Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Intelligence is violated by error 1338. There is causal fraud when insidious words or
Freedom by violence machinations of one of the parties causes the other to
Spontaneity by fraud enter a contract, which without these insidious
machinations, they never would have agreed to
Causal fraud: fraud used to induce people into entering
a contract whose remedy is annulment of the contract 1339. Failure to disclose facts when there is a duty to
plus damages reveal them, as when the parties are bound by
confidential relations constitutes fraud
Incidental fraud: fraud incident to the performance of
an obligation whose remedy is damages 1340. Sales talk is not in itself fraudulent
Defect in consent renders contract voidable. But the 1344. In order that fraud may make a contract voidable,
lack of valid consent must be established by clear and it should be serious and should not have been
convincing evidence. Mere allegations are not enough employed by both contracting parties. Incidental fraud
to prove vitiated consent. only obliges the person employing it to pay damages
Vices of consent: must refer to the substance of the 1345. Simulation of a contract may be:
thing Absolute: parties do not intend to be bound
Relative: when parties conceal true agreement
1331. In order that that mistake may invalidate consent,
it should refer to the substance of the thing which is 1346.
the object of the contract, or to those conditions which Absolute simulation is void
have principally moved one or both parties to enter the Relative simulation (when it doesn’t prejudice
contract. a third party and is not contrary to morals)
Mistake as to the identity or qualifications of binds parties to their REAL agreement
one of the parties will vitiate consent only
when such things have been the principal 1347. All things which are not outside the commerce
cause of the contract. of men including future things may be the object of a
A simple mistake of account shall give rise to contract. All transmissible rights may also be the
its correction object of contracts.
No contracts may be entered into upon future
1332. When one of the parties is unable to read, or if inheritance except in cases authorized by law
the contract is in a language not understood by him All services which are not contrary to law,
AND mistake or fraud is alleged, the person enforcing morals, good customs, public order/policy may
the contract must prove that the terms have been fully likewise be the object of a contract
explained to the former.
1350.
1334. Mutual error as to the legal effect of an onerous contracts: the cause is understood to
agreement when the real purpose of the parties is be the prestation or promise of a thing/service
frustrated, may vitiate consent. by the other
renumeratory contracts: the cause is the
1335. service or benefit which is renumerated
Violence: serious/irresistible force employed pure beneficence: liberality of benefactor
to wrest consent
Intimidation: contracting parties compelled 1351. The particular motives of parties in entering into
by reasonable fear of evil that may come to a contract are different from the cause thereof
his/her person, property, spouse, descendants,
or ascendants to give consent
1352. Contracts without cause or with unlawful cause 1366. There shall be no reformation in the ff. cases:
cease to exist and produce no effect whatsoever. The simple donations while alive wherein no
cause is unlawful if it is contrary to law/public morals condition is imposed
wills because person is dead
1355. The statement of a false cause in contracts shall when real agreement is void
render them void, if it should not be proved that they
were founded upon another cause which is true and 1367. When one of the parties has brought an action to
lawful. enforce the instrument, he cannot subsequently ask for
its reformation because the very act of asking for
1356. Contracts shall create obligation in whatever enforcement means that the person agrees to the terms.
form they have been entered into, provided all the
essential requisites for their validity are present. 1370. If contract terms are clear and leave no doubt
However, when the law requires that a contract need upon the intention of the contracting parties, the literal
be in some form to be enforceable, then that meaning of its stipulations shall control. If the words
requirement is absolute. appear to be contrary to the evident intention of the
parties, the latter shall prevail over the former.
1358. The following must appear in a public
document: 1371. In order to judge the intention of contracting
a) acts and contracts which have for their object the parties, their contemporaneous and subsequent acts
creation, transmission, modification, or extinguishment shall be principally considered.
of real rights over immovable property
b) cession, repudiation, or renunciation of hereditary 1380. Contracts validly agreed upon may be rescinded
rights of those of the conjugal partnership of gains in the cases established by law.
c) power to administer property or any other power
which has for its object an act appearing or which 1381. The ff. contracts are rescissible:
should appear in a public document or should
prejudice a 3rd person (1) those which are entered into by guardians
d) the cession of actions or rights proceeding from an whenever the wards whom they represent
act appearing in a public document suffer lesion by more than one fourth of the
things which are the object thereof
all contracts where amount involved exceeds (2) those agreed upon in representation of
500php must appear in writing, even private absentees, if the latter suffers the lesion stated
in the preceding number
1359. When true intention is not expressed in the (3) those undertaken in fraud of creditors when
instrument after a meeting of the minds by reason of the latter cannot in any other manner collect
fraud, mistake, inequitable conduct, or accident; ones the claims due them
of the parties may ask for reformation of instrument to (4) those which refer to things under litigation if
the end that true intention may be expressed they have been entered into by the defendant
without the knowledge and approval of
1361. When mutual mistake of parties causes failure of litigants or of competent juridical authority
the instrument to disclose real agreement, said (5) all other contracts declared by law to be
instrument may be reformed subject to rescission
1362. If one party was mistaken and the other acted Lesion: damage, injury, or detriment caused by
fraudulently in such a way that the instrument doesn’t inadequate price.
show true intention, the former may ask for
reformation of the instrument. 1390. Void Contracts: can’t be ratified, don’t exist
they lack one of the elements or
1363. When one party was mistaken and the other purpose is illegal
knew or believed that the instrument did not state their consent obtained through fraud/mistake
real agreement but concealed that fact from the former, object is contrary to morals
the instrument may be removed
1391. The action for annulment shall be brought within
1364. When through ignorance, lack of skill, four years. This period shall begin…
negligence, or bad faith on the part of the person - in cases of intimidation, violence, or undue
drafting the instrument or the clerk or typist; the influence: from time that the defect of consent
instrument does not express the true intention of the ceases. In cases of mistake or fraud, same.
parties and thus the courts may order that the - From time that the guardianship ceases when
instrument be reformed. action refers to contracts entered into by
minors or incapacitated persons
1392. Ratification extinguishes action to annul a CAN A CORP EXERCISE POWERS IT DOESN’T
voidable contract. HAVE?
- no, powers beyond those given by law and not
1293. Ratification can be effected expressly or tacitly. in the articles of incorporation are not allowed
There is tacit ratification if the person still agrees to - however, these are not necessarily void and
the contract even if there is knowledge that the can be ratified unless illegal
contract is voidable.
CORPORATIONS CANNOT BE USED AS A
1403. Unenforceable contracts FRONT FOR ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES
1) entered into the name of another person by one - piercing the corporate veil is allowed when the
who has been given no authority or legal separate personality of corp is used as a means
representation who has acted beyond his powers to perpetrate fraud/illegal cats OR when the
2) those that do not comply with statute of frauds corporation itself is only a farce