Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Finance
20 September 2019
Breuer, Wolfgang, and Andreas Pinkwart. “Venture Capital and Private Equity Finance as Key
entrepreneurial finance and understanding how investment in the new age works. According to
my research, the main ways entrepreneurs gain the funds to sustain their visions is through
venture capital and private equity financing. Through this article, I have come to learn more
about what exactly venture capital (VC) funding is and how it differs from private equity
financing. Though the article did not go down to the specific advantages and disadvantages of
each option for entrepreneurs, it did mention how both were instrumental in demonstrating the
level of prosperity of an economy as well as a reflection of the values for that time.
An interesting point that was brought up in the article was about the extent to which
entrepreneurs have autonomy upon gaining funding. Obviously, to make their businesses work,
entrepreneurs need to be able to secure funding. And most entrepreneurs today do it through
venture capital firms and private equity firms. However, when they secure funding this way they
are essentially transferring a considerable amount of risk and by extension ownership of the
governing board of the business. Initially, it was something I had not considered, but reading the
article made this an obvious connection since these financing firms will naturally do what they
can to maximize the returns on their investments. The article also goes to mention some
criticisms about private equity financing, though, because it presents a more long-term hold on a
business. It takes on a more operational role in managing risks to see growth. The critics
mentioned in the article believe, however, that private equity financing actually “puts a heavy
burden on firms limiting their financial flexibility and lowering their long-term prospects.”
Another point that I thought was interesting about this article was the fact that the health
national culture, and effectuation. With a better firm reputation, entrepreneurs can come out of
their initial growth period with less debt overall, longer maturities, and lower interest rates. This
part was pretty self-explanatory since it can be assumed that if a firm has a strong track record,
they would provide more benefits to the business they are financing. National culture and
effectuation are not as self-explanatory. With national culture, there are a myriad of components
that can dictate the effectiveness of a firm. An example shared in the article was family structure.
In the past, financing did not have to be relegated to third-party, private investment firms as
much because in a joint-family structure, much of the financing over an extended amount of time
with multiple family members contributing their own money. Similarly, growth would happen in
a similar fashion due to the power over the business being passed down to successors within a
family. With family structure having had changed so much, this is no longer possible, so firms
Furthermore, effectuation was a peculiar factor that was mentioned. As it is defined in the
article, effectuation is, “a form of problem solving which assumes the future is largely
unpredictable, but that it can be controlled through entrepreneurial action.” Essentially, the future
is exactly what entrepreneurs want it to be. When this philosophy is implemented by business
angels, it actually leads to more growth and return on investment. The implementation of this
really reflects the impact of simple psychology and confidence in finance and economics.
and becoming even more in the changing economy. It is a truly fascinating field, but to fully
grasp how impactful it is, I would need to conduct and equally detailed analysis on the impact of