International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern

Engineering & Science (IJTIMES)

Impact Factor: 5.22 (SJIF-2017), e-ISSN: 2455-2585
Volume 5, Issue 06, June-2019

Design of G+7 hostel building subjected to dynamic (seismic and wind) loading
Stella Veerendra Pinto1, Sachin B Mulay2
1
Masters in Technology, Department of structural engineering, Sandip university Nashik.
2
Phd, Master of technology, Department of civil engineering, Sandip university, Nashik.

Abstract—Structural engineer face the challenge of obtaining the most efficient and economical design with a precise
solution, while ensuring that the final design of a building can be maintained for its intended function throughout its
duration. Nowadays, structural needs for high rise buildings are changing and expansion of planning flexibility is
becoming significant. In the present work, study of hostel building for G+7 storey structure is been carried out. Apart
from Dead load & Live load, structures are subjected to two types of dynamic loads i.e. wind & seismic. Mainly in
order to design a structure for nashik district we ought to know its wind velocity & its zonal location, nashik is a
district for which wind velocity is 39 m/s and it lies in Zone III. Hence to achieve maximum strength with optimum
material utilization analysis of structure plays a vital role. The main focus of the project is over the generation of
stress developed in member subjected to loading condition in software’s mainly STAAD. The result of optimum
condition is considered for design. Also the parameters for the variation are set up with a proper explanatory term.
Help of Some Indian standard codes and their provision is taken in account so as to achieve required results, the most
important parameter used is revised code for wind analysis which is IS 875 part 3 2015. Few assumption are been
considered and later are been replaced by actual required need.

Keywords— Hostel building, G+7 building, STAAD Pro, Seismic effect, Wind effect.

I. INTRODUCTION

Generally speed of growth in population and the constant pressure on limited space considerably influenced tall building
constructions in developing countries like India. These kind of tall buildings are constructed using various structural
elements. In order to meet this demand in short stipulated time advance method for design and analysis must be adopted,
here in came the use of software in picture. Anciently prior to the implementation of software the structure were analyzed
manually due to which their seemed a delay in time and ultimately the hunger was not fulfilled within stipulated time. In
the project the need to fulfil the demand within stipulated time is focused on and even the software with which it can be
fulfilled within is found. On other hand the software’s are liable to do just the analysis based on the inputs given, here in
few calculations for load acting on structure are found. Even some modern techniques such as column with rectangle at
base and circular cross sections at middle, effect of seismic load on shear wall and even on structure is studied, this study
is just to meet the economy, shorter construction period and architectural demand.

II. DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING

The building is situated in Mahiravani region of Nashik District.

Floor to floor height: 3.3m
Built up area at each floor:
 Ground and first floor: 769.18 m2
 Second floor: 734.05 m2
 Third floor: 716.50 m2
 Fourth floor: 745.75 m2
 Fifth floor: 734.05 m2
 Sixth floor: 729.01 m2
 Seventh floor: 734.05 m2

III. MODELLING OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEM IN STAAD SOFTWARE

STAAD. Pro is one of the most widely used structural analysis and design software products in the world. It supports
over 90 international design rules for steel, concrete and wood. This software can use various forms of analysis from the
traditional static analysis, p-delta analysis, geometric non-linear analysis, Pushover analysis (Static-Non Linear Analysis)
or a buckling analysis. Various form of dynamic analysis can also be used, from modal extraction to time history and
response spectrum analysis.
Fundamental to software modelling is the generalization that multi-story buildings usually consist of identical or similar
floor plans that repeat in the vertical direction. The following modeling features optimize analysis modeling and simulate
advanced seismic systems.

IJTIMES-2019@All rights reserved 351

 International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering & Science (IJTIMES)
Volume 5, Issue 06, June-2019, e-ISSN: 2455-2585, Impact Factor: 5.22 (SJIF-2017)

 Templates for global-system and local-element modeling

 Customized section geometry and constitutive behavior
 Grouping of frame and shell objects
 Linkage mapping for modeling isolators, shock absorbers and other advanced seismic systems
 Nonlinear hinge specification
 Automatic meshing with manual options
 Editing and assignment functions for planes, views and 3D views.
Once modelling is complete, STAAD automatically generates and assigns code-based loading conditions for gravity,
seismic, wind, and thermal forces. One may specify an unlimited number of load cases and combination.

IV. MEMBER PROPERTY AND LOAD COMBINATION USED FOR ANALYSIS

The structure is entirely considered as a space frame in which there are 1968 number of nodes where as the highest node
is 4885 and number of element is 3479 for which highest beam is 10387. The entire structure is analysed for basic 4 load
cases which include Dead load, Live Load, Wind load in “X” and wind load in “Z” direction according with earthquake
load in “X” and “Z” direction as well. Apart from basic load cases there are 21 different load combinations considered.
All the data is been mentioned below.
TABLE I
INPUT DATA
Data utilised for design consideration
Property Member property Combinatio Defined combination
number (m) n number

1 Rec (0.6X0.15) 7 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL

2 Rec (0.6X0.3) 8 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 WIND X
3 Rec (0.6X0.23) 9 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 WIND Z
4 Rec (0.3X0.3) 10 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL - 1.2 WIND X
5 Rec (2.95X0.23) 11 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL - 1.2 WIND Z
6 Rec (2.5X0.23) 12 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 EQX
7 Rec (0.4X0.4) 13 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 EQZ
8 Rec (0.45X0.6) 14 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL - 1.2 EQX
9 Rec (0.9X0.3) 15 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL - 1.2 EQZ
10 Rec (0.75X0.3) 16 1.5 DL + 1.5 WIND X
11 Rec (1.1X0.3) 17 1.5 DL + 1.5 WIND Z
12 Cir (0.45) 18 1.5 DL - 1.5 WIND X
- - 19 1.5 DL - 1.5 WIND Z
- - 20 1.5 DL + 1.5 EQX
- - 21 1.5 DL + 1.5 EQZ
- - 22 1.5 DL - 1.5 EQX
- - 23 1.5 DL - 1.5 EQZ
- - 24 0.9 DL + 1.5 EQX
- - 25 0.9 DL + 1.5 EQZ
- - 26 0.9 DL - 1.5 EQX
- - 27 0.9 DL - 1.5 EQZ

V. RESULTS

Structure is designed and is analysed for above mentioned load combination amongst which the critical combination for
wind load is combination number 08 and combination 09 where as for seismic critical combination is combination
number 12 and combination number 13. Considering all the critical combinations results are obtained for storey
displacement and storey drift.

IJTIMES-2019@All rights reserved 352

 International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering & Science (IJTIMES)
Volume 5, Issue 06, June-2019, e-ISSN: 2455-2585, Impact Factor: 5.22 (SJIF-2017)

Fig. 1 Storey displacements for wind and seismic loading in X direction.

Fig. 2 Storey displacements for wind and seismic loading in Z direction.

Fig. 3 Storey drift for wind and seismic loading in X direction.

IJTIMES-2019@All rights reserved 353

 International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering & Science (IJTIMES)
Volume 5, Issue 06, June-2019, e-ISSN: 2455-2585, Impact Factor: 5.22 (SJIF-2017)

Fig. 4 Storey drift for wind and seismic loading in Z direction.

VI. CONCLUSIONS

The drift in the building's frame is the result of contributions in bending and cutting mode due to the axial deformation of
the column or the deformations of the diagonal and of the support. In the structures of a few floors, the shear changes are
the most significant and largely determine the lateral rigidity of the structure. For medium-high structures, the axial
forces and the higher deformations in the columns and the accumulation of their effects on a greater height make the
flexion component dominate the displacement. As mentioned in IS 1893 2002, the structures are limited to a drift value
of 0.007 times the height of the projectile based on the results of drift and displacement obtained.

REFERENCES

[1] V.Ramanjaneyulu1, Dharmesh.M2, V.Chrinjeevi3 (2018); Comparative study on design results of a multi-
storied building using STAAD pro and ETABS for regular and irregular plan configuration, International
Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(1).
[2] Krishna G Nair, Akshara S P (2017); Seismic analysis of reinforced concrete building- A review, International
Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(2).
[3] Akshay R. Kohli, Prof. N. G. Gore (2017); Analysis and design of earthquake resisting structure using STAAD
Pro, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(12).
[4] Zaid Mohammada, Abdul Baqib, Mohammed Arif (2017); Seismic Response of RC Framed Buildings Resting
on Hill slopes.
[5] Shaikh Muffassir ¹, L.G. Kalurkar ² (2016); Comparative Study on Wind Analysis of Multi-story RCC and
Composite Structure for Different Plan, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-
ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 13, Issue 4 Ver. VII
[6] M.D. KEVADKAR, P.B. KODAG (2013); Lateral load analysis of RCC structure, International Journal of
Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) www.ijmer.com Vol.3, Issue.3
[7] P. P. Chandurkar, Dr. P. S. Pajgade (2013); Seismic analysis of RCC building with and without shear wall,
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) www.ijmer.com Vol.3, Issue.3
[8] Wakchaure M.R, Ped S. P (2012); Earthquake Analysis of High Rise Building with and Without In filled Walls,
International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 2, Issue 2.
[9] Bureau of Indian Standards IS 456: 2000: Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice,
[10] 3. Bureau of Indian Standards IS 1893 (part 1): 2016: Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures: Part
1 General Provisions and Buildings (Sixth Revision),
[11] 4. Bureau of Indian Standards 800:2007 - code of practice for general construction in steel,
[12] 5. Bureau of Indian Standards 875(part I)-1987-Code of practice for design load for building and Structure (dead
load),
[13] 6. Bureau of Indian Standards 875(part V)-1987-Code of practice for design load for building and structure
(special loads and combinations),
[14] 7. Bureau of Indian Standards 875(part III)-1987-Code of practice for design load for building and structure
(wind load),
[15] 8. Bureau of Indian Standards 875(part II)-1987-Code of practice for design load for building and structure (live
load),

IJTIMES-2019@All rights reserved 354