Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The purpose of this report write up is to discuss the overall findings of our survey
instrument and discussing recommendations regarding the entirety of this evaluation project. The
document is organized into different sections beginning with the methodology of the evaluation,
Methodology
Themes.
The themes of the focus group as discussed in Phase II were as follows; how the
participant’s social settings impacted their nutritional decisions, how the participant’s stress
levels influence their food/drink intake, and how the emotions of others or the participant’s own
emotions changed their eating habits. We felt as if all these themes were important to find more
information on and all three themes were therefore present in the quantitative research in means
of a questionnaire. All three of these themes were reoccurring throughout the entire focus group.
Even when presented with new questions the participants’ responses would still relate back to
one of these three themes. The themes are prevalent in every participant’s life and each
participant had much to share about each one. Each theme is also not focused primarily on
college life. They each are involved in a big enough picture to take place in the everyday life of
Survey Instrument.
The purpose of this evaluation is to explore to what extent do RCLS 425 students engage
in healthy eating habits.
PHASE 3: SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT 3
Please indicate your nutritional habits during the periods of time mentioned below.
Please check where you fall on the scale.
3. Hanging out with friends.
6. On a scale of 1-6 (with 1 being the lowest and 6 being the highest), how do
you rate the amount of food you have bought and consumed on campus?
______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
1 2 3 4 5 6
7. Rank the following nutritional contents by what you believe is the most
important when buying a product. Please list what you believe is the most
important content as a 1 and the least important as a 6.
________ SODIUM
________ No (2)
Question styles can potentially alter the effects of how participants respond and thus how
data is recorded. In the following sections, the reasons for our use of Likert style, semantic
differences, self-assessment, rank order, and demographic questions on our take home survey
After analyzing the result of our focus group in phase two, we sought to gather further
information around the impacts cost, social groups, emotions, and stress have on people's
nutritional habits. The entirety of our survey instrument involved Likert style questions, semantic
differences, self-assessment, ranking order, and demographic questions as these question forms
best formulated our finding into quantitative data. All question typed were posed as close ended
questions (Henderson, 2017). Likert scales seek to measure attitudes using response anchors such
as strongly agree, disagree, strongly agree, and so on (Henderson, 2017). Our survey purposely
included only four anchor questions as strongly disagree, disagree, agree, and strongly agree for
quantitative purposes. Semantic differentials are another form of scaling question used to
measure attitudes. These questions are formatted to, “...include a list of two opposing adjectives
written in a linear fashion” (Henderson, 2017, p.159). Additionally, ranking questions were
chosen to capture descriptive information. Ranking questions are formulated to be forced choice
close ended questions with all items falling on a ranking scale. Rankings the items are not based
on being good or bad but rather offers further insight at the relative meaning of one item to
participants rank themselves on a scale or answer close ended yes or no questions. Both were
used on our survey to gather coded data (Henderson, 2017). Lastly, demographic/background
questions are used to measure age, gender, race, and/or birth place and are structured
PHASE 3: SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT 6
categorically (Henderson, 2017). The selected categories for the demographic questions will be
further described in the next section of this write up along with all used data level types.
Level of Data.
In using the question types indicated above, each can be formatted into different levels of
data questions. Interval level questions were utilized frequently as it was crucial to capture
meaningful and predictable size differences between data values. In doing so, more sophisticated
data could be gathered in the forms of mean, median, mode, and a standard deviation
(Henderson, 2017). Additionally, ordinal level question styles forced survey takers to rank
options least to greatest yielding more sophisticated data (Henderson, 2017). Our rank order
question probed at the participants’ level of interest of nutrition label contents as the members of
our focus group shared high protein amounts and low sugar levels were preferred. We wanted to
see if the larger RCLS 425 class population felt the same way. Moreover, nominal level data
questions were used to capture “...non-assumptive data with little overlap ...including gender,
race, and birthplace” (Henderson, 2017, p. 286). For the purposes of this evaluation, our
categorical styled questions asked participant’s gender, major, and college class standings. The
choices of majors included Outdoor Recreation, Therapeutic Recreation, and Recreation Tourism
and Management. Respondents were asked to provide whether they were female or male, and
lastly if they were a freshman, sophomore, junior, or senior in college. Lastly, ratio data stands as
the “...most sophisticated data type including a zero point” (Henderson, 2017, p.285). Our survey
instrument implemented this level data type by asking for participant’s exact age. Utilizing all
four of these level data types helped produce exceptional qualitative data. Next, this write up will
Instrument Organization.
have a visually appealing instrument to help engage participants further. Our questionnaire was a
total of twelve questions and should have taken no longer than five minutes to complete. We
utilized different types of questions ranging from ranking questions to scale questions to yes or
no questions and others. By switching up the types of questions, it kept participants actively
hooked on what the survey was asking. The questions were worded in a non-biased manner,
ensuring that the results were not skewed in one way or another. The question numbers were
bolded to make sure participants could see where the next question started. Each option of
answer to choose from were in all capitalization so it was clear what the options there were.
Additionally, instructions were placed before every different type of question so that participants
Purposes.
For the purpose of this evaluation project, convenient sampling was utilized as the RCLS
425 class was readily available. According to Henderson, 2017, “...descriptive statistics will
include a list of the frequencies reported for the values of the variables, the mean, median, …and
standard deviation” (p. 323). The mode was also utilized. All data collected on our survey
instrument were plugged into the computer program Excel to calculate these statistical data
values. As a result, we were able to determine the mean, median, mode, and standard deviations
for our Likert style questions. From this, we were able to draw analysis of our data and thus
conclusions of our findings that pertained to RCLS 425 student’s engagement in healthy eating
habits.
PHASE 3: SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT 8
Analysis/Findings
The following sections will include detailed data found throughout the evaluation. Data
will be broken down into two different sections beginning with demographics and ending with
interval data. Visual aids have been included to assist in the understanding of the data.
Demographics.
The following graphs are a representative of the collected demographic data types.
AGE N = 39
15 13
Mean: 22.4
Number of Participants
11
10
Median: 22
5 2 3 3 2
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0
Mode: 22
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Age Standard Deviation: 3.3
It was determined that the most common age of participants was 22 at 13 participants.
GENDER N= 39
Females:
Female, 17,
Male 17 participants = 43.6%
44%
Male, 22, Female
56% Males:
22 participants = 56.4%
It was determined that there were more males in the study at 22 participants compared to
17 female participants. Males made up 56% of the population and females 44%.
PHASE 3: SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT 9
The following questions aimed to measure to what extent social groups and the stress of
Mean: 2.2
Median: 2
Mode: 3
time mentioned below. Please check where you fall on the scale. Mean: 4.1
Median: 4
Mode: 5
Standard Deviation.
The following data describes the mean, median, mode, and standard deviations associated
Results:
0.7 6.7 N= 39
1.7 5.7
Mean: 3.7
2.7 4.7
Median: 4
Mode: 4
3.7
With a standard deviation of 1.0, we are confident in the reliability of these results. 68%
of participants fell between 2.7 and 4.7 on a scale of eating healthy or unhealthy around their
friends. This is one standard deviation above or below our mean of 3.7.
Conclusion
Of the forty-two students that were handed surveys in the RCLS 425 class, we received
thirty-nine responses. Of the thirty-nine respondents, 35.9% were Recreation and Tourism
management majors, 28.2% Therapeutic Recreation majors, and 35.9% Outdoor Recreation
majors. Also, of the thirty-nine respondents, 43.6% were females and 56.4% were males. A
junior class standing was the most prominent being 76.9% followed by a senior class standing at
23%. None of the participants were of freshman or sophomore level standing. Further, when
asked if social groups greatly impact their nutritional choices, 41% of participants disagreed and
41% agreed. The other 18% either strongly agreed or strongly disagreed. When participants were
asked on what nutritional values they thought were the most important when buying a product,
total sugars, calories, and protein were significantly the most prominent responses. Additionally,
participants were in agreeance of how stress during finals week works hand in hand with
PHASE 3: SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT 11
unhealthy eating habits. Each self-assessment question was on a scale of one to six: one being
very healthy and 6 being very unhealthy. The most common answer was five out of six. Lastly,
participants were also in agreeance about the cost of nutritional food. 87.2% of the respondents
reported that cost does influences their nutritional choices. After finding our conclusive results,
Recommendations
The final section of this report discusses recommendations. Based on our founded
results, we recommend campuses offer healthier food options to their students. Teaching stress
management techniques that do not involve unhealthy food choices would also benefit the
participants’ ability to continuously engage in healthy eating habits. Additionally, peer pressure
awareness, encouraging friends to choose healthier food options when in social groups together,
self-autonomy, and pride in personal dietary decisions would assist in people’s confidence to
pursue their chosen dietary habits when in social settings. Lastly, teaching proper budgeting
tactics would assist people in their decisions to purchase specific healthy foods based on their
allotted budget.
PHASE 3: SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT 12
References
Henderson, K. A., Bialeschki, M. D., & Browne, L.P. (2017). Evaluating Recreation Services