SIP TRAINING

SCHEDULE
 SECTION A: SIP TRAINING SCHEDULE
Student’s Name: Huda binti Muhammad Firdaus Student no: 21730 Programme: CVE

Place of Training : MMC-Gamuda KVMRT (T) Sdn. Bhd – Bandar Malaysia North Station Period of Training:
30/04/2018 -03/08/2018

Week No/ Date

Department Training activities
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

(Please return this form to SIIU within three weeks after student’s registration) (Make copies if necessary)

Host Company Supervisor Signature &stamp:

Name:

Designation:

Date:
 SIP SUMMARY OF
WEEKLY ACTIVITIES
SIP SUMMARY OF WEEKLY ACTIVITIES

WEEK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DAILY ACTIVITIES

a) Asses daily soil conditioning works and planning and evaluate the results.
b) Modify the existing HDLS Mix Design to suit the testing outcome.
1-2
c) To further build on my understanding and experience in other parts of
engineering like site surveillance.
a) Conduct slump test for 1.7g/cm3 HDLS with increasing sodium silicate
3-4 dosing.
b) Evaluate workability for varying density and volume of the conducted test.

a) Conducting lab testing to evaluate the workability and viscosity

5-6 of HDLS reacting with sodium silicate.
b) Conduct lab testing to determine water to limestone rocks ratio.
a) Assess the workability of HDLS with sodium silicate in various density and
volume by lab testing.
b) Develop a deeper understanding and experience in other parts of civil
7-8
works for example, ground improvement works in EWL, concrete work and
earthwork.
c) Shift my exposure from lab testing to site operation work.
a) Gather more information related to the slurry parameters for the
tunnelling works.
b) Joined on-site activities and understand more on fissure grouting
9 – 10 works at IB.
c) Understand onsite testing for ground improvement works at EWL.
d) Restructure the work testing programmed and design for Soil
Soil Conditioning testing.

11 - 12

13 - 14
 SIP SUMMARY OF
WEEKLY REPORT
SCORES (LOG BOOK)
FORM
SIP SUMMARY OF WEEKLY REPORT SCORES (LOG BOOK) FORM
Student’s Name: Huda binti Muhammad Firdaus Student no: 21730 Programme: CVE

Place of Training: MMC-Gamuda KVMRT (T) Sdn. Bhd. Period of Training:

WEEK SCORE
1-2 /20
3-4 /20
5-6 /20
7-8 /20
9 – 10 /20
11 - 12 /20
13 - 14 /20
TOTAL SCORE /140

𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇
FINAL SCORE = × 100 /100
140

KINDLY SUBMIT THIS FORM WITH SCORES (*to the completed weeks) TO THE UTP
SUPERVISOR DURING THE INTERNSHIP PRESENTATION.

Host Company Supervisor’s Signature & stamp:

Name:
Designation:
Host Company’s name:
Date:
*Note: The remaining scores of any outstanding weeks will be filled up by UTP Supervisor upon the student submission
of complete log book at UTP
SIP LOGBOOK REPORT
 LOG BOOK WEEK NO: 1-2

WEEK NO DATE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DAILY ACTIVITIES

a) To assess the workability and required amount of sodium silicate for different
density of HDLS.
30/4/2018 –
b) To understand more regarding ongoing testing.
04/05/2018
1-2
a) Revise on current HDLS design.
07/05/2018 –
b) To further build on my understanding and experience in other parts of engineering like si
11/05/2018
surveillance.

Logbook Weekly Evaluation by HOST COMPANY SUPERVISOR

Instruction to Host Company Supervisor
Please refer to the student’s to assess his/her performance.
Please award the scores based on the range below:

Accomplished Exemplary
Beginning Developing
Student’s Score (Rare) (Exceptionally Rare) Score
(<2.0) (2.0 to <3.25)
(3.25 to <4.0) (4.0 to 5.0)

Mostly self-starter and Always a self-starter and

Had little observable
Initiative & Some observable drive sometimes sought new consistently sought new
drive and did not have /5
Creativity and some new ideas challenges and offered challenge and offered new
new ideas
new ideas creative ideas

Partially accomplished Accomplished given Accomplished given task

Task
given task despite full Accomplished given task task but with some with very minimum /5
Accomplishment
supervision but with full supervision supervision supervision
& Commitment

Frequently absent and Sometimes absent and Never absent and

Attendance & Never absent and always /5
Punctuality always late sometimes late almost always on time on time
Unable to demonstrate Sometimes
positive attitude and Occasionally demonstrated positive Consistently
demonstrated positive demonstrated positive
Attitude & Self hardly maintained attitude and /5
attitude and occasionally attitude and consistently
Control self-control under maintained self-
maintained self-control maintained self-control
pressure under pressure control under pressure under pressure

Total Score /20

Comments:

Host Company Supervisor’s Signature & stamp:

Name & Designation:

Date:
(make copies if necessary)
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 1

Objective(s) of the activities:

a) To assess the workability and required amount of sodium silicate for different
density of HDLS.
b) To understand more regarding ongoing testing.

Contents:
Monday (30/04/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump for reaction of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with in-situ ground
and sodium silicate for 0.001𝑚3 volume with these variables:
o Manipulated variables: 10ml of 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
o Responding variables: Height of slump test.
o Constant variables: 80% volume of in-situ ground, 20% volume of HDLS from total
volume of sample.

Tuesday (01/05/2018)
 Labor Day

Wednesday (02/05/2018)
 Attended toolbox talk
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump for reaction of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with in-situ ground
and sodium silicate for 0.001𝑚3 volume with these variables:
o Manipulated variables: 10ml of 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
o Responding variables: Height of slump test.
o Constant variables:100% coarse aggregates
 Site supervision at EI12

Thursday (03/05/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump for reaction of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with in-situ ground
and sodium silicate for 0.001𝑚3 volume with these variables:
o Manipulated variables: 10ml of 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
o Responding variables: Height of slump test.
o Constant variables:100% coarse aggregates

Friday (04/05/2018)
 Preparation of Instrumentation and Monitoring document for approval.
 Consult Mawar from TU7 regarding ongoing testing.
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 2

Objective(s) of the activities:

a) Revise on current HDLS design.
b) To further build on my understanding and experience in other parts of engineering like site
surveillance.
Contents:
Monday (07/05/2018)
 Joined morning discussion with TU8 team to discuss about current progress.
 Compilation of testing result for slide preparation.
 Site visit to TU7 plant to revise their High-Density Slurry Mix Design.

Tuesday (08/05/2018)
 Assist Peng with site surveillance and Anti-Mosquito Breeding report at BMNS.

Wednesday (09/05/2018)
 Election public holiday.

Thursday (10/05/2018)
 Election public holiday.

Friday (11/05/2018)
 Election public holiday.
 LOG BOOK WEEK NO: 3-4
WEEK NO DATE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DAILY ACTIVITIES

14/05/2018 –
a) To conduct lab testing for 1.7g/cm3 HDLS in achieving the optimum slump.
18/05/2018
3-4
21/05/2018 –
a) To assess the workability and required amount of sodium silicate for different
25/05/2018
density and volume of HDLS.

Logbook Weekly Evaluation by HOST COMPANY SUPERVISOR

Instruction to Host Company Supervisor
Please refer to the student’s to assess his/her performance.
Please award the scores based on the range below:

Accomplished Exemplary
Beginning Developing
Student’s Score (Rare) (Exceptionally Rare) Score
(<2.0) (2.0 to <3.25)
(3.25 to <4.0) (4.0 to 5.0)

Mostly self-starter and Always a self-starter and

Had little observable
Initiative & Some observable drive sometimes sought new consistently sought new
drive and did not have /5
Creativity and some new ideas challenges and offered challenge and offered new
new ideas
new ideas creative ideas

Partially accomplished Accomplished given

Task Accomplished given Accomplished given task
given task despite full task but with some /5
Accomplishment task but with full with very minimum
& Commitment supervision supervision supervision supervision
Frequently absent and Sometimes absent and Never absent and
Attendance & Never absent and always /5
Punctuality always late sometimes late almost always on time on time

Occasionally Sometimes
Unable to demonstrate Consistently
demonstrated positive demonstrated positive
positive attitude and demonstrated positive
Attitude & Self attitude and attitude and /5
hardly maintained self- attitude and consistently
Control occasionally maintained maintained self-
control under pressure maintained self-control
self-control under control under pressure under pressure
pressure
Total Score /20
Comments:

Host Company Supervisor’s Signature & stamp:

Name & Designation:

Date:
(make copies if necessary)
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 3

Objective(s) of the activities:

a) To conduct lab testing for 1.7g/cm3 HDLS in achieving the optimum slump.

Contents:

Monday (14/05/2018)
 Morning meeting to update progress.
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 10% HDLS volume from total sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 80-20.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
o 48% HDLS of total volume sample:
 20% fines of total volume sample.
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 100-0.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Tuesday (15/05/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 48% HDLS of total volume sample:
 20% fines of total volume sample.
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 95-5, 90-0
and 85-15.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Wednesday (16/05/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 48% HDLS of total volume sample:
 20% fines of total volume sample.
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 80-20.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
o 30% HDLS of total volume sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 90-10 and
85-15.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Thursday (17/05/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 30% HDLS of total volume sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 95-5 and
100-0.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
o 20% HDLS of total volume sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 100-0.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Manage manpower for laboratory testing.

Friday (18/05/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 20% HDLS of total volume sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 90-10 and
85-15.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Manage manpower for laboratory testing.
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 4

Objective(s) of the activities:

a) To assess the workability and required amount of sodium silicate for different
density and volume of HDLS.
Contents:

Monday (21/05//2018)
 Meeting with TU8 team to update progress at site.
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 10% HDLS of total volume sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 100-0 and
95-5.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Tuesday (22/05/2018)
 Conduct lab testing to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 10% HDLS of total volume sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 80-20 and
85-15.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Material preparation for Sieve Analysis at Soil Instrument lab.

Wednesday (23/05/2018)
 Conduct lab testing to find the optimum slump of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 10% HDLS of total volume sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 100-0, 95-5
and 90-10.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Discussion regarding Sieve Analysis at Soil Instrument lab with Mr Jeevan.

Thursday (24/05/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 20% HDLS of total volume sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 100-0, 95-5
and 90-10.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Literature review on ‘Soil Conditioning with Artificial Soil and Foam in EPB-Tunnelling’
o This paper uses Artificial Soil which consist of HDLS with TamSoil 2000CP and
TamSoil 1000CP.
o Laboratory testing carried out in this paper is to investigate set of conditioning
parameters for high permeable coarse grained soil.

Friday (25/05/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 20% HDLS of total volume sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 85-15 and
80-20.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 30% HDLS of total volume sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 100.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 LOG BOOK WEEK NO: 5-6

WEEK NO DATE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DAILY ACTIVITIES

a) Conducting lab testing to evaluate the workability and viscosity

28/05/2018 –
5-6 of HDLS reacting with sodium silicate.
08/06/2018
b) Conduct lab testing to determine water to limestone rocks ratio.

Logbook Weekly Evaluation by HOST COMPANY SUPERVISOR

Instruction to Host Company Supervisor
Please refer to the student’s to assess his/her performance.
Please award the scores based on the range below:

Accomplished Exemplary
Beginning Developing
Student’s Score (Rare) (Exceptionally Rare) Score
(<2.0) (2.0 to <3.25)
(3.25 to <4.0) (4.0 to 5.0)

Mostly self-starter and Always a self-starter and

Had little observable
Initiative & Some observable drive sometimes sought new consistently sought new
drive and did not have /5
Creativity and some new ideas challenges and offered challenge and offered new
new ideas
new ideas creative ideas

Partially accomplished Accomplished given

Task Accomplished given task
given task despite full Accomplished given task task but with some /5
Accomplishment with very minimum
supervision but with full supervision supervision
& Commitment supervision
Frequently absent and Sometimes absent and Never absent and
Attendance & Never absent and always /5
Punctuality always late sometimes late almost always on time on time
Unable to demonstrate Sometimes
positive attitude and Occasionally demonstrated positive Consistently
demonstrated positive demonstrated positive
Attitude & Self hardly maintained attitude and /5
attitude and occasionally attitude and consistently
Control self-control under maintained self-
maintained self-control maintained self-control
pressure under pressure control under pressure under pressure

Total Score /20

Comments:

Host Company Supervisor’s Signature & stamp:

Name & Designation:

Date:
(make copies if necessary)
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 5

Objective(s) of the activities:

a) To assess the workability and viscosity for HDLS reaction with sodium silicate.
b) To determine ratio of water to limestone rocks by conducting testing.
Contents:

Monday (28/05/2018)
 Emergency leave.

Tuesday (29/05/2018)
 Wesak Day

Wednesday (30/05/2018)
 Testing to find percentage of maximum volume of water with 100% coarse rock, the result
was 54.8% rocks and 45.2% water.

Thursday (31/05/2018)
 Viscometer test at SI Lab with the old and new batch of HDLS. The HDLS for the new
batch is less viscous than the old HDLS.
 Conduct lab testing to find the optimum slump of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 30% HDLS of total volume sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 95-5 and 90-
10.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Friday (01/06/2018)
 Received new task which is to find percentage for different ground condition.
 Joined DBKL Authority Visit-Mosquito Control spot-check at TU7 site.
 Conduct lab testing to find the optimum slump of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 30% HDLS of total volume sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 85-5 and 80-
20.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Conduct lab testing to find the optimum slump of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 40% HDLS of total volume sample:
 Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 100-0 95-5,
90-10 and 85-15.
 Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 6

Objective(s) of the activities:

a) To assess the workability and required amount of sodium silicate for different
density and volume of HDLS.
Contents:

Monday (04/06/2018)
 Meeting with TU8 team to update progress at site:
o Testing progress: 80%
o Received new task to conduct testing with 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 and 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with
20% fines and no aggregates.
 Conduct lab testing to find the optimum slump of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 50% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 100-0, 95-5
and 90-10.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Tuesday (05/06/2018)
 Conduct lab testing to find the optimum slump of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 50% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 85-15 and
80-20.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Conduct lab testing to find the optimum slump of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 58% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 100-0 and
95-5.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Wednesday (06/06/2018)
 Conduct lab testing to find the optimum slump of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 58% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 90-10, 85-
15 and 80-20.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Thursday (07/06/2018)
 Conduct lab testing to find the optimum slump of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 58% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 95-5 and 90-
10.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Site visit to BMNS tunnel S776 to see site progress with Kalai, Calvin and Peng.

Friday (08/06/2018)
 Conduct lab testing to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 40% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 100-0, 95-5
and 90-10.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 LOG BOOK WEEK NO: 7-8

WEEK NO DATE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DAILY ACTIVITIES

a) Assess the workability of HDLS with sodium silicate in various density

and volume by lab testing.
b) Develop a deeper understanding and experience in other parts of civil
11/06/2018 –
7-8 works for example, ground improvement works in EWL, concrete
22/06/2018
work and earthwork.
c) Shift my exposure from lab testing to site operation work.

Logbook Weekly Evaluation by HOST COMPANY SUPERVISOR

Instruction to Host Company Supervisor
Please refer to the student’s to assess his/her performance.
Please award the scores based on the range below:

Accomplished Exemplary
Beginning Developing
Student’s Score (Rare) (Exceptionally Rare) Score
(<2.0) (2.0 to <3.25)
(3.25 to <4.0) (4.0 to 5.0)

Mostly self-starter and Always a self-starter and

Had little observable
Initiative & Some observable drive sometimes sought new consistently sought new
drive and did not have /5
Creativity and some new ideas challenges and offered challenge and offered new
new ideas
new ideas creative ideas

Partially accomplished Accomplished given

Task Accomplished given task
given task despite full Accomplished given task task but with some /5
Accomplishment with very minimum
supervision but with full supervision supervision
& Commitment supervision
Frequently absent and Sometimes absent and Never absent and
Attendance & Never absent and always /5
Punctuality always late sometimes late almost always on time on time
Unable to demonstrate Sometimes
positive attitude and Occasionally demonstrated positive Consistently
demonstrated positive demonstrated positive
Attitude & Self hardly maintained attitude and /5
attitude and occasionally attitude and consistently
Control self-control under maintained self-
maintained self-control maintained self-control
pressure under pressure control under pressure under pressure

Total Score /20

Comments:

Host Company Supervisor’s Signature & stamp:

Name & Designation:

Date:
(make copies if necessary)
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 7

Objective(s) of the activities:

a) To assess the workability of HDLS with sodium silicate for different density and volume.
b) To strengthen my understanding and experience in other parts of engineering like ground
improvements works in EWL.
Contents:

Monday (11/06/2018)
 Testing progress: 97%
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 40% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 85-15 and
80-20.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 80% HDLS with 20% fines
o Variation of 10ml and 60ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Revised HDLS Mix Design Calculation.

Tuesday (12/06/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 80% HDLS with 20% fines
o Variation of 10ml and 60ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Wednesday (13/06/2018)
 Assist Kalai to review Soil Geological Profile drawing.
 Have a short discussion with Mussadiq on Deep Soil Mixing (DSM) – ground improvement
method used at East West Link Highway.
o DSM is a significant improvement of mechanical and physical properties of existing
soil, after mixing with cement. The stabilized soil material produced is generally high
in strength, lower permeability and lower compressibility compared to the native soil.

Thursday (14/06/2018)
 Half day unrecorded leave and half day compulsory leave.

Friday (15/06/2018)
 Hari Raya Puasa Holiday
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 8

Objective(s) of the activities:

a) Shift my exposure from lab testing to site operation work.
b) To gain more experience on the real site practice especially on concreting & earthwork.
Contents:

Monday (18/06/2018)
 Take leave.

Tuesday (19/06/2018)
 Take leave.

Wednesday (20/06/2018)
 Take leave.

Thursday (21/06/2018)
 Prepare new mix design for High Density Slurry mix by using varying Fines/Water Volume
ratio and fixed slurry volume.
 Testing lab with new mix design for 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o Fines/Water ratio of: 1.3, 1.3 and 1.1.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 The result was showing the mixtures are too dry and porous.
 Calvin briefed on interval time for concrete truck order, factors in consideration are:
o Travel time
o Discharge method (ex: Sky pump/pressure pump, concrete bucket and direct
discharge)
o Site setup
 Site visit to South Station: Calvin briefed about diaphragm wall, cement batching plant and
fissure grouting at Intervention Block (IB).
 Concreting base slab with Calvin
o 0.7m3 bucket of concrete is used to discharge the concrete.
o It takes around 4 minutes for 1 cycle of transportation of concrete from concrete
track to the construction base.
o Learn time estimation to order concrete mixing from batching plant.

Figure 1: Concrete pouring at Circulating Water Tank

Friday (22/06/2018)
 Testing lab for 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS (30% Volume) with sodium silicate of Fines/Water ratio:
o 0.7 and 0.8.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 The result was showing the mixtures are too dry and porous.

Figure 2: Slump result for F/W ratio of 0.8

 LOG BOOK WEEK NO: 9-10

WEEK NO DATE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DAILY ACTIVITIES

a) Gather more information related to the slurry parameters for the

tunnelling works.
b) Joined on-site activities and understand more on fissure grouting
25/06/2018 –
9-10 works at IB.
06/07/2018
c) Understand onsite testing for ground improvement works at EWL.
d) Restructure the work testing programmed and design for Soil
Soil Conditioning testing.

Logbook Weekly Evaluation by HOST COMPANY SUPERVISOR

Instruction to Host Company Supervisor
Please refer to the student’s to assess his/her performance.
Please award the scores based on the range below:

Accomplished Exemplary
Beginning Developing
Student’s Score (Rare) (Exceptionally Rare) Score
(<2.0) (2.0 to <3.25)
(3.25 to <4.0) (4.0 to 5.0)

Mostly self-starter and Always a self-starter and

Had little observable
Initiative & Some observable drive sometimes sought new consistently sought new
drive and did not have /5
Creativity and some new ideas challenges and offered challenge and offered new
new ideas
new ideas creative ideas

Partially accomplished Accomplished given

Task Accomplished given Accomplished given task
given task despite full task but with some /5
Accomplishment task but with full with very minimum
& Commitment supervision supervision supervision supervision
Frequently absent and Sometimes absent and Never absent and
Attendance & Never absent and always /5
Punctuality always late sometimes late almost always on time on time
Unable to demonstrate Occasionally Sometimes
positive attitude and demonstrated positive Consistently
demonstrated positive
demonstrated positive
Attitude & Self hardly maintained attitude and attitude and maintained /5
attitude and consistently
Control self-control under occasionally maintained self-control under maintained self-control
pressure self-control under pressure under pressure
pressure
Total Score /20
Comments:

Host Company Supervisor’s Signature & stamp:

Name & Designation:

Date:
(make copies if necessary)
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 9

Objective(s) of the activities:

a) To gain more information related to the slurry parameters for the tunnelling works.
b) To further build on my understanding and experience in fissure grouting works at IB.
Contents:
Monday (25/06/2018)
 Monday meeting to update site progress:
o Transitional period: Start to handover soil conditioning testing to Syafwan.
 Testing lab for 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS (40% Volume) with sodium silicate of Fines/Water ratio:
o 0.7 and 0.8
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Tuesday (26/06/2018)
 Testing lab for 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS (40% Volume) with sodium silicate of Fines/Water ratio:
o 0.9 and 1.0
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Monitor the construction of muck storage area in the IB workplace, the construction site
does not match the site layout drawing.
 Lugeon Test for Fissure Grouting at Intervention Block (IB):
o Testing method used to estimate the average hydraulic conductivity of rock mass.
𝑄 𝑝𝑜
o Lugeon value=( )x ).
𝐿 𝑝
o Q= flow rate
o L= length of borehole
o po= reference pressure of 1MPa
o p= Test pressure (MPa)
 Lugeon value<5 for our specs, but the real results are always less than 1.

Machine for Fissure Grouting Lugeon Test is being conducted at IB.

 Monitoring device to control pressure and record data for absorption of water compression
in the IB.

Wednesday (27/06/2018)
 Testing lab for 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS (40% Volume) with sodium silicate of Fines/Water ratio:
o 1.2
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Discussion with Mawar, Plant Enginner TU7 regarding Cake Baroid Testing:
o The objective of the test is to know the permeability of the slurry prior to
tunnelling works.
o The thicker the filtrate cake, the less permeable.
 Cake Baroid Testing in TU7 lab for 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS.

Thursday (28/06/2018)
 Redo testing lab for 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS (40% Volume) with sodium silicate of Fines/Water ratio:
o 1.0
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Fire drilling training
 Assist Syafwan with Daily Site Report

Friday (29/06/2018)
 Testing lab for 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS (40% Volume) with sodium silicate of Fines/Water ratio:
o 0.9
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Mussadiq brief on Field Density Test:
o Two testing method can be used to check compaction test which is soil replacement
and nuclear test
o BMNS is using Nuclear Test
 o Every layer of soil is around 300mm for every nuclear test
o Average 2 days for the compaction soil to be ready for every test
 Kalai bring to see site and brief on control blasting on site:
o Blasting site will be closed during the blasting time and all personnel wull be
evacuated from the immediate vicinity of the blasting site.
o Blasting Schedule:
 6 days a week
 Monday to Saturday (except Sunday and Public Holiday)
 Blasting is carried out from 8am to 5pm once a day.
 1st Siren/Signal : All Personnel Alert
 2nd Siren/Signal: All Personnel move to assemble point.
 3rd Siren/Signal: Proceed Blasting
 4th Siren/Signal: Clear and start work.
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 10

Objective(s) of the activities:

a) Understand on site testing for grouting works in EWL.
b) Restructure the work testing programmed and design for Soil Conditioning testing.
Contents:
Monday (02/07/2018)
 Redo testing lab for 1.6𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS (40% Volume) with sodium silicate of Fines/Water ratio:
o 0.9
o A Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Assist Kalai with Segment Comparison slide as per new modification is done.
 Assist Siew Ling with Surveillance at BMNS.

Tuesday (03/07/2018)
 Presentation lab testing demo for Management (Ng Hau Wei, Salehuddin, Khairi, Chin Ray
Mun, Nicholas and Syafwan)

Wednesday (04/07/2018)
 Rising head test at EWL:
o A rising-head test is initiated by rapidly lowering the water level in the control well
and then taking measurements of the rising water level in the well. Baildown test
and slug-out test are alternate terms for rising-head test.
 Coring: UCS and Triaxial test is to be conducted by Keller to obtain stiffness and strength
parameters for coring samples.
 Understand the current EWL drawings.
 Understand the authority land work for EWL.
 Permit is needed from DBKL in order to do work at EWL highway.
 Refer to specification document, IFC drawing or method statement for any works on site.

 DSM rig: machinery for Deep Soil Mixing (DSM) ground improvement
Thursday (05/07/2018)
 Site walk to VD S776 TBM (NB) Tunnel:
o Queenie briefed on VD TBM components and function.
 Do the daily site report on site work progress.

Friday (06/07/2018)
 Design a new set of HDLS Mix Design Test by constant fixed fines and increasing water
content from 0% to 30%.
 Do the daily site report on site work progress.
 LOG BOOK WEEK NO: 11-12

WEEK NO DATE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DAILY ACTIVITIES

09/07/2018 –
11-12
20/07/2018

Logbook Weekly Evaluation by HOST COMPANY SUPERVISOR

Instruction to Host Company Supervisor
Please refer to the student’s to assess his/her performance.
Please award the scores based on the range below:

Accomplished Exemplary
Beginning Developing
Student’s Score (Rare) (Exceptionally Rare) Score
(<2.0) (2.0 to <3.25)
(3.25 to <4.0) (4.0 to 5.0)

Mostly self-starter and Always a self-starter and

Had little observable
Initiative & Some observable drive sometimes sought new consistently sought new
drive and did not have /5
Creativity and some new ideas challenges and offered challenge and offered
new ideas
new ideas new creative ideas

Partially accomplished Accomplished given

Task Accomplished given task
given task despite full Accomplished given task task but with some /5
Accomplishment with very minimum
supervision but with full supervision supervision
& Commitment supervision
Frequently absent and Sometimes absent and Never absent and
Attendance & Never absent and always /5
Punctuality always late sometimes late almost always on time on time
Unable to demonstrate Sometimes
positive attitude and Occasionally demonstrated positive Consistently
demonstrated positive demonstrated positive
Attitude & Self hardly maintained attitude and /5
attitude and occasionally attitude and consistently
Control self-control under maintained self-
maintained self-control maintained self-control
pressure under pressure control under pressure under pressure

Total Score /20

Comments:

Host Company Supervisor’s Signature & stamp:

Name & Designation:

Date:
(make copies if necessary)
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 11

Objective(s) of the activities:

a) Understand on site testing for grouting works in EWL.
b) Restructure the work testing programmed and design for Soil Conditioning testing.
Contents:
Monday (09/07/2018)
 Emergency Leave

Tuesday (10/07/2018)
 Conducting Surveillance on site with Siew Ling.
 Documentation of soil conditioning paperwork.
 Testing on the new design: reaction of Sodium Silicate with or without existence of
Bentonite.
 Do the daily site report on site work progress.

Wednesday (11/07/2018)
 Segment Type E erection in TU7:
o Manual installation by using bicone (joint attachment) at S776.
o Bicone is applied with mixing of Sikadur-31 CF (Part A and Part B) to be installed
as joint between rings.
o Ring 322-328.
 EWL test points verification: Selection of coring locations by justification of the weakest
grouting point to be tested.
 Do the daily site report on site work progress.

Thursday (12/07/2018)
 Toolbox talk: Wear proper PPE for work.
 Assist Siew Ling with surveillance on site.
 Safety inspection at concourse level BMNS station box with Safety Team:
o Safety Tag must be constantly inspected for every 7 days.
o PTW is required for 10 specific work which requires renewal every:
 7 days for excavation, working at height and piling works.
 3 days for working near/above water and night work
 1 day/per-entry for confined space, hot work cutting/grinding/welding,
electrical works (exceed 600v) and blasting works.
 Safety Issue:
o Void protection in excavation area should be barricaded and no one is allowed to
enter that area including site supervisor.
o Excavation work due to construction of sump pit at concourse level should also be
barricaded.
o Remove or seal lifting hook on backhoe bucket with safety latch to prevent
unauthorized lifting.
o Electrical cable must be hang 2m above from the ground.

Friday (13/07/2018)
 Assist Brian with Task Statement for ERL underpinning works.
 Do the daily site report on site work progress.
 Update SPRS
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 12

Objective(s) of the activities:

Contents:
Monday (16/07/2018)
 Tu8 morning meeting to update site progress.
 Conducting Surveillance on site with Siew Ling.
 Do the daily site report on work site progress.

Tuesday (17/06/2018)
 Assist Kalai with site drawing layout.
 Do the daily site report on work site progress.
 East West Link:

Wednesday (18/07/2018)
 Calibration test for new DSM machine
 Conducting Surveillance on site with Siew Ling.
 Coordinate of TUDM points: Assist Kalai using AUTOCAD.
 Received new task: To conduct research on TMP signage standards.
 Do the daily site report on work site progress.

Thursday (19/07/2018)
 Toolbox talk on manual handling considerations:
o Buddy system is used on lifting load: 6 meter GI pipe and 50kg cement bag.
o Working environment
o Individuals capability: suitable to be manually handle by 2 or more person.
o Risk area identified:
 Manual handling
 Material in unsafe condition
 Fitness of the workers
 Personal Protective Equipment(PPE) use
 Position of the loaders (Workers)
o Measure to minimize the risk
 Conduct material inspection before start work
 Ensure works use the right body posture to load, unload and carry items.
 Ensure safe access

Figure 3: Demonstration on lifting long construction material

Friday (20/07/2018)
 Conducting Surveillance on site with Siew Ling.
 Documentation of soil conditioning paperwork.
 Do the daily site report on site work progress.
 LOG BOOK WEEK NO: 13-14

WEEK NO DATE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DAILY ACTIVITIES

23/07/2018 –
13-14
03/08/2018

Logbook Weekly Evaluation by HOST COMPANY SUPERVISOR

Instruction to Host Company Supervisor
Please refer to the student’s detailed report for that particular week before assessing his/her performance.
Please mark in the appropriate box based on the following score : [5] Excellent [4] Good [3] Average [2] Below Average [1] Unsatisfactory

Accomplished Exemplary
Beginning Developing
Student’s Score (Rare) (Exceptionally Rare) Score
(<2.0) (2.0 to <3.25)
(3.25 to <4.0) (4.0 to 5.0)

Mostly self-starter and Always a self-starter and

Had little observable
Initiative & Some observable drive sometimes sought new consistently sought new
drive and did not have /5
Creativity and some new ideas challenges and offered challenge and offered
new ideas
new ideas new creative ideas

Partially accomplished Accomplished given

Task Accomplished given task
given task despite full Accomplished given task task but with some /5
Accomplishment with very minimum
supervision but with full supervision supervision
& Commitment supervision
Frequently absent and Sometimes absent and Never absent and
Attendance & Never absent and always /5
Punctuality always late sometimes late almost always on time on time
Unable to demonstrate Sometimes
positive attitude and Occasionally demonstrated positive Consistently
demonstrated positive demonstrated positive
Attitude & Self hardly maintained attitude and /5
attitude and occasionally attitude and consistently
Control self-control under maintained self-
maintained self-control maintained self-control
pressure under pressure control under pressure under pressure

Total Score /20

Comments:

Host Company Supervisor’s Signature & stamp:

Name & Designation:

Date:
(make copies if necessary)
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 13

Objective(s) of the activities:

a) Understand on site testing for grouting works in EWL.
b) Restructure the work testing programmed and design for Soil Conditioning testing.
Contents:

Monday (23/07/2018)
 Segment Type E erection in TU7:
o Manual installation by using bicone (joint attachment) at S776.
o Bicone is applied with mixing of Sikadur-31 CF (Part A and Part B) to be installed
as joint between rings.
o Ring 322-328.
 EWL test points verification: Selection of coring locations by justification of the weakest
grouting point to be tested.
 Do the daily site report on site work progress.

Tuesday (24/07/2018)
 Assist Kalai to review Soil Geological Profile drawing.
 Have a short discussion with Mussadiq on Deep Soil Mixing (DSM) – ground improvement
method used at East West Link Highway.
o DSM is a significant improvement of mechanical and physical properties of existing
soil, after mixing with cement. The stabilized soil material produced is generally high
in strength, lower permeability and lower compressibility compared to the native soil.

Wednesday (25/07/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 40% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 85-15 and
100.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 80% HDLS with 20% fines
o Variation of 10ml and 60ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Revised HDLS Mix Design Calculation.

Thursday (26/07/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 40% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 85-15 and
80-20.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 80% HDLS with 20% fines
o Variation of 10ml and 60ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Friday (27/07/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 40% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 85-15 and
95-5.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
DETAIL REPORT WEEK NO: 14

Objective(s) of the activities:

a) Restructure the work testing programmed and design for Soil Conditioning testing.
b) Understand on site testing for grouting works in EWL.

Contents:

Monday (30/07/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 40% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 85-15 and
80-20.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 80% HDLS with 20% fines
o Variation of 10ml and 60ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Tuesday (31/07/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 40% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 85-15 and
80-20.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 80% HDLS with 20% fines
o Variation of 10ml and 60ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Wednesday (01/08/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 40% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 85-15 and
80-20.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 80% HDLS with 20% fines
o Variation of 10ml and 60ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Thursday (02/08/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 40% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 85-15 and
80-20.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 80% HDLS with 20% fines
o Variation of 10ml and 60ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.

Friday (03/08/2018)
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 40% HDLS of total volume sample:
o Variation of in-situ coarse to fines aggregates by percentage of 85-15 and
80-20.
o Variation of 10ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.
 Testing lab to find the optimum slump of 1.7𝑔/𝑐𝑚3 HDLS with sodium silicate:
o 80% HDLS with 20% fines
o Variation of 10ml and 60ml 𝑁𝑎2 𝑆𝑖𝑂3 dosing.