Final Gmef Questionnaire PDF

Gender
Mainstreaming
Evaluation
Framework
(GMEF)
Questionnaire
A Toolkit on the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework

© Copyright 2016- Philippine Commission on Women
1145 J.P Laurel St. San Miguel Manila 1005 Philippines
Telephone: +6327365249 or +6327367712
Fax Number: +6327364449
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL
ASSESMENT QUESTIONAIRE
POLICY
The Policy questionnaire consists of 13 descriptors that track the progress of an organization’s efforts in
integrating GAD in its plans and policy issuances.
 At the Foundation Formation level, organizations issue policies supporting the elements of GAD Planning
and Budgeting, review existing policies to ensure consistency with new GAD issuances, and issue
documents to support attendance to PCW-led GAD-related events.
 At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, organizations progress to the issuance of policies to
address gender issues using gender-fair language and images among its internal and external clients.
 At the GAD Application level, a GAD agenda or strategic framework is already adopted and implemented
to ensure that GAD is being integrated in the organization’s major programs and projects.
 At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the plans and policies of the
organization have already resulted in positive impacts.
 At the Replication and Innovation level, these plans and policies are continually enhanced and used as
standards by

Telephone: +6327365249 or +6327367712
Fax Number: +6327364449
POLICY ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONAIRE
DESCRIPTORS Score
SCORE
per Means of Verification/ Remarks
NO PARTLY YES item
1. Issuance of Foundational Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 0.83)
1.1 Has the organization No policy/policies Policy/policies Policy/policies □ A policy articulating support to GAD mandates and
issued policies articulating support to articulating support to articulating support to establishing all the following four elements of GPB
articulating support to GAD mandates and GAD mandates and GAD mandates and namely: 1) Setting up of GFPS or GAD Office; 2)
GAD mandates and establishing essential establishing at least establishing all four Collection and maintenance of sex-disaggregated
establishing the essential elements of GAD one (1) essential essential elements of database; 3) Conduct of organization-wide Gender
elements of GAD planning and element of GAD GAD planning and Audit; and
Planning and Budget? budgeting issued planning and budgeting issued 4) Capacity-building of GFPS
budgeting issued □ Separate policies issued establishing at least one
GPB element
□ Reissued/updated policy reflecting compliance to
(0) (0.83) (1.67) new GAD issuances such as the reconstitution of
GFPS system of the school
1.2 Has the organization No policy reviewed Some existing policies Some existing policies □ Revised or reissued policy/plan on articulating GAD
conducted a review of reviewed but no new reviewed, revised and mandates and establishing four essential elements
existing policies for policies re-issued and/ re-issued of GPB
consistency with or revised □ Documentation of the review conducted if the
emerging GAD issues? policy/plan reviewed does not need updating
□ New GAD policies/plans issued after the review
(0) (0.0.83) (1.67)
1.3 Has the organization No broad statement 1-2 broad statements 3 or more broad
issued broad statements supporting GAD- supporting GAD- statements supporting □ The organization issued three or more separate
of intentions or related activities issued related activities issued GAD-related activities policies supporting GAD-related activities such as
aspirations reflecting its issued Women’s Month activities, 18-day Campaign on
support for GAD-related VAW, Rural Women’s Day, etc.; or
activities? □ Internal policies supporting other GAD-related
(0) (0.83) (1.67) activities such as office orders/travel order for
attendance of GAD trainings/conference and
seminars.
Sub-total GMEF Score
(Level 1 Policy)
2. Issuance of Policies to mainstream GAD in the Organization (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
2.1 Has the organization No policy reflecting the 1-2 policies reflecting 3 or more policies □ All MOVs cited in 1.1 and 1.2;
issued policies reflecting organization’s interest the organization’s reflecting the □ Document issued stating support for GAD such as
its interest for gender for gender interest for gender organization’s interest directive from the top management or LCE to
mainstreaming? mainstreaming issued mainstreaming issued for gender mainstream GAD, implement GAD programs,
mainstreaming issued relevant policies/plans and create/reconstitute
mechanisms such as the GFPS;
□ A copy of policy/guideline approving the GAD
(0) (0.83) (1.67) agenda/GAD Framework/GAD Strategic Plan;
and
□ Issuance of an order or policy indicating
enhancement or updating of items 1 or 2.
*If said document is issued annually then three

successive issuances will be required to merit a full
score for this item
2.2 Has the organization No policy reflecting 1-2 policies reflecting 3 or more policies □ Approved GAD Plan and Budget with client-
issued policies gender needs of gender needs of reflecting gender focused and organization-focused PAPs;
addressing the gender internal and/or internal and/or needs of internal and/ □ Sectoral or organization plans identifying
needs of the clients external clients issued external clients issued or external clients programs to address gender issues of employees
(internal and external)? issued and external clients;
□ Administrative orders or policies on flexi-time or
support for women qualified to be promoted to
(0) (0.83) (1.67) management positions; and
□ Policies creating facilities and mechanisms for the
use of employees and/or external clients such as
breastfeeding rooms/daycare centers and
establishment of CODI or VAW referral desk as
applicable.
2.3 Has the organization Gender-fair language Gender-fair language Gender-fair language □ Administrative Order or Executive Order enjoining
used gender-fair language and images not yet and images used in and images used in all the organization to adopt the use of gender-fair
and images in its policy used in policy issuances some policy issuances policy issuances language and images in policy issuances;
issuances? □ Policy enjoining the organization personnel to
(0) (0.83) (1.67) adopt existing guidelines on the use of gender-fair
language and images in policy issuances (e.g. CSC
circular on gender fair language); or
□ Policy adopting the use of gender-fair language
and images based on policy issuances issued by
the mother agency (e.g. Armed Forced of the
Philippines issuing a policy to adopt DND
Guidelines on the Use of Gender-Fair Language);
or
□ Policy adopting the directive of the line agency to
use gender-fair language and images in policy
issuances (for attached agencies/bureaus).

(Level 2 Policy)
3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
3.1 Has the organization No GAD Agenda/ GAD Agenda/Strategic GAD □ Copy of the draft or approved three-year/annual
adopted a GAD Strategic Framework Framework formulated Agenda/Strategic GAD mandate/GAD Strategic Framework of the
Agenda/Strategic formulated but not adopted by Framework organization; or
Framework? management formulated and □ Copy of the draft or approved GAD Code or three-
adopted by year GAD agenda of the LGU or document
(0) (0.83) management adopting GAD agenda/ GAD Code of municipality
or city (for barangays).
(1.67)
3.2 Has the organization GAD perspective not GAD perspective GAD perspective □ National policies or national plans issued by
integrated GAD yet integrated in integrated in selected integrated in all areas oversight organizations such as the Bottoms Up
perspective in its organizational and/ or areas of the of the organizational Budgeting (BUB) or DBM or Philippine
organizational and/ or national/ sectoral organizational and/ or and/or national/ Development Plan (PDP) of NEDA highlighting
national/sectoral plan/s national/sectoral plan/s sectoral plan/s where GAD has been mainstreamed;
plan/s? □ Approved sectoral or Annual Work and Financial
Plan denoting presence of GAD PAPs (NGA or LGU
(0) (0.83) (1.67) WFP, Youth Plan, DRRM Plan, etc.);
□ Copy of the approved Comprehensive
Development Plan (CDP), Executive-Legislative
Agency (ELA), Annual Investment Plan (AIP) or
other relevant LGU plan integrated with GAD;
□ Capacity Development Plan for GAD where topics
on GAD were integrated (e.g. HR Plan or Capacity
Development Plan for Project Implementers); or
□ Project Implementation Plan of Major or Flagship
Programs, whether GAA or ODA-funded
integrated with GAD that have scored at least 4
when subjected to the Harmonized Gender and
Development Guidelines (HGDG).
3.3 Has the organization No organizational/ 1-2 organizational/ 3 or more □ Policies issued to implement specific mandates
formulated national/sectoral national/sectoral organizational/ under laws on women such as Special
organizational/national/ policies on GAD issued policies on GAD issued national/sectoral Gynecological Leave for Women, DFA-
sectoral policies on policies on GAD establishment of Gender Focal Point Officer in
GAD? issued Philippine Embassies and Consulates, Gender-
(0) (0.83) Responsive DRRM Plan, GAD Code, RH Code and
(1.67) National Action Plan on Women, Peace and
Security (NAP WPS); or
□ Approved GAD Code and/or GAD Code IRR

(Level 3 Policy)
4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
4.1 Has the organization’s No gender gaps Gender gaps of either Gender gaps of either □ Copy of GAD Accomplishment Reports, Gender
GAD policy/policies addressed by GAD internal and/or external internal and/or Impact Assessment, Policy Assessment Reports
resulted in bridging policy/policies clients are addressed by external clients are and/or program/ project documentation
gender gaps of its clients 1-2 GAD policies addressed by 3 or integrated with GAD with the following data:
(internal and external)? more GAD policies
(0.83) a. Statistical data/qualitative data showing
(0) (1.67) impacts or results from the issuance of
policies (e.g. decline in the number of
VAWC cases and rise in the number of
males participating in family planning
program);
b. Anecdotal/interview data from beneficiaries
on how the policy creating the
program/mechanisms has benefitted them
(whether written or video testimonies); and
c. Citations, awards or recognition received by
the organization due to the positive impacts
of GAD policies implemented.
4.2 Has the organization Results of gender Results of gender Results of gender □ MOVs cited in 1.2 and 3.2;
used the results of analysis was not used analysis used in the analysis used in the □ Policies issued to implement GAD-related
gender analysis in the in the development development and/or development and/or mandates of the organization to align with current
development and/ or and/or enhancement enhancement of 1-2 enhancement of 3 or laws relating to women’s empowerment and
enhancement of of policies policies more policies gender equality (e.g. Issuance of CHED
policies? Memorandum on GAD for Higher Educational
Institutions);
(0) (0.83) (1.67) □ Policies issued indicating revision of documents
such as other policies, plans, reports, etc. to
mainstream gender perspective or use of gender-
fair language and images;
□ Policy issued resulting from review of existing GAD
policies (e.g. reconstitution of GFPS to comply
with Guidelines on the Creation of GFPS); and
□ Policies issued based on the results of the
administration of GA tools such as GMEF, HGDG,
GERL Ka Ba? etc. (e.g. policy on including
indicators to monitor gender related impact of
PAMANA project).
4.3 Has the organization GAD perspective not GAD perspective GAD perspective □ Words and phrases indicating gender equality are
integrated GAD yet integrated in the integrated in either the integrated in the reflected in the VMG of the organization as
perspective in its Vision, Vision, Mission or Vision, Mission or Goals Vision, Mission and related to its mandates, such as:
Mission and Goals? Goals Goals a. Inclusive growth;
b. Equal development/Equal/Equitable;
(0.83) c. Affirmative Action;
(0) (1.67) d. Men and Women;
e. Women’s Empowerment/Empowerment of
All/For All/ Equal Empowerment;
f. Universal Access;
g. Gender-Sensitive/Gender-
Responsive/Gender Transformative;
h. Gender-Fair;
i. Needs-Based;
j. Rights-Based;
k. Prioritization of vulnerable/marginalized
groups; or
l. Other terms that connotes emphasis on
equal enjoyment of men and men on the
services and programs provided by the
organization as well as giving emphasis on
those who are more vulnerable.

(Level 4 Policy)
5. Model GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 5)
5.1 Has the organization’s Other organizations 1-2 organization/s have 3 or more □ GAD policies and plans of the organizations have
GAD policies been used have not used the used the organization’s organizations have been used as a model or standard by other
as model/standard by organization’s policy/ policy/ policies as used the organizations (other NGAs/LGUs, attached
other organizations? policies as model or model/ standard organization’s policy/ agencies or bureaus) such as:
standard policies as model/ a. GAD Mandate/GAD Agenda/Framework on
standard GAD;
(0) (0.83) b. GAD Manuals and Guidelines;
(1.67) c. GAD Code (LGUs);
d. Vision, Mission and Goals;
e. LGU Plan/s integrated with GAD; and
f. Other relevant issuances.
*The organization may include the contact details of

the agency/ LGU that used their policies and plans
as reference for validation of PCW or DILG or
provide copies of citation/s or
(Level 5 Policy)
TOTAL GMEF SCORE POLICY

(Policy)
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL
PEOPLE
The People questionnaire consists of 27 questions that assess the progress of an organization’s efforts in
ensuring that its people, whether top management, GAD Focal Point System (GFPS) members or employees are
gender-responsive and supportive of the organization’s gender mainstreaming efforts.
 At the Foundation Formation level, the organization designates key people to be part of its GFPS and
ensures that the appropriate capacity development sessions on GAD are provided to its top management,
GFPS and staff members;
 At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, the organization moves from the conduct of GAD
orientation sessions towards ensuring that its program implementers are trained to do gender analysis,
and clients are given opportunities to articulate their gender issues as per direction of its top
management;
 During the GAD Application level, top management GFPS members and program implementers are
consciously integrating GAD in the organization’s regular operations.
 At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the organization’s GFPS members are
already tapped as GAD resource person within the organization and are able to develop GAD-related
tools, customized to the mandate of the organization; and
 At the Replication and Innovation level, the people of the organization are already recognized and
tapped as GAD experts by other organizations, while its top management is able to raise GAD concerns
during high level meetings/discussions.

Telephone: +6327365249 or +6327367712
Fax Number: +6327364449
PEOPLE ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONAIRE
DESCRIPTORS Score
SCORE
NO PARTLY YES item
1. On the Establishment of GFPS & GAD Champions/ Advocates (max score: 5; for each item or question, 0.83)
1.1 Has the organization The organization has Some members of the Majority of the □ Copy of Office Order on the
designated people in yet to identify key GFPS occupy strategic members of the GFPS Creation/Reconstitution of the GFPS of the
strategic positions as people to be members positions in the occupy strategic organization with positions/designations; or
members of its GAD Focal of its GFPS organization positions in the □ Profile of GFPS members with strategic positions in
Point System (GFPS)? organization the top-level and middle management following
the prescribed GFPS structure or a similar
mechanism applicable to the organization as
(0) (0.41) (0.83) prescribed under JMC 2012-01 for NGAs and JMC
2013-01 for LGUs.
1.2 Have the organization’s GPFS members have GFPS members GFPS members □ Profile of current GFPS members that have
GAD Focal Point System not attended any of attended 1-2 basic attended all three attended the following:
(GFPS) members attended the basic GAD training GAD training basic, GAD training a. Basic GAD Orientation or Gender Sensitivity
appropriate and relevant Training (GST);
training on GAD? b. Basic Gender Analysis (GA) and/or deepening
sessions on GA especially with PCW developed
GA Tools such as HGDG & GMEF;
c. GAD Planning and Budgeting;
(0) (0.41) (0.83) d. GST++ which include Basic GAD Orientation,
discussion of Basic GA and use of GA tools and
GAD Planning and Budgeting; and
e. Other relevant GAD training/conferences and
seminars; and
□ Documentation report with attendance sheets
and/or pictures of a majority of current GFPS
members therein.
1.3 Has the organization’s top Top management has Only selected All top management □ Profile of top management officials who have
management attended not yet attended Basic members of the top officials have attended attended any of the following:
Basic GAD Orientation or GAD orientation or GST management attended Basic GAD orientation a. Basic GAD Orientation or Gender Sensitivity
Gender Sensitivity Basic GAD orientation or GST Training (GST);
Training (GST)? or GST b. Basic Gender Analysis (GA) and/or deepening
sessions on GA especially with PCW developed
(0) (0.41) (O.83) GA Tools such as HGDG & GMEF;
c. GST++ which include Basic GAD Orientation,
GAD Planning and Budgeting; and
d. Other relevant GAD training/conferences and
seminars; and
□ Documentation report of GAD sessions attended

by top management with attendance sheets
and/or pictures with top management officials in
attendance.
1.4 Have the organization’s Less than 50% of the 50-99% of the 100% of the □ Profiles of organization staff members
staff members been organization’s staff organization’s staff organizations staff who have attended any of the following:
oriented on GAD? members have members have members have a. Basic GAD Orientation;
attended Basic GAD attended Basic GAD attended Basic GAD b. Gender Sensitivity Training;
Orientation or GST orientation or GST Orientation or GST c. GST++ which include Basic GAD Orientation,
(0) (0.41) GAD Planning and Budgeting; and
(0.83) d. Other relevant GAD training/conferences and
seminars; and
□ Documentation report with attendance sheets
and/or pictures of staff members in attendance.
1.5 Are the organization’s top Top management and Some of GFPS Some top management For GFPS members
management and GAD GFPS members are not members are aware and all GFPS members □ MOVs cited in 1.2; or
Focal Point System (GFPS) yet aware and and conscious of GAD- are aware and □ Office order/letter of invite to GFPS to serve as RP
members aware and conscious of GAD- related policies and conscious of GAD- on GAD Mandates.
conscious of GAD-related related policies and mandates related policies
policies and mandates? mandates mandates For Top Management
□ MOVs cited in 1.3;
□ Office order/letter of invitation to top
(0) (0.41) (0.83) management official to serve as RP on GAD
Mandates;
□ Copies of GAD policies of the organization
endorsed or approved by top level officials within
the period of the assessment; and
□ For SB/SP members (For LGU GFPS) copy of the
draft GAD-related ordinance sponsored in the
SB/SP.
1.6 Does the organization’s Top management does Top management Top management
top management allow not allow staff allows only the GFPS allows, all key officials, □ Office order, travel order and/or directive to staff
staff members to members to members to GFPS members and to participate in GAD-related activities; and
participate in GAD-related participate in GAD- participate in GAD- staff members to □ Endorsement letter for the participation of a GFPS
activities? related activities related activities participate in GAD- member to participate in regional/international
related activities GAD related trainings.
(0) (0.41) (0.83)

(Level 1 People)
2. GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities (max score: 5; for each item,0.83)
2.1 Does the top Top management does Top management Top management □ GAD Plan and Budget of the agency/LGU signed
management direct the not direct GPB approves GPB but not approves GPB and for approval by the top management;
implementation of the implementation visible during critical/ attends critical/ □ GAD Agenda, GAD Strategic Framework or GAD
GAD Plan and Budget significant GAD significant GAD Code signed by the top management; and
(GPB) of the organization? activities activities □ Minutes of Man com /Exe com meetings where
top management articulated direction for GPB
(0) (0.41) (0.83) implementation.
2.2 Are the program Program implementers Only selected program All program □ Documentation report with photos and/or
implementers trained on not yet trained on GA implements are trained implementers are attendance sheets indicating the attendance of
gender analysis (GA) and and use of GA tools on GA and use of GA trained on GA and use project implementers to the following trainings:
the use of gender analysis tools of GA tools a. Gender Analysis Training involving use of tools
(GA) tools? such GMEF, HGDG, GeRLKa Ba? Tool and other
(0) (0.41) (0.83) GA tools; or
b. GST++ which includes a discussion of gender
analysis and use of GA tools such as HGDG;
□ Documentation report of trainings conducted
where program implementers served as resource
persons in the administration of gender analysis
tools; and
□ Copy of program documents where GAD has been
integrated.
2.3 Are concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff □ Attendance sheets and/or certificate of
members trained in the members are not yet members are trained members are trained participation/ appearance to trainings regarding
importance of collecting trained on the in the importance of in the importance of the use of sex-disaggregated data (SDD) and/or
sex-disaggregated data importance of collecting SDD and collecting SDD and gender statistics; and
(SDD) and gender collecting SDD and gender statistics gender statistics, and □ Sample of actual collected SDD or gender statistics
statistics? gender statistics are collecting them by concerned staff (e.g. sex disaggregated profile
of staff/ clients).
(0) (0.41) (0.83)
2.4 Are male employees Male employees do Male employees Male employees □ Attendance sheets and/or certificate of
involved and appreciate of not participate in the participate in the initiate and participate participation/ appearance to GAD-related events
the organization’s GAD organization’s GAD organization’s GAD in the organization’s attended by male employees of the organization;
PAPs? PAPs PAPs GAD PAPs □ Certificate of membership or IDs to advocacy
groups such as Men Opposed to Violence against
(0) (0.41) (0.83) Women Everywhere (MOVE), MR GAD, ERPAT,
etc.;
□ Documentation of meetings highlighting the
contribution of male GFPS members; and
□ Office order/letter of invitation to male employees
of the organizations to serve as RP on GAD
Mandates.
2.5 Are clients (internal and Clients are not yet Either internal or Both internal and For internal clients (employees)
external) aware of the oriented on the GAD external clients are external clients are □ Attendance sheets and/or documentation reports
GAD efforts of the efforts of the oriented on the GAD oriented of with photos of IEC campaigns conducted for the
organization? organization efforts of the organization employees of the organization (internal and
organization external) on the GAD PAPs of the organization;
□ Copies of GAD-related issuances posted in the GAD
(0) (0.41) (0.83) corner, GAD website or disseminated to social
networking sites such as GAD-related articles,
information on GAD-related events or a copy of
approved GAD Plan and Budget (for LGUs); and
□ Results of assessment or surveys conducted to
measure awareness of employees of its GAD-
related programs.
For external clients

□ Attendance sheets and/or documentation reports
with photos of IEC campaigns conducted for the
external clients of the organization on the GAD
PAPs of the organization;
□ No. of hits/likes generated by a GAD-related post
in GAD website or social network site for GAD;
□ Testimonies from clients regarding the GAD-
related programs of the organization;
□ Copies of GAD-related knowledge products and list
of clients provided with said knowledge products;
□ List of clients/beneficiaries of GAD-related services
and or trainings provided by the organization; and
□ Results of assessment or surveys conducted to
measure awareness of external clients’ awareness
on the organization’s GAD-related programs.
2.6 Are the clients (internal Clients (internal and Either internal or Both internal or □ Documentation of gender issues raised by clients
and external) able to external) are not able external clients are external clients are during consultations, meetings or assessments of
articulate their gender to articulate gender able to articulate able to articulate effectiveness/ level of satisfaction regarding a GAD
needs/issues in the needs/issues in the gender issues/needs in gender issues/needs in program or service;
development of the development of the the development of the development of □ Attendance sheets and/or documentation reports
organization’s GAD PAPs? organization’s GAD the organization’s GAD the organization’s GAD with photos for consultations or meetings
PAPs PAPs PAPs conducted (see no. 1);
□ Copies of written communication, video
(0) (0.41) (0.83) testimonies, field visit notes, etc. regarding
comments, recommendations or assessment of
the organization’s GAD programs; and
□ Feedback gathered from GAD website/social
network sites regarding GAD programs of the
organization from clients.
Sub-total GMEF, Score

(Level 2 People)
3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs (max score: 5; for each item, 0.83)
3.1 Does the top No initial discussion With initial discussion Top management □ Minutes of meetings or speeches of top
management direct the among top among top issued directive/s to management directing the integration of GAD in
integration of GAD management official management officials integrate GAD the organization’s PAPs;
perspective in the on the integration of regarding integration perspective in the □ Administrative order, executive order, department
organization’s GAD perspective in the of GAD perspective in organization’s PAPs order, special order, office memorandum on the
programs/activities/ organization’s PAPs the organization’s PAPs and performance integration of GAD in the organization’s PAPs and
projects (PAPs) and and performance and performance indicator performance indicators signed by top level GAD
performance indicators? indicators indicators champion/s;
□ Work plan, strategic plan, sectoral plan or national
(0) (0.41) (0.83) plan integrated with GAD endorsed or approved
by top level GAD/champion/s; or
□ For LGUs, copies of draft or approved ordinances
sponsored by SB members supportive of GAD
regarding integration of GAD in LGU PAPs and
performance indicators.
3.2 Are the GFPS members GFPS members and Either GFPS members Both the GFPS □ GAD Plan and Budget and corresponding GAD AR
and program program implementers or program members or program indicating activities such as conduct of gender
implementers able to are not yet able to implementers are able implementers are able analysis training for program implementers and/or
integrate GAD perspective integrate GAD to integrate GAD to integrate GAD enhancement of program documents to integrate
in the development of the perspective in the perspective in the perspective in the GAD;
organization’s programs development of the development of the development of the □ Documentation of workshops or write shops
/activities/ projects organizations PAPs organization’s PAPs organization’s PAPs conducted to integrate GAD into the
(PAPs)? organization’s programs and projects; and
□ Copy of adjusted project documents integrated
(0) (0.41) (0.83) with GAD perspective (especially those that will be
attributed to the GAD Budget through HGDG).
3.3 Are concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff □ Intake forms used to collect data such as
members able to utilize members are not yet members utilize SDD members utilize SDD attendance sheets, client/beneficiary forms, etc.;
sex-disaggregated data able to utilize SDD and/or gender and/or gender □ Copies of reports utilizing collected SDD with
(SDD) and or gender and/or gender statistics for GA statistics for GA and analysis; or
statistics for gender statistics for GA recommend strategies □ Approved GAD Plan or LGU plan utilizing SDD
analysis (GA) to enhance to enhance the collected to contextualize gender issues and cause
the organization’s GAD organization’s GAD of the gender issues.
PAPs? PAPs
(0) (0.41) (0.83)
3.4 Does the top Top management does Top management Top Management □ Department order, administrative order, special
management support the not appoint women to appoint women to appoints women to order or executive order issued by top
appointment of qualified leadership positions leadership position but leadership position and management endorsing qualified women
women staff members to provides limited provides full support employee/s to a higher position/promotion;
leader ship positions? support □ Department order, administrative order, special
(0) (0.41) (0.83) order or executive order issued by top
management to support qualified women staff
members for promotion such as attendance to
needed trainings or scholarships or creation of
enabling environment such as flexi-time schedule
at work, availability of facilities such as day care
centers, etc.; and
□ Activity proposal or documentation of mentoring
session/s conducted for staff members, including
qualified women candidates.
3.5 Do women assume critical Women occupy less Women occupy less Women occupy 50% or □ Statistical data showing that women occupy at
roles and authority in the than 50% of the third than 50% of third level more of the third level least 50%of third level positions, middle
organization? level, middle positions but comprise positions in the management and technical positions in the
management and 50% or more of the organization organization vis-a-vis the men in the organization;
technical positions in middle management and
the organization and technical positions □ Records of awards received and/or positive
in the organization testimonies from clients received by women
employees in the organization.
(0) (0.41) (0.83)
3.6 Are the clients (internal No client(internal and Either internal or Both internal or □ MOVs cited in 2.6;
and external), able to external) involvement external clients external clients □ Administrative order, executive orders indicating
participate in the planning in the planning and participate in the participate in the membership of clients in program or project
and implementation of implementation of the planning and planning and management teams; and
the organization’s GAD organizations GAD implementation of the implementation of the □ Reports of project implementation with
PAPs? PAPs organization’s GAD organization’s GAD contribution by clients (e.g. article or pictures).
PAPs PAPs
(0) (0.41) (0.83)

(Level 3 People)
4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers (max score: 5; for each item,0.83)
4.1 Are the GAD Focal Point GFPS members are not Less than 50% of the 50% or more of the □ Profile of GFPS members with updated list of GAD
System (GFPS) members yet serving as resource GFPS members are GFPS members are trainings conducted within and outside their
able to serve as GAD persons on GAD within serving as GAD serving as GAD organizations;
resource persons within the organization resource persons resource persons □ Letter of invitation to GFPS member/s of the
the organization, including within the organization within the organization organization to serve as RP/s on GAD for other
its regional offices and organizations;
attached agencies? □ Documentation of the trainings where GFPS
members served as resource persons, preferably
(0) (0.41) (0.83) with processed evaluation results from
participants; and
□ Copy of Certificate of appreciation as GAD resource
person.
*Contact details of organization where GFPS
members have served as GAD resource persons
may also be provided for verification purposes
4.2 Does the top No initial discussion With initial discussion Top Management □ Minutes of meetings or speeches of top
management direct the among top among top issued directive/s to management directing the monitoring of the
monitoring of the management officials management officials monitor the or the organization’s GAD PAPs;
organization’s GAD PAPs? on the monitoring of on the monitoring of organization’s GAD □ Policy issuances such as administrative order,
the organization’s GAD the organization’s GAD PAPs executive order, department order, special order,
PAPs PAPs office memorandum regarding the
(0) (0.41) (0.83) implementation of the organization’s GAD
programs; and
□ Reports of the organization highlighting status of
its GAD programs approved by concerned top
management (relevant sections only).
4.3 Are concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff □ MOVs cited in 3.2 except for #1; and
members able to adjust members not able to members able to members able to □ Administrative orders or executive orders directing
GAD PAPs to address adjust GAD PAPs to identify emerging identify and adjust concerned staff members to address emerging
emerging gender issues? address emerging gender issues but are GAD PAPs to address gender issues in the organization’s programs and
gender issues not capable of emerging gender projects (e.g. policy requiring offices to establish a
addressing them issues breastfeeding corner for lactating mothers).
(0) (0.41) (0.83)
4.4 Do top management and GAD is not reflected in GAD is reflected in the GAD reflected in the □ Copy of Terms of Reference (TORs), Performance
concerned staff members the performance performance contracts performance contracts Contract, Individual Performance Commitment
reflect GAD functions in contracts or TORs of or TORs of either top or TORs of both top and Review (IPCR) forms of staff members that
their performance both top management management or management or reflect GAD functions;
contracts or terms of and concerned staff concerned staff concerned staff □ Copy of Career Executive Service Performance
reference (T0Rs)? members members members Evaluation System (CESPES) of top management
integrated with GAD; and
(0) (0.41) (0.83) □ For LGUs, copy of relevant portion of Executive-
Legislative Agenda integrated with GAD.
4.5 Are concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff □ Draft or final copies of tools such as customized
members able to develop members not yet able members develop GAD members develop GAD HGDG checklists, gender-sensitive manual on
tools and/or knowledge to develop GAD tools tools and KPs on GAD tools and KPs on GAD handling VAW victim-survivors, etc. developed by
products (KPs) on GAD? and KPs on GAD with assistance from on their own the organization;
external GAD □ Situationers or reports on the status of men and
experts/resource women utilizing sex-disaggregated data;
persons
□ Briefers on GAD-related programs, laws, etc. for
(0) (0.41) (0.83) the use of internal and external clients;
□ Videos or audio visual presentations for GAD
programs/ projects of the organization.
4.6 Are clients (internal and No participation from Either internal or Both internal or
external) able to clients in all levels of external clients have external clients have □ MOVs cited in 2.5, 2.6 and 3.6
participate in 3 or more the development participated in 1-2 participated in all
levels of the development planning cycle of the levels of the levels of the
planning cycle of the organization’s GAD development planning development planning
organization’s GAD PAPs? PAPs cycle of the cycle of the
organization’s GAD organization’s GAD
(0) PAPs PAPs
(0.41) (0.83)

(Level 4 People)
5. GAD Experts (max score: 5; for each item, 1.67)
5.1 Does the top Top management has Top managements able Top management is □ Copy of meeting agenda with GAD included in the
management raise GAD not raised GAD to raise GAD concerns able to raise and agenda sponsored by a top-level official of the
concerns during high-level concerns during high- during high-level receive support on organization;
meetings/discussions? level meetings meetings GAD concerns from □ Copy of speech or report delivered by a top level
(e.g. Cabinet cluster colleagues during high- official regarding a GAD concern/s raised during
meeting , international level meetings high level meetings or discussions;
conferences) □ Press release regarding the high-level meeting or
discussion detailing the participation of a top-level
(0) (0.41) (0.83) official (e.g. chairpersonship of a country
delegation to United Nations Commission on the
Status of Women, etc.);
□ Documentation report with photos of top-level
meetings with GAD as part of the agenda attended
where top management official/s of the
organizations participated.
5.2 Are the organization’s Staff members not yet Staff members Staff members □ Profile of organization’s GFPS members tapped as
staff members recognized tapped by other recognized as GAD recognized as GAD GAD resource persons by other organizations;
as GAD experts by the organizations experts and tapped by experts and tapped by □ Documentation reports, preferably with evaluation
other organizations? 1-4 organizations 5 or more results of GAD trainings conducted for other
organizations organizations;
□ Video coverage, news article, copy of certificate,
(0) (0.41) (0.83) awards or citations received by GFPS members,
among others; and
□ Copy of certification to the PCW GAD Resource
Pool, if applicable.
5.3 Are the external clients of External clients not yet External clients External clients □ Copies of news articles, other write-ups or
the organization recognized for their received nominations received awards for documentation (e.g. TV interviews) regarding
recognized as GAD gender mainstreaming or have shortlisted their gender awards or citations received by the external clients
champions by reputable efforts and/or cited in their mainstreaming regarding their gender mainstreaming efforts;
local, national and respective localities for reputable local, □ Pictures of plaque of appreciation or certificate
international their gender national and received regarding the GAD programs of the
organizations? mainstreaming efforts international agency or LGU recognized within the agency or
by reputable local, organizations LGU; and
national and □ Copies of partnership agreement resulting from
international the recognition, if applicable.
organizations
(0) (0.41) (0.83)
(Level 5 People)
TOTAL GMEF SCORE

(People)
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL
ENABLING MECHANISMS
The Enabling Mechanisms questionnaire consists of 23 questions that assess the progress of an
organization’s efforts in ensuring that mechanisms to mainstream the GAD perspective are established and fully
functional.
 At the Foundation Formation level, the organization has established or reconstituted its GAD Focal Point
System (GFPS) as a catalyst for gender mainstreaming. It is also at this level where the organization has
conducted exploratory engagements with PCW and other GAD-related institutions and experts;
 At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, other GAD mechanisms that will address the needs of
the organization’s internal and external clients are established, and there is a marked increase in the
utilization of the GAD Budget.
 At the GAD Application level, the organization judiciously utilizes more than the minimum 5% GAD
budget allocation while boasting of a fully functioning M&E System and has set-up a Knowledge
Management System.
 At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the organization’s enabling mechanisms
can now track desired gender-related impacts and are able to produce GAD-related knowledge products;
and
 At the Replication and Innovation level, the enabling mechanisms are recognized as models by other
organizations and the whole budget of the organization is fully gender-responsive.

Telephone: +6327365249 or +6327367712
Fax Number: +6327364449
ENABLING MECHANISMS ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONAIRE
DESCRIPTORS SCORE Score
NO PARTLY YES item
1. Setting up of Essential GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
1.1 Has the organization created/ GFPS not created/ GFPS or similar GAD GFPS or similar GAD □ MOVs cited in People 1.1
reconstituted its GAD Focal reconstituted in mechanism created/ mechanism created/
Point System (GFPS) in accordance with MCW reconstituted in the reconstituted in the
accordance with Magna Carta IRR Sec 37-C and central office and/ or central office and all *Organizations with created/reconstituted GFPS
of Women Implementing pertinent policies selected regional regional and attached or similar GAD mechanism in accordance with
Rules and Regulations (MCW issued by concerned and/or attached agencies pertinent guidelines with no regional and
IRR) Sec.37-C and other oversight agencies agencies/offices only attached offices will be awarded 1.67 points as
pertinent policies issued by equivalent to a “full yes” answer
oversight agencies?
(0) (0.83) (1.67)
1.2 Has the organization initiated No exploratory Organization Organization initiated □ Documentation of meetings with photos
exploratory activities with the activities initiated at conducted initial exploratory regarding implementation of the organization’s
Philippine Commission on all meetings. activity/activities with GAD PAPs such as meeting with PCW, GAD
Women (PCW) or other Consultations with PCW, organizations Consultants or benchmarking activities for GAD
agencies/LGUs, institutions to PCW, organizations and/or individuals to
facilitate gender and/or individuals to facilitate gender □ Copies of communication whether hard copy or
mainstreaming? facilitate gender mainstreaming digital
mainstreaming
□ Office/travel order of concerned GFPS member
(0) (0.83) (1.67) regarding implementation of GAD programs
1.3 Has the organization collected No information Data and information Intake forms □ MOVs cited in People 1.1
information towards the collected collected but are not developed and used to
establishment of sex- yet disaggregated by collect sex-
disaggregated database and sex disaggregated data or
enhancement of its M&E gender statistics
system?
(0) (0.83) (1.67)

(Level 1 Enabling Mechanisms)
2. Functional GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
2.1 Does the organization have a No functional GFPS GFPS performing GFPS members actively □ MOVs cited in People 1.1
functional GAD Focal Point based on the limited functions performing all the
System based on the provisions of the based on the functions based on the □ Activity report, minutes of meeting and other
provisions of the guidelines guidelines issued by provisions of the provisions of forms of relevant documentation during
issued by relevant oversight relevant oversight guidelines issued by guidelines issued by meetings or trainings led by the GFPS members
agencies? (e.g. PCW MC 2011- agencies relevant oversight relevant oversight
01 for NGAs, JMC 2013-01 for agencies agencies □ Exchanges of communication with PCW,
LGUs and CHED MO 2015-01 DILG, partner institutions and GAD experts for
for SUCs) (1) the implementation of the organization’s GAD
(0) program
(0.5)
2.2 Has the organization No other GAD 1 other GAD 2 other GAD For NGAs
established other GAD mechanism mechanism mechanism established □ Policy establishing other GAD mechanisms
mechanisms? established established such as GAD Office
□ Policies creating offices to respond special
*Other GAD Mechanisms refer to mandates as per VAW laws
those in addition to the GFPS (0) (0.5) (1) □ Policies issued such as administrative orders
and the GAD Database designating the staff members assigned to
make the GAD mechanism functional;
□ Manuals or Guidelines issued to implement
nos. 2 and 3;
□ Pictures of actual mechanisms.
For LGUs
□ Policy/ies establishing GAD mechanisms such
as local GAD Office, Committee on Decorum
and Investigation, Violence Against Women
and their Children, Referral system/desk,
Barangay VAW desk, Women’s Economic
Empowerment Desk, breastfeeding room,
daycare room
□ Policies issued such as executive orders
designating the staff members assigned to
make the GAD mechanism functional.
* Other GAD mechanisms may also include

Women and Children Protection Units for
hospitals or Rape Crisis Centers, Gad
Research/Women’s Studies Offices and GAD
Corner.
2.3 Has the organization utilized at No GAD budget Organization utilized Organization utilized □ Copy of GAD Plan and Budget and GAD
least 5% of its budget* to utilized less than 5% of total 5% or more than of Accomplishment Report of the same fiscal year
implement GAD PAPs? budget to implement total budget to
GAD PAPs implement GAD PAPs □ Copy of Audit Observation Memo from the
Commission on Audit justification, if the
*refers to the total GAA of NGAs organization failed to utilize at least 5% of its
and LGUs or COB for GOCCs budget for GAD.
(0) (0.5) (1)
2.4 Has engagement with Organization has not Organization has Organization has □ MOVs cited in 1.2; and
organizations such as PCW, engaged with sporadic engagement established working
LGUs and/or other agencies, agencies/ LGUs, with agencies/ LGUs, engagement with □ Documentation of GAD-related activities
and individuals been institutions and/or institutions and/or agencies/LGUs, conducted with PCW,GAD Consultants or
established towards the individuals towards the individuals towards institutions and/or partner organizations such as minutes of
conduct of GAD-related PAPs of conduct of GAD- the conduct of GAD- individuals towards the meeting, activity report, etc.
the organization? related PAPs related PAPs conduct of GAD-related
PAPs
(0) (0.5) (1)
2.5 Is the organization able to No effort from the Organization is in the Organization is collecting □ MOVs cited in People 2.3
collect or generate sex- organization yet to process of collecting and generating SDD
disaggregated data (SDD) collect or generate or generating SDD and/or gender statistics □ Report citing SDD and/or gender statistics
and/or gender statistics*? SDD and/or gender and/or gender generated or collected by the organization
statistics statistics
(0) (0.5) (1)

(Level 2 Enabling Mechanism)
3. Integration of GAD Organization’s Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
3.1 Do the organization’s other Other GAD mechanisms Other GAD Other GAD mechanisms □ Status reports, accomplishment reports
GAD mechanisms coordinate, established but not mechanisms coordinate and monitor and/or work and financial plans of other
monitor and report the functional coordinate and and generate GAD mechanisms established such as GAD
progress of the implementation monitor progress of status/progress Office, Committee on Decorum and
of its functions? implementation but Investigation (CODI),Women Friendly
do not generate Spaces ( for DSWD), Violence Against
status/progress (1) Women and their children (VAWC),Referral
system desk, breastfeeding room and
(0) daycare center for employees and/or
(0.5) external clients;
3.2 Has the organization utilized Organization utilized Organization utilized Organization utilized □ Copy of the GAD Plan and Budget and GAD
30% or more fits total budget 5% or less of total 6-29% of total 30% of more of total Accomplishment Report of the same fiscal
to implement GAD PAPs? budget to implement budget to implement budget to implement year denoting planned budget vs. Utilized
GAD PAPs GAD PAPs GAD PAPs budget including relevant attachments
(HGDG checklist for attribution, etc.)
*refers to the total GAA of NGAs
and LGUs or COB for GOCCS (0) (1)
(0.5)
3.3 Has the organization With AOM indicating With AOM indicating With AOM □ MOVs cited in 2.3 and 3.2
judiciously utilized its Gad non-utilization of at non-utilization of at commending the
budget to implement GAD least 5% of its budget least 5% of its budget judicious use of GAD □ AOM from COA denoting that the
activities based in its GPB? for GAD or Notice of for GAD with funds or no AOM from organization has fully utilized at least 5% of
Disallowance from COA acceptable COA indicating non- its budget for GAD, if applicable, or
with no justification justification from the utilization of at least justifications for AOMs received.
from the organization organization 5% of its budget for
GAD
* The organization should not have not have a
Notice of Dis allowance from COA during the
(0) (0.5) (1) time of assessment to merit a score.
3.4 Has the organization partnered Has not partnered with Partnered with 1 Partnered with 2 or □ MOVs cited in 2.4
with agencies/LGUs, other organizations organization towards more organization
institutions and/or individuals towards the strategic the strategic towards the strategic □ Memoranda of Agreement (MOA),
towards the strategic implementation of implementation of implementation of memoranda of Understanding (MOU),
implementation of its GAD GAD PAPs GAD PAPs GAD PAPs Partnership Agreement, Work and Financial
PAPs? Plan, Accomplishment Reports, Terms of
Reference, Consultancy Contracts or
(0) (0.5) (1) Conforme for GAD Consultants.
3.5 Is the organization utilizing sex- No SDD or gender SDD and/or gender SDD and/or gender □ Project implementation Plans, Work and
disaggregated data and/or statistic utilized in the statistics utilized in 1- statistics utilized in all Financial Plans, Budget Utilization Reports
gender statistic in the development planning 2 stages of the stages of the and Status reports of GAD programs or
development planning cycle cycle development development planning flagship/major programs integrated with
(planning, implementation and planning cycle cycle GAD utilizing SDD or gender statistics.
management and monitoring □ Copy of monitoring indicators for GAD-
and evaluation)? related PAPs.
□ Copy of monitoring reports of the
(0) (0.5) (1) organization or LGU with data on the
implementation of GAD programs or
flagship/major programs implemented with
GAD perspective integrated.
□ Copies of local plans integrated with GAD
such as CDP, PDPFP, AIP, ELA, etc.
□ Copies of knowledge products utilizing SGG
and /or gender statistics.

4. Functional GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)

4.1 Are the organization’s other Other GAD Other Gad Other GAD □ Copy of status/progress report, results of
GAD mechanisms able to mechanisms are fully mechanisms are fully mechanisms are fully Gender Impact Assessment of other GAD
contribute towards the functional but still has functional and functional and resulted mechanisms of the organization;
attainment of its desired to contribute to the contributing to the in desired impact/s
impact/s? attainment of desired attainment of desired □ Copies of client satisfaction reports and/or
impact/s impact/s documented testimonies of beneficiaries; or
(0) (0.5) (1)

□ Copies of certificates, pictures of plaques,
seals and/or news article regarding citations
received by the organization for gender-
responsive mechanisms.
4.2 Has the organization utilized Organization utilized Organization utilized Organization utilized □ MOVs cited in 2.3 and 3.2
70% or more of its total 30% or less of total 31-69% of total 70% or more of total □ AOM from COA denoting that the
budget* to implement GAP budget to implement budget to implement budget to implement organization has fully utilized 70% of its
PAPs? GAD PAPs GAD PAPs GAD PAPs budget for GAD, if applicable.
*refers to the total GAA of NGAs (0) (0.5) (1)

and LGUs or COB for GOCCs
4.3 Is the organization’s database Database has no SDD Database with SDD Database with SDD □ Briefers, case studies, situationers utilizing
with sex-disaggregated data and/or gender and/or gender and/or gender SDD and/or gender statistics produced by
and/or gender statistics able to statistics and is not statistics generated statistics generated 3 the organization;
generate sector-specific able to generate 1-2 sector-specific or more sector-specific
knowledge products (KPs) on sector-specific KPs on KPs on GAD KPs on GAD □ Socio Economic and Physical Plan (SEPP) of
GAD? GAD LGUs with situationers on women and men
at the local level:
(0) (0.5) (1)
□ Reports of the organization utilizing SDD and
gender statistics
□ Caselets or case studies with SDD or gender

statistics utilized.
4.4 Is the organization’s M&E M&E system is not able M&E system able to M&E system is not able □ NGAs: Gender Impact Assessment (GIA);
system able to track the to track gender-related track gender-related to track gender-related Annual Audit Reports (AARs);Audit Financial
desired gender-related impacts impacts of GAD PAPs impacts of GAD PAPs impacts of GAD PAPs Reports (AFRs);Special Audit Reports
of its GAD PAPs on clients on clients (internal and on either internal on both internal and (SARs);Socio-Economic Reports (SERs),
(internal and external)? external) and external clients external clients Philippine Development Plan (PDP) reports,
program/project reports, accomplishment
reports and other related knowledge
(0) (0.5) (1) products (KPs); or
□ LGUs: end of term reports: Annual Audit

Reports (AARs);
administrative/accomplishment reports;
State of the Municipal Address (SOMA);
State of the Province Address (SOPA), Socio-
Economic Reports (RPMES) reports,
program/project reports, and other related
knowledge products.
4.5 Does the organization have KM system does not KM system has GAD- KM system has GAD- □ MOVs cited in 4.3
Knowledge Management (KM) have GAD-related KPs related KPs accessed related KPs accessed □ Customized gender analysis tools or
System with GAD-related and utilized by either and utilized by both checklists;
knowledge products (KPs)) internal or external internal or external □ Manuals or guidelines on integrating GAD in
clients clients programs or projects;
□ Training modules on GAD customized to the
mandate of the organization
□ Documentation of best practices on GAD of
(0) (0.5) (1) the organization or of its partners and/or
clients.

5. Model GAD Structures and System (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
5.1 Has the organization’s GAD GFPS not yet GFPS nominated, GFPS awarded as □ Actual invitation or notice for the
Focal Point System been recognized as model shortlisted or cited as model GAD mechanism award/citation
recognized or awarded as a GAD mechanism by model GAD by reputable □ Copies of certificates, pictures of plaques of
model GAD mechanism by reputable mechanism by organizations on recognition/seals for the award or citation
reputable local, national and organizations on reputable gender mainstreaming received; and
international organizations on gender mainstreaming organizations on □ Pictures, press releases or videos of the
gender mainstreaming? gender awarding ceremony.
mainstreaming
(0) (0.5) (1)
5.2 Has the organization’s other Other GAD Other GAD Other GAD □ List of organizations that have used the GAD
GAD mechanisms been mechanisms not yet mechanisms mechanisms mechanism/s as a model to establish their
recognized as models by other recognized by other recognized as models recognized as models own written testimony from said
organizations? organizations as by 1-2 organizations by 3 or more organizations;
models organizations □ Actual invitation or notice for the award
/citation;
□ Certificates, pictures of plaques of
(0) (0.5) (1) recognition for the award or citation, and
□ Pictures, press releases or videos of the

awarding ceremony.
5.3 Has the organization utilized Organization utilized Organization utilized Organization utilized □ MOVs cited in 2.3 and 3.2; and
100% of its total budget* to 70% or less of its total 71-99% or less of its 100% of its total
implement GAD PAPs? budget to implement total budget to budget to implement □ AOM from COA denoting that the
GAD PAPs implement GAD PAPs GAD PAPs organization has fully utilized 100% of its
budget for GAD, if applicable
(0) (0.5) (1)
5.4 Has the organization Database with SDD Database with SDD Database with SDD □ All MOVs cited in 4.3
established a centralized and/or gender and/or gender and/or gender □ Copy of policy creating centralized database
database with sex- statistics established statistics established statistics established with SDD; and
disaggregated data and/or but accessible only to but accessible only to but accessible only to □ Implementation report and data on the
gender statistics accessible to the central office the central office, the central office, number of those who accessed the
its regional offices and regional office and regional office and database with disaggregation for
attached agencies, as well as attached agencies attached agencies, employees, partner organizations and
external clients and partner as well as external clients.
organizations? clients and partner
organizations
(0) (0.5) (1)
5.3 Is the knowledge KM system of the KM system of the KM system of the □ MOVs cited 4.5
Management (KM) system of organization not organization not organization not □ List of organizations that have used KM
the organization integrated integrated with GAD integrated with GAD integrated with GAD system; and
with GAD and replicated by and not replicated by are replicated by 1-2 are replicated by 1-2 □ Testimonies or anecdotes from clients or
other organizations? other organizations organizations organizations partners that have used the KM system of
the organization as a model or standard.
(0) (0.5) (1)

TOTAL GMEF SCORE

(Enabling Mechanisms)
GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL
PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES/PROJECTS (PAPS)
The PAPs questionnaire consists of 30 questions that assess the organization’s progress in mainstreaming
GAD in all of its programs, activities and projects, whether through policy and/or plan formulation and issuances,
capacitating the GFPS members, generating top-level management support on GAD and the establishment of
enabling GAD mechanisms.
 At the Foundation Formulation level, the organization has expressed initial support to gender
mainstreaming through conduct of GAD capacity development sessions for its GFPS members, top
management and the rest of its employees. It has also involved clients to ensure that their gender issues
are taken into account, while also engaging with PCW and relevant organizations and individual experts
on GAD. It is also at this stage that the organization plans or sets-up a GAD corner containing GAD IEC
materials or references for the use of its clients (internal and external).
 At the Installation of Strategic Mechanisms level, the organization already has a GAD agenda or strategic
framework to guide its gender mainstreaming efforts through the implementation of its GAD Plan and
Budget. Deepening sessions for GFPS members and concerned staff members are also conducted,
especially on the application of gender analysis tools. These sessions are meant to further guide them on
how to intensify gender mainstreaming efforts in the organization. Lastly, IEC materials are customized for
the organization’s use and a GAD section in the website is planned or set-up.
 At the GAD Application level, the organization ensures that the implementation of its GAD PAPs,
especially those in the GAD Plan and Budget are monitored. External clients are also capacitated through
relevant GAD sessions. Finally, a Knowledge Management (KM) system to ensure the transfer of
knowledge on GAD is set-up.
 At the Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization level, the organization ensures that
monitoring of its GAD PAPs is sustained and its impacts evaluated. Sector-specific GAD capacity
development sessions for both internal and external clients are also conducted, as well as periodic
applications and re-application of gender analysis tools to ensure integration of GAD in the organization’s
PAPs. A sustainability action plan for GAD is also developed.
 At the Replication and Innovation level, the organization is now recognized as a learning hub for its
noteworthy GAD efforts with convergence models resulting from its partnerships. GAD knowledge
products and IEC materials produced by the organization are also utilized by other organizations as
references or models to develop their own GAD-related materials.

Telephone: +6327365249 or +6327367712
Fax Number: +6327364449
PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES AND PROJECTS (PAPS) ASSESSMENT QUESTIONAIRE
DESCRIPTORS Score
SCORE
NO PARTLY YES item
1. Initial activities to Facilitate GAD Mainstreaming (max score: ; for each item or question:0.83)
1.1 Is the organization Organization has not Organization has Organization initiated  Has the organization issued three or more
observing initiated or initiated or or participated in 3 or separate policies supporting GAD-related
international/national/n participated in the participated in 1-2 more observance of activities such as Women’s Month activities, 18-
ational/local GAD events observance of observance of international/national/ day Campaign on VAW, Rural Women’s Day, etc.;
international/national/ international/national/ local GAD-related or
local GAD-related local GAD-related events  Internal policies supporting other GAD-related
events events activities such as office orders/travel order for
attendance of GAD trainings/conferences and
seminars
(0) (0.41) (0.83)  Documentation such as activity reports with
photos of events conducted by the organization
to observe international/national/local GAD-
related events.
1.2 Has the organization No Basic GAD Basic GAD orientation Basic GAD orientation  Profiles of organization staff members
conducted BASIC GAD orientation or GST or GST conducted for or GST conducted for who have attended any of the following:
Orientation or Gender conducted for its either internal or both internal and a. Basic GAD Orientation;
Sensitivity Training (GST) clients external clients external clients b. Gender Sensitivity Training;
for its clients (internal c. GST which include Basic GAD Orientation,
and external discussion of Basic GA and the use of GA Tools
and GAD Planning and Budgeting; and
d. Other relevant GAD training/ conferences and
seminars
(0) (0.41) (0.83)  Documentation Report withattendance sheets
and/or pictures of staff members in attendance
1.3. Has the organization No consultation Conducted Conducted  Attendance sheets and/or documentation reports
conducted consultation conducted with clients consultation with consultation with both with photos of IEC campaigns conducted to the
activities with clients either internal or internal or external employees of the organization (internal and
(internal and external) external clients to clients to identify external) on the GAD PAPs of the organization;
to identify gender issues identify gender issues gender issues and  Copies of GAD-related issuances posted in the
and corresponding and corresponding corresponding GAD corner, GAD website or disseminated to
strategies strategies strategies social networking sites such as GAD-related
articles, information on GAD-related events or a
copy of approved GAD Plan and Budget (for
LGUs); and
 Results of assessment or surveys conducted to
(0) (0.41) (0.83) measure awareness of employees of its GAD-
related programs
 Number of hits/likes generated by a GAD-related
post in GAD website or social network site of
GAD;
 Testimonies from clients regarding the GAD-
1.4 Has the organization No consultation Initiated consultation Initiated consultation  Policy/ies establishing other GAD mechanisms
consulted PCW and conducted at all with either PCW or with both PCW or such as local GAD Office, Committee on Decorum
relevant relevant organizations/ relevant organizations/ and Investigation (CODI), Violence Against
organizations/individual individuals on its GAD Individuals on its GAD Women and their Children (VAWC), referral
s on its GAD mainstreaming effort mainstreaming efforts system/ desk, barangay VAW Desk, Women’s
mainstreaming efforts Economic Empowerment Desk, Breast Feeding
Room, Day Care Room, etc; and/ or
 Policies issued such as administrative order
(0) (0.41) (0.83) designating the staff member assigned to make
the GAD mechanism functional;
 Pictures of actual mechanisms

1.5 Has the organization No review of existing 1-3 existing IEC 4 or more existing IEC  Administrative Order or Executive Order enjoining
reviewed and revised IEC materials & KP’s materials and KPs materials and KPs the organization to adopt the use of gender-fair
existing conducted reviewed but not reviewed and revised language and images in policy issuance;
Information/Education/ revised  Policy enjoining the organization personnel to
Communication (IEC) adopt existing guidelines on the use of gender-fair
materials and language and images in policy issuance (e.g. CSC
Knowledge Products Circular on Gender-Fair language);or
(KPs) to ensure use of (0.41) (0.83)  Policy adopting the use of Gender-Fair language
gender-fair language (0) and images based on policy issuances issued by
and images? the mother agency (Armed Force of the
Philippines issuing a policy to adopt DND
Guidelines on the use of Gender-Fair language);or
 Policy Adopting the directive of the line agency/
LGU to use Gender-Fair language and images and
policy issuances (for attached agencies and
bureaus).
List of IEC materials reviewed; and
Documentation of the write shop of assessment
conducted for review of IEC Materials
1.6 Has the organization set No plan to set up GAD GAD IEC materials and Established GAD  List of materials/lay-out of the GAD Corner;
up a GAD corner corner KPs compiled and corner with updated  Picture of the GAD Corner or actual link of the
collected to set up GAD GAD IEC materials and GAD Corner, if digital; and
corner KPs  Tracking matrix indicating schedule of updating to
ensure that contents are updated and relevant
(0) (0.41) (0.83)

(Level 1 PAPs)
2. Establishing Commitment towards Gender Mainstreaming (max score: 5; for each item or question: 0.62)
2.1 Has the organization No GAD agenda or Draft of GAD agenda or GAD agenda or  Minutes of meetings or speeches of top
formulated GAD agenda strategic framework strategic framework strategic framework management directing the integration of GAD in
or strategic framework? formulated formulated formulated and the organization’s PAPs;
approved  Administrative order, executive order,
department order, special order, office
memorandum on the integration of GAD in the
(0) (0.31) (0.62) organization’s PAPs and performance indicators
signed by top level GAD champion/s;
 Work plan, strategic plan, sectoral plan or
national plan integrated with GAD endorsed or
approved by top level GAD champion/s; or
 For LGUs, copies of draft or approved ordinances
sponsored by SB members supportive of GAD
regarding integration of GAD in LGU PAPs and
performance indicators.
2.2 Has the organization GPB is not based on GPB is based on at GPB is based on at  Copy of the draft or approved three-year/annual
developed its GAD Plan GAD agenda/GAD least 1 of the least 3 of the GAD mandate/GAD Strategic Framework of the
and Budget ( GPB ) Code, emerging gender following: GAD following: GAD organization; or
based on GAD agenda, issues, agenda/GAD Code, agenda/GAD Code,  Copy of the draft or approved GAD Code or three-
emerging gender issues, international/national emerging gender emerging gender year GAD agenda of the LGU or document
international/national GAD mandates and/or issues, issues, adopting GAD agenda/GAD Code of municipality
GAD mandates and/or results of gender international/national international/national or city ( for barangays )
results of gender analysis GAD mandates and/or GAD mandates and/or  Copy of GPBs and GAD ARs of the most recent
analysis? results of gender results of gender fiscal year reflecting its development based on the
analysis analysis following:
 GAD agenda
 Emerging gender issues
 Linking relevant international/national GAD
mandates
(0) (0.31) (0.62)  Results of the administration of GA tools such as
GMEF, HGDG, GERL Ka Ba?, GEWE, GIA, GAD
audit, etc.
2.3 Has the organization No deepening sessions Conducted deepening Conducted deepening  Copy of the draft or approved three-year/annual
conducted deepening on GAD conducted session/s on GAD for session/s on GAD for GAD mandate/GAD Strategic Framework of the
sessions on GAD based either the GFPS or either the GFPS or organization; or
on the results of the concerned staff concerned staff  Copy of the draft or approved GAD Code or three-
Training Needs members but not members based on the year GAD agenda of the LGU or document
Assessment (TNA) or based on the results of results of TNA or adopting GAD agenda/GAD Code of municipality
updated GAD policies TNA or updated Gad updated Gad policies or city ( for barangays )
and tools as part of the policies or tools or tools  Copy of GPBs and GAD ARs of the most recent
continuing capacity fiscal year reflecting its development based on the
development of GAD following:
Focal Point  GAD agenda
System(GFPS) and  Emerging gender issues
concerned staff (0) (0.31) (0.62)  Linking relevant international/national GAD
members? mandates
 Results of the administration of GA tools such as
GMEF, HGDG, GERL Ka Ba?, GEWE, GIA, GAD
audit, etc.
 Copies of processed TNA results or accomplished
TNA forms; and
 Copies of training designs for GAD deepening
sessions for GFPS or concerned staff members
2.4 Has the organization No GA tool applied to Results of the Results of the  Documentation report with photos and/or
used Gender Analysis develop, review and/or application of GA tools application of GA tool attendance sheets indicating the attendance of
(GA) tools and enhance PAPs used to review, used to review, project implementers to the following trainings:
techniques in the enhance or develop enhance or develop 3 a. Gender Analysis Training involving use
review, enhancement or 1-2 PAPs or more PAPS  Documentation report of trainings conducted
development of PAPs? where program implementers served as resource
tools;
 Copy of program documents where GAD has been
integrated.
 Documentation of workshops or writeshops
(0) (0.31) (0.62) conducted to integrate GAD into the
organization’s programs and projects;
 Copy of adjusted project documents integrated
with GAD perspective (especially those that will
be attributed to the GAD Budget through HGDG.
 Administrative orders or executive orders
directing concerned staff members to address
emerging gender issues in the organization’s
programs and projects (e.g. policy requiring
offices to establish a breastfeeding corner for
lactating mothers)
 Results of the administration of GA Tools such as
GMEF, HGDG, GeRL Ka BA?, GEWE, GIA, GAD
Audit, etc.
of tools such as GMEF, HGDG, GeRL Ka Ba? Tool and

other GA tools; or
b. GST+++ which includes a discussion of gender
analysis and use of GA tools such as HGDG.
2.5 Does the organization No facilities and With existing facilities With existing facilities  A policy articulating support to GAD mandates
have facilities and services addressing and services that and services that and establishing all the following four elements of
services that address gender issues and address gender issues address gender issues GPB namely: (1) Setting up of GFPS or GAD Office;
the gender issues and concerns of the and concerns of either and concerns of both (2) Collection and maintenance of sex-
concerns of its clients organization’s clients internal or external internal or external disaggregated database; (3) Conduct of
(internal and external) clients clients organization-wide Gender Audit and (4) Capacity-
building of GFPS;
 Separate policies issued establishing at least one
GPB element;
 Reissued/updated policy reflecting compliance to
new GAD issuances such as the reconstitution of
(0) (0.31) (0.62) GFPS system of the organization; or
 LGU policies incorporating elements of GPB such
as GAD Code and Gender-Responsive
Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP)
 Activity report, minutes of meeting and/or other
forms of relevant documentation during meetings
or trainings led by the GFPS members; and
 Exchanges of communication with PCW, DILG,
partner institutions and GAD experts for the
implementation of the organization’s GAD
program
2.6 Has the organization No GAD orientation Developed GAD Developed GAD  Copy of orientation module developed for new
developed orientation module with gender orientation module but orientation module but employees integrated with GAD; and
module for new sensitivity as a core not yet included in the are included in the  Attendance sheets, activity report, activity
employees with gender- competency developed orientation of new orientation of new evaluation, etc. of the orientation using the
sensitivity as a core employees employees developed module.
competency?
(0) (0.31) (0.62)
2.7 Has the organization No new GAD IEC Developed but has not Developed and  List of GAD IEC materials developed for specific
developed and materials developed disseminated new GAD disseminated new GAD target audience;
disseminated new IEC materials IEC materials  Copies of GAD IEC materials;
Information/Education/  Received a copy or acknowledgement receipts of
Communication (IEC) disseminated materials;
materials on GAD to (0) (0.31) (0.62)  Screenshot of IEC materials uploaded to the GAD
clients(internal and website/corner.
external)?
2.8 Has the organization No GAD section in the Developed GAD Developed GAD  Web link or URL of developed GAD section in the
created a GAD section in agency website section in organization section in organization organization’s website or GAD website of the
its website? website but not website and regularly organization and
updated updated  Monitoring report/tracking matrix of updates on
the GAD section/GAD website
(0) (0.31) (0.62)
Sub-total GMEF, Score

(Level 2 PAPs)
3. GAD Applications (max score: 5; for each item or question: 0.71)
3.1 Has the organization Implementation of Implementation of Implementation of  Copy of monitoring reports such as:
monitored the GAD PAPs not GAD PAPs GAD PAPs regularly o GAD Accomplishment Report
implementation of its monitored intermittently monitored and o Project implementation reports for those
GAD Programs/Activities monitored and not reported that will be attributed to the GAD
Projects (PAPs)? reported Budget; and
o Assessment reports such as Gender Audit
(0) (0.35) (0.71) and Gender Impact Assessment of the
organization’s GAD programs
 Documentation of GFPS meeting detailing status
of implementation of the GAD Plan and Budget of
the organization
3.2 Has the organization GPB and GAD AR not GPB and GAD AR GPB and GAD AR  Copy of endorsed GPB and GAD AR by PCW/DILG;
prepared and submitted submitted to submitted to endorsed by PCW* / or
on time its GAD Plan PCW/DILG PCW*/DILG** but not DILG**  Screen shot of GMMS exchanges for the
and Budget (GPB) and endorsed submission, review and endorsement of GPBs and
GAD Accomplishment AR of the organization
Report (GAD AR)? (0) (0.35) (0.71)
3.3 Has the organization No GAD capacity GAD capacity GAD capacity  Profile of current GFPS members, top
conducted and development development and development and management and organization staff members that
sustained the GAD conducted and sustained for either sustained for both have attended the following:
capacity development of sustained for clients internal and external internal and external o Basic GAD Orientation or Gender Sensitivity
its clients clients clients Training (GST);
(internal/external)? o Basic Gender Analysis (GA) and/or deepening
sessions on GA especially with PCW
developed GA Tools such as HGDG & GMEF;
o GAD Planning
(0) (0.35) (0.71) o Other relevant GAD training/conferences and
seminars;
 Documentation report with attendance sheets
members, top management officials and
organization staff members therein
 Documentation report with photos and/or
attendance sheets indicating the attendance of
project implementers to the following trainings:
o Gender Analysis Training involving use of
tools such GMEF, HGDG, GeRL Ka Ba?
Tool and other GA tools; or
o GST++ which includes a discussion of
gender analysis and use of GA tools such
as HGDG;
 Documentation report of trainings conducted
tools; and
integrated.
 Attendance sheets and/or certificate of
participation/ appearance to trainings regarding
the use of sex- disaggregated data (SDD) and/or
gender statistics; and
 Sample of actual collected SDD or gender
statistics by concerned staff (e.g. sex
disaggregated profile of staff/ clients).
3.4 Has the organization No GAD capacity Conducted GAD Conducted GAD  Profile of current GFPS members, top
conducted GAD capacity development session capacity development capacity development management and organization staff members that
development sessions conducted to develop session but no internal session that resulted in have attended the following:
for its internal GAD internal GAD experts GAD experts the development of o Basic GAD Orientation or Gender Sensitivity
experts? developed internal GAD experts Training (GST);
o Basic Gender Analysis (GA) and/or deepening
sessions on GA especially with PCW
(0) (0.35) (0.71) developed GA Tools such as HGDG & GMEF;
o GAD Planning
o Other relevant GAD training/conferences and
seminars;
 Documentation report with attendance sheets
members, top management officials and
organization staff members therein
 Documentation report with photos and/or
attendance sheets indicating the attendance of
project implementers to the following trainings:
o Gender Analysis Training involving use of
tools such GMEF, HGDG, GeRL Ka Ba?
Tool and other GA tools; or
o GST++ which includes a discussion of
gender analysis and use of GA tools such
as HGDG;
 Documentation report of trainings conducted
tools; and
integrated.
 Attendance sheets and/or certificate of
participation/ appearance to trainings regarding
the use of sex- disaggregated data (SDD) and/or
gender statistics; and
 Sample of actual collected SDD or gender
statistics by concerned staff (e.g. sex
disaggregated profile of staff/ clients).
3.5 Has the organization No GA tools applied in GA tools applied in 1-2 GA tools applied in all  Documentation report with photos and/or
regularly applied Gender development planning levels of the levels of the attendance sheets indicating the attendance of
Analysis (GA) tools in cycle development planning development planning project implementers to the following trainings:
the development cycle cycle a. Gender Analysis Training involving use
planning cycle (planning,  Documentation report of trainings conducted
implementation and where program implementers served as resource
management, and persons in the administration of gender analysis
monitoring and (0) (0.35) (0.83) tools;
evaluation)?  Copy of program documents where GAD has been
integrated.
conducted to integrate GAD into the
lactating mothers)
Audit,etc.
3.6 Has the organization GAD section has not GAD section updated GAD section updated  Reports regarding updating of the content of the
regularly updated its been updated for more annually quarterly or more GAD section in the website/GAD website of the
GAD section in the than a year often organization; and
website?  Copies or screenshots of materials
uploaded/modified
(0) (0.35) (0.71)
3.7 Has the organization set No existing plan to set Has initial plan to set Has set up a KM  Documents on draft or approved Knowledge
up a Knowledge up KM up KM system to transfer Management (KM) system plan, framework or
Management (KM) system knowledge on GAD web link such as:
as a mechanism to transfer o KM Framework
knowledge on GAD? o Implementation Report of KM
(0) (0.35) (0.71) o List of knowledge products developed
within the system
 Implementation report of the KM Plan
a. KM Framework;
b. Implementation Report of KM;
c. List of knowledge products developed within the

system; and
Implementation report of the KM Plan.
(Level 3 PAPs)
4. GAD Commitment and Institutionalization (max score: 5; for each item or question: 1)
4.1 Has the organization GAD mandates not GAD mandates GAD mandates  Monitoring reports indicating implementation of
sustained implemented and continuously continuously GAD mandates such as:
implementation and monitored implemented but not implemented and o GAD Accomplishment Report;
monitoring of regularly monitored by regularly monitored by o Reports submitted to Interagency
international, national, the organization the organization Committees such as the IAC-VAWC,
and local GAD mandates IACAT, etc.;
in its PAPs? o Reports submitted for international
reporting (such as those
(0) (0.5) (1) submitted to DFA for status of
implementation of international GAD-
related conventions such as CEDAW);
o Reports of the GFPS regarding status of
implementation of GAD Mandates; and
o Monitoring reports of programs/projects
being implemented by the organization
that contributes to the fulfillment of
GAD mandates.
4.2 Has the organization No organizational Organizational/sector- Organizational/sector-  Attendance sheets and/or documentation reports
conducted/organization sector-specific capacity specific GAD capacity specific GAD capacity with photos of IEC campaigns conducted for the
al/sector-specific development session/s development session/s development session/s employees of the organization (internal and
capacity development on GAD conducted conducted for either conducted for both external) on the GAD PAPs of the organization;
sessions on GAD for internal or external internal or external Copies of GAD-related issuances posted in the
clients (internal and clients clients GAD corner, GAD website or disseminated to
external)? social networking sites such as GAD-related
(0) (0.5) (1) articles, information on GAD-related events or a
copy of approved GAD Plan and Budget (for
LGUs); and
Results of assessment or surveys conducted to
measure awareness of employees of its GAD-
related programs.
 Attendance sheets and/or documentation reports
with photos of IEC campaigns conducted for the
external clients of the organization on the GAD
PAPs of the organization;
 No. of hits/likes generated by a GAD-related post
in GAD website or social network site for GAD;
 Testimonies from clients regarding the GAD-
 Copies of GAD-related knowledge products and
list of clients provided with said knowledge
products;
 List of clients/beneficiaries of GAD-related
services and or trainings provided by the
organization; and
 Results of assessment or surveys conducted to
measure awareness of external clients’ awareness
on the organization’s GAD-related programs.
 Documentation of gender issues raised by clients
during consultations, meetings or assessments of
effectiveness/ level of satisfaction regarding a
GAD program or service;
 Attendance sheets and/or documentation reports
with photos for consultations or meetings
conducted (see no. 1);
 Copies of written communication, video
testimonies, field visit notes, etc. regarding
comments, recommendations or assessment of
the organization’s GAD programs; and
 Feedback gathered from GAD website/social
network sites regarding GAD programs of the
organization from clients.
 Administrative order, executive orders indicating
membership of clients in program or project
management teams; and
 Reports of project implementation with
contribution by clients (e.g. article or pictures).
 Copies of news articles, other write-ups or
documentation (e.g. TV interviews) regarding
awards or citations received by the external
clients regarding their gender mainstreaming
efforts;
 Pictures of plaque of appreciation or certificate
received regarding the GAD programs of the
agency or LGU recognized within the agency or
LGU; and
 Copies of partnership agreement resulting from
the recognition, if applicable.
4.3 Does the organization GAD tools not applied GAD tools used to GAD tools used to  Documentation report with photos and/or
regularly apply gender to assess PAPs assess gender- assess gender- attendance sheets indicating the attendance of
analysis (GA) tools to responsiveness of 1-2 responsiveness of 1-2 project implementers to the following trainings:
assess gender- PAPs PAPs a. Gender Analysis Training involving use
responsiveness of  Documentation report of trainings conducted
programs/activities / where program implementers served as resource
Projects (PAPs)? persons in the administration of gender analysis
(0) (0.5) (1) tools;
integrated.
conducted to integrate GAD into the

lactating mothers)
Audit, etc.
 Results of application of gender analysis tools in
different periods of time (e.g. annual, every three
years) to establish regularity of application
 Documentation reports of application of Gender
Analysis tools during trainings or writeshops
where programs of the organization have been
assessed
4.4 Has the organization No sustainability action Draft sustainability Sustainability action  Copy of the draft or approved sustainability action
developed sustainability plan on GAD PAPs action plan on GAD plan on GAD PAPs plan on GAD efforts of the organization
action plan for GAD formulated PAPs formulated formulated and
PAPs? approved
(0) (0.5) (1)
4.5 Has the organization Gender impact not yet Impact assessment of Impact assessment of  Copy of the draft or approved impact evaluation
conducted impact conducted GAD PAPs ongoing GAD PAPs completed of the GAD efforts of the organization (e.g.
evaluation of its GAD and reported Gender Impact Assessment)
PAPs?
(Level 4 PAPs)
5. Model PAPs (max score: 5; for each item or question: 1.25)
5.1 Has the organization Organization is still Organization has been Organization has been  Actual invitation or notice for the award/citation;
been recognized as a developing notable recognized as a recognized as a  Certificates, pictures of plaques of recognition for
GAD learning hub for its GAD PAPs learning hub but GAD learning hub and in the award or citation;
notable GAD PAPs? PAPs are not yet GAD PAPs are  Pictures, press releases or videos of the awarding
replicated replicated by other ceremony; and
organizations  List of organizations that have used the
organization as a GAD model or written/video
(0) (0.62) (1.25) testimony from said organizations.
5.2 Has the organization’s No convergence model Convergence model Convergence model  Copies of partnership agreements, Memoranda of
partnership with resulting from recognized but not recognized and Understanding/Agreement resulting from the
stakeholders resulted in partnership replicated replicated convergence;
convergence model that  List of organizations that have replicated the
is recognized and convergence model;
replicated by other (0) (0.62) (1.25)  Written or video testimonials from organizations
organizations? that have replicated the convergence model.
5.3 Has the organization’s GAD KPs and GAD IEC GAD KPs and GAD IEC GAD KPs and GAD IEC  List and type of existing GAD knowledge products
Knowledge Products materials not yet cited materials used and materials used and (KPs) and GAD Information, Education,
(KPs) and Information / as reference by other cited as reference by at cited as reference by 3 Communication (IEC) materials utilized by other
Educational / organizations least 1-2 organizations or more organizations organization (e.g. MCW mobile application,
Communication (IEC) videos, brochures);
materials on GAD been  List of organizations who accessed existing GAD
used by other KPs and GAD IEC materials; and
organization? (0) (0.62) (1.25)  Testimonials from users of GAD KPs and GAD IEC
materials produced by the organization.
5.4 Has the organization’s Award system not yet Award system being Award/incentive  Copy of the criteria for the existing
existing award/incentive integrated with GAD reviewed for system integrated with award/incentive system integrated with GAD
system been integrated perspective integration of GAD GAD perspective perspective;
with GAD perspective? perspective  List of personnel/program who were awarded;
 Testimonies from awardees.
(0) (0.62) (1.25)

(Level 5 PAPs)
TOTAL GMEF SCORE

(PAPs)
GMEF SCORESHEET
Name of the Organization Assessed:______________________________________________________________________
Date Administered:___________________________________________________________________________________
Inclusive Period of Assessment: _________________________________________________________________________
Key Areas Score

Policy
1. Issuance of initial policies on GAD
2. Issuance of policies to mainstream Gad in the organization
3. Integration of Gad in the Organization’s Policies
4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies
5. Model Gad Policy
Sub-Total:
Level for Policy:
People
1. On Establishing GFPS & Gad Champions/Advocates
2. On GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities
3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs
4. GAD Championship as Program Implementers
5. GAD Experts
Sub-Total:
Level for People:
Enabling Mechanisms
1. Setting-up of Essential Mechanisms
2. Functional Gad Mechanisms
3. Integration of Gad in the Organization’s Mechanisms
4. Advanced GAD Structures and Systems
5. Model GAD Structures and Systems
Sub-Total:
Level for Enabling Mechanism:
Programs, Activities, and Projects
1. Initial Activities to Facilitate GAD Mainstreaming
2. Establishing Commitment towards GAD Mainstreaming
3. GAD Application
4. GAD Commitment and Institutionalization
5. Model PAPs
Sub-Total
Level for PAPs
TOTAL SCORE
OVER-ALL LEVEL
RANGES LEVEL DESCRIPTION
0-7.99 points 1. Foundation Formation
Level 8-14.99 points 2. Installation of Strategic Mechanisms

Per Entry
15-19.99 points 3. GAD Application
Point
20-23.99 points 4. Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization
24-25 points 5. Replication and Innovation
RANGES LEVEL DESCRIPTION
0-30.99 points 1. Foundation Formation
31-60.99 points 2. Installation of Strategic Mechanisms

Over-all
Level 61.80.99 points 3. GAD Application
81-95.99 points 4. Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization
96-100 points 5. Replication and Innovation

Final Gmef Questionnaire PDF

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Final Gmef Questionnaire PDF

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Gender

A Toolkit on the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework

A Toolkit on the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework

*If said document is issued annually then three

Sub-total GMEF Score

Sub-total GMEF Score

Sub-total GMEF Score

*The organization may include the contact details of

TOTAL GMEF SCORE POLICY

A Toolkit on the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework

□ Documentation report of GAD sessions attended

(0) (0.41) (0.83)

For external clients

Sub-total GMEF, Score

Sub-total GMEF Score

(0) (0.41) (0.83)

Sub-total GMEF Score

5. GAD Experts (max score: 5; for each item, 1.67)

TOTAL GMEF SCORE

A Toolkit on the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework

Sub-total GMEF Score

2. Functional GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)

* Other GAD mechanisms may also include

(0) (0.5) (1)

(0) (0.5) (1)

Sub-total GMEF Score

Sub-total GMEF Score

4. Functional GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)

(0) (0.5) (1)

*refers to the total GAA of NGAs (0) (0.5) (1)

□ Caselets or case studies with SDD or gender

□ LGUs: end of term reports: Annual Audit

Sub-total GMEF Score

(0) (0.5) (1)

□ Pictures, press releases or videos of the

(0) (0.5) (1)

Sub-total GMEF Score

TOTAL GMEF SCORE

A Toolkit on the Enhanced Gender Mainstreaming Evaluation Framework

 Pictures of actual mechanisms

Sub-total GMEF Score

of tools such as GMEF, HGDG, GeRL Ka Ba? Tool and

Sub-total GMEF, Score

b. Implementation Report of KM;

c. List of knowledge products developed within the

 Administrative orders or executive orders

(0) (0.5) (1)

Sub-total GMEF Score

TOTAL GMEF SCORE

Name of the Organization Assessed:______________________________________________________________________

Inclusive Period of Assessment: _________________________________________________________________________

Key Areas Score

0-7.99 points 1. Foundation Formation

Level 8-14.99 points 2. Installation of Strategic Mechanisms

24-25 points 5. Replication and Innovation

RANGES LEVEL DESCRIPTION

0-30.99 points 1. Foundation Formation

31-60.99 points 2. Installation of Strategic Mechanisms

81-95.99 points 4. Commitment Enhancement and Institutionalization

96-100 points 5. Replication and Innovation

Вам также может понравиться