Research and Development UBRDC- Version Version

Center RM Doc Number: Date:

No. 05 04 02.10.2017
Effectivity Date:
School:
02-10-17
TOOL EVALUATION Title:
(Questionnaire)

yes no REMARKS
1. Are the objectives of the study explicitly defined to the
respondents in the questionnaire?
2. Are there provisions for the respondents that their
participation is voluntary?
3. Are there provisions for the respondents that they will be
informed of the results of the study?
4. Are there provisions for the respondents about
protection of their identity?
5. Are there provisions for the respondents about the
protection of the confidentiality of their responses?
6. Are the indicators in the questionnaire stated clearly and
objectively?
7. Are the indicators stated positively?
8. Are the indicators presented in a logical manner?
9. Are the terms used unambiguous?
10. Are there double-barreled questions?
11. Are there loaded questions?
12. Are the indicators phrased in a manner that all
respondents can answer them?
13. Is the questionnaire valid in terms of (as necessitated by
the study):
a. Content Validity (at first glance, is it immediately
evident that the items are measuring the
behavior it was meant to measure?)
b. Construct Validity (Do the items of the test
measure the specific construct it was meant to
measure.
c. Predictive Validity (can the test predict the future
performance of the sample population?
14. Is the descriptive interpretation of the scale appropriate?
15. Is the rubric, if applicable, accurate enough to set
differences in measurement?
16. Is there a need for the questionnaire to be tested for
reliability?
17. Is the questionnaire designed for easy tabulation?

V1.01-10-17rb