicular –Comparison with BRICS Nations 123

Graph 5.4: Registered Motor Vehicles per 1,000 Population in Mil- Graph 5.4: Registered Motor Vehicles per 1,000 Population in Mil-
125 125
lion-Plus Indian Cities lion-Plus Indian Cities

Graph 5.5: Vehicle Population in India (in ’000) 129 Graph 5.5: Vehicle Population in India (in ’000) 129

Graph 5.6: Vehicular Composition in India (Per Cent) 131 Graph 5.6: Vehicular Composition in India (Per Cent) 131

Graph 5.7: Cities provided with Metro Rail Facility 133 Graph 5.7: Cities provided with Metro Rail Facility 133

Graph 5.8: Growth of Metro Rail Line in India 134 Graph 5.8: Growth of Metro Rail Line in India 134

Chapter 6. Urban Sanitation 137-152 Chapter 6. Urban Sanitation 137-152

Graph 6.1: Percentage of Households having Bathroom Facility within Graph 6.1: Percentage of Households having Bathroom Facility within
142 142
premises premises

Graph 6.2 Percentage of Households having Drainage Facilities 143 Graph 6.2 Percentage of Households having Drainage Facilities 143

Graph 6.3 Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per 2001 Census 146 Graph 6.3 Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per 2001 Census 146

Graph 6.4 Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per 2011 Census 146 Graph 6.4 Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per 2011 Census 146

Chapter 7. Urban Housing 153-186 Chapter 7. Urban Housing 153-186

 Graph 7.1: Percentage of Households with No. of Dwelling Rooms – In- Graph 7.1: Percentage of Households with No. of Dwelling Rooms – In-
160 160
dia (2001-2011) dia (2001-2011)
Graph 7.2: Percentage of Households living in Houses by No . of dwell- Graph 7.2: Percentage of Households living in Houses by No . of dwell-
163 163
ing of Dwellings – 2001-2011 ing of Dwellings – 2001-2011
Graph 7.3: Percentage of Households Living in Houses by No . of Rooms Graph 7.3: Percentage of Households Living in Houses by No . of Rooms
168 168
of Rented Dwellings (2001-2011) of Rented Dwellings (2001-2011)
Graph 7.4: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by “Owner- Graph 7.4: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by “Owner-
171 171
ship/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units – 2001 (%) ship/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units – 2001 (%)
Graph 7.5: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by “Owner- Graph 7.5: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by “Owner-
174 174
ship/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units – 2011 (%) ship/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units – 2011 (%)

Graph 7.6: Condition of Census Houses - 2001 177 Graph 7.6: Condition of Census Houses - 2001 177

Graph.7: Condition of Census Houses - 2011 178 Graph.7: Condition of Census Houses - 2011 178

Graph 7.8: Variation of Housing Price Index (2014 to 2018) 181 Graph 7.8: Variation of Housing Price Index (2014 to 2018) 181

Chapter 8. Smart Cities Mission 187-206 Chapter 8. Smart Cities Mission 187-206

Graph 8.1: Development Model selected by 100 Smart Cities 189 Graph 8.1: Development Model selected by 100 Smart Cities 189

Graph 8.2: List of Selected Cities and their Progress 190 Graph 8.2: List of Selected Cities and their Progress 190

Graph 8.3: Source of Funding in Smart Cities 191 Graph 8.3: Source of Funding in Smart Cities 191

Graph 8.4: SCM Progress – Tender issued 192 Graph 8.4: SCM Progress – Tender issued 192

Graph 8.5: SCM Progress – Work Order issued (Under Implementation) 192 Graph 8.5: SCM Progress – Work Order issued (Under Implementation) 192

Graph 8.6: SCM Progress – Work Completed 194 Graph 8.6: SCM Progress – Work Completed 194

Chapter 11. Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana-Urban (PMAY-U) 207-272 Chapter 11. Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana-Urban (PMAY-U) 207-272
 Graph 11.1: Houses Sanctioned under PMAY(U) 267 Graph 11.1: Houses Sanctioned under PMAY(U) 267

Graph 11.2: Houses sanctioned under EWS/LIG and MIG in CLSS 267 Graph 11.2: Houses sanctioned under EWS/LIG and MIG in CLSS 267

Graph 11.3: Investment in Housing Construction through PMAY (U) Graph 11.3: Investment in Housing Construction through PMAY (U)
268 268
(States/UTs wise) (States/UTs wise)
Graph 11.4: Commitment of Central Assistance under PMAY-U (States/ Graph 11.4: Commitment of Central Assistance under PMAY-U (States/
269 269
UTs wise) UTs wise)
Graph 11.5: Expenditure of Central Assistance under PMAY-U (States/ Graph 11.5: Expenditure of Central Assistance under PMAY-U (States/
269 269
UTs wise) UTs wise)

Graph 11.6: Grounded Houses under PMAY (U) 270 Graph 11.6: Grounded Houses under PMAY (U) 270

Graph 11.7: Completed Houses under PMAY(U) 270 Graph 11.7: Completed Houses under PMAY(U) 270

Graph 11.8: Houses occupied under PMAY(U) 271 Graph 11.8: Houses occupied under PMAY(U) 271

Graph 11.9: Number of beneficiaries residing in slums availed benefits Graph 11.9: Number of beneficiaries residing in slums availed benefits
271 271
under various components of PMAY (U) under various components of PMAY (U)

Chapter 12. National Urban Livelihood Mission (NULM) 273-294 Chapter 12. National Urban Livelihood Mission (NULM) 273-294

Graph 12.1: No. Of SHGs formed and Revolving Fund Disbursed 280 Graph 12.1: No. Of SHGs formed and Revolving Fund Disbursed 280

Graph 12.2: No. Of SHGs formed 280 Graph 12.2: No. Of SHGs formed 280

Graph 12.3: No. Of SHGs given Revolving Fund 281 Graph 12.3: No. Of SHGs given Revolving Fund 281

Graph 12.4: No. Of Candidates Trained and Placed 283 Graph 12.4: No. Of Candidates Trained and Placed 283

Graph 12.5: Number of Candidates skill-trained and Certified Graph 12.5: Number of Candidates skill-trained and Certified
283 283

Graph 12.6: Number of Candidates placed 284 Graph 12.6: Number of Candidates placed 284

Graph 12.7: Number of individuals and groups assisted with Loan 285 Graph 12.7: Number of individuals and groups assisted with Loan 285
Graph 12.8: No. Of SHGs disbursed loans under SHG-Bank Linkage Pro- Graph 12.8: No. Of SHGs disbursed loans under SHG-Bank Linkage Pro-
286 286
gramme gramme
Graph 12.9: Credit and Subsidies given to SHGs Graph 12.9: Credit and Subsidies given to SHGs
287 287
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Definitions Definitions
Average annual population growth rate is the compound annual population growth rate. Average annual population growth rate is the compound annual population growth rate.

Average household size is total population divided by total number of households. Average household size is total population divided by total number of households.

Birth rate: Number of live births per thousand population. Birth rate: Number of live births per thousand population.

Census house: A ‘Census house’ is a building or part of a building having a separate main entrance Census house: A ‘Census house’ is a building or part of a building having a separate main entrance
from the road or common courtyard or staircase, etc. used or recognised as a separate unit. It from the road or common courtyard or staircase, etc. used or recognised as a separate unit. It
may be occupied or vacant. It may be used for residential or non-residential purpose or both. may be occupied or vacant. It may be used for residential or non-residential purpose or both.

Death Rate: Number of deaths per thousand population. Death Rate: Number of deaths per thousand population.

Household: A ‘Household’ is a group of persons who commonly live together and would take their Household: A ‘Household’ is a group of persons who commonly live together and would take their
meals from a common kitchen unless the exigencies of work prevented any of them from doing meals from a common kitchen unless the exigencies of work prevented any of them from doing
so. There may be a household of persons related by blood or a household of unrelated persons so. There may be a household of persons related by blood or a household of unrelated persons
or having a mix of both. or having a mix of both.

• Chawl/bastee: is a collection of huts of tenements generally of Katcha or semi-pucca type in- • Chawl/bastee: is a collection of huts of tenements generally of Katcha or semi-pucca type in-
habited by a large number of households. habited by a large number of households.

• Dwelling House (unit): is the existing house accommodation available to the household for • Dwelling House (unit): is the existing house accommodation available to the household for
residential purpose. residential purpose.

• Households with drainage facility: Households having either closed or open drainage connec- • Households with drainage facility: Households having either closed or open drainage connec-
tivity for waste water outlet. tivity for waste water outlet.

• Households with Safe Drinking Water (SDW): Households with main source of drinking water • Households with Safe Drinking Water (SDW): Households with main source of drinking water
from tap (both treated and untreated source, hand pump and tube well/borehole. from tap (both treated and untreated source, hand pump and tube well/borehole.

• Independent House: is a free standing structure or structures with a separate entrance. In oth- • Independent House: is a free standing structure or structures with a separate entrance. In oth-
er words, if the dwelling unit and the entire structure of the houses are physically coterminous, er words, if the dwelling unit and the entire structure of the houses are physically coterminous,
it is considered to be an independent house. it is considered to be an independent house.

• Katcha Structure: Katcha structure is one, which has walls and roofs made of non-pucca mate- • Katcha Structure: Katcha structure is one, which has walls and roofs made of non-pucca mate-
rials. rials.

• Pucca Structure: is one whose walls and roof are made of pucca materials. • Pucca Structure: is one whose walls and roof are made of pucca materials.

• Semi-Pucca: It is one in which either the walls or the roof (but not both) are made of pucca ma- • Semi-Pucca: It is one in which either the walls or the roof (but not both) are made of pucca ma-
terial. Walls/roof made partially of pucca material are regarded as Katcha walls/roof. terial. Walls/roof made partially of pucca material are regarded as Katcha walls/roof.

1 1
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Infant Mortality Rate: Number of infant deaths (< 1 year) during the year per number of live birth
during that year, or
Number of infant deaths during the year
----------------------------------------------------------- x 1000
Number of live births during the year
Latrines (Types):
• Other Latrine: This category includes service latrines, latrines serviced by animals such as pigs,
etc. and all latrines other than the pit and the water closet types of latrine. Service latrines are
dry type of latrines from where human excreta are removed by scavengers.
• Pit Latrine: These latrines are attached to a pit that is dug into the ground for the receiving hu-
man excreta.
• Water Closet Latrine: The sanitary water flush latrines are those that have water closets fitted
with flushing cistern. Such latrines may be connected to a septic tank or an underground sew-
erage system. The human excreta from these types of latrines is removed without the need for
scavenging.
Labour Force: Persons who are either ‘working’ (or employed) or ‘seeking or available for work’ (or
unemployed).
Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR): It is the proportion of persons/person-days in the labour force
to the total persons/person-days. These ratios are given in per 1000 of persons/person-days.
Level of Urbanization: It is the percentage of urban population to total population in the indicated
year.
Literacy rate: Percentage of literates to the total population aged 7 years and above. As per Census, a
person aged seven and above who can both read and write with understanding in any language,
is treated as literate.
Notified Slums: Areas notified as slums by the respective municipalities, corporations, local bodies or
development authorities.
Non-notified Slums: Area with inadequate basic services are considered as non-notified slums if at
least 20 households live in that area.
Out Growths (OG): An Out Growth (OG) is a viable unit such as a village or a hamlet or an enumeration
block made up of such village or hamlet and clearly identifiable in terms of its boundaries and
location. Some of the examples are railway colony, university campus, port area, military camps,
etc., which have come up near a statutory town outside its statutory limits but within the rev-
enue limits of a village or villages contiguous to the town. While determining the outgrowth of
2 2
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Infant Mortality Rate: Number of infant deaths (< 1 year) during the year per number of live birth
during that year, or
Number of infant deaths during the year
----------------------------------------------------------- x 1000
Number of live births during the year
Latrines (Types):
• Other Latrine: This category includes service latrines, latrines serviced by animals such as pigs,
etc. and all latrines other than the pit and the water closet types of latrine. Service latrines are
dry type of latrines from where human excreta are removed by scavengers.
• Pit Latrine: These latrines are attached to a pit that is dug into the ground for the receiving hu-
man excreta.
• Water Closet Latrine: The sanitary water flush latrines are those that have water closets fitted
with flushing cistern. Such latrines may be connected to a septic tank or an underground sew-
erage system. The human excreta from these types of latrines is removed without the need for
scavenging.
Labour Force: Persons who are either ‘working’ (or employed) or ‘seeking or available for work’ (or
unemployed).
Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR): It is the proportion of persons/person-days in the labour force
to the total persons/person-days. These ratios are given in per 1000 of persons/person-days.
Level of Urbanization: It is the percentage of urban population to total population in the indicated
year.
Literacy rate: Percentage of literates to the total population aged 7 years and above. As per Census, a
person aged seven and above who can both read and write with understanding in any language,
is treated as literate.
Notified Slums: Areas notified as slums by the respective municipalities, corporations, local bodies or
development authorities.
Non-notified Slums: Area with inadequate basic services are considered as non-notified slums if at
least 20 households live in that area.
Out Growths (OG): An Out Growth (OG) is a viable unit such as a village or a hamlet or an enumeration
block made up of such village or hamlet and clearly identifiable in terms of its boundaries and
location. Some of the examples are railway colony, university campus, port area, military camps,
etc., which have come up near a statutory town outside its statutory limits but within the rev-
enue limits of a village or villages contiguous to the town. While determining the outgrowth of
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
a town, it should be ensured that it possesses the urban features in terms of infrastructure and
amenities such as pucca roads, electricity, taps, drainage system for disposal of waste water
etc. educational institutions, post offices, medical facilities, banks etc. and physically contiguous
with the core town of the Urban Area. Each town together with its outgrowth(s) is treated as an
integrated urban area and is designated as an ‘urban agglomeration’.
Population density is population divided by land area in square kilometers.
Poverty line: Planning Commission updated the poverty lines and poverty ratios for the year 2009-10
as per the recommendations of the Tendulkar Committee using NSS 66th round (2009-10) data
of Household Consumer Expenditure Survey and released poverty estimates for 2009-10 on 19th
March 2012. According to this, poverty line at all India level is estimated as Monthly Per-capita
Consumption Expenditure of Rs. 672.8 for rural areas and Rs 859.6 for urban areas in 2009-10.
Sex Ratio: Number of females per 1000 males.
Slum: Slums are those residential areas where dwellings are in any respect unfit for human habitation
by reasons of dilapidation, overcrowding, faulty arrangements and designs of such buildings,
narrowness or faulty arrangement of streets, lack of ventilation, light, sanitation facilities or
any combination of these factors which are detrimental to safety, health and morals. A slum is
characterized by lack of durable housing, insufficient living area, lack of access to clean water,
inadequate sanitation and insecure tenure.
Total population of a country includes all residents regardless of legal status or citizenship - except for
refugees not permanently settled in the country of asylum, which is generally considered part
of the population of their country of origin.
Unemployment rate: This is defined as the number of persons / person days unemployed per thou-
sand persons / person days in the labour force (which includes both the employed and the
unemployed).
Urban Agglomeration:
A town together with its outgrowth(s) is treated as an integrated urban area and is designated
as “Urban agglomeration”. It constitutes:
(i) A city or a town with a continuous outgrowth, the outgrowth being outside the statutory limit
but falling within the boundaries of the adjoining village or villages; or
(ii) Two or more adjoining towns with their outgrowth, if any, as in (i) above; or
(iii) A city and one or more adjoining towns with or without outgrowth all of which form a con-
tinuous spread.
3 3
Handbook of Urban Statistics
a town, it should be ensured that it possesses the urban features in terms of infrastructure and
amenities such as pucca roads, electricity, taps, drainage system for disposal of waste water
etc. educational institutions, post offices, medical facilities, banks etc. and physically contiguous
with the core town of the Urban Area. Each town together with its outgrowth(s) is treated as an
integrated urban area and is designated as an ‘urban agglomeration’.
Population density is population divided by land area in square kilometers.
Poverty line: Planning Commission updated the poverty lines and poverty ratios for the year 2009-10
as per the recommendations of the Tendulkar Committee using NSS 66th round (2009-10) data
of Household Consumer Expenditure Survey and released poverty estimates for 2009-10 on 19th
March 2012. According to this, poverty line at all India level is estimated as Monthly Per-capita
Consumption Expenditure of Rs. 672.8 for rural areas and Rs 859.6 for urban areas in 2009-10.
Sex Ratio: Number of females per 1000 males.
Slum: Slums are those residential areas where dwellings are in any respect unfit for human habitation
by reasons of dilapidation, overcrowding, faulty arrangements and designs of such buildings,
narrowness or faulty arrangement of streets, lack of ventilation, light, sanitation facilities or
any combination of these factors which are detrimental to safety, health and morals. A slum is
characterized by lack of durable housing, insufficient living area, lack of access to clean water,
inadequate sanitation and insecure tenure.
Total population of a country includes all residents regardless of legal status or citizenship - except for
refugees not permanently settled in the country of asylum, which is generally considered part
of the population of their country of origin.
Unemployment rate: This is defined as the number of persons / person days unemployed per thou-
sand persons / person days in the labour force (which includes both the employed and the
unemployed).
Urban Agglomeration:
A town together with its outgrowth(s) is treated as an integrated urban area and is designated
as “Urban agglomeration”. It constitutes:
(i) A city or a town with a continuous outgrowth, the outgrowth being outside the statutory limit
but falling within the boundaries of the adjoining village or villages; or
(ii) Two or more adjoining towns with their outgrowth, if any, as in (i) above; or
(iii) A city and one or more adjoining towns with or without outgrowth all of which form a con-
tinuous spread.
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Urban area: Urban area:
Census defines urban area as:-
(a) all places with a municipality, corporation, cantonment board or notified town area commit-
tee, etc.
(b) all other places which satisfy the following criteria:
(i) a minimum population of 5,000
(ii) at least 75% of male working population engaged in non-agricultural pursuits; and
(iii) a density of population of at least 400 persons per square kilometer.
• Census town:
Places which satisfy criterion (b) above are referred to as census towns or non-municipal towns.
• Statutory town: • Statutory town:
All places with criterion (a) above are called statutory towns.
Usual activity status: According to the usual status, workers are those who perform some work activ-
ity either in the principal status or in the subsidiary status. The two categories of usual activity
status are as under:
• Current daily activity status: The activity pattern of the population, particularly in the infor-
mal sector, is such that during a week, and sometimes, even during a day, a person could pur-
sue more than one activity. Moreover, many people could even undertake both economic and
non-economic activities on the same day of a reference week. The current daily activity status
for a person was determined on the basis of his/her activity status on each day of the reference
week using a priority-cum-major time criterion (day to day labour time disposition).
• Current weekly activity status: The current weekly activity status of a person is the activity
status obtained for a person during a reference period of 7 days preceding the date of enumer-
ation. A person was considered working (or employed) if he/she, while pursuing any economic
activity, had worked for at least one hour on at least one day during the 7 days preceding the
date of enumeration.
• Usual principal activity status: The usual activity status relates to the activity status of a person
during the reference period of 365 days preceding the date of enumeration. The activity status
on which a person spent relatively longer time (i.e. major time criterion) during the 365 days
preceding the date of enumeration is considered as the usual principal activity status of the
person.
4 4
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Census defines urban area as:-
(a) all places with a municipality, corporation, cantonment board or notified town area commit-
tee, etc.
(b) all other places which satisfy the following criteria:
(i) a minimum population of 5,000
(ii) at least 75% of male working population engaged in non-agricultural pursuits; and
(iii) a density of population of at least 400 persons per square kilometer.
• Census town:
Places which satisfy criterion (b) above are referred to as census towns or non-municipal towns.
All places with criterion (a) above are called statutory towns.
Usual activity status: According to the usual status, workers are those who perform some work activ-
ity either in the principal status or in the subsidiary status. The two categories of usual activity
status are as under:
• Current daily activity status: The activity pattern of the population, particularly in the infor-
mal sector, is such that during a week, and sometimes, even during a day, a person could pur-
sue more than one activity. Moreover, many people could even undertake both economic and
non-economic activities on the same day of a reference week. The current daily activity status
for a person was determined on the basis of his/her activity status on each day of the reference
week using a priority-cum-major time criterion (day to day labour time disposition).
• Current weekly activity status: The current weekly activity status of a person is the activity
status obtained for a person during a reference period of 7 days preceding the date of enumer-
ation. A person was considered working (or employed) if he/she, while pursuing any economic
activity, had worked for at least one hour on at least one day during the 7 days preceding the
date of enumeration.
• Usual principal activity status: The usual activity status relates to the activity status of a person
during the reference period of 365 days preceding the date of enumeration. The activity status
on which a person spent relatively longer time (i.e. major time criterion) during the 365 days
preceding the date of enumeration is considered as the usual principal activity status of the
person.
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
• Usual subsidiary economic activity status: A person whose usual principal status was deter-
mined on the basis of the major time criterion could have pursued some economic activity for
a shorter time throughout the reference year of 365 days preceding the date of enumeration or
for a minor period, which is not less than 30 days, during the reference year. The status in which
such economic activity pursued was the subsidiary economic activity status of that person.
Work: Work is defined as participation in any economically productive activity. Such participa-
tion may be physical or mental in nature. Work involves not only actual work but also effective
supervision and direction of work. It also includes unpaid work on farm and enterprise.
Workers:
Agricultural Labourer: A person who works on another person’s land for wages or money, kind
or share is regarded as an agricultural Labourer.
• Casual wage labour: A person casually engaged in others farm or non-farm enterprises (both
household and non-household) and getting in return wage according to the terms of the daily
or periodic work contract is defined as a casual wage labour.
• Cultivator: A person is considered working as cultivator if he/she is engaged as employer, single
worker or family worker in cultivation of land owned or held from Government or held from
private person or institutions for payment in money, kind or share. Cultivation includes super-
vision or direction of cultivation.
• Main Workers are those who had worked in some economic activity for a major part of the year
i.e. for a period of six months (183 days) or more and,
• Marginal Workers are those who had worked for some time during the last year but not for a
major part that is for six months.
• Regular salaried/wage employee: Persons working in others farm or non-farm enterprises
(both household and non-household) and getting in return salary or wages on a regular basis
(and not on the basis of daily or periodic renewal of work contract) are defined as regular sala-
ried/wage employees.
• Self-employed: Defined as persons who operate their own farm or non-farm enterprises or are
engaged independently in a profession or trade on own-account or with one or a few partners
are self-employed in household enterprises. The essential feature of the self-employed is that
they have autonomy and economic independence for carrying out operation.
Work force participation rate (WFPR): WFPR is defined as the number of persons/ person – Work force participation rate (WFPR): WFPR is defined as the number of persons/ person –
days employed per thousand persons/person-days.Work participation Rate: Percentage of to days employed per thousand persons/person-days.Work participation Rate: Percentage of to
tal workers (main and marginal) to total population.
5 5
Handbook of Urban Statistics
• Usual subsidiary economic activity status: A person whose usual principal status was deter-
mined on the basis of the major time criterion could have pursued some economic activity for
a shorter time throughout the reference year of 365 days preceding the date of enumeration or
for a minor period, which is not less than 30 days, during the reference year. The status in which
such economic activity pursued was the subsidiary economic activity status of that person.
Work: Work is defined as participation in any economically productive activity. Such participa-
tion may be physical or mental in nature. Work involves not only actual work but also effective
supervision and direction of work. It also includes unpaid work on farm and enterprise.
Workers:
Agricultural Labourer: A person who works on another person’s land for wages or money, kind
or share is regarded as an agricultural Labourer.
• Casual wage labour: A person casually engaged in others farm or non-farm enterprises (both
household and non-household) and getting in return wage according to the terms of the daily
or periodic work contract is defined as a casual wage labour.
• Cultivator: A person is considered working as cultivator if he/she is engaged as employer, single
worker or family worker in cultivation of land owned or held from Government or held from
private person or institutions for payment in money, kind or share. Cultivation includes super-
vision or direction of cultivation.
• Main Workers are those who had worked in some economic activity for a major part of the year
i.e. for a period of six months (183 days) or more and,
• Marginal Workers are those who had worked for some time during the last year but not for a
major part that is for six months.
• Regular salaried/wage employee: Persons working in others farm or non-farm enterprises
(both household and non-household) and getting in return salary or wages on a regular basis
(and not on the basis of daily or periodic renewal of work contract) are defined as regular sala-
ried/wage employees.
• Self-employed: Defined as persons who operate their own farm or non-farm enterprises or are
engaged independently in a profession or trade on own-account or with one or a few partners
are self-employed in household enterprises. The essential feature of the self-employed is that
they have autonomy and economic independence for carrying out operation.
tal workers (main and marginal) to total population.
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Abbreviations Abbreviations

AEGR Annual Exponential Growth rate SCS Special Category States AEGR Annual Exponential Growth rate SCS Special Category States
BBMP Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike SDW Source of drinking water BBMP Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike SDW Source of drinking water
CAS Central Assistance to States SRS Sample Registration System CAS Central Assistance to States SRS Sample Registration System
CB Cantonment Board/Cantonment SWM Solid Waste Management CB Cantonment Board/Cantonment SWM Solid Waste Management
CMC City Municipal Council STC Small town Committee CMC City Municipal Council STC Small town Committee
CT Census Town TC Town Committee/Town Area Committee CT Census Town TC Town Committee/Town Area Committee
DJB Delhi Jal Board TMC Town Municipal Council DJB Delhi Jal Board TMC Town Municipal Council
EWS Economically Weaker section TP Town Panchayat EWS Economically Weaker section TP Town Panchayat
EO Estate Office TS Township EO Estate Office TS Township
FFC Fourteenth Finance Commission UA Urban Agglomeration FFC Fourteenth Finance Commission UA Urban Agglomeration
GCS General Category States WSA Wilmer Smith Associates GCS General Category States WSA Wilmer Smith Associates
GP Gram Panchayat GP Gram Panchayat
GVMC Greater Vishakhapatnam Municipal Corpo- GVMC Greater Vishakhapatnam Municipal Corpo-
ration ration
HHs Households HHs Households
INA Industrial Notified Area INA Industrial Notified Area
ITS Industrial Township ITS Industrial Township
LIG Lower Income Group LIG Lower Income Group
M Municipality M Municipality
MB Municipal Board MB Municipal Board
MC Municipal Committee MC Municipal Committee
MCl Municipal Council MCl Municipal Council
MCorp Municipal Corporation MCorp Municipal Corporation
NA Notified Area NA Notified Area
NCT National Capital Territory NCT National Capital Territory
NAC Notified Area Committee/Notified Area NAC Notified Area Committee/Notified Area
Council Council
NDMC New Delhi Municipal Council NDMC New Delhi Municipal Council
NP Nagar Panchayat NP Nagar Panchayat
NT Notified Town NT Notified Town
NSDP Net State Domestic Product NSDP Net State Domestic Product

NTA Notified Town Area NTA Notified Town Area

OG Out Growth OG Out Growth

O&M Operation & management O&M Operation & management

OTR Own Tax Revenue Receipts OTR Own Tax Revenue Receipts

RITES Rail India Technical and Economic Services RITES Rail India Technical and Economic Services

6 6
 Chapter 1 Chapter 1

Urban Demography Urban Demography

 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Urban Demography
India is rapidly urbanizing. According to the 2011 Census, the urban population grew to 377.1 million
as compared to 286.1 million in 2001 census showing a growth of 2.76 percent per annum during
2001-2011. The level of urbanization in the country as a whole increased from 25.7 percent in 1991
to 27.82 percent in 2001 and to 31.14 percent in 2011 – an increase of 3.3 percentage points during
2001-2011 compared to an increase of 2.1 percentage points during 1991-2001.
A large number of new towns emerged during the decade, contributing significantly to the speeding
up of urbanization. The number of statutory towns in India increased from 3,799 to 4,041 during 2001-
2011 whereas the number of census towns have increased from 1,362 to 3,892 during the decade.
Among the states, Uttar Pradesh had the largest number of towns – 648 statutory towns and 267
census towns in 2011.
There is wide inter-State disparity in urbanization levels. In terms of overall urban population, Ma-
harashtra had the largest urban population of 50.8 million followed by Uttar Pradesh, which had an
urban population of 44.5 million in 2011. If we look at the level of urbanization, defined as urban
population as a proportion of total population, Goa was the most urbanized state with 62.17 percent
urbanization in 2011 followed by Mizoram at 52.11 percent urban population. Among the Union
Territories, Delhi had urbanization level of 97.50 percent followed by Chandigarh with an urbaniza-
tion level of 97.25 percent in 2011. Himachal Pradesh had the lowest urbanization with only 10.03
percent population living in urban areas in 2011, followed by Bihar (11.29 percent ).
Sikkim witnessed the most rapid growth in urban population registering an annual exponential growth
rate (AEGR) of 9.42 percent during 2001-2011. On the other hand, Himachal Pradesh registered
slowest growth in urban population with an AEGR of 1.45 percent during the decade. Among the
UTs, Daman & Diu witnessed the sharpest growth in urban population with an AEGR of 11.60 percent
during the decade closely followed by Dadra & Nagar Haveli (11.58 percent ).
According to Census 2011, the number of urban agglomeration (1 lakh and above population) in India
stood at 474. Uttar Pradesh had the largest number of urban agglomerations (67) followed by Andhra
Pradesh (58). Birth rate and death rate decreased to 17.60 and 5.70 respectively in 2011. Birth rate
was highest in Uttar Pradesh (23.70) and least in Tripura (11). Arunachal Pradesh recorded the lowest
death rate (2.50), whereas Puducherry registered the highest death rate at 6.80.
According to the estimates of UNESCAP, 29.4 percent of India’s urban population lived in slums 96
percent urban population in India was estimated to have access to improved water sources in 2010
and 59 percent urban population had access to improved sanitation in 2010. The global figure for
urban population with improved water sources was 96.1 percent in 2010 and those with improved
sanitation was 79.4 percent in 2010.
Table 1.6 shows number of statutory and slum reported towns with type wise slum population in India.
9 9
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Urban Demography
India is rapidly urbanizing. According to the 2011 Census, the urban population grew to 377.1 million
as compared to 286.1 million in 2001 census showing a growth of 2.76 percent per annum during
2001-2011. The level of urbanization in the country as a whole increased from 25.7 percent in 1991
to 27.82 percent in 2001 and to 31.14 percent in 2011 – an increase of 3.3 percentage points during
2001-2011 compared to an increase of 2.1 percentage points during 1991-2001.
A large number of new towns emerged during the decade, contributing significantly to the speeding
up of urbanization. The number of statutory towns in India increased from 3,799 to 4,041 during 2001-
2011 whereas the number of census towns have increased from 1,362 to 3,892 during the decade.
Among the states, Uttar Pradesh had the largest number of towns – 648 statutory towns and 267
census towns in 2011.
There is wide inter-State disparity in urbanization levels. In terms of overall urban population, Ma-
harashtra had the largest urban population of 50.8 million followed by Uttar Pradesh, which had an
urban population of 44.5 million in 2011. If we look at the level of urbanization, defined as urban
population as a proportion of total population, Goa was the most urbanized state with 62.17 percent
urbanization in 2011 followed by Mizoram at 52.11 percent urban population. Among the Union
Territories, Delhi had urbanization level of 97.50 percent followed by Chandigarh with an urbaniza-
tion level of 97.25 percent in 2011. Himachal Pradesh had the lowest urbanization with only 10.03
percent population living in urban areas in 2011, followed by Bihar (11.29 percent ).
Sikkim witnessed the most rapid growth in urban population registering an annual exponential growth
rate (AEGR) of 9.42 percent during 2001-2011. On the other hand, Himachal Pradesh registered
slowest growth in urban population with an AEGR of 1.45 percent during the decade. Among the
UTs, Daman & Diu witnessed the sharpest growth in urban population with an AEGR of 11.60 percent
during the decade closely followed by Dadra & Nagar Haveli (11.58 percent ).
According to Census 2011, the number of urban agglomeration (1 lakh and above population) in India
stood at 474. Uttar Pradesh had the largest number of urban agglomerations (67) followed by Andhra
Pradesh (58). Birth rate and death rate decreased to 17.60 and 5.70 respectively in 2011. Birth rate
was highest in Uttar Pradesh (23.70) and least in Tripura (11). Arunachal Pradesh recorded the lowest
death rate (2.50), whereas Puducherry registered the highest death rate at 6.80.
According to the estimates of UNESCAP, 29.4 percent of India’s urban population lived in slums 96
percent urban population in India was estimated to have access to improved water sources in 2010
and 59 percent urban population had access to improved sanitation in 2010. The global figure for
urban population with improved water sources was 96.1 percent in 2010 and those with improved
sanitation was 79.4 percent in 2010.
Table 1.6 shows number of statutory and slum reported towns with type wise slum population in India.
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Out of 4,041 statutory towns, 2,613 are towns which reported slums with an estimated population of
over 6.5 crore living in slums. If we look at State share of slum population to total slum population of
India (Table 1.10), Maharashtra followed by Andhra Pradesh reported highest share of slum popula-
tion in 2001-11.
To put a global perspective on urbanization in India, international comparison is presented in Tables
1.11, 1.12, 1.13 and 1.14. According to the World Urbanization Prospects, 2018, 55.29 percent of
world population lived in urban areas in 2018 as compared to 34.03 percent in India in 2018. The
average annual growth rate of urban population in world is projected at 1.90 percent during 2015-
20. India’s urban population is projected to grow at 2.37 percent during this period. India is the least
urbanized among BRICS countries as is seen in Table 1.13. However, India’s urban population is esti-
mated to grow at a rapid pace of 2.39 percent during 2010-15. Only China (2.94 percent ) has better
rate among all other BRICS Countries.
10
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Out of 4,041 statutory towns, 2,613 are towns which reported slums with an estimated population of
over 6.5 crore living in slums. If we look at State share of slum population to total slum population of
India (Table 1.10), Maharashtra followed by Andhra Pradesh reported highest share of slum popula-
tion in 2001-11.
To put a global perspective on urbanization in India, international comparison is presented in Tables
1.11, 1.12, 1.13 and 1.14. According to the World Urbanization Prospects, 2018, 55.29 percent of
world population lived in urban areas in 2018 as compared to 34.03 percent in India in 2018. The
average annual growth rate of urban population in world is projected at 1.90 percent during 2015-
20. India’s urban population is projected to grow at 2.37 percent during this period. India is the least
urbanized among BRICS countries as is seen in Table 1.13. However, India’s urban population is esti-
mated to grow at a rapid pace of 2.39 percent during 2010-15. Only China (2.94 percent ) has better
rate among all other BRICS Countries.
10
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

11 11
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.1: Demographic Profile of India Table 1.1: Demographic Profile of India

Statutory In- Statutory In-

S. Increase Census towns Increase Villages S. Increase Census towns Increase Villages
States/UTs Towns crease States/UTs Towns crease

No. (%) (%) (%) No. (%) (%) (%)

2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011

Andaman &Nico- Andaman &Nico-

1 bar 1 1 0.0 2 4 100.0 547 555 1.46 1 bar 1 1 0.0 2 4 100.0 547 555 1.46

Islands Islands
2 Andhra Pradesh 117 126 7.7 93 227 144.1 28,123 27,800 -1.15 2 Andhra Pradesh 117 126 7.7 93 227 144.1 28,123 27,800 -1.15
3 Arunachal Pradesh 0 26 - 17 1 -94.1 4,065 5,589 37.49 3 Arunachal Pradesh 0 26 - 17 1 -94.1 4,065 5,589 37.49
4 Assam 80 91 13.8 45 123 173.3 26,312 26,395 0.32 4 Assam 80 91 13.8 45 123 173.3 26,312 26,395 0.32
5 Bihar 125 139 11.2 5 60 1100.0 45,098 44,874 -0.50 5 Bihar 125 139 11.2 5 60 1100.0 45,098 44,874 -0.50
6 Chandigarh 1 1 0.0 0 5 - 24 5 -79.17 6 Chandigarh 1 1 0.0 0 5 - 24 5 -79.17
7 Chhattisgarh 75 168 124.0 22 14 -36.4 20,308 20,126 -0.90 7 Chhattisgarh 75 168 124.0 22 14 -36.4 20,308 20,126 -0.90
Dadra & Nagar Dadra & Nagar
8 0 1 - 2 5 150.0 70 65 -7.14 8 0 1 - 2 5 150.0 70 65 -7.14
Haveli Haveli
9 Daman & Diu 2 2 0.0 0 6 - 23 19 -17.39 9 Daman & Diu 2 2 0.0 0 6 - 23 19 -17.39
10 Goa 14 13 -7.1 30 57 90.0 359 334 -6.96 10 Goa 14 13 -7.1 30 57 90.0 359 334 -6.96
11 Gujarat 168 195 16.1 74 153 106.8 18,539 18,225 -1.69 11 Gujarat 168 195 16.1 74 153 106.8 18,539 18,225 -1.69
12 Haryana 84 80 -4.8 22 74 236.4 6,955 6,841 -1.64 12 Haryana 84 80 -4.8 22 74 236.4 6,955 6,841 -1.64
13 Himachal Pradesh 56 56 0.0 1 3 200.0 20,118 20,690 2.84 13 Himachal Pradesh 56 56 0.0 1 3 200.0 20,118 20,690 2.84
14 Jammu & Kashmir 72 86 19.4 3 36 1100.0 6,652 6,551 -1.52 14 Jammu & Kashmir 72 86 19.4 3 36 1100.0 6,652 6,551 -1.52
15 Jharkhand 44 39 -11.4 108 189 75.0 32,615 32,394 -0.68 15 Jharkhand 44 39 -11.4 108 189 75.0 32,615 32,394 -0.68
16 Karnataka 226 220 -2.7 44 127 188.6 29,406 29,340 -0.22 16 Karnataka 226 220 -2.7 44 127 188.6 29,406 29,340 -0.22
17 Kerala 60 58 -3.3 99 462 366.7 1,364 1,018 -25.37 17 Kerala 60 58 -3.3 99 462 366.7 1,364 1,018 -25.37
18 Lakshadweep 0 0 - 3 6 100.0 24 21 -12.50 18 Lakshadweep 0 0 - 3 6 100.0 24 21 -12.50
19 Madhya Pradesh 339 364 7.4 55 112 103.6 55,393 54,903 -0.88 19 Madhya Pradesh 339 364 7.4 55 112 103.6 55,393 54,903 -0.88
20 Maharashtra 251 255 1.6 127 279 119.7 43,711 43,663 -0.11 20 Maharashtra 251 255 1.6 127 279 119.7 43,711 43,663 -0.11
21 Manipur 28 28 0.0 5 23 360.0 2,391 2,588 8.24 21 Manipur 28 28 0.0 5 23 360.0 2,391 2,588 8.24
22 Meghalaya 10 10 0.0 6 12 100.0 6,026 6,839 13.49 22 Meghalaya 10 10 0.0 6 12 100.0 6,026 6,839 13.49
23 Mizoram 22 23 4.5 0 0 - 817 830 1.59 23 Mizoram 22 23 4.5 0 0 - 817 830 1.59
24 Nagaland 8 19 137.5 1 7 600.0 1,317 1,428 8.43 24 Nagaland 8 19 137.5 1 7 600.0 1,317 1,428 8.43
25 NCT of Delhi 3 3 0.0 59 110 86.4 165 112 -32.12 25 NCT of Delhi 3 3 0.0 59 110 86.4 165 112 -32.12
26 Odisha 107 107 0.0 31 116 274.2 51,349 51,313 -0.07 26 Odisha 107 107 0.0 31 116 274.2 51,349 51,313 -0.07
27 Puducherry 6 6 0.0 0 4 - 92 90 -2.17 27 Puducherry 6 6 0.0 0 4 - 92 90 -2.17
28 Punjab 139 143 2.9 18 74 311.1 12,673 12581 -0.73 28 Punjab 139 143 2.9 18 74 311.1 12,673 12581 -0.73
29 Rajasthan 184 185 0.5 38 112 194.7 41,353 44,672 8.03 29 Rajasthan 184 185 0.5 38 112 194.7 41,353 44,672 8.03
30 Sikkim 8 8 0.0 1 1 0.0 452 452 0.00 30 Sikkim 8 8 0.0 1 1 0.0 452 452 0.00
31 Tamil Nadu 721 721 0.0 111 376 238.7 16,317 15,979 -2.07 31 Tamil Nadu 721 721 0.0 111 376 238.7 16,317 15,979 -2.07
32 Tripura 13 16 23.1 10 26 160.0 870 875 0.57 32 Tripura 13 16 23.1 10 26 160.0 870 875 0.57
33 Uttar Pradesh 638 648 1.6 66 267 304.5 107,452 106,704 -0.70 33 Uttar Pradesh 638 648 1.6 66 267 304.5 107,452 106,704 -0.70
34 Uttarakhand 74 74 0.0 12 41 241.7 16,826 16,793 -0.20 34 Uttarakhand 74 74 0.0 12 41 241.7 16,826 16,793 -0.20
35 West Bengal 123 129 4.9 252 780 209.5 40,782 40,203 -1.42 35 West Bengal 123 129 4.9 252 780 209.5 40,782 40,203 -1.42
India 3,799 4,041 6.4 1,362 3,892 185.8 638,588 640,867 0.36 India 3,799 4,041 6.4 1,362 3,892 185.8 638,588 640,867 0.36

Source: Census of India 2001, 2011. Source: Census of India 2001, 2011.

12 12
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.1: Demographic Profile of India (Contd…) Table 1.1: Demographic Profile of India (Contd…)

S. No. of S. No. of
States/UTs 2001 Population 2011 Population States/UTs 2001 Population 2011 Population
No. Districts No. Districts
2001 2011 Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total 2001 2011 Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total
Andaman & Andaman &
1 2 3 239,954 116,198 356,152 237,093 143,488 380,581 1 2 3 239,954 116,198 356,152 237,093 143,488 380,581
Nicobar Islands Nicobar Islands
2 Andhra Pradesh 23 23 55,401,067 20,808,940 76,210,007 56,361,702 28,219,075 84,580,777 2 Andhra Pradesh 23 23 55,401,067 20,808,940 76,210,007 56,361,702 28,219,075 84,580,777
Arunachal Arunachal
3 13 16 870,087 227,881 1,097,968 1,066,358 317,369 1,383,727 3 13 16 870,087 227,881 1,097,968 1,066,358 317,369 1,383,727
Pradesh Pradesh
4 Assam 23 27 23,216,288 3,439,240 26,655,528 26,807,034 4,398,542 31,205,576 4 Assam 23 27 23,216,288 3,439,240 26,655,528 26,807,034 4,398,542 31,205,576
5 Bihar 37 38 74,316,709 8,681,800 82,998,509 92,341,436 11,758,016 104,099,452 5 Bihar 37 38 74,316,709 8,681,800 82,998,509 92,341,436 11,758,016 104,099,452
6 Chandigarh 1 1 92,120 808,515 900,635 28,991 1,026,459 1,055,450 6 Chandigarh 1 1 92,120 808,515 900,635 28,991 1,026,459 1,055,450
7 Chhattisgarh 16 18 16,648,056 4,185,747 20,833,803 19,607,961 5,937,237 25,545,198 7 Chhattisgarh 16 18 16,648,056 4,185,747 20,833,803 19,607,961 5,937,237 25,545,198
Dadra & Nagar Dadra & Nagar
8 1 1 170,027 50,463 220,490 183,114 160,595 343,709 8 1 1 170,027 50,463 220,490 183,114 160,595 343,709
Haveli Haveli
9 Daman & Diu 2 2 100,856 57,348 158,204 60,396 182,851 243,247 9 Daman & Diu 2 2 100,856 57,348 158,204 60,396 182,851 243,247
10 Goa 2 2 677,091 670,577 1,347,668 551,731 906,814 1,458,545 10 Goa 2 2 677,091 670,577 1,347,668 551,731 906,814 1,458,545
11 Gujarat 25 26 31,740,767 18,930,250 50,671,017 34,694,609 25,745,083 60,439,692 11 Gujarat 25 26 31,740,767 18,930,250 50,671,017 34,694,609 25,745,083 60,439,692
12 Haryana 19 21 15,029,260 6,115,304 21,144,564 16,509,359 8,842,103 25,351,462 12 Haryana 19 21 15,029,260 6,115,304 21,144,564 16,509,359 8,842,103 25,351,462
Himachal Himachal
13 12 12 5,482,319 595,581 6,077,900 6,176,050 688,552 6,864,602 13 12 12 5,482,319 595,581 6,077,900 6,176,050 688,552 6,864,602
Pradesh Pradesh
Jammu & Jammu &
14 14 22 7,627,062 2,516,638 10,143,700 9,108,060 3,433,242 12,541,302 14 14 22 7,627,062 2,516,638 10,143,700 9,108,060 3,433,242 12,541,302
Kashmir Kashmir
15 Jharkhand 18 24 20,952,088 5,993,741 26,945,829 25,055,073 7,933,061 32,988,134 15 Jharkhand 18 24 20,952,088 5,993,741 26,945,829 25,055,073 7,933,061 32,988,134
16 Karnataka 27 30 34,889,033 17,961,529 52,850,562 37,469,335 23,625,962 61,095,297 16 Karnataka 27 30 34,889,033 17,961,529 52,850,562 37,469,335 23,625,962 61,095,297
17 Kerala 14 14 23,574,449 8,266,925 31,841,374 17,471,135 15,934,926 33,406,061 17 Kerala 14 14 23,574,449 8,266,925 31,841,374 17,471,135 15,934,926 33,406,061
18 Lakshadweep 1 1 33,683 26,967 60,650 14,141 50,332 64,473 18 Lakshadweep 1 1 33,683 26,967 60,650 14,141 50,332 64,473
Madhya Madhya
19 45 50 44,380,878 15,967,145 60,348,023 52,557,404 20,069,405 72,626,809 19 45 50 44,380,878 15,967,145 60,348,023 52,557,404 20,069,405 72,626,809
Pradesh Pradesh
20 Maharashtra 35 35 55,777,647 41,100,980 96,878,627 61,556,074 50,818,259 112,374,333 20 Maharashtra 35 35 55,777,647 41,100,980 96,878,627 61,556,074 50,818,259 112,374,333
21 Manipur 9 9 1,717,928 575,968 2,293,896 2,021,640 834,154 2,855,794 21 Manipur 9 9 1,717,928 575,968 2,293,896 2,021,640 834,154 2,855,794
22 Meghalaya 7 7 1,864,711 454,111 2,318,822 2,371,439 595,450 2,966,889 22 Meghalaya 7 7 1,864,711 454,111 2,318,822 2,371,439 595,450 2,966,889
23 Mizoram 8 8 447,567 441,006 888,573 52,5435 571,771 1,097,206 23 Mizoram 8 8 447,567 441,006 888,573 52,5435 571,771 1,097,206
24 Nagaland 8 11 1647,249 342,787 1,990,036 1,407,536 570,966 1,978,502 24 Nagaland 8 11 1647,249 342,787 1,990,036 1,407,536 570,966 1,978,502
25 NCT of Delhi 9 9 9,44,727 12,905,780 13,850,507 419,042 16,368,899 16,787,941 25 NCT of Delhi 9 9 9,44,727 12,905,780 13,850,507 419,042 16,368,899 16,787,941
26 Odisha 30 30 31,287,422 5,517,238 36,804,660 34,970,562 7,003,656 41,974,218 26 Odisha 30 30 31,287,422 5,517,238 36,804,660 34,970,562 7,003,656 41,974,218
27 Puducherry 4 4 325,726 648,619 974,345 395,200 852,753 1,247,953 27 Puducherry 4 4 325,726 648,619 974,345 395,200 852,753 1,247,953
28 Punjab 17 20 16,096,488 8,262,511 24,358,999 17,344,192 10,399,146 27,743,338 28 Punjab 17 20 16,096,488 8,262,511 24,358,999 17,344,192 10,399,146 27,743,338
29 Rajasthan 32 33 43,292,813 13,214,375 56,507,188 51,500,352 17,048,085 68,548,437 29 Rajasthan 32 33 43,292,813 13,214,375 56,507,188 51,500,352 17,048,085 68,548,437
30 Sikkim 4 4 480,981 59,870 540,851 456,999 153,578 610,577 30 Sikkim 4 4 480,981 59,870 540,851 456,999 153,578 610,577
31 Tamil Nadu 30 32 34,921,681 27,483,998 62,405,679 37,229,590 34,917,440 72,147,030 31 Tamil Nadu 30 32 34,921,681 27,483,998 62,405,679 37,229,590 34,917,440 72,147,030
32 Tripura 4 4 2,653,453 545,750 3,199,203 2,712,464 961,453 3,673,917 32 Tripura 4 4 2,653,453 545,750 3,199,203 2,712,464 961,453 3,673,917
33 Uttar Pradesh 70 71 131,658,339 34,539,582 166,197,921 155,317,278 44,495,063 199,812,341 33 Uttar Pradesh 70 71 131,658,339 34,539,582 166,197,921 155,317,278 44,495,063 199,812,341
34 Uttarakhand 13 13 6,310,275 2,179,074 8,489,349 7,036,954 3,049,338 10,086,292 34 Uttarakhand 13 13 6,310,275 2,179,074 8,489,349 7,036,954 3,049,338 10,086,292
35 West Bengal 18 19 57,748,946 22,427,251 80,176,197 62,183,113 29,093,002 91,276,115 35 West Bengal 18 19 57,748,946 22,427,251 80,176,197 62,183,113 29,093,002 91,276,115
India 593 640 742,617,747 286,119,689 1,028,737,436 833,748,852 377,106,125 1,210,854,977 India 593 640 742,617,747 286,119,689 1,028,737,436 833,748,852 377,106,125 1,210,854,977

Source: Source: Census of India 2001, 2011. Source: Source: Census of India 2001, 2011.

13 13
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.2: Level of Urbanization Table 1.2: Level of Urbanization

% of urban population AEGR % of urban population AEGR

S.No. States/UTs S.No. States/UTs
1991 2001 2011 1991-2001 2001-11 1991 2001 2011 1991-2001 2001-11

1 Andaman &Nicobar Islands 26.71 32.63 37.70 4.48 2.11 1 Andaman &Nicobar Islands 26.71 32.63 37.70 4.48 2.11

2 Andhra Pradesh 26.89 27.30 33.36 1.52 3.05 2 Andhra Pradesh 26.89 27.30 33.36 1.52 3.05
3 Arunachal Pradesh 12.80 20.75 22.94 7.49 3.31 3 Arunachal Pradesh 12.80 20.75 22.94 7.49 3.31
4 Assam 11.08 12.90 14.10 3.29 2.46 4 Assam 11.08 12.90 14.10 3.29 2.46
5 Bihar 13.14 10.46 11.29 - 3.03 5 Bihar 13.14 10.46 11.29 - 3.03
6 Chandigarh 89.69 89.77 97.25 3.45 2.39 6 Chandigarh 89.69 89.77 97.25 3.45 2.39
7 Chhattisgarh - 20.09 23.24 - 3.50 7 Chhattisgarh - 20.09 23.24 - 3.50
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 08.47 22.89 46.72 15.71 11.58 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 08.47 22.89 46.72 15.71 11.58
9 Daman & Diu 46.80 36.25 75.17 1.89 11.60 9 Daman & Diu 46.80 36.25 75.17 1.89 11.60
10 Goa 41.01 49.76 62.17 3.41 3.02 10 Goa 41.01 49.76 62.17 3.41 3.02
11 Gujarat 34.49 37.36 42.60 2.88 3.07 11 Gujarat 34.49 37.36 42.60 2.88 3.07
12 Haryana 24.63 28.92 34.88 4.19 3.69 12 Haryana 24.63 28.92 34.88 4.19 3.69
13 Himachal Pradesh 08.69 9.80 10.03 2.86 1.45 13 Himachal Pradesh 08.69 9.80 10.03 2.86 1.45
14 Jammu & Kashmir - 24.81 27.38 3.18 3.11 14 Jammu & Kashmir - 24.81 27.38 3.18 3.11
15 Jharkhand - 22.24 24.05 - 2.80 15 Jharkhand - 22.24 24.05 - 2.80
16 Karnataka 30.92 33.99 38.67 2.59 2.74 16 Karnataka 30.92 33.99 38.67 2.59 2.74
17 Kerala 26.39 25.96 47.70 0.74 6.56 17 Kerala 26.39 25.96 47.70 0.74 6.56
18 Lakshadweep 56.31 44.46 78.07 -0.76 6.24 18 Lakshadweep 56.31 44.46 78.07 -0.76 6.24
19 Madhya Pradesh 23.18 26.46 27.63 - 2.29 19 Madhya Pradesh 23.18 26.46 27.63 - 2.29
20 Maharashtra 38.69 42.43 45.22 3.01 2.12 20 Maharashtra 38.69 42.43 45.22 3.01 2.12
21 Manipur 27.52 26.58 29.21 1.31 3.70 21 Manipur 27.52 26.58 29.21 1.31 3.70
22 Meghalaya 18.60 19.58 20.07 3.24 2.71 22 Meghalaya 18.60 19.58 20.07 3.24 2.71
23 Mizoram 46.10 49.63 52.11 3.33 2.60 23 Mizoram 46.10 49.63 52.11 3.33 2.60
24 Nagaland 17.21 17.23 28.86 5.11 5.10 24 Nagaland 17.21 17.23 28.86 5.11 5.10
25 NCT of Delhi 89.93 93.18 97.50 4.30 2.38 25 NCT of Delhi 89.93 93.18 97.50 4.30 2.38
26 Odisha 13.38 14.99 16.69 2.68 2.39 26 Odisha 13.38 14.99 16.69 2.68 2.39
27 Puducherry 64.00 66.57 68.33 2.29 2.74 27 Puducherry 64.00 66.57 68.33 2.29 2.74
28 Punjab 29.55 33.92 37.48 3.26 2.30 28 Punjab 29.55 33.92 37.48 3.26 2.30
29 Rajasthan 22.88 23.39 24.87 2.76 2.55 29 Rajasthan 22.88 23.39 24.87 2.76 2.55
30 Sikkim 09.10 11.07 25.15 4.93 9.42 30 Sikkim 09.10 11.07 25.15 4.93 9.42
31 Tamil Nadu 34.15 44.04 48.40 3.72 2.39 31 Tamil Nadu 34.15 44.04 48.40 3.72 2.39
32 Tripura 15.30 17.06 26.17 2.61 5.66 32 Tripura 15.30 17.06 26.17 2.61 5.66
33 Uttar Pradesh 19.84 20.78 22.27 - 2.53 33 Uttar Pradesh 19.84 20.78 22.27 - 2.53
34 Uttarakhand - 25.67 30.23 - 3.36 34 Uttarakhand - 25.67 30.23 - 3.36
35 West Bengal 27.48 27.97 31.87 1.83 2.60 35 West Bengal 27.48 27.97 31.87 1.83 2.60
India 25.73 27.82 31.14 2.73 2.76 India 25.73 27.82 31.14 2.73 2.76
Source: Census of India 2001, 2011 Source: Census of India 2001, 2011

NOTE: AEGR data not available for few states due to reorganization. NOTE: AEGR data not available for few states due to reorganization.

14 14
 Graph 1.1 : Level of Urbanization (%)

15
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 1.1 : Level of Urbanization (%)

15
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Graph 1.2: Level of Urbanization-AEGR-1991-2011
Handbook of Urban Statistics

16
Source: Census of India 1991, 2001, 2011

Graph 1.2: Level of Urbanization-AEGR-1991-2011

Handbook of Urban Statistics

16

Source: Census of India 1991, 2001, 2011

 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.3 : Number of Urban Agglomerations (UAs) in India Table 1.3 : Number of Urban Agglomerations (UAs) in India

S. Name of State/UT No. of Urban Agglomerations S. Name of State/UT No. of Urban Agglomerations
1991 2001 2011 1991 2001 2011
No. No.
(all urban centres) (all urban centres)
1 Andaman &Nicobar Islands - NA NA 1 Andaman &Nicobar Islands - NA NA
2 Andhra Pradesh 15 37 58 2 Andhra Pradesh 15 37 58
3 Arunachal Pradesh - NA NA 3 Arunachal Pradesh - NA NA
4 Assam 6 10 12 4 Assam 6 10 12
5 Bihar 21 9 14 5 Bihar 21 9 14
6 Chandigarh 1 NA 1 6 Chandigarh 1 NA 1
7 Chhattisgarh - 12 14 7 Chhattisgarh - 12 14
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli - NA NA 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli - NA NA
9 Daman & Diu - NA NA 9 Daman & Diu - NA NA
10 Goa 3 3 3 10 Goa 3 3 3
11 Gujarat 46 41 38 11 Gujarat 46 41 38
12 Haryana 7 11 12 12 Haryana 7 11 12
13 Himachal Pradesh 2 1 3 13 Himachal Pradesh 2 1 3
14 Jammu & Kashmir - 7 7 14 Jammu & Kashmir - 7 7
15 Jharkhand - 11 11 15 Jharkhand - 11 11
16 Karnataka 22 24 22 16 Karnataka 22 24 22
17 Kerala 16 17 19 17 Kerala 16 17 19
18 Lakshadweep - NA NA 18 Lakshadweep - NA NA
19 Madhya Pradesh 60 42 37 19 Madhya Pradesh 60 42 37
20 Maharashtra 18 15 17 20 Maharashtra 18 15 17
21 Manipur 1 1 1 21 Manipur 1 1 1
22 Meghalaya 1 1 1 22 Meghalaya 1 1 1
23 Mizoram - NA NA 23 Mizoram - NA NA
24 Nagaland - NA NA 24 Nagaland - NA NA
25 NCT of Delhi 1 1 1 25 NCT of Delhi 1 1 1
26 Orissa 9 10 14 26 Orissa 9 10 14
27 Puducherry 1 1 2 27 Puducherry 1 1 2
28 Punjab 22 19 18 28 Punjab 22 19 18
29 Rajasthan 19 23 28 29 Rajasthan 19 23 28
30 Sikkim - NA NA 30 Sikkim - NA NA
31 Tamil Nadu 34 27 25 31 Tamil Nadu 34 27 25
32 Tripura - NA NA 32 Tripura - NA NA
33 Uttar Pradesh 31 32 67 33 Uttar Pradesh 31 32 67
34 Uttarakhand - 8 11 34 Uttarakhand - 8 11
35 West Bengal 38 21 38 35 West Bengal 38 21 38
India 374 384 474 India 374 384 474
Source: Census of India 1991, 2001, 2011. Source: Census of India 1991, 2001, 2011.

17 17
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.4: State-wise Birth and Death Rates (per 1000 population) Table 1.4: State-wise Birth and Death Rates (per 1000 population)

S.No. States/UTs Birth Rate Death Rate S.No. States/UTs Birth Rate Death Rate
    2001 2011 2016 2001 2011 2016     2001 2011 2016 2001 2011 2016
1 Andaman &Nicobar Islands 14.2 15.3 10.6 4.1 3.6 4.6 1 Andaman &Nicobar Islands 14.2 15.3 10.6 4.1 3.6 4.6
2 Andhra Pradesh 19.6 16.6 15.8* 5.6 5.2 4.9* 2 Andhra Pradesh 19.6 16.6 15.8* 5.6 5.2 4.9*
3 Arunachal Pradesh 12.8 14.2 16.1 2.3 2.5 4.5 3 Arunachal Pradesh 12.8 14.2 16.1 2.3 2.5 4.5
4 Assam 18.5 15.5 15 6.6 5.6 4.9 4 Assam 18.5 15.5 15 6.6 5.6 4.9
5 Bihar 23.4 21.7 21.1 6.3 5.5 5.5 5 Bihar 23.4 21.7 21.1 6.3 5.5 5.5
6 Chandigarh 15.6 14.4 13.8 3.7 4.1 4.6 6 Chandigarh 15.6 14.4 13.8 3.7 4.1 4.6
7 Chhattisgarh 22.4 18.3 18.1 7 6.1 6.2 7 Chhattisgarh 22.4 18.3 18.1 7 6.1 6.2
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 20 28.1 27.7 2.9 3 3.2 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 20 28.1 27.7 2.9 3 3.2
9 Daman & Diu 22 17.9 25.8 5.9 4.8 4.2 9 Daman & Diu 22 17.9 25.8 5.9 4.8 4.2
10 Goa 13.9 13.7 13.5 6.5 5.9 6.1 10 Goa 13.9 13.7 13.5 6.5 5.9 6.1
11 Gujarat 21.5 19 17.7 5.6 5.7 5.5 11 Gujarat 21.5 19 17.7 5.6 5.7 5.5
12 Haryana 22.8 19.5 18.3 7.4 5.3 5.1 12 Haryana 22.8 19.5 18.3 7.4 5.3 5.1
13 Himachal Pradesh 16.8 11.2 10.5 5.3 3.6 4.3 13 Himachal Pradesh 16.8 11.2 10.5 5.3 3.6 4.3
14 Jammu & Kashmir 16.3 13.1 11.9 6.1 4.7 4.4 14 Jammu & Kashmir 16.3 13.1 11.9 6.1 4.7 4.4
15 Jharkhand 19.5 19 18.4 6 5.2 4.7 15 Jharkhand 19.5 19 18.4 6 5.2 4.7
16 Karnataka 19 17.2 16.2 6.4 5.4 4.9 16 Karnataka 19 17.2 16.2 6.4 5.4 4.9
17 Kerala 16.6 14.4 14.4 6.1 6.6 7.8 17 Kerala 16.6 14.4 14.4 6.1 6.6 7.8
18 Lakshadweep 18.7 13.7 17.6 5.2 6.7 5.5 18 Lakshadweep 18.7 13.7 17.6 5.2 6.7 5.5
19 Madhya Pradesh 23 20.1 19.5 7.2 6.1 5.7 19 Madhya Pradesh 23 20.1 19.5 7.2 6.1 5.7
20 Maharashtra 20.1 15.8 15.5 5.9 5.1 4.6 20 Maharashtra 20.1 15.8 15.5 5.9 5.1 4.6
21 Manipur 15.9 15 12.4 6.1 4.2 4.8 21 Manipur 15.9 15 12.4 6.1 4.2 4.8
22 Meghalaya 15 14.6 14 3.9 5.5 5 22 Meghalaya 15 14.6 14 3.9 5.5 5
23 Mizoram 13.2 12.6 12.6 3.4 3.4 4.1 23 Mizoram 13.2 12.6 12.6 3.4 3.4 4.1
24 Nagaland 12.4 15.5 13.3 2.6 2.9 2.8 24 Nagaland 12.4 15.5 13.3 2.6 2.9 2.8
25 NCT of Delhi 18.1 17.2 15.5 5 4.3 4 25 NCT of Delhi 18.1 17.2 15.5 5 4.3 4
26 Odisha 19.6 14.7 13.7 6.8 6.5 6.1 26 Odisha 19.6 14.7 13.7 6.8 6.5 6.1
27 Puducherry 17.3 15.9 14 6.6 6.8 6.9 27 Puducherry 17.3 15.9 14 6.6 6.8 6.9
28 Punjab 18.7 15.2 14.1 6.4 5.6 5.1 28 Punjab 18.7 15.2 14.1 6.4 5.6 5.1
29 Rajasthan 24.7 22.5 21.6 6.2 5.8 5.2 29 Rajasthan 24.7 22.5 21.6 6.2 5.8 5.2
30 Sikkim 16.7 16.6 18.5 3.2 3.5 3.4 30 Sikkim 16.7 16.6 18.5 3.2 3.5 3.4
31 Tamil Nadu 17.8 15.7 15 6 6.4 5.7 31 Tamil Nadu 17.8 15.7 15 6 6.4 5.7
32 Telangana# - - 17 - - 4.6 32 Telangana# - - 17 - - 4.6
33 Tripura 13.5 11 11.3 5.2 5.4 6.1 33 Tripura 13.5 11 11.3 5.2 5.4 6.1
34 Uttar Pradesh 27 23.7 22.8 7.8 6.1 5.5 34 Uttar Pradesh 27 23.7 22.8 7.8 6.1 5.5
35 Uttarakhand 16.6 16 16 6.1 4.9 5.9 35 Uttarakhand 16.6 16 16 6.1 4.9 5.9
36 West Bengal 13.8 11.5 11.8 6.4 6.5 6.1 36 West Bengal 13.8 11.5 11.8 6.4 6.5 6.1
  India 20.20 17.60 17.00 6.30 5.70 5.40   India 20.20 17.60 17.00 6.30 5.70 5.40

Source: SRS Bulletin, October 2002, October 2012 and September 2017 Source: SRS Bulletin, October 2002, October 2012 and September 2017

Note: - denotes that figures do not exists Note: - denotes that figures do not exists

* For 2016, the figures for Andhra Pradesh is excluding Telangana * For 2016, the figures for Andhra Pradesh is excluding Telangana

# Telangana was created in June 2014, hence figures for Telangana are available only for 2016 # Telangana was created in June 2014, hence figures for Telangana are available only for 2016

18 18
 Graph 1.3: State-wise Birth Rates (per 1000 population)

19
Source: SRS Bulletin, October 2002, October 2012 and September 2017
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 1.3: State-wise Birth Rates (per 1000 population)

19

Source: SRS Bulletin, October 2002, October 2012 and September 2017
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Graph 1.4: State-wise Death Rates (per 1000 population)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

20
Legend: 2001, 2011, 2016

Source: SRS Bulletin, October 2002, October 2012 and September 2017

Graph 1.4: State-wise Death Rates (per 1000 population)

Handbook of Urban Statistics

20

Legend: 2001, 2011, 2016

Source: SRS Bulletin, October 2002, October 2012 and September 2017
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table1.5: Slum Population and Basic Amenities Available to Urban Population Table1.5: Slum Population and Basic Amenities Available to Urban Population

Slum Population Urban Population with Urban Population with Im- Slum Population Urban Population with Urban Population with Im-
Improved Water Sources (in proved Sanitation Improved Water Sources (in proved Sanitation
(in percent) percent) (in percent) percent)
(in percent) (in percent)

Country/Regions 1990 2000 2009 1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010 Country/Regions 1990 2000 2009 1990 2000 2010 1990 2000 2010

India 54.9 41.5 29.4 89.0 92.0 96.0 50.0 54.0 59.0 India 54.9 41.5 29.4 89.0 92.0 96.0 50.0 54.0 59.0

Africa 56.5 53.8 50 85.4 85.7 86.4 55.4 54.6 53.5 Africa 56.5 53.8 50 85.4 85.7 86.4 55.4 54.6 53.5

Asia and Pacific 49.4 39.9 30.4 94.3 95.5 96.9 65.3 69.3 75.1 Asia and Pacific 49.4 39.9 30.4 94.3 95.5 96.9 65.3 69.3 75.1

Europe NA NA NA 99.7 99.8 99.8 98.6 98.7 98.7 Europe NA NA NA 99.7 99.8 99.8 98.6 98.7 98.7
Latin America and Latin America and
Caribbean 35.4 30.2 NA 94.4 95.8 96.8 79.9 83.5 86.5 Caribbean 35.4 30.2 NA 94.4 95.8 96.8 79.9 83.5 86.5

North America NA NA NA 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 North America NA NA NA 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Pacific NA NA NA 99.3 99.4 100.0 97.8 97.8 97.8 Pacific NA NA NA 99.3 99.4 100.0 97.8 97.8 97.8

World 46.8 39.6 33.1 95.0 95.5 96.1 75.7 77.0 79.4 World 46.8 39.6 33.1 95.0 95.5 96.1 75.7 77.0 79.4

Source: Statistical Year Book for Asia and Pacific, 2014. Source: Statistical Year Book for Asia and Pacific, 2014.

http://www.unescap.org http://www.unescap.org

21 21
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.6: Number of Statutory and slum reported towns with type wise slum population Table 1.6: Number of Statutory and slum reported towns with type wise slum population

Towns Type wise Slum Population Towns Type wise Slum Population
State/ UTs State/ UTs
Statutory Slum report- Total popula- Recognised Identified Statutory Slum report- Total popula- Recognised Identified
Notified slums Notified slums
towns ed towns tion slums slums towns ed towns tion slums slums
Andaman & Nicobar Island 1 1 14,172 0 0 14,172 Andaman & Nicobar Island 1 1 14,172 0 0 14,172
Andhra Pradesh 125 125 10,186,934 8,338,154 877,172 971,608 Andhra Pradesh 125 125 10,186,934 8,338,154 877,172 971,608
Arunachal Pradesh 26 5 15,562 0 0 15,562 Arunachal Pradesh 26 5 15,562 0 0 15,562
Assam 88 31 197,266 9,163 70,979 117,124 Assam 88 31 197,266 9,163 70,979 117,124
Bihar 139 88 1,237,682 0 0 1,237,682 Bihar 139 88 1,237,682 0 0 1,237,682
Chandigarh 1 1 95,135 95,135 0 0 Chandigarh 1 1 95,135 95,135 0 0
Chhattisgarh 168 94 1,898,931 713,654 764,851 420,426 Chhattisgarh 168 94 1,898,931 713,654 764,851 420,426
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1 0 0 0 0 0 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1 0 0 0 0 0
Daman & Diu 2 0 0 0 0 0 Daman & Diu 2 0 0 0 0 0
Goa 14 3 26,247 6,107 0 20,140 Goa 14 3 26,247 6,107 0 20,140
Gujarat 195 103 1,680,095 0 0 1,680,095 Gujarat 195 103 1,680,095 0 0 1,680,095
Haryana 80 75 1,662,305 14,912 0 1,647,393 Haryana 80 75 1,662,305 14,912 0 1,647,393
Himachal Pradesh 56 22 61,312 60,201 0 1,111 Himachal Pradesh 56 22 61,312 60,201 0 1,111
Jammu & Kashmir 86 40 662,062 162,909 136,649 362,504 Jammu & Kashmir 86 40 662,062 162,909 136,649 362,504
Jharkhand 40 31 372,999 64,399 59,432 249,168 Jharkhand 40 31 372,999 64,399 59,432 249,168
Karnataka 220 206 3,291,434 2,271,990 445,899 573,545 Karnataka 220 206 3,291,434 2,271,990 445,899 573,545
Kerala 59 19 202,048 186,835 8,215 6,998 Kerala 59 19 202,048 186,835 8,215 6,998
Lakshadweep 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lakshadweep 0 0 0 0 0 0
Madhya Pradesh 364 303 5,688,993 1,900,942 2,530,637 1,257,414 Madhya Pradesh 364 303 5,688,993 1,900,942 2,530,637 1,257,414
Maharashtra 256 189 11,848,423 3,709,309 3,485,783 4,653,331 Maharashtra 256 189 11,848,423 3,709,309 3,485,783 4,653,331
Manipur 28 0 0 0 0 0 Manipur 28 0 0 0 0 0
Meghalaya 10 6 57,418 34,699 8,006 14,713 Meghalaya 10 6 57,418 34,699 8,006 14,713
Mizoram 23 1 78,561 0 78,561 0 Mizoram 23 1 78,561 0 78,561 0
Nagaland 19 11 82,324 0 48,249 34,075 Nagaland 19 11 82,324 0 48,249 34,075
NCT Delhi 3 22 1,785,390 738,915 0 1,046,475 NCT Delhi 3 22 1,785,390 738,915 0 1,046,475
Odisha 107 76 1,560,303 0 812,737 747,566 Odisha 107 76 1,560,303 0 812,737 747,566
Puducherry 6 6 144,573 70,092 73,928 553 Puducherry 6 6 144,573 70,092 73,928 553
Punjab 143 73 1,460,518 787,696 193,305 479,517 Punjab 143 73 1,460,518 787,696 193,305 479,517
Rajasthan 185 107 2,068,000 0 0 2,068,000 Rajasthan 185 107 2,068,000 0 0 2,068,000
Sikkim 8 7 31,378 31,378 0 0 Sikkim 8 7 31,378 31,378 0 0
Tamil Nadu 721 507 5,798,459 2,541,345 1,978,441 1,278,673 Tamil Nadu 721 507 5,798,459 2,541,345 1,978,441 1,278,673
Tripura 16 15 139,780 0 124,036 15,744 Tripura 16 15 139,780 0 124,036 15,744
Uttar Pradesh 648 293 6,239,965 562,548 4,678,326 999,091 Uttar Pradesh 648 293 6,239,965 562,548 4,678,326 999,091
Uttarakhand 74 31 487,741 185,832 52,278 249,631 Uttarakhand 74 31 487,741 185,832 52,278 249,631
West Bengal 129 122 6,418,594 48,918 3,703,852 2,665,824 West Bengal 129 122 6,418,594 48,918 3,703,852 2,665,824
INDIA 4,041 2,613 65,494,604 22,535,133 20,131,336 22,828,135 INDIA 4,041 2,613 65,494,604 22,535,133 20,131,336 22,828,135

Source: Census of India-2011 Source: Census of India-2011

22 22
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.7: Growth Indicators for Slum Households Table 1.7: Growth Indicators for Slum Households

Decadal Growth Decadal Growth

Absolute Absolute change 2001-11 Absolute Absolute change 2001-11
Indicator Indicator
2001-11 2001-11
(%) (%)
2001 2011 2001 2011

Slum Slum

Households 10,150,719 13,920,191 3,769,472 37.1 Households 10,150,719 13,920,191 3,769,472 37.1

Household Size 5.2 4.7 -0.5 Household Size 5.2 4.7 -0.5

Urban (slum reported towns) Urban (slum reported towns)

Households 43,556,155 62,792,741 19,236,586 44.2 Households 43,556,155 62,792,741 19,236,586 44.2

Household Size 0.6 0.5 -0.1 Household Size 0.6 0.5 -0.1

Urban (all towns) Urban (all towns)

Households 55,832,570 80,888,766 25,056,196 44.9 Households 55,832,570 80,888,766 25,056,196 44.9

Household Size 5.1 4.7 -0.4 Household Size 5.1 4.7 -0.4

Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011 Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011

23 23
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.8: Slum and Urban Population (Slum reported towns) Table 1.8: Slum and Urban Population (Slum reported towns)

Absolute Slum Percentage Absolute Slum Percentage

Absolute change Decadal Growth Absolute change Decadal Growth
Indicator Indicator
2001-11 2001-11 2001-11 2001-11
2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011

Slum Slum

Persons 52,371,589 65,494,604 13,123,015 25.1 23.5 22.4 Persons 52,371,589 65,494,604 13,123,015 25.1 23.5 22.4

Males 27,759,224 33,968,203 6,208,979 22.4 23.6 22.4 Males 27,759,224 33,968,203 6,208,979 22.4 23.6 22.4

Females 24,612,365 31,526,401 6,914,036 28.1 23.3 22.5 Females 24,612,365 31,526,401 6,914,036 28.1 23.3 22.5

Sex ratio 887 928 41 Sex ratio 887 928 41

Urban (slum reported towns) Urban (slum reported towns)

Persons 223,111,858 291,838,124 68,726,266 30.8 100 100 Persons 223,111,858 291,838,124 68,726,266 30.8 100 100

Males 117,610,448 151,666,671 34,056,223 29 100 100 Males 117,610,448 151,666,671 34,056,223 29 100 100

Females 105,501,410 140,171,453 34,670,043 32.9 100 100 Females 105,501,410 140,171,453 34,670,043 32.9 100 100

Sex ratio 897 924 27       Sex ratio 897 924 27      

Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011 Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011

24 24
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.9: Slum and Urban Population (all towns) Table 1.9: Slum and Urban Population (all towns)

Slum and Urban population (all towns) Slum and Urban population (all towns)

Absolute Slum Percentage Absolute Slum Percentage

Absolute change Decadal Growth Absolute change Decadal Growth
Indicator Indicator
2001-11 2001-11 2001-11 2001-11
2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011

Slum Slum

52,371,589 65,494,604 13,123,015 25.1 18.3 17.4 52,371,589 65,494,604 13,123,015 25.1 18.3 17.4
Persons Persons

27,759,224 33,968,203 6,208,979 22.4 18.4 17.4 27,759,224 33,968,203 6,208,979 22.4 18.4 17.4
Males Males

24,612,365 31,526,401 6,914,036 28.1 18.2 17.4 24,612,365 31,526,401 6,914,036 28.1 18.2 17.4
Females Females

887 928 41 887 928 41

Sex ratio Sex ratio

Urban (all towns) Urban (all towns)

286,119,689 377,106,125 90,986,436 31.8 100 100 286,119,689 377,106,125 90,986,436 31.8 100 100
Persons Persons

150,554,098 195,489,200 44,935,102 29.8 100 100 150,554,098 195,489,200 44,935,102 29.8 100 100
Males Males

135,565,591 181,616,925 46,051,334 34 100 100 135,565,591 181,616,925 46,051,334 34 100 100
Females Females

900 929 29 900 929 29

Sex ratio Sex ratio

Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011 Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011

25 25
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.10: State Share of Slum Population to Total Slum Population of India Table 1.10: State Share of Slum Population to Total Slum Population of India

State/UTs 2001 2011 State/UTs 2001 2011

Andhra Pradesh 12 15.6 Andhra Pradesh 12 15.6

Bihar 1.6 1.9 Bihar 1.6 1.9

Chhattisgarh 2.1 2.9 Chhattisgarh 2.1 2.9

Gujarat 3.8 2.6 Gujarat 3.8 2.6

Haryana 3.2 2.5 Haryana 3.2 2.5

Karnataka 4.5 5.0 Karnataka 4.5 5.0

Madhya Pradesh 7.2 8.7 Madhya Pradesh 7.2 8.7

Maharashtra 22.9 18.1 Maharashtra 22.9 18.1

NCT of Delhi 3.9 2.7 NCT of Delhi 3.9 2.7

Odisha 2.1 2.4 Odisha 2.1 2.4

Other State/Uts 3.1 3.8 Other State/Uts 3.1 3.8

Punjab 2.8 2.2 Punjab 2.8 2.2

Rajasthan 3 3.2 Rajasthan 3 3.2

Tamil Nadu 8.1 8.9 Tamil Nadu 8.1 8.9

Uttar Pradesh 11 9.5 Uttar Pradesh 11 9.5

West Bengal 8.9 9.8 West Bengal 8.9 9.8

Note: Note:

In 2001- Other States/UTs includes: In 2001- Other States/UTs includes:

1. Reported slum less than 1%-Jammu & Kashmir, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, Chandigarh, Meghalaya, Assam, 1. Reported slum less than 1%-Jammu & Kashmir, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, Chandigarh, Meghalaya, Assam,
Puducherry, Tripura and Kerala Puducherry, Tripura and Kerala

2. State/UTs not reported slum-Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, 2. State/UTs not reported slum-Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram,
Daman & Diu, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Lakshadweep and Andaman & Nagar Islands Daman & Diu, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Lakshadweep and Andaman & Nagar Islands

In 2011-Other States/UTs includes: In 2011-Other States/UTs includes:

1. Reported slum less than 1%-Jammu & Kashmir, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, Assam, Kerala, Tripura, Tripura, 1. Reported slum less than 1%-Jammu & Kashmir, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, Assam, Kerala, Tripura, Tripura,
Puducherry, Himachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, Nagaland, Mizoram, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Sikkim, Puducherry, Himachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, Nagaland, Mizoram, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Sikkim,
Arunachal Pradesh, Goa and Andaman & Nicobar Islands Arunachal Pradesh, Goa and Andaman & Nicobar Islands

2. State/UTs not reported slum-Manipur, Daman & Diu, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Lakshadweep 2. State/UTs not reported slum-Manipur, Daman & Diu, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Lakshadweep

Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011 Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011

26 26
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 1.5: State Share of Slum Population to Total Slum Population of India (2001) Graph 1.5: State Share of Slum Population to Total Slum Population of India (2001)

Source: Census of India-2001 Source: Census of India-2001

Graph 1.6: State Share of Slum Population to Total Slum Population of India (2011) Graph 1.6: State Share of Slum Population to Total Slum Population of India (2011)

Source: Primary Census Abstract for Slum, 2011 Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India Source: Primary Census Abstract for Slum, 2011 Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India

27 27
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 1.7: Percentage of Slum Population (2001-2011) Graph 1.7: Percentage of Slum Population (2001-2011)

Source: Primary Census Abstract for Slum, 2011 Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India
Source: Primary Census Abstract for Slum, 2011 Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India

28 28
 Table 1.11: Urban Population, Urbanization Level and Urban Growth Rate

Latin Amer-
North
  India Africa Asia Europe ica and Oceania World
America
Caribbean

Annual Urban Population at Mid-year (‘000)

2000 291,350 285,998 1,399,722 516,725 397,062 247,471 21,329 2,868,308
2005 334,479 341,034 1,631,489 525,432 433,253 261,880 22,818 3,215,906
2010 380,745 408,587 1,877,015 537,673 469,583 277,070 24,941 3,594,868
2015 429,069 491,531 2,119,873 547,147 505,392 290,616 26,938 3,981,498
2018 460,780 547,602 2,266,131 552,911 526,057 298,987 28,129 4,219,817
Percentage of Population Living in Urban Areas

29
2000 27.67 34.98 37.52 71.06 75.52 79.10 68.30 46.68
2005 29.24 36.88 41.15 71.95 77.14 79.95 67.98 49.16
2010 30.93 38.93 44.75 72.94 78.58 80.79 68.08 51.66
2015 32.78 41.15 47.96 73.86 79.92 81.63 68.12 53.93
2018 34.03 42.52 49.86 74045 80.68 82.17 68.17 55.29
Average Annual Rate of Change of Urban Population (%)
2000-2005 2.76 3.52 3.06 0.33 1.74 1.13 1.35 2.29
2005-2010 2.59 3.61 2.80 0.46 1.61 1.13 1.78 2.23
2010-2015 2.39 3.70 2.43 0.35 1.47 0.95 1.54 2.04
2015-2020* 2.37 3.58 2.16 0.35 1.30 0.95 1.42 1.90
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.11: Urban Population, Urbanization Level and Urban Growth Rate

Latin Amer-
North
  India Africa Asia Europe ica and Oceania World
America
Caribbean

Annual Urban Population at Mid-year (‘000)

2000 291,350 285,998 1,399,722 516,725 397,062 247,471 21,329 2,868,308
2005 334,479 341,034 1,631,489 525,432 433,253 261,880 22,818 3,215,906
2010 380,745 408,587 1,877,015 537,673 469,583 277,070 24,941 3,594,868
2015 429,069 491,531 2,119,873 547,147 505,392 290,616 26,938 3,981,498
2018 460,780 547,602 2,266,131 552,911 526,057 298,987 28,129 4,219,817
Percentage of Population Living in Urban Areas
29

2000 27.67 34.98 37.52 71.06 75.52 79.10 68.30 46.68

2005 29.24 36.88 41.15 71.95 77.14 79.95 67.98 49.16
2010 30.93 38.93 44.75 72.94 78.58 80.79 68.08 51.66
2015 32.78 41.15 47.96 73.86 79.92 81.63 68.12 53.93
2018 34.03 42.52 49.86 74045 80.68 82.17 68.17 55.29
Average Annual Rate of Change of Urban Population (%)
2000-2005 2.76 3.52 3.06 0.33 1.74 1.13 1.35 2.29
2005-2010 2.59 3.61 2.80 0.46 1.61 1.13 1.78 2.23
2010-2015 2.39 3.70 2.43 0.35 1.47 0.95 1.54 2.04
2015-2020* 2.37 3.58 2.16 0.35 1.30 0.95 1.42 1.90
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 1.8 : Urbanization- International Comparison Graph 1.8 : Urbanization- International Comparison

Source: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision Source: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision

30 30
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.12: Selected Demographic Indicators in India and across Continents Table 1.12: Selected Demographic Indicators in India and across Continents

Latin Latin
America North America North
Years India Africa Asia Europe Oceania World Years India Africa Asia Europe Oceania World
and Carib- America and Carib- America
bean bean
Total Population (‘000) Total Population (‘000)
2000 10,53,051 8,17,566 37,30,371 7,27,201 5,25,795 3,12,845 31,229 61,45,007 2000 10,53,051 8,17,566 37,30,371 7,27,201 5,25,795 3,12,845 31,229 61,45,007
2005 11,44,119 9,24,758 39,64,343 7,30,290 5,61,656 3,27,546 33,568 65,42,159 2005 11,44,119 9,24,758 39,64,343 7,30,290 5,61,656 3,27,546 33,568 65,42,159
2010 12,30,981 10,49,446 41,94,425 7,37,164 5,97,562 3,42,937 36,636 69,58,169 2010 12,30,981 10,49,446 41,94,425 7,37,164 5,97,562 3,42,937 36,636 69,58,169
2015 13,09,054 11,94,370 44,19,898 7,40,814 6,32,381 3,56,004 39,543 73,83,009 2015 13,09,054 11,94,370 44,19,898 7,40,814 6,32,381 3,56,004 39,543 73,83,009
2018 13,54,051 12,87,920 45,45,133 7,42,648 6,52,012 3,63,844 41,261 76,32,819 2018 13,54,051 12,87,920 45,45,133 7,42,648 6,52,012 3,63,844 41,261 76,32,819
Population Growth Rate (Average Annual Growth Rate in Percent) Population Growth Rate (Average Annual Growth Rate in Percent)
2000-2005 1.66 2.46 1.22 0.09 1.32 0.92 1.44 1.25 2000-2005 1.66 2.46 1.22 0.09 1.32 0.92 1.44 1.25
2005-2010 1.46 2.53 1.13 0.19 1.24 0.92 1.75 1.23 2005-2010 1.46 2.53 1.13 0.19 1.24 0.92 1.75 1.23
2010-2015 1.23 2.59 1.05 1.24 1.13 0.75 1.53 1.19 2010-2015 1.23 2.59 1.05 1.24 1.13 0.75 1.53 1.19
2015-2020 1.10 2.49 0.90 1.10 0.99 0.73 1.39 1.09 2015-2020 1.10 2.49 0.90 1.10 0.99 0.73 1.39 1.09
Sex Ratio (Males per 100 Females) Sex Ratio (Males per 100 Females)
2000 107.48 99.34 104.33 93.10 98.18 97.16 100.17 101.34 2000 107.48 99.34 104.33 93.10 98.18 97.16 100.17 101.34
2005 107.62 99.39 104.57 93.13 98.05 97.50 100.20 101.54 2005 107.62 99.39 104.57 93.13 98.05 97.50 100.20 101.54
2010 107.76 99.46 104.76 93.16 97.91 97.69 100.53 101.69 2010 107.76 99.46 104.76 93.16 97.91 97.69 100.53 101.69
2015 107.63 99.69 104.79 93.36 97.78 97.96 100.16 101.78 2015 107.63 99.69 104.79 93.36 97.78 97.96 100.16 101.78
2020 107.43 99.85 104.72 93.66 97.65 98.18 100.11 101.81 2020 107.43 99.85 104.72 93.66 97.65 98.18 100.11 101.81
Sex Ratio at Birth (Number of male per Female Birth) Sex Ratio at Birth (Number of male per Female Birth)
2000-2005 1.11 1.04 1.10 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.08 2000-2005 1.11 1.04 1.10 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.08
2005-2010 1.11 1.04 1.10 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.08 2005-2010 1.11 1.04 1.10 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.08
2010-2015 1.11 1.04 1.10 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.07 1.07 2010-2015 1.11 1.04 1.10 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.07 1.07
2015-2020 1.11 1.04 1.10 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.07 2015-2020 1.11 1.04 1.10 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.07
Crude Birth Rate (per 1,000 population) Crude Birth Rate (per 1,000 population)
2000-2005 25 38 20 10 21 14 18 21 2000-2005 25 38 20 10 21 14 18 21
2005-2010 23 37 19 11 19 14 18 20 2005-2010 23 37 19 11 19 14 18 20
2010-2015 20 36 18 11 18 12 17 20 2010-2015 20 36 18 11 18 12 17 20
2015-2020 19 34 16 10 16 12 16 19 2015-2020 19 34 16 10 16 12 16 19

31 31
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.12: Selected Demographic Indicators in India and across Continents (Continued...) Table 1.12: Selected Demographic Indicators in India and across Continents (Continued...)

Years India Africa Asia Europe Latin North Oceania World Years India Africa Asia Europe Latin North Oceania World
America and America America and America
Caribbean Caribbean
Crude Death Rate (deaths per 1,000 population) Crude Death Rate (deaths per 1,000 population)
2000-2005 8 13 7 12 6 8 7 8 2000-2005 8 13 7 12 6 8 7 8
2005-2010 8 11 7 11 6 8 7 8 2005-2010 8 11 7 11 6 8 7 8
2010-2015 7 9 7 11 6 8 7 8 2010-2015 7 9 7 11 6 8 7 8
2015-2020 7 8 7 11 6 8 7 8 2015-2020 7 8 7 11 6 8 7 8
Infant Mortality Rates [Infant death (B/w 0-1 years) by per 1,000 live births] Infant Mortality Rates [Infant death (B/w 0-1 years) by per 1,000 live births]
2000-2005 60 81 46 8 25 7 25 49 2000-2005 60 81 46 8 25 7 25 49

2005-2010 50 68 37 6 21 7 22 41 2005-2010 50 68 37 6 21 7 22 41
2010-2015 41 57 31 5 19 6 21 35 2010-2015 41 57 31 5 19 6 21 35
2015-2020 35 50 26 4 16 5 19 31 2015-2020 35 50 26 4 16 5 19 31
Life Expectancy at Birth (years) Life Expectancy at Birth (years)
2000-2005 63.54 53.66 68.65 73.80 72.13 77.41 74.66 67.20 2000-2005 63.54 53.66 68.65 73.80 72.13 77.41 74.66 67.20
2005-2010 65.57 56.97 70.33 75.29 73.44 78.42 77.02 69.07 2005-2010 65.57 56.97 70.33 75.29 73.44 78.42 77.02 69.07
2010-2015 67.58 60.23 71.81 77.20 74.65 79.17 77.92 70.79 2010-2015 67.58 60.23 71.81 77.20 74.65 79.17 77.92 70.79
2015-2020 68.89 62.44 72.86 78.10 75.70 79.92 78.67 71.95 2015-2020 68.89 62.44 72.86 78.10 75.70 79.92 78.67 71.95
Total Fertility Rate (children per woman) Total Fertility Rate (children per woman)
2000-2005 3.14 5.08 2.41 1.43 2.48 1.99 2.44 2.63 2000-2005 3.14 5.08 2.41 1.43 2.48 1.99 2.44 2.63
2005-2010 2.80 4.89 2.30 1.55 2.26 2.01 2.53 2.57 2005-2010 2.80 4.89 2.30 1.55 2.26 2.01 2.53 2.57
2010-2015 2.44 4.72 2.20 1.60 2.14 1.85 2.41 2.52 2010-2015 2.44 4.72 2.20 1.60 2.14 1.85 2.41 2.52
2015-2020 2.30 4.43 2.15 1.62 2.04 1.86 2.34 2.47 2015-2020 2.30 4.43 2.15 1.62 2.04 1.86 2.34 2.47

32 32
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.12: Selected Demographic Indicators in India and across Continents (Continued...) Table 1.12: Selected Demographic Indicators in India and across Continents (Continued...)

Years India Africa Asia Europe Latin America North Oceania World Years India Africa Asia Europe Latin America North Oceania World
and Caribbean America and Caribbean America

Median Age of the Population (in years) Median Age of the Population (in years)
2000 22.72 18.37 25.98 37.67 24.16 35.36 30.90 26.33 2000 22.72 18.37 25.98 37.67 24.16 35.36 30.90 26.33
2005 23.78 18.77 27.43 39.10 25.70 36.36 31.89 27.44 2005 23.78 18.77 27.43 39.10 25.70 36.36 31.89 27.44
2010 25.07 19.09 28.85 40.39 27.42 37.20 32.22 28.51 2010 25.07 19.09 28.85 40.39 27.42 37.20 32.22 28.51
2015 26.68 19.35 30.32 41.60 29.15 37.93 32.79 29.62 2015 26.68 19.35 30.32 41.60 29.15 37.93 32.79 29.62
2020 28.25 19.75 32.09 42.72 30.94 38.60 33.50 30.94 2020 28.25 19.75 32.09 42.72 30.94 38.60 33.50 30.94
Dependency Ratio (Age 0-14 and 65 +/Age 15-64) (%) Dependency Ratio (Age 0-14 and 65 +/Age 15-64) (%)
2000 64.30 85.02 56.51 47.72 60.52 51.05 55.52 58.69 2000 64.30 85.02 56.51 47.72 60.52 51.05 55.52 58.69
2005 60.14 82.46 50.99 46.66 56.31 49.12 54.12 54.62 2005 60.14 82.46 50.99 46.66 56.31 49.12 54.12 54.62
2010 56.26 81.24 48.00 46.61 52.39 49.02 53.39 52.52 2010 56.26 81.24 48.00 46.61 52.39 49.02 53.39 52.52
2015 52.19 80.19 47.33 50.07 49.69 50.78 54.97 52.52 2015 52.19 80.19 47.33 50.07 49.69 50.78 54.97 52.52
2020 49.55 77.98 48.01 54.41 48.64 54.22 57.18 53.50 2020 49.55 77.98 48.01 54.41 48.64 54.22 57.18 53.50
Child Dependency Ratio (Age 0-14/Age 15-64) (%) Child Dependency Ratio (Age 0-14/Age 15-64) (%)
2000 57.07 78.81 47.37 25.95 51.57 32.40 40.13 47.76 2000 57.07 78.81 47.37 25.95 51.57 32.40 40.13 47.76
2005 52.50 76.32 41.37 23.34 46.73 30.66 38.32 43.32 2005 52.50 76.32 41.37 23.34 46.73 30.66 38.32 43.32
2010 48.27 75.08 37.90 22.65 42.09 29.51 36.88 40.87 2010 48.27 75.08 37.90 22.65 42.09 29.51 36.88 40.87
2015 43.62 73.97 36.17 23.66 38.30 28.48 36.50 39.88 2015 43.62 73.97 36.17 23.66 38.30 28.48 36.50 39.88
2020 39.75 71.55 34.85 24.68 35.51 28.32 36.78 39.14 2020 39.75 71.55 34.85 24.68 35.51 28.32 36.78 39.14
Old age Dependency Ratio (Age 65+/Age 15-64)(%) Old age Dependency Ratio (Age 65+/Age 15-64)(%)
2000 7.23 6.21 9.14 21.77 8.94 18.64 15.39 10.93 2000 7.23 6.21 9.14 21.77 8.94 18.64 15.39 10.93
2005 7.64 6.14 9.62 23.31 9.58 18.45 15.80 11.30 2005 7.64 6.14 9.62 23.31 9.58 18.45 15.80 11.30
2010 7.99 6.15 10.10 23.96 10.30 19.51 16.51 11.65 2010 7.99 6.15 10.10 23.96 10.30 19.51 16.51 11.65
2015 8.58 6.23 11.16 26.41 11.39 22.30 18.47 12.64 2015 8.58 6.23 11.16 26.41 11.39 22.30 18.47 12.64
2020 9.80 6.43 13.16 29.73 13.13 25.90 20.40 14.36 2020 9.80 6.43 13.16 29.73 13.13 25.90 20.40 14.36

Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017). World Popula- Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017). World Popula-
tion Prospects: The 2017 Revision, DVD Edition. tion Prospects: The 2017 Revision, DVD Edition.

33 33
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.13: Selected Demographic Indicators in BRICS countries Table 1.13: Selected Demographic Indicators in BRICS countries

Population of Urban Areas at Mid-Year (thousands) and Percentage Urban, 2018 Population of Urban Areas at Mid-Year (thousands) and Percentage Urban, 2018
Countries Urban Total Percentage urban Countries Urban Total Percentage urban

Brazil 182,546 210,868 86.6 Brazil 182,546 210,868 86.6

Russian Federation 107,157 143,965 74.4 Russian Federation 107,157 143,965 74.4
India 460,780 1,354,052 34.0 India 460,780 1,354,052 34.0
China# 837,022 1,415,046 59.2 China# 837,022 1,415,046 59.2
South Africa 38,087 57,398 66.4 South Africa 38,087 57,398 66.4
Percentage of Population at Mid-Year Residing in Urban Areas Percentage of Population at Mid-Year Residing in Urban Areas
Countries 1990 2000 2010 2015 2020* Countries 1990 2000 2010 2015 2020*
Brazil 73.92 81.19 84.34 85.77 87.07 Brazil 73.92 81.19 84.34 85.77 87.07
Russian Federation 73.39 73.35 73.69 74.05 74.75 Russian Federation 73.39 73.35 73.69 74.05 74.75
India 25.55 27.67 30.93 32.78 34.93 India 25.55 27.67 30.93 32.78 34.93
China# 26.44 35.88 49.23 55.50 61.43 China# 26.44 35.88 49.23 55.50 61.43
South Africa 52.04 56.89 62.22 64.83 67.35 South Africa 52.04 56.89 62.22 64.83 67.35
Average Annual Rate of Change of the Urban Population (in %) Average Annual Rate of Change of the Urban Population (in %)
Countries 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 2005-2010 2010-2015 Countries 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 2005-2010 2010-2015
Brazil 2.64 2.44 1.69 1.39 1.25 Brazil 2.64 2.44 1.69 1.39 1.25
Russian Federation 0.09 - 0.26 - 0.35 - 0.004 0.20 Russian Federation 0.09 - 0.26 - 0.35 - 0.004 0.20
India 2.79 2.62 2.76 2.59 2.39 India 2.79 2.62 2.76 2.59 2.39
China# 4.27 3.63 3.99 3.50 2.94 China# 4.27 3.63 3.99 3.50 2.94
South Africa 3.20 2.52 2.22 1.98 2.21 South Africa 3.20 2.52 2.22 1.98 2.21

*Projected *Projected

#The data for China do not include Hong Kong and Macao, Special Administrative Regions (SAR) of China. #The data for China do not include Hong Kong and Macao, Special Administrative Regions (SAR) of China.

Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2018). World Urban- Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2018). World Urban-
ization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Online Edition. According to the World Urbanization Prospects “there ization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Online Edition. According to the World Urbanization Prospects “there
exists no common global definition of what constitutes an urban settlement. The estimates in the World Urban- exists no common global definition of what constitutes an urban settlement. The estimates in the World Urban-
ization Prospects are based on national statistics.” ization Prospects are based on national statistics.”

34 34
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 1.9: Demographic Indicators in BRICS countries- Urban Population (%) Graph 1.9: Demographic Indicators in BRICS countries- Urban Population (%)

Source: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision Source: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision

Graph 1.10: Demographic Indicators in BRICS countries-Average Annual Rate of Change of Urban Graph 1.10: Demographic Indicators in BRICS countries-Average Annual Rate of Change of Urban
population. population.

Source: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision Source: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision

35 35
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.14: Selected Demographic Indicators in SAARC countries. Table 1.14: Selected Demographic Indicators in SAARC countries.

Population of Urban Areas at Mid-Year (thousands) and Percentage Urban, 2018 Population of Urban Areas at Mid-Year (thousands) and Percentage Urban, 2018

Countries Urban Total Percentage urban Countries Urban Total Percentage urban
Afghanistan 9,273 36,373 25.5 Afghanistan 9,273 36,373 25.5
Bangladesh 60,944 166,368 36.6 Bangladesh 60,944 166,368 36.6
Bhutan 334 817 40.9 Bhutan 334 817 40.9
India 460,780 1,354,052 34.0 India 460,780 1,354,052 34.0
Maldives 177 444 39.8 Maldives 177 444 39.8
Nepal 5,848 29,624 19.7 Nepal 5,848 29,624 19.7
Pakistan 73,630 200,814 36.7 Pakistan 73,630 200,814 36.7
Sri Lanka 3,871 20,950 18.5 Sri Lanka 3,871 20,950 18.5
Percentage of Population at Mid-Year Residing in Urban Areas Percentage of Population at Mid-Year Residing in Urban Areas
Countries 1990 2000 2010 2015 2020* Countries 1990 2000 2010 2015 2020*
Afghanistan 21.2 22.1 23.7 24.8 26.0 Afghanistan 21.2 22.1 23.7 24.8 26.0
Bangladesh 19.8 23.6 30.5 34.3 38.2 Bangladesh 19.8 23.6 30.5 34.3 38.2
Bhutan 16.4 25.4 34.8 38.7 42.3 Bhutan 16.4 25.4 34.8 38.7 42.3
India 25.5 27.7 30.9 32.8 34.9 India 25.5 27.7 30.9 32.8 34.9
Maldives 25.8 27.7 36.4 38.5 40.7 Maldives 25.8 27.7 36.4 38.5 40.7
Nepal 8.9 13.4 16.8 18.6 20.6 Nepal 8.9 13.4 16.8 18.6 20.6
Pakistan 30.6 33.0 35.0 36.0 37.2 Pakistan 30.6 33.0 35.0 36.0 37.2
Sri Lanka 18.5 18.4 18.2 18.3 18.7 Sri Lanka 18.5 18.4 18.2 18.3 18.7

36 36
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.14: Selected Demographic Indicators in SAARC countries (Continued…) Table 1.14: Selected Demographic Indicators in SAARC countries (Continued…)

Average Annual Rate of Change of the Urban Population (in %) Average Annual Rate of Change of the Urban Population (in %)
Countries 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 2005-2010 2010-2015 Countries 1990-1995 1995-2000 2000-2005 2005-2010 2010-2015
Afghanistan 7.09 3.64 4.98 3.67 4.04 Afghanistan 7.09 3.64 4.98 3.67 4.04
Bangladesh 4.04 3.74 4.28 3.73 3.53 Bangladesh 4.04 3.74 4.28 3.73 3.53
Bhutan 3.66 6.42 6.66 4.38 3.69 Bhutan 3.66 6.42 6.66 4.38 3.69
India 2.79 2.62 2.76 2.59 2.39 India 2.79 2.62 2.76 2.59 2.39
Maldives 2.43 3.52 6.52 4.21 3.88 Maldives 2.43 3.52 6.52 4.21 3.88
Nepal 6.77 6.24 4.00 3.08 3.20 Nepal 6.77 6.24 4.00 3.08 3.20
Pakistan 3.44 3.11 2.70 2.64 2.67 Pakistan 3.44 3.11 2.70 2.64 2.67
Sri Lanka 0.95 0.49 0.69 0.59 0.54 Sri Lanka 0.95 0.49 0.69 0.59 0.54
*Projected *Projected

Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2018). World Urban- Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2018). World Urban-
ization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Online Edition. According to the World Urbanization Prospects ization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Online Edition. According to the World Urbanization Prospects
“there exists no common global definition of what constitutes an urban settlement. The estimates in the “there exists no common global definition of what constitutes an urban settlement. The estimates in the
World Urbanization Prospects are based on national statistics.” World Urbanization Prospects are based on national statistics.”

Graph 1.11: Demographic Indicators in SAARC countries- Population of Urban areas at Graph 1.11: Demographic Indicators in SAARC countries- Population of Urban areas at

Mid Year-2014 (%) Mid Year-2014 (%)

Source: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision Source: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision

37 37
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 1.12: Demographic Indicators in SAARC countries- Average Annual Rate of Change of the Graph 1.12: Demographic Indicators in SAARC countries- Average Annual Rate of Change of the
Urban Population Urban Population

Source: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision Source: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision

38 38
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 1.15: The 30 Largest Urban Agglomerations Ranked by Population Size (2015) Table 1.15: The 30 Largest Urban Agglomerations Ranked by Population Size (2015)

Rank order Country Urban Agglomeration Population (millions) Rank order Country Urban Agglomeration Population (millions)
1 Japan Tokyo 37.26 1 Japan Tokyo 37.26
2 India Delhi 25.87 2 India Delhi 25.87
3 China Shanghai 23.48 3 China Shanghai 23.48
4 Mexico Ciudad de México (Mexico City) 21.34 4 Mexico Ciudad de México (Mexico City) 21.34
5 Brazil São Paulo 20.88 5 Brazil São Paulo 20.88
6 India Mumbai (Bombay) 19.32 6 India Mumbai (Bombay) 19.32
7 Japan Kinki M.M.A. (Osaka) 19.30 7 Japan Kinki M.M.A. (Osaka) 19.30
8 Egypt Al-Qahirah (Cairo) 18.82 8 Egypt Al-Qahirah (Cairo) 18.82
9 United States of America New York-Newark 18.65 9 United States of America New York-Newark 18.65
10 China Beijing 18.42 10 China Beijing 18.42
11 Bangladesh Dhaka 17.60 11 Bangladesh Dhaka 17.60
12 Argentina Buenos Aires 14.71 12 Argentina Buenos Aires 14.71
13 India Kolkata (Calcutta) 14.42 13 India Kolkata (Calcutta) 14.42
14 Pakistan Karachi 14.29 14 Pakistan Karachi 14.29
15 Turkey Istanbul 14.13 15 Turkey Istanbul 14.13
16 China Chongqing 13.37 16 China Chongqing 13.37
17 Brazil Rio de Janeiro 12.94 17 Brazil Rio de Janeiro 12.94
18 Philippines Manila 12.86 18 Philippines Manila 12.86
19 China Tianjin 12.52 19 China Tianjin 12.52
20 United States of America Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana 12.35 20 United States of America Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana 12.35
21 Nigeria Lagos 12.24 21 Nigeria Lagos 12.24
22 Russian Federation Moskva (Moscow) 12.05 22 Russian Federation Moskva (Moscow) 12.05
23 China Guangzhou, Guangdong 11.69 23 China Guangzhou, Guangdong 11.69
Democratic Republic of the Democratic Republic of the
11.60 11.60
24 Congo Kinshasa 24 Congo Kinshasa
25 China Shenzhen 11.28 25 China Shenzhen 11.28
26 France Paris 10.73 26 France Paris 10.73
27 Pakistan Lahore 10.37 27 Pakistan Lahore 10.37
28 Indonesia Jakarta 10.17 28 Indonesia Jakarta 10.17
29 India Bangalore 10.14 29 India Bangalore 10.14
30 Republic of Korea Seoul 9.90 30 Republic of Korea Seoul 9.90

Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2018). World Urban- Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2018). World Urban-
ization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Online Edition. According to the World Urbanization Prospects “there ization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Online Edition. According to the World Urbanization Prospects “there
exists no common global definition of what constitutes an urban settlement. The estimates in the World Urban- exists no common global definition of what constitutes an urban settlement. The estimates in the World Urban-
ization Prospects are based on national statistics.” ization Prospects are based on national statistics.”

39 39
 Graph: 1.13: The 30 Largest Urban Agglomerations Ranked by Population Size (2015)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

40
Graph: 1.13: The 30 Largest Urban Agglomerations Ranked by Population Size (2015)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

40
 Chapter 2 Chapter 2

Socio-economic Socio-economic
indicators of Urban India indicators of Urban India
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Socio-economic indicators of Urban India
This Chapter includes data relating to different socio-economic aspects of urban India viz., access to
basic amenities in urban India, literacy rate, sex ratio, percentage of population below poverty line,
infant mortality rate and total surplus/shortfall after transfer under Central Assistance to States (CAS).
State-wise data is presented for the latest year.
Access to basic amenities like drinking water, electricity, septic tank or flush and toilet facilities are the
major determinants of quality of urbanisation. Estimates at the state and national level collected from
National Sample Survey for all the four components have shown an improvement over the year 2001
to 2011. For example, the use of septic-tank /flush by households in urban areas have increased from
70.7 percent in 2002 to 81.6 percent in 2012. In the year 2012, 97.9 percent households in urban India
had access to electricity, which shows an improvement of over 6 percentage points over 91.6 percent
estimated in 2002. Nagaland, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman & Diu, Goa, Lakshadweep, Mizoram and
Sikkim topped on this aspect with all the households having access to electricity in 2012. Bihar was at
the bottom of this list with only 89.20 percent urban households having access to electricity in 2012.
In urban areas, only 8.8 percent households had no latrine facilities in 2012.
Literacy level and educational attainment are vital indicators of development in a society. According to
census 2011, Urban India was 84.1 percent literate. Since 1991, Mizoram and Kerala are the leading
States in terms of literacy rate and having urban literacy rate of 97.6 and 95.1 percent respectively.
Whereas, Uttar Pradesh and Jammu & Kashmir had the lowest urban literacy at 75.10 percent and
77.10 percent respectively, in the year 2011. Table 2.3 is about the urban sex ratio and child sex ra-
tio of India and its States. Sex ratio at national level has increased from 894 in 1991 to 929 (female
per thousand male) in 2011. States like Gujarat, Daman & Diu and Dadra & Nagar Haveli saw a huge
decline in urban sex ratio from 1991 to 2011. The States which saw a huge increase in sex ratio were
Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Nagaland and Andaman & Nicobar Islands. Kerala, Puducherry and Mani-
pur had more women in urban areas than men, with sex ratios of 1091, 1042 and 1026 respectively. On
the other hand, the child sex ratio at country level declined from 906 in 2001 to 905 in 2011.
Table 2.4 shows the poverty rates at Tendulkar committee lines in urban India. The percentage of
population below poverty lines in urban area reduced to 13.7 percent in 2011-12 from 25.5 percent in
2004-05. There is a wide inter-state disparity in the poverty ratio. States like Chandigarh (22.3), Naga-
land (16.5) and Jharkhand (24.8) saw an increase in the poverty rates.
43
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Socio-economic indicators of Urban India
This Chapter includes data relating to different socio-economic aspects of urban India viz., access to
basic amenities in urban India, literacy rate, sex ratio, percentage of population below poverty line,
infant mortality rate and total surplus/shortfall after transfer under Central Assistance to States (CAS).
State-wise data is presented for the latest year.
Access to basic amenities like drinking water, electricity, septic tank or flush and toilet facilities are the
major determinants of quality of urbanisation. Estimates at the state and national level collected from
National Sample Survey for all the four components have shown an improvement over the year 2001
to 2011. For example, the use of septic-tank /flush by households in urban areas have increased from
70.7 percent in 2002 to 81.6 percent in 2012. In the year 2012, 97.9 percent households in urban India
had access to electricity, which shows an improvement of over 6 percentage points over 91.6 percent
estimated in 2002. Nagaland, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman & Diu, Goa, Lakshadweep, Mizoram and
Sikkim topped on this aspect with all the households having access to electricity in 2012. Bihar was at
the bottom of this list with only 89.20 percent urban households having access to electricity in 2012.
In urban areas, only 8.8 percent households had no latrine facilities in 2012.
Literacy level and educational attainment are vital indicators of development in a society. According to
census 2011, Urban India was 84.1 percent literate. Since 1991, Mizoram and Kerala are the leading
States in terms of literacy rate and having urban literacy rate of 97.6 and 95.1 percent respectively.
Whereas, Uttar Pradesh and Jammu & Kashmir had the lowest urban literacy at 75.10 percent and
77.10 percent respectively, in the year 2011. Table 2.3 is about the urban sex ratio and child sex ra-
tio of India and its States. Sex ratio at national level has increased from 894 in 1991 to 929 (female
per thousand male) in 2011. States like Gujarat, Daman & Diu and Dadra & Nagar Haveli saw a huge
decline in urban sex ratio from 1991 to 2011. The States which saw a huge increase in sex ratio were
Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Nagaland and Andaman & Nicobar Islands. Kerala, Puducherry and Mani-
pur had more women in urban areas than men, with sex ratios of 1091, 1042 and 1026 respectively. On
the other hand, the child sex ratio at country level declined from 906 in 2001 to 905 in 2011.
Table 2.4 shows the poverty rates at Tendulkar committee lines in urban India. The percentage of
population below poverty lines in urban area reduced to 13.7 percent in 2011-12 from 25.5 percent in
2004-05. There is a wide inter-state disparity in the poverty ratio. States like Chandigarh (22.3), Naga-
land (16.5) and Jharkhand (24.8) saw an increase in the poverty rates.
43
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

44 44
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 2.1: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India Table 2.1: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India

S. Area Name HHs with SDW HHs with Electricity (%) HHs with Septic Tank/ HHs with No Latrine (%) S. Area Name HHs with SDW HHs with Electricity (%) HHs with Septic Tank/ HHs with No Latrine (%)
(%) Flush (%) (%) Flush (%)
No. No.
2001 2011 2002 2008-09 2012 2002 2008-09 2012 2002 2008-09 2012 2001 2011 2002 2008-09 2012 2002 2008-09 2012 2002 2008-09 2012
1 Andaman & Nicobar 97.8 98.1 97.2 98.5 99.9 85.9 93.9 95.0 14.0 6.1 5.0 1 Andaman & Nicobar 97.8 98.1 97.2 98.5 99.9 85.9 93.9 95.0 14.0 6.1 5.0
Islands Islands
2 Andhra Pradesh 90.2 94.5 93.7 97.5 99.3 76.8 85.3 88.2 19.8 11.2 8.1 2 Andhra Pradesh 90.2 94.5 93.7 97.5 99.3 76.8 85.3 88.2 19.8 11.2 8.1
3 Arunachal Pradesh 90.7 91.3 95.8 98.5 98.1 51.6 61.5 88.7 0.6 0.1 0.0 3 Arunachal Pradesh 90.7 91.3 95.8 98.5 98.1 51.6 61.5 88.7 0.6 0.1 0.0
4 Assam 70.4 78.2 86.8 94.6 98.9 76.2 84.8 89.5 1.8 0.9 0.3 4 Assam 70.4 78.2 86.8 94.6 98.9 76.2 84.8 89.5 1.8 0.9 0.3
5 Bihar 91.2 94.7 66.0 79.4 89.2 61.3 61.9 71.3 31.0 27.7 20.8 5 Bihar 91.2 94.7 66.0 79.4 89.2 61.3 61.9 71.3 31.0 27.7 20.8
6 Chandigarh 99.8 99.4 99.7 98.5 98.3 92.9 99.4 97.1 5.0 0.6 1.6 6 Chandigarh 99.8 99.4 99.7 98.5 98.3 92.9 99.4 97.1 5.0 0.6 1.6
7 Chhattisgarh 88.8 93.9 86.5 96.7 99.1 56.2 64.3 72.1 41.5 31.5 24.9 7 Chhattisgarh 88.8 93.9 86.5 96.7 99.1 56.2 64.3 72.1 41.5 31.5 24.9
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 96.1 98.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 92.9 87.1 67.8 3.8 7.1 32.2 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 96.1 98.4 100.0 100.0 100.0 92.9 87.1 67.8 3.8 7.1 32.2
9 Daman & Diu 98.9 99.0 99.9 97.4 100.0 87.0 N.A. 99.9 11.7 6.4 0.1 9 Daman & Diu 98.9 99.0 99.9 97.4 100.0 87.0 N.A. 99.9 11.7 6.4 0.1
10 Goa 82.1 90.4 99.7 97.3 100.0 83.1 87.6 95.1 12.1 9.6 4.0 10 Goa 82.1 90.4 99.7 97.3 100.0 83.1 87.6 95.1 12.1 9.6 4.0
11 Gujarat 95.4 97.0 95.9 99.0 98.9 87.5 79.5 90.2 6.8 7.3 6.2 11 Gujarat 95.4 97.0 95.9 99.0 98.9 87.5 79.5 90.2 6.8 7.3 6.2
12 Haryana 97.3 96.7 97.7 98.3 99.3 76.2 73.5 84.6 15.0 8.4 1.4 12 Haryana 97.3 96.7 97.7 98.3 99.3 76.2 73.5 84.6 15.0 8.4 1.4
13 Himachal Pradesh 97.0 97.8 99.8 99.4 99.7 68.6 87.5 95.3 10.3 8.8 4.3 13 Himachal Pradesh 97.0 97.8 99.8 99.4 99.7 68.6 87.5 95.3 10.3 8.8 4.3
14 Jammu & Kashmir 95.7 96.1 99.5 97.5 99.9 59.3 71.3 77.1 12.6 11.8 6.0 14 Jammu & Kashmir 95.7 96.1 99.5 97.5 99.9 59.3 71.3 77.1 12.6 11.8 6.0
15 Jharkhand 68.2 78.4 86.5 93.9 94.4 62.8 70.6 79.1 30.9 24.5 17.7 15 Jharkhand 68.2 78.4 86.5 93.9 94.4 62.8 70.6 79.1 30.9 24.5 17.7
16 Karnataka 92.1 92.3 94.9 97.9 99.5 60.2 72.8 74.6 21.0 11.3 9.0 16 Karnataka 92.1 92.3 94.9 97.9 99.5 60.2 72.8 74.6 21.0 11.3 9.0
17 Kerala 42.8 39.4 90.4 97.9 98.7 49.1 50.6 51.5 3.7 1.5 1.2 17 Kerala 42.8 39.4 90.4 97.9 98.7 49.1 50.6 51.5 3.7 1.5 1.2
18 Lakshadweep 4.6 20.2 100.0 100.0 100.0 73.7 62.0 70.8 8.2 1.0 2.3 18 Lakshadweep 4.6 20.2 100.0 100.0 100.0 73.7 62.0 70.8 8.2 1.0 2.3
19 Madhya Pradesh 88.6 92.1 92.0 96.9 99.4 51.4 66.2 76.8 33.1 24.3 14.0 19 Madhya Pradesh 88.6 92.1 92.0 96.9 99.4 51.4 66.2 76.8 33.1 24.3 14.0
20 Maharashtra 95.4 95.7 95.9 98.5 99.1 82.7 89.4 91.5 15.2 5.9 6.9 20 Maharashtra 95.4 95.7 95.9 98.5 99.1 82.7 89.4 91.5 15.2 5.9 6.9
21 Manipur 59.4 60.8 92.8 99.5 99.4 45.6 51.6 51.4 N.A. N.A. 0.0 21 Manipur 59.4 60.8 92.8 99.5 99.4 45.6 51.6 51.4 N.A. N.A. 0.0
22 Meghalaya 73.5 79.5 93.9 99.3 98.3 77.7 79.1 87.6 0.9 0.2 0.2 22 Meghalaya 73.5 79.5 93.9 99.3 98.3 77.7 79.1 87.6 0.9 0.2 0.2
23 Mizoram 47.8 75.8 99.8 99.8 100.0 55.8 82.3 91.2 N.A. N.A. 0.0 23 Mizoram 47.8 75.8 99.8 99.8 100.0 55.8 82.3 91.2 N.A. N.A. 0.0
24 Nagaland 42.3 51.8 97.5 100.0 99.5 72.0 70.1 92.1 N.A. 1.3 0.0 24 Nagaland 42.3 51.8 97.5 100.0 99.5 72.0 70.1 92.1 N.A. 1.3 0.0
25 NCT Of Delhi 97.7 95.2 99.5 98.6 99.9 76.4 92.8 98.6 6.9 1.2 0.0 25 NCT Of Delhi 97.7 95.2 99.5 98.6 99.9 76.4 92.8 98.6 6.9 1.2 0.0
26 Odisha 72.3 79.8 86.6 90.1 97.3 59.2 56.2 68.8 32.9 29.1 18.2 26 Odisha 72.3 79.8 86.6 90.1 97.3 59.2 56.2 68.8 32.9 29.1 18.2
27 Puducherry 95.5 97.0 95.3 99.3 99.1 76.2 84.8 90.6 21.7 9.1 6.3 27 Puducherry 95.5 97.0 95.3 99.3 99.1 76.2 84.8 90.6 21.7 9.1 6.3
28 Punjab 98.9 98.9 98.0 99.3 99.7 74.5 84.1 86.6 11.6 5.0 6.2 28 Punjab 98.9 98.9 98.0 99.3 99.7 74.5 84.1 86.6 11.6 5.0 6.2
29 Rajasthan 93.5 94.3 87.1 97.0 98.4 57.7 70.3 65.4 30.7 12.6 14.2 29 Rajasthan 93.5 94.3 87.1 97.0 98.4 57.7 70.3 65.4 30.7 12.6 14.2
30 Sikkim 97.1 92.2 99.1 99.4 100.0 92.3 98.9 97.9 0.7 N.A. 0.0 30 Sikkim 97.1 92.2 99.1 99.4 100.0 92.3 98.9 97.9 0.7 N.A. 0.0
31 Tamil Nadu 85.9 92.9 93.7 97.8 98.8 74.4 79.1 79.9 21.9 16.0 12.2 31 Tamil Nadu 85.9 92.9 93.7 97.8 98.8 74.4 79.1 79.9 21.9 16.0 12.2
32 Tripura 85.8 91.9 90.3 95.3 98.9 33.1 48.6 54.1 0.8 0.9 0.1 32 Tripura 85.8 91.9 90.3 95.3 98.9 33.1 48.6 54.1 0.8 0.9 0.1
33 Uttar Pradesh 97.2 97.9 86.3 89.8 92.4 39.9 92.8 83.8 19.9 16.8 10.7 33 Uttar Pradesh 97.2 97.9 86.3 89.8 92.4 39.9 92.8 83.8 19.9 16.8 10.7
34 Uttarakhand 97.8 98.7 98.0 98.6 99.1 65.9 72.8 67.8 16.5 14.2 1.6 34 Uttarakhand 97.8 98.7 98.0 98.6 99.1 65.9 72.8 67.8 16.5 14.2 1.6
35 West Bengal 92.3 93.9 83.7 93.3 96.8 65.4 73.4 75.2 11.2 5.6 5.4 35 West Bengal 92.3 93.9 83.7 93.3 96.8 65.4 73.4 75.2 11.2 5.6 5.4
  India 90.0 91.4 91.6 96.1 97.9 70.7 77.3 81.6 17.9 11.3 8.8   India 90.0 91.4 91.6 96.1 97.9 70.7 77.3 81.6 17.9 11.3 8.8
SDW: Source of Drinking Water; HHs: Households SDW: Source of Drinking Water; HHs: Households

Source: Household tables, Census of India and NSSO 58th , 65th and 69th Rounds, 2002, 2008-09 and 2012 respectively Source: Household tables, Census of India and NSSO 58th , 65th and 69th Rounds, 2002, 2008-09 and 2012 respectively

45 45
 Graph 2.1: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India-Households with Source of Drinking Water (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

46
Source: Household tables, Census of India and NSSO 58th, 65th and 69th Rounds, 2002, 2008-09 and 2012 respectively

Graph 2.1: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India-Households with Source of Drinking Water (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

46

Source: Household tables, Census of India and NSSO 58th, 65th and 69th Rounds, 2002, 2008-09 and 2012 respectively
 Graph 2.2: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India-Households with electricity (%)

47
Source: Household tables, Census of India and NSSO 58th, 65th and 69th Rounds, 2002, 2008-09 and 2012 respectively
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 2.2: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India-Households with electricity (%)

47

Source: Household tables, Census of India and NSSO 58th, 65th and 69th Rounds, 2002, 2008-09 and 2012 respectively
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Graph 2.3: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India-Households with no latrine (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

48
Source: Household tables, Census of India and NSSO 58th, 65th and 69th Rounds, 2002, 2008-09 and 2012 respectively.

Graph 2.3: Access to Basic Amenities in Urban India-Households with no latrine (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

48

Source: Household tables, Census of India and NSSO 58th, 65th and 69th Rounds, 2002, 2008-09 and 2012 respectively.
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 2.2: Literacy Rate in Urban India Table 2.2: Literacy Rate in Urban India

S.No. Area Name Literacy Rate S.No. Area Name Literacy Rate
1991 2001 2011 1991 2001 2011
1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 81.69 86.57 90.10 1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 81.69 86.57 90.10
2 Andhra Pradesh 66.35 76.09 80.10 2 Andhra Pradesh 66.35 76.09 80.10
3 Arunachal Pradesh 71.59 78.26 82.90 3 Arunachal Pradesh 71.59 78.26 82.90
4 Assam 79.39 85.34 88.50 4 Assam 79.39 85.34 88.50
5 Bihar 67.89 71.93 76.90 5 Bihar 67.89 71.93 76.90
6 Chandigarh 79.87 82.64 86.20 6 Chandigarh 79.87 82.64 86.20
7 Chhattisgarh - 80.58 84.00 7 Chhattisgarh - 80.58 84.00
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 78.44 84.36 89.80 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 78.44 84.36 89.80
9 Daman & Diu 81.61 82.31 89.00 9 Daman & Diu 81.61 82.31 89.00
10 Goa 80.10 84.39 89.00 10 Goa 80.10 84.39 89.00
11 Gujarat 76.54 81.84 86.30 11 Gujarat 76.54 81.84 86.30
12 Haryana 73.66 79.16 83.10 12 Haryana 73.66 79.16 83.10
13 Himachal Pradesh 84.17 88.95 91.10 13 Himachal Pradesh 84.17 88.95 91.10
14 Jammu & Kashmir - 71.92 77.10 14 Jammu & Kashmir - 71.92 77.10
15 Jharkhand - 79.14 82.30 15 Jharkhand - 79.14 82.30
16 Karnataka 79.67 80.58 85.80 16 Karnataka 79.67 80.58 85.80
17 Kerala 92.25 93.19 95.10 17 Kerala 92.25 93.19 95.10
18 Lakshadweep 83.99 88.62 91.90 18 Lakshadweep 83.99 88.62 91.90
19 Madhya Pradesh 70.81 79.39 82.80 19 Madhya Pradesh 70.81 79.39 82.80
20 Maharashtra 79.20 85.48 88.70 20 Maharashtra 79.20 85.48 88.70
21 Manipur 70.53 79.28 85.40 21 Manipur 70.53 79.28 85.40
22 Meghalaya 81.74 86.30 90.80 22 Meghalaya 81.74 86.30 90.80
23 Mizoram 93.45 96.13 97.60 23 Mizoram 93.45 96.13 97.60
24 Nagaland 83.10 84.74 89.60 24 Nagaland 83.10 84.74 89.60
25 NCT Of Delhi 76.18 81.93 86.30 25 NCT Of Delhi 76.18 81.93 86.30
26 Odisha 71.99 80.84 85.70 26 Odisha 71.99 80.84 85.70
27 Puducherry 79.88 84.84 88.50 27 Puducherry 79.88 84.84 88.50
28 Punjab 72.08 79.10 83.20 28 Punjab 72.08 79.10 83.20
29 Rajasthan 65.33 76.20 79.70 29 Rajasthan 65.33 76.20 79.70
30 Sikkim 80.89 83.91 88.70 30 Sikkim 80.89 83.91 88.70
31 Tamil Nadu 77.99 82.53 87.00 31 Tamil Nadu 77.99 82.53 87.00
32 Tripura 83.09 89.21 93.50 32 Tripura 83.09 89.21 93.50
33 Uttar Pradesh 61.00 69.75 84.50 33 Uttar Pradesh 61.00 69.75 84.50
34 Uttarakhand - 81.44 84.50 34 Uttarakhand - 81.44 84.50
35 West Bengal 75.27 81.25 84.80 35 West Bengal 75.27 81.25 84.80
India 73.08 79.92 84.10 India 73.08 79.92 84.10
Source: Census of India 1991, 2001 & 2011 Source: Census of India 1991, 2001 & 2011

49 49
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 2.4: Literacy Rate in Urban India

Graph 2.4: Literacy Rate in Urban India

Source: Census of India 1991, 2001 & 2011

Source: Census of India 1991, 2001 & 2011

Table 2.3: Percentage of Population below Poverty Line in Urban India Table 2.3: Percentage of Population below Poverty Line in Urban India

50 50
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 2.3: Percentage of Population below Poverty Line in Urban India Table 2.3: Percentage of Population below Poverty Line in Urban India

Population Below Poverty Line (%) Population Below Poverty Line (%)
S.No. Area Name S.No. Area Name
2004-05 2009-10 2011-12 2004-05 2009-10 2011-12
1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 0.8 0.3 0.0 1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 0.8 0.3 0.0
2 Andhra Pradesh 23.4 17.7 5.8 2 Andhra Pradesh 23.4 17.7 5.8
3 Arunachal Pradesh 23.5 24.9 20.3 3 Arunachal Pradesh 23.5 24.9 20.3
4 Assam 21.8 26.1 20.5 4 Assam 21.8 26.1 20.5
5 Bihar 43.7 39.4 31.2 5 Bihar 43.7 39.4 31.2
6 Chandigarh 10.1 9.2 22.3 6 Chandigarh 10.1 9.2 22.3
7 Chhattisgarh 28.4 23.8 24.8 7 Chhattisgarh 28.4 23.8 24.8
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 17.8 17.7 15.4 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 17.8 17.7 15.4
9 Daman & Diu 14.4 33.0 12.6 9 Daman & Diu 14.4 33.0 12.6
10 Goa 22.2 6.9 4.1 10 Goa 22.2 6.9 4.1
11 Gujarat 20.1 17.9 10.1 11 Gujarat 20.1 17.9 10.1
12 Haryana 22.4 23.0 10.3 12 Haryana 22.4 23.0 10.3
13 Himachal Pradesh 4.6 12.6 4.3 13 Himachal Pradesh 4.6 12.6 4.3
14 Jammu & Kashmir 10.4 12.8 7.2 14 Jammu & Kashmir 10.4 12.8 7.2
15 Jharkhand 23.8 31.1 24.8 15 Jharkhand 23.8 31.1 24.8
16 Karnataka 25.9 19.6 15.3 16 Karnataka 25.9 19.6 15.3
17 Kerala 18.4 12.1 5.0 17 Kerala 18.4 12.1 5.0
18 Lakshadweep 10.5 1.7 3.4 18 Lakshadweep 10.5 1.7 3.4
19 Madhya Pradesh 35.1 22.9 21.0 19 Madhya Pradesh 35.1 22.9 21.0
20 Maharashtra 25.6 18.3 9.1 20 Maharashtra 25.6 18.3 9.1
21 Manipur 34.5 46.4 32.6 21 Manipur 34.5 46.4 32.6
22 Meghalaya 24.7 24.1 9.3 22 Meghalaya 24.7 24.1 9.3
23 Mizoram 7.9 11.5 6.4 23 Mizoram 7.9 11.5 6.4
24 Nagaland 4.3 25 16.5 24 Nagaland 4.3 25 16.5
25 NCT Of Delhi 12.9 14.4 9.8 25 NCT Of Delhi 12.9 14.4 9.8
26 Odisha 37.6 25.9 17.3 26 Odisha 37.6 25.9 17.3
27 Puducherry 9.9 1.6 6.3 27 Puducherry 9.9 1.6 6.3
28 Punjab 18.7 18.1 9.2 28 Punjab 18.7 18.1 9.2
29 Rajasthan 29.7 19.9 10.7 29 Rajasthan 29.7 19.9 10.7
30 Sikkim 25.9 5 3.7 30 Sikkim 25.9 5 3.7
31 Tamil Nadu 19.7 12.8 6.5 31 Tamil Nadu 19.7 12.8 6.5
32 Tripura 22.5 10 7.4 32 Tripura 22.5 10 7.4
33 Uttar Pradesh 34.1 31.7 26.1 33 Uttar Pradesh 34.1 31.7 26.1
34 Uttarakhand 26.2 25.2 10.5 34 Uttarakhand 26.2 25.2 10.5
35 West Bengal 24.4 22 14.7 35 West Bengal 24.4 22 14.7
India 25.5 20.9 13.7 India 25.5 20.9 13.7
NOTE: Poverty Ratios given in this table are as per the methodology recommended by Tendulkar Committee. NOTE: Poverty Ratios given in this table are as per the methodology recommended by Tendulkar Committee.
Source: Planning Commission, 2012. Source: Planning Commission, 2012.

51 51
 Graph 2.5: Population below Poverty Line in Urban India (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

52
Source: Planning Commission, 2012

Graph 2.5: Population below Poverty Line in Urban India (%)

Handbook of Urban Statistics

52

Source: Planning Commission, 2012

 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 2.4: Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) in Urban India Table 2.4: Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) in Urban India

2001 2011 2001 2011

1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 8 14 1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 8 14
2 Andhra Pradesh 39 31 2 Andhra Pradesh 39 31
3 Arunachal Pradesh 11 10 3 Arunachal Pradesh 11 10
4 Assam 33 34 4 Assam 33 34
5 Bihar 52 34 5 Bihar 52 34
6 Chandigarh 23 20 6 Chandigarh 23 20
7 Chhattisgarh 56 41 7 Chhattisgarh 56 41
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 9 22 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 9 22
9 Daman & Diu 35 29 9 Daman & Diu 35 29
10 Goa 16 13 10 Goa 16 13
11 Gujarat 42 27 11 Gujarat 42 27
12 Haryana 54 35 12 Haryana 54 35
13 Himachal Pradesh 32 28 13 Himachal Pradesh 32 28
14 Jammu & Kashmir 39 28 14 Jammu & Kashmir 39 28
15 Jharkhand 40 28 15 Jharkhand 40 28
16 Karnataka 27 26 16 Karnataka 27 26
17 Kerala 9 9 17 Kerala 9 9
18 Lakshadweep 33 27 18 Lakshadweep 33 27
19 Madhya Pradesh 53 39 19 Madhya Pradesh 53 39
20 Maharashtra 27 17 20 Maharashtra 27 17
21 Manipur 23 12 21 Manipur 23 12
22 Meghalaya 41 38 22 Meghalaya 41 38
23 Mizoram 12 19 23 Mizoram 12 19
24 Nagaland 13 20 24 Nagaland 13 20
25 NCT Of Delhi 28 26 25 NCT Of Delhi 28 26
26 Odisha 60 40 26 Odisha 60 40
27 Puducherry 15 18 27 Puducherry 15 18
28 Punjab 37 25 28 Punjab 37 25
29 Rajasthan 57 32 29 Rajasthan 57 32
30 Sikkim 31 17 30 Sikkim 31 17
31 Tamil Nadu 35 19 31 Tamil Nadu 35 19
32 Tripura 30 19 32 Tripura 30 19
33 Uttar Pradesh 62 41 33 Uttar Pradesh 62 41
34 Uttarakhand 26 23 34 Uttarakhand 26 23
35 West Bengal 38 26 35 West Bengal 38 26
India 42 29 India 42 29

Note: 1. Infant Mortality Rates for smaller states and Union Territories for the year 2001 are based on three Note: 1. Infant Mortality Rates for smaller states and Union Territories for the year 2001 are based on three
years period 1998-00; 2. Infant Mortality Rates for smaller states and Union Territories for the year 2011 are years period 1998-00; 2. Infant Mortality Rates for smaller states and Union Territories for the year 2011 are
based on three-years period 2009-11. based on three-years period 2009-11.
Source: SRS Bulletin, October 2002, October 2012, Registrar General, India. Source: SRS Bulletin, October 2002, October 2012, Registrar General, India.

53 53
 Graph 2.6: Infant Mortality Rate
Handbook of Urban Statistics

54
Source: SRS Bulletin, October 2002, October 2012, Registrar General, India.

Graph 2.6: Infant Mortality Rate

Handbook of Urban Statistics

54

Source: SRS Bulletin, October 2002, October 2012, Registrar General, India.
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 2.5: Total Surplus/shortfall after transfer under Central Assistance to States (CAS) but pre Table 2.5: Total Surplus/shortfall after transfer under Central Assistance to States (CAS) but pre
serving the fiscal space (in 2015-16 over 2014- 15) serving the fiscal space (in 2015-16 over 2014- 15)

CAS over and above Surplus/shortfall after transfer under CAS but preserving the CAS over and above Surplus/shortfall after transfer under CAS but preserving the
legally backed fiscal space for centre legally backed fiscal space for centre
State schemes Absolute State schemes Absolute
Per capita Per capita
% of NSDP % of OTR % of NSDP % of OTR
(in Rs. crore) (in Rs) (in Rs. crore) (in Rs)
(in Rs. Crore) (in Rs. Crore)
Andhra Pradesh (united) 5,062 10,134 1,198 1.5 19.0 Andhra Pradesh (united) 5,062 10,134 1,198 1.5 19.0
Arunachal Pradesh 2,555 4,572 33,038 41.8 1439.2 Arunachal Pradesh 2,555 4,572 33,038 41.8 1439.2
Assam 5,860 4,378 1,403 3.5 57.3 Assam 5,860 4,378 1,403 3.5 57.3
Bihar 6,998 8,783 844 3.2 69.6 Bihar 6,998 8,783 844 3.2 69.6
Chhattisgarh 2,673 5,258 2,058 3.8 49.1 Chhattisgarh 2,673 5,258 2,058 3.8 49.1
Goa 180 995 6,820 2.7 39.6 Goa 180 995 6,820 2.7 39.6
Gujarat 4179 2,454 406 0.4 5.5 Gujarat 4179 2,454 406 0.4 5.5
Haryana 1,509 714 282 0.2 3.5 Haryana 1,509 714 282 0.2 3.5
Himachal Pradesh 3,593 6,826 9,944 11.7 166.2 Himachal Pradesh 3,593 6,826 9,944 11.7 166.2
Jammu & Kashmir 8,185 10,679 8,515 17.1 225.0 Jammu & Kashmir 8,185 10,679 8,515 17.1 225.0
Jharkhand 2,870 4,650 1,410 3.6 66.9 Jharkhand 2,870 4,650 1,410 3.6 66.9
Karnataka 4,873 5,300 867 1.1 11.4 Karnataka 4,873 5,300 867 1.1 11.4
Kerala 2,778 7,834 2,345 2.5 30.5 Kerala 2,778 7,834 2,345 2.5 30.5
Madhya Pradesh 7,959 10,389 1,431 3.1 38.5 Madhya Pradesh 7,959 10,389 1,431 3.1 38.5
Maharashtra 5,365 7,496 667 0.6 8.6 Maharashtra 5,365 7,496 667 0.6 8.6
Manipur 2,029 1,250 4,861 11.4 339.5 Manipur 2,029 1,250 4,861 11.4 339.5
Meghalaya 1,536 661 2,226 4.1 94.8 Meghalaya 1,536 661 2,226 4.1 94.8
Mizoram 1,157 1,967 17,925 26.0 1,100.7 Mizoram 1,157 1,967 17,925 26.0 1,100.7
Nagaland 2,019 1,839 9293 12.7 605.0 Nagaland 2,019 1,839 9293 12.7 605.0
Odisha 6,826 3,497 833 1.7 26.0 Odisha 6,826 3,497 833 1.7 26.0
Punjab 1,820 2,478 893 1.0 13.2 Punjab 1,820 2,478 893 1.0 13.2
Rajasthan 6,618 2,423 353 0.6 9.5 Rajasthan 6,618 2,423 353 0.6 9.5
Sikkim 1,415 489 8,006 5.2 166.3 Sikkim 1,415 489 8,006 5.2 166.3
Tamil Nadu 2,376 2,644 366 0.4 4.4 Tamil Nadu 2,376 2,644 366 0.4 4.4
Tripura 2,139 458 1,246 2.0 53.3 Tripura 2,139 458 1,246 2.0 53.3
Uttar Pradesh 9,110 18,716 937 2.7 35.6 Uttar Pradesh 9,110 18,716 937 2.7 35.6
Uttarakhand 3,014 -48 -48 -0.1 -0.9 Uttarakhand 3,014 -48 -48 -0.1 -0.9
West Bengal 8,386 11,365 1,245 2.0 45.6 West Bengal 8,386 11,365 1,245 2.0 45.6
TOTAL 113,081 138,198 TOTAL 113,081 138,198
NSDP: Net State Domestic Product; OTR: Own tax revenue Receipts; CAS: Central assistance to States NSDP: Net State Domestic Product; OTR: Own tax revenue Receipts; CAS: Central assistance to States

Source: Ministry of Finance Source: Ministry of Finance

55 55
 Chapter 3 Chapter 3

Urban Employment Urban Employment

 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Urban Employment
Employment generation is one of the main challenges for economic policy makers in India so as to
exploit the demographic dividend and boost economic growth. The share of agriculture in GDP has
declined significantly. However, agriculture continues to be the major occupation in India. It is import-
ant to create adequate jobs in urban areas so that labour force can be shifted out of agriculture and
employed in more productive sectors such as manufacturing and services. This chapter contains data
on various indicators of urban employment.
According to estimates of National Sample Survey (NSS) 68th round, labour force participation rate
(LFPR) in urban India was 36.7% in 2011-12 by Usual Principal and Subsidiary Status (UPSS), up from
35.4% in 1999-2000 (NSSO 55th round estimates). Typically, LFPR was higher for urban male as com-
pared to urban female, and LFPR for both categories, urban male and urban female, witnessed an in-
crease during this period. LFPR for urban male by UPSS increased from 54.2% in 1999-2000 to 56.3%
in 2011-12. LFPR for urban female by UPSS increased from 14.7% in 1999-2000 to 15.5% in 2011-12.
Among the States, West Bengal had the highest (63%) and Bihar the least (44.1%) LFPR of urban male
in year 2011-12. As for female LFPR, Sikkim registered the highest participation rate (27.4%) and Bihar
registered the least participation rate (5.4%).
Workforce participation rate (WFPR) in urban India was 35.5% in 2011-12 by UPSS, up from 33.7% in
1999-2000. Male WFPR was 54.6% in 2011-12 by UPSS, whereas female WFPR was 14.7% only. Sikkim
had the highest male and female WFPR at 60.9% and 27.3% respectively. On the other hand, Nagaland
had the lowest male WFPR at 41.2% while Bihar had lowest female WFPR at 4.5%.
Given that one of the greatest challenges in India is the lack of decent work in the organized sector, it is
crucial to look in further detail at the characteristics of work status of urban male and female. In year
2011-12, the percentage of urban male workforce population self employed stood at 41.7%, while
14.9% of urban male workforce was engaged as casual labourers. In case of female workers, 42.8% of
workforce is self-employed and 14.3% of female workforce was engaged as casual labourers. Overall,
the workforce employed as casual labourers has declined from 17.8% in 1999-2000 to 14.6% in 2011-
12.
An encouraging sign is reflected in decline of unemployment rates in urban areas during the first de-
cade of this century. Overall, urban unemployment rate in terms of usual status declined from 5.2% in
1999-2000 to 3.8% in 2011-12. Although the unemployment rates declined for both male and female,
it was seen that unemployment continues to be higher among females than males. Unemployment
rates stood at 3.2% for urban male and at 6.6% for urban female at all-India level in 2011-12. The high-
est unemployment rate has been registered in Nagaland (21.9%) for urban male and in Tripura (57.9%)
for urban female for the year 2011-12.
59
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Urban Employment
Employment generation is one of the main challenges for economic policy makers in India so as to
exploit the demographic dividend and boost economic growth. The share of agriculture in GDP has
declined significantly. However, agriculture continues to be the major occupation in India. It is import-
ant to create adequate jobs in urban areas so that labour force can be shifted out of agriculture and
employed in more productive sectors such as manufacturing and services. This chapter contains data
on various indicators of urban employment.
According to estimates of National Sample Survey (NSS) 68th round, labour force participation rate
(LFPR) in urban India was 36.7% in 2011-12 by Usual Principal and Subsidiary Status (UPSS), up from
35.4% in 1999-2000 (NSSO 55th round estimates). Typically, LFPR was higher for urban male as com-
pared to urban female, and LFPR for both categories, urban male and urban female, witnessed an in-
crease during this period. LFPR for urban male by UPSS increased from 54.2% in 1999-2000 to 56.3%
in 2011-12. LFPR for urban female by UPSS increased from 14.7% in 1999-2000 to 15.5% in 2011-12.
Among the States, West Bengal had the highest (63%) and Bihar the least (44.1%) LFPR of urban male
in year 2011-12. As for female LFPR, Sikkim registered the highest participation rate (27.4%) and Bihar
registered the least participation rate (5.4%).
Workforce participation rate (WFPR) in urban India was 35.5% in 2011-12 by UPSS, up from 33.7% in
1999-2000. Male WFPR was 54.6% in 2011-12 by UPSS, whereas female WFPR was 14.7% only. Sikkim
had the highest male and female WFPR at 60.9% and 27.3% respectively. On the other hand, Nagaland
had the lowest male WFPR at 41.2% while Bihar had lowest female WFPR at 4.5%.
Given that one of the greatest challenges in India is the lack of decent work in the organized sector, it is
crucial to look in further detail at the characteristics of work status of urban male and female. In year
2011-12, the percentage of urban male workforce population self employed stood at 41.7%, while
14.9% of urban male workforce was engaged as casual labourers. In case of female workers, 42.8% of
workforce is self-employed and 14.3% of female workforce was engaged as casual labourers. Overall,
the workforce employed as casual labourers has declined from 17.8% in 1999-2000 to 14.6% in 2011-
12.
An encouraging sign is reflected in decline of unemployment rates in urban areas during the first de-
cade of this century. Overall, urban unemployment rate in terms of usual status declined from 5.2% in
1999-2000 to 3.8% in 2011-12. Although the unemployment rates declined for both male and female,
it was seen that unemployment continues to be higher among females than males. Unemployment
rates stood at 3.2% for urban male and at 6.6% for urban female at all-India level in 2011-12. The high-
est unemployment rate has been registered in Nagaland (21.9%) for urban male and in Tripura (57.9%)
for urban female for the year 2011-12.
59
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

60 60
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.1: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012(in percent) Table 3.1: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012(in percent)

1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011-
2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2012
States/UTs States/UTs
Principal and Subsidi- Current Current Principal and Subsidi- Current Current
Principal Status Principal Status
ary Status Weekly Status Daily Status ary Status Weekly Status Daily Status
Andaman & Nicobar Islands 44.1 43.4 45.4 43.7 44.8 42.8 43.6 42.1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 44.1 43.4 45.4 43.7 44.8 42.8 43.6 42.1
Andhra Pradesh 35.2 37.5 36.2 38.0 35.3 37.5 34.1 36.8 Andhra Pradesh 35.2 37.5 36.2 38.0 35.3 37.5 34.1 36.8
Arunachal Pradesh 27.5 31.5 27.5 31.8 23.4 31.8 22.9 31.6 Arunachal Pradesh 27.5 31.5 27.5 31.8 23.4 31.8 22.9 31.6
Assam 35.7 34.3 36.8 34.8 36.8 34.5 34.5 34.2 Assam 35.7 34.3 36.8 34.8 36.8 34.5 34.5 34.2
Bihar 28.1 25.8 28.7 26.7 28.4 26.5 27.8 26.0 Bihar 28.1 25.8 28.7 26.7 28.4 26.5 27.8 26.0
Chandigarh 35.7 37.5 36.9 37.9 37.5 37.9 36.8 37.8 Chandigarh 35.7 37.5 36.9 37.9 37.5 37.9 36.8 37.8
Chhattisgarh 32.4 37.9 33.1 39.3 32.3 38.9 31.2 37.2 Chhattisgarh 32.4 37.9 33.1 39.3 32.3 38.9 31.2 37.2
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 40.9 36.5 40.9 36.7 40.2 36.5 39.2 36.5 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 40.9 36.5 40.9 36.7 40.2 36.5 39.2 36.5
Daman & Diu 38.4 34.9 38.7 35.7 38.4 35.7 36.5 34.8 Daman & Diu 38.4 34.9 38.7 35.7 38.4 35.7 36.5 34.8
Delhi 33.2 34.7 34.3 34.9 35.8 34.8 34.4 34.8 Delhi 33.2 34.7 34.3 34.9 35.8 34.8 34.4 34.8
Goa 37.5 35.2 37.9 35.3 37.8 35.2 37.0 35.0 Goa 37.5 35.2 37.9 35.3 37.8 35.2 37.0 35.0
Gujarat 34.0 37.8 35.2 38.7 34.6 38.5 32.8 37.8 Gujarat 34.0 37.8 35.2 38.7 34.6 38.5 32.8 37.8
Haryana 30.4 32.5 32.3 33.1 32.6 33.1 30.7 32.7 Haryana 30.4 32.5 32.3 33.1 32.6 33.1 30.7 32.7
Himachal Pradesh 32.8 42.1 34.4 43.3 33.8 42.9 33.0 42.2 Himachal Pradesh 32.8 42.1 34.4 43.3 33.8 42.9 33.0 42.2
Jammu & Kashmir 28.4 34.3 29.6 36.2 28.7 35.3 28.2 34.7 Jammu & Kashmir 28.4 34.3 29.6 36.2 28.7 35.3 28.2 34.7
Jharkhand 28.1 29.0 28.7 30.0 28.4 29.7 27.8 29.1 Jharkhand 28.1 29.0 28.7 30.0 28.4 29.7 27.8 29.1
Karnataka 37.2 38.5 37.8 38.8 37.3 38.5 36.0 37.9 Karnataka 37.2 38.5 37.8 38.8 37.3 38.5 36.0 37.9
Kerala 38.5 37.0 41.5 38.6 38.7 36.9 36.0 35.1 Kerala 38.5 37.0 41.5 38.6 38.7 36.9 36.0 35.1
Lakshadweep 30.2 37.2 34.3 39.3 30.6 37.2 29.8 36.2 Lakshadweep 30.2 37.2 34.3 39.3 30.6 37.2 29.8 36.2
Madhya Pradesh 32.4 32.4 33.1 33.4 32.3 32.7 31.2 32.3 Madhya Pradesh 32.4 32.4 33.1 33.4 32.3 32.7 31.2 32.3
Maharashtra 35.9 36.2 36.7 37.4 36.3 36.8 35.2 36.1 Maharashtra 35.9 36.2 36.7 37.4 36.3 36.8 35.2 36.1
Manipur 31.7 33.2 35.3 34.7 34.3 34.7 31.4 33.2 Manipur 31.7 33.2 35.3 34.7 34.3 34.7 31.4 33.2
Meghalaya 31.0 35.0 31.0 35.0 31.1 35.2 30.5 34.3 Meghalaya 31.0 35.0 31.0 35.0 31.1 35.2 30.5 34.3
Mizoram 36.4 38.6 37.4 38.6 38.5 38.3 34.5 37.2 Mizoram 36.4 38.6 37.4 38.6 38.5 38.3 34.5 37.2
Nagaland 31.5 35.3 33.5 37.6 33.5 36.5 32.1 34.8 Nagaland 31.5 35.3 33.5 37.6 33.5 36.5 32.1 34.8
Odisha 32.3 38.5 33.9 39.5 31.9 38.5 30.9 37.9 Odisha 32.3 38.5 33.9 39.5 31.9 38.5 30.9 37.9
Puducherry 36.2 34.9 36.8 36.0 36.3 34.2 35.1 33.7 Puducherry 36.2 34.9 36.8 36.0 36.3 34.2 35.1 33.7
Punjab 33.6 35.9 36.3 37.9 35.2 37.6 34.1 36.7 Punjab 33.6 35.9 36.3 37.9 35.2 37.6 34.1 36.7
Rajasthan 31.0 31.4 33.2 33.6 31.6 33.2 30.8 32.2 Rajasthan 31.0 31.4 33.2 33.6 31.6 33.2 30.8 32.2
Sikkim 40.5 46.3 40.7 46.3 40.6 46.3 39.6 46.2 Sikkim 40.5 46.3 40.7 46.3 40.6 46.3 39.6 46.2
Tamil Nadu 40.0 39.6 41.0 40.3 40.2 40.1 38.6 39.1 Tamil Nadu 40.0 39.6 41.0 40.3 40.2 40.1 38.6 39.1
Tripura 31.0 42.3 31.3 42.7 31.1 42.4 30.7 42.2 Tripura 31.0 42.3 31.3 42.7 31.1 42.4 30.7 42.2
Uttar Pradesh 30.1 31.4 31.7 33.1 31.0 32.5 29.8 31.4 Uttar Pradesh 30.1 31.4 31.7 33.1 31.0 32.5 29.8 31.4
Uttarakhand 30.1 31.1 31.7 32.2 31.0 32.1 29.8 31.1 Uttarakhand 30.1 31.1 31.7 32.2 31.0 32.1 29.8 31.1
West Bengal 37.0 39.2 37.8 41.9 37.7 41.3 36.5 39.4 West Bengal 37.0 39.2 37.8 41.9 37.7 41.3 36.5 39.4
India 34.2 35.6 35.4 36.7 34.7 36.3 33.5 35.4 India 34.2 35.6 35.4 36.7 34.7 36.3 33.5 35.4
NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand
respectively. respectively.
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report
No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round). No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round).

61 61
 Graph 3.1: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons (Principal & subsidiary status) (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

62
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554 (2011-2012; 68th Round).

Graph 3.1: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons (Principal & subsidiary status) (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

62

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554 (2011-2012; 68th Round).
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.2: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Male, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 Table 3.2: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Male, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012
(in percent) (in percent)
1999- 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999- 2011-2012 1999- 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999- 2011-2012
2000 2000 2000 2000
States/UTs States/UTs
Principal and Subsidiary Current Current Principal and Subsidiary Current Current
Principal Status Principal Status
Status Weekly Status Daily Status Status Weekly Status Daily Status
Andaman & Nicobar Islands 65.2 63.1 65.3 63.3 65.5 61.6 65.3 60.8 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 65.2 63.1 65.3 63.3 65.5 61.6 65.3 60.8
Andhra Pradesh 53.0 57.4 53.2 57.6 52.7 57.4 51.7 56.7 Andhra Pradesh 53.0 57.4 53.2 57.6 52.7 57.4 51.7 56.7
Arunachal Pradesh 40.6 47.5 40.6 47.5 35.6 47.6 34.9 47.5 Arunachal Pradesh 40.6 47.5 40.6 47.5 35.6 47.6 34.9 47.5
Assam 55.8 56.9 56.5 57.3 56.7 56.9 53.3 56.7 Assam 55.8 56.9 56.5 57.3 56.7 56.9 53.3 56.7
Bihar 46.3 43.7 46.6 44.1 46.3 43.9 45.8 43.8 Bihar 46.3 43.7 46.6 44.1 46.3 43.9 45.8 43.8
Chandigarh 55.9 57.9 56.6 57.9 56.6 57.9 56.5 57.9 Chandigarh 55.9 57.9 56.6 57.9 56.6 57.9 56.5 57.9
Chhattisgarh 50.5 51.2 50.9 51.7 50.3 51.6 49.1 49.9 Chhattisgarh 50.5 51.2 50.9 51.7 50.3 51.6 49.1 49.9
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 66.4 57.6 66.4 57.6 66.3 57.6 64.8 57.6 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 66.4 57.6 66.4 57.6 66.3 57.6 64.8 57.6
Daman & Diu 55.4 59.4 55.7 59.5 55.6 59.5 53.7 59.5 Daman & Diu 55.4 59.4 55.7 59.5 55.6 59.5 53.7 59.5
Delhi 54.4 54.8 54.6 54.8 56.7 54.7 55.5 54.7 Delhi 54.4 54.8 54.6 54.8 56.7 54.7 55.5 54.7
Goa 58.5 52.6 58.5 52.6 57.6 52.5 56.6 52.5 Goa 58.5 52.6 58.5 52.6 57.6 52.5 56.6 52.5
Gujarat 54.4 60.5 54.7 60.7 54.4 60.6 52.5 60.4 Gujarat 54.4 60.5 54.7 60.7 54.4 60.6 52.5 60.4
Haryana 51.9 53.4 52.0 53.5 52.1 53.4 51.0 53.2 Haryana 51.9 53.4 52.0 53.5 52.1 53.4 51.0 53.2
Himachal Pradesh 53.1 61.1 53.3 61.2 53.2 60.7 53.2 60.6 Himachal Pradesh 53.1 61.1 53.3 61.2 53.2 60.7 53.2 60.6
Jammu & Kashmir 49.6 55.8 50.0 56.3 49.3 55.7 49.0 55.5 Jammu & Kashmir 49.6 55.8 50.0 56.3 49.3 55.7 49.0 55.5
Jharkhand 46.3 49.7 46.6 50.3 46.3 50.1 45.8 49.6 Jharkhand 46.3 49.7 46.6 50.3 46.3 50.1 45.8 49.6
Karnataka 56.0 59.3 56.2 59.4 55.8 59.3 54.6 58.6 Karnataka 56.0 59.3 56.2 59.4 55.8 59.3 54.6 58.6
Kerala 57.4 55.8 59.1 56.7 56.9 55.1 53.9 52.8 Kerala 57.4 55.8 59.1 56.7 56.9 55.1 53.9 52.8
Lakshadweep 45.3 57.2 46.0 58.2 45.0 57.0 44.2 55.5 Lakshadweep 45.3 57.2 46.0 58.2 45.0 57.0 44.2 55.5
Madhya Pradesh 50.5 52.9 50.9 53.3 50.3 53.1 49.1 52.8 Madhya Pradesh 50.5 52.9 50.9 53.3 50.3 53.1 49.1 52.8
Maharashtra 56.2 55.6 56.3 56.0 56.2 55.7 55.1 55.3 Maharashtra 56.2 55.6 56.3 56.0 56.2 55.7 55.1 55.3
Manipur 47.0 48.3 47.8 48.3 47 48.2 44.9 47.7 Manipur 47.0 48.3 47.8 48.3 47 48.2 44.9 47.7
Meghalaya 40.7 51.5 40.7 51.5 40.7 51.8 40.0 50.6 Meghalaya 40.7 51.5 40.7 51.5 40.7 51.8 40.0 50.6
Mizoram 48.1 50.7 48.7 50.7 49.9 50.5 46.0 49.2 Mizoram 48.1 50.7 48.7 50.7 49.9 50.5 46.0 49.2
Nagaland 43.2 50.8 43.3 50.9 43.3 50.3 43.1 49.8 Nagaland 43.2 50.8 43.3 50.9 43.3 50.3 43.1 49.8
Odisha 50.8 60.1 51.1 60.3 49.7 59.8 49.1 59.3 Odisha 50.8 60.1 51.1 60.3 49.7 59.8 49.1 59.3
Puducherry 57.3 55.5 57.4 56.3 57.4 53.8 56.3 53.4 Puducherry 57.3 55.5 57.4 56.3 57.4 53.8 56.3 53.4
Punjab 55.9 58.4 56.5 58.6 55.9 58.5 55.5 58.3 Punjab 55.9 58.4 56.5 58.6 55.9 58.5 55.5 58.3
Rajasthan 49.6 50.6 49.9 50.7 49.7 50.7 49.4 50.6 Rajasthan 49.6 50.6 49.9 50.7 49.7 50.7 49.4 50.6
Sikkim 55.3 62.8 55.7 62.8 55.6 62.8 54.9 62.8 Sikkim 55.3 62.8 55.7 62.8 55.6 62.8 54.9 62.8
Tamil Nadu 58.2 59.6 58.5 59.9 58.1 59.8 56.9 59 Tamil Nadu 58.2 59.6 58.5 59.9 58.1 59.8 56.9 59
Tripura 51.9 59.3 52.2 59.4 51.7 59.3 51.1 59 Tripura 51.9 59.3 52.2 59.4 51.7 59.3 51.1 59
Uttar Pradesh 50.7 52.7 51.2 53.3 50.7 52.9 49.8 52.2 Uttar Pradesh 50.7 52.7 51.2 53.3 50.7 52.9 49.8 52.2
Uttarakhand 50.7 51.5 51.2 51.9 50.7 51.5 49.8 51.3 Uttarakhand 50.7 51.5 51.2 51.9 50.7 51.5 49.8 51.3
West Bengal 60.8 62.1 61.2 63.0 61 62.6 60.2 61.5 West Bengal 60.8 62.1 61.2 63.0 61 62.6 60.2 61.5
India 53.9 56.0 54.2 56.3 53.9 56.1 52.8 55.5 India 53.9 56.0 54.2 56.3 53.9 56.1 52.8 55.5
NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand respectively. NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand respectively.
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011- Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-
2012; 68th Round) 2012; 68th Round)

63 63
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.3: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Female, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 Table 3.3: Labour Force Participation Rate of Urban Female, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012
(in percent) (in percent)
1999-00 2011-12 1999-00 2011-12 1999-00 2011-12 1999-00 2011-12 1999-00 2011-12 1999-00 2011-12 1999-00 2011-12 1999-00 2011-12
States/UTs Current Current States/UTs Current Current
Principal and Subsidi- Principal and Subsidi-
Principal Status ary Status Weekly Status Daily Status Principal Status ary Status Weekly Status Daily Status
Andaman & Nicobar Islands 22.3 24.4 24.9 24.8 23.5 24.8 21.2 24.1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 22.3 24.4 24.9 24.8 23.5 24.8 21.2 24.1
Andhra Pradesh 16.6 17.1 18.4 18.0 17.1 17.2 15.8 16.6 Andhra Pradesh 16.6 17.1 18.4 18.0 17.1 17.2 15.8 16.6
Arunachal Pradesh 11.0 13.1 11.0 13.9 8.1 13.8 8.0 13.3 Arunachal Pradesh 11.0 13.1 11.0 13.9 8.1 13.8 8.0 13.3
Assam 12.4 9.0 13.8 9.7 13.8 9.3 12.8 9.1 Assam 12.4 9.0 13.8 9.7 13.8 9.3 12.8 9.1
Bihar 7.1 3.7 8.2 5.4 7.8 5.0 7.0 4.1 Bihar 7.1 3.7 8.2 5.4 7.8 5.0 7.0 4.1
Chandigarh 13.4 12.8 15.3 13.5 16.4 13.7 15.1 13.3 Chandigarh 13.4 12.8 15.3 13.5 16.4 13.7 15.1 13.3
Chhattisgarh 12.4 22.9 13.6 25.2 12.6 24.6 11.6 22.8 Chhattisgarh 12.4 22.9 13.6 25.2 12.6 24.6 11.6 22.8
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 11.2 11.1 11.2 11.5 9.9 11.1 9.5 11.1 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 11.2 11.1 11.2 11.5 9.9 11.1 9.5 11.1
Daman & Diu 19.8 13.7 20.3 15.2 19.7 15.2 17.8 13.5 Daman & Diu 19.8 13.7 20.3 15.2 19.7 15.2 17.8 13.5
Delhi 8.7 10.5 10.9 10.9 11.8 10.9 10.0 10.8 Delhi 8.7 10.5 10.9 10.9 11.8 10.9 10.0 10.8
Goa 15.1 17.2 15.9 17.4 16.5 17.4 16.0 16.9 Goa 15.1 17.2 15.9 17.4 16.5 17.4 16.0 16.9
Gujarat 11.7 11.7 13.8 13.5 13.0 13.2 11.2 11.9 Gujarat 11.7 11.7 13.8 13.5 13.0 13.2 11.2 11.9
Haryana 6.1 9.0 10.1 10.2 10.4 10.2 7.8 9.6 Haryana 6.1 9.0 10.1 10.2 10.4 10.2 7.8 9.6
Himachal Pradesh 10.9 21.1 14.2 23.6 13.0 23.2 11.4 21.8 Himachal Pradesh 10.9 21.1 14.2 23.6 13.0 23.2 11.4 21.8
Jammu & Kashmir 4.8 10.8 6.8 14.5 5.7 13.1 5.0 11.9 Jammu & Kashmir 4.8 10.8 6.8 14.5 5.7 13.1 5.0 11.9
Jharkhand 7.1 6.0 8.2 7.3 7.8 7.0 7.0 6.3 Jharkhand 7.1 6.0 8.2 7.3 7.8 7.0 7.0 6.3
Karnataka 17.5 16.7 18.6 17.1 18.0 16.7 16.5 16.0 Karnataka 17.5 16.7 18.6 17.1 18.0 16.7 16.5 16.0
Kerala 21.2 19.9 25.4 22.2 22.0 20.4 19.5 19.0 Kerala 21.2 19.9 25.4 22.2 22.0 20.4 19.5 19.0
Lakshadweep 14.4 14.5 22.1 17.8 15.7 14.6 14.9 14.1 Lakshadweep 14.4 14.5 22.1 17.8 15.7 14.6 14.9 14.1
Madhya Pradesh 12.4 10.3 13.6 11.9 12.6 10.8 11.6 10.3 Madhya Pradesh 12.4 10.3 13.6 11.9 12.6 10.8 11.6 10.3
Maharashtra 13.2 15.2 14.6 17.2 14.0 16.4 12.9 15.3 Maharashtra 13.2 15.2 14.6 17.2 14.0 16.4 12.9 15.3
Manipur 15.8 17.3 22.5 20.4 21.1 20.5 17.4 18.0 Manipur 15.8 17.3 22.5 20.4 21.1 20.5 17.4 18.0
Meghalaya 21.0 21.0 21.1 21.0 21.2 21.1 20.7 20.4 Meghalaya 21.0 21.0 21.1 21.0 21.2 21.1 20.7 20.4
Mizoram 25.2 26.7 26.5 26.7 27.6 26.3 23.4 25.5 Mizoram 25.2 26.7 26.5 26.7 27.6 26.3 23.4 25.5
Nagaland 17.6 17.7 21.7 22.4 21.7 20.8 18.9 17.8 Nagaland 17.6 17.7 21.7 22.4 21.7 20.8 18.9 17.8
Odisha 12.0 13.8 15.3 15.8 12.5 14.4 11.1 13.6 Odisha 12.0 13.8 15.3 15.8 12.5 14.4 11.1 13.6
Puducherry 17.1 14.0 18.1 15.3 17.3 14.2 15.9 13.7 Puducherry 17.1 14.0 18.1 15.3 17.3 14.2 15.9 13.7
Punjab 7.5 10.0 12.8 14.1 11.1 13.6 9.0 11.8 Punjab 7.5 10.0 12.8 14.1 11.1 13.6 9.0 11.8
Rajasthan 9.7 9.8 14.1 14.4 11.1 13.6 9.7 11.5 Rajasthan 9.7 9.8 14.1 14.4 11.1 13.6 9.7 11.5
Sikkim 22.5 27.4 22.5 27.4 22.5 27.4 21.1 27.4 Sikkim 22.5 27.4 22.5 27.4 22.5 27.4 21.1 27.4
Tamil Nadu 20.9 20.0 22.7 21.1 21.4 20.7 19.5 19.6 Tamil Nadu 20.9 20.0 22.7 21.1 21.4 20.7 19.5 19.6
Tripura 7.9 25.4 8.1 26.0 8.3 25.4 8.1 25.3 Tripura 7.9 25.4 8.1 26.0 8.3 25.4 8.1 25.3
Uttar Pradesh 6.9 7.7 9.7 10.6 8.8 9.8 7.3 8.4 Uttar Pradesh 6.9 7.7 9.7 10.6 8.8 9.8 7.3 8.4
Uttarakhand 6.9 8.7 9.7 10.8 8.8 10.8 7.3 9.1 Uttarakhand 6.9 8.7 9.7 10.8 8.8 10.8 7.3 9.1
West Bengal 11.5 13.8 12.9 18.6 12.7 17.7 11.2 14.8 West Bengal 11.5 13.8 12.9 18.6 12.7 17.7 11.2 14.8
India 12.6 13.4 14.7 15.5 13.8 14.8 12.3 13.6 India 12.6 13.4 14.7 15.5 13.8 14.8 12.3 13.6
NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand
respectively. respectively.
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report
No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round). No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round).

64 64
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.4: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 Table 3.4: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012

1999- 2011- 1999- 1999- 2011- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 1999- 2011- 2011-
2000 2012 2000 2011-2012 2000 2012 1999-2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2011-2012 2000 2012 1999-2000 2012
States/UTs States/UTs
Principal and Subsidi- Current Current Principal and Subsidi- Current Current
Principal Status ary Status Weekly Status Daily Status Principal Status ary Status Weekly Status Daily Status
Andaman & Nicobar Islands 40.1 38.4 42.2 39.9 41.1 38.2 39.4 37.3 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 40.1 38.4 42.2 39.9 41.1 38.2 39.4 37.3
Andhra Pradesh 33.7 35.8 34.8 36.4 33.5 35.4 31.5 34.5 Andhra Pradesh 33.7 35.8 34.8 36.4 33.5 35.4 31.5 34.5
Arunachal Pradesh 26.7 29.9 26.7 30.3 22.7 30.4 22.3 30.1 Arunachal Pradesh 26.7 29.9 26.7 30.3 22.7 30.4 22.3 30.1
Assam 31.7 32.4 33.2 32.9 33.0 32.5 30.4 32.2 Assam 31.7 32.4 33.2 32.9 33.0 32.5 30.4 32.2
Bihar 25.8 24.1 26.6 25.3 26.0 24.7 25.2 24.1 Bihar 25.8 24.1 26.6 25.3 26.0 24.7 25.2 24.1
Chandigarh 33.6 35.1 35.1 35.4 34.4 35.3 33.9 35.1 Chandigarh 33.6 35.1 35.1 35.4 34.4 35.3 33.9 35.1
Chhattisgarh 31.1 35.8 31.9 37.6 30.5 35.9 29.0 33.9 Chhattisgarh 31.1 35.8 31.9 37.6 30.5 35.9 29.0 33.9
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 40.4 36.5 40.4 36.7 39.4 36.5 38.4 36.5 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 40.4 36.5 40.4 36.7 39.4 36.5 38.4 36.5
Daman & Diu 37.1 34.7 37.6 35.5 37.3 35.5 35.4 34.6 Daman & Diu 37.1 34.7 37.6 35.5 37.3 35.5 35.4 34.6
Delhi 32.0 33.4 33.2 33.7 34.6 33.4 33.0 33.3 Delhi 32.0 33.4 33.2 33.7 34.6 33.4 33.0 33.3
Goa 30.3 33.6 30.9 33.7 28.8 33.6 27.3 33.3 Goa 30.3 33.6 30.9 33.7 28.8 33.6 27.3 33.3
Gujarat 33.3 37.5 34.5 38.4 33.6 38.2 31.4 37.2 Gujarat 33.3 37.5 34.5 38.4 33.6 38.2 31.4 37.2
Haryana 29.6 31.1 31.4 31.8 31.3 31.6 29.3 31.3 Haryana 29.6 31.1 31.4 31.8 31.3 31.6 29.3 31.3
Himachal Pradesh 30.4 40.4 32.2 41.6 31.4 41.4 30.4 40.6 Himachal Pradesh 30.4 40.4 32.2 41.6 31.4 41.4 30.4 40.6
Jammu & Kashmir 26.8 31.6 28.1 33.7 27.0 32.6 26.3 31.7 Jammu & Kashmir 26.8 31.6 28.1 33.7 27.0 32.6 26.3 31.7
Jharkhand 25.8 27.5 26.6 28.4 26.0 27.9 25.2 27.3 Jharkhand 25.8 27.5 26.6 28.4 26.0 27.9 25.2 27.3
Karnataka 35.9 37.2 36.6 37.6 35.8 37.2 34.0 36.3 Karnataka 35.9 37.2 36.6 37.6 35.8 37.2 34.0 36.3
Kerala 33.7 34.1 37.3 36.3 33.3 33.8 29.1 30.8 Kerala 33.7 34.1 37.3 36.3 33.3 33.8 29.1 30.8
Lakshadweep 26.1 32.5 30.8 34.7 26.3 32.4 24.9 30.8 Lakshadweep 26.1 32.5 30.8 34.7 26.3 32.4 24.9 30.8
Madhya Pradesh 31.1 31.5 31.9 32.5 30.5 31.6 29.0 30.8 Madhya Pradesh 31.1 31.5 31.9 32.5 30.5 31.6 29.0 30.8
Maharashtra 33.6 35.3 34.6 36.5 33.8 35.7 32.3 34.8 Maharashtra 33.6 35.3 34.6 36.5 33.8 35.7 32.3 34.8
Manipur 29.1 30.6 33.0 32.2 32.0 32.2 29.2 30.7 Manipur 29.1 30.6 33.0 32.2 32.0 32.2 29.2 30.7
Meghalaya 29.6 34.0 29.6 34.0 29.7 34.1 29.1 33.2 Meghalaya 29.6 34.0 29.6 34.0 29.7 34.1 29.1 33.2
Mizoram 35.1 36.6 36.3 36.7 37.5 36.3 33.2 35.3 Mizoram 35.1 36.6 36.3 36.7 37.5 36.3 33.2 35.3
Nagaland 28.5 25.6 30.5 28.7 30.2 27.4 29.9 25.6 Nagaland 28.5 25.6 30.5 28.7 30.2 27.4 29.9 25.6
Odisha 30.0 37.0 31.7 38.1 29.3 36.7 27.9 35.7 Odisha 30.0 37.0 31.7 38.1 29.3 36.7 27.9 35.7
Puducherry 34.6 33.6 35.2 35.0 33.6 32.3 30.7 31.0 Puducherry 34.6 33.6 35.2 35.0 33.6 32.3 30.7 31.0
Punjab 32.5 34.8 35.3 36.8 33.8 36.3 32.4 35.1 Punjab 32.5 34.8 35.3 36.8 33.8 36.3 32.4 35.1
Rajasthan 30.1 30.3 32.3 32.6 30.4 31.7 29.5 30.5 Rajasthan 30.1 30.3 32.3 32.6 30.4 31.7 29.5 30.5
Sikkim 37.3 45.2 37.5 45.2 37.5 45.2 36.7 45.2 Sikkim 37.3 45.2 37.5 45.2 37.5 45.2 36.7 45.2
Tamil Nadu 38.2 38.5 39.3 39.2 38.1 38.4 35.2 36.4 Tamil Nadu 38.2 38.5 39.3 39.2 38.1 38.4 35.2 36.4
Tripura 29.1 31.6 29.5 31.9 29.2 31.6 28.8 30.5 Tripura 29.1 31.6 29.5 31.9 29.2 31.6 28.8 30.5
Uttar Pradesh 28.8 30.0 30.4 31.7 29.4 30.8 28.0 29.5 Uttar Pradesh 28.8 30.0 30.4 31.7 29.4 30.8 28.0 29.5
Uttarakhand 28.8 29.3 30.4 30.5 29.4 30.2 28.0 28.9 Uttarakhand 28.8 29.3 30.4 30.5 29.4 30.2 28.0 28.9
West Bengal 34.0 36.9 35.0 40.0 34.4 39.0 32.6 36.7 West Bengal 34.0 36.9 35.0 40.0 34.4 39.0 32.6 36.7
India 32.4 34.2 33.7 35.5 32.7 34.7 30.9 33.5 India 32.4 34.2 33.7 35.5 32.7 34.7 30.9 33.5
NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand
respectively respectively

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and
Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68 Round)
th
Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)

65 65
 Graph 3.2: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons (Principal & subsidiary status) (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

66
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554 (2011-2012; 68th Round)

Graph 3.2: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Persons (Principal & subsidiary status) (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

66

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554 (2011-2012; 68th Round)
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.5: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Male, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 Table 3.5: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Male, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012
(in percent) (in percent)

1999- 2011- 1999- 2011-2012 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011-2012 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011-
2000 2012 2000 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2000 2012 2000 2012
States/UTs Current Current States/UTs Current Current
Principal and Subsid- Principal and Subsid-
Principal Status Principal Status
iary Status iary Status
Weekly Status Daily Status Weekly Status Daily Status
Andaman & Nicobar Islands 62.7 59.6 63.2 60.7 62.9 58.6 62.0 57.7 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 62.7 59.6 63.2 60.7 62.9 58.6 62.0 57.7
Andhra Pradesh 50.8 55.1 51.1 55.4 50.2 54.7 48.0 53.6 Andhra Pradesh 50.8 55.1 51.1 55.4 50.2 54.7 48.0 53.6
Arunachal Pradesh 39.9 45.7 39.9 45.7 34.8 45.8 34.1 45.8 Arunachal Pradesh 39.9 45.7 39.9 45.7 34.8 45.8 34.1 45.8
Assam 50.7 53.8 52.2 54.2 51.9 53.8 48.0 53.4 Assam 50.7 53.8 52.2 54.2 51.9 53.8 48.0 53.4
Bihar 42.8 41.4 43.2 42.1 42.8 41.6 41.8 41.2 Bihar 42.8 41.4 43.2 42.1 42.8 41.6 41.8 41.2
Chandigarh 53.7 54.7 54.7 54.7 54.4 54.7 54.0 54.5 Chandigarh 53.7 54.7 54.7 54.7 54.4 54.7 54.0 54.5
Chhattisgarh 48.3 48.6 48.8 49.6 47.3 47.5 45.5 45.3 Chhattisgarh 48.3 48.6 48.8 49.6 47.3 47.5 45.5 45.3
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 65.6 57.6 65.6 57.6 64.9 57.6 63.4 57.6 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 65.6 57.6 65.6 57.6 64.9 57.6 63.4 57.6
Daman & Diu 54.5 59.4 54.9 59.5 54.8 59.5 52.8 59.5 Daman & Diu 54.5 59.4 54.9 59.5 54.8 59.5 52.8 59.5
Delhi 52.6 52.9 52.8 53.0 54.8 52.6 53.2 52.4 Delhi 52.6 52.9 52.8 53.0 54.8 52.6 53.2 52.4
Goa 49.5 51.1 49.8 51.1 46.7 50.9 44.5 50.9 Goa 49.5 51.1 49.8 51.1 46.7 50.9 44.5 50.9
Gujarat 53.2 60.1 53.6 60.3 52.9 60.1 50.4 59.6 Gujarat 53.2 60.1 53.6 60.3 52.9 60.1 50.4 59.6
Haryana 50.5 51.2 50.6 51.4 50.2 51.2 48.7 51.1 Haryana 50.5 51.2 50.6 51.4 50.2 51.2 48.7 51.1
Himachal Pradesh 49.8 59.9 49.9 60.0 49.7 59.5 49.4 59.3 Himachal Pradesh 49.8 59.9 49.9 60.0 49.7 59.5 49.4 59.3
Jammu & Kashmir 47.3 53.2 47.8 53.9 46.7 53.2 46.1 52.6 Jammu & Kashmir 47.3 53.2 47.8 53.9 46.7 53.2 46.1 52.6
Jharkhand 42.8 47.3 43.2 48.0 42.8 47.2 41.8 46.8 Jharkhand 42.8 47.3 43.2 48.0 42.8 47.2 41.8 46.8
Karnataka 54.3 57.5 54.5 57.9 53.6 57.5 51.7 56.5 Karnataka 54.3 57.5 54.5 57.9 53.6 57.5 51.7 56.5
Kerala 53.4 54.0 55.8 55.2 51.3 52.5 45.6 48.2 Kerala 53.4 54.0 55.8 55.2 51.3 52.5 45.6 48.2
Lakshadweep 41.2 53.7 43.2 55.0 40.3 53.4 38.4 51.0 Lakshadweep 41.2 53.7 43.2 55.0 40.3 53.4 38.4 51.0
Madhya Pradesh 48.3 51.6 48.8 52.0 47.3 51.3 45.5 50.4 Madhya Pradesh 48.3 51.6 48.8 52.0 47.3 51.3 45.5 50.4
Maharashtra 52.8 54.5 53.2 54.9 52.6 54.4 50.9 53.7 Maharashtra 52.8 54.5 53.2 54.9 52.6 54.4 50.9 53.7
Manipur 43.6 45.5 44.5 45.6 43.9 45.5 41.9 44.9 Manipur 43.6 45.5 44.5 45.6 43.9 45.5 41.9 44.9
Meghalaya 39.3 50.2 39.3 50.3 39.3 50.5 38.6 49.3 Meghalaya 39.3 50.2 39.3 50.3 39.3 50.5 38.6 49.3
Mizoram 46.0 48.7 47.1 48.7 48.4 48.4 44.3 47.1 Mizoram 46.0 48.7 47.1 48.7 48.4 48.4 44.3 47.1
Nagaland 39.1 39.7 39.3 41.2 39.1 40.3 38.9 39.6 Nagaland 39.1 39.7 39.3 41.2 39.1 40.3 38.9 39.6
Odisha 47.2 57.7 47.5 57.9 45.7 56.7 44.3 55.5 Odisha 47.2 57.7 47.5 57.9 45.7 56.7 44.3 55.5
Puducherry 55.3 53.6 55.5 54.8 53.3 50.7 48.9 48.6 Puducherry 55.3 53.6 55.5 54.8 53.3 50.7 48.9 48.6
Punjab 54.1 56.8 54.9 57.0 53.7 56.5 52.9 55.8 Punjab 54.1 56.8 54.9 57.0 53.7 56.5 52.9 55.8
Rajasthan 48.3 48.8 48.6 49.0 47.7 48.2 47.1 47.9 Rajasthan 48.3 48.8 48.6 49.0 47.7 48.2 47.1 47.9
Sikkim 51.5 60.9 51.9 60.9 52.2 60.9 51.4 60.9 Sikkim 51.5 60.9 51.9 60.9 52.2 60.9 51.4 60.9
Tamil Nadu 56.0 58.3 56.3 58.7 55.2 57.8 51.8 55.3 Tamil Nadu 56.0 58.3 56.3 58.7 55.2 57.8 51.8 55.3
Tripura 49.0 52.5 49.4 52.5 48.8 52.5 48.2 50.6 Tripura 49.0 52.5 49.4 52.5 48.8 52.5 48.2 50.6
Uttar Pradesh 48.4 50.4 49.0 51.1 47.9 50.2 46.7 49.0 Uttar Pradesh 48.4 50.4 49.0 51.1 47.9 50.2 46.7 49.0
Uttarakhand 48.4 50.2 49.0 50.6 47.9 49.9 46.7 49.1 Uttarakhand 48.4 50.2 49.0 50.6 47.9 49.9 46.7 49.1
West Bengal 56.1 58.9 56.7 60.2 56.0 59.4 54.1 57.6 West Bengal 56.1 58.9 56.7 60.2 56.0 59.4 54.1 57.6
India 51.3 54.2 51.8 54.6 50.9 53.9 49.0 52.8 India 51.3 54.2 51.8 54.6 50.9 53.9 49.0 52.8
NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand
respectively.Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) respectively.Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round)
and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)

67 67
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.6: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Female, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 Table 3.6: Work Force Participation Rate of Urban Female, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012
(in percent) (in percent)

1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011-
2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012
States/UTs States/UTs
Principal and Subsidi- Current Weekly Principal and Subsidi- Current Weekly
Principal Status Current Daily Status Principal Status Current Daily Status
ary Status Status ary Status Status
Andaman & Nicobar Islands 16.9 18.1 20.6 20.0 18.6 18.6 16.1 17.8 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 16.9 18.1 20.6 20.0 18.6 18.6 16.1 17.8
Andhra Pradesh 15.9 16.0 17.8 17.0 16.1 15.7 14.4 15.0 Andhra Pradesh 15.9 16.0 17.8 17.0 16.1 15.7 14.4 15.0
Arunachal Pradesh 10.0 11.9 10.0 12.7 7.5 12.6 7.5 12.1 Arunachal Pradesh 10.0 11.9 10.0 12.7 7.5 12.6 7.5 12.1
Assam 9.7 8.4 11.2 9.0 11.1 8.6 10.0 8.4 Assam 9.7 8.4 11.2 9.0 11.1 8.6 10.0 8.4
Bihar 6.4 2.8 7.5 4.5 6.9 3.9 6.1 3.0 Bihar 6.4 2.8 7.5 4.5 6.9 3.9 6.1 3.0
Chandigarh 11.4 11.4 13.6 12.1 12.5 11.8 11.7 11.6 Chandigarh 11.4 11.4 13.6 12.1 12.5 11.8 11.7 11.6
Chhattisgarh 12.2 21.3 13.4 24.0 12.1 22.8 10.9 20.9 Chhattisgarh 12.2 21.3 13.4 24.0 12.1 22.8 10.9 20.9
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 11.2 11.1 11.2 11.5 9.9 11.1 9.5 11.1 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 11.2 11.1 11.2 11.5 9.9 11.1 9.5 11.1
Daman & Diu 18.1 13.4 18.6 14.8 18.2 14.8 16.3 13.2 Daman & Diu 18.1 13.4 18.6 14.8 18.2 14.8 16.3 13.2
Delhi 8.2 10.0 10.5 10.4 11.3 10.4 9.6 10.3 Delhi 8.2 10.0 10.5 10.4 11.3 10.4 9.6 10.3
Goa 9.8 15.5 10.6 15.7 9.6 15.7 8.9 15.2 Goa 9.8 15.5 10.6 15.7 9.6 15.7 8.9 15.2
Gujarat 11.4 11.4 13.5 13.3 12.5 13.0 10.6 11.6 Gujarat 11.4 11.4 13.5 13.3 12.5 13.0 10.6 11.6
Haryana 5.8 8.5 9.8 9.7 10.0 9.6 7.4 9.0 Haryana 5.8 8.5 9.8 9.7 10.0 9.6 7.4 9.0
Himachal Pradesh 9.6 18.8 13.0 21.2 11.7 21.5 10.1 20.1 Himachal Pradesh 9.6 18.8 13.0 21.2 11.7 21.5 10.1 20.1
Jammu & Kashmir 4.1 8.1 6.2 11.7 5.1 10.2 4.3 9.0 Jammu & Kashmir 4.1 8.1 6.2 11.7 5.1 10.2 4.3 9.0
Jharkhand 6.4 5.3 7.5 6.6 6.9 6.3 6.1 5.7 Jharkhand 6.4 5.3 7.5 6.6 6.9 6.3 6.1 5.7
Karnataka 16.7 15.8 17.8 16.3 17.2 15.9 15.6 15.2 Karnataka 16.7 15.8 17.8 16.3 17.2 15.9 15.6 15.2
Kerala 15.6 16.1 20.3 19.1 16.9 16.8 14.0 15.0 Kerala 15.6 16.1 20.3 19.1 16.9 16.8 14.0 15.0
Lakshadweep 10.3 8.4 17.9 11.6 11.8 8.5 10.8 7.9 Lakshadweep 10.3 8.4 17.9 11.6 11.8 8.5 10.8 7.9
Madhya Pradesh 12.2 9.9 13.4 11.5 12.1 10.3 10.9 9.8 Madhya Pradesh 12.2 9.9 13.4 11.5 12.1 10.3 10.9 9.8
Maharashtra 12.2 14.6 13.7 16.6 12.9 15.5 11.6 14.3 Maharashtra 12.2 14.6 13.7 16.6 12.9 15.5 11.6 14.3
Manipur 14.2 15.1 21.1 18.2 19.7 18.3 16.1 15.8 Manipur 14.2 15.1 21.1 18.2 19.7 18.3 16.1 15.8
Meghalaya 19.6 20.2 19.7 20.2 19.7 20.2 19.3 19.5 Meghalaya 19.6 20.2 19.7 20.2 19.7 20.2 19.3 19.5
Mizoram 24.6 24.9 25.9 24.9 27.0 24.6 22.7 23.8 Mizoram 24.6 24.9 25.9 24.9 27.0 24.6 22.7 23.8
Nagaland 15.8 9.5 19.9 14.4 19.6 12.7 17.0 9.8 Nagaland 15.8 9.5 19.9 14.4 19.6 12.7 17.0 9.8
Odisha 11.2 13.5 14.5 15.5 11.6 14.0 10.2 13.2 Odisha 11.2 13.5 14.5 15.5 11.6 14.0 10.2 13.2
Puducherry 15.9 13.2 16.9 14.7 15.8 13.6 14.2 13.0 Puducherry 15.9 13.2 16.9 14.7 15.8 13.6 14.2 13.0
Punjab 7.3 9.5 12.5 13.6 10.6 13.0 8.5 11.3 Punjab 7.3 9.5 12.5 13.6 10.6 13.0 8.5 11.3
Rajasthan 9.3 9.5 13.8 14.1 10.8 13.1 9.4 11.0 Rajasthan 9.3 9.5 13.8 14.1 10.8 13.1 9.4 11.0
Sikkim 20.0 27.3 20.0 27.3 19.7 27.3 18.9 27.3 Sikkim 20.0 27.3 20.0 27.3 19.7 27.3 18.9 27.3
Tamil Nadu 19.7 19.0 21.5 20.1 20.1 19.4 17.8 17.9 Tamil Nadu 19.7 19.0 21.5 20.1 20.1 19.4 17.8 17.9
Tripura 7.2 10.7 7.5 11.3 7.6 10.7 7.4 10.5 Tripura 7.2 10.7 7.5 11.3 7.6 10.7 7.4 10.5
Uttar Pradesh 6.6 7.3 9.4 10.2 8.4 9.3 7.0 7.9 Uttar Pradesh 6.6 7.3 9.4 10.2 8.4 9.3 7.0 7.9
Uttarakhand 6.6 6.5 9.4 8.6 8.4 8.7 7.0 6.9 Uttarakhand 6.6 6.5 9.4 8.6 8.4 8.7 7.0 6.9
West Bengal 10.2 12.4 11.7 17.4 11.3 16.3 9.7 13.5 West Bengal 10.2 12.4 11.7 17.4 11.3 16.3 9.7 13.5
India 11.7 12.5 13.9 14.7 12.8 13.8 11.1 12.5 India 11.7 12.5 13.9 14.7 12.8 13.8 11.1 12.5
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report
No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round) NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round) NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand,
Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand respectively. Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand respectively.

68 68
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.7: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 Table 3.7: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012

(in percent) (in percent)

1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012
States/UTs States/UTs
Self-employed Regular Salaried Casual Labourers Self-employed Regular Salaried Casual Labourers
Andaman & Nicobar Andaman & Nicobar
Islands 29.1 18.5 44.2 58.1 26.7 23.3 Islands 29.1 18.5 44.2 58.1 26.7 23.3
Andhra Pradesh 36.7 37.6 38.7 46.7 24.6 15.9 Andhra Pradesh 36.7 37.6 38.7 46.7 24.6 15.9
Arunachal Pradesh 24.1 35.6 59.0 53.1 16.9 11.2 Arunachal Pradesh 24.1 35.6 59.0 53.1 16.9 11.2
Assam 44.7 53.8 42.9 36.5 12.4 9.7 Assam 44.7 53.8 42.9 36.5 12.4 9.7
Bihar 53.7 60.5 30.2 22.1 16.1 17.4 Bihar 53.7 60.5 30.2 22.1 16.1 17.4
Chandigarh 33.1 37.3 61.5 55.9 5.4 7.1 Chandigarh 33.1 37.3 61.5 55.9 5.4 7.1
Chhattisgarh 46.3 35.1 33.0 36.2 20.7 28.7 Chhattisgarh 46.3 35.1 33.0 36.2 20.7 28.7
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 34.3 16.3 51.4 81.5 14.3 2.2 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 34.3 16.3 51.4 81.5 14.3 2.2
Daman & Diu 55.7 35.5 39.1 53.8 5.2 10.7 Daman & Diu 55.7 35.5 39.1 53.8 5.2 10.7
Delhi 41.1 34.7 54.8 61.4 4.1 3.6 Delhi 41.1 34.7 54.8 61.4 4.1 3.6
Goa 26.3 27.9 51.4 65.3 22.3 6.8 Goa 26.3 27.9 51.4 65.3 22.3 6.8
Gujarat 41.0 41.7 34.1 49.5 24.9 8.9 Gujarat 41.0 41.7 34.1 49.5 24.9 8.9
Haryana 44.8 40.6 42.8 49.4 12.4 10.1 Haryana 44.8 40.6 42.8 49.4 12.4 10.1
Himachal Pradesh 37.6 30.3 51.6 60.6 10.8 9.1 Himachal Pradesh 37.6 30.3 51.6 60.6 10.8 9.1
Jammu & Kashmir 48.1 48.7 40.4 40.9 11.5 10.4 Jammu & Kashmir 48.1 48.7 40.4 40.9 11.5 10.4
Jharkhand 53.7 43.7 30.2 38.0 16.1 18.3 Jharkhand 53.7 43.7 30.2 38.0 16.1 18.3
Karnataka 38.8 39.4 39.6 44.9 21.6 16.0 Karnataka 38.8 39.4 39.6 44.9 21.6 16.0
Kerala 41.3 36.4 29.1 35.8 29.6 27.8 Kerala 41.3 36.4 29.1 35.8 29.6 27.8
Lakshadweep 45.7 35.4 38.3 42.4 16.0 22.2 Lakshadweep 45.7 35.4 38.3 42.4 16.0 22.2
Madhya Pradesh 46.3 48.3 33.0 34.8 20.7 16.9 Madhya Pradesh 46.3 48.3 33.0 34.8 20.7 16.9
Maharashtra 33.8 36.2 51.5 54.5 14.7 9.3 Maharashtra 33.8 36.2 51.5 54.5 14.7 9.3
Manipur 60.3 73.0 30.6 22.0 9.1 5.0 Manipur 60.3 73.0 30.6 22.0 9.1 5.0
Meghalaya 26.3 35.9 56.4 50.0 17.3 14.1 Meghalaya 26.3 35.9 56.4 50.0 17.3 14.1
Mizoram 49.5 52.3 33.8 39.8 16.7 7.6 Mizoram 49.5 52.3 33.8 39.8 16.7 7.6
Nagaland 24.2 42.9 71.7 54.0 4.1 2.8 Nagaland 24.2 42.9 71.7 54.0 4.1 2.8
Odisha 42.8 51.2 35.8 34.6 21.4 14.2 Odisha 42.8 51.2 35.8 34.6 21.4 14.2
Puducherry 29.3 23.7 40.8 54.9 29.9 21.1 Puducherry 29.3 23.7 40.8 54.9 29.9 21.1
Punjab 47.7 44.6 40.9 47.8 11.4 7.6 Punjab 47.7 44.6 40.9 47.8 11.4 7.6
Rajasthan 49.9 45.4 36.5 38.7 13.6 15.6 Rajasthan 49.9 45.4 36.5 38.7 13.6 15.6
Sikkim 32.7 38.3 56.5 58.2 10.8 3.8 Sikkim 32.7 38.3 56.5 58.2 10.8 3.8
Tamil Nadu 34.7 34.4 44.1 43.4 21.2 22.4 Tamil Nadu 34.7 34.4 44.1 43.4 21.2 22.4
Tripura 31.3 39.2 53.0 44.5 15.7 16.3 Tripura 31.3 39.2 53.0 44.5 15.7 16.3
Uttar Pradesh 55.0 54.6 32.3 28.7 12.7 17.0 Uttar Pradesh 55.0 54.6 32.3 28.7 12.7 17.0
Uttarakhand 55.0 51.5 32.3 40.0 12.7 8.9 Uttarakhand 55.0 51.5 32.3 40.0 12.7 8.9
West Bengal 43.2 45.0 40.0 38.0 16.8 16.8 West Bengal 43.2 45.0 40.0 38.0 16.8 16.8
India 42.2 42.0 40.0 43.4 17.8 14.6 India 42.2 42.0 40.0 43.4 17.8 14.6
NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh
and Uttarakhand respectively. and Uttarakhand respectively.

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999- Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-
2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round) 2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)

69 69
 Graph 3.3: Work Status (Principal & subsidiary statues) of Urban Persons (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

70
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round).

Graph 3.3: Work Status (Principal & subsidiary statues) of Urban Persons (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

70

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round).
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.8: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Males, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 Table 3.8: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Males, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012
(in percent) (in percent)
1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012
States/UTs States/UTs
Self-employed Regular Salaried Casual Labourers Self-employed Regular Salaried Casual Labourers
Andaman & Nicobar Andaman & Nicobar
Islands 26.2 20.9 46.9 58.3 26.9 20.8 Islands 26.2 20.9 46.9 58.3 26.9 20.8
Andhra Pradesh 35.8 35.4 42.0 49.5 22.2 15.2 Andhra Pradesh 35.8 35.4 42.0 49.5 22.2 15.2
Arunachal Pradesh 21.6 32.2 59.0 56.7 19.4 11.2 Arunachal Pradesh 21.6 32.2 59.0 56.7 19.4 11.2
Assam 48.3 55.0 40.5 35.2 11.2 9.8 Assam 48.3 55.0 40.5 35.2 11.2 9.8
Bihar 54.1 61.0 31.0 21.9 14.9 17.1 Bihar 54.1 61.0 31.0 21.9 14.9 17.1
Chandigarh 36.2 36.7 58.3 55.0 5.5 8.2 Chandigarh 36.2 36.7 58.3 55.0 5.5 8.2
Chhattisgarh 45.2 35.9 36.9 36.3 17.9 27.8 Chhattisgarh 45.2 35.9 36.9 36.3 17.9 27.8
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 32.8 18.1 55.7 80.2 11.5 1.6 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 32.8 18.1 55.7 80.2 11.5 1.6
Daman & Diu 54.1 33.1 41.8 59.2 4.1 7.7 Daman & Diu 54.1 33.1 41.8 59.2 4.1 7.7
Delhi 41.9 36.8 54.1 59.4 4.0 4.0 Delhi 41.9 36.8 54.1 59.4 4.0 4.0
Goa 23.3 32.5 53.5 60.1 23.2 7.4 Goa 23.3 32.5 53.5 60.1 23.2 7.4
Gujarat 40.8 40.3 35.9 51.9 23.3 7.8 Gujarat 40.8 40.3 35.9 51.9 23.3 7.8
Haryana 43.3 42.6 44.4 46.3 12.3 11.1 Haryana 43.3 42.6 44.4 46.3 12.3 11.1
Himachal Pradesh 33.7 28.5 54.3 61.0 12.0 10.5 Himachal Pradesh 33.7 28.5 54.3 61.0 12.0 10.5
Jammu & Kashmir 48.9 49.9 40.4 39.1 10.7 11.1 Jammu & Kashmir 48.9 49.9 40.4 39.1 10.7 11.1
Jharkhand 54.1 45.0 31.0 37.1 14.9 17.7 Jharkhand 54.1 45.0 31.0 37.1 14.9 17.7
Karnataka 37.9 41.6 41.7 42.7 20.4 15.7 Karnataka 37.9 41.6 41.7 42.7 20.4 15.7
Kerala 37.4 36.4 28.0 31.5 34.6 32.1 Kerala 37.4 36.4 28.0 31.5 34.6 32.1
Lakshadweep 34.5 34.5 43.1 39.3 22.4 26.0 Lakshadweep 34.5 34.5 43.1 39.3 22.4 26.0
Madhya Pradesh 45.2 48.3 36.9 34.6 17.9 17.3 Madhya Pradesh 45.2 48.3 36.9 34.6 17.9 17.3
Maharashtra 33.0 36.8 54.0 54.6 13.0 8.6 Maharashtra 33.0 36.8 54.0 54.6 13.0 8.6
Manipur 53.1 68.6 35.5 25.2 11.4 6.1 Manipur 53.1 68.6 35.5 25.2 11.4 6.1
Meghalaya 25.6 32.2 55.2 50.7 19.2 17.1 Meghalaya 25.6 32.2 55.2 50.7 19.2 17.1
Mizoram 42.6 41.9 39.8 47.2 17.6 10.7 Mizoram 42.6 41.9 39.8 47.2 17.6 10.7
Nagaland 20.0 36.2 75.5 60.0 4.5 3.9 Nagaland 20.0 36.2 75.5 60.0 4.5 3.9
Odisha 41.9 49.6 39.9 36.4 18.2 14.0 Odisha 41.9 49.6 39.9 36.4 18.2 14.0
Puducherry 29.2 24.8 41.0 52.0 29.8 23.2 Puducherry 29.2 24.8 41.0 52.0 29.8 23.2
Punjab 47.4 45.3 40.4 46.5 12.2 8.2 Punjab 47.4 45.3 40.4 46.5 12.2 8.2
Rajasthan 46.1 41.8 40.4 41.8 13.5 16.5 Rajasthan 46.1 41.8 40.4 41.8 13.5 16.5
Sikkim 40.5 35.0 51.4 59.9 8.1 5.1 Sikkim 40.5 35.0 51.4 59.9 8.1 5.1
Tamil Nadu 33.0 32.4 45.4 43.6 21.6 23.9 Tamil Nadu 33.0 32.4 45.4 43.6 21.6 23.9
Tripura 33.8 43.4 50.4 39.8 15.8 16.8 Tripura 33.8 43.4 50.4 39.8 15.8 16.8
Uttar Pradesh 53.1 52.1 33.4 29.9 13.5 18.0 Uttar Pradesh 53.1 52.1 33.4 29.9 13.5 18.0
Uttarakhand 53.1 51.2 33.4 39.3 13.5 9.5 Uttarakhand 53.1 51.2 33.4 39.3 13.5 9.5
West Bengal 43.1 44.9 39.9 37.5 17.0 17.8 West Bengal 43.1 44.9 39.9 37.5 17.0 17.8
India 41.5 41.7 41.7 43.4 16.8 14.9 India 41.5 41.7 41.7 43.4 16.8 14.9
NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh
and Uttarakhand respectively. and Uttarakhand respectively.

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000;
55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round) 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)

71 71
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.9: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Females, Table 3.9: Work Status (principal and subsidiary) of Urban Females,
1999-2000 and 2011-2012 1999-2000 and 2011-2012
(in percent) (in percent)
1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012 1999-2000 2011-2012
States/UTs States/UTs
Self-employed Regular Salaried Casual Labourers Self-employed Regular Salaried Casual Labourers
Andaman & Nicobar Andaman & Nicobar
Islands 38.3 11.5 35.8 58.0 25.9 30.5 Islands 38.3 11.5 35.8 58.0 25.9 30.5
Andhra Pradesh 39.3 44.7 28.5 37.6 32.2 18.2 Andhra Pradesh 39.3 44.7 28.5 37.6 32.2 18.2
Arunachal Pradesh 35.7 48.8 57.1 38.6 7.2 11.8 Arunachal Pradesh 35.7 48.8 57.1 38.6 7.2 11.8
Assam 25.1 46.7 55.6 44.4 19.3 7.8 Assam 25.1 46.7 55.6 44.4 19.3 7.8
Bihar 51.3 53.3 25.2 26.7 23.5 17.8 Bihar 51.3 53.3 25.2 26.7 23.5 17.8
Chandigarh 19.4 39.7 75.9 60.3 4.7 0.0 Chandigarh 19.4 39.7 75.9 60.3 4.7 0.0
Chhattisgarh 50.4 33.3 17.2 35.8 32.4 30.8 Chhattisgarh 50.4 33.3 17.2 35.8 32.4 30.8
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 44.4 7.0 22.2 88.7 33.4 4.3 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 44.4 7.0 22.2 88.7 33.4 4.3
Daman & Diu 62.2 43.9 28.9 35.1 8.9 21.6 Daman & Diu 62.2 43.9 28.9 35.1 8.9 21.6
Delhi 36.4 23.1 59.1 74.0 4.5 1.9 Delhi 36.4 23.1 59.1 74.0 4.5 1.9
Goa 41.4 12.7 41.1 82.8 17.5 4.5 Goa 41.4 12.7 41.1 82.8 17.5 4.5
Gujarat 41.9 48.1 26.4 36.8 31.7 15.0 Gujarat 41.9 48.1 26.4 36.8 31.7 15.0
Haryana 53.5 27.8 33.0 67.0 13.5 5.2 Haryana 53.5 27.8 33.0 67.0 13.5 5.2
Himachal Pradesh 53.3 35.8 40.6 59.0 6.1 5.2 Himachal Pradesh 53.3 35.8 40.6 59.0 6.1 5.2
Jammu & Kashmir 41.0 42.7 41.3 50.4 17.7 6.0 Jammu & Kashmir 41.0 42.7 41.3 50.4 17.7 6.0
Jharkhand 51.3 33.3 25.2 45.5 23.5 21.2 Jharkhand 51.3 33.3 25.2 45.5 23.5 21.2
Karnataka 41.5 30.1 32.6 53.4 25.9 16.6 Karnataka 41.5 30.1 32.6 53.4 25.9 16.6
Kerala 50.9 36.1 31.9 46.6 17.2 17.3 Kerala 50.9 36.1 31.9 46.6 17.2 17.3
Lakshadweep 69.6 39.7 26.1 59.5 4.3 0.9 Lakshadweep 69.6 39.7 26.1 59.5 4.3 0.9
Madhya Pradesh 50.4 48.7 17.2 35.7 32.4 15.7 Madhya Pradesh 50.4 48.7 17.2 35.7 32.4 15.7
Maharashtra 37.4 33.1 41.0 54.2 21.6 12.0 Maharashtra 37.4 33.1 41.0 54.2 21.6 12.0
Manipur 75.8 84.6 19.7 13.7 4.5 1.6 Manipur 75.8 84.6 19.7 13.7 4.5 1.6
Meghalaya 27.7 43.6 58.8 48.5 13.5 8.4 Meghalaya 27.7 43.6 58.8 48.5 13.5 8.4
Mizoram 61.6 72.3 23.3 25.7 15.1 2.0 Mizoram 61.6 72.3 23.3 25.7 15.1 2.0
Nagaland 34.3 64.6 62.9 35.4 2.8 0.0 Nagaland 34.3 64.6 62.9 35.4 2.8 0.0
Odisha 46.0 58.1 21.2 27.1 32.8 14.8 Odisha 46.0 58.1 21.2 27.1 32.8 14.8
Puducherry 29.8 19.7 40.5 66.7 29.7 13.6 Puducherry 29.8 19.7 40.5 66.7 29.7 13.6
Punjab 49.1 41.2 43.4 54.4 7.5 4.4 Punjab 49.1 41.2 43.4 54.4 7.5 4.4
Rajasthan 65.3 60.3 20.9 27.0 13.8 12.8 Rajasthan 65.3 60.3 20.9 27.0 13.8 12.8
Sikkim 11.4 46.5 74.3 53.5 14.3 0.0 Sikkim 11.4 46.5 74.3 53.5 14.3 0.0
Tamil Nadu 39.4 39.8 40.7 41.8 19.9 18.4 Tamil Nadu 39.4 39.8 40.7 41.8 19.9 18.4
Tripura 12.8 20.4 72.3 66.4 14.9 13.3 Tripura 12.8 20.4 72.3 66.4 14.9 13.3
Uttar Pradesh 66.1 67.6 25.7 21.6 8.2 10.8 Uttar Pradesh 66.1 67.6 25.7 21.6 8.2 10.8
Uttarakhand 66.1 53.5 25.7 43.0 8.2 4.7 Uttarakhand 66.1 53.5 25.7 43.0 8.2 4.7
West Bengal 43.6 46.0 40.1 40.2 16.3 13.2 West Bengal 43.6 46.0 40.1 40.2 16.3 13.2
India 45.3 42.8 33.3 42.8 21.4 14.3 India 45.3 42.8 33.3 42.8 21.4 14.3
NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and
Uttarakhand respectively. Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 Uttarakhand respectively. Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458
(1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round) (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)

72 72
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.10: Unemployment Rate of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 Table 3.10: Unemployment Rate of Urban Persons, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012
(in percent) (in percent)
1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011-
2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012
States/UTs Current Current States/UTs Current Current
Usual Status (ad- Usual Status (ad-
Usual Status Usual Status
justed) justed)
Weekly Status Daily Status Weekly Status Daily Status
Andaman & Nicobar Islands 8.8 11.4 6.9 8.6 8.4 10.7 9.7 11.3 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 8.8 11.4 6.9 8.6 8.4 10.7 9.7 11.3
Andhra Pradesh 4.2 4.5 3.9 4.3 5.1 5.5 7.6 6.4 Andhra Pradesh 4.2 4.5 3.9 4.3 5.1 5.5 7.6 6.4
Arunachal Pradesh 2.9 4.9 2.9 4.8 2.7 4.7 2.9 4.7 Arunachal Pradesh 2.9 4.9 2.9 4.8 2.7 4.7 2.9 4.7
Assam 11.3 5.7 9.7 5.6 10.4 5.7 11.9 6.0 Assam 11.3 5.7 9.7 5.6 10.4 5.7 11.9 6.0
Bihar 7.9 6.6 7.4 5.6 8.3 6.7 9.3 7.4 Bihar 7.9 6.6 7.4 5.6 8.3 6.7 9.3 7.4
Chandigarh 5.8 6.5 4.8 6.4 8.1 7.0 8.1 7.0 Chandigarh 5.8 6.5 4.8 6.4 8.1 7.0 8.1 7.0
Chhattisgarh 3.8 5.6 3.5 4.3 5.6 7.8 7.0 8.9 Chhattisgarh 3.8 5.6 3.5 4.3 5.6 7.8 7.0 8.9
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.9 0.0 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.9 0.0
Daman & Diu 3.1 0.5 3.0 0.5 3.1 0.5 3.1 0.6 Daman & Diu 3.1 0.5 3.0 0.5 3.1 0.5 3.1 0.6
Delhi 3.5 3.6 3.3 3.5 3.4 4.0 4.1 4.3 Delhi 3.5 3.6 3.3 3.5 3.4 4.0 4.1 4.3
Goa 19.1 4.6 18.5 4.6 23.8 4.6 26.1 4.7 Goa 19.1 4.6 18.5 4.6 23.8 4.6 26.1 4.7
Gujarat 2.2 0.9 2.0 0.8 2.8 0.9 4.2 1.6 Gujarat 2.2 0.9 2.0 0.8 2.8 0.9 4.2 1.6
Haryana 2.9 4.2 2.7 4.2 3.8 4.3 4.5 4.4 Haryana 2.9 4.2 2.7 4.2 3.8 4.3 4.5 4.4
Himachal Pradesh 7.2 4.2 6.6 4.0 7.3 3.4 7.8 3.6 Himachal Pradesh 7.2 4.2 6.6 4.0 7.3 3.4 7.8 3.6
Jammu & Kashmir 5.4 7.8 5.0 7.0 5.7 7.6 6.6 8.4 Jammu & Kashmir 5.4 7.8 5.0 7.0 5.7 7.6 6.6 8.4
Jharkhand 7.9 5.5 7.4 5.1 8.3 6.0 9.3 6.2 Jharkhand 7.9 5.5 7.4 5.1 8.3 6.0 9.3 6.2
Karnataka 3.4 3.4 3.3 2.9 4.0 3.4 5.4 4.1 Karnataka 3.4 3.4 3.3 2.9 4.0 3.4 5.4 4.1
Kerala 12.5 7.8 10.2 6.1 13.8 8.5 19.1 12.3 Kerala 12.5 7.8 10.2 6.1 13.8 8.5 19.1 12.3
Lakshadweep 13.9 13.2 10.0 11.5 13.8 13.2 16.5 14.7 Lakshadweep 13.9 13.2 10.0 11.5 13.8 13.2 16.5 14.7
Madhya Pradesh 3.8 2.8 3.5 2.6 5.6 3.6 7.0 4.6 Madhya Pradesh 3.8 2.8 3.5 2.6 5.6 3.6 7.0 4.6
Maharashtra 6.4 2.4 5.8 2.3 6.8 3.0 8.1 3.7 Maharashtra 6.4 2.4 5.8 2.3 6.8 3.0 8.1 3.7
Manipur 8.1 7.6 6.7 7.1 6.7 7.2 6.9 7.4 Manipur 8.1 7.6 6.7 7.1 6.7 7.2 6.9 7.4
Meghalaya 4.6 2.8 4.6 2.8 4.6 3.0 4.6 3.3 Meghalaya 4.6 2.8 4.6 2.8 4.6 3.0 4.6 3.3
Mizoram 3.8 5.0 3.0 5.0 2.7 5.0 3.6 5.2 Mizoram 3.8 5.0 3.0 5.0 2.7 5.0 3.6 5.2
Nagaland 9.7 27.5 9.1 23.8 9.6 24.9 10.0 26.4 Nagaland 9.7 27.5 9.1 23.8 9.6 24.9 10.0 26.4
Odisha 7.1 3.7 6.7 3.5 8.0 4.7 9.5 5.8 Odisha 7.1 3.7 6.7 3.5 8.0 4.7 9.5 5.8
Puducherry 4.4 3.7 4.1 2.9 7.5 5.4 12.5 8.3 Puducherry 4.4 3.7 4.1 2.9 7.5 5.4 12.5 8.3
Punjab 3.2 3.1 2.7 2.8 3.9 3.5 4.9 4.3 Punjab 3.2 3.1 2.7 2.8 3.9 3.5 4.9 4.3
Rajasthan 2.9 3.5 2.5 3.1 3.8 4.7 4.5 5.2 Rajasthan 2.9 3.5 2.5 3.1 3.8 4.7 4.5 5.2
Sikkim 7.6 2.3 7.5 2.3 7.5 2.3 7.5 2.3 Sikkim 7.6 2.3 7.5 2.3 7.5 2.3 7.5 2.3
Tamil Nadu 4.4 3.0 4.0 2.7 5.2 4.1 8.9 6.8 Tamil Nadu 4.4 3.0 4.0 2.7 5.2 4.1 8.9 6.8
Tripura 5.9 25.4 5.8 25.2 6.2 25.4 6.2 27.6 Tripura 5.9 25.4 5.8 25.2 6.2 25.4 6.2 27.6
Uttar Pradesh 4.5 4.4 4.1 4.1 5.2 5.0 6.2 6.1 Uttar Pradesh 4.5 4.4 4.1 4.1 5.2 5.0 6.2 6.1
Uttarakhand 4.5 5.6 4.1 5.3 5.2 5.7 6.2 7.1 Uttarakhand 4.5 5.6 4.1 5.3 5.2 5.7 6.2 7.1
West Bengal 8.2 5.9 7.6 4.8 8.7 5.6 10.6 6.8 West Bengal 8.2 5.9 7.6 4.8 8.7 5.6 10.6 6.8
India 5.2 3.8 4.7 3.4 5.9 4.4 7.7 5.5 India 5.2 3.8 4.7 3.4 5.9 4.4 7.7 5.5
NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand respectively. NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand respectively.
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round). Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round).

73 73
 Graph 3.4: Unemployment Rate of Urban Persons (Usual Status) (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

74
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)

Graph 3.4: Unemployment Rate of Urban Persons (Usual Status) (%)

Handbook of Urban Statistics

74

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.11: Unemployment Rate of Urban Males, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 Table 3.11: Unemployment Rate of Urban Males, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012
(in percent) (in percent)
1999- 2011- 1999- 1999- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 1999- 1999- 2011-
States/UTs 2000 2012 2000 2011-2012 2000 2011-2012 2000 2012 States/UTs 2000 2012 2000 2011-2012 2000 2011-2012 2000 2012
Usual Status Usual Status (adjusted) Current Weekly Status Current Daily Status Usual Status Usual Status (adjusted) Current Weekly Status Current Daily Status
Andaman & Nicobar Andaman & Nicobar
Islands 3.8 5.7 3.0 4.0 3.8 5.0 5.1 5.1 Islands 3.8 5.7 3.0 4.0 3.8 5.0 5.1 5.1
Andhra Pradesh 4.2 4.0 4.0 3.9 4.8 4.7 7.2 5.4 Andhra Pradesh 4.2 4.0 4.0 3.9 4.8 4.7 7.2 5.4
Arunachal Pradesh 1.4 3.6 1.4 3.6 2.4 3.6 2.2 3.7 Arunachal Pradesh 1.4 3.6 1.4 3.6 2.4 3.6 2.2 3.7
Assam 9.1 5.4 7.7 5.4 8.4 5.5 9.9 5.8 Assam 9.1 5.4 7.7 5.4 8.4 5.5 9.9 5.8
Bihar 7.6 5.3 7.3 4.5 7.7 5.2 8.7 5.9 Bihar 7.6 5.3 7.3 4.5 7.7 5.2 8.7 5.9
Chandigarh 3.9 5.7 3.2 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.4 5.8 Chandigarh 3.9 5.7 3.2 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.4 5.8
Chhattisgarh 4.3 5.1 4.1 4.1 6.0 8.0 7.2 9.3 Chhattisgarh 4.3 5.1 4.1 4.1 6.0 8.0 7.2 9.3
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1.6 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.6 0.0 2.1 0.0 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1.6 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.6 0.0 2.1 0.0
Daman & Diu 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.5 0.0 Daman & Diu 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.5 0.0
Delhi 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.0 4.0 4.2 Delhi 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.0 4.0 4.2
Goa 15.3 2.9 14.7 2.9 18.9 2.9 21.4 3.1 Goa 15.3 2.9 14.7 2.9 18.9 2.9 21.4 3.1
Gujarat 2.1 0.7 2.0 0.6 2.7 0.8 4.0 1.4 Gujarat 2.1 0.7 2.0 0.6 2.7 0.8 4.0 1.4
Haryana 2.7 4.0 2.7 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.5 4.1 Haryana 2.7 4.0 2.7 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.5 4.1
Himachal Pradesh 6.3 2.1 6.2 1.9 6.7 2.1 7.0 2.3 Himachal Pradesh 6.3 2.1 6.2 1.9 6.7 2.1 7.0 2.3
Jammu & Kashmir 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.1 5.1 4.5 6.0 5.3 Jammu & Kashmir 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.1 5.1 4.5 6.0 5.3
Jharkhand 7.6 4.9 7.3 4.6 7.7 5.6 8.7 5.7 Jharkhand 7.6 4.9 7.3 4.6 7.7 5.6 8.7 5.7
Karnataka 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.4 3.8 3.0 5.3 3.7 Karnataka 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.4 3.8 3.0 5.3 3.7
Kerala 6.9 3.3 5.6 2.7 9.7 4.7 15.5 8.7 Kerala 6.9 3.3 5.6 2.7 9.7 4.7 15.5 8.7
Lakshadweep 8.2 6.7 6.5 5.3 10.0 6.8 13.1 8.3 Lakshadweep 8.2 6.7 6.5 5.3 10.0 6.8 13.1 8.3
Madhya Pradesh 4.3 2.4 4.1 2.4 6.0 3.4 7.2 4.5 Madhya Pradesh 4.3 2.4 4.1 2.4 6.0 3.4 7.2 4.5
Maharashtra 6.1 1.9 5.6 1.8 6.5 2.3 7.7 3.0 Maharashtra 6.1 1.9 5.6 1.8 6.5 2.3 7.7 3.0
Manipur 7.4 5.8 6.9 5.6 6.6 5.8 6.6 5.8 Manipur 7.4 5.8 6.9 5.6 6.6 5.8 6.6 5.8
Meghalaya 3.4 2.4 3.4 2.4 3.4 2.4 3.5 2.7 Meghalaya 3.4 2.4 3.4 2.4 3.4 2.4 3.5 2.7
Mizoram 4.4 4.0 3.4 4.0 2.9 4.0 3.8 4.2 Mizoram 4.4 4.0 3.4 4.0 2.9 4.0 3.8 4.2
Nagaland 9.3 21.9 9.3 19.1 9.7 19.8 9.8 20.5 Nagaland 9.3 21.9 9.3 19.1 9.7 19.8 9.8 20.5
Odisha 7.2 4.0 7.0 3.9 8.2 5.1 9.8 6.4 Odisha 7.2 4.0 7.0 3.9 8.2 5.1 9.8 6.4
Puducherry 3.5 3.3 3.3 2.7 7.1 5.6 13.1 9.0 Puducherry 3.5 3.3 3.3 2.7 7.1 5.6 13.1 9.0
Punjab 3.1 2.8 2.8 2.6 3.9 3.4 4.8 4.3 Punjab 3.1 2.8 2.8 2.6 3.9 3.4 4.8 4.3
Rajasthan 2.7 3.5 2.6 3.2 4.0 5.0 4.7 5.4 Rajasthan 2.7 3.5 2.6 3.2 4.0 5.0 4.7 5.4
Sikkim 6.7 3.2 6.7 3.2 5.9 3.2 6.4 3.1 Sikkim 6.7 3.2 6.7 3.2 5.9 3.2 6.4 3.1
Tamil Nadu 3.9 2.3 3.6 2.1 4.9 3.4 9.0 6.3 Tamil Nadu 3.9 2.3 3.6 2.1 4.9 3.4 9.0 6.3
Tripura 5.5 11.5 5.4 11.5 5.7 11.5 5.7 14.2 Tripura 5.5 11.5 5.4 11.5 5.7 11.5 5.7 14.2
Uttar Pradesh 4.5 4.3 4.3 4.2 5.3 5.1 6.3 6.2 Uttar Pradesh 4.5 4.3 4.3 4.2 5.3 5.1 6.3 6.2
Uttarakhand 4.5 2.6 4.3 2.5 5.3 3.1 6.3 4.3 Uttarakhand 4.5 2.6 4.3 2.5 5.3 3.1 6.3 4.3
West Bengal 7.7 5.1 7.2 4.3 8.2 5.1 10.0 6.4 West Bengal 7.7 5.1 7.2 4.3 8.2 5.1 10.0 6.4
India 4.8 3.2 4.5 3.0 5.6 3.8 7.3 4.9 India 4.8 3.2 4.5 3.0 5.6 3.8 7.3 4.9
NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttara- NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttara-
khand respectively. khand respectively.

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and
Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round) Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)

75 75
 Graph 3.5: Unemployment Rate of Urban Males (Usual Status) (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

76
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)

Graph 3.5: Unemployment Rate of Urban Males (Usual Status) (%)

Handbook of Urban Statistics

76

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.12: Unemployment Rate of Urban Females, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012 Table 3.12: Unemployment Rate of Urban Females, 1999-2000 and 2011-2012
(in percent) (in percent)
1999- 2011- 1999- 2011-2012 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011-2012 1999- 2011- 1999- 2011-
2000 2012 2000 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2012 2000 2000 2012 2000 2012
States/Uts Current Current States/Uts Current Current
Usual Status (ad- Usual Status (ad-
Usual Status Usual Status
justed) justed)
Weekly Status Daily Status Weekly Status Daily Status
Andaman & Nicobar Islands 23.9 26.2 17.3 19.7 20.7 25.2 24.0 26.5 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 23.9 26.2 17.3 19.7 20.7 25.2 24.0 26.5
Andhra Pradesh 4.2 6.3 3.7 5.4 6.0 8.5 8.9 9.7 Andhra Pradesh 4.2 6.3 3.7 5.4 6.0 8.5 8.9 9.7
Arunachal Pradesh 10.0 9.2 10.0 8.7 9.1 8.0 6.5 8.6 Arunachal Pradesh 10.0 9.2 10.0 8.7 9.1 8.0 6.5 8.6
Assam 22.3 7.5 18.9 7.0 19.7 7.1 21.9 7.3 Assam 22.3 7.5 18.9 7.0 19.7 7.1 21.9 7.3
Bihar 9.4 25.0 8.1 16.5 11.8 22.8 13.5 27.1 Bihar 9.4 25.0 8.1 16.5 11.8 22.8 13.5 27.1
Chandigarh 14.4 11.0 10.9 10.4 23.8 13.8 22.9 13.0 Chandigarh 14.4 11.0 10.9 10.4 23.8 13.8 22.9 13.0
Chhattisgarh 1.6 7.0 1.4 4.7 3.8 7.2 5.7 8.1 Chhattisgarh 1.6 7.0 1.4 4.7 3.8 7.2 5.7 8.1
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Daman & Diu 8.3 2.4 8.0 2.2 8.3 2.2 8.2 2.8 Daman & Diu 8.3 2.4 8.0 2.2 8.3 2.2 8.2 2.8
Delhi 5.3 4.8 3.9 4.6 3.9 4.6 4.2 4.6 Delhi 5.3 4.8 3.9 4.6 3.9 4.6 4.2 4.6
Goa 35.2 9.8 33.3 9.7 42.1 9.7 44.2 10.1 Goa 35.2 9.8 33.3 9.7 42.1 9.7 44.2 10.1
Gujarat 2.6 1.9 2.0 1.7 3.4 1.4 5.4 2.4 Gujarat 2.6 1.9 2.0 1.7 3.4 1.4 5.4 2.4
Haryana 4.6 5.6 2.8 5.0 3.9 5.9 4.9 6.3 Haryana 4.6 5.6 2.8 5.0 3.9 5.9 4.9 6.3
Himachal Pradesh 11.8 11.0 7.9 9.9 9.9 7.4 11.9 7.7 Himachal Pradesh 11.8 11.0 7.9 9.9 9.9 7.4 11.9 7.7
Jammu & Kashmir 12.8 25.6 8.9 19.0 11.4 21.8 13.4 24.2 Jammu & Kashmir 12.8 25.6 8.9 19.0 11.4 21.8 13.4 24.2
Jharkhand 9.4 10.9 8.1 8.9 11.8 9.3 13.5 10.3 Jharkhand 9.4 10.9 8.1 8.9 11.8 9.3 13.5 10.3
Karnataka 4.7 5.1 4.4 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.9 5.6 Karnataka 4.7 5.1 4.4 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.9 5.6
Kerala 26.4 19.2 20.0 13.9 23.5 17.9 28.2 21.3 Kerala 26.4 19.2 20.0 13.9 23.5 17.9 28.2 21.3
Lakshadweep 26.3 41.2 17.9 35.0 25.0 41.2 26.9 43.4 Lakshadweep 26.3 41.2 17.9 35.0 25.0 41.2 26.9 43.4
Madhya Pradesh 1.6 4.5 1.4 3.5 3.8 4.6 5.7 4.9 Madhya Pradesh 1.6 4.5 1.4 3.5 3.8 4.6 5.7 4.9
Maharashtra 7.8 4.3 6.6 3.8 8.1 5.7 10.0 6.6 Maharashtra 7.8 4.3 6.6 3.8 8.1 5.7 10.0 6.6
Manipur 10.3 12.9 6.2 10.8 6.8 10.8 7.6 11.9 Manipur 10.3 12.9 6.2 10.8 6.8 10.8 7.6 11.9
Meghalaya 6.8 3.7 6.8 3.7 6.8 4.4 6.9 4.6 Meghalaya 6.8 3.7 6.8 3.7 6.8 4.4 6.9 4.6
Mizoram 2.6 6.8 2.4 6.7 2.4 6.7 3.1 6.9 Mizoram 2.6 6.8 2.4 6.7 2.4 6.7 3.1 6.9
Nagaland 10.8 46.3 8.7 36.0 9.8 39.2 10.4 45.1 Nagaland 10.8 46.3 8.7 36.0 9.8 39.2 10.4 45.1
Odisha 6.7 2.3 5.3 2.0 7.3 2.8 8.2 2.8 Odisha 6.7 2.3 5.3 2.0 7.3 2.8 8.2 2.8
Puducherry 6.9 5.4 6.4 3.7 8.6 4.5 10.4 5.4 Puducherry 6.9 5.4 6.4 3.7 8.6 4.5 10.4 5.4
Punjab 3.5 5.1 2.1 3.6 4.3 4.1 5.3 4.8 Punjab 3.5 5.1 2.1 3.6 4.3 4.1 5.3 4.8
Rajasthan 3.7 3.7 2.1 2.5 2.7 3.4 3.5 4.2 Rajasthan 3.7 3.7 2.1 2.5 2.7 3.4 3.5 4.2
Sikkim 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 10.7 0.2 Sikkim 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 10.7 0.2
Tamil Nadu 5.8 5.1 5.1 4.5 6.0 6.1 8.6 8.5 Tamil Nadu 5.8 5.1 5.1 4.5 6.0 6.1 8.6 8.5
Tripura 8.8 57.9 8.5 56.4 8.9 57.8 9.6 58.6 Tripura 8.8 57.9 8.5 56.4 8.9 57.8 9.6 58.6
Uttar Pradesh 4.6 5.2 3.3 3.7 4.2 4.5 5.0 5.5 Uttar Pradesh 4.6 5.2 3.3 3.7 4.2 4.5 5.0 5.5
Uttarakhand 4.6 25.3 3.3 20.0 4.2 19.3 5.0 24.3 Uttarakhand 4.6 25.3 3.3 20.0 4.2 19.3 5.0 24.3
West Bengal 11.1 9.8 9.5 6.4 11.5 7.6 13.9 8.8 West Bengal 11.1 9.8 9.5 6.4 11.5 7.6 13.9 8.8
India 7.1 6.6 5.7 5.2 7.3 6.7 9.4 8.0 India 7.1 6.6 5.7 5.2 7.3 6.7 9.4 8.0
NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand NOTE: In 1999-2000, the figures of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh are used for Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand
respectively respectively
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report
No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round). No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round).

77 77
 Graph 3.6: Unemployment Rate of Urban Females (Usual Status)(%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

78
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)

Graph 3.6: Unemployment Rate of Urban Females (Usual Status)(%)

Handbook of Urban Statistics

78

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)
 Table 3.13: National Industrial Classification of Urban Workers (principal and subsidiary), 2011-2012
(in percent)

States/UTs A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U Total
Andaman & Nicobar
Islands 3.9 0.0 7.3 2.0 0.9 16.2 15.9 11.2 2.9 0.7 0.9 0.0 0.6 1.5 21.8 7.2 3.7 0.3 1.5 1.5 0.0 100.0
Andhra Pradesh 4.9 1.3 16.4 0.7 0.1 12.1 19.0 10.6 3.0 3.3 2.5 0.8 1.6 2.0 6.0 6.7 2.0 0.5 4.0 2.5 0.0 100.0
Arunachal Pradesh 14.7 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.2 12.5 15.1 1.5 1.2 0.4 0.7 0.0 2.5 3.5 30.4 7.4 2.3 0.1 3.1 2.2 0.0 100.0
Assam 4.4 4.0 9.5 0.1 0.3 8.0 30.6 6.9 3.2 0.9 2.7 0.1 1.2 1.3 8.6 5.6 0.7 1.3 7.2 3.7 0.0 100.0
Bihar 9.4 0.1 15.2 0.2 0.0 8.4 28.7 6.1 5.3 0.9 2.1 0.1 1.4 4.4 4.9 6.3 1.6 0.0 4.9 0.1 0.0 100.0
Chandigarh 0.6 0.0 14.1 0.0 1.2 8.2 26.0 6.0 6.4 1.3 2.7 0.6 1.8 8.1 14.3 3.5 4.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 100.0
Chhattisgarh 14.9 2.2 11.9 1.6 0.4 18.8 17.0 4.5 4.5 1.1 1.8 0.1 0.9 0.6 2.6 7.9 3.2 0.2 4.4 1.6 0.0 100.0
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 5.7 0.0 55.3 0.0 0.0 5.3 5.3 9.3 2.9 1.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.6 6.0 2.1 0.0 3.3 1.6 0.0 100.0
Daman & Diu 11.0 0.0 13.7 0.0 1.4 3.8 16.1 13.4 6.1 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 8.8 11.2 3.6 2.6 2.1 2.7 0.0 100.0

79
Delhi 0.0 0.0 21.6 0.1 0.8 4.4 24.5 8.2 4.1 3.3 2.8 1.5 3.7 3.7 7.9 4.7 2.9 1.0 2.4 2.4 0.1 100.0
Goa 3.1 5.7 8.9 2.3 2.1 6.1 20.4 5.9 11.3 1.2 5.4 0.3 2.7 3.6 6.9 6.9 3.4 1.0 2.0 1.2 0.0 100.0
Gujarat 4.3 0.6 39.4 0.4 3.4 5.6 18.9 5.5 4.3 1.1 1.7 0.2 1.4 1.4 3.5 2.8 2.3 0.1 2.2 1.0 0.0 100.0
Haryana 6.2 0.0 22.2 1.0 0.4 10.7 18.8 6.3 1.8 5.0 2.8 1.4 2.2 0.6 5.6 8.0 3.6 0.0 2.5 0.9 0.0 100.0
Himachal Pradesh 8.4 0.3 33.3 0.8 0.4 5.8 11.4 1.9 4.3 1.0 2.9 0.0 3.1 4.0 7.1 8.5 1.6 0.0 4.9 0.2 0.0 100.0
Jammu & Kashmir 8.8 0.1 16.0 0.6 1.1 14.2 21.8 6.1 2.3 1.8 1.6 0.2 0.4 1.1 8.5 8.5 3.0 0.3 2.9 0.6 0.0 100.0
Jharkhand 3.7 7.4 10.5 0.3 0.3 14.3 25.9 9.6 2.7 0.7 2.3 0.6 2.5 2.8 4.8 5.1 1.2 0.1 3.4 1.9 0.0 100.0
Karnataka 7.8 0.3 18.4 0.6 0.3 9.7 18.1 6.3 6.4 7.5 2.1 0.8 2.6 2.8 2.6 6.6 2.1 0.5 1.8 2.8 0.0 100.0
Kerala 8.7 0.3 16.4 0.7 0.1 14.0 18.8 8.2 4.3 2.5 3.2 0.9 1.6 1.4 3.7 5.1 3.8 1.0 3.3 2.2 0.0 100.0
Lakshadweep 36.4 0.4 4.2 1.3 1.4 13.4 5.3 5.9 2.1 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 10.6 10.8 2.6 1.8 0.7 0.0 0.0 100.0
Madhya Pradesh 11.1 0.8 15.7 0.5 0.5 11.9 23.4 7.7 2.3 1.4 2.4 0.1 0.9 1.1 5.9 6.8 1.7 0.5 4.8 0.6 0.0 100.0
Maharashtra 4.5 0.2 22.2 0.6 0.4 8.1 18.0 9.5 3.4 3.2 4.1 0.6 1.7 2.1 3.9 5.3 2.2 0.7 4.7 4.5 0.0 100.0
Manipur 20.0 0.0 18.1 0.2 0.1 9.7 19.5 6.2 2.8 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.4 0.7 11.8 6.2 0.8 0.4 1.5 0.6 0.0 100.0
Megahlaya 4.8 1.1 3.5 0.1 0.0 11.0 27.3 5.2 3.2 0.5 2.8 0.0 0.2 0.2 25.1 8.4 1.4 0.0 3.1 2.2 0.0 100.0
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.13: National Industrial Classification of Urban Workers (principal and subsidiary), 2011-2012
(in percent)

States/UTs A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U Total
Andaman & Nicobar
Islands 3.9 0.0 7.3 2.0 0.9 16.2 15.9 11.2 2.9 0.7 0.9 0.0 0.6 1.5 21.8 7.2 3.7 0.3 1.5 1.5 0.0 100.0
Andhra Pradesh 4.9 1.3 16.4 0.7 0.1 12.1 19.0 10.6 3.0 3.3 2.5 0.8 1.6 2.0 6.0 6.7 2.0 0.5 4.0 2.5 0.0 100.0
Arunachal Pradesh 14.7 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.2 12.5 15.1 1.5 1.2 0.4 0.7 0.0 2.5 3.5 30.4 7.4 2.3 0.1 3.1 2.2 0.0 100.0
Assam 4.4 4.0 9.5 0.1 0.3 8.0 30.6 6.9 3.2 0.9 2.7 0.1 1.2 1.3 8.6 5.6 0.7 1.3 7.2 3.7 0.0 100.0
Bihar 9.4 0.1 15.2 0.2 0.0 8.4 28.7 6.1 5.3 0.9 2.1 0.1 1.4 4.4 4.9 6.3 1.6 0.0 4.9 0.1 0.0 100.0
Chandigarh 0.6 0.0 14.1 0.0 1.2 8.2 26.0 6.0 6.4 1.3 2.7 0.6 1.8 8.1 14.3 3.5 4.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 100.0
Chhattisgarh 14.9 2.2 11.9 1.6 0.4 18.8 17.0 4.5 4.5 1.1 1.8 0.1 0.9 0.6 2.6 7.9 3.2 0.2 4.4 1.6 0.0 100.0
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 5.7 0.0 55.3 0.0 0.0 5.3 5.3 9.3 2.9 1.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.6 6.0 2.1 0.0 3.3 1.6 0.0 100.0
Daman & Diu 11.0 0.0 13.7 0.0 1.4 3.8 16.1 13.4 6.1 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 8.8 11.2 3.6 2.6 2.1 2.7 0.0 100.0
79

Delhi 0.0 0.0 21.6 0.1 0.8 4.4 24.5 8.2 4.1 3.3 2.8 1.5 3.7 3.7 7.9 4.7 2.9 1.0 2.4 2.4 0.1 100.0
Goa 3.1 5.7 8.9 2.3 2.1 6.1 20.4 5.9 11.3 1.2 5.4 0.3 2.7 3.6 6.9 6.9 3.4 1.0 2.0 1.2 0.0 100.0
Gujarat 4.3 0.6 39.4 0.4 3.4 5.6 18.9 5.5 4.3 1.1 1.7 0.2 1.4 1.4 3.5 2.8 2.3 0.1 2.2 1.0 0.0 100.0
Haryana 6.2 0.0 22.2 1.0 0.4 10.7 18.8 6.3 1.8 5.0 2.8 1.4 2.2 0.6 5.6 8.0 3.6 0.0 2.5 0.9 0.0 100.0
Himachal Pradesh 8.4 0.3 33.3 0.8 0.4 5.8 11.4 1.9 4.3 1.0 2.9 0.0 3.1 4.0 7.1 8.5 1.6 0.0 4.9 0.2 0.0 100.0
Jammu & Kashmir 8.8 0.1 16.0 0.6 1.1 14.2 21.8 6.1 2.3 1.8 1.6 0.2 0.4 1.1 8.5 8.5 3.0 0.3 2.9 0.6 0.0 100.0
Jharkhand 3.7 7.4 10.5 0.3 0.3 14.3 25.9 9.6 2.7 0.7 2.3 0.6 2.5 2.8 4.8 5.1 1.2 0.1 3.4 1.9 0.0 100.0
Karnataka 7.8 0.3 18.4 0.6 0.3 9.7 18.1 6.3 6.4 7.5 2.1 0.8 2.6 2.8 2.6 6.6 2.1 0.5 1.8 2.8 0.0 100.0
Kerala 8.7 0.3 16.4 0.7 0.1 14.0 18.8 8.2 4.3 2.5 3.2 0.9 1.6 1.4 3.7 5.1 3.8 1.0 3.3 2.2 0.0 100.0
Lakshadweep 36.4 0.4 4.2 1.3 1.4 13.4 5.3 5.9 2.1 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 10.6 10.8 2.6 1.8 0.7 0.0 0.0 100.0
Madhya Pradesh 11.1 0.8 15.7 0.5 0.5 11.9 23.4 7.7 2.3 1.4 2.4 0.1 0.9 1.1 5.9 6.8 1.7 0.5 4.8 0.6 0.0 100.0
Maharashtra 4.5 0.2 22.2 0.6 0.4 8.1 18.0 9.5 3.4 3.2 4.1 0.6 1.7 2.1 3.9 5.3 2.2 0.7 4.7 4.5 0.0 100.0
Manipur 20.0 0.0 18.1 0.2 0.1 9.7 19.5 6.2 2.8 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.4 0.7 11.8 6.2 0.8 0.4 1.5 0.6 0.0 100.0
Megahlaya 4.8 1.1 3.5 0.1 0.0 11.0 27.3 5.2 3.2 0.5 2.8 0.0 0.2 0.2 25.1 8.4 1.4 0.0 3.1 2.2 0.0 100.0
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Mizoram 26.8 0.3 2.8 0.3 0.3 7.8 21.2 4.3 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.9 21.4 10.2 1.4 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.0 100.0
Nagaland 17.8 0.0 5.3 3.8 0.3 5.1 17.3 4.6 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 27.7 12.9 1.3 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 100.0
Odisha 14.1 0.8 10.6 1.1 0.6 10.0 22.1 9.3 4.6 2.7 2.8 0.2 1.0 0.2 5.8 6.5 1.5 1.8 3.6 0.8 0.0 100.0
States/UTs A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U Total
Punjab 5.7 0.0 27.8 1.3 1.0 7.3 19.0 7.1 2.9 1.3 2.2 1.0 1.3 0.6 3.2 7.3 3.7 0.5 6.0 0.7 0.0 100.0
Rajasthan 6.8 1.0 25.0 1.5 0.5 14.4 18.2 6.0 3.0 1.1 1.9 0.7 1.9 1.7 2.9 6.7 1.6 0.2 4.2 0.7 0.0 100.0
Sikkim 1.5 0.1 8.7 1.3 3.9 6.5 21.7 8.0 8.9 4.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 4.5 18.9 5.9 1.1 0.9 2.9 0.7 0.0 100.0
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Tamil Nadu 10.5 0.7 28.1 0.7 0.2 8.3 16.7 6.9 4.8 3.2 2.7 0.8 0.9 1.8 1.9 4.0 1.4 0.4 3.4 2.4 0.0 100.0
Tripura 3.3 0.5 6.8 0.0 0.0 16.1 20.9 10.2 1.8 1.0 2.7 0.5 1.1 0.6 12.4 10.2 4.5 0.1 2.9 4.3 0.0 100.0
Uttar Pradesh 8.9 0.8 28.8 0.5 0.9 9.9 21.0 4.9 3.3 0.8 1.2 0.1 1.5 1.5 3.5 3.5 2.3 0.6 5.5 0.8 0.0 100.0
Uttarakhand 4.8 0.1 18.2 0.8 0.3 11.9 28.1 7.8 5.7 0.2 1.3 0.2 0.6 1.4 4.3 7.7 2.4 0.3 3.3 0.7 0.0 100.0
West Bengal 2.4 0.9 31.4 0.4 0.6 6.2 18.7 7.9 3.0 1.8 2.5 0.3 1.7 2.0 2.7 6.9 2.1 0.4 2.9 5.4 0.0 100.0
India 6.7 0.8 23.6 0.6 0.7 9.3 19.6 7.4 3.8 2.5 2.5 0.6 1.6 1.9 4.1 5.5 2.2 0.5 3.8 2.3 0.0 100.0

A: Agriculture, forestry and fishing B: Mining and quarrying

80
C: Manufacturing D: Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply
E: Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities F: Construction
G: Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles H: Transportation and storage
I: Accommodation and Food service activities J: Information and communication
K: Financial and insurance activities L: Real estate activities
M: Professional, scientific and technical activities N: Administrative and support service activities
O: Public administration and defence; compulsory social security P: Education
Q: Human health and social work activities R: Arts, entertainment and recreation
S: Other service activities T: Activities of households as employers; undifferentiated goods and
U: Activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies services producing activities of households for own use

NOTE: National Industrial Classification of workers is based on NIC 2008.

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)

Mizoram 26.8 0.3 2.8 0.3 0.3 7.8 21.2 4.3 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.9 21.4 10.2 1.4 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.0 100.0
Nagaland 17.8 0.0 5.3 3.8 0.3 5.1 17.3 4.6 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 27.7 12.9 1.3 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 100.0
Odisha 14.1 0.8 10.6 1.1 0.6 10.0 22.1 9.3 4.6 2.7 2.8 0.2 1.0 0.2 5.8 6.5 1.5 1.8 3.6 0.8 0.0 100.0
States/UTs A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U Total
Punjab 5.7 0.0 27.8 1.3 1.0 7.3 19.0 7.1 2.9 1.3 2.2 1.0 1.3 0.6 3.2 7.3 3.7 0.5 6.0 0.7 0.0 100.0
Rajasthan 6.8 1.0 25.0 1.5 0.5 14.4 18.2 6.0 3.0 1.1 1.9 0.7 1.9 1.7 2.9 6.7 1.6 0.2 4.2 0.7 0.0 100.0
Sikkim 1.5 0.1 8.7 1.3 3.9 6.5 21.7 8.0 8.9 4.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 4.5 18.9 5.9 1.1 0.9 2.9 0.7 0.0 100.0
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Tamil Nadu 10.5 0.7 28.1 0.7 0.2 8.3 16.7 6.9 4.8 3.2 2.7 0.8 0.9 1.8 1.9 4.0 1.4 0.4 3.4 2.4 0.0 100.0
Tripura 3.3 0.5 6.8 0.0 0.0 16.1 20.9 10.2 1.8 1.0 2.7 0.5 1.1 0.6 12.4 10.2 4.5 0.1 2.9 4.3 0.0 100.0
Uttar Pradesh 8.9 0.8 28.8 0.5 0.9 9.9 21.0 4.9 3.3 0.8 1.2 0.1 1.5 1.5 3.5 3.5 2.3 0.6 5.5 0.8 0.0 100.0
Uttarakhand 4.8 0.1 18.2 0.8 0.3 11.9 28.1 7.8 5.7 0.2 1.3 0.2 0.6 1.4 4.3 7.7 2.4 0.3 3.3 0.7 0.0 100.0
West Bengal 2.4 0.9 31.4 0.4 0.6 6.2 18.7 7.9 3.0 1.8 2.5 0.3 1.7 2.0 2.7 6.9 2.1 0.4 2.9 5.4 0.0 100.0
India 6.7 0.8 23.6 0.6 0.7 9.3 19.6 7.4 3.8 2.5 2.5 0.6 1.6 1.9 4.1 5.5 2.2 0.5 3.8 2.3 0.0 100.0

A: Agriculture, forestry and fishing B: Mining and quarrying

80

C: Manufacturing D: Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply

E: Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities F: Construction
G: Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles H: Transportation and storage
I: Accommodation and Food service activities J: Information and communication
K: Financial and insurance activities L: Real estate activities
M: Professional, scientific and technical activities N: Administrative and support service activities
O: Public administration and defence; compulsory social security P: Education
Q: Human health and social work activities R: Arts, entertainment and recreation
S: Other service activities T: Activities of households as employers; undifferentiated goods and
U: Activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies services producing activities of households for own use

NOTE: National Industrial Classification of workers is based on NIC 2008.

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)
 Graph 3.7: National Industrial Classification of Urban Workers (principal and subsidiary), 2011-12(%)

81
A: Agriculture, forestry and fishing B: Mining and quarrying
C: Manufacturing D: Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning
E: Water supply; sewerage, waste management and supply
remediation activities F: Construction
G: Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles H: Transportation and storage
and motorcycles I: Accommodation and Food service activities
J: Information and communication K: Financial and insurance activities
L: Real estate activities M: Professional, scientific and technical activities
N: Administrative and support service activities O:Public administration and defence;
P: Education compulsory social security
Q: Human health and social work activities R: Arts, entertainment and recreation
S: Other service activities T: Activities of households as employers;
U: Activities of extraterritorial organizations and undifferentiated goods and services producing
bodies activities of households for own use
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and
Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 3.7: National Industrial Classification of Urban Workers (principal and subsidiary), 2011-12(%)

81

A: Agriculture, forestry and fishing B: Mining and quarrying

C: Manufacturing D: Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning
E: Water supply; sewerage, waste management and supply
remediation activities F: Construction
G: Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles H: Transportation and storage
and motorcycles I: Accommodation and Food service activities
J: Information and communication K: Financial and insurance activities
L: Real estate activities M: Professional, scientific and technical activities
N: Administrative and support service activities O:Public administration and defence;
P: Education compulsory social security
Q: Human health and social work activities R: Arts, entertainment and recreation
S: Other service activities T: Activities of households as employers;
U: Activities of extraterritorial organizations and undifferentiated goods and services producing
bodies activities of households for own use
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and
Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Table 3.14: National Industrial Classification of Urban Male Workers (principal and subsidiary), 2011-2012

(in percent)

States/UTs  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U Total
Andaman &
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Nicobar
Islands 5.3 0.0 6.5 2.5 1.2 18.0 16.8 14.1 2.9 0.5 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.1 22.0 3.8 2.4 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 100
Andhra Pradesh 3.9 1.6 13.2 0.8 0.1 14.1 19.6 13.5 2.6 3.8 2.8 1.0 2.0 2.3 6.5 5.5 2.0 0.6 3.4 0.9 0.0 100
Arunachal Pradesh 10.4 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.2 13.2 15.4 1.9 1.3 0.4 0.9 0.0 3.0 3.5 32.2 8.1 1.7 0.0 3.4 1.6 0.0 100
Assam 4.0 4.5 9.2 0.2 0.3 9.0 32.7 7.9 3.6 1.0 1.7 0.1 1.3 1.2 9.0 3.5 0.4 1.4 6.8 2.4 0.0 100
Bihar 8.3 0.1 14.8 0.2 0.0 8.7 29.8 6.6 5.6 0.9 2.3 0.1 1.5 4.7 5.0 5.1 1.7 0.0 4.6 0.1 0.0 100
Chandigarh 0.7 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.9 9.8 26.7 6.5 7.5 1.5 2.7 0.8 1.5 8.2 14.6 1.8 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 100
Chhattisgarh 11.8 3.0 12.6 2.1 0.5 18.1 21.7 6.2 5.1 1.4 2.6 0.2 1.2 0.9 3.3 4.9 2.6 0.3 1.3 0.4 0.0 100
Dadra & Nagar
Haveli 5.8 0.0 61.9 0.0 0.0 4.7 5.0 10.8 3.4 1.7 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.5 0.5 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 100

82
Daman & Diu 13.1 0.0 11.4 0.0 1.1 5.0 14.4 16.7 7.9 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 8.0 10.6 1.3 3.3 2.7 0.0 0.0 100
Delhi 0.0 0.0 23.5 0.1 0.9 5.0 25.3 9.0 4.8 3.2 2.8 1.7 3.2 3.7 8.0 1.9 2.2 1.1 2.3 1.4 0.0 100
Goa 3.4 6.9 10.8 3.0 2.5 5.7 23.4 7.4 13.5 1.1 3.5 0.4 1.3 2.2 6.0 3.7 2.0 0.7 1.6 1.0 0.0 100
Gujarat 3.4 0.5 39.5 0.4 4.0 6.2 20.8 6.5 4.5 1.1 1.7 0.3 1.4 1.5 3.7 1.9 1.0 0.1 1.4 0.1 0.0 100
Haryana 5.2 0.0 24.5 0.9 0.4 12.2 21.2 7.3 1.9 4.5 2.9 1.7 2.6 0.6 5.9 3.6 3.0 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.0 100
Himachal Pradesh 4.9 0.4 32.7 1.0 0.5 7.0 13.0 2.6 5.2 1.3 3.6 0.0 3.5 5.2 7.3 5.4 0.4 0.0 5.8 0.2 0.0 100
Jammu & Kashmir 5.2 0.1 16.4 0.6 1.3 15.6 25.6 7.2 2.7 2.0 1.6 0.2 0.4 1.4 8.4 5.2 2.4 0.4 2.8 0.5 0.0 100
Jharkhand 3.1 7.5 10.1 0.3 0.3 15.3 28.0 10.4 2.9 0.8 1.9 0.7 2.8 3.1 5.2 3.7 0.9 0.1 2.6 0.5 0.0 100
Karnataka 7.7 0.3 15.8 0.7 0.3 11.5 21.1 8.0 5.8 7.6 2.1 1.0 2.6 3.5 2.8 4.7 1.2 0.5 1.8 0.9 0.0 100
Kerala 8.2 0.3 13.8 0.7 0.2 18.0 20.8 10.8 4.8 2.3 3.1 1.2 1.7 1.5 3.6 2.0 1.9 1.0 3.6 0.6 0.0 100
Lakshadweep 37.3 0.0 3.2 1.0 1.6 15.9 6.3 6.6 2.5 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 10.4 8.2 0.4 2.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 100
Madhya Pradesh 9.9 0.9 14.5 0.6 0.4 13.2 25.4 9.1 2.5 1.5 2.5 0.1 1.1 1.2 6.5 4.8 1.4 0.6 3.8 0.1 0.0 100
Maharashtra 3.3 0.2 21.6 0.7 0.3 9.2 21.0 12.0 3.8 3.4 4.0 0.7 1.7 2.3 4.4 3.6 1.5 0.9 3.8 1.5 0.0 100
Manipur 23.2 0.0 8.2 0.2 0.1 13.2 17.4 8.5 2.3 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.6 1.0 14.0 6.0 0.7 0.5 1.6 0.7 0.0 100
Meghalaya 3.5 1.5 2.2 0.2 0.0 15.5 24.6 7.4 3.1 0.8 2.4 0.0 0.3 0.3 27.4 5.9 0.8 0.0 1.4 2.8 0.0 100

Table 3.14: National Industrial Classification of Urban Male Workers (principal and subsidiary), 2011-2012

(in percent)

States/UTs  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U Total
Andaman &
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Nicobar
Islands 5.3 0.0 6.5 2.5 1.2 18.0 16.8 14.1 2.9 0.5 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.1 22.0 3.8 2.4 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 100
Andhra Pradesh 3.9 1.6 13.2 0.8 0.1 14.1 19.6 13.5 2.6 3.8 2.8 1.0 2.0 2.3 6.5 5.5 2.0 0.6 3.4 0.9 0.0 100
Arunachal Pradesh 10.4 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.2 13.2 15.4 1.9 1.3 0.4 0.9 0.0 3.0 3.5 32.2 8.1 1.7 0.0 3.4 1.6 0.0 100
Assam 4.0 4.5 9.2 0.2 0.3 9.0 32.7 7.9 3.6 1.0 1.7 0.1 1.3 1.2 9.0 3.5 0.4 1.4 6.8 2.4 0.0 100
Bihar 8.3 0.1 14.8 0.2 0.0 8.7 29.8 6.6 5.6 0.9 2.3 0.1 1.5 4.7 5.0 5.1 1.7 0.0 4.6 0.1 0.0 100
Chandigarh 0.7 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.9 9.8 26.7 6.5 7.5 1.5 2.7 0.8 1.5 8.2 14.6 1.8 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 100
Chhattisgarh 11.8 3.0 12.6 2.1 0.5 18.1 21.7 6.2 5.1 1.4 2.6 0.2 1.2 0.9 3.3 4.9 2.6 0.3 1.3 0.4 0.0 100
Dadra & Nagar
Haveli 5.8 0.0 61.9 0.0 0.0 4.7 5.0 10.8 3.4 1.7 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.5 0.5 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 100
82

Daman & Diu 13.1 0.0 11.4 0.0 1.1 5.0 14.4 16.7 7.9 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 8.0 10.6 1.3 3.3 2.7 0.0 0.0 100
Delhi 0.0 0.0 23.5 0.1 0.9 5.0 25.3 9.0 4.8 3.2 2.8 1.7 3.2 3.7 8.0 1.9 2.2 1.1 2.3 1.4 0.0 100
Goa 3.4 6.9 10.8 3.0 2.5 5.7 23.4 7.4 13.5 1.1 3.5 0.4 1.3 2.2 6.0 3.7 2.0 0.7 1.6 1.0 0.0 100
Gujarat 3.4 0.5 39.5 0.4 4.0 6.2 20.8 6.5 4.5 1.1 1.7 0.3 1.4 1.5 3.7 1.9 1.0 0.1 1.4 0.1 0.0 100
Haryana 5.2 0.0 24.5 0.9 0.4 12.2 21.2 7.3 1.9 4.5 2.9 1.7 2.6 0.6 5.9 3.6 3.0 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.0 100
Himachal Pradesh 4.9 0.4 32.7 1.0 0.5 7.0 13.0 2.6 5.2 1.3 3.6 0.0 3.5 5.2 7.3 5.4 0.4 0.0 5.8 0.2 0.0 100
Jammu & Kashmir 5.2 0.1 16.4 0.6 1.3 15.6 25.6 7.2 2.7 2.0 1.6 0.2 0.4 1.4 8.4 5.2 2.4 0.4 2.8 0.5 0.0 100
Jharkhand 3.1 7.5 10.1 0.3 0.3 15.3 28.0 10.4 2.9 0.8 1.9 0.7 2.8 3.1 5.2 3.7 0.9 0.1 2.6 0.5 0.0 100
Karnataka 7.7 0.3 15.8 0.7 0.3 11.5 21.1 8.0 5.8 7.6 2.1 1.0 2.6 3.5 2.8 4.7 1.2 0.5 1.8 0.9 0.0 100
Kerala 8.2 0.3 13.8 0.7 0.2 18.0 20.8 10.8 4.8 2.3 3.1 1.2 1.7 1.5 3.6 2.0 1.9 1.0 3.6 0.6 0.0 100
Lakshadweep 37.3 0.0 3.2 1.0 1.6 15.9 6.3 6.6 2.5 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.5 10.4 8.2 0.4 2.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 100
Madhya Pradesh 9.9 0.9 14.5 0.6 0.4 13.2 25.4 9.1 2.5 1.5 2.5 0.1 1.1 1.2 6.5 4.8 1.4 0.6 3.8 0.1 0.0 100
Maharashtra 3.3 0.2 21.6 0.7 0.3 9.2 21.0 12.0 3.8 3.4 4.0 0.7 1.7 2.3 4.4 3.6 1.5 0.9 3.8 1.5 0.0 100
Manipur 23.2 0.0 8.2 0.2 0.1 13.2 17.4 8.5 2.3 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.6 1.0 14.0 6.0 0.7 0.5 1.6 0.7 0.0 100
Meghalaya 3.5 1.5 2.2 0.2 0.0 15.5 24.6 7.4 3.1 0.8 2.4 0.0 0.3 0.3 27.4 5.9 0.8 0.0 1.4 2.8 0.0 100
 States/UTs  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U Total
Mizoram 22.1 0.4 2.8 0.5 0.3 11.1 14.5 6.5 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.2 1.0 26.6 10.6 1.0 0.1 1.4 0.2 0.0 100
Nagaland 13.4 0.0 3.4 3.7 0.3 6.7 16.1 6.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 31.9 12.9 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 100
Odisha 12.1 1.0 9.3 1.3 0.7 9.9 23.3 11.2 4.4 3.4 3.3 0.3 1.1 0.3 6.9 4.6 0.9 2.2 3.4 0.5 0.0 100
Puducherry 6.9 0.6 15.5 0.2 0.5 17.1 20.1 6.8 4.5 2.6 5.0 1.3 1.6 0.4 6.4 2.6 3.4 0.3 4.1 0.1 0.0 100
Punjab 4.4 0.0 28.8 1.4 1.1 8.7 22.2 8.5 3.5 1.6 2.5 1.2 1.6 0.7 3.0 2.6 2.8 0.4 4.5 0.5 0.0 100
Rajasthan 3.8 1.3 23.0 1.8 0.4 15.9 21.1 7.4 3.4 1.3 2.0 0.8 2.3 1.9 3.1 5.2 1.3 0.2 3.7 0.1 0.0 100
Sikkim 1.0 0.1 9.9 1.7 4.0 9.0 17.5 8.9 7.8 5.4 1.0 0.0 0.2 6.2 17.7 6.0 1.1 1.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 100
Tamil Nadu 9.2 0.8 25.1 0.6 0.0 10.2 18.9 9.2 5.5 3.5 2.9 1.0 1.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 0.9 0.4 3.5 0.9 0.0 100
Tripura 3.1 0.6 6.0 0.0 0.0 17.8 24.3 12.4 1.8 1.3 2.0 0.3 1.4 0.7 11.5 9.1 3.7 0.2 3.1 0.9 0.0 100
Uttar Pradesh 8.0 0.9 25.6 0.5 0.7 11.2 23.5 5.7 3.7 0.8 1.4 0.1 1.8 1.5 3.9 2.4 2.0 0.7 5.2 0.5 0.0 100
Uttarakhand 4.3 0.1 17.2 0.8 0.2 13.7 30.9 8.5 5.6 0.2 1.5 0.2 0.7 1.5 4.4 4.7 1.8 0.3 3.1 0.3 0.0 100
West Bengal 2.6 1.1 31.0 0.5 0.5 7.6 21.2 9.7 3.4 2.0 2.6 0.3 1.9 2.1 2.9 4.0 1.5 0.3 2.8 2.1 0.0 100
India 5.6 0.9 22.3 0.7 0.7 10.7 22.0 9.1 4.0 2.6 2.5 0.7 1.8 2.1 4.5 3.6 1.6 0.6 3.3 0.9 0.0 100

A: Agriculture, forestry and fishing B: Mining and quarrying

83
C: Manufacturing D: Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply

E: Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities F: Construction

G: Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles H: Transportation and storage

I: Accommodation and Food service activities J: Information and communication

K: Financial and insurance activities L: Real estate activities

M: Professional, scientific and technical activities N: Administrative and support service activities

O: Public administration and defence; compulsory social security P: Education

Q: Human health and social work activities R: Arts, entertainment and recreation

S: Other service activities T: Activities of households as employers; undifferentiated goods and

U: Activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies services producing activities of households for own use

NOTE: National Industrial Classification of workers is based on NIC 2008.

Handbook of Urban Statistics

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)

States/UTs  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U Total
Mizoram 22.1 0.4 2.8 0.5 0.3 11.1 14.5 6.5 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.2 1.0 26.6 10.6 1.0 0.1 1.4 0.2 0.0 100
Nagaland 13.4 0.0 3.4 3.7 0.3 6.7 16.1 6.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 31.9 12.9 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 100
Odisha 12.1 1.0 9.3 1.3 0.7 9.9 23.3 11.2 4.4 3.4 3.3 0.3 1.1 0.3 6.9 4.6 0.9 2.2 3.4 0.5 0.0 100
Puducherry 6.9 0.6 15.5 0.2 0.5 17.1 20.1 6.8 4.5 2.6 5.0 1.3 1.6 0.4 6.4 2.6 3.4 0.3 4.1 0.1 0.0 100
Punjab 4.4 0.0 28.8 1.4 1.1 8.7 22.2 8.5 3.5 1.6 2.5 1.2 1.6 0.7 3.0 2.6 2.8 0.4 4.5 0.5 0.0 100
Rajasthan 3.8 1.3 23.0 1.8 0.4 15.9 21.1 7.4 3.4 1.3 2.0 0.8 2.3 1.9 3.1 5.2 1.3 0.2 3.7 0.1 0.0 100
Sikkim 1.0 0.1 9.9 1.7 4.0 9.0 17.5 8.9 7.8 5.4 1.0 0.0 0.2 6.2 17.7 6.0 1.1 1.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 100
Tamil Nadu 9.2 0.8 25.1 0.6 0.0 10.2 18.9 9.2 5.5 3.5 2.9 1.0 1.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 0.9 0.4 3.5 0.9 0.0 100
Tripura 3.1 0.6 6.0 0.0 0.0 17.8 24.3 12.4 1.8 1.3 2.0 0.3 1.4 0.7 11.5 9.1 3.7 0.2 3.1 0.9 0.0 100
Uttar Pradesh 8.0 0.9 25.6 0.5 0.7 11.2 23.5 5.7 3.7 0.8 1.4 0.1 1.8 1.5 3.9 2.4 2.0 0.7 5.2 0.5 0.0 100
Uttarakhand 4.3 0.1 17.2 0.8 0.2 13.7 30.9 8.5 5.6 0.2 1.5 0.2 0.7 1.5 4.4 4.7 1.8 0.3 3.1 0.3 0.0 100
West Bengal 2.6 1.1 31.0 0.5 0.5 7.6 21.2 9.7 3.4 2.0 2.6 0.3 1.9 2.1 2.9 4.0 1.5 0.3 2.8 2.1 0.0 100
India 5.6 0.9 22.3 0.7 0.7 10.7 22.0 9.1 4.0 2.6 2.5 0.7 1.8 2.1 4.5 3.6 1.6 0.6 3.3 0.9 0.0 100

A: Agriculture, forestry and fishing B: Mining and quarrying

83

C: Manufacturing D: Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply

E: Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities F: Construction

G: Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles H: Transportation and storage

I: Accommodation and Food service activities J: Information and communication

K: Financial and insurance activities L: Real estate activities

M: Professional, scientific and technical activities N: Administrative and support service activities

O: Public administration and defence; compulsory social security P: Education

Q: Human health and social work activities R: Arts, entertainment and recreation

S: Other service activities T: Activities of households as employers; undifferentiated goods and

U: Activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies services producing activities of households for own use

NOTE: National Industrial Classification of workers is based on NIC 2008.

Handbook of Urban Statistics

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)
 Table 3.15: National Industrial Classification of Urban Female Workers (principal and subsidiary), 2011-2012
(in percent)

 States/UTs A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U Total
Andaman & Nico-
bar Islands 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.6 0.0 11.1 13.2 2.8 2.8 1.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 2.6 21.3 17.2 7.7 1.3 1.3 5.9 0.0 100.0
Andhra Pradesh 8.4 0.6 27.1 0.2 0.4 5.5 16.8 0.9 4.2 1.5 1.6 0.0 0.4 0.9 4.4 10.9 2.4 0.2 6.0 7.8 0.0 100.0
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Arunachal Pradesh 32.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 9.3 14.1 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 3.7 22.9 4.3 4.8 0.5 1.8 4.7 0.0 100.0
Assam 7.4 0.5 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 16.5 0.0 0.6 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.1 2.0 6.2 20.2 2.8 0.0 9.6 12.8 0.0 100.0
Bihar 22.1 0.0 19.9 0.0 0.0 4.2 16.3 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.8 3.3 20.1 0.9 0.0 8.2 0.8 0.0 100.0
Chandigarh 0.0 0.0 13.1 0.0 3.1 0.0 22.2 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 3.2 7.5 12.9 12.9 13.3 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 100.0
Chhattisgarh 22.3 0.4 10.0 0.2 0.0 20.2 6.1 0.6 2.9 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 14.9 4.6 0.0 11.7 4.5 0.0 100.0
Dadra & Nagar
Haveli 4.6 0.0 15.3 0.0 0.0 8.5 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.1 11.7 0.0 1.9 11.3 0.0 100.0
Daman & Diu 3.6 0.0 21.7 0.0 2.5 0.0 21.9 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.4 13.2 11.6 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 100.0

84
Delhi 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 19.0 3.2 0.0 4.2 3.2 0.0 7.1 4.1 6.8 21.7 7.5 0.5 2.9 8.7 0.4 100.0
Goa 2.1 1.5 2.3 0.0 0.6 7.1 10.0 0.8 4.1 1.5 12.0 0.0 7.3 8.2 9.8 17.6 8.1 2.0 3.0 2.1 0.0 100.0
Gujarat 8.8 0.7 38.7 0.1 0.3 2.5 9.1 0.4 3.5 1.0 1.9 0.0 1.1 1.0 2.5 7.9 9.0 0.0 6.0 5.3 0.0 100.0
Haryana 12.7 0.0 8.2 1.5 0.2 2.1 4.4 0.0 1.2 7.9 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 4.3 34.0 7.4 0.0 8.5 4.6 0.0 100.0
Himachal Pradesh 19.3 0.0 35.1 0.5 0.0 2.3 6.3 0.0 1.5 0.1 0.8 0.0 1.7 0.0 6.6 18.3 5.2 0.0 2.2 0.2 0.0 100.0
Jammu & Kashmir 26.5 0.0 13.8 0.5 0.3 7.0 3.1 0.4 0.0 0.6 1.6 0.0 0.3 0.1 9.2 25.3 6.4 0.0 3.8 1.1 0.0 100.0
Jharkhand 8.6 7.0 14.0 0.0 0.2 5.6 9.6 3.0 1.1 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.6 16.3 3.8 0.0 9.5 13.7 0.0 100.0
Karnataka 8.1 0.2 28.2 0.2 0.0 2.6 6.8 0.2 8.7 7.2 2.2 0.0 2.6 0.2 1.7 13.5 5.1 0.6 2.1 9.7 0.0 100.0
Kerala 10.1 0.2 22.9 1.0 0.1 3.5 13.5 1.3 2.8 2.9 3.2 0.0 1.3 0.9 4.0 13.2 8.8 1.2 2.7 6.4 0.0 100.0
Lakshadweep 31.9 2.7 9.8 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.4 24.9 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
Madhya Pradesh 17.2 0.1 21.3 0.0 1.2 5.4 13.9 1.0 1.2 1.1 2.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 2.9 16.3 3.3 0.1 9.5 3.0 0.0 100.0
Maharashtra 8.9 0.1 24.2 0.5 0.7 4.0 7.3 0.7 1.9 2.5 4.2 0.5 2.0 1.4 2.1 11.3 4.7 0.0 8.1 15.0 0.0 100.0
Manipur 11.6 0.0 44.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 24.8 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 6.7 1.0 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.0 100.0
Meghalaya 7.4 0.4 6.2 0.0 0.0 1.5 32.9 0.4 3.3 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.2 13.7 2.8 0.0 6.6 0.9 0.0 100.0
Mizoram 35.8 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.5 1.6 34.0 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 11.3 9.4 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 100.0

Table 3.15: National Industrial Classification of Urban Female Workers (principal and subsidiary), 2011-2012
(in percent)

 States/UTs A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U Total
Andaman & Nico-
bar Islands 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.6 0.0 11.1 13.2 2.8 2.8 1.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 2.6 21.3 17.2 7.7 1.3 1.3 5.9 0.0 100.0
Andhra Pradesh 8.4 0.6 27.1 0.2 0.4 5.5 16.8 0.9 4.2 1.5 1.6 0.0 0.4 0.9 4.4 10.9 2.4 0.2 6.0 7.8 0.0 100.0
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Arunachal Pradesh 32.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 9.3 14.1 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 3.7 22.9 4.3 4.8 0.5 1.8 4.7 0.0 100.0
Assam 7.4 0.5 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 16.5 0.0 0.6 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.1 2.0 6.2 20.2 2.8 0.0 9.6 12.8 0.0 100.0
Bihar 22.1 0.0 19.9 0.0 0.0 4.2 16.3 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.8 3.3 20.1 0.9 0.0 8.2 0.8 0.0 100.0
Chandigarh 0.0 0.0 13.1 0.0 3.1 0.0 22.2 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 3.2 7.5 12.9 12.9 13.3 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 100.0
Chhattisgarh 22.3 0.4 10.0 0.2 0.0 20.2 6.1 0.6 2.9 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 14.9 4.6 0.0 11.7 4.5 0.0 100.0
Dadra & Nagar
Haveli 4.6 0.0 15.3 0.0 0.0 8.5 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.1 11.7 0.0 1.9 11.3 0.0 100.0
Daman & Diu 3.6 0.0 21.7 0.0 2.5 0.0 21.9 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.4 13.2 11.6 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 100.0
84

Delhi 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 19.0 3.2 0.0 4.2 3.2 0.0 7.1 4.1 6.8 21.7 7.5 0.5 2.9 8.7 0.4 100.0
Goa 2.1 1.5 2.3 0.0 0.6 7.1 10.0 0.8 4.1 1.5 12.0 0.0 7.3 8.2 9.8 17.6 8.1 2.0 3.0 2.1 0.0 100.0
Gujarat 8.8 0.7 38.7 0.1 0.3 2.5 9.1 0.4 3.5 1.0 1.9 0.0 1.1 1.0 2.5 7.9 9.0 0.0 6.0 5.3 0.0 100.0
Haryana 12.7 0.0 8.2 1.5 0.2 2.1 4.4 0.0 1.2 7.9 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 4.3 34.0 7.4 0.0 8.5 4.6 0.0 100.0
Himachal Pradesh 19.3 0.0 35.1 0.5 0.0 2.3 6.3 0.0 1.5 0.1 0.8 0.0 1.7 0.0 6.6 18.3 5.2 0.0 2.2 0.2 0.0 100.0
Jammu & Kashmir 26.5 0.0 13.8 0.5 0.3 7.0 3.1 0.4 0.0 0.6 1.6 0.0 0.3 0.1 9.2 25.3 6.4 0.0 3.8 1.1 0.0 100.0
Jharkhand 8.6 7.0 14.0 0.0 0.2 5.6 9.6 3.0 1.1 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.6 16.3 3.8 0.0 9.5 13.7 0.0 100.0
Karnataka 8.1 0.2 28.2 0.2 0.0 2.6 6.8 0.2 8.7 7.2 2.2 0.0 2.6 0.2 1.7 13.5 5.1 0.6 2.1 9.7 0.0 100.0
Kerala 10.1 0.2 22.9 1.0 0.1 3.5 13.5 1.3 2.8 2.9 3.2 0.0 1.3 0.9 4.0 13.2 8.8 1.2 2.7 6.4 0.0 100.0
Lakshadweep 31.9 2.7 9.8 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.4 24.9 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
Madhya Pradesh 17.2 0.1 21.3 0.0 1.2 5.4 13.9 1.0 1.2 1.1 2.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 2.9 16.3 3.3 0.1 9.5 3.0 0.0 100.0
Maharashtra 8.9 0.1 24.2 0.5 0.7 4.0 7.3 0.7 1.9 2.5 4.2 0.5 2.0 1.4 2.1 11.3 4.7 0.0 8.1 15.0 0.0 100.0
Manipur 11.6 0.0 44.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 24.8 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 6.7 1.0 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.0 100.0
Meghalaya 7.4 0.4 6.2 0.0 0.0 1.5 32.9 0.4 3.3 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.2 13.7 2.8 0.0 6.6 0.9 0.0 100.0
Mizoram 35.8 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.5 1.6 34.0 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 11.3 9.4 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 100.0
  States/UTs A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U Total
Nagaland 32.0 0.0 11.5 4.0 0.3 0.0 21.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.9 13.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 100.0
Odisha 22.7 0.0 16.4 0.2 0.1 10.4 16.7 1.3 5.3 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.9 14.4 4.2 0.0 4.3 1.9 0.0 100.0
Punjab 11.9 0.0 23.1 0.7 0.4 0.8 3.9 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.3 4.0 29.8 7.9 0.6 13.0 1.8 0.0 100.0
Rajasthan 18.7 0.0 32.8 0.4 0.6 8.6 6.9 0.4 1.3 0.3 1.6 0.0 0.6 0.8 2.0 12.8 2.5 0.2 6.2 3.2 0.0 100.0
Sikkim 2.6 0.0 5.7 0.2 3.7 0.0 32.5 5.5 11.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.8 5.6 1.0 0.0 6.9 2.5 0.0 100.0
Tamil Nadu 14.3 0.4 36.8 0.8 0.5 2.9 10.4 0.4 3.0 2.4 2.2 0.2 0.3 1.1 1.4 9.3 3.1 0.3 3.4 6.6 0.0 100.0
Tripura 4.2 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 8.0 5.5 0.0 1.8 0.0 6.1 1.5 0.0 0.0 16.7 14.9 8.3 0.0 2.2 20.3 0.0 100.0
Uttar Pradesh 14.0 0.0 46.4 0.5 1.9 2.5 6.8 0.5 1.3 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 9.4 3.9 0.3 7.5 2.4 0.0 100.0
Uttarakhand 8.3 0.0 24.4 0.7 0.7 0.5 9.8 3.1 6.6 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.9 3.5 26.5 6.3 0.8 4.5 3.0 0.0 100.0
West Bengal 1.6 0.2 32.9 0.0 1.2 0.8 9.1 1.0 1.6 0.7 1.8 0.0 1.0 1.8 1.7 18.4 4.3 0.6 3.2 18.2 0.0 100.0
India 10.9 0.3 28.7 0.4 0.6 4.0 10.0 0.7 2.8 2.0 2.2 0.1 1.1 1.1 2.6 13.3 4.6 0.3 5.9 8.3 0.0 100.0

A: Agriculture, forestry and fishing B: Mining and quarrying

C: Manufacturing D: Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply

85
E: Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities F: Construction

G: Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles H: Transportation and storage

I: Accommodation and Food service activities J: Information and communication

K: Financial and insurance activities L: Real estate activities

M: Professional, scientific and technical activities N: Administrative and support service activities

O: Public administration and defence; compulsory social security P: Education

Q: Human health and social work activities R: Arts, entertainment and recreation

S: Other service activities T: Activities of households as employers; undifferentiated goods and

U: Activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies services producing activities of households for own use

NOTE: National Industrial Classification of workers is based on NIC 2008.

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Round)

 States/UTs A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U Total
Nagaland 32.0 0.0 11.5 4.0 0.3 0.0 21.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.9 13.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 100.0
Odisha 22.7 0.0 16.4 0.2 0.1 10.4 16.7 1.3 5.3 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.9 14.4 4.2 0.0 4.3 1.9 0.0 100.0
Punjab 11.9 0.0 23.1 0.7 0.4 0.8 3.9 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.3 4.0 29.8 7.9 0.6 13.0 1.8 0.0 100.0
Rajasthan 18.7 0.0 32.8 0.4 0.6 8.6 6.9 0.4 1.3 0.3 1.6 0.0 0.6 0.8 2.0 12.8 2.5 0.2 6.2 3.2 0.0 100.0
Sikkim 2.6 0.0 5.7 0.2 3.7 0.0 32.5 5.5 11.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.8 5.6 1.0 0.0 6.9 2.5 0.0 100.0
Tamil Nadu 14.3 0.4 36.8 0.8 0.5 2.9 10.4 0.4 3.0 2.4 2.2 0.2 0.3 1.1 1.4 9.3 3.1 0.3 3.4 6.6 0.0 100.0
Tripura 4.2 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 8.0 5.5 0.0 1.8 0.0 6.1 1.5 0.0 0.0 16.7 14.9 8.3 0.0 2.2 20.3 0.0 100.0
Uttar Pradesh 14.0 0.0 46.4 0.5 1.9 2.5 6.8 0.5 1.3 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 9.4 3.9 0.3 7.5 2.4 0.0 100.0
Uttarakhand 8.3 0.0 24.4 0.7 0.7 0.5 9.8 3.1 6.6 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.9 3.5 26.5 6.3 0.8 4.5 3.0 0.0 100.0
West Bengal 1.6 0.2 32.9 0.0 1.2 0.8 9.1 1.0 1.6 0.7 1.8 0.0 1.0 1.8 1.7 18.4 4.3 0.6 3.2 18.2 0.0 100.0
India 10.9 0.3 28.7 0.4 0.6 4.0 10.0 0.7 2.8 2.0 2.2 0.1 1.1 1.1 2.6 13.3 4.6 0.3 5.9 8.3 0.0 100.0

A: Agriculture, forestry and fishing B: Mining and quarrying

C: Manufacturing D: Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply

85

E: Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities F: Construction

G: Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles H: Transportation and storage

I: Accommodation and Food service activities J: Information and communication

K: Financial and insurance activities L: Real estate activities

M: Professional, scientific and technical activities N: Administrative and support service activities

O: Public administration and defence; compulsory social security P: Education

Q: Human health and social work activities R: Arts, entertainment and recreation

S: Other service activities T: Activities of households as employers; undifferentiated goods and

U: Activities of extraterritorial organizations and bodies services producing activities of households for own use

NOTE: National Industrial Classification of workers is based on NIC 2008.

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Round)
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.16: Average Wage/Salary earnings (Rs./day) received by Regular Wage/Salaried Employees In Urban Table 3.16: Average Wage/Salary earnings (Rs./day) received by Regular Wage/Salaried Employees In Urban
India India

Male Female Persons Male Female Persons

States/UTs States/UTs
2009-2010 2011-2012 2009-10 2011-2012 2009-2010 2011-2012 2009-2010 2011-2012 2009-10 2011-2012 2009-2010 2011-2012
Andaman & Nicobar 548.91 654.08 397.69 773.96 509.61 684.32 Andaman & Nicobar 548.91 654.08 397.69 773.96 509.61 684.32
Islands Islands
Andhra Pradesh 341.63 427.82 248.05 244.30 325.10 395.35 Andhra Pradesh 341.63 427.82 248.05 244.30 325.10 395.35
Arunachal Pradesh 628.30 705.38 553.27 629.15 614.98 694.41 Arunachal Pradesh 628.30 705.38 553.27 629.15 614.98 694.41
Assam 491.19 615.23 380.92 561.63 479.62 606.96 Assam 491.19 615.23 380.92 561.63 479.62 606.96
Bihar 338.31 417.10 500.75 369.02 354.29 412.24 Bihar 338.31 417.10 500.75 369.02 354.29 412.24
Chandigarh 708.70 568.13 479.84 654.22 654.09 582.63 Chandigarh 708.70 568.13 479.84 654.22 654.09 582.63
Chhattisgarh 500.26 351.60 266.09 252.07 454.73 322.84 Chhattisgarh 500.26 351.60 266.09 252.07 454.73 322.84
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 289.70 324.00 238.00 390.06 289.25 334.28 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 289.70 324.00 238.00 390.06 289.25 334.28
Daman & Diu 283.24 459.66 230.30 423.02 274.98 454.34 Daman & Diu 283.24 459.66 230.30 423.02 274.98 454.34
Delhi 355.34 569.56 348.69 683.98 354.62 589.29 Delhi 355.34 569.56 348.69 683.98 354.62 589.29
Goa 340.01 459.04 359.52 435.98 344.06 452.29 Goa 340.01 459.04 359.52 435.98 344.06 452.29
Gujarat 306.58 326.34 221.35 271.86 291.83 319.71 Gujarat 306.58 326.34 221.35 271.86 291.83 319.71
Haryana 316.91 810.93 330.10 635.59 318.96 776.85 Haryana 316.91 810.93 330.10 635.59 318.96 776.85
Himachal Pradesh 487.56 426.03 435.70 306.55 478.13 396.75 Himachal Pradesh 487.56 426.03 435.70 306.55 478.13 396.75
Jammu & Kashmir 379.61 497.61 321.86 484.71 368.37 494.95 Jammu & Kashmir 379.61 497.61 321.86 484.71 368.37 494.95
Jharkhand 491.94 576.69 215.50 380.00 448.37 551.39 Jharkhand 491.94 576.69 215.50 380.00 448.37 551.39
Karnataka 414.95 518.58 293.37 391.97 387.58 486.92 Karnataka 414.95 518.58 293.37 391.97 387.58 486.92
Kerala 450.76 519.84 320.61 412.47 399.29 480.43 Kerala 450.76 519.84 320.61 412.47 399.29 480.43
Lakshadweep 637.11 690.68 583.30 591.57 619.14 669.29 Lakshadweep 637.11 690.68 583.30 591.57 619.14 669.29
Madhya Pradesh 325.15 459.66 230.33 320.58 306.78 436.12 Madhya Pradesh 325.15 459.66 230.33 320.58 306.78 436.12
Maharashtra 439.30 516.55 391.71 370.30 430.59 485.72 Maharashtra 439.30 516.55 391.71 370.30 430.59 485.72
Manipur 380.19 666.55 339.65 646.92 373.06 663.17 Manipur 380.19 666.55 339.65 646.92 373.06 663.17
Meghalaya 349.75 527.21 319.43 444.08 338.98 501.52 Meghalaya 349.75 527.21 319.43 444.08 338.98 501.52
Mizoram 382.36 850.29 416.84 610.51 389.88 797.23 Mizoram 382.36 850.29 416.84 610.51 389.88 797.23
Nagaland 478.11 596.60 386.09 417.63 470.42 569.24 Nagaland 478.11 596.60 386.09 417.63 470.42 569.24
Odisha 358.89 457.66 238.48 286.42 346.29 431.66 Odisha 358.89 457.66 238.48 286.42 346.29 431.66
Puducherry 428.05 409.82 308.37 224.19 394.93 364.09 Puducherry 428.05 409.82 308.37 224.19 394.93 364.09
Punjab 342.35 352.58 374.49 399.38 347.62 361.75 Punjab 342.35 352.58 374.49 399.38 347.62 361.75
Rajasthan 374.42 417.14 317.85 412.89 365.61 416.54 Rajasthan 374.42 417.14 317.85 412.89 365.61 416.54
Sikkim 340.33 541.06 205.19 418.87 313.53 510.07 Sikkim 340.33 541.06 205.19 418.87 313.53 510.07
Tamil Nadu 319.60 420.76 277.23 297.63 310.92 389.81 Tamil Nadu 319.60 420.76 277.23 297.63 310.92 389.81
Tripura 316.15 409.66 325.86 301.52 318.83 380.23 Tripura 316.15 409.66 325.86 301.52 318.83 380.23
Uttar Pradesh 360.29 496.53 285.54 378.00 351.92 482.87 Uttar Pradesh 360.29 496.53 285.54 378.00 351.92 482.87
Uttarakhand 385.05 447.54 386.34 445.76 385.27 447.26 Uttarakhand 385.05 447.54 386.34 445.76 385.27 447.26
West Bengal 391.77 454.61 277.08 323.56 371.09 424.85 West Bengal 391.77 454.61 277.08 323.56 371.09 424.85
India 377.16 469.87 308.79 366.15 364.95 449.65 India 377.16 469.87 308.79 366.15 364.95 449.65
NOTE: In this Table, workers belonging to 15-59 years are taken into account and regular wage/salaried employees includes persons NOTE: In this Table, workers belonging to 15-59 years are taken into account and regular wage/salaried employees includes persons
with activity status of 31(worked as regular wage/salaried employee), 71 (did not work owing to sickness but had regular salaried/ with activity status of 31(worked as regular wage/salaried employee), 71 (did not work owing to sickness but had regular salaried/
wage employment) and 72(did not work owing to other reasons but had regular salaried/wage employment) wage employment) and 72(did not work owing to other reasons but had regular salaried/wage employment)

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.537 (2009-2010; 66th Round) and Report Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.537 (2009-2010; 66th Round) and Report
No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round). No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round).

86 86
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 3.8: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs. /day) Received by Regular wage/ Salaried Employees in Ur- Graph 3.8: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs. /day) Received by Regular wage/ Salaried Employees in Ur-
ban India. ban India.

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report
No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round) No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round)

87 87
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.17: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs./day) received by Casual Labours Engaged in Works Table 3.17: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs./day) received by Casual Labours Engaged in Works
other than Public Works in Urban India other than Public Works in Urban India
Male Female Persons Male Female Persons
States/UTs States/UTs
2009-2010 2011-2012 2009-2010 2011-2012 2009-2010 2011-2012 2009-2010 2011-2012 2009-2010 2011-2012 2009-2010 2011-2012
Andaman & Nicobar 150.25 190.51 157.97 169.69 151.86 184.06 Andaman & Nicobar 150.25 190.51 157.97 169.69 151.86 184.06
Islands Islands
Andhra Pradesh 155.2 193.52 92.85 126.6 138.2 178.34 Andhra Pradesh 155.2 193.52 92.85 126.6 138.2 178.34
Arunachal Pradesh 161.22 234.68 148.34 96.52 160.63 207.96 Arunachal Pradesh 161.22 234.68 148.34 96.52 160.63 207.96
Assam 115.65 159.4 82.01 101.68 104.59 155.38 Assam 115.65 159.4 82.01 101.68 104.59 155.38
Bihar 94.04 158.28 59.63 134.41 91.9 157.33 Bihar 94.04 158.28 59.63 134.41 91.9 157.33
Chandigarh 148.48 197.21 89.02 - 134.43 197.21 Chandigarh 148.48 197.21 89.02 - 134.43 197.21
Chhattisgarh 127.18 119.48 71.65 81.87 110.55 106.16 Chhattisgarh 127.18 119.48 71.65 81.87 110.55 106.16
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 141.94 170.01 100 - 140.62 170.01 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 141.94 170.01 100 - 140.62 170.01
Daman & Diu 109.51 272.39 162.22 81.29 113.1 207.95 Daman & Diu 109.51 272.39 162.22 81.29 113.1 207.95
Delhi 173.35 284.85 - 86.26 173.35 277.27 Delhi 173.35 284.85 - 86.26 173.35 277.27
Goa 185.61 181.46 79.1 218.97 170.42 186.45 Goa 185.61 181.46 79.1 218.97 170.42 186.45
Gujarat 119.02 160.64 66.32 88.84 106.17 144.52 Gujarat 119.02 160.64 66.32 88.84 106.17 144.52
Haryana 154.27 206.67 70.58 165.75 142.97 204.46 Haryana 154.27 206.67 70.58 165.75 142.97 204.46
Himachal Pradesh 149.23 170.87 157.57 131.78 152.4 167.23 Himachal Pradesh 149.23 170.87 157.57 131.78 152.4 167.23
Jammu & Kashmir 152.23 216.86 136.87 178.40 150.41 210.47 Jammu & Kashmir 152.23 216.86 136.87 178.40 150.41 210.47
Jharkhand 108.53 154.44 74.41 83.75 105.34 145.48 Jharkhand 108.53 154.44 74.41 83.75 105.34 145.48
Karnataka 123.03 192.24 67.88 101.77 108.64 174.05 Karnataka 123.03 192.24 67.88 101.77 108.64 174.05
Kerala 237.42 335.76 120.9 167.56 217.66 309.9 Kerala 237.42 335.76 120.9 167.56 217.66 309.9
Lakshadweep 234.33 289.54 131.39 - 224.26 289.54 Lakshadweep 234.33 289.54 131.39 - 224.26 289.54
Madhya Pradesh 88.92 129.9 75.48 98.13 86.54 125.89 Madhya Pradesh 88.92 129.9 75.48 98.13 86.54 125.89
Maharashtra 121.55 173.18 57.64 95.91 109.90 154.62 Maharashtra 121.55 173.18 57.64 95.91 109.90 154.62
Manipur 126.97 168.16 111.55 170.38 125.41 168.29 Manipur 126.97 168.16 111.55 170.38 125.41 168.29
Meghalaya 147.77 214.85 86.88 134.06 133.03 198.47 Meghalaya 147.77 214.85 86.88 134.06 133.03 198.47
Mizoram 162.64 231.53 122.37 164.83 159.05 227.4 Mizoram 162.64 231.53 122.37 164.83 159.05 227.4
Nagaland 128.37 174.94 - - 128.37 174.94 Nagaland 128.37 174.94 - - 128.37 174.94
Odisha 100.26 165.34 72.80 91.17 94.69 150.85 Odisha 100.26 165.34 72.80 91.17 94.69 150.85
Puducherry 173.66 215.67 76.81 157.25 154.73 205.07 Puducherry 173.66 215.67 76.81 157.25 154.73 205.07
Punjab 142.65 198.45 85.68 79.05 138.67 187.95 Punjab 142.65 198.45 85.68 79.05 138.67 187.95
Rajasthan 146.04 180.62 100.04 131.84 141.48 173.67 Rajasthan 146.04 180.62 100.04 131.84 141.48 173.67
Sikkim 163.4 201.62 - - 163.4 201.62 Sikkim 163.4 201.62 - - 163.4 201.62
Tamil Nadu 155.4 227.66 76.19 126.53 136.71 208.34 Tamil Nadu 155.4 227.66 76.19 126.53 136.71 208.34
Tripura 129.68 174.09 78.35 147.54 122.83 172.05 Tripura 129.68 174.09 78.35 147.54 122.83 172.05
Uttar Pradesh 109.3 145.23 72.37 116.56 106.81 143.2 Uttar Pradesh 109.3 145.23 72.37 116.56 106.81 143.2
Uttarakhand 140.66 173.26 99.27 108.26 136.45 170.41 Uttarakhand 140.66 173.26 99.27 108.26 136.45 170.41
West Bengal 98.98 134.58 78.46 89.56 96.86 128.24 West Bengal 98.98 134.58 78.46 89.56 96.86 128.24
India 131.92 182.04 76.73 110.62 121.83 170.1 India 131.92 182.04 76.73 110.62 121.83 170.1

NOTE: In this Table, workers belonging to 15-59 years are taken into account and casual labours include persons with NOTE: In this Table, workers belonging to 15-59 years are taken into account and casual labours include persons with
activity status of 51 (worked as casual labour in other types of works). activity status of 51 (worked as casual labour in other types of works).

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.537 (2009-2010; 66th Round) Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.537 (2009-2010; 66th Round)
and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round). and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round).

88 88
 Graph 3.9: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs. / day) received by Casual Labours Engaged in Works other than Public Work in Urban India

89
Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round).
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 3.9: Average Wage/salary earnings (Rs. / day) received by Casual Labours Engaged in Works other than Public Work in Urban India

89

Source: National Sample Survey Organization, Employment and Unemployment, Report No.458 (1999-2000; 55th Round) and Report No. 554(2011-2012; 68th Round).
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Table 3.18: Work Participation Rate- 2001

% of % of % of
Work % of % of % of
% of Main % of Marginal CL to AL to % of % of Non
S. Partici Main % of CL % of AL % of OT Marginal HH to
Workers to HH to Workers Mar- Mar- OT to Worker to
Name Workers to Main to Main to Main Workers Mar-
Total Popu- Main to Total ginal ginal Marginal Total Pop-
No pation to Total Worker Worker Worker to Total ginal
lation Worker Popula- Work- Work- Worker ulation
Rate Worker Worker Worker
tion er er
1 Andaman & Nicobar 36.32 34.56 95.14 0.09 0.26 0.86 98.79 1.76 4.86 0.29 1.81 4.05 93.85 63.68
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Islands
2 Andhra Pradesh 32.30 29.14 90.21 1.55 5.04 5.57 87.84 3.16 9.79 1.22 21.59 10.23 66.96 67.70
3 Arunachal Pradesh 35.50 32.90 92.69 4.18 0.91 1.18 93.73 2.59 7.31 12.91 8.90 6.28 71.92 64.50
4 Assam 33.20 30.92 93.14 1.38 0.57 2.22 95.83 2.28 6.86 4.22 5.13 9.84 80.81 66.80
5 Bihar 25.59 22.35 87.31 5.33 9.73 5.72 79.22 3.25 12.69 5.34 29.56 12.01 53.09 74.41
5 Chandigarh 37.13 35.97 96.87 0.21 0.08 0.89 98.83 1.16 3.13 0.41 0.45 5.81 93.33 62.87
6 Chhattisgarh 31.11 27.97 89.91 3.78 3.16 3.58 89.48 3.14 10.09 6.49 24.59 5.41 63.51 68.89
7 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 44.75 41.95 93.75 4.57 0.94 0.57 93.92 2.80 6.25 34.14 21.53 3.61 40.72 55.25
8 Daman & Diu 35.42 33.25 93.88 0.36 0.16 1.80 97.68 2.17 6.12 1.13 1.69 22.75 74.44 64.58

90
9 Delhi 32.89 31.33 95.28 0.24 0.14 2.97 96.65 1.55 4.72 0.49 0.84 6.33 92.34 67.11
10 Goa 37.04 32.87 88.72 1.19 0.74 2.06 96.02 4.18 11.28 6.76 11.07 5.30 76.87 62.96
11 Gujarat 33.08 31.23 94.39 1.58 2.16 2.04 94.23 1.86 5.61 3.46 14.54 13.66 68.35 66.92
12 Haryana 31.49 28.16 89.42 3.00 1.68 3.45 91.88 3.33 10.58 3.98 12.53 7.50 75.99 68.51
13 Himachal Pradesh 36.96 34.42 93.14 2.28 0.40 1.28 96.05 2.54 6.86 21.94 5.04 4.64 68.38 63.04
14 Jammu & Kashmir 32.95 29.64 89.98 2.95 1.33 4.85 90.88 3.30 10.02 11.91 11.08 23.35 53.66 67.05
15 Jharkhand 25.68 22.38 87.14 1.61 1.24 2.69 94.46 3.30 12.86 4.62 12.13 6.15 77.10 74.32
16 Karnataka 35.67 32.86 92.12 3.18 3.96 5.28 87.58 2.81 7.88 2.34 18.12 10.22 69.32 64.33
17 Kerala 31.61 27.08 85.69 1.10 3.19 3.32 92.40 4.52 14.31 1.51 11.33 5.36 81.80 68.39
18 Lakshadweep 27.24 21.56 79.15 0.00 0.00 1.74 98.26 5.68 20.85 0.00 0.00 23.63 76.37 72.76
19 Maharashtra 33.85 31.37 92.68 1.69 2.79 2.87 92.66 2.48 7.32 2.56 13.89 9.82 73.72 66.15
20 Manipur (Excl. 3 38.57 28.58 74.11 12.25 5.11 9.40 73.24 9.98 25.89 15.54 22.08 23.57 38.80 61.43
Sub-Divisions)
21 Mizoram 47.87 36.47 76.19 23.77 4.22 1.80 70.20 11.40 23.81 21.85 20.53 3.08 54.54 52.13

Table 3.18: Work Participation Rate- 2001

% of % of % of
Work % of % of % of
% of Main % of Marginal CL to AL to % of % of Non
S. Partici Main % of CL % of AL % of OT Marginal HH to
Workers to HH to Workers Mar- Mar- OT to Worker to
Name Workers to Main to Main to Main Workers Mar-
Total Popu- Main to Total ginal ginal Marginal Total Pop-
No pation to Total Worker Worker Worker to Total ginal
lation Worker Popula- Work- Work- Worker ulation
Rate Worker Worker Worker
tion er er
1 Andaman & Nicobar 36.32 34.56 95.14 0.09 0.26 0.86 98.79 1.76 4.86 0.29 1.81 4.05 93.85 63.68
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Islands
2 Andhra Pradesh 32.30 29.14 90.21 1.55 5.04 5.57 87.84 3.16 9.79 1.22 21.59 10.23 66.96 67.70
3 Arunachal Pradesh 35.50 32.90 92.69 4.18 0.91 1.18 93.73 2.59 7.31 12.91 8.90 6.28 71.92 64.50
4 Assam 33.20 30.92 93.14 1.38 0.57 2.22 95.83 2.28 6.86 4.22 5.13 9.84 80.81 66.80
5 Bihar 25.59 22.35 87.31 5.33 9.73 5.72 79.22 3.25 12.69 5.34 29.56 12.01 53.09 74.41
5 Chandigarh 37.13 35.97 96.87 0.21 0.08 0.89 98.83 1.16 3.13 0.41 0.45 5.81 93.33 62.87
6 Chhattisgarh 31.11 27.97 89.91 3.78 3.16 3.58 89.48 3.14 10.09 6.49 24.59 5.41 63.51 68.89
7 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 44.75 41.95 93.75 4.57 0.94 0.57 93.92 2.80 6.25 34.14 21.53 3.61 40.72 55.25
8 Daman & Diu 35.42 33.25 93.88 0.36 0.16 1.80 97.68 2.17 6.12 1.13 1.69 22.75 74.44 64.58
90

9 Delhi 32.89 31.33 95.28 0.24 0.14 2.97 96.65 1.55 4.72 0.49 0.84 6.33 92.34 67.11
10 Goa 37.04 32.87 88.72 1.19 0.74 2.06 96.02 4.18 11.28 6.76 11.07 5.30 76.87 62.96
11 Gujarat 33.08 31.23 94.39 1.58 2.16 2.04 94.23 1.86 5.61 3.46 14.54 13.66 68.35 66.92
12 Haryana 31.49 28.16 89.42 3.00 1.68 3.45 91.88 3.33 10.58 3.98 12.53 7.50 75.99 68.51
13 Himachal Pradesh 36.96 34.42 93.14 2.28 0.40 1.28 96.05 2.54 6.86 21.94 5.04 4.64 68.38 63.04
14 Jammu & Kashmir 32.95 29.64 89.98 2.95 1.33 4.85 90.88 3.30 10.02 11.91 11.08 23.35 53.66 67.05
15 Jharkhand 25.68 22.38 87.14 1.61 1.24 2.69 94.46 3.30 12.86 4.62 12.13 6.15 77.10 74.32
16 Karnataka 35.67 32.86 92.12 3.18 3.96 5.28 87.58 2.81 7.88 2.34 18.12 10.22 69.32 64.33
17 Kerala 31.61 27.08 85.69 1.10 3.19 3.32 92.40 4.52 14.31 1.51 11.33 5.36 81.80 68.39
18 Lakshadweep 27.24 21.56 79.15 0.00 0.00 1.74 98.26 5.68 20.85 0.00 0.00 23.63 76.37 72.76
19 Maharashtra 33.85 31.37 92.68 1.69 2.79 2.87 92.66 2.48 7.32 2.56 13.89 9.82 73.72 66.15
20 Manipur (Excl. 3 38.57 28.58 74.11 12.25 5.11 9.40 73.24 9.98 25.89 15.54 22.08 23.57 38.80 61.43
Sub-Divisions)
21 Mizoram 47.87 36.47 76.19 23.77 4.22 1.80 70.20 11.40 23.81 21.85 20.53 3.08 54.54 52.13
 Table 3.18: Work Participation Rate- 2001

% of % of % of
Work % of % of % of
% of Main % of Marginal CL to AL to % of % of Non
S. Partici Main % of CL % of AL % of OT Marginal HH to
Workers to HH to Workers Mar- Mar- OT to Worker to
Name Workers to Main to Main to Main Workers Mar-
Total Popu- Main to Total ginal ginal Marginal Total Pop-
No pation to Total Worker Worker Worker to Total ginal
lation Worker Popula- Work- Work- Worker ulation
Rate Worker Worker Worker
tion er er
% of % of % of
Work % of % of
% of Main % of Marginal CL to % of AL HH to % of % of Non
S. Partici Main % of CL % of AL % of OT Marginal
Workers to HH to Workers Mar- to Mar- Mar- OT to Worker to
Name Workers to Main to Main to Main Workers
Total Popu- Main to Total ginal ginal ginal Marginal Total Pop-
No pation to Total Worker Worker Worker to Total
lation Worker Popula- Work- Worker Work- Worker ulation
Rate Worker Worker
tion er er
22 Nagaland 31.03 27.90 89.93 3.27 0.58 2.09 94.06 3.13 10.07 16.46 4.49 11.77 67.28 68.97
23 Orissa 30.62 27.50 89.80 2.82 2.70 2.91 91.57 3.12 10.20 4.00 21.02 8.60 66.38 69.38
24 Pondicherry 33.13 31.44 94.89 0.89 4.92 1.72 92.46 1.69 5.11 0.80 18.28 5.88 75.04 66.87
25 Punjab 33.49 31.32 93.51 2.45 2.87 3.73 90.95 2.17 6.49 1.70 12.03 9.06 77.21 66.51

91
26 Rajasthan 29.59 26.30 88.87 5.03 1.24 5.30 88.44 3.29 11.13 10.11 10.16 10.84 68.89 70.41
27 Sikkim 37.94 35.07 92.43 0.19 0.13 1.04 98.64 2.87 7.57 0.52 0.29 1.80 97.38 56.93
28 Tamil Nadu 37.54 34.45 91.75 3.41 9.11 6.05 81.43 3.10 8.25 2.40 28.33 9.53 59.74 62.46
29 Tripura 32.45 30.14 92.86 1.35 1.52 1.36 95.76 2.32 7.14 1.60 7.24 7.58 83.59 67.55
30 Uttar Pradesh 27.08 23.60 87.14 4.85 3.77 6.27 85.11 3.48 12.86 3.15 14.36 13.84 68.66 72.92
31 Uttaranchal 29.15 26.47 90.80 2.04 1.77 2.08 94.12 2.68 9.20 3.72 8.51 6.15 81.62 70.85
32 West Bengal 33.85 30.84 91.11 0.85 1.13 5.07 92.96 3.01 8.89 1.41 6.58 15.31 76.70 66.15
AL: Agricultural Labourers
CL: Cultivators
HH: (workers in) Household Industry
OT: Other workers
Source: Census of India, 2001
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 3.18: Work Participation Rate- 2001

% of % of % of
Work % of % of % of
% of Main % of Marginal CL to AL to % of % of Non
S. Partici Main % of CL % of AL % of OT Marginal HH to
Workers to HH to Workers Mar- Mar- OT to Worker to
Name Workers to Main to Main to Main Workers Mar-
Total Popu- Main to Total ginal ginal Marginal Total Pop-
No pation to Total Worker Worker Worker to Total ginal
lation Worker Popula- Work- Work- Worker ulation
Rate Worker Worker Worker
tion er er
% of % of % of
Work % of % of
% of Main % of Marginal CL to % of AL HH to % of % of Non
S. Partici Main % of CL % of AL % of OT Marginal
Workers to HH to Workers Mar- to Mar- Mar- OT to Worker to
Name Workers to Main to Main to Main Workers
Total Popu- Main to Total ginal ginal ginal Marginal Total Pop-
No pation to Total Worker Worker Worker to Total
lation Worker Popula- Work- Worker Work- Worker ulation
Rate Worker Worker
tion er er
22 Nagaland 31.03 27.90 89.93 3.27 0.58 2.09 94.06 3.13 10.07 16.46 4.49 11.77 67.28 68.97
23 Orissa 30.62 27.50 89.80 2.82 2.70 2.91 91.57 3.12 10.20 4.00 21.02 8.60 66.38 69.38
24 Pondicherry 33.13 31.44 94.89 0.89 4.92 1.72 92.46 1.69 5.11 0.80 18.28 5.88 75.04 66.87
25 Punjab 33.49 31.32 93.51 2.45 2.87 3.73 90.95 2.17 6.49 1.70 12.03 9.06 77.21 66.51
91

26 Rajasthan 29.59 26.30 88.87 5.03 1.24 5.30 88.44 3.29 11.13 10.11 10.16 10.84 68.89 70.41
27 Sikkim 37.94 35.07 92.43 0.19 0.13 1.04 98.64 2.87 7.57 0.52 0.29 1.80 97.38 56.93
28 Tamil Nadu 37.54 34.45 91.75 3.41 9.11 6.05 81.43 3.10 8.25 2.40 28.33 9.53 59.74 62.46
29 Tripura 32.45 30.14 92.86 1.35 1.52 1.36 95.76 2.32 7.14 1.60 7.24 7.58 83.59 67.55
30 Uttar Pradesh 27.08 23.60 87.14 4.85 3.77 6.27 85.11 3.48 12.86 3.15 14.36 13.84 68.66 72.92
31 Uttaranchal 29.15 26.47 90.80 2.04 1.77 2.08 94.12 2.68 9.20 3.72 8.51 6.15 81.62 70.85
32 West Bengal 33.85 30.84 91.11 0.85 1.13 5.07 92.96 3.01 8.89 1.41 6.58 15.31 76.70 66.15
AL: Agricultural Labourers
CL: Cultivators
HH: (workers in) Household Industry
OT: Other workers
Source: Census of India, 2001
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Table 3.19: Work Participation Rate- 2011

% of
% of % of
Work % of Mar- % of Non
Main Marginal % of CL % of AL % of % of OT
Partici Main % of CL % of AL % of HH % of OT ginal Worker
Workers Workers to Mar- to Mar- HH to to Mar-
S.No. Name Workers to Main to Main to Main to Main Work- to Total
to Total to Total ginal ginal Marginal ginal
pation to Total Worker Worker Worker Worker ers to Popula-
Popula- Popula- Worker Worker Worker Worker
Rate Worker Total tion
tion tion
Worker
Handbook of Urban Statistics

1 Andaman & 40.47 37.32 92.21 0.54 0.22 0.70 98.54 3.15 7.79 2.01 0.95 1.64 95.40 59.53
Nicobar
Islands
2 Andhra Pradesh 36.75 31.52 85.77 2.09 7.45 4.75 85.71 5.23 14.23 2.58 13.69 6.97 76.76 63.25
3 Arunachal Pradesh 36.97 31.93 86.36 3.44 1.46 1.34 93.76 5.04 13.64 6.89 7.06 6.07 79.98 63.03
4 Assam 36.41 31.29 85.93 2.29 1.29 2.64 93.77 5.12 14.07 4.96 6.01 9.19 79.84 63.59
5 Bihar 28.62 22.42 78.32 5.75 11.83 5.87 76.55 6.20 21.68 5.01 27.69 8.68 58.62 71.38
6 Chandigarh 38.17 36.46 95.52 0.47 0.34 1.10 98.09 1.71 4.48 2.01 1.49 3.24 93.26 61.83
7 Chhattisgarh 35.66 31.60 88.63 4.31 6.05 3.03 86.61 4.05 11.37 9.48 34.73 3.60 52.20 64.34

92
8 Dadra & Nagar 45.48 42.40 93.22 2.43 1.07 0.87 95.63 3.08 6.78 7.41 10.14 5.05 77.39 54.52
Haveli
9 Daman & Diu 53.58 51.95 96.97 0.63 0.18 0.27 98.92 1.62 3.03 2.22 1.72 3.07 92.99 46.42
10 Delhi 33.34 31.70 95.09 0.31 0.49 3.21 96.00 1.64 4.91 1.44 2.09 4.52 91.95 66.66
11 Goa 39.89 34.35 86.13 1.13 0.88 2.09 95.91 5.53 13.87 3.11 7.01 3.61 86.26 60.11
12 Gujarat 35.73 32.97 92.28 2.07 3.35 1.60 92.97 2.76 7.72 2.87 10.35 5.63 81.14 64.27
13 Haryana 32.95 29.17 88.54 2.72 3.23 4.36 89.70 3.78 11.46 3.63 11.65 4.77 79.95 67.05
14 Himachal Pradesh 39.22 34.91 89.02 2.32 0.98 2.16 94.54 4.31 10.98 26.63 8.13 4.49 60.75 60.78
15 Jammu & Kashmir 35.23 28.38 80.55 2.58 1.87 2.21 93.33 6.85 19.45 16.91 13.16 7.60 62.34 64.77
16 Jharkhand 29.26 24.35 83.23 1.80 2.14 2.90 93.17 4.91 16.77 7.07 14.24 5.09 73.60 70.74
17 Karnataka 39.66 35.28 88.96 2.56 3.89 3.80 89.74 4.38 11.04 2.53 9.15 7.11 81.22 60.34
18 Kerala 33.12 27.61 83.37 1.44 3.60 2.13 92.83 5.51 16.63 2.27 9.27 3.24 85.22 66.88
19 Lakshadweep 28.01 17.04 60.84 0.00 0.00 0.90 99.10 10.97 39.16 0.00 0.00 1.70 98.30 71.99
20 Madhya Pradesh 34.18 29.76 87.08 5.52 5.47 5.01 83.99 4.42 12.92 4.62 19.64 7.18 68.57 65.82
21 Maharashtra 36.95 33.95 91.88 1.78 3.59 3.17 91.46 3.00 8.12 2.94 9.55 6.52 80.99 63.05
22 Manipur 41.41 31.25 75.46 14.69 3.61 6.72 74.99 10.16 24.54 14.40 17.55 19.25 48.80 58.59

Table 3.19: Work Participation Rate- 2011

% of
% of % of
Work % of Mar- % of Non
Main Marginal % of CL % of AL % of % of OT
Partici Main % of CL % of AL % of HH % of OT ginal Worker
Workers Workers to Mar- to Mar- HH to to Mar-
S.No. Name Workers to Main to Main to Main to Main Work- to Total
to Total to Total ginal ginal Marginal ginal
pation to Total Worker Worker Worker Worker ers to Popula-
Popula- Popula- Worker Worker Worker Worker
Rate Worker Total tion
tion tion
Worker
Handbook of Urban Statistics

1 Andaman & 40.47 37.32 92.21 0.54 0.22 0.70 98.54 3.15 7.79 2.01 0.95 1.64 95.40 59.53
Nicobar
Islands
2 Andhra Pradesh 36.75 31.52 85.77 2.09 7.45 4.75 85.71 5.23 14.23 2.58 13.69 6.97 76.76 63.25
3 Arunachal Pradesh 36.97 31.93 86.36 3.44 1.46 1.34 93.76 5.04 13.64 6.89 7.06 6.07 79.98 63.03
4 Assam 36.41 31.29 85.93 2.29 1.29 2.64 93.77 5.12 14.07 4.96 6.01 9.19 79.84 63.59
5 Bihar 28.62 22.42 78.32 5.75 11.83 5.87 76.55 6.20 21.68 5.01 27.69 8.68 58.62 71.38
6 Chandigarh 38.17 36.46 95.52 0.47 0.34 1.10 98.09 1.71 4.48 2.01 1.49 3.24 93.26 61.83
7 Chhattisgarh 35.66 31.60 88.63 4.31 6.05 3.03 86.61 4.05 11.37 9.48 34.73 3.60 52.20 64.34
92

8 Dadra & Nagar 45.48 42.40 93.22 2.43 1.07 0.87 95.63 3.08 6.78 7.41 10.14 5.05 77.39 54.52
Haveli
9 Daman & Diu 53.58 51.95 96.97 0.63 0.18 0.27 98.92 1.62 3.03 2.22 1.72 3.07 92.99 46.42
10 Delhi 33.34 31.70 95.09 0.31 0.49 3.21 96.00 1.64 4.91 1.44 2.09 4.52 91.95 66.66
11 Goa 39.89 34.35 86.13 1.13 0.88 2.09 95.91 5.53 13.87 3.11 7.01 3.61 86.26 60.11
12 Gujarat 35.73 32.97 92.28 2.07 3.35 1.60 92.97 2.76 7.72 2.87 10.35 5.63 81.14 64.27
13 Haryana 32.95 29.17 88.54 2.72 3.23 4.36 89.70 3.78 11.46 3.63 11.65 4.77 79.95 67.05
14 Himachal Pradesh 39.22 34.91 89.02 2.32 0.98 2.16 94.54 4.31 10.98 26.63 8.13 4.49 60.75 60.78
15 Jammu & Kashmir 35.23 28.38 80.55 2.58 1.87 2.21 93.33 6.85 19.45 16.91 13.16 7.60 62.34 64.77
16 Jharkhand 29.26 24.35 83.23 1.80 2.14 2.90 93.17 4.91 16.77 7.07 14.24 5.09 73.60 70.74
17 Karnataka 39.66 35.28 88.96 2.56 3.89 3.80 89.74 4.38 11.04 2.53 9.15 7.11 81.22 60.34
18 Kerala 33.12 27.61 83.37 1.44 3.60 2.13 92.83 5.51 16.63 2.27 9.27 3.24 85.22 66.88
19 Lakshadweep 28.01 17.04 60.84 0.00 0.00 0.90 99.10 10.97 39.16 0.00 0.00 1.70 98.30 71.99
20 Madhya Pradesh 34.18 29.76 87.08 5.52 5.47 5.01 83.99 4.42 12.92 4.62 19.64 7.18 68.57 65.82
21 Maharashtra 36.95 33.95 91.88 1.78 3.59 3.17 91.46 3.00 8.12 2.94 9.55 6.52 80.99 63.05
22 Manipur 41.41 31.25 75.46 14.69 3.61 6.72 74.99 10.16 24.54 14.40 17.55 19.25 48.80 58.59
 % of
% of % of
Work % of Mar- % of Non
Main Marginal % of CL % of AL % of % of OT
Partici Main % of CL % of AL % of HH % of OT ginal Worker
Workers Workers to Mar- to Mar- HH to to Mar-
S.No. Name Workers to Main to Main to Main to Main Work- to Total
to Total to Total ginal ginal Marginal ginal
pation to Total Worker Worker Worker Worker ers to Popula-
Popula- Popula- Worker Worker Worker Worker
Rate Worker Total tion
tion tion
Worker
23 Meghalaya 35.63 32.01 89.84 3.71 1.69 0.66 93.94 3.62 10.16 5.97 13.56 2.21 78.25 64.37
24 Mizoram 40.98 34.49 84.16 16.35 7.11 1.98 74.57 6.49 15.84 13.93 23.40 3.90 58.77 59.02
25 Nagaland 37.44 30.39 81.17 6.83 1.50 1.69 89.97 7.05 18.83 22.51 11.64 9.05 56.81 62.56
26 Odisha 34.81 29.75 85.47 2.90 3.10 4.60 89.40 5.06 14.53 3.75 15.93 7.91 72.42 65.19
27 Puducherry 34.84 32.54 93.41 0.99 2.95 1.57 94.50 2.30 6.59 1.80 10.00 4.32 83.88 65.16
28 Punjab 35.75 32.16 89.93 2.53 2.67 3.82 90.98 3.60 10.07 2.67 6.56 6.10 84.67 64.25
29 Rajasthan 32.27 28.65 88.79 4.35 2.51 4.67 88.48 3.62 11.21 7.83 13.52 7.42 71.23 67.73
30 Sikkim 41.90 36.93 88.13 1.05 0.75 1.29 96.90 4.97 11.87 3.57 8.88 4.75 82.80 58.10
31 Tamil Nadu 40.16 36.09 89.87 2.61 7.79 4.47 85.13 4.07 10.13 2.38 15.30 7.00 75.33 59.84
32 Tripura 36.76 31.25 85.00 2.94 3.31 1.62 92.13 5.51 15.00 2.59 8.98 6.28 82.15 63.24

93
33 Uttar Pradesh 31.16 24.94 80.04 4.26 5.91 8.33 81.50 6.22 19.96 3.03 13.48 10.35 73.14 68.84
34 Uttarakhand 32.36 28.64 88.50 2.03 2.49 3.48 92.00 3.72 11.50 3.56 7.70 6.19 82.55 67.64
35 West Bengal 36.69 31.61 86.17 1.33 2.49 6.99 89.19 5.08 13.83 2.83 7.85 14.53 74.79 63.31
India 35.31 30.95 87.65 2.66 4.46 4.36 88.52 4.36 12.35 3.77 12.93 7.91 75.38 64.69
AL: Agricultural Labourers

CL: Cultivators

HH: (workers in) Household Industry

OT: Other workers

Source: Census of India, 2011

Handbook of Urban Statistics

% of
% of % of
Work % of Mar- % of Non
Main Marginal % of CL % of AL % of % of OT
Partici Main % of CL % of AL % of HH % of OT ginal Worker
Workers Workers to Mar- to Mar- HH to to Mar-
S.No. Name Workers to Main to Main to Main to Main Work- to Total
to Total to Total ginal ginal Marginal ginal
pation to Total Worker Worker Worker Worker ers to Popula-
Popula- Popula- Worker Worker Worker Worker
Rate Worker Total tion
tion tion
Worker
23 Meghalaya 35.63 32.01 89.84 3.71 1.69 0.66 93.94 3.62 10.16 5.97 13.56 2.21 78.25 64.37
24 Mizoram 40.98 34.49 84.16 16.35 7.11 1.98 74.57 6.49 15.84 13.93 23.40 3.90 58.77 59.02
25 Nagaland 37.44 30.39 81.17 6.83 1.50 1.69 89.97 7.05 18.83 22.51 11.64 9.05 56.81 62.56
26 Odisha 34.81 29.75 85.47 2.90 3.10 4.60 89.40 5.06 14.53 3.75 15.93 7.91 72.42 65.19
27 Puducherry 34.84 32.54 93.41 0.99 2.95 1.57 94.50 2.30 6.59 1.80 10.00 4.32 83.88 65.16
28 Punjab 35.75 32.16 89.93 2.53 2.67 3.82 90.98 3.60 10.07 2.67 6.56 6.10 84.67 64.25
29 Rajasthan 32.27 28.65 88.79 4.35 2.51 4.67 88.48 3.62 11.21 7.83 13.52 7.42 71.23 67.73
30 Sikkim 41.90 36.93 88.13 1.05 0.75 1.29 96.90 4.97 11.87 3.57 8.88 4.75 82.80 58.10
31 Tamil Nadu 40.16 36.09 89.87 2.61 7.79 4.47 85.13 4.07 10.13 2.38 15.30 7.00 75.33 59.84
32 Tripura 36.76 31.25 85.00 2.94 3.31 1.62 92.13 5.51 15.00 2.59 8.98 6.28 82.15 63.24
93

33 Uttar Pradesh 31.16 24.94 80.04 4.26 5.91 8.33 81.50 6.22 19.96 3.03 13.48 10.35 73.14 68.84
34 Uttarakhand 32.36 28.64 88.50 2.03 2.49 3.48 92.00 3.72 11.50 3.56 7.70 6.19 82.55 67.64
35 West Bengal 36.69 31.61 86.17 1.33 2.49 6.99 89.19 5.08 13.83 2.83 7.85 14.53 74.79 63.31
India 35.31 30.95 87.65 2.66 4.46 4.36 88.52 4.36 12.35 3.77 12.93 7.91 75.38 64.69
AL: Agricultural Labourers

CL: Cultivators

HH: (workers in) Household Industry

OT: Other workers

Source: Census of India, 2011

Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Chapter 4 Chapter 4

Public Expenditure on Public Expenditure on

Urban Development Urban Development
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Public Expenditure on Urban Development
Public expenditure has historically played a major role in creation of urban infrastructure and provision
of various municipal services to citizen.
State Domestic Product is a reflection of economic development of the State. Income of a State can
be assumed as one of the proxy for the development. Table 4.1 presents the scenario and trend of
net State Domestic Product at current prices. The NSDP of India increased from Rs. 78,19,154 crore in
2011-12 to Rs. 1,22,36,662 crore in the year 2015-16 and witnessed the growth of 10.2 percent over
the previous year 2014-15.
Per capita income is an important indicator representing welfare of people of a country. As highlight-
ed in table 4.2, per capita of India at current prices has increased from Rs. 63,462 in 2011-12 to Rs.
94,130 in 2015-16. General category States like Goa, Haryana, Maharashtra and Kerala were the top
States in terms of per capita income and having high per capita income of Rs. 3,27,059, Rs. 1,62,034,
Rs. 1,47,399 and Rs. 1,47,190 respectively. Bihar (Rs. 31,454) and Uttar Pradesh (Rs. 46,299) were the
lowest generating per capita income States in India. The growth of per capita income (Table 4.4) wit-
nessed a decline from 11.9 percent in 2012-13 to 8.9 percent in the year 2015-16. But few States like
Goa, Jammu and Kashmir, Andhra Pradesh and Assam performed well in accelerating their per capita
income with a growth of 13.1, 22, 15.4 and 14.4 percent respectively.
Table 4.5 and 4.6 gives a scenario of urban development expenditure made by States under the reve-
nue and the capital accounts. At all India level, in terms of revenue expenditure, the share of urban de-
velopment in development expenditure was 3.64 percent in 2015-16, which increased to 4.98 percent
in the year 2017-18. Further, the share of urban development in total expenditure was 2.34 percent in
2015-16 and increased to 3.17 percent in 2017-18. On the capital expenditure side, the urban devel-
opment expenditure increased from 3.06 percent in 2015-16 to 4.57 percent in 2017-18.
Table 4.7 contains data on additional Fourteenth Finance Commission transfers to States. The total
additional benefit to States on account of FFC transfers amounts to Rs. 2,04,198 crore in 2015-16 over
2014-15.
Table 4.9 contains data on per capita municipal income and expenditure. Municipal income comes
from Municipal own revenue and grants from Centre and State government. Municipal expenditure
consists majorly of administrative expenditure, establishment expenditure and operation & manage-
ment expenditure. At national level the average per capita municipal income was Rs. 1,708.71 and
the average expenditure was Rs. 1,747.78 in 2003-05. The average per capita income and expenditure
increased to Rs. 2,493.25 and Rs. 2,461.91 in the period 2006-08 and left with a per capita surplus of
Rs. 31.34.
97
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Public Expenditure on Urban Development
Public expenditure has historically played a major role in creation of urban infrastructure and provision
of various municipal services to citizen.
State Domestic Product is a reflection of economic development of the State. Income of a State can
be assumed as one of the proxy for the development. Table 4.1 presents the scenario and trend of
net State Domestic Product at current prices. The NSDP of India increased from Rs. 78,19,154 crore in
2011-12 to Rs. 1,22,36,662 crore in the year 2015-16 and witnessed the growth of 10.2 percent over
the previous year 2014-15.
Per capita income is an important indicator representing welfare of people of a country. As highlight-
ed in table 4.2, per capita of India at current prices has increased from Rs. 63,462 in 2011-12 to Rs.
94,130 in 2015-16. General category States like Goa, Haryana, Maharashtra and Kerala were the top
States in terms of per capita income and having high per capita income of Rs. 3,27,059, Rs. 1,62,034,
Rs. 1,47,399 and Rs. 1,47,190 respectively. Bihar (Rs. 31,454) and Uttar Pradesh (Rs. 46,299) were the
lowest generating per capita income States in India. The growth of per capita income (Table 4.4) wit-
nessed a decline from 11.9 percent in 2012-13 to 8.9 percent in the year 2015-16. But few States like
Goa, Jammu and Kashmir, Andhra Pradesh and Assam performed well in accelerating their per capita
income with a growth of 13.1, 22, 15.4 and 14.4 percent respectively.
Table 4.5 and 4.6 gives a scenario of urban development expenditure made by States under the reve-
nue and the capital accounts. At all India level, in terms of revenue expenditure, the share of urban de-
velopment in development expenditure was 3.64 percent in 2015-16, which increased to 4.98 percent
in the year 2017-18. Further, the share of urban development in total expenditure was 2.34 percent in
2015-16 and increased to 3.17 percent in 2017-18. On the capital expenditure side, the urban devel-
opment expenditure increased from 3.06 percent in 2015-16 to 4.57 percent in 2017-18.
Table 4.7 contains data on additional Fourteenth Finance Commission transfers to States. The total
additional benefit to States on account of FFC transfers amounts to Rs. 2,04,198 crore in 2015-16 over
2014-15.
Table 4.9 contains data on per capita municipal income and expenditure. Municipal income comes
from Municipal own revenue and grants from Centre and State government. Municipal expenditure
consists majorly of administrative expenditure, establishment expenditure and operation & manage-
ment expenditure. At national level the average per capita municipal income was Rs. 1,708.71 and
the average expenditure was Rs. 1,747.78 in 2003-05. The average per capita income and expenditure
increased to Rs. 2,493.25 and Rs. 2,461.91 in the period 2006-08 and left with a per capita surplus of
Rs. 31.34.
97
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Net State Domestic Product at Current Per Capita Municipal Income and Expen- Net State Domestic Product at Current Per Capita Municipal Income and Expen-
Prices diture in India (in Rs.) Prices diture in India (in Rs.)

98 98
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 4.1: Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (Base Year 2011-12) Table 4.1: Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (Base Year 2011-12)

(Rs. crore) (Rs. crore)

Sl Sl
No. States\UT 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 No. States\UT 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 3,404 3,793 4,288 4,916 5,248 1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 3,404 3,793 4,288 4,916 5,248
2 Andhra Pradesh 339,996 370,196 413,164 469,909 545,638 2 Andhra Pradesh 339,996 370,196 413,164 469,909 545,638
3 Arunachal Pradesh 10,229 11,617 13,377 16,475 18,566 3 Arunachal Pradesh 10,229 11,617 13,377 16,475 18,566
4 Assam 129,354 142,039 160,442 172,849 200,347 4 Assam 129,354 142,039 160,442 172,849 200,347
5 Bihar 228,497 261,327 292,143 315,732 351,871 5 Bihar 228,497 261,327 292,143 315,732 351,871
6 Chandigarh 16,930 19,768 22,522 23,498 25,941 6 Chandigarh 16,930 19,768 22,522 23,498 25,941
7 Chhattisgarh 142,273 159,431 185,939 211,016 233,023 7 Chhattisgarh 142,273 159,431 185,939 211,016 233,023
8 Delhi 314,619 357,251 404,664 447,435 501,104 8 Delhi 314,619 357,251 404,664 447,435 501,104
9 Goa 38,009 34,567 32,043 43,233 49,222 9 Goa 38,009 34,567 32,043 43,233 49,222
10 Gujarat 532,809 634,572 707,456 804,764 908,442 10 Gujarat 532,809 634,572 707,456 804,764 908,442
11 Haryana 271,152 314,353 363,590 395,890 438,140 11 Haryana 271,152 314,353 363,590 395,890 438,140
12 Himachal Pradesh 60,536 69,432 80,129 87,510 96,038 12 Himachal Pradesh 60,536 69,432 80,129 87,510 96,038
13 Jammu & Kashmir 67,274 73,003 79,692 81,003 100,341 13 Jammu & Kashmir 67,274 73,003 79,692 81,003 100,341
14 Jharkhand 137,383 160,304 172,030 200,357 211,905 14 Jharkhand 137,383 160,304 172,030 200,357 211,905
15 Karnataka 554,952 635,924 746,569 824,506 917,472 15 Karnataka 554,952 635,924 746,569 824,506 917,472
16 Kerala 328,021 371,384 417,265 460,614 502,689 16 Kerala 328,021 371,384 417,265 460,614 502,689
17 Madhya Pradesh 282,370 333,936 391,369 429,896 483,969 17 Madhya Pradesh 282,370 333,936 391,369 429,896 483,969
18 Maharashtra 1,122,173 1,277,163 1,445,116 1,551,628 1,748,771 18 Maharashtra 1,122,173 1,277,163 1,445,116 1,551,628 1,748,771
19 Manipur 11,501 12,193 14,456 16,420 17,542 19 Manipur 11,501 12,193 14,456 16,420 17,542
20 Meghalaya 18,028 19,653 20,415 20,697 23,124 20 Meghalaya 18,028 19,653 20,415 20,697 23,124
21 Mizoram 6,404 7,375 8,989 12,067 13,651 21 Mizoram 6,404 7,375 8,989 12,067 13,651
22 Nagaland 10,554 12,318 14,545 16,104 17,368 22 Nagaland 10,554 12,318 14,545 16,104 17,368
23 Odisha 201,111 229,888 256,211 282,322 300,236 23 Odisha 201,111 229,888 256,211 282,322 300,236
24 Puducherry 15,160 16,984 19,778 20,143 22,212 24 Puducherry 15,160 16,984 19,778 20,143 22,212
25 Punjab 239,227 267,116 297,908 316,534 351,198 25 Punjab 239,227 267,116 297,908 316,534 351,198
26 Rajasthan* 396,710 447,203 490,951 542,657 602,648 26 Rajasthan* 396,710 447,203 490,951 542,657 602,648
27 Sikkim* 9,742 10,817 12,203 13,556 14,973 27 Sikkim* 9,742 10,817 12,203 13,556 14,973
28 Tamil Nadu 674,478 768,946 859,556 957,447 1,037,488 28 Tamil Nadu 674,478 768,946 859,556 957,447 1,037,488
29 Telangana 325,139 364,030 408,282 456,110 512,282 29 Telangana 325,139 364,030 408,282 456,110 512,282
30 Tripura 17,419 19,631 23,329 27,484 NA 30 Tripura 17,419 19,631 23,329 27,484 NA
31 Uttar Pradesh 645,132 732,995 833,825 891,798 991,836 31 Uttar Pradesh 645,132 732,995 833,825 891,798 991,836
32 Uttarakhand 101,960 117,041 131,814 143,789 157,456 32 Uttarakhand 101,960 117,041 131,814 143,789 157,456
33 West Bengal1           33 West Bengal1          
All-India NDP 7,819,154 8,883,108 10,037,547 11,101,191 12,236,662 All-India NDP 7,819,154 8,883,108 10,037,547 11,101,191 12,236,662
Source: Economic Survey 2017-18 Source: Economic Survey 2017-18

Notes: Notes:

1. The estimates of West Bengal for new series with base year 2011-12 compiled by the DES, West Bengal 1. The estimates of West Bengal for new series with base year 2011-12 compiled by the DES, West Bengal
are under examination are under examination

2. NA: Not available, *: Provisional 2. NA: Not available, *: Provisional

99 99
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 4.2: Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (Base Year 2011-12) Table 4.2: Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (Base Year 2011-12)

SL No. State\UT 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 SL No. State\UT 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 88,183 96,032 106,413 119,312 124,361 1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 88,183 96,032 106,413 119,312 124,361
2 Andhra Pradesh 69,000 74,687 82,870 93,699 108,163 2 Andhra Pradesh 69,000 74,687 82,870 93,699 108,163
3 Arunachal Pradesh 73,068 81,353 91,809 110,793 122,466 3 Arunachal Pradesh 73,068 81,353 91,809 110,793 122,466
4 Assam 41,142 44,599 49,734 52,895 60,526 4 Assam 41,142 44,599 49,734 52,895 60,526
5 Bihar 21,750 24,487 26,948 28,671 31,454 5 Bihar 21,750 24,487 26,948 28,671 31,454
6 Chandigarh 159,116 183,039 205,492 211,313 229,976 6 Chandigarh 159,116 183,039 205,492 211,313 229,976
7 Chhattisgarh 55,177 60,849 69,839 78,001 84,767 7 Chhattisgarh 55,177 60,849 69,839 78,001 84,767
8 Delhi 185,343 206,503 229,518 249,004 273,618 8 Delhi 185,343 206,503 229,518 249,004 273,618
9 Goa 259,444 234,354 215,776 289,185 327,059 9 Goa 259,444 234,354 215,776 289,185 327,059
10 Gujarat 87,481 102,826 113,139 127,017 141,504 10 Gujarat 87,481 102,826 113,139 127,017 141,504
11 Haryana 106,085 121,269 138,300 148,485 162,034 11 Haryana 106,085 121,269 138,300 148,485 162,034
12 Himachal Pradesh 87,721 99,730 114,095 123,532 134,376 12 Himachal Pradesh 87,721 99,730 114,095 123,532 134,376
13 Jammu & Kashmir 53,173 56,834 61,108 61,185 74,653 13 Jammu & Kashmir 53,173 56,834 61,108 61,185 74,653
14 Jharkhand 41,254 47,360 50,006 57,301 59,628 14 Jharkhand 41,254 47,360 50,006 57,301 59,628
15 Karnataka 90,263 102,319 118,829 129,823 142,906 15 Karnataka 90,263 102,319 118,829 129,823 142,906
16 Kerala 97,912 110,314 123,388 135,537 147,190 16 Kerala 97,912 110,314 123,388 135,537 147,190
17 Madhya Pradesh 38,550 44,931 51,897 56,182 62,334 17 Madhya Pradesh 38,550 44,931 51,897 56,182 62,334
18 Maharashtra 99,173 111,542 124,724 132,341 147,399 18 Maharashtra 99,173 111,542 124,724 132,341 147,399
19 Manipur 39,762 41,246 47,852 53,187 55,603 19 Manipur 39,762 41,246 47,852 53,187 55,603
20 Meghalaya 60,013 64,036 65,118 64,638 70,693 20 Meghalaya 60,013 64,036 65,118 64,638 70,693
21 Mizoram 57,654 65,013 77,581 103,049 114,524 21 Mizoram 57,654 65,013 77,581 103,049 114,524
22 Nagaland 53,010 61,225 71,510 78,367 83,621 22 Nagaland 53,010 61,225 71,510 78,367 83,621
23 Odisha 47,632 53,900 59,468 64,869 68,293 23 Odisha 47,632 53,900 59,468 64,869 68,293
24 Puducherry 119,649 130,548 148,147 146,921 157,871 24 Puducherry 119,649 130,548 148,147 146,921 157,871
25 Punjab 85,577 94,318 103,831 108,897 119,261 25 Punjab 85,577 94,318 103,831 108,897 119,261
26 Rajasthan* 57,391 63,775 69,018 75,201 82,325 26 Rajasthan* 57,391 63,775 69,018 75,201 82,325
27 Sikkim* 158,667 174,183 194,624 214,148 233,954 27 Sikkim* 158,667 174,183 194,624 214,148 233,954
28 Tamil Nadu 92,984 105,031 116,329 128,385 137,837 28 Tamil Nadu 92,984 105,031 116,329 128,385 137,837
29 Telangana 91,121 101,007 112,162 124,058 137,955 29 Telangana 91,121 101,007 112,162 124,058 137,955
30 Tripura 47,079 52,434 61,570 71,666 NA 30 Tripura 47,079 52,434 61,570 71,666 NA
31 Uttar Pradesh 32,002 35,812 40,124 42,267 46,299 31 Uttar Pradesh 32,002 35,812 40,124 42,267 46,299
32 Uttarakhand 100,305 113,610 126,247 135,881 146,826 32 Uttarakhand 100,305 113,610 126,247 135,881 146,826
33 West Bengal 1
          33 West Bengal 1
         
  All-India Per Capita NNI 63,462 70,983 79,118 86,454 94,130   All-India Per Capita NNI 63,462 70,983 79,118 86,454 94,130
Notes: Notes:

1. The estimates of West Bengal for new series with base year 2011-12 compiled by the DES, West Bengal are 1. The estimates of West Bengal for new series with base year 2011-12 compiled by the DES, West Bengal are
under examination under examination

2. NA: Not available, *: Provisional 2. NA: Not available, *: Provisional

100 100
 Graph 4.1: Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (Rs. Per Capita) (2012-13)

101
Source: Directorate of Economics & Statistics of respective State Governments, and for All-India - Central Statistics Office
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 4.1: Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (Rs. Per Capita) (2012-13)

101

Source: Directorate of Economics & Statistics of respective State Governments, and for All-India - Central Statistics Office
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Tables 4.3 : Growth of Net State Domestic Product at current prices (Percentage Tables 4.3 : Growth of Net State Domestic Product at current prices (Percentage
change over previous year) change over previous year)
(Base Year 2011-12) (Base Year 2011-12)
(per cent) (per cent)
SL No. State\UT 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 SL No. State\UT 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 11.4 13.1 14.6 6.8 1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 11.4 13.1 14.6 6.8
2 Andhra Pradesh 8.9 11.6 13.7 16.1 2 Andhra Pradesh 8.9 11.6 13.7 16.1
3 Arunachal Pradesh 13.6 15.1 23.2 12.7 3 Arunachal Pradesh 13.6 15.1 23.2 12.7
4 Assam 9.8 13 7.7 15.9 4 Assam 9.8 13 7.7 15.9
5 Bihar 14.4 11.8 8.1 11.4 5 Bihar 14.4 11.8 8.1 11.4
6 Chandigarh 16.8 13.9 4.3 10.4 6 Chandigarh 16.8 13.9 4.3 10.4
7 Chhattisgarh 12.1 16.6 13.5 10.4 7 Chhattisgarh 12.1 16.6 13.5 10.4
8 Delhi 13.6 13.3 10.6 12 8 Delhi 13.6 13.3 10.6 12
9 Goa -9.1 -7.3 34.9 13.9 9 Goa -9.1 -7.3 34.9 13.9
10 Gujarat 19.1 11.5 13.8 12.9 10 Gujarat 19.1 11.5 13.8 12.9
11 Haryana 15.9 15.7 8.9 10.7 11 Haryana 15.9 15.7 8.9 10.7
12 Himachal Pradesh 14.7 15.4 9.2 9.7 12 Himachal Pradesh 14.7 15.4 9.2 9.7
13 Jammu & Kashmir 8.5 9.2 1.6 23.9 13 Jammu & Kashmir 8.5 9.2 1.6 23.9
14 Jharkhand 16.7 7.3 16.5 5.8 14 Jharkhand 16.7 7.3 16.5 5.8
15 Karnataka 14.6 17.4 10.4 11.3 15 Karnataka 14.6 17.4 10.4 11.3
16 Kerala 13.2 12.4 10.4 9.1 16 Kerala 13.2 12.4 10.4 9.1
17 Madhya Pradesh 18.3 17.2 9.8 12.6 17 Madhya Pradesh 18.3 17.2 9.8 12.6
18 Maharashtra 13.8 13.2 7.4 12.7 18 Maharashtra 13.8 13.2 7.4 12.7
19 Manipur 6 18.6 13.6 6.8 19 Manipur 6 18.6 13.6 6.8
20 Meghalaya 9 3.9 1.4 11.7 20 Meghalaya 9 3.9 1.4 11.7
21 Mizoram 15.2 21.9 34.2 13.1 21 Mizoram 15.2 21.9 34.2 13.1
22 Nagaland 16.7 18.1 10.7 7.8 22 Nagaland 16.7 18.1 10.7 7.8
23 Odisha 14.3 11.5 10.2 6.3 23 Odisha 14.3 11.5 10.2 6.3
24 Puducherry 12 16.4 1.8 10.3 24 Puducherry 12 16.4 1.8 10.3
25 Punjab 11.7 11.5 6.3 11 25 Punjab 11.7 11.5 6.3 11
26 Rajasthan* 12.7 9.8 10.5 11.1 26 Rajasthan* 12.7 9.8 10.5 11.1
27 Sikkim* 11 12.8 11.1 10.5 27 Sikkim* 11 12.8 11.1 10.5
28 Tamil Nadu 14 11.8 11.4 8.4 28 Tamil Nadu 14 11.8 11.4 8.4
29 Telangana 12 12.2 11.7 12.3 29 Telangana 12 12.2 11.7 12.3
30 Tripura 12.7 18.8 17.8 NA 30 Tripura 12.7 18.8 17.8 NA
31 Uttar Pradesh 13.6 13.8 7 11.2 31 Uttar Pradesh 13.6 13.8 7 11.2
32 Uttarakhand 14.8 12.6 9.1 9.5 32 Uttarakhand 14.8 12.6 9.1 9.5
33 West Bengal 1
        33 West Bengal 1
       
  All-India NDP 13.6 13 10.6 10.2   All-India NDP 13.6 13 10.6 10.2

Source: Economic Survey 2017-18 Source: Economic Survey 2017-18

Notes: Notes:

1. The estimates of West Bengal for new series with base year 2011-12 compiled by the DES, West 1. The estimates of West Bengal for new series with base year 2011-12 compiled by the DES, West
Bengal are under examination Bengal are under examination

2. NA: Not available, *: Provisional 2. NA: Not available, *: Provisional

102 102
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 4.4 Growth of Per Capita Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (percentage Table 4.4 Growth of Per Capita Net State Domestic Product at Current Prices (percentage
change over previous year) change over previous year)
(Base Year 2011-12) (Base Year 2011-12)
(per cent) (per cent)
SL No. State\UT 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 SL No. State\UT 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 8.9 10.8 12.1 4.2 1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 8.9 10.8 12.1 4.2
2 Andhra Pradesh 8.2 11 13.1 15.4 2 Andhra Pradesh 8.2 11 13.1 15.4
3 Arunachal Pradesh 11.3 12.9 20.7 10.5 3 Arunachal Pradesh 11.3 12.9 20.7 10.5
4 Assam 8.4 11.5 6.4 14.4 4 Assam 8.4 11.5 6.4 14.4
5 Bihar 12.6 10.1 6.4 9.7 5 Bihar 12.6 10.1 6.4 9.7
6 Chandigarh 15 12.3 2.8 8.8 6 Chandigarh 15 12.3 2.8 8.8
7 Chhattisgarh 10.3 14.8 11.7 8.7 7 Chhattisgarh 10.3 14.8 11.7 8.7
8 Delhi 11.4 11.1 8.5 9.9 8 Delhi 11.4 11.1 8.5 9.9
9 Goa -9.7 -7.9 34 13.1 9 Goa -9.7 -7.9 34 13.1
10 Gujarat 17.5 10 12.3 11.4 10 Gujarat 17.5 10 12.3 11.4
11 Haryana 14.3 14 7.4 9.1 11 Haryana 14.3 14 7.4 9.1
12 Himachal Pradesh 13.7 14.4 8.3 8.8 12 Himachal Pradesh 13.7 14.4 8.3 8.8
13 Jammu & Kashmir 6.9 7.5 0.1 22 13 Jammu & Kashmir 6.9 7.5 0.1 22
14 Jharkhand 14.8 5.6 14.6 4.1 14 Jharkhand 14.8 5.6 14.6 4.1
15 Karnataka 13.4 16.1 9.3 10.1 15 Karnataka 13.4 16.1 9.3 10.1
16 Kerala 12.7 11.9 9.8 8.6 16 Kerala 12.7 11.9 9.8 8.6
17 Madhya Pradesh 16.6 15.5 8.3 10.9 17 Madhya Pradesh 16.6 15.5 8.3 10.9
18 Maharashtra 12.5 11.8 6.1 11.4 18 Maharashtra 12.5 11.8 6.1 11.4
19 Manipur 3.7 16 11.1 4.5 19 Manipur 3.7 16 11.1 4.5
20 Meghalaya 6.7 1.7 -0.7 9.4 20 Meghalaya 6.7 1.7 -0.7 9.4
21 Mizoram 12.8 19.3 32.8 11.1 21 Mizoram 12.8 19.3 32.8 11.1
22 Nagaland 15.5 16.8 9.6 6.7 22 Nagaland 15.5 16.8 9.6 6.7
23 Odisha 13.2 10.3 9.1 5.3 23 Odisha 13.2 10.3 9.1 5.3
24 Puducherry 9.1 13.5 -0.8 7.5 24 Puducherry 9.1 13.5 -0.8 7.5
25 Punjab 10.2 10.1 4.9 9.5 25 Punjab 10.2 10.1 4.9 9.5
26 Rajasthan* 11.1 8.2 9 9.5 26 Rajasthan* 11.1 8.2 9 9.5
27 Sikkim* 9.8 11.7 10 9.2 27 Sikkim* 9.8 11.7 10 9.2
28 Tamil Nadu 13 10.8 10.4 7.4 28 Tamil Nadu 13 10.8 10.4 7.4
29 Telangana 10.8 11 10.6 11.2 29 Telangana 10.8 11 10.6 11.2
30 Tripura 11.4 17.4 16.4 na 30 Tripura 11.4 17.4 16.4 na
31 Uttar Pradesh 11.9 12 5.3 9.5 31 Uttar Pradesh 11.9 12 5.3 9.5
32 Uttarakhand 13.3 11.1 7.6 8.1 32 Uttarakhand 13.3 11.1 7.6 8.1
33 West Bengal1         33 West Bengal1        
  All-India Per Capita NNI 11.9 11.5 9.3 8.9   All-India Per Capita NNI 11.9 11.5 9.3 8.9
Source: Economic Survey 2017-18 Source: Economic Survey 2017-18

Notes: Notes:

1. The estimates of West Bengal for new series with base year 2011-12 compiled by the DES, 1. The estimates of West Bengal for new series with base year 2011-12 compiled by the DES,
West Bengal are under examination West Bengal are under examination

2. na: Not available, *: Provisional 2. na: Not available, *: Provisional

103 103
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 4.5: Revenue expenditure of States and Union Territories (Urban development) Table 4.5: Revenue expenditure of States and Union Territories (Urban development)
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Budget esti- Budget esti-
Actuals Revised estimates Actuals Revised estimates
mates mates
S. % of Urban % of Urban % of Urban S. % of Urban % of Urban % of Urban
States/UTs % of Urban % of Urban States/UTs % of Urban % of Urban
No. Development Development Development No. Development Development Development
Development Development Development Development
to Develop- to Develop- to Develop- to Develop- to Develop- to Develop-
to Total to Total to Total to Total
ment Expendi- ment Expendi- ment Expendi- ment Expendi- ment Expendi- ment Expendi-
Expenditure Expenditure Expenditure Expenditure
ture ture ture ture ture ture
1 Andhra Pradesh 3.76 2.64 5.76 4.02 4.57 1 Andhra Pradesh 3.76 2.64 5.76 4.02 4.57
2 Arunachal Pradesh 1.17 0.82 1.14 0.81 3.40 2 Arunachal Pradesh 1.17 0.82 1.14 0.81 3.40
3 Assam 0.21 0.14 2.55 1.69 4.44 3 Assam 0.21 0.14 2.55 1.69 4.44
4 Bihar 2.96 1.97 3.91 2.71 4.42 4 Bihar 2.96 1.97 3.91 2.71 4.42
5 Chandigarh NA NA NA NA NA 5 Chandigarh NA NA NA NA NA
6 Chhattisgarh 1.19 0.88 4.47 3.61 3.35 6 Chhattisgarh 1.19 0.88 4.47 3.61 3.35
7 Dadar& Nagar Haveli NA NA NA NA NA 7 Dadar& Nagar Haveli NA NA NA NA NA
8 Daman & Diu NA NA NA NA NA 8 Daman & Diu NA NA NA NA NA
9 Goa 1.34 0.93 2.21 1.53 3.20 9 Goa 1.34 0.93 2.21 1.53 3.20
10 Gujarat 12.71 8.27 12.69 8.19 12.63 10 Gujarat 12.71 8.27 12.69 8.19 12.63
11 Haryana 4.88 3.31 6.74 4.70 7.17 11 Haryana 4.88 3.31 6.74 4.70 7.17
12 Himachal Pradesh 2.30 1.39 3.34 2.14 2.09 12 Himachal Pradesh 2.30 1.39 3.34 2.14 2.09
13 Jammu & Kashmir 2.69 1.68 2.71 1.65 2.42 13 Jammu & Kashmir 2.69 1.68 2.71 1.65 2.42
14 Jharkhand 5.51 3.70 7.03 5.06 5.75 14 Jharkhand 5.51 3.70 7.03 5.06 5.75
15 Karnataka 1.27 0.87 3.04 2.14 2.67 15 Karnataka 1.27 0.87 3.04 2.14 2.67
16 Kerala 0.74 0.36 2.03 0.98 2.90 16 Kerala 0.74 0.36 2.03 0.98 2.90
17 Lakshadweep NA NA NA NA NA 17 Lakshadweep NA NA NA NA NA
18 Madhya Pradesh 5.40 3.69 4.79 3.33 5.43 18 Madhya Pradesh 5.40 3.69 4.79 3.33 5.43
19 Maharashtra 5.33 3.37 7.53 4.86 7.74 19 Maharashtra 5.33 3.37 7.53 4.86 7.74
20 Manipur 1.24 0.69 1.41 0.83 1.72 20 Manipur 1.24 0.69 1.41 0.83 1.72
21 Meghalaya 0.67 0.43 1.27 0.91 1.98 21 Meghalaya 0.67 0.43 1.27 0.91 1.98
22 Mizoram 2.21 1.45 2.09 1.34 1.92 22 Mizoram 2.21 1.45 2.09 1.34 1.92
23 Nagaland 0.37 0.19 0.72 0.40 0.73 23 Nagaland 0.37 0.19 0.72 0.40 0.73
24 NCT of Delhi 6.48 4.67 8.07 6.00 8.50 24 NCT of Delhi 6.48 4.67 8.07 6.00 8.50
25 Odisha 1.82 1.33 2.44 1.72 2.75 25 Odisha 1.82 1.33 2.44 1.72 2.75
26 Puducherry 2.95 2.13 2.15 1.51 2.52 26 Puducherry 2.95 2.13 2.15 1.51 2.52
27 Punjab 0.28 0.14 0.28 0.14 0.26 27 Punjab 0.28 0.14 0.28 0.14 0.26
28 Rajasthan 4.23 2.99 5.46 3.84 4.73 28 Rajasthan 4.23 2.99 5.46 3.84 4.73
29 Sikkim 1.28 0.83 3.65 2.39 1.39 29 Sikkim 1.28 0.83 3.65 2.39 1.39
30 Tamil Nadu 0.82 0.50 1.16 0.68 1.34 30 Tamil Nadu 0.82 0.50 1.16 0.68 1.34
31 Telangana 3.22 2.23 4.47 3.26 4.93 31 Telangana 3.22 2.23 4.47 3.26 4.93
32 Tripura 1.70 1.00 2.24 1.33 2.21 32 Tripura 1.70 1.00 2.24 1.33 2.21
33 Uttar Pradesh 2.33 1.43 3.59 2.10 5.90 33 Uttar Pradesh 2.33 1.43 3.59 2.10 5.90
34 Uttarakhand 1.85 1.11 1.62 0.95 2.16 34 Uttarakhand 1.85 1.11 1.62 0.95 2.16
35 West Bengal 6.46 3.93 6.56 4.14 6.68 35 West Bengal 6.46 3.93 6.56 4.14 6.68
  All States 3.64 2.34 4.74 3.07 4.98   All States 3.64 2.34 4.74 3.07 4.98

Source: State Finances, A Study of Budgets of 2017-18, Reserve Bank of India. Source: State Finances, A Study of Budgets of 2017-18, Reserve Bank of India.

104 104
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 4.6: Capital Expenditure of States and Union Territories (Urban Development) Table 4.6: Capital Expenditure of States and Union Territories (Urban Development)
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Actuals Revised estimates Budget estimates Actuals Revised estimates Budget estimates

S. % of Urban % of Urban % of Urban % of Urban % of Urban % of Urban S. % of Urban % of Urban % of Urban % of Urban % of Urban % of Urban
States/UTs Develop- Develop- Develop- Develop- Develop- Develop- States/UTs Develop- Develop- Develop- Develop- Develop- Develop-
No. No.
ment to De- ment to ment to De- ment to ment to De- ment to ment to De- ment to ment to De- ment to ment to De- ment to
velopment Total Expen- velopment Total Expen- velopment Total Expen- velopment Total Expen- velopment Total Expen- velopment Total Expen-
Expenditure diture Expenditure diture Expenditure diture Expenditure diture Expenditure diture Expenditure diture
1 Andhra Pradesh 6.49 0.26 12.95 2.36 4.33 1.07 1 Andhra Pradesh 6.49 0.26 12.95 2.36 4.33 1.07
2 Arunachal Pradesh 7.32 0.17 15.62 0.36 9.44 0.29 2 Arunachal Pradesh 7.32 0.17 15.62 0.36 9.44 0.29
3 Assam 4.59 0.08 6.80 0.42 7.64 0.50 3 Assam 4.59 0.08 6.80 0.42 7.64 0.50
4 Bihar NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 Bihar NA NA NA NA NA NA
5 Chandigarh NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 Chandigarh NA NA NA NA NA NA
6 Chhattisgarh 6.49 0.45 8.34 0.93 6.64 0.72 6 Chhattisgarh 6.49 0.45 8.34 0.93 6.64 0.72
7 Dadar & Nagar aveli NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 Dadar & Nagar aveli NA NA NA NA NA NA
8 Daman & Diu NA NA NA NA NA NA 8 Daman & Diu NA NA NA NA NA NA
9 Goa 0.22 0.02 0.26 0.03 4.45 0.61 9 Goa 0.22 0.02 0.26 0.03 4.45 0.61
10 Gujarat 1.26 0.10 0.72 0.09 0.89 0.12 10 Gujarat 1.26 0.10 0.72 0.09 0.89 0.12
11 Haryana 3.38 0.14 NA NA 9.5 0.4 11 Haryana 3.38 0.14 NA NA 9.5 0.4
12 Himachal Pradesh 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.02 12 Himachal Pradesh 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.02
13 Jammu & Kashmir 4.85 0.48 4.62 1.87 3.79 1.92 13 Jammu & Kashmir 4.85 0.48 4.62 1.87 3.79 1.92
14 Jharkhand NA NA 0.47 0.04 0.33 0.03 14 Jharkhand NA NA 0.47 0.04 0.33 0.03
15 Karnataka 4.36 0.14 5.28 0.33 7.70 0.43 15 Karnataka 4.36 0.14 5.28 0.33 7.70 0.43
16 Kerala 0.54 0.02 0.29 0.01 NA NA 16 Kerala 0.54 0.02 0.29 0.01 NA NA
17 Lakshadweep NA NA NA NA NA NA 17 Lakshadweep NA NA NA NA NA NA
18 Madhya Pradesh 3.16 0.13 0.85 0.06 1.25 0.10 18 Madhya Pradesh 3.16 0.13 0.85 0.06 1.25 0.10
19 Maharashtra 1.97 0.09 2.12 0.11 1.11 0.06 19 Maharashtra 1.97 0.09 2.12 0.11 1.11 0.06
20 Manipur 3.29 0.21 8.70 0.77 4.88 0.28 20 Manipur 3.29 0.21 8.70 0.77 4.88 0.28
21 Meghalaya 2.13 0.09 4.00 0.20 8.61 0.48 21 Meghalaya 2.13 0.09 4.00 0.20 8.61 0.48
22 Mizoram 12.09 0.64 11.07 2.43 23.95 2.27 22 Mizoram 12.09 0.64 11.07 2.43 23.95 2.27
23 Nagaland 5.82 0.46 16.92 1.26 15.67 0.88 23 Nagaland 5.82 0.46 16.92 1.26 15.67 0.88
24 NCT of Delhi 4.23 2.08 8.14 3.79 6.96 3.46 24 NCT of Delhi 4.23 2.08 8.14 3.79 6.96 3.46
25 Odisha 0.11 0.01 0.92 0.09 0.65 0.07 25 Odisha 0.11 0.01 0.92 0.09 0.65 0.07
26 Puducherry NA NA 0.04 0.00 0.06 0.00 26 Puducherry NA NA 0.04 0.00 0.06 0.00
27 Punjab 6.37 0.08 11.72 0.23 26.79 0.66 27 Punjab 6.37 0.08 11.72 0.23 26.79 0.66
28 Rajasthan 2.20 0.13 6.11 0.31 5.18 0.36 28 Rajasthan 2.20 0.13 6.11 0.31 5.18 0.36
29 Sikkim 7.13 0.39 7.87 0.95 8.38 1.03 29 Sikkim 7.13 0.39 7.87 0.95 8.38 1.03
30 Tamil Nadu 9.80 0.36 14.81 0.63 19.43 1.18 30 Tamil Nadu 9.80 0.36 14.81 0.63 19.43 1.18
31 Telangana 0.06 0.00 NA NA NA NA 31 Telangana 0.06 0.00 NA NA NA NA
32 Tripura 4.05 0.27 13.52 1.28 16.05 1.14 32 Tripura 4.05 0.27 13.52 1.28 16.05 1.14
33 Uttar Pradesh 2.26 0.13 1.20 0.15 0.42 0.04 33 Uttar Pradesh 2.26 0.13 1.20 0.15 0.42 0.04
34 Uttarakhand 8.73 0.53 2.54 0.80 4.90 1.39 34 Uttarakhand 8.73 0.53 2.54 0.80 4.90 1.39
35 West Bengal 6.91 0.17 9.89 0.27 13.89 0.45 35 West Bengal 6.91 0.17 9.89 0.27 13.89 0.45
  All States 3.06 0.15 3.99 0.30 4.57 0.38   All States 3.06 0.15 3.99 0.30 4.57 0.38

Source: State Finances, A Study of Budgets of 2017-18, Reserve Bank of India. Source: State Finances, A Study of Budgets of 2017-18, Reserve Bank of India.

105 105
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 4.7: Additional FFC Transfers (in 2015-16 over 2014-15) Table 4.7: Additional FFC Transfers (in 2015-16 over 2014-15)

   
Benefits from Benefits Per Benefits as Benefits as Benefits from Benefits Per Benefits as Benefits as
State Category State Category
FFC (Rs. in crore) Capita (Rs) % of OTR % of NSDP FFC (Rs. in crore) Capita (Rs) % of OTR % of NSDP

1 Andhra Pradesh(United) GCS 14,620 1,728 27.4 2.2 1 Andhra Pradesh(United) GCS 14,620 1,728 27.4 2.2
2 Arunachal Pradesh SCS 5,585 40,359 1,758.1 51.0 2 Arunachal Pradesh SCS 5,585 40,359 1,758.1 51.0
3 Assam SCS 7,295 2,338 95.5 5.8 3 Assam SCS 7,295 2,338 95.5 5.8
4 Bihar GCS 13,279 1,276 105.3 4.9 4 Bihar GCS 13,279 1,276 105.3 4.9
5 Chhattisgarh GCS 7,227 2,829 67.5 5.2 5 Chhattisgarh GCS 7,227 2,829 67.5 5.2
6 Goa GCS 1,107 7,591 44.1 3.0 6 Goa GCS 1,107 7,591 44.1 3.0
7 Gujarat GCS 4,551 753 10.3 0.8 7 Gujarat GCS 4,551 753 10.3 0.8
8 Haryana GCS 1,592 628 7.8 0.5 8 Haryana GCS 1,592 628 7.8 0.5
9 Himachal Pradesh SCS 8,533 12,430 207.7 14.6 9 Himachal Pradesh SCS 8,533 12,430 207.7 14.6
10 Jammu & Kashmir SCS 13,970 11,140 294.4 22.4 10 Jammu & Kashmir SCS 13,970 11,140 294.4 22.4
11 Jharkhand GCS 6,196 1,878 89.1 4.8 11 Jharkhand GCS 6,196 1,878 89.1 4.8
12 Karnataka GCS 8,401 1,375 18.1 1.8 12 Karnataka GCS 8,401 1,375 18.1 1.8
13 Kerala GCS 9,508 2,846 37.0 3.1 13 Kerala GCS 9,508 2,846 37.0 3.1
14 Madhya Pradesh GCS 15,072 2,075 55.9 4.5 14 Madhya Pradesh GCS 15,072 2,075 55.9 4.5
15 Maharashtra GCS 10,682 951 12.2 0.9 15 Maharashtra GCS 10,682 951 12.2 0.9
16 Manipur SCS 2,130 8,286 578.7 19.5 16 Manipur SCS 2,130 8,286 578.7 19.5
17 Meghalaya SCS 1,381 4,655 198.0 8.6 17 Meghalaya SCS 1,381 4,655 198.0 8.6
18 Mizoram SCS 2,519 22,962 1,410.1 33.3 18 Mizoram SCS 2,519 22,962 1,410.1 33.3
19 Nagaland SCS 2,694 13,616 886.5 18.7 19 Nagaland SCS 2,694 13,616 886.5 18.7
20 Odisha GCS 6,752 1,609 50.2 3.2 20 Odisha GCS 6,752 1,609 50.2 3.2
21 Punjab GCS 3,457 1,246 18.3 1.4 21 Punjab GCS 3,457 1,246 18.3 1.4
22 Rajasthan GCS 6,479 945 25.5 1.6 22 Rajasthan GCS 6,479 945 25.5 1.6
23 Sikkim SCS 1,010 16,543 343.7 10.7 23 Sikkim SCS 1,010 16,543 343.7 10.7
24 Tamil Nadu GCS 5,973 828 10.0 0.9 24 Tamil Nadu GCS 5,973 828 10.0 0.9
25 Tripura SCS 1,560 4,247 181.8 6.9 25 Tripura SCS 1,560 4,247 181.8 6.9
26 Uttar Pradesh GCS 24,608 1,232 46.8 3.5 26 Uttar Pradesh GCS 24,608 1,232 46.8 3.5
27 Uttarakhand SCS 1,303 1,292 23.2 1.4 27 Uttarakhand SCS 1,303 1,292 23.2 1.4
28 West Bengal GCS 16,714 1,831 67.0 3.0 28 West Bengal GCS 16,714 1,831 67.0 3.0
  Total   204,198 1,715       Total   204,198 1,715    

FFC : Fourteenth Finance Commission FFC : Fourteenth Finance Commission

GCS : General Category States GCS : General Category States
SCS : Special Category States SCS : Special Category States
OTR : Own Tax Revenue Receipts OTR : Own Tax Revenue Receipts
NSDP : Net State Domestic Product NSDP : Net State Domestic Product

Source: Economic Survey 2014-15 Source: Economic Survey 2014-15

106 106
 Graph 4.2: Additional FFC Transfers (in 2015-16 over 2014-15)- Benefits from FFC (Rs. In crore)

107
Source : State Finances, A Study of Budgets of 2011-12, Reserve Bank of India.
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 4.2: Additional FFC Transfers (in 2015-16 over 2014-15)- Benefits from FFC (Rs. In crore)

107

Source : State Finances, A Study of Budgets of 2011-12, Reserve Bank of India.

Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Graph 4.3: Additional FFC Transfers (in 2015-16 over 2014-15)- FFC transfer Benefits as % of NSDP
Handbook of Urban Statistics

108
Source : State Finances, A Study of Budgets of 2011-12, Reserve Bank of India

Graph 4.3: Additional FFC Transfers (in 2015-16 over 2014-15)- FFC transfer Benefits as % of NSDP
Handbook of Urban Statistics

108

Source : State Finances, A Study of Budgets of 2011-12, Reserve Bank of India

 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 4.8: Decomposition of FFC Transfers to States Table 4.8: Decomposition of FFC Transfers to States

State Decomposition of FFC Transfers State Decomposition of FFC Transfers

State State
share Due to share Due to
share Due to change share Due to change
State in change State in change
in 14th in Divisible in 14th in Divisible
13th in 13th in
FC pool FC pool
FC Share FC Share
1 Andhra 6.74 6.94 107.5 -7.5 1 Andhra 6.74 6.94 107.5 -7.5
Pradesh(United) Pradesh(United)
2 Arunachal 1.37 0.33 2,409.0 75.1 2 Arunachal 1.37 0.33 2,409.0 75.1
Pradesh Pradesh
3 Assam 3.31 3.63 129.0 -29.0 3 Assam 3.31 3.63 129.0 -29.0
4 Bihar 9.66 10.92 142.8 -42.8 4 Bihar 9.66 10.92 142.8 -42.8
5 Chhattisgarh 3.08 2.47 64.9 35.1 5 Chhattisgarh 3.08 2.47 64.9 35.1
6 Goa 0.38 0.27 53.9 46.1 6 Goa 0.38 0.27 53.9 46.1
7 Gujarat 3.08 3.04 96.7 3.3 7 Gujarat 3.08 3.04 96.7 3.3
8 Haryana 1.08 1.05 92.3 7.7 8 Haryana 1.08 1.05 92.3 7.7
9 Himachal 0.71 0.78 128.9 -28.9 9 Himachal 0.71 0.78 128.9 -28.9
Pradesh Pradesh
10 Jammu & Kash- 1.85 1.55 69.5 30.5 10 Jammu & Kash- 1.85 1.55 69.5 30.5
mir mir
11 Jharkhand 3.14 2.80 78.2 21.8 11 Jharkhand 3.14 2.80 78.2 21.8
12 Karnataka 4.71 4.33 82.7 17.3 12 Karnataka 4.71 4.33 82.7 17.3
13 Kerala 2.50 2.34 86.1 13.9 13 Kerala 2.50 2.34 86.1 13.9
14 Madhya Pradesh 7.55 7.12 87.4 12.6 14 Madhya Pradesh 7.55 7.12 87.4 12.6
15 Maharashtra 5.52 5.20 87.1 12.9 15 Maharashtra 5.52 5.20 87.1 12.9
16 Manipur 0.62 0.45 56.6 43.4 16 Manipur 0.62 0.45 56.6 43.4
17 Meghalaya 0.64 0.41 47.7 52.3 17 Meghalaya 0.64 0.41 47.7 52.3
18 Mizoram 0.46 0.27 43.7 56.3 18 Mizoram 0.46 0.27 43.7 56.3
19 Nagaland 0.50 0.31 47.3 52.7 19 Nagaland 0.50 0.31 47.3 52.7
20 Odisha 0.46 4.78 107.7 -7.7 20 Odisha 0.46 4.78 107.7 -7.7
21 Punjab 1.58 1.39 76.2 23.8 21 Punjab 1.58 1.39 76.2 23.8
22 Rajasthan 5.49 5.85 118.4 -18.4 22 Rajasthan 5.49 5.85 118.4 -18.4
23 Sikkim 0.37 0.24 49.0 51.0 23 Sikkim 0.37 0.24 49.0 51.0
24 Tamil Nadu 4.02 4.97 207.5 -107.5 24 Tamil Nadu 4.02 4.97 207.5 -107.5
25 Tripura 0.64 0.51 64.1 35.9 25 Tripura 0.64 0.51 64.1 35.9
26 Uttar Pradesh 17.96 19.68 129.0 -29.0 26 Uttar Pradesh 17.96 19.68 129.0 -29.0
27 Uttarakhand 1.05 1.12 118.2 -18.2 27 Uttarakhand 1.05 1.12 118.2 -18.2
28 West Bengal 7.32 7.26 98.0 2.0 28 West Bengal 7.32 7.26 98.0 2.0

Source: Economic Survey 2014-15 Source: Economic Survey 2014-15

109 109
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 4.9: Per-Capita Municipal Income and Expenditure in India Table 4.9: Per-Capita Municipal Income and Expenditure in India

S.No. Area Name Average Per Capita S.No. Area Name Average Per Capita
Average Per Capita Municipal Average Per Capita Municipal
Per Capita NSDP (in Rs.) Municipal Expenditure Per Capita NSDP (in Rs.) Municipal Expenditure
Income (in Rs.) Income (in Rs.)
(in Rs.) (in Rs.)
2001 2011 2003-05 2006-08 2003-05 2006-08 2001 2011 2003-05 2006-08 2003-05 2006-08
1 Andaman & Nicobar 24,560 85,741 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 1 Andaman & Nicobar 24,560 85,741 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
Islands Islands
2 Andhra Pradesh 16,708 62,912 1,735.89 2,529.96 1,725.5 2,555.44 2 Andhra Pradesh 16,708 62,912 1,735.89 2,529.96 1,725.5 2,555.44
3 Arunachal Pradesh 14,683 55,789 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 3 Arunachal Pradesh 14,683 55,789 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
4 Assam 10,718 30,569 410.3 628.05 462.05 743.15 4 Assam 10,718 30,569 410.3 628.05 462.05 743.15
5 Bihar 5,333 18,928 270.66 990.12 336.93 986.95 5 Bihar 5,333 18,928 270.66 990.12 336.93 986.95
6 Chandigarh 46,498 1,30,461 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 6 Chandigarh 46,498 1,30,461 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
7 Chhattisgarh 9,922 41,167 1,813.01 3,475.23 2,161.62 3,789.65 7 Chhattisgarh 9,922 41,167 1,813.01 3,475.23 2,161.62 3,789.65
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
9 Daman & Diu N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 9 Daman & Diu N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
10 Goa 48,582 1,59,244 1,100.91 2,454.43 936.64 1,192.45 10 Goa 48,582 1,59,244 1,100.91 2,454.43 936.64 1,192.45
11 Gujarat 18,560 75,115 2,397.41 3,374.44 2,451.1 3,426.29 11 Gujarat 18,560 75,115 2,397.41 3,374.44 2,451.1 3,426.29
12 Haryana 23,286 94,464 792.68 1,467.34 811.08 1,480.62 12 Haryana 23,286 94,464 792.68 1,467.34 811.08 1,480.62
13 Himachal Pradesh 19,784 68,020 1,968.54 2,534.23 2,079.34 2278 13 Himachal Pradesh 19,784 68,020 1,968.54 2,534.23 2,079.34 2278
14 Jammu & Kashmir 12,781 37,593 652.67 1,999.56 734.33 1,208.22 14 Jammu & Kashmir 12,781 37,593 652.67 1,999.56 734.33 1,208.22
15 Jharkhand 8,749 31,993 501.63 771.48 500.68 771.52 15 Jharkhand 8,749 31,993 501.63 771.48 500.68 771.52
16 Karnataka 17,806 59,975 1,766.9 2,726.22 1,725.66 2,974.33 16 Karnataka 17,806 59,975 1,766.9 2,726.22 1,725.66 2,974.33
17 Kerala 19,951 71,434 1,322.42 1,255.93 1,056.14 1,218.53 17 Kerala 19,951 71,434 1,322.42 1,255.93 1,056.14 1,218.53
18 Lakshadweep N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 18 Lakshadweep N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
19 Madhya Pradesh 10,704 32,253 1,126.04 2,088.22 1,307.54 2,348.05 19 Madhya Pradesh 10,704 32,253 1,126.04 2,088.22 1,307.54 2,348.05
20 Maharashtra 21,871 87,686 4,557.94 6,565.55 4,359.55 6,193.71 20 Maharashtra 21,871 87,686 4,557.94 6,565.55 4,359.55 6,193.71
21 Manipur 10,658 29,684 517.52 438.43 312.47 319.31 21 Manipur 10,658 29,684 517.52 438.43 312.47 319.31
22 Meghalaya 14,654 47,164 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 22 Meghalaya 14,654 47,164 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
23 Mizoram 18,491 48,591 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 23 Mizoram 18,491 48,591 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
24 Nagaland 17,629 52,966 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 24 Nagaland 17,629 52,966 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
25 NCT Of Delhi 42,378 1,50,653 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 25 NCT Of Delhi 42,378 1,50,653 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
26 Odisha 9,281 40,412 662.22 1,067.69 662.22 1,067.69 26 Odisha 9,281 40,412 662.22 1,067.69 662.22 1,067.69
27 Puducherry 35,190 98,719 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 27 Puducherry 35,190 98,719 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
28 Punjab 24,283 68,998 2,050.19 3,222.88 1,935.46 2,547.89 28 Punjab 24,283 68,998 2,050.19 3,222.88 1,935.46 2,547.89
29 Rajasthan 12,570 42,434 118.04 1,760.08 1,200.34 1,603.85 29 Rajasthan 12,570 42,434 118.04 1,760.08 1,200.34 1,603.85
30 Sikkim 16,658 1,04,506 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 30 Sikkim 16,658 1,04,506 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
31 Tamil Nadu 20,361 75,449 1,730.5 2,162.06 1,921.75 2,326.23 31 Tamil Nadu 20,361 75,449 1,730.5 2,162.06 1,921.75 2,326.23
32 Tripura 15,253 44,965 828.4 1,315.07 657.77 969.02 32 Tripura 15,253 44,965 828.4 1,315.07 657.77 969.02
33 Uttar Pradesh 9,178 26,903 779 1,235.02 1,085.67 1,065.61 33 Uttar Pradesh 9,178 26,903 779 1,235.02 1,085.67 1,065.61
34 Uttarakhand 12,687 72,093 1,023.33 937.33 696.9 816.95 34 Uttarakhand 12,687 72,093 1,023.33 937.33 696.9 816.95
35 West Bengal 16,146 47,738 1,122.62 1,508.04 1,220.92 1,810.36 35 West Bengal 16,146 47,738 1,122.62 1,508.04 1,220.92 1,810.36
India 53,331 1,708.71 2,493.25 1,747.78 2,461.91 India 53,331 1,708.71 2,493.25 1,747.78 2,461.91
NSDP: Net State Domestic Product NSDP: Net State Domestic Product

Source: Economic Survey, 2012-13 and 13th Finance Commission, 2010 Source: Economic Survey, 2012-13 and 13th Finance Commission, 2010

110 110
 Chapter 5 Chapter 5

Urban Transportation Urban Transportation

“A multi-modal transportation system will ensure that use of “A multi-modal transportation system will ensure that use of
fuel is cut down, which will help the common man save money fuel is cut down, which will help the common man save money
and will also be useful for the environment. ” and will also be useful for the environment. ”

Narendra Modi Narendra Modi

Prime Minister Prime Minister
(While inaugurating the Magenta Line of Delhi Metro) (While inaugurating the Magenta Line of Delhi Metro)
25-12-2017 25-12-2017
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Urban Transportation
Indian cities have experienced rapid growth in population and geographical expanse over the years.
This has resulted in increased demand for transportation services in urban areas. There is an increas-
ing emphasis on urban transport policies with a view to improve the overall quality of living in the
cities. Demand for urban transportation infrastructure has increased manifold in recent decades. This has
necessitated significant improvement in the existing transport infrastructures in urban areas.
The distribution of travel among various modes of transportation varies significantly across Indian
cities. Table 5.1 gives an overview of modal share of transportation in various Indian cities. Among
the large cities, use of public transport ranges between 15% in Ahmedabad to 57% in Kolkata. The
share of motorised personal transport is very high in case of cites where public transport is less used.
For example, in Ahmedabad the share of motorized personal transport is 44%, whereas in Mumbai
and Kolkata it is 14% and 10%, respectively. Auto rickshaws considered to be intermediate public
transport has also a prominent share in overall transport in cities like Bengaluru (18%) and Mumbai
(9%). It is seen that the share of public transport is very low in case of small cities with a population
of 0.5-1 million (9%) and cities with a population 1-2 million (13%). Not surprisingly, share of walking
and cycle is higher for smaller cities. The pattern of public transport in selected Indian cities can be
seen at table 5.2.
Table 5.3 provides a comparison of share of public transport in various cities categorized on the basis
of their population in two studies conducted in 1994 and 2007. It shows that the share of public trans-
port in large cities (cities with population of 4-8 million and above 8 million) has declined, whereas for
cities with a population of 1-2 million the share of public transport has increased.
Table 5.4 contains desirable modal shares for different city sizes. It clearly indicates that for small and
medium-sized cities, non-motorized forms of urban mobility should be dominant. For towns and cit-
ies with a population of up to 2 million, walking should be the dominant form of mobility and should
constitute 30% of the trips made. This is followed by cycle and motorized two-wheelers. But in case of
large cities, the public transport should constitute the dominant share of the modal-mix. For a city of
population exceeding 2 million, it is appropriate that public transport constitutes more than a third of
the trips made.
Table 5.5 provides international comparison regarding vehicular penetration in select developed and
developing countries. It shows that passenger cars and total vehicles per 1000 persons is high in the
developed countries, though the number of two-wheelers per 1000 persons is higher for the develop-
ing countries. Table 5.7 contains a comparison of investment estimates for urban transport by various
committees. The High Powered Expert Committee 2011 (HPEC 2011) has estimated the investment
requirements over 2010-2030 at Rs. 22.68 trillion, whereas McKinsey study (2010) puts it at Rs. 27.04
trillion.
113
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Urban Transportation
Indian cities have experienced rapid growth in population and geographical expanse over the years.
This has resulted in increased demand for transportation services in urban areas. There is an increas-
ing emphasis on urban transport policies with a view to improve the overall quality of living in the
cities. Demand for urban transportation infrastructure has increased manifold in recent decades. This has
necessitated significant improvement in the existing transport infrastructures in urban areas.
The distribution of travel among various modes of transportation varies significantly across Indian
cities. Table 5.1 gives an overview of modal share of transportation in various Indian cities. Among
the large cities, use of public transport ranges between 15% in Ahmedabad to 57% in Kolkata. The
share of motorised personal transport is very high in case of cites where public transport is less used.
For example, in Ahmedabad the share of motorized personal transport is 44%, whereas in Mumbai
and Kolkata it is 14% and 10%, respectively. Auto rickshaws considered to be intermediate public
transport has also a prominent share in overall transport in cities like Bengaluru (18%) and Mumbai
(9%). It is seen that the share of public transport is very low in case of small cities with a population
of 0.5-1 million (9%) and cities with a population 1-2 million (13%). Not surprisingly, share of walking
and cycle is higher for smaller cities. The pattern of public transport in selected Indian cities can be
seen at table 5.2.
Table 5.3 provides a comparison of share of public transport in various cities categorized on the basis
of their population in two studies conducted in 1994 and 2007. It shows that the share of public trans-
port in large cities (cities with population of 4-8 million and above 8 million) has declined, whereas for
cities with a population of 1-2 million the share of public transport has increased.
Table 5.4 contains desirable modal shares for different city sizes. It clearly indicates that for small and
medium-sized cities, non-motorized forms of urban mobility should be dominant. For towns and cit-
ies with a population of up to 2 million, walking should be the dominant form of mobility and should
constitute 30% of the trips made. This is followed by cycle and motorized two-wheelers. But in case of
large cities, the public transport should constitute the dominant share of the modal-mix. For a city of
population exceeding 2 million, it is appropriate that public transport constitutes more than a third of
the trips made.
Table 5.5 provides international comparison regarding vehicular penetration in select developed and
developing countries. It shows that passenger cars and total vehicles per 1000 persons is high in the
developed countries, though the number of two-wheelers per 1000 persons is higher for the develop-
ing countries. Table 5.7 contains a comparison of investment estimates for urban transport by various
committees. The High Powered Expert Committee 2011 (HPEC 2011) has estimated the investment
requirements over 2010-2030 at Rs. 22.68 trillion, whereas McKinsey study (2010) puts it at Rs. 27.04
trillion.
113
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Table 5.8 contains data regarding parking charges in various cities in the world. It reveals that parking
charges in Indian cities is much lower than the cities abroad. While cities such as London, Tokyo and
New York have high parking charges, it can be seen that cities in even developing countries like Bang-
kok and Mexico City have much higher parking charges. This is significant because high parking charges
create disincentive for using private vehicles for transport and are an important tool in promoting
public transport. In cities like London, parking charges have been used as an instrument to reduce the
congestion on roads. Parking charges can also be an important source of financing of urban local body.
Table 5.9 and table 5.10 indicates composition of India’s vehicle population over the years. It shows
that overall registered vehicles have increased from 0.3 million in 1951 to 114,951 in 2009. The share
of two wheelers in total vehicle has increased significantly from 9.6 percent in 1956 to 71.8 percent
in 2011. The share of cars, jeeps and taxis has declined from 47.7 percent in 1956 to 13.6 percent in
2011. The share of buses in total vehicle has declined from 11 percent in 1956 to 1.1 percent in 2011.
Another mode of transportation playing an increasingly important role in urban mobility is metro rail.
Table 5.11 provides details of Metro Rail Projects approved by the Government of India. Budgetary al-
location towards metro rail projects in last five years can be seen at Table 5.12. This indicates massive
push towards improving a sustainable public transport system in various Indian cities.
114
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Table 5.8 contains data regarding parking charges in various cities in the world. It reveals that parking
charges in Indian cities is much lower than the cities abroad. While cities such as London, Tokyo and
New York have high parking charges, it can be seen that cities in even developing countries like Bang-
kok and Mexico City have much higher parking charges. This is significant because high parking charges
create disincentive for using private vehicles for transport and are an important tool in promoting
public transport. In cities like London, parking charges have been used as an instrument to reduce the
congestion on roads. Parking charges can also be an important source of financing of urban local body.
Table 5.9 and table 5.10 indicates composition of India’s vehicle population over the years. It shows
that overall registered vehicles have increased from 0.3 million in 1951 to 114,951 in 2009. The share
of two wheelers in total vehicle has increased significantly from 9.6 percent in 1956 to 71.8 percent
in 2011. The share of cars, jeeps and taxis has declined from 47.7 percent in 1956 to 13.6 percent in
2011. The share of buses in total vehicle has declined from 11 percent in 1956 to 1.1 percent in 2011.
Another mode of transportation playing an increasingly important role in urban mobility is metro rail.
Table 5.11 provides details of Metro Rail Projects approved by the Government of India. Budgetary al-
location towards metro rail projects in last five years can be seen at Table 5.12. This indicates massive
push towards improving a sustainable public transport system in various Indian cities.
114
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

115 115
 Table 5.1: Mode Share in Various Indian Cities (%)
MOTORISED
NON-MOTORISED INTERMEDIATE PUBLIC PUBLIC
POPULA- PERSONAL
CITY SIZE CATEGORY TRANSPORT TRANSPORT TRANSPORT
TION IN TRANSPORT
(MILLION
CITY NAME THE CITY WALK AUTO
POPULATION) RICK- TWO
(MILLION) CYCLE RICK- OTHERS CARS
SHAW WHEELERS
SHAW
> 8.0 – - 22 8 7 - 44 10 9
Handbook of Urban Statistics

> 5.0 - - 29 8 1 1 - 47 4 10
Mumbai 16.4 28 5 - 9 - 44 9 5
Kolkata 13.2 18 12 - 3 - 57 7 3
Delhi 12.9 20 12 - 6 - 43 14 5
Chennai 6.56 22 6 - 9 - 32 9 22
Bengaluru 5.7 28 5 - 18 - 26 16 7
Hyderabad 6.34 22 6 - 7 - 49 8 8
  Ahmedabad 5.41 22 14 - 5 - 15 20 24
4-8 - - 25 11 - 7 - 21 10 26

116
2-5 - - 29 13 2 7 - 33 1 24
Pune 3.78 24 8 - 8 - 12 10 38
Kanpur 2.72 30 18 - 7 - 6 7 32
  Lucknow 2.24 38 26 - 8 - - 4 24
1-2 - - 30 8 5 2 - 24 1 30
0.5 -1 - - 32 20 - 3 - 9 12 24
< 0.5(category 1a) - - 34 3 - 5 - 5 27 26
< 0.5(category
1b for hilly
towns) - - 57 1 - 0 - 8 28 6
0.1-0.5 - - 38 15 12 3 - 13 1 18
.05-0.1 - - 38 17 13 4 - 11 1 16

Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

Table 5.1: Mode Share in Various Indian Cities (%)

MOTORISED
NON-MOTORISED INTERMEDIATE PUBLIC PUBLIC
POPULA- PERSONAL
CITY SIZE CATEGORY TRANSPORT TRANSPORT TRANSPORT
TION IN TRANSPORT
(MILLION
CITY NAME THE CITY WALK AUTO
POPULATION) RICK- TWO
(MILLION) CYCLE RICK- OTHERS CARS
SHAW WHEELERS
SHAW
> 8.0 – - 22 8 7 - 44 10 9
Handbook of Urban Statistics

> 5.0 - - 29 8 1 1 - 47 4 10
Mumbai 16.4 28 5 - 9 - 44 9 5
Kolkata 13.2 18 12 - 3 - 57 7 3
Delhi 12.9 20 12 - 6 - 43 14 5
Chennai 6.56 22 6 - 9 - 32 9 22
Bengaluru 5.7 28 5 - 18 - 26 16 7
Hyderabad 6.34 22 6 - 7 - 49 8 8
  Ahmedabad 5.41 22 14 - 5 - 15 20 24
4-8 - - 25 11 - 7 - 21 10 26
116

2-5 - - 29 13 2 7 - 33 1 24
Pune 3.78 24 8 - 8 - 12 10 38
Kanpur 2.72 30 18 - 7 - 6 7 32
  Lucknow 2.24 38 26 - 8 - - 4 24
1-2 - - 30 8 5 2 - 24 1 30
0.5 -1 - - 32 20 - 3 - 9 12 24
< 0.5(category 1a) - - 34 3 - 5 - 5 27 26
< 0.5(category
1b for hilly
towns) - - 57 1 - 0 - 8 28 6
0.1-0.5 - - 38 15 12 3 - 13 1 18
.05-0.1 - - 38 17 13 4 - 11 1 16

Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 5.1: Mode Share in Various Indian Cities Graph 5.1: Mode Share in Various Indian Cities

Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

117 117
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 5.2: Pattern of Public Transport in Selected Indian Cities Table 5.2: Pattern of Public Transport in Selected Indian Cities

(All figures in numbers) (All figures in numbers)

BANGA- BANGA-
CITY MUMBAI DELHI CHENNAI LORE KOLKATA PUNE CITY MUMBAI DELHI CHENNAI LORE KOLKATA PUNE

CALCUTTA CALCUTTA
Public Transport Buses op- BEST DTC MTC BMTC PUNE MPML Public Transport Buses op- BEST DTC MTC BMTC PUNE MPML
STC STC
erated by State Road erated by State Road
Transport Undertak- Transport Undertak-
ing (SRTU) 4,652 5,771 3,414 6,111 956 1,549 ing (SRTU) 4,652 5,771 3,414 6,111 956 1,549

Other Buses (Registered Other Buses (Registered

buses excluding buses excluding
SRTU buses) 8,189 39,986 33,791 22,150 3,293 13,459 SRTU buses) 8,189 39,986 33,791 22,150 3,293 13,459

Paratransit-registered Paratransit-registered
commercial trans- commercial trans-
port vehicles includ- port vehicles includ-
ing taxis and three to 159,629 253,532 174,314 162,431 49,648 78,778 ing taxis and three to 159,629 253,532 174,314 162,431 49,648 78,778
six seater passenger six seater passenger
vehicles vehicles

Source National Transport: Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source National Transport: Development Policy Committee, 2013

118 118
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 5.3: Public Transport Share Comparison, 1994 and 2007 Table 5.3: Public Transport Share Comparison, 1994 and 2007

CITY POPULATION CITY POPULATION

CITY CATEGO- CITY CATEGO-
(RANGE IN WSA, 2007 (PER CENT) RITES, 1994 (PER CENT) (RANGE IN WSA, 2007 (PER CENT) RITES, 1994 (PER CENT)
RY RY
MILLIONS) MILLIONS)

1 < 0.5 0–15.6 0–22.7 1 < 0.5 0–15.6 0–22.7

2 0.5-1 15.6–22.5 22.7–29.1 2 0.5-1 15.6–22.5 22.7–29.1

3 1–2 0–50.8 28.1–35.6 3 1–2 0–50.8 28.1–35.6

4 2–4 0–22.2 35.6–45.8 4 2–4 0–22.2 35.6–45.8

5 4–8 0-32.1 45.8–59.7 5 4–8 0-32.1 45.8–59.7

6 Above 8 35.2–54.0 59.7–78.7 6 Above 8 35.2–54.0 59.7–78.7

WSA : Wilmer Smith Associates WSA : Wilmer Smith Associates

RITES : Rail India Technical and Economic Services RITES : Rail India Technical and Economic Services

Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

119 119
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 5.4:Desirable Modal Shares for Different City Sizes Table 5.4:Desirable Modal Shares for Different City Sizes

CITY SIZE IN CITY SIZE IN

0.05-0.1 0.1-0.5 0.5-1 1.0-2.0 2.0-5.0 >5 0.05-0.1 0.1-0.5 0.5-1 1.0-2.0 2.0-5.0 >5
MILLIONS MILLIONS

Walk 30 30 30 30 25 25 Walk 30 30 30 30 25 25

Cycle 25 20 15 12 10 10 Cycle 25 20 15 12 10 10

Rickshaw 12 10 8 6 1 1 Rickshaw 12 10 8 6 1 1

TSR 8 3 5 3 3 1 TSR 8 3 5 3 3 1

PT 12 15 15 20 33 38 PT 12 15 15 20 33 38

Cars 1 1 2 4 8 10 Cars 1 1 2 4 8 10

MTW 12 21 25 25 20 15 MTW 12 21 25 25 20 15

Note: MTW: Motorized Two-Wheeler; PT: Para-Transit; TSR: Three-wheeler Scooter Rickshaws Note: MTW: Motorized Two-Wheeler; PT: Para-Transit; TSR: Three-wheeler Scooter Rickshaws
Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

120 120
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 5.2 : Desirable Modal Shares for Different City Sizes Graph 5.2 : Desirable Modal Shares for Different City Sizes

Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

121 121
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 5.5: Vehicular Penetration in Select Developed and Developing Countries Table 5.5: Vehicular Penetration in Select Developed and Developing Countries

GROSS NATIONAL GROSS NATIONAL

COUNTRY INCOME PER PER 1,000 PERSON COUNTRY INCOME PER PER 1,000 PERSON
CAPITA CAPITA
2009 (US $) 2009 (US $)
DEVELOPED PASSENGER CARS TOTAL VEHICLES** TWO WHEELERS DEVELOPED PASSENGER CARS TOTAL VEHICLES** TWO WHEELERS
US 46,360 439 828 26 US 46,360 439 828 26
UK 41,370 460 544 21 UK 41,370 460 544 21
Japan 38,080 617 617 28 Japan 38,080 617 617 28
Germany 42,620 510 610 46 Germany 42,620 510 610 46
Australia 40,240 550 717 28 Australia 40,240 550 717 28
France 42,620 496 654 56 France 42,620 496 654 56
DEVELOPING DEVELOPING
Mexico 8,960 191 288 11 Mexico 8,960 191 288 11
Malaysia 7,350 313 675 325 Malaysia 7,350 313 675 325
South Africa 5,760 110 170 7 South Africa 5,760 110 170 7
Brazil (*) 8,070 165 275 68 Brazil (*) 8,070 165 275 68
China 3,650 34 119 72 China 3,650 34 119 72
Korea, Rep 19,830 267 393 37 Korea, Rep 19,830 267 393 37
India (##) 1,220 13 117 76 India (##) 1,220 13 117 76

**: India Vehicle include passenger cars, buses + coaches, vans + lorries and Two wheelers **: India Vehicle include passenger cars, buses + coaches, vans + lorries and Two wheelers
(*): Data relates to 2008 (*): Data relates to 2008

##: Data relates to 2011 ##: Data relates to 2011

Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

122 122
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 5.3 : Vehicular Penetration-Comparison of BRICS Nations Graph 5.3 : Vehicular Penetration-Comparison of BRICS Nations

Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

123 123
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 5.6: Registered Motor Vehicles per 1,000 Population in Million-Plus Indian Cities Table 5.6: Registered Motor Vehicles per 1,000 Population in Million-Plus Indian Cities

CITY MVS/’000 POPULATION (2012) CITY MVS/’000 POPULATION (2012)

Agra 366 Agra 366
Bangalore 434 Bangalore 434
Bhopal 401 Bhopal 401
Chennai 388 Chennai 388
Coimbatore 577 Coimbatore 577
Delhi 332 Delhi 332
Greater Mumbai 90 Greater Mumbai 90
Gwalior 408 Gwalior 408
Hyderabad 391 Hyderabad 391
Indore 560 Indore 560
Jaipur 551 Jaipur 551
Jodhpur 559 Jodhpur 559
Kanpur 343 Kanpur 343
Kochi 193 Kochi 193
Kolkata 30 Kolkata 30
Lucknow 417 Lucknow 417
Madurai 412 Madurai 412
Pune 415 Pune 415
Visakhapatnam 356 Visakhapatnam 356
Average of 35 Million + cities 293 Average of 35 Million + cities 293
Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

124 124
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 5.4 : Registered Motor Vehicles per 1,000 Population in Million-Plus Indian Cities Graph 5.4 : Registered Motor Vehicles per 1,000 Population in Million-Plus Indian Cities

Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

125 125
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 5.7: Comparison of Investment Estimates for Urban Transport by Various Committees Table 5.7: Comparison of Investment Estimates for Urban Transport by Various Committees
(2010-30) (Rs. trillion) (2010-30) (Rs. trillion)

ITEM MGI HPEC WGUT ITEM MGI HPEC WGUT

      SPRAWL INTERMEDIARY DESIRED       SPRAWL INTERMEDIARY DESIRED

Urban Urban
8.9 17.29 12.08 9.41 9.17 8.9 17.29 12.08 9.41 9.17
Roads Roads

Transit 17.64 4.49 10.55 7.44 5.56 Transit 17.64 4.49 10.55 7.44 5.56

Others 0.5 0.9 0.15 0.15 0.27 Others 0.5 0.9 0.15 0.15 0.27

TOTAL 27.04 22.68 22.78 17 15 TOTAL 27.04 22.68 22.78 17 15

MGI : McKinsey Global Institute; HPEC: High-Power Expert Committee, Government of India; MGI : McKinsey Global Institute; HPEC: High-Power Expert Committee, Government of India;
WGUT: Working Group on Urban Transport, NTDPC. WGUT: Working Group on Urban Transport, NTDPC.

Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

126 126
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 5.8: Comparison of Parking Charges in Various Cities, 2011 Table 5.8: Comparison of Parking Charges in Various Cities, 2011

(CBD daily parking charges in US $) (CBD daily parking charges in US $)

 City Parking Charges  City Parking Charges
Bangkok 13.2 Bangkok 13.2
Beijing 7.05 Beijing 7.05
Bengaluru 1.54 Bengaluru 1.54
Chennai 0.99 Chennai 0.99
Delhi 1.32 Delhi 1.32
Dubai 4.08 Dubai 4.08
Hong Kong 28.25 Hong Kong 28.25
London 65.97 London 65.97
Mexico City 15 Mexico City 15
Mumbai 1.11 Mumbai 1.11
New York 41 New York 41
Singapore 24.59 Singapore 24.59
Tokyo 62 Tokyo 62
CBD: Central Business District CBD: Central Business District

Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

127 127
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 5.9: Vehicle Population in India (in ‘000) Table 5.9: Vehicle Population in India (in ‘000)

YEAR YEAR
CARS, JEEPS GOODS CARS, JEEPS GOODS
(AS ON ALL VEHICLES TWO WHEELERS BUSES OTHERS (AS ON ALL VEHICLES TWO WHEELERS BUSES OTHERS
AND TAXIS VEHICLES AND TAXIS VEHICLES
31 MARCH) 31 MARCH)
1951 306 27 159 34 82 4 1951 306 27 159 34 82 4
1956 426 41 203 47 119 16 1956 426 41 203 47 119 16
1961 665 88 310 57 168 42 1961 665 88 310 57 168 42
1966 1,099 226 456 73 259 85 1966 1,099 226 456 73 259 85
1971 1,865 576 682 94 343 170 1971 1,865 576 682 94 343 170
1976 2,700 1,057 779 115 351 398 1976 2,700 1,057 779 115 351 398
1981 5,391 2,618 1,160 162 554 897 1981 5,391 2,618 1,160 162 554 897
1986 10,577 6,245 1,780 227 863 1,462 1986 10,577 6,245 1,780 227 863 1,462
1991 21,374 14,200 2,954 331 1,356 2,533 1991 21,374 14,200 2,954 331 1,356 2,533
1996 33,786 23,252 4,204 449 2,031 3,850 1996 33,786 23,252 4,204 449 2,031 3,850
2001 54,991 38,556 7,058 634 2,948 5,795 2001 54,991 38,556 7,058 634 2,948 5,795
2002 58,924 41,581 7,613 635 2,974 6,121 2002 58,924 41,581 7,613 635 2,974 6,121
2003 67,007 47,519 8,599 721 3,492 6,676 2003 67,007 47,519 8,599 721 3,492 6,676
2004 72,718 51,922 9,451 768 3,749 6,828 2004 72,718 51,922 9,451 768 3,749 6,828
2005 81,501 58,799 10,320 892 4,031 7,459 2005 81,501 58,799 10,320 892 4,031 7,459
2006 89,618 64,743 11,526 992 4,436 7,921 2006 89,618 64,743 11,526 992 4,436 7,921
2007 96,707 69,129 12,649 1,350 5,119 8,460 2007 96,707 69,129 12,649 1,350 5,119 8,460
2008 105,353 75,336 13,950 1,427 5,601 9,039 2008 105,353 75,336 13,950 1,427 5,601 9,039
2009 114,951 82,402 15,313 1,486 6,041 9,709 2009 114,951 82,402 15,313 1,486 6,041 9,709
Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

128 128
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 5.5 : Vehicle Population in India (in ‘000) Graph 5.5 : Vehicle Population in India (in ‘000)

Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

129 129
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 5.10: Vehicular Composition in India (%) Table 5.10: Vehicular Composition in India (%)

YEAR YEAR

(AS ON CARS, JEEPS GOODS (AS ON CARS, JEEPS GOODS

ALL VEHICLES TWO WHEELERS BUSES OTHERS ALL VEHICLES TWO WHEELERS BUSES OTHERS
31 MARCH AND TAXIS VEHICLES 31 MARCH AND TAXIS VEHICLES
2013) 2013)
1956 100 9.6 47.7 11 27.9 3.8 1956 100 9.6 47.7 11 27.9 3.8
1961 100 13.2 46.6 8.6 25.3 6.3 1961 100 13.2 46.6 8.6 25.3 6.3
1966 100 20.6 41.5 6.6 23.6 7.7 1966 100 20.6 41.5 6.6 23.6 7.7
1971 100 30.9 36.6 5 18.4 9.1 1971 100 30.9 36.6 5 18.4 9.1
1976 100 39.1 28.9 4.3 13 14.7 1976 100 39.1 28.9 4.3 13 14.7
1981 100 48.6 21.5 3 10.3 16.6 1981 100 48.6 21.5 3 10.3 16.6
1986 100 59 16.8 2.1 8.2 13.8 1986 100 59 16.8 2.1 8.2 13.8
1991 100 66.4 13.8 1.5 6.3 11.9 1991 100 66.4 13.8 1.5 6.3 11.9
1996 100 68.8 12.4 1.3 6 11.4 1996 100 68.8 12.4 1.3 6 11.4
2001 100 70.1 12.8 1.2 5.4 10.5 2001 100 70.1 12.8 1.2 5.4 10.5
2002 100 70.6 12.9 1.1 5 10.4 2002 100 70.6 12.9 1.1 5 10.4
2003 100 70.9 12.8 1.1 5.2 10 2003 100 70.9 12.8 1.1 5.2 10
2004 100 71.4 13 1.1 5.2 9.4 2004 100 71.4 13 1.1 5.2 9.4
2005 100 72.1 12.7 1.1 4.9 9.2 2005 100 72.1 12.7 1.1 4.9 9.2
2006 100 72.2 12.9 1.1 4.9 8.8 2006 100 72.2 12.9 1.1 4.9 8.8
2007 100 71.5 13.1 1.4 5.3 8.7 2007 100 71.5 13.1 1.4 5.3 8.7
2008 100 71.5 13.2 1.4 5.3 8.6 2008 100 71.5 13.2 1.4 5.3 8.6
2009 100 71.7 13.3 1.3 5.3 8.4 2009 100 71.7 13.3 1.3 5.3 8.4
2011 100 71.8 13.6 1.1 5 8.5 2011 100 71.8 13.6 1.1 5 8.5
Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

130 130
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 5.6 : Vehicular Composition in India (Per Cent) Graph 5.6 : Vehicular Composition in India (Per Cent)

Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013 Source: National Transport Development Policy Committee, 2013

131 131
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 5.11 METRO RAIL PROJECTS IN THE COUNTRY Table 5.11 METRO RAIL PROJECTS IN THE COUNTRY
(as on 20.02.2019) (as on 20.02.2019)

APPROVED PROJ- APPROVED PROJ-

APPROX LENGTH ECT COST APPROX LENGTH ECT COST
S. No PROJECT S. No PROJECT
(KM) (KM)
(Rs. Cr.) (Rs. Cr.)
Delhi Metro Rail Project Phase I, II, III and extensions (Including NCR Delhi Metro Rail Project Phase I, II, III and extensions (Including NCR
1 350 85,077.07 1 350 85,077.07
Extensions and Airport Express Line) Extensions and Airport Express Line)
2 Bangalore Metro Project - Phase-I 42 13,845.01 2 Bangalore Metro Project - Phase-I 42 13,845.01
3 Bangalore Metro Project - Phase-II 72 26.405.14 3 Bangalore Metro Project - Phase-II 72 26.405.14
4 Chennai Metro Rail Project Phase I 45 14,600.00 4 Chennai Metro Rail Project Phase I 45 14,600.00
5 Extension of Chennai Metro Rail Project Phase –I 9 3,770.00 5 Extension of Chennai Metro Rail Project Phase –I 9 3,770.00
6 Lucknow Metro Rail Project 23 6,928.00 6 Lucknow Metro Rail Project 23 6,928.00
7 Kochi Metro Rail Project Phase I 26 5,181.79 7 Kochi Metro Rail Project Phase I 26 5,181.79
8 Ahmedabad Metro Rail Project- Phase-I 36 10,773.00 8 Ahmedabad Metro Rail Project- Phase-I 36 10,773.00
9 Nagpur Metro Rail Project 38 8,680.00 9 Nagpur Metro Rail Project 38 8,680.00
10 Mumbai Metro Line - III 34 23,136.00 10 Mumbai Metro Line - III 34 23,136.00
11 Noida-Greater Noida Metro Rail Project 29 5,503.00 11 Noida-Greater Noida Metro Rail Project 29 5,503.00
12 Bhopal Metro Rail Project 28 6,941.40 12 Bhopal Metro Rail Project 28 6,941.40
13 Indore Metro Rail Project 32 7,500.80 13 Indore Metro Rail Project 32 7,500.80
14 Pune Metro Rail Project 31 11,420.00 14 Pune Metro Rail Project 31 11,420.00
15 Jaipur Metro Phase-I (State Initiative) 12 3,149.00 15 Jaipur Metro Phase-I (State Initiative) 12 3,149.00
Kolkata Metro Corridor (Under Ministry of Railways) including East West Kolkata Metro Corridor (Under Ministry of Railways) including East West
Corridor of 16.55 Km at an estimated cost of Rs 4,875.00 Cr which is joint Corridor of 16.55 Km at an estimated cost of Rs 4,875.00 Cr which is joint
16 135 21,390.00 16 135 21,390.00
venture of M/o of Railways & M/o Housing & Urban Affairs with equity venture of M/o of Railways & M/o Housing & Urban Affairs with equity
participation in the ratio of 76:24 participation in the ratio of 76:24
17 Mumbai Metro Line-1 (Public Private Partnership Mode) 11 2,356.00 17 Mumbai Metro Line-1 (Public Private Partnership Mode) 11 2,356.00
18 Hyderabad Metro (Public Private Partnership Mode) 72 14,132.00 18 Hyderabad Metro (Public Private Partnership Mode) 72 14,132.00
19 Pune Metro Line-3 (Public Private Partnership Mode) 23 6,124.00 19 Pune Metro Line-3 (Public Private Partnership Mode) 23 6,124.00
20 Rapid Metro Gurugram Phase I: Sikanderpur and NH-8 5 1,239.00 20 Rapid Metro Gurugram Phase I: Sikanderpur and NH-8 5 1,239.00
6 6
21 Rapid Metro Gurugram Phase II: Sikanderpur to Sector-56 2,396.00 21 Rapid Metro Gurugram Phase II: Sikanderpur to Sector-56 2,396.00

22 Patna Metro Rail Project 31 13,365.77 22 Patna Metro Rail Project 31 13,365.77
Navi Mumbai Metro (Implemented by City &Industrial Development Navi Mumbai Metro (Implemented by City &Industrial Development
23 11 3,064.00 23 11 3,064.00
Corporation (CIDCO)) Corporation (CIDCO))
Mumbai Mono Rail (Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Author- Mumbai Mono Rail (Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Author-
24 20 2,460.00 24 20 2,460.00
ity initiative (MMRDA)) ity initiative (MMRDA))

25 Other metro projects in Mumbai(MMRDA* initiative) 132 54,126.00 25 Other metro projects in Mumbai(MMRDA* initiative) 132 54,126.00

Agra Metro Rail Project (Recommended by Public Investment Board Agra Metro Rail Project (Recommended by Public Investment Board
26 29 8,379.62 26 29 8,379.62
(PIB) for Cabinet approval) (PIB) for Cabinet approval)
Kanpur Metro Rail Project (Recommended by Public Investment Board Kanpur Metro Rail Project (Recommended by Public Investment Board
27 32 11,076.48 27 32 11,076.48
(PIB) for Cabinet approval) (PIB) for Cabinet approval)
Source: Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs Source: Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs

132 132
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 5.7: CITIES PROVIDED WITH METRO RAIL FACILITY Graph 5.7: CITIES PROVIDED WITH METRO RAIL FACILITY

Operational - 642 km (Operational at present is 585 km and rest 57km is likely to be commissioned by March, 2019) Operational - 642 km (Operational at present is 585 km and rest 57km is likely to be commissioned by March, 2019)

Under Construction-691 Km Under Construction-691 Km

RRTS Under Construction: Delhi – Meerut = 82.15 Km. RRTS Under Construction: Delhi – Meerut = 82.15 Km.

*Agra and Kanpur metro rail projects recommended by PIB. *Agra and Kanpur metro rail projects recommended by PIB.

133 133
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 5.8: GROWTH OF METRO RAIL LINE IN INDIA Graph 5.8: GROWTH OF METRO RAIL LINE IN INDIA

642 642

249 249

102 102

50 50
27 27

Year Year

*Includes 585km operational in the country at present and about 57 kms of metro rail lines (Delhi – 16km, Nag- *Includes 585km operational in the country at present and about 57 kms of metro rail lines (Delhi – 16km, Nag-
pur – 19.1 km, Lucknow – 15 km, Ahmedabad – 6.5 km) are likely to be commissioned by March, 2019. pur – 19.1 km, Lucknow – 15 km, Ahmedabad – 6.5 km) are likely to be commissioned by March, 2019.

134 134
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 5.12 Funds released for various metro rail projects: Table 5.12 Funds released for various metro rail projects:

Funds released as equity/ subordinate debt/pass through assis- Funds released as equity/ subordinate debt/pass through assis-
Year Year
tance/grant (Rs. in crore) tance/grant (Rs. in crore)

2014-15 6122.67 2014-15 6122.67

2015-16 9286.09 2015-16 9286.09

2016-17 15298.61 2016-17 15298.61

2017-18 13956.23 2017-18 13956.23

2018-19 2018-19
14,384.00 14,384.00
(upto to 20.02.2019) (upto to 20.02.2019)

Total 59,047.60 Total 59,047.60

Source: Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs Source: Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs

135 135
 Chapter 6 Chapter 6

Urban Sanitation Urban Sanitation

 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Urban Sanitation
Improving Urban sanitation in India is a major challenge in India. Lack of adequate sanitation remains a
major cause of disease in developing countries, including India. Government of India is mindful of the fact
that universal provision of good sanitation facilities and drainage system is a necessary requirement
to ensure betterment of community health and hygiene. This chapter presents data on availability
of bathing facility, type of drainage system, availability and type of latrine facility. A comparison of
the 2001 and 2011 Census figures has been made to facilitate understanding the progress during the
decade.
Table 6.1 provides details of Bathing and Drainage Facilities from 2001 to 2011. Bathing facility with-
in house was 70% in 2001 which increased to 87% in 2011. Households having drainage facility in
2001 was 78% which also increased to 82% in 2011. Chandigarh, Maharashtra, Karnataka and Delhi
are some of the states which have decent percentage of households having bathroom and drainage
facility. Tables 6.2 and 6.3 provide data on urban household latrine availability as per 2001 and 2011
census. In 2001, 26% of households had no latrine facility available within the house, which decreased
to 18.60 % in 2011.
Data sourced from National Family Health Survey have been incorporated in Tables 6.4, 6.5 and 6.7.
As Table 6.4 indicates, 89.50 percent households had access to latrine facilities in 2015-16. Table 6.7
shows that 97.62 percent households surveyed in the country were found to have place of handwash-
ing available, and 93.68 percent households had presence of water at the place of handwashing. These
indicators are important pointers towards scope of improving public health by enhancing sanitation
facilities.
139
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Urban Sanitation
Improving Urban sanitation in India is a major challenge in India. Lack of adequate sanitation remains a
major cause of disease in developing countries, including India. Government of India is mindful of the fact
that universal provision of good sanitation facilities and drainage system is a necessary requirement
to ensure betterment of community health and hygiene. This chapter presents data on availability
of bathing facility, type of drainage system, availability and type of latrine facility. A comparison of
the 2001 and 2011 Census figures has been made to facilitate understanding the progress during the
decade.
Table 6.1 provides details of Bathing and Drainage Facilities from 2001 to 2011. Bathing facility with-
in house was 70% in 2001 which increased to 87% in 2011. Households having drainage facility in
2001 was 78% which also increased to 82% in 2011. Chandigarh, Maharashtra, Karnataka and Delhi
are some of the states which have decent percentage of households having bathroom and drainage
facility. Tables 6.2 and 6.3 provide data on urban household latrine availability as per 2001 and 2011
census. In 2001, 26% of households had no latrine facility available within the house, which decreased
to 18.60 % in 2011.
Data sourced from National Family Health Survey have been incorporated in Tables 6.4, 6.5 and 6.7.
As Table 6.4 indicates, 89.50 percent households had access to latrine facilities in 2015-16. Table 6.7
shows that 97.62 percent households surveyed in the country were found to have place of handwash-
ing available, and 93.68 percent households had presence of water at the place of handwashing. These
indicators are important pointers towards scope of improving public health by enhancing sanitation
facilities.
139
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

140 140
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 6.1: Bathing and Drainage Facilities, 2001-11 Table 6.1: Bathing and Drainage Facilities, 2001-11

2001 2011 2001 2011

Percentage of Percentage of
Percentage of Percentage Percentage of Percentage
Percentage of HHs HHs having Percentage of HHs HHs having
State/UTs HHs having of HHs having State/UTs HHs having of HHs having
having Drainage bathing facility having Drainage bathing facility
bathroom facility drainage bathroom facility drainage
facility within the facility within the
within premises facility within premises facility
premises premises
Andaman & Nicobar Islands 78.18 74.13 93.87 86.04 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 78.18 74.13 93.87 86.04
Andhra Pradesh 78.48 82.29 92.61 88.26 Andhra Pradesh 78.48 82.29 92.61 88.26
Arunachal Pradesh 53.93 63.26 80.65 66.21 Arunachal Pradesh 53.93 63.26 80.65 66.21
Assam 52.98 52.62 84.54 56.35 Assam 52.98 52.62 84.54 56.35
Bihar 43.13 68.61 68.63 71.39 Bihar 43.13 68.61 68.63 71.39
Chandigarh 78.38 89.89 89.72 96 Chandigarh 78.38 89.89 89.72 96
Chhattisgarh 51.88 62.96 67.36 68.9 Chhattisgarh 51.88 62.96 67.36 68.9
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 69.01 52.18 89.99 62.7 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 69.01 52.18 89.99 62.7
Daman & Diu 86.96 50.87 84.17 77.24 Daman & Diu 86.96 50.87 84.17 77.24
Goa 77.21 69.03 94.91 77.96 Goa 77.21 69.03 94.91 77.96
Gujarat 80.62 78.29 90.45 82.64 Gujarat 80.62 78.29 90.45 82.64
Haryana 75.41 88.41 92.63 92.25 Haryana 75.41 88.41 92.63 92.25
Himachal Pradesh 74.93 86.08 92.8 93.56 Himachal Pradesh 74.93 86.08 92.8 93.56
Jammu & Kashmir 77.74 81.84 91.38 83.12 Jammu & Kashmir 77.74 81.84 91.38 83.12
Jharkhand 54.55 72.36 69.8 70.8 Jharkhand 54.55 72.36 69.8 70.8
Karnataka 79.15 80.97 96.39 87.6 Karnataka 79.15 80.97 96.39 87.6
Kerala 78.91 30.89 92.87 54.55 Kerala 78.91 30.89 92.87 54.55
Lakshadweep 84.78 0 97.64 25.93 Lakshadweep 84.78 0 97.64 25.93
Madhya Pradesh 63.21 75.93 85.35 82.34 Madhya Pradesh 63.21 75.93 85.35 82.34
Maharashtra 81.6 87.58 95.36 91.15 Maharashtra 81.6 87.58 95.36 91.15
Manipur 16.35 57.14 65.74 70.4 Manipur 16.35 57.14 65.74 70.4
Meghalaya 69.81 76.66 79.9 80.34 Meghalaya 69.81 76.66 79.9 80.34
Mizoram 64.8 63 89.72 79.48 Mizoram 64.8 63 89.72 79.48
Nagaland 58.29 72.24 94.38 76.52 Nagaland 58.29 72.24 94.38 76.52
NCT of Delhi 71.72 91.04 91.28 96.04 NCT of Delhi 71.72 91.04 91.28 96.04
Odisha 48.94 57.49 64.33 59.04 Odisha 48.94 57.49 64.33 59.04
Puducherry 70.94 68.07 91.98 82.58 Puducherry 70.94 68.07 91.98 82.58
Punjab 82.76 89.77 94.82 90.9 Punjab 82.76 89.77 94.82 90.9
Rajasthan 71.4 80.19 89.18 86.04 Rajasthan 71.4 80.19 89.18 86.04
Sikkim 83.38 94.19 91.99 92.12 Sikkim 83.38 94.19 91.99 92.12
Tamil Nadu 66.42 70.02 85.17 74.94 Tamil Nadu 66.42 70.02 85.17 74.94
Tripura 43.37 53.06 63.96 53.45 Tripura 43.37 53.06 63.96 53.45
Uttar Pradesh 63.76 92.38 84.61 93.36 Uttar Pradesh 63.76 92.38 84.61 93.36
Uttarakhand 77.87 88.24 93.1 92.9 Uttarakhand 77.87 88.24 93.1 92.9
West Bengal 58.56 67.14 70.66 66.83 West Bengal 58.56 67.14 70.66 66.83
INDIA 70.40 77.87 86.98 81.77 INDIA 70.40 77.87 86.98 81.77
HHs: Households HHs: Households

Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011 Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011

141 141
 142 142

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
90
100

80
80

Andaman &Nicobar Islands Andaman &Nicobar Islands

Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh
Assam Assam
Bihar Bihar
Chandigarh Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh Chhattisgarh

Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011

Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011

Dadra & Nagar Haveli Dadra & Nagar Haveli

Daman & Diu Daman & Diu
Goa Goa
Gujarat Gujarat
Haryana Haryana
Himachal Pradesh Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand Jharkhand
Karnataka Karnataka
Kerala Kerala

2001
2001
Lakshadweep Lakshadweep

Graph 6.1: Percentage of Households having bathroom facility within premises

Graph 6.1: Percentage of Households having bathroom facility within premises

Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh

2011
2011
Maharashtra Maharashtra
Manipur Manipur
Meghalaya Meghalaya
Mizoram Mizoram
Nagaland Nagaland
NCT of Delhi NCT of Delhi
Odisha Odisha
Puducherry Puducherry
Punjab Punjab
Rajasthan Rajasthan
Sikkim Sikkim
Tamil Nadu Tamil Nadu
Tripura Tripura
Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand Uttarakhand
West Bengal West Bengal
INDIA INDIA
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics
 143 143

10
20
30
40
50
60
80
90
100
10
20
30
40
50
60
80
90
100

0
70
0
70

Andaman &Nicobar Islands Andaman &Nicobar Islands

Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh
Assam Assam
Bihar Bihar
Chandigarh Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh Chhattisgarh
Dadra & Nagar Haveli Dadra & Nagar Haveli

Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011

Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011

Daman & Diu Daman & Diu

Goa Goa
Gujarat Gujarat
Haryana Haryana
Himachal Pradesh Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir Jammu & Kashmir

Graph 6.2: Percentage of Households having drainage facility

Graph 6.2: Percentage of Households having drainage facility

Jharkhand Jharkhand
Karnataka Karnataka
Kerala Kerala

2001
2001
Lakshadweep Lakshadweep
Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh

2011
2011
Maharashtra Maharashtra
Manipur Manipur
Meghalaya Meghalaya
Mizoram Mizoram
Nagaland Nagaland
NCT of Delhi NCT of Delhi
Odisha Odisha
Puducherry Puducherry
Punjab Punjab
Rajasthan Rajasthan
Sikkim Sikkim
Tamil Nadu Tamil Nadu
Tripura Tripura
Uttar Pradesh Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand Uttarakhand
West Bengal West Bengal
INDIA INDIA
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 6.2 Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per 2001 Census (%) Table 6.2 Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per 2001 Census (%)

Total HHs Total HHs

Water Pit Other with No Water Pit Other with No
S. No. State / UT Closet* Latrine Latrine# Latrines Latrine S. No. State / UT Closet* Latrine Latrine# Latrines Latrine
1 Andaman & Nicobar 58.69 6.74 11.06 76.49 23.51 1 Andaman & Nicobar 58.69 6.74 11.06 76.49 23.51
2 islands
Andhra Pradesh 46.97 15.1 16 78.07 21.93 2 islands
Andhra Pradesh 46.97 15.1 16 78.07 21.93
3 Arunachal Pradesh 28.06 32.08 26.82 86.95 13.05 3 Arunachal Pradesh 28.06 32.08 26.82 86.95 13.05
4 Assam 58.88 26.39 9.33 94.6 5.4 4 Assam 58.88 26.39 9.33 94.6 5.4
5 Bihar 43.45 11.37 14.88 69.69 30.31 5 Bihar 43.45 11.37 14.88 69.69 30.31
6 Chandigarh 70.77 1.02 8.28 80.07 19.93 6 Chandigarh 70.77 1.02 8.28 80.07 19.93
7 Chhattisgarh 38.82 5.15 8.62 52.59 47.41 7 Chhattisgarh 38.82 5.15 8.62 52.59 47.41
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 71.58 3.47 2.15 77.2 22.8 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 71.58 3.47 2.15 77.2 22.8
9 Daman & Diu 60.55 3.42 1.46 65.43 34.57 9 Daman & Diu 60.55 3.42 1.46 65.43 34.57
10 Goa 38.88 18.74 11.61 69.23 30.77 10 Goa 38.88 18.74 11.61 69.23 30.77
11 Gujarat 62.11 9.75 8.69 80.55 19.45 11 Gujarat 62.11 9.75 8.69 80.55 19.45
12 Haryana 30.99 26.48 23.19 80.66 19.34 12 Haryana 30.99 26.48 23.19 80.66 19.34
13 Himachal Pradesh 49.72 11.99 15.51 77.22 22.78 13 Himachal Pradesh 49.72 11.99 15.51 77.22 22.78
14 Jammu & Kashmir 26.54 20.17 40.17 86.87 13.13 14 Jammu & Kashmir 26.54 20.17 40.17 86.87 13.13
15 Jharkhand 41.24 7.41 18.03 66.68 33.32 15 Jharkhand 41.24 7.41 18.03 66.68 33.32
16 Karnataka 44.86 20.7 9.67 75.23 24.77 16 Karnataka 44.86 20.7 9.67 75.23 24.77
17 Kerala 74.76 11.11 6.16 92.02 7.98 17 Kerala 74.76 11.11 6.16 92.02 7.98
18 Lakshadweep 70.17 0.77 12.83 83.77 16.23 18 Lakshadweep 70.17 0.77 12.83 83.77 16.23
19 Madhya Pradesh 41.1 11.89 14.74 67.74 3.26 19 Madhya Pradesh 41.1 11.89 14.74 67.74 3.26
20 Maharashtra 44.37 7.08 6.63 58.08 41.92 20 Maharashtra 44.37 7.08 6.63 58.08 41.92
21 Manipur 20.55 66.96 7.8 95.31 4.69 21 Manipur 20.55 66.96 7.8 95.31 4.69
22 Meghalaya 43.54 33.13 14.91 91.58 8.42 22 Meghalaya 43.54 33.13 14.91 91.58 8.42
23 Mizoram 34.52 54.5 9.01 98.03 1.97 23 Mizoram 34.52 54.5 9.01 98.03 1.97
24 Nagaland 19.87 40.47 33.78 94.12 5.88 24 Nagaland 19.87 40.47 33.78 94.12 5.88
25 NCT of Delhi 47.36 15.18 16.49 79.03 20.97 25 NCT of Delhi 47.36 15.18 16.49 79.03 20.97
26 Odisha 43.05 9.48 7.15 59.69 40.31 26 Odisha 43.05 9.48 7.15 59.69 40.31
27 Puducherry 59.4 2.19 3.44 65.03 34.97 27 Puducherry 59.4 2.19 3.44 65.03 34.97
28 Punjab 46.52 20.53 19.48 86.52 13.48 28 Punjab 46.52 20.53 19.48 86.52 13.48
29 Rajasthan 40.58 18.21 17.33 76.11 23.89 29 Rajasthan 40.58 18.21 17.33 76.11 23.89
30 Sikkim 86.99 1.93 2.87 91.79 8.21 30 Sikkim 86.99 1.93 2.87 91.79 8.21
31 Tamil Nadu 45.47 11.16 7.71 64.33 35.67 31 Tamil Nadu 45.47 11.16 7.71 64.33 35.67
32 Tripura 43.13 44.8 9.03 96.96 3.04 32 Tripura 43.13 44.8 9.03 96.96 3.04
33 Uttar Pradesh 31.98 18.07 29.96 80.01 19.99 33 Uttar Pradesh 31.98 18.07 29.96 80.01 19.99
34 Uttarakhand 40.82 26.72 19.35 86.88 13.12 34 Uttarakhand 40.82 26.72 19.35 86.88 13.12
35 West Bengal 55.2 22.89 6.76 84.85 15.15 35 West Bengal 55.2 22.89 6.76 84.85 15.15
INDIA 46.12 14.60 13.00 73.72 26.28 INDIA 46.12 14.60 13.00 73.72 26.28
HHs: Households HHs: Households
Note: * Water Closet-Flush/Pour Flush Latrine connected to Piped Sewer/Septic Tank/Others Note: * Water Closet-Flush/Pour Flush Latrine connected to Piped Sewer/Septic Tank/Others
# Other Latrines include night soil disposed into open drains and service latrines. # Other Latrines include night soil disposed into open drains and service latrines.

Source: Census of India-2001 Source: Census of India-2001

144 144
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 6.3 Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per 2011 Census (%) Table 6.3 Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per 2011 Census (%)

S. No. State / UT Water Pit Latrine Other Total HHs No Latrine S. No. State / UT Water Pit Latrine Other Total HHs No Latrine
Closet Latrine with Closet Latrine with
Latrines Latrines
1 Andaman & Nicobar 86.80 0.20 0.10 87.10 12.90 1 Andaman & Nicobar 86.80 0.20 0.10 87.10 12.90
2 AndhraIsland
Pradesh 79.40 4.10 2.60 86.10 13.90 2 AndhraIsland
Pradesh 79.40 4.10 2.60 86.10 13.90
3 Arunachal Pradesh 74.90 13.90 0.70 89.50 10.50 3 Arunachal Pradesh 74.90 13.90 0.70 89.50 10.50
4 Assam 71.00 21.00 1.70 93.70 6.30 4 Assam 71.00 21.00 1.70 93.70 6.30
5 Bihar 63.40 4.60 1.00 69.00 31.00 5 Bihar 63.40 4.60 1.00 69.00 31.00
6 Chandigarh 87.00 0.50 0.10 87.60 12.40 6 Chandigarh 87.00 0.50 0.10 87.60 12.40
7 Chhattisgarh 58.70 1.10 0.40 60.20 39.80 7 Chhattisgarh 58.70 1.10 0.40 60.20 39.80
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 80.30 0.70 0.30 81.30 18.70 8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 80.30 0.70 0.30 81.30 18.70
9 Daman & Diu 84.20 1.10 0.10 85.40 14.60 9 Daman & Diu 84.20 1.10 0.10 85.40 14.60
10 Goa 80.60 3.50 1.10 85.20 14.70 10 Goa 80.60 3.50 1.10 85.20 14.70
11 Gujarat 85.20 2.10 0.40 87.70 12.30 11 Gujarat 85.20 2.10 0.40 87.70 12.30
12 Haryana 80.50 7.70 1.70 89.90 10.10 12 Haryana 80.50 7.70 1.70 89.90 10.10
13 Himachal Pradesh 87.00 0.80 1.30 89.10 10.90 13 Himachal Pradesh 87.00 0.80 1.30 89.10 10.90
14 Jammu & Kashmir 68.50 4.30 14.70 87.50 12.50 14 Jammu & Kashmir 68.50 4.30 14.70 87.50 12.50
15 Jharkhand 64.70 1.80 0.60 67.10 32.80 15 Jharkhand 64.70 1.80 0.60 67.10 32.80
16 Karnataka 71.60 12.00 1.40 85.00 15.10 16 Karnataka 71.60 12.00 1.40 85.00 15.10
17 Kerala 75.30 21.90 0.30 97.50 2.60 17 Kerala 75.30 21.90 0.30 97.50 2.60
18 Lakshadweep 97.20 0.50 0.00 97.70 2.30 18 Lakshadweep 97.20 0.50 0.00 97.70 2.30
19 Madhya Pradesh 71.50 1.70 1.00 74.20 25.80 19 Madhya Pradesh 71.50 1.70 1.00 74.20 25.80
20 Maharashtra 67.30 2.40 1.60 71.30 28.70 20 Maharashtra 67.30 2.40 1.60 71.30 28.70
21 Manipur 63.70 23.30 8.80 95.80 4.20 21 Manipur 63.70 23.30 8.80 95.80 4.20
22 Meghalaya 82.90 12.30 0.60 95.80 4.30 22 Meghalaya 82.90 12.30 0.60 95.80 4.30
23 Mizoram 80.90 17.20 0.50 98.60 1.50 23 Mizoram 80.90 17.20 0.50 98.60 1.50
24 Nagaland 79.10 15.00 0.50 94.60 5.40 24 Nagaland 79.10 15.00 0.50 94.60 5.40
25 NCT of Delhi 86.00 1.70 2.10 89.80 10.20 25 NCT of Delhi 86.00 1.70 2.10 89.80 10.20
26 Odisha 58.80 4.20 1.80 64.80 35.20 26 Odisha 58.80 4.20 1.80 64.80 35.20
27 Puducherry 81.10 0.60 0.30 82.00 18.00 27 Puducherry 81.10 0.60 0.30 82.00 18.00
28 Punjab 85.60 6.80 1.00 93.40 6.60 28 Punjab 85.60 6.80 1.00 93.40 6.60
29 Rajasthan 73.70 5.40 2.90 82.00 18.00 29 Rajasthan 73.70 5.40 2.90 82.00 18.00
30 Sikkim 91.80 3.30 0.10 95.20 4.80 30 Sikkim 91.80 3.30 0.10 95.20 4.80
31 Tamil Nadu 66.50 6.80 1.80 75.10 24.90 31 Tamil Nadu 66.50 6.80 1.80 75.10 24.90
32 Tripura 50.00 47.00 0.90 97.90 2.10 32 Tripura 50.00 47.00 0.90 97.90 2.10
33 Uttar Pradesh 77.20 2.90 3.00 83.10 16.90 33 Uttar Pradesh 77.20 2.90 3.00 83.10 16.90
34 Uttarakhand 85.90 6.50 1.10 93.50 6.40 34 Uttarakhand 85.90 6.50 1.10 93.50 6.40
35 West Bengal 61.60 22.50 0.90 85.00 15.00 35 West Bengal 61.60 22.50 0.90 85.00 15.00
INDIA 72.60 7.10 1.70 81.40 18.60 INDIA 72.60 7.10 1.70 81.40 18.60
HHs: Households HHs: Households

Source: Census of India-2011 Source: Census of India-2011

145 145
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 6.3: Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per Census (%) (2001) Graph 6.3: Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per Census (%) (2001)

26.28 26.28

46.12 46.12

13 13

14.6 14.6

Water Closet Pit Latrine Other Latrine No Latrine Water Closet Pit Latrine Other Latrine No Latrine

Source: Census of India, 2001 Source: Census of India, 2001

Graph 6.4 : Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per Census (%) (2011) Graph 6.4 : Urban Household Latrine Availability Data as per Census (%) (2011)

18.6 18.6

1.7 1.7

7.1 7.1

72.6 72.6

Water Closet Pit Latrine Other Latrine No Latrine Water Closet Pit Latrine Other Latrine No Latrine

Source: Census of India, 2011 Source: Census of India, 2011

146 146
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table-6.4 Percentage distribution of households with toilet facilities, 2015-16 Table-6.4 Percentage distribution of households with toilet facilities, 2015-16
Other Total HHs with Other Total HHs with
States/UTs Water Closet Pit Latrines No Latrines States/UTs Water Closet Pit Latrines No Latrines
Latrines Latrines Latrines Latrines
A & N Islands 94.00 2.94 0.69 97.63 2.37 A & N Islands 94.00 2.94 0.69 97.63 2.37
Andhra Pradesh 88.06 0.52 0.39 88.97 11.03 Andhra Pradesh 88.06 0.52 0.39 88.97 11.03
Arunachal Pradesh 87.52 10.23 1.31 99.07 0.93 Arunachal Pradesh 87.52 10.23 1.31 99.07 0.93
Assam 73.74 24.17 1.09 99.00 1.00 Assam 73.74 24.17 1.09 99.00 1.00
Bihar 71.53 5.09 1.44 78.05 21.95 Bihar 71.53 5.09 1.44 78.05 21.95
Chandigarh 96.69 0.68 0.55 97.92 2.08 Chandigarh 96.69 0.68 0.55 97.92 2.08
Chhattisgarh 78.41 3.11 0.92 82.44 17.56 Chhattisgarh 78.41 3.11 0.92 82.44 17.56
Dadra and Nagar Haveli 85.13 8.53 0.00 93.66 6.34 Dadra and Nagar Haveli 85.13 8.53 0.00 93.66 6.34
Daman and Diu 76.05 19.26 0.99 96.30 3.70 Daman and Diu 76.05 19.26 0.99 96.30 3.70
Goa 85.72 1.31 3.85 90.89 9.11 Goa 85.72 1.31 3.85 90.89 9.11
Gujarat 91.01 2.90 0.23 94.15 5.85 Gujarat 91.01 2.90 0.23 94.15 5.85
Haryana 81.73 14.56 0.14 96.43 3.57 Haryana 81.73 14.56 0.14 96.43 3.57
Himachal Pradesh 95.17 0.79 0.07 96.02 3.98 Himachal Pradesh 95.17 0.79 0.07 96.02 3.98
Jammu And Kashmir 87.49 1.35 7.79 96.63 3.37 Jammu And Kashmir 87.49 1.35 7.79 96.63 3.37
Jharkhand 72.23 1.19 0.55 73.97 26.03 Jharkhand 72.23 1.19 0.55 73.97 26.03
Karnataka 75.66 12.41 0.78 88.85 11.15 Karnataka 75.66 12.41 0.78 88.85 11.15
Kerala 91.67 7.97 0.11 99.75 0.25 Kerala 91.67 7.97 0.11 99.75 0.25
Lakshadweep 84.40 15.45 0.15 100.00 0.00 Lakshadweep 84.40 15.45 0.15 100.00 0.00
Madhya Pradesh 78.92 4.00 0.90 83.81 16.19 Madhya Pradesh 78.92 4.00 0.90 83.81 16.19
Maharashtra 85.88 2.16 1.85 89.90 10.10 Maharashtra 85.88 2.16 1.85 89.90 10.10
Manipur 67.82 30.77 0.87 99.46 0.54 Manipur 67.82 30.77 0.87 99.46 0.54
Meghalaya 87.07 11.03 1.41 99.51 0.49 Meghalaya 87.07 11.03 1.41 99.51 0.49
Mizoram 94.84 5.04 0.11 99.99 0.01 Mizoram 94.84 5.04 0.11 99.99 0.01
Nagaland 92.14 7.38 0.18 99.70 0.30 Nagaland 92.14 7.38 0.18 99.70 0.30
Delhi 95.45 0.14 0.42 96.01 3.99 Delhi 95.45 0.14 0.42 96.01 3.99
Odisha 62.61 8.89 0.18 71.68 28.32 Odisha 62.61 8.89 0.18 71.68 28.32
Puducherry 78.42 0.12 0.04 78.58 21.42 Puducherry 78.42 0.12 0.04 78.58 21.42
Punjab 95.09 2.90 0.03 98.02 1.98 Punjab 95.09 2.90 0.03 98.02 1.98
Rajasthan 85.26 3.49 0.24 88.98 11.02 Rajasthan 85.26 3.49 0.24 88.98 11.02
Sikkim 98.93 0.76 0.19 99.88 0.12 Sikkim 98.93 0.76 0.19 99.88 0.12
Tamil Nadu 80.05 1.41 2.06 83.51 16.49 Tamil Nadu 80.05 1.41 2.06 83.51 16.49
Telangana 91.56 1.20 0.31 93.07 6.93 Telangana 91.56 1.20 0.31 93.07 6.93
Tripura 70.17 29.27 0.18 99.61 0.39 Tripura 70.17 29.27 0.18 99.61 0.39
Uttar Pradesh 87.72 1.33 0.90 89.96 10.04 Uttar Pradesh 87.72 1.33 0.90 89.96 10.04
Uttarakhand 86.74 10.53 0.09 97.37 2.63 Uttarakhand 86.74 10.53 0.09 97.37 2.63
West Bengal 78.54 11.67 0.42 90.63 9.37 West Bengal 78.54 11.67 0.42 90.63 9.37
India 83.93 4.62 0.96 89.50 10.50 India 83.93 4.62 0.96 89.50 10.50
Source: National Family Health Survey, 2015-16 Source: National Family Health Survey, 2015-16
Note: In water closet, all categories related to toilets with flush system provided in NFHS are included Note: In water closet, all categories related to toilets with flush system provided in NFHS are included
In pit latrines, all categories related to pit latrines provided in NFHS are included In pit latrines, all categories related to pit latrines provided in NFHS are included
In other latrines, composting toilet, dry toilet and others are included In other latrines, composting toilet, dry toilet and others are included

147 147
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 6.5 Percentage distribution of households by main source of drinking water, 2015-16 Table 6.5 Percentage distribution of households by main source of drinking water, 2015-16

Main Source of Drinking Water Main Source of Drinking Water

Tap/Piped water Tube River/Da Tanker Tap/Piped water Tube River/Da Tanker
States/UTs well/B m/Lake/P Truck/Car Bottled Other States/UTs well/B m/Lake/P Truck/Car Bottled Other
within outside Well Spring within outside Well Spring
orehol onds/Stre t with water sources orehol onds/Stre t with water sources
premises premises e am/Canal small tank premises premises e am/Canal small tank
A & N Islands 76.06 23.83 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 A & N Islands 76.06 23.83 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Andhra Andhra
13.52 51.23 4.42 0.44 0.01 0.11 0.59 28.16 1.52 13.52 51.23 4.42 0.44 0.01 0.11 0.59 28.16 1.52
Pradesh Pradesh
Arunachal Arunachal
40.37 42.64 5.74 8.43 1.96 0.52 0.06 0.13 0.16 40.37 42.64 5.74 8.43 1.96 0.52 0.06 0.13 0.16
Pradesh Pradesh
Assam 16.31 22.51 44.79 12.73 1.03 0.42 1.15 0.90 0.15 Assam 16.31 22.51 44.79 12.73 1.03 0.42 1.15 0.90 0.15
Bihar 10.97 7.26 78.10 1.83 0.12 0.01 0.55 0.43 0.73 Bihar 10.97 7.26 78.10 1.83 0.12 0.01 0.55 0.43 0.73
Chandigarh 82.91 15.20 0.91 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.28 0.27 0.12 Chandigarh 82.91 15.20 0.91 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.28 0.27 0.12
Chhattisgarh 25.18 44.83 26.62 2.25 0.02 0.11 0.52 0.15 0.32 Chhattisgarh 25.18 44.83 26.62 2.25 0.02 0.11 0.52 0.15 0.32
Dadra and Dadra and
23.37 36.96 18.64 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.83 17.76 2.20 23.37 36.96 18.64 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.83 17.76 2.20
Nagar Haveli Nagar Haveli
Daman and Daman and
36.10 49.04 1.34 0.62 0.97 0.00 0.61 8.87 2.45 36.10 49.04 1.34 0.62 0.97 0.00 0.61 8.87 2.45
Diu Diu
Goa 67.06 29.44 0.00 2.69 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.62 0.12 Goa 67.06 29.44 0.00 2.69 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.62 0.12
Gujarat 58.03 27.88 3.64 0.33 0.05 0.05 0.76 6.08 3.17 Gujarat 58.03 27.88 3.64 0.33 0.05 0.05 0.76 6.08 3.17
Haryana 57.52 17.32 12.19 0.17 0.13 0.08 5.30 6.34 0.94 Haryana 57.52 17.32 12.19 0.17 0.13 0.08 5.30 6.34 0.94
Himachal Himachal
69.74 19.79 1.41 1.07 3.85 0.38 1.60 0.00 2.16 69.74 19.79 1.41 1.07 3.85 0.38 1.60 0.00 2.16
Pradesh Pradesh
Jammu & Jammu &
72.50 14.80 7.76 0.96 2.35 1.38 0.12 0.12 0.01 72.50 14.80 7.76 0.96 2.35 1.38 0.12 0.12 0.01
Kashmir Kashmir
Jharkhand 26.68 24.88 34.84 9.51 0.57 0.71 0.96 1.33 0.52 Jharkhand 26.68 24.88 34.84 9.51 0.57 0.71 0.96 1.33 0.52
Karnataka 32.87 49.54 4.54 3.25 0.33 1.41 2.57 5.08 0.41 Karnataka 32.87 49.54 4.54 3.25 0.33 1.41 2.57 5.08 0.41
Kerala 16.29 13.75 3.92 64.95 0.42 0.09 0.15 0.19 0.25 Kerala 16.29 13.75 3.92 64.95 0.42 0.09 0.15 0.19 0.25
Lakshadweep 3.74 9.46 4.36 74.82 0.47 0.00 0.15 0.00 6.99 Lakshadweep 3.74 9.46 4.36 74.82 0.47 0.00 0.15 0.00 6.99
Madhya Madhya
35.13 32.72 27.32 2.96 0.19 0.15 1.10 0.12 0.29 35.13 32.72 27.32 2.96 0.19 0.15 1.10 0.12 0.29
Pradesh Pradesh
Maharashtra 44.17 48.33 3.90 0.98 0.24 0.12 0.71 0.78 0.77 Maharashtra 44.17 48.33 3.90 0.98 0.24 0.12 0.71 0.78 0.77
Manipur 4.46 37.31 2.26 4.28 1.99 15.03 31.74 1.85 1.09 Manipur 4.46 37.31 2.26 4.28 1.99 15.03 31.74 1.85 1.09
Meghalaya 34.10 40.89 1.01 11.81 3.93 0.75 5.27 0.00 2.24 Meghalaya 34.10 40.89 1.01 11.81 3.93 0.75 5.27 0.00 2.24
Mizoram 54.73 31.51 0.16 2.86 4.41 0.73 3.33 0.02 2.25 Mizoram 54.73 31.51 0.16 2.86 4.41 0.73 3.33 0.02 2.25
Nagaland 21.88 18.68 14.78 25.31 4.12 4.33 4.31 0.29 6.31 Nagaland 21.88 18.68 14.78 25.31 4.12 4.33 4.31 0.29 6.31
Delhi 67.78 8.68 3.54 0.14 0.02 0.01 13.56 5.74 0.53 Delhi 67.78 8.68 3.54 0.14 0.02 0.01 13.56 5.74 0.53
Odisha 18.51 39.77 32.45 7.16 0.69 0.26 0.52 0.27 0.36 Odisha 18.51 39.77 32.45 7.16 0.69 0.26 0.52 0.27 0.36
Puducherry 24.33 62.00 5.47 1.64 0.01 0.17 1.12 4.57 0.68 Puducherry 24.33 62.00 5.47 1.64 0.01 0.17 1.12 4.57 0.68
Punjab 61.62 16.66 18.93 0.09 0.15 0.16 0.27 0.21 1.90 Punjab 61.62 16.66 18.93 0.09 0.15 0.16 0.27 0.21 1.90
Rajasthan 42.47 35.53 11.44 1.09 0.02 0.55 4.09 3.05 1.76 Rajasthan 42.47 35.53 11.44 1.09 0.02 0.55 4.09 3.05 1.76
Sikkim 69.38 28.59 0.17 0.00 1.28 0.27 0.09 0.00 0.22 Sikkim 69.38 28.59 0.17 0.00 1.28 0.27 0.09 0.00 0.22

148 148
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Tamil Nadu 20.65 58.55 4.42 2.59 0.42 1.16 4.01 7.11 1.09 Tamil Nadu 20.65 58.55 4.42 2.59 0.42 1.16 4.01 7.11 1.09
Telangana 24.90 53.43 1.48 0.73 0.02 0.03 2.34 16.41 0.65 Telangana 24.90 53.43 1.48 0.73 0.02 0.03 2.34 16.41 0.65
Tripura 9.47 35.71 51.14 2.11 0.10 0.39 0.20 0.44 0.43 Tripura 9.47 35.71 51.14 2.11 0.10 0.39 0.20 0.44 0.43
Uttar Pradesh 28.15 9.62 53.26 0.40 0.12 0.04 0.81 6.09 1.50 Uttar Pradesh 28.15 9.62 53.26 0.40 0.12 0.04 0.81 6.09 1.50
Uttarakhand 58.47 24.03 15.87 0.70 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.17 0.05 Uttarakhand 58.47 24.03 15.87 0.70 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.17 0.05
West Bengal 13.36 46.15 32.41 2.45 0.74 0.05 0.75 3.89 0.21 West Bengal 13.36 46.15 32.41 2.45 0.74 0.05 0.75 3.89 0.21
India 33.43 35.55 17.45 4.70 0.30 0.37 2.13 5.10 0.97 India 33.43 35.55 17.45 4.70 0.30 0.37 2.13 5.10 0.97

Source: National Family Source: National Family

Health Survey, 2015-16 Health Survey, 2015-16
Note: In tap/piped water within premises, Note: In tap/piped water within premises,
piped water into dwellings is included piped water into dwellings is included
In tap/piped water outside premises, piped water in yard/plot and In tap/piped water outside premises, piped water in yard/plot and
public tap/standpipe are included public tap/standpipe are included
In Well and Spring, protected and unprotected both are included In Well and Spring, protected and unprotected both are included
In other sources, rainwater, community RO plant and other source of In other sources, rainwater, community RO plant and other source of
water are included water are included

149 149
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 6.6 Percentage distribution of households by main source of drinking water, 2011 Table 6.6 Percentage distribution of households by main source of drinking water, 2011

Main Source of Drinking Water Main Source of Drinking Water

River/ River/
Tap Water Tank/ Tap Water Tank/
States/UTs Tubewell/ Other States/UTs Tubewell/ Other
Well Handpump Spring Pond/ Well Handpump Spring Pond/
Borehole sources Borehole sources
Within Outside Lake/ Within Outside Lake/
premises premises Canal premises premises Canal
ANDAMAN & ANDAMAN &
14.24 0.01 0.12 14.24 0.01 0.12
NICOBAR ISLANDS 83.70 1.06 0.01 0.47 0.38 NICOBAR ISLANDS 83.70 1.06 0.01 0.47 0.38
23.56 4.43 6.59 23.56 4.43 6.59
ANDHRA PRADESH 59.93 2.17 0.06 0.11 3.15 ANDHRA PRADESH 59.93 2.17 0.06 0.11 3.15
21.56 5.66 1.50 21.56 5.66 1.50
ARUNACHAL PRADESH 62.59 5.05 1.53 1.31 0.79 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 62.59 5.05 1.53 1.31 0.79
5.75 32.97 15.03 5.75 32.97 15.03
ASSAM 24.42 17.83 1.00 1.98 1.02 ASSAM 24.42 17.83 1.00 1.98 1.02
3.30 64.37 10.37 3.30 64.37 10.37
BIHAR 16.65 3.27 0.05 0.28 1.72 BIHAR 16.65 3.27 0.05 0.28 1.72
11.93 1.79 0.81 11.93 1.79 0.81
CHANDIGARH 84.84 0.07 0.02 0.08 0.46 CHANDIGARH 84.84 0.07 0.02 0.08 0.46
27.59 18.18 13.24 27.59 18.18 13.24
CHHATTISGARH 34.86 5.14 0.11 0.40 0.49 CHHATTISGARH 34.86 5.14 0.11 0.40 0.49
DADRA & NAGAR DADRA & NAGAR
12.70 19.16 28.92 12.70 19.16 28.92
HAVELI 37.63 1.13 0.03 0.07 0.36 HAVELI 37.63 1.13 0.03 0.07 0.36
16.51 5.38 20.96 16.51 5.38 20.96
DAMAN & DIU 56.13 0.46 0.02 0.01 0.54 DAMAN & DIU 56.13 0.46 0.02 0.01 0.54
9.67 0.07 0.16 9.67 0.07 0.16
GOA 80.50 8.04 0.26 0.26 1.04 GOA 80.50 8.04 0.26 0.26 1.04
10.08 3.37 8.01 10.08 3.37 8.01
GUJARAT 75.50 0.83 0.03 0.14 2.04 GUJARAT 75.50 0.83 0.03 0.14 2.04
8.38 8.42 10.81 8.38 8.42 10.81
HARYANA 69.12 0.54 0.03 0.68 2.03 HARYANA 69.12 0.54 0.03 0.68 2.03
12.18 1.34 0.95 12.18 1.34 0.95
HIMACHAL PRADESH 83.35 0.98 0.41 0.25 0.56 HIMACHAL PRADESH 83.35 0.98 0.41 0.25 0.56
9.84 6.45 1.71 9.84 6.45 1.71
JAMMU & KASHMIR 78.06 1.20 0.41 1.34 0.98 JAMMU & KASHMIR 78.06 1.20 0.41 1.34 0.98
12.64 27.16 9.71 12.64 27.16 9.71
JHARKHAND 28.92 19.31 0.11 0.84 1.31 JHARKHAND 28.92 19.31 0.11 0.84 1.31
19.96 1.27 10.58 19.96 1.27 10.58
KARNATAKA 60.46 4.66 0.12 0.74 2.22 KARNATAKA 60.46 4.66 0.12 0.74 2.22
7.71 0.63 3.93 7.71 0.63 3.93
KERALA 27.14 58.89 0.08 0.19 1.42 KERALA 27.14 58.89 0.08 0.19 1.42
4.32 3.20 0.05 4.32 3.20 0.05
LAKSHADWEEP 12.62 78.09 - 0.46 1.26 LAKSHADWEEP 12.62 78.09 - 0.46 1.26
20.61 14.62 15.32 20.61 14.62 15.32
MADHYA PRADESH 41.59 5.46 0.06 0.88 1.47 MADHYA PRADESH 41.59 5.46 0.06 0.88 1.47
14.54 2.83 3.77 14.54 2.83 3.77
MAHARASHTRA 74.60 2.60 0.08 0.44 1.15 MAHARASHTRA 74.60 2.60 0.08 0.44 1.15
27.32 4.27 0.30 27.32 4.27 0.30
MANIPUR 28.95 5.50 1.22 25.78 6.65 MANIPUR 28.95 5.50 1.22 25.78 6.65
25.72 0.45 1.46 25.72 0.45 1.46
MEGHALAYA 51.87 7.95 8.82 1.65 2.09 MEGHALAYA 51.87 7.95 8.82 1.65 2.09

150 150
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

21.96 0.85 0.59 21.96 0.85 0.59

MIZORAM 52.40 4.28 11.97 2.93 5.01 MIZORAM 52.40 4.28 11.97 2.93 5.01
13.53 4.00 12.13 13.53 4.00 12.13
NAGALAND 22.15 28.32 5.17 9.70 5.00 NAGALAND 22.15 28.32 5.17 9.70 5.00
12.10 5.11 8.24 12.10 5.11 8.24
NCT OF DELHI 69.76 0.09 0.01 1.21 3.48 NCT OF DELHI 69.76 0.09 0.01 1.21 3.48
15.85 12.79 18.95 15.85 12.79 18.95
ODISHA 32.19 18.38 0.25 0.74 0.86 ODISHA 32.19 18.38 0.25 0.74 0.86
13.91 0.50 1.10 13.91 0.50 1.10
PUDUCHERRY 81.46 2.71 0.02 0.01 0.28 PUDUCHERRY 81.46 2.71 0.02 0.01 0.28
4.65 10.29 12.20 4.65 10.29 12.20
PUNJAB 71.80 0.24 0.04 0.11 0.67 PUNJAB 71.80 0.24 0.04 0.11 0.67
9.75 6.13 5.58 9.75 6.13 5.58
RAJASTHAN 72.81 1.52 0.04 1.74 2.43 RAJASTHAN 72.81 1.52 0.04 1.74 2.43
13.20 0.02 0.10 13.20 0.02 0.10
SIKKIM 78.87 0.96 6.37 0.18 0.30 SIKKIM 78.87 0.96 6.37 0.18 0.30
35.20 3.96 8.65 35.20 3.96 8.65
TAMIL NADU 45.11 4.34 0.19 0.26 2.29 TAMIL NADU 45.11 4.34 0.19 0.26 2.29
17.96 21.40 16.47 17.96 21.40 16.47
TRIPURA 36.04 6.53 0.08 0.32 1.19 TRIPURA 36.04 6.53 0.08 0.32 1.19
6.39 36.75 9.59 6.39 36.75 9.59
UTTAR PRADESH 45.15 0.83 0.04 0.28 0.97 UTTAR PRADESH 45.15 0.83 0.04 0.28 0.97
7.12 17.14 3.11 7.12 17.14 3.11
UTTARAKHAND 71.30 0.18 0.06 0.24 0.85 UTTARAKHAND 71.30 0.18 0.06 0.24 0.85
21.62 22.60 15.69 21.62 22.60 15.69
WEST BENGAL 34.01 4.53 0.38 0.34 0.82 WEST BENGAL 34.01 4.53 0.38 0.34 0.82
16.56 11.86 8.90 16.56 11.86 8.90
INDIA 54.07 6.15 0.16 0.56 1.74 INDIA 54.07 6.15 0.16 0.56 1.74

Source: Population Source: Population

Census of India, 2011 Census of India, 2011
Note: In tap water, both treated and untreated sources are included. In outside premises, tap water near the premises and away Note: In tap water, both treated and untreated sources are included. In outside premises, tap water near the premises and away
from premises are included. from premises are included.
In well, covered and uncovered well are included. In well, covered and uncovered well are included.

151 151
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 6.7 Hand-washing facility in urban India, 2015-16 (%) Table 6.7 Hand-washing facility in urban India, 2015-16 (%)
Households with Households with
Place of Handwashing Households with Presence Place of Handwashing Households with Presence
States/UTs available and of Water at the place of States/UTs available and of Water at the place of
observed by handwashing observed by handwashing
Enumerator Enumerator
A & N Islands 100 99.14 A & N Islands 100 99.14
Andhra Pradesh 99.09 94.45 Andhra Pradesh 99.09 94.45
Arunachal Pradesh 95.25 84.82 Arunachal Pradesh 95.25 84.82
Assam 94.16 93.07 Assam 94.16 93.07
Bihar 97.83 95.27 Bihar 97.83 95.27
Chandigarh 99.22 98.84 Chandigarh 99.22 98.84
Chhattisgarh 99.82 92.58 Chhattisgarh 99.82 92.58
Dadra and Nagar Haveli 99.50 86.10 Dadra and Nagar Haveli 99.50 86.10
Daman and Diu 98.42 95.75 Daman and Diu 98.42 95.75
Goa 91.94 96.44 Goa 91.94 96.44
Gujarat 98.87 95.52 Gujarat 98.87 95.52
Haryana 97.64 95.26 Haryana 97.64 95.26
Himachal Pradesh 99.10 94.77 Himachal Pradesh 99.10 94.77
Jammu And Kashmir 98.94 98.72 Jammu And Kashmir 98.94 98.72
Jharkhand 97.43 84.81 Jharkhand 97.43 84.81
Karnataka 95.69 94.52 Karnataka 95.69 94.52
Kerala 99.31 95.57 Kerala 99.31 95.57
Lakshadweep 99.84 95.10 Lakshadweep 99.84 95.10
Madhya Pradesh 98.06 94.19 Madhya Pradesh 98.06 94.19
Maharashtra 99.16 96.90 Maharashtra 99.16 96.90
Manipur 89.57 90.00 Manipur 89.57 90.00
Meghalaya 98.10 96.47 Meghalaya 98.10 96.47
Mizoram 99.79 98.77 Mizoram 99.79 98.77
Nagaland 98.96 91.24 Nagaland 98.96 91.24
Delhi 94.84 91.08 Delhi 94.84 91.08
Odisha 97.62 76.06 Odisha 97.62 76.06
Puducherry 95.37 94.64 Puducherry 95.37 94.64
Punjab 98.70 98.97 Punjab 98.70 98.97
Rajasthan 98.26 96.13 Rajasthan 98.26 96.13
Sikkim 99.43 97.77 Sikkim 99.43 97.77
Tamil Nadu 94.71 90.74 Tamil Nadu 94.71 90.74
Telangana 99.15 94.40 Telangana 99.15 94.40
Tripura 99.86 90.18 Tripura 99.86 90.18
Uttar Pradesh 99.20 97.19 Uttar Pradesh 99.20 97.19
Uttarakhand 98.15 97.22 Uttarakhand 98.15 97.22
West Bengal 95.46 85.31 West Bengal 95.46 85.31
India 97.62 93.68 India 97.62 93.68

Source: National Family Health Survey, 2015-16 Source: National Family Health Survey, 2015-16

152 152
 Chapter 7 Chapter 7

Urban Housing Urban Housing

“A House is a turning point in the lives of poor which leads “A House is a turning point in the lives of poor which leads
towards a better life” towards a better life”

Narendra Modi Narendra Modi

Prime Minister Prime Minister
(Launch of PMAY-U, Smart City, AMRUT Missions) (Launch of PMAY-U, Smart City, AMRUT Missions)
PIB Release 25-06-2015 PIB Release 25-06-2015
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Urban Housing
Rapid urbanization combined with economic disparities has led to increasing problem of housing,
overcrowding in small houses, steady growth of slums and unplanned settlements and severe delete-
rious effect on civic services in urban areas.
Total number of households in urban areas in 2001 were 53.7 million which increased to 78.9 million
in 2011. Table 7.1 and 7.2 provide a detailed picture of change in living standard of urban households.
The distribution of households by size and number of rooms during the year 2001 and 2011 shows that
majority of households dwell in one room i.e 35.11% of households lived in one room house in 2001,
though this decreased to 32.13% in 2011. The percentage of households not having any separate
space or those that dwell in non-exclusive rooms was 2.32% in 2001 and it has increased to 3.08% in
2011. One-third of population has been using two-rooms for living purpose in 2001-11. 17.09% house-
holds in 2001 and 18.38% households in 2011 had three rooms size dwelling. The table also shows that
only 15.94% households in 2001 and 15.81% households in 2011 have four rooms and above as their
living space.
Tenure status of houses is another dimension of housing stock that exists in urban areas. Tables 7.3
and 7.4 show change in percentage of households living in houses by number of rooms of owned
dwellings. In 2001, 35.8 million households were in owned dwelling and the number increased to 54.5
million in 2011. In 2001, majority of households lived in one room (29.25%) and two rooms (29.27%)
owned dwellings. The trend has been similar in 2011 as well wherein 26.46% household had one room
dwellings and 30.43% in two room dwelling. Only 20.56% in 2001 and 20.27% in 2011 had owned
dwelling of four rooms and above.
Tables 7.5 and 7.6 show the change in percentage of households living in houses by number of rooms
of rented dwellings. It shows that two-third of rented households have less than three rooms. The per-
centage of households not having any exclusive rooms has increased from 2.75% in 2001 to 4.20% in
2011. Tables 7.7 and 7.8 give the ownership/tenure status of dwelling units of 2001 and 2011 respec-
tively. In 2001, 66.79 % of households stayed in owned dwellings while 28.53% of households stayed
in rented dwellings whereas in 2011, 69.16% households stayed in owned dwellings while 27.55 %
households stayed in rented dwellings.
Table 7.9 shows the qualitative condition of Households. It shows that the percentage of households
living in good condition dwellings has increased from 64.16% in 2001 to 68.44% in 2011. Another trend
visible from the table is decrease in percentage of households living in houses in dilapidated condition
from 3.6% in 2001 to 2.88% in 2011.
155
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Urban Housing
Rapid urbanization combined with economic disparities has led to increasing problem of housing,
overcrowding in small houses, steady growth of slums and unplanned settlements and severe delete-
rious effect on civic services in urban areas.
Total number of households in urban areas in 2001 were 53.7 million which increased to 78.9 million
in 2011. Table 7.1 and 7.2 provide a detailed picture of change in living standard of urban households.
The distribution of households by size and number of rooms during the year 2001 and 2011 shows that
majority of households dwell in one room i.e 35.11% of households lived in one room house in 2001,
though this decreased to 32.13% in 2011. The percentage of households not having any separate
space or those that dwell in non-exclusive rooms was 2.32% in 2001 and it has increased to 3.08% in
2011. One-third of population has been using two-rooms for living purpose in 2001-11. 17.09% house-
holds in 2001 and 18.38% households in 2011 had three rooms size dwelling. The table also shows that
only 15.94% households in 2001 and 15.81% households in 2011 have four rooms and above as their
living space.
Tenure status of houses is another dimension of housing stock that exists in urban areas. Tables 7.3
and 7.4 show change in percentage of households living in houses by number of rooms of owned
dwellings. In 2001, 35.8 million households were in owned dwelling and the number increased to 54.5
million in 2011. In 2001, majority of households lived in one room (29.25%) and two rooms (29.27%)
owned dwellings. The trend has been similar in 2011 as well wherein 26.46% household had one room
dwellings and 30.43% in two room dwelling. Only 20.56% in 2001 and 20.27% in 2011 had owned
dwelling of four rooms and above.
Tables 7.5 and 7.6 show the change in percentage of households living in houses by number of rooms
of rented dwellings. It shows that two-third of rented households have less than three rooms. The per-
centage of households not having any exclusive rooms has increased from 2.75% in 2001 to 4.20% in
2011. Tables 7.7 and 7.8 give the ownership/tenure status of dwelling units of 2001 and 2011 respec-
tively. In 2001, 66.79 % of households stayed in owned dwellings while 28.53% of households stayed
in rented dwellings whereas in 2011, 69.16% households stayed in owned dwellings while 27.55 %
households stayed in rented dwellings.
Table 7.9 shows the qualitative condition of Households. It shows that the percentage of households
living in good condition dwellings has increased from 64.16% in 2001 to 68.44% in 2011. Another trend
visible from the table is decrease in percentage of households living in houses in dilapidated condition
from 3.6% in 2001 to 2.88% in 2011.
155
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Table 7.10 contains data on housing price index in select 50 cities. It is evident that there is wide vari-
ation in changes in housing prices in various cities in India. During 2014-2018, Vizag reported highest
increase in housing prices – its housing price index increased by over 40 percent during this period. On
the other hand, some cities like Delhi and Gandhinagar witnessed disinflation in housing prices during
this period.
156
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Table 7.10 contains data on housing price index in select 50 cities. It is evident that there is wide vari-
ation in changes in housing prices in various cities in India. During 2014-2018, Vizag reported highest
increase in housing prices – its housing price index increased by over 40 percent during this period. On
the other hand, some cities like Delhi and Gandhinagar witnessed disinflation in housing prices during
this period.
156
 Table 7.1: State wise Households having number of Dwelling Rooms-2001 (%)

S. Area Name Total number of Percentage of households having

No. households

No exclusive One room Two rooms Three Four rooms Five rooms Six rooms Four rooms
room rooms and above and above
01 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 23,409 2.86 34.95 40.33 13.65 5.07 1.40 1.73 8.21
02 Andhra Pradesh 4,173,639 1.63 35.28 29.59 18.99 9.08 2.70 2.72 14.51
03 Arunachal Pradesh 48,114 1.17 26.86 40.60 21.62 6.04 1.87 1.84 9.75
04 Assam 715,185 1.26 29.72 28.02 18.81 10.44 5.61 6.14 22.19
05 Bihar 1,322,583 0.92 30.03 29.41 17.69 10.37 4.40 7.18 21.95
36 Chandigarh UT 180,576 0.96 38.38 26.25 19.97 8.05 2.90 3.49 14.44
07 Chhattisgarh 789,440 0.52 24.72 34.24 21.15 10.09 4.00 5.27 19.37
08 Daman & Diu 11,190 3.32 44.50 35.03 12.52 3.23 0.80 0.60 4.63
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 12,251 0.76 27.38 29.18 18.88 11.74 4.58 7.49 23.80
09 0

157
10 NCT of Delhi 138,461 2.75 23.22 25.54 23.20 13.49 5.62 6.19 25.30
11 Goa 3,758,028 0.91 41.35 31.45 16.07 6.10 1.95 2.15 10.21
12 Gujarat 1,075,179 1.32 27.91 31.32 20.13 11.07 3.93 4.32 19.32
13 Haryana 143,113 1.47 34.14 31.18 14.78 9.28 3.82 5.32 18.43
14 Himachal Pradesh 390,411 2.16 20.27 22.35 18.89 16.71 6.54 13.08 36.33
15 Jammu & Kashmir 1,060,178 0.68 25.94 38.77 17.61 8.97 3.26 4.78 17.00
16 Jharkhand 3,556,960 4.85 30.44 29.59 17.73 9.37 4.01 4.01 17.39
17 Karnataka 1,652,656 1.13 9.05 23.37 27.88 20.05 9.63 8.89 38.56
18 Kerala 3,889 1.31 9.05 20.70 24.17 21.99 12.03 10.75 44.77
19 Madhya Pradesh 2,794,858 1.00 26.14 31.61 19.52 10.83 4.28 6.62 21.73
20 Maharashtra 8,069,526 3.86 46.71 26.90 13.49 5.38 1.70 1.96 9.04
21 Manipur 101,302 1.61 14.51 25.67 28.77 14.64 7.10 7.70 29.44
22 Meghalaya 90,568 2.45 22.80 28.76 20.52 11.13 6.04 8.30 25.47
23 Mizoram 81,604 1.18 21.20 40.96 22.19 8.82 3.18 2.48 14.48
24 Nagaland 66,716 1.66 28.91 30.76 19.65 10.61 4.18 4.23 19.02
25 Odisha 2,384,621 0.88 38.34 27.03 17.93 8.87 2.87 4.07 15.82
Handbook of Urban Statistics

26 Puducherry UT 1,087,248 1.20 30.06 33.62 18.09 8.81 3.59 4.63 17.03

Table 7.1: State wise Households having number of Dwelling Rooms-2001 (%)

S. Area Name Total number of Percentage of households having

No. households

No exclusive One room Two rooms Three Four rooms Five rooms Six rooms Four rooms
room rooms and above and above
01 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 23,409 2.86 34.95 40.33 13.65 5.07 1.40 1.73 8.21
02 Andhra Pradesh 4,173,639 1.63 35.28 29.59 18.99 9.08 2.70 2.72 14.51
03 Arunachal Pradesh 48,114 1.17 26.86 40.60 21.62 6.04 1.87 1.84 9.75
04 Assam 715,185 1.26 29.72 28.02 18.81 10.44 5.61 6.14 22.19
05 Bihar 1,322,583 0.92 30.03 29.41 17.69 10.37 4.40 7.18 21.95
36 Chandigarh UT 180,576 0.96 38.38 26.25 19.97 8.05 2.90 3.49 14.44
07 Chhattisgarh 789,440 0.52 24.72 34.24 21.15 10.09 4.00 5.27 19.37
08 Daman & Diu 11,190 3.32 44.50 35.03 12.52 3.23 0.80 0.60 4.63
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 12,251 0.76 27.38 29.18 18.88 11.74 4.58 7.49 23.80
09 0
157

10 NCT of Delhi 138,461 2.75 23.22 25.54 23.20 13.49 5.62 6.19 25.30
11 Goa 3,758,028 0.91 41.35 31.45 16.07 6.10 1.95 2.15 10.21
12 Gujarat 1,075,179 1.32 27.91 31.32 20.13 11.07 3.93 4.32 19.32
13 Haryana 143,113 1.47 34.14 31.18 14.78 9.28 3.82 5.32 18.43
14 Himachal Pradesh 390,411 2.16 20.27 22.35 18.89 16.71 6.54 13.08 36.33
15 Jammu & Kashmir 1,060,178 0.68 25.94 38.77 17.61 8.97 3.26 4.78 17.00
16 Jharkhand 3,556,960 4.85 30.44 29.59 17.73 9.37 4.01 4.01 17.39
17 Karnataka 1,652,656 1.13 9.05 23.37 27.88 20.05 9.63 8.89 38.56
18 Kerala 3,889 1.31 9.05 20.70 24.17 21.99 12.03 10.75 44.77
19 Madhya Pradesh 2,794,858 1.00 26.14 31.61 19.52 10.83 4.28 6.62 21.73
20 Maharashtra 8,069,526 3.86 46.71 26.90 13.49 5.38 1.70 1.96 9.04
21 Manipur 101,302 1.61 14.51 25.67 28.77 14.64 7.10 7.70 29.44
22 Meghalaya 90,568 2.45 22.80 28.76 20.52 11.13 6.04 8.30 25.47
23 Mizoram 81,604 1.18 21.20 40.96 22.19 8.82 3.18 2.48 14.48
24 Nagaland 66,716 1.66 28.91 30.76 19.65 10.61 4.18 4.23 19.02
25 Odisha 2,384,621 0.88 38.34 27.03 17.93 8.87 2.87 4.07 15.82
Handbook of Urban Statistics

26 Puducherry UT 1,087,248 1.20 30.06 33.62 18.09 8.81 3.59 4.63 17.03
 27 Punjab 136,456 1.45 49.73 29.23 11.49 4.38 1.37 2.35 8.11
28 Rajasthan 1,489,694 0.79 26.11 29.63 20.88 12.81 5.06 4.72 22.59
29 Sikkim 2,185,591 0.99 27.45 29.53 18.41 11.91 5.13 6.58 23.61
30 Tamil Nadu 13,015 0.88 33.88 32.45 16.61 7.71 3.17 5.29 16.17
31 Telangana 5,898,836 5.90 37.30 29.23 16.18 6.65 2.34 2.40 11.39
32 Tripura 122,343 1.19 61.40 23.47 9.09 3.12 0.98 0.75 4.85
33 Uttar Pradesh 5,170,527 1.62 30.76 31.46 16.91 9.77 3.91 5.58 19.25
34 Uttarakhand 390,164 0.64 32.33 32.68 17.49 9.87 3.44 3.55 16.86
Handbook of Urban Statistics

35 West Bengal 4,554,045 0.88 45.87 29.30 12.99 6.11 1.89 2.97 10.97
INDIA 53,692,376 2.32 35.11 29.53 17.09 8.67 3.27 4.00 15.94
Source: Census of India-2001

158
27 Punjab 136,456 1.45 49.73 29.23 11.49 4.38 1.37 2.35 8.11
28 Rajasthan 1,489,694 0.79 26.11 29.63 20.88 12.81 5.06 4.72 22.59
29 Sikkim 2,185,591 0.99 27.45 29.53 18.41 11.91 5.13 6.58 23.61
30 Tamil Nadu 13,015 0.88 33.88 32.45 16.61 7.71 3.17 5.29 16.17
31 Telangana 5,898,836 5.90 37.30 29.23 16.18 6.65 2.34 2.40 11.39
32 Tripura 122,343 1.19 61.40 23.47 9.09 3.12 0.98 0.75 4.85
33 Uttar Pradesh 5,170,527 1.62 30.76 31.46 16.91 9.77 3.91 5.58 19.25
34 Uttarakhand 390,164 0.64 32.33 32.68 17.49 9.87 3.44 3.55 16.86
Handbook of Urban Statistics

35 West Bengal 4,554,045 0.88 45.87 29.30 12.99 6.11 1.89 2.97 10.97
INDIA 53,692,376 2.32 35.11 29.53 17.09 8.67 3.27 4.00 15.94
Source: Census of India-2001
158
 Table 7.2 : State wise Households having number of dwellings Rooms - 2011 (%)
Percentage of households having
Total number of
S. No. State/UTs Six rooms and Four rooms and
households No exclusive room One room Two rooms Three rooms Four rooms Five rooms
above above
1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 34,346 1.85 26.22 41.52 20.16 6.66 1.96 1.64 10.25
2 Andhra Pradesh 6,778,225 2.26 32.68 32.59 20.34 8.37 2.14 1.63 12.13
3 Arunachal Pradesh 65,891 1.58 21.03 39.53 24.61 7.63 2.81 2.81 13.26
4 Assam 992,742 2.13 24.19 27.93 19.70 12.81 6.64 6.61 26.06
5 Bihar 2,013,671 2.27 32.45 30.76 15.72 9.59 3.61 5.59 18.79
6 Chandigarh 228,276 1.43 38.45 25.74 19.01 8.67 3.20 3.50 15.37
7 Chhattisgarh 1,238,738 1.45 27.27 33.48 19.52 10.04 3.75 4.50 18.29
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 37,655 6.54 50.75 26.29 12.25 2.83 0.68 0.67 4.17
9 Daman & Diu 47,631 4.13 62.83 16.34 9.34 3.87 1.40 2.09 7.36
10 Delhi 3,261,423 1.32 32.25 29.67 19.95 10.38 2.98 3.44 16.81
11 Goa 198,139 3.59 20.36 24.96 25.82 13.64 5.82 5.81 25.27
12 Gujarat 5,416,315 2.41 35.54 33.34 17.81 6.79 2.26 1.85 10.90
13 Haryana 1,751,901 1.76 26.24 29.52 21.28 12.89 4.39 3.92 21.20
14 Himachal Pradesh 166,043 1.76 27.44 30.44 16.55 11.79 5.04 6.97 23.80
15 Jammu & Kashmir 517,168 2.88 15.08 22.49 23.13 15.65 6.91 13.87 36.43
16 Jharkhand 1,495,642 2.84 22.13 38.50 18.26 10.61 3.38 4.28 18.27
17 Karnataka 5,315,715 7.10 29.62 30.96 18.77 8.32 2.86 2.37 13.54
18 Kerala 3,620,696 0.91 6.28 23.34 32.44 21.36 8.63 7.02 37.02

159
19 Lakshadweep 8,180 0.42 7.35 19.60 29.19 21.99 10.77 10.68 43.45
20 Madhya Pradesh 3,845,232 1.35 25.23 32.30 19.22 11.82 4.28 5.80 21.90
21 Maharashtra 10,813,928 4.85 41.69 28.41 15.36 5.99 1.89 1.80 9.68
22 Manipur 171,400 1.42 13.48 28.57 30.32 14.28 6.54 5.40 26.22
23 Meghalaya 116,102 0.84 21.56 28.00 20.93 11.97 6.66 10.03 28.67
24 Mizoram 116,203 1.67 12.80 41.10 24.78 11.32 4.56 3.78 19.65
25 Nagaland 115,054 0.98 22.19 29.84 22.40 13.30 5.83 5.47 24.60
26 Odissa 1,517,073 1.69 28.29 33.57 19.49 9.58 3.57 3.80 16.96
27 Puducherry 206,143 4.58 40.50 31.81 15.59 4.85 1.50 1.18 7.53
28 Punjab 2,094,067 1.29 25.27 29.23 21.54 12.91 5.28 4.48 22.67
29 Rajasthan 3,090,940 1.65 25.87 29.06 18.90 13.20 5.33 5.98 24.52
30 Sikkim 35,761 2.22 31.02 30.23 15.38 9.42 4.51 7.23 21.16
31 Tamil Nadu 8,929,104 4.68 36.74 31.62 17.11 6.33 2.08 1.44 9.85
32 Tripura 235,002 3.66 62.09 23.61 6.95 2.43 0.67 0.59 3.69
33 Uttar Pradesh 7,449,195 2.40 31.27 30.55 16.64 10.64 3.85 4.64 19.13
34 Uttaranchal 592,223 1.07 29.25 30.82 18.68 11.86 4.24 4.08 20.17
35 West Bengal 6,350,113 2.97 41.69 31.70 13.52 6.12 1.74 2.26 10.12
INDIA 78,865,937 3.08 32.13 30.60 18.38 9.26 3.24 3.31 15.81
Source: Census of India-2011
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 7.2 : State wise Households having number of dwellings Rooms - 2011 (%)
Percentage of households having
Total number of
S. No. State/UTs Six rooms and Four rooms and
households No exclusive room One room Two rooms Three rooms Four rooms Five rooms
above above
1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 34,346 1.85 26.22 41.52 20.16 6.66 1.96 1.64 10.25
2 Andhra Pradesh 6,778,225 2.26 32.68 32.59 20.34 8.37 2.14 1.63 12.13
3 Arunachal Pradesh 65,891 1.58 21.03 39.53 24.61 7.63 2.81 2.81 13.26
4 Assam 992,742 2.13 24.19 27.93 19.70 12.81 6.64 6.61 26.06
5 Bihar 2,013,671 2.27 32.45 30.76 15.72 9.59 3.61 5.59 18.79
6 Chandigarh 228,276 1.43 38.45 25.74 19.01 8.67 3.20 3.50 15.37
7 Chhattisgarh 1,238,738 1.45 27.27 33.48 19.52 10.04 3.75 4.50 18.29
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 37,655 6.54 50.75 26.29 12.25 2.83 0.68 0.67 4.17
9 Daman & Diu 47,631 4.13 62.83 16.34 9.34 3.87 1.40 2.09 7.36
10 Delhi 3,261,423 1.32 32.25 29.67 19.95 10.38 2.98 3.44 16.81
11 Goa 198,139 3.59 20.36 24.96 25.82 13.64 5.82 5.81 25.27
12 Gujarat 5,416,315 2.41 35.54 33.34 17.81 6.79 2.26 1.85 10.90
13 Haryana 1,751,901 1.76 26.24 29.52 21.28 12.89 4.39 3.92 21.20
14 Himachal Pradesh 166,043 1.76 27.44 30.44 16.55 11.79 5.04 6.97 23.80
15 Jammu & Kashmir 517,168 2.88 15.08 22.49 23.13 15.65 6.91 13.87 36.43
16 Jharkhand 1,495,642 2.84 22.13 38.50 18.26 10.61 3.38 4.28 18.27
17 Karnataka 5,315,715 7.10 29.62 30.96 18.77 8.32 2.86 2.37 13.54
18 Kerala 3,620,696 0.91 6.28 23.34 32.44 21.36 8.63 7.02 37.02
159

19 Lakshadweep 8,180 0.42 7.35 19.60 29.19 21.99 10.77 10.68 43.45
20 Madhya Pradesh 3,845,232 1.35 25.23 32.30 19.22 11.82 4.28 5.80 21.90
21 Maharashtra 10,813,928 4.85 41.69 28.41 15.36 5.99 1.89 1.80 9.68
22 Manipur 171,400 1.42 13.48 28.57 30.32 14.28 6.54 5.40 26.22
23 Meghalaya 116,102 0.84 21.56 28.00 20.93 11.97 6.66 10.03 28.67
24 Mizoram 116,203 1.67 12.80 41.10 24.78 11.32 4.56 3.78 19.65
25 Nagaland 115,054 0.98 22.19 29.84 22.40 13.30 5.83 5.47 24.60
26 Odissa 1,517,073 1.69 28.29 33.57 19.49 9.58 3.57 3.80 16.96
27 Puducherry 206,143 4.58 40.50 31.81 15.59 4.85 1.50 1.18 7.53
28 Punjab 2,094,067 1.29 25.27 29.23 21.54 12.91 5.28 4.48 22.67
29 Rajasthan 3,090,940 1.65 25.87 29.06 18.90 13.20 5.33 5.98 24.52
30 Sikkim 35,761 2.22 31.02 30.23 15.38 9.42 4.51 7.23 21.16
31 Tamil Nadu 8,929,104 4.68 36.74 31.62 17.11 6.33 2.08 1.44 9.85
32 Tripura 235,002 3.66 62.09 23.61 6.95 2.43 0.67 0.59 3.69
33 Uttar Pradesh 7,449,195 2.40 31.27 30.55 16.64 10.64 3.85 4.64 19.13
34 Uttaranchal 592,223 1.07 29.25 30.82 18.68 11.86 4.24 4.08 20.17
35 West Bengal 6,350,113 2.97 41.69 31.70 13.52 6.12 1.74 2.26 10.12
INDIA 78,865,937 3.08 32.13 30.60 18.38 9.26 3.24 3.31 15.81
Source: Census of India-2011
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Graph 7.1: Percentage of Households with No. of Dwelling rooms-India (2001-2011)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

160
Source: Census of India, 2001 and 2011

Graph 7.1: Percentage of Households with No. of Dwelling rooms-India (2001-2011)

Handbook of Urban Statistics

160

Source: Census of India, 2001 and 2011

 Table 7.3 : State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of owned dwellings - 2001 (%)
Percentage Households having number of dwelling rooms
Six
S. No. Area Name Total number of households One Three Five rooms Four rooms and
No exclusive room Two rooms Four rooms
room rooms rooms and above
above
1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 10,082 2.55 28.65 37.57 16.89 8.49 2.72 3.13 14.34
2 Andhra Pradesh 2,337,461 1.63 32.51 28.86 18.46 10.79 3.65 4.10 18.54
3 Arunachal Pradesh 11,994 0.98 20.14 36.18 23.85 10.02 4.09 4.74 18.86
4 Assam 396,935 1.26 19.42 26.05 21.16 14.24 8.45 9.42 32.11
5 Bihar 1,019,701 0.87 27.81 27.50 17.76 12.01 5.31 8.75 26.06
6 Chandigarh 85,251 1.10 35.19 22.95 18.11 11.92 4.68 6.04 22.64
7 Chhattisgarh 506,659 0.50 21.64 31.89 20.25 12.63 5.53 7.56 25.72
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 4,179 1.34 31.54 42.26 16.61 5.26 1.68 1.32 8.26
9 Daman & Diu 8,234 0.86 19.06 27.41 20.72 15.21 6.22 10.53 31.95
10 Delhi 1,580,853 0.71 26.76 28.77 22.33 11.81 3.96 5.67 21.44
11 Goa 93,648 1.50 12.86 24.26 27.04 17.73 7.90 8.72 34.35
12 Gujarat 2,749,173 0.64 33.91 33.49 18.92 7.69 2.53 2.82 13.04
13 Haryana 844,282 1.18 22.21 31.80 22.23 12.92 4.67 4.99 22.59
14 Himachal Pradesh 60,485 1.39 15.76 25.28 20.61 17.86 7.99 11.12 36.97

161
15 Jammu & Kashmir 323,508 1.93 13.16 21.81 20.93 19.27 7.63 15.26 42.17
16 Jharkhand 542,281 0.68 22.34 31.65 18.80 13.02 5.35 8.16 26.53
17 Karnataka 1,942,982 3.99 26.00 27.79 19.02 11.71 5.45 6.04 23.20
18 Kerala 1,446,667 1.06 7.67 22.33 28.20 20.97 10.19 9.58 40.74
19 Lakshadweep 2,912 1.37 4.22 13.32 24.04 27.54 15.45 14.05 57.04
20 Madhya Pradesh 1,937,989 0.99 22.48 29.36 19.62 13.10 5.57 8.89 27.55
21 Maharashtra 5,419,455 3.47 41.33 27.94 15.44 6.87 2.30 2.65 11.82
22 Manipur 91,300 1.49 11.73 25.39 30.13 15.53 7.65 8.09 31.27
23 Meghalaya 36,041 1.63 9.66 20.19 23.54 16.08 11.34 17.56 44.98
24 Mizoram 41,038 0.77 13.56 36.53 28.07 12.21 4.92 3.95 21.07
25 Nagaland 23,098 1.19 13.65 22.85 26.50 18.31 8.58 8.90 35.79
26 Odissa 581,156 1.22 26.45 30.23 18.74 11.42 5.05 6.88 23.35
27 Puducherry 81,974 1.38 46.16 29.10 12.70 5.64 1.89 3.14 10.66
28 Punjab 1,149,543 0.56 18.45 30.03 23.59 15.45 6.20 5.71 27.37
29 Rajasthan 1,715,726 0.94 21.87 28.78 20.24 14.08 6.20 7.90 28.17
30 Sikkim 2,986 0.87 13.26 19.26 20.03 17.62 10.11 18.85 46.58
31 Tamil Nadu 3,452,816 5.99 33.37 28.45 17.39 8.37 3.21 3.22 14.80
32 Tripura 86,716 0.76 55.08 26.81 11.08 3.99 1.28 1.01 6.27
33 Uttar Pradesh 4,140,288 1.57 26.88 30.80 18.37 11.27 4.63 6.48 22.38
34 Uttaranchal 229,421 0.59 23.70 28.89 21.61 14.37 5.30 5.55 25.22
35 West Bengal 2,905,310 0.64 35.48 32.22 16.35 8.51 2.74 4.07 15.31
INDIA 35,862,144 2.04 29.25 29.27 18.88 10.86 4.32 5.38 20.56
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Source: Census of India-2001

Table 7.3 : State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of owned dwellings - 2001 (%)
Percentage Households having number of dwelling rooms
Six
S. No. Area Name Total number of households One Three Five rooms Four rooms and
No exclusive room Two rooms Four rooms
room rooms rooms and above
above
1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 10,082 2.55 28.65 37.57 16.89 8.49 2.72 3.13 14.34
2 Andhra Pradesh 2,337,461 1.63 32.51 28.86 18.46 10.79 3.65 4.10 18.54
3 Arunachal Pradesh 11,994 0.98 20.14 36.18 23.85 10.02 4.09 4.74 18.86
4 Assam 396,935 1.26 19.42 26.05 21.16 14.24 8.45 9.42 32.11
5 Bihar 1,019,701 0.87 27.81 27.50 17.76 12.01 5.31 8.75 26.06
6 Chandigarh 85,251 1.10 35.19 22.95 18.11 11.92 4.68 6.04 22.64
7 Chhattisgarh 506,659 0.50 21.64 31.89 20.25 12.63 5.53 7.56 25.72
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 4,179 1.34 31.54 42.26 16.61 5.26 1.68 1.32 8.26
9 Daman & Diu 8,234 0.86 19.06 27.41 20.72 15.21 6.22 10.53 31.95
10 Delhi 1,580,853 0.71 26.76 28.77 22.33 11.81 3.96 5.67 21.44
11 Goa 93,648 1.50 12.86 24.26 27.04 17.73 7.90 8.72 34.35
12 Gujarat 2,749,173 0.64 33.91 33.49 18.92 7.69 2.53 2.82 13.04
13 Haryana 844,282 1.18 22.21 31.80 22.23 12.92 4.67 4.99 22.59
14 Himachal Pradesh 60,485 1.39 15.76 25.28 20.61 17.86 7.99 11.12 36.97
161

15 Jammu & Kashmir 323,508 1.93 13.16 21.81 20.93 19.27 7.63 15.26 42.17
16 Jharkhand 542,281 0.68 22.34 31.65 18.80 13.02 5.35 8.16 26.53
17 Karnataka 1,942,982 3.99 26.00 27.79 19.02 11.71 5.45 6.04 23.20
18 Kerala 1,446,667 1.06 7.67 22.33 28.20 20.97 10.19 9.58 40.74
19 Lakshadweep 2,912 1.37 4.22 13.32 24.04 27.54 15.45 14.05 57.04
20 Madhya Pradesh 1,937,989 0.99 22.48 29.36 19.62 13.10 5.57 8.89 27.55
21 Maharashtra 5,419,455 3.47 41.33 27.94 15.44 6.87 2.30 2.65 11.82
22 Manipur 91,300 1.49 11.73 25.39 30.13 15.53 7.65 8.09 31.27
23 Meghalaya 36,041 1.63 9.66 20.19 23.54 16.08 11.34 17.56 44.98
24 Mizoram 41,038 0.77 13.56 36.53 28.07 12.21 4.92 3.95 21.07
25 Nagaland 23,098 1.19 13.65 22.85 26.50 18.31 8.58 8.90 35.79
26 Odissa 581,156 1.22 26.45 30.23 18.74 11.42 5.05 6.88 23.35
27 Puducherry 81,974 1.38 46.16 29.10 12.70 5.64 1.89 3.14 10.66
28 Punjab 1,149,543 0.56 18.45 30.03 23.59 15.45 6.20 5.71 27.37
29 Rajasthan 1,715,726 0.94 21.87 28.78 20.24 14.08 6.20 7.90 28.17
30 Sikkim 2,986 0.87 13.26 19.26 20.03 17.62 10.11 18.85 46.58
31 Tamil Nadu 3,452,816 5.99 33.37 28.45 17.39 8.37 3.21 3.22 14.80
32 Tripura 86,716 0.76 55.08 26.81 11.08 3.99 1.28 1.01 6.27
33 Uttar Pradesh 4,140,288 1.57 26.88 30.80 18.37 11.27 4.63 6.48 22.38
34 Uttaranchal 229,421 0.59 23.70 28.89 21.61 14.37 5.30 5.55 25.22
35 West Bengal 2,905,310 0.64 35.48 32.22 16.35 8.51 2.74 4.07 15.31
INDIA 35,862,144 2.04 29.25 29.27 18.88 10.86 4.32 5.38 20.56
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Source: Census of India-2001

 Table 7.4: State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of owned dwellings - 2011 (%)

Households having number of dwelling rooms

Total number of
S. No. State/UTs No exclusive Two Three Four Five Six rooms and Four rooms and
households One room
room rooms rooms rooms rooms above above
1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 15,497 1.37 22.00 35.00 23.79 11.11 3.57 3.16 17.84
2 Andhra Pradesh 3,639,895 1.97 28.42 32.16 21.30 10.49 3.07 2.58 16.14
3 Arunachal Pradesh 19,305 0.95 12.68 28.62 29.06 14.50 6.73 7.45 28.69
4 Assam 635,544 1.86 16.57 25.73 21.07 16.06 9.21 9.52 34.78
Handbook of Urban Statistics

5 Bihar 1,671,456 2.19 31.74 29.19 15.71 10.61 4.12 6.44 21.17
6 Chandigarh 110,480 1.20 28.21 25.32 20.18 13.54 5.09 6.46 25.09
7 Chhattisgarh 867,179 1.26 24.32 32.38 19.29 11.87 4.81 6.08 22.76
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 13,089 1.38 23.97 39.40 24.79 7.00 1.75 1.71 10.46
9 Daman & Diu 13,743 1.61 18.52 33.02 23.61 11.85 4.61 6.77 23.24
10 Delhi 2,214,621 0.91 20.56 31.10 24.70 13.73 4.09 4.90 22.72
11 Goa 145,304 2.18 11.09 24.11 29.95 17.43 7.61 7.61 32.65
12 Gujarat 3,927,857 1.60 27.29 35.97 21.09 8.61 2.98 2.46 14.05
13 Haryana 1,318,409 1.30 18.20 30.50 24.19 15.44 5.42 4.96 25.81
14 Himachal Pradesh 82,152 0.91 11.25 21.90 22.30 20.72 9.44 13.49 43.64
15 Jammu & Kashmir 471,821 2.70 11.85 21.85 24.32 16.77 7.46 15.04 39.27
16 Jharkhand 944,950 2.57 19.46 33.74 19.28 13.80 4.77 6.38 24.95

162
17 Karnataka 2,713,891 6.18 24.18 28.33 21.20 11.65 4.49 3.98 20.12
18 Kerala 3,196,968 0.85 5.18 22.16 32.75 22.30 9.17 7.59 39.06
19 Lakshadweep 6,727 0.39 4.30 16.57 29.09 24.71 12.37 12.58 49.65
20 Madhya Pradesh 2,862,789 1.18 21.09 31.08 19.84 13.96 5.34 7.50 26.80
21 Maharashtra 7,545,680 3.71 36.10 29.94 17.78 7.60 2.51 2.36 12.47
22 Manipur 152,379 1.16 10.95 28.15 31.79 15.08 7.04 5.83 27.95
23 Meghalaya 51,289 0.43 8.03 19.18 23.13 17.24 11.80 20.20 49.24
24 Mizoram 55,708 1.24 7.53 32.21 28.92 15.81 7.38 6.91 30.10
25 Nagaland 46,645 0.62 7.79 20.56 27.02 21.57 11.12 11.31 44.01
26 Odissa 909,644 1.60 25.02 31.52 19.62 11.88 4.85 5.52 22.25
27 Puducherry 118,093 4.08 35.42 32.07 17.74 6.62 2.19 1.89 10.69
28 Punjab 1,639,740 1.06 17.27 29.71 24.41 15.55 6.48 5.52 27.55
29 Rajasthan 2,499,269 1.48 20.82 28.40 20.54 15.30 6.33 7.14 28.76
30 Sikkim 11,760 0.77 8.38 18.44 20.63 20.05 11.72 20.02 51.79
31 Tamil Nadu 5,130,112 4.52 31.71 31.21 19.15 8.26 2.96 2.20 13.42
32 Tripura 192,606 3.01 60.27 25.31 7.40 2.58 0.77 0.66 4.01
33 Uttar Pradesh 6,123,592 2.31 27.56 30.30 17.86 12.08 4.46 5.42 21.96
34 Uttaranchal 395,519 0.93 21.34 27.52 22.24 16.18 5.95 5.84 27.97
35 West Bengal 4,798,614 2.52 35.61 33.80 15.53 7.56 2.19 2.79 12.54
INDIA 54,542,327 2.50 26.46 30.43 20.34 11.53 4.25 4.49 20.27
Source: Census of India-2011

Table 7.4: State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of owned dwellings - 2011 (%)

Households having number of dwelling rooms

Total number of
S. No. State/UTs No exclusive Two Three Four Five Six rooms and Four rooms and
households One room
room rooms rooms rooms rooms above above
1 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 15,497 1.37 22.00 35.00 23.79 11.11 3.57 3.16 17.84
2 Andhra Pradesh 3,639,895 1.97 28.42 32.16 21.30 10.49 3.07 2.58 16.14
3 Arunachal Pradesh 19,305 0.95 12.68 28.62 29.06 14.50 6.73 7.45 28.69
4 Assam 635,544 1.86 16.57 25.73 21.07 16.06 9.21 9.52 34.78
Handbook of Urban Statistics

5 Bihar 1,671,456 2.19 31.74 29.19 15.71 10.61 4.12 6.44 21.17
6 Chandigarh 110,480 1.20 28.21 25.32 20.18 13.54 5.09 6.46 25.09
7 Chhattisgarh 867,179 1.26 24.32 32.38 19.29 11.87 4.81 6.08 22.76
8 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 13,089 1.38 23.97 39.40 24.79 7.00 1.75 1.71 10.46
9 Daman & Diu 13,743 1.61 18.52 33.02 23.61 11.85 4.61 6.77 23.24
10 Delhi 2,214,621 0.91 20.56 31.10 24.70 13.73 4.09 4.90 22.72
11 Goa 145,304 2.18 11.09 24.11 29.95 17.43 7.61 7.61 32.65
12 Gujarat 3,927,857 1.60 27.29 35.97 21.09 8.61 2.98 2.46 14.05
13 Haryana 1,318,409 1.30 18.20 30.50 24.19 15.44 5.42 4.96 25.81
14 Himachal Pradesh 82,152 0.91 11.25 21.90 22.30 20.72 9.44 13.49 43.64
15 Jammu & Kashmir 471,821 2.70 11.85 21.85 24.32 16.77 7.46 15.04 39.27
16 Jharkhand 944,950 2.57 19.46 33.74 19.28 13.80 4.77 6.38 24.95
162

17 Karnataka 2,713,891 6.18 24.18 28.33 21.20 11.65 4.49 3.98 20.12
18 Kerala 3,196,968 0.85 5.18 22.16 32.75 22.30 9.17 7.59 39.06
19 Lakshadweep 6,727 0.39 4.30 16.57 29.09 24.71 12.37 12.58 49.65
20 Madhya Pradesh 2,862,789 1.18 21.09 31.08 19.84 13.96 5.34 7.50 26.80
21 Maharashtra 7,545,680 3.71 36.10 29.94 17.78 7.60 2.51 2.36 12.47
22 Manipur 152,379 1.16 10.95 28.15 31.79 15.08 7.04 5.83 27.95
23 Meghalaya 51,289 0.43 8.03 19.18 23.13 17.24 11.80 20.20 49.24
24 Mizoram 55,708 1.24 7.53 32.21 28.92 15.81 7.38 6.91 30.10
25 Nagaland 46,645 0.62 7.79 20.56 27.02 21.57 11.12 11.31 44.01
26 Odissa 909,644 1.60 25.02 31.52 19.62 11.88 4.85 5.52 22.25
27 Puducherry 118,093 4.08 35.42 32.07 17.74 6.62 2.19 1.89 10.69
28 Punjab 1,639,740 1.06 17.27 29.71 24.41 15.55 6.48 5.52 27.55
29 Rajasthan 2,499,269 1.48 20.82 28.40 20.54 15.30 6.33 7.14 28.76
30 Sikkim 11,760 0.77 8.38 18.44 20.63 20.05 11.72 20.02 51.79
31 Tamil Nadu 5,130,112 4.52 31.71 31.21 19.15 8.26 2.96 2.20 13.42
32 Tripura 192,606 3.01 60.27 25.31 7.40 2.58 0.77 0.66 4.01
33 Uttar Pradesh 6,123,592 2.31 27.56 30.30 17.86 12.08 4.46 5.42 21.96
34 Uttaranchal 395,519 0.93 21.34 27.52 22.24 16.18 5.95 5.84 27.97
35 West Bengal 4,798,614 2.52 35.61 33.80 15.53 7.56 2.19 2.79 12.54
INDIA 54,542,327 2.50 26.46 30.43 20.34 11.53 4.25 4.49 20.27
Source: Census of India-2011
 Graph 7.2: Percentage of Households Living in Houses by No. of Rooms of Owned Dwellings-India (2001-11)

163
Source: Census of India, 2001 and 2011
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 7.2: Percentage of Households Living in Houses by No. of Rooms of Owned Dwellings-India (2001-11)

163

Source: Census of India, 2001 and 2011

Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Table 7.5: State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of rented dwellings -2001 (%)

    2001 2001
Percentage of households having
State
Area Name Total number of house- Four
Code Six rooms
No exclu- Two Three Four Five rooms
Handbook of Urban Statistics

holds One room and

sive room rooms rooms rooms rooms and
above
above
01 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 9,796 2.27 43.14 40.67 10.69 2.34 0.38 0.52 3.24
02 Andhra Pradesh 1,713,494 1.41 38.89 31.07 19.50 6.71 1.47 0.94 9.12
03 Arunachal Pradesh 15,150 2.03 43.72 37.94 11.33 3.19 0.90 0.88 4.98
04 Assam 261,790 1.18 46.75 29.29 13.86 5.21 1.77 1.93 8.91
05 Bihar 246,817 0.85 36.94 36.70 17.44 4.94 1.32 1.81 8.07
06 Chandigarh 72,895 0.59 29.68 34.68 26.57 5.76 1.54 1.18 8.47
07 Chhattisgarh 225,490 0.48 31.03 39.96 20.98 5.35 1.16 1.04 7.56

164
08 Daman & Diu 6840 4.24 52.13 30.94 10.20 2.03 0.28 0.18 2.49
09 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 3,456 0.46 45.11 33.80 14.58 4.08 0.98 0.98 6.05
10 NCT of Delhi 39,444 4.75 43.02 29.86 16.10 4.68 0.79 0.81 6.27
11 Goa 856,636 1.43 61.94 26.25 8.10 1.66 0.37 0.26 2.29
12 Gujarat 190,965 1.52 48.62 29.82 12.69 4.36 1.22 1.77 7.35
13 Haryana 73,276 1.18 47.00 36.68 10.55 2.88 0.69 1.02 4.59
14 Himachal Pradesh 52,923 2.56 53.27 26.51 9.48 4.53 1.23 2.41 8.17
15 Jammu & Kashmir 362,534 0.59 30.28 45.32 16.63 4.91 1.08 1.19 7.18
16 Jharkhand 1,493,272 5.69 35.47 32.29 16.24 6.54 2.23 1.54 10.31
17 Karnataka 168,713 1.09 17.12 31.17 26.58 14.12 5.89 4.03 24.03
18 Kerala 917 0.87 23.45 43.29 24.32 5.34 1.74 0.98 8.07
19 Madhya Pradesh 691,171 0.85 35.88 37.31 18.21 5.11 1.27 1.37 7.75
20 Maharashtra 2,296,107 4.36 57.62 25.37 9.43 2.25 0.46 0.51 3.21
21 Manipur 8,675 2.52 42.06 27.97 15.11 6.19 2.02 4.13 12.33
22 Meghalaya 48,664 3.06 33.07 34.56 17.68 7.43 2.34 1.86 11.63
23 Mizoram 37,908 1.57 29.41 45.83 15.71 5.20 1.33 0.95 7.48

Table 7.5: State wise Households living in houses by number of rooms of rented dwellings -2001 (%)

    2001 2001
Percentage of households having
State
Area Name Total number of house- Four
Code Six rooms
No exclu- Two Three Four Five rooms
Handbook of Urban Statistics

holds One room and

sive room rooms rooms rooms rooms and
above
above
01 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 9,796 2.27 43.14 40.67 10.69 2.34 0.38 0.52 3.24
02 Andhra Pradesh 1,713,494 1.41 38.89 31.07 19.50 6.71 1.47 0.94 9.12
03 Arunachal Pradesh 15,150 2.03 43.72 37.94 11.33 3.19 0.90 0.88 4.98
04 Assam 261,790 1.18 46.75 29.29 13.86 5.21 1.77 1.93 8.91
05 Bihar 246,817 0.85 36.94 36.70 17.44 4.94 1.32 1.81 8.07
06 Chandigarh 72,895 0.59 29.68 34.68 26.57 5.76 1.54 1.18 8.47
07 Chhattisgarh 225,490 0.48 31.03 39.96 20.98 5.35 1.16 1.04 7.56
164

08 Daman & Diu 6840 4.24 52.13 30.94 10.20 2.03 0.28 0.18 2.49
09 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 3,456 0.46 45.11 33.80 14.58 4.08 0.98 0.98 6.05
10 NCT of Delhi 39,444 4.75 43.02 29.86 16.10 4.68 0.79 0.81 6.27
11 Goa 856,636 1.43 61.94 26.25 8.10 1.66 0.37 0.26 2.29
12 Gujarat 190,965 1.52 48.62 29.82 12.69 4.36 1.22 1.77 7.35
13 Haryana 73,276 1.18 47.00 36.68 10.55 2.88 0.69 1.02 4.59
14 Himachal Pradesh 52,923 2.56 53.27 26.51 9.48 4.53 1.23 2.41 8.17
15 Jammu & Kashmir 362,534 0.59 30.28 45.32 16.63 4.91 1.08 1.19 7.18
16 Jharkhand 1,493,272 5.69 35.47 32.29 16.24 6.54 2.23 1.54 10.31
17 Karnataka 168,713 1.09 17.12 31.17 26.58 14.12 5.89 4.03 24.03
18 Kerala 917 0.87 23.45 43.29 24.32 5.34 1.74 0.98 8.07
19 Madhya Pradesh 691,171 0.85 35.88 37.31 18.21 5.11 1.27 1.37 7.75
20 Maharashtra 2,296,107 4.36 57.62 25.37 9.43 2.25 0.46 0.51 3.21
21 Manipur 8,675 2.52 42.06 27.97 15.11 6.19 2.02 4.13 12.33
22 Meghalaya 48,664 3.06 33.07 34.56 17.68 7.43 2.34 1.86 11.63
23 Mizoram 37,908 1.57 29.41 45.83 15.71 5.20 1.33 0.95 7.48
 24 Nagaland 39,587 1.90 39.58 35.13 14.64 5.72 1.53 1.51 8.75
25 Odisha 621,962 0.89 57.99 25.80 10.23 3.39 0.78 0.93 5.10
26 Puducherry 360,757 0.99 31.59 38.71 18.47 6.30 1.88 2.05 10.23
27 Punjab 47,453 1.33 52.35 31.49 10.35 2.68 0.65 1.15 4.48
28 Rajasthan 279,669 0.86 53.66 27.67 11.42 3.87 1.18 1.34 6.38
29 Sikkim 399,766 1.00 49.14 31.96 11.28 3.88 1.11 1.63 6.62
30 Tamil Nadu 7,808 0.88 46.06 35.71 11.57 3.86 0.88 1.05 5.79
31 Telangana 2,266,215 5.56 42.88 30.69 14.38 4.18 1.11 1.19 6.48
32 Tripura 32,461 2.04 76.84 15.58 4.16 1.04 0.22 0.12 1.38
33 Uttar Pradesh 849,799 1.48 46.31 34.86 10.86 3.63 0.99 1.88 6.49
34 Uttarakhand 120,278 0.60 43.24 39.48 11.82 3.50 0.74 0.61 4.85
35 West Bengal 1,414,664 1.14 65.00 23.79 6.85 1.83 0.38 1.02 3.23
INDIA 15,317,352 2.75 46.93 30.40 13.40 4.24 1.13 1.15 6.52
Source: Census of India-2001

165
Handbook of Urban Statistics

24 Nagaland 39,587 1.90 39.58 35.13 14.64 5.72 1.53 1.51 8.75
25 Odisha 621,962 0.89 57.99 25.80 10.23 3.39 0.78 0.93 5.10
26 Puducherry 360,757 0.99 31.59 38.71 18.47 6.30 1.88 2.05 10.23
27 Punjab 47,453 1.33 52.35 31.49 10.35 2.68 0.65 1.15 4.48
28 Rajasthan 279,669 0.86 53.66 27.67 11.42 3.87 1.18 1.34 6.38
29 Sikkim 399,766 1.00 49.14 31.96 11.28 3.88 1.11 1.63 6.62
30 Tamil Nadu 7,808 0.88 46.06 35.71 11.57 3.86 0.88 1.05 5.79
31 Telangana 2,266,215 5.56 42.88 30.69 14.38 4.18 1.11 1.19 6.48
32 Tripura 32,461 2.04 76.84 15.58 4.16 1.04 0.22 0.12 1.38
33 Uttar Pradesh 849,799 1.48 46.31 34.86 10.86 3.63 0.99 1.88 6.49
34 Uttarakhand 120,278 0.60 43.24 39.48 11.82 3.50 0.74 0.61 4.85
35 West Bengal 1,414,664 1.14 65.00 23.79 6.85 1.83 0.38 1.02 3.23
INDIA 15,317,352 2.75 46.93 30.40 13.40 4.24 1.13 1.15 6.52
Source: Census of India-2001
165
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Table 7.6: State wise Households living by number of rooms of rented dwellings-2011 (%)

Area Name Percentage of households having

Total number of house-
S.No. No exclusive Three Four Five Six rooms Four rooms
holds One room Two rooms
room rooms rooms rooms and above and above
01 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 17,363 1.90 29.46 47.99 16.78 2.97 0.56 0.34 3.87
Handbook of Urban Statistics

02 Andhra Pradesh 3,004,702 2.36 37.09 33.67 19.46 5.87 1.05 0.50 7.42
03 Arunachal Pradesh 37,186 1.84 26.60 44.61 20.93 4.30 0.97 0.76 6.02
04 Assam 306,723 2.54 39.88 31.63 16.19 6.59 1.92 1.25 9.76
05 Bihar 274,983 2.18 33.78 40.19 16.44 4.86 1.15 1.39 7.41
06 Chandigarh UT 105,357 1.50 46.27 27.05 18.68 4.32 1.50 0.68 6.50
07 Chhattisgarh 293,600 1.76 34.20 36.82 19.89 5.48 1.17 0.67 7.32
08 Daman & Diu 23698 8.72 65.77 19.44 5.33 0.54 0.08 0.11 0.74
09 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 32,330 5.00 81.64 9.16 3.42 0.56 0.07 0.14 0.78
10 NCT of Delhi 44,791 7.21 44.63 28.32 15.23 3.15 0.78 0.68 4.61

166
11 Goa 1,315,157 4.37 57.61 26.49 9.09 1.92 0.32 0.19 2.43
12 Gujarat 380,254 2.76 51.46 26.48 12.01 5.26 1.30 0.74 7.29
13 Haryana 75,029 2.28 42.47 40.12 11.01 2.89 0.70 0.53 4.11
14 Himachal Pradesh 33,531 3.91 47.02 30.52 11.48 4.29 1.12 1.67 7.08
15 Jammu & Kashmir 408,108 3.37 27.98 46.41 15.77 4.98 0.88 0.62 6.47
16 Jharkhand 2,447,718 7.77 35.32 34.06 16.27 4.80 1.13 0.65 6.58
17 Karnataka 362,153 1.11 13.36 32.93 30.93 14.50 4.57 2.59 21.67
18 Kerala 1,289 0.39 22.27 35.07 31.19 8.46 1.40 1.24 11.09
19 Madhya Pradesh 811,821 1.69 38.31 36.10 16.77 5.28 1.10 0.76 7.13
20 Maharashtra 2,940,731 7.29 54.99 25.16 9.49 2.19 0.42 0.46 3.07
21 Manipur 15,648 2.93 33.74 32.81 18.87 7.34 2.50 1.82 11.66
22 Meghalaya 58,765 1.19 33.45 35.31 18.52 7.38 2.37 1.79 11.53
23 Mizoram 57,059 1.93 17.65 49.79 20.79 7.04 1.92 0.87 9.83
24 Nagaland 63,227 1.21 32.82 36.62 18.46 7.40 2.08 1.41 10.89
25 Odisha 929,112 1.88 56.83 27.08 9.92 3.37 0.62 0.31 4.30
26 Puducherry 476,402 1.75 30.67 37.25 20.67 6.70 1.77 1.20 9.67

Table 7.6: State wise Households living by number of rooms of rented dwellings-2011 (%)

Area Name Percentage of households having

Total number of house-
S.No. No exclusive Three Four Five Six rooms Four rooms
holds One room Two rooms
room rooms rooms rooms and above and above
01 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 17,363 1.90 29.46 47.99 16.78 2.97 0.56 0.34 3.87
Handbook of Urban Statistics

02 Andhra Pradesh 3,004,702 2.36 37.09 33.67 19.46 5.87 1.05 0.50 7.42
03 Arunachal Pradesh 37,186 1.84 26.60 44.61 20.93 4.30 0.97 0.76 6.02
04 Assam 306,723 2.54 39.88 31.63 16.19 6.59 1.92 1.25 9.76
05 Bihar 274,983 2.18 33.78 40.19 16.44 4.86 1.15 1.39 7.41
06 Chandigarh UT 105,357 1.50 46.27 27.05 18.68 4.32 1.50 0.68 6.50
07 Chhattisgarh 293,600 1.76 34.20 36.82 19.89 5.48 1.17 0.67 7.32
08 Daman & Diu 23698 8.72 65.77 19.44 5.33 0.54 0.08 0.11 0.74
09 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 32,330 5.00 81.64 9.16 3.42 0.56 0.07 0.14 0.78
10 NCT of Delhi 44,791 7.21 44.63 28.32 15.23 3.15 0.78 0.68 4.61
166

11 Goa 1,315,157 4.37 57.61 26.49 9.09 1.92 0.32 0.19 2.43
12 Gujarat 380,254 2.76 51.46 26.48 12.01 5.26 1.30 0.74 7.29
13 Haryana 75,029 2.28 42.47 40.12 11.01 2.89 0.70 0.53 4.11
14 Himachal Pradesh 33,531 3.91 47.02 30.52 11.48 4.29 1.12 1.67 7.08
15 Jammu & Kashmir 408,108 3.37 27.98 46.41 15.77 4.98 0.88 0.62 6.47
16 Jharkhand 2,447,718 7.77 35.32 34.06 16.27 4.80 1.13 0.65 6.58
17 Karnataka 362,153 1.11 13.36 32.93 30.93 14.50 4.57 2.59 21.67
18 Kerala 1,289 0.39 22.27 35.07 31.19 8.46 1.40 1.24 11.09
19 Madhya Pradesh 811,821 1.69 38.31 36.10 16.77 5.28 1.10 0.76 7.13
20 Maharashtra 2,940,731 7.29 54.99 25.16 9.49 2.19 0.42 0.46 3.07
21 Manipur 15,648 2.93 33.74 32.81 18.87 7.34 2.50 1.82 11.66
22 Meghalaya 58,765 1.19 33.45 35.31 18.52 7.38 2.37 1.79 11.53
23 Mizoram 57,059 1.93 17.65 49.79 20.79 7.04 1.92 0.87 9.83
24 Nagaland 63,227 1.21 32.82 36.62 18.46 7.40 2.08 1.41 10.89
25 Odisha 929,112 1.88 56.83 27.08 9.92 3.37 0.62 0.31 4.30
26 Puducherry 476,402 1.75 30.67 37.25 20.67 6.70 1.77 1.20 9.67
 27 Punjab 80,274 4.67 46.40 32.51 13.14 2.53 0.54 0.21 3.28
28 Rajasthan 390,177 1.85 55.40 27.18 10.78 3.31 0.84 0.65 4.79
29 Sikkim 523,159 2.08 47.85 31.88 11.87 4.25 1.06 1.01 6.32
30 Tamil Nadu 22,752 3.00 42.44 36.33 12.30 4.10 0.94 0.89 5.93
31 Telangana 3,590,179 4.72 43.44 32.51 14.36 3.71 0.87 0.40 4.98
32 Tripura 35,626 6.36 70.41 15.72 5.15 1.86 0.25 0.25 2.36
33 Uttar Pradesh 1,114,832 2.44 49.42 31.58 10.72 3.88 0.99 0.96 5.84
34 Uttarakhand 157,724 1.28 46.43 37.67 10.65 2.86 0.70 0.41 3.97
35 West Bengal 1,292,263 4.24 60.90 25.24 7.07 1.61 0.35 0.59 2.55
INDIA 21,723,723 4.20 44.89 31.26 13.97 4.14 0.93 0.61 5.68
Source: Census of India-2011

167
Handbook of Urban Statistics

27 Punjab 80,274 4.67 46.40 32.51 13.14 2.53 0.54 0.21 3.28
28 Rajasthan 390,177 1.85 55.40 27.18 10.78 3.31 0.84 0.65 4.79
29 Sikkim 523,159 2.08 47.85 31.88 11.87 4.25 1.06 1.01 6.32
30 Tamil Nadu 22,752 3.00 42.44 36.33 12.30 4.10 0.94 0.89 5.93
31 Telangana 3,590,179 4.72 43.44 32.51 14.36 3.71 0.87 0.40 4.98
32 Tripura 35,626 6.36 70.41 15.72 5.15 1.86 0.25 0.25 2.36
33 Uttar Pradesh 1,114,832 2.44 49.42 31.58 10.72 3.88 0.99 0.96 5.84
34 Uttarakhand 157,724 1.28 46.43 37.67 10.65 2.86 0.70 0.41 3.97
35 West Bengal 1,292,263 4.24 60.90 25.24 7.07 1.61 0.35 0.59 2.55
INDIA 21,723,723 4.20 44.89 31.26 13.97 4.14 0.93 0.61 5.68
Source: Census of India-2011
167
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Graph 7.3: Percentage of Households Living in Houses by No. of Rooms of Rented Dwellings-India (2001-11)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

168
Source: Census of India, 2001 and 2011

Graph 7.3: Percentage of Households Living in Houses by No. of Rooms of Rented Dwellings-India (2001-11)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

168

Source: Census of India, 2001 and 2011

 Table 7.7: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by ‘Ownership/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units’ - 2001
 
State/Uts Total number of No. of Households by Ownership/Tenure Status of dwelling rooms-2001
households Owned Rented Any others
    Numbers Percentage Numbers Percentage Numbers Percentage

Andaman & Nicobar Islands 23,409 10,082 43.07 9,796 41.85 3,531 15.08
Andhra Pradesh 4,173,639 2,337,461 56.01 1,713,494 41.06 122,684 2.94
Arunachal Pradesh 48,114 11,994 24.93 15,150 31.49 20,970 43.58
Assam 715,185 396,935 55.50 261,790 36.60 56,460 7.89
Bihar 1,322,583 1,019,701 77.10 246,817 18.66 56,065 4.24
Chandigarh 180,576 85,251 47.21 72,895 40.37 22,430 12.42
Chhatisgarh 789,440 506,659 64.18 225,490 28.56 57,291 7.26
Dadra & nagar Haveli 11,190 4,179 37.35 6,840 61.13 171 1.53

169
Daman & Diu 12,251 8,234 67.21 3,456 28.21 561 4.58
Goa 138,461 93,648 67.63 39,444 28.49 5,369 3.88
Gujarat 3,758,028 2,749,173 73.15 856,636 22.79 152,219 4.05
Haryana 1,075,179 844,282 78.52 190,965 17.76 39,932 3.71
Himachal Pradesh 143,113 60,485 42.26 73,276 51.20 9,352 6.53
Jammu & Kashmir 390,411 323,508 82.86 52,923 13.56 13,980 3.58
Jharkhand 1,060,178 542,281 51.15 362,534 34.20 155,363 14.65
Karnataka 3,556,960 1,942,982 54.62 1,493,272 41.98 120,706 3.39
Kerala 1,652,656 1,446,667 87.54 168,713 10.21 37,276 2.26
Lakshadweep 3,889 2,912 74.88 917 23.58 60 1.54
Madhya Pradesh 2,794,858 1,937,989 69.34 691,171 24.73 165,698 5.93
Maharashtra 8,069,526 5,419,455 67.16 2,296,107 28.45 353,964 4.39
Manipur 101,302 91,300 90.13 8,675 8.56 1,327 1.31
Meghalaya 90,568 36,041 39.79 48,664 53.73 5,863 6.47
Mizoram 81,604 41,038 50.29 37,908 46.45 2,658 3.26
Nagaland 66,716 23,098 34.62 39,587 59.34 4,031 6.04
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 7.7: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by ‘Ownership/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units’ - 2001
 
State/Uts Total number of No. of Households by Ownership/Tenure Status of dwelling rooms-2001
households Owned Rented Any others
    Numbers Percentage Numbers Percentage Numbers Percentage

Andaman & Nicobar Islands 23,409 10,082 43.07 9,796 41.85 3,531 15.08
Andhra Pradesh 4,173,639 2,337,461 56.01 1,713,494 41.06 122,684 2.94
Arunachal Pradesh 48,114 11,994 24.93 15,150 31.49 20,970 43.58
Assam 715,185 396,935 55.50 261,790 36.60 56,460 7.89
Bihar 1,322,583 1,019,701 77.10 246,817 18.66 56,065 4.24
Chandigarh 180,576 85,251 47.21 72,895 40.37 22,430 12.42
Chhatisgarh 789,440 506,659 64.18 225,490 28.56 57,291 7.26
Dadra & nagar Haveli 11,190 4,179 37.35 6,840 61.13 171 1.53
169

Daman & Diu 12,251 8,234 67.21 3,456 28.21 561 4.58
Goa 138,461 93,648 67.63 39,444 28.49 5,369 3.88
Gujarat 3,758,028 2,749,173 73.15 856,636 22.79 152,219 4.05
Haryana 1,075,179 844,282 78.52 190,965 17.76 39,932 3.71
Himachal Pradesh 143,113 60,485 42.26 73,276 51.20 9,352 6.53
Jammu & Kashmir 390,411 323,508 82.86 52,923 13.56 13,980 3.58
Jharkhand 1,060,178 542,281 51.15 362,534 34.20 155,363 14.65
Karnataka 3,556,960 1,942,982 54.62 1,493,272 41.98 120,706 3.39
Kerala 1,652,656 1,446,667 87.54 168,713 10.21 37,276 2.26
Lakshadweep 3,889 2,912 74.88 917 23.58 60 1.54
Madhya Pradesh 2,794,858 1,937,989 69.34 691,171 24.73 165,698 5.93
Maharashtra 8,069,526 5,419,455 67.16 2,296,107 28.45 353,964 4.39
Manipur 101,302 91,300 90.13 8,675 8.56 1,327 1.31
Meghalaya 90,568 36,041 39.79 48,664 53.73 5,863 6.47
Mizoram 81,604 41,038 50.29 37,908 46.45 2,658 3.26
Nagaland 66,716 23,098 34.62 39,587 59.34 4,031 6.04
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 NCT Of Delhi 2,384,621 1,580,853 66.29 621,962 26.08 181,806 7.62
Odisha 1,087,248 581,156 53.45 360,757 33.18 145,335 13.37
Puducherry 136,456 81,974 60.07 47,453 34.78 7,029 5.15
Punjab 1,489,694 1,149,543 77.17 279,669 18.77 60,482 4.06
Rajasthan 2,185,591 1,715,726 78.50 399,766 18.29 70,099 3.21
Sikkim 13,015 2,986 22.94 7,808 59.99 2,221 17.06
Tamil Nadu 5,898,836 3,452,816 58.53 2,266,215 38.42 179,805 3.05
Tripura 122,343 86,716 70.88 32,461 26.53 3,166 2.59
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Uttar Pradesh 5,170,527 4,140,288 80.07 849,799 16.44 180,440 3.49

Uttarakhand 390,164 229,421 58.80 120,278 30.83 40,465 10.37
West Bengal 4,554,045 2,905,310 63.80 1,414,664 31.06 234,071 5.14
India 53,692,376 35,862,144 66.79 15,317,352 28.53 2,512,880 4.68

Source: Census of India-2001

170
NCT Of Delhi 2,384,621 1,580,853 66.29 621,962 26.08 181,806 7.62
Odisha 1,087,248 581,156 53.45 360,757 33.18 145,335 13.37
Puducherry 136,456 81,974 60.07 47,453 34.78 7,029 5.15
Punjab 1,489,694 1,149,543 77.17 279,669 18.77 60,482 4.06
Rajasthan 2,185,591 1,715,726 78.50 399,766 18.29 70,099 3.21
Sikkim 13,015 2,986 22.94 7,808 59.99 2,221 17.06
Tamil Nadu 5,898,836 3,452,816 58.53 2,266,215 38.42 179,805 3.05
Tripura 122,343 86,716 70.88 32,461 26.53 3,166 2.59
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Uttar Pradesh 5,170,527 4,140,288 80.07 849,799 16.44 180,440 3.49

Uttarakhand 390,164 229,421 58.80 120,278 30.83 40,465 10.37
West Bengal 4,554,045 2,905,310 63.80 1,414,664 31.06 234,071 5.14
India 53,692,376 35,862,144 66.79 15,317,352 28.53 2,512,880 4.68

Source: Census of India-2001

170
 Graph 7.4: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by ‘Ownership/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units’ in India - 2001 (%)

171
Source: Census of India, 2001.
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 7.4: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by ‘Ownership/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units’ in India - 2001 (%)

171

Source: Census of India, 2001.

Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Table 7.8: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by ‘Ownership/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units’ - 2011

No. of Households by Ownership/Tenure Status of dwelling rooms

Total number of
State/UTs
households Owned Rented Any others

Numbers Percentage Numbers Percentage Numbers Percentage

Andaman & Nicobar Islands 34,346 15,497 45.12 17,363 50.55 1,486 4.33
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Andhra Pradesh 6,778,225 3,639,895 53.70 3,004,702 44.33 133,628 1.97

Arunachal Pradesh 65,891 19,305 29.30 37,186 56.44 9,400 14.27
Assam 992,742 635,544 64.02 306,723 30.90 50,475 5.08
Bihar 2,013,671 1,671,456 83.01 274,983 13.66 67,232 3.34
Chandigarh 228,276 110,480 48.40 105,357 46.15 12,439 5.45
Chhattisgarh 1,238,738 867,179 70.01 293,600 23.70 77,959 6.29
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 37,655 13,089 34.76 23,698 62.93 868 2.31
Daman & Diu 47,631 13,743 28.85 32,330 67.88 1,558 3.27
Goa 198,139 145,304 73.33 44,791 22.61 8,044 4.06

172
Gujarat 5,416,315 3,927,857 72.52 1,315,157 24.28 173,301 3.20
Haryana 1,751,901 1,318,409 75.26 380,254 21.71 53,238 3.04
Himachal Pradesh 166,043 82,152 49.48 75,029 45.19 8,862 5.34
Jammu & Kashmir 517,168 471,821 91.23 33,531 6.48 11,816 2.28
Jharkhand 1,495,642 944,950 63.18 408,108 27.29 142,584 9.53
Karnataka 5,315,715 2,713,891 51.05 2,447,718 46.05 154,106 2.90
Kerala 3,620,696 3,196,968 88.30 362,153 10.00 61,575 1.70
Lakshadweep 8,180 6,727 82.24 1,289 15.76 164 2.00
Madhya Pradesh 3,845,232 2,862,789 74.45 811,821 21.11 170,622 4.44
Maharashtra 10,813,928 7,545,680 69.78 2,940,731 27.19 327,517 3.03
Manipur 171,400 152,379 88.90 15,648 9.13 3,373 1.97
Meghalaya 116,102 51,289 44.18 58,765 50.61 6,048 5.21
Mizoram 116,203 55,708 47.94 57,059 49.10 3,436 2.96
Nagaland 115,054 46,645 40.54 63,227 54.95 5,182 4.50
NCT Of Delhi 3,261,423 2,214,621 67.90 929,112 28.49 117,690 3.61
Odisha 1,517,073 909,644 59.96 476,402 31.40 131,027 8.64
Puducherry 206,143 118,093 57.29 80,274 38.94 7,776 3.77

Table 7.8: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by ‘Ownership/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units’ - 2011

No. of Households by Ownership/Tenure Status of dwelling rooms

Total number of
State/UTs
households Owned Rented Any others

Numbers Percentage Numbers Percentage Numbers Percentage

Andaman & Nicobar Islands 34,346 15,497 45.12 17,363 50.55 1,486 4.33
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Andhra Pradesh 6,778,225 3,639,895 53.70 3,004,702 44.33 133,628 1.97

Arunachal Pradesh 65,891 19,305 29.30 37,186 56.44 9,400 14.27
Assam 992,742 635,544 64.02 306,723 30.90 50,475 5.08
Bihar 2,013,671 1,671,456 83.01 274,983 13.66 67,232 3.34
Chandigarh 228,276 110,480 48.40 105,357 46.15 12,439 5.45
Chhattisgarh 1,238,738 867,179 70.01 293,600 23.70 77,959 6.29
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 37,655 13,089 34.76 23,698 62.93 868 2.31
Daman & Diu 47,631 13,743 28.85 32,330 67.88 1,558 3.27
Goa 198,139 145,304 73.33 44,791 22.61 8,044 4.06
172

Gujarat 5,416,315 3,927,857 72.52 1,315,157 24.28 173,301 3.20

Haryana 1,751,901 1,318,409 75.26 380,254 21.71 53,238 3.04
Himachal Pradesh 166,043 82,152 49.48 75,029 45.19 8,862 5.34
Jammu & Kashmir 517,168 471,821 91.23 33,531 6.48 11,816 2.28
Jharkhand 1,495,642 944,950 63.18 408,108 27.29 142,584 9.53
Karnataka 5,315,715 2,713,891 51.05 2,447,718 46.05 154,106 2.90
Kerala 3,620,696 3,196,968 88.30 362,153 10.00 61,575 1.70
Lakshadweep 8,180 6,727 82.24 1,289 15.76 164 2.00
Madhya Pradesh 3,845,232 2,862,789 74.45 811,821 21.11 170,622 4.44
Maharashtra 10,813,928 7,545,680 69.78 2,940,731 27.19 327,517 3.03
Manipur 171,400 152,379 88.90 15,648 9.13 3,373 1.97
Meghalaya 116,102 51,289 44.18 58,765 50.61 6,048 5.21
Mizoram 116,203 55,708 47.94 57,059 49.10 3,436 2.96
Nagaland 115,054 46,645 40.54 63,227 54.95 5,182 4.50
NCT Of Delhi 3,261,423 2,214,621 67.90 929,112 28.49 117,690 3.61
Odisha 1,517,073 909,644 59.96 476,402 31.40 131,027 8.64
Puducherry 206,143 118,093 57.29 80,274 38.94 7,776 3.77
 Punjab 2,094,067 1,639,740 78.30 390,177 18.63 64,150 3.06
Rajasthan 3,090,940 2,499,269 80.86 523,159 16.93 68,512 2.22
Sikkim 35,761 11,760 32.88 22,752 63.62 1,249 3.49
Tamil Nadu 8,929,104 5,130,112 57.45 3,590,179 40.21 208,813 2.34
Tripura 235,002 192,606 81.96 35,626 15.16 6,770 2.88
Uttar Pradesh 7,449,195 6,123,592 82.20 1,114,832 14.97 210,771 2.83
Uttarakhand 592,223 395,519 66.79 157,724 26.63 38,980 6.58
West Bengal 6,350,113 4,798,614 75.57 1,292,263 20.35 259,236 4.08

India 78,865,937 54,542,327 69.16 21,723,723 27.55 2,599,887 3.30

Source: Census of India-2011

173
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Punjab 2,094,067 1,639,740 78.30 390,177 18.63 64,150 3.06

Rajasthan 3,090,940 2,499,269 80.86 523,159 16.93 68,512 2.22
Sikkim 35,761 11,760 32.88 22,752 63.62 1,249 3.49
Tamil Nadu 8,929,104 5,130,112 57.45 3,590,179 40.21 208,813 2.34
Tripura 235,002 192,606 81.96 35,626 15.16 6,770 2.88
Uttar Pradesh 7,449,195 6,123,592 82.20 1,114,832 14.97 210,771 2.83
Uttarakhand 592,223 395,519 66.79 157,724 26.63 38,980 6.58
West Bengal 6,350,113 4,798,614 75.57 1,292,263 20.35 259,236 4.08

India 78,865,937 54,542,327 69.16 21,723,723 27.55 2,599,887 3.30

Source: Census of India-2011

173
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Graph 7.5: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by ‘Ownership/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units’ in India - 2011 (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

174
Source: Census of India, 2011

Graph 7.5: State-wise Urban Households living in Houses by ‘Ownership/Tenure Status of Dwelling Units’ in India - 2011 (%)
Handbook of Urban Statistics

174

Source: Census of India, 2011

 Table7.9: Households with condition of House-2001-11
2001 2011
Percentage of households with condition of Census Percentage of households with condition of Census House
House as as
S. No. Area Name
Good Liveable Dilapidated Good Liveable Dilapidated
01 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 62.08 35.04 2.88 76.52 22.19 1.29

02 Andhra Pradesh 71.92 25.87 2.21 78.95 19.57 1.48

03 Arunachal Pradesh 56.31 39.1 4.59 58.52 38.69 2.80

04 Assam 51.98 41.49 6.53 58.92 35.42 5.66

05 Bihar 54.22 37.75 8.03 53.05 40.04 6.91

06 Chandigarh 69.72 27.48 2.8 69.86 26.60 3.53

07 Chhattisgarh 60.16 37.01 2.82 64.24 33.13 2.64

08 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 61.91 35.91 2.18 78.96 20.80 0.24

09 Daman & Diu 84.35 14.42 1.23 65.31 34.16 0.54

10 68.53 27.49 3.98 76.89 21.80 1.31

175
Goa
11 Gujarat 67.25 30.8 1.94 76.52 22.62 0.86

12 Haryana 58.64 37.49 3.87 62.92 33.70 3.38

13 Himachal Pradesh 73.28 23.93 2.78 80.12 18.47 1.41

14 Jammu & Kashmir 57.16 40.15 2.69 70.86 26.28 2.86

15 Jharkhand 59.58 36.03 4.39 59.94 36.33 3.73

16 Karnataka 58.41 38.25 3.34 72.40 25.67 1.93

17 Kerala 64.85 29.45 5.7 72.37 23.69 3.94

18 Lakshadweep 80.23 18.59 1.18 85.21 14.32 0.48

19 Madhya Pradesh 63.49 33.37 3.14 67.60 29.70 2.70

20 Maharashtra 62.61 34.34 3.04 73.13 24.99 1.87

21 Manipur 62.17 34.14 3.7 63.38 32.14 4.48

22 Meghalaya 60.88 34.61 4.51 69.53 27.73 2.74

23 Mizoram 59.62 39.33 1.05 73.64 24.86 1.50

24 49.6 45.97 4.43 62.04 36.07 1.89

Handbook of Urban Statistics

Nagaland

Table7.9: Households with condition of House-2001-11

2001 2011
Percentage of households with condition of Census Percentage of households with condition of Census House
House as as
S. No. Area Name
Good Liveable Dilapidated Good Liveable Dilapidated
01 Andaman & Nicobar Islands 62.08 35.04 2.88 76.52 22.19 1.29

02 Andhra Pradesh 71.92 25.87 2.21 78.95 19.57 1.48

03 Arunachal Pradesh 56.31 39.1 4.59 58.52 38.69 2.80

04 Assam 51.98 41.49 6.53 58.92 35.42 5.66

05 Bihar 54.22 37.75 8.03 53.05 40.04 6.91

06 Chandigarh 69.72 27.48 2.8 69.86 26.60 3.53

07 Chhattisgarh 60.16 37.01 2.82 64.24 33.13 2.64

08 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 61.91 35.91 2.18 78.96 20.80 0.24

09 Daman & Diu 84.35 14.42 1.23 65.31 34.16 0.54

10 68.53 27.49 3.98 76.89 21.80 1.31

175

Goa
11 Gujarat 67.25 30.8 1.94 76.52 22.62 0.86

12 Haryana 58.64 37.49 3.87 62.92 33.70 3.38

13 Himachal Pradesh 73.28 23.93 2.78 80.12 18.47 1.41

14 Jammu & Kashmir 57.16 40.15 2.69 70.86 26.28 2.86

15 Jharkhand 59.58 36.03 4.39 59.94 36.33 3.73

16 Karnataka 58.41 38.25 3.34 72.40 25.67 1.93

17 Kerala 64.85 29.45 5.7 72.37 23.69 3.94

18 Lakshadweep 80.23 18.59 1.18 85.21 14.32 0.48

19 Madhya Pradesh 63.49 33.37 3.14 67.60 29.70 2.70

20 Maharashtra 62.61 34.34 3.04 73.13 24.99 1.87

21 Manipur 62.17 34.14 3.7 63.38 32.14 4.48

22 Meghalaya 60.88 34.61 4.51 69.53 27.73 2.74

23 Mizoram 59.62 39.33 1.05 73.64 24.86 1.50

24 49.6 45.97 4.43 62.04 36.07 1.89

Handbook of Urban Statistics

Nagaland
 25 NCT Of Delhi 58.94 35.64 5.41 66.02 31.21 2.77

26 Odisha 46.25 45.92 7.83 51.54 42.65 5.81

27 Puducherry 91.34 8.06 0.61 79.95 18.86 1.19

28 Punjab 63.94 32.24 3.82 57.32 37.44 5.24

29 Rajasthan 62.38 35.34 2.28 68.90 29.29 1.81

30 Sikkim 85.8 12.7 1.5 80.29 17.95 1.76

31 Tamil Nadu 89.94 9.34 0.72 76.40 22.42 1.18

Handbook of Urban Statistics

32 Tripura 61.6 34.15 4.25 63.63 32.14 4.23

33 Uttar Pradesh 54.9 40.46 4.64 56.98 39.15 3.88

34 Uttarakhand 70.95 25.75 3.3 74.41 23.06 2.53

35 West Bengal 53.77 39.75 6.48 57.52 35.87 6.60

India 64.16 32.24 3.6 68.44 28.67 2.88

Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011

176
25 NCT Of Delhi 58.94 35.64 5.41 66.02 31.21 2.77

26 Odisha 46.25 45.92 7.83 51.54 42.65 5.81

27 Puducherry 91.34 8.06 0.61 79.95 18.86 1.19

28 Punjab 63.94 32.24 3.82 57.32 37.44 5.24

29 Rajasthan 62.38 35.34 2.28 68.90 29.29 1.81

30 Sikkim 85.8 12.7 1.5 80.29 17.95 1.76

31 Tamil Nadu 89.94 9.34 0.72 76.40 22.42 1.18

Handbook of Urban Statistics

32 Tripura 61.6 34.15 4.25 63.63 32.14 4.23

33 Uttar Pradesh 54.9 40.46 4.64 56.98 39.15 3.88

34 Uttarakhand 70.95 25.75 3.3 74.41 23.06 2.53

35 West Bengal 53.77 39.75 6.48 57.52 35.87 6.60

India 64.16 32.24 3.6 68.44 28.67 2.88

Source: Census of India-2001 & 2011

176
 Graph 7.6: Condition of Census Houses-2001

177
Source: Census of India, 2001
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 7.6: Condition of Census Houses-2001

177

Source: Census of India, 2001

Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Graph 7.7: Condition of Census Houses-2011
Handbook of Urban Statistics

178
Source: Census of India, 2001

Graph 7.7: Condition of Census Houses-2011

Handbook of Urban Statistics

178

Source: Census of India, 2001

 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 7.10 Housing Pricing Index (at Assessment Prices) for 50 Cities Table 7.10 Housing Pricing Index (at Assessment Prices) for 50 Cities

Mar-- Variation (18 Mar-- Variation (18

City Mar--2014 Mar--2015 Mar--2016 Mar--2017 City Mar--2014 Mar--2015 Mar--2016 Mar--2017
SL No. 2018 over 14) SL No. 2018 over 14)
1 Vizag 104 109 118 134 146 42 1 Vizag 104 109 118 134 146 42
2 Meerut 121 141 151 168 159 38 2 Meerut 121 141 151 168 159 38
3 Kanpur 116 128 138 158 153 37 3 Kanpur 116 128 138 158 153 37
4 Pune 113 124 132 141 147 34 4 Pune 113 124 132 141 147 34
5 Vijayawada 111 126 138 147 145 34 5 Vijayawada 111 126 138 147 145 34
6 Howrah 123 143 145 164 156 33 6 Howrah 123 143 145 164 156 33
7 Kalyan Dombivali 117 125 138 150 150 33 7 Kalyan Dombivali 117 125 138 150 150 33
8 Ranchi 118 131 136 124 151 33 8 Ranchi 118 131 136 124 151 33
9 Chakan 116 134 133 136 148 32 9 Chakan 116 134 133 136 148 32
10 Mumbai 112 119 131 138 144 32 10 Mumbai 112 119 131 138 144 32
11 Pimpri Chinchwad 113 124 129 134 143 30 11 Pimpri Chinchwad 113 124 129 134 143 30
12 Bengaluru 107 115 125 139 135 28 12 Bengaluru 107 115 125 139 135 28
13 Bidhan Nagar 114 131 137 138 142 28 13 Bidhan Nagar 114 131 137 138 142 28
14 Kochi 108 112 121 136 136 28 14 Kochi 108 112 121 136 136 28
15 Surat 101 106 104 116 129 28 15 Surat 101 106 104 116 129 28
16 Hyderabad 107 114 120 127 132 25 16 Hyderabad 107 114 120 127 132 25
17 Mira Bhayander 110 119 128 132 135 25 17 Mira Bhayander 110 119 128 132 135 25
18 Nagpur 104 107 114 128 129 25 18 Nagpur 104 107 114 128 129 25
19 New Town Kolkata 107 119 123 127 132 25 19 New Town Kolkata 107 119 123 127 132 25
20 Thane 122 130 143 148 146 24 20 Thane 122 130 143 148 146 24
21 Panvel 101 103 122 122 124 23 21 Panvel 101 103 122 122 124 23
22 Rajkot 117 114 125 132 140 23 22 Rajkot 117 114 125 132 140 23
23 Chennai 107 112 119 131 128 21 23 Chennai 107 112 119 131 128 21
24 Thiruvananthapuram 99 102 119 130 120 21 24 Thiruvananthapuram 99 102 119 130 120 21
25 Indore 108 115 120 127 128 20 25 Indore 108 115 120 127 128 20
26 Guwahati 108 125 121 128 127 19 26 Guwahati 108 125 121 128 127 19
27 Kolkata 111 119 124 136 130 19 27 Kolkata 111 119 124 136 130 19
28 Nashik 108 111 119 121 127 19 28 Nashik 108 111 119 121 127 19
29 Patna 118 117 125 126 136 18 29 Patna 118 117 125 126 136 18
30 Vasai Virar 115 118 124 126 132 17 30 Vasai Virar 115 118 124 126 132 17
31 Greater Noida 108 119 121 123 124 16 31 Greater Noida 108 119 121 123 124 16
32 Lucknow 119 115 125 136 135 16 32 Lucknow 119 115 125 136 135 16
33 Dehradun 94 100 103 110 109 15 33 Dehradun 94 100 103 110 109 15
34 Ludhiana 113 134 136 148 128 15 34 Ludhiana 113 134 136 148 128 15
35 Navi Mumbai 116 125 133 133 131 15 35 Navi Mumbai 116 125 133 133 131 15
36 Ahmedabad 95 96 96 99 107 12 36 Ahmedabad 95 96 96 99 107 12
37 Gurugram 103 108 113 121 114 11 37 Gurugram 103 108 113 121 114 11
38 Bhubaneswar 112 112 113 115 121 9 38 Bhubaneswar 112 112 113 115 121 9
39 Vadodara 107 110 109 113 116 9 39 Vadodara 107 110 109 113 116 9
40 Raipur 113 110 112 125 121 8 40 Raipur 113 110 112 125 121 8
41 Bhopal 105 104 108 108 112 7 41 Bhopal 105 104 108 108 112 7

179 179
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

42 Faridabad 102 114 103 115 107 5 42 Faridabad 102 114 103 115 107 5
43 Noida 107 111 113 116 112 5 43 Noida 107 111 113 116 112 5
44 Chandigarh (Tricity) 96 99 104 96 100 4 44 Chandigarh (Tricity) 96 99 104 96 100 4
45 Jaipur 112 128 134 135 116 4 45 Jaipur 112 128 134 135 116 4
46 Coimbatore 114 115 118 115 116 2 46 Coimbatore 114 115 118 115 116 2
47 Bhiwadi 115 134 138 134 113 -2 47 Bhiwadi 115 134 138 134 113 -2
48 Ghaziabad 113 113 111 113 109 -4 48 Ghaziabad 113 113 111 113 109 -4
49 Delhi 112 93 92 107 101 -11 49 Delhi 112 93 92 107 101 -11
50 Gandhinagar 118 97 100 100 103 -15 50 Gandhinagar 118 97 100 100 103 -15

180 180
 Graph 7.8: Variation of Housing Price Index (2014 to 2018)

181
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 7.8: Variation of Housing Price Index (2014 to 2018)

181
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 Table 7.11 Occupied Census Houses with Usage

Occupied Census Houses used as

Total
Occupied
Hotel/ Factory/ Occupied
States/UTs Residence Hospital/ locked cen-
Shop/ School/ Lodge/ Workshop/ Place of Non- resi- Census
Residence cum other Dispensary sus houses
Office College etc. Guest Workshed Worship dential use Houses
use etc.
house etc. etc.

JAMMU & KASHMIR 58.94 1.00 21.11 0.67 0.52 0.18 1.38 1.04 13.50 1.65 100
Handbook of Urban Statistics

HIMACHAL PRADESH 61.34 1.34 19.49 0.75 0.87 0.36 1.55 0.74 12.08 1.48 100

PUNJAB 70.80 2.68 17.12 0.29 0.16 0.22 1.86 0.47 5.46 0.94 100

CHANDIGARH 82.87 1.49 8.70 0.25 0.18 0.13 1.01 0.15 4.70 0.51 100

UTTARAKHAND 71.37 3.13 14.59 0.50 0.68 0.31 0.95 0.50 7.09 0.87 100

HARYANA 70.90 3.48 15.01 0.31 0.24 0.25 1.64 0.36 6.96 0.86 100

NCT OF DELHI 77.70 3.36 9.38 0.24 0.19 0.19 2.26 0.21 5.50 0.97 100

RAJASTHAN 71.80 2.49 15.34 0.52 0.32 0.25 1.42 0.88 5.95 1.02 100

182
UTTAR PRADESH 72.94 4.88 11.42 0.41 0.23 0.28 0.98 0.62 7.37 0.87 100

BIHAR 74.18 3.68 11.40 0.55 0.50 0.39 0.69 0.64 7.31 0.66 100

SIKKIM 72.34 3.60 11.23 0.71 1.75 0.15 0.75 0.47 8.32 0.68 100

ARUNACHAL PRADESH 68.69 2.86 12.37 0.69 0.71 0.25 0.89 0.51 10.96 2.09 100

NAGALAND 73.98 1.63 12.21 0.59 0.79 0.22 1.10 0.54 7.68 1.26 100

MANIPUR 79.30 2.27 5.83 0.58 0.47 0.14 1.25 0.81 9.10 0.25 100

MIZORAM 82.52 1.46 7.04 1.29 0.33 0.18 0.96 1.08 4.90 0.24 100

TRIPURA 77.30 1.22 13.91 0.57 0.25 0.29 0.77 0.78 4.48 0.42 100

MEGHALAYA 73.53 1.20 12.54 0.70 0.45 0.21 1.15 0.41 7.24 2.58 100

ASSAM 71.06 1.49 15.17 0.63 0.57 0.45 1.15 1.29 7.56 0.65 100

Table 7.11 Occupied Census Houses with Usage

Occupied Census Houses used as

Total
Occupied
Hotel/ Factory/ Occupied
States/UTs Residence Hospital/ locked cen-
Shop/ School/ Lodge/ Workshop/ Place of Non- resi- Census
Residence cum other Dispensary sus houses
Office College etc. Guest Workshed Worship dential use Houses
use etc.
house etc. etc.

JAMMU & KASHMIR 58.94 1.00 21.11 0.67 0.52 0.18 1.38 1.04 13.50 1.65 100
Handbook of Urban Statistics

HIMACHAL PRADESH 61.34 1.34 19.49 0.75 0.87 0.36 1.55 0.74 12.08 1.48 100

PUNJAB 70.80 2.68 17.12 0.29 0.16 0.22 1.86 0.47 5.46 0.94 100

CHANDIGARH 82.87 1.49 8.70 0.25 0.18 0.13 1.01 0.15 4.70 0.51 100

UTTARAKHAND 71.37 3.13 14.59 0.50 0.68 0.31 0.95 0.50 7.09 0.87 100

HARYANA 70.90 3.48 15.01 0.31 0.24 0.25 1.64 0.36 6.96 0.86 100

NCT OF DELHI 77.70 3.36 9.38 0.24 0.19 0.19 2.26 0.21 5.50 0.97 100

RAJASTHAN 71.80 2.49 15.34 0.52 0.32 0.25 1.42 0.88 5.95 1.02 100
182

UTTAR PRADESH 72.94 4.88 11.42 0.41 0.23 0.28 0.98 0.62 7.37 0.87 100

BIHAR 74.18 3.68 11.40 0.55 0.50 0.39 0.69 0.64 7.31 0.66 100

SIKKIM 72.34 3.60 11.23 0.71 1.75 0.15 0.75 0.47 8.32 0.68 100

ARUNACHAL PRADESH 68.69 2.86 12.37 0.69 0.71 0.25 0.89 0.51 10.96 2.09 100

NAGALAND 73.98 1.63 12.21 0.59 0.79 0.22 1.10 0.54 7.68 1.26 100

MANIPUR 79.30 2.27 5.83 0.58 0.47 0.14 1.25 0.81 9.10 0.25 100

MIZORAM 82.52 1.46 7.04 1.29 0.33 0.18 0.96 1.08 4.90 0.24 100

TRIPURA 77.30 1.22 13.91 0.57 0.25 0.29 0.77 0.78 4.48 0.42 100

MEGHALAYA 73.53 1.20 12.54 0.70 0.45 0.21 1.15 0.41 7.24 2.58 100

ASSAM 71.06 1.49 15.17 0.63 0.57 0.45 1.15 1.29 7.56 0.65 100
 WEST BENGAL 78.22 2.50 10.88 0.33 0.22 0.33 1.48 0.73 5.01 0.31 100
JHARKHAND 77.56 2.55 10.04 0.55 0.47 0.26 0.70 0.60 6.74 0.53 100
ODISHA 73.79 1.84 12.84 0.58 0.56 0.29 0.97 0.85 7.58 0.70 100
CHHATTISGARH 80.08 3.43 7.87 0.59 0.35 0.28 0.85 0.78 5.20 0.57 100
MADHYA PRADESH 79.00 4.20 8.91 0.53 0.28 0.25 0.78 0.76 4.58 0.72 100
GUJARAT 75.96 1.24 13.67 0.29 0.24 0.37 2.71 0.63 4.49 0.39 100
DAMAN & DIU 80.43 1.14 9.27 0.21 0.48 0.19 2.91 0.51 4.59 0.29 100
DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI 75.69 1.05 10.45 0.33 0.68 0.25 4.02 0.34 6.55 0.63 100
MAHARASHTRA 75.56 1.74 10.05 0.35 0.47 0.45 2.01 0.53 7.84 1.00 100
ANDHRA PRADESH 84.44 1.98 6.35 0.38 0.37 0.32 1.08 0.34 4.27 0.48 100
KARNATAKA 78.72 1.42 10.43 0.50 0.70 0.34 1.74 0.62 4.97 0.56 100
GOA 68.55 1.19 12.81 0.51 1.69 0.46 1.47 0.96 10.14 2.23 100
LAKSHADWEEP 60.74 0.36 7.93 1.73 1.18 0.25 3.46 2.12 20.61 1.61 100
KERALA 75.52 0.46 11.39 0.74 0.67 0.36 1.93 0.91 6.97 1.05 100
TAMIL NADU 82.86 1.78 7.67 0.25 0.33 0.34 1.18 0.44 4.50 0.64 100
PUDUCHERRY 83.80 1.18 8.55 0.45 0.38 0.34 0.97 0.49 3.31 0.54 100
ANDAMAN & NICOBAR ISLANDS 73.99 1.16 10.25 0.62 0.68 0.16 1.54 0.84 10.15 0.61 100

183
INDIA 76.87 2.37 10.80 0.41 0.38 0.33 1.51 0.60 6.00 0.73 100
Handbook of Urban Statistics

WEST BENGAL 78.22 2.50 10.88 0.33 0.22 0.33 1.48 0.73 5.01 0.31 100
JHARKHAND 77.56 2.55 10.04 0.55 0.47 0.26 0.70 0.60 6.74 0.53 100
ODISHA 73.79 1.84 12.84 0.58 0.56 0.29 0.97 0.85 7.58 0.70 100
CHHATTISGARH 80.08 3.43 7.87 0.59 0.35 0.28 0.85 0.78 5.20 0.57 100
MADHYA PRADESH 79.00 4.20 8.91 0.53 0.28 0.25 0.78 0.76 4.58 0.72 100
GUJARAT 75.96 1.24 13.67 0.29 0.24 0.37 2.71 0.63 4.49 0.39 100
DAMAN & DIU 80.43 1.14 9.27 0.21 0.48 0.19 2.91 0.51 4.59 0.29 100
DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI 75.69 1.05 10.45 0.33 0.68 0.25 4.02 0.34 6.55 0.63 100
MAHARASHTRA 75.56 1.74 10.05 0.35 0.47 0.45 2.01 0.53 7.84 1.00 100
ANDHRA PRADESH 84.44 1.98 6.35 0.38 0.37 0.32 1.08 0.34 4.27 0.48 100
KARNATAKA 78.72 1.42 10.43 0.50 0.70 0.34 1.74 0.62 4.97 0.56 100
GOA 68.55 1.19 12.81 0.51 1.69 0.46 1.47 0.96 10.14 2.23 100
LAKSHADWEEP 60.74 0.36 7.93 1.73 1.18 0.25 3.46 2.12 20.61 1.61 100
KERALA 75.52 0.46 11.39 0.74 0.67 0.36 1.93 0.91 6.97 1.05 100
TAMIL NADU 82.86 1.78 7.67 0.25 0.33 0.34 1.18 0.44 4.50 0.64 100
PUDUCHERRY 83.80 1.18 8.55 0.45 0.38 0.34 0.97 0.49 3.31 0.54 100
ANDAMAN & NICOBAR ISLANDS 73.99 1.16 10.25 0.62 0.68 0.16 1.54 0.84 10.15 0.61 100
183

INDIA 76.87 2.37 10.80 0.41 0.38 0.33 1.51 0.60 6.00 0.73 100
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 7.12 Total Number of Vacant Census Houses. Table 7.12 Total Number of Vacant Census Houses.

Total number Total number

States/UTs of Percentage of vacant houses States/UTs of Percentage of vacant houses
vacant census houses vacant census houses
JAMMU & KASHMIR 1,11,974 11.91 JAMMU & KASHMIR 1,11,974 11.91
HIMACHAL PRADESH 56,360 17.55 HIMACHAL PRADESH 56,360 17.55
PUNJAB 3,38,214 10.64 PUNJAB 3,38,214 10.64
CHANDIGARH 19,313 6.67 CHANDIGARH 19,313 6.67
UTTARAKHAND 78,584 9.02 UTTARAKHAND 78,584 9.02
HARYANA 2,96,809 11.23 HARYANA 2,96,809 11.23
NCT OF DELHI 4,90,135 10.94 NCT OF DELHI 4,90,135 10.94
RAJASTHAN 6,43,115 13.47 RAJASTHAN 6,43,115 13.47
UTTAR PRADESH 9,57,044 9.16 UTTAR PRADESH 9,57,044 9.16
BIHAR 1,66,091 6.15 BIHAR 1,66,091 6.15
SIKKIM 6,537 12.19 SIKKIM 6,537 12.19
ARUNACHAL PRADESH 13,534 12.84 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 13,534 12.84
NAGALAND 22,311 12.82 NAGALAND 22,311 12.82
MANIPUR 4,691 2.21 MANIPUR 4,691 2.21
MIZORAM 7,688 5.26 MIZORAM 7,688 5.26
TRIPURA 19,577 6.15 TRIPURA 19,577 6.15
MEGHALAYA 14,328 8.53 MEGHALAYA 14,328 8.53
ASSAM 1,20,224 8.09 ASSAM 1,20,224 8.09
WEST BENGAL 5,43,006 6.47 WEST BENGAL 5,43,006 6.47
JHARKHAND 1,92,288 9.38 JHARKHAND 1,92,288 9.38
ODISHA 2,19,418 9.95 ODISHA 2,19,418 9.95
CHHATTISGARH 1,63,007 9.97 CHHATTISGARH 1,63,007 9.97
MADHYA PRADESH 4,50,134 8.92 MADHYA PRADESH 4,50,134 8.92
GUJARAT 12,28,467 14.93 GUJARAT 12,28,467 14.93
DAMAN & DIU 12,068 17.21 DAMAN & DIU 12,068 17.21
DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI 11,641 19.22 DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI 11,641 19.22
MAHARASHTRA 21,11,777 13.16 MAHARASHTRA 21,11,777 13.16
ANDHRA PRADESH 6,14,366 7.30 ANDHRA PRADESH 6,14,366 7.30
KARNATAKA 7,59,761 10.30 KARNATAKA 7,59,761 10.30
GOA 89,823 24.14 GOA 89,823 24.14
LAKSHADWEEP 2,610 16.36 LAKSHADWEEP 2,610 16.36
KERALA 6,03,146 11.25 KERALA 6,03,146 11.25
TAMIL NADU 6,94,239 6.18 TAMIL NADU 6,94,239 6.18
PUDUCHERRY 25,318 9.55 PUDUCHERRY 25,318 9.55
ANDAMAN & NICOBAR ISLANDS 6,032 11.66 ANDAMAN & NICOBAR ISLANDS 6,032 11.66
INDIA 1,10,93,630 10.07 INDIA 1,10,93,630 10.07

184 184
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

185 185
 Chapter 8 Chapter 8

Smart Cities Mission Smart Cities Mission

“Smart cities are about modern facilities and becoming centres “Smart cities are about modern facilities and becoming centres
of development” of development”

Narendra Modi Narendra Modi

Prime Minister Prime Minister
(At the time of 1st Anniversary of SCM at Pune) (At the time of 1st Anniversary of SCM at Pune)
25-06-2016 25-06-2016
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Chapter 8
Smart Cities Mission
Inputs for Handbook of Urban Statistics 2019
Smart Cities Mission (SCM) was launched on 25 June 2015 for 5-year period with the objective of promoting
smart cities that provide core infrastructure and give a decent quality of life to its citizens, a clean and sustain-
able environment and application of Smart’ Solutions.  The strategic components of Smart City initiative are
area-based development involving city improvement (retrofitting), city renewal (redevelopment) and city ex-
tension (Greenfield development) plus a Pan-city development in which Smart Solutions are applied covering
larger parts of the city.
Graph 8.1 Development Model Selected by 100 Smart Cities:
Based on an All-India Competition, 100 smart cities, as targeted, have been selected in various Rounds ensur-
ing that at least one city will be selected from each state/UT as under:
189
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Chapter 8
Smart Cities Mission
Inputs for Handbook of Urban Statistics 2019
Smart Cities Mission (SCM) was launched on 25 June 2015 for 5-year period with the objective of promoting
smart cities that provide core infrastructure and give a decent quality of life to its citizens, a clean and sustain-
able environment and application of Smart’ Solutions.  The strategic components of Smart City initiative are
area-based development involving city improvement (retrofitting), city renewal (redevelopment) and city ex-
tension (Greenfield development) plus a Pan-city development in which Smart Solutions are applied covering
larger parts of the city.
Graph 8.1 Development Model Selected by 100 Smart Cities:
Based on an All-India Competition, 100 smart cities, as targeted, have been selected in various Rounds ensur-
ing that at least one city will be selected from each state/UT as under:
189
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 8.2 List of Selected Cities and their progress Graph 8.2 List of Selected Cities and their progress

List of selected Cities(State wise) and their progress details are given in Annexure I List of selected Cities(State wise) and their progress details are given in Annexure I

Source of funding for Smart Cities is mentioned as below: Source of funding for Smart Cities is mentioned as below:

Source Percentage Amount (Rs. crore) Source Percentage Amount (Rs. crore)

Centre + State Government 45% 92258 Centre + State Government 45% 92258

Convergence 21% 43054 Convergence 21% 43054

Public Private Partnership 21% 43054 Public Private Partnership 21% 43054

Debt/Loans 5% 10251 Debt/Loans 5% 10251

Own funds 1% 2050 Own funds 1% 2050

Others 7% 14351 Others 7% 14351

Total 100% 205018 Total 100% 205018

190 190
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 8.3 Source of Funding in Smart Cities Graph 8.3 Source of Funding in Smart Cities

Under the SCM, 100 Smart Cities have been selected in 4 Rounds based on All India Competition.  Since the Under the SCM, 100 Smart Cities have been selected in 4 Rounds based on All India Competition.  Since the
launch of the mission 5,151 projects identified by the cities worth more than Rs. 2 lakh crores are in various launch of the mission 5,151 projects identified by the cities worth more than Rs. 2 lakh crores are in various
stages of in the 100 cities.  stages of in the 100 cities. 

All 100 cities have incorporated Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), City Level Advisory Forums (CLAFs) and ap- All 100 cities have incorporated Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), City Level Advisory Forums (CLAFs) and ap-
pointed Project Management Consultants (PMCs).  pointed Project Management Consultants (PMCs). 

191 191
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

As on 31.01.2019, the value of tendered smart city projects is Rs. 1,05,780 crore , the value of work orders As on 31.01.2019, the value of tendered smart city projects is Rs. 1,05,780 crore , the value of work orders
issued is Rs. 62,652 crores, and value of all completed projects is Rs 11,040 crore. issued is Rs. 62,652 crores, and value of all completed projects is Rs 11,040 crore.

192 192
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Significant progress has been made with respect to implementation of projects pertaining to Smart Solutions, Significant progress has been made with respect to implementation of projects pertaining to Smart Solutions,
Smart Roads, Smart Water, Solar Rooftops, and Vibrant Public Spaces. Smart Roads, Smart Water, Solar Rooftops, and Vibrant Public Spaces.

   

**City details in Annexure II **City details in Annexure II

193 193
Handbook of Urban Statistics
• The India Smart Cities Fellowship (ISCF) and India Smart Cities Internship (ISCI) programmes were
launched on 9 July 2018. The India Smart Cities Fellowship Program seeks to engage young graduates/
post-graduates and PhDs in the fields of urban planning, design, engineering, information and technol-
ogy, mobility, finance, social sector and environmental issues for a period of one year, extendable up to
three years. This Program is designed to provide valuable experience to the youth interested in smart
cities specifically, and urban renewal sector in general to bring in new ideas, passion and energy to
the challenging work of implementing cutting edge, high-impact solutions to key urban problems. This
programme ultimately aims at cultivating young leaders, strengthening their understanding of Indian
urban sector and preparing them for greater leadership roles in future. The first batch of Fellows has
already been selected.
• The India Smart Cities Internship (ISCI) programme seeks to  engage students  pursuing   Undergrad-
uate / Graduate / Post- Graduate  Degrees  from recognized Universities/Institutions  from India or
abroad, as “Interns” for a period of six to twelve weeks. This programme aims at giving exposure to
the interns in various areas of urban development like planning, design, engineering, information and
technology, mobility, finance, social sector and environmental issues under Smart Cities Mission.
• The Smart Cities Digital Payments Awards 2018 is an initiative of the Ministry of Housing and Urban
Affairs to promote ease of living for India’s urban residents. The objective of these awards is to guide,
motivate, recognize and reward the Smart Cities for promoting digital payments and carrying out inno-
vative payment initiatives in their respective cities through a two-stage Challenge process. This not only
aims to reward Smart Cities at the forefront of digital payments but also to encourage other cities to
follow suite and strengthen their digital payments infrastructure, create awareness through promotion
of digital payments amongst all stakeholders and to provide citizens with multiple options to make dig-
ital transactions. The evaluation process for awards is at an advanced stage.
• An all-India Challenge named CITIIS (Cities Investments to Innovate Integrate and Sustain) was
launched on July 9, 2018 in partnership with Agence Française de Développement (AFD) and European
Union. A Loan of EUR 100 million will be extended by Agence Française de Développement (AFD), which
shall be given as a grant to Smart Cities for implementation of 15 innovative projects selected through
the All-India Challenge. The projects would be in four sectors- sustainable mobility, public open spaces,
urban governance & ICT and social and organizational innovation in low-income settlements. Technical
support with global expertise will be provided for preparation and implementation of selected demon-
strative projects. A preparatory Workshop on CITIIS was held with international experts in September
2018. Proposals submitted by cities are under evaluation.
194
Handbook of Urban Statistics
• The India Smart Cities Fellowship (ISCF) and India Smart Cities Internship (ISCI) programmes were
launched on 9 July 2018. The India Smart Cities Fellowship Program seeks to engage young graduates/
post-graduates and PhDs in the fields of urban planning, design, engineering, information and technol-
ogy, mobility, finance, social sector and environmental issues for a period of one year, extendable up to
three years. This Program is designed to provide valuable experience to the youth interested in smart
cities specifically, and urban renewal sector in general to bring in new ideas, passion and energy to
the challenging work of implementing cutting edge, high-impact solutions to key urban problems. This
programme ultimately aims at cultivating young leaders, strengthening their understanding of Indian
urban sector and preparing them for greater leadership roles in future. The first batch of Fellows has
already been selected.
• The India Smart Cities Internship (ISCI) programme seeks to  engage students  pursuing   Undergrad-
uate / Graduate / Post- Graduate  Degrees  from recognized Universities/Institutions  from India or
abroad, as “Interns” for a period of six to twelve weeks. This programme aims at giving exposure to
the interns in various areas of urban development like planning, design, engineering, information and
technology, mobility, finance, social sector and environmental issues under Smart Cities Mission.
• The Smart Cities Digital Payments Awards 2018 is an initiative of the Ministry of Housing and Urban
Affairs to promote ease of living for India’s urban residents. The objective of these awards is to guide,
motivate, recognize and reward the Smart Cities for promoting digital payments and carrying out inno-
vative payment initiatives in their respective cities through a two-stage Challenge process. This not only
aims to reward Smart Cities at the forefront of digital payments but also to encourage other cities to
follow suite and strengthen their digital payments infrastructure, create awareness through promotion
of digital payments amongst all stakeholders and to provide citizens with multiple options to make dig-
ital transactions. The evaluation process for awards is at an advanced stage.
• An all-India Challenge named CITIIS (Cities Investments to Innovate Integrate and Sustain) was
launched on July 9, 2018 in partnership with Agence Française de Développement (AFD) and European
Union. A Loan of EUR 100 million will be extended by Agence Française de Développement (AFD), which
shall be given as a grant to Smart Cities for implementation of 15 innovative projects selected through
the All-India Challenge. The projects would be in four sectors- sustainable mobility, public open spaces,
urban governance & ICT and social and organizational innovation in low-income settlements. Technical
support with global expertise will be provided for preparation and implementation of selected demon-
strative projects. A preparatory Workshop on CITIIS was held with international experts in September
2018. Proposals submitted by cities are under evaluation.
194
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 8.1 List of selected Cities (state wise) and their progress details Table 8.1 List of selected Cities (state wise) and their progress details

Tendered Grounded/Completed Tendered Grounded/Completed

Roun Roun
State City No of No of State City No of No of
d Value Value d Value Value
Projects Projects Projects Projects
Andaman & Port Blair FT 2 14.33 2 14.33 Andaman & Port Blair FT 2 14.33 2 14.33
Nicobar Nicobar
Andhra Kakinada 1 42 1613.11 28 967.36 Andhra Kakinada 1 42 1613.11 28 967.36
Pradesh Vishakhapatnam 1 57 2247.49 46 1462.19 Pradesh Vishakhapatnam 1 57 2247.49 46 1462.19
Tirupati 2 50 1668.17 21 184.86 Tirupati 2 50 1668.17 21 184.86
Amravati 3 22 1792.46 20 1591.45 Amravati 3 22 1792.46 20 1591.45
Subtotal 171 7321.23 115 4205.86 Subtotal 171 7321.23 115 4205.86
Arunachal Pasighat 3 0 0 0 0 Arunachal Pasighat 3 0 0 0 0
Pradesh Itanagar 4 0 0 0 0 Pradesh Itanagar 4 0 0 0 0
Subtotal 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 0 0 0 0
Assam Guwahati 1 11 538.25 6 25.03 Assam Guwahati 1 11 538.25 6 25.03
Bihar Bhagalpur FT 12 1046.38 9 511.14 Bihar Bhagalpur FT 12 1046.38 9 511.14
Muzaffarpur 3 4 180.41 3 21.99 Muzaffarpur 3 4 180.41 3 21.99
Patna 3 23 1760.92 7 663.32 Patna 3 23 1760.92 7 663.32
Bihar Sharif 4 13 384.1 3 224.02 Bihar Sharif 4 13 384.1 3 224.02
Subtotal 52 3371.81 22 1420.47 Subtotal 52 3371.81 22 1420.47
Chandigarh Chandigarh FT 30 1286.55 22 238.09 Chandigarh Chandigarh FT 30 1286.55 22 238.09
Chhattisgarh Raipur FT 93 986.26 71 471.73 Chhattisgarh Raipur FT 93 986.26 71 471.73
Bilaspur 3 1 100 0 0 Bilaspur 3 1 100 0 0
Naya Raipur 3 3 176 2 168 Naya Raipur 3 3 176 2 168
Subtotal 97 1262.26 73 639.73 Subtotal 97 1262.26 73 639.73
Dadra and Silvassa 4 0 0 0 0 Dadra and Silvassa 4 0 0 0 0
Nagar Haveli Nagar Haveli
Daman and Diu 4 2 97.03 1 9.49 Daman and Diu 4 2 97.03 1 9.49
Diu Diu
Delhi NDMC 1 86 1244.6 84 1134.6 Delhi NDMC 1 86 1244.6 84 1134.6
Goa Panaji FT 22 392.71 17 335.47 Goa Panaji FT 22 392.71 17 335.47
Gujarat Ahmedabad 1 63 3049.29 45 2593.43 Gujarat Ahmedabad 1 63 3049.29 45 2593.43
Surat 1 76 3270.02 65 2971.06 Surat 1 76 3270.02 65 2971.06
Vadodara 2 53 2454.14 44 2063.27 Vadodara 2 53 2454.14 44 2063.27
Dahod 3 18 647.4 6 168.89 Dahod 3 18 647.4 6 168.89
Gandhinagar 3 14 418.94 7 142.68 Gandhinagar 3 14 418.94 7 142.68
Rajkot 3 26 2618.46 7 117.3 Rajkot 3 26 2618.46 7 117.3

195 195
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Tendered Grounded/Completed Tendered Grounded/Completed

Roun Roun
State City No of No of State City No of No of
d Value Value d Value Value
Projects Projects Projects Projects
Subtotal 250 12458.25 174 8056.63 Subtotal 250 12458.25 174 8056.63
Haryana Faridabad FT 19 532.78 12 227.18 Haryana Faridabad FT 19 532.78 12 227.18
Karnal 3 0 0 0 0 Karnal 3 0 0 0 0
Subtotal 19 532.78 12 227.18 Subtotal 19 532.78 12 227.18
Himachal Dharamshala FT 10 77.73 9 75.3 Himachal Dharamshala FT 10 77.73 9 75.3
Pradesh Pradesh
Shimla 3 4 138.19 4 138.19 Shimla 3 4 138.19 4 138.19
Subtotal 14 215.92 13 213.49 Subtotal 14 215.92 13 213.49
Jammu and Jammu 3 3 232.86 2 215.86 Jammu and Jammu 3 3 232.86 2 215.86
Kashmir Kashmir
Srinagar 3 9 8.88 9 8.88 Srinagar 3 9 8.88 9 8.88
Subtotal 12 241.74 11 224.74 Subtotal 12 241.74 11 224.74
Jharkhand Ranchi FT 28 3296.6 18 1726.34 Jharkhand Ranchi FT 28 3296.6 18 1726.34
Karnataka Belagavi 1 53 1383.45 38 1240.32 Karnataka Belagavi 1 53 1383.45 38 1240.32
Davanagere 1 56 1650.63 36 1134.75 Davanagere 1 56 1650.63 36 1134.75
Hubli-Dharwad 2 38 903.89 23 534.9 Hubli-Dharwad 2 38 903.89 23 534.9
Mangaluru 2 42 872.21 26 397.16 Mangaluru 2 42 872.21 26 397.16
Shivamogga 2 44 963.63 24 706.18 Shivamogga 2 44 963.63 24 706.18
Tumakuru 2 82 1688.31 55 1299.33 Tumakuru 2 82 1688.31 55 1299.33
Bengaluru 3 7 957.98 4 65.29 Bengaluru 3 7 957.98 4 65.29
Subtotal 322 8420.1 206 5377.93 Subtotal 322 8420.1 206 5377.93
Kerala Kochi 1 22 632.07 10 136.67 Kerala Kochi 1 22 632.07 10 136.67
Tiruvanantapuram 3 11 281.21 5 191.19 Tiruvanantapuram 3 11 281.21 5 191.19
Subtotal 33 913.28 15 327.86 Subtotal 33 913.28 15 327.86
Lakshadwee Kavarati 4 3 7.7 3 7.7 Lakshadwee Kavarati 4 3 7.7 3 7.7
p p
Madhya Bhopal 1 68 6108.51 65 3026.84 Madhya Bhopal 1 68 6108.51 65 3026.84
Pradesh Pradesh
Indore 1 176 6353.82 139 3255.56 Indore 1 176 6353.82 139 3255.56
Jabalpur 1 66 1066.44 56 883.67 Jabalpur 1 66 1066.44 56 883.67
Gwalior 2 60 1598.75 41 1055.77 Gwalior 2 60 1598.75 41 1055.77
Ujjain 2 44 1822.01 40 1642.73 Ujjain 2 44 1822.01 40 1642.73
Sagar 3 11 1038.35 11 1038.35 Sagar 3 11 1038.35 11 1038.35
Satna 3 14 531.59 10 327.46 Satna 3 14 531.59 10 327.46
Subtotal 439 18519.47 362 11230.3 Subtotal 439 18519.47 362 11230.3
8 8
Maharashtra Pune 1 58 3975.82 38 1594.7 Maharashtra Pune 1 58 3975.82 38 1594.7
Solapur 1 39 1941.24 28 346.15 Solapur 1 39 1941.24 28 346.15

196 196
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Tendered Grounded/Completed Tendered Grounded/Completed

Roun Roun
State City No of No of State City No of No of
d Value Value d Value Value
Projects Projects Projects Projects
Aurangabad 2 3 357.02 2 237.02 Aurangabad 2 3 357.02 2 237.02
Kalyan-Dombivali 2 8 940.48 6 228.48 Kalyan-Dombivali 2 8 940.48 6 228.48
Nagpur 2 7 1879.03 7 1879.03 Nagpur 2 7 1879.03 7 1879.03
Nashik 2 41 1855.73 31 893.09 Nashik 2 41 1855.73 31 893.09
Thane 2 39 1510.83 34 634.33 Thane 2 39 1510.83 34 634.33
Pimpri-Chinchwad 3 19 1140.85 5 315.91 Pimpri-Chinchwad 3 19 1140.85 5 315.91
Subtotal 214 13601 151 6128.71 Subtotal 214 13601 151 6128.71
Manipur Imphal FT 4 275.16 4 275.16 Manipur Imphal FT 4 275.16 4 275.16
Meghalaya Shillong 4 0 0 0 0 Meghalaya Shillong 4 0 0 0 0
Mizoram Aizawl 3 11 212.02 11 212.02 Mizoram Aizawl 3 11 212.02 11 212.02
Nagaland Kohima 2 6 135.69 4 76.41 Nagaland Kohima 2 6 135.69 4 76.41
Odisha Bhubaneswar 1 27 4076.33 23 2817.22 Odisha Bhubaneswar 1 27 4076.33 23 2817.22
Rourkela 2 12 871.45 7 374.17 Rourkela 2 12 871.45 7 374.17
Subtotal 39 4947.78 30 3191.39 Subtotal 39 4947.78 30 3191.39
Puducherry Puducherry 3 8 62.43 8 62.43 Puducherry Puducherry 3 8 62.43 8 62.43
Punjab Ludhiana 1 14 609.57 9 418.93 Punjab Ludhiana 1 14 609.57 9 418.93
Amritsar 2 9 383.15 3 101.33 Amritsar 2 9 383.15 3 101.33
Jalandhar 2 7 269.82 3 98.41 Jalandhar 2 7 269.82 3 98.41
Subtotal 30 1262.54 15 618.67 Subtotal 30 1262.54 15 618.67
Rajasthan Jaipur 1 63 1459.42 44 1076.62 Rajasthan Jaipur 1 63 1459.42 44 1076.62
Udaipur 1 49 1309.49 30 996.42 Udaipur 1 49 1309.49 30 996.42
Ajmer 2 72 910.28 60 816.97 Ajmer 2 72 910.28 60 816.97
Kota 2 42 1499.61 30 710.58 Kota 2 42 1499.61 30 710.58
Subtotal 226 5178.8 164 3600.59 Subtotal 226 5178.8 164 3600.59
Sikkim Namchi 2 13 344.51 11 324.51 Sikkim Namchi 2 13 344.51 11 324.51
Gangtok 3 5 308.95 1 22.61 Gangtok 3 5 308.95 1 22.61
Subtotal 18 653.46 12 347.12 Subtotal 18 653.46 12 347.12
Tamil Nadu Chennai 1 35 880.38 25 360.36 Tamil Nadu Chennai 1 35 880.38 25 360.36
Coimbatore 1 40 1210.43 36 986.79 Coimbatore 1 40 1210.43 36 986.79
Madurai 2 9 363.28 8 323.09 Madurai 2 9 363.28 8 323.09
Salem 2 24 791.02 22 786.14 Salem 2 24 791.02 22 786.14
Thanjavur 2 20 417.74 13 279.1 Thanjavur 2 20 417.74 13 279.1
Vellore 2 14 688.47 10 504.56 Vellore 2 14 688.47 10 504.56
Thoothukudi 3 18 49.52 18 49.52 Thoothukudi 3 18 49.52 18 49.52
Tiruchirappalli 3 9 244.87 6 195.04 Tiruchirappalli 3 9 244.87 6 195.04
Tirunelveli 3 11 347.49 11 347.49 Tirunelveli 3 11 347.49 11 347.49
Tiruppur 3 14 611.99 6 211.41 Tiruppur 3 14 611.99 6 211.41
Erode 4 8 326.24 7 311.24 Erode 4 8 326.24 7 311.24

197 197
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Tendered Grounded/Completed Tendered Grounded/Completed

Roun Roun
State City No of No of State City No of No of
d Value Value d Value Value
Projects Projects Projects Projects
Subtotal 202 5931.43 162 4354.74 Subtotal 202 5931.43 162 4354.74
Telangana Warangal FT 29 901.52 12 616.6 Telangana Warangal FT 29 901.52 12 616.6
Karimnagar 3 3 231.7 0 0 Karimnagar 3 3 231.7 0 0
Subtotal 32 1133.22 12 616.6 Subtotal 32 1133.22 12 616.6
Tripura Agartala FT 28 329.02 20 152.59 Tripura Agartala FT 28 329.02 20 152.59
Uttar Lucknow FT 40 987.73 32 794.76 Uttar Lucknow FT 40 987.73 32 794.76
Pradesh Agra 2 59 2006.65 42 1298.01 Pradesh Agra 2 59 2006.65 42 1298.01
Kanpur 2 34 2504.42 17 1834.56 Kanpur 2 34 2504.42 17 1834.56
Varanasi 2 66 1838.49 61 1761.56 Varanasi 2 66 1838.49 61 1761.56
Aligarh 3 21 622.98 7 111.21 Aligarh 3 21 622.98 7 111.21
Allahabad 3 133 952.06 129 881.58 Allahabad 3 133 952.06 129 881.58
Jhansi 3 24 2668.6 12 908.3 Jhansi 3 24 2668.6 12 908.3
Bareilly 4 1 88.09 0 0 Bareilly 4 1 88.09 0 0
Moradabad 4 0 0 0 0 Moradabad 4 0 0 0 0
Saharanpur 4 0 0 0 0 Saharanpur 4 0 0 0 0
Subtotal 378 11669.02 300 7589.98 Subtotal 378 11669.02 300 7589.98
Uttarakhand Dehradun 3 4 244.07 0 0 Uttarakhand Dehradun 3 4 244.07 0 0
West Bengal New Town FT 1 10 1 10 West Bengal New Town FT 1 10 1 10
Kolkata Kolkata

Grand Total 100 2794 105780.2 2050 62651.7 Grand Total 100 2794 105780.2 2050 62651.7
5 3 5 3
Note: FTFast Track, Value in Rs. crore Note: FTFast Track, Value in Rs. crore

198 198
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 8.2 Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission Table 8.2 Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission
Table 8.2.1 Smart Command and Control Centres Table 8.2.1 Smart Command and Control Centres

Smart Command and Control Centres Smart Command and Control Centres
Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed
(18 Cities) (33 cities) (13 cities) (18 Cities) (33 cities) (13 cities)
Patna Gandhinagar Ahmedabad Patna Gandhinagar Ahmedabad
Bhagalpur Belagavi Rajkot Bhagalpur Belagavi Rajkot
Shivamogga Jabalpur Surat Shivamogga Jabalpur Surat
Thane Indore Vadodara Thane Indore Vadodara
Nashik Gwalior Vizag Nashik Gwalior Vizag
Udaipur Satna Kakinada Udaipur Satna Kakinada
Warangal Sagar Bhopal Warangal Sagar Bhopal
Solapur Jaipur Pune Solapur Jaipur Pune
Guwahati Varanasi Nagpur Guwahati Varanasi Nagpur
Ranchi Raipur Naya Raipur Ranchi Raipur Naya Raipur
Kochi NDMC Ujjain Kochi NDMC Ujjain
Pimpri -Chinchwad Panaji Bhubaneswar Pimpri -Chinchwad Panaji Bhubaneswar
Aurangabad Kanpur Allahabad (Prayagraj) Aurangabad Kanpur Allahabad (Prayagraj)
Tirupati Chennai Tirupati Chennai
Rourkela Agra   Rourkela Agra  
Aligarh Tiruchirapalli   Aligarh Tiruchirapalli  
Jalandhar Tirunelveli      Jalandhar Tirunelveli     
Amritsar Thanjavur   Amritsar Thanjavur  
  Tiruppur     Tiruppur  
  Salem     Salem  
  Vellore     Vellore  
  Coimbatore     Coimbatore  
  Madurai     Madurai  
  Erode     Erode  
  Thoothukudi        Thoothukudi     
  Lucknow     Lucknow  
  Hubballi - Dharwad     Hubballi - Dharwad  
  Agartala     Agartala  
  Mangaluru     Mangaluru  
  Tumakuru     Tumakuru  
  Devengere     Devengere  
  Faridabad     Faridabad  
  Dahod     Dahod  

199 199
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 8.2 Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission Table 8.2 Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission
Table 8.2.2 Smart Road Projects Table 8.2.2 Smart Road Projects

Smart Road Projects... Smart Road Projects...

Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed
(39 Cities) (50 cities) (20 cities) (39 Cities) (50 cities) (20 cities)
Agartala Agartala Agra Agartala Agartala Agra
Agra Agra Ahmedabad Agra Agra Ahmedabad
Ahmedabad Ahmedabad Ajmer Ahmedabad Ahmedabad Ajmer
Allahabad Ajmer Belagavi Allahabad Ajmer Belagavi
Belagavi Allahabad Bhopal Belagavi Allahabad Bhopal
Bengaluru Belagavi Chennai Bengaluru Belagavi Chennai
Bhagalpur Bhagalpur Indore Bhagalpur Bhagalpur Indore
Dahod Bhopal Jabalpur Dahod Bhopal Jabalpur
Davanagere Bhubaneswar Kanpur Davanagere Bhubaneswar Kanpur
Faridabad Chandigarh Kota Faridabad Chandigarh Kota
Gangtok Chennai Mangaluru Gangtok Chennai Mangaluru
Gwalior Coimbatore Namchi Gwalior Coimbatore Namchi
Hubli-Dharwad Davanagere NDMC Hubli-Dharwad Davanagere NDMC
Jabalpur Erode Panaji Jabalpur Erode Panaji
Jalandhar Faridabad Pune Jalandhar Faridabad Pune
Kakinada Gwalior Raipur Kakinada Gwalior Raipur
Kanpur Hubli-Dharwad Solapur Kanpur Hubli-Dharwad Solapur
Karimnagar Indore Surat Karimnagar Indore Surat
Kochi Jabalpur Vadodara Kochi Jabalpur Vadodara
Kota Jaipur Varanasi Kota Jaipur Varanasi
Lucknow Kakinada   Lucknow Kakinada  
Ludhiana Kochi   Ludhiana Kochi  
Mangaluru Kohima   Mangaluru Kohima  
Namchi Ludhiana   Namchi Ludhiana  
Patna Mangaluru   Patna Mangaluru  
Pune Nagpur   Pune Nagpur  
Raipur Namchi   Raipur Namchi  
Ranchi Nashik   Ranchi Nashik  
Rourkela Panaji   Rourkela Panaji  
Solapur Patna   Solapur Patna  
Thane Puducherry   Thane Puducherry  
Tirupati Pune   Tirupati Pune  
Tiruppur Ranchi   Tiruppur Ranchi  
Tiruvanantapuram Sagar   Tiruvanantapuram Sagar  
Tumakuru Shimla   Tumakuru Shimla  
Udaipur Shivamogga   Udaipur Shivamogga  
Vadodara Solapur   Vadodara Solapur  
Vishakhapatnam Srinagar   Vishakhapatnam Srinagar  
Warangal Surat   Warangal Surat  
  Thane     Thane  

200 200
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Smart Road Projects... Smart Road Projects...

Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed
(39 Cities) (50 cities) (20 cities) (39 Cities) (50 cities) (20 cities)
  Tirunelveli     Tirunelveli  
  Tiruppur     Tiruppur  
  Tiruvanantapuram     Tiruvanantapuram  
  Tumakuru     Tumakuru  
  Udaipur     Udaipur  
  Ujjain     Ujjain  
  Vadodara     Vadodara  
  Varanasi     Varanasi  
  Vishakhapatnam     Vishakhapatnam  
  Warangal     Warangal  

Table 8.2 Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission Table 8.2 Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission
Table 8.2.3 Smart Solar Projects Table 8.2.3 Smart Solar Projects

Smart Solar Projects Smart Solar Projects

Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed
(11 Cities) (38 cities) (13 cities) (11 Cities) (38 cities) (13 cities)
Bhubaneswar Agra Ajmer Bhubaneswar Agra Ajmer
Dharamshala Ajmer Aurangabad Dharamshala Ajmer Aurangabad
Hubli-Dharwad Amritsar Bhopal Hubli-Dharwad Amritsar Bhopal
Jalandhar Bengaluru Chandigarh Jalandhar Bengaluru Chandigarh
Kochi Bhopal Coimbatore Kochi Bhopal Coimbatore
Patna Bhubaneswar Indore Patna Bhubaneswar Indore
Raipur Chandigarh Jabalpur Raipur Chandigarh Jabalpur
Shivamogga Chennai Jaipur Shivamogga Chennai Jaipur
Solapur Coimbatore NDMC Solapur Coimbatore NDMC
Tumakuru Davanagere Surat Tumakuru Davanagere Surat
Vadodara Guwahati Tumakuru Vadodara Guwahati Tumakuru
  Gwalior Udaipur   Gwalior Udaipur
  Imphal Vishakhapatnam   Imphal Vishakhapatnam
  Indore     Indore  
  Jabalpur     Jabalpur  
  Jaipur     Jaipur  
  Kakinada     Kakinada  
  Kochi     Kochi  
  Kota     Kota  
  Lucknow     Lucknow  
  Ludhiana     Ludhiana  
  Madurai     Madurai  
  Mangaluru     Mangaluru  
  Namchi     Namchi  
  Nashik     Nashik  

201 201
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Smart Solar Projects Smart Solar Projects

Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed
(11 Cities) (38 cities) (13 cities) (11 Cities) (38 cities) (13 cities)
  Naya Raipur     Naya Raipur  
  New Town Kolkata     New Town Kolkata  
  Pune     Pune  
  Solapur     Solapur  
  Surat     Surat  
  Thane     Thane  
  Tiruvanantapuram     Tiruvanantapuram  
  Tumakuru     Tumakuru  
  Udaipur     Udaipur  
  Ujjain     Ujjain  
  Vadodara     Vadodara  
  Varanasi     Varanasi  
  Vishakhapatnam     Vishakhapatnam  

Table 8.2 Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission Table 8.2 Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission

Table 8.2.4 Smart Water Projects Table 8.2.4 Smart Water Projects

Smart Water Projects... Smart Water Projects...

Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed
(27 Cities) (44 cities) (20 cities) (27 Cities) (44 cities) (20 cities)
Agartala Ahmedabad Ahmedabad Agartala Ahmedabad Ahmedabad
Agra Ajmer Coimbatore Agra Ajmer Coimbatore
Ahmedabad Allahabad Dahod Ahmedabad Allahabad Dahod
Aligarh Amravati Dharamshala Aligarh Amravati Dharamshala
Allahabad Belagavi Guwahati Allahabad Belagavi Guwahati
Bhopal Bhagalpur Gwalior Bhopal Bhagalpur Gwalior
Chandigarh Bhopal Kakinada Chandigarh Bhopal Kakinada
Chennai Bihar Sharif Kochi Chennai Bihar Sharif Kochi
Dahod Chennai Lucknow Dahod Chennai Lucknow
Davanagere Coimbatore Nashik Davanagere Coimbatore Nashik
Dehradun Davanagere NDMC Dehradun Davanagere NDMC
Gandhinagar Erode Raipur Gandhinagar Erode Raipur
Hubli-Dharwad Gangtok Solapur Hubli-Dharwad Gangtok Solapur
Jhansi Gwalior Surat Jhansi Gwalior Surat
Kakinada Hubli-Dharwad Thanjavur Kakinada Hubli-Dharwad Thanjavur
Kohima Imphal Ujjain Kohima Imphal Ujjain
Lucknow Indore Vadodara Lucknow Indore Vadodara
Ludhiana Jabalpur Varanasi Ludhiana Jabalpur Varanasi
Mangaluru Jaipur Vellore Mangaluru Jaipur Vellore
NDMC Jhansi Warangal NDMC Jhansi Warangal

202 202
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Smart Water Projects... Smart Water Projects...

Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed
(27 Cities) (44 cities) (20 cities) (27 Cities) (44 cities) (20 cities)
Raipur Kakinada   Raipur Kakinada  
Surat Kavarati   Surat Kavarati  
Thane Kochi   Thane Kochi  
Thanjavur Namchi   Thanjavur Namchi  
Tirupati Pune   Tirupati Pune  
Tiruppur Raipur   Tiruppur Raipur  
Vadodara Rajkot   Vadodara Rajkot  
  Ranchi     Ranchi  
  Sagar     Sagar  
  Salem     Salem  
  Shivamogga     Shivamogga  
  Surat     Surat  
  Thane     Thane  
  Thanjavur     Thanjavur  
  Tirunelveli     Tirunelveli  
  Tiruppur     Tiruppur  
  Tiruvanantapuram     Tiruvanantapuram  
  Tumakuru     Tumakuru  
  Ujjain     Ujjain  
  Vadodara     Vadodara  
  Varanasi     Varanasi  
  Vellore     Vellore  
  Vishakhapatnam     Vishakhapatnam  
  Warangal     Warangal  

203 203
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 8.2 Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission Table 8.2 Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission
Table 8.2.5 Public Private Partnership (PPP) Projects Table 8.2.5 Public Private Partnership (PPP) Projects

Public Private Partnership Projects Public Private Partnership Projects

Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed
(39 Cities) (38 cities) (21 cities) (39 Cities) (38 cities) (21 cities)
Ahmedabad Agra Agra Ahmedabad Agra Agra
Allahabad Ahmedabad Ahmedabad Allahabad Ahmedabad Ahmedabad
Amravati Ajmer Ajmer Amravati Ajmer Ajmer
Belagavi Bhopal Bhopal Belagavi Bhopal Bhopal
Bengaluru Bhubaneswar Coimbatore Bengaluru Bhubaneswar Coimbatore
Bhagalpur Chandigarh Dahod Bhagalpur Chandigarh Dahod
Bhubaneswar Chennai Gwalior Bhubaneswar Chennai Gwalior
Bihar Sharif Coimbatore Indore Bihar Sharif Coimbatore Indore
Chandigarh Davanagere Jabalpur Chandigarh Davanagere Jabalpur
Coimbatore Gandhinagar Kochi Coimbatore Gandhinagar Kochi
Davanagere Guwahati Kota Davanagere Guwahati Kota
Dehradun Gwalior Lucknow Dehradun Gwalior Lucknow
Faridabad Hubli-Dharwad Nashik Faridabad Hubli-Dharwad Nashik
Gandhinagar Indore NDMC Gandhinagar Indore NDMC
Gangtok Jabalpur Pune Gangtok Jabalpur Pune
Gwalior Jaipur Raipur Gwalior Jaipur Raipur
Hubli-Dharwad Jhansi Surat Hubli-Dharwad Jhansi Surat
Indore Kakinada Thane Indore Kakinada Thane
Jabalpur Kanpur Ujjain Jabalpur Kanpur Ujjain
Kakinada Kota Vadodara Kakinada Kota Vadodara
Kalyan-Dombivali Lucknow Vishakhapatnam Kalyan-Dombivali Lucknow Vishakhapatnam
Kanpur Ludhiana   Kanpur Ludhiana  
Kochi Mangaluru   Kochi Mangaluru  
Lucknow Nagpur   Lucknow Nagpur  
Mangaluru Namchi   Mangaluru Namchi  
Nashik Nashik   Nashik Nashik  
Panaji NDMC   Panaji NDMC  
Patna Pune   Patna Pune  
Pune Raipur   Pune Raipur  
Raipur Sagar   Raipur Sagar  
Satna Surat   Satna Surat  
Shivamogga Thane   Shivamogga Thane  
Solapur Tumakuru   Solapur Tumakuru  
Surat Udaipur   Surat Udaipur  
Tirupati Ujjain   Tirupati Ujjain  
Tiruvanantapuram Vadodara   Tiruvanantapuram Vadodara  
Tumakuru Varanasi   Tumakuru Varanasi  
Udaipur Vishakhapatnam   Udaipur Vishakhapatnam  

204 204
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Public Private Partnership Projects Public Private Partnership Projects

Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed
(39 Cities) (38 cities) (21 cities) (39 Cities) (38 cities) (21 cities)
Ujjain     Ujjain    

Table 8.2 Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission Table 8.2 Key Projects Under Smart Cities Mission
Table 8.2.6 Vibrant Public Places Table 8.2.6 Vibrant Public Places

Vibrant Public Places Vibrant Public Places

Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed
(21 Cities) (37 cities) (18 cities) (21 Cities) (37 cities) (18 cities)
Agartala Agra Bhagalpur Agartala Agra Bhagalpur
Ahmedabad Ahmedabad Bhopal Ahmedabad Ahmedabad Bhopal
Bhubaneswar Ajmer Chandigarh Bhubaneswar Ajmer Chandigarh
Coimbatore Belagavi Davanagere Coimbatore Belagavi Davanagere
Faridabad Bhopal Indore Faridabad Bhopal Indore
Guwahati Bhubaneswar Jaipur Guwahati Bhubaneswar Jaipur
Gwalior Chandigarh Kanpur Gwalior Chandigarh Kanpur
Jabalpur Chennai Nashik Jabalpur Chennai Nashik
Jaipur Coimbatore NDMC Jaipur Coimbatore NDMC
Kalyan-Dombivali Davanagere Pune Kalyan-Dombivali Davanagere Pune
Kota Gwalior Ranchi Kota Gwalior Ranchi
Lucknow Imphal Thane Lucknow Imphal Thane
Mangaluru Indore Tumakuru Mangaluru Indore Tumakuru
Nashik Jabalpur Udaipur Nashik Jabalpur Udaipur
Ranchi Jaipur Vadodara Ranchi Jaipur Vadodara
Rourkela Kakinada Varanasi Rourkela Kakinada Varanasi
Shivamogga Kalyan-Dombivali Vishakhapatnam Shivamogga Kalyan-Dombivali Vishakhapatnam
Surat Kanpur Warangal Surat Kanpur Warangal
Thane Kohima   Thane Kohima  
Tumakuru Kota   Tumakuru Kota  
Udaipur Lucknow   Udaipur Lucknow  
  Ludhiana     Ludhiana  
  Madurai     Madurai  
  Namchi     Namchi  
  Panaji     Panaji  
  Raipur     Raipur  
  Ranchi     Ranchi  
  Rourkela     Rourkela  
  Shivamogga     Shivamogga  
  Surat     Surat  
  Thane     Thane  
  Udaipur     Udaipur  

205 205
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Vibrant Public Places Vibrant Public Places

Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed Tender issued Work Order Issued Work Completed
(21 Cities) (37 cities) (18 cities) (21 Cities) (37 cities) (18 cities)
  Ujjain     Ujjain  
  Vadodara     Vadodara  
  Varanasi     Varanasi  
  Vishakhapatnam     Vishakhapatnam  
  Warangal     Warangal  

206 206
 Chapter 9 Chapter 9

Swachh Bharat Mission Swachh Bharat Mission

“The biggest strength of a democracy is Jan Bhagidari. We are “The biggest strength of a democracy is Jan Bhagidari. We are
seeing great enthusiasm towards Swachh Bharat Mission. seeing great enthusiasm towards Swachh Bharat Mission.
Success of Swachh Bharat Mission is not due to governments, it Success of Swachh Bharat Mission is not due to governments, it
is due to people.” is due to people.”

Narendra Modi Narendra Modi

Prime Minister Prime Minister
(Speech on the occasion of concluding ceremony of (Speech on the occasion of concluding ceremony of
'Namami Devi Narmada Sewa Yatra') 'Namami Devi Narmada Sewa Yatra')
15-05-2017 15-05-2017
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Objectives- Objectives-

Two primary components of implementation: Two primary components of implementation:

a.    achieving 100% open defecation free (ODF) status, and a.    achieving 100% open defecation free (ODF) status, and

b.    putting in place systems to achieve 100% solid waste management —   in all ULBs in the b.    putting in place systems to achieve 100% solid waste management —   in all ULBs in the
country. country.

Progress in Sanitation and ODF status: Progress in Sanitation and ODF status:

Till date, urban areas of 23 states / UTs have become ODF (Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Dadra & Nagar Till date, urban areas of 23 states / UTs have become ODF (Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Dadra & Nagar
Haveli, Daman & Diu, Chandigarh, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Haryana, Jharkhand, Haveli, Daman & Diu, Chandigarh, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Haryana, Jharkhand,
Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Mizoram, Manipur, Sikkim, Telangana, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Karnata- Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Mizoram, Manipur, Sikkim, Telangana, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Karnata-
ka, Puducherry, Kerala, Tripura and Punjab). ka, Puducherry, Kerala, Tripura and Punjab).

209 209
Handbook of Urban Statistics
In all, 4,140 cities have declared themselves ODF, of which 3,489 cities have been certified through
third party verification.This has been achieved by the construction of nearly 62.7 lakh Individu-
al Household Toilets (against Mission target of 66 lakhs; i.e. 94% constructed and under construc-
tion against target), and 5.12 lakh seats of community / public toilets (against Mission target of 5.08
lakh seats; i.e. more than 100% constructed and under construction against target) under the Mission.
210
Handbook of Urban Statistics
In all, 4,140 cities have declared themselves ODF, of which 3,489 cities have been certified through
third party verification.This has been achieved by the construction of nearly 62.7 lakh Individu-
al Household Toilets (against Mission target of 66 lakhs; i.e. 94% constructed and under construc-
tion against target), and 5.12 lakh seats of community / public toilets (against Mission target of 5.08
lakh seats; i.e. more than 100% constructed and under construction against target) under the Mission.
210
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
MoHUA has partnered with Google to map all public toilets on Google maps, thereby improving ease of access
of sanitation facilities to citizens. Till date, 1065 cities have uploaded more than 37000 PTs mapped on google
maps, covering more than 50% of India’s urban population.
.As we move ahead with nearly achieving objectives of ODF, the Ministry is now focusing on its sustainability
and management of complete chain of faecal and septage. In this regard, ODF+ and ODF++ protocols have
been launched, wherein ODF+ focuses on wherein ODF+ protocol focuses on Operation &Maintenance of
community / public toilets by ensuring functionality and proper maintenance of CT/PTs for their continued
usage, and ODF++ focuses on addressing safe management of faecal sludge from toilets, and ensuring that
no untreated sludge is discharged into open drains, water bodies or in the open. Till date,308 cities have been
certified ODF+, and 130 cities have been certified ODF++
Progress in Solid Waste Management:
Currently, 72,503 wards out of 84,229 wards, i.e. 86% of wards, are practicing 100% door to door collection,
51,114 wards out of 84,229 wards, i.e. 60.7% of wards, are practicing 100% source segregation, and 51.26%
of waste generated is being processed which was close to 18% in 2014.
86%
74%
51%
41%
A variety of policy interventions have been introduced to encourage conversion of waste to value added prod-
ucts under solid waste management:
• Revision of SBM guidelines for enhanced Central assistance
- The SBM guidelines have been revised upwards to 35% of project cost to ULBs as Central share
(from 20% earlier) for SWM.
211
Handbook of Urban Statistics
MoHUA has partnered with Google to map all public toilets on Google maps, thereby improving ease of access
of sanitation facilities to citizens. Till date, 1065 cities have uploaded more than 37000 PTs mapped on google
maps, covering more than 50% of India’s urban population.
.As we move ahead with nearly achieving objectives of ODF, the Ministry is now focusing on its sustainability
and management of complete chain of faecal and septage. In this regard, ODF+ and ODF++ protocols have
been launched, wherein ODF+ focuses on wherein ODF+ protocol focuses on Operation &Maintenance of
community / public toilets by ensuring functionality and proper maintenance of CT/PTs for their continued
usage, and ODF++ focuses on addressing safe management of faecal sludge from toilets, and ensuring that
no untreated sludge is discharged into open drains, water bodies or in the open. Till date,308 cities have been
certified ODF+, and 130 cities have been certified ODF++
Progress in Solid Waste Management:
Currently, 72,503 wards out of 84,229 wards, i.e. 86% of wards, are practicing 100% door to door collection,
51,114 wards out of 84,229 wards, i.e. 60.7% of wards, are practicing 100% source segregation, and 51.26%
of waste generated is being processed which was close to 18% in 2014.
86%
74%
51%
41%
A variety of policy interventions have been introduced to encourage conversion of waste to value added prod-
ucts under solid waste management:
• Revision of SBM guidelines for enhanced Central assistance
- The SBM guidelines have been revised upwards to 35% of project cost to ULBs as Central share
(from 20% earlier) for SWM.
211
Handbook of Urban Statistics
• Policy on promotion of Waste to Compost
- M/o Chemicals & Fertilizers provides Market Development Assistance of Rs. 1,500 per Tonne to
encourage compost production & consumption. Compost manufacturing plants have been tagged
with fertilizer distribution companies in all States.
• Policy on promotion of Waste to Electricity
- Ministry of Power has revised the Tariff Policy 2006 under Indian Electricity Act, 2003, making it
mandatory for DISCOMS to purchase power from Waste-to-Energy plants
• Policy on promotion of reuse and recycle of Construction & Demolition Waste
- It is been made mandatory for CPWD and National Buildings Construction Company (NBCC) to use
recycled portions of Construction and Demolition (C & D) waste in their construction activities, if
the same is available within 100 km from the construction site.
• Policy on promotion of Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF)
- MOHUA has revised RDF standards to encourage greater off take of RDF and more optimum utili-
zation of RDF as fuel in cement plants and industrial units - Replacement of at least 15% of cement
industry fuel intake by Municipal Solid Waste based SCF and/or RDF (subject to the availability of
RDF).
To motivate cities to achieve garbage free status, the Ministry has launched ‘Star Rating protocol for
garbage free cities’. It is a single metric rating system, based on 12 parameters of Solid Waste Man-
agement covering, Source segregation, Door to Door Collection, compliance by bulk waste genera-
tors, daily sweeping, scientific processing of waste, scientific land filling, plastic waste management,
construction and demolition waste management, dumpsite remediation, citizen grievance redressal
system etc, all of which together contribute to a city’s overall cleanliness and garbage free status.
Additionally, in order to foster a healthy competition between cities for improving cleanliness stan-
dards, Ministry conducted Swachh Survekshan survey for the rating of 73 cities in 2016, which was
followed by ‘Swachh Survekshan-2017’ which ranked 434 cities. Indore secured 1st rank in ‘Swachh
Survekshan’ 2017.   Swachh Survekshan 2018 covered 4,203 statutory towns. Swachh Survekshan
2019covered 4,237 ULBs across the country, and the final results are being computed. In the process,
the survey has emerged as a key tool for Mission implementation and governance.
Initiatives taken by MoHUA towards making SBM a ‘Jan Andolan’ :
212
Handbook of Urban Statistics
• Policy on promotion of Waste to Compost
- M/o Chemicals & Fertilizers provides Market Development Assistance of Rs. 1,500 per Tonne to
encourage compost production & consumption. Compost manufacturing plants have been tagged
with fertilizer distribution companies in all States.
• Policy on promotion of Waste to Electricity
- Ministry of Power has revised the Tariff Policy 2006 under Indian Electricity Act, 2003, making it
mandatory for DISCOMS to purchase power from Waste-to-Energy plants
• Policy on promotion of reuse and recycle of Construction & Demolition Waste
- It is been made mandatory for CPWD and National Buildings Construction Company (NBCC) to use
recycled portions of Construction and Demolition (C & D) waste in their construction activities, if
the same is available within 100 km from the construction site.
• Policy on promotion of Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF)
- MOHUA has revised RDF standards to encourage greater off take of RDF and more optimum utili-
zation of RDF as fuel in cement plants and industrial units - Replacement of at least 15% of cement
industry fuel intake by Municipal Solid Waste based SCF and/or RDF (subject to the availability of
RDF).
To motivate cities to achieve garbage free status, the Ministry has launched ‘Star Rating protocol for
garbage free cities’. It is a single metric rating system, based on 12 parameters of Solid Waste Man-
agement covering, Source segregation, Door to Door Collection, compliance by bulk waste genera-
tors, daily sweeping, scientific processing of waste, scientific land filling, plastic waste management,
construction and demolition waste management, dumpsite remediation, citizen grievance redressal
system etc, all of which together contribute to a city’s overall cleanliness and garbage free status.
Additionally, in order to foster a healthy competition between cities for improving cleanliness stan-
dards, Ministry conducted Swachh Survekshan survey for the rating of 73 cities in 2016, which was
followed by ‘Swachh Survekshan-2017’ which ranked 434 cities. Indore secured 1st rank in ‘Swachh
Survekshan’ 2017.   Swachh Survekshan 2018 covered 4,203 statutory towns. Swachh Survekshan
2019covered 4,237 ULBs across the country, and the final results are being computed. In the process,
the survey has emerged as a key tool for Mission implementation and governance.
Initiatives taken by MoHUA towards making SBM a ‘Jan Andolan’ :
212
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Swachh Survekshan has Citizen Feedback as one of its key data sources. Swachh Survekshan 2016 re-
ceived 1 lakh citizens’ feedback, while in 2017, Swachh Survekshan received 18 lakh citizen feedback.
For Swachh Survekshan 2018, 38 citizens gave their feedback whereas in Swachh Survekshan 2019,
the number has swelled to 64 lakhs, testimony to the way SBM has evolved as a people’s movement.
- For the Swachh Survekshan 2019, a series of TVCs and Radio ads have been brought out by
MOHUA featuring celebrities (film and sports personalities including Aishwarya Rai, Sachin
Tendulkar, Anil Kapoor, Shah Rukh Khan, Ayushman Khurana, Sonu Nigam, Shankar Ma-
hadevan, Deepa Malik, Sanjeev Kapoor, etc).
- MoHUA has also partnered with Department of Field Publicity to hold nearly 1000 on-field
outreach events across 250 cities for targeted behaviour change and messaging around SBM
components.
- MoHUA has also started a radio series titled ‘swachhata selfie’ where every Monday, good
practices from across the country are aired on AIR channels, along with phone-in by citizens
to give their feedback on overall cleanliness in their cities, or to pose related queries. This
programme has been very well received by cities and proving to be a good success.
- The Ministry has introduced several digital initiatives to inculcate behavioural change, viz.
o national helpline number – 1969 – to address queries from citizens around Swachh
Bharat Mission,
o ‘Swachhata’ app as a grievance redressal platform for any complaints from citizens
related to cleanliness, and
o ‘Swachh Manch’ which acts as an online knowledge management and stakeholder
engagement portal to galvanize the SBM into a true ‘jan andolan’, have been launched.   engagement portal to galvanize the SBM into a true ‘jan andolan’, have been launched.
o SBM-Urbanhas also introduced an online educational portal where 150 best practic-
es have been uploaded, in the form of training modules.
In order to build capacities of ULBs, MOHUA has brought out various advisories, viz.
1. A guideline document on Bulk waste generators to help ULBs to ensure compliance to SWM
213
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Swachh Survekshan has Citizen Feedback as one of its key data sources. Swachh Survekshan 2016 re-
ceived 1 lakh citizens’ feedback, while in 2017, Swachh Survekshan received 18 lakh citizen feedback.
For Swachh Survekshan 2018, 38 citizens gave their feedback whereas in Swachh Survekshan 2019,
the number has swelled to 64 lakhs, testimony to the way SBM has evolved as a people’s movement.
- For the Swachh Survekshan 2019, a series of TVCs and Radio ads have been brought out by
MOHUA featuring celebrities (film and sports personalities including Aishwarya Rai, Sachin
Tendulkar, Anil Kapoor, Shah Rukh Khan, Ayushman Khurana, Sonu Nigam, Shankar Ma-
hadevan, Deepa Malik, Sanjeev Kapoor, etc).
- MoHUA has also partnered with Department of Field Publicity to hold nearly 1000 on-field
outreach events across 250 cities for targeted behaviour change and messaging around SBM
components.
- MoHUA has also started a radio series titled ‘swachhata selfie’ where every Monday, good
practices from across the country are aired on AIR channels, along with phone-in by citizens
to give their feedback on overall cleanliness in their cities, or to pose related queries. This
programme has been very well received by cities and proving to be a good success.
- The Ministry has introduced several digital initiatives to inculcate behavioural change, viz.
o national helpline number – 1969 – to address queries from citizens around Swachh
Bharat Mission,
o ‘Swachhata’ app as a grievance redressal platform for any complaints from citizens
related to cleanliness, and
o ‘Swachh Manch’ which acts as an online knowledge management and stakeholder
 
o SBM-Urbanhas also introduced an online educational portal where 150 best practic-
es have been uploaded, in the form of training modules.
In order to build capacities of ULBs, MOHUA has brought out various advisories, viz.
1. A guideline document on Bulk waste generators to help ULBs to ensure compliance to SWM
213
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Rules 2016 by bulk waste generators.
2. A compendium titled ‘waste to wealth’ to help ULBs identify processing technologies suitable
to their specific needs.
3. A compendium on “Decentralised Composting options” for households and RWAs to process
their wet waste on-site
4. A ‘Manual on Municipal Solid Waste Management’ which is a comprehensive guidance manual
for Urban Local Bodies covering all aspects of SWM including planning, designing and operation
and maintenance
5. A Swachh Bharat idea book to enthuse common citizens with easy-to-implement ideas on how
they can contribute to the Mission
6. A “Swachh Neighbourhood” guideline document to encourage all stakeholders’ involvement
and ownership in keeping their neighbourhoods clean.
7. Standard Operating Procedures for Swachh Offices, Swachh parks,Swachh Hospitals, Swachh
RWAs, Swachh Clubs, Swachh Railway Stations, Swachh Roads, Swachh Volunteering, Swachh
School.
8. A DPR planning tool for providing handholding support to cities.
9. Two compilations of case studies/ success stories of transforming urban landscapes in the field
of ‘Sanitation’ and ‘Solid Waste Management’ respectively.
Through NIUA, MoHUA is conducting 80 workshops covering more than 1600 ULBs across the country to
build ULB capacities on various components of SBM. In all, nearly, 128 Capacity Building workshops have been
conducted by MoHUA to train more than 16,000 ULB Officials.
Budget and Fund releases under the Mission
Estimated cost of implementation of SBM Urban is Rs. 62,009/-Crore, including
(i). Government of India share of Rs. 14,600/- Crore.
(a). Approx. Rs. 4,800/- Crores for ODF – individual household toilets [IHHL], urinals, and community
and public toilets [CT/PT],
(b). Approx. Rs. 7,400/- Crores for SWM,
(c). Rs. 1,800/- Crores approx. for IEC, and
(d). Rs. 600/- Crores approx. for capacity building,
 (ii). State share of Rs 4,874/- Crores.
 (iii). Balance funds (Rs.42,535/- Crore) to be generated through other sources.
(iv.) Releases till date-  Rs 8720 crores have been released under various Mission components till date. The
breakup of Mission allocation of various components and year-wise releases are given in the table below:
214
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Rules 2016 by bulk waste generators.
2. A compendium titled ‘waste to wealth’ to help ULBs identify processing technologies suitable
to their specific needs.
3. A compendium on “Decentralised Composting options” for households and RWAs to process
their wet waste on-site
4. A ‘Manual on Municipal Solid Waste Management’ which is a comprehensive guidance manual
for Urban Local Bodies covering all aspects of SWM including planning, designing and operation
and maintenance
5. A Swachh Bharat idea book to enthuse common citizens with easy-to-implement ideas on how
they can contribute to the Mission
6. A “Swachh Neighbourhood” guideline document to encourage all stakeholders’ involvement
and ownership in keeping their neighbourhoods clean.
7. Standard Operating Procedures for Swachh Offices, Swachh parks,Swachh Hospitals, Swachh
RWAs, Swachh Clubs, Swachh Railway Stations, Swachh Roads, Swachh Volunteering, Swachh
School.
8. A DPR planning tool for providing handholding support to cities.
9. Two compilations of case studies/ success stories of transforming urban landscapes in the field
of ‘Sanitation’ and ‘Solid Waste Management’ respectively.
Through NIUA, MoHUA is conducting 80 workshops covering more than 1600 ULBs across the country to
build ULB capacities on various components of SBM. In all, nearly, 128 Capacity Building workshops have been
conducted by MoHUA to train more than 16,000 ULB Officials.
Budget and Fund releases under the Mission
Estimated cost of implementation of SBM Urban is Rs. 62,009/-Crore, including
(i). Government of India share of Rs. 14,600/- Crore.
(a). Approx. Rs. 4,800/- Crores for ODF – individual household toilets [IHHL], urinals, and community
and public toilets [CT/PT],
(b). Approx. Rs. 7,400/- Crores for SWM,
(c). Rs. 1,800/- Crores approx. for IEC, and
(d). Rs. 600/- Crores approx. for capacity building,
 (ii). State share of Rs 4,874/- Crores.
 (iii). Balance funds (Rs.42,535/- Crore) to be generated through other sources.
(iv.) Releases till date-  Rs 8720 crores have been released under various Mission components till date. The
breakup of Mission allocation of various components and year-wise releases are given in the table below:
214
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Releases (Rs in crores) for various components Releases (Rs in crores) for various components

Year IEC (inclat CB(inclat Year IEC (inclat CB(inclat

IHHL CT/PT SWM Total IHHL CT/PT SWM Total
Centre) Centre) Centre) Centre)

2014-2015 2014-2015
367.61 85.03 287.50 95.59 23.75 859.48 367.61 85.03 287.50 95.59 23.75 859.48
2015-2016 2015-2016
694.68 35.04 286.46 79.15 13.04 1108.16 694.68 35.04 286.46 79.15 13.04 1108.16
2016-2017 699.11 157.60 916.70 307.58 56.38 2137.38 2016-2017 699.11 157.60 916.70 307.58 56.38 2137.38
2017-2018 531.84 225.96 1302.59 345.17 136.16 2541.74 2017-2018 531.84 225.96 1302.59 345.17 136.16 2541.74
2018-2019 (till date) 2018-2019 (till date)
427.44 93.74 1347.22 141.26 64.27 2073.96 427.44 93.74 1347.22 141.26 64.27 2073.96
Total (till date) Total (till date)
2720.48 597.39 4140.48 968.78 293.61 8720.74 2720.48 597.39 4140.48 968.78 293.61 8720.74

Mission alloca- Mission alloca-

4819.79 7365.82 1827.85 609.27 14622.73 4819.79 7365.82 1827.85 609.27 14622.73
tion tion

Some Indicative Stories from the field Some Indicative Stories from the field

Under SBM Urban, there are various encouraging pockets of excellence being demonstrated across and cities. Under SBM Urban, there are various encouraging pockets of excellence being demonstrated across and cities.
In fact, some states and cities are doing remarkably well. For example: In fact, some states and cities are doing remarkably well. For example:

• Indore, which has emerged as India’s cleanest city for two years in succession practices 100%
source segregation and processing, has out in place a variety of innovative waste processing
models to treat every waste stream, and has also bio-remediated its legacy dumpsite and con-
verted it into a golf course.
• Similarly, Bhopal and Jabalpur in MP are practicing 100% source segregation.
• 100% of waste in Gangtok is being segregated at source and being processed.
• Navi Mumbai is already segregating 88% of its MSW at source.
• Bengaluru has an innovative online portal to support all Bulk Waste generators to comply with
SWM rules.
• Chhatisgarh is on its way to becoming a Zero Landfill state through the Zero Waste Model being
replicated in its cities. Ambikapur in Chhatisgarh has no open dumping yards, segregating over
90% of its waste and generating ₹13 lakh every month through their innovative Solid Liquid
Waste Management (SLRM) approach.
• Kerala has been leading the way in decentralized waste management with most of its cities
having installed pipe compost and bio gas plants at the household level. In fact, Alappuzha in
Kerala is among the top five cities in the world recognised by the United Nations Environment
Programme (UNEP) in its efforts to tackle the problem of solid waste.
• Goa has proven how waste can be an asset through its source segregation into 5 fractions. The
city claims 100% door to door collection. Most residential societies have composting units and
kitchen gardens in place for utilizing the compost produced.
• Indore, which has emerged as India’s cleanest city for two years in succession practices 100%
source segregation and processing, has out in place a variety of innovative waste processing
models to treat every waste stream, and has also bio-remediated its legacy dumpsite and con-
verted it into a golf course.
• Similarly, Bhopal and Jabalpur in MP are practicing 100% source segregation.
• 100% of waste in Gangtok is being segregated at source and being processed.
• Navi Mumbai is already segregating 88% of its MSW at source.
• Bengaluru has an innovative online portal to support all Bulk Waste generators to comply with
SWM rules.
• Chhatisgarh is on its way to becoming a Zero Landfill state through the Zero Waste Model being
replicated in its cities. Ambikapur in Chhatisgarh has no open dumping yards, segregating over
90% of its waste and generating ₹13 lakh every month through their innovative Solid Liquid
Waste Management (SLRM) approach.
• Kerala has been leading the way in decentralized waste management with most of its cities
having installed pipe compost and bio gas plants at the household level. In fact, Alappuzha in
Kerala is among the top five cities in the world recognised by the United Nations Environment
Programme (UNEP) in its efforts to tackle the problem of solid waste.
• Goa has proven how waste can be an asset through its source segregation into 5 fractions. The
city claims 100% door to door collection. Most residential societies have composting units and
kitchen gardens in place for utilizing the compost produced.

215 215
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission Urban Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission Urban
Table 9.1 OPEN DEFECATION FREE STATUS (ODF) Table 9.1 OPEN DEFECATION FREE STATUS (ODF)

OPEN DEFECATION FREE STATUS (ODF) OPEN DEFECATION FREE STATUS (ODF)
Sr. No. State/UT Sr. No. State/UT
ODF Declared ODF Declared
Total Cities % ODF Declared Total Cities % ODF Declared
Cities Cities
1 Andhra Pradesh 110 110 100% 1 Andhra Pradesh 110 110 100%
Andman & Nicobar Andman & Nicobar
2 1 1 100% 2 1 1 100%
Islands Islands
3 Arunachal Pradesh 28 13 46% 3 Arunachal Pradesh 28 13 46%
4 Assam 96 66 69% 4 Assam 96 66 69%
5 Bihar 144 135 94% 5 Bihar 144 135 94%
6 Chandigarh UT 1 1 100% 6 Chandigarh UT 1 1 100%
7 Chhattisgarh 168 168 100% 7 Chhattisgarh 168 168 100%
8 Daman & Diu 1 1 100% 8 Daman & Diu 1 1 100%
9 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 2 2 100% 9 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 2 2 100%
10 NCT of Delhi 5 5 100% 10 NCT of Delhi 5 5 100%
11 Goa 14 0 0% 11 Goa 14 0 0%
12 Gujarat 171 171 100% 12 Gujarat 171 171 100%
13 Haryana 81 81 100% 13 Haryana 81 81 100%
14 Himachal Pradesh 61 58 95% 14 Himachal Pradesh 61 58 95%
15 Jammu & Kashmir 82 78 95% 15 Jammu & Kashmir 82 78 95%
16 Jharkhand 42 42 100% 16 Jharkhand 42 42 100%
17 Karnataka 280 280 100% 17 Karnataka 280 280 100%
18 Kerala 94 93 99% 18 Kerala 94 93 99%
19 Madhya Pradesh 383 383 100% 19 Madhya Pradesh 383 383 100%
20 Maharashtra 391 391 100% 20 Maharashtra 391 391 100%
21 Manipur 27 27 100% 21 Manipur 27 27 100%
22 Meghalaya 10 2 20% 22 Meghalaya 10 2 20%
23 Mizoram 23 23 100% 23 Mizoram 23 23 100%
24 Nagaland 19 5 26% 24 Nagaland 19 5 26%
25 Odisha 114 51 45% 25 Odisha 114 51 45%
26 Puduchery UT 5 5 100% 26 Puduchery UT 5 5 100%
27 Punjab 170 170 100% 27 Punjab 170 170 100%
28 Rajasthan 193 193 100% 28 Rajasthan 193 193 100%
29 Sikkim 7 7 100% 29 Sikkim 7 7 100%
30 Tamil Nadu 666 666 100% 30 Tamil Nadu 666 666 100%
31 Telangana 74 71 96% 31 Telangana 74 71 96%
32 Tripura 20 20 100% 32 Tripura 20 20 100%
33 Uttar Pradesh 666 649 97% 33 Uttar Pradesh 666 649 97%
34 Uttarakhand 99 99 100% 34 Uttarakhand 99 99 100%
35 West Bengal 128 73 57% 35 West Bengal 128 73 57%
  Total 4,376 4,140     Total 4,376 4,140  

216 216
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission Urban Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission Urban

Table 9.2 IHHL CONSTRUCTED Table 9.2 IHHL CONSTRUCTED

IHHL Constructed IHHL Constructed

Sr. No. State/UT Sr. No. State/UT
Mission Target Constructed % Construction Mission Target Constructed % Construction
1 Andhra Pradesh 1,93,426 2,40,964 125% 1 Andhra Pradesh 1,93,426 2,40,964 125%
2 Andman & Nicobar Islands 384 336 88% 2 Andman & Nicobar Islands 384 336 88%
3 Arunachal Pradesh 12,252 5,611 46% 3 Arunachal Pradesh 12,252 5,611 46%
4 Assam 75,720 31,489 42% 4 Assam 75,720 31,489 42%
5 Bihar 3,83,079 2,89,078 75% 5 Bihar 3,83,079 2,89,078 75%
6 Chandigarh UT 4,282 6,117 143% 6 Chandigarh UT 4,282 6,117 143%
7 Chhattisgarh 3,00,000 3,25,050 108% 7 Chhattisgarh 3,00,000 3,25,050 108%
8 Daman & Diu 672 675 100% 8 Daman & Diu 672 675 100%
9 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1,742 1,181 68% 9 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1,742 1,181 68%
10 NCT of Delhi 1,25,398 458 0% 10 NCT of Delhi 1,25,398 458 0%
11 Goa 8,020 1,293 16% 11 Goa 8,020 1,293 16%
12 Gujarat 4,06,388 5,60,046 138% 12 Gujarat 4,06,388 5,60,046 138%
13 Haryana 1,10,000 62,068 56% 13 Haryana 1,10,000 62,068 56%
14 Himachal Pradesh 12,560 3,173 25% 14 Himachal Pradesh 12,560 3,173 25%
15 Jammu & Kashmir 94,091 37,725 40% 15 Jammu & Kashmir 94,091 37,725 40%
16 Jharkhand 1,61,713 2,14,264 132% 16 Jharkhand 1,61,713 2,14,264 132%
17 Karnataka 3,50,000 3,05,244 87% 17 Karnataka 3,50,000 3,05,244 87%
18 Kerala 90,986 44,868 49% 18 Kerala 90,986 44,868 49%
19 Madhya Pradesh 5,12,380 5,10,519 100% 19 Madhya Pradesh 5,12,380 5,10,519 100%
20 Maharashtra 6,29,819 6,82,812 108% 20 Maharashtra 6,29,819 6,82,812 108%
21 Manipur 43,644 16,512 38% 21 Manipur 43,644 16,512 38%
22 Meghalaya 5,066 1,037 20% 22 Meghalaya 5,066 1,037 20%
23 Mizoram 16,441 2,972 18% 23 Mizoram 16,441 2,972 18%
24 Nagaland 24,350 9,300 38% 24 Nagaland 24,350 9,300 38%
25 Odisha 2,84,071 1,04,246 37% 25 Odisha 2,84,071 1,04,246 37%
26 Puduchery UT 9,626 3,825 40% 26 Puduchery UT 9,626 3,825 40%
27 Punjab 1,38,010 1,00,511 73% 27 Punjab 1,38,010 1,00,511 73%
28 Rajasthan 3,93,767 3,55,958 90% 28 Rajasthan 3,93,767 3,55,958 90%
29 Sikkim 1,587 1,066 67% 29 Sikkim 1,587 1,066 67%
30 Tamil Nadu 6,02,029 4,58,631 76% 30 Tamil Nadu 6,02,029 4,58,631 76%
31 Telangana 2,16,075 1,47,788 68% 31 Telangana 2,16,075 1,47,788 68%
32 Tripura 63,348 16,516 26% 32 Tripura 63,348 16,516 26%
33 Uttar Pradesh 8,28,237 7,33,256 89% 33 Uttar Pradesh 8,28,237 7,33,256 89%
34 Uttarakhand 27,640 14,623 53% 34 Uttarakhand 27,640 14,623 53%
35 West Bengal 5,15,419 2,82,542 55% 35 West Bengal 5,15,419 2,82,542 55%
  Total 66,42,220 55,71,754     Total 66,42,220 55,71,754  

217 217
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission Urban Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission Urban
Table 9.3 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC TOILETS Table 9.3 COMMUNITY & PUBLIC TOILETS

COMMUNITY & PUBLIC TOILETS COMMUNITY & PUBLIC TOILETS

(NO. OF SEATS) (NO. OF SEATS)
Sr. No. State/UT Sr. No. State/UT
Mission Target Constructed % Construction Mission Target Constructed % Construction
1 Andhra Pradesh 21,464 15,368 72% 1 Andhra Pradesh 21,464 15,368 72%
Andman & Nicobar Andman & Nicobar
2 126 601 478% 2 126 601 478%
Islands Islands
3 Arunachal Pradesh 387 46 12% 3 Arunachal Pradesh 387 46 12%
4 Assam 3,554 2,808 79% 4 Assam 3,554 2,808 79%
5 Bihar 26,439 8,651 33% 5 Bihar 26,439 8,651 33%
6 Chandigarh UT 976 2,441 250% 6 Chandigarh UT 976 2,441 250%
7 Chhattisgarh 17,796 23,965 135% 7 Chhattisgarh 17,796 23,965 135%
8 Daman & Diu 77 511 664% 8 Daman & Diu 77 511 664%
9 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 142 118 83% 9 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 142 118 83%
10 NCT of Delhi 11,138 19,373 174% 10 NCT of Delhi 11,138 19,373 174%
11 Goa 507 545 107% 11 Goa 507 545 107%
12 Gujarat 31,010 21,928 71% 12 Gujarat 31,010 21,928 71%
13 Haryana 10,393 10,392 100% 13 Haryana 10,393 10,392 100%
14 Himachal Pradesh 876 1,422 162% 14 Himachal Pradesh 876 1,422 162%
15 Jammu & Kashmir 3,779 2,114 56% 15 Jammu & Kashmir 3,779 2,114 56%
16 Jharkhand 12,366 7,495 61% 16 Jharkhand 12,366 7,495 61%
17 Karnataka 34,839 28,424 82% 17 Karnataka 34,839 28,424 82%
18 Kerala 4,801 2,546 53% 18 Kerala 4,801 2,546 53%
19 Madhya Pradesh 40,230 27,978 70% 19 Madhya Pradesh 40,230 27,978 70%
20 Maharashtra 59,706 1,06,263 178% 20 Maharashtra 59,706 1,06,263 178%
21 Manipur 620 394 64% 21 Manipur 620 394 64%
22 Meghalaya 362 142 39% 22 Meghalaya 362 142 39%
23 Mizoram 491 160 33% 23 Mizoram 491 160 33%
24 Nagaland 478 165 34% 24 Nagaland 478 165 34%
25 Odisha 17,800 7,910 44% 25 Odisha 17,800 7,910 44%
26 Puduchery UT 1,204 280 23% 26 Puduchery UT 1,204 280 23%
27 Punjab 10,924 10,530 96% 27 Punjab 10,924 10,530 96%
28 Rajasthan 26,364 22,146 84% 28 Rajasthan 26,364 22,146 84%
29 Sikkim 142 108 76% 29 Sikkim 142 108 76%
30 Tamil Nadu 59,921 84,847 142% 30 Tamil Nadu 59,921 84,847 142%
31 Telangana 15,543 4,907 32% 31 Telangana 15,543 4,907 32%
32 Tripura 586 110 19% 32 Tripura 586 110 19%
33 Uttar Pradesh 63,451 54,205 85% 33 Uttar Pradesh 63,451 54,205 85%
34 Uttarakhand 2,611 4,459 171% 34 Uttarakhand 2,611 4,459 171%
35 West Bengal 26,484 299 1% 35 West Bengal 26,484 299 1%
  Total 5,07,588 4,73,651     Total 5,07,588 4,73,651  

218 218
 Table 9.4 Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission Urban
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT STATUS
Wards with 100% Door to Wards with 100% Source
Waste Processing
door collection Segregation
Sr. No. State/UT Total Wards Total
(Nos.) Total waste
waste
No. of Wards % of wards No. of Wards % of wards generation
process-
(MT/D)
ing (%)
1 Andhra Pradesh 3,409 3,409 100% 3,050 89% 6,384 40%
Andaman & Nicobar
2 24 24 100% 6 25% 100 54%
Islands
3 Arunachal Pradesh 73 73 100% 22 30% 181 20%
4 Assam 934 547 59% 142 15% 1,134 41%
5 Bihar 3,377 2,970 88% 624 18% 2,389 48%
6 Chandigarh UT 26 26 100% 24 92% 446 87%

219
7 Chhattisgarh 3,217 3,217 100% 3,217 100% 1,649 84%
8 Daman & Diu 28 28 100% 28 100% 32 65%
9 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 15 15 100% 0 0% 35 0%
10 NCT of Delhi 294 254 86% 37 13% 10,500 55%
11 Goa 214 214 100% 128 60% 260 65%
12 Gujarat 1,415 1,415 100% 750 53% 10,721 69%
13 Haryana 1,496 1,310 88% 670 45% 4,514 30%
14 Himachal Pradesh 497 419 84% 218 44% 342 52%
15 Jammu & Kashmir 1,100 630 57% 141 13% 1,415 8%
16 Jharkhand 978 956 98% 804 82% 2,126 56%
17 Karnataka 6,507 5,291 81% 1,814 28% 10,000 32%
18 Kerala 3,536 2,918 83% 3,536 100% 624 61%
19 Madhya Pradesh 6,999 6,999 100% 5,675 81% 6,424 71%
20 Maharashtra 7,322 5,990 82% 5,485 75% 22,570 57%
21 Manipur 306 157 51% 45 15% 174 50%
22 Meghalaya 114 27 24% 27 24% 268 58%
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 9.4 Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission Urban

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT STATUS
Wards with 100% Door to Wards with 100% Source
Waste Processing
door collection Segregation
Sr. No. State/UT Total Wards Total
(Nos.) Total waste
waste
No. of Wards % of wards No. of Wards % of wards generation
process-
(MT/D)
ing (%)
1 Andhra Pradesh 3,409 3,409 100% 3,050 89% 6,384 40%
Andaman & Nicobar
2 24 24 100% 6 25% 100 54%
Islands
3 Arunachal Pradesh 73 73 100% 22 30% 181 20%
4 Assam 934 547 59% 142 15% 1,134 41%
5 Bihar 3,377 2,970 88% 624 18% 2,389 48%
6 Chandigarh UT 26 26 100% 24 92% 446 87%
219

7 Chhattisgarh 3,217 3,217 100% 3,217 100% 1,649 84%

8 Daman & Diu 28 28 100% 28 100% 32 65%
9 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 15 15 100% 0 0% 35 0%
10 NCT of Delhi 294 254 86% 37 13% 10,500 55%
11 Goa 214 214 100% 128 60% 260 65%
12 Gujarat 1,415 1,415 100% 750 53% 10,721 69%
13 Haryana 1,496 1,310 88% 670 45% 4,514 30%
14 Himachal Pradesh 497 419 84% 218 44% 342 52%
15 Jammu & Kashmir 1,100 630 57% 141 13% 1,415 8%
16 Jharkhand 978 956 98% 804 82% 2,126 56%
17 Karnataka 6,507 5,291 81% 1,814 28% 10,000 32%
18 Kerala 3,536 2,918 83% 3,536 100% 624 61%
19 Madhya Pradesh 6,999 6,999 100% 5,675 81% 6,424 71%
20 Maharashtra 7,322 5,990 82% 5,485 75% 22,570 57%
21 Manipur 306 157 51% 45 15% 174 50%
22 Meghalaya 114 27 24% 27 24% 268 58%
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 23 Mizoram 328 264 80% 83 25% 201 4%
24 Nagaland 234 104 44% 128 55% 342 52%
25 Odisha 2,024 1,752 87% 520 26% 2,720 13%
26 Puduchery UT 122 122 100% 32 26% 350 35%
27 Punjab 3,096 2,804 91% 1,365 44% 4,100 38%
28 Rajasthan 5,399 5,350 99% 3,950 73% 6,500 58%
29 Sikkim 53 53 100% 47 89% 89 66%
30 Tamil Nadu 12,814 11,788 92% 10,379 81% 15,437 57%
Handbook of Urban Statistics

31 Telangana 2,112 2,020 96% 1,008 48% 8,634 73%

32 Tripura 310 65 21% 11 4% 420 45%
33 Uttar Pradesh 12,007 10,831 90% 6,689 56% 15,500 57%
34 Uttarakhand 936 873 93% 245 26% 1,406 38%
35 West Bengal 2,913 2,312 79% 214 7% 7,700 5%
  Total 84,229 75,227 51,114 1,45,687 51.26%

220
23 Mizoram 328 264 80% 83 25% 201 4%
24 Nagaland 234 104 44% 128 55% 342 52%
25 Odisha 2,024 1,752 87% 520 26% 2,720 13%
26 Puduchery UT 122 122 100% 32 26% 350 35%
27 Punjab 3,096 2,804 91% 1,365 44% 4,100 38%
28 Rajasthan 5,399 5,350 99% 3,950 73% 6,500 58%
29 Sikkim 53 53 100% 47 89% 89 66%
30 Tamil Nadu 12,814 11,788 92% 10,379 81% 15,437 57%
Handbook of Urban Statistics

31 Telangana 2,112 2,020 96% 1,008 48% 8,634 73%

32 Tripura 310 65 21% 11 4% 420 45%
33 Uttar Pradesh 12,007 10,831 90% 6,689 56% 15,500 57%
34 Uttarakhand 936 873 93% 245 26% 1,406 38%
35 West Bengal 2,913 2,312 79% 214 7% 7,700 5%
  Total 84,229 75,227 51,114 1,45,687 51.26%
220
 Table 9.5 Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission Urban

MISSION ALLOCATION Rs. in Crores

Sr.
State/UT
No. ODF
SWM IEC CB Total
(IHHL & CT/PT)
1 Andhra Pradesh 212.03 308.54 40.61 10.15 571.33
2 Andman & Nicobar Islands 0.53 2.5 0.39 0.1 3.52
3 Arunachal Pradesh 13.75 7.25 12.22 3.06 36.28
4 Assam 84.26 76.76 66.62 16.66 244.3
5 Bihar 264.17 259.96 47.64 11.91 583.68
6 Chandigarh UT 2.98 22.24 2.24 0.56 28.02
7 Chhattisgarh 175.16 131.53 40.93 10.23 357.85
8 Daman & Diu 0.35 1.57 0.53 0.13 2.58
9 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1.37 2.27 0.39 0.1 4.13

221
10 NCT of Delhi 55.31 263.68 24.61 6.15 349.75
11 Goa 3.69 9.29 3.29 0.82 17.09
12 Gujarat 194.78 536.22 82.52 20.63 834.15
13 Haryana 97.28 181.8 30.4 7.6 317.08
14 Himachal Pradesh 14.92 15.22 11.05 2.76 43.95
15 Jammu & Kashmir 106.32 67.99 21.06 5.26 200.63
16 Jharkhand 113.49 122.68 18.03 4.51 258.71
17 Karnataka 399.66 512.52 84.62 21.16 1017.96
18 Kerala 72.15 121.35 21.19 5.3 219.99
19 Madhya Pradesh 358.21 434.01 102.26 25.56 920.04
20 Maharashtra 417.47 1081.84 142.79 35.7 1677.8
21 Manipur 47.74 14.72 16.51 4.13 83.1
22 Meghalaya 5.98 8.69 7.56 1.89 24.12
23 Mizoram 18.16 13.22 14.11 3.53 49.02
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 9.5 Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission Urban

MISSION ALLOCATION Rs. in Crores

Sr.
State/UT
No. ODF
SWM IEC CB Total
(IHHL & CT/PT)
1 Andhra Pradesh 212.03 308.54 40.61 10.15 571.33
2 Andman & Nicobar Islands 0.53 2.5 0.39 0.1 3.52
3 Arunachal Pradesh 13.75 7.25 12.22 3.06 36.28
4 Assam 84.26 76.76 66.62 16.66 244.3
5 Bihar 264.17 259.96 47.64 11.91 583.68
6 Chandigarh UT 2.98 22.24 2.24 0.56 28.02
7 Chhattisgarh 175.16 131.53 40.93 10.23 357.85
8 Daman & Diu 0.35 1.57 0.53 0.13 2.58
9 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1.37 2.27 0.39 0.1 4.13
221

10 NCT of Delhi 55.31 263.68 24.61 6.15 349.75

11 Goa 3.69 9.29 3.29 0.82 17.09
12 Gujarat 194.78 536.22 82.52 20.63 834.15
13 Haryana 97.28 181.8 30.4 7.6 317.08
14 Himachal Pradesh 14.92 15.22 11.05 2.76 43.95
15 Jammu & Kashmir 106.32 67.99 21.06 5.26 200.63
16 Jharkhand 113.49 122.68 18.03 4.51 258.71
17 Karnataka 399.66 512.52 84.62 21.16 1017.96
18 Kerala 72.15 121.35 21.19 5.3 219.99
19 Madhya Pradesh 358.21 434.01 102.26 25.56 920.04
20 Maharashtra 417.47 1081.84 142.79 35.7 1677.8
21 Manipur 47.74 14.72 16.51 4.13 83.1
22 Meghalaya 5.98 8.69 7.56 1.89 24.12
23 Mizoram 18.16 13.22 14.11 3.53 49.02
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 24 Nagaland 26.78 11.69 12.02 3 53.49
25 Odisha 195.15 138.05 31.06 7.76 372.02
26 Puduchery UT 8.35 17.3 2.63 0.66 28.94
27 Punjab 87.11 220.97 44.75 11.19 364.02
28 Rajasthan 260.74 363.46 65.01 16.25 705.46
29 Sikkim 2.69 3.42 4.33 1.08 11.52
30 Tamil Nadu 431.54 689.87 186.47 46.62 1354.5
31 Telangana 153.55 223.43 29.41 7.35 413.74
Handbook of Urban Statistics

32 Tripura 68.77 15.51 12.87 3.22 100.37

33 Uttar Pradesh 553.31 940.91 197.41 49.35 1740.98
34 Uttarakhand 31.89 57.57 18.03 4.51 112
35 West Bengal 340.15 487.79 66.72 16.68 911.34
State/UT 4819.79 7365.82 1462.28 365.57 14013.46
MoHUA     365.57 243.70 609.27
Total 14622.73

222
24 Nagaland 26.78 11.69 12.02 3 53.49
25 Odisha 195.15 138.05 31.06 7.76 372.02
26 Puduchery UT 8.35 17.3 2.63 0.66 28.94
27 Punjab 87.11 220.97 44.75 11.19 364.02
28 Rajasthan 260.74 363.46 65.01 16.25 705.46
29 Sikkim 2.69 3.42 4.33 1.08 11.52
30 Tamil Nadu 431.54 689.87 186.47 46.62 1354.5
31 Telangana 153.55 223.43 29.41 7.35 413.74
Handbook of Urban Statistics

32 Tripura 68.77 15.51 12.87 3.22 100.37

33 Uttar Pradesh 553.31 940.91 197.41 49.35 1740.98
34 Uttarakhand 31.89 57.57 18.03 4.51 112
35 West Bengal 340.15 487.79 66.72 16.68 911.34
State/UT 4819.79 7365.82 1462.28 365.57 14013.46
MoHUA     365.57 243.70 609.27
Total 14622.73
222
 Table 9.6 Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission Urban

MISSION RELEASED (as on 31st January 2019)

Sr.
State/UT
No. ODF
SWM IEC CB Total
(IHHL & CT/PT)
1 Andhra Pradesh 157.38 308.54 26.50 9.64 502.05
2 Andman & Nicobar Islands 1.00 0.40 0.29 0.00 1.69
3 Arunachal Pradesh 8.00 6.84 5.93 1.95 22.72
4 Assam 42.11 38.38 19.26 5.60 105.35
5 Bihar 185.24 142.32 8.77 9.75 346.08
6 Chandigarh UT 1.72 2.47 0.85 0.34 5.39
7 Chhattisgarh 179.76 114.76 40.93 10.23 345.68
8 Daman & Diu 0.35 0.00 0.27 0.05 0.66

223
9 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 0.74 0.00 0.39 0.06 1.19
10 NCT of Delhi 30.23 116.24 11.20 0.21 157.88
11 Goa 2.58 5.93 2.93 0.42 11.86
12 Gujarat 185.54 480.23 51.44 12.80 730.01
13 Haryana 57.06 57.66 2.69 5.30 122.70
14 Himachal Pradesh 5.71 12.16 3.67 1.53 23.07
15 Jammu & Kashmir 51.54 39.45 12.77 2.10 105.86
16 Jharkhand 75.47 101.02 13.47 4.99 194.95
17 Karnataka 198.83 313.51 29.66 17.62 559.62
18 Kerala 31.67 51.64 11.45 1.46 96.22
19 Madhya Pradesh 328.24 301.75 80.13 11.24 721.36
20 Maharashtra 362.78 428.96 28.88 13.28 833.89
21 Manipur 28.06 9.61 2.76 1.17 41.60
22 Meghalaya 2.74 3.53 0.92 0.11 7.30
23 Mizoram 1.30 8.21 8.18 2.09 19.77
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 9.6 Progress of Swachh Bharat Mission Urban

MISSION RELEASED (as on 31st January 2019)

Sr.
State/UT
No. ODF
SWM IEC CB Total
(IHHL & CT/PT)
1 Andhra Pradesh 157.38 308.54 26.50 9.64 502.05
2 Andman & Nicobar Islands 1.00 0.40 0.29 0.00 1.69
3 Arunachal Pradesh 8.00 6.84 5.93 1.95 22.72
4 Assam 42.11 38.38 19.26 5.60 105.35
5 Bihar 185.24 142.32 8.77 9.75 346.08
6 Chandigarh UT 1.72 2.47 0.85 0.34 5.39
7 Chhattisgarh 179.76 114.76 40.93 10.23 345.68
8 Daman & Diu 0.35 0.00 0.27 0.05 0.66
223

9 Dadra & Nagar Haveli 0.74 0.00 0.39 0.06 1.19

10 NCT of Delhi 30.23 116.24 11.20 0.21 157.88
11 Goa 2.58 5.93 2.93 0.42 11.86
12 Gujarat 185.54 480.23 51.44 12.80 730.01
13 Haryana 57.06 57.66 2.69 5.30 122.70
14 Himachal Pradesh 5.71 12.16 3.67 1.53 23.07
15 Jammu & Kashmir 51.54 39.45 12.77 2.10 105.86
16 Jharkhand 75.47 101.02 13.47 4.99 194.95
17 Karnataka 198.83 313.51 29.66 17.62 559.62
18 Kerala 31.67 51.64 11.45 1.46 96.22
19 Madhya Pradesh 328.24 301.75 80.13 11.24 721.36
20 Maharashtra 362.78 428.96 28.88 13.28 833.89
21 Manipur 28.06 9.61 2.76 1.17 41.60
22 Meghalaya 2.74 3.53 0.92 0.11 7.30
23 Mizoram 1.30 8.21 8.18 2.09 19.77
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 24 Nagaland 14.28 7.14 5.55 1.13 28.11
25 Odisha 103.56 28.29 8.08 1.42 141.35
26 Puduchery UT 5.66 2.12 0.83 2.87 11.48
27 Punjab 56.95 120.38 14.78 1.08 193.19
28 Rajasthan 207.43 344.26 45.50 14.16 611.35
29 Sikkim 0.41 2.52 1.57 0.52 5.02
30 Tamil Nadu 259.14 345.38 73.23 9.63 687.38
31 Telangana 68.25 111.72 11.61 4.67 196.25
Handbook of Urban Statistics

32 Tripura 7.78 0.00 7.72 1.93 17.43

33 Uttar Pradesh 450.82 427.73 102.51 48.80 1029.86
34 Uttarakhand 30.13 7.55 3.43 1.69 42.80
35 West Bengal 175.41 199.80 24.02 11.19 410.42
State/UT 3317.87 4140.48 662.17 211.02 8331.54
MoHUA     306.61 82.60 389.20
Total 8720.74

224
24 Nagaland 14.28 7.14 5.55 1.13 28.11
25 Odisha 103.56 28.29 8.08 1.42 141.35
26 Puduchery UT 5.66 2.12 0.83 2.87 11.48
27 Punjab 56.95 120.38 14.78 1.08 193.19
28 Rajasthan 207.43 344.26 45.50 14.16 611.35
29 Sikkim 0.41 2.52 1.57 0.52 5.02
30 Tamil Nadu 259.14 345.38 73.23 9.63 687.38
31 Telangana 68.25 111.72 11.61 4.67 196.25
Handbook of Urban Statistics

32 Tripura 7.78 0.00 7.72 1.93 17.43

33 Uttar Pradesh 450.82 427.73 102.51 48.80 1029.86
34 Uttarakhand 30.13 7.55 3.43 1.69 42.80
35 West Bengal 175.41 199.80 24.02 11.19 410.42
State/UT 3317.87 4140.48 662.17 211.02 8331.54
MoHUA     306.61 82.60 389.20
Total 8720.74
224
 Chapter 10 Chapter 10

Atal Mission for Atal Mission for

Rejuvenation Rejuvenation
and Urban Transformation and Urban Transformation
(AMRUT) (AMRUT)
“Our pledge to make lives of Indians simple and comfortable “Our pledge to make lives of Indians simple and comfortable
has become stronger in last 3 years” has become stronger in last 3 years”

“We are working to build a system for future generations, “We are working to build a system for future generations,
where life will be based on 5 Es: Ease of Living, Education, where life will be based on 5 Es: Ease of Living, Education,
Employment, Economy and Entertainment” Employment, Economy and Entertainment”

Narendra Modi Narendra Modi

Prime Minister Prime Minister
(At Lucknow, 3rd Anniversary of PMAY-U, AMRUT & SCM) (At Lucknow, 3rd Anniversary of PMAY-U, AMRUT & SCM)
28-08-2018 28-08-2018
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT)
Background
The Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) was launched by Hon’ble Prime
Minister on 25 June, 2015 in 500 cities across the country. All ULBs with a population of one lakh or
more as per Census 2011, all other capital cities of States/Union territories(UTs), all HRIDAY cities,
identified cities in hill States, islands & tourist destinations and on the stem of the main rivers, are
covered under AMRUT. The thrust areas of the Mission are universal water supply and substantial
improvement in sewerage & septage management, storm water drainage, green spaces & parks and
non-motorized urban transport in Mission cities.
AMRUT Mission is a centrally sponsored scheme with a total outlay of Rs. 1,00,000 crore including
Central Assistance of Rs.50,000 crore spread over 5 years i.e. from FY 2015-2016 to FY 2019-2020.
80% of the budgetary allocation is for the projects, 10% for reform incentive and 10% for Administra-
tive and Office Expenses(A&OE). The Mission provides flexibility to States/UTs to appraise, approve
and implement the projects at their level. The Government of India only approves State Annual Action
Plans(SAAPs) submitted by the States/UTs and releases central assistance. For cities having population
above 10 lakh, the assistance is one third of the projects cost and for cities with less than 10 lakh pop-
ulation, assistance is 50% of the projects cost. For North East and Hill States, 90% of the project cost is
funded by Centre and projects in UTs are fully funded by the Centre. Balance funding is by the State/
ULBs or through private investment.
The funds are released to the States/UTs in three instalments of 20:40:40. First instalment is released
immediately on approval of SAAP and subsequent instalments are released on submission of UCs
worth at least 75% of the central share & corresponding State/ULB share and submission of the report
by Independent Review and Monitoring Agency (IRMA).
227
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT)
Background
The Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) was launched by Hon’ble Prime
Minister on 25 June, 2015 in 500 cities across the country. All ULBs with a population of one lakh or
more as per Census 2011, all other capital cities of States/Union territories(UTs), all HRIDAY cities,
identified cities in hill States, islands & tourist destinations and on the stem of the main rivers, are
covered under AMRUT. The thrust areas of the Mission are universal water supply and substantial
improvement in sewerage & septage management, storm water drainage, green spaces & parks and
non-motorized urban transport in Mission cities.
AMRUT Mission is a centrally sponsored scheme with a total outlay of Rs. 1,00,000 crore including
Central Assistance of Rs.50,000 crore spread over 5 years i.e. from FY 2015-2016 to FY 2019-2020.
80% of the budgetary allocation is for the projects, 10% for reform incentive and 10% for Administra-
tive and Office Expenses(A&OE). The Mission provides flexibility to States/UTs to appraise, approve
and implement the projects at their level. The Government of India only approves State Annual Action
Plans(SAAPs) submitted by the States/UTs and releases central assistance. For cities having population
above 10 lakh, the assistance is one third of the projects cost and for cities with less than 10 lakh pop-
ulation, assistance is 50% of the projects cost. For North East and Hill States, 90% of the project cost is
funded by Centre and projects in UTs are fully funded by the Centre. Balance funding is by the State/
ULBs or through private investment.
The funds are released to the States/UTs in three instalments of 20:40:40. First instalment is released
immediately on approval of SAAP and subsequent instalments are released on submission of UCs
worth at least 75% of the central share & corresponding State/ULB share and submission of the report
by Independent Review and Monitoring Agency (IRMA).
227
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Against the total plan size of Rs.77,640 crore, Rs.39,011 crore (50%) has been allocated to water supply,
Rs.32,456 crore (42%) to sewerage & septage projects, Rs.2,969 crore (4%) towards drainage projects,
Rs.1,436 crore (2%) for non-motorised urban transport and Rs.1,768 crore (2%) has been allocated for
green spaces and parks.
Besides creating basic infrastructure, the Mission also has a reform agenda spread over a set of 11
reforms comprising 54 milestones to be achieved by the States/UTs over a period of four years. These
reforms broadly cover e-governance, single window for all approvals, establishing municipal cadre,
achieving at least 90% of billing and collection of taxes/user charges, developing at least one park for
children every year, establishing maintenance system for parks and play grounds, credit rating of ULBs,
implementing model building bye-laws and audit of energy and water etc. The States/UTs are incentiv-
ized for reforms implemented in first four years of the Mission.
Progress of AMRUT Mission
Projects
• SAAPs for the entire Mission period have been approved in the first
three years itself in three rounds viz. SAAP-I (2015-16), SAAP-II (2016-
17) & SAAP-III (2017-2020).
228
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Against the total plan size of Rs.77,640 crore, Rs.39,011 crore (50%) has been allocated to water supply,
Rs.32,456 crore (42%) to sewerage & septage projects, Rs.2,969 crore (4%) towards drainage projects,
Rs.1,436 crore (2%) for non-motorised urban transport and Rs.1,768 crore (2%) has been allocated for
green spaces and parks.
Besides creating basic infrastructure, the Mission also has a reform agenda spread over a set of 11
reforms comprising 54 milestones to be achieved by the States/UTs over a period of four years. These
reforms broadly cover e-governance, single window for all approvals, establishing municipal cadre,
achieving at least 90% of billing and collection of taxes/user charges, developing at least one park for
children every year, establishing maintenance system for parks and play grounds, credit rating of ULBs,
implementing model building bye-laws and audit of energy and water etc. The States/UTs are incentiv-
ized for reforms implemented in first four years of the Mission.
Progress of AMRUT Mission
Projects
• SAAPs for the entire Mission period have been approved in the first
three years itself in three rounds viz. SAAP-I (2015-16), SAAP-II (2016-
17) & SAAP-III (2017-2020).
228
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
• Of the total plan size, Detailed Project Reports (DPRs) have been approved for 5,439 projects
worth Rs. 78,599 crore. Of these, contracts have been awarded for 4,472 projects worth Rs.56,919
crore including 1,270 completed projects worth Rs. 2,995 crore. Notice Inviting Tenders (NITs) have
been issued for 589 projects worth Rs.11,038 crore and for 378 projects worth Rs. 7,647 crore DPRs
have been approved and tenders are to be invited.
• So far. Rs.17,167 crore have been released to the States/UTs as central assistance. This includes
Rs.11,949 crore for projects funds, Rs. 591 crore for A&OE, Rs.1,395 as reform incentive, Rs.88
crore for formulation of GIS based master plans and Rs.3,144 crore for eligible projects of erst-
while JnNURM scheme. Utilization Certificates for Rs. 10,265 crore have so far been furnished
by the States and UTs.
• So far, 48.82 lakh tap water connections have been provided under the Mission and in conver-
gence with others
229
Handbook of Urban Statistics
• Of the total plan size, Detailed Project Reports (DPRs) have been approved for 5,439 projects
worth Rs. 78,599 crore. Of these, contracts have been awarded for 4,472 projects worth Rs.56,919
crore including 1,270 completed projects worth Rs. 2,995 crore. Notice Inviting Tenders (NITs) have
been issued for 589 projects worth Rs.11,038 crore and for 378 projects worth Rs. 7,647 crore DPRs
have been approved and tenders are to be invited.
• So far. Rs.17,167 crore have been released to the States/UTs as central assistance. This includes
Rs.11,949 crore for projects funds, Rs. 591 crore for A&OE, Rs.1,395 as reform incentive, Rs.88
crore for formulation of GIS based master plans and Rs.3,144 crore for eligible projects of erst-
while JnNURM scheme. Utilization Certificates for Rs. 10,265 crore have so far been furnished
by the States and UTs.
• So far, 48.82 lakh tap water connections have been provided under the Mission and in conver-
gence with others
229
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Reforms Reforms
• So far, 58 lakh street lights out of identified 94lakh have been replaced with LED lights. MoU has • So far, 58 lakh street lights out of identified 94lakh have been replaced with LED lights. MoU has
been signed for energy audit of water pumps in 445 cities and the audit completed in 337cities. been signed for energy audit of water pumps in 445 cities and the audit completed in 337cities.
10,427 pumps have been identified for replacement. 10,427 pumps have been identified for replacement.

• Credit rating work has been awarded for 485 cities/ULBs and completed in 466 cities. 163 cities • Credit rating work has been awarded for 485 cities/ULBs and completed in 466 cities. 163 cities
have received Investible Grade Rating (IGR), including 36 cities with rating of A- or above rating. have received Investible Grade Rating (IGR), including 36 cities with rating of A- or above rating.

• Cities are being encouraged to mobilize resources by issuing Municipal Bonds. Incentive will • Cities are being encouraged to mobilize resources by issuing Municipal Bonds. Incentive will
be awarded to 10 cities for issuing Municipal Bonds @ Rs.13 crore per Rs.100 crore worth of be awarded to 10 cities for issuing Municipal Bonds @ Rs.13 crore per Rs.100 crore worth of
bonds issue during 2018-19. A city can avail incentive upto Rs.26 crore. Pune, Hyderabad, Am- bonds issue during 2018-19. A city can avail incentive upto Rs.26 crore. Pune, Hyderabad, Am-
ravati, Visakhapatnam, Bhopal, Indore and Ahmedabad have already issued Municipal Bonds. ravati, Visakhapatnam, Bhopal, Indore and Ahmedabad have already issued Municipal Bonds.

230 230
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
• Rs.1,395 crore has been awarded as incentive for implementing reforms so far. Rs.400 crore
were awarded to 20 States for reforms implemented in 2015-16, Rs.500 crore to 16 States for
reforms implemented in 2016-17. Rs.495 crore have been awarded to 21 States for reforms
implemented in 2017-18 including Rs.155 crore awarded to seven ULBs for issuing Municipal
Bonds.
• 439 AMRUT cities have implemented Online Building Permission system (OBPS). States/UTs
of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Punjab, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Telangana, Himachal
Pradesh, Tripura, Jharkhand and Delhi have implemented OBPS in all the ULBs. This is being
extended to all the cities/ towns across the country.
• India is ranked 77 among 190 economies in the ease of doing business, according to the latest
World Bank annual rankings – Doing Business Report (DBR) 2019. The rank of India improved
to 77 in DBR-2019 from 100 in DBR-2018.
• India’s rank in World Bank-Doing Business Report (DBR) under Construction permits has im-
proved to 52 in 2019 from 181 in 2018.
231
Handbook of Urban Statistics
• Rs.1,395 crore has been awarded as incentive for implementing reforms so far. Rs.400 crore
were awarded to 20 States for reforms implemented in 2015-16, Rs.500 crore to 16 States for
reforms implemented in 2016-17. Rs.495 crore have been awarded to 21 States for reforms
implemented in 2017-18 including Rs.155 crore awarded to seven ULBs for issuing Municipal
Bonds.
• 439 AMRUT cities have implemented Online Building Permission system (OBPS). States/UTs
of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Punjab, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Telangana, Himachal
Pradesh, Tripura, Jharkhand and Delhi have implemented OBPS in all the ULBs. This is being
extended to all the cities/ towns across the country.
• India is ranked 77 among 190 economies in the ease of doing business, according to the latest
World Bank annual rankings – Doing Business Report (DBR) 2019. The rank of India improved
to 77 in DBR-2019 from 100 in DBR-2018.
• India’s rank in World Bank-Doing Business Report (DBR) under Construction permits has im-
proved to 52 in 2019 from 181 in 2018.
231
Handbook of Urban Statistics
• To develop Brown field/Green field areas on pilot basis, Local Area Plan/Town Planning Scheme
has been launched as sub-scheme of AMRUT in 25 cities in June 2018. It is a fully centrally fund-
ed scheme. ₹50 crore has been sanctioned under this scheme @ ₹2 crore per city.
Ease of Living Index 2018
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, with great pride, released the first ever ‘Ease of Living Index
2018’ covering 111 Indian cities on 13 August, 2018. It serves as a litmus test to help assess the prog-
ress made in urban environments through various initiatives.
The Ease of Living framework comprises four pillars namely Institutional, Social, Economic and Physical
which are further broken down into 15 categories (governance, identity and culture, education, health,
safety and security, economy, affordable housing, land use planning, public open spaces, transporta-
tion and mobility, assured water supply, waste-water management, solid waste management, power,
and quality of environment) and evaluated across 78 indicators. The overall model for computation of
Ease of Living Index 2018 is given below.
Ease of
Living
Index
232
Handbook of Urban Statistics
• To develop Brown field/Green field areas on pilot basis, Local Area Plan/Town Planning Scheme
has been launched as sub-scheme of AMRUT in 25 cities in June 2018. It is a fully centrally fund-
ed scheme. ₹50 crore has been sanctioned under this scheme @ ₹2 crore per city.
Ease of Living Index 2018
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, with great pride, released the first ever ‘Ease of Living Index
2018’ covering 111 Indian cities on 13 August, 2018. It serves as a litmus test to help assess the prog-
ress made in urban environments through various initiatives.
The Ease of Living framework comprises four pillars namely Institutional, Social, Economic and Physical
which are further broken down into 15 categories (governance, identity and culture, education, health,
safety and security, economy, affordable housing, land use planning, public open spaces, transporta-
tion and mobility, assured water supply, waste-water management, solid waste management, power,
and quality of environment) and evaluated across 78 indicators. The overall model for computation of
Ease of Living Index 2018 is given below.
Ease of
Living
Index
232
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Evaluation of cities has been done on a 100-point scale across the 78 indicators with the Institutional
and Social pillars carrying 25 points each, 5 points for the pillar on Economy and 45 points for the
Physical pillar.
Apart from presenting the overall national ranking of 111 cities, the Ease of Living dashboard presents
ranking of the cities across pillars, category, geographical zone and population classifications(four clas-
sifications of cities based on population include: Classification 1- Cities with population of 4 million and
above; Classification 2: Cities with population greater than1 million but less than 4 million; Classifica-
tion 3: Cities with population greater 0.5 million but less than 1 million; and Classification 4:Cities with
population less than 0.5 million). The dashboard also have a comparison feature that allows users to
analyse the performance across cities on various liveability parameters. The dashboard is available at
easeofliving.niua.org.
Ease of Living Index 2019 and Municipal Performance Index 2019
The Ease of Living Index 2018 was a mix of both input and output/outcome indicators. Over the course
of consultation with various stakeholders, and with the experience of these first set of indicators, it is
felt that there is a need to separate the enabling input indicators and the outcome indictors in its next
iteration. This has resulted in ‘Ease of Living Index 2019’ (EoL 2019) focussing on output/outcome
indicators, accompanied by the ‘Municipal Performance Index 2019’ (MPI 2019) which would assess
the performance of municipalities based on their efforts to improve the quality of live, create infra-
structure thereby enabling ease of living for its citizens.
Ministry has launched the assessment frameworks for Ease of Living Index 2019 and Municipal Per-
formance Index 2019 on 26 February, 2019. EoL 2019 aims to assess the ease of living of citizens
across three pillars: Quality of Life, Economic Ability and Sustainability. Quality of Life will focus on
social well-being, Economic Ability will reflect on economic robustness and Sustainability will capture
the management of urban spaces. These 3 pillars are further divided into 14 categories which will be
measured across 50 indicators. MPI 2019 seeks to examine the sectoral performance of Municipalities
across a set of 5 verticals namely Service, Finance, Planning, Technology and Governance. These 5
verticals have been further divided into 20 sectors which will be evaluated across 100 indicators. The
assessment frameworks are available at smartnet.niua.org/eol19/.
It is envisaged that these indices would act as tools of assessment, planning and transformation of
cities. This exercise would institutionalize outcome-based planning and evidence-based policy making.
It would assist cities in undertaking a 360-degree assessment of their strengths, weaknesses, oppor-
tunities, and they can leverage this knowledge to formulate plans and prioritise investments. Also,
this would encourage healthy competition among cities and municipalities. The indicators are closely
linked to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of United Nation and would lead to systematic col-
lection of data & mapping of progress on SDG indicators. As a result, cities will move towards a single
unified data driven decision making paradigm.
233
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Evaluation of cities has been done on a 100-point scale across the 78 indicators with the Institutional
and Social pillars carrying 25 points each, 5 points for the pillar on Economy and 45 points for the
Physical pillar.
Apart from presenting the overall national ranking of 111 cities, the Ease of Living dashboard presents
ranking of the cities across pillars, category, geographical zone and population classifications(four clas-
sifications of cities based on population include: Classification 1- Cities with population of 4 million and
above; Classification 2: Cities with population greater than1 million but less than 4 million; Classifica-
tion 3: Cities with population greater 0.5 million but less than 1 million; and Classification 4:Cities with
population less than 0.5 million). The dashboard also have a comparison feature that allows users to
analyse the performance across cities on various liveability parameters. The dashboard is available at
easeofliving.niua.org.
Ease of Living Index 2019 and Municipal Performance Index 2019
The Ease of Living Index 2018 was a mix of both input and output/outcome indicators. Over the course
of consultation with various stakeholders, and with the experience of these first set of indicators, it is
felt that there is a need to separate the enabling input indicators and the outcome indictors in its next
iteration. This has resulted in ‘Ease of Living Index 2019’ (EoL 2019) focussing on output/outcome
indicators, accompanied by the ‘Municipal Performance Index 2019’ (MPI 2019) which would assess
the performance of municipalities based on their efforts to improve the quality of live, create infra-
structure thereby enabling ease of living for its citizens.
Ministry has launched the assessment frameworks for Ease of Living Index 2019 and Municipal Per-
formance Index 2019 on 26 February, 2019. EoL 2019 aims to assess the ease of living of citizens
across three pillars: Quality of Life, Economic Ability and Sustainability. Quality of Life will focus on
social well-being, Economic Ability will reflect on economic robustness and Sustainability will capture
the management of urban spaces. These 3 pillars are further divided into 14 categories which will be
measured across 50 indicators. MPI 2019 seeks to examine the sectoral performance of Municipalities
across a set of 5 verticals namely Service, Finance, Planning, Technology and Governance. These 5
verticals have been further divided into 20 sectors which will be evaluated across 100 indicators. The
assessment frameworks are available at smartnet.niua.org/eol19/.
It is envisaged that these indices would act as tools of assessment, planning and transformation of
cities. This exercise would institutionalize outcome-based planning and evidence-based policy making.
It would assist cities in undertaking a 360-degree assessment of their strengths, weaknesses, oppor-
tunities, and they can leverage this knowledge to formulate plans and prioritise investments. Also,
this would encourage healthy competition among cities and municipalities. The indicators are closely
linked to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of United Nation and would lead to systematic col-
lection of data & mapping of progress on SDG indicators. As a result, cities will move towards a single
unified data driven decision making paradigm.
233
 Table 10.1 Progress of Project Implementation

Progress in Project Implementation (Amount Rs. in crore)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Contracts
Name of States/ No. Contracts Contracts DPRs to be
SAAP Works Awarded NITs NITs to Total
Handbook of Urban Statistics

SL of Awarded to be Approved
UTs Size Completed & work in Issued be Issued (5+7+8)
cities Total (3+4) awarded (2-9)
progress

Nos Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount

A and N Islands 1 11 2 6 7.87 3 - 3 11 0

1

Andhra Pradesh 33 2,890 509 2,740 3,249 81 81 - 3,330 0

2

234
Arunachal Pradesh 1 140 - 15 15 125 50 50 115 26
3

Assam 4 657 - 11 11 646 - 330 341 316

4

Bihar 27 2,470 - 2,029 2,029 441 161 187 2,377 93

5

Chandigarh 1 95 30 8 38 57 - - 38 57
6

Chhattisgarh 9 2,193 39 1,923 1,962 677 675 3 2,639 0

7

Dadra and Nagar

1 11 - 41 41 - - - 41 0
8 Haveli

Table 10.1 Progress of Project Implementation

Progress in Project Implementation (Amount Rs. in crore)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Contracts
Name of States/ No. Contracts Contracts DPRs to be
SAAP Works Awarded NITs NITs to Total
Handbook of Urban Statistics

SL of Awarded to be Approved
UTs Size Completed & work in Issued be Issued (5+7+8)
cities Total (3+4) awarded (2-9)
progress

Nos Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount Amount

A and N Islands 1 11 2 6 7.87 3 - 3 11 0

1

Andhra Pradesh 33 2,890 509 2,740 3,249 81 81 - 3,330 0

2
234

Arunachal Pradesh 1 140 - 15 15 125 50 50 115 26

3

Assam 4 657 - 11 11 646 - 330 341 316

4

Bihar 27 2,470 - 2,029 2,029 441 161 187 2,377 93

5

Chandigarh 1 95 30 8 38 57 - - 38 57
6

Chhattisgarh 9 2,193 39 1,923 1,962 677 675 3 2,639 0

7

Dadra and Nagar

1 11 - 41 41 - - - 41 0
8 Haveli
 9 Daman and Diu 18 - 26 26 - - - 26 0
1

10 Delhi 802 20 583 219 - 163 746 56

4 563

11 Goa 14 44 165 16 44 104 105

1 209 30

12 Gujarat 620 3,782 1,220 815 404 5,001 0

31 4,884 3,162

13 Haryana 72 2,274 291 31 - 2,306 260

20 2,566 2,203

14 Himachal Pradesh 19 183 121 30 17 231 74

2 305 164
Jammu and Kash-
15 48 486 107 38 5 529 64
mir 5 593 438

235
16 Jharkhand 10 1,613 2 2 - 1,615 0
7 1,246 1,603

17 Karnataka 81 4,706 535 520 15 5,241 0

27 4,953 4,624

18 Kerala 34 1,326 1,069 680 389 2,395 0

9 2,359 1,292

19 Lakshadweep - 1 3 - 1 2 2
1 4 1

20 Madhya Pradesh 215 6,347 97 83 14 6,444 0

34 6,201 6,132

21 Maharashtra 68 6,930 869 746 123 7,798 0

44 7,759 6,862

22 Manipur 1 209 3 - 3 212 0

1 180 207
Handbook of Urban Statistics

23 Meghalaya - 5 75 - 0 5 75
1 80 5

9 Daman and Diu 18 - 26 26 - - - 26 0

1

10 Delhi 802 20 583 219 - 163 746 56

4 563

11 Goa 14 44 165 16 44 104 105

1 209 30

12 Gujarat 620 3,782 1,220 815 404 5,001 0

31 4,884 3,162

13 Haryana 72 2,274 291 31 - 2,306 260

20 2,566 2,203

14 Himachal Pradesh 19 183 121 30 17 231 74

2 305 164
Jammu and Kash-
15 48 486 107 38 5 529 64
mir 5 593 438
235

16 Jharkhand 10 1,613 2 2 - 1,615 0

7 1,246 1,603

17 Karnataka 81 4,706 535 520 15 5,241 0

27 4,953 4,624

18 Kerala 34 1,326 1,069 680 389 2,395 0

9 2,359 1,292

19 Lakshadweep - 1 3 - 1 2 2
1 4 1

20 Madhya Pradesh 215 6,347 97 83 14 6,444 0

34 6,201 6,132

21 Maharashtra 68 6,930 869 746 123 7,798 0

44 7,759 6,862

22 Manipur 1 209 3 - 3 212 0

1 180 207
Handbook of Urban Statistics

23 Meghalaya - 5 75 - 0 5 75
1 80 5
 24 Mizoram 21 125 15 - 14 139 1
1 140 105

25 Nagaland 1 35 86 - 36 71 50
2 120 34

26 Odisha 240 1,639 73 73 - 1,713 0

9 1,599 1,399

27 Puducherry 0 16 48 14 22 52 13
Handbook of Urban Statistics

3 65 16

28 Punjab 16 71 363 2,403 773 253 1,389 1,377

2,767 293

29 Rajasthan 29 76 3,008 216 182 34 3,224 0

3,224 2,932

30 Sikkim 1 1 23 17 - 5 29 11
40 23

31 Tamil Nadu 33 302 7,383 4,333 4,333 - 11,715 0

236
11,195 7,081

32 Telangana 12 234 1,647 19 7 7 1,661 5

1,666 1,413

33 Tripura 1 - 19 129 117 - 137 12

148 19

34 Uttar Pradesh 61 216 6,345 6,146 1,106 5,040 12,492 0

11,422 6,129

35 Uttarakhand 7 14 347 246 55 58 460 133

593 333

36 West Bengal 60 39 3,096 939 448 427 3,970 64.66

4,035 3,057

  Total 500 2,995 59,914 11,038 7,647 78,599 2,794#

77,640 56,919 21,479
# Some States have uploaded projects in excess of SAAP size. In such cases, entire excess amount shall be borne by the States.

24 Mizoram 21 125 15 - 14 139 1

1 140 105

25 Nagaland 1 35 86 - 36 71 50
2 120 34

26 Odisha 240 1,639 73 73 - 1,713 0

9 1,599 1,399

27 Puducherry 0 16 48 14 22 52 13
Handbook of Urban Statistics

3 65 16

28 Punjab 16 71 363 2,403 773 253 1,389 1,377

2,767 293

29 Rajasthan 29 76 3,008 216 182 34 3,224 0

3,224 2,932

30 Sikkim 1 1 23 17 - 5 29 11
40 23

31 Tamil Nadu 33 302 7,383 4,333 4,333 - 11,715 0

236

11,195 7,081

32 Telangana 12 234 1,647 19 7 7 1,661 5

1,666 1,413

33 Tripura 1 - 19 129 117 - 137 12

148 19

34 Uttar Pradesh 61 216 6,345 6,146 1,106 5,040 12,492 0

11,422 6,129

35 Uttarakhand 7 14 347 246 55 58 460 133

593 333

36 West Bengal 60 39 3,096 939 448 427 3,970 64.66

4,035 3,057

  Total 500 2,995 59,914 11,038 7,647 78,599 2,794#

77,640 56,919 21,479
# Some States have uploaded projects in excess of SAAP size. In such cases, entire excess amount shall be borne by the States.
 Table 10.2 Progress on release of funds and Utilization Certificates

Progress on release of funds and Utilization Certificates (Amount Rs. in crore)

SAAP Size Release of Central Assistance (CA) and AMRUT Fund Total
GIS
CA Re- Utilization
Name of State Reform Based
# Approved Commit- leased Certificates
/ UT A&OE Incen- Mas- JnNURM Total
SAAP Size ted CA (Proj- (UCs) Re-
tives ter
ects) ceived
Plan
Andaman and
1 10.82 10.82 2.17 0.10 0.00 0.04 0.00 2.31 2.09
Nicobar Islands
2 Andhra Pradesh 2,890.17 1,056.62 619.69 38.69 93.08 13.66 4.17 769.29 628.04
Arunachal
3 140.25 126.22 25.25 1.65 0.00 0.49 65.18 92.57 66.14
Pradesh
4 Assam 657.14 591.42 73.23 8.21 0.00 0.70 57.26 139.39 47.32

237
5 Bihar 2,469.77 1,164.80 369.93 19.68 29.11 4.27 13.19 436.18 230.76
6 Chandigarh 95.07 54.09 26.95 0.25 1.94 0.18 0.00 29.32 26.72
7 Chhattisgarh 2,192.76 1,009.74 407.90 25.74 52.02 1.73 57.01 544.40 357.16
Dadra & Nagar
8 10.82 10.82 2.16 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.27 1.41
Haveli
9 Daman & Diu 18.03 18.03 3.60 0.15 0.00 0.17 0.00 3.92 1.61
10 Delhi 802.31 802.31 160.46 1.00 0.00 0.12 190.08 351.66 209.41
11 Goa 209.18 104.58 20.91 0.25 3.71 0.17 1.79 26.83 7.26
12 Gujarat 4,884.42 2,069.96 518.78 21.54 99.87 5.51 137.60 783.30 522.94
13 Haryana 2,565.74 764.51 152.90 9.23 6.40 3.04 0.00 171.57 87.03
Himachal
14 304.52 274.07 54.81 2.33 3.54 0.36 196.25 257.28 244.21
Pradesh
Jammu & Kash-
15 593.05 533.72 265.15 13.45 4.20 1.04 127.24 411.08 259.16
mir
16 Jharkhand 1,245.74 566.17 113.23 13.78 28.40 1.47 0.00 156.88 98.64
17 Karnataka 4,952.87 2,318.79 1,141.87 50.52 57.56 4.89 180.53 1,435.36 1174.96
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 10.2 Progress on release of funds and Utilization Certificates

Progress on release of funds and Utilization Certificates (Amount Rs. in crore)

SAAP Size Release of Central Assistance (CA) and AMRUT Fund Total
GIS
CA Re- Utilization
Name of State Reform Based
# Approved Commit- leased Certificates
/ UT A&OE Incen- Mas- JnNURM Total
SAAP Size ted CA (Proj- (UCs) Re-
tives ter
ects) ceived
Plan
Andaman and
1 10.82 10.82 2.17 0.10 0.00 0.04 0.00 2.31 2.09
Nicobar Islands
2 Andhra Pradesh 2,890.17 1,056.62 619.69 38.69 93.08 13.66 4.17 769.29 628.04
Arunachal
3 140.25 126.22 25.25 1.65 0.00 0.49 65.18 92.57 66.14
Pradesh
4 Assam 657.14 591.42 73.23 8.21 0.00 0.70 57.26 139.39 47.32
237

5 Bihar 2,469.77 1,164.80 369.93 19.68 29.11 4.27 13.19 436.18 230.76
6 Chandigarh 95.07 54.09 26.95 0.25 1.94 0.18 0.00 29.32 26.72
7 Chhattisgarh 2,192.76 1,009.74 407.90 25.74 52.02 1.73 57.01 544.40 357.16
Dadra & Nagar
8 10.82 10.82 2.16 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.27 1.41
Haveli
9 Daman & Diu 18.03 18.03 3.60 0.15 0.00 0.17 0.00 3.92 1.61
10 Delhi 802.31 802.31 160.46 1.00 0.00 0.12 190.08 351.66 209.41
11 Goa 209.18 104.58 20.91 0.25 3.71 0.17 1.79 26.83 7.26
12 Gujarat 4,884.42 2,069.96 518.78 21.54 99.87 5.51 137.60 783.30 522.94
13 Haryana 2,565.74 764.51 152.90 9.23 6.40 3.04 0.00 171.57 87.03
Himachal
14 304.52 274.07 54.81 2.33 3.54 0.36 196.25 257.28 244.21
Pradesh
Jammu & Kash-
15 593.05 533.72 265.15 13.45 4.20 1.04 127.24 411.08 259.16
mir
16 Jharkhand 1,245.74 566.17 113.23 13.78 28.40 1.47 0.00 156.88 98.64
17 Karnataka 4,952.87 2,318.79 1,141.87 50.52 57.56 4.89 180.53 1,435.36 1174.96
Handbook of Urban Statistics
 18 Kerala 2,359.38 1,161.20 232.24 22.89 47.57 1.29 26.06 330.05 147.76
19 Lakshadweep 3.61 3.61 0.73 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.61

20 Madhya Pradesh 6,200.67 2,592.86 1,471.29 63.15 172.14 6.45 394.93 2,107.96 1158.22

21 Maharashtra 7,759.32 3,534.08 706.81 60.03 170.13 6.18 546.44 1,489.59 1030.61
22 Manipur 180.31 162.28 32.46 0.25 0.00 0.18 66.95 99.84 93.27
23 Meghalaya 80.14 72.12 8.91 1.21 0.00 0.19 63.73 74.04 0.89
Handbook of Urban Statistics

24 Mizoram 140.25 126.22 74.44 1.37 4.58 0.47 0.00 80.86 76.48
25 Nagaland 120.22 108.19 21.63 1.70 0.00 0.36 9.48 33.17 14.34
26 Odisha 1,598.96 796.97 472.40 16.40 41.66 0.46 19.24 550.16 373.00
27 Puducherry 64.91 64.91 12.98 1.33 0.81 0.55 20.65 36.32 31.15
28 Punjab 2,766.62 1,204.47 240.89 24.05 32.72 3.24 191.58 492.48 274.26
29 Rajasthan 3,223.94 1,541.95 727.51 34.09 73.03 1.75 248.54 1,084.92 701.32
30 Sikkim 40.06 36.06 7.21 0.41 0.00 0.18 3.41 11.21 10.95
31 Tamil Nadu 11,194.78 4,756.58 1,686.74 43.03 231.72 3.20 107.61 2,072.30 1226.62

238
32 Telangana 1,666.26 832.60 302.00 13.16 68.44 2.30 81.10 466.99 219.69
33 Tripura 148.25 133.43 26.68 1.86 1.70 0.18 9.75 40.16 14.95
34 Uttar Pradesh 11,421.67 4,922.46 984.49 69.59 129.35 12.10 139.07 1,334.60 436.14
35 Uttarakhand 593.02 533.72 149.49 1.75 0.00 1.19 32.11 184.54 85.05
36 West Bengal 4,035.00 1,929.32 831.00 27.59 41.69 9.91 152.74 1,062.93 404.15
Sub - Total 77,640.02 35,989.70 11,948.89 590.53 1,395.37 88.03 3,143.69 17,166.50 10264.31
Total Fund Released 17,166.50
Total UCs received (including UC worth Rs. 0.45 crore from NRSC) 10,264.76

18 Kerala 2,359.38 1,161.20 232.24 22.89 47.57 1.29 26.06 330.05 147.76
19 Lakshadweep 3.61 3.61 0.73 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.61

20 Madhya Pradesh 6,200.67 2,592.86 1,471.29 63.15 172.14 6.45 394.93 2,107.96 1158.22

21 Maharashtra 7,759.32 3,534.08 706.81 60.03 170.13 6.18 546.44 1,489.59 1030.61
22 Manipur 180.31 162.28 32.46 0.25 0.00 0.18 66.95 99.84 93.27
23 Meghalaya 80.14 72.12 8.91 1.21 0.00 0.19 63.73 74.04 0.89
Handbook of Urban Statistics

24 Mizoram 140.25 126.22 74.44 1.37 4.58 0.47 0.00 80.86 76.48
25 Nagaland 120.22 108.19 21.63 1.70 0.00 0.36 9.48 33.17 14.34
26 Odisha 1,598.96 796.97 472.40 16.40 41.66 0.46 19.24 550.16 373.00
27 Puducherry 64.91 64.91 12.98 1.33 0.81 0.55 20.65 36.32 31.15
28 Punjab 2,766.62 1,204.47 240.89 24.05 32.72 3.24 191.58 492.48 274.26
29 Rajasthan 3,223.94 1,541.95 727.51 34.09 73.03 1.75 248.54 1,084.92 701.32
30 Sikkim 40.06 36.06 7.21 0.41 0.00 0.18 3.41 11.21 10.95
31 Tamil Nadu 11,194.78 4,756.58 1,686.74 43.03 231.72 3.20 107.61 2,072.30 1226.62
238

32 Telangana 1,666.26 832.60 302.00 13.16 68.44 2.30 81.10 466.99 219.69
33 Tripura 148.25 133.43 26.68 1.86 1.70 0.18 9.75 40.16 14.95
34 Uttar Pradesh 11,421.67 4,922.46 984.49 69.59 129.35 12.10 139.07 1,334.60 436.14
35 Uttarakhand 593.02 533.72 149.49 1.75 0.00 1.19 32.11 184.54 85.05
36 West Bengal 4,035.00 1,929.32 831.00 27.59 41.69 9.91 152.74 1,062.93 404.15
Sub - Total 77,640.02 35,989.70 11,948.89 590.53 1,395.37 88.03 3,143.69 17,166.50 10264.31
Total Fund Released 17,166.50
Total UCs received (including UC worth Rs. 0.45 crore from NRSC) 10,264.76
 Table 10.3 Progress of Reforms at a Glance

Progress on Reforms at a glance

No. of cities with

No. of cities No. of cities
A (-) and above No. of
where Cred- No. of cit- No. of cities where Energy
No. of Mis- rating and eligi- Streetlights
# Name of State/UT it Rating ies having where OBPS Audit of water
sion cities ble for issuance Replaced
work com- IGR Rating implemented pumps Com-
of Municipal with LED
pleted pleted
Bonds
1 A& N Islands 1 1 NIL NIL NIL 13,500 NIL
2 Andhra Pradesh 33 32 13 2 33 5,30,000 32
3 Arunachal Pradesh 1 NIL NIL NIL NIL - NIL

239
4 Assam 4 4 1 1 1 10,536 3
5 Bihar 27 27 1 NIL 27 1,40,034 NIL
6 Chandigarh 1 1 1 NIL NIL 42,103 1
7 Chhattisgarh 9 9 4 NIL 9 1,91,370 9
8 D & N Haveli 1 NIL NIL NIL 1 2,744 NIL
9 Daman and Diu 1 1 NIL NIL NIL 6,217 NIL
10 Delhi 4 4 4 4 NIL 4,94,285 NIL
11 Goa 1 1 1 NIL 4 20,005 NIL
12 Gujarat 31 31 14 4 31 7,73,244 25
13 Haryana 20 18 5 2 20 60,000 10
14 Himachal Pradesh 2 2 1 NIL 2 11,224 1
15 J&K 5 5 NIL NIL 5 - NIL
16 Jharkhand 7 7 1 NIL 7 7
Handbook of Urban Statistics

88,814

Table 10.3 Progress of Reforms at a Glance

Progress on Reforms at a glance

No. of cities with

No. of cities No. of cities
A (-) and above No. of
where Cred- No. of cit- No. of cities where Energy
No. of Mis- rating and eligi- Streetlights
# Name of State/UT it Rating ies having where OBPS Audit of water
sion cities ble for issuance Replaced
work com- IGR Rating implemented pumps Com-
of Municipal with LED
pleted pleted
Bonds
1 A& N Islands 1 1 NIL NIL NIL 13,500 NIL
2 Andhra Pradesh 33 32 13 2 33 5,30,000 32
3 Arunachal Pradesh 1 NIL NIL NIL NIL - NIL
239

4 Assam 4 4 1 1 1 10,536 3
5 Bihar 27 27 1 NIL 27 1,40,034 NIL
6 Chandigarh 1 1 1 NIL NIL 42,103 1
7 Chhattisgarh 9 9 4 NIL 9 1,91,370 9
8 D & N Haveli 1 NIL NIL NIL 1 2,744 NIL
9 Daman and Diu 1 1 NIL NIL NIL 6,217 NIL
10 Delhi 4 4 4 4 NIL 4,94,285 NIL
11 Goa 1 1 1 NIL 4 20,005 NIL
12 Gujarat 31 31 14 4 31 7,73,244 25
13 Haryana 20 18 5 2 20 60,000 10
14 Himachal Pradesh 2 2 1 NIL 2 11,224 1
15 J&K 5 5 NIL NIL 5 - NIL
16 Jharkhand 7 7 1 NIL 7 7
Handbook of Urban Statistics

88,814
 17 Karnataka 27 27 24 2 27 49,146 23
18 Kerala 9 9 2 NIL 9 44,183 NIL
19 Lakshadweep 1 NA NA NA NIL - 1
20 Madhya Pradesh 34 34 11 3 34 1,63,969 26
21 Maharashtra 44 42 21 9 NIL 1,13,286 26
22 Manipur 1 NIL NIL NIL 44 1,165 1
23 Meghalaya 1 NIL NIL NIL 1 - NIL
Handbook of Urban Statistics

24 Mizoram 1 1 NIL NIL NIL - 1

25 Nagaland 2 2 NIL NIL NIL - NIL
26 Odisha 9 9 2 NIL 1 1,23,719 9

27 Puducherry 3 3 NIL NIL 16 450 3

28 Punjab 16 16 5 NIL NIL 64,011 16

29 Rajasthan 29 29 16 4 29 ,75,394 22

240
30 Sikkim 1 1 NIL NIL NIL 492 1

31 Tamil Nadu 33 28 11 NIL 33 3,65,639 19

32 Telangana 12 12 8 2 12 6,20,722 11

33 Tripura 1 1 NIL NIL 1 34,500 1

34 Uttar Pradesh 61 59 10 2 25 6,55,934 60

35 Uttarakhand 7 7 1 NIL 7 55,348 4

36 West Bengal 60 43 6 1 60 5,49,389 25

  Total 500 466 163 36 439 337

58,01,423

17 Karnataka 27 27 24 2 27 49,146 23
18 Kerala 9 9 2 NIL 9 44,183 NIL
19 Lakshadweep 1 NA NA NA NIL - 1
20 Madhya Pradesh 34 34 11 3 34 1,63,969 26
21 Maharashtra 44 42 21 9 NIL 1,13,286 26
22 Manipur 1 NIL NIL NIL 44 1,165 1
23 Meghalaya 1 NIL NIL NIL 1 - NIL
Handbook of Urban Statistics

24 Mizoram 1 1 NIL NIL NIL - 1

25 Nagaland 2 2 NIL NIL NIL - NIL
26 Odisha 9 9 2 NIL 1 1,23,719 9

27 Puducherry 3 3 NIL NIL 16 450 3

28 Punjab 16 16 5 NIL NIL 64,011 16

29 Rajasthan 29 29 16 4 29 ,75,394 22
240

30 Sikkim 1 1 NIL NIL NIL 492 1

31 Tamil Nadu 33 28 11 NIL 33 3,65,639 19

32 Telangana 12 12 8 2 12 6,20,722 11

33 Tripura 1 1 NIL NIL 1 34,500 1

34 Uttar Pradesh 61 59 10 2 25 6,55,934 60

35 Uttarakhand 7 7 1 NIL 7 55,348 4

36 West Bengal 60 43 6 1 60 5,49,389 25

  Total 500 466 163 36 439 337

58,01,423
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 10.4 Ease of Living Index 2018 – Full Rank List Table 10.4 Ease of Living Index 2018 – Full Rank List
Pillar wise Rank Pillar wise Rank

So- So-
Institution- Econom- Physical Overall Institution- Econom- Physical Overall
City Population Category cial City Population Category cial
al Rank ic Rank Rank Rank al Rank ic Rank Rank Rank
Rank Rank
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Pune 8 5 7 2 1 Pune 8 5 7 2 1
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Navi Mumbai 1 3 16 7 2 Navi Mumbai 1 3 16 7 2
4 million 4 million

Greater Mumbai Population ≥ 4 million 23 6 63 1 3 Greater Mumbai Population ≥ 4 million 23 6 63 1 3

Tirupati Less than 0.5 million 2 1 38 6 4 Tirupati Less than 0.5 million 2 1 38 6 4

Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million

Chandigarh 40 4 1 4 5 Chandigarh 40 4 1 4 5
< 1 million < 1 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Thane 24 12 9 3 6 Thane 24 12 9 3 6
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Raipur 12 21 29 5 7 Raipur 12 21 29 5 7
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Indore 13 9 4 18 8 Indore 13 9 4 18 8
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Vijayawada 9 8 10 24 9 Vijayawada 9 8 10 24 9
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Bhopal 16 17 39 8 10 Bhopal 16 17 39 8 10
4 million 4 million

Karim Nagar Less than 0.5 million 3 15 31 28 11 Karim Nagar Less than 0.5 million 3 15 31 28 11

Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million

Tiruchirappalli 51 2 19 17 12 Tiruchirappalli 51 2 19 17 12
< 1 million < 1 million

Bilaspur Less than 0.5 million 5 34 47 9 13 Bilaspur Less than 0.5 million 5 34 47 9 13

Chennai Population ≥ 4 million 20 14 70 12 14 Chennai Population ≥ 4 million 20 14 70 12 14

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Jabalpur 14 11 54 26 15 Jabalpur 14 11 54 26 15
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million
Amravati 35 7 30 16 16 Amravati 35 7 30 16 16
< 1 million < 1 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Visakhapatnam 10 46 74 10 17 Visakhapatnam 10 46 74 10 17
4 million 4 million

241 241
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

So- So-
Institution- Econom- Physical Overall Institution- Econom- Physical Overall
City Population Category cial City Population Category cial
al Rank ic Rank Rank Rank al Rank ic Rank Rank Rank
Rank Rank
Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million
Bhubaneswar 25 13 18 19 18 Bhubaneswar 25 13 18 19 18
< 1 million < 1 million

Surat Population ≥ 4 million 11 57 69 11 19 Surat Population ≥ 4 million 11 57 69 11 19

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Vasai-Virar City 32 10 21 29 20 Vasai-Virar City 32 10 21 29 20
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Nashik 18 25 40 21 21 Nashik 18 25 40 21 21
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million
Solapur 26 18 68 20 22 Solapur 26 18 68 20 22
< 1 million < 1 million

Ahmedabad Population ≥ 4 million 7 53 45 22 23 Ahmedabad Population ≥ 4 million 7 53 45 22 23

Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million

Ujjain 15 30 33 32 24 Ujjain 15 30 33 32 24
< 1 million < 1 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Coimbatore 41 19 17 27 25 Coimbatore 41 19 17 27 25
4 million 4 million

Erode Less than 0.5 million 63 20 37 15 26 Erode Less than 0.5 million 63 20 37 15 26

Hyderabad Population ≥ 4 million 4 43 59 44 27 Hyderabad Population ≥ 4 million 4 43 59 44 27

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Madurai 28 27 28 25 28 Madurai 28 27 28 25 28
4 million 4 million

Tiruppur Less than 0.5 million 37 16 5 39 29 Tiruppur Less than 0.5 million 37 16 5 39 29

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Jaipur 64 29 12 30 30 Jaipur 64 29 12 30 30
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Nagpur 44 78 43 14 31 Nagpur 44 78 43 14 31
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Gwalior 42 40 22 36 32 Gwalior 42 40 22 36 32
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Varanasi 46 81 48 13 33 Varanasi 46 81 48 13 33
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million
Jhansi 52 22 11 47 34 Jhansi 52 22 11 47 34
< 1 million < 1 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Ludhiana 68 35 8 37 35 Ludhiana 68 35 8 37 35
4 million 4 million

242 242
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

So- So-
Institution- Econom- Physical Overall Institution- Econom- Physical Overall
City Population Category cial City Population Category cial
al Rank ic Rank Rank Rank al Rank ic Rank Rank Rank
Rank Rank
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Vadodara 31 54 42 35 36 Vadodara 31 54 42 35 36
4 million 4 million

Tirunelveli Less than 0.5 million 53 52 35 31 37 Tirunelveli Less than 0.5 million 53 52 35 31 37

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Rajkot 55 33 15 42 38 Rajkot 55 33 15 42 38
4 million 4 million

Gandhinagar Less than 0.5 million 49 55 107 23 39 Gandhinagar Less than 0.5 million 49 55 107 23 39

Dindigul Less than 0.5 million 87 23 23 34 40 Dindigul Less than 0.5 million 87 23 23 34 40

Mangaluru Less than 0.5 million 39 31 57 52 41 Mangaluru Less than 0.5 million 39 31 57 52 41

Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million

Salem 34 32 82 60 42 Salem 34 32 82 60 42
< 1 million < 1 million

Thanjavur Less than 0.5 million 54 47 36 43 43 Thanjavur Less than 0.5 million 54 47 36 43 43

Thoothukkudi Less than 0.5 million 29 59 56 57 44 Thoothukkudi Less than 0.5 million 29 59 56 57 44

Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million

Kochi 6 99 67 56 45 Kochi 6 99 67 56 45
< 1 million < 1 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Ghaziabad 30 107 20 33 46 Ghaziabad 30 107 20 33 46
4 million 4 million

Diu Less than 0.5 million 81 24 61 51 47 Diu Less than 0.5 million 81 24 61 51 47

Vellore Less than 0.5 million 47 70 60 40 48 Vellore Less than 0.5 million 47 70 60 40 48

Rae Bareli Less than 0.5 million 17 105 77 41 49 Rae Bareli Less than 0.5 million 17 105 77 41 49

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Kalyan-Dombivali 36 38 81 71 50 Kalyan-Dombivali 36 38 81 71 50
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million
Ajmer 94 61 2 38 51 Ajmer 94 61 2 38 51
< 1 million < 1 million

Belagavi Less than 0.5 million 70 26 88 63 52 Belagavi Less than 0.5 million 70 26 88 63 52

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Jodhpur 38 84 27 53 53 Jodhpur 38 84 27 53 53
4 million 4 million

243 243
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

So- So-
Institution- Econom- Physical Overall Institution- Econom- Physical Overall
City Population Category cial City Population Category cial
al Rank ic Rank Rank Rank al Rank ic Rank Rank Rank
Rank Rank
Udaipur Less than 0.5 million 85 41 14 50 54 Udaipur Less than 0.5 million 85 41 14 50 54

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Agra 45 48 75 73 55 Agra 45 48 75 73 55
4 million 4 million

Dharamshala Less than 0.5 million 60 63 84 48 56 Dharamshala Less than 0.5 million 60 63 84 48 56

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Hubbali-Dharwad 33 68 66 72 57 Hubbali-Dharwad 33 68 66 72 57
4 million 4 million

Bangalore Population ≥ 4 million 21 97 71 54 58 Bangalore Population ≥ 4 million 21 97 71 54 58

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Kota 75 67 3 59 59 Kota 75 67 3 59 59
4 million 4 million

Puducherry Less than 0.5 million 86 28 55 61 60 Puducherry Less than 0.5 million 86 28 55 61 60

Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million

Warangal 59 58 87 55 61 Warangal 59 58 87 55 61
< 1 million < 1 million

Satna Less than 0.5 million 62 73 73 46 62 Satna Less than 0.5 million 62 73 73 46 62

Muzaffarpur Less than 0.5 million 22 74 99 76 63 Muzaffarpur Less than 0.5 million 22 74 99 76 63

Kakinada Less than 0.5 million 65 51 91 64 64 Kakinada Less than 0.5 million 65 51 91 64 64

Delhi Population ≥ 4 million 19 71 109 70 65 Delhi Population ≥ 4 million 19 71 109 70 65

Sagar Less than 0.5 million 77 42 52 74 66 Sagar Less than 0.5 million 77 42 52 74 66

Shivamogga Less than 0.5 million 58 56 64 79 67 Shivamogga Less than 0.5 million 58 56 64 79 67

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Ranchi 56 80 50 69 68 Ranchi 56 80 50 69 68
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Pimpri Chinchwad 92 60 80 49 69 Pimpri Chinchwad 92 60 80 49 69
4 million 4 million

Tumakuru Less than 0.5 million 69 77 86 62 70 Tumakuru Less than 0.5 million 69 77 86 62 70

Thiruvananthapu- Population ≥ 0.5 million Thiruvananthapu- Population ≥ 0.5 million

27 75 94 86 71 27 75 94 86 71
ram < 1 million ram < 1 million

244 244
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Faridabad 50 49 106 84 72 Faridabad 50 49 106 84 72
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Lucknow 43 102 58 65 73 Lucknow 43 102 58 65 73
4 million 4 million

Gangtok Less than 0.5 million 73 72 49 66 74 Gangtok Less than 0.5 million 73 72 49 66 74

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Kanpur 104 39 13 68 75 Kanpur 104 39 13 68 75
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Amritsar 78 64 46 75 76 Amritsar 78 64 46 75 76
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million
Jalandhar 98 45 24 78 77 Jalandhar 98 45 24 78 77
< 1 million < 1 million

Port Blair Less than 0.5 million 102 66 102 45 78 Port Blair Less than 0.5 million 102 66 102 45 78

Dahod Less than 0.5 million 72 44 32 95 79 Dahod Less than 0.5 million 72 44 32 95 79

Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million

Dehradun 61 62 53 94 80 Dehradun 61 62 53 94 80
< 1 million < 1 million
Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million
Bareilly 74 98 62 58 81 Bareilly 74 98 62 58 81
< 1 million < 1 million

Karnal Less than 0.5 million 97 37 78 88 82 Karnal Less than 0.5 million 97 37 78 88 82

Davanagere Less than 0.5 million 82 82 41 82 83 Davanagere Less than 0.5 million 82 82 41 82 83

Aizawl Less than 0.5 million 57 96 98 80 84 Aizawl Less than 0.5 million 57 96 98 80 84

Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million

Guwahati 66 79 72 91 85 Guwahati 66 79 72 91 85
< 1 million < 1 million
Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million
Aligarh 48 103 34 90 86 Aligarh 48 103 34 90 86
< 1 million < 1 million

Rourkela Less than 0.5 million 95 65 89 81 87 Rourkela Less than 0.5 million 95 65 89 81 87

Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million

Gurgaon 91 94 65 67 88 Gurgaon 91 94 65 67 88
< 1 million < 1 million

Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million

Moradabad 79 89 25 89 89 Moradabad 79 89 25 89 89
< 1 million < 1 million

Panaji Less than 0.5 million 84 83 96 87 90 Panaji Less than 0.5 million 84 83 96 87 90

245 245
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Imphal Less than 0.5 million 67 50 92 104 91 Imphal Less than 0.5 million 67 50 92 104 91

Shimla Less than 0.5 million 96 76 97 85 92 Shimla Less than 0.5 million 96 76 97 85 92

Agartala Less than 0.5 million 76 86 101 96 93 Agartala Less than 0.5 million 76 86 101 96 93

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Dhanbad 71 91 95 97 94 Dhanbad 71 91 95 97 94
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million
Jammu 110 69 105 77 95 Jammu 110 69 105 77 95
< 1 million < 1 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Allahabad 89 87 51 99 96 Allahabad 89 87 51 99 96
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Aurangabad 103 36 83 107 97 Aurangabad 103 36 83 107 97
4 million 4 million

Shillong Less than 0.5 million 111 88 100 83 98 Shillong Less than 0.5 million 111 88 100 83 98

Namchi Less than 0.5 million 93 93 76 101 99 Namchi Less than 0.5 million 93 93 76 101 99

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Srinagar 109 90 90 93 100 Srinagar 109 90 90 93 100
4 million 4 million
Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <
Meerut 101 104 44 100 101 Meerut 101 104 44 100 101
4 million 4 million

Silvassa Less than 0.5 million 90 85 79 106 102 Silvassa Less than 0.5 million 90 85 79 106 102

Population ≥ 0.5 million Population ≥ 0.5 million

Saharanpur 107 100 104 92 103 Saharanpur 107 100 104 92 103
< 1 million < 1 million

Kavaratti Less than 0.5 million 80 106 110 103 104 Kavaratti Less than 0.5 million 80 106 110 103 104

Pasighat Less than 0.5 million 99 101 103 105 105 Pasighat Less than 0.5 million 99 101 103 105 105

Itanagar Less than 0.5 million 83 109 6 109 106 Itanagar Less than 0.5 million 83 109 6 109 106

Bhagalpur Less than 0.5 million 88 92 85 111 107 Bhagalpur Less than 0.5 million 88 92 85 111 107

Biharsharif Less than 0.5 million 100 108 93 108 108 Biharsharif Less than 0.5 million 100 108 93 108 108

Population ≥ 1 million < Population ≥ 1 million <

Patna 106 110 108 98 109 Patna 106 110 108 98 109
4 million 4 million

246 246
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Kohima Less than 0.5 million 108 95 111 102 110 Kohima Less than 0.5 million 108 95 111 102 110

Rampur Less than 0.5 million 105 111 26 110 111 Rampur Less than 0.5 million 105 111 26 110 111

247 247
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 10.5 Status Of Municipal Bonds Issued Table 10.5 Status Of Municipal Bonds Issued

(As on 31.01.2019) (As on 31.01.2019)

Rate Rate
Amount Amount
City of City of
S. raised by Credit S. raised by Credit
& Return Tenure Listing & Return Tenure Listing
No. Issue (In rating No. Issue (In rating
Details (Coupon Details (Coupon
Crores) Crores)
Rate) Rate)
Pune (Maharashtra) Pune (Maharashtra)
Pune   Municipal Corporation Listed   on Pune   Municipal Corporation Listed   on
AA+/ Bombay AA+/ Bombay
(PMC) raised bonds amounting (PMC) raised bonds amounting
1. to INR 200 crores on   19.06.2017 200.00 7.59 % 10   years Stable Stock Ex- 1. to INR 200 crores on   19.06.2017 200.00 7.59 % 10   years Stable Stock Ex-
during the first tranche of its   change on during the first tranche of its   change on
5-year bond program (approx. INR   22.06.2017    5-year bond program (approx. INR   22.06.2017   
2264 crores). 2264 crores).
Listed   on Listed   on
Hyderabad (Telengana) AA/ Hyderabad (Telengana) AA/
the Bom- the Bom-
Greater   Hyderabad Municipal Stable  bay Stock Greater   Hyderabad Municipal Stable  bay Stock
2. 200.00 8.90 % 10   years 2. 200.00 8.90 % 10   years
Corporation (GHMC) raised Rs.   Exchange Corporation (GHMC) raised Rs.   Exchange
200 crore on 13.02.2018. (BSE) on 200 crore on 13.02.2018. (BSE) on
   
22.02.2018 22.02.2018
Listed   on Listed   on
Indore (Madhya Pradesh) National Indore (Madhya Pradesh) National
Stock Ex- Stock Ex-
3. Indore   Municipal Corporation 139.90 9.25 % 10   years AA   (SO) change 3. Indore   Municipal Corporation 139.90 9.25 % 10   years AA   (SO) change
issued bonds aggregating ₹139.9 of India issued bonds aggregating ₹139.9 of India
crore on 29.06.2018 (NSE) on crore on 29.06.2018 (NSE) on
05.07.2018. 05.07.2018.

Listed on Listed on
Hyderabad (Telengana) AA / Hyderabad (Telengana) AA /
the Bom- the Bom-
Greater   Hyderabad Municipal Stable  bay Stock Greater   Hyderabad Municipal Stable  bay Stock
4. 195.00 9.38 % 10   years 4. 195.00 9.38 % 10   years
Corporation (GHMC) raised Rs.   Exchange Corporation (GHMC) raised Rs.   Exchange
195 crore on 13.08.2018. (BSE) on 195 crore on 13.08.2018. (BSE) on
   
14.08.2018 14.08.2018

Listed on Listed on
Amaravati (Andhra Pradesh) 10.32 % the Bom- Amaravati (Andhra Pradesh) 10.32 % the Bom-
Capital Regional Development (Green 10 years bay Stock Capital Regional Development (Green 10 years bay Stock
5. 2,000.00 A+ 5. 2,000.00 A+
Authority raised Rs. 2000 crore on Shoe op- Exchange Authority raised Rs. 2000 crore on Shoe op- Exchange
21.08.2018. tion) (BSE) on 21.08.2018. tion) (BSE) on
27.08.2018 27.08.2018

248 248
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

10 years Listed   on 10 years Listed   on

Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) National Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) National
(with put- Stock Ex- (with put- Stock Ex-
6. Bhopal Municipal Corpora- 175.00 9.55% A- 6. Bhopal Municipal Corpora- 175.00 9.55% A-
call option change call option change
tion raised Rs.175 Crore on tion raised Rs.175 Crore on
at the end (NSE) on at the end (NSE) on
25.09.2018 25.09.2018
of 7th year) 25.09.2018. of 7th year) 25.09.2018.

Listed on Listed on
Vishakhapatnam (Andhra Pradesh) the Bom- Vishakhapatnam (Andhra Pradesh) the Bom-
Greater Vishakapatnam Municipal 10.00 % bay Stock Greater Vishakapatnam Municipal 10.00 % bay Stock
7. 80.00 10 years AA 7. 80.00 10 years AA
Corporation (GVMC) raised Rs. 80 Exchange Corporation (GVMC) raised Rs. 80 Exchange
crore on 21.12.2018. (BSE) on crore on 21.12.2018. (BSE) on
21.12.2018 21.12.2018
Listed   at Listed   at
Ahmedabad (Gujarat) National Ahmedabad (Gujarat) National
Ahmedabad Municipal Corpora- Stock Ex- Ahmedabad Municipal Corpora- Stock Ex-
8. 200.00 8.7% 05 years AA+ 8. 200.00 8.7% 05 years AA+
tion (AMC) raised Rs.200 crore on change tion (AMC) raised Rs.200 crore on change
10.01.2019 (NSE) on 10.01.2019 (NSE) on
25.09.2019. 25.09.2019.
Grand Total 3,189.90 Grand Total 3,189.90

249 249
 Chapter 11 Chapter 11

Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana

(Urban) (Urban)
“Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana is a step towards fulfilment of “Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana is a step towards fulfilment of
the vision of Housing for All by 2022” the vision of Housing for All by 2022”

“Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana would benefit people who “Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana would benefit people who
cannot afford a house themselves” cannot afford a house themselves”

Narendra Modi Narendra Modi

Prime Minister Prime Minister
(Twitter Account of Hon'ble PM) (Twitter Account of Hon'ble PM)
21-02-2016 21-02-2016
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban)
Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban) - Housing for All Mission was launched on 25th June 2015.
1.        Objective
The objective of the Mission is to provide Central assistance to implementing agencies
through States/Union Territories (UTs) for providing houses to all eligible families/beneficiaries
by 2022.
2.        Coverage and Duration
• The scheme focuses to cover the entire urban area consisting of all statutory towns and ar-
eas including Notified Planning/ Development Area/ Industrial Development Authority/ Special
Area Development Authority/ Urban Development Authority or any such Authority under the
State legislation which is entrusted with the functions of urban planning and regulations. So far
4,331 cities/towns have been included under PMAY (U).
• The duration of the Mission is seven years (FY: 2015-16 to FY: 2021-22).
3.       Components of the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban)
In order to address Housing for All in urban areas, the Mission has the following four verticals:
• “ In-situ” Slum Redevelopment (ISSR):
Slum redevelopment grant of Rs. 1 lakh per house is admissible for all houses built for eligible
slum dwellers under this component using land as resource with participation of private devel-
opers. After redevelopment, de-notification of slums by State/UT Government is recommend-
ed under the guidelines.
• Credit Linked Subsidy Scheme (CLSS):  • Credit Linked Subsidy Scheme (CLSS):
Beneficiaries of Economically Weaker Section (EWS)/Low Income Group (LIG), Middle Income
Group (MIG)-I and Middle Income Group (MIG)-II seeking housing loans from Banks, Housing
Finance Companies and other such institutions for acquiring/constructing houses are eligible
for an interest subsidy of 6.5%, 4% and 3% on loan amount upto Rs. 6 lakh, Rs. 9 lakh and Rs.
12 lakh respectively. Ministry has nominated Housing and Urban Development Corporation
(HUDCO) and National Housing Bank (NHB) as Central Nodal Agencies (CNAs) to channelize this
subsidy to the lending institutions and for monitoring the progress of this component. The
scheme for MIG category was upto 31st March 2019 which has been now extended up to 31st
March 2020 recently
• Affordable Housing in Partnership with public or private sector (AHP)  • Affordable Housing in Partnership with public or private sector (AHP)
Central assistance of Rs. 1.5 Lakh per EWS house is provided by GoI in projects where at least
253
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban)
Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban) - Housing for All Mission was launched on 25th June 2015.
1.        Objective
The objective of the Mission is to provide Central assistance to implementing agencies
through States/Union Territories (UTs) for providing houses to all eligible families/beneficiaries
by 2022.
2.        Coverage and Duration
• The scheme focuses to cover the entire urban area consisting of all statutory towns and ar-
eas including Notified Planning/ Development Area/ Industrial Development Authority/ Special
Area Development Authority/ Urban Development Authority or any such Authority under the
State legislation which is entrusted with the functions of urban planning and regulations. So far
4,331 cities/towns have been included under PMAY (U).
• The duration of the Mission is seven years (FY: 2015-16 to FY: 2021-22).
3.       Components of the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban)
In order to address Housing for All in urban areas, the Mission has the following four verticals:
• “ In-situ” Slum Redevelopment (ISSR):
Slum redevelopment grant of Rs. 1 lakh per house is admissible for all houses built for eligible
slum dwellers under this component using land as resource with participation of private devel-
opers. After redevelopment, de-notification of slums by State/UT Government is recommend-
ed under the guidelines.
 
Beneficiaries of Economically Weaker Section (EWS)/Low Income Group (LIG), Middle Income
Group (MIG)-I and Middle Income Group (MIG)-II seeking housing loans from Banks, Housing
Finance Companies and other such institutions for acquiring/constructing houses are eligible
for an interest subsidy of 6.5%, 4% and 3% on loan amount upto Rs. 6 lakh, Rs. 9 lakh and Rs.
12 lakh respectively. Ministry has nominated Housing and Urban Development Corporation
(HUDCO) and National Housing Bank (NHB) as Central Nodal Agencies (CNAs) to channelize this
subsidy to the lending institutions and for monitoring the progress of this component. The
scheme for MIG category was upto 31st March 2019 which has been now extended up to 31st
March 2020 recently
 
Central assistance of Rs. 1.5 Lakh per EWS house is provided by GoI in projects where at least
253
Handbook of Urban Statistics
35% of the houses in the projects are for EWS category.
• Beneficiary-led individual house construction/ enhancements (BLC):
Under this component, central assistance of Rs. 1.5 lakh per EWS house is provided to individ-
ual eligible families belonging to EWS categories.
4. Ownership of houses and Selection process of projects :
Beneficiaries of EWS are covered under all four verticals of the Mission while LIG and
MIG beneficiaries are eligible for benefits under CLSS. House is to be allotted in the name of
adult female member or in joint name and all houses to have toilet facility, drinking water and
power supply. Preference is given to persons with disabilities, ST/ SC/ OBCs, minorities and
transgender
As per the scheme guidelines of PMAY (U), the States/UTs are required to prepare De-
tailed Project Reports (DPRs) covering the eligible beneficiaries as per demand survey in the
particular urban cities/towns and get these approved by the State Level Sanctioning and Mon-
itoring Committee (SLSMC) before these projects are considered by Central Government for
considering the admissible central assistance involved in consonance with the scheme guide-
lines. Thus, selection of projects under PMAY (U) and their implementation are with the State/
UT Governments.
5.       Technology Sub-Mission
• In order to promote green and environment friendly, disaster resistant technologies and
planning/layouts suitable for different areas of the country, a Technology Sub-Mission has
also been launched as part of the Mission. This Sub-Mission envisages to facilitate State/
city Governments to adopt modern, innovative and green technologies for adoption of
layout designs building plans suitable for various geo-climatic zones and to deploy disas-
ter resistant and environment friendly technologies. It is envisaged that Centre and State
would partner with willing IITs, NITs and Planning & Architecture institutes for developing
technical solutions, capacity building and handholding of States and Cities.
• 24 Emerging Technologies have been identified, evaluated and are being promoted by
Building Materials and Technology Promotion Council (BMTPC). CPWD has issued Sched-
ule of Rates (SoRs) for 14 such Technologies to bring them into the main stream of mass
housing construction.  Benefits of new alternative technologies are that the houses built
are safer and disaster resilient, better quality of construction, low maintenance, speedy
construction resulting in early occupancy, cost effective and environment friendly, better
fire resistance and thermal efficiency. About 12 Lakh houses are being constructed using
these technologies all over the country.  these technologies all over the country.
• In addition, Ministry is organizing Global Housing Technology Challenge (GHTC-India) to
co-opt internationally acclaimed rapid mass housing construction technologies and to help
254
Handbook of Urban Statistics
35% of the houses in the projects are for EWS category.
• Beneficiary-led individual house construction/ enhancements (BLC):
Under this component, central assistance of Rs. 1.5 lakh per EWS house is provided to individ-
ual eligible families belonging to EWS categories.
4. Ownership of houses and Selection process of projects :
Beneficiaries of EWS are covered under all four verticals of the Mission while LIG and
MIG beneficiaries are eligible for benefits under CLSS. House is to be allotted in the name of
adult female member or in joint name and all houses to have toilet facility, drinking water and
power supply. Preference is given to persons with disabilities, ST/ SC/ OBCs, minorities and
transgender
As per the scheme guidelines of PMAY (U), the States/UTs are required to prepare De-
tailed Project Reports (DPRs) covering the eligible beneficiaries as per demand survey in the
particular urban cities/towns and get these approved by the State Level Sanctioning and Mon-
itoring Committee (SLSMC) before these projects are considered by Central Government for
considering the admissible central assistance involved in consonance with the scheme guide-
lines. Thus, selection of projects under PMAY (U) and their implementation are with the State/
UT Governments.
5.       Technology Sub-Mission
• In order to promote green and environment friendly, disaster resistant technologies and
planning/layouts suitable for different areas of the country, a Technology Sub-Mission has
also been launched as part of the Mission. This Sub-Mission envisages to facilitate State/
city Governments to adopt modern, innovative and green technologies for adoption of
layout designs building plans suitable for various geo-climatic zones and to deploy disas-
ter resistant and environment friendly technologies. It is envisaged that Centre and State
would partner with willing IITs, NITs and Planning & Architecture institutes for developing
technical solutions, capacity building and handholding of States and Cities.
• 24 Emerging Technologies have been identified, evaluated and are being promoted by
Building Materials and Technology Promotion Council (BMTPC). CPWD has issued Sched-
ule of Rates (SoRs) for 14 such Technologies to bring them into the main stream of mass
housing construction.  Benefits of new alternative technologies are that the houses built
are safer and disaster resilient, better quality of construction, low maintenance, speedy
construction resulting in early occupancy, cost effective and environment friendly, better
fire resistance and thermal efficiency. About 12 Lakh houses are being constructed using
 
• In addition, Ministry is organizing Global Housing Technology Challenge (GHTC-India) to
co-opt internationally acclaimed rapid mass housing construction technologies and to help
254
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
States/UTs to construct sanctioned houses under PMAY(U) to address housing shortage in
the urban areas by 2022 as well as to bring a paradigm shift in mass housing construction
technologies in the country.  technologies in the country.
6.         Progress under PMAY (U) as on 31.01.2019
• Barring Lakshadweep (which does not have an urban area), 35 States/UTs of the country
have signed Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) under the Mission. As on 0 31.01.2019,
15,263 project proposals for construction of 72.82 lakh houses have been approved.
• An investment of about Rs. 4.09 lakh crore with the Central assistance of Rs. 1.12 lakh crore
have been approved of which Central assistance of Rs. 36,154 crore has been released out
of the budgetary allocations and Extra Budgetary Resources (EBR). An expenditure for Rs.
26,500 crore has already been reported by the States/UTs through web portal.
• A total of 38.67 lakh houses have been grounded of which construction for 14.76 lakh are
complete and 14.12 lakh are occupied.
• Under CLSS, 3.77 lakh beneficiaries have availed an interest subsidy of Rs. 8,378 crore.
There has been a massive jump of more than 3 fold with respect to sanctions of previous
year particularly in MIG category where more than 1.10 lakh beneficiary have availed the
benefits.
7.       Transparency, Accountability and Monitoring Systems
• Digitization of Beneficiary databases alongwith Aadhaar number and bank account number
in MIS System.
• BHUVAN Mobile App used for Geo-referenced photographs of 5 stages of houses being
constructed under BLC Component for monitoring the progress of construction. Electronic
transfer of funds using DBT mode is being made in accordance to stages of construction
captured for BLC component. For house under other component such as AHP and ISSR , NIC
Mobile App is developed and in use for Geo-referenced photographs of projects on Bharat
Maps.
• Field level verification of works are being carried out by State Level Technical Cell/ City
Level Technical Cell, Third Party Quality and Monitoring Agency (TPQMA) and Social Audit
Team.
• Regular meetings of Central sanctioning and Monitoring Committee (CSMC) under chair-
manship of Secretary (HUA) at Central Level and State Level Sanctioning and Monitoring
Committee (SLSMC) under the chairmanship of Chief Secretary of the State concerned at
State level reviews progress of implementation of scheme.
• Hon’ble Minister (MoHUA) holds review meetings with Hon’ble Chief Ministers and con-
cerned Ministers of the State.
255
Handbook of Urban Statistics
States/UTs to construct sanctioned houses under PMAY(U) to address housing shortage in
the urban areas by 2022 as well as to bring a paradigm shift in mass housing construction
 
6.         Progress under PMAY (U) as on 31.01.2019
• Barring Lakshadweep (which does not have an urban area), 35 States/UTs of the country
have signed Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) under the Mission. As on 0 31.01.2019,
15,263 project proposals for construction of 72.82 lakh houses have been approved.
• An investment of about Rs. 4.09 lakh crore with the Central assistance of Rs. 1.12 lakh crore
have been approved of which Central assistance of Rs. 36,154 crore has been released out
of the budgetary allocations and Extra Budgetary Resources (EBR). An expenditure for Rs.
26,500 crore has already been reported by the States/UTs through web portal.
• A total of 38.67 lakh houses have been grounded of which construction for 14.76 lakh are
complete and 14.12 lakh are occupied.
• Under CLSS, 3.77 lakh beneficiaries have availed an interest subsidy of Rs. 8,378 crore.
There has been a massive jump of more than 3 fold with respect to sanctions of previous
year particularly in MIG category where more than 1.10 lakh beneficiary have availed the
benefits.
7.       Transparency, Accountability and Monitoring Systems
• Digitization of Beneficiary databases alongwith Aadhaar number and bank account number
in MIS System.
• BHUVAN Mobile App used for Geo-referenced photographs of 5 stages of houses being
constructed under BLC Component for monitoring the progress of construction. Electronic
transfer of funds using DBT mode is being made in accordance to stages of construction
captured for BLC component. For house under other component such as AHP and ISSR , NIC
Mobile App is developed and in use for Geo-referenced photographs of projects on Bharat
Maps.
• Field level verification of works are being carried out by State Level Technical Cell/ City
Level Technical Cell, Third Party Quality and Monitoring Agency (TPQMA) and Social Audit
Team.
• Regular meetings of Central sanctioning and Monitoring Committee (CSMC) under chair-
manship of Secretary (HUA) at Central Level and State Level Sanctioning and Monitoring
Committee (SLSMC) under the chairmanship of Chief Secretary of the State concerned at
State level reviews progress of implementation of scheme.
• Hon’ble Minister (MoHUA) holds review meetings with Hon’ble Chief Ministers and con-
cerned Ministers of the State.
255
Handbook of Urban Statistics
8. Strengthening of Structural Policy Framework
• Affordable Housing has been accorded Infrastructure Status by including it in the Harmon-
ised List of Infrastructure.
• Fiscal incentives under section 80-IBA of the Income Tax Act has been provided, which lead
100% deduction of profits and gains for Affordable Housing projects.
• Eight ‘PPP Models for Affordable Housing’ have been circulated to States/Union Territo-
ries (UTs) to facilitate private sector participation.
• States/UTs have been urged to take more steps under the Ease of Doing Business to im-
prove the processes of granting faster clearances and approvals. So far Online Building
Permission System (OBPS) has been made operational in 1,453 cities including 436 AM-
RUT cities. 10 States (Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh,
Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Punjab, Telangana and Tripura ) have implemented OBPS in all
ULBs. It is targeted to get this operational in all cities by March, 2019.  ULBs. It is targeted to get this operational in all cities by March, 2019.
• Implementation of Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act (RERA) has created a
mechanism that effectively regulates and addresses issues like project delivery delays,
property pricing, quality of construction, title, complaint redressal system in an efficient
and transparent manner. This also protects the interests of the lenders by ring-fencing the
project funds and enabling completion & delivery of projects on-time.
• GST Council has lowered the effective GST rate from 12% to 8% (after deducting one third
of the amount charged from the house toward cost of land) for all the houses constructed
under PMAY (U) to improve affordability and enhancing access to housing credit to the target-
ed beneficiary:
• Ministry of Finance has setup an Affordable Housing Fund (AHF) of Rs. 10,000 crore in
National Housing Bank (NHB) using backlog funding available in priority sector lending of
Banks. This will reduce the borrowing cost for the beneficiary as NHB will be refinancing
more loans given by the Primary Lending Institutions (PLIs) in the targeted segment at a
reduced interest rate.
256
Handbook of Urban Statistics
8. Strengthening of Structural Policy Framework
• Affordable Housing has been accorded Infrastructure Status by including it in the Harmon-
ised List of Infrastructure.
• Fiscal incentives under section 80-IBA of the Income Tax Act has been provided, which lead
100% deduction of profits and gains for Affordable Housing projects.
• Eight ‘PPP Models for Affordable Housing’ have been circulated to States/Union Territo-
ries (UTs) to facilitate private sector participation.
• States/UTs have been urged to take more steps under the Ease of Doing Business to im-
prove the processes of granting faster clearances and approvals. So far Online Building
Permission System (OBPS) has been made operational in 1,453 cities including 436 AM-
RUT cities. 10 States (Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh,
Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Punjab, Telangana and Tripura ) have implemented OBPS in all
 
• Implementation of Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act (RERA) has created a
mechanism that effectively regulates and addresses issues like project delivery delays,
property pricing, quality of construction, title, complaint redressal system in an efficient
and transparent manner. This also protects the interests of the lenders by ring-fencing the
project funds and enabling completion & delivery of projects on-time.
• GST Council has lowered the effective GST rate from 12% to 8% (after deducting one third
of the amount charged from the house toward cost of land) for all the houses constructed
under PMAY (U) to improve affordability and enhancing access to housing credit to the target-
ed beneficiary:
• Ministry of Finance has setup an Affordable Housing Fund (AHF) of Rs. 10,000 crore in
National Housing Bank (NHB) using backlog funding available in priority sector lending of
Banks. This will reduce the borrowing cost for the beneficiary as NHB will be refinancing
more loans given by the Primary Lending Institutions (PLIs) in the targeted segment at a
reduced interest rate.
256
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 11.1 Houses Sanctioned under PMAY (U) Table 11.1 Houses Sanctioned under PMAY (U)
Sl. No. States/ UTs Number of Houses Sl. No. States/ UTs Number of Houses
1 A&N Island (UT) 611 1 A&N Island (UT) 611
2 Andhra Pradesh 1,129,530 2 Andhra Pradesh 1,129,530
3 Arunachal Pradesh 6,284 3 Arunachal Pradesh 6,284
4 Assam 57,572 4 Assam 57,572
5 Bihar 242,294 5 Bihar 242,294
6 Chandigarh (UT) 145 6 Chandigarh (UT) 145
7 Chhattisgarh 211,267 7 Chhattisgarh 211,267
8 D&N Haveli (UT) 4,073 8 D&N Haveli (UT) 4,073
9 Daman & Diu (UT) 819 9 Daman & Diu (UT) 819
10 Delhi 7,889 10 Delhi 7,889
11 Goa 381 11 Goa 381
12 Gujarat 421,813 12 Gujarat 421,813
13 Haryana 251,126 13 Haryana 251,126
14 Himachal Pradesh 8,428 14 Himachal Pradesh 8,428
15 Jammu & Kashmir 34,451 15 Jammu & Kashmir 34,451
16 Jharkhand 163,503 16 Jharkhand 163,503
17 Karnataka 519,583 17 Karnataka 519,583
18 Kerala 114,734 18 Kerala 114,734
19 Lakshadweep (UT) - 19 Lakshadweep (UT) -
20 Madhya Pradesh 647,017 20 Madhya Pradesh 647,017
21 Maharashtra 792,658 21 Maharashtra 792,658
22 Manipur 29,081 22 Manipur 29,081
23 Meghalaya 805 23 Meghalaya 805
24 Mizoram 29,865 24 Mizoram 29,865
25 Nagaland 25,764 25 Nagaland 25,764
26 Orissa 133,175 26 Orissa 133,175
27 Puducherry (UT) 9,573 27 Puducherry (UT) 9,573
28 Punjab 52,365 28 Punjab 52,365
29 Rajasthan 166,295 29 Rajasthan 166,295
30 Sikkim 518 30 Sikkim 518
31 Tamil Nadu 605,515 31 Tamil Nadu 605,515
32 Telangana 200,607 32 Telangana 200,607
33 Tripura 80,011 33 Tripura 80,011
34 Uttar Pradesh 959,257 34 Uttar Pradesh 959,257
35 Uttarakhand 32,202 35 Uttarakhand 32,202
36 West Bengal 341,640 36 West Bengal 341,640
Grand Total :- 7,280,851 Grand Total :- 7,280,851

257 257
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 11.2: Houses Sanctioned under EWS/ LIG and MIG in CLSS under PMAY (U) Table 11.2: Houses Sanctioned under EWS/ LIG and MIG in CLSS under PMAY (U)

Sl. Name of the No. of Beneficiary under No. of Beneficiary un- Sl. Name of the No. of Beneficiary under No. of Beneficiary un-
No. State/ UT EWS/ LIG der MIG No. State/ UT EWS/ LIG der MIG
1 A&N Island (UT) 2 - 1 A&N Island (UT) 2 -
2 Andhra Pradesh 2,411 3,883 2 Andhra Pradesh 2,411 3,883
3 Arunachal Pradesh 3 1 3 Arunachal Pradesh 3 1
4 Assam 314 104 4 Assam 314 104
5 Bihar 630 934 5 Bihar 630 934
6 Chandigarh (UT) 51 94 6 Chandigarh (UT) 51 94
7 Chhattisgarh 4,206 958 7 Chhattisgarh 4,206 958
8 D&N Haveli (UT) 833 104 8 D&N Haveli (UT) 833 104
9 Daman & Diu (UT) 164 28 9 Daman & Diu (UT) 164 28
10 Delhi 4,204 3,685 10 Delhi 4,204 3,685
11 Goa 113 208 11 Goa 113 208
12 Gujarat 101,263 14,384 12 Gujarat 101,263 14,384
13 Haryana 3,507 3,570 13 Haryana 3,507 3,570
14 Himachal Pradesh 124 90 14 Himachal Pradesh 124 90
15 Jammu & Kashmir 246 24 15 Jammu & Kashmir 246 24
16 Jharkhand 339 837 16 Jharkhand 339 837
17 Karnataka 5,014 10,575 17 Karnataka 5,014 10,575
18 Kerala 4,250 724 18 Kerala 4,250 724
19 Lakshadweep (UT) - - 19 Lakshadweep (UT) - -
20 Madhya Pradesh 18,241 3,300 20 Madhya Pradesh 18,241 3,300
21 Maharashtra 72,623 28,537 21 Maharashtra 72,623 28,537
22 Manipur 138 7 22 Manipur 138 7
23 Meghalaya 66 4 23 Meghalaya 66 4
24 Mizoram 365 4 24 Mizoram 365 4
25 Nagaland 6 4 25 Nagaland 6 4
26 Orissa 838 614 26 Orissa 838 614
27 Puducherry (UT) 106 121 27 Puducherry (UT) 106 121
28 Punjab 3,504 1,837 28 Punjab 3,504 1,837
29 Rajasthan 12,515 4,160 29 Rajasthan 12,515 4,160
30 Sikkim 2 1 30 Sikkim 2 1
31 Tamil Nadu 8,625 7,159 31 Tamil Nadu 8,625 7,159
32 Telangana 3,255 8,444 32 Telangana 3,255 8,444
33 Tripura 122 45 33 Tripura 122 45
34 Uttar Pradesh 12,189 10,968 34 Uttar Pradesh 12,189 10,968
35 Uttarakhand 2,434 713 35 Uttarakhand 2,434 713
36 West Bengal 4,159 4,037 36 West Bengal 4,159 4,037
Grand Total :- 266,862 110,158 Grand Total :- 266,862 110,158

258 258
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 11.3: Investment in Housing Construction through PMAY (U) Table 11.3: Investment in Housing Construction through PMAY (U)
Sl. Investment Sl. Investment
States/ UTs States/ UTs
No. (Rs in Crore) No. (Rs in Crore)
1 A&N Island (UT) 54.10 1 A&N Island (UT) 54.10
2 Andhra Pradesh 59,167.73 2 Andhra Pradesh 59,167.73
3 Arunachal Pradesh 357.79 3 Arunachal Pradesh 357.79
4 Assam 1,785.92 4 Assam 1,785.92
5 Bihar 12,155.09 5 Bihar 12,155.09
6 Chandigarh (UT) 34.92 6 Chandigarh (UT) 34.92
7 Chhattisgarh 8,820.15 7 Chhattisgarh 8,820.15
8 D&N Haveli (UT) 220.17 8 D&N Haveli (UT) 220.17
9 Daman & Diu (UT) 40.10 9 Daman & Diu (UT) 40.10
10 Delhi 1,477.96 10 Delhi 1,477.96
11 Goa 68.97 11 Goa 68.97
12 Gujarat 35,061.62 12 Gujarat 35,061.62
13 Haryana 23,998.13 13 Haryana 23,998.13
14 Himachal Pradesh 430.40 14 Himachal Pradesh 430.40
15 Jammu & Kashmir 1,842.42 15 Jammu & Kashmir 1,842.42
16 Jharkhand 10,462.66 16 Jharkhand 10,462.66
17 Karnataka 28,467.72 17 Karnataka 28,467.72
18 Kerala 4,106.78 18 Kerala 4,106.78
19 Lakshadweep (UT) - 19 Lakshadweep (UT) -
20 Madhya Pradesh 35,390.45 20 Madhya Pradesh 35,390.45
21 Maharashtra 60,623.81 21 Maharashtra 60,623.81
22 Manipur 747.47 22 Manipur 747.47
23 Meghalaya 35.27 23 Meghalaya 35.27
24 Mizoram 619.27 24 Mizoram 619.27
25 Nagaland 680.75 25 Nagaland 680.75
26 Orissa 4,795.95 26 Orissa 4,795.95
27 Puducherry (UT) 428.09 27 Puducherry (UT) 428.09
28 Punjab 2,029.53 28 Punjab 2,029.53
29 Rajasthan 9,482.56 29 Rajasthan 9,482.56
30 Sikkim 13.64 30 Sikkim 13.64
31 Tamil Nadu 29,405.57 31 Tamil Nadu 29,405.57
32 Telangana 16,071.59 32 Telangana 16,071.59
33 Tripura 2,199.93 33 Tripura 2,199.93
34 Uttar Pradesh 40,982.20 34 Uttar Pradesh 40,982.20
35 Uttarakhand 2,052.71 35 Uttarakhand 2,052.71
36 West Bengal 14,799.28 36 West Bengal 14,799.28
Grand Total :- 408,910.69 Grand Total :- 408,910.69

259 259
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 11.4: Commitment of Central Assistance under PMAY (U) Table 11.4: Commitment of Central Assistance under PMAY (U)
Committment Committment
Sl. No. States/ UTs Sl. No. States/ UTs
(Rs in Crore) (Rs in Crore)
1 A&N Island (UT) 9.18 1 A&N Island (UT) 9.18
2 Andhra Pradesh 16,999.91 2 Andhra Pradesh 16,999.91
3 Arunachal Pradesh 148.63 3 Arunachal Pradesh 148.63
4 Assam 865.55 4 Assam 865.55
5 Bihar 3,770.52 5 Bihar 3,770.52
6 Chandigarh (UT) 3.40 6 Chandigarh (UT) 3.40
7 Chhattisgarh 3,152.03 7 Chhattisgarh 3,152.03
8 D&N Haveli (UT) 68.61 8 D&N Haveli (UT) 68.61
9 Daman & Diu (UT) 13.57 9 Daman & Diu (UT) 13.57
10 Delhi 177.80 10 Delhi 177.80
11 Goa 8.04 11 Goa 8.04
12 Gujarat 6,989.54 12 Gujarat 6,989.54
13 Haryana 3,966.81 13 Haryana 3,966.81
14 Himachal Pradesh 150.39 14 Himachal Pradesh 150.39
15 Jammu & Kashmir 527.36 15 Jammu & Kashmir 527.36
16 Jharkhand 2,417.59 16 Jharkhand 2,417.59
17 Karnataka 8,186.59 17 Karnataka 8,186.59
18 Kerala 1,774.08 18 Kerala 1,774.08
19 Lakshadweep (UT) - 19 Lakshadweep (UT) -
20 Madhya Pradesh 9,940.28 20 Madhya Pradesh 9,940.28
21 Maharashtra 11,617.60 21 Maharashtra 11,617.60
22 Manipur 436.41 22 Manipur 436.41
23 Meghalaya 12.18 23 Meghalaya 12.18
24 Mizoram 455.94 24 Mizoram 455.94
25 Nagaland 412.37 25 Nagaland 412.37
26 Orissa 2,085.99 26 Orissa 2,085.99
27 Puducherry (UT) 144.91 27 Puducherry (UT) 144.91
28 Punjab 780.14 28 Punjab 780.14
29 Rajasthan 2,684.47 29 Rajasthan 2,684.47
30 Sikkim 7.79 30 Sikkim 7.79
31 Tamil Nadu 9,230.79 31 Tamil Nadu 9,230.79
32 Telangana 3,092.69 32 Telangana 3,092.69
33 Tripura 1,233.60 33 Tripura 1,233.60
34 Uttar Pradesh 14,688.78 34 Uttar Pradesh 14,688.78
35 Uttarakhand 581.75 35 Uttarakhand 581.75
36 West Bengal 5,189.31 36 West Bengal 5,189.31
Grand Total :- 111,824.61 Grand Total :- 111,824.61

260 260
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 11.5:Expenditure of Central Assistance under PMAY (U Table 11.5:Expenditure of Central Assistance under PMAY (U

Sl. Expenditure Sl. Expenditure

States/ UTs States/ UTs
No. (Rs in Crore) No. (Rs in Crore)
1 A&N Island (UT) 0.27 1 A&N Island (UT) 0.27
2 Andhra Pradesh 3,867.40 2 Andhra Pradesh 3,867.40
3 Arunachal Pradesh 87.41 3 Arunachal Pradesh 87.41
4 Assam 347.53 4 Assam 347.53
5 Bihar 968.48 5 Bihar 968.48
6 Chandigarh (UT) 3.40 6 Chandigarh (UT) 3.40
7 Chhattisgarh 1,055.45 7 Chhattisgarh 1,055.45
8 D&N Haveli (UT) 37.53 8 D&N Haveli (UT) 37.53
9 Daman & Diu (UT) 6.71 9 Daman & Diu (UT) 6.71
10 Delhi 177.80 10 Delhi 177.80
11 Goa 7.50 11 Goa 7.50
12 Gujarat 3,989.99 12 Gujarat 3,989.99
13 Haryana 517.79 13 Haryana 517.79
14 Himachal Pradesh 60.36 14 Himachal Pradesh 60.36
15 Jammu & Kashmir 103.05 15 Jammu & Kashmir 103.05
16 Jharkhand 993.45 16 Jharkhand 993.45
17 Karnataka 2,639.71 17 Karnataka 2,639.71
18 Kerala 938.38 18 Kerala 938.38
19 Lakshadweep (UT) - 19 Lakshadweep (UT) -
20 Madhya Pradesh 4,897.10 20 Madhya Pradesh 4,897.10
21 Maharashtra 3,098.82 21 Maharashtra 3,098.82
22 Manipur 160.46 22 Manipur 160.46
23 Meghalaya 5.57 23 Meghalaya 5.57
24 Mizoram 83.46 24 Mizoram 83.46
25 Nagaland 148.18 25 Nagaland 148.18
26 Orissa 707.99 26 Orissa 707.99
27 Puducherry (UT) 60.22 27 Puducherry (UT) 60.22
28 Punjab 281.57 28 Punjab 281.57
29 Rajasthan 755.50 29 Rajasthan 755.50
30 Sikkim 2.93 30 Sikkim 2.93
31 Tamil Nadu 2,844.36 31 Tamil Nadu 2,844.36
32 Telangana 1,437.89 32 Telangana 1,437.89
33 Tripura 619.49 33 Tripura 619.49
34 Uttar Pradesh 3,081.26 34 Uttar Pradesh 3,081.26
35 Uttarakhand 272.52 35 Uttarakhand 272.52
36 West Bengal 1,894.09 36 West Bengal 1,894.09
Grand Total :- 36,153.60 Grand Total :- 36,153.60

261 261
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 11.6:Grounded Houses under PMAY (U) Table 11.6:Grounded Houses under PMAY (U)

Houses Houses
Sl. No. States/ UTs Sl. No. States/ UTs
Grounded Grounded
1 A&N Island (UT) 35 1 A&N Island (UT) 35
2 Andhra Pradesh 703,613 2 Andhra Pradesh 703,613
3 Arunachal Pradesh 6,327 3 Arunachal Pradesh 6,327
4 Assam 33,407 4 Assam 33,407
5 Bihar 115,185 5 Bihar 115,185
6 Chandigarh (UT) 5,105 6 Chandigarh (UT) 5,105
7 Chhattisgarh 94,259 7 Chhattisgarh 94,259
8 D&N Haveli (UT) 2,460 8 D&N Haveli (UT) 2,460
9 Daman & Diu (UT) 598 9 Daman & Diu (UT) 598
10 Delhi 48,469 10 Delhi 48,469
11 Goa 322 11 Goa 322
12 Gujarat 332,432 12 Gujarat 332,432
13 Haryana 26,574 13 Haryana 26,574
14 Himachal Pradesh 4,477 14 Himachal Pradesh 4,477
15 Jammu & Kashmir 14,010 15 Jammu & Kashmir 14,010
16 Jharkhand 106,892 16 Jharkhand 106,892
17 Karnataka 242,001 17 Karnataka 242,001
18 Kerala 66,840 18 Kerala 66,840
19 Lakshadweep (UT) - 19 Lakshadweep (UT) -
20 Madhya Pradesh 406,999 20 Madhya Pradesh 406,999
21 Maharashtra 224,017 21 Maharashtra 224,017
22 Manipur 12,550 22 Manipur 12,550
23 Meghalaya 1,440 23 Meghalaya 1,440
24 Mizoram 2,409 24 Mizoram 2,409
25 Nagaland 9,705 25 Nagaland 9,705
26 Orissa 71,443 26 Orissa 71,443
27 Puducherry (UT) 4,610 27 Puducherry (UT) 4,610
28 Punjab 29,137 28 Punjab 29,137
29 Rajasthan 92,536 29 Rajasthan 92,536
30 Sikkim 493 30 Sikkim 493
31 Tamil Nadu 425,267 31 Tamil Nadu 425,267
32 Telangana 160,621 32 Telangana 160,621
33 Tripura 63,927 33 Tripura 63,927
34 Uttar Pradesh 353,827 34 Uttar Pradesh 353,827
35 Uttarakhand 13,831 35 Uttarakhand 13,831
36 West Bengal 191,373 36 West Bengal 191,373
Grand Total :- 3,867,191 Grand Total :- 3,867,191

262 262
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 11.7:Completed Houses under PMAY (U) Table 11.7:Completed Houses under PMAY (U)
Houses Houses
Sl. No. States/ UTs Sl. No. States/ UTs
Completed Completed
1 A&N Island (UT) 8 1 A&N Island (UT) 8
2 Andhra Pradesh 179,783 2 Andhra Pradesh 179,783
3 Arunachal Pradesh 857 3 Arunachal Pradesh 857
4 Assam 1,516 4 Assam 1,516
5 Bihar 27,750 5 Bihar 27,750
6 Chandigarh (UT) 5,105 6 Chandigarh (UT) 5,105
7 Chhattisgarh 29,589 7 Chhattisgarh 29,589
8 D&N Haveli (UT) 1,042 8 D&N Haveli (UT) 1,042
9 Daman & Diu (UT) 258 9 Daman & Diu (UT) 258
10 Delhi 31,869 10 Delhi 31,869
11 Goa 321 11 Goa 321
12 Gujarat 181,337 12 Gujarat 181,337
13 Haryana 9,634 13 Haryana 9,634
14 Himachal Pradesh 1,140 14 Himachal Pradesh 1,140
15 Jammu & Kashmir 1,968 15 Jammu & Kashmir 1,968
16 Jharkhand 46,713 16 Jharkhand 46,713
17 Karnataka 108,307 17 Karnataka 108,307
18 Kerala 20,981 18 Kerala 20,981
19 Lakshadweep (UT) - 19 Lakshadweep (UT) -
20 Madhya Pradesh 160,603 20 Madhya Pradesh 160,603
21 Maharashtra 152,416 21 Maharashtra 152,416
22 Manipur 1,340 22 Manipur 1,340
23 Meghalaya 760 23 Meghalaya 760
24 Mizoram 1,185 24 Mizoram 1,185
25 Nagaland 2,462 25 Nagaland 2,462
26 Orissa 27,939 26 Orissa 27,939
27 Puducherry (UT) 1,160 27 Puducherry (UT) 1,160
28 Punjab 9,006 28 Punjab 9,006
29 Rajasthan 52,447 29 Rajasthan 52,447
30 Sikkim 188 30 Sikkim 188
31 Tamil Nadu 135,655 31 Tamil Nadu 135,655
32 Telangana 38,387 32 Telangana 38,387
33 Tripura 18,337 33 Tripura 18,337
34 Uttar Pradesh 120,741 34 Uttar Pradesh 120,741
35 Uttarakhand 6,467 35 Uttarakhand 6,467
36 West Bengal 98,608 36 West Bengal 98,608
Grand Total :- 1,475,879 Grand Total :- 1,475,879

263 263
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 11.8:Occupied Houses under PMAY (U) Table 11.8:Occupied Houses under PMAY (U)

Sl. No. States/ UTs Houses Sl. No. States/ UTs Houses
Occupied Occupied
1 A&N Island (UT) 8 1 A&N Island (UT) 8
2 Andhra Pradesh 119,871 2 Andhra Pradesh 119,871
3 Arunachal Pradesh 781 3 Arunachal Pradesh 781
4 Assam 2,979 4 Assam 2,979
5 Bihar 36,441 5 Bihar 36,441
6 Chandigarh (UT) 2,834 6 Chandigarh (UT) 2,834
7 Chhattisgarh 31,438 7 Chhattisgarh 31,438
8 D&N Haveli (UT) 1,042 8 D&N Haveli (UT) 1,042
9 Daman & Diu (UT) 258 9 Daman & Diu (UT) 258
10 Delhi 9,505 10 Delhi 9,505
11 Goa 321 11 Goa 321
12 Gujarat 189,883 12 Gujarat 189,883
13 Haryana 9,875 13 Haryana 9,875
14 Himachal Pradesh 1,034 14 Himachal Pradesh 1,034
15 Jammu & Kashmir 3,135 15 Jammu & Kashmir 3,135
16 Jharkhand 46,758 16 Jharkhand 46,758
17 Karnataka 109,352 17 Karnataka 109,352

264 264
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

18 Kerala 20,658 18 Kerala 20,658

19 Lakshadweep (UT) - 19 Lakshadweep (UT) -
20 Madhya Pradesh 164,044 20 Madhya Pradesh 164,044
21 Maharashtra 169,152 21 Maharashtra 169,152
22 Manipur 2,049 22 Manipur 2,049
23 Meghalaya 366 23 Meghalaya 366
24 Mizoram 1,553 24 Mizoram 1,553
25 Nagaland 4,055 25 Nagaland 4,055
26 Orissa 25,490 26 Orissa 25,490
27 Puducherry (UT) 1,013 27 Puducherry (UT) 1,013
28 Punjab 8,621 28 Punjab 8,621
29 Rajasthan 52,325 29 Rajasthan 52,325
30 Sikkim 129 30 Sikkim 129
31 Tamil Nadu 124,318 31 Tamil Nadu 124,318
32 Telangana 29,326 32 Telangana 29,326
33 Tripura 18,337 33 Tripura 18,337
34 Uttar Pradesh 119,470 34 Uttar Pradesh 119,470
35 Uttarakhand 6,933 35 Uttarakhand 6,933
36 West Bengal 98,432 36 West Bengal 98,432
Grand Total :- 1,411,786 Grand Total :- 1,411,786

265 265
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 11.9: No of beneficiaries residing in slums availed benefits Table 11.9: No of beneficiaries residing in slums availed benefits
under various components of PMAY (U) under various components of PMAY (U)
In-situ Slum Affordable In-situ Slum Affordable
Beneficiary Total Benefi- Beneficiary Total Benefi-
Sl. Redevel- Housing in Sl. Redevel- Housing in
States/ UTs Led Construc- ciaries resid- States/ UTs Led Construc- ciaries resid-
No. op-ment Partnership No. op-ment Partnership
tion (BLC) ing in slums tion (BLC) ing in slums
(ISSR) (AHP) (ISSR) (AHP)
1 A&N Island (UT) - - - 1 A&N Island (UT) - - -
- -
2 Andhra Pradesh 1,617 203,494 174,609 379,720 2 Andhra Pradesh 1,617 203,494 174,609 379,720
3 Arunachal Pradesh 1,536 - - 1,536 3 Arunachal Pradesh 1,536 - - 1,536
4 Assam - - 308 308 4 Assam - - 308 308
5 Bihar 11,276 - 2,809 14,085 5 Bihar 11,276 - 2,809 14,085
6 Chandigarh (UT) - - - - 6 Chandigarh (UT) - - - -
7 Chhattisgarh 6,246 51,753 43,122 101,121 7 Chhattisgarh 6,246 51,753 43,122 101,121
8 D&N Haveli (UT) - - - - 8 D&N Haveli (UT) - - - -
9 Daman & Diu (UT) - - - - 9 Daman & Diu (UT) - - - -
10 Delhi - - - - 10 Delhi - - - -
11 Goa - - - - 11 Goa - - - -
12 Gujarat 86,620 15,611 - 102,231 12 Gujarat 86,620 15,611 - 102,231
13 Haryana 3,226 83,799 8,648 95,673 13 Haryana 3,226 83,799 8,648 95,673
14 Himachal Pradesh 300 - - 300 14 Himachal Pradesh 300 - - 300
15 Jammu & Kashmir 369 - - 369 15 Jammu & Kashmir 369 - - 369
16 Jharkhand 19,448 - 3,250 22,698 16 Jharkhand 19,448 - 3,250 22,698
17 Karnataka 23,125 80,703 13 103,841 17 Karnataka 23,125 80,703 13 103,841
18 Kerala 2,118 - 263 2,381 18 Kerala 2,118 - 263 2,381
19 Lakshadweep (UT) - - - - 19 Lakshadweep (UT) - - - -
20 Madhya Pradesh 10,295 122,109 96,169 228,573 20 Madhya Pradesh 10,295 122,109 96,169 228,573
21 Maharashtra 222,303 58,021 3,932 284,256 21 Maharashtra 222,303 58,021 3,932 284,256
22 Manipur - - - - 22 Manipur - - - -
23 Meghalaya - - 24 24 23 Meghalaya - - 24 24
24 Mizoram 142 - - 142 24 Mizoram 142 - - 142
25 Nagaland 1,054 - - 1,054 25 Nagaland 1,054 - - 1,054
26 Orissa 18,535 - 14,782 33,317 26 Orissa 18,535 - 14,782 33,317
27 Puducherry (UT) - - - - 27 Puducherry (UT) - - - -
28 Punjab 1,025 - 267 1,292 28 Punjab 1,025 - 267 1,292
29 Rajasthan 21,908 - - 21,908 29 Rajasthan 21,908 - - 21,908
30 Sikkim - - - - 30 Sikkim - - - -
31 Tamil Nadu 4,880 41,779 55,955 102,614 31 Tamil Nadu 4,880 41,779 55,955 102,614
32 Telangana 1,198 72,992 - 74,190 32 Telangana 1,198 72,992 - 74,190
33 Tripura 3,005 - 2,116 5,121 33 Tripura 3,005 - 2,116 5,121
34 Uttar Pradesh 8,409 - - 8,409 34 Uttar Pradesh 8,409 - - 8,409
35 Uttarakhand 3,130 1,872 534 5,536 35 Uttarakhand 3,130 1,872 534 5,536
36 West Bengal 472 - - 472 36 West Bengal 472 - - 472
Grand Total :- 452,237 732,133 406,801 1,591,171 Grand Total :- 452,237 732,133 406,801 1,591,171

266 266
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 11.1 Houses sanctioned under PMAY (U) Graph 11.1 Houses sanctioned under PMAY (U)

Graph 11.2 Houses sanctioned under EWS/LIG and MIG in CLSS under PMAY (U) Graph 11.2 Houses sanctioned under EWS/LIG and MIG in CLSS under PMAY (U)

267 267
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 11.3 Investment in Housing Construction through PMAY (U) Graph 11.3 Investment in Housing Construction through PMAY (U)

(in Lakh Crore) (in Lakh Crore)

268 268
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 11.4 Commitment of Central Assistance under PMAY (U) Graph 11.4 Commitment of Central Assistance under PMAY (U)

(in Lakh Crore) (in Lakh Crore)

Graph 11.5 Expenditure of Central Assistance under PMAY (U) Graph 11.5 Expenditure of Central Assistance under PMAY (U)

(Rs in Crore) (Rs in Crore)

269 269
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 11.6 Grounded Houses under PMAY (U) Graph 11.6 Grounded Houses under PMAY (U)

( inLakh ( inLakh

Graph 11.7 Completed Houses under PMAY (U) Graph 11.7 Completed Houses under PMAY (U)

270 270
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 11.8 Occupied Houses under PMAY (U) Graph 11.8 Occupied Houses under PMAY (U)

Graph 11.9 No. of beneficiaries residing in slums availed benefits under PMAY (U) Graph 11.9 No. of beneficiaries residing in slums availed benefits under PMAY (U)

(inLakh) (inLakh)

271 271
 Chapter 12 Chapter 12

Deendayal Antyodaya Deendayal Antyodaya

Yojana – National Urban Yojana – National Urban
Livelihoods Mission Livelihoods Mission
(DAY-NULM) (DAY-NULM)
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana – National Urban Livelihoods Mission
(DAY-NULM)
India’s vibrant and rapidly growing economy needs a steady supply of skilled human resources. As
per the Census, 2011, more than 31% of the total population lived in urban areas and more recent
estimates suggest that this will rise to 50% by 2030. As cities increase in number and existing cities be-
come denser, the pressure to support livelihoods will keep mounting. About 10 lakh new people enter
the workforce every month (Ministry of Labour & Employment). The changing technological landscape
in the manufacturing and service industries and further mechanization of agriculture is expected to
lead to more robust job growth in urban areas. It is estimated that over the next two decades, about
70% of the new jobs will be created in urban India (Sankhe et all, 2010).
The Report on Conditions of Work and Promotion of Livelihoods in the Unorganized Sector by the
National Commission on Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector brought out in August 2007 (NCEUS,
2007) reveals that in 2004-05, out of India’s total workforce, 92 percent worked in the informal econ-
omy. The urban informal sector comprises a large part of the unorganized non-agriculture sector. Low
levels of education and skill in the unorganized sector workers have resulted in their inability to access
the opportunities offered by emerging markets. This underscores the criticality of skills up-gradation
for better livelihoods opportunities in urban areas.
The Government of India is addressing these challenges from multiple directions as follows -
1. The National Skill Development Policy was released in 2009, along with the establishment of the
National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC)
2. The skilling ecosystem is being complemented by a parallel effort to broaden access to formal fi-
nancial services which are essential to promote self-employment opportunities these include the
JAM+ architecture, comprising of Jan Dhan, Aadhar, and Mobile based services.
3. An integrated approach to support both wage employment and self-employment is part of the
Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana – National Urban Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NULM), under the Min-
istry of Housing & Urban Affairs (MoHUA). The Mission has been working towards creating liveli-
hoods opportunities for the poor and vulnerable population, in all the statutory towns.
Mission Statement
To reduce poverty and vulnerability of the urban poor households by enabling them to access self-em-
ployment and skilled wage employment opportunities, resulting in an appreciable improvement in
their livelihoods on a sustainable basis, through building strong grassroots level institutions of the
poor. The mission aims at providing shelter equipped with essential services to the urban homeless in
275
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana – National Urban Livelihoods Mission
(DAY-NULM)
India’s vibrant and rapidly growing economy needs a steady supply of skilled human resources. As
per the Census, 2011, more than 31% of the total population lived in urban areas and more recent
estimates suggest that this will rise to 50% by 2030. As cities increase in number and existing cities be-
come denser, the pressure to support livelihoods will keep mounting. About 10 lakh new people enter
the workforce every month (Ministry of Labour & Employment). The changing technological landscape
in the manufacturing and service industries and further mechanization of agriculture is expected to
lead to more robust job growth in urban areas. It is estimated that over the next two decades, about
70% of the new jobs will be created in urban India (Sankhe et all, 2010).
The Report on Conditions of Work and Promotion of Livelihoods in the Unorganized Sector by the
National Commission on Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector brought out in August 2007 (NCEUS,
2007) reveals that in 2004-05, out of India’s total workforce, 92 percent worked in the informal econ-
omy. The urban informal sector comprises a large part of the unorganized non-agriculture sector. Low
levels of education and skill in the unorganized sector workers have resulted in their inability to access
the opportunities offered by emerging markets. This underscores the criticality of skills up-gradation
for better livelihoods opportunities in urban areas.
The Government of India is addressing these challenges from multiple directions as follows -
1. The National Skill Development Policy was released in 2009, along with the establishment of the
National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC)
2. The skilling ecosystem is being complemented by a parallel effort to broaden access to formal fi-
nancial services which are essential to promote self-employment opportunities these include the
JAM+ architecture, comprising of Jan Dhan, Aadhar, and Mobile based services.
3. An integrated approach to support both wage employment and self-employment is part of the
Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana – National Urban Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NULM), under the Min-
istry of Housing & Urban Affairs (MoHUA). The Mission has been working towards creating liveli-
hoods opportunities for the poor and vulnerable population, in all the statutory towns.
Mission Statement
To reduce poverty and vulnerability of the urban poor households by enabling them to access self-em-
ployment and skilled wage employment opportunities, resulting in an appreciable improvement in
their livelihoods on a sustainable basis, through building strong grassroots level institutions of the
poor. The mission aims at providing shelter equipped with essential services to the urban homeless in
275
Handbook of Urban Statistics
a phased manner. In addition, the Mission also addresses livelihood concerns of the urban street ven-
dors by facilitating access to suitable spaces, institutional credit, social security and skills to the urban
street vendors for accessing emerging market opportunities.
Guiding Principles
• The core belief of Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana-National Urban Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NULM)
is that the poor are entrepreneurial and have innate desire to come out of poverty. The challenge
is to unleash its capabilities to generate meaningful and sustainable livelihoods. The first step in
this process is motivating the urban poor to form their own institutions. They and their institu-
tions need to be provided sufficient capacity so that they can manage the external environment,
access finance, expand their skills, enterprises, and assets. This requires continuous and carefully
designed handholding support. An external, dedicated and sensitive support structure, from the
national level to the city and community levels, is required to induce social mobilization, institution
building, and livelihood promotion.
• DAY-NULM believes that any livelihood promotion programme can be scaled up in a time-bound
manner only if driven by the poor and their institutions. Such strong institutional platforms sup-
port the poor in building up their own human, social, financial, and other assets. This, in turn, en-
ables them access to rights, entitlements, opportunities, and services from the public and private
sectors, while enhancing their solidarity, voice and bargaining power.
• As per the Constitution (74thAmendment) Act, 1992, urban poverty alleviation is a legitimate func-
tion of the Urban Local Bodies (ULB). Therefore, ULBs need to undertake a lead role for all issues
and programmes concerning the urban poor in cities/towns, including skills and livelihoods.
• DAY-NULM aim at universal coverage of the urban poor for skill development and credit facilities. It
strives for skills training of the urban poor for market-based jobs and self-employment, facilitating
easy access to credit.
• Street vendors constitute an important segment of the urban population at the bottom of the
pyramid. Street vending provides a source of self-employment, and thus acts as a measure of ur-
ban poverty alleviation without major Government intervention. Street Vendors have a prominent
place in the urban supply chain and are an integral part of the economic growth process within
urban areas. DAY-NULM aims at facilitating access to suitable spaces, institutional credit, social
security and skills to the urban street vendors for accessing emerging market opportunities.
• Urban homeless persons who live without shelter or social security/ protection are the most vul-
nerable class, even while they contribute towards sustaining cities with their cheap labour. Life on
the streets involves surviving continuously at the edge, in a physically brutalized and challenging
environment. There is a need for appropriate policy intervention to address the challenges faced
by homeless people, with regard to shelter, social housing, and social protection. Accordingly,
276
Handbook of Urban Statistics
a phased manner. In addition, the Mission also addresses livelihood concerns of the urban street ven-
dors by facilitating access to suitable spaces, institutional credit, social security and skills to the urban
street vendors for accessing emerging market opportunities.
Guiding Principles
• The core belief of Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana-National Urban Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NULM)
is that the poor are entrepreneurial and have innate desire to come out of poverty. The challenge
is to unleash its capabilities to generate meaningful and sustainable livelihoods. The first step in
this process is motivating the urban poor to form their own institutions. They and their institu-
tions need to be provided sufficient capacity so that they can manage the external environment,
access finance, expand their skills, enterprises, and assets. This requires continuous and carefully
designed handholding support. An external, dedicated and sensitive support structure, from the
national level to the city and community levels, is required to induce social mobilization, institution
building, and livelihood promotion.
• DAY-NULM believes that any livelihood promotion programme can be scaled up in a time-bound
manner only if driven by the poor and their institutions. Such strong institutional platforms sup-
port the poor in building up their own human, social, financial, and other assets. This, in turn, en-
ables them access to rights, entitlements, opportunities, and services from the public and private
sectors, while enhancing their solidarity, voice and bargaining power.
• As per the Constitution (74thAmendment) Act, 1992, urban poverty alleviation is a legitimate func-
tion of the Urban Local Bodies (ULB). Therefore, ULBs need to undertake a lead role for all issues
and programmes concerning the urban poor in cities/towns, including skills and livelihoods.
• DAY-NULM aim at universal coverage of the urban poor for skill development and credit facilities. It
strives for skills training of the urban poor for market-based jobs and self-employment, facilitating
easy access to credit.
• Street vendors constitute an important segment of the urban population at the bottom of the
pyramid. Street vending provides a source of self-employment, and thus acts as a measure of ur-
ban poverty alleviation without major Government intervention. Street Vendors have a prominent
place in the urban supply chain and are an integral part of the economic growth process within
urban areas. DAY-NULM aims at facilitating access to suitable spaces, institutional credit, social
security and skills to the urban street vendors for accessing emerging market opportunities.
• Urban homeless persons who live without shelter or social security/ protection are the most vul-
nerable class, even while they contribute towards sustaining cities with their cheap labour. Life on
the streets involves surviving continuously at the edge, in a physically brutalized and challenging
environment. There is a need for appropriate policy intervention to address the challenges faced
by homeless people, with regard to shelter, social housing, and social protection. Accordingly,
276
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
DAY-NULM aims at providing shelter equipped with essential services to the urban homeless in a
phased manner.
• DAY-NULM has placed a very high emphasis on convergence with schemes/programmes of the
relevant line Ministries/Departments and programmes of state governments dealing with skills,
livelihoods, entrepreneurship development, health, education, social assistance, etc. An alliance
strategy is being sought with all concerned departments to promote skills training of rural-urban
migrants as a bridge between the livelihoods of the rural and urban poor.
• DAY-NULM aims at a partnership with the private sector in providing skill training, employment,
and operation of a shelter for the homeless. It strives for active participation of private and civil so-
ciety sectors in providing shelter to the urban homeless, skill training and placement of the urban
poor and also in facilitating technological, marketing and handholding support for the urban poor
entrepreneurs who want to be self-employed and set up their own small businesses or manufac-
turing units.
Values
The mission espouses the following values:
1. Ownership and productive involvement of the urban poor and their institutions in all process-
es;
2. Transparency in programme design and implementation, including institution - building and
capacity strengthening;
3. Accountability of government functionaries and the community;
4. Partnerships with industry and other stakeholders; and
5. Community self-reliance, self-dependence, self-help, and mutual help. 5. Community self-reliance, self-dependence, self-help, and mutual help.
Strategy
DAY-NULM has adopted the following strategy:
1. Building capacity of the urban poor, their institutions and the machinery involved in the imple-
mentation of livelihoods development and poverty alleviation programmes through handhold-
ing support;
2. Enhancing and expanding existing livelihoods options of the urban poor;
3. Building skills to enable access to growing market-based job opportunities offered by emerging
urban economies;
4. Training for and support to the establishment of micro-enterprises by the urban poor – self and
group;
277
Handbook of Urban Statistics
DAY-NULM aims at providing shelter equipped with essential services to the urban homeless in a
phased manner.
• DAY-NULM has placed a very high emphasis on convergence with schemes/programmes of the
relevant line Ministries/Departments and programmes of state governments dealing with skills,
livelihoods, entrepreneurship development, health, education, social assistance, etc. An alliance
strategy is being sought with all concerned departments to promote skills training of rural-urban
migrants as a bridge between the livelihoods of the rural and urban poor.
• DAY-NULM aims at a partnership with the private sector in providing skill training, employment,
and operation of a shelter for the homeless. It strives for active participation of private and civil so-
ciety sectors in providing shelter to the urban homeless, skill training and placement of the urban
poor and also in facilitating technological, marketing and handholding support for the urban poor
entrepreneurs who want to be self-employed and set up their own small businesses or manufac-
turing units.
Values
The mission espouses the following values:
1. Ownership and productive involvement of the urban poor and their institutions in all process-
es;
2. Transparency in programme design and implementation, including institution - building and
capacity strengthening;
3. Accountability of government functionaries and the community;
4. Partnerships with industry and other stakeholders; and
Strategy
DAY-NULM has adopted the following strategy:
1. Building capacity of the urban poor, their institutions and the machinery involved in the imple-
mentation of livelihoods development and poverty alleviation programmes through handhold-
ing support;
2. Enhancing and expanding existing livelihoods options of the urban poor;
3. Building skills to enable access to growing market-based job opportunities offered by emerging
urban economies;
4. Training for and support to the establishment of micro-enterprises by the urban poor – self and
group;
277
Handbook of Urban Statistics
5. Ensure availability and access for the urban homeless population to permanent 24-hour shel-
ters including the basic infrastructural facilities like water supply, sanitation, safety, and secu-
rity;
6. Cater to the needs of especially vulnerable segments of the urban homeless like the dependent
children, aged, disabled, mentally ill, and recovering patients etc., by creating special sections
within homeless shelters and provisioning special service linkages for them;
7. To establish strong rights-based linkages with other programmes which cover the right of the
urban homeless to food, healthcare, education, etc. and ensure access for homeless popu-
lations to various entitlements, including to social security pensions, PDS, ICDS, feeding pro-
grammes, drinking water, sanitation, identity, financial inclusion, school admission etc., and to
affordable housing;
8. To address livelihood concerns of the urban street vendors by facilitating access to suitable
spaces, institutional credit, social security and skills to the urban street vendors for accessing
emerging market opportunities.
DAY-NULM derives its theory of change from the sustainable livelihood’s framework, with an emphasis
on bottom-up planning, vulnerability reduction, providing vocational skills and enhancing livelihoods
assets. Sustainable livelihoods are defined as those that are resilient to shocks and risks, diversified,
dynamic and adaptable as well as environmentally sustainable. (Walker, et al., 2001). Social capital
accumulated through various types of networks that exist in urban poor settlements is equally critical
to get access to employment avenues, especially for women. DAY-NULM and its predecessor schemes
were designed based on this paradigm.
DFID funded Slum Improvement Projects in the late 1980s-90s that were implemented through munic-
ipal corporations included the formation of Neighbourhood Committees (NHC) to act as an interface
between slum communities and the government, and “as an instrument for mobilizing peoples’ in-
puts on projects” (Phillips, 2002). These programs influenced the design of the Swarna Jayanti Shahari
Rozgar Yojana (SJSRY) implemented by the erstwhile Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Allevia-
tion (MoHUPA).
Considering the lessons learned from the implementation of SJSRY, the scheme was re-designed as
‘Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana-National Urban Livelihoods Mission (NULM)’ and was launched in 2013-
14 in all district and in all cities above 1 lakh population (790 Cities). On 20th February 2016 Mission
was extended to all the statutory towns in India. DAY-NULM is now one of the flagship schemes of the
Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (MoHUA).
278
Handbook of Urban Statistics
5. Ensure availability and access for the urban homeless population to permanent 24-hour shel-
ters including the basic infrastructural facilities like water supply, sanitation, safety, and secu-
rity;
6. Cater to the needs of especially vulnerable segments of the urban homeless like the dependent
children, aged, disabled, mentally ill, and recovering patients etc., by creating special sections
within homeless shelters and provisioning special service linkages for them;
7. To establish strong rights-based linkages with other programmes which cover the right of the
urban homeless to food, healthcare, education, etc. and ensure access for homeless popu-
lations to various entitlements, including to social security pensions, PDS, ICDS, feeding pro-
grammes, drinking water, sanitation, identity, financial inclusion, school admission etc., and to
affordable housing;
8. To address livelihood concerns of the urban street vendors by facilitating access to suitable
spaces, institutional credit, social security and skills to the urban street vendors for accessing
emerging market opportunities.
DAY-NULM derives its theory of change from the sustainable livelihood’s framework, with an emphasis
on bottom-up planning, vulnerability reduction, providing vocational skills and enhancing livelihoods
assets. Sustainable livelihoods are defined as those that are resilient to shocks and risks, diversified,
dynamic and adaptable as well as environmentally sustainable. (Walker, et al., 2001). Social capital
accumulated through various types of networks that exist in urban poor settlements is equally critical
to get access to employment avenues, especially for women. DAY-NULM and its predecessor schemes
were designed based on this paradigm.
DFID funded Slum Improvement Projects in the late 1980s-90s that were implemented through munic-
ipal corporations included the formation of Neighbourhood Committees (NHC) to act as an interface
between slum communities and the government, and “as an instrument for mobilizing peoples’ in-
puts on projects” (Phillips, 2002). These programs influenced the design of the Swarna Jayanti Shahari
Rozgar Yojana (SJSRY) implemented by the erstwhile Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Allevia-
tion (MoHUPA).
Considering the lessons learned from the implementation of SJSRY, the scheme was re-designed as
‘Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana-National Urban Livelihoods Mission (NULM)’ and was launched in 2013-
14 in all district and in all cities above 1 lakh population (790 Cities). On 20th February 2016 Mission
was extended to all the statutory towns in India. DAY-NULM is now one of the flagship schemes of the
Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs (MoHUA).
278
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

The Mission aims to alleviate urban poverty through a holistic approach and a clear focus on liveli- The Mission aims to alleviate urban poverty through a holistic approach and a clear focus on liveli-
hoods promotion. hoods promotion.

Components of DAY-NULM Components of DAY-NULM

Figure 1: DAY-NULM Components Figure 1: DAY-NULM Components

Social Mobilization and Employment through Skill Self-Employment Support to Urban Street Social Mobilization and Employment through Skill Self-Employment Support to Urban Street
Institution Development Training and Placement Programme (SEP) Vendors (SUSV) Institution Development Training and Placement Programme (SEP) Vendors (SUSV)
(SM&ID) (EST&P) (SM&ID) (EST&P)

Scheme of Shelter for Capacity Building and Innovative and Special Scheme of Shelter for Capacity Building and Innovative and Special
Urban Homeless (SUH) Training (CBT) Projects (I&SP) Urban Homeless (SUH) Training (CBT) Projects (I&SP)
a. Social Mobilization and Institutional Development Component a. Social Mobilization and Institutional Development Component
The Social Mobilization and Institutional Development component of the Mission builds social capital The Social Mobilization and Institutional Development component of the Mission builds social capital
through a three-tiered community structure; Self Help Groups (SHGs), area or slum level federations through a three-tiered community structure; Self Help Groups (SHGs), area or slum level federations
and city level federations. These federations give a collective voice to the community and support their and city level federations. These federations give a collective voice to the community and support their
livelihoods. SHG federations in Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh for example, have established waste segrega- livelihoods. SHG federations in Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh for example, have established waste segrega-
tion centers and earned municipal contracts to provide solid waste management services to the city. tion centers and earned municipal contracts to provide solid waste management services to the city.

279 279
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 12.1 : No. of SHGs Formed and Revolving Fund Disbursed (Year-wise) Graph 12.1 : No. of SHGs Formed and Revolving Fund Disbursed (Year-wise)

Graph 12.2: No. Of SHGs formed Graph 12.2: No. Of SHGs formed

280 280
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 12.3: No. Of SHGs given Revolving Fund Graph 12.3: No. Of SHGs given Revolving Fund

Table 12.1: No of SHGs formed and given revolving funds up to January 2019 Table 12.1: No of SHGs formed and given revolving funds up to January 2019

No. of Self-Help No. of SHGs given Re- No. of Self-Help No. of SHGs given Re-
Year % of SHGs given RF Year % of SHGs given RF
Groups (SHGs) formed volving Fund (RF) Groups (SHGs) formed volving Fund (RF)

2014-15 47772 18677 39% 2014-15 47772 18677 39%

2015-16 58186 36125 62% 2015-16 58186 36125 62%

2016-17 84308 71818 85% 2016-17 84308 71818 85%

2017-18 106472 78982 74% 2017-18 106472 78982 74%

2018-19 (Apr-Janu- 2018-19 (Apr-Janu-

69856 45938 66% 69856 45938 66%
ary ) ary )

Total 366594 251540 69% Total 366594 251540 69%

Source: DAY-NULM MIS, Up to January 2019 Source: DAY-NULM MIS, Up to January 2019

281 281
Handbook of Urban Statistics
City Livelihoods Centers (CLCs) established under the Mission help to organize the informal hyper-local
services sector at the Urban Local Body (ULB) level. Self-employed and freelancing service providers
such as electricians, carpenters, plumbers, painters, tailors, tutors etc. are registered at the CLCs and
customers can access these services by calling the CLC. CLCs also provide marketing support to mi-
croenterprises. The Jaipur CLC, for example, has established tie-ups with e-commerce platforms to
sell products made by SHGs. At present more than 350 CLCs have been made operational across the
country.
b. Employment through Skill Training & Placement - Skill India Mission
The Employment through Skill Training and Placement (ESTP) component of the Mission aims to en-
hance the employability of the urban poor by providing market relevant skill training and placement
support. The emphasis is on outcome driven skill training programs. After training, candidates are
either supported to get job placements or to become self-employed.
To ensure that the programs respond to domestic demand, a skill gap study for the City is conducted.
Candidates are selected through a screening process and counseled so that they can choose courses,
aligned to their aspirations as well as the industry demand.
A network of 1,187 Skill Training Providers and 6,136 training centers across the country is engaged
to provide training and placement support. The mode of training is primarily short-term skill training
courses ranging from 3 to 6 months. There are about 200+ courses being offered currently across
various sectors. The most popular sectors are – IT-ITES, Apparels, Beauty & Wellness, Construction,
Healthcare & Nutrition.
ESTP also offers courses of the Modular Employable Skills (MES) framework under the Director General
of Training (DGT) within which courses are approved by the National Council on Vocational Training
(NCVT). These courses also are now aligned to the National Skill Qualification Framework (NSQF).
Within the NSQF framework, a network of 38 Industry established bodies called Sector Skill Councils
(SSCs) are responsible for housing the qualification packs (QPs) for various courses, and for setting the
standards for assessment and certification. This ecosystem responds to the changing requirements of
the industry and ensures that obsolete courses are weeded out and new QPs are added as industry
demand evolves.
282
Handbook of Urban Statistics
City Livelihoods Centers (CLCs) established under the Mission help to organize the informal hyper-local
services sector at the Urban Local Body (ULB) level. Self-employed and freelancing service providers
such as electricians, carpenters, plumbers, painters, tailors, tutors etc. are registered at the CLCs and
customers can access these services by calling the CLC. CLCs also provide marketing support to mi-
croenterprises. The Jaipur CLC, for example, has established tie-ups with e-commerce platforms to
sell products made by SHGs. At present more than 350 CLCs have been made operational across the
country.
b. Employment through Skill Training & Placement - Skill India Mission
The Employment through Skill Training and Placement (ESTP) component of the Mission aims to en-
hance the employability of the urban poor by providing market relevant skill training and placement
support. The emphasis is on outcome driven skill training programs. After training, candidates are
either supported to get job placements or to become self-employed.
To ensure that the programs respond to domestic demand, a skill gap study for the City is conducted.
Candidates are selected through a screening process and counseled so that they can choose courses,
aligned to their aspirations as well as the industry demand.
A network of 1,187 Skill Training Providers and 6,136 training centers across the country is engaged
to provide training and placement support. The mode of training is primarily short-term skill training
courses ranging from 3 to 6 months. There are about 200+ courses being offered currently across
various sectors. The most popular sectors are – IT-ITES, Apparels, Beauty & Wellness, Construction,
Healthcare & Nutrition.
ESTP also offers courses of the Modular Employable Skills (MES) framework under the Director General
of Training (DGT) within which courses are approved by the National Council on Vocational Training
(NCVT). These courses also are now aligned to the National Skill Qualification Framework (NSQF).
Within the NSQF framework, a network of 38 Industry established bodies called Sector Skill Councils
(SSCs) are responsible for housing the qualification packs (QPs) for various courses, and for setting the
standards for assessment and certification. This ecosystem responds to the changing requirements of
the industry and ensures that obsolete courses are weeded out and new QPs are added as industry
demand evolves.
282
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 12.4: No of Candidates Trained and Placed (Year-wise ) Graph 12.4: No of Candidates Trained and Placed (Year-wise )

Graph 12.5: Number of Candidates skill-trained and Certified. Graph 12.5: Number of Candidates skill-trained and Certified.

283 283
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 12.6: No. Of Candidates placed Graph 12.6: No. Of Candidates placed

Table 12.2: No of candidates trained and placed up to January 2019 Table 12.2: No of candidates trained and placed up to January 2019

No. of Candidates No. of Candidates Placement Percent- No. of Candidates No. of Candidates Placement Percent-
Year Year
Trained Placed age Trained Placed age

2014-15 182037 63115 35% 2014-15 182037 63115 35%

2015-16 254073 33664 13% 2015-16 254073 33664 13%

2016-17 401654 151901 38% 2016-17 401654 151901 38%

2017-18 264512 115416 44% 2017-18 264512 115416 44%

2018-19 (Apr-January) 215123 112278 52% 2018-19 (Apr-January) 215123 112278 52%

Total 1317399 476374 36% Total 1317399 476374 36%

284 284
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
C. Self-Employment Program
The Self-Employment Program (SEP) is a critical component of the Mission, focusing on financial inclu-
sion of the urban poor, and support for their micro-enterprises through subsidized micro-credit. The
Self-Employment component of the Mission supports individuals and groups to establish micro-enter-
prises by facilitating bank loans @ 7% ROI. There are three types of subsidized loans offered – individ-
ual loans up to Rs. 2 lakh, group loans up to Rs. 10 lakh and SHG-bank linkage loans in the ratio of 1:4
based on the group corpus (as per the RBI guidelines). Loan applications under the SEP component are
evaluated by a task force which includes representatives from banks as well as the Urban Local Body
(ULB).
Interest charged by the banks/ lending institutions beyond 7% is transferred to the beneficiary as
interest subvention. Women’s SHGs are provided additional interest subvention of 3% to incentivize
timely repayment. Capacity Building under the Entrepreneurship Development Program is provided to
beneficiaries to provide knowledge and skills, needed to sustain and grow micro-enterprises.
Graph 12.7: : No. of individuals and groups assisted with loans (Year-wise)
285
Handbook of Urban Statistics
C. Self-Employment Program
The Self-Employment Program (SEP) is a critical component of the Mission, focusing on financial inclu-
sion of the urban poor, and support for their micro-enterprises through subsidized micro-credit. The
Self-Employment component of the Mission supports individuals and groups to establish micro-enter-
prises by facilitating bank loans @ 7% ROI. There are three types of subsidized loans offered – individ-
ual loans up to Rs. 2 lakh, group loans up to Rs. 10 lakh and SHG-bank linkage loans in the ratio of 1:4
based on the group corpus (as per the RBI guidelines). Loan applications under the SEP component are
evaluated by a task force which includes representatives from banks as well as the Urban Local Body
(ULB).
Interest charged by the banks/ lending institutions beyond 7% is transferred to the beneficiary as
interest subvention. Women’s SHGs are provided additional interest subvention of 3% to incentivize
timely repayment. Capacity Building under the Entrepreneurship Development Program is provided to
beneficiaries to provide knowledge and skills, needed to sustain and grow micro-enterprises.
Graph 12.7: : No. of individuals and groups assisted with loans (Year-wise)
285
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 12.8: No. Of SHGs disbursed loans under SHG-Bank Linkage Programme Graph 12.8: No. Of SHGs disbursed loans under SHG-Bank Linkage Programme

Table 12.3: Number of Individuals Groups and SHGs provided loan Table 12.3: Number of Individuals Groups and SHGs provided loan

Year No of Individuals (I) No of Groups (G) No of SHGs pro- Year No of Individuals (I) No of Groups (G) No of SHGs pro-
provided Loan provided Loan vided Loan provided Loan provided Loan vided Loan

2014-15 20709 1243 35544 2014-15 20709 1243 35544

2015-16 48665 1268 61324 2015-16 48665 1268 61324

2016-17 72632 1697 170610 2016-17 72632 1697 170610

2017-18 86890 5395 136157 2017-18 86890 5395 136157

2018-19 (Apr-January) 55524 5310 82244 2018-19 (Apr-January) 55524 5310 82244

Total 284420 14913 485879 Total 284420 14913 485879

Source: DAY-NULM MIS, Up to January 2019 Source: DAY-NULM MIS, Up to January 2019

286 286
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Graph 12.9: Credit and Subsidies given to SHGs groups Graph 12.9: Credit and Subsidies given to SHGs groups

Table 12.4: Total credit linkage (In Cr) and Interest subventions Table 12.4: Total credit linkage (In Cr) and Interest subventions

Year Total Credit Linkage (Cr) Total Interest Subvention (Cr) Year Total Credit Linkage (Cr) Total Interest Subvention (Cr)

2014-15 602.6 14.6 2014-15 602.6 14.6

2015-16 2470.0 109.6 2015-16 2470.0 109.6

2016-17 6618.1 65.4 2016-17 6618.1 65.4

2017-18 5478.1 41.9 2017-18 5478.1 41.9

2018-19 (Apr-January) 609.90 7.80 2018-19 (Apr-January) 609.90 7.80

Total 15778.7 239.3 Total 15778.7 239.3

Source: DAY- NULM MIS, Up to January 2019 Source: DAY- NULM MIS, Up to January 2019

287 287
Handbook of Urban Statistics
d. Capacity Building and Training
The Capacity Building and Training component look at building strong institutional structures at the
National, State and City level for effective implementation of the mission. At the national level, a team
of technical experts forms the National Mission Management Unit (NMMU) headed by the Mission
Director.
At the state level, the mission is implemented by the State Urban Livelihood Mission (SULM) or a desig-
nated autonomous body working in the field of poverty alleviation. A State Mission Management Unit
(SMMU) supports the State Mission Director, SULM in implementation and monitoring of the mission.
At the city level, the NULM activities are implemented through Urban Local Bodies (ULBs). City Mission
Management Unit (CMMU), headed by a City Project Officer (CPO) appointed by state government/
ULB, have been formed. Community Organisers (COs) are the last mile functionaries who are respon-
sible for regularly interacting and mobilizing the community. Every city is required to appoint COs and
each CO is required to cover at least 3000 urban poor families.
e. Support to Urban Street Vendors
The Support for Urban Street Vendors component of the Mission seeks to protect the livelihoods of
street vendors as per the provisions of the Street Vendors Act. 2014. Under this component, more
than 8 lakh ID cards have been issued to street vendors – thereby legitimizing their profession as well
as their vending locations. Many cities have prepared the Town Vending Plans and started establishing
dedicated vending zones with required vending infrastructure. Cities are now conducting workshops
for street vendors to sensitize them on aspects of food safety standards, maintaining hygiene, waste
disposal and their roles and responsibilities under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
As per the advisory issued by the Ministry under the SUSV component, states shall identify and devel-
op two models ULBs (preferably million plus cities) as per the spirit of the Street Vendors Act, 2014 and
the provisions under the SUSV component guidelines. This move shall have a demonstration effect and
encourage other cities to follow suit.
Under the mission, 2430 cities have completed the street vendor survey and 18.26 lakhs street ven-
dors have identified. The out of 18.26 lakh identified street vendors, 9.13 lakhs vendors have issued
the ID cards.
288
Handbook of Urban Statistics
d. Capacity Building and Training
The Capacity Building and Training component look at building strong institutional structures at the
National, State and City level for effective implementation of the mission. At the national level, a team
of technical experts forms the National Mission Management Unit (NMMU) headed by the Mission
Director.
At the state level, the mission is implemented by the State Urban Livelihood Mission (SULM) or a desig-
nated autonomous body working in the field of poverty alleviation. A State Mission Management Unit
(SMMU) supports the State Mission Director, SULM in implementation and monitoring of the mission.
At the city level, the NULM activities are implemented through Urban Local Bodies (ULBs). City Mission
Management Unit (CMMU), headed by a City Project Officer (CPO) appointed by state government/
ULB, have been formed. Community Organisers (COs) are the last mile functionaries who are respon-
sible for regularly interacting and mobilizing the community. Every city is required to appoint COs and
each CO is required to cover at least 3000 urban poor families.
e. Support to Urban Street Vendors
The Support for Urban Street Vendors component of the Mission seeks to protect the livelihoods of
street vendors as per the provisions of the Street Vendors Act. 2014. Under this component, more
than 8 lakh ID cards have been issued to street vendors – thereby legitimizing their profession as well
as their vending locations. Many cities have prepared the Town Vending Plans and started establishing
dedicated vending zones with required vending infrastructure. Cities are now conducting workshops
for street vendors to sensitize them on aspects of food safety standards, maintaining hygiene, waste
disposal and their roles and responsibilities under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
As per the advisory issued by the Ministry under the SUSV component, states shall identify and devel-
op two models ULBs (preferably million plus cities) as per the spirit of the Street Vendors Act, 2014 and
the provisions under the SUSV component guidelines. This move shall have a demonstration effect and
encourage other cities to follow suit.
Under the mission, 2430 cities have completed the street vendor survey and 18.26 lakhs street ven-
dors have identified. The out of 18.26 lakh identified street vendors, 9.13 lakhs vendors have issued
the ID cards.
288
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 12.5: Status of No. of cities street vendor survey completed, Vendor identified Table 12.5: Status of No. of cities street vendor survey completed, Vendor identified
and TVC formed and TVC formed
No. of Cities No. of Cities
No. of Street Ven- No. of identified No. of Street Ven- No. of identified
Sl. Street Vendor TVC Sl. Street Vendor TVC
Names of the States/UTs dors Identified in vendors issued ID Names of the States/UTs dors Identified in vendors issued ID
No. survey complet- formed No. survey complet- formed
surveyed cities Cards surveyed cities Cards
ed ed
1 Andhra Pradesh 32 71822 60664 110 1 Andhra Pradesh 32 71822 60664 110
2 Arunachal Pradesh 30 4657 4657 14 2 Arunachal Pradesh 30 4657 4657 14
3 Assam 25 21876 312 30 3 Assam 25 21876 312 30
4 Bihar 142 58542 16170 144 4 Bihar 142 58542 16170 144
5 Chhattisgarh 59 30237 16147 64 5 Chhattisgarh 59 30237 16147 64
6 Goa 10 1285 0 14 6 Goa 10 1285 0 14
7 Gujarat 167 190963 173009 169 7 Gujarat 167 190963 173009 169
8 Haryana 80 100866 0 76 8 Haryana 80 100866 0 76
9 Himachal Pradesh 33 5541 1456 39 9 Himachal Pradesh 33 5541 1456 39
10 Jammu & Kashmir 78 7942 6226 0 10 Jammu & Kashmir 78 7942 6226 0
11 Jharkhand 37 37107 16869 44 11 Jharkhand 37 37107 16869 44
12 Karnataka 265 82967 14716 265 12 Karnataka 265 82967 14716 265
13 Kerala 93 21649 16745 93 13 Kerala 93 21649 16745 93
14 Madhya Pradesh 80 209165 198255 58 14 Madhya Pradesh 80 209165 198255 58
15 Maharashtra 24 247498 61622 97 15 Maharashtra 24 247498 61622 97
16 Manipur 2 818 278 6 16 Manipur 2 818 278 6
17 Meghalaya 3 1219 314 7 17 Meghalaya 3 1219 314 7
18 Mizoram 8 4545 1531 6 18 Mizoram 8 4545 1531 6
19 Nagaland 3 947 0 2 19 Nagaland 3 947 0 2
20 Odisha 111 63183 3848 105 20 Odisha 111 63183 3848 105
21 Punjab 165 87224 10184 163 21 Punjab 165 87224 10184 163
22 Rajasthan 190 94501 41100 189 22 Rajasthan 190 94501 41100 189
23 Sikkim 7 285 0 3 23 Sikkim 7 285 0 3
24 Tamil Nadu 664 121098 103048 482 24 Tamil Nadu 664 121098 103048 482
25 Telangana 66 69161 65793 103 25 Telangana 66 69161 65793 103
26 Tripura 5 2254 0 20 26 Tripura 5 2254 0 20
27 Uttar Pradesh 30 248873 86760 30 27 Uttar Pradesh 30 248873 86760 30
28 Uttarakhand 20 18565 4392 22 28 Uttarakhand 20 18565 4392 22
29 West Bengal 0 0 0 3 29 West Bengal 0 0 0 3
30 A & N Islands 0 0 0 0 30 A & N Islands 0 0 0 0
31 Chandigarh 1 21622 9297 1 31 Chandigarh 1 21622 9297 1
32 D & N Haveli 0 0 0 0 32 D & N Haveli 0 0 0 0
33 Daman & Diu 0 0 0 0 33 Daman & Diu 0 0 0 0
34 Delhi 0 0 0 0 34 Delhi 0 0 0 0
35 Puducherry 0 0 0 5 35 Puducherry 0 0 0 5
TOTAL 2,430 18,26,412 9,13,393 2,364 TOTAL 2,430 18,26,412 9,13,393 2,364
Source: DAY- NULM MIS, Up to January 2019 Source: DAY- NULM MIS, Up to January 2019

289 289
Handbook of Urban Statistics
f. Shelter for Urban Homeless
Shelter for the Urban Homeless component ensures availability and access to permanent shelters to
the urban homeless population. These shelters are equipped with basic infrastructure facilities like
water supply, sanitation, safety, and security to ensure dignified living. The shelters act as a space for
linking the urban poor with various social entitlements and convergence with various government
schemes.
The ULB is required to submit a proposal for the construction and management of shelters to SULM to
seek its approval. Once the shelter is constructed, a Shelter Management Committee (SMC) is consti-
tuted that supervises the day-to-day functioning of the shelter. Each shelter should have one full-time
manager and three caregivers for its upkeep and maintenance.
States/ULBs may consider setting up separate shelters to cater the special needs such as men shelter,
women shelter, family shelter, special shelter depending on the local context. Under the Mission, there
are 1144 shelters are operational in the country.
To improve the quality of shelters across the country, the ministry has advised the states to develop
two model shelters in each state preferably in the state capital and one million plus city. This will set
a quality standard and encourage the officials and shelter managers to replicate the model in other
cities.
290
Handbook of Urban Statistics
f. Shelter for Urban Homeless
Shelter for the Urban Homeless component ensures availability and access to permanent shelters to
the urban homeless population. These shelters are equipped with basic infrastructure facilities like
water supply, sanitation, safety, and security to ensure dignified living. The shelters act as a space for
linking the urban poor with various social entitlements and convergence with various government
schemes.
The ULB is required to submit a proposal for the construction and management of shelters to SULM to
seek its approval. Once the shelter is constructed, a Shelter Management Committee (SMC) is consti-
tuted that supervises the day-to-day functioning of the shelter. Each shelter should have one full-time
manager and three caregivers for its upkeep and maintenance.
States/ULBs may consider setting up separate shelters to cater the special needs such as men shelter,
women shelter, family shelter, special shelter depending on the local context. Under the Mission, there
are 1144 shelters are operational in the country.
To improve the quality of shelters across the country, the ministry has advised the states to develop
two model shelters in each state preferably in the state capital and one million plus city. This will set
a quality standard and encourage the officials and shelter managers to replicate the model in other
cities.
290
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table: 12.6: State-wise Details of NULM & Non-NULM Shelters Table: 12.6: State-wise Details of NULM & Non-NULM Shelters

Capacity Capacity
Total No. of Capacity No. of Non- Total No. of Capacity No. of Non-
of Non- of Non-
S.No State Name No. of NULM of NULM NULM Shel- S.No State Name No. of NULM of NULM NULM Shel-
NULM NULM
Shelters Shelters Shelters ters Shelters Shelters Shelters ters
Shelters Shelters
Andaman & Nicobar Andaman & Nicobar
1 1 0 0 1 60 1 1 0 0 1 60
Islands Islands
2 Andhra Pradesh 70 70 3525 0 0 2 Andhra Pradesh 70 70 3525 0 0
3 Assam 21 0 0 21 1090 3 Assam 21 0 0 21 1090
4 Bihar 51 50 1488 1 50 4 Bihar 51 50 1488 1 50
5 Chandigarh 2 0 0 2 239 5 Chandigarh 2 0 0 2 239
6 Chhattisgarh 22 22 812 0 0 6 Chhattisgarh 22 22 812 0 0
7 Goa 4 0 0 4 175 7 Goa 4 0 0 4 175
8 Gujarat 84 41 2674 43 1722 8 Gujarat 84 41 2674 43 1722
9 Haryana 16 5 254 11 838 9 Haryana 16 5 254 11 838
10 Himachal Pradesh 8 4 195 4 35 10 Himachal Pradesh 8 4 195 4 35
11 Jharkhand 28 28 718 0 0 11 Jharkhand 28 28 718 0 0
12 Karnataka 34 30 1156 4 128 12 Karnataka 34 30 1156 4 128
13 Kerala 16 14 1319 2 180 13 Kerala 16 14 1319 2 180
14 Madhya Pradesh 134 134 4813 0 0 14 Madhya Pradesh 134 134 4813 0 0
15 Maharashtra 87 58 2531 29 2332 15 Maharashtra 87 58 2531 29 2332
16 Mizoram 61 50 2931 11 486 16 Mizoram 61 50 2931 11 486
17 NCT of Delhi 190 190 16269 0 0 17 NCT of Delhi 190 190 16269 0 0
18 Odisha 26 26 1513 0 0 18 Odisha 26 26 1513 0 0
19 Puducherry 1 1 50 0 0 19 Puducherry 1 1 50 0 0
20 Punjab 184 27 1161 157 2445 20 Punjab 184 27 1161 157 2445
21 Rajasthan 162 162 7084 0 0 21 Rajasthan 162 162 7084 0 0
22 Sikkim 3 0 0 3 82 22 Sikkim 3 0 0 3 82
23 Tamil Nadu 134 134 6929 0 0 23 Tamil Nadu 134 134 6929 0 0
24 Telangana 81 26 1258 55 3180 24 Telangana 81 26 1258 55 3180
25 Uttar Pradesh 63 52 3530 11 547 25 Uttar Pradesh 63 52 3530 11 547
26 Uttarakhand 21 10 608 11 652 26 Uttarakhand 21 10 608 11 652
27 West Bengal 18 10 500 8 536 27 West Bengal 18 10 500 8 536
  Total 1,522 1,144 61,318 378 14,777   Total 1,522 1,144 61,318 378 14,777
Source: DAY-NULM MIS, Up to January 2019 Source: DAY-NULM MIS, Up to January 2019

291 291
Handbook of Urban Statistics
g. Innovation and Special Projects
The aim of the Innovative and Special Projects component is to support novel initiatives under the
Mission which have wider implications to sustain poverty alleviation efforts. These innovative projects
should be such that they provide gainful insights and can become models which can then be scaled/
replicated across the country. The projects should address the livelihood issues of the special vulner-
able population such as mentally ill, disabled, infirm etc. that are otherwise not covered under the
scope of NULM.
The proposals submitted by the various agencies are reviewed by the State and forwarded to the Min-
istry. The proposals approved by the National Mission Directorate, NULM are then considered by the
Project Approval Committee (PAC). Under NULM, up to five (5) percent of the total Central Funds can
be used for Special & Innovative Projects. This component is centrally administered, and no state share
is required for the projects sanctioned under this component.
Evaluation of the mission and new initiatives
As per the mid-term evaluation of DAY-NULM by the Quality Council of India, wherein primary data
were collected to evaluate the impact across a sample of 80 ULBs, most of the beneficiaries reported a
positive impact on their ability to support their families financially, and on their expenditure on health/
education/nutrition and other social aspects. While most of the SHGs were found to be performing
well in terms of regular meetings, regular savings, internal lending, and loan repayments, the groups
require further capacity building to improve their record keeping and accounts.
The evaluation also found that after skill training the income increases significantly for placed candi-
dates. There was a significant improvement in average income after accessing loans through the SEP
component as well. However, while most candidates were aware of the interest subsidy available, not
all were able to access it. To address this gap identified through the mid-term evaluation, DAY-NULM
has undertaken a major new initiative to set up a web portal for interest subvention – which has en-
abled the transfer of interest subvention directly to the loan accounts of the beneficiaries through
Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT).
MUDRA loans which are already available at subsidized rates of interest have also been made eligible
for interest subvention through DAY-NULM as a convergence measure.
The Mission is also making strides towards enhancing placements of trained candidates by engaging
placement agencies, exploring captive placement models and through partnerships with private sec-
tor players in high growth sectors. A mechanism to get direct feedback from trained candidates has
been introduced, called PARAS (Personalized Rapid Assessment System), which is helping States to
assess and improve their training programs.
Recent Initiatives –
Introduction of SPARK
Till FY 2017-18, there was no performance measurement tool based on real-time data updated in
NULM MIS to assess the performance of the State under DAY NULM. To facilitate inter-state rank-
ing of States/UTs/ULBs performance in a transparent manner and to foster a spirit of competition
among them a ranking method christened as SPARK (SYSTEMATIC PROGRESSIVE ANALYTICAL REAL
TIME RANKING) was introduced in during Aug-Sep’17.
Three States Madhya Pradesh (first rank), Chhattisgarh (second rank) and Kerala (third rank) which
topped the performance for the year 2017-18 were awarded on 23rd March 2018 for their perfor-
292
Handbook of Urban Statistics
g. Innovation and Special Projects
The aim of the Innovative and Special Projects component is to support novel initiatives under the
Mission which have wider implications to sustain poverty alleviation efforts. These innovative projects
should be such that they provide gainful insights and can become models which can then be scaled/
replicated across the country. The projects should address the livelihood issues of the special vulner-
able population such as mentally ill, disabled, infirm etc. that are otherwise not covered under the
scope of NULM.
The proposals submitted by the various agencies are reviewed by the State and forwarded to the Min-
istry. The proposals approved by the National Mission Directorate, NULM are then considered by the
Project Approval Committee (PAC). Under NULM, up to five (5) percent of the total Central Funds can
be used for Special & Innovative Projects. This component is centrally administered, and no state share
is required for the projects sanctioned under this component.
Evaluation of the mission and new initiatives
As per the mid-term evaluation of DAY-NULM by the Quality Council of India, wherein primary data
were collected to evaluate the impact across a sample of 80 ULBs, most of the beneficiaries reported a
positive impact on their ability to support their families financially, and on their expenditure on health/
education/nutrition and other social aspects. While most of the SHGs were found to be performing
well in terms of regular meetings, regular savings, internal lending, and loan repayments, the groups
require further capacity building to improve their record keeping and accounts.
The evaluation also found that after skill training the income increases significantly for placed candi-
dates. There was a significant improvement in average income after accessing loans through the SEP
component as well. However, while most candidates were aware of the interest subsidy available, not
all were able to access it. To address this gap identified through the mid-term evaluation, DAY-NULM
has undertaken a major new initiative to set up a web portal for interest subvention – which has en-
abled the transfer of interest subvention directly to the loan accounts of the beneficiaries through
Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT).
MUDRA loans which are already available at subsidized rates of interest have also been made eligible
for interest subvention through DAY-NULM as a convergence measure.
The Mission is also making strides towards enhancing placements of trained candidates by engaging
placement agencies, exploring captive placement models and through partnerships with private sec-
tor players in high growth sectors. A mechanism to get direct feedback from trained candidates has
been introduced, called PARAS (Personalized Rapid Assessment System), which is helping States to
assess and improve their training programs.
Recent Initiatives –
Introduction of SPARK
Till FY 2017-18, there was no performance measurement tool based on real-time data updated in
NULM MIS to assess the performance of the State under DAY NULM. To facilitate inter-state rank-
ing of States/UTs/ULBs performance in a transparent manner and to foster a spirit of competition
among them a ranking method christened as SPARK (SYSTEMATIC PROGRESSIVE ANALYTICAL REAL
TIME RANKING) was introduced in during Aug-Sep’17.
Three States Madhya Pradesh (first rank), Chhattisgarh (second rank) and Kerala (third rank) which
topped the performance for the year 2017-18 were awarded on 23rd March 2018 for their perfor-
292
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
mance by the Hon’ble Minister. For the current year, 2018-19 also SPARK ranking of the States is un-
derway, and awards will be given at the end of the year.
Convergence of NULM with other urban missions
The missions of the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs; the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY),
Swachh Bharat Mission – Urban (SBM – U), Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation
(AMRUT), and Smart Cities; are making significant investments in the urban areas. Urban mobility is
also improving through mass transit projects. The creation and maintenance of this growing urban in-
frastructure are generating tremendous employment opportunities; thus, complementing the efforts
of DAY-NULM.
Convergence guidelines for DAY-NULM and SBM-U were released in March 2018 by the Hon’ble Min-
ister, with the objective of developing dignified livelihoods opportunities along the sanitation value
chain. Similar policy interventions focusing on improving the quality of livelihoods generated through
other urban missions are being explored. Convergence with the National Health Mission (NHM) has
also been initiated, as health is an important livelihood asset.
MoHUA is encouraging certification of workers in the construction sector, with the twin objective of
improving livelihoods and the quality of public works. A beginning has been made in this direction
by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD), by deploying at least 20% certified workers for its
projects.
References
1. Census of India, 2011. Provisional Population Totals Paper 2 of 2011 India Series 1, New Delhi:
Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Government of India.
2. Chenoy, D., 2012. Skill Development in India; A Transformation in the Making. India infrastruc-
ture report, pp.99-207.
3. Sankhe, S., Vittal, I., Dobbs, R., Mohan, A. and Gulati, A., 2010. India’s urban awakening: Build-
ing inclusive cities sustaining economic growth.
293
Handbook of Urban Statistics
mance by the Hon’ble Minister. For the current year, 2018-19 also SPARK ranking of the States is un-
derway, and awards will be given at the end of the year.
Convergence of NULM with other urban missions
The missions of the Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs; the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY),
Swachh Bharat Mission – Urban (SBM – U), Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation
(AMRUT), and Smart Cities; are making significant investments in the urban areas. Urban mobility is
also improving through mass transit projects. The creation and maintenance of this growing urban in-
frastructure are generating tremendous employment opportunities; thus, complementing the efforts
of DAY-NULM.
Convergence guidelines for DAY-NULM and SBM-U were released in March 2018 by the Hon’ble Min-
ister, with the objective of developing dignified livelihoods opportunities along the sanitation value
chain. Similar policy interventions focusing on improving the quality of livelihoods generated through
other urban missions are being explored. Convergence with the National Health Mission (NHM) has
also been initiated, as health is an important livelihood asset.
MoHUA is encouraging certification of workers in the construction sector, with the twin objective of
improving livelihoods and the quality of public works. A beginning has been made in this direction
by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD), by deploying at least 20% certified workers for its
projects.
References
1. Census of India, 2011. Provisional Population Totals Paper 2 of 2011 India Series 1, New Delhi:
Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Government of India.
2. Chenoy, D., 2012. Skill Development in India; A Transformation in the Making. India infrastruc-
ture report, pp.99-207.
3. Sankhe, S., Vittal, I., Dobbs, R., Mohan, A. and Gulati, A., 2010. India’s urban awakening: Build-
ing inclusive cities sustaining economic growth.
293
 Chapter 13 Chapter 13

NATIONAL HERITAGE CITY NATIONAL HERITAGE CITY

DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AND
AUGMENTATION YOJANA AUGMENTATION YOJANA
(HRIDAY) (HRIDAY)
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
NATIONAL HERITAGE CITY DEVELOPMENT AND
AUGMENTATION YOJANA (HRIDAY)
India is endowed with rich and diverse natural, historic and cultural resources. However, it is yet to
harness the full potential of such resources to its full advantages. Past efforts of conserving historic and
cultural resources in Indian cities and towns have often been carried out in isolation from the needs
and aspirations of the local communities as well as the main urban development issues, such as local
economy, urban planning, livelihoods, service delivery, and infrastructure provision in the areas. The
heritage development of a city is not about development and conservation of few monuments, but
development of the entire city, its planning, its basic services, quality of life to its communities, its
economy and livelihoods, cleanliness, security, reinvigoration of its’ soul and explicit manifestation of
its character.
With the in mind, the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) launched the Heritage Cities
Development and Augmentation Yojana (HRIDAY) Scheme (Central Sector Scheme) which offers tre-
mendous opportunity towards an integrated, inclusive and sustainable development of the selected
heritage cities in India. HRIDAY offers a paradigm shift in India’s approach to city development, bring-
ing together urban planning/economic growth and heritage conservation in an inclusive and integrat-
ed manner with a focus on livelihoods, skills, cleanliness, security, accessibility and service delivery.
With a duration of 4 years and a total outlay of INR 500 Crores, the Scheme is being implemented in 12
identified Cities namely, Ajmer, Amaravati, Amritsar, Badami, Dwarka, Gaya, Kanchipuram, Mathura,
Puri, Varanasi, Velankanni and Warangal. The scheme is implemented in a mission mode and is ending
in March, 2019.
Mission Statement
To preserve and revitalize the soul of the heritage city to reflect the city’s unique character by encour-
aging aesthetically appealing, accessible, informative and secured environment. To undertake strate-
gic and planned development of heritage cities aiming at improvement in overall quality of life with
specific focus on sanitation, security, tourism, heritage revitalization and livelihoods retaining the city’s
cultural identity.
297
Handbook of Urban Statistics
NATIONAL HERITAGE CITY DEVELOPMENT AND
AUGMENTATION YOJANA (HRIDAY)
India is endowed with rich and diverse natural, historic and cultural resources. However, it is yet to
harness the full potential of such resources to its full advantages. Past efforts of conserving historic and
cultural resources in Indian cities and towns have often been carried out in isolation from the needs
and aspirations of the local communities as well as the main urban development issues, such as local
economy, urban planning, livelihoods, service delivery, and infrastructure provision in the areas. The
heritage development of a city is not about development and conservation of few monuments, but
development of the entire city, its planning, its basic services, quality of life to its communities, its
economy and livelihoods, cleanliness, security, reinvigoration of its’ soul and explicit manifestation of
its character.
With the in mind, the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) launched the Heritage Cities
Development and Augmentation Yojana (HRIDAY) Scheme (Central Sector Scheme) which offers tre-
mendous opportunity towards an integrated, inclusive and sustainable development of the selected
heritage cities in India. HRIDAY offers a paradigm shift in India’s approach to city development, bring-
ing together urban planning/economic growth and heritage conservation in an inclusive and integrat-
ed manner with a focus on livelihoods, skills, cleanliness, security, accessibility and service delivery.
With a duration of 4 years and a total outlay of INR 500 Crores, the Scheme is being implemented in 12
identified Cities namely, Ajmer, Amaravati, Amritsar, Badami, Dwarka, Gaya, Kanchipuram, Mathura,
Puri, Varanasi, Velankanni and Warangal. The scheme is implemented in a mission mode and is ending
in March, 2019.
Mission Statement
To preserve and revitalize the soul of the heritage city to reflect the city’s unique character by encour-
aging aesthetically appealing, accessible, informative and secured environment. To undertake strate-
gic and planned development of heritage cities aiming at improvement in overall quality of life with
specific focus on sanitation, security, tourism, heritage revitalization and livelihoods retaining the city’s
cultural identity.
297
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Objectives Objectives

The main objective of HRIDAY is to preserve the character of the soul of heritage city and facilitate The main objective of HRIDAY is to preserve the character of the soul of heritage city and facilitate

inclusive heritage linked urban development by exploring various avenues including involving private inclusive heritage linked urban development by exploring various avenues including involving private

sector. The other objectives includes: sector. The other objectives includes:

 Planning, development and implementation of heritage sensitive infrastructure.  Planning, development and implementation of heritage sensitive infrastructure.

 Service delivery and infrastructure provisioning in historic city core areas.  Service delivery and infrastructure provisioning in historic city core areas.

 Preserve and revitalize heritage wherein tourists can connect directly with city’s unique char-  Preserve and revitalize heritage wherein tourists can connect directly with city’s unique char-
acter. acter.

 Develop and document a heritage asset inventory of cities – natural, cultural, living and built  Develop and document a heritage asset inventory of cities – natural, cultural, living and built
heritage as a basis for urban planning, growth and service provision & delivery. heritage as a basis for urban planning, growth and service provision & delivery.

 Implementation and enhancement of basic services delivery with focus on sanitation services  Implementation and enhancement of basic services delivery with focus on sanitation services
like public conveniences, toilets, water taps, street lights with use of latest technologies in im- like public conveniences, toilets, water taps, street lights with use of latest technologies in im-
proving tourist facilities/amenities. proving tourist facilities/amenities.

 Development and promotion of core tangible economic activities to enhance avenues of live-  Development and promotion of core tangible economic activities to enhance avenues of live-
lihoods amongst stakeholders. This would also include necessary skill development amongst lihoods amongst stakeholders. This would also include necessary skill development amongst
them including making public spaces accessible and developing cultural spaces. them including making public spaces accessible and developing cultural spaces.

 Increase accessibility i.e. physical access (roads as well as universal design) and intellectual  Increase accessibility i.e. physical access (roads as well as universal design) and intellectual
access access

298 298
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Planning
In order to have a robust planning and competent implementation mechanism, aCity HRIDAY Plan
(CHP) were prepared which is an area based planning document prepared in consultation with people
and the government to uplift physical condition of surrounding areas of the identified prominent her-
itage assets of the cities. To maintain the unique heritage character of the cities, every CHP has come
up with city specific design HRIDAY Toolkits. The Toolkit for the cities include design components and
elements for various project features and specifications inspired by Heritage Characteristics of the
respective city.
299
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Planning
In order to have a robust planning and competent implementation mechanism, aCity HRIDAY Plan
(CHP) were prepared which is an area based planning document prepared in consultation with people
and the government to uplift physical condition of surrounding areas of the identified prominent her-
itage assets of the cities. To maintain the unique heritage character of the cities, every CHP has come
up with city specific design HRIDAY Toolkits. The Toolkit for the cities include design components and
elements for various project features and specifications inspired by Heritage Characteristics of the
respective city.
299
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Implementation Structure
The Scheme is structured for planning and implementation through the following institutional mechanism:
I. National Level
• National Advisory Committee (NAC): The National Advisory Committee is the apex advisory body
for the HRIDAY Scheme. The NAC provides advice and guidance on all components of the Scheme
including implementation and governance.
• HRIDAY National Empowered Committee (HNEC): The HNEC is co-chaired by Secretary, MoHUA
and Chief Secretary of the respective State. The HNEC provides overall sanctions, approval, guid-
ance and advice to the Scheme.
• National Mission Directorate: The National Mission Directorate is headed by the Mission Director
and supported by the National Project Management Unit. The National Mission Directorate is
responsible for overseeing the implementation of the HRIDAY Scheme.
• National Technical Committee: The National Technical Committee is convened by the Director,
NIUA with representatives from Ministry of Tourism & Culture, ASI, and CPWD. The Committee
technically reviews and evaluates implementation frameworks, detailed project reports, and City
HRIDAY Plans before they are placed before the HNEC.
300
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Implementation Structure
The Scheme is structured for planning and implementation through the following institutional mechanism:
I. National Level
• National Advisory Committee (NAC): The National Advisory Committee is the apex advisory body
for the HRIDAY Scheme. The NAC provides advice and guidance on all components of the Scheme
including implementation and governance.
• HRIDAY National Empowered Committee (HNEC): The HNEC is co-chaired by Secretary, MoHUA
and Chief Secretary of the respective State. The HNEC provides overall sanctions, approval, guid-
ance and advice to the Scheme.
• National Mission Directorate: The National Mission Directorate is headed by the Mission Director
and supported by the National Project Management Unit. The National Mission Directorate is
responsible for overseeing the implementation of the HRIDAY Scheme.
• National Technical Committee: The National Technical Committee is convened by the Director,
NIUA with representatives from Ministry of Tourism & Culture, ASI, and CPWD. The Committee
technically reviews and evaluates implementation frameworks, detailed project reports, and City
HRIDAY Plans before they are placed before the HNEC.
300
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
II. City Level
Since the implementation of the Scheme will be driven at the city level, the following institutional
arrangements have been established in the Cities.
• City Level Advisory and Monitoring Committee (CLAMC): The CLAMC is convened by District
Magistrate, and is constituted of City Officials along with Elected Members of the city and
eminent local citizens. The CLAMC provides approval for the City HRIDAY Plans and Detailed
Project Reports at the City level.
• City Mission Directorate: The City Mission Directorate is constituted and situated at the City
level nodal agency. The City Mission Directorate is responsible for overall coordination, execu-
tion and monitoring of the HRIDAY Scheme at City level starting from preparation of DPRs to
execution of works.
• HRIDAY City Anchors: The HCAs for each city were selected through a competitive selection
process for the purpose of planning, advising, and supporting the City Mission Directorate
for the successful implementation of the Scheme. The Anchors came with an expertise in
heritage conservation along with urban planning and prepared the City HRIDAY Plan for each
which identifies the gaps and suggests a shelf of projects to be implemented in that city un-
der the Scheme.
Intangible Heritage
Intangible heritage associated with any city plays vital role in defining the heritage character of that
city. It also has an impact on the “feeling of belongingness” among citizens, visitors and other stake-
holders of the city. In HRIDAY scheme, initiatives for promotion of intangible heritage, its sustainability,
linkage with livelihood etc. are taken in to consideration. Local artisans involved in stone carving, wall
art work etc. given opportunity in development of related components in physical infrastructure cre-
ated under the scheme. Similarly, Scheme continuously investing in Promotional and capacity building
measures such as International conferences on Intangible heritage, city level cultural events, city spe-
cific mobile apps, short video films of each city etc. In future more of such initiatives to improve the
sustainability of intangible heritage will come on ground.
301
Handbook of Urban Statistics
II. City Level
Since the implementation of the Scheme will be driven at the city level, the following institutional
arrangements have been established in the Cities.
• City Level Advisory and Monitoring Committee (CLAMC): The CLAMC is convened by District
Magistrate, and is constituted of City Officials along with Elected Members of the city and
eminent local citizens. The CLAMC provides approval for the City HRIDAY Plans and Detailed
Project Reports at the City level.
• City Mission Directorate: The City Mission Directorate is constituted and situated at the City
level nodal agency. The City Mission Directorate is responsible for overall coordination, execu-
tion and monitoring of the HRIDAY Scheme at City level starting from preparation of DPRs to
execution of works.
• HRIDAY City Anchors: The HCAs for each city were selected through a competitive selection
process for the purpose of planning, advising, and supporting the City Mission Directorate
for the successful implementation of the Scheme. The Anchors came with an expertise in
heritage conservation along with urban planning and prepared the City HRIDAY Plan for each
which identifies the gaps and suggests a shelf of projects to be implemented in that city un-
der the Scheme.
Intangible Heritage
Intangible heritage associated with any city plays vital role in defining the heritage character of that
city. It also has an impact on the “feeling of belongingness” among citizens, visitors and other stake-
holders of the city. In HRIDAY scheme, initiatives for promotion of intangible heritage, its sustainability,
linkage with livelihood etc. are taken in to consideration. Local artisans involved in stone carving, wall
art work etc. given opportunity in development of related components in physical infrastructure cre-
ated under the scheme. Similarly, Scheme continuously investing in Promotional and capacity building
measures such as International conferences on Intangible heritage, city level cultural events, city spe-
cific mobile apps, short video films of each city etc. In future more of such initiatives to improve the
sustainability of intangible heritage will come on ground.
301
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Achievements /Progress under the scheme since inception
To capture the unique heritage character of each City, City HRIDAY Plans (CHPs) specific to each City
have been prepared. The plan had identified shelf of projects to be implemented through the scheme.
The shelf of projects identified for each city has been translated into Detailed Project Reports by em-
panelled agencies.
So far 77 projects amounting to Rs. 357.78 Crores have been sanctioned out of which Rs.103.63 crores
has been released.
Several Capacity building workshops/Exposure visits and IEC events have been held since inception.
Mention some……
Projects
The Scheme supports development of core heritage linked civic infrastructure projects which includes
revitalization of urban infrastructure for areas around heritage, religious, cultural and tourism assets
of the cities. These initiatives include development of approach roads & streets, pedestrian pathways,
installation of street lights and luminaries, Water & Sanitation facilities, Open space & landscape im-
provement, Façade Improvement, Solid waste management, Visitors amenities etc.
302
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Achievements /Progress under the scheme since inception
To capture the unique heritage character of each City, City HRIDAY Plans (CHPs) specific to each City
have been prepared. The plan had identified shelf of projects to be implemented through the scheme.
The shelf of projects identified for each city has been translated into Detailed Project Reports by em-
panelled agencies.
So far 77 projects amounting to Rs. 357.78 Crores have been sanctioned out of which Rs.103.63 crores
has been released.
Several Capacity building workshops/Exposure visits and IEC events have been held since inception.
Mention some……
Projects
The Scheme supports development of core heritage linked civic infrastructure projects which includes
revitalization of urban infrastructure for areas around heritage, religious, cultural and tourism assets
of the cities. These initiatives include development of approach roads & streets, pedestrian pathways,
installation of street lights and luminaries, Water & Sanitation facilities, Open space & landscape im-
provement, Façade Improvement, Solid waste management, Visitors amenities etc.
302
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Main components Main components

Table 13.1: Snapshot of Projects and expenditure Table 13.1: Snapshot of Projects and expenditure

Number of Projects Approved 77 Number of Projects Approved 77

Total Cost of the Approved Projects Rs. 402 Crore Total Cost of the Approved Projects Rs. 402 Crore
Funds Released for the Implementation of Projects Rs. 357.73 Crore Funds Released for the Implementation of Projects Rs. 357.73 Crore
Projects Completed 28 Projects Completed 28

Table 13.2: Year Wise Breakup of Expenditure in Rupees Table 13.2: Year Wise Breakup of Expenditure in Rupees

2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

0.87 Crore 27.21 Crore 141.55 Crore 108.16 Crore 92.23 Crore 0.87 Crore 27.21 Crore 141.55 Crore 108.16 Crore 92.23 Crore

303 303
 Table 13.3: City wise details of projects in the 12 HRIDAY cities is as under:

Budget Al-
City location for Cost of the Project Fund Released to cities % Financial Progress No. of Projects % Physical Prog-
Project Imple- for implementation Approved ress
mentation
Ajmer (Rajasthan) 35 Cr 33.35 Cr 33.02 Cr 99.01% 7 99.74%
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Amravati (A.P.) 20 Cr 18.46 Cr 16.61 Cr 89.97% 3 74.98%

Amritsar (Punjab) 60 Cr 74.85 Cr 61.36 Cr 81.97% 12 66.66%

Badami (Karnataka) 20 Cr 18.44 Cr 8.68 Cr 47.07% 4 57.23%

Dwarka (Gujarat) 20 Cr 28.20 Cr 24.63 Cr 87.34% 8 67.81%

304
Gaya (Bihar) 35 Cr 34.63 Cr 26.98 Cr 77.9% 7 50.39%

Kanchipuram (T.N.) 20 Cr 19.99 Cr 19.50 Cr 97.54% 3 84.94%

Mathura (U.P.) 35 Cr 21.46 Cr 18.78 Cr 87.5% 8 37.24%

Puri (Odisha) 20 Cr 16.98 Cr 16.14 Cr 95% 6 75.38%

Varanasi (U.P.) 80 Cr 88.57 Cr 86.16 Cr 97.27% 11 93.70%

Velankanni (T.N.) 20 Cr 19.26 Cr 17.30 Cr 89.8% 3 78.53%

Warangal (Telanga- 35 Cr 34.99 Cr 28.57 Cr 81.6% 5 55.55%

na)

Total 425 402 Cr 357.73 Cr 85.9% 77 73.34%

Table 13.3: City wise details of projects in the 12 HRIDAY cities is as under:

Budget Al-
City location for Cost of the Project Fund Released to cities % Financial Progress No. of Projects % Physical Prog-
Project Imple- for implementation Approved ress
mentation
Ajmer (Rajasthan) 35 Cr 33.35 Cr 33.02 Cr 99.01% 7 99.74%
Handbook of Urban Statistics

Amravati (A.P.) 20 Cr 18.46 Cr 16.61 Cr 89.97% 3 74.98%

Amritsar (Punjab) 60 Cr 74.85 Cr 61.36 Cr 81.97% 12 66.66%

Badami (Karnataka) 20 Cr 18.44 Cr 8.68 Cr 47.07% 4 57.23%

Dwarka (Gujarat) 20 Cr 28.20 Cr 24.63 Cr 87.34% 8 67.81%

304

Gaya (Bihar) 35 Cr 34.63 Cr 26.98 Cr 77.9% 7 50.39%

Kanchipuram (T.N.) 20 Cr 19.99 Cr 19.50 Cr 97.54% 3 84.94%

Mathura (U.P.) 35 Cr 21.46 Cr 18.78 Cr 87.5% 8 37.24%

Puri (Odisha) 20 Cr 16.98 Cr 16.14 Cr 95% 6 75.38%

Varanasi (U.P.) 80 Cr 88.57 Cr 86.16 Cr 97.27% 11 93.70%

Velankanni (T.N.) 20 Cr 19.26 Cr 17.30 Cr 89.8% 3 78.53%

Warangal (Telanga- 35 Cr 34.99 Cr 28.57 Cr 81.6% 5 55.55%

na)

Total 425 402 Cr 357.73 Cr 85.9% 77 73.34%

 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Other Components
IEC Events and Activities
Information, Education and Communication (IEC) are important components of the HRIDAY scheme. Un-
der IEC, the emphasis is given to educating and creating awareness among the people about the im-
portance of associated heritage (tangible and intangible) of the city and initiatives taken under the
scheme. The IEC initiatives assist the city and the mission to obtain innovative solutions for areas in
need and build alliances with compatible organizations and the community, as a whole it results in
long term success by facilitating community involvement and ownership.
Capacity Building
The Capacity Building component of the scheme aims to develop institutional and individual capac-
ity at national, state and city level governance. It helps in augmenting and improving the capacity
at various levels to enhance the efficiency in civic administration for planned, inclusive, spatial and
socio-economic development keeping in mind the associated heritage value of the cities. The focus
group under this section is the administrative body of the mission (National and State Level), the local
people who are closely associated in various economic activities (craftsmen, tour guides, etc.) around
heritage of the city and also the students involved in various studies related to heritage, architecture
or urban development. A four day capacity building workshop was also organized at SPA, Bhopal in
August, 2018 for all HRIDAY city officials with an objective to improve the understanding of heritage
management (including operations and management) in cities. Subsequently a one day workshop was
organized at the NIUA Office, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi in December, 2018 to further the under-
standing of various city officials regarding the sustainable approaches to maintain the assts created
under the HRIDAY scheme.
Transformation brought by HRIDAY
Picture taken before development at Rambagh School
305
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Other Components
IEC Events and Activities
Information, Education and Communication (IEC) are important components of the HRIDAY scheme. Un-
der IEC, the emphasis is given to educating and creating awareness among the people about the im-
portance of associated heritage (tangible and intangible) of the city and initiatives taken under the
scheme. The IEC initiatives assist the city and the mission to obtain innovative solutions for areas in
need and build alliances with compatible organizations and the community, as a whole it results in
long term success by facilitating community involvement and ownership.
Capacity Building
The Capacity Building component of the scheme aims to develop institutional and individual capac-
ity at national, state and city level governance. It helps in augmenting and improving the capacity
at various levels to enhance the efficiency in civic administration for planned, inclusive, spatial and
socio-economic development keeping in mind the associated heritage value of the cities. The focus
group under this section is the administrative body of the mission (National and State Level), the local
people who are closely associated in various economic activities (craftsmen, tour guides, etc.) around
heritage of the city and also the students involved in various studies related to heritage, architecture
or urban development. A four day capacity building workshop was also organized at SPA, Bhopal in
August, 2018 for all HRIDAY city officials with an objective to improve the understanding of heritage
management (including operations and management) in cities. Subsequently a one day workshop was
organized at the NIUA Office, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi in December, 2018 to further the under-
standing of various city officials regarding the sustainable approaches to maintain the assts created
under the HRIDAY scheme.
Transformation brought by HRIDAY
Picture taken before development at Rambagh School
305
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Restoration of Rambagh Gate and School: The Rambagh gate is the only surviv-
ing gate of the walled city of Amritsar from the times of Maharaja Ranjit Singh the
famed Maharaja of Punjab. A segment of the fortification wall houses, above it, a colo-
nial period building which houses a 100 year old Municipal Printing Press and a school.
On the outset, the project aimed to address the structural conservation of the entire com-
plex which was in an extremely poor condition. The project aimed to undertake the conservation
and revitalization in a manner so that the cultural edifices impact the quality of lives of the us-
ers and hence reintegrates the significance of the building into the lives of the local community.
Initially all the five classes were running out of two run down rooms. The project reorganized the
spaces within the building into five classrooms and provided verandahs for children for extra-cur-
ricular activities. Toilets and kitchen were upgraded. A room was provided for the teachers as
well. Facilities for play were provided in the open area including games as snakes and ladders etc.
Picture taken after development at Rambagh School
The Rambagh gate was restored to house a ‘Peoples’ Museum’ locally called the LokVirsa thus pro-
viding a cultural space for the community which showcases the historical and cultural narrative of
the city of Amritsar and its people using art installations, films and information boards and graphics.
The Municipal Printing Press and has been provided with improved building infrastructure and
services for continued use as a printing press. It is important to note here that Dhani Ram Chatr-
ik, a Punjabi poet and typographer standardized the typeset for Gurmukhi typeset too came
from city of Amritsar and this Municipal Printing Press could commemorate his contribution.
Conservation and Development of Town Hall as Heritage Centre: The main objective was to revive the historic
building located at the city centre and reuse it as a city heritage centre to depict the history and culture of Vara-
nasi. The project also supports the vision of HRIDAY by creating city level public space and community centre.
306
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Restoration of Rambagh Gate and School: The Rambagh gate is the only surviv-
ing gate of the walled city of Amritsar from the times of Maharaja Ranjit Singh the
famed Maharaja of Punjab. A segment of the fortification wall houses, above it, a colo-
nial period building which houses a 100 year old Municipal Printing Press and a school.
On the outset, the project aimed to address the structural conservation of the entire com-
plex which was in an extremely poor condition. The project aimed to undertake the conservation
and revitalization in a manner so that the cultural edifices impact the quality of lives of the us-
ers and hence reintegrates the significance of the building into the lives of the local community.
Initially all the five classes were running out of two run down rooms. The project reorganized the
spaces within the building into five classrooms and provided verandahs for children for extra-cur-
ricular activities. Toilets and kitchen were upgraded. A room was provided for the teachers as
well. Facilities for play were provided in the open area including games as snakes and ladders etc.
Picture taken after development at Rambagh School
The Rambagh gate was restored to house a ‘Peoples’ Museum’ locally called the LokVirsa thus pro-
viding a cultural space for the community which showcases the historical and cultural narrative of
the city of Amritsar and its people using art installations, films and information boards and graphics.
The Municipal Printing Press and has been provided with improved building infrastructure and
services for continued use as a printing press. It is important to note here that Dhani Ram Chatr-
ik, a Punjabi poet and typographer standardized the typeset for Gurmukhi typeset too came
from city of Amritsar and this Municipal Printing Press could commemorate his contribution.
Conservation and Development of Town Hall as Heritage Centre: The main objective was to revive the historic
building located at the city centre and reuse it as a city heritage centre to depict the history and culture of Vara-
nasi. The project also supports the vision of HRIDAY by creating city level public space and community centre.
306
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
The building built by the Maharaja of
Vizianagram to commemorate the visit
of the Duke of Edinburgh to Varanasi in
January 1870 represents a unique exam-
ple of Indo-Saracenic style. The project
execution was undertaken in three stage
1) Structural Conservation work of the
building comprising repair, waterproof-
ing of the terrace, providing roof over
the green room, repair of damaged
plaster, flooring, doors and windows.  b)
Site development comprising new pav-
ing, repair of boundary wall, entrance
Picture taken before development at Town hall gate and c) Acoustic of the auditorium,
illumination of the building, electrical
and HVAC work.
IMPACT: The project helped in show-
casing the possibility and potential of
restoration of existing buildings and
reuse instead of building new build-
ings, which is also the ideal case for
energy efficiency. The new use of the
building as a cultural place will main-
tain the vibrancy of the neighborhood
along with the economic activities oth-
er than providing a permanent plat-
form to the local artists, performers.  form to the local artists, performers.
Picture taken after development at Town hall
Development of SubhashUdhyan at Ajmer: SubashUdhyan was built on a land where Jahangir had
erected palaces which had later disappeared. The park provides facilities to all groups of people that
visit it and makes for a flexible
Picture taken after development at SubashUdhyan
307
Picture taken before development at Town hall
Picture taken after development at Town hall
Development of SubhashUdhyan at Ajmer: SubashUdhyan was built on a land where Jahangir had
erected palaces which had later disappeared. The park provides facilities to all groups of people that
visit it and makes for a flexible
Picture taken after development at SubashUdhyan
307
Handbook of Urban Statistics
The building built by the Maharaja of
Vizianagram to commemorate the visit
of the Duke of Edinburgh to Varanasi in
January 1870 represents a unique exam-
ple of Indo-Saracenic style. The project
execution was undertaken in three stage
1) Structural Conservation work of the
building comprising repair, waterproof-
ing of the terrace, providing roof over
the green room, repair of damaged
plaster, flooring, doors and windows.  b)
Site development comprising new pav-
ing, repair of boundary wall, entrance
gate and c) Acoustic of the auditorium,
illumination of the building, electrical
and HVAC work.
IMPACT: The project helped in show-
casing the possibility and potential of
restoration of existing buildings and
reuse instead of building new build-
ings, which is also the ideal case for
energy efficiency. The new use of the
building as a cultural place will main-
tain the vibrancy of the neighborhood
along with the economic activities oth-
er than providing a permanent plat-
Handbook of Urban Statistics
recreational space. The scope of the project included development, illumination of park and creation
of facilities like jogging track, cycle track, boating pond, cafes etc. The project was completed in Sep-
tember, 2018 and has rejuvenated the moods of local people who now use the park as a social hub.
Development of landscape garden by using treated water from waste water treatment plant at
BankiMuhan: The BankiMuhan garden is located on the seafront in Puri. The beach of Puri used by
the visitors was found to be of a length of approximately 1500 metres only while the town exists for
over 7000 metres along the waterfront of the Bay of Bengal. It was understood that the carrying ca-
pacity of the visitors to Puri is enhanced due to the presence of the beach and enhancement of this
would benefit this tourism destination.
BankiMuhan water channel flows into the Bay of Bengal and is located towards the northern part of
the town. It has cultural significance due to its association with Lord Jagannatha. A large parcel of
land was found along the channel which was being used as a garbage dump and was filled with de-
bris. A over 2metres wide and deep, covered drain was found flowing along the entire length of the
waterfront leading upto the BankiMuhan water channel. The BankiMuhan waters is contaminated
and effort was being made by the local government for treating its waters.
The HRIDAY project aimed to revitalise the waterfront with landscape development so as to extend
the ‘usable’ beach with elements of interest for the visitors on the other hand and integrate the ex-
isting built features which otherwise were found to be an eye sore.
As part of the project, numerous elements of interest have been added to the landscape. These
include, an open air theatre in the large parcel of land built which has been built with few retain-
ing walls and mounds of earth along with supporting infrastructure of green rooms and toilets. The
existing covered drain has been paved with local laterite stone and platforms have been built to hold
deep benches built of local materials. Interpretative panels to narrate the story of Lord Jagannatha
have been installed along the pathways. Local artisans were employed to create these exquisite-
ly carved panels. Trees such as coconut, cashewnut and casaurina have been planted to provide a
green buffer along the seafront.
Picture taken before development at Banki Muhana
308
Handbook of Urban Statistics
recreational space. The scope of the project included development, illumination of park and creation
of facilities like jogging track, cycle track, boating pond, cafes etc. The project was completed in Sep-
tember, 2018 and has rejuvenated the moods of local people who now use the park as a social hub.
Development of landscape garden by using treated water from waste water treatment plant at
BankiMuhan: The BankiMuhan garden is located on the seafront in Puri. The beach of Puri used by
the visitors was found to be of a length of approximately 1500 metres only while the town exists for
over 7000 metres along the waterfront of the Bay of Bengal. It was understood that the carrying ca-
pacity of the visitors to Puri is enhanced due to the presence of the beach and enhancement of this
would benefit this tourism destination.
BankiMuhan water channel flows into the Bay of Bengal and is located towards the northern part of
the town. It has cultural significance due to its association with Lord Jagannatha. A large parcel of
land was found along the channel which was being used as a garbage dump and was filled with de-
bris. A over 2metres wide and deep, covered drain was found flowing along the entire length of the
waterfront leading upto the BankiMuhan water channel. The BankiMuhan waters is contaminated
and effort was being made by the local government for treating its waters.
The HRIDAY project aimed to revitalise the waterfront with landscape development so as to extend
the ‘usable’ beach with elements of interest for the visitors on the other hand and integrate the ex-
isting built features which otherwise were found to be an eye sore.
As part of the project, numerous elements of interest have been added to the landscape. These
include, an open air theatre in the large parcel of land built which has been built with few retain-
ing walls and mounds of earth along with supporting infrastructure of green rooms and toilets. The
existing covered drain has been paved with local laterite stone and platforms have been built to hold
deep benches built of local materials. Interpretative panels to narrate the story of Lord Jagannatha
have been installed along the pathways. Local artisans were employed to create these exquisite-
ly carved panels. Trees such as coconut, cashewnut and casaurina have been planted to provide a
green buffer along the seafront.
Picture taken before development at Banki Muhana
308
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

It is envisaged that this open air theatre will be utilised for performing arts such as Odissi dance and It is envisaged that this open air theatre will be utilised for performing arts such as Odissi dance and
enactments to tell the story of Lord Jagannatha and local folklore to the visitors and local community. enactments to tell the story of Lord Jagannatha and local folklore to the visitors and local community.
Further the beach along the garden would be used for sand art festival, a growing art and culture in- Further the beach along the garden would be used for sand art festival, a growing art and culture in-
terest in the town and the region. terest in the town and the region.

Pictures taken after development at Banki Pictures taken after development at Banki
Muhana Muhana

Thematic development of 10 HRIDAY Roads: Thematic development of 10 HRIDAY Roads:

Picture taken before development of Pictures taken after development of Picture taken before development of Pictures taken after development of
Kamaccha Road Kamaccha Road Kamaccha Road Kamaccha Road

Picture taken before development of Pictures taken after development of Picture taken before development of Pictures taken after development of
Kamaccha Road Kamaccha Road Kamaccha Road Kamaccha Road

309 309
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Picture taken before development of Pictures taken after development of
Kamaccha Road Kamaccha Road
The lanes and by-lanes of Varanasi runs between havelis, palaces, temples, gateways, Kunds, Idols,
traditional craft clusters each leading to landmark sites. Under the HRIDAY scheme of MoUD, 10 such
roads have been taken up for comprehensive thematic development. These roads are: SundarNaria
Main road leading to SankatMochan Temple, GT Road BhadauChungi to BhaishasurGhat, Antargrahi
Hanuman Mandir Marg at Sarai Nandan, Gurudham road, Ghanti Mill road, Road from Hanuman
temple to Kali temple at Kamachha etc. The Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (IN-
TACH) has been assigned to undertake the work. Gurudham road taken up as a pilot road has been
successfully completed and greatly appreciated by everyone. Work at other roads is ongoing and
expected to be completed by January, 2019. The work has garnered huge support from the local resi-
dents, who have given permission to repair and paint their walls. Instead of spot paintings, the entire
streets have been unified with uniform colours, which has also led to major cleaning of the areas. The
themes for the artistic works chosen for each street are related to its local significance such as the
wooden toys of the Khojwa, textile represented through Saanjhi style, lost features of Varanasi tradi-
tional buildings etc. Some residents witness their walls being plastered for the first ever time. Along
with Urban fabric up-liftment, the work has also positively impacted the consciousness of people.
Many house owners have expressed that now their daughters’ marriages would be finalized easily as
the house front looks nice and welcoming.
Conclusion – A Unique Scheme
Therefore, the HRIDAY scheme has pioneered the framework to balance the rejuvenation of Cultural
Heritage and Urbanisation. Various aspects such as the introduction of city anchors, IEC events and
sustainability frameworks have also been devised under the scheme in order to ensure its effective
application, and create a sustainable framework for the implementation of the scheme on a Nation-
wide Level.
310
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Picture taken before development of Pictures taken after development of
Kamaccha Road Kamaccha Road
The lanes and by-lanes of Varanasi runs between havelis, palaces, temples, gateways, Kunds, Idols,
traditional craft clusters each leading to landmark sites. Under the HRIDAY scheme of MoUD, 10 such
roads have been taken up for comprehensive thematic development. These roads are: SundarNaria
Main road leading to SankatMochan Temple, GT Road BhadauChungi to BhaishasurGhat, Antargrahi
Hanuman Mandir Marg at Sarai Nandan, Gurudham road, Ghanti Mill road, Road from Hanuman
temple to Kali temple at Kamachha etc. The Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (IN-
TACH) has been assigned to undertake the work. Gurudham road taken up as a pilot road has been
successfully completed and greatly appreciated by everyone. Work at other roads is ongoing and
expected to be completed by January, 2019. The work has garnered huge support from the local resi-
dents, who have given permission to repair and paint their walls. Instead of spot paintings, the entire
streets have been unified with uniform colours, which has also led to major cleaning of the areas. The
themes for the artistic works chosen for each street are related to its local significance such as the
wooden toys of the Khojwa, textile represented through Saanjhi style, lost features of Varanasi tradi-
tional buildings etc. Some residents witness their walls being plastered for the first ever time. Along
with Urban fabric up-liftment, the work has also positively impacted the consciousness of people.
Many house owners have expressed that now their daughters’ marriages would be finalized easily as
the house front looks nice and welcoming.
Conclusion – A Unique Scheme
Therefore, the HRIDAY scheme has pioneered the framework to balance the rejuvenation of Cultural
Heritage and Urbanisation. Various aspects such as the introduction of city anchors, IEC events and
sustainability frameworks have also been devised under the scheme in order to ensure its effective
application, and create a sustainable framework for the implementation of the scheme on a Nation-
wide Level.
310
 Chapter 14 Chapter 14

NERUDP SCHEMES NERUDP SCHEMES

 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

NER SCHEMES NER SCHEMES

1. Background: 1. Background:

The North Eastern Region comprising of 8 North Eastern States is one of the least-de- The North Eastern Region comprising of 8 North Eastern States is one of the least-de-

veloped regions of India. The region’s economy has been growing at 3.4% p.a. against veloped regions of India. The region’s economy has been growing at 3.4% p.a. against

7-8% nationally. Hence, Government of India has been giving special attention to 7-8% nationally. Hence, Government of India has been giving special attention to

its development. In order to bring the NER at par with the developed regions of the its development. In order to bring the NER at par with the developed regions of the

country, Government of India launched the NERUDP with assistance of ADB in 2009. country, Government of India launched the NERUDP with assistance of ADB in 2009.

Under Phase-I, the NERUDP program covers five capital cities viz. Agartala (Tripura), Under Phase-I, the NERUDP program covers five capital cities viz. Agartala (Tripura),

Aizawl (Mizoram), Gangtok (Sikkim), Kohima (Nagaland), and Shillong (Meghalaya). Aizawl (Mizoram), Gangtok (Sikkim), Kohima (Nagaland), and Shillong (Meghalaya).

The project covers (i) Improvement in Urban Infrastructure and Services in the ar- The project covers (i) Improvement in Urban Infrastructure and Services in the ar-

eas of Water Supply, Sanitation and Solid Waste Management and (ii) Project Man- eas of Water Supply, Sanitation and Solid Waste Management and (ii) Project Man-

agement and Capacity Building of the urban local bodies through institutional and agement and Capacity Building of the urban local bodies through institutional and

financial reforms. financial reforms.

The program spanning a period of 10 years (2009-2019), has an outlay of Rs 1371.40 The program spanning a period of 10 years (2009-2019), has an outlay of Rs 1371.40

crores, (Sanctioned amount varies as per the dollar value) spread over three tranch- crores, (Sanctioned amount varies as per the dollar value) spread over three tranch-

es. The Government of India and Asian Development Bank are financing the project es. The Government of India and Asian Development Bank are financing the project

in the proportion of 30:70. The money is being passed on to the states as 90% grant in the proportion of 30:70. The money is being passed on to the states as 90% grant

and 10% loan. and 10% loan.

313 313
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

2. category wise progress of NERUDP (Table 14.1) 2. category wise progress of NERUDP (Table 14.1)

Projects/Packages Undertaken in NERUDP (State wise/Category wise) Projects/Packages Undertaken in NERUDP (State wise/Category wise)

No. of Projects/Packages (Category wise) No. of Projects/Packages (Category wise)

Contract Contract
Water Value (Rs. Water Value (Rs.
S.No City/(State) SWM Sanitation Total Cr.) S.No City/(State) SWM Sanitation Total Cr.)
Supply Supply

1 Agartala/(Tripura) 16 06 01 23 267.40 1 Agartala/(Tripura) 16 06 01 23 267.40

2 Aizawl/(Mizoram) 13 03 07 23 508.49 2 Aizawl/(Mizoram) 13 03 07 23 508.49

3 Gangtok/(Sikkim) 04 09 00 13 86.29 3 Gangtok/(Sikkim) 04 09 00 13 86.29

4 Kohima/(Nagaland) 08 02 03 13 145.85 4 Kohima/(Nagaland) 08 02 03 13 145.85

5 Shillong/(Meghalaya) 00 13 00 13 67.62 5 Shillong/(Meghalaya) 00 13 00 13 67.62

6 Total/(North East) 41 33 11 85 1075.66 6 Total/(North East) 41 33 11 85 1075.66

Total Contract value Total Contract value

760.14 208.69 106.83 1075.66* 760.14 208.69 106.83 1075.66*
Category Wise (Rs. Cr) Category Wise (Rs. Cr)

* The value is only for work packages i.e. Excluding Capacity Building and PIA * The value is only for work packages i.e. Excluding Capacity Building and PIA
3. Physical Progress: (Tranche wise) (Table 14.2) 3. Physical Progress: (Tranche wise) (Table 14.2)

Packages Com- Packages Com-

Packages Packages % Commis- Packages Packages % Commis-
Tranche missioned till Tranche missioned till
Sanctioned Contracted sioned Sanctioned Contracted sioned
date date
Tranche-1 18 18 18 100% Tranche-1 18 18 18 100%

Tranche-2 51 49 31 63% Tranche-2 51 49 31 63%

Tranche-3 16 12 5 42% Tranche-3 16 12 5 42%

Total 85 79 54 68% Total 85 79 54 68%

314 314
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Financial Progress: (Tranche wise) Figures in Rs. Crore (Table 14.3) Financial Progress: (Tranche wise) Figures in Rs. Crore (Table 14.3)

S a n c t i o n e d L i a b i l i t i e s / Total Expenditure Balance Lia- S a n c t i o n e d L i a b i l i t i e s / Total Expenditure Balance Lia-

 Tranche % Disbursed  Tranche % Disbursed
amount# Contracts* till Dec.’18 bilities amount# Contracts* till Dec.’18 bilities
Tranche-1 205 192 186 06 97% Tranche-1 205 192 186 06 97%

Tranche-2 560 541 414 127 77% Tranche-2 560 541 414 127 77%

Tranche-3 680 542 228 314 42% Tranche-3 680 542 228 314 42%

Total 1445 1275 828 447 65% Total 1445 1275 828 447 65%

* The value is for the Contract packages including Capacity Building and PIA * The value is for the Contract packages including Capacity Building and PIA

315 315
Handbook of Urban Statistics
10% LUMPSUM PROVISION SCHEME FOR BENIFT OF NORTH EASTERN STATES IN-
CLUDING SIKKIM
As per the extant decision of the Government of India, 10% of the total budget
provision for the Ministries/Departments will be spent on the projects/schemes of de-
velopment for the North Eastern Region including Sikkim. The Scheme of 10% Lump
sum Provision for the benefit of North Eastern Region, including Sikkim has been oper-
ational in the Ministry from the year 2001-2002. It is implemented as per guidelines of
Non-Lapsable Central Pool of Resources (NLCPR).
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The broad objective of the scheme is to ensure speedy development in the North East-
ern Region including Sikkim by increasing the flow of budgetary financing for new proj-
ects/schemes in the Region. Funds are released to State Governments for development
of infrastructure in urban towns.
COVERAGE
Grant-in-Aid under the scheme is released for the following thrust areas:-
• Water Supply-Urban Water Programme/Augmentation of water supply
• Development/improvement of Sewerage System/Sanitation Projects/Septage
Management/City Sanitation Plan.
• Solid Waste Management Project/Decentralized treatment of liquid waste.
• Construction of Bridges/Flyovers/Footpaths.
• Construction of multi utility buildings/market complex/parking complexes/truck
terminus.
• Construction of retaining wall.
• Civic amenities like playground, community hall, night shelters, old age and des-
titute children home, burial and cremation ground.
• Improvement of existing/construction of new roads, pavements.
• Draining system such as storm water drainage.
• Construction of affordable Houses for economically weaker sections etc.,
FUNDING PATTERN
The cost of the projects is shared by the Central and State Governments in ratio of 90:10.
However, in case of projects to be executed by Central Governments agency, the sanction-
ing committee may provide enhanced level funding. The State will bear/waive Turnover
Tax/ Work Contract Tax, or any such State level taxes where the projects are executed by
a Central Agency. Central share is released in three/four instalments, depending upon
the physical and financial progress and fulfilment of the provisions of the GFRs, 2005.
316
Handbook of Urban Statistics
10% LUMPSUM PROVISION SCHEME FOR BENIFT OF NORTH EASTERN STATES IN-
CLUDING SIKKIM
As per the extant decision of the Government of India, 10% of the total budget
provision for the Ministries/Departments will be spent on the projects/schemes of de-
velopment for the North Eastern Region including Sikkim. The Scheme of 10% Lump
sum Provision for the benefit of North Eastern Region, including Sikkim has been oper-
ational in the Ministry from the year 2001-2002. It is implemented as per guidelines of
Non-Lapsable Central Pool of Resources (NLCPR).
The broad objective of the scheme is to ensure speedy development in the North East-
ern Region including Sikkim by increasing the flow of budgetary financing for new proj-
ects/schemes in the Region. Funds are released to State Governments for development
of infrastructure in urban towns.
COVERAGE
Grant-in-Aid under the scheme is released for the following thrust areas:-
• Water Supply-Urban Water Programme/Augmentation of water supply
• Development/improvement of Sewerage System/Sanitation Projects/Septage
Management/City Sanitation Plan.
• Solid Waste Management Project/Decentralized treatment of liquid waste.
• Construction of Bridges/Flyovers/Footpaths.
• Construction of multi utility buildings/market complex/parking complexes/truck
terminus.
• Construction of retaining wall.
• Civic amenities like playground, community hall, night shelters, old age and des-
titute children home, burial and cremation ground.
• Improvement of existing/construction of new roads, pavements.
• Draining system such as storm water drainage.
• Construction of affordable Houses for economically weaker sections etc.,
FUNDING PATTERN
The cost of the projects is shared by the Central and State Governments in ratio of 90:10.
However, in case of projects to be executed by Central Governments agency, the sanction-
ing committee may provide enhanced level funding. The State will bear/waive Turnover
Tax/ Work Contract Tax, or any such State level taxes where the projects are executed by
a Central Agency. Central share is released in three/four instalments, depending upon
the physical and financial progress and fulfilment of the provisions of the GFRs, 2005.
316
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Project details Project details

a) Physical progress (Table 14.4) a) Physical progress (Table 14.4)
Name of the Sanctioned Completed Ongoing Name of the Sanctioned Completed Ongoing
state state
A r u n a c h a l 96 (01 dropped) 84 11 A r u n a c h a l 96 (01 dropped) 84 11
Pradesh Pradesh
Assam 72 26 46 Assam 72 26 46
Manipur 40 32 08 Manipur 40 32 08
Meghalaya 24(01 dropped) 12 11 Meghalaya 24(01 dropped) 12 11
Mizoram 44(01 cancelled) 36 07 Mizoram 44(01 cancelled) 36 07
Nagaland 71(01 cancelled) 47 23 Nagaland 71(01 cancelled) 47 23
Sikkim 44(01 dropped) 29 14 Sikkim 44(01 dropped) 29 14
Tripura 40 32 08 Tripura 40 32 08
Total 431(05 cancelled/dropped) 298 128 Total 431(05 cancelled/dropped) 298 128

b) Financial Progress of the Ongoing projects (Rs. In Lakhs) (Table 14.5) b) Financial Progress of the Ongoing projects (Rs. In Lakhs) (Table 14.5)

Total Total
No. of Sanctioned Amount to be No. of Sanctioned Amount to be
Sl.No. Name of the state Amount Sl.No. Name of the state Amount
projects Amount released projects Amount released
Disbursed Disbursed
1 Assam 46 32626.11 18271.56 14354.55 1 Assam 46 32626.11 18271.56 14354.55
2 Nagaland 23 24236.06 18610.72 5625.34 2 Nagaland 23 24236.06 18610.72 5625.34
3 Tripura 08 19497.90 13519.15 5978.75 3 Tripura 08 19497.90 13519.15 5978.75
4 Mizoram 07 9522.29 8202.57 1319.72 4 Mizoram 07 9522.29 8202.57 1319.72
5 Manipur 08 12830.62 9070.23 3760.39 5 Manipur 08 12830.62 9070.23 3760.39
6 Arunachal Pradesh 11 12415.66 9923.02 2492.64 6 Arunachal Pradesh 11 12415.66 9923.02 2492.64
7 Sikkim 14 16168.32 15256.57 911.75 7 Sikkim 14 16168.32 15256.57 911.75
8 Meghalaya 11 12991.37 8191.44 4799.93 8 Meghalaya 11 12991.37 8191.44 4799.93
Total 128 140288.33 101045.26 39243.07 Total 128 140288.33 101045.26 39243.07
The sunset date for completion of projects under the erstwhile UD is 31.03.2020 . No new projects The sunset date for completion of projects under the erstwhile UD is 31.03.2020 . No new projects
are being taken up. The ongoing projects are to be completed. are being taken up. The ongoing projects are to be completed.

317 317
 Chapter 15 Chapter 15

Real Estate Real Estate

(Regulation & Development) (Regulation & Development)
Act, 2016 Act, 2016
“”A person saves money for buying a house of his own. We have “”A person saves money for buying a house of his own. We have
passed the Real Estate Bill that ensures protection of buyers.” passed the Real Estate Bill that ensures protection of buyers.”

Narendra Modi Narendra Modi

Prime Minister Prime Minister
(Twitter Account of Hon'ble PM) (Twitter Account of Hon'ble PM)
21-02-2016 21-02-2016
 Handbook of Urban Statistics
Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) was passed in March, 2016 marking the
beginning of a new era in the Indian real estate sector and a step towards reforming the real estate
sector in India, encouraging greater transparency, citizen centricity, accountability and financial dis-
cipline. The core objective of this transformative legislation is to ensure regulation and promotion of
real estate sector in an efficient and transparent manner and to protect the interest of home buyers.
Benefits under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 to Consumers:
§ The Act along with the Rules will ensure timely completion of real estate projects. This will help to
achieve the PM’s vision of “HOUSING FOR ALL”. It will prevent diversion of funds and protect the
buyers’ interests.
§ The Act will help curb black money & speculation. It will make operations transparent – project in-
formation will be available – promoting informed choice for buyers. The Disclosure of ‘carpet area’
for sale will curb unfair trade practices.
§ Agreement for Sale Rules would end one-sided agreements and end consumer exploitation and
power asymmetry prevalent in the sector.
§ Indefinite delay in dispute resolution through civil courts will end with fast track dispute resolution
mechanism.
§ Another major provision in the Act is the inclusion of equal rate of interest to be paid by the pro-
moters and buyers in case of default or delays thus brining equity in Operations.
Main features of RERA:
§ It regulates transactions between buyers and promoters of real estate projects.
§ It provides for establishment of state level regulatory authorities called Real Estate Regulatory Au-
thorities (RERAs).
§ Real estate projects, need to be registered with RERAs. Promoters cannot book or offer these pro-
jects for sale without registering them. Real estate agents dealing in these projects also need to
register with RERAs.
§ The promoters must upload details of the project on the website of the RERA. These include the
site and layout plan, and schedule for completion of the real estate project etc.
§ 70% of the amount collected from buyers for a project must be maintained in a separate bank
account and must only be used for construction of that project only. The withdrawals have to be
certified by architects, CA and project engineers.
§ The Act stipulates that the appropriate government should establish the Real Estate Appellate Tri-
bunal by May 01, 2018. Adjudicating officers, Real Estate Authorities and Appellate Tribunals shall
dispose complaints within 60 days.
321
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) was passed in March, 2016 marking the
beginning of a new era in the Indian real estate sector and a step towards reforming the real estate
sector in India, encouraging greater transparency, citizen centricity, accountability and financial dis-
cipline. The core objective of this transformative legislation is to ensure regulation and promotion of
real estate sector in an efficient and transparent manner and to protect the interest of home buyers.
Benefits under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 to Consumers:
§ The Act along with the Rules will ensure timely completion of real estate projects. This will help to
achieve the PM’s vision of “HOUSING FOR ALL”. It will prevent diversion of funds and protect the
buyers’ interests.
§ The Act will help curb black money & speculation. It will make operations transparent – project in-
formation will be available – promoting informed choice for buyers. The Disclosure of ‘carpet area’
for sale will curb unfair trade practices.
§ Agreement for Sale Rules would end one-sided agreements and end consumer exploitation and
power asymmetry prevalent in the sector.
§ Indefinite delay in dispute resolution through civil courts will end with fast track dispute resolution
mechanism.
§ Another major provision in the Act is the inclusion of equal rate of interest to be paid by the pro-
moters and buyers in case of default or delays thus brining equity in Operations.
Main features of RERA:
§ It regulates transactions between buyers and promoters of real estate projects.
§ It provides for establishment of state level regulatory authorities called Real Estate Regulatory Au-
thorities (RERAs).
§ Real estate projects, need to be registered with RERAs. Promoters cannot book or offer these pro-
jects for sale without registering them. Real estate agents dealing in these projects also need to
register with RERAs.
§ The promoters must upload details of the project on the website of the RERA. These include the
site and layout plan, and schedule for completion of the real estate project etc.
§ 70% of the amount collected from buyers for a project must be maintained in a separate bank
account and must only be used for construction of that project only. The withdrawals have to be
certified by architects, CA and project engineers.
§ The Act stipulates that the appropriate government should establish the Real Estate Appellate Tri-
bunal by May 01, 2018. Adjudicating officers, Real Estate Authorities and Appellate Tribunals shall
dispose complaints within 60 days.
321
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Present Status of Implementation:
28 States/UTs have notified Rules under RERA and established Real Estate Regulatory Authorities and
21 States/UTs have established Real Estate Appellate Tribunals. More than 37,000 Real Estate Projects
and 28,000 Real Estate Agents have been registered under different Real Estate Regulatory Authorities
across the country.
RERA is not applicable in the state of Jammu & Kashmir. However, Jammu & Kashmir has notified
‘The Jammu and Kashmir  Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2018’  on 16th December,
2018; which is identical to RERA.
6 North Eastern States (Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland and Sikkim) are
in the process of notifying Rules under RERA.
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has organized four regional workshops on RERA- first workshop
at Pune on 10th September 2018 for Western Region States/UTs, second workshop at Chennai on 12th
October 2018 for Southern Region States / UTs, third workshop at Delhi on 15th November 2018 for
Northern Region States / UTs and fourth workshop at Ranchi on 15th December 2018 for Eastern and
North Eastern Region States / UTs to spread awareness on RERA and also to discuss the issues faced in
implementation of RERA.
322
Handbook of Urban Statistics
Present Status of Implementation:
28 States/UTs have notified Rules under RERA and established Real Estate Regulatory Authorities and
21 States/UTs have established Real Estate Appellate Tribunals. More than 37,000 Real Estate Projects
and 28,000 Real Estate Agents have been registered under different Real Estate Regulatory Authorities
across the country.
RERA is not applicable in the state of Jammu & Kashmir. However, Jammu & Kashmir has notified
‘The Jammu and Kashmir  Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2018’  on 16th December,
2018; which is identical to RERA.
6 North Eastern States (Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland and Sikkim) are
in the process of notifying Rules under RERA.
Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has organized four regional workshops on RERA- first workshop
at Pune on 10th September 2018 for Western Region States/UTs, second workshop at Chennai on 12th
October 2018 for Southern Region States / UTs, third workshop at Delhi on 15th November 2018 for
Northern Region States / UTs and fourth workshop at Ranchi on 15th December 2018 for Eastern and
North Eastern Region States / UTs to spread awareness on RERA and also to discuss the issues faced in
implementation of RERA.
322
 Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Table 15.1: Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 [RERA] Table 15.1: Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016 [RERA]
Implementation Progress Report Implementation Progress Report
(as on 31-01-2019) (as on 31-01-2019)

Establishment Establishment Registrations Establishment Establishment Registrations

General Web General Web
Sl. State/UT of Regulatory of Appellate Sl. State/UT of Regulatory of Appellate
Rules Portal Projects Agents Rules Portal Projects Agents
Authority Tribunal Authority Tribunal
Andaman Andaman
1 & Nicobar Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 1 16 1 & Nicobar Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 1 16
Island Island
Andhra Not Estab- Andhra Not Estab-
2 Notified Permanent Setup 189 41 2 Notified Permanent Setup 189 41
Pradesh lished Pradesh lished
Arunachal Not Noti- Not Estab- Not Estab- Arunachal Not Noti- Not Estab- Not Estab-
3 Not Setup  --  -- 3 Not Setup  --  --
Pradesh fied lished lished Pradesh fied lished lished
Not Estab- Not Estab-
4 Assam Notified Interim Not Setup 79 13 4 Assam Notified Interim Not Setup 79 13
lished lished
5 Bihar Notified Permanent Interim Setup 409 65 5 Bihar Notified Permanent Interim Setup 409 65

6 Chandigarh Notified Permanent Interim Setup 3 14 6 Chandigarh Notified Permanent Interim Setup 3 14
Not Estab- Not Estab-
7 Chhattisgarh Notified Permanent Setup 935 341 7 Chhattisgarh Notified Permanent Setup 935 341
lished lished
Dadar & Dadar &
8 Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 72 2 8 Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 72 2
Nagar Haveli Nagar Haveli
9 Daman & Diu Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 16 0 9 Daman & Diu Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 16 0

10 NCT of Delhi Notified Permanent Interim Setup 16 86 10 NCT of Delhi Notified Permanent Interim Setup 16 86
Not Estab- Not Estab-
11 Goa Notified Interim Setup 376 141 11 Goa Notified Interim Setup 376 141
lished lished
12 Gujarat Notified Permanent Interim Setup 4819 821 12 Gujarat Notified Permanent Interim Setup 4819 821

13 Haryana * Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 521 1275 13 Haryana * Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 521 1275
Himachal Not Estab- Himachal Not Estab-
14 Notified Interim Setup 27 24 14 Notified Interim Setup 27 24
Pradesh lished Pradesh lished
Not Not Not Not
Jammu & Not Not Jammu & Not Not
15 Applica- Applica-  --  -- 15 Applica- Applica-  --  --
Kashmir** Applicable Applicable Kashmir** Applicable Applicable
ble ble ble ble
16 Jharkhand Notified Permanent Interim Setup 50 2 16 Jharkhand Notified Permanent Interim Setup 50 2

17 Karnataka Notified Interim Interim Setup 2365 1296 17 Karnataka Notified Interim Interim Setup 2365 1296
Not Estab- Not Estab-
18 Kerala Notified Interim Not Setup  --  -- 18 Kerala Notified Interim Not Setup  --  --
lished lished
Not Estab- Not Estab- Not Estab- Not Estab-
19 Lakshadweep Notified Not Setup  --  -- 19 Lakshadweep Notified Not Setup  --  --
lished lished lished lished
Madhya Madhya
20 Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 2086 507 20 Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 2086 507
Pradesh Pradesh
21 Maharashtra Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 19491 18530 21 Maharashtra Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 19491 18530
Not Noti- Not Estab- Not Estab- Not Noti- Not Estab- Not Estab-
22 Manipur Not Setup  --  -- 22 Manipur Not Setup  --  --
fied lished lished fied lished lished

323 323
Handbook of Urban Statistics Handbook of Urban Statistics

Not Noti- Not Noti-

23 Meghalaya Not Established Not Established Not Setup  --  -- 23 Meghalaya Not Established Not Established Not Setup  --  --
fied fied
Not Noti- Not Noti-
24 Mizoram Interim Not Established Not Setup  --  -- 24 Mizoram Interim Not Established Not Setup  --  --
fied fied
Not Noti- Not Noti-
25 Nagaland Not Established Not Established Not Setup  --  -- 25 Nagaland Not Established Not Established Not Setup  --  --
fied fied
26 Odisha Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 239 35 26 Odisha Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 239 35

27 Puducherry Notified Interim Permanent Not Setup 10 1 27 Puducherry Notified Interim Permanent Not Setup 10 1

28 Punjab Notified Permanent Interim Setup 638 1369 28 Punjab Notified Permanent Interim Setup 638 1369

29 Rajasthan Notified Interim Interim Setup 868 761 29 Rajasthan Notified Interim Interim Setup 868 761
Not Noti- Not Noti-
30 Sikkim Not Established Not Established Not Setup  --  -- 30 Sikkim Not Established Not Established Not Setup  --  --
fied fied

31 Tamil Nadu Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 876 416 31 Tamil Nadu Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 876 416

32 Telangana Notified Interim Interim Setup 300 249 32 Telangana Notified Interim Interim Setup 300 249

33 Tripura Notified Interim Interim Not Setup  --  -- 33 Tripura Notified Interim Interim Not Setup  --  --

34 Uttar Pradesh Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 2533 2463 34 Uttar Pradesh Notified Permanent Permanent Setup 2533 2463

35 Uttarakhand Notified Permanent Interim Setup 229 218 35 Uttarakhand Notified Permanent Interim Setup 229 218

West Bengal*** Not Noti- West Bengal*** Not Noti-

36 Not Established Not Established Not Setup  --  -- 36 Not Established Not Established Not Setup  --  --
fied fied

Total 37148 28686 Total 37148 28686

* Haryana has two Regulatory Authority i.e. one for Gurugram and other for rest of Haryana. * Haryana has two Regulatory Authority i.e. one for Gurugram and other for rest of Haryana.

** RERA was not applicable in the state of Jammu & Kashmir, however, the State has notified its own legislation ** RERA was not applicable in the state of Jammu & Kashmir, however, the State has notified its own legislation
named as ‘The Jammu and Kashmir Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2018’ on 16th December, named as ‘The Jammu and Kashmir Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2018’ on 16th December,
2018 which is identical to RERA. 2018 which is identical to RERA.

***West Bengal has enacted its own Act namely 'West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017' however, ***West Bengal has enacted its own Act namely 'West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017' however,
state has been advised by MoHUA to notify the rules under Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016. state has been advised by MoHUA to notify the rules under Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016.

Summary: Summary:

• 28 States/UTs have notified rules under RERA;6 North Eastern States (Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Me-
ghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland and Sikkim) are under process to notify the rules under RERA.
• 28 States/UTs have set up Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Regular - 18, Interim - 10).
• 21 States/UTs have set up Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (Regular -10, Interim – 11).
• Regulatory Authorities of 23 States/UTs have operationalised their websites under the provisions of RERA.
• 37,148 Real Estate Projects and 28,686 Real Estate Agents have registered under RERA across the country.
• 28 States/UTs have notified rules under RERA;6 North Eastern States (Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Me-
ghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland and Sikkim) are under process to notify the rules under RERA.
• 28 States/UTs have set up Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Regular - 18, Interim - 10).
• 21 States/UTs have set up Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (Regular -10, Interim – 11).
• Regulatory Authorities of 23 States/UTs have operationalised their websites under the provisions of RERA.
• 37,148 Real Estate Projects and 28,686 Real Estate Agents have registered under RERA across the country.

324 324