Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chapter 1:
B2B marketing - business to business. The marketing activities of any kind of organization
which has exchange relationships with other organizations or businesses. Oftenly in terms of
continuously interaction rather than as a sequence.
B2C marketing - business to consumer. The process of selling products and services directly
between consumers who are end-users of this product/services.
supply chain - a network who refer to the flow of goods, from upstream(start) to
downstream(end). The trade between the supplying and buying organization, a serie of
inter-organizational relationships set up to support the buying and selling of goods. Strives to
integrate the dependent activities, actors, and resources into marketing channels between
point of origin - final consumption.
demand chain: network or supply chain, looking at supply chain from a demand perspective.
Aligned to B2B, start with specific customers need and attempts to design the chain to serve
those needs, instead of starting with the supplier/manufacturer and workers as in SCM.
value chain: you concentrate on value provided by each actor, similar to unique; what value
is each actor adding to the product/service. Adding values is important in the competing of
customers. Adding those activities together should reduce cost or improve performance in a
way that the customer perceive they are gaining superior value
Supporting activities:
- Purchasing
- Research & developments
- Personnel
- Organizational infrastructure
stakeholders - “intressenter”
Chapter 3:
Opportunistic behavior - means buyer/seller taking advantage of the business situation,
example: cheating, dishonesty, disorting data, hiding issues, false promises etc.
→ can lead to legal or ethical consequences.
Buying behaviour model - includes all activities of organizational members as they define a
buying situation and identify, evaluate and choose among alternative brands and suppliers.
Individual: individuals are working for organisations but they may also have personal
motives.
Social: interactions and relationships between people in the organization and outside it might
influence the nature and results of the process.
Organizational: organizationals factors - goals, structe, technology, rules and regulations of
the company or organization strongly impact role and powers of personnel and the nature of
the process.
Environmental: general economic, business, political factors that influence the demand for
and availability of goods and services.
SDL- service dominant logic - a synthesis of our knowledge of the significance of the
service element of product offerings, the co-creation of value with customers, and how this
impact on buyer-seller relationship. Explaining value creation through exchange among
configurations of actors.
CRM five primary stages in development and implementation of the strategy:
1. customer portfolio analysis: to identify the actual and potential customer.
2. customer intimacy: to explore profile, history, expectations, preferences of the customer.
3. network development: to manage relationship with the individuals and organizations that
contribute to value creations.
4. value proposition development: to identify sources of value for customers that meet their
expectations.
5. manage the customer life cycle: repetitive and continuously develop and keep the
customer.
→ customer profitability
IMP - saying that the business process is based on interactions rather than single
isolated transactions. The model consist four elements;
→ the interaction process
→ the participants in the interaction process
→ the environment within which interaction takes place
→ the atmosphere affecting and affected by the interaction.
Reposition
Cell 1: basic components “less complete offering -transactional nature of relationship”
Involves the most basic offerings, limited relationships with customer.
Cell 2: integrated components “less complete offering -relational nature of relationships”
Entails offerings a slightly more integrated set of components that require relationships. This
may spur product development, enhance CR, but incur relationships management cost.
Cell 3: basic solution “more complete offering-transactional nature of relationships”
Involves a more complete product, with no commitment beyond transactional relationships.
This allows the offering to become more differentiated, keeps relationships cost low, but
increase costs in coordinating more complex products and services required.
Cell 4: integrated solution “more complete offering-relational nature of relationships”
Entails making a complete offering and developing a close relationships with the customer.
This can bring the maximum degree of differentiation, but brings higher relationships
management cost.
Benchmarking - a method to guide positioning. Identify best practices for particular business
processes, and then learning from and adapting these practices for the benefit of your own
organization.
SME - small and medium-sized enterprises. They can make the most of opportunities in the
relationships by focusing on the development of capabilities that are valued for their
customer. Build their relationships portfolio in categorize options carefully, take better, quick
decisions.
1. standard supply: basic products/services can be offered from a catalogue or list. Involves
an internal management focus on technical skills in production.
2. traditional supply: products are developed from customer specification, requires the careful
management of information and component flows between buyer and seller.
3. partnership supply: involves a similar set of management skill as the traditional one but
with additional need for careful management of relationships and collaboration.
Product attributes - To understand how customers value their different elements of their
offerings it’s helpful for B2B marketers to apply tangibility who refers to the physical
attributes of a good, something in which service is a obvious relative lacking. We can relate
the idea of tangibility to core products, augmented products and intangibility who are
additional elements such as the services which can support a conventional product.
● Tangible core attributes: these represent the basic functional capacity of a product.
Ex) ice-cream making machines produced by the italian manufacture Carpigiani. The
firm website markets one line of it’s machines as having “ a big production capacity
in order to provide ice cream even during busy periods” and a “electronic control and
refrigeration system built taking into account current international standards”
● Tangible augmented attributes: these features are added to core attributes, either to
enhance the product’s performance or to provide something that helps distinguish it
from competitors offerings.
Ex) Carpigiani claims that it’s Holiday S3 SuperTRE product represents a “powerful
electronic machine..” ideal in order to create specialized offerings where if requested
by the customer the ice cream can have different toppings.
● Intangible attributes: These are what customers perceive as enhancing the product
including warranties, financial services, delivery, staff training, and the corporate
reputation of the salesman. Such attributes are becoming increasingly important to
help seller differentiate their offerings in the marketplace, many manufactures can
now provide goods with very similar levels of operational excellence. Rapid,
real-time phone assistance to resolve technical issues.
Ex) Carpigiani provides it’s organizational customers with support options such as
personalized luminous display sign and T-shirts for their retail staff.
The product life cycle - products having limited life. The figure stands income against time.
1. Development: Income negative due the investment cost resources to bring the product to
the market. Costs can include material testing, field-testing, staff training. Activites happens
inside the selling firm or partnerships up and downstream.
2. Introduction: The product enter the market for the first time, low level of customer
awareness, communication, media. Customer reaction to the new product will need to be
carefully monitored at this stage in order ro refine the marketing mix.
3. Growth: If customer had accept the new product the sale are thought to expand at this
stage.
4. Maturity: most potential buyers have adopted the product, the sales will reach is highest
point. Focusing on maintaining the volume of production in an attempt to achieve economics
sales.
5. Decline: the market consolidate and underperforming products may have to be withdrawn.
Ensure efficient production, focus on key customers. If the relationships between seller-buyer
are strong might be a possibility to use it for a new development of a product.
Business offerings
A product in marketing is goods, services, ideas, personalities, experiences, places, that a
company can sell or exchange in the market.
Aspects of offerings:
- products that other wants
- products that satisfy needs
- offerings as exchanges
- offerings as innovation
- offerings as promises
The uncertainties of Customers - when a customer can’t define it’s problem or may not
know the best solution to the problem.
- network uncertainties: the customer don’t have any clear supplier, might be optinals but no
established relationships with any supplier.
- fulfillment uncertainties: the purchaser knows what it wants, but unsure if the supplier can
fulfill all these wants. If the supplier can promise the right price, quality, performance.
Customer abilities
- problem-solving ability: t he purchaser can offer the supplier knowledge about the type of
solution it should produce, the volume and type of demand it requires. A customer’s
problem-solving ability helps a supplier who has high application and fulfillment uncertainty.
The customer can help the supplier to integrate the supply in the right way.
- fulfillment ability: the ability to fulfill it’s part of the deal, delivery arrangements,
information, payment. A customer with strong fulfillment ability will help the supplier to
fulfill the need better and will be an easy purchaser.
Supplier abilities
- problem-solving ability: t he supplier ability to design, develop, deliver and offering that will
provide a solution to a customer’s problem. Having the networks or able to create the
networks to help them to provide the solution.
- fulfillment ability: The ability to fulfill the needs of the purchaser. The ability to deal with
the uncertainties of the purchaser and deliver the required solution.
GAP-MODEL
Gap 1 - management’s perception of consumer expectations is different from consumer’s
expectations.
Gap 2 - management's perceptions of consumer expectations aren’t correct translated into
quality specifications.
Gap 3 - Service quality specifications aren’t correctly implemented in service delivery.
Gap 4 - Promises made in external communication are different from the service offered.
Gap 5 - Perceived or experienced service isn’t consistent with expected service
Embeddedness - Each relationship are dependent on and interacts with nets and networks.
You’re positioned in a context that you are working in and impact by your business
environment. It’s about a strong position, and one which it is difficult to get out of. You are
in a net – when others move it affects you, when you move it affects others and so even if
you are independent, you are constrained.
Ex) If you want to bring a new product to the market, your success depends on getting your
network partners to support you as well as what happens in other networks
Adaptations - reacting to others, changing views and positions in order to adjust to others,
economic technical adaptations go on throughout the relationship.
.
The myth of actions
→ the supplier acts and the customer reacts
→ marketing is what manufactures do
→ each customer is individually insignificant
→ the marketing actions of a supplier and the purchasing reactions of a customer can be
analysed
→ Business markets don’t consist of active suppliers and passive customers: a customer
faced with a particular problem has to seek out for it’s suitable supplier, asses it’s abilities,
ask it to help the customer.
→ Customers aren’t looking for a product from a manufacture: instead they seek a
solution of their problem from a supplier. Can also arise in a positive meaning bc there’s
problems ending in development. Many possible solutions that’s not provide by a single
product/service, interaction between a customer and different suppliers may lead to different
offerings.
→ Lot’s of people from different functions in both companies are likely to be involved
in the process of developing and fulfilling the offering that is traded between them:
Business market is not a process of action by the supplier and reaction of the customer it.s
one interaction between them.
→ Each business sale and purchase isn’t an isolated event, but part of a continuing
relationship between a supplier and a customer. Each interaction between a customer and
a supplier is a single episode in the relationship between them.
IMP approach - the interaction that takes place between active customers and active
suppliers in relationships. The companies in these relationships are interdependent for sales,
supplies, information, development and for access to other companies elsewhere in the
surroundings network.
→ a company’s network position changes and develops through interaction with other
companies in different positions in the network.
→ strategy involves using a company's own resources and those with which it interacts
and with which it’s interdependent.
→ a large part of what company sell is made up of what it buys. The value of a
company’s purchases often accounts for 60-80% of it cost of goods sold.
→ companies are becoming less complete. Each generation of new offerings is likely to
involve more and different technologies.
→ core competencies are based in the network. A company’s ability to bundle will depend
on it’s overall network position and in skills managing to activate relationships.
What is a network?
etwork isn’t a world of of individual and isolated transactions. It’s the result of
The N
complex interaction within and between companies, each which interacts with each other. No
single relationship can be understood without reference to the network itself. Each company
is embedded in a network of relationships.
Activity links
- interlocking of behaviours of the two actors(companies) will be necessary to start. Example
an order to be processed, scheduled, fulfilled by the supplier. Activities that leads to
development and these links results in design, production, logistic.
Resources ties
Assets that companies use to perform their activities.
types of resources:
→ Physical: machinery, equipment, buildings
→ Financial: investments, bank accounts, credit agreements
→ Technological: patents, technology development competences, innovation
→ Human: HR, staff, experience and cultural knowledge, engineering capabilities,
management skills etc.
→ Marketing: market knowledge, negotiation skills, marketing relationships, network
→ Reputational: brand assets, corporate reputation, corporate social responsibility reputation.
→ Organisational/managerial/entrepreneurial: management and entrepreneurial skills,
coordination and organisational skills.
→ Relationship and networking: contacts and relationships, “whom do you know?”
Heterogeneity of resources - a key. resources are many and varied as the previous list
shows. They are getting more varied and complex due to increasing competition/sophisticated
products.
Involvement in relationships
● solid actor bonds support extensive interaction, mutual knowledge and develop a high
level of mutual trust with customers.
● tight activity links closely co-ordinate different activities of the companies.
● strong resource ties dedicate different resource elements such as offerings, operations,
facilities and organisation roles to a counterpart.
Conclusion:
The major conclusion is that the way a company creates economic value from tech is to large
extent dependent on it’s relationships. Relationships are the way tech becomes embedded in a
networks.
For individuals: a company’s ability to mobilise its own personnel and their contacts is very
important to achieve a change. Recruit new staff of using the individual network to create
innovation. The aim is to obtain someone who already having a network within resources,
this strategy is faster and less costly than trying to develop change from scratch.
For companies: all relationships between companies will involve self-interest by both parties.
A certain interest in the other well-being is a necessary condition for a relationship to
develop. If two parties having their own ambitious but also listen to each other, are prepared
for change, to influence, then we having conditions for co-evolution.
The two most common problems in improving the link between tech and relationships
concern human technical resources. The available human resource determine what can be
done and how, which limits the number and potential of a company’s development. But must
be seen as priority to expend. Any technological change can affect a company’s relationships
possibilities and all changes must be looked at from it’s perspective.
● A network isn’t restricted to the set of companies with which a single company deals,
or even to the companies that they also deal with.
● A network isn’t confined to the set of companies with which a company has formal or
informal agreements about some particular co-operation.
● Any view of a network centred on single company, or defined by the company, or
defined by the company itself, is inevitable restricted and biased and gives an
incomplete view of the world surrounding that company and the actual or potential
influences on it.
● A company-centered view of a network provides a distorted picture of the ideas,
problems, pressures and aspirations of the companies that the company includes it’s
view.
● A company-centred view of the network is likely to be limited to those companies and
influences within it’s immediate horizons. As such, it provides an inadequate basis for
understanding the dynamics if the wider world of the network. It hinders the
company’s attempts to understand the pressures and opportunities that exist or may
exist in the future.
Network pictures: refers to the views of the network held by participants in that network.
The network picture will depend on their OWN experience, relationships and position in the
network and will be affected by their problems, uncernatines, abilities and by the limits to
their knowledge and understanding. There’s no absolute or objective network types and all
will have different elements, characteristics, possibilities when seen from different
perspectives. Dependent on the company’s own experience, position, knowledge,
understanding. Need to be realistic and put yourself in the other companie position.
Ex) IKEA catalogue wanting green paper as an reaction to their customers environmentally
aware. They formulated a environmental policy which their producer Haindl refused to
accept. IKEA had to mobilise paper producers in a number of countries, as well as suppliers
of equipment and chemicals. In other words they had to expand its picture of network in
order to find a solution.
Networking: refers to what the company can or might wish to do. Networking include all of
the interactions of a company or individual in the network.
2. Choices about position: “It’s equally valid to say that a company defines it’s relationships
or that a company is defined by those relationships. “
“ the choice for a company between consolidate by stabilizing and strengthening it’s existing
network position or create a new position by changing the combination of it’s existing
relationships developing new ones. “
- new relationships for consolidation: a company may seek to consolidate it’s existing
position by adding new customers or suppliers that are similar to it’s existing ones. Alt. it
may try to change it’s position by developing new and different relationships.
- existing relationships for consolidation and creating: existing relationships can be used to
create a new network position by, for example: developing new tech in those relationships so
as radically alter their content, or enable new relationships to be developed. Alt. the company
can simply seek to consolidate it’s existing position by operation in the same ways as before
it’s existing relationships, but with increased effectiveness.
3. Choices about how to network: “companies try to control the network and want the
benefits of control, but control has it’s problems and when it comes total, it’s destructive”
- it’s dependence of others
- the inadequacy of it’s picture of the network
- the diverse perspectives, approaches, requirements and aims of those around it
- the need to accommodate and work with these others but to be willing to coerce them when
it’s necessary and it’s able to do so
Network outcomes
Networking always affects more than one company. We can’t with certainty if the outcome
will be positive or negative in terms of profit, now or in the future. But each company will
observe, assess and respond to only a subset of the networking outcomes that affect it based
on it’s particular network picture. A useful way of coping with multi-faceted and
multi-layered nature of network outcomes it to examine them along three dimensions that we
have used throughout this book - actors, activities and resources.
Actors
single actor: network outcomes directly affect each single in the network, each company
needs to examine the outcomes of networking for other significant actors, as well as
examining outcomes of itself. Is important to examine network outcomes of single actors in
relation to other actors in the network.
the network: the outcome can be identified for whole sets of actors and relationships. Change
or stability in one or more relationships can lead to wider outcomes in the network as a
whole. Network outcomes have an important collective element. The outcomes that are
observed by all participants and can explain to them how the network operates.
Activities
Network outcomes can also affect how different activities are related to each other. They can
restructure a company’s relationship by changing their activities that are performed and
linked between them.
Resources
Networking can have outcomes that affect the development and utilization of resource
between companies.
Utilisation of resources: Networking has important outcome that affects access to and
utilisation of resources for companies. There resources include both those in the company
itself and it’s counterparts. The resources may include existing tech, know-how, offerings,
facilities and knowledge-intensive companies.
Ex) IKEA access to and efficient utilisation of resource dominated the networking.
Development of resources: Another type of outcome affects the development of
the resources of the companies involved, weather technical, physical or operational.
Ex) IKEA case when the development and introduction of a new tech of totally chlorine-free
paper.
Interconnections
Networking, network pictures and network customers outcomes are all interconnected. None
of them automatically precedes the others and each affects and is affected by those others.
A view of Networks
● Networks is something complex, the network consist of all of the companies that are
significant for the particular issue being addressed.
● Networks don’t exist in isolation.
● No-one manage the network but all have to try to manage in it.
● A major concern for a manager is to maintain or change the position of her company
in the network. Network position consists of the company’s relationships and the
benefits, costs, rights and obligations that come from them and changing position is
likely to involve variation in existing relationships and establishing.
● It’s important for the manager to investigate her own network picture and why they
see things that way and to try to make sense of the network pictures of others that
form the basis for their action.
→ Each customer and supplier relationships must be managed for clearly thought-out costs
and benefits. Some business relationships are individually vital to a company’s success or
even survival. Others are only important as part of a collectivity of other, similar ones. Some
relationships are just trival. What should be the company’s own level of resource investment,
adaptation and integration. What it should seek and expect from it’s counterpart.
→ Each relationship must be investigate from the company’s own perspective and from the
perspective of the counterpart. Both companies will have different idea of the value of the
relationship, it’s place, portfolio and commitment. The manager’s task in a successful
business relationships isn’t to do exactly what the other part wants, whatever cost.
Relationships management requires a combination of co-operation, confrontation, guile and
pursuit of mutual and self-interest.
→ Each relationship and the things that happen in it are linked to all the relationships of both
companies and to those, in which they aren’t directly involved, in the wider network around
them. The manager needs to approach each relationship with an eye on the wider context.
This might well involve her in acting in a particular relationship in order to achieve an effect
elsewhere in the network and being aware that each relationship is subject to multiple effects.
● No company can have all the skills and technologies that are needed to satisfy any
customer’s requirements. Keep internally and rely on companies externally.
● The successful operation in business network aren’t based on their internal tech skills.
Is about managing relationships with a number of others, their ability to bundle
together these technologies to supply an offering that meets the requirements.
● The manager’s task is not to develop new technology in splendid isolation over a long
time period. Instead, she needs to investigate and match her own technologies with
those of other companies. With those other companies she has to synthesise or
develop technologies and bring them to new applications, often in a different form.
● a company’s strategic direction isn’t the outcome of it’s own deliberations, choice,
actions alone. But it’s dependent on the corresponding commitment, aquisense,
initiative and countermoves of others.
● Both purchasing and marketing people have to manage individual relationships and
portfolios of relationships and are concerned with how these relationships are linked
to their company’s other direct relationships.
● Both are concerned with their company’s current and potential network position.
● Both have to interact with each other and with numerous other functions in their own
and each other’s companies.
● Both are concerned with integrating their own company’s technologies with those of
others.
● Both have to carry out a combination of routine order administration and strategic
roles.
● Finally, both functions exist in the same company and need to work with each other.
A company is where a supply and customer network come together and each is
mutually interdependent.
Purchasing = to scan for the resources that the company needs to complement it’s own. The
role of purchasing function must extend far beyond that of choosing a supplier against a
specification issued by another function. Purchasing must initiate and develop supplier
relationships and portfolio strategies. It units analysis have to be the relationship and the
portfolio and not product, service, order.
Marketing
Outcome and actors: The marketer must not restrict the examination of her actions to their
immediate effect on the single customer to which they were directed, but also consider their
outcomes for the longer-term relationships with that customer with other relationships,
including her own suppliers and their effect on the wider network as a whole.
Outcome and activities: Relationships in network involve adaptations and the integration of
the activities of the companies involved in them. Bc of this the marketer must consider the
outcomes of her own actions and those of her counterpart on the operation of both of the
companies. Ex) the acceptance of a single order may involve both companies in changes to
their offerings and operations or may lead to the restructuring of the wider network.
Outcomes and resources: Finally, marketers must considers the outcomes of their own
actions and those of their customers in terms of resources of both companies. The
establishment of a new relationship or even an individual sale may have a significant effect
on the utilisation of the resources of both companies. It may also lead to or require the
development of those resources, sometimes in directions that do not relate to either
company’s overall strategies.