Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 10

Particulars 2001 2002 2003 2004

BCF 76436 89711 101966 115277


(Corp Ex) 3849 4334 4800 5275
EBITDA 72587 85377 97166 110002
(D&A) 90420 90840 91260 91680
EBIT -17833 -5463 5906 18322
EBIAT -10700 -3278 3544 10993
D&A 90420 90840 91260 91680
"-Delta Capex -2100 -2100 -2100 -2100
"-Delta NWC" -2377
FCFF 75493 83038 90374 1613386.504
PVIF 0.903016074 0.815438029 0.736353648 0.66493918
PVCF 68171 67712 66547 1072804
EV 1275235
Market Value of Equity = EV - Debt of 1999 + Cash of 1999
= 1198830
BCF Multiple = 18.43 //Not to be diluted
We want to value only new markets
Year Corporate Expeneses
1997 6.66%
1998 6.07%
1999 5.09%
2000 2.65%
2001 2.73%
2002 2.80%
//Case Data (21xCapex per year) 2003 2.92%
2004 3.06%
Considering g of 4% Assume Corp Ex to be 3% of net revenue
TV = 1515190.504

Year Capex
2001 2100
2002 2100
There is a constraint in g. Make sure
that the g in terminal phase is lower 2003 2100
than the g of the economy 2004 2100

(Interest Exp 1999/Int Bearing of 1998)*100


Post Tax CoD
CoE =
=

Asset Beta = EqBeta(E/V)+DebtBeta(D/V)


Radio One Asset Beta

Therefore, CoE =

WACC =
=
Decrease in
trend

Increase in
trend

Dep. Data from exhibit 9 footnote Total Depreciation


420 90000 90420
840 90000 90840
1260 90000 91260
1680 90000 91680

of 1998)*100 = 11.60% = PreTax CoD


= 6.96%
rf + Beta*Rm
6.35+Equity Beta*5.5 //Assuming 5.5%
= 0.82 = (EqB x 420256/(420256+82626))+(0.25*(82626/
"=>" EqBeta = 0.93

11.47

6.96*0.16+0.84*11.47
10.75
420256+82626))+(0.25*(82626/502882)
Particulars 2004 2005 2006 2007
EBITDA 110002 121002 133102 146413
(D&A) 91680 92100 92100 92100
EBIT 18322 28902 41002 54313
EBIAT(Tax is 40%) 10993 17341 24601 32588
"+D&A 91680 92100 92100 92100
"-Delta Capex -2100 -2100 -2100 -2100
"-NWC -2377 -2615 -2876 -3164
FCFF 98196 104727 111725 119424
PVIF 0.664 0.600 0.541 0.489
PVCF 65202 62794 60494 58391
EV 1173923 //The main difference between EV from prev
Equity Value = EV - Debt + Cash
= 1097518
BCF Multiple = 16.87425586
Our limit is 30 times, so we are not paying more
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
161054 177159 194875 214363 235799 259379 285317
92100 92100 92100 92100 92100 92100 92100
68954 85059 102775 122263 143699 167279 193217
41372 51036 61665 73358 86219 100367 115930
92100 92100 92100 92100 92100 92100 92100
-2100 -2100 -2100 -2100 -2100 -2100 -2100
-3480 -3828 -4211 -4632 -5095 -5605 -6165
127892 137207 147454 158726 171124 184763 199765
0.442 0.399 0.360 0.325 0.294 0.265 0.239
56467 54704 53088 51604 50239 48983 47824
rence between EV from previous question is because of terminal values being different
2015 2016
313849 323266
92100 2100
221749 321166 Cash flow adjustment for 2004
133049 192699 D&A 91680
92100 2100 "-Delta Capex -2100
-2100 -2100 "-Delta NWC -2377
-6782 -7460 Cash flow adjustment 87203
2609536 185239
0.216 Delta capex is 2100 for the next 15 years
564133 In this case, we have a constraint on delta capex (21L every year for next 15
Thus, cash flow adjustment is dependent only in growth of the NWC

EBTDA of 2015 313850

TV 2393269

We are using 2016 numbers for TV computation as assumptions (D&A) ar


Cash flow would change and hence TV has to be computed fr
a capex (21L every year for next 15 years) and D&A(2100 every year)
only in growth of the NWC

mputation as assumptions (D&A) are being changed from 2016.


nd hence TV has to be computed from 2016 values.

Вам также может понравиться