Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research

Vol. 77, June 2018, pp. 337-341

Damage Identification of Reinforced Concrete Beam Using Modal


Curvature Approach
A Chaurasia, S K Panigrahi* and S S Patel
CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee-247667, India

Received 03 April 2017; revised 22 December 2017; accepted 16 January 2018

Reinforced concrete (RC) beams are one of the main load bearing structural elements in buildings. These elements suffer
from distress, primarily cracks, due to many reasons resulting into degradation of stiffness and strength. The modal
curvature approach is a very good technique in damage identification in steel and RC beams. This study provides a critical
review on the different approaches for damage prediction. The current state of the knowledge is presented and the different
models which have been proposed in the past for damage identification on structural systems are discussed. In this paper, a
technique for damage identification and assessment of RC beams is proposed which makes use of vibration data to compute
the Curvature Damage Factor (CDF). To detect damage progression, simply-supported RC beams were subjected to an
incrementally increasing static four point loading in steps till ultimate failure. After each load step, vibration measurements
were performed using wireless sensors mounted at critical locations. The experimental crack pattern and results of modal
curvature were compared. The results show that this approach is efficient for damage identification of reinforced concrete
beams which exhibit high non-linear behavior.

Keywords: RC Beam, Modal Curvature, Frequency, Crack Pattern, CDF Value, Vibration Measurement, Damage
Identification

Introduction proposed a method for identifying damage in a multi


The performance of a structure is affected due to storeyed shear building using minimum number of
permanent unfavorable change in its physical modal parameters of the structure. The proposed
properties, which is referred as damage. The causes of methodology requires experimentally determined
damage may be due to excessive vibration, harsh sparse modal data of any particular mode as input to
environment, ageing, overloading, fatigue, corrosion detect the location and extent of damage in the
of reinforcing bars in concrete etc. Consequently, it is structure. Patel et al.3 used acceleration-time histories
important to know damage progression for estimation from reinforced concrete building to detect the change
of residual service life. Structural Health Monitoring in physical properties of the building. Frequency
is the implementation of damage identification spectra have been widely used for fault identification
process, classified into four levels: Level 1: Damage in mechanical and civil structures4. An alternative
detection, Level 2: Damage location, Level 3: approach, based on modal curvature was
Damage quantification and Level 4: Remaining life demonstrated to enhance the sensitivity of damage
prediction. Structural damage is a local perturbation identification5. Further, Wahab6 studied the use of
of its physical characteristics, i.e. its stiffness, mass modal curvature for damage identification. Based on
and/or damping, which produces change in the measurements of Eigen vector curvatures and Eigen
vibration characteristics of the structure. This forms frequencies. Ciambella et al.7 proposed a technique
the basis for vibration based structural health for damage detection and assessment. The proposed
monitoring techniques. Extensive efforts have been technique was illustrated with reference to a
made to detect and ascertain the cause of damage in cantilever Euler beam endowed with a set of
global scenario. Fan & Qiao1 presented a piezoelectric transducers. The result shows that the
comprehensive review on vibration based approaches modal curvature difference method is an effective
for structural damage identification. Panigrahi et al.2 damage detection technique for 1D beams but not
——————
very effective for 2D structures. Therefore, Zhang8
*Author for Correspondence improved this method by introducing coordinate
E-mail: skpanigrahi@cbri.res.in transformation technique so as to settle the calculation
338 J SCI IND RES VOL 77 JUNE 2018

difficulty of modal curvature methods. Bai et al.9 and u’’di is that of damaged structure. To the
presented another method for damage identification knowledge of authors, no work has yet been reported
of a plane grid structure similar to 2D plate bending in literature to identify the extent of damage using
by computing modal curvature changes in two modal curvature approach in reinforced concrete
directions of the damaged structure. Modal Curvature structures. The approach is illustrated by considering
based damage identification methods along with several extent of damage states, thereby establishing
filtering procedure were studied extensively10-11. the relation between CDF and damage percentage.
Srinivasa et al.12 studied modal characteristics of
reinforced concrete structures under various test Experimental set-up and analysis
conditions. Different methods have been proposed by Description of beam specimens
researchers for damage identification in building The experiment was carried out on RC beam
structures using experimental/simulated modal having sectional dimension of 100×150 mm, length
information to detect possible damages13-15. 1800 mm, casted with M30 grade of concrete and
The present paper aims to provide a method for HYSD reinforcement (Fe 415). Three different types
determination of the location of damage in RC beams of beams of varying reinforcement details with two
due to load-induced cracks through modal curvature samples of each beam were considered for the test.
approach by computing CDF values. CDF values The beams were designed as per IS: 456-2000 code.
were computed from the modal curvatures and The beam under consideration had a balanced section
compared with the obtained crack patterns in each with reinforcement percentage of 1.88%. Other beams
case on the beam. The current study provided an were designed as under-reinforced beams.
overview of the identified behavior of damaged RC
beams with different loaded conditions using modal Experimental methodology and instrumentation
curvature approach, thereby verifying the relation The experimental methodology and instrumentation
between CDF values and the location of damage and for all the RC beam specimens were identical. The
extent of crack. subsequent section describes the details for balanced
section specimen only, followed by the analyzed
Mathematical model results. For vibration measurement of beam, four tri-
Pandey et al.5 demonstrated that absolute changes axial MEMS accelerometers were mounted at
in modal curvature are highly sensitive to damage and different locations on one side of beam as depicted in
can be used as a good indicator of damage. The Figure 1a. The data acquisition system used in this
curvature (k) is often calculated from the measured experimentation consists of 4 on-board tri-axial MEMs
displacement mode shapes using central difference
approximation,
k = (ui+1 – 2ui + ui-1) / l2 … (1)
where i is the node number, l is the distance
between the two successive measured locations and ui
is the deflection of the beam at the cross-section
considered. As a consequence, curvature mode shape
may be obtained from displacement mode shape, and
curvature of the jth mode shape may be derived from
the vertical displacement of the same mode shape.
Wahab and Roeck6 introduced curvature damage
factor (CDF), in which the difference in modal
curvature is averaged over all modes. When the
structure contains several damage locations, the CDF
gives a clear indication of these locations. The
curvature damage factor is given by Fig. 1—Placement of accelerometers and crack pattern developed
CDF= (1/N) Σ Iu’’0i – u’’diI , i= 1 to N … (2) at different load stages a) Placement of wireless tri-axial
accelerometer on RC beam (dimensions in mm), b)Crack at first
where N is the total no of modes considered, u’’0i is significangt crack instant (15kN), c)crack at maximum load
the curvature mode shape of the undamaged structure (52kN) and d) crack at ultimate failure (44kN)
PANIGRAHI et al.: DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM USING CURVATURE 339

accelerometer with range of ±2 g to ±10 g and domain data for various damage scenarios of
resolution of 1.5 mg RMS (±2 g), 9 mg RMS (±10 g). considered beam, the frequencies and corresponding
The accelerometers were synchronized with sampling mode shapes are computed. SigView platform was
rate of 1 Hz-512 Hz and range for bi-directional used to convert time spectrum data to frequency
RF-Link from 70 meters to 2 kilometers. The data from spectrum data. The modal frequencies for different
the wireless sensors was acquired using a compatible states of beam under test are given in Table 1. It is
base station (WSDA®-Base) at a sampling rate of 256 observed that with increase in load from zero to 52
Hz. The aim of the system is to sample the data in kN, the damage increases leading to decrease in
synchronized manner from various nodes placed at frequency. On attaining maximum load of 52 kN,
different positions on the beam. The sensors were there is substantial reduction in load on further
synchronized such that the data analysis algorithm displacement loading with a 44 kN load at ultimate
provides the consistent results. To induce cracks on a failure for RC beam specimen. As a result of increase
simple supported RC beam, specimens were subjected in load, substantial increase in cracks were noticed
to four point loading using servo-hydraulic actuator of leading to reduced frequency. Figure 2 shows the
100 kN capacity. High Eigen frequency may cause
weakness of supports which leads to vertical
displacement resulting changes in dynamic
characteristics, such as degradation in frequency values
due to simple support condition. To restrict vertical
displacement, the specimens were mounted between
backing roller at bottom and top. The rollers were placed
on the steel plate which was fixed to the supports. This
eliminates the monitoring error resulting from support
vibration. The beam specimens were subjected to
incremental increase in monotonic four point loading
and vibration responses were recorded at each stage.
The dynamic analysis was performed on the captured
data i.e. on intact beam as well as over progressively
damaged beam. The vibration characteristics and the
damage pattern of the beam were measured in 37 load
steps. For damage identification of a particular RC beam
under consideration, the analysis of vibration signature
was performed at different damage state viz. undamaged
state, at first significant crack at loading-15 kN, at
maximum loading-52 kN and at ultimate failure-44 kN.
The crack pattern on the Beam at different damage
state is shown in Figure 1b, Figure 1c and
Figure 1d corresponding to the above mentioned
damage states respectively.
Health monitoring of RC beam
The recorded acceleration-time histories were
analyzed for determination of dynamic properties of
undamaged and at different damage states of the beam
Fig. 2—Mode shapes at intact and damaged states under various
specimens. From the obtained experimental time- loadings
Table 1—Experimentally obtained frequencies of RC Beam at different damage states
Damage states of beam Load(kN) 1st Frequency (Hz) 2nd Frequency (Hz) 3rd Frequency (Hz)
Undamaged 0 3.39 7.18 11.7
At first crack 15 3.375 7.1406 11.547
At Max loading 52 3.1406 7.1094 11.422
At ultimate failure 44 3.0625 7.0625 11.156
340 J SCI IND RES VOL 77 JUNE 2018

Fig. 3—Curvature Damage Factor (CDF) vs position for Beam at different load cases

mode shapes for undamaged and damaged RC Beam in failure pattern of RC beam specimens. For the load
specimen respectively. The mode shapes obtained in case corresponding to ultimate failure of beam, the
damaged state shows some variation as compared to ratio of CDF values for position of 1st element to
the undamaged state. In the case of 1st mode shape 4th element is 1.46. Practically, the crack developed
there is a significant variation in mode shape for at 1st element is approximately 1.46 times the cracks
52 kN and 44 kN loaded conditions. For the case of developed near 4th element. Similarly, other two
15 kN, there is significant damage, with a slight beams with different reinforcement detailing were
variation in the graph. From lower mode towards tested and analyzed, showing analogous behavior
higher mode side, locating any change between between CDF values vis-à-vis crack pattern.
the mode shapes is difficult. From the mode shape
values, modal curvatures are computed for the first Conclusions
three modes using Eq. (1) and curvature damage Past studies undertaken by several researchers for
factors (CDF) using first three modes are derived damage identification on structures have been
using Eq. (2). Figure 3 shows the CDF values presented in brief. However, the current paper focuses
at various positions of the beam at 15 kN, 52 kN and mainly on the system identification procedure using
44 kN respectively. modal curvatures to detect damage zones of a simply
supported RC beam subjected to incrementally
Results and Discussion increasing load. The vibration measurement and its
Figure 3 shows that at 15 kN load the CDF value at analysis using Modal Curvature Method for damage
1st element is small as compared to that near 4th identification of a RC beam for different load
element. However, as load increases the CDF values condition and damage states was carried out. The
near 1st element keeps on increasing and at maximum results indicate that the adopted methodology is
loading it becomes significant in comparison to CDF effective in identifying the damage location on RC
values at 4th element. At failure, the CDF values beams. The results obtained in this study show that
obtained are greater than that of 4th element. The CDF the increase in load on RC beam resulted into increase
value shows two peaks at element no. 1 and 4 after in damage (i.e. cracks) which is in proportion to the
subjected to a load of 15 kN, which indicates the CDF values, leads to the hypothesis that the use of
crack position near to Element no.1 and 4 (Figure 3). this technique is viable in predicting the extent of
After applying maximum load of 52 kN and at failure damage and in-turn remaining service life of the
the crack position remains unchanged i.e. cracks near structure. However, further research is needed to
1st and 4th element. CDF value at element no. 1 further achieve better agreement with the experimental data
increases in comparison to that element no. 4. The possibly taking into account the different material and
cracks identified from CDF plots match with the real geometrical configuration of structural component
dense crack zone developed in the beam during the and system.
experimentation (Figure1d). The variation in crack
pattern observed during experiment are comparable to Acknowledgement
the variation observed in CDF values. After failure The work is conducted as a part of Mission
the crack density near 1st element is observed to be Mode research project under 12th five year plan at
more than that near 4th element which is also observed CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee,
PANIGRAHI et al.: DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM USING CURVATURE 341

India. The authors are thankful to the Director, 8 Zhang J, Hue P, Hue Y C, Long D Y & Yu Z H,
CSIR-CBRI Roorkee for his support. The team Damage detection of plane member structures based on
modal curvature difference method, Adv Mat Res, 163 (2011)
acknowledges Ms Pankhuri, Project Fellow, for 2848-2851.
assistance in experimental work. 9 Bai Y, He S, Nie W, Gaoa J & Song X, Plane grid structure
damage location identification by model curvature, Int Conf
References on Adv in Comp Model and Simul, Procedia Engg, 31 (2012)
1 Fan W & Qiao P, Vibration-based damage identification 534-540.
methods: A review and comparative study, Struc Health 10 Ciambella J & Vestroni F, The use of modal curvatures for
Monit, 10 (2011) 83-111. damage localization in beam-type structures, J Sound Vib,
2 Panigrahi S K, Chakraverty S, Bhattacharyya S K, 340 (2015) 126-37.
Damage detection of multi-storeyed shear structure
11 Panigrahi S K, Choursia A, Patel S S, & Parashar J,
using sparse and noisy modal data, Smart Struc and Syst,
Application of modal curvature technique for damage
15(2015) 1215-1232.
identification of reinforced concrete beam, Int Conf on Innov
3 Patel S S, Chourasia A P, Panigrahi S K, Parasher J, Parvez
in Struc Engg, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India,
N, & Kumar M, Damage identification of RC structures
14-16 Dec 2015, 941-949.
using wavelet transformation, Procedia Engg, 144 (2016),
336-342. 12 Srinivasa V, Sasmala S, Ramanjaneyulua K & Jeyasehar C A,
4 Nataraj M & Baskaran G, Experimental investigation of Influence of test conditions on modal characteristics of
misalignment and looseness in rotor bearing system reinforced concrete structures under different damage
using Bartlett power spectral density, J Sci Ind Res,76 (2017) scenarios, Arch of civil and Mech Engg, 13 (2013)
308-313. 491-505.
5 Pandey A K, Biswas M & Samman M M, Damage detection 13 Yahiaoui A, Med M S C & Laddada S, Analysis of the
from changes in curvature mode shapes, J Sound Vib,145 composite materials using the wavelet transform, J Sci Ind
(1991) 321-332. Res, 75 (2016) 344-348.
6 Wahab M M A & Roeck G De, Damage detection in bridges 14 Behera D & Chakraverty S, Dynamic response and
using modal curvatures: application to a real damage oscillating behavior of fractionally damped beam, CMES:
scenario, J Sound Vib, 226 (1999) 217-235. Comp Mod in Engg & Sci, 104 (2015) 211-225.
7 Ciambella J, Vestroni F & Vidoli S, Damage observability, 15 Patel S S, Structural health monitoring of reinforced
localization and assessment based on eigen frequencies concrete buildings using wavelet analysis, M.Tech Thesis,
and eigen vectors curvatures, Smart Struc and Syst, 8 (2011) Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, India,
191-204. (2015).

Вам также может понравиться