Labor Lavi aguits V. Ando v.Acresito V. Campa, etl. GR. No. 184007. February 16 2011 GR. No, 184007 : February 16, 2011 PAQUITO V. ANDO, Petitioner, v. ANDRESITO Y. CAMPO, ET AL.,, Respondents NACHURA, J. Facts: Petitioner was the president of PACSI, an independent labor contractor. Respondents were hired by PACSI as pilers or haulers. They filed a case for ilegal dismissal and some money claims with the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) ‘The Labor Arbiter ruled in respondents’ favor, To answer for the monetary avard, NLRC issued a Notice of Sale on Execution of Personal Property over the property in the name of "Paquito V. Ando x x x married to Erinde S. Ando. Petitioner then flied an action for prohibition and damages with prayer for the issuance of a temporary restraining order (TRO) before the Regional Tral Court (RTC). Petitioner claimed that the property belonged to him and his wife, not to the corporation, and, hence, could not be subject of the executon sale. The RTC denied petitioner's prayer for a TRO, holding that the trial court had no Junsdiction to try and decide the case. The CA affirmed the RTC Order. Potitioner then filad the prasent petition secking the nullification of tha CA Decision. He argued that thare was no indication in the body of the Decision that he was solidarily lable with the comoration. issu! nether or not the CA erred in upholding the RTC Decision HELD: ‘The petition is meritorious. LABOR LAW: Execution ‘The power of the NLRC, of the courts, to execute its judgment extends only to properties unquestionably belonging to the judgment debtor alone. A sheriff, therefore, has no authority to attach the property of any person except that of the judgment debtor. Likeviise, there is no shovring that the sheriff ever tried to execute on the properties of the corporation. Petition is GRANTED.