Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 22

SY 2016-2017

I. Enrolment
II. Health & Nutritional status

Number of Learners by Health Status,


SY 2015

200

180 10
9 4
1
0 6
1
0
160
7
5 4
3 4
140 0 3
0

120

100

162 161
80
134 133
60

40

20

0
Male (Baseline) FemaleBaseline) Male (Endline) Female(Endline)

Normal Obese Overweight Wasted Severely wasted

Significantly, only 6.96 % (22 out of 294) of students both


male and female fall to the condition under obese,
overweight, wasted and severely wasted. The rest of 272
students belong to normal health status.
III. Learner’s Material

It is really evident that k-12 books aren’t still


completely provided to the school
specifically the Grade 7 textbooks to almost
all the subject areas except TLE and Science.
IV. Teacher’s Professional
Development

Teachers had general training in ICT


and LAC while the majority attended
other individual and personal
trainings/seminars/call ups set by
the division or region.

TRAININGS ATTENDED BY TEACHERS


FROM 2016-2017
Number of Teachers

OTHERS

ICT

LAC

0 2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
V. Funding Sources

600000

500000

400000

300000

MOOE

200000 Canteen
CNC
Others

100000

0
MOOE CANTEEN CNC OTHERS

Sources of School Funding SY 2015

One notable source of fund of the school came from


its MOOE. Other sources came from the school
canteen and from Carrascal Nickel Corporation who
shouldered the miscellaneous fees of the students.
IX. Awards Received

\
VI. Number & Rate of Dropouts by cause

Number of Dropouts by Cause


0
1

0
1

0 0
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Working Uninterested Distance Family related problem

With 0 Dropout rate from the previous


year, It is presently alarming to have 1.9%
(6 dropped out). The primary reasons of
students’ dropping are work and impassive
outlook to the significance of education to
them. Others tend to prefer working in
their early years because of the job
opportunities in the school. Family
problem has been also the reason of
dropping out.
VII. Promotion Rate

Grade 7-10 Percentage of Promotion

Garde 11

Grade 10

Grade 9

Grade 8

Grade 7

0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00%

Total Female Male

Except in Grade 7 and Grade 10,


Promotion rate of female students
in every year level is higher than
those of male students which is
more evident in Grade 8 and Grade
9 which peak to 100%.
VIII. NAT MPS RESULTS

Fluctuating Mean Percentage


Score is observable in all
learning areas except in
English, which needs an
intervention due to its
decreasing MPS for the past
three years.
X. Literacy Level

NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY LITERACY LEVEL


IN ENGLISH

80 0
1
3
70 6
60
50
40 70
58
30
20
10
0
Pretest Post Test

Frustration Instructional Independent


XI. School Based
Management Result
Level

SBM LEVEL

2
QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION

DEVELOPING

XII. Child-friendly School


Survey Result

19 points
XIII. Stakeholder’s Participation

STAKEHOLDERS' ATTENDANCE
250

200

150

100

50

0
Co-curricular Extra-Curriclular Meetings Assembly

CASH/IN KIND NO. OF VOLUNTEER HOURS


120000 1800
1600
100000
1400
80000 1200
1000
60000
800
40000 600
400
20000
200
0 0
Brigada Contest Scouting Others Brigada Contest Scouting Others

Compared to the participation extended by the stakeholders


last year, this school year data on stakeholders’ chipping as
to hours and cash/in kind has significantly increased. This
could be a manifestation of good relationship that the school
is fervently striving for the total development of the
students.
XIV. Learner-Teacher Ratio

Number of Students by Grade Level


SY 2016-17
(Two sections per grade level)
90

80
- -------- *- - - - Standard
70 77 - --------
- --------
74

60

50
- --------
65 65
58

40

30

20

10

0
Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11

The data show that the school’s student-teacher


ratio is still in the ideal proportion where every
Grade level is composed of two sections (with 1
teacher-adviser per section).
XV. Learner-Classroom Ratio

Number of Learners by Grade Level


Standard
(Two sections per Grade Level)

Grade 11

Grade 10

Grade 9

Grade 8

Grade 7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11


XVI. Learner-Toilet Ratio

There is an enough toilet to


accommodate the number of
students as to the recommended
student-toilet ratio.
Enrolment: 335
Number of Toilet: 14

Student-Toilet Ratio
25

20
No. of Students

15 Standard

10
Two (2) toilets were used by
female students alone and
5
another (2) toilets were used
by male students solely. On
0 the other hand, there are 10
Toilet shared comfort rooms by the
learners in the school.
XVII. Learner-Seat Ratio

Student-Seat Ratio SY 2016-2017


1.4
Enrolment: 335
1.2
Number of seats: 394
1

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

Currently, students are provided with


enough number of seats with the ratio
of 1: 1.17.
XVIII.. STATUS OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
XIX. Other Stakeholders’ Accomplishments

Flag pole

Landscaping

New Computer Laboratory Tables

Repainting of Classroom Walls

New Computer Laboratory Tables

Hand-washing facility
Certified Accurate:

NILO F. TRIPOLI, P-II CESAR C. PRADAS


School Head Teacher Representative

MERNALYN B. ESCARDA SWEETY B. SUGIAN


PTECA President SSG President

LEIZEL G. GOMA
Brgy. Council Education Committee Chair

Вам также может понравиться