Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Castro, En Banc]
Issue: Was the Bill of Assignment really one that involves transfer of the formula for Mafran sauce itself?
Digest:
In 1938, Magdalo V. Francisco, Sr. discovered a formula for the manufacture of a food seasoning (sauce)
derived from banana fruits popularly known as MAFRAN sauce. He registered his trademark in his name
as owner and inventor with the Bureau of Patents. However, due to lack of sufficient capital to finance the
expansion of the business, he secured the financial assistance of Tirso T. Reyes who, after a series of
negotiations, formed with Universal Food Corporation eventually leading to the execution of a "Bill of
Assignment"
Magdalo Francisco entered into contract with UFC that he be the Chief Chemist and shall have absolute
control in the purchase and safekeeping of the chemicals used in the preparation of said Mafran sauce.
Francisco kept the formula of the Mafran sauce secret to himself. Thereafter, however, due to the alleged
scarcity and high prices of raw materials, only the necessary daily employees without employing permanent
employees was instructed. Successive memoranda on business operatins were release, without Francisco
being recalled back to work, he filed tan action for rescission of the Bill of Assignment. Then in a letter
dated March 20, 1961, UFC requested Francisco to report for duty, but the latter declined the request
because the present action was already filed in court.
Art. 1191. The power to rescind obligations is implied in reciprocal ones, in case one of the obligors
should not comply with what is incumbent upon him. The injured party may choose between the
fulfillment and the rescission of the obligation, with the payment of damages in either case. He may
also seek rescission, even after he has chosen fulfillment, if the latter should become impossible.
ART. 1383. The action for rescission is subsidiary; it cannot be instituted except when the party
suffering damage has no other legal means to obtain reparation for the same.
Was UFC’s contention that Magdalo Francisco is not entitled to rescission valid?
No. Francisco is entitled for rescission of contract. Under Art. 1383, the action for rescission is subsidiary;
it cannot be instituted except when the party suffering damage has no other legal means to obtain reparation
for the same. Here, the dismissal of the Francisco as the permanent chief chemist of the corporation is a
fundamental and substantial breach of the Bill of Assignment. He was dismissed without any fault or
negligence on his part. Thus, apart from the legal principle that the option — to demand performance or
ask for rescission of a contract — belongs to the injured party, the fact remains that he had no alternative
but to file the present action for rescission and damages.
Whether or not Francisco ceded not only the use of Mafran sauce formula but also the formula itself.
Francisco only cede the use of Mafran sauce formula. It is the cumulative effects of (a) foregoing
circumstances (b) the admission made by the petitioner of paragraph 3 of the respondent’s complaint (c)
the factual milieu of the case (d) the application of the first sentence of Article 1378 which led the court to
conclude that what was actually ceded and transferred was only the use of the Mafran sauce formula.