Requesting Party- Amos Choen Ltd.

C.E.O.- Ms. Zenia Gupta

Counsel – Mr. Ritvik Garg
Negotiation
About Company
- Reputation
- National as well as international Status
- Market Share 30%
- Award winner for the best facilities for employment and other awards
- Efficient Company
- Profitable Company
- Many Branches in other states and country.
- Profit bonus to Workers and other schemes

Against Company
- Rivals of the company
- No opportunities to the company for recover back
- No time given to Company to inquiry regarding incident
- No time for the solution for the problem of the workers
- Direct strike and closure of factory

Problems in company
- Losses in company
- Reduce Wages
- Stop incentive for temporary basis
- Accident in factory
- Safeguard and medical
- Contractual basis worker inefficient
- No redressal

Points to be negotiated
- Technical workers
- Negligence of the Workers
- Reduce wages due to loss
- Temporary basis wages and incentive reduced
- Rival taking advantages
- Safety over wages
- Due to loss inefficient worker to be dismissed as per the contractual terms
- Stop unwanted strike
- Give time for solution of problems
- Company Condition
- Worker unwanted strike damaging the company

Company toward Workers

- Bonus always
- Best incentive
- Best conditions
- Part of the family
- Due to the worker the company works
- Proper facilities to the worker as the same award is given to the factory
- Cooperative works
- Technical works only on technical Machineries
- Working in company for many past years
 Negotiation Agreement
(Between Amos Choens Ltd and Trade Union for protection of right of workers)
The company presents following negotiation demands
 Time given for recovery of loss
 Kumar incident inquiry before any action to be taken
 Time for solving problems before approaches court
 Temporary basis low wages and less incentive and perks
 After company recovers back the worker provide extra bonus
 Prior Notice for the strike
 Try first to solute problem with the Broad
 Constitute special broad for the worker redressal
 No compensation
 No unwanted case file to the court
 Job security to the Permanent workers.
The company will negotiate with the trade union based on the above ground. Company also
demands withdraw its case from the court without any compensation. If the company seem fit
any other ground on which negotiation can be done than the company is open for the same.
If the inquiry for the Kumar incident shows that the company negligent than company will fully
compensate to the worker without any litigation proceeding.
The Company also Promise to provide bonus and extra wages in case the company fully recover
with profits. The company also seeks Cooperation on the behalf of the worker for the
betterment of the company and fast growth in the Indian and International Market also.
If the company seem fit that other better solution to the current problem can be concluded, the
company is open for that.

Zenia Gupta
Client (C.E.O.)

Ritvik Garg
Counsel (Company: Amos Choens Ltd.)