PROPOSED BRIDGE NO- 232

EXISTING BRIDGE NO- NA

ACROSS NALA
AT CH- 80897 KM 80.897
LOCATION 22°27'56.52" N 74°38'15.05"

PROPOSED 1 6X3 RCC Box

6 3
Proposed Bed Level 336.076
HFL 336.911

CATCHMENT AREA 0.21 Sqkm

SHAPE OF CATCHMENT OBLONG

LENGTH OF LONGEST
STREAM COURSE FROM
0.721 Km.
THE SOURCE TO BRIDGE
SITE

HEIGHT OF FARTHEST
POINT ABOVE THE POINT OF
6.920 M.
INTEREST ALONG THE
RIVER

TOPOSHEET INFORMATION 46J/11

TOPOGRAPHY PLAIN
LAND COVER BARREN LAND
SUB ZONE Lower Narmada & Tapi (3b)

WIDTH AT HFL 2 m
Obstructed Area 1.67 Sqm

Reduced distance from point of

Reduced Level
study
Km M
0 336.076
0.721 343.000

Type of Catchment
Hilly soils / plateau & barren

R50(24) = 280 MM Ref: - FIG -1.0

R50(1)/R50(24) = Ratio for 1h = 0.38 Ref: - FIG -4.0
Ratio for tch = 0.21 Ref: - FIG -4.0

Silt Factor (Soil Investigation report)' f 2.73

river bend condition Moderate Bend

PARTICULARS AT BRIDGE SITE

1 2
HFL 336.911
BED LEVEL 336.076
CROSS SECTIONAL AREA (A) 3.26
WETTED PERIMETER (P) 7.79
BED SLOPE 0.010
Rugosity Co-efficient (η) 0.055
E
 WATERWAY CALCULATIONS
FOR
PROPOSED BRIDGE NO-232
ACROSS NALA
AT CH-80897 (KM- 80.897)

CONSTRUCTION OF NEW BG LINE FROM

CHHOTAUDEPUR TO DHAR
Client- Western Railway

PREPARED BY
SM CONSULTANTS
 DATA SHEET

1 SECTION CHHOTAUDEPUR - DHAR

2 PROPOSED BRIDGE NO. 232

3 EXISTING BRIDGE NO. NA

4 CHAINAGE 80897

5 KILOMETERAGE 80.897

6 RIVER/STREAM/TRIBUTARY/NALLA NALA

7 PROPOSED OPENING 1 X 6 X 3 ( RCC Box )

8 LOCATION

a. LATITUDE 22°27'56.52" N

b. LONGITUTDE 74°38'15.05" E

9 CATCHMENT AREA(ATTACHED TOPOSHEET) 0.21 SqKm

10 SHAPE OF CATCHMENT OBLONG

LENGTH OF LONGEST STREAM COURSE

11 0.721 Km
FROM THE SOURCE TO BRIDGE SITE
HEIGHT OF FARTHEST POINT ABOVE THE
12 6.92 m
POINT OF INTEREST ALONG THE RIVER

13 TOPOSHEET INFORMATION 46J/11

14 TOPOGRAPHY PLAIN

15 LAND COVER BARREN LAND

16 SUB ZONE Lower Narmada & Tapi (3b)

References:
(i) Bridges and flood wing Report No. RBF- 16
(ii) IRS code of practice for the design of substructure and foundation of bridges
(iii) Flood Estimation Report for Lower Narmada and Tapi (3b)

SM CONSULTANTS, BHUBANESWAR 1
 FLOOD ESTIMATION BY RATIONAL FORMULA AS PER RBF-16

A - PHYSIOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS
Catchment Area of River/Stream//Nala ……………..…...……….. A = 0.210 SqKm
Length of Longest Stream ………....….....….……….….…....…....L = 0.721 Km
Height difference between origination of Stream and Bridge site. H = 6.920 m
B - RATIONAL FORMULA

i) Runoff Coefficient (C)

The value of C depends on the nature of soil, soil cover
& location of catchment and may be taken as under.
Type of Catchment
Hilly soils / plateau & barren
for C = 0.498 (R x F)^0.2 Ref: - 2.1.1
Where
R = 50 year 24 hour point rainfall (cm)
F = Areal reduction factor depending upon catchment area & duration of rainfall

ii) Time of Concentration, tc = [L³ / H] 0.345

tc = 0.37 Hr. Ref: - 2.1.3
= 21.95 Min.
R50(24) = 280 mm Ref: - FIG -1.0
F = 0.720 Ref: - Table( for F)
Hence, C = 0.909 Ref: - 2.1.1 (Table)

iii) Intensity of Rainfall (I)

Ratio for tch = 0.210 Ref: - FIG -4
Ratio for 1h = 0.380 Ref: - FIG -4
R50(1) = 70 mm Ref: - FIG -3.3
Co.efficient K = tc h ratio / 1 h ratio =
K = 0.55
R50 (tc) = K x R50 (1) = 38.710 mm
I = R50 (tc) / tc = 105.823 mm/hr
iv) Design Flood Discharge(Q50)
Q50 = 0.278 x C x I x A
= 0.278 x 0.909 x 105.823 x 0.21
Q50 = 5.616 Cumecs

SM CONSULTANTS, BHUBANESWAR 2
 CALCULATION OF DISCHARGE BY AREA VELOCITY METHOD

Observed H.F.L. = 336.911 m

Lowest B.L. = 336.076 m
Rugosity Coefficient (η) = 0.055

A) CROSS SECTION PROFILE OF STREAM AT CH - 80897

(By summation of elements)

DISTANCE PERIMETER
CH -(m) RL(m) HFL(m) HEIGHT (m) AREA (m2)
(m) (m)
-4.000 336.928 336.911
-3.912 336.911 336.911 0.000
-2.000 336.540 336.911 1.912 0.371 0.355 1.948
-1.500 336.358 336.911 0.500 0.553 0.231 0.532
0.000 336.076 336.911 1.500 0.835 1.041 1.526
1.500 336.358 336.911 1.500 0.553 1.041 1.526
2.000 336.498 336.911 0.500 0.413 0.242 0.519
3.689 336.911 336.911 1.689 0.000 0.349 1.739
4.000 336.987 336.911 `
7.602 3.26 7.79

337.200

337.000

336.800

336.600

336.400

336.200

336.000

335.800

335.600
-5.000 -4.000 -3.000 -2.000 -1.000 0.000 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000
Cross Section

B) VELOCITY CALCULATION BY MANNINGS FORMULA

From Mannings formula, Velocity (V) = 1/η R2/3 S1/2

Parameters :- Rugosity coefficient η= 0.055

Wetted Area A= 3.26 Sq.m
Wetted Perimeter P= 7.79 m
Hydraulic Radius R=A/P= 0.418 m
Slope Calculation
At 25.17 m u/s, Bed Level = 335.59 m
At 62.35 m d/s, Bed Level = 334.35 m
SM CONSULTANTS, BHUBANESWAR 3
 Slope = 0.014168
Hence, Velocity (V) = 1.211 m/s

C) DISCHARGE CALCULATION

Discharge = A x V
Q = 3.95 Cumecs

SM CONSULTANTS, BHUBANESWAR 4
 WATERWAY CALCULATION
AS PER CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE DESIGN OF SUB STRUCTURES
AND FOUNDATIONS OF BRIDGES

Adopted Design Flood Discharge = Maxm of (QRational method & Qarea-Velocity method)
So, Design Flood Discharge, Qdesign = 5.62 Cumecs

1) Design Water Way (Regime Width) [ Clause no 4.5 ]

Pw = 1.811 C √Q
Pw = Regime Width in metre
C = Coefficient = 2.67
Q = Design Discharge in Cumsec = 5.62

Pw = 1.811 x 2.67 x √5.62 = 11.5 m

At HFL Condition P = 7.602 m From Site

However, Considering Discharge, Flow Velocity and Embakment Height,

Length of the proposed bridge 1 x 6 =6 m
Type of bridge 1X6X3 RCC Box

2) Design Discharge For Foundation [ Clause no 4.4 ]

Qf = 1.3 x Q
Qf = 1.3 x 5.62 = 7.301 Cumecs

3) Calculation Of Afflux [ Clause no 4.7 ]

The afflux can be calculated by Molesworth Equation:

  A  
2
 V2
h    0.015     1
 17.88   a  

Where,
h = afflux generated in m
V = Velocity of unobstructed water in m/s
A = Cross Sectional Area of unobstructed channel in Sqm
a = Cross Sectional Area of constricted channel in Sqm
(calculated from the cross section of the river in the bridge site)
A = 3.26 sqm a = 5.01 sqm

Velocity of Flow V =(1/η x R⅔ x S½) As per Manning's Formula

Hydraulic Mean Depth, R=A/P = 0.42 wetted perimeter = 7.790 m

Rugosity coefficient = 0.055 Bed slope= 0.009605

V= 1.00 m/s

SM CONSULTANTS, BHUBANESWAR 4
 h= 0.000 m
As h<0.15m, adopt h= 0.15 m

SM CONSULTANTS, BHUBANESWAR 5
4) Design H.F.L.
Design Discharge (Q) = 5.62 Cumecs
Velocity (V) = 1.211 m/s
Area Required (A = Q/V) = 4.63748968 Sq.m.
Water depth required = Area/Provided waterway = 0.77291495 m
Calculated HFL = BL+ Required Waterdepth = 336.848915 m
But, Observed HFL = = 336.911 m
Observed HFL + Afflux = 337.061 m
Hence,
Design HFL(Max. of CHFL & OHFL+Afflux) = 337.061 m

5) Scour Depth Calculation [ Clause no 4.6 ]

As Water way provided = Less than Lacey's regime width

Hence, Depth of Scour, D = 1.338*(qf²/f)⅓

Discharge intensity per m width qfb = Q/W = 0.936 Cumec

Lacey's silt factor f = 2.73

Normal Scour depth D = 1.000 m

In Moderate Bend
Maximum Depth of Scour 1.5 x D = 1.500 m For RCC BOX
Scour Level = 335.411 m
Scour below G.L. = 0.665 m
Depth of Rock strata from G.L. = 5.100 m
Rock Level = 330.976 m

6) Check for Fomation Level

i) RL of D.HFL should be less than or equal to RL of bottom of Top Slab

D. HFL = 337.061 m
Bed Level = 336.076 m
Box height = 3.000 m
Wearing Coat = 0.150 m
RL of B/O Top Slab = 338.926 m

SAFE, DHFL < RL of B/O Top Slab

ii) Provided Formation Level should be greater than or equal to RL of top of Top Slab

RL of B/O Top Slab = 338.926 m

Top Slab Thickness = 0.7 m
RL of T/O Top Slab = 339.626 m
Provided formation level = 343.447 m

SAFE, Provided FL > Min FL Reqd

iii) Freeboard from DHFL to Formation Level should be greater than 1m

SM CONSULTANTS, BHUBANESWAR 6
 D. HFL = = 337.061 m
Provided Formation Level = 343.447 m
Freeboard = 6.386 m

SAFE, Freeboard >1m

Justification for span:

From the above calculation it is inferred that proposed span of 1 x 6 X 3m is satisfying all criteria of Vertical
Clearance, Freeboard Clearance, Formation Level and site requirements. Hence, the choice of span is justified.

SM CONSULTANTS, BHUBANESWAR 7
RES

[ Clause no 4.5 ]

[ Clause no 4.4 ]

[ Clause no 4.7 ]

SM CONSULTANTS, BHUBANESWAR 8
[ Clause no 4.6 ]

SM CONSULTANTS, BHUBANESWAR 9
criteria of Vertical
span is justified.

SM CONSULTANTS, BHUBANESWAR 10
 SUMMARY OF WATER WAY CALCULATIONS FOR BRIDGE NO 232@ Chainage 80897
Sl.No. Description Denoted by Unit Value Remarks
1 Location
1.a Latitude 22°19'45.89" N
1.b Longitude 74°26'14.24" E
2 Catchment Area A Sqkm 0.21 From Toposheet
3 Length of the longest streamcourse from
source to the bridge site L km 0.721 From Toposheet
4 Difference in elevation between source
and point of interest H m 6.92 From Toposheet
5 soil Hilly soils / plateau & barren RBF-16
6 Sub Zone Lower Narmada & Tapi (3b)
7 50 year 24 hour point rainfall R cm 280 Fig-1 of RBF-16
8 Time of concentration = (L3/H)0.345 tc hour 0.37
9 Areal Reduction Factor F 21.95 RBF-16
10 Runoff Coefficient -0.415(RXF)0.2 C 0.909

CALCULATION
11 tc hour ratio 0.21 Fig-4 of RBF-16
12 1 hour ratio 0.38 Fig-4 of RBF-16
13 K = tc hour ratio / 1 hour ratio K 0.55
14 R50(1) mm 70 From Fig 3.3 of RBF-16
15 R50(tc) =R50(1) x K mm 38.71
16 I50 =R50(tc) /tc mm/h 105.823

DESIGN FLOOD DISCHARGE

17 Q50 =0.278xCxI50xA Q50 m3/s 5.6

WATER WAY CALCULATION

18 Velocity of flow V m/s 1.211

19 Bed Level m 336.076
20 Design HFL m 337.061
21 Scour Level m 335.411
22 Formation Level m 343.447